It is in power under the Florida State Law and North Miami Beach Code to hold hearings on code violation cases and the post-fiance of the $250 per day for non-compliance on new cases and up to $500 per day for repeat violation cases. Your case is called you may approach the podium and state your name and address. The city within present is case and you will have the right to question the city or any of the city witnesses. After the city present his case you will have the opportunity to present a defense. Once both parties have presented their cases, the special magistrate will make a ruling. All those that are here to testify must be sworn in. If you are going to testify, please stand and raise your right hand. Do you solemnize where or firm that the testimony you're about to give at this hearing is the truth, the whole truth and not about the truth? It's so say I do. Thank you, you may be seated and seated, of course cost for this case. First case is just item number 18, which is case CCCR EN240039. Co-compliance officer Lorenzo in Inspector Property Address at 2022 North East 168 Street. Ones of the property is B&F properties one LLC. This is non-home state of property. Ownship was termed by tax record. Property was cited for residential Renault inspection. Notice it was achieved by certified mail and posting. the . . . . . . . . . The violation was observed April 4th, 2024. First re-inspection was January 28th, 2025. And the most recent re-inspection was April 7th, 2025. Recommendations 30 days. And what do they need to do to bring? For residential re-inspection, they need to... Is mostly mostly paint from what I saw in the property is mostly paint and some probably some litter but other than that that's about it. Okay. Good afternoon. So the painting has been done. Wait, before we start. Okay. Please can you tell me? My name is Fred Gottlieb. I'm the owner of the property. What is your relationship to be in the property? I'm the owner of the property and the company. With that being said, the painting has been done as far as debris, the entire street of 160 A street is littered with debris constantly. So I live in Miami. I have a landscaper that comes every 10 days. He cleans the swale, he cleans the garbage area, but it continuously gets littered. I don't think that it would be my responsibility to take care of the city streets and people littering from their car, from the sidewalk, etc. on my property. And this is what happens. People walk on the sidewalk, they take their wrapper, their cup, whatever it may be, and they throw it on the street. So if you come by on a Friday, and my glance caper doesn't come until 10 days after that, and there's debris, then that's what you're going to see. So I'd have to come out there every day, sir, and clean the streets because that you can go there right now, and you can drive up and run 16 one sixty eighth because I was just there and I took pictures. The street is full of garbage from one side to the other. Would you like to see the pictures? The trash was on the property. It was maybe not on the swing. So that's where it's on the property. So you saw it on the front, sir. You have the pictures. I have all the photos that I have. So the back party, excuse me one second. The back part of the property, which is the alley, I've continuously gone to the city. There's a gentleman here that's not here today. Continuously going to the city made them aware that I have a property that has illegal dumping. Many, many, many, many times they come to the back alley. You have signs in the back alley. I was not here for that. I'm sorry. That was not for you. So what is it for? We painted all that, sir. That was Monday. So your Monday. So this right there, excuse me, I'm sorry about that. You put your phone on side. Yeah. Excuse me one second. Okay. You didn't specify that. What happened was in your original violation. You stated multiple areas to be painted. I didn't recognize that as that being one of them. So. And the whole back area. Okay. And your garbage enclosure is well too, as you see. Yep. I could do that. But just to make you aware, just to make the whole panel aware, the whole alley, I've owned the property for 10 years. I'm consistently dealing with illegal dumping. Yes. I agree with you as far as the paint. It needs to be painted. As you painted the other part, the- Yeah, I did, I painted the other part. Yeah, I didn't, to tell you the truth, I didn't think that needed to be done, but okay, I recognize that. But while I'm here, I would like to make the panel aware of all the illegal dumping on 168th Street, the Street, the back alley. There's two signs there. I'm sure you guys are aware of it. Why don't you just a recommendation? Why don't you put up some cameras? Because if you put up some cameras and why don't you people get caught, you might stop that from happening so consistently. Just there, can you please put your phone on silent? I did, sir. Just unfortunately it's not working. So just a recommendation, I'll take care of what you've just showed me on the screen. But anything else needs to be addressed? Just how much time would you think you need to? Can you give me 30 days because that's what I originally heard. Okay, so the client state will be set in 30 days and in the event of non-compliance that will be a daily fine of $100 per day. Great, thank you very much. Have a great day. Next case is a general item number 15, which is case BV2410148WP, chief building inspector or inspect the property address at at 500 East Drive. On the property is Shofy, consulting LLC. There's a non-home state of property ownership was termed by tax breaker. Property was cited for lieu construction. Notice was achieved by posting. Hey, good 60 days to apply for the permit and then the life of the permit. Okay, sir, can you please tell me your name and your relation? My name is Alhandro Carrillo. I'm the owner of the property. Okay. Do you understand the nature of the violation for the construction that does not have a permit according to the expected? Yes, sir. So what happened in my case? I was away. I was traveling with my family and And we were receiving a delivery, a big truck parked on my lawn and it broke the lid of my septic tank. When I came back, I had three little kids. I had black water all over my front lawn. And I had to call a company to fix it right away. That's how I started for my kids. And they came. They fixed the lid of the septic tank. they asked me if I wanted to add a, this plastic lid that they used away, they don't have to dig a hole every time they come. So they did install the lid on the septic tank. And they were, he told me that was in the drain field. One of the parts broke or something, so they dug. And they fixed the drain field. And I understand that, I mean, that was done without permit. I'm full responsible and I'm in contact with Mr. Hugo here to to put everything by law. I use I mean I run out of time but I have received here from the company that did the repairs to my septic tank not the septic tank the drain field and they came last week they are doing their work to re-certify everything. I contacted the survey company, but due to weather, but weather this week, the field engineer, something was not able to go to my property to do the measurements and everything. I just need a little bit more time. I'm fully, I'm willing to have everything by law. I just need a little bit more time to complete this. So this was started off as this emergency repair work and now they need a full permit to bring everything into compliance. Yes sir. Well 60 days, 60 days is not enough. I believe 60 days is a fair amount of time. Okay then I'm going to set a compliance date on 60 days. That and that's just to apply for the permit so you'll have the life of the permit once it gets issued. Yes sir. Now I have a question. I'm no more days in. I have questions. The person from the company asked me what permit do they need to apply for because that's not for me. I'll deal with the Minister later. with the department. Okay, okay, I'm sorry. Apply the law which is you need a permit. May I follow you for that? To the pack? No. Okay, okay. I'm sorry. It is applied though. The law, which is you need a permit. My apologies for that. No, no, no worries. This is your first time. So and apply it to the facts. So obviously, a permit's needed. We're going to hopefully get you on the right track. Yeah, and 60 days and the event there. Noncompliance. they'll be a tally pine at $50 per day. Perfect. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. And the event there are noncompliance. They'll be a daily pint of $50 per day. Perfect. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Onan. Thank you. Next two cases are ratification cases, which is 58 and 59. 58 is CCCBTR230026 and. TR-230026 and C.C.C.R.E.N. 230060. Co-compliance officer Pierre, Inspector Property Address, at 2200 North East 173rd Street. Case ending in 0026 has been out of compliance for 432 days and total fine if ratify would be $32,400 and the case ending in 0 0 6 0 has been out of compliance also for 432 days and total fine would be $32,400. Good afternoon, your honor. Code compliance officer Nisli Pio, the city of Miami Beach, Prophecy address 22, 00, no East 173rd Street, is in violation of section 12-1.1. In reference to business tax receipt, section 14-12.2 in reference to residential went to inspection program the valuation was observed inside on July 14, 2023. The first post-production was on February 3, 2024 and the most recent with the inspection was on April 8, 2025 and there was no compliance. CD will comment what's the certification. Good afternoon, sir. If you could please tell me your name and your relationship to the property owner. Yes, Nicholas Burdos, owner of the LHC and property. Mr. Burdos, is this rental property? Now, yes, it is. Okay, what about when and back in July? Back in July, it was not a rental property like 2023. And at that time, we were doing renovations like had permit for the windows. So for that reason and also the backing on the front because it was a very small parking So I was not able to have any turn-ons at the time So we put pyramid it took some time and now we we done with that So in July 20 24 not 2020 Free I started to have tenant in and I applied now for BT BTR and CU and But I didn't understand what was going to take that much time. When we started the process, the person told us we need to do an inspection. We need to also do the fire department before. So I went to the fire department. I fixed all the issues with the fire. I got the report now, so I got everything cleaned with the fire. But we had to do like another thing. And anywhere a long story short, I just hang up like before coming today with my person which is working on all the paperwork. So he's specialised to do that, to get everything he's. He told me, I should really need like one or two days because everything is submitted. We're just waiting for an approval and he had to get like another application today from, I forgot in Miami. I think it's a dim, he told me. Derm. Derm. Yeah, thank you, Derm. In Miami, it was there like this morning, and you need to send an email to Natali today with the paperwork and we should be done. From what he's saying. Right. Well, my concern is that it's been 432 days out of compliance. But it was, so I'm sorry to interrupt you. No, no, sorry. At the time, I thought it was because I went to the city and I mentioned like, we're not choosing as rental as a properties on the repair. So I thought I didn't need it. And I thought it was clear with them. And I didn't have to do that. But when I saw the other day, the notice on my front, and I was like, sure, yeah, I didn't realize. And that's why everything happened, and I didn't know, and I didn't realize. So obviously it's on me. I should have foreseen and moved forward and be more, more, yeah, check on that. But I think since I didn't have internance, I didn't need any BTR or in all that. So, so just for I'm standing now, I wanna fix everything, I got the turn on T and everything is good. I'm happy with the property, but we like, we on the process to finalizing between next few days. But when this violation was issued on July 14, 2023, was the property empty and under construction? Yes. It was empty under construction. On the waiting for the pyramid and all. So if a vacant property still needs to be registered for the BTR? No, I want to check it. I'm sorry. Oh, yeah, good. It wasn't. It wasn't that empty at that time. They have a few ways to get inside. So it was occupied in July of. I mean, I want proof of that because there is no way. I mean, even easier it was quarter inside that I never heard of it, but I don't think it's the case. And I'm certain at the time it was I had no attendance. If you can help me out. When was this case initially heard with a compliance date set? Last year. Because those pictures just to inform you, those pictures are from 2024, right? Or 2045? Yeah, that's, yeah. Choose there. I mean, that's when you do all the marketing. Yeah. Those are the first pictures. January, 4th, 2024. I tried to get in contact with you. I give you all of your guide, my business card. Because I can give also proof of my lease that all started in July 2024. So the ratification hearing has been continued from prior date? Yes, it looks like it. No, he was absent. He was absent, but there have been subsequent hearings for ratification. Was anyone present on those days? No. That the first time somebody present. Yeah, that because like I mentioned, I didn't know I thought at the time I went to the city and I say I got not an auntie and I thought it was because of that it was closed. I didn't follow through and I you know it's on me I should have followed through with that. But since I went to the city and I mentioned that the property was vacant because it was vacant and so that's what I understood from the situation. How far are you from getting compliance with the, to get your BTR? In 30 days, it's going to be all done because it told me it just needs to get, to send the last application to Natali. It told me that this morning because on the Derm was the last paperwork we were missing and And after that, we should have everything ready. Since this, normally I would not find a basis, not to ratify the fines, but they are substantial. And I think that there's more that could have been done on your behalf to be here for the prior hearings as well as the ratification here. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to give you one last chance to June of this year because I'll be back in June. I'm going to continue this hearing for 60 days. If you're in compliance great, if you're not, then I'm going to proceed with ratifying that. Of course. That's one third. OK, so it'll be June, I think, 5th or 6th. Great. 12th, 12th. OK, 12th. 12th. 9th June? I think that was my date. OK. June? Well, June 12th is the date of the year. No, no, no, worse. I could probably look on something. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the bathroom. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. So we'll see you on June 12th. Hopefully you'll have this all resolved. Yeah, yeah, exactly. I am. I have it on my calendar already. So we'll see you on June 12th. Or June. Hopefully you'll have this all resolved. Yeah, yeah, exactly. But this is pretty much your last chance. Perfect. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. Next case is the item number eight, which is case CCCCOM25005. Co-compliance officer Denizel has inspected property address. 357 North East 167 Street. So the property is star bright of Florida Corp. There's a non-home stated property ownership was determined by tax record. Property was cited for business tax receipt. Notice it was achieved by posting. It's going to be 369. Good afternoon, Your Honor. Court Officer Drew Denizzo, City of North Miami Beach. The property was cited for a business tax receipt on January 8, 2025. Reinspection was done January 21, 2025. And the most recent re-inspection was April January 21st, 2025. In the most recent, Reinspection was April 9th, 2025. No compliance. The city recommends 30 days. Good afternoon, sir. Can you please tell me your name and your relationships with the property owner? My name is Robert Barretto. I'm the owner of the property. And how long have you under operated at that address? Since 2023. Have you ever had a BTR to operate? Well, actually I'm the landlord and I've been cited as a landlord but the business owner's not here. It's one of the units that I rent out. Can I speak out? Yeah. And whatever the officer is saying is true. I'm aware of this. And that being following with the lady and the gentleman there and the property. But the problem is they did not understand the system. We have the Miami date and also the seat of North Miami and they have to be compliant with both They went and applied to Miami date and they have the the business life from Miami date and they thought that was it and I was talking to them over the phone And they say well, we have it. We have it. So when the the the hearing was approaching I I asked them what you have showed me everything you have. Well, they had nothing on the Sea of North Miami, on these ends. They had the fire inspection. They had the business license from Miami. From Miami, they had the most ever thing except for the arm. So I came to the office. I spoke to the fine ladies and the office here office here in the city of North Miami. And so I got the grasp of what is happening. I'm helping them to apply. I already went with them yesterday in the computer. And they were sending emails to Miami-Dade County not uploading the forms. So I went with them in my computer yesterday and I didn't make the applications. I have here for you if you can take a look at it. The process is running. I'm not sure the experience I've had to the Miami-Dade County is 30 days, sometimes it's not good, sometimes I need more. If you can extend a little longer, I'll be helping them to get these done. It's my best interest there. I'm a tenant, the good people, and that's pretty much it. All right. Well, I appreciate your candor. You're most welcome. And obviously, you know what needs to be done in just a question of time. So if it does involve Durham, I think 30 days might be a little challenging. So going to set a compliance date of 60 days and in the event of noncompliance, they'll be a daily fine of $50 per day. Appreciate it. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you, Your Honor. Next case agenda item number 30, with the CC, CBTR 240019, co-compliance officer, Connie, inspected property address at 202.0 North East 163rd Street. Owners of the property is 2020 office NNB LLC. Is it non-home state of property? Ownership was returned by tax record. Property was cited for a business tax receipt. Notice was achieved by certified mail and posting. Good afternoon, Your Honor. Co-compliance Officer Alacia kindly with the City of North Miami Beach. Property Adjus 2020 Northeast 163rd Street is in violation of Section 21-1.1 in Reference to Business Tax Receipt. The violation was observed inside on July 11th, 2024. The first reinspection was January 31st, 2025, and the most recent reinspection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends 30 days. Okay, and that's to obtain the business tax receipt, right? Yes. Okay, perfect. Good afternoon, ma'am. If you can tell me your name and your relationships are the property. Yes. Good afternoon, my name is Donna Rodriguez. My attorney, I am assisting the tenants in this property to get this sorted out. From what I understand, we just came from across the street. This is a boutique. They had a business entity that closed and it was improperly closed. They just completed the business tax receipt application. We were informed it's going to take probably more than 30 days to sort this out. So we're asking for an extension and hopefully get the sorted out before 60 days and reset this hearing. But I'm assisting them with the process and we're hoping to get this sorted out. Okay, appreciate that. So based on the testimony that I've heard here today, I'm going to set a compliance date of 60 days to get the BTR. In the event of noncompliance, they'll be a daily fine of $50 per day. Thank you. Thank you. Next case, agenda item number 29, which is CCC BTR 240009, Vocal Plants Officer, Iacuzym Jr. Inspector Property Address at 315 North East 160th Street. Ones of the property is RK Associates 18 LLC. This is a non-home state of property ownership was termed by tax record probably was cited for business tax receipt notice with chief by certified mail and post. Before we start I frequent this establishment many times so probably once a week so So city as a conflict of interest if I hear this. The city would wave any conflict. Thank you. Good afternoon, you're on a coal compliance officer. I'm Lee Kaseem with the city north mind beach. As of Aprilth, 2025, there was no compliance. The city would like to recommend 30 days. And what is the nature of the violation, sir? It's a business tax receipt. Do you know what's preventing from being issued? Well, I'll be honest. The owner has been in touch with me on a lot. I know he's going through a process. However, it's just become that time. We have to bring it to the hearing. Okay. Good afternoon, sir. We have to know how well that's your name and your relationship to the property. Sure. My name is Pablo Coronel. I'm the owner, Knight Pizza. And the reason I'm here is, this is my first time I have a business here. We don't know like a too many thing about it. And this one we open, we apply for everything everywhere, every regionally. So this is my first time I have a business here and we don't know like a too many thing about it. This one we open, we apply for everything everywhere, every city, Miami-Dade, everything. And then the COVID came out and I never get like a notice to renew something. Whatever I got I renew, I pay for it. But over here I never got any notice.. I have to renew something else, so that's why I go so long. And like, last year, I have somebody came over to my store. It told me I have a violation here because I didn't apply for the BTR or something now. I didn't know that. And the song we came over to apply for, I find out, the Grishtrap got to be set up. So that, that, that is the big thing, you know, we're working on it. But thanks guys, we know it's just everything in some process. So we just, we just need some, some more time. Okay, how much time do you need? The truth is, we, we don't want to look at for about eight months and keep moving like that. Where are you as far as Durham with the Greece trap? Yeah, different. We on process, we know. Actually, we approve for the plan. We approve everything. We need just to final approve it. And they start doing the job. I don't know how long they're going to do. They choose two, three, four months out of the trail. I don't know. The officer, I have a question. The violations are K associates, which is the landlord. That's correct, yes. We issue all our... I don't know. For the officer, I have a question. The violations are K associates, which is the landlord. That is correct. Yes, we issue a lot of violations to the property owner and not to the business. So that's why it appears that way. Businesses here. The business, yeah. He's the business owner. Okay. So do you think 90 days? I don't know. The true, I don't know You know, now I just got reviews like they answer like after a month and a half, they just answer. So did they answer it favorably or is there more work that needs to be done? I feel like about three or four months they're going to be more than enough. But I don't know if I can do it again. Well, you know, everyone in the city has that eventually have a I hope you're to operate. If not, you know, I understand. I'm going to give you 90 days and hope for the best. Beautiful. You'll get it done. I appreciate it. And in the event of noncompliance, there'll be a daily fine of 15 hours per day. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. You're welcome. Next to the next two. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Next two cases is genital number two and three, which is case CCCRES250026 and CCCRES250028. So the property. The property was decided for 12 maintenance as well as landscaping maintenance and notice it was achieved by certified swell maintenance, as well as landscaping maintenance, and notice it was achieved by certified mail and posting. Good afternoon, Your Honor. Court Officer Jewel Denizel, City of North Miami Beach. Property address 75, Norfie's 172nd Street. The property was inspected January 9th, 2025. reinspected January 22nd, 2025, and the last reinspection was April 9th, 2025. No compliance. City recommends 30 days. Good afternoon, sir. Can you please tell me your name? Yeah, good afternoon. My name is Sonny Zimor.'m the owner of this property. I was a vendor called Lopez, one seven second street. Yes, I do realize that the officer was doing a fantastic job by doing the violation at the property. But the reason we still have not put in the gas and that is because I have the permit pending for the driveway, which is by putting the driveway, by putting the soil right now, when the machine comes, it's going to miss it up. And also this will need to be restored. It's already deep going down. And I put the gas like three times already. It died. So what I'm doing now, I have a permit pending, which is reviewing by the city. It's about two months. I will ask that I take it a little bit too long. It's something. The government. The government. And I'm waiting for the government, and I'll do the driveway, and then put this off. That will be it. And now. For the swell, you're just waiting so that everything matches for the driveway. For the driveway. Yes. And then you do the landscaping on it. We store the soil. Not only for the soil, we have to we store the soil because people parking in it is getting different deeper, which is something need to be we stop and make it fly whatever fix it up and put the soil in there. And by doing the driver is going to be me stop if I do it right now, that's the reason I'm waiting for the driver for the payment. Where, okay, so you applied for the permit? The permit is spending now, it's we're very. Okay, and then what is, or how long is it anticipated that once you get the permit, that you will be able to finish the job? Yes, correct. How long? And I would say like, give me like 60 days a piece. OK. Yes. So you think everything you can do? It's something I cannot go beyond of it. For the payment, I'm waiting for it. So it's not up to me, it's up to the city. All right. Anything else from the city? No, sir. I grew up in the 60 days. So I'm gonna and give you more time. Yes. You'll have 60 days for both violations ending in 0026 and the one ending in 0028. So it'll be 60 days to do what you need to do. Yes. The permit and then the final inspection after all the work's done. Yes. And in the event there's not compliance, then there'll be a daily fine of $50 per day per violation. So are you sure 60 days is enough? I will say that for 90 days, which is two months. That's where I was going to go before we leave. Thanks so much. I think you might need 90. So it'll be 90 days in each case. And in the event of non-compliance, So be a daily fine. Yes. All right. Thanks, Tony. Thank you. Thank you. You're honor. It'll be 90 days in each case and in the event of noncompliance. There'll be a daily fine. Yes. All right. Thanks. All right. Thank you so much. Thank you. You're welcome. Next case is agenda item number 62, which is a which is a ratification case. CC, CCOM-2 in the community section 24-92A1 in reference to parking area maintenance. Most recent re-inspection was on April 9th, 2025. There was no compliance. The city would like to recommend ratification. Good afternoon and could you come in your name and your relationship to the property on you. My name is Maria Virginia Correa. I'm the property manager. Property manager. Yeah. Okay. So we're here today because 852 days have passed since you're supposed to be in compliance. Okay. this was the thing. We did correct the violation on 2023. We request the permit. Here I have the permit and the payments, you can see, but we did not request the final inspection at that time. And after that, we started with a concrete restoration on the balconies. And there is another contractor working on the parking spaces. So that's why we cannot complete with the painting. But we did the, how did it say? We painting of the spaces sorry what I'll let us see you know let me see the then and Racial and restripe Here I have the plants the permits As you can see. Okay. Well, I have pictures of the property from originally when it was cited and I have pictures from Tuesday. And you can see that on from appears to be the same. I'm not saying what was or wasn't done. I also did check the system because the reason that the case was table and it lasted so long was because there was a permit that was applied for. However, when I checked the system, the parking permit, it shows up as voided. And you can see there if you notice it was due to inactivity, I believe. And I did take a look at the permit that you mentioned as well as far as concrete restoration and balconies. And that permit is currently expired. So, usually when there is a permit in process, we will give them time, but unfortunately, it has to come to the hearing today for ratification. Okay, based upon the testimony that I've heard here today, I'm going to go ahead and grant the city's request and ratify the fines based on the fact that it's been out of compliance for 852 days, and there's no act of permit to address this violation. So not sure what the disconnect was. I'm not sure if you were the property manager at that time. No. At that time. No. It's no reflection on anything that you're doing currently with the position. So please understand when you have to put up directors, the bad news that it's not a reflection on you, but there's nothing here to move the case forward. And as the officer indicated, it had been tabled several times. But I understand. Yeah, I understand. There's no permit, and apparently I understand. There's nothing to address this issue. So I wish you the best with the permits and finishing the job. But please, once it's done, reachouch to the officer. Okay, thank you. Thank you for your time. Next case is a genital item number 63, which is also ratification case. Just case CC CBTR 240032. Co- papers. Co-compliance officer kindly inspected property address at 1959 Northeast 164 Street. So the property is in the B place owner LLC. This property has been out of compliance for 116 days and total fine to date if ratify would be $8,700. Co-compliance officer, Alacia kindly with the city of North Miami Beach. Property at just 1959, Northeast 164 Street in violation of Section 12-1.1 in reference to business tax receipt. The violation was observed inside on September 4th, 2024. The first post-reinspection was on December 16th, 2024. the most recent reinspection was on April 9, 2025, and there's no compliance. The city recommends ratification. Good afternoon. If you could please tell me your names and your relationship to the property owner. My name is Susan Robinson, I'm the property manager. This is Scott Greenwald, he is the property owner. Good afternoon. Good afternoon. Okay, so where are we with obtaining the business tax receipt? Well, we had the same confusion that you had in that as the owner of the property, we were notified. I thought that the property was out of compliance when in fact it is our tenant who is out of compliance. I've spoken with the co-d officer quite often as a matter of fact, and she was not the individual who signed the most recent violation notice. I reached out to the officer who did sign the violation notice and have had no response. I spoke to Alicia in the hallway and she indicated that it was the tenants who were out of compliance. I told her that we would put that together, get the tenants in compliance and keep her in the loop along the way. Okay, how much time do you envision that you would now? Well, let's see. We have seven tenants who are not in compliance. It's like hurting cats. I would say probably 60 to 90 days. So, um, officer, are there seven tenants that need their BTR? Yes, but this violation is just for the food truck, so it's three right now. Three, three. But, but she also in front of that. Yeah, she does have other things that aren't in compliance, but this is just for the three. It isn't for the three, but we know the others are coming, so we might as well take care of them at the same time. Yes. Well these three I think should be at the top. Oh they're at the top of the list. Okay so it's out of compliance now for 87 days. Yes. Okay so I'm going to give you another 60 days for these three hopefully you can get it done so I'm going to continue the hearing to June 12th. Thank Thank you. And then hopefully at least these three that are subject to the violation. Great. Care if you can do all seven at one time. That's great. Give it a shot. Just try to get these done by the next time I see you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much. Next two cases, agenda item number 69 and 70, which is also ratification cases. case CC C-C-C-R-E-S 24-0557. Co-compliance officer Guerrero, Inspector Property Address. At 162-15 North East 18th Court. Ones of the property is Sivila Plaza Cando. This property has been out of compliance for 96 days for both cases and so to find to date if ratify would be $7,200 for both cases. Good afternoon, my name is Edward. Yeah, I'm going to just wait for the officer to go first. Good afternoon, Your Honor. Co-compliance Officer Wilhelm Girl with the City of North Miami Beach. The property addresses and violation of Section 9-3.2 and references the litter. In Section 24-128 in reference to landscape maintenance. The violation was observed inside it on August 7, 2024. The first post-reinspection was on January 4, 2025, and the most recent reinspection was on April 9, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends ratification. Okay, good afternoon, sir. If you could reach tell me your name and your relationship to the None of the Many Association. Good afternoon, my name is Edward Peruz. I'm the property manager for Saville Plaza Association 16215 North East 18th Court, North Miami Beach 33162. We have a landscaper, we have a handyman and myself. Every time we visit the property, we clean it up and put everything away. We have no control over who drives by and dumps their personal items on our things, but we do have spent 600 and 700 respectively to take these items away at a cost to the association. This is a continuing situation over at that particular 18th Northeast 18th Court. We do our best to comply and keep it clean, but last week if he would have been by, would have been clean, and then all of a sudden, Monday a couch showed up, and it's not any of our property. So, I think what you have to do is the manager cleaned it up, called the inspector out to close the violation. Unfortunately, you know, it's, the violation was issued back in 2024 and it's still not in compliance. Well, we do clean up all the time that I go there, since then before then after then it's just a chance that he shows up when the when the things are there. I mean, yeah, but you got to call the things are there and you got to call them to when it's clean. We had a have them go by like two days ago or three days ago. Right. That it's still not a compliance. But as his pictures can tell it's not the same stuff. Yeah, but technically they could recite you every day and get you for continuing violations. We're doing the best we can and we do go out there and clean it because you know the board gets on me about this stuff. So I try and do it. I'm going to give you one last chance to get a clean. Call the inspector within the next 30 days. I'll continue this hearing for 30 days. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Thank you, honor. May I have your contact information? Thank you. Next two cases is the agenda item number 16 and 17, which is case BV240185WP and BV25027WP. Senior building inspector Rosenkoff, Inspector property address at 460 North East 178 Street. Ones of the property is Renee Wazano and Raquel Gonzalez. This home state property ownership was termed by tax record. Property was cited for for allele construction for both cases. Grazino, the city? The city, with the city on Miami Beach with the department, the city would like to recommend 60 days to comply. Seeing there is two violations on their property. The first violation was issued in October 16, 2024, and was regarding two kidship and bathroom cremoling. After that, a chief building inspector, Francisco, this, inspect the property. You may see it. A new violation was issued in March 7, 2025. In this regard was related to the water heater, new lighting through the house, and garage I'll find a fence. Okay, so that I understand initially the violation the first violation was for kitchen bathroom remodel I said when the Building inspector went out there again. There was additional Items of concern that caused the issuance of a second violation on March 7th Which was for the water heater, lighting, and garage conversion. I'm Fence. And Fence. Okay. All right. Thank you. Sir, can you please tell me your name and your relationship to the property owner? My name is René Lozano and the owner of the property. So tell me what you mean. Well, no, I mean, I didn't do any of this stuff. We just bought the house a few years ago. I just had a baby, we were going to sell, move back to Texas, and then the buyer that was a buying the house a few years ago. I just had a baby, we were going to sell, move back to Texas. And then the buyer that was buying the house submitted these code violations against us as a deal fell through. We didn't do any of this stuff. The property has never been cited. It's been on the records of the county. Like, we didn't do any of this stuff, sir. And then so I came here to the across the street. They told me to call Francie's goal. He came over and then he cited me for more stuff. And I was like, Francie's glad. of the stuff. So I came here to the across the street, they told me to call Francis. He came over, and then he cited me for more stuff. I didn't even do any of this stuff. We didn't do any of these things. Yeah, unfortunately under the law chapter 162 you are the current owner and you're responsible even if it was a prior owner that did the conversions and the installation without approved permits. So basically you need an after the fact permit now. And is the 60 days just to get the permit? To apply for permit and then the life for the. Okay, it's not that he has to have the final at 60 days. It's just get the permit. Because it's after the fact. Yes, after the Fudsen. Well, again, I mean they told me to come here to like my case to please that to remove none of this was. I can't dismiss the violation. I find that a violation does exist of the Florida Building Code because this work does not match the city's records for the building and beautiful workmanship here, but it has to be done with the permit. So it has to be inspected and hopefully with the permits, there's not going to need to be additional work so you can get it done pretty fast. But I'm going to, you know, you have to get a permit. So the question is just, I mean, he literally, like the entire, like it's a lot of stuff. I guess not even, I guess it's just so, so many things. It's like, no, I understand that it. The house is all the whole neighborhood. Yeah, but it has to be, it has to be permit. The work needs to be permitted and inspected. Yeah. That's the law. I can't change the law. And I can't change the fact that under 162 you are the owner. It's just, and we have like proof that when we have the original listing we bought it. All the pictures, they're all the same. Like you can tell that we bought it just, we have the inspection report, the praiser reports, all the pictures are there. Everything was already there. And I'm not doubting your word that it was there when you purchased it. But unfortunately you are the current owner and you're responsible for making sure that your house and any additions remodeling comply with Florida law. So the only question for me at this point is just how much time you need to get the permit in both cases. It's probably easy to get one permit to pay for one permit. Yeah, it's one permit. If you please, 90 days may well because they have a good conversion. That probably is the most difficult item to artist. Like, saying that the garage conver- and it's been there 20 plus years, sir. Look at the Google Earth pictures, the original- like that. This house is from 1950, sir. Like, it's been- Yes, but if that house was built in 1957, that bathroom and that kitchen was not designed in 1950. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, that for. That bathroom looks like a spa. We'd reach a beautiful. No, the garage conversion, sir. The garage conversion. You honor. check the records and we check the records records and we check the Properties sir this probably has never had any any issue we were we just had a baby and we had got to go back home And I'm not from here and so we're selling the house It's probably had never had an issue It would happen when the buyer and his due diligence went to the city to pull the records It was a discrepancy in the building department records as to that converted garage and there were no permits done. And that triggered a whole review of everything that's been done. And unfortunately, you know, I have, like I said, I find that, you know, unfortunately it's going to fall down on you because I find that there is a violation of the Florida Building Code. There have been no permits that have been addressed or issued to address the areas that the inspector already testified to. So I'm going to give you 90 days to obtain the permits. In the event of non-compliance, there'll be a daily final $50 a day for each of the cases cases. So I just wish you the best, and if you need more time, please just keep in contact with the city. And if there's a problem with the conversion and you hopefully it can be legalized. How much is the permit for all of the women? I have no idea. That's beyond my authority under Lord of of Law I'm just empowered to take the facts and apply it to the law I can't give legal advice I can't quote you I can't do the work I'm bound like Lord of Law come on who will who will who will I mean if they told me him in I mean I've been trying to work with these Yeah, certainly if you want to go outside in the hall, if there's no additional cases, you guys can chat. I recommend you... I recommend... I've got to move on to the other cases. Yeah, that's the worst. I recommend the end-time set of meetings in French courtes and the official Danielos Suna. may be abiding you over the matter. I'll give you guidance, I should say. You can retain the services of folks who actually do that. So help folks with permitting issues. They're folks who actually do that. That's you can retain. It just seems like a line. Oh, it just seems like it's my hands are tied. Thank you. Next two cases, gen I and number 60 and 61, which is CCCRES240528 and CCCC. which is case CCCRES240528 and CCC-C-C-R-E-S 240528 and CCC-C-C-R-E-S 240528 and CCC-C-R-E-S 240528 and CCC-C-R-E-S 240528 and CCC-C-R-E-S 240528 and CCC-R-E-S 240528 and CCC-R-E-S 240528 and CCCRES2050531. Co-compliance officer, Attic, is aimed to your respective property address at 3446 Northeast 168 Street. So the property is 3, 4, 4, 6, North East 168th Street, LLC. This property has been out of compliance for 56 days for both cases. And the total fine, if ratified today, would be $14,000 for the case ending in $0.528. and 5,600 dollars for the case ending in 0528 and $5,600 for the case ending in 0531. Good afternoon, Your Honor. Coco Blind's officer has sent a link of the city of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm a Shaky Dobs and I'm the property owner. Good afternoon, sir. Good afternoon. Hey, Your Honor, how you doing? How are you? property owner. My name is Shaki Dobbs and I'm the property owner. Good afternoon, sir. Good afternoon. Hey, Your Honor. How are you doing? How are you? How are you guys doing? All right. I'm sorry. Everything like, blessings to you guys. Happy Thursday. My name is Tom Musso and I am the business manager to the property owner. Shaki Dobbs, that handles the affairs when it comes to the property. Mr. Dobbs, I guess what's happened because you were supposed to have compliance? I'm last to the show, unfortunately. So I purchased the property, purchased it as it is exactly the way it looks. For a full demolition, it's going to ultimately look like this. Right, that was my recollection. Right, so it's going to look like this. So for a full demo, we put all the plans together. I inherited sets of plans that I thought we would be able to use. When I purchased it, two story plans, I thought, okay, I get these plans. We move forward, construct a project. The person in GC of record.Sick, and now you can't use the plans. Illegally use the plans without the person being involved, at the start from scratch. We put in a master permit, and I can quote master permit. They still had the prior GC attached. I had to completely get a brand new GC, new plans, new architect and the plans are going to go back in within the next four or five days. In those plans, in the original plans and the other plans was the demo permit so the pool wouldn't be issue. I do have people, I did have people in the GC coming to do cut the grass same thing with it had electrical lines that, you know, trees needed to be cut there, but I didn't see it coming. I didn't see the fact that we couldn't use the plans because a key personnel was no longer involved in the process. So my question for the city is if the intention is to demolish the property. Completely. Is it the issuance of the demolition permit or is it the whole building being down? It has to be the demo permit. For us on the code side, the violation is related to the pool, being uncapped with the dirty water, and pieces of the roof, which is missing just the overall, what do you see from outside, the aesthetic portion of the building. So with us, we wouldn't necessarily tell him to demo the property or do anything. It would be a matter of fixing it. Right, they're not. The whole inside of the property is completely demoed. You can look in almost nothing in there. They started on the inside out and then went to get an additional permit to do outside in the excavation and then that's where it's all. Okay. Correct. So, so for us on cold tide, it's all what you see. As far as the interior, I understand exactly what you're saying, but as far as the interior of the property, that would be more of a building side. So, I mean, I understand you guys are waiting. I guess you have the permit process going on. Yes, we do. And the pool is in shape where it has to come out. Yes. if you look at it, it's not even, it's an eye sore to the point where everything is going to go. And that's... the pool is in shape where it has to come out. You see if you look at it, it's not even, it's the eye sore to the point where everything is gonna go. And even to try to fix it, we even thought about trying to just cover it up in the demo permit. Yeah, so that's kind of exactly the issue here for us. It's a six to eight week process from in a few days, when we finally got our things straight, they're saying it's a six to eight week process from in a few days, when we finally got our things straight, they're saying it's a six to eight week process. So we can get maybe 90 days to get the demo permit, we'll turn it in and everything will go away. It doesn't take but maybe a week and a half to two weeks to demo the property. Correct. Everything will be gone. That's correct. about four walls that are just before a while. So the issue for us, just to go back is the status of the property now. So it's an issue. It's a. but for a while, so it'll just be for a while. So the issue for us, just to go back is the status of the property now. So it's an issue for the neighbors. They have to look at the property and the pool was 30. There's parts of the property that's not in place. I mean, the violation is at a ratification hearing. there is a we're willing to you can do afterwards and in your honor of course we're called compliant we're willing to take any advice on how we can probably I guess try to put a bandaid on it as the demo permit goes in even though he explained it very well just to piggyback off of, we had everything in place when we actually went and the property don't have purchased it. But the GC for personal matters just went away. It was very, very shocking to us. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Question for the city. What if they were to put a tarpa over the roof and seal the pool and put a cover over it? Well, I would say to empty the pool. That would be the best thing, you know, because to empty the pool, because it's green, it's uncapped and it's causing a lot of mosquitoes. And like I said, to possibly do something, I don't want to give you exact recommendation on how to make your property look good, but make it look in a way that's Not so bad Can we just work with you to figure out on my top set a temporary thing because it's all gonna come of course All right, and then in the front it looks looks nice in the front. You just don't agree I agree I agree. When it comes to your honor, what. I agree. I agree. I agree. I agree. I agree. When it comes to your honor, what you said, you're definitely covering up the roof. Yeah, that's definitely one thing. But when it gets to the poll, we've already paid a substantial amount of money for the general contract to do something. And that involves the poll. That poll is actually going to be an affinity poll. Later on, so they already have the the monetary value to do everything where they're supposed to do it to pull. The question though is not the future plans for the house. It's the condition of the house now and the complaints that have been conveyed through the officer that the neighbors are upset about the condition of the property. So I know I balancing the neighbor's quality of life and their concerns versus your investment and the difficulties you've had with your contractor. But the fact remains as far as the pool goes it's a life safety issue and it's also a health hazard. The roof is just you know cosmetically not so so appealing in light of the neighborhood but there is there is a problem with the condition of the house as it works. Now I understand that you're going to be demolishing the property and demolishing the pool, but right now in the condition it's in and it's not complying with the city code. So that's where we're at at this point. And I'm willing to give you like 30 or 30 days to do something. We do 60 days and then we'll work with COVID. Well, I'll be back in 60 days. So if we continue this hearing for 60 days and it looks like that, I'm going to ratify the fines. OK. We'll make sure it doesn't look like that. Either it's going to be a beautiful leveled lot that he can say, well, right and but if we can't remember the level of what we'll try to cover we'll come up with something is definitely definitely emptying the pool you heard some comments something to make it look pretty so the neighbors don't complain okay I understand okay so I'll see you in 60 days I'll give you my card thank you you honor thank you. Thank you. Object. Thank you. Overruled. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. Next. I had that last thing. I'm sorry, I just wanted to. No, no, it's okay, did you pay money? I apologize. Did you have to pay to get rid of it? I had that guy so much. No, I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm different man. Oh, I have to see them. Over 200 million people watching me, and I'm voting for them, and I didn't see them today. I'm happy about that. Yes, good. I don't know where I'm here for. OK, we'll find out. Just bear with us. Good afternoon, Your Honor. Code Officer Jude Denizel, City of North Miami Beach. Address is 40, Northeast. 174th Drive. The property was inspected November 21st, 2024. Second re-inspection was December 29th, 2024. And the last recent re-inspection was April 9th, 2025. There's no compliance. The city recommends 30 days. Okay, and this is for the roof. Can you read that, sir? Sure. And this is the violations issued in connection with the roof. Yes, sir. And I'm looking at a photograph. Taken earlier this week. Looks like April. And it's showing a blue top over the. Yes, sir. The roof there just above the entrance door it looks like. Yes, sir. Okay, and it's obviously still not in compliance. Yes, it's not in compliance. There was no communication between me and the owner, so here we are today. Okay, perfect. So, Ma'am, can you please tell me your name? My name is Natasha Bourdot, not Philistine, but that's what I know I heard. Yes, you know, insurance not take three years. We end quote with the insurance. They take three years to even answer what happened to the hurricane. Remember the hurricane two, three, four years, that's the one I'm dealing with. But within 90 days, I should be able to do it because why I had left the order position I had, I went to school for a thing. I'm finished and got and if you can your owner give me like 90 days. I'll fix it on my own and I'm waiting for them until they want to send me the money. Okay, so then you have your damages, how much you spent and you're gonna spend? Yeah, I already fixed all inside. Because inside was messed up too. I just did the kitchen. You have to do the inside, the kitchen by yourself and you're doing beautiful things to your house. I see, I know about the roof, but I was waiting. School, nursing, I'm paying my own doing this. And then I said, when I'm finished with inside, I'm getting, I'm waiting to see if the money will come. But they take forever. So now I'm going to do it myself. Do you do it myself? Do you do it myself? Do you do it myself? If you can give me more, I'll appreciate that. I love you guys more. I love you. Thank you very much. So I'm going to set a compliance date in 120 days. Thank you. and in the event that there's not compliance, there'll be a $50 a day. I will not do that. And there's one more thing. I see now they put the sign. That is And in the event that there's not compliance, there'll be a $50 a day. I will not do that. And there's one more thing. I see now they put the sign that said, do not jump trash. But it was an empty place where everybody went and dropped their stuff. I do my stuff too. But the ticket they give me, which I want you to help me as a Honda, if you can honor me that. The ticket they give me, they said, for me to pay 500, I was not the first one to dump the garbage. Yeah, unfortunately that's not for me here today. Oh, so I can't. Where should I go in ticket at? I think you should talk to her outside. Yeah, it was not me. I was not the first. I'm not his friend because he brings me here, but I'm going to try to see. We're not going to fight. I promise. I'm not going friend because you know he bring me here, but I'm gonna try to see We're not gonna fight I promise I'm not gonna fight with him, but I was not I was mad at him. I'm honest I don't even look at him because I'm obsessed you know I'm kidding I'm honest I think we all agree that okay, that's my roof and my house that's the only one I have if you know know my situation, when you buy yourself, you divorce, you lose your mumbum, you divorce, you buy yourself, you have to fix everything, then you have to live that thing and to go learn something else. It takes time. I understand. But I wish it the 120 days. You're very welcome. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. and I'm gonna speak about the garbage outside, that's fine. I just don't have the case here, so I can't help you. You're very nice, oh my God. Thank you. I wish I can take a picture Enjoy it. I'm not trying to flirt. I'm so have a great day Thank you, Anna No, no, I enjoyed it. I should set a... I should set a poster compliance lady. I'll come back. It's always good to end on a high note. Okay, the next case is a agenda item number one, just on a separate agenda. And that's case 225181 building official Ozzona Inspector Property Address at 3.725 North East 169th Street. Owners of the property is eating out condo association. There's a ratification case that's been out of compliance for 247 days and total fine to date of ratifier be $49,400. Good afternoon, sir. How you doing? Good, good. We're going to hear from the city first, and I'll get to you. Good afternoon, you're on the way out for the city of Miami Beach, building the Batman. The city recommend table this case for 30 days. Sure. Yeah. We can agree on about the submission of the final engineering report. They conclude the concrete restoration. They are about to, they are handling something related with their reliance and airlines, my bless. We came to agreement. He has part of the report with him. So 30 days, probably the best. Hey, sir, please tell me your name. My name's Calvin Pitt. Some of the project manager, Eden, now it's kind of many. And so the city's requesting that we reset this hearing for 30 days. Apparently you've been in communication. OK, yeah, what happened? I got the five. I've already sent the final for the buildings over there. I know the only thing I was lacking was the Garreal. Well, it took a while to get the permits for the Garreal, but now I got them and I got the letter. But and the fact that they're mailing me the hard copy because they don't take a copy. But I've got the engine every port in the final permit and everything. Do you think 30 days is enough? Oh yeah, they should, they just mail it from home state. I'll go pick it up and don't mail it. I got the copy here, but they don't take a copy. It's got to be a hard copy with the engine. Yeah, I need to be silenced here. But I've already put the both of those buildings in and the other one. I got the 2032 letter from City. Okay, not a problem. So I'm going to, based on the agreement of the parties, I'm going in and the other one I got the 2032 letter from City so okay not a problem so I'm going to Based on the agreement of the parties. I'm gonna continue the hearing for 30 days. Okay. Thank you. Thank you the next case of switching agendas is agenda item number one which is CC C B T R 24 zero 0020 CC, CBTR 24-0. 0020, Co-compliance Officer kindly inspected property address at 161-21 North East 18 place. Ones of the property is Johnson's apartment. Ones of was termed by tax record and property and noticed with achieved by posting. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Co-compliance officer Alessia Akami with the city of North Miami Beach property I just 16121 north east 18th places in violation of section 12-1.1 in reference to business tax receipt. The violation was observed inside on July 12, 2024. The first reinspection was on February 28, 2025, and the most recent reinspection was on April 9, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends 10 days. Okay, is anyone here? We have Johnson apartments. Okay, it's 233, nobody's here. So to set a complaint, I find that a violation exists based upon the officer's testimony. I'm set a compliance date of 10 days in the event of noncompliance that will be at the early point of $50 per day. Thank you. Thank you. Next three agenda items to be heard are agenda items number four. Case CCCRES241415, agenda item number five. Case CCCRES241416, and agenda item number six, case CCCRES241419. Code officer Denna Zell, inspected property at 190 North East 169th Terrace, owner of the property at the time side of the Cynthia and Carlos Torres, this is a non-instead property ownership of the term by tax record and notes for the chief by posting on all three violations. Good afternoon, Your Honor. Code officer Jude Denizel, city of North Miami Beach. Property 190, North East 167, terrorists. The property was cited on December 12th 2024, re-inspected January 15, 2025. In the most recent re-inspection was April 9, 2025. No compliance. The city recommends 30 days. In each of the cases, correct? Each of the cases. Okay, and I'm looking at some photographs depicting the roof condition on the discoloration of the paint and I'm just looking for a driveway photo Let me correct myself the driveway was complied. Okay. Yes, I apologize So number of the violation ending in one four one nine is in compliance. Yes, sir Okay. So So number the violation ending in one four one nine is in compliance. Yes, sir So based upon the testimony of the code compliance officer in case for ending in 1415 that the violation still exists And a review of the photographs the picked in the current condition I'm going to set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of non-compliance. There'll be a daily fine of $100 per day and in the case ending in 14-16 for the paint based upon the testimony of the code compliance officer and review of the photographs depicting that the condition still exists. I'll set a compliance date 30 days and in the event of non-compliance there'll be at daily fine of $100 per day. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you. Next agenda item to be heard is agenda item number 19, case CCCR EN 240040. Code of Silerinzo, inspected property at 2032, North East 168 Street, owner of the property time-side it is Rosa Capital investment LLC. This is an item set of property ownership was turned by tax record and knows what it's you by posting Good afternoon, Your Honor. Sid, Northland Beach, Co-Compliance Office of Walking, Lorenzo. Property was cited April 4, 2024. First inspection was June, I'm sorry, January 28, 2025. The most recent inspection was April 7, 2025. Recommendation 30 days. It was cited for, I'm sorry, wrong one. Do a apologize. So the violation was April 3, 2024. First reusing inspection was January 28, 2025. Most recent re-expression was April 7, 2025. It was for repair the fence, paint and derelict property. Repair fence, paint and derelict property. Okay, good afternoon sir. Can you please tell me your name and your relationship to the property? Yes, my name is Manuel Rosa. I'm the owner of the property. Okay, good afternoon, sir. The city, we're here today because of the value of your property to pass inspection for rental and it's in connection with the fence, the paint, and some abandoned or derelict property on the site. Do you understand the nature of the violation? I'm starting to, I was not aware of. Okay, so there are minimum standards that you need to maintain the property, and your property has fallen below those based upon the series of photographs that we're seeing today. On the fence, what am I looking at? It looks like somebody hit the fence and it's breaking. It won't even close. The fence doesn't close, it it the whole pole is bent it in okay, so that needs to be fixed okay One of that's one of those I didn't get I just Tenants send me a copy of the violation. I was not aware of any Okay, then that's why we're here today. Yes, because this has been going on since April of last year. Last year. Yeah. April last year of April 3rd, 2024. Okay, I'm sorry, I was not aware. So can I get like a letter saying was the violations or I'll know? You could certainly be there. With the inspector and the file. Right now we're looking at for free. Yeah, I see the three. I know that that okay. Can't be there. That's got to be cleaned up. Okay We've talked about the painting the doors this colored okay, see in that photograph. It's orange on the top and white on the bottom So it all has to be uniform the area under the AC unit. Uh-huh, and then the fence that we Those are the three things that you need to do to pass the inspection fence trash and paint right and then call for the inspection to have Okay, yeah, all right. Thank you. So the city is requesting that I set a compliance date in 30 days. Okay. Is that sufficient time for you to address? I think that's 60 that will be that's fine perfect. OK, so what I'm going to do in 0040 set a compliance date of 60 days. In the event of noncompliance, there'll be a daily fine of $50 per day. Thank you. OK, thank you. Wish you the best. Next two cases is general item number 9 and 10 um, nine and ten, which is KCC CRES 24 1431. And also CC CRE S 24 14 32 for property address 265 North East 171st Street are both in compliance. Thank you. No problem? Next agenda item to be heard, agenda item number 14. Excuse me, 13. 13. I'm sorry, 13. Case BV2010194WP. Chief building inspector or teeth, inspected property at 580 Northeast, 172nd Street owner of the property at the time-sided is Eat Mr. Egor, Yaro Slavsky. This is a non-emsetter property, only should put it in my tax record. You also achieved by posting. Graph, Your Honor. We will wait for the CD on May, maybe, building the department. I will add to recommend 30 days to comply. Meaning apply for the permit and then the live. Why the permit? Okay, is Igor Yaroslavoski here or anyone on his behalf? L not it's At 240 three on one clocked. So I'll go with the 243 Based upon the testimony from the city that the violation is not in compliance I'm going to set a compliance date of 30 days to apply for the permit. In the event of noncompliance, they'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. Thank you. Next, the item to be heard, the genitimate number 14, case CCCCOM250427. Code officer Denizel, inspected property at 705 North East 167 Street, owner of the property time-sided. Is Yarkin holding real TLC, this is a nam set of property, ownership was determined by tax record and notes for achieved by posting. Good afternoon, Your Honor, Court Officer Jew Denizel, City of North Varian Beach. The violation was for a business tax receipt. The property was inspected January 6, 2025, re-inspected January 1, 13, 2025. And last re-inspection was April 9, 2025. There was no compliance. The city recommends 30 days. Okay, is anyone here for Yarkhan holding Realty? 705 North East, 167th Street? Okay, the record reflect that it's now 2.44 pm. And nobody's appeared on behalf of the owners. So based upon the testimony from the inspector that the violation is not in compliance. I'm going to set up compliance date of 10 days and the event of not compliance that we daily find out. Thank you, Your Honor. Next three agenda items to be heard are agenda items number 20, case CCCOM250016. in item number 21, Case CC, CCOM250017, and a gen item number 22 case, CC, CCOM250018. Court officer Ali Kassam inspected property at 17450, this game boulevard. Owner of the property that I'm cited is MTV 55 LLC. This is a non-instead property owner to put it in my tax record and knows for the chief by posting on all three cases. Good afternoon, Your Honor. Coca-pline's officer has sent out a casino with the city of North Ryan Beach. As of April 9, 2025, there was no compliance and the city would like to recommend seven days. For the landscape, for the litter, and for the graffiti. That is correct. Seven days on each violation. Is anyone here for MTV 55 LLC? Yeah, pictures too. 26, now. 25. And I'm looking at photographs depicting the graffiti, the poorly maintained landscape as well as the litter. So based upon my review of the photographs and the testimony from the officer advising that the violation is still not in compliance, I'm going to set a compliance date of seven days in case number 0016 or a fine of $50 per day. In the litter case 0017, I find that the violation does exist as I stated on the record, seven days for compliance and $100 a day for the the letter And in the case 0018, which is the graffiti case, I find that the violation does exist, cooperated by the photographs as well as the testimony of the officer. So I'm going to set a compliance date of seven days in the event of noncompliance that will be be a daily fine of $100 per day. Thank you. Thank you. Next agenda. Not him to be heard. The tonight of number 23 case CCC BTR 250007. Code officer Guerrero, inspected property at 17111, bis game Boulevard. One of thevard. One of the property that time cited is Marina Palms, Residences South, LLC. This is a non-instead property, ownership was determined by tax record and notes with a G by posting. Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the city of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-inspection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends 14 days. Okay, is anyone here from Marina Palm's resident south? 17111, Visking Boulevard? Okay, nobody's failed to appear. It's 247. Based upon the testimony from the officer that the violation still exists, outside of compliance date in 14 days, in the event of non-compliance WAD fine of $50 per day. Thank you, Ana. Thank you. Next is your item to be heard. Tonight on number 24, case CC, CRS 24, 14, 26, court officer, Guerrero once again, the vacant lot on northeast 171st Street in eastern shores. Owner. the wherever once again, inspected the vacant lot on North East 171st Street in Eastern shores. Owner of the property at the time-side, it is tier-so PM Artenas. This is a non-sider property, only supposed to turn by tax record and notes were achieved by certified mail and by posting. Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the City of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-espection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends 30 days. Okay, is anyone here for Mr. Martinez for the property located in the eastern shores? Nope. Okay, so based upon the testimony from the Co-compliance officer that the landscaping has not been brought into compliance. You said seven or ten? Thirty days, Your Honor. Okay. Thirty days for compliance and the event of non-compliance will be a daily fine of $100 per day. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you. The next four items to be heard are agenda items number 25, KCC, CSAN, 240036. I have item number 26, KCC, CSAN, 240037. Agenda item number 27, KCC, CSAN, 240038. And agenda item number 28, KCC, CSAN, 240039. 3, 8, and the gen item number 28, case CC, CS, A and 24, 0, 0, 3, 9. Code officer Guerrero, Inspector Property at 34, 166, North East, 164th Street, owner of the property at the time cited. Is Vela, Rika, Lake Investment Inc. This is the Ananthada property, ownership, position term by tax record and notes for the chief by certified mail and posting on all four cases. Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the City of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-espection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The City recommends 30 days. In each of the violations, right? Each of the separate violations. Yes, Your Honor. Okay, so is anyone here for a Vila Rika Lake Investments 3460 Northeast 164th Street? Okay, let the record reflect. It's approximately 250 PM. Nobody's appeared on behalf of the owners. So in case number 0036, which is the construction degree, I find based upon the officers' testimony as well as a review of the photographs and pickpings that the condition still exists. That I'll set a compliance date in 30 days in the event of noncompliance. There'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. Case number 0037, which is the landscaping and the failure to maintain it in a healthy and good condition, based the officers testimony and review of the photographs depicting that the condition still exists and as the violation is not in compliance I'll set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of non-compliance that will be a daily fine of $100 per day. In case number 0038 which is the swell maintenance I find based upon the testimony of the officer that the violation still exists and reviewing the photographs, it's clear that the violation's not in compliance. I'll set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of noncompliance. There'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. And in the litter matter, I find that 0 3 9 I find that the violation does exist based upon the testimony of the Code Compliance Officer and a reviewer of photographs depicting that the conditions still exist and I'll set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of noncompliance that will be a daily final $100 per day. Thank you, honor. Looks agenda item to be heard is a denitem number 31 case CCC BTR 240018. Code officer kindly inspected property at 1960 Northeast 161st Street. Owner of the property that I'm cited is Ken Wood, apartments LLC. This is a non-instead property ownership of the term, but a tax record and notes were achieved by posting. Co-compliance officer Alacia Carney with the City of North Miami Beach. The property is in violation of section 12-1.1 a reference of business tax receipt the violation was observed and cited on July 11, 2024 The first reinspection was January 31st, 2025 and the most recent reinspection was on April 9th, 2025 And there was no compliance to city recommends 10 days. Okay. Is anyone here for Kenwood apartments? 1960 Northeast 160 first street, first street. Okay. Let the record reflect. It's 253 in the afternoon. Nobody's appeared on behalf of the ownership. I find that the violation does exist based upon the officer's testimony. And I'll set a compliance date of 10 days in the event of non-compliance. There'll be a daily fine of $50 per day. Thank you. Thank you. Next three, Adenitums to be heard are Adenitums No. 32, case CC, CRES241378, Agenda Item No. 33, case CC, CRES241379. Excuse me, just two cases, next two cases. Adenitum 32 and a denied on number 33. Code officer Guerrero, inspected property at 1830 Northeast, 157 terrorists, owner of the property time side of this T and T in Vescorp. This is a non-steaded property, owns the position by tax record and notes with a G by posting on both complete numbers. Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the City of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-inspection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The City recommends 30 days. Okay, is anyone here for TNT investments? 1830 Northeast 157 Street. Okay, I'm looking at some photographs of derelict property as well as lack of hedge maintenance. So based upon the testimony of the officer, as well as a review of the photographs depicting that the conditions still exist. In case number 1378, I'll set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of non-iance, there'll be a daily fine of $50 per day. And in case number 1379, which is the derelict property, I'll set a compliance date of 30 days. In the event of noncompliance, there'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. Thank you, honor. Thank you. Thank you. Next agenda items to be heard are agenda item number 34, KCCCRES 241283, a agenda item number 35, CCCCRES 241284, and a agenda item number 86, KCCCRES 2485. Oh, I'm sorry, 36. So, J9, number 86. KCCCRES 2485. Oh I'm sorry 36. So deny number 36. KCCCRES 241285. Court Officer Guerrero, Inspector Property at 1921, Northeast 158th Street, owner of the property and time side is Pompeo Gamara. This is a non-unstated property ownership of the term by tax record and notice with a cheap by posting on all three cases. The co-compliance officer, Wilhelm Guerrero with the city of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-inspession was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends 30 days. Anyone here on behalf of the estate of Pompeo Gamara 1921 Northeast 158th Street. Okay. It's 255. No one's appeared on behalf of the estate. I find based upon the testimony of the officer as well as a photograph. photograph of the property depicting that the conditions exist as far as the landscape, unsafe condition as well as the hedge, hedges that are not maintained properly. Excuse me. I'm going to set a compliance date in case number 1, 2, 8, 3, which is the landscape case 30 days or daily fine of about $50 per day. In the unsafe condition case number one, two, eight, four, I'll also find that the violation exists for the reason set forth in the record and I will set up compliance state of 30 days or $50 a day fine. As far as the hedges go, I find that the violation does exist based upon the testimony, as well as a review of the photographs. So I'll set a compliance date in 30 days or there'll be a daily fine of $50 per day. Thank you, honor. Thank you. Next to the agenda item to be heard, the agenda item number 37, case CCC, BTR 240045. Code Officer Guerrero, respected property at 2000, Northeast 154 Street, owner of the property at the time-sided is group force, North Lake LLC. This is a non-impedated property ownership was termed by tax record and notes was achieved by certified mail and by post-in. Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the city of North Mammy Beach. The most recent re-espression was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends 14 days. Is anyone here for a group for North Lake? Okay, it's 257. Nobody's appeared on behalf of the ownership based upon the testimony. From the officer that the is not in compliance. I'll set a compliance date of 10, 14 days. 14, yes, sir. 14 days. And in the event of noncompliance, they'll be a daily find a $50 per day. Thank you. Thank you. The next item to be heard is item 38, CCCOM-0303-71. code officer kindly inspected property at 1576, northeast 163rd Street owner of the property that time cited. His national retail properties LP. This is a non-instead property owned so it was termed by tax record. Knows for the Chief by Certified Mail and by Post-it. Co-compliance officer, Elacia kindly with the state of North Miami Beach. Property address just 1576, Northeast 1633, treated in violation of section 24-93G in reference to off street lighting. The violation was observed and cited on September 24, 2024. The first reinspection was on January 16, 2025, and the most recent reinspection was on April 9, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends 10 days., I anyone here for national retail properties, 1576 Northeast, 163rd Street. It's 258 PM, nobody's appeared, based upon the testimony from the officer as well as review of the photographs. I'm quickening that the illumination conditions still exist. I'll set a compliance date of 10 days in the event of noncompliance. There'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. Thank you. Thank you. Next agenda item to be heard. It's a item number 39, case CCCBTR240037. Code officer Pierre, Inspector Property at 16678, North East 10th Avenue. Owner of the property at that I'm cited is Misty Valley LLC. This is the announced of the property ownership of the term by tax record and knows for the chief by posting. Co-companieds officer Nisl Pio, the city of Miami Beach, property address 16678 North East 10th Avenue. 10th Avenue is a violation of section 12-1. New evidence of have to business tax receipt. The valuation was observed inside on November 4th. On November 14th, sorry, 2024. The first inspection was on December 4th, 2024. And the most recent inspection was on April 8th, 2025. And there was no compliance in the city requirement 30 days. Okay. Is Is anyone here for Misty Valley? LLC 16678 North East 10th Avenue. The record reflect nobody's appeared on behalf of the ownership. It's 3pm. Based upon the testimony of the Code Compliance Officer that the violation is not in compliance. I'll set a compliance date in 30 days. And in the of non-compliance, they'll be a daily fine of $50 per day. Thank you. Next, I'd like to be heard. Is a denied of number 40 case, CC, CCOM, 23,03,05, Court Officer Pierre, Inspector Property at 12, 22, Northeast 163rd Street. Owner of the property atsided is Yang and Yang and Yang Investment Corp. This is a novelty property ownership of the term my tax record and also achieved by poster Good compliance officer Nisli Pio, the city of Miami Beach, Probeciad, US 1220 to an all east 163rd Street Is in Valichon of section 24-93 and We found the exterior light. The version was observed inside on November 7, 2023. The first one in the picture was on December 8, 2023. And the most we sent, the most we mentioned was on the people night, people night, 2025. And there was no compliance. The city would come in 30 days. The in process to bring the valuation in compliance. Okay, thank you. So is anyone here for Jung and Yang investments, 12, 22 North East 163rd Street? Okay, it's approximately 302 in the afternoon. Nobody's appeared on behalf of the ownership. Based upon the testimony of the officer and review of photographs depicting the violation still exists. And it's poorly illuminated. I'm going to set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of non-compliance. There'll be $100 a day fine. Thank you. Thank you. Next agenda item to be heard is agenda item number 41, case BV24, 0,2, 12 WP. Chief building inspector or T, Inspector property at 16097, Northeast 9th place, owner of the property at the time-sided, is FL leasing management LLC. this is a non-instead property, only should put the term by tax record and also the chief by certified mail. Good afternoon, Your Honor. We will be sitting on Miami Beach, believe the Batman. I recommend 30 days to comply. There is a huge issue with this property. The property used to be a single family, a wall's divide into units. I've been in touch with planning and zoning, thising, the extension of the parcel and everything. They don't let the owner divide the property into. So it has to go back to the single family. Yes, it has to go back. And have you had any contact with Laura Lee Sin Manage? I've been trying. I've been trying to contact them. I've been with the roofer because at that moment, they have an appointment for the roof. Nothing happened. Nothing happened. Show the both things. So I guess how much time? 30 days. 30 days. 30 days to obtain the permits. To, unfortunately, it can't be legalized from what I understand from your testimony. It has to be the interior demolition. We post the, then until heating in the property. So, just going back to my question, so I understand. 30 days to obtain the demolition permit to convert it back to a single family rest. Apply for the permit for the demo and then the live for the permit. Okay, perfect. Anyone here for far at a leasing? And nobody's here. It's about 305 in the afternoon. So nobody's here based upon the testimony from the city as well as a review of the photographs depicting the condition as well as the proof of posting. I'm going to set a compliance date of 30 days to obtain the permit in the event of non-compliance that will be a daily fine fine $100 today. Thank you. Thank you. Next case agenda item number 42, which is BV2410145WP. Singer building inspector Rosicoff inspected property address 15590 North East 10th Avenue. One of the property is Eric Jules. This non-home state of property ownership is termed by tax breaker property decided for a legal construction. And notice was achieved by posting. Good afternoon, Yonor. We are with the city of Miami Beach, building the bathroom. The city will recommend to table this case for a hundred and eighty days because they obtain, they have an application right now. Perfect. Until September 5, 2025. I know, I know you need it. Yeah. Sometimes. Thank you. And so, Yeah, they apply this week. Yeah. As long as they're trying to, we'll continue this for 180 days. Next agenda, and to, the Gendai number 43, case CCC, COM230251. Court officer Guerrero, inspected property at 1, 3521, this game boulevard, owner of the property that I am cited, is Erwin Tauber. This is a non-instead property ownership was termed by tax record and notes were achieved by post. Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the City of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-espression was on April 9th, 2025 and there was no compliance. The City recommends 30 days. Anyone here from Mr. Talber for 13521, the Englouvard. Based upon the testimony from the Co-compliance officer that the violation is not in compliance. And a review of the photographs of the property. I'm going to set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of noncompliance that we ideally find of $100 per day. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you. Next three cases. agenda item number 44, 45, and 46, which is CCCR ES25091. CCCR ES25092. And CCCR ES250090. Co-compliance. Yes. Okay. I just said it out of order. Co-compliance officer Guerrero inspect the property address and 1-3917, Northeast 20th place, onerous of the property, is Art Creek Equity LLC. This is a not home state of property, ownership was termed by tax record. Property was cited for building maintenance, landscape maintenance, and hedge maintenance. And notice what's achieved by posting. Co-compliance Officer Wilhelm Guerrero with of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-inspection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The City recommends 30 days. Okay, is anyone here for arch-creek equities? 139-17 northeast 20th place. It's 308 PM. Officer, is this a repeat violation? No. No, these are the first time. It's not the first time they also have rent zone inspections yearly. So that's partly why you recognize it. Yeah, that's why I'm asking because yeah. All right. So based upon the officer's testimony as well as the review of the photographs, depicting that the conditions still exist. In the building maintenance case and the N9-0, well, the 0-0-9-0, the client state of 30 days or daily fine of $100 per day, in 0-0-9-1, which is the landscape violation, I find that the violation does does exist based upon the testimony of the co-compliance officer as well as the photographs. The picked even that the condition still exists as of April 9th. So I'll set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of noncompliance. There'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. In the case 0092, which is the hedge, I find that the violation does exist based upon the testimony of the Code Compliance Officer in review of the photographs taken on April 9th, 2025. I set a compliance date of 30 days and in the event of noncompliance, there will be a daily fine of $100 per day. Thank you, hon. Thank you. Next item to be heard are agenda items number 47, case CCC, CRES241264, agenda item number 49, case CCC, CRES241267, and agenda item number 50, case CCC, CRES 241268. Code officer Guerrero, respected property at 2298, North East, 137th Street. Owner of the property to the time-sided is the right fund. One LLC, this is a non-instead of property ownership was determined by tax record, and notes achieved by posting on all three cases. I have a question. What happened? It's 49 part of it? Ford. I've marked up 48 as off the agenda. So I have 47. Excuse me, a denied item number 47, a denied item number 49, case CC, CRES, 24, 1267, and a denied item number 50, case CC, CRES, 24, 1268. Apologies. Okay, thank you. Co-compliance Officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the City of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-inspection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends 30 days. Okay, so is anyone here for the right fund LLC? Right fund, Rural Mino, number one LLC, 2298 Northeast 137 Street. And nobody's here let the record reflect its 3.11 PM. And based upon the testimony of the Code Compliance Officer as well as review of the photographs depicting the conditions do exist as far as the construction debris, the landscape, and the litter. So I'm going to set a compliance date of 30 days in case number 1, 2, 6, 6. And in the event of noncompliance, there'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. In case number 1267, which is the landscaping maintenance case, again, I find that the violation does exist based upon the testimony of the officers as well as the review of the photographs taken on April 9th, picking that the condition still exists. So it'll be 30 days for compliance for a daily fine of $100 per day. And in the last case, 1, 2, 6, 8, which is the litter case, I find that the violation does exist based upon the testimony of the Code Compliance Officer as well as the photographs that I've reviewed to picking that the condition still exists. So there'll be a compliance date of 30 days in the event of noncompliance. There'll be a daily part of $100 per day. Thank you, Your Honor. Next case is a genital item number 51, which is BV24007 US. Chief building inspector Ortiz, Inspector Property Address at 2361 North East 136th Street. So the property is hidden Central Park LLC. This is a non-home state property ownership was termed by a tax record property decided for a Leo construction. Notice was achieved by posting. Good afternoon, Your Honor. We are for the City of Miami Beach, building the bad timing. The city will recommend to table this case for 90 days since we region are in and with the with the owner related to the demolition and the new product in the perfect. Well, table is for 90 days. Yeah. Thank you. The next five of the items to be heard are gen item number 52, case ending in 1229, a gen item number 53, case ending in 1230, a gen item number 54, case ending in 1231, Item number 55, case ending in 1232, and and a gen item number 56 case ending in 1232 and agenda item number 56, case ending in 1233. Code officer Guerrero, inspected property at 2374, North East, 135th Lane. Owner of the property is Mr. David Newman. This is a non-instead property ownership position in my tax my tax record and note through the chief by posting on all five of the cases Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the city of North Miami Beach the most recent re-especially was on April 9th, 2025 and there was no compliance The city recommends 30 days Okay, the name looks very familiar obviously to me because I've seen plenty of cases for Mr. Newman. Is this a repeat violation on this property? No, Your Honor. Okay. It's now 314 PM. Is anyone here for Mr. Newman? 2374 Nathes 135 fine. Okay, let the record reflect. Nobody's appeared on behalf of property owner. Based upon the officer's testimony as well as the review of the photographs, in each of the cases that I've reviewed, I find that the violation does exist. So in case number 1, 2, 2, 9, I'll set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of non-compliance. There'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. In the litter matter, which is 1230, I find that the violation does exist again based upon our review of the photographs as well as the officer's testimony and I will set a compliance date of 130 days with a daily fine of $100 per day. In case number 1, 2, 3, 1, which is the derelict property, I find that the violation does exist again based upon our review of the photographs as well as the testimony of the officer. So I'll set a compliance date of 30 days and the event of non-compliance will be a daily find them 100 hours per day. In case number one, two, three, two, which is the unsafe condition of building issue, I find that the violation does exist based upon the officer's testimony as well as the review of the photographs taken on April 9th, 2025. Going to set a compliance date of 30 days and the event of noncompliance, they'll be a daily item 100 dollars per day. And then the final case, which is the hedge case, one, two, three, three, I find that the violation does exist based upon the officer's testimony as well as review the photographs taken on April 9th, 2025. And I'll set a compliance date of 30 days and the event of non-compliance, there'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. Thank you, honor. Thank you. Next case is the remaining cases are all ratification. Next case is a general item number 57, which is CC, CBTR240029. Co-compliance officer, kindly inspect the property address at 16899 North East 15 Avenue. This property has been out of compliance for 126 days and total fine to date if ratified would be $6,300. Co-compliance officer Alacia kindly with the City of North Miami Beach property address 168.99 Northeast 15,000 violation of section 12-1.1 and reference to business tax receipt. The violation was observed and cited on August 8, 2024. The first post-reinspection was on December 16, 2024. And the most recent reinspection was on April 9, 2025 and there was no compliance. The city recommends ratification. Hey, is anyone here for Beth Pazwa? Pazwa 16899 Northeast 15th Avenue? It's 317 PM. Nobody's appeared on behalf of the owner based upon the testimony of the officer that the violation has not been brought into compliance. I'm going to grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $6,300. Thank you. Thank you. Next four cases. the Ina number 64 65 66 and 67 which is CCCREN2400808182 and 83. Co-compliance Officer Guerrero, Inspector Property Address, at 16160 North East, 18th Place, owner of the property is Ge-Jesica, Hawaii. This property has been out of compliance for 96 days. 96 days for all four cases and and totifying to date if ratify would be $4,800 for all four cases and Tote fine to date if ratify be $4,800 for all four cases Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the city of North Miami Beach the most recent re-espection was on April 9th 2025 And there was no compliance the city recommends ratification Anyone here for the property owner? G Jessica? Why? 161-660? North East 18th place. It is 318 PM. Nobody's appeared on behalf of the property owner. Based upon the testimony for the code compliance officer as well as a review of the photographs to pick the landscaping violations still exist. In case 0080, I will grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $4,800 based on the noncompliance. In case number, ending in 0081, which is the litter, based upon the testimony of the Code Compliance Officer, as well as the photographs depicting that the violation has not been brought into compliance. I'm going to grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $4,800. In case ending in 0082 which is the derelict property case, I find that the violation still exists based upon the officers testimony as well as a review of the photographs depicting that the violation has not been brought into compliance so I'll grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of 40 $4,800 and then in the final case 0 0 8 3 which is the swell maintenance I find that the violation still exists based upon the testimony of the Code Compliance Officer as well as a review of the photographs depicting that the violation has not been brought into compliance. I will grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $4,800. Thank you, honor. Thank you next Next agenda item to be heard, the agenda item number 68, KCC, CBTR, 24, 0036. Code Officer Guerrero, Inspector Property at 1, 5, 4, 5, 5, Westix, Highway, owner of the property at the time-sided. This North Miami Beach Commerce Center, LC. This is a non-instead property. This case was last heard on February 6, 2025. The property has been out of compliance for a total of 49 days to date. If ratified, the final amount would be $4,900. The co-compliance officer Guerrero with the City of North Miami Beach. The city would like to table this until June 12th. Okay. And I'll see everyone back here on this case for June 12th. And yeah. Thank you. Thank you. The next five cases, June 9, number 71, 72, 73, 74, and 75, which is case CCCRES240557, 05558, 05559, and 0561. co-compliance officer Guerrero inspect the property address at 1694 northeast 160th Street. Ones of the property is Remain Dorville and property was cited for litter, landscape maintenance, derelict property, building maintenance and hedge maintenance. And notice was achieved by posting. This property has been out of compliance for 96 days and total fine to date for all five cases would be $4,800. Co-compliance officer, William Guerrero with the City of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-inspiration was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends ratification. Okay, is anyone here for a germane door bill 169-4 northeast 160th street? Let the record reflect it's now 322 and nobody's appeared on behalf of the owner. So based upon the testimony of the officer as well as a review of the photographs depicting that the violations have not been brought into compliance in case number 0557. I'll grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $1,800. In the landscaping case which is 0558, I find that the violation has not been cured and still exists. Again based upon the testimony of the officer as well as a review of the photographs taken on 4 9 20 25. So I'll grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $4,800. In case 0559 which is the derelict property, I find that the violation still exists as reflected by the officer's testimony as well as a review of the photographs taken on April 9th, 2025. So I'll grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $4,800. In case number 0560, which is the unsafe condition of the building and not being kept in good repair. I find that the violation still exists based upon the officer's testimony as well as a review of the photographs taken on April 9th 2025. I will ratify the fines for non-compliance in the amount of $4,800. And in the final case 0 51, which is the hedge violation, I find that the violation still exists and has not been cured, based upon the testimony of the officer as well as a review of the photographs taken on April 9th, 2025, and will grant the cities requests and ratify the fines in the amount of $4800. Thank you, honor. Thank you. Thank you. Next agenda items, next three agenda items to be heard. Our agenda items, number 76, case ending in 0127. A agenda item, number 77, case ending in 0128. And a agenda item, number 78, case ending in 0129. Code officer Pierre, inspected property at 1050, Northeast 1603. Owner of the property time cited is Martha Maltor. This is a non-instated property only should be termed by tax record. This case was last termed on May 11, 2023. The property has been out of compliance for a total of 693 days to date a Friday on all three violations. The dollar amount would be $34,650. Could compliance of Senate Sleepy or the City of Miami Beach and the most recent one is on April 8, 2025 and there was no compliance. The city would come in with a justification. OK. Is anyone here for Martha? Martha, Martha, 1050, northeast 160th Street. It's about 325 and nobody's appeared on behalf of the property owner. In case number 0127, based upon the testimony of the officer as well as the photographs of the inspection on 4-8-2025, I find that the violation is still not in compliance and will grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $34,650. In case number 0128, which is the parking issue with parking on the grass, and there are still vehicles that are located on the grassy area, which means that the violation is not in compliance as stated by the co-compliance officer as well as Cooperated by the photographs taking on for a 2025. I find that the violation still exists and I will ratify the fines in the amount of $34,650 and in the final case, which is the painting case I Find that the violation still exists based upon the testimony of the co-compliance officer as well as review the photographs from the inspection on April 8th, 2025 and grant the city's request to ratify the fines in the amount of $34,650. Thank you. The next two cases is a genital number 79 and 80, which is CCCRES, sorry, CCCOM24061 and CCCOM24073. Co-compliance officer kindly inspected property address at 1630 North Miami Beach Boulevard. This property has been out of compliance for 222 days and total fine today if ratified would be 22,200 dollars for both cases. Co-compliance officer Alacia Conley with the City of North Miami Beach, property address 1630, North Miami Beach, Will of Art is in violation of Section 24-148 in reference to the sign. And Section 12-1.1 in reference to business tax receipt. The violation was observed and cited on February 20th, 2024. The first post-reinspection was on January 15th, 2025. And the most recent rein inspection was on April 9th, 2025, and the most recent re-inspection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends ratification. Okay, is anyone here for one 30, sorry, one 63rd Street Plaza, 1630 North Miami Beach Boulevard? It's 328, and nobody's appeared on behalf of the ownership. Based upon review of the photographs taken on, it's like May, I wait. When was your most recent inspection? The night. The night. Okay, I find that the violation is not in compliance and in case number 0061, I'll ratify the fines in the amount of 22,200 dollars in case zero zero seven three which is the business tax receipt case I find that the violation is not in compliance as per the testimony of the co-compliance officer and I will grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $22,200. Thank you. Thank you. Next item. ratify the fines in the amount of $22,200. Thank you. Thank you. Next items to be heard on the agenda are denitems number 81, case ending in 0, 8, 4, 9, and agenda item number 82, case ending in 0, 8, 5, 0. Court Officer Guerrero, inspected property at 2499. North East, 137 street. Owner of the property at the time cited is the right fund, one LLC. This case was last heard. These both these cases were last heard on February 6, 2025. The property has been out of compliance for a total of 49 days to date. If ratified, both fine amounts would be $4,900. Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the City of North Mammy Beach. The most recent re-inspections was on April 9, 2025, and there was no compliance. The City recommends ratification. Does anyone here for the right fund, Roman No. 1 for 2499. Northeast 137th Street. It's approximately 329 in the afternoon. And nobody's appeared on behalf of the ownership. So based upon my review of the photographs as well as the testimony from the Code Compliance Officer that the violation as of April 9 has not been cured. Board into compliance, I'll grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $4,900. In case number 0850, based upon the testimony of the Code Compliance Officer, as well as a review of the photographs, depicting that the that the landscaping condition as brought into compliance. I'll grant the city's request to ratify the fines and the amount of $4,900 and also just for the record the photographs were taken on 429-2025. Thank you, honore. Thank you. Next case, I have an Ida number 87, which is BV240013US, Chief Building Inspector Ortiz Inspector Property Address, 2374 North East 135th Lane. One of those are properties is David A. Newman. This property has been out of compliance for 53 days and total fine to date a ratified B 13,250 dollars. Hey, good afternoon, Your Honor. Hey, what would you say to my baby, should be the department, I recommend ratify. Okay, is anyone here for Mr. Naman. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you., sir. Next, I'd like to be heard. The Denitom number 88, case ending in 003, a Denitom number 89, case ending in 004, and a Denitom number 90 90 case ending in 0 0 1 9 Code officer Guerrero inspected property at 24 45 North East 136 Street owner of the property time cited is Cab 3 investment LLC All three of these cases were last heard on December 5th, 2024 The property has been out of compliance for a total of 96 days to date, it's ratified, the file amount on all three cases would be $7,200. Co-compliance offers to Wilhelm Guerrero with the city of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-inspection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends ratification. Okay, is anyone here for CAP 3 investments? 2445, not these, 136th Street. So let the record reflect nobody's appeared at Subhark's 2333 PM. Based upon the testimony from the co-compliance officer as well as a photograph depicting that the violation has not been brought into compliance in the landscaping matter, which is 003. gonna grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $7,200. In case number 004, which is the fence violation, again I find that the violation has not been brought into compliance based upon the testimony from Co-compliance Officer Guerrero as well as a review of the photographs taken on April 9th, 2025. 4 which is the fence violation. Again I find that the violation has not been brought into compliance based upon the testimony from Co-compliance Officer Guerrero as well as a review of the photographs taken on April 9th, 2025. And I will proceed to grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $7,200. In the final matter, which is 0019, which is the litter case, I find that the violation has not been brought into compliance as per the inspector Guerrero as well as a review of the photographs taken on 4 9 20 25 and grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of 7 200 dollars. Thank you, honor. Thank you. Next case is the gen I'm number 91, 92 and 93, which is case CCCRES 240535, 0536 and 0538. Co-compliance officer Guerrero, Inspector Property Address, at 2485 North East 136 Lane. One of the properties is David A. Newman. This property has been out of compliance for 96 days and total fine to date of ratified would be the city of Nothmae Beach. The most recent re-inspection was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The City recommends her edification. Anyone here for Mr. Newman, 2485 Northeast 135th Lane, let the record reflect that nobody's appeared on behalf of the property owner in 335 in the afternoon. In case number 0535 based upon the testimony from the Co-compliance Officer as well as a review of the photographs taken on April 9th that the violation has not been brought into compliance. I'll grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $7,200. In case number 0536, which is the vote matter, I find that the violation has not been complied with and is still out there. So grant the city's request, again based upon the testimony from the city as well as the photographs taken depicting that the condition still exists as of yesterday April 9th 2025 and grant the city's request and ratify the fines in the amount of $7,200 and in the final matter 0538, which is the derelict property, I find that the violation has not been brought into compliance. Again, based upon the testimony from the city as well as a review of the photographs taken on April 9th 2025 and ratify the fines in the amount of $7,200. Thank you, hon. Next, two items to be heard on the agenda. agenda item number 94, case ending in 0, 0, 0, 6, and agenda item number 95, case ending in 0, 0, 1, 6. Code officer Garrevo, Inspector property at 1, 4, 0, 0, 5, Biscayne Boulevard, owner of the property, the time-sided is A, J, M, Properties, LC. This is a non-instead of property ownership was termed by the tax record. These both cases were heard on December 5th, 2024. Both cases are out of compliance for the 96 days. And both cases, if ratified, would be $7,200. Co-compliance officer Wilhelm Guerrero with the City of North Miami Beach. The most recent re-espression was on April 9th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends ratification. Anyone here for AGM properties? LC-14005, this came over.vard. I'll let the record reflect. It's now 3.38 pm and nobody's appeared on behalf of ownership based upon the testimony from the Co-compliance Officers as well as the photographs taken on April 9, 2025. case in case number 006, I'll grant the city's request to ratify the fines in the amount of $7,200 for the owner's non-compliance with the city code, as well as in case 0016. ratified the fines in the amount of 7,200 based upon the non-compliance with the city code. As again, evidence by the testimony from the officer as well. ratified the fines in the amount of 7,200 based upon the non-compliance with the city code, as again evidenced by the testimony from the officer as well as a review of the photograph. Thank you. Thank you, Your Honor. We're done, no more cases. Yes. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. It's innovative and this will help me do my job more efficiently and quickly. This made me more confident in taking the call. Not hard at all. If it actually was probably easier than what we used. It is very important for us to be able to communicate with our call in a more effective way. So not being able to have car buying to provide us a video feed. Live video would really help our office person. What they're gonna come across before they even get there. For officers to know that information, it is huge. And it kinda as a dispatcher, it brings closure. Oh, in the past, I did handle an occupied burglary. you're able to do siphon chat if somebody is having an issue. Verbalizing something, they can text it to you. Sometimes there's a language barrier. So now I can look and see, and I can type it in, and send the information to the officer. Carbine gives us location information. It's there. You're looking at it live. Which way to lead that person to safety if you need to. I received two calls. It was super exciting. I love it. I think it's going to be very, very helpful. And I'm looking forward to using it with many of our calls. Oh, and there's a room here to go. For a very long time, you've had operators. They're worried, they're stressing with calls. But here at North Miami Beach, police department is letting us know that they're ready to push forward with modern technology. The citizens are gonna be amazed. I love it. Like, I'm ready to go forward with it. Because to me, once you start with new technology, you're gonna advance even further. Like, there's gonna be so much more that we can do as a city for our citizens. The scorching Florida heat can be difficult to bear. Often, the only relief is the air conditioner, but turning it on all day could mean a higher energy bill. And in this economy, keeping bills low is important for everyone. Florida Power and Light Company has a team of energy experts dedicated to helping customers save money and keep bills as low as possible. Hi, my name is Rolanda Moreiro, and I've been an energy expert for over 30 30 years helping customers save money. We're here to help you. Our team is always helping customers save money on their monthly bills through our tools and our knowledge and our programs. There are tools and information available on the