[♪ OUTRO MUSIC PLAYING [♪ Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for taking your time to be here this afternoon and for this special meeting. Before we start the meeting, first let me take a few minutes to state why we have the special meeting today and why the meeting is called for. Staff and I receive overwhelming phone calls over the last several days due to falsified information on different YouTube and social media. All right, I just, I was just reminded I was stating the fact first and call for the meeting. But okay, we can do that. I was trying to state the reason for calling this special meeting, but CD attorney said that we probably want to take the salute to the plaque and invocation first, so that's okay, we can do to take the salute to the plaque and invocation first so that's okay We can do that in the prompt so this time I would like to call for suppression meeting the time now is 521 Meeting now is called to order real call please Mayor win I'm here vice mayor hell. I'm here. Vice Mayor Hull. I'm here. Councilwoman Fenwest. Fenwest here. Councilmember Monzo. Here. Councilmember Wynn. I'm here. Mayor, you have a quorum with all members present. Thank you very much. Salute to the flag today is going to be Councilmember Menzo and invocation by Vice Mayor Hull. Please stand. Ready, begin. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Please remain standing about your heads. Heavenly Father, we ask for your guidance in right? In erection, as matters of importance, our discusses evening. May the decisions made here to the benefit of all citizens of Westminster, amen. And Jesus name, amen. Thank you. Thanks to the customer, Mr. Manzo, and vice mayor, for a salute to the flag in the vocation. Before I open up for the oral communication for agenda items only as you know today is the special meetings we are only have one agenda item that we are talking about so please address the council accordingly. And before I open up the oral communications once again, good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for taking the time to be here at this special meeting. First, let me check a few minutes to state as why this special meeting is called for. Stop and I receive overwhelming phone calls over the last several days due to falsify information on different YouTube and social media. These people also distributed leaf leaf homeowners at mobile home parks throughout the city with the eviction notice. Eviction notice, that's very important in red. They falsify and propaganda. There's misleading information by referring to the study, I mentioned again, the study item 5.2, which was discussed at the September 11 meeting. This evil act was brought overly concerned, our most vulnerable seniors, resident who currently own or live in the mobile home parks. Sadly to say that this evil act, this evil acts carried out by our own City Council members, Nam Kuan and Amy Phan West. And I'm candidate by the name of Joseph No, Joseph No is sitting in the audience right now. At I see. I now call this special meeting, City Council meeting, to discuss the tooth of this matter. So at this time, I would like to open up for oral communication. Is there any one sign up for a speaker? Thank you, Mayor. This is the time of the meeting. That members of the public may address the City Council regarding any items on the agenda. Unless extended by a majority vote of the city council, comment shall be limited to three minutes per speaker. Any person wishing to address the city council in person should complete a green speaker slip that is provided at the entrance to the council chambers and submit the card to the city clerk. When your name is called, please step to the podium at that time and state your name and city of residence for the record. Our first speaker is Dow Tran, followed by Win Hung. the podium at that time and state your name and city of residents for the record. Our first speaker is Dow Tran followed by Win Hung. Dow Tran followed Win Hung. Before Dow Tran speak I just want to remind that we have the policy, the court and the civility passed by the policies passed by the previous Council. So please follow that policy and at the same time please refrain from using profanity during this meeting. As I mentioned over and over again, we may have people who have high school students follow our meetings. Thank you very much. You can start now. Good evening ladies and gentlemen. I wonder why do we have this emergency meeting? Isn't it because of the fake news from Joe Saep no traffic commissioner and candidate for district three? With the help from council member Amy and Nam Kuan. This fake news, why I call this fake news? Because the meeting September 11, didn't say anything, anything about the mobile home. And did anything about the mobile home and anything about the zoning. Then I can say this is the fake news, but why they have this new? This fake news comes from the true news news was in September 2016 under Mayor Gita's time. They have a reasoning for Los Angeles estate model. That is the real new. But they said that from you guys, from three people here. So this is the fake news. And the fake news cause they scared the vulnerable residents to death because the eviction notice, they passed out. They are irresponsible people. So we never vote for that guy to the city because he already passed the pregnant before he already passed the trick you before he come in. And these two council members should be recalled because they caused the worries for the vulnerable residents. You clap, okay? You clap? Okay, you see. And I'm calling West Minister of Residence to stand up for your right. condemn these fake news and recall Namquam and Amy. Thank you for listening. I have a chapter that is issued a missing information in item in item in item in item in item in item in item in item in item in item in item in item in item in item I have accepted that issue the missing information in item 5.2 on the September 11, 2020 for the lady in the month. I would like to ask a few questions about the event on item 5.2 on the September 11, 2024. This is special meeting. I am completely unaware of this incident, especially in this meeting on October 9, 2024. Three members of the Council Member, Mayor Chi, Wynne, Vice Mayor Kimberley Ho and Council Member Carl Colots Mandel. However, try firmly, refuel to an explanation in item A, B, 1, 2, 3, 4. Proposal by Cousin member Amy Fan West, and Annamquan Nguyen. For review and explanation, I am very disappointed. And this point made me believe that the accusation of the two young thousand member Amy and Namquan are very credible. Is there any hidden matter that is a three-casson member above deliberately avoided to clarify. This is November. Councilor Nguyen Manjol will definitely be gone. Councilor Carlos Manjol will probably also end his term because if he did not serve the three actions. Talk about the agenda item please. So on the three of them we will definitely keep this 5.3 decision. But thank you very much for City Manager Kittin Gordon on Friday, October 12, 2024 announcing this meeting. It's so loud. City know how to listen to whistness and the people. Today, I come here with a belief in explanation and hope to live with the peaceful and as a mobile home resident in the city. Ladies and gentlemen, I am a mobile resident in District 4. And I really hope for an explanation about how exactly item 5.3 zone is. I am only interesting in the relocation of the area with mobile home park so I would like to make a few suggestions. Number one, this banding the City Mobile Home Park will unintentionally create a lack of housing and many people. City Mobile Home Park in Westmeet City. Even if a new apartment building is built, it will take at least one, two years or more. Westmeet the more more here on example. Resident in the mobile park might be can shoot before the city makes a difference. By the way, your time is up. I have my letter. Our next speaker is Joseph Niel, followed by Michael Verangia. Today October 14, 2024, I good afternoon Mayor and the CEO of City Management, Anthony. The I am a city of the traffic commissioner. I could like to ask the city attorney to the city manager of the legalization of the proposed ordinate, Phi Poichu, that was put vote on September 11th. I would like to ask the city manager to provide the legalization of the proposed ordinate to the city manager to the city manager to the city manager to provide the legalization of the proposed ordinary 5.2 that was put vote on September 11. Have you said letter to all residents in the affected area regarding the change and the legalization of the future inquiry of the developer. Did you resent audience 5.2 to the planning commissioner for review before bringing it to see the council to approve? Are you aware that this good lead confrontation with potential law should and developer to the city resident. We can see the people who are in the field. We can see the people who are in the field. We can see the people who are in the field. We can see the people who are in the field. We can see the people who are in the field. We can see the people who are in the field. We can see the people who are in the field. We can see the people who are in the field. We can see the people who are in the field. before you guys voted. I see that you guys should try to cheat people and try to do something. You know, just want to make something later, you guys can get the money back or what a kick back. I saw that a people say that, you know, you guys are planning, and if you guys give the developer come in the city and they are applied for the zone but you guys already vote for 5.2 if the people they don't approve it they may sue the city so we need the attorney and the manager have to double check this one again. Thank you. I will have a fifth comment. I will have a fifth comment. I will respond to that. The answer to yours are no. No. And the reason is it's a study. If you don't understand the study, then we need to go. Next speaker please. Our next speaker is Nat Lynn followed by Huay Donato. Thank you. Hello, Mr. Huy Dong, Mr. Huy Dong. Before I announce, I would like to say that Mr. Huy Dong's decision to go to the under team. So here's the map of the mix use districts. These districts were approved in 2016 as part of the general plan. As you can see there's basically six various areas. Most of them along West Minister Boulevard, the malls included in this little site on in the north, we're calling the Northwest District. These areas does encompass some of your primary commercial areas, which is primarily dedicated to, mostly at this point in time, retail uses. There's some other kind of non-retail uses, but right now it's primarily retail. The first thing that I learned was the construction of the building. The building was built in the 6th area of the building. The building was built in the are not available to the public. The public has the ability to buy a home in the Weston, Weston, and I know that it is the year of the past and the United States of America, the two of the United States. I have signed a contract with Hongkwa. The and will be able to provide a better opportunity. I want to give the audience a chance to talk about the city. On the 28th of September 2016, the city's Green Lantern and Los Alicero Estes have been able to meet youth zoning. This is the opportunity for the city to provide a better opportunity the Green Lantern S.S. is the reason why this is the main character. He has two roles. The mission is to join the mission. And the first two years, the 2007 was a global event. And the trust and trust of the audience. After that, the audience was head of the Moba Homme, and the Moba Homme was the head of the Moba Homme, and the head of the Moba Homme was the head of the Moba Homme, and the head of the Moba Homme was the head of the Moba Homme, and the head of the Moba Homme, and the head of the Moba Homme, and the head of the Moba Homme, and the head of the a phone, not a phone, not a phone. And the government has lived in this room for a long time, and they have been very busy with the government. And in the year 2018, I thank Kim Lee Ho-wo in the first meeting of the government. And after that, I thank the government for the first meeting and when I have the support of the government, I thank this Green Lantern I Excuse me, are you going to let her speak for six minutes? Six minutes. This is my meeting. Check. We need six minutes. Six minutes. You do your job. six minutes. But you're not this. Yes, later. No, it's six minutes. All over the trash. All over the trash. All right. You do your job. I'm not doing my job. You do your job. I do my job. You do your job right now. Quiet, please. You do your job right now. You be quiet, please. Because you're behind the table. It's because you're hunting. Okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay is being I ought to told them they have six minutes and if they use up their time is therefore it's therefore they have only six minutes they can have more time they have only three minutes talking but they have told of six minutes and they's therefore right now. How come they have six minutes? It's also breathing. Idiot. How did you have to live? You are a idiot. You are stupid. You're breaking the law right now. It's okay. That's okay. You are breaking the law. I did not. I told people over and over and over again. You have six minutes. What a grab is this? You, I used to the first warning to you. Okay, come on, come on. Your people make a lot of noise and that you don't miss through a warning. I am running the meeting, not you. Okay, you can go ahead and start me. If you don't run it, right, I'm going to run it. I'm going to run it. But you see first one. You were idiot. The thing that they said in the Evisian notice was not true because of the meeting September September 11th, the council meeting didn't say anything about the mobile homes. So Mr. Asi, the city manager, Asi, has already said that the reasoning was September 2016 under Mayor Chita, not this council member, and they blamed three people right here to reason. And that is not the record soul that made it anything about the reason they. So that is really fake news. Okay. Your time is up. Thank you, ma'am. Before we go on, I want to say two things. As I did before, and I will continue to do that that way, that I will allow you, if you have the interpreter, then you have to hold off six minutes. And if you don't wisely use your time, then you have no interpretation after that. So if you don't want to, let me make it clear. So the people come up here to talk, they can talk for six minutes and then just about like a 30 second, they can use it to translate. They don't use the time properly wisely then that's therefore, that's therefore they only have that six minute and without the extension. The second thing that I want to let you know that I forgot to mention it's at the beginning of the meeting. From now on, every meeting, I understand that we need to have a break to go to the resume break. So what I'm going to do is every hour I will take a recess for five minutes. So with that, I ask all the council members, please stay for the meeting until the time that we need to take a break then we do that. So now I would like to go back to the oral communication please. Our next speaker is Wade Ernesto, followed by GGVO. Vivo. and the people of the city have to learn a special lesson. The only thing that can be done is to teach the people to learn a special lesson, especially when they are not hungry and they have to be at home. In fact, the people who want to teach to use the right to earn and to be careful as they say to teach and to be careful. and the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in the same position as the people who are not in The two young women, the Emequette, have helped the young men to be able to make their own decisions and to make sure that they are able to make their own decisions. The young men have helped the young men to make their own decisions. The young men have helped the young men to make their own decisions. The young men have helped the young men to make their own decisions. The young men have helped the young men to make their own decisions. to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people of the country to be able to help the people Thank you. Good evening, Mayor, Vice Mayor, Council Members and everyone. Today the city has to have a special meeting just because we need to straighten out the facts so that the mobile home residents, especially the elders, won't lose sleep and worry about being kicked out of their homes. How cruel and unethical for the people who want to run for office and resort to use such a horrible tactic to light a people to get votes. Which candidate was it you wonder? Who else but Mr. Joseph know? Who listed his contact info in the flyers? To make the matter worse, Council Member Nam Kwan and Amy West were aiding and abetting such criminal activities by promoting fake news to hurt the mobile home residents. They are council members who refuse to understand the facts. Their ignorant judgment made their own assumptions to mislead the voters and ensure to get their gang members voted in. So they can further destroy the city? Please use your votes wisely and vote for the right candidate. Thank you. Please use your votes wisely and vote for the right candidate. Thank you. Next speaker is Gigi Vogue, followed by Tammy Hamilton. Xin kính chào, Thì chứng, gi Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin, Xin The the The first two years of the pandemic, the pandemic has been in place for a long time. The pandemic has been in place for a long time. The pandemic has been in place for a long time. The pandemic has been in place for a long time. The pandemic has been in place for a long time. The pandemic has been in place for a long time. The pandemic has been in place for a long time. The pandemic has been in place for a long time. The pandemic has been in place for a long time. The last four months, the last 5-2,000, no. 16,000. Why do you have to be so careful with the last three months of the show? You have to be very careful. I'm sorry. Thank you. and the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of the staff of Hello Mayor, when and everyone. Councilmembers, NAMKWAN and Amy, please stop destroying our city. We know you're ill-intentioned and frankly we're so sick and tired of your behavior. During the meeting of September 11th, where the consultants were here to update the council about the progress of the project, Councilmembers, NAMKWAN chose to leave the important portion of the meeting and not listen to facts. Councilmember Amy was there but she did not understand anything. She's not fit to hold any office position because she just talks and doesn't know how to listen, especially to the experts to get the facts. Both of these council members helped a candidate to spread the fake news about mobile home residents being evicted. These two council members refused to listen to Assistant City Manager for his quick answer in the meeting last Wednesday, and Amy went even further by accusing the Assistant City Manager of being a liar. Amy, you went too far. How dare you? In a public setting to abuse the City employee publicly like that? You are a horrible beyond words. Mobile home residents know your mean and ill intentions. Thanks to the mayor to hold a press conference and assure the residents it's all just fake news. Our next speaker is Tammy Hamill, followed by Debbie Schwabble. Okay, I mean, pretty much whatever. She talks into her thing anyway, so it's better she's not here. I mean, pretty much what it's better she's not here. I mean, pretty much what's already been said. This is, it's wasted time, it's wasted taxpayer money. They clearly don't care. I appreciate you doing it because you're a mayor who's actually working for everyone and wanting everyone to know what's actually going on instead of those two, they're just working for whatever votes they can scrape together. It's clear they're being coached on this stuff. They look at each other like you ready, you ready? Like it's clear this, his little outburst earlier was, I mean really early compared to other meetings. They're both on YouTube, she's talking over there, they're doing whatever they can do just to cause complete chaos. But one of the big things that really bothers me is the continued defamation of city staff. When is it going to be enough? She literally, just because she and he are too stupid and literally uneducated to understand the answers that they're given or just don't care because they're being coached to cause the chaos and pretend they don't understand. Does not give either of them the right to defame city staff consistently. These people know what they're doing. They're the ones keeping us afloat. They're the ones keeping all this shit straight. These two are the ones causing chaos. When is it going to be enough? Is it going to take a class action lawsuit against the two of them? I hope they do that because then you guys can vote to have her defend herself and not the city. And then hopefully she will bankrupt and just leave Westminster. Because that's all there, they're're causing so much harm People are gonna get hurt their reputation. They're trying to damage reputations Because of this I mean this is the epitome of Accusation is admission they talk about bribes they talk about misinformation they talk about all of it You know the names that they call the mayor. He just literally stupid and idiot Could not be more clear that that is what they're doing. It needs to stop. That alone needs to stop. City staff have to be here. Like I said before, we choose to be here. They have to be here. They should not have to put up with this bullshit. I don't care whether you like my language or not. That doesn't defame anybody. What they're doing is absolutely doing that. It's causing harm. There's got to be something you can do. You have got to advise her to do something. She cannot continue. Like they can defend themselves. They're up here, their council members. They have to be very careful, I'm sure. Because they can't say the kind of things we're saying. Luckily we can. But until she stops, something bad is going to happen. And then she's going to claim like, I have no idea that was going to happen. That's why she's got angry dude up here talking smack about residents and wanting him to name names. Yeah, thank you. Thank you. All right next speaker is W. Schwabble followed by Tony. Good evening. I'm Debbie Schwabble. I'm in 18-year resident. Can you hold up? The C-20 have a paper comment about your comment. Yeah, just a brief response just to say that that issue has come up and I have discussed with the council members that they need to be very cautious about the way that they speak because it can lead to liability. So that is not something that's ignored. Thank you. I'll see you there, Tony. You can start now. Thank you very much. Good evening. I'm Debbie Schwabbel. I'm an 18-year resident of Westminster. I wanted to speak on 5.2 at the 9.11 meeting. The last meeting took care of that problem that we're here to talk about. As far as I remember and have seen as I was at the meeting, we did exclude mobile home park developments, mobile home parks for mixed use developments, and that was corrected from the 2016 issue that was brought up. I do live in district three, so this is really affecting me, even though I don't live in a mobile home, the person who signed their name to the eviction notice, that really affects me, because I am now a little bit afraid that this person may get in. And I agree with Tammy that there are people behind these people who are acting as mentors and just want to discuss killing our city. There's not too much more that I can say, except to these people who were in charge of the eviction notice, which Namquan tried to describe as a survey. I wanted to tell them that they should feel lucky and blessed to live in a country where you can get to do this kind of crap and you will still get a fair assessment and a reasonable punishment because where they come from, it wouldn't be like that. So they should count their blessings that they're even here. And I know that you guys will do the best you can to get out the information to those people who are affected that this was a big lie. Thank you. Our next speaker is Tony, followed by Sevo. Hello. I'm with the mayor, Eddie. Morning. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello. I'm going to take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, and then I'll take this letter, I'm gonna get out of here. You've got to use the camera. Okay. Okay. Go ahead. So, to know that, I've got broken. Let me try to get out of here. But, go. I'm going to buy them. And then, right now, I talk English, okay? I'm saying about the key to our office and then talk to NAMKWAN, Joseph Law, Amy, to the fake news, Go to the top down on you. I will fill you up. Charlie will not get any. You can. Not me. You can compare. No compete. Okay, that's the size. Okay, you can say anything else. Yeah, but no compete. Okay, I'm sorry. Okay, okay. I'm so I know. Okay. I will Hopefully meet the Georgia team and women on November 5th Martin ring and any ring and Carlos men's or two Talking you can talk anything else, but don't come pain Okay, okay, okay, I to me. OK, OK. I know, I know, OK, OK. So, so, this is the way to get the money. So, I want to make money, to get the money. Because there is a way to get the money, not to get the money. The way to get the money. Okay. So I should help. Thirty-nine seconds. You don't need to use it if you don't want it. Okay. That's all I want to say. Thank you, everybody. So you vote followed by Michael Verangia? Good evening, Mayor Charlie J. All the City Council. I come here as like a middle. I am not on any one side. But I mean, like the people like live in the mobile homes, they've been there for a long time. And I heard that data. I was the one who did it 2016 to get it to mix use. But I noticed a radiant change and also someone that have fought for them. So I think Nampoyang and MBFAN was and I did spoke to them that you guys need to do some studies. If you need expert expert I will help see if you can revert the reuse because you can rezone again to help the people if you do care for the residents because I know most of them are gonna they owe and they get used to it just like people who stayed there for a long time it's not you, landlord have the right because they own the land, but as human, as, you know, courtesy, and as a city council, as a mayor, that you get voted, get elected, and I know it's a state level too, so you can work together to get it revert or radiate and change or even they have to move in the binding contracts. You can fight for the people and see if in a few years the interest rate or something that can compensate them so that they have a peaceful life and they are not frustrated at their age. Most of them are very old. And so it's a courtesy and a caring. That's all I want to say. Thank you. Before you, I'll call the next speaker. You and I, we learn new things every day. I was just advised by the city attorney, my apology to Tony. He was saying that if only if the person who speaks is the candidate who can't promote or campaign, but anyone they can do for them so I can do it. So my apology to you, which I just learned now, and I want to let everyone of you here know that you can if you are not a candidate during the election. Thank you very much. Next speaker please. Our next speaker is Michael Verangia, followed by Roger Mindrom. Thank you. And here again, the two people who are responsible for this meeting are not here. Now, the other one's sitting in the audience because he's the one who backed that eviction notice. That's where it started. These two backed his play. He lied and they swore that he was telling the truth. So, they bailed out, they're going in the back, they're back there laughing watching it on TV and just listening to a drink and coffee, stuffing their face. But the last meeting I watched as a Dolphor assistant city manager tried to explain where this whole thing came up. And back in 2016, this was part of the general plan. Multiple times, he explained it to Amy. Apparently it doesn't sink in because she kept asking the same questions. We've all seen that happen. We've seen her do it to the police department. We've seen her do it to the police department. We've seen her do it to the city manager. We've seen her do it to other people up her making presentations. Either this woman is too stupid to understand what she's told or she's doing this on purpose along with this guy. They sit up here, they yell back and forth. They complain about everybody else and what. They leave the dias when the public is up here speaking. That just basically shows you what they think of us. They might as well sit up here and give us all the finger while we're sitting out the audience because it's the same damn thing. And I'm sorry, Christian, but there has got to be something to dock these people's pay for all the closed session and active meetings that they've bothered walking out of for whatever reason. There's no reason they can't sit up here. If you're just back there, your face or drinking coffee too bad, should have done that before the meeting. But they get up and they walk out, they don't want to listen to anybody out here. Their buddy's sitting out there in the audience. He's probably laughing his ass off that everybody's complaining about the eviction notice that he sent out. His name is on the eviction notice. That's where the blame goes. He has no business running for a seat on this council, let alone be elected. And he's not the only one. There's others out there that are running that these two are backing because they want to flip control of the council. And what I worry about is we'll lose our city manager, we'll lose our assistant city manager. And these are the kind of things that they send out. This is nothing but BS that's put together by their handler. Thank you. Thank you. Good evening, Roger Mindrom, resident of Westminster. It's obviously really unfortunate that we're even here in the first place. These two council members continuously waste our time and it's not even wasting our time. It's wasting our lives realistically. Think about it. They're wasting our lives. Every time they squabble and back and forth, it's just the adjective to describe it is just crazy. I think this situation is fortunate for the voters. And I don't even know, Joseph No, is he running for District 2 against 3? Hello people. Strike this guy off your ballot because it's obvious who not to vote for. So thank you for showing us who not to vote for. And these two being gone right after the mayor asks them to not leave the dius. He's flipping you off right now. He's just a middle finger in your face. And it's just totally uncalled for. And then leaving the room, it just shows their colors. Why would you believe them? And the meeting, the 9-11 meeting, that entire presentation, I made note of it. I spoke to people that were sitting around me. I said, look, Namquan left for that entire presentation. The cameras are probably on the presenters. And Mr. O'Zayn probably, whoever was doing the presentation, the camera was probably on them. He was gone for the entire time, plus at least a half an hour after that. And as far as docking their pay, seriously, there are derelicks to even be here. Why, they can be, the question is, how many times is this gonna have to be explained to them? Because after we're done speaking, you're gonna have your discussion as far as spelling it out letter for letter, and they're still not going to understand it. Are they ignorant? Are they stupid? Or is there some other evil plan going behind it? People, you need to ask yourself a lot of questions here. Why is this happening? Why are they doing this? Can you be that stupid and ignorant to have somebody sitting four feet in front of you and explain the truth in writing and you're going to do it again today and are they still going to argue with the truth? Are they still going to argue with the truth? And do more press conferences and call you all a bunch of liars. I mean what's it going to take to show them in writing what was presented, they're too stupid to even go back and listen to the presentation that was on the meeting. It's so obvious that they don't listen to anything. look at the You run out of my time I don't know why you have the three minutes there. I Got some free time. I don't I wasn't time with it. Let me keep going Star my three minutes. You claim my time. See that's another thing The it what's really hilarious is the meeting on Wednesday When Amy was continuously going on and on about reclaiming your time. People go back and watch the YouTube six minutes no six hours 16 minutes section. Okay section and she is so funny that she sends go back and watch the tape go back and watch YouTube and you can watch that, and Mr. Mayor, you've given her so much leniency that she was going on and on and on about giving her time back. You gave her more than enough time that she was asking for. You went to three minutes and then you said go. You can see the green light on YouTube. You can see the green light go on when you said go. And everybody needs to know that the mayor is the only one that controls this clock and going to the city clerk. So as soon as you said go and that green light went on, what happened? Namquan immediately interrupted her. You asked him to be quiet and not interrupt her and then the shit hits the fan between the two of them. They do it themselves. They waste so much of our lives, something needs to be done here legally. Dr. Pay, they need to be fired. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We have two final speakers, Casey Wolbert, followed by Terry Reigns. Good evening, council. My name is Casey Wolbert. I'm currently the chairman of the planning commission. I just want to touch base on a couple things. The reason we are here on the Monday night is actually the direct result of confusion and chaos that is displayed on a regular basis by this governing board as clearly demonstrated already here tonight. We the people demand more from our elected leaders. We demand that logic and reason far outseed the individual political or personal goals of any individual. You are public servants and as such the duty to be informed and educated on city business is paramount. But tonight's midst of information meeting is merely distraction from the real miss information in my opinion. And the real miss information, well, let's get into that. Tonight you're gonna spend time informing residents that mobile home parks are effectively protected class of zoning and protected by California law and they're not going to be part of any kind of redevelopment. But the actual misinformation that's happening is suggesting to the public that re-zoning the city for any kind of mixed use in certain areas is going to ultimately leave our city with control over development when it likely won't. Now that may have been true prior to 2019 when 2016 came out and we were creating some of these plans. But because of 2019 and the laws created by SB 330, the city will have almost no control over its development if we are not careful and don't create something that and use a tool that we have effectively and that's specific Plans that is the only tool left in our arsenal to actually try to control what is done in our city specific plans are super important Any builder at any point in time can take any land use or anything that you zone and develop cheap low-income housing with density bonus law on any zoning property Anywhere in the state by right and there's nothing a planning commission or a city council can do about it So you can spend a lot of time and a lot of money researching how rezone the city is gonna help when it likely won't Until specific plans are created for every area the big lots area area on Westminster, the ducts rink over off of Springdale. Those type of critical areas that predatory builders will come in and take over that land and buy right to build on it with no input from anyone in the city is a huge problem. That's the misinformation that I feel is going on here and I urge the city council that 21 days out from an election, you stop voting on city planning issues that cause chaos in the city that it be retained for the next council that comes up. So that way we're not pushing an agenda or making it look like an agenda is being pushed by one side or the other or all council members. Take your time slow down do what's right for the rest of the residents thank you. Our next speaker is Tim Hogan followed followed by your final speaker, Terry Reigns. Good evening. I didn't expect to speak this evening, but I wanted to address an issue in terms of just the structure of the meeting, which may help us to solve some of these problems. For one, I work with two lawyers and I have one of his retired action. I just want to remind you that if you want to touch on this. This is specifically about how the structure of the meeting here can affect the way that these issues are brought up. Okay. But it's also related to the topic today with the we start. I'm on the topic in the sense. Yeah, I just want to describe the structure. If I may, there has to be a way. There has to be a way to bring some kind of control into this. When they disappear like this, I'm not being served. I'm supposedly this person's district, you know, I'm not being served. So there's got to be some way to do it. Both of those lawyers tell me that it definitely can be done. You just have to have the structure within the government here. The second one has to do with the meeting itself. I would suggest that we put together something like a Zoom meeting so that down the side over here, we can see each one of you. So we can see when a seat is empty. We can see when somebody is just playing with their phone or or senselessly filming people. If we do that, then it brings an accountability to the to the to the city council and accountability on these issues and accountability on how they're behaving and accountability to us. So if we could come up with something like that, I'll chip in a few bucks to buy those cameras myself if that's what it takes. And I'm certain that there's plenty of people here in the city that will do that. But we have to have some kind of an accountability so that we know when we're being served, and we're not being served now, we're not being served when we have to come in for special meetings like this, to explain what was explained to us just a month ago. I mean, it's a sad state of affairs. Thank you. Our final speaker is Terry Rains. The scope of this meeting must be limited to discussion and providing direction to staff on how to correct the misinformation of the infamous eviction notice flyer and decide how to get that correct information out to the community as soon as possible in English, Spanish and Vietnamese. Just stop with the BS political press conferences. Please, Amy N. Kwan and Joseph pivoted their usual, their visual props and presentation at yesterday's press conference. Maybe they finally realized the map they were obsessing over had nothing to do with In the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same time, the same housing element and phase one of the zoning text amendment housing overlay were approved. Amy Namp-Quant and Joseph have no friggin clue what a general plan is, a specific plan is, what a housing element is, what arena allocation is, and most importantly, that state law controls how all of these are created and implemented. Assistant City Manager Adolfo Azeta, the subject matter expert deserves a medal for maintaining his patience and professionalism while explaining the facts to the two morons over and over again at the last meeting without losing his ship. A dog flow you are a saint the abuse of staff by the two obstructions must stop I will fervently support any employer group of employees who decide to sue the shit out of Amy and Namquan Namquan wasn't on the diester in the entire discussion of the feasibility study on the 11th. He left at 9.06 pm and didn't return from that little break until 11.29 pm, two and a half hours later. Amy left a few times, but even being present, she clearly doesn't listen or understand anything. They never read their agenda packets and usually avoid standing meetings with city leadership to assist them with questions about the agenda packet. If they attended every council meeting and stayed on the damn dyes, maybe they would understand more now their little P brain simply can't process information. The general plan was adopted in 2016 with Tree Taw as mayor and the puppet master Tyler dip was on council. Dip taught these two out of B obstructionist. He ditched that meeting where the general plan was adopted and often was absent or late to council meetings same at Midway City. page 217 of the general plan quote, at the time of a general plan adoption the Northwest District is a large mobile home community. This area provides a unique opportunity to create a large scale development should existing mobile home transition over time. Significant lot consolidation would be needed in order for this area to see long-term land use transition. Additionally, the closure of mobile home communities is influenced by local and state regulations aimed at protecting the rights of mobile home tenants. Before any changes could be made to the property, significant outreach and coordination with residents of the community would be required. Unquote. The city must mail an official letter ASAP, not a mail it because it will get tossed with campaign crap. In all three languages to all mobile home park residents and management with the correct and factual information, hopefully the cost can be recouped through legal action against the perps. No, no, amen, thatone go to hell. Thank you. I didn't know what's going on. Mayor, we received one more speaker cards from Kiteau. Sorry, you can cross out. I was going to need a translator, but I guess the ones available. Well here we are again, like I said, all this commotion, press conference and talking about you said here. Scotion of misinformation related to the misuse analysis related to strategic plan goals and objectives. I guess you want to pin this on the Amy Fun West, the Councilwoman or Namguan and no fandom Namguan. But I guess you never see any thoughts on yourself or your group. To me, this is all about campaigning. You guys, this is the misuse, misuse of your position. You don't have any press conference, just Amy, Fun West, and I'm going to hold a press conference. What about yourself? All this conference, all this press, all this releases, all this discussion, you two releases, all this discussion, YouTube being, you're going to YouTube, you're going on YouTube, accusing others of things that, you know, a certain mayor shouldn't be doing on YouTube. See, this is a shame. And I feel ashamed, you know, you're crony. This is all about cronyism. You guys trying to position yourself to try to get the majority. So after the election, either one of your groups kind of have the majority, right? To run the city the way you think you can run it, you own it. You're going to be king of the hill king of Westminster You guys is groaning of Michelle still You's groaning of Sean still I just want to remind you you are one of the candidate, too So you you must not About any one of them or talking about anyone of the candidates. Oh, okay. He's not talking about this campaign. Oh, yeah. I'm talking about that. Yeah. You're talking about any campaign, any for anyone. I'm not talking about for her. Right. So please. And he's not campaigning for someone. Let me just clarify. So if a candidate is coming up here and campaigning for office. That's not allowed. If it's criticizing the government, the general thing that anybody can do, then that's okay. Thank you, sir. I'm just saying you guys are a bunch of cronies. You know, just trying to campaign for Michelle Steele using the money coming from Sean Steele. And you guys trying to install your crony to have the majority of the city council. Either one of the YouTube groups going to win, still going to be Michelle Still's chrony. I'm going to call you out on that. Mr. Manzo, I hope you remember that. And I guess we're counting on you to defend know, to defend the city here from this chronicism. And it's shame of him to compare himself to Golden Game. He's not worthy to be more than Golden Game. Compared to Golden Game, nepotism, nepotism, you're trying to install your relatives to be your co-counsel. That's nepotism. You have no place. You have no comparing yourself to Golden Yem. Such a shame. So either way, we're going to record and I'm going. There's no way we shall still gonna run the city Me are we have no further speaker cards You then we're done All right, thank you very much for taking your time out and express your opinion At this time I think that the council can have the brief comments I just said the brief comment. I just said that brief comment, not taking so long about this. Number one, I want to restate it again. If you have the interpreter and you have the right to use the six minute. If you miss use yourself, I can't control the time that you want to speak. But if you misuse your time, then it's your fault. I will not extend beyond the six minutes. And this is not new. This has been going on for years now. So it's not newly developed or newly grew policy. As you can see also that the second people they come up they also have only used only three minutes instead of six minutes. The second one is to answer to SEPNO and very disappointed as a traffic commissioner that he doesn't understand what's going on. What he said is what he's trying to present to us is something that totally, totally ignores about the issues that we're talking about. Once again, we are not saying anything. We are not discussing anything about the mobile homes. That is what I want to make sure that we, and he has to understand, this is just a study. What is study means? If he doesn't know what study means, then he better go back and learn what is study. There is no law required us to have meeting with, or which meeting with the community before we do this study. We have a number of studies over the years and that what it means. As I said that starting from this meeting, I will call for a lesson break or a break in mid-o so people can use the time wisely for themselves. Can I make this a trick? Comment? No, not yet. I'm still speaking. I am still speaking. I am still speaking. Not a problem. All right. Get the hell here. Please, please, please. So with that, I want to mention that I will do what I promised before we continue of the meeting, but I want to go to each and everyone. Council here if you have the pre-comment about the public comments. I think you want to go. Let's. Okay, thank you, Mr. Mayor. So earlier, my goal was, V was talking about that we are wasting time of the city and being irresponsible. I just want to make it clear who called for the meeting the mayor did. And this, supposed to talk, and also we, Namguang Councilman Nambguang and I, I can I can I can I can Mr. Mayor there are. Can I stop you from in the description in the chair? No, just understand. Can you please address? And I stop you for a minute please. Mr. Mayor, I have a floor. Can I stop you for a minute please? May I finish? No. Yes, I do. I have a thought for a minute. Please. You just have five minutes. Now the time keep going. No, no, no, no, no. Let me tell you this. Mr. Mayor, my hand is right. Sorry. Let me explain. Okay. Mr. Mayor, I have the phone. I'm not. I'm not. I'm not. No. Then you can speak. Let me tell you. Let me tell you. Just tell us. At this time here we are not going with the five minutes. So basically the mayor has five minutes. And now he's not going to have my five minutes. So there's no big time. And if it does there if there are no five minutes already and now there's no time for there's no time for the pretty crazy. Do you guys see it the public should I should I would you so the mayor just got five minutes to explain Briefly and now I don't have city attorney. Okay brief response this is all According police why don't you say it? Yeah? If you're responding to public comment then we're under the law. You're allowed a brief response So it's that's as much as we're allowed to do Okay, may I finish? I have the floor. Thank you. So what I was saying is that the council, last council meeting, as you guys understand, Namguang and I walk in as an urgent agenda to recent 5.2, but the three council here, the mayor, Vice Mayor Kimberly Ho and Carlos Monzo voted to not recent to take out the mobile home park and start talking about, or at least discuss about it. We brought it up twice, one at the beginning for walk in and the second time was to put it on the agenda for the next meeting. And obviously, the thing is that they vote no. So we give them a lifeline and we throw them the lifeline to redeem them. So because we understand everyone make mistakes, right on their votes. But that was the two action that they can redeem themselves and re-send the agenda 5.2. So in that way, the public and the mobile home park can have a safer. That's all we're asking. Let the community, let the homeowner, and the mobile home park people have a safe first. Before you come with the plan, rezoning the area and rezoning and change the general plan. I think that's unacceptable. So I want to make sure you understand that, Michael. Thank you. And then the other thing is. Yes, the other thing is. The other thing is, I see that it's very sad that I know the senior citizens and most of them live in the mobile home park. And it's very sad that they don't give the people the voice first. Because those senior citizens are on a fixed income, some of them are on disability. And they cannot pay for if it's redeveloped to those town homes. It's going to cost them about what, four, five, $6,000 a month, how can they pay for that guys? So we have to be concerned. That's a member, yes, that's a member, yes. Have a say. for that guys so we have to be concerned. Councilmember West, councilmember West. Councilmember West. Councilmember West. Councilmember West. Councilmember West. Thank you Mr. Mayor. This is a separate comment to respond to the public comment. Not to discuss about the item. We can wait until the time that we are for Council discussion then we can do that. I understand I just answered. Please. That's all. Thank you. Thank you. It's anything else from the council here? Not sure that we get to the facts, make sure that we're here to explain to the community the true facts about what's going on in the city. The true facts about the meeting of September 11, the true facts about what a general plan is, the true facts about what a specific plan is. The true facts about the process, not fake and fiction that peddling lies over here. So, thank you very much. At this time, I closed the old communications. So next is we are going to go into the discussion for the main reason of misinformation related to the mixed-use analysis related to strategic plan goals and objectives from September 11, 2020, the 4CD Council meeting. Also, the item 5.2 was called as a study section of public hearing. So I stated what I stated being already at this time. I would like to open up for the council to comment about it. Let me go around. Let me start with this time with Vice Mayor Hall. Okay. First of all, I would like to ask you really quickly, City Clerk, on 9-11 item 5.2. Who were present during that time? 9-11, 5.2. So while you pull that information up, I'd like to, I will, once you have it, let me know, okay? So You know, here's the thing is that I believe this is a tactic that they have they are using to win the election and I'm it's really sad because it's not you know, it shows that number one is lack of care. I think that they use the senior citizens who occupy these mobile home parks. They do so without in regard for their livelihood. Many of them showed up at the City Hall crying. They're very upset, but these guys think it's funny and that it's going to continue to put the blame on us. But number one is that it's number one is, I'd have to say, it's their lack of understanding. But okay, so that's initially, I said it's lack of understanding, go back and maybe talk to the city manager, have a sit down with her and go over and understand what you don't understand. But then I really feel like, okay, I don't think that's the case because when we bring it up like today, you know, for special meeting, we have to like cut our day short, our work day short just to be here. And Nam Kwan left and this lady left and so, and then the person who was who wrote or passed around that letter, that flyer, left as we are not even finished discussing. So if he really, really want to know the truth, then he would stay here, listen to the people, understand and make the appointment with the city manager and really sit down and understand. Because I know I understand it's a lot. It's a lot to understand what you're new, okay? But I do believe that they do this on purpose. They wanna waste the people's time. They use you, they use the people as ponds, like is if they're playing chess game or something. So I'm saying, do you have that answer for me, Ms. Ashton, Aroto? What is it? I do, you guys may hear. So there is some that had left the dius and returned to the dius during the item. Councilman Fan-West returned when the item started. Council member Wynne left the dius as soon as the item started. There was Mayor Wynne left the dius and returned throughout. Councilwoman Fan-West left the dius and returned throughout and the only one that did not return during the item was a council member and went. Okay. So today you know that's the thing is like he really doesn't care, really doesn't understand, really really does not understand. I don't think you need me to convince you that the person, these people do not understand the agenda and nor do they understand what's going on here at City Hall for that matter. So I'm saying it's a waste of my time, waste of your time and the time of the people at home. I feel really really sorry for our city. So I ask Ms. Fan West and Ms. Nam Kwan when what part of this do you not understand 5.2 is not about a zonal change agenda 5.2 is not even about any mobile home parks 5.2 if I may you know if you do even do your homework, 5.2 is about in January, on January 24, 2024. The City Council as a whole approved an agreement with economic planning systems, EPS, to conduct an economic analysis, okay? And this is all relating to commercial area. Okay, so what part of this do you not understand? I am so disturbed by the fact that unqualified people are elected to serve. And to serve at this level as a stepping stone, she uses to twice run for a higher office and thank goodness she didn't get there twice. Okay. And so I'm just saying, please don't waste your time. Your time is up. Vice Mayor Ho. I would like to ask the council members to hold your thought about this question about this. As I promise at the beginning we are going to take a break for the recess for five minutes so that we can take a break for the rest of the break or whatever. And I do what I promise. So I will take the five minute recess. And then we come back. At this, the time now is five, 30, I mean, 35. Please get back here. Six, 45, please. Thank you. Five minute recess. I'm going to recognize a council member, Mendoel, for your comments. So we just, just to clarify before you started, we just read comments. No, no, no, we are done with oral communications. So we just just to clarify before you start which is three comments were that were. No, no, we are done with oral communications. At this time we are in the discussion. So you have five minutes to discuss about it. If we are in the comments section, there is no need to have five minutes. I mean, it's just a brief comment. So at this time here, you have five minutes and we go for first round. And if needed to, we can go for second round And if need more time then we go, you know, we need the Majority of council decision. Okay, so you are now recognized for the five minutes. Thank you mayor Well, first of all I want the community to know and especially the media that you're out here in the front in the back I mean my main concern We're all this is a resident of these mobile home parks and that's it There are being there and all this nonsense. They are the victims They are the victims and all this and in anybody who's watching this That is connect that understands what's going on, is simply it's just political gain in using innocent people's mental health to gain. So that is my main concern, and what I want is to make sure that the residents get the facts straight. So I want to make sure, in no way, shape or form, that I want to put our staff in the middle of any of this nonsense. Because they're the ones actually also victims of this, especially our system city manager, Adolfo. Because I've known a lot of people in my life and I've known Adolfo for great some time since being on the panic commission even prior to that. I mean he's somebody that I know that has the utmost integrity that I've ever seen. So he really bothers him that he was his character, his integrity was attacked on our last meeting. And that is not something that I'm going to stand for and I am not going to forgive. So, um. I actually want to then to understand during that September 11 meeting, at any time that we ever discuss or mention anything about mobile homes at all. So you're asking me, sir? Yes, I am asking. So the item that was discussed on September 11th was brought to you and it was an effort by staff and a consultant. Leading up during the study as the study was finalized and then when it was presented to this council during the entire months process, not once, zero times, zero seconds was spent discussing mobile home parks. Okay. And I said, we refresh my memory if this was during one of our study sessions that we were speaking about, you know, like our, what do we want to focus on for areas of, you know, feasibility study we had. And I know that we had multiple locations throughout the city, but we discussed specific plans. And can you remind me how many time, how many of those areas, that we, as I remember, there was more than one. There was quite a few areas that we spoke about. Correct. So as has been stated in the past, the general plan update of 2016 created mixed use districts. And as part of our strategic plan effort that the city manager brought forth to the city over the last three years, we have talked about the mixed use districts in a presentation format with the previous council once and with this council on May 10th. And on May 10th, we showed this council, eight and a half by 11 full page slides of each mixed use district. And at that time, there was discussion about mixed use district number or whatever has a mobile home park in it. This other one has a mobile home park in it. And that ultimately led to a prioritization of specific clients. And that was also, there was a receiving file action unanimously on May 10th to receive and file that report that covered these items. And what specific areas that we say, these are the ones we want to start with a specific plan to do a specific plan. I have the presentation from that night that Ryan can pull up so we can go to the priority list. I have the presentation from May 10th. I also have the presentation from September 11th, if anybody wants to refer to those. So Ryan's gonna hold those on. Excuse me. Mayor, you have turned his June of 12 seconds and you can go ahead and ask questions. And the presentation from the staff is different. Yeah, just answer those questions in which areas they were and also how we voted on that and also our housing element. What about our housing element that we address? Sure. So can we pull the presentation? Okay. At this time here, Brian, a big time for the presentation. Okay. It'll be, so I'm just going to hit on some slides that were brought up during this initial conversation. Can I just go back to hit on some slides that were brought up during this initial conversation. I should go back to all of them. All of them to one. So this is the present. Go back to the master one. The one that shows the citywide one. So the general plan map that is seen there, that's a product of 2016. Mayor Treetau, at the time, he was our mayor and that council adopted the general plan effort. There's a $1 million effort, extensive outreach, thousands and thousands of people, emails, text messages led to the development of the general plan update. And that's a legal document that's been filed with the state of California. Every city in California has to have a general plan. ours had lagged for almost 20 plus years and we adopted it in 2016. In that plan, we're six mixed-use districts. As you can see the slide at the bottom there, identify as one, two, three, four, five, six. And then what we did on May 10th, and we had done this previously, but May 10th is relevant because all of you here were present on May 10th. And now Ryan will just go through briefly. We zoomed in to each of these areas. As you can see, the top slide shows one. The bottom slide shows a zoomed in area. District one, as you can see to the bottom, there is a mobile park there. We talked about that on May 10th. Next one. District two, we call this the mixed use downtown. District three. Mixed use, this one's the mixed used, this one's also mixed use corridor. District four, we all know the mall site. District five is Bolsa. Several mobile home parks identified here. And with the statement that was made on May 10th is that we were going to not do a specific plan that includes mobile home parks. We said that. We said similar to the way Bolsa row was a project specific plan that provided some of the protections we were looking for and developed a really nice project. We're looking at other owners along here, not mobile home parks, to fund their own specific plans. Six is entirely a mobile home park and I pointed that out during the presentation. Now the prioritization that this council received and filed is the next slide and this is the list of them so we we broke up The district to into two that's why it came up twice and I vividly remember vice mayor Host saying that we got a name at something different because it's a little confusing the way it's named and we agreed that when we actually go and Do the outreach do the environmental studies for each of these that we would name it appropriately, let the whole world know that there's a study that's going to take place. We also stated that you can't do all these at once because they just confused the whole world and we don't have the money for that. No city has the money to do every specific plan at the same time. So this list was presented, along with the exhibits I just displayed, and it was a receive and file action, unanimous receive and file for this. And this is the party list. I think that's where your statement is. You're the same one. We're president. Everyone voted on this all five. Who are everyone? The five of you. The five of you. The five of you. The vice mayor. The vice mayor. I'm sorry, I just want to quit. On May 10th, all of you voted to receive and file this item. The whole point was we had presented this mixed use district to the previous council. As part of our strategic plan, we have some new faces on the council. We wanted to make sure that they were brought on board and not surprised by anything. So we brought this almost same presentation again on May 10th. For the purposes of getting everybody's comments and there were no changes made. So with previous council had voted on this is the priority list. We are now moving forward towards trying to build out strategic specific plans for the downtown district. That's kind of where we're. That's our next step. Is that May 10, 20, 20? Right. May I ask, may I ask 20, 20, 20 to be, to be, may I ask the council, but your time is up already, by the way. May I ask the council, at this time, stop presenters with the presentation, and if you have a question, please note it out. Then, you know, when it's come to your turn for the second round, so you can route, then you can ask all of those questions. Please. So keep going with the question. I have one more point that I that was left. And it has to do with the housing element. The housing element was adopted by the city and ratified by HDL, housing development in Sacramento. It's a huge accomplishment to get your housing element adopted. For the Reena cycle, we all know about the Reena cycle. Sacramentos, essentially, expecting us to plan for a lot of residential in each of our cities throughout the state. There are a lot of cities that are nowhere near being able to deliver an adopted housing element. We are one of the half, less than half, I would just say. So we're very excited about that, because if we don't have a housing element adopted, then the builder's remedy kicks in, which essentially means that we have zero control, zero local control. So this is a huge thing that we have a housing element adopted. Now here's the main important point, because everything is about mobile home parks. And I've worked for 20 years to protect mobile home parks when they were almost going to be demolished by the four or five projects. I take this very seriously. It would have been easy for us, easier for us to meet the arena numbers by putting housing in these mobile home parks. Zero additional housing was placed in our housing element in mobile home parks. Zero additional housing was placed in our housing element in mobile home parks. Zero. They were not included. They were not included in the housing element and it's still got adopted because of the good work of the staff of the City of Westminster to deliver the general plan update for the mall. Another. Thank you. Thank you for your presentation, Mayor. Go ahead. At this time, I would like to recognize Coach Member West. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Okay, so Namguang and I, we stand by our words. What we said are true and the evidence speaks for itself, and they do not lie. And so, May, can you Ryan open to this map right here that you guys present on September 11th? Which is also in our agenda today. On agenda 5.2, September 11th. Okay, so while you do that, I'm gonna read. So District 4 on this map, there's Mission Bill Amal, Mobile Home Park, 9702, Bosa Avenue, Westminster, California 92683. There's about 195 housing units there. Approximately 780 people will be displaced. Rage and Sea, Village, Mobile Home Park at 1511, Boshar Street, Westminster California, 214 housing unit in that area. Approximately with this plan that the majority of the council approved, 856 people will be displaced. Rancho Doso, 9851, Boca Avenue, Westminster, California. There is 181 housing unit. Basically approximately 724 people will be displaced. Ken Sington Gardens at 9800 Bosa Avenue, Westminster, 145 housing unit there, and approximately 580 people will be displaced. For district two, the Green Lanter Village Mobile Home Act, 14352 Boulevard, Beach Boulevard, Westminster, have 133 housing unit. There will be about 532 people will be displaced for district one, Los Aliso State, 5772 Garden Grove Boulevard, Westminster. They have about 586,000 unit, about approximately 2,344 people will be displaced. And those were was mobile home estate at the dress 13100 Melanie Lane, Westminster. The 456 people will be displaced. Approximately a total of 6,244 people will be displaced when the majority of the council, Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Carlos Manzo voted for this plan that was presented on September 11th. And they'd never talk about the mobile home park that's in this area was given to us on the dius at last minute on in a folder. And when I look at it and I check with Google map at the address and I say, wow, where's this mixed use area that they're going to do? Is this potential expansion of mixed use district? These are the mixed use that was never talked about. And I go, wait, wait, hold the horses. Let's have the people have a safe first. Let the people, the owners, home owners, resident, businesses around that area have a safe first before we approve tonight. Because what's the approval? Can you pull the page where it says approve action will take if we approve it tonight? That's the last page on that slide. Ryan, it's on the last page of the slide on September 11th. I don't know what you, I can't feel what she's showing. Okay, it says if the action is approved, they will go ahead and rezone those areas. Oh my god. You saw the map. That is not right. Please, please. Can you go to the floor and then let the whole finish up. Can you stop the call? Thank you. It will, um, it will basically, she's just interrupt my thought. That's exactly what they want. So basically it says that it will automatically have staff and the consulting to go ahead, rezone those areas that you saw on the map, right? And then the other thing is, whenever we do any rezoning, we need the input of the public and in 2016 they have the input of the public because it's brought to the attention of the people that live in those two mobile home area green lantern and Los Aliso. Right now you look at this mix use is total of six mobile home part. There's four in Bosa area district four, Bosa area. There's one green lantern in district three. There's two in district one my area, Los Aliso and Los Robles and Those are the people that will be affected the most so it's important to have the people have a safe first Your time is up the Customs of the West and retain if you have any further question, but at this time I would like to have the stop respond to that. Absolutely. So, actually, if you could, if you don't have to be... As City Clerk, if you could please put back the illustration that was first reference. Yeah, go back to the store, start off with the illustration. So when technical studies are put together, each technical study can't ignore previous studies. You're building a story, you're building an narrative. Past information is important. The, I'll call it the purple areas. Those areas are the areas that I just showed you that you've all seen several times. The title here, and I will say one more time, on the six mixed use areas, in the three years that I've been a part of the City Manager's Office, and I can go back to 20 years I've been here. We have never discussed redeveloping mobile home parts, and we didn't during the study. We didn't in 2016, and we didn't during the study. We didn't in 2016 and we didn't during the study. Those six areas are there as a reference, meaning that they happened in 2016. That's it. Not one penny of consultant time was spent looking at mobile home parks in any of these areas. What this slide is about, I need to go ahead. I'm just wondering if could this be translated into Vietnamese? This is a very critical part. Do we have to do our part? We do. Because the whole purpose is to make sure that the elderly have good, nice leaves. They're coming to us crying. We don't have a translator right now. You're off translation? I don't want to counsel it with Jambsley again, but I don't want to translate it myself. I want somebody if somebody wants you from their audience. Mr. Long, can you? Long, Mr. Long. You want to understand. Mr. Long, can you translate for the request from the Vice Mayor Hall? With the long, you are sitting at the end there. I know that you are capable to accept the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . several times they're just referencing the 2016 areas. That's it. This present dish, this slide is showing you what was there in 2016 in the color purple. And then as part of the analysis, we looked at commercial districts in the city. Some of these commercial districts are next to the original districts. That's why it's an expansion. And that's as simple as I can put it. There was zero discussion on numbers of mobile home parks, number of parks. I don't even know how many mobile home parks are in the city because we've never talked about mobile home parks. We simply said if we want to focus on the top left corner, in that mixed use area, you have a property adjacent to it. That's a commercial property that's dilapidated that could benefit from mixed use expansion. That would be in this particular case, the ice palace, the ice frink area. And if you look at the other areas in here that are blue, these are the areas we're looking at expanding. That's where our staff spent time looking at opportunities. We did not spend time looking at opportunities in mobile home parks. We did not. Period. Period. Now if we go to the last slide, I don't know how we get approval out of this last slide. Further analysis and refinement. Staff? City Manager has a very limited amount of authority when it comes to policy? That's your job. This slide simply says we're going to bring back more information so that Council can further understand the next step. This is not an approval because there is no project. This wasn't publicly noticed. This didn't go through the planning commission. We're not asking for anything other than, did you read the study and do you support the study? Do you want us to keep looking at economic development opportunities in the city? That's it. There is no approval. I don't see an approval on any of these bullets, so I don't understand how I can answer that last statement. So nobody's going to be, nobody's getting evicted. Nobody's being evicted. We've never looked at mobile home parks. We've never discussed it now for one second in the last three years that I've been with City Manager's office. So once again, I just want to remind you that I want to be fair across the board. Make sure that you note it out. The question and then we can go next at this time. I think that answers the questions I will pose. All right, Councilwoman. Okay. It's going to be me before Councilmember Nambuwan. First of all, I just want to come back at the last meeting. I know that you are doing the work for the City of Westminster and your credibility is very important to the city. And at the last meeting, we have no opportunity to discuss about it because it wasn't merchandise. And so we have to brief about it. But at the same time, when I asked you the question, is it related to mobile homes park? Did we discuss that item 5.2? Anything related to mobile home parks? And I know that you respond to that and then also it's surprised to me that the council member West call you a liar. It's very important for you to clarify yourself today. What do you want to say about it? Well, I will say I was taken back by that. I received many phone calls from colleagues all over Southern California that unfortunately saw that play out and all I can say is that my reputation is everything and when my services are no longer needed at the city I'll be happy to move on. It's that simple. My answer that day was there are no pending projects that involve mobile home parks as part of the September 11 study period. Period. Period. There's no discussion, there's no projects. There's been zero analysis focusing on mobile home parks. I am asking that question again. I know that we repeated a number of times. There's no discussion about mobile home parks at the 5.2 study session. Study public hearing. Every document you see in the presentation was presented in the agenda report. All of the exhibits were in the attachment, which is the entire technical study. There isn't another version of that study. It was attached to the September 11th agenda. If a certain illustration doesn't look familiar, then that means that the report wasn't read as thoroughly as it possibly should have been read. That's that simple. With that, I can tell that you are not a liar as a council member will call you. Okay. Thank you very much. The buyers are up there. Now, in 2016 adopted, you mentioned about two or three parks, more home parks was adopted as a mix use. Mr. Mayor. I am sorry, right now is my time, okay, please. You're the chair, so there's disruption. That's okay, if you serve me, okay. In 2016, the server parks that was adopted by, as a mixed use area, by whom? Can you identify who was the mayor at the time and then all the council members on the board? Sure, it was like I stated before, it was a $1 million investment by the city to program and deliver a new general plan update. And it was a multi-year process that involved stakeholder groups, outreach, events at the mall that brought out thousands of people. We won an award for outreach by the American Planning Association because it was that extensive of an effort as a two-year effort, I believe. So in 2016, and it was championed, it was championed by two council members by the mayor, Treeta. And I don't know what is official title was at the time, but it was Sergio Contreras. May have been mayor Pro Tem, but those are the two individuals. And it was unanimously approved by them, Diana Carey, and Margie Rice was also on it. And Tyler was on it. I can't remember the exact vote, but it was adopted under that council. Okay, I have one minute left and I just want to make sure with you to you answer to the people Residents at the mobile home parks or own or live in the home home parks It was very surprised to me when I heard that councilmember West that said the total of 6,000 two hundred because before people will be displaced From the mobile home mobile home park. What do you talk about? What do you say about it? Well, the city has no authority to evict anybody. I never studied. We never studied. We don't know the numbers of people in mobile home parks. Mobile home parks are overseen by the state of California for the most part. We're there for emergency service response and they tend to govern themselves. So we are not planning anything in any of these mobile home park areas in the city. Thank you very much. I just want to let you know I have 12, 11 second, but remember when I asked the question and the staff answered the question, it's also going to my time, but that that's okay I don't have any problem with that so my time. I can use my time. I just will put it in Vietnam. Yes, because so we're moving from West to South, okay? Just don't interrupt me. You do say. Shhh. and the Ministry of Justice, Kimberley Ho. This week, a group of experts have been working to help the Ministry of Justice to develop the city. This week, the Ministry of Justice will continue to develop the Ministry of Justice, Kimberley Ho. The last question is, the Ministry of Justice, Kimberley Ho, and the Ministry of Justice, Kimberley Ho, have repeatedly asked the Ministry of Justice to help the Ministry of Justice to develop the city. The government has been working hard to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to make a decision to The and to ensure that every single person in the West Minister is able to listen. We have asked the staff of the government to provide this kind of information. We have asked the government to keep the government's support and support to ensure that the government will be able to help and support the government's support and support the government's support and support. We have asked the government to provide support to the government and I still have two minutes left. I just want to address the allegations that Koso Kimberli Ho and Carlos Manzo just said that we are wasting people's time. I just want to make it clear that this emergency meeting was going to be a very difficult time. I just want to make it clear that this emergency meeting was called by G. Challengwen, not us. And tonight, I have to back my babysitter to look after my two kids and they have to skip their swimming class and their martial arts class for me to attend this meeting. So that's the same. Okay, so whatever that came to you guys and then you come for the emergency meeting, this is the meeting that I am expecting for the next two weeks. I only talk about this. I try to talk you guys into this. We're going to have a meeting like this discussion. And you guys three times voted it now. Am I right? That's correct. So then you are always talking about saving the money for the city. And then you are wasting the time and the money on this kind of what a necessary meeting. They're covering the track. So it's just like you are good. Yes, you are right. You just have this meeting to cover enough your butt. Man, this is sort of shame. That's why I count you idiot and stoop it, man. Okay, I give up my 15, that's it. That's exactly quote from, there's not you, it's a real, not recognized at this time. I ask you already, please, You've chatted me in several times. I restated the reason why we have this special meeting at the beginning. I'm the need to go back and talk about it. And this is very urgent for the people who are vulnerable living in the seniors who are living in the mobile home spark. And we need to make sure that we calm them down in the seniors who are living in the mobile homes park. And we need to make sure that we calm them down and let them know that they're safe about it. And there is no misunderstanding. So that's what's the reason why we call this meeting. And I think it's at a place. Hold on. It's my turn. I'm still talking. OK, I am running this meeting, not you. Please. Hold on. So I just want to let you know that what it is. And it's been repeated a number of times today. Now we can go for the second time because people still want to discuss about it. And I believe that Council Member Menzel want to go before you. So I recognize Council Member Menzel first. Mayor, thank you. What we have here, anybody can see what we have here, it's just political stunts. But we're not going to waste any more time on that. We've said enough staff has explained it as clearly as can possibly be to an adult person. So there's nothing out anymore clear that you can explain it. I just want to, at this time, I want to make sure, like I said earlier, my concern is the residents of these mobile home parks and their mental health and make sure that they feel secure and nothing they're not going to be displaced as these folks are saying. So I wanna make, right now I'll make a motion to have staff process and produce a press release explaining, explaining I'm speaking right now, so I'm gonna interrupt you. This is what I wanna have, make sure that- Can't make a motion right now, right? I can make a motion. We haven't done this discussion. I'm making a motion, I'm making a motion. It's my five minutes. Is that correct, Mr. Mayor? Can we make a motion? May I ask you to go ahead and wait a minute? No, I have to make a motion. Okay, go ahead and make a motion. I can make a motion. My motion is to have staff to press release, explaining it, and also to make sure the residents of these mobile home parks to make sure our staff nails a letter Explain the facts of what's going on those are what my motion is going to be because my concern is the residents And make sure that they are not being used as but they're not pawns and some political stun and make sure that their mental health Is is taking care of and it's protected So those are my motions that I want us to do mental health is taking care of and is protected. Those are my motions that I want us to do. And that is a responsible thing as a city that we make our residents are secure and protect our residents. So we need to make sure that they're getting the correct information. And I think that's the responsible thing for a city to do. So that's my motion, That's what I want to do I don't I don't need to call for the second at this time because I want to go ahead and I Recognize your motion, but I want to go ahead and finish the second round at this time. I recognize Councilmember West go ahead ahead, five minutes please. We set the clock to five minutes please. Madam Clerk. So basically, I know that eminent domain, it's only used when it's necessary, the last resort, right? It's like a nuclear bomb. And it's a tool that when a city feel that there's a threat, they use eminent domain. So the law allowed the city and state and local agency to have power to use eminent domain for public benefits. And that's the only time that they can do it. When it's qualified for public benefit, like bringing tax dollars to the city, then when they come to the court, of course, the city will have that power of eminent domain in those mixed use area. So let me give you an example for the city of Garden Grill. Remember the time when they want to take advantage of Disneyland and use the outer corridors to make it a tourist corridor. And garden from Garden Grove and Catella off of Harbor, which you see right now, a lot of hotels, you know, shopping mall and everything to beautify it. And what they use in Garden Grove was eminent domain. And those were private properties and homes in those areas and they use that because they say if we use Disneyland As a tourist attraction off of harbor then basically that will bring taxes tax to the city and that will benefit the public So therefore they got approved so those people home owners were misplaced this place for sure 100% if you talk to any of them they were moved out okay with an imminent domain so that's what happened so the government can use that and now the thing is that we have to think about this those people on that map okay because of course staff is correct. They didn't discuss that on September 11th of that map or the mobile home that is on that map. It's because they want to pass it through to change the zoning ASAP because they have the majority vote here. And for me, I want to make sure there's transparency and let the people have a say. And I keep begging for that. Now, the thing is that we must understand the people that live in those mobile homes park. They have to move out when M and M domain is applied. So we have to remember those people who are on a fixed income, they're sick, elderly, and they get money from social security and disability. And the quality of life for them will be diminished because they live and they choose those mobile home park. They sell their homes to go to those mobile home park because it's closer to their Buddha temple, their churches, their shopping mall, and the areas that they can go for coffee or whatever it is, the community. That's why they live there for a reason. And if the city does eminent domain, then they have to be kicked out. For the purpose of bringing more tax into beautify, but they, the city have to deem that area as plight zone, that they can do eminent domain. And that's the only thing, and I don't appreciate that. And I think it's important to be transparent and to have the public, the people in the resident have a safe verse. If you look on that map, that map go all the way from one end of Westminster to the other, and it overlaps a lot of single homes as well. And not only that, those businesses. So they don't have a say. There need to be a say for them. And we will continue, Nam Kwon and I, Councilman, will continue to fight for the people to have a say in the businesses and the stakeholder in the city of Westminster. So the thing is that I want to give an example to the other most common eminent domain is when they want to expand a few freeway through your home area that's happened a lot through government, through the city. We've seen that in an intimate domain through those freeway expansion. But also I just want to mention to the three of them, the three of you guys, the Mayor Charlie, Vice Mayor Ho and Mr. Monzo, you guys passed that plan. And you keep telling us why we were making a big deal of it and why we're scaring the resident. Let me tell you, listen, this is a first step in every project and this is the first concrete step that was taken in September on September 11th and this first step, the three of you had taken is completely wrong. The residents deserve to know and that we are lurking them to this issue. The people will be misplaced, this place, and the thing is that you guys don't really care. The time is up because we're in the West. Audience as well as customer members, I hope that we are going to, you know, conclude this meeting pretty soon because I think it's very much that we can, we think so about it, it's very clear, it's transparent. I just hope that we can finish so you can go back. But before that, I know that the Councilmember West brought up something is not related, it's something that I don't think even need to bring it up here about imminent domain. I'd like to ask the city attorney to clarify this for us. Yeah, we have to be careful in utilizing that term eminent domain because what we're talking about here with the planning, these are more zoning type decisions. Eminent domain is a process where if the city requires land and they need to obtain ownership of the land, then they're entitled to do that if they have a proper governmental use for it. And then they're required to pay fair market value, just compensation for it. And then the city can take it So if they're building the freeway and they need land for the freeway they can literally take your property But they have to pay you for it too. That's not what we're talking about here and we have to be careful not to use Emanut domain and talk about the fact that we're allegedly using it because People would be worried that there's no discussion going on here that we're allegedly using it because people would be worried that, there's no discussion going on here that we're gonna take people's mobile home parks or any other land. This is, there's nothing to do with that. This is talking about a zoning decision, which is where the city's not actually taking someone's property there, designating the uses that are allowed on that property. So the general plan is the primary document in the city, and then we have zoning underneath that specific plan in between that. But these are not things where the city is taking ownership of this land. We're basically setting forth a use that is allowed there, and then whoever owns that property can then redevelop that property and accordance with that zoning that we've established. It's their decision. They get to decide what they're going to do with that property or not do with that property. That's kind of what we're talking about here. Not talking about taking somebody's property from them. It's important because we don't want to think that we're doing that. There's actually legal liability there if we start indicating that we're going to take someone's property. So that's why it's important that we clarify that. Thank you very much for the clarifications. This time I'd like to call customer win if you want to go for a second round. I have to write to move around. Sure. Sure. I would say that, you know, it's very clear. Okay. If you want to go first. You can. You go ahead. You go ahead. Go. No. It's Mayor's prerogative. He runs the show. Go ahead, please. All right. Staff, can you pull up the maps that you just show? I'll go ahead, please. All right. Staff, can you pull up the maps that you just show? Council member West. All right. Thank you. All right. For the residents that leave, that currently living in the mobile homes park, I just want you to know that the pink color that you see on the maps, that included every single mobile homes park that you are living in. So that's, if you see the legend Robbie right at the left corner I'm just talking facts here okay that's the areas currently designated mix use is that true I'm asking staff is that true are you asking if every mobile home park in the city is no I mean like right here the mobile home park in the city is... No, I mean, like right here, the mobile home park that included in the pink car. So, am I right or wrong? There are, I'm not gonna answer right or wrong. I'm gonna explain my answer. No, no, no, I'm talking about this. Is it an excuse? Is that the designated mixed use? Those mobile homes park that you see on the maps. So, okay, if you don't want to answer the question, I just need to answer the map. So the map speaks for itself. You're asking me a yes or no question. No, no, no. That's all right. Okay, I don't need your answer anymore. He wants to So the map, speak for itself. Okay, so I want the resident to look at this map that this is a lantern, Green Lanterns mobile home park. Okay, so I don't want you guys one day for one day then your mob home park going to turn into this this high density building And then you have nowhere to go that's garden growable over Lantern I have my time I have my time. It's a card in the blue world. Right. Is that the end? Please, please, please, please, Mr. Levin. We can respond to that later and let him finish. Hold on, please. All right, so let's get back to the map. Can I see the map one more time? All right, what I want to, the message to the resident that living in Moved Home Parks that you guys have to speak for yourself, because a woman from West and I, we can only do whatever that we can do here, but we are not the majority. We are the minority and whatever that, the super majority here decided we, the city, have to follow. So it's time that the residents, the people have to speak up. And you have my phone number, 714-589-7543. So that's my number. I'm currently getting signatures to, so yeah, just call my number. So I'm going to be there, talking, taking on the question that I you have Okay, so I still have a one minute and sixty six sixteen second. Okay, so I want to make a subsidy motion Let's not not yet I'm so you can go ahead make Go ahead and make sure to my're not going to make a motion then go ahead and make sure that my, but I'm going to get the second. I'm not going to let you go. But let's first see. Is there a second to the original motion? I don't know the. At this time here we still this question. It's okay to get a motion a second and then you can discuss whether you know because Because when I say, if I second it, I will make a modification to that. And I will recommend the modifications. Okay, so can I go back and make my motion? Go ahead and make yourself a motion. But we don't have a first motion, right? No, no, no. Okay. But is there a rule that a policy that we have to have the second for the first one before we substitute motion. Yes. Okay. So at this time here, if I can ask you to hold that so that we can go ahead and because you guys must not let me let me be clear. Okay, so lay down you can let me make my substitute motion. Yes. Okay. Yes. All right. Yes. After the subsidy motion. Yes, okay. Yes, all right. After the first motion. I'll return my motion. Second. Okay. You still have to turn six to a second. I don't want to do the interview. Can I take your note? No, you can't. You can't do that. Please. Yes. You have already let the second term. You have all the second time. You have all the facilities. No, Mr. City Attorney, Robbers rule that we can play the time. If we speak something different. Please. Please. Please. No, you can't. All right. At this time, please go ahead and stop the time for Councilmember Wynne. If you use it or you don't use it, it's right now. Why does the Robins need someone who can play, replay that? one if you use it or you don't use it as right now. Okay. Okay. Okay. Just want to repeat my number again. 714-589-7453. 714-589-7453. That's my direct number. Thank you. City Attorney, can you please answer? I want to get the ball right. Go ahead. No, we want legal rights. So City Attorney, you are not recognized this time. Okay, you are not recognized this time. You already have the second row. There are several people here have not got the second row. How can you claim your time when you use up five minutes? It's his time. No, you cannot. And I tell you I repeated, tell you. Please. No. At this time. Do you know Robert? Yes, I know. I know exactly. My right now I'm running the meeting, not you. So I ask you to refrain. You are not you to refrain speaking right now. You are not recognized at this time. No, that's what the problem is. All right. I give you the first, I will issue you the first one right now. Okay, go ahead. Attorney, what's the problem? Right? For? The City Attorney. I want to ask staff, follow up the question. Council member, when present with a map, it's kind of, to me, it's confusing. He was mentioned that it is a green lantern, but it's actually on the ground floor. Bolivar, is that, I want you to confirm that please So about that I have to work Yes, right now please so not not answering please I'm asking staff. Yes, it was not like a nice Tancy your question the board that was displayed by council member wind Was a property located near the intersection of Garden Grove, Boulevard, and Springdale. It is not Green Lantern, Mobile Home Park. All right, thank you very much. It's a commercial site. It's not a mobile home site. It's a commercial site. The odd information that they presented, all misleading, all wrong information, I can tell you right now. Okay, at this time, I would like to recognize, rise me a whole. Well, first I want you to say that, I guess you're making headway, and you're reading Robert's rule of conduct, prior to that, you didn't know anything, that's why your action was all over the place. You know, so it's good, you didn't know anything. That's why your action was all over the place. You know, so it's good. You're doing well. You're fine. So here, no one is being evicted. I just want to make it clear. A scare tactic is what is being used by the two. Amy Fan West and Namquan, you need to apologize to the residents of the Mobile Home Parks and all the residents because look they're not not all these people here from Mobile Home Parks. And I apologize for them because I know they're not going to do that. Apologize to Adolfo and And I know Adolfo for a long time now, since I was actually, I was on the traffic commission. And Adolfo was the one who actually gave me the orientation. I could never forget that. I thought, wow, what a good guy. And still, until this day, I feel so privileged to be working with you. Thank you, it's all fault. And I want to say, Miss Amy Fan West, you do a data dump as you do all the time. Information dump, I would say. You can't pronounce eminent domain. And so I know it's really hard for you. I don't know where you got that from. You don't understand it, but I think I'm glad our city attorney clarified it. So for you to think, for you to think, you know what you're saying. Tonight's special meeting, we are addressing fake news. This is all fake news and I'm so sorry. I apologize to the Vietnamese residents. I would like our YouTuber and I do have a lot of respect for our YouTuber, Lan Vu, and I know you understand English very well. So if you can report the news as the way it happened tonight, and I would like to, our residents to have peace, quiet, and mental health. I really feel bad, and that's why I agreed to come to this meeting. This meeting is all about making, if we didn't have these people going out there making fake news, we wouldn't need to clarify anything. My Saturday, yes, I agreed to come in and have that press conference at 9 in the morning, 9.30, 10 in the morning. And it lasted a couple hours and also to clarify, to make sure that the fake news is put to bed. But I know that they don't care because they just do the data dump. Nam Kwan was not even here when 5.2 was discussed. And she laughing and out and out and the person over there that candidate obviously wanting to be on this board and on this council. I am so sorry if that person ever makes it to this council to replace me. I will be the first one to apologize to you guys because we would have a mess. This council is going to be such a mess. And so why do you insist on making an issue of this mobile home park when it is a non-issue? I don't get it. So please, I know you talk about the Bible, you hallelujah this and that and amen this and that. Please, if you can just show some compassion, you are dealing with, you know, elderly here. Yes, you're right. They come here. They want to be here. They don't want to be evicted and no one, none of us voted to evict them. Okay. So these two are not capable of protecting you, because they cannot comprehend the zoning process. I believe they cannot even spell zoning. So how do they protect you? Amen. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. It's my turn. So if I'm in it for me please. Well, first of all, I would like to apologize as I'm running the meeting last time that comes the West call you a liar, which is totally unacceptable. But because we're not agitized, I have not got a chance to go further. So today I would like to give you the opportunity to clarify it, but understand that my hand was tired on that day, so today, officially, I want to apologize. Why do I say that? Because I know you. I know you serve the community and this city with dignity, integrity, and you are all for the best of the community. I know that for the fact. Now, I want to talk to the investor and the people who want to invest in the city of West Mr. He is very important for you to know that our city, assistant city manager is doing his best to grow the city, to move the city as an extensible and having that comment from the city to move the city to next level and having that comment from the city council is unacceptable and that is not true at all. So please disregard that and please have placed trust in him that he is doing the best for you and for us. Now I heard some of the council here said that, you know, Councilmember West, you need to apologize to our assistance to the measures. Good luck. I don't think she is going to apologize because that's her nature. So don't expect to have that from her. So they're hiding it. And at this time, I don't want to go further. Today, the meeting that was of the meeting today has been clarifying. And I hope that the residents here in the city of Westminster as well as the people who live in their mobile home parks understand and feel safe, more safe about it and you don't have to worry about anything. I respect you for that again. Thank you very much. And at this time here, I want to say can your motion, but I like to make a modification on your motion a little bit. Can you repeat your motion, please? My original motion was perhaps staff put out a press release and also a mail letter to mobile home residents explaining the true facts. That's my two items. If you want to do modification, let me know. I'd like to modify your motion. I will second your motion, but I'd like to make your motion. I would say that I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. I would like to modify your motion. to press release to convey the truth about the study item 5.2 on September 11 and provide necessary assistance to ease the worries of our mobile homes resident, including the press, the press release and the, and mail out the information. That's number one. You can consider that part A, and I would like to go through the part B too. Part B, I would like to direct staff to prepare a resolution to denounce this fake news and the statement made by Chusevngo to continue spreading the fake news. That's my second, that's part B, to prepare a resolution to denounce the fake news from Chusepngo. The third, which is the C part, I'd like to ask staff to prepare statement to censure. Those involved in knowingly the spreading the false information, which is both NAMQAN and Amy Francois. And if you are busy, I'd like to I'd like to say to you. A second emotion, a second. So city attorney, how can the mayor that can hear me censure me? We have the motion and second on the floor. So now at this time I can go ahead and ask. So City Attorney please ask. I can ask a customer if you want to make a substitute motion go ahead and make that. Yes I'm making it for Mrs. no, no. My substitute motion. No, it's not just substitute motion. My substitute motion. It wants me to do it. I would like for her to make substitute motion. Yes. So I am making it. I want to make a substitute motion. You let her take it. I just need to do the dinner. So one thing. Yes. If I could. I hear what clarify B. If we're talking about doing something right before the election, I'm concerned about that because you have somebody running and the council taking an action that could be construed. Exactly. It's about as it campaigned. Why are they doing that? Why are they spreading the flyer? Yeah, how do we get the information to those? What is the best way to do that? What do you want? Information is fine. Yeah, that's what it's about. The information is announcing a particular person. That's what I'm talking about. That would be the announcement. And you can't say that. A particular person for fake news. That would be, might be seen as. Make sure that the person has the name on their fake news. If you don't let me do that, then what is your recommendation? I'd like to have that the mouse. Well, I think we choose that. You don't need now some information without telling them. The mouse, what? Who? Right, no. I think you could that. You don't need now some information without telling them. You know what? Who? Right. No, I think you could identify that that particular flyer and provide the correct information. That's fine. That's perfectly fine. I'd like to ask you. Why that person can sign the name and have the name on it and I can't need now is that person. I think if we're after the election, it might be different. No. now is that person. I think if we're after the election it might be a different. No, he is I'll make sure that's how you go ahead. So that's why he recommended. That's why Joe's wrong. So my recommendation was, don't try to intimidate him. No, everything you said would be correct. It just would take the person's name out of that and just identify the flyer and correct all the, give the correct facts. That would be a common problem. I will agree with you to take the person name out. But let, I want a clear explanation from you. How why that person get the rights to put that on the flyer themselves. You just go ahead and ask the election. And distribute this information. And right during the election and that person is the candidate and we can do it. You give me the clear up-to-x ventilation and I will take it. It's just the reason. The candidate, you can't target the candidate for election. Let's look at the office. Let me talk about that. I'm running the mayor against you and then you try to central me. Okay, I think that we were right we need to change the things. Okay. All right. Well, we'll take care of that. I'm going to take your seat or what? Oh, my goodness. You cannot. All right. So at this time we can I will modify I will modify with taking the name out but with the information still stated with this. So I have I can't use that. I'm going to have some more questions. Yes, please. That's what I meant. Yes. So we have a motion and second for the motion. Okay. Now, please, please, please, please, we want to make a substitute motion go ahead right now. Let me see. Yes. Go ahead, go ahead. Okay. So, do you have a question? You said that you let her know I have a question in regard of your motion Let him let her make the motion first and then you can come back and ask the question. Can I have my time? No, you know you can go ahead and make a motion city attorney see is centering Nam glang and myself can he send to recent for me? How does that work? It's kind of funny. No, but actually we are running against him. And then he was just running out. Yeah, just to ask for a member, let's hear it speak. Okay, so you are recognized. This is political attack. You are recognized for. I am running against him. Yeah, he's running from McWay, Senator Heson. And I am too running from McWay, Senator Heson against the mayor. And he has his brother law in here. Mark Wynn in District 3, so he'd take Joseph out. After the elections, not an issue could break down. Major motion is shut out. the election is not an issue. Right now. Mr. Chairman, motion and shadow. City, Mr. Mayor, there's disruption in the chamber. So can you please, can I ask you to stop first? You're the chair. Can you please? Can I ask you both to stop if you ask me to control the meeting, then you have to obey the policy of the meeting, which is you are not going to cost talk each other. So that way, if you are not, if you are not cost talking each other, then I will, I will be able to do that. I am asking that city terming for this time. You guys keep it to the lifting. Again, it's you are not, I'm talking right now. So please. But I was asking the city terming, and I'm talking right now. So please. But I was asking to be attorney. I'm talking right now. You are not recognized. You are not recognized. I am talking right now. You, I, go, right now. Let me ask you, we have the motion, original motion and the second on the floor. You are now, if you are talking about subject emotion and I will let you do that. Go ahead. Answer yet. So, City Attorney, can you please answer that? The section B. C part? I shall see, yes. Yes, section C. If the people that issue are running against each other, then I would have the same Cossians. That we don't want to use the City Council to be advocating what could be perceived as advocating for or against somebody. That's all I'm saying. So after the election it's a different question. So I would just say that correcting facts and saying those are incorrect facts and sending a letter out and explaining the true facts, that's all fine, perfectly fine. But if we're going to be censoring or denouncing in particular individuals if members of the council are running against those individuals that doesn't that would not be good right before an election. Thank you city for answering that. Okay so my substitute motion. Hold on. With that we need to clarify the original motion first. Okay. Before you can substitute motion. Do you agree with what he said? No, not yet. Let me know, one by one. If you are not recognized this time, you know that. I know. But I want to make sure that I am in control of this meeting. Not that many people can a lot or each other. I have, unfortunately, I have to do that. I don't want to do it. If we can run the meeting politely, and we respect each other. So at this time, I understand what you are saying, see the attorney. the city of Tony. So if I for the item see. What is your recommendation if I want to censure? If that's still an issue. He already said it. This way bring it up. I the election. I was thinking. I was thinking. And I was also. I think he needs to bring a dictionary. This is not for the council, but certainly as a candidate, any of the candidates can use their own. They can speak outside of a council meeting and say whatever they want. Outside of the council meeting. Okay. Okay, why don't we do this? Why don't we do this? That I would defer item C to after the election. So at this time here, we have A and B. Are you okay with that change for the original motion? Or do you have any question? Can you just make sure we, they have to take out a name, right? Okay, I will repeat the modified motion if you will. First, the next staff is to convey the truth about the study section item 4.2. On September 11th, and provide necessary assistance to ease the worries of their mobile homes residents, including what you said that email out the letters to the mobile home residents. The second one is prepare a resolution to denounce this fake news and a statement made by, for the statement to continue spreading the fake news, I took out the names, okay? Those are the two. Okay, I agree. Okay, all right. So we have the motion and say another floor. My subject. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, I'm not finished, okay? At this time here, I will recognize you for a substitute motion. Okay, thank you, Mr. Mayor. So my substitute motion is I want to amend the implementation of the project that was presented on September 11th. For six months until we, as a council here, can come to an agreement on what we will do with the mobile home parts So I Substitute motion. No, that's okay. Can you repeat can you repeat if I say if I hear you write I substitute motion to a man I'm in the implementation of the project that you guys approved. Please. What project? You guys voted on to rezone. Okay? That's what the action would already taken because you guys voted on September 11th. That was one of the action is to rezone this area. Okay? So I want to make an amend the implementation of that project that you approve for six months so we can talk about it and the people can talk about it regarding the mobile home part. I hear you. I hear you. I hear you clearly. I want to make sure that this motion is valid or not. Can staff verify to me? We are not rezoning at that meeting. You understand, you guys? No, no, no. The action that you guys approve on September 11th. Yes, Mayor, there was no. There was a man policy document, there was no emergency document. The action was taken in people though. And then there was no vote to be zoomed. So therefore there is no way that the motion is not valid. And facilitate public review. But that's OK. Let's see. Let's see. Let's see. Actually. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I think that's a good idea. I have a substitute by council member fan west. Seconded by council member win to amend the implementation of the project that was presented at the September 11th, 2024 meeting for six months so the council and public can discuss regarding the mobile home park. and was yes. Councillor M�ndo? There is no such thing that was Councillor M�ndo was talking about. How can you vote on something? That does not exist. There was no motion there. There is nothing. There is no project. There is no rezoning. There is nothing. The only thing that lacks here. The only thing that lacks I think there's a time for you to not discussion. I'm going to vote. Go ahead. Just go ahead. Let's go. We know that. The only thing that lacks is comprehension. Come on, let's know. Just vote. Just say no. We know. Just say no. No, we know. Counts no wind. We should know. Yes, shooter. Vice Mayor Hoh? No. I vote for her to have a tutor. And so I vote no. Mayor Nguyen is really funny. No. Substitute motion failed to three. Please vote for the vote for the original motion, please. So for the amended original motion, I have motion made by Councilmember Monzo, psyched by Mayor Wynn. This is to direct staff to issue a press release regarding the truth behind the September 11, 2024 meeting and send a mail-air to mobile home residents with accurate information to provide peace to the residents impacted and direct staff to prepare a resolution to denounce the fake news. Mayor, I would like to see if you can and I'll call her. Look, I'm sorry. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. That's this time we have a call. Well, I know we're voting, but I'm gonna, I'd like to see if you could amend your motion. And no, it's a rain in the process. We can't amend their original? Okay, I want to ask that. It's already been mentioned. Because it just went too fast. Yes or no? Yes. Yes. Okay. So, for the part that says, Okay, so if they can amend the original motion, can we go ahead and make a substitute motion? A man out? Huh? Yeah, what kind of rules? Yeah. No, that's permissible. She's asking for some kind of amendment to the vote. But we're already in the process of voting, like you said before, city attorney. We haven't started the vote. We did. We vote no. Substitute motion. And now we're going to vote on the original motion. How come you, I just like how can you guys just go back and forth. Okay, so I would like to see if you can make the motion could amend. And number one is, I think that would be for part A. So conveying the truth about 5.2 and mail out letter to Mobile Home Parks only. And could you have it, of course, it's gonna be an English Vietnamese. And then could that be published on like New Year's newspaper and then also and I would like the bill to be made to split between Nam Khoang and Amy Fang West those two should be charged I'd like to know how much it costs and it needs to be. Can't do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. You don't have to do that. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. I can't believe it. They're going to buy the news paper and put it on all right. So okay, so basically the city will present fake news the majority of the council You are okay with that said Investors as a second of the motion I do agree to that so please call for the vote please It's an a's that is a legal I have a motion made by council member Monzo Seconded by Mayor win to direct staffed to issue of press release regarding the truth behind the September 11th, 2024 meeting and send a mail-air to mobile home residents in English, Spanish and Vietnamese. Published in the Vietnamese newspaper with the bill to be split between both Councilmember Fanlul. That's clear. That's clear. You can't read that. Okay, hold on. Sorry, sorry. Okay. Let me write you a check. Let me repeat. Direct staffed if she pressed release. No. She can't go. Let the men in. Let the men in. Don't even write it. Because we can't make any sense. I'm a mayor at the Bolivian resident in English. You're going to embarrass me. You're going to embarrass me. She doesn't. I'm going to embarrass you. She doesn't know that the city attorney will be able to go and call for the police. Okay. Councilwoman Canwe. So, we read that again. I'm in action. Can you please read that again? What's the motion? Direct staff to issue. That's the statement in the committee. That's the truth as you ask. Let me know. Go ahead, please. Direct staff to issue a press release regarding the truth behind the September 11, 2024 meeting and Senate mailer to mobile home residents in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese, published in the newspaper with accurate information to provide peace to the residents impacted, and direct staff to prepare a resolution to denounce the fake news. All right, thank you. We'll go in call for the board press resolution to denounce the fake news. All right. Thank you. Go in. Call for the board. Press release. Yes, the press release. Councilwoman Fanouist. No. Councilmember Monzo. Yes. Councilmember Wynne. No. Vice Mayor Ho. They don't want people to know the truth. Yes. Mayor Wynne. Yes. Motion is very high on the truth. All right, thank you very much. Thank you. And at this time, I want to thank you, the resident that come out and voice your opinion. I would like to adjourn the meeting, and the next level of meeting will be how on Wednesday, October 23rd, 2024, at 6 p.m. Morning, adjourn. Thank you.