Yeah. I don't think so. It's all your time, buddy. And welcome to the February, 2025. I always have to stop and think. February, 2025, code enforcement, special magistrate hearing. This morning I will hear lean certification cases. These are cases that have already been bought before the codes enforcement board in a previous evidentiary hearing and are now back for consideration by the special magistrate to impose fines and certify leans. For each case, I will hear testimony from the property owners and the city's Codes Compliance Department about whether a property that was previously found to be in violation of the city code has been brought into compliance. The issue was not whether the property was in violation. The code enforcement board had an earlier meeting made that decision. The issue today will be whether the violations have been corrected. And if not, I, a special magistrate will then consider whether a fine and a lien should be imposed on the property. I will hear testimony from the city's Coates compliance assistance department, even if a property owner who has received notice of this hearing fails to appear. And any property owner who arrives late after his or her case has been called, heard and decided by me will no longer have a right to be heard. The hearing will be conducted as follows. The city will present its case first. After each witness has testified, the property owner may cross examine or ask questions of the witnesses, but always directing those questions through me. When the city has presented all its case, the property owner may present his or her case, an attorney or some other representative may represent you. You can present evidence in your defense either through witnesses or your own testimony. If you present photographs or written documents as evidence, they must be submitted to the Rec secretary seated before me. They'll be placed in the permanent case file. The city will also be able to cross examine you and each of your witnesses. Of course I may ask questions of the witnesses on both sides as evidence is presented at any time. Just upon the testimony and evidence presented, I will decide whether the violation or violations have been corrected. If a violation has not been corrected, or was corrected after the deadline for compliance, I may impose a fine or certify a lien on the property based on the original findings and orders of the code enforcement board. Or, I may defer such action for a specific amount of time. An additional fine or lien may be imposed at a later date if the property is still not brought into compliance. a case will be brought before a future special magistrate meeting for considerations to certify any deferred leans. If a lien is imposed upon the property, a copy of the order imposing the lien will be handed to you before you leave this hearing. Do not leave without that written paper, which is the only written record you will receive of my decision. If after your case has heard you wish to appeal my decision you have 30 days to petition the Circuit Court of Pinellas County and if a lien is certified a property owner may apply to come back to a future code enforcement board hearing to request the possible reduction or release of that lien. With that description introduction, I now ask you to join me as we pledge allegiance to the flag and then please remain standing to be sworn in for testimony today. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for the world. Please remain standing if you are going to give testimony today. Raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm that the evidence you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. Ready for the first case? Whenever you're ready. All right. We're starting with item C77. Rita and Anna Rita investigator Greg Foster Morning, Greg good morning, Mr. Schultz. How are you, sir? Good to hear you. Good. All right. All right. Good morning. Good morning. I'm Greg Foster. I'm a codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg testifying and referenced item number C77. This is case number 23 11408 regarding property located at 4918. Haynes Road, North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure. It's occupied by owner. Case began on June 22nd, 2023, as it codes initiated case. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure. It's occupied by owner. Case began on June 22nd, 2023, as it codes initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, copy the Codans Forest towards Board Order was sent to the owner by mail on November 21st, 2023. Property was last reinspected on the 19th of February, 2025, zero out of one violation that have been corrected since the case began. I don't see any work since the last meeting. The remaining violation is that the rear of the structure has had an exterior alterations that would require permits for enclosures, wall alterations to include new windows and doors installed. Additional relevant facts. There was a permit. They hired a contractor. I believe that there has been a lot of back and forth language barriers. I think there's a relative that lives out of state and just the triangle of communications has been very difficult to achieve what was required for this permit. In conversations this morning it looks like they might end up having to abandon the project. They've been trying to work through it but there's just been a lot going on and- What happens to the greater of the abandon the project? What do they mean? It would have to remove the enclosure whatever was done in return it to existing prior conditions. So not sure what direction we we're gonna go here, but that's the fact that I know at this time, okay? That would conclude my presentation. Thank you. Thank you. Good morning. Good morning. Your name and address please. Iris Cowdron, a 4,000, 2 westward replace. Tampa, Florida, 336, 0. Your relationship to Jose and Anna? She's my aunt and Hector Caldron is who resides there. He got the special paperwork a while back that's been submitted to be able to speak on behalf of Jose and Anna Routia. So he's my dad. He started this martial as a passion project for himself, but unfortunately he's had health issues and he's also retired. So he did not realize the extent of to what this would be. As Mr. Foster had stated earlier, yes, we had contracted an engineer when they did go to pick up the permits. Apparently there was something additional that was needed and when we communicated when the engineer, she said it would be an additional 4,000 on top of the 4,000 that was already given to her and that's not considering the cost of like redoing anything that needs to be re-redued plus the contractor and all of that. And so unfortunately for my dad, it's just not something that is available more so for his mental and physical health, but also financial. So what he is requesting, and again, he is doing all of this alone. How much time he would have? I understand. I'm sorry, I'm sorry to hear all of this. And he gave $4,000 to it. He originally gave $4,000. Sorry, it's been a long. I've originally gave $4,000 for the original plants for the engineer to make. And then it was submitted. And when the contractor was finally able to pick it up, I guess there was something additional that wasn't in there. And that's when we spoke with the engineer, and she said that she could do it. It would be an additional 4,000, and that wasn't considering the things that would have to be fixed, plus everything else that the contractor would have to do. And he's retired. He can't be taking on that project. So going forward, what do you see? He's going to have to slowly just kind of take it down on his own. OK, I also hate to see that. I can't control that one way or the other. What I can do is give you some time or give him some time. I don't know if there's any other resolution. I will tell you this, your best friend, at least, for some direction or whatever happens to be your code enforcement officer in this case. Greg, we can at least point you in the direction necessary you'd have to make those decisions. In the meantime, let me rule this. I order that for item C77 case number two, three, one, one, four, zero, eight, that then lean certification. Be deferred and I don't have it where's my sheet up. Thank you. Lean certification be deferred for 120 days or until June the 25th 2025. Now I've chosen 120 days because this at least will take some pressure off him making a decision as to whether it's here at town. I hope that doesn't happen or some other course of action. Okay. But that leaves his grant soon some time. Okay and I would like to say thank you to Mr. Fossor because he's been an excellent communicator so thank you. You are welcome. Be sure to get the written copy. Okay. Welcome. Thank you. Item C, 235, property owner, your Muda Bay Beach Condo Association, investigator, Zeridam Alendez. Good morning. I have two cases. Do you want me to read both for similar violations on the same property? Hold on, Zerid. I mean, look here. C235. Yeah, 235 and 236. Might as well, Zerid. I handled them both the same in the past. So I am so right. I'm a land that's going to investigate it for the city of San Petersburg testifying and reference to item C 235 case number 23154 93 regarding property located at 42 01 38 Avenue South. I was learning at the beginning of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is occupied by owners. This case began on August 14, 2023, and it was a close follow-up case. After the adventuary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on January 38, 2024. This property was last reinspected on February 19, 2025, and zero out of one valid to have been arrested since this case began. The remaining validations are permits required for active work and or recent inspection at least every 90 days to be considered active and approve for permits. Additional revelant fact in regards to this case is there have not been any active work since July of last year. There was some permits that expire and they are being activated little by little. They're so far, I was able to check on you like four because there's so many permits and some of them are with different partial numbers. And also, the previous contractor removed himself from this case. So now he got a new contractor, but we still don't have any progress on the work. You know when the old contractor removed himself any date on that? I don't remember. I think it was sometime after the storm. And he just got a new contractor back in this month. OK, and this case is long before the storm. I'm sorry. This case goes long before the storm. Yes, it's starting in 2023. Okay. Okay, that same applies to both 236 and 235. Correct. All right, thank you. Sir, your name and address please. Good morning, Your Honor. My name is Paul Terry with Onsbacher Law. I am the attorney for the Bermuda Bay Beach Conyminium Association. I have with me four exhibits. I would like the court to, for the meds straight to consider if that's all right. What do you have? Exhibits. Exhibits. Alright, fine. And if we could also get your business address for the record. So your business address. Yes. It is, uh, we even know what it what, it's 400 North Ashley Drive, sweet 1900, Tampa, Florida, 33602. Let me begin, Your Honor, with respectfully disagreeing with the Code Enforcement Officer. We have done substantial amount of work. We hired a rougher. The rougher has done repairs to the fascia and the softest. That was part of the first violation. The remaining part of the first violation is related to the entry stairs. And the entry stairs still require a final inspection. We are unable to obtain a final inspection on those because as I'll get into in a moment, there's a rear staircase. It's part of the same permit and the city won't final the front, the entry staircase until the rear staircase is completed and attached to these balcony decks. Let me stand by you there. I understand the permit expired. There is no permit. No, some of the permit expired, but they are being reinstated. So, so far they were poor. They were active. And I'm not sure how many others are active, but yeah, at one point they all have expires. So, but like I said, they've been working on getting all these, the contract is working on getting this permit active. Okay, sorry. All right, that's fine. I was here approximately five months ago. I presented to your honor an expert report by an architect and the engineers notice of grounds to terminate the then contractor. This project involves 20 buildings and 70 balcony decks. Since that time we did actually terminate the contractor, the client interviewed new contractors. The new contractor was selected. It's the one that actually has transferred some of the permits. The first thing that we had to do was all these decks are defective, which is why we had to fire the contractor. We then had a member of the board who's a retired contractor with the new contractor. They had to develop repairs to all of these decks that had been improperly constructed. That's the first exhibit that I gave you. Those are the details that they developed. We subsequently entered into a contract with Victor Construction, which is the contractor. And was that entered into the Councillor? That was entered into... Well it was probably three or four weeks ago. That contractor after that we had to submit those details that have been prepared back to the engineer for approval. That has occurred. If you look at the details, you'll see there's little pink sticky notes on it, those are the engineers comments approving the details. Then the next step was we had to formally notify the other contractor, even though we'd fired them. The building department requires that you send them a formal notice. So we did that. And then once that was completed, we have now started the transfer permits. There's 20 buildings, there's 20 permits. We started with the first four buildings. The third document I gave you is a printout showing that the four of the permits have been transferred to Victor construction They can only do so much at time anyway, so we renewing all the permits all at one time. What wouldn't really accomplish anything? The last document is a printout from the building department shows that that permit is active The contractor has started work the contractor has called for an inspection this Friday of the water proofing. I'm leaving here. I'm going to go to the site, I'm meeting with the engineer and the contractor because we still have to work out some of the details with the framing. But then the water proofing will start tomorrow and hopefully be approved by the building department. With the new contractor, when is he going to the project? When is this gonna be off the rolls? Does he give you any idea at all? A little frustrated and I'll tell you why in a minute. I'm totally, I expected to take about four months. Four more months? Four months to do all of the work. And what I am requesting here today is 60 days. Within 60 days, substantial amount of work will have been done. Code enforcement have been out there and inspected it. And two weeks after that, I'm retiring. So it will be somebody else. We'll be handling this matter. So I hope to get it wrapped up in a position where code enforcement is satisfied with the progress that the client is making. You're retiring in 60 days? I am retiring in a little over 60 days. Well, let me say to you what I tell my wife every time she leaves to the beauty parlor, good luck to you. Yeah. My record shows counselor that I have, as you know, appeared before me before. The last time was in August of 24. I granted 150 days. Something I normally do not do. And then so I'm a little frustrated to find out that in effect nothing really has happened happened now. I hear you saying, okay, it's about to happen or whatever. But the condo was accumulated a potential lien if I certified today of more than $70,000. You asked me for 60 days, actually asked me for more than that,, you asked me for 60 days. I guess I would send back this message to the Condo Association. I really am kind of up to here because I granted 150 days, but I will be lenient in this sense and grant you your request, however. It goes with this warning that you need to send back to the board, that if this case comes before me after 60 days, which it will, I could give you the date, I trust it will not. If it does, they will be looking at leans at that point of about $90,000. So the end of the line is clear because you have appeared, Councillor, and because it appears something is happening, I will go ahead and grant your request for the 60 days. So they'd be aware, however, of the warning, and I want assurance that all of the requirements are met more when I see this case again, I will act accordingly. So I most I order that for item C 235, then any insert of case can be deferred for 60 days. Well, until July the until April 26th, 2025. My further order vote for case number two, three, six. But similarly, a lien certification be deferred for 60 days. Thank you. And I know you won't be back in 60 days. I hope no one else is. I'll be here. I'll be here. Oh. 70 days I would not. Uh-huh. And I hope I don't see in 60 days counts. I tell you, I warned them that I could have slapped them with 70,000 plus today. I will let them know. So it'll be about 90 by the time this is over. I appreciate it. Okay. Item C206, property owner Don Bryant, investigator Bonnie Green. Good morning. I'm Bonnie Green, codes investigator for the city of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item number C206, case number 24-367, regarding property located at 28, excuse me, 28, 18, 46 avenues south. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single-family structure and is occupied by owner. This case began on January 8, 2024 and is a code follow-up case. After the evidentiary hearing a copy of the Code Enforcement Board order was sent to the Ono Buy mail on July 30, 2024. This property was last re-inspected on February 24, 2025. One out of four violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are tarp present on roof indicating roof disrepair Chipping peeling paint present on exterior walls and phesha and Rottenwood present around trim of garage door This concludes my presentation. Okay. Thanks, Bonnie. Hi, name and address please. Good morning. My name is Dawn Bryant The address is 28 18 46th Avenue South. Did you say Miss Bryant? Yes. OK. Hi. Well, you've heard the testimony of the city and one out of four. I like that. What's the game plan for the rest? I am asking for a little bit more time. Hurricane Milton did a number on me. I do have a copy of my estimate of damages from my insurance company right at about 59, a little more than 59,000, yeah, in damages. So I'm gonna need a little more time. Okay, and I'm more than happy to grant that to you because your case is very new unlike the one you just heard that goes back a long way. How much time do you think you're going to need? I'm asking for 120 days because I'm also working with FEMA so I'm waiting on a determination from FEMA. Yeah that may take 120 days. Do you have someone that's going to do the work contractors? I do have a contractor. Yes, lined up. Okay. Well, thank you for the day. Always the one out of four. I'm curious. Vegetation removed from the structure. Good. Well, and also the, because it was storming yesterday, the soft bits and the fascia boards have been completed already. Great. Okay. All right. I order that for item C206, case number 24367, that any lean certification be deferred for 120 days, or until June the 25th, 2025. I wish you well. Thank you. It's an honor. I might comment that while this case is very new, or a compliance date was in the middle of the last month, many of the cases I have reviewed all the potential cases for today, and many of you sitting here know that your cases like that condo that left here go back long before the hurricane. And therefore the hurricane really is not relevant to my thinking nor relative to the relevant to the case now. So just so that you're aware, I do see the dates of the cases. Okay, next case. Item 151, property owner Nancy Petney, investigator Robert Hicks. Go ahead, Robert. All right, good morning. I'm Robert Hicks, co-investigator for the city of St. Petersburg, testifying a reference to item C-151. Case 24-1625 regarding property located at 15046 Street, North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. The property is a single family structure and is occupied by the owner. The case began on January 30th of 2024 and is a citizens complaint case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of Code Enforcement's Board order was sent to the owner by mail on 7-2 of 2024. The property was last respected on 2-22, 2025. Zero out of one violations remain. The violation is actually an after-effect permit required for installation of a new driveway. In additional relevant faxes as a permit, 24-03001564 for driveway that remains in process per city records with last action and plan tracking on 528 of 2024. Still waiting for corrections. Also owner has previously applied for a variance under application number 24-5400-644, which was scheduled at the DRC meeting last year September 4th and was actually denied, and this concludes my presentation. Okay, yo. Okay, good morning, your name and address please. Good morning, my name is Nancy Lee Pitney. My address is 1501 46th Street North and St. Pete. Okay, Ms. Pitney, It gives me a problem with the driveway. And they notice that the case goes back away. And as a matter of fact, staff deferred the case several times. So it's kind of dragged on for a while now. The permit, as I understand it, the permit is in process and has been since last. Yes, been in process. Which is a little strange to me since last May and then the variance has been denied. So what is the plan here now? I don't see where you're going with this. This is a very long is a very long story, but this actually this driveway was installed in 2023. I hired a contractor to put it in. He did other work as well. I did not know. I did not know. Pardon? You were to call the name of the contractor. I do, but I, I hesitate to say his name. He's a hothead and I really don't want to bring him in here. I did not know he did not get permit of course I didn't even know it was out of compliance until I got to notice from Mr. Hicks and that's when my knowledge of this being a violation first began so I I tried to get a permit. They would not issue me a permit. I've had two surveys done since this thing has started. And I don't know the process. So I keep learning. As soon as I complete one, I have to do something else. But I was denied the variance because my mother did not live with me. That was what they read into the record. I mean, I meet all the other standards. I'm 80% green space because this is a big corner a lot. And they showed a picture of my house on the screen, which was before my renovation or my beautification project. I'm a environmentalist, and I took concrete that was broken up. Roots had deformed it. It was a hazard. I have fallen in my driveway three times myself. And my mother is 100 years old in June. So I just wanted her to be safe. So when I talked with my contractor about this, we took my cars, we put them in the driveway, and we opened up the doors we had. I had my heart real chair, and that we determined. We joined my walkway and my driveway together. I believe me, I can kind of understand that. You know what I mean? I just kind of get it. But what I want to go back here is, okay, you did apply or the contractor applied for an after the fact permit. I applied. You applied. Okay. That has been in process since May 20th. They won't give it to me. I've been there twice. I'm sorry. They won't give it to me. They will not give it to her. They won't give me a permit. I'm sorry. They won't give it to me. They will not give it to her. They won't give me a permit. I'm not sure. So, Mr. Schultz, in the notes from when she first applied for the driveway permit, the notes from Zone state that the existing driveway is non-conforming. So in order to keep it, she had to lie for the variance, but then she was denied. Numerance was denied. OK, what's your idea now? OK, I kind of. A friend of mine who's a contractor told me to go to the office of the American Disabilities Act. I'm working with Lendell Brett in that office. He provided me with the paperwork that stated that the variance committee should have given me the variance. And I have it in writing. I've provided that to Mr. Hicks. So where we are now is the zoning office is waiting. I don't know anymore. Everything you told me is number one, you got to stay in touch with Mr. Hicks. She best friend to get you somehow directed through this. I'm going to grant you additional time. No leans have been certified against the property. You don't even want to know what could be certified because I'm not going to certify. And I'm going to grant additional time to get through this. Follow Mr. Hicks' kind of direction or his advice, but be sure and do it. I order, bet for item C, 151 case 241625, that any certification be deferred for 120 days or until 6, that's June 25, 2025. Now the reason I picked 120 days is because essentially, no, he's complaining that the driveway isn't correct or whatever there's some technical problems here. I hope you're able to resolve them, and I don't see the case again, but I certainly don't want to find you for that. Please continue to process, continue to stay in touch with Mr. X. Thank you, sir. Get your paperwork. Our next case is item C27, property owner Jamie Lee Washington, investigator Brian O'Donnell. Okay, Brian. Good morning. I am Brian on debt. Codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg. Testifying and reference to item number C27. Case number 23-14610. Regarding property located at 6428. 21st Street North and I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and is occupied by owner. This case began on July 31st 2023 and is a citizen complaint case. After the evidentiary hearing a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on 1121-2023. This property was last reinspected on 221-2025. Zero of the two violations have been corrected since this case began. The following work has been completed since the last meeting. There's been several fence sections installed and a gate on the north side of the property. The remaining violations are area of six foot wood fencing and disrepair, leaning and our damage to missing and asphalt driveway and is in disrepair with holes, voids and or missing sections. There are no additional relevant facts in this case, and this concludes my presentation. All right, thanks, Brian. Hi, your name and address, please. Good morning. Jamie Washington, 64, 28, 21st Street North. St. Pete Florida. Okay. Defense. I need to say, this was a citizen's complaint, which I'm more sensitive to. I must have a neighbor didn't like your fence like that. But anyway. And you repaired part of the fence. Tell me what's happening, where we're at, and what's your game plan. Okay. Actually, it's finished. My father and I finished it this past weekend. And I got a dumpster and we tore down the old one, put up the new. So it's up. The gates are about, I have pictures that I can give you guys. I just need an extension for the driveway. To, he advised me to go to Home Depot. And my dad's going to help me with that too. There's some stuff that you can do to repair it. Yeah. So it's just I'm a single mom of four and a nurse and so it just takes time. Okay. Getting the money together. Great report. Thank you for getting the fence done. That should make the neighbor happy or that might be. Brian, stay in touch. I order that for item C27K2314610, the lean certification. Be deferred for 60 days or until April of 26, 2025. Now. April of 26, 2025. Now, you are aware that there are a bunch of lean certified previously. Yes, so I was going to speak with him on how I... And I described the process. Yes. Again, Brian, can tell you the process. I can tell you what, I can't tell you what will happen. I don't deal with that one, but there is a process that you may want to look at. Yes. Again, Brian can tell you the process. I can tell you what I can't tell you what will happen I don't deal with that one, but there is a process that you may want to look at. Yes. Very good. Thank you. Do you have these two? Do you have any of that? You can just put them in the record? Okay. Okay. Item C279, property owner Willie C. Trust, Art Willie Carter Trust and Vernell Carter Trusty, investigator, Anthony Rivers. Oh, Jose Rodriguez. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office. The prosecutor9. Case number 24, dash 18695 regarding property located at 2185, 16th Avenue, South, and I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a multi-family structure and is occupied by tenants. Case began on October 10th of 2024 and the codes follow up. And as the codes follow up case, After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board's order was sent to the on and by mail on January 28th of 2025. This property was last re-inspected on February 19th of 2025. The throughout of one violations have been corrected since this case began. Following work has been completed since the last meeting. There have been signs posted for the tenants regarding past for safety. The remaining violation is for the city building official that can't to leave a balcony, concrete supports, so significant concrete spa, section loss and exposed still reinforcement at exposed sections where the aluminum soft fit was removed due to wind damage from the hurricane. The entire balcony can't to leave a floor system and guard rail attachment will need to be evaluated by an architect or engineer and a report provided to the city prior to the occupancy of the second floor apartments. Additional running effects regarding this case are there is a commercial permit number 25-02001932 that is in process in the last action on February 19th the 25th the plan review was approved as of 224 25 received contract proposal for repairs an inspection report received from the contractor as well. Also we received an engineered plans for the repair and a letter stating that a full structuralurally evaluation of the balcony system was completed, but we did not get a copy of the evaluation. And this concludes my presentation. Okay. I'm not sure. Sorry, buddy. I'll just let them know that he got a compliment today Yeah, your name and address My name is Danny Carter address is 22 55 21st Avenue South St. Petersburg Florida Conquer your relationship to Carter Willie Carter Trust and all that parents Willis E Carter Transition his wife my mother Bernie out Carter is here with me. I do all of the managing. She's just the CEO on the COO. CEO is very important. All right, I've heard the testimony is a second floor or a permanent occupied? Yes it is. We had a safety issue. The safety issue we've directed a tennis to certain ways to go. And for the tenants we had about four or five of them that moved out and we are not putting anybody back on the second floor as we promised Mr. Rodriguez that we're not putting anybody back up there. We're just waiting for the final permit. We've already had everything drafted. We can start in two weeks if we could ever get that permit through. I do not know how exactly how long it's gonna take. I know we got the money to do it. I just don't know not being a contractor, not knowing how to put those things together. I couldn't tell you exactly how long it's gonna take us to do. The funds to do it, if everything is the permit. Oh yes, yes, yes, we do have the funds. What you should understand and everybody should understand is if we grant time as the code enforcement code compliance department if we grant you time if I grant you time. Yes. The case for codes remains on hold pending you executing what this is assuming you get permit, pending you executing what's in that permit. So the key here is I will grant some time to get the permit. Once the permit is obtained you must then perform within a confines or within whatever that permit specifies. If you do not, then this case comes back forward. Otherwise it it's put on hold, complete the permit and the case goes away. So that's the process. So I will grant you some time given the testimonies to get the permit. That means that the case will remain on hold with codes enforcement, pending you executing what's in that permit. Failure to do that and the case comes back. And all the fines potentially come back. Okay? That's understood. So I order that for item C279, case number 24, 18695, that means certification, be deferred for 120 days or until June the 25th, 2025. Now if you can't get a permit or your contract can't get a permit in 120 days, we're in deep trouble. We've already applied for it. We just waiting. And I'm sure you'll get it. I'm just trying to grant you sufficient time to make sure that permit is in place. It doesn't go back for processing or corrections or whatever. I Appreciate it. Thank you. Right. Item C 23 Property Honor James Hallock, Investigator Brian O'Dat. I'm going to go to the right. Good morning. I'm Brian Audette, Coz investigator for City of St. Petersburg, testifying a reference to item number C23, case number 23-20820, regarding property located at 7,820th Street North, and I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and is occupied by owner. This case began on November 8, 2023 and is code-initiated case. After the evidence you are hearing a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on 430-2024. This property was last reinspected on 221-2025. Zero of the two violations have been corrected since this case. The case waspected on 221, 2025. Zero of the two violations have been corrected since this case began. Remaining violations are outdoor storage, junk and or trash stored in the area of the carport, front yard side yard and or rear yard to include not limited to. Plastic tubs, containers, furniture, folding tables, dead tree branches, brush, and other miscellaneous items, and overgrown vegetation, bushes, and or trees present, and the front and rear of the property. There are no additional relevant facts in this case, and this concludes my presentation. Okay, thanks, Ryan. Hi, name an address, sir. Name James Haluk. I just asked 7-0-0-8 20 let's rate north. St. Peter's burped Florida. So we 3-7-0-2. Okay, Mr. Haluk. You remember you and I met in September. I'm gonna go ahead and do some time to get to junk out. I thought, you know, you kind of said you're going to get it done. Why are we here? OK. First of all, those issues have been complied with. Oh, really? They're out. They're out. They did date of the last inspection on the press. There was a recent. 41. Yeah. That was 51 last Friday. There was a recent. Okay, that was a recent visit by Mr. O'Dad himself. And he had mentioned on that particular day that he was going to work to take me off the list. So Mr. O'Dad himself. Mr. O'Dad, it was a few days ago you inspected the property. I'm with it said that again I'm sorry. Two days ago you inspected the property. Yeah it was last Friday. Oh that's 530 and you found. Well at one point the carport had been cleaned off and I was kind of wild but when I went back it's full of stuff again there's blankets covering items in the carport, and I had no choice. That's about a love here. Okay, let's get clear, I can get clear Russian through your misogynistate. Okay, now in the core part right now, or lawn furniture outdoor furniture and things for entertainment purposes, I own a music company. And those those clients have asked if I could have some things to make. Okay, my way area more friendly to both my clients and my neighbors. And neighbors, including the one who had filed a initial complaint with the code compliance there to have some firms were inside of that car board. And that's what I got to do. What about the rest of the product? Forget the car board for a minute. What about the rest of the product? Now, if it's the decision of the board to have those, particular things completely removed, I shall do so promptly and get them out. That decision was made by the code enforcement board some time ago. Case wouldn't be before me if the board hadn't already granted you time. Your case goes back to 2023. Okay. Okay. Okay. So it's that kind of running out of patience and your case, sir yeah. Is that that particular issue on the core port that's remaining through? Okay. Aside from the car get it out within three days. Aside from the car port, which I can have reinspected based on your testimony, the rest of the property is still in question. Okay. your case goes back to 2023. I granted in September 30 days because is still in question. Okay. Your case goes back to 2023. I granted in September 30 days because you said you could get it cleaned up. Yes. Okay. Yeah. Including that. Including the department. Not by and trace. So they gave you a gift and deferred action for more. So sir. So here we sit. No better off than we were back last year. Yes sir. I have not certified a lien against your property. But if I did today, it would be more than $18,000 that you've accumulated since this began. Yes sir. So this is what I will do. I will ask Mr. Roth to review the garage port or whatever, to see if that can be removed or whatever. However, the rest of the property needs to be cleaned up. In the time frame I'm going to give you and understand that if it is not you will face next month when you when you have to appear before me again finds in excess of 20,000 and I will be forced to do that because your case goes back so far. So with that warning and understanding Brian you understand what I'm saying here I Order that for item C23 case number 2320820 that lean certification be deferred For 30 days or until a march the 27th 2025 All remarks to 27th, 2025. Thank you. Thank you. Item C 268 property owner reserve investments incorporated investigators are right and Melendez. right now. Good morning. I answer right. I'm going to investigate it am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. I am the right. SAC home and is occupied by tenants. This case began on December 28, 2023 and it was a co-initiated case. After the adventurer receiving a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on April 2, 2024. This property was less respected on February 11, 2025 and 0 out of one violation have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are after the fact that permits require for new from porch floors, new poles, and there's no permit for the storage container in the back yard. So additional revenue index, regard to this case, there's a permit that was filed for this work on, it's permit 24101001478. It was sitting, unfortunately it was sitting on the permit in the permit for a little while. So after he contacted me, he went to the permit in the permit. And then the permit was moved to, the permit application was moved to Sony, and on January 13, it was rewrotted again to Sony, and it'd been there there since January 15 and I believe that the hold on this permit might be because there is a commercial container in the backyard so it's before zoning right now. Right yeah so it been there since January 15 and this will conclude my presentation. Okay, thanks, Lorraine. Okay, name an address, sir. Reserve investments, PO box 7084, St. Petersburg, Florida. Need your personal address. Gilbert Repelt, Gilbert Repelt. And the post office boxes, the address. Retired law enforcement, enforcement have a protected address. Okay. Okay, you heard the testimony of the city. You don't know how familiar with the case. Tell me what's happening. I'm sorry to say again. You're familiar with the case. Tell me what is happening. Oh, the... Are you the owner? I beg your pardon? Yes. The last month when I was here, I had a general contractor problem. Now I seem to have a city problem where I can't find out what they want me to do here. The nice lady over here, she's made an inquiry and her and I talked, but she can't tell me where this is either. My last check on the city website, well, I can't even get into the website because I have to do something with the browser now that they've made a change. So I'm stuck. The other thing is all the emails and respond from the zoning department is going to the contractor. So he's trying very hard to comply, but the contractor has to step in. Okay. Now, a bit of a mess. I'm going to tie up anymore. There's no, no, lean or anything certified against the property at this point. Appreciate that. I'm going to, because you're working with the investigator as a rate, I'm going to grant you more time. That's all I can do at this point. Hopefully within that time things will get resolved. I order a bet for item C268 case number 2323281. that lean certification be deferred for 90 days or until May the 26th, 2025. Hopefully within 90 days, you'll get a zoning answer or you'll get a permit or something. You get a brownie point for that, thank you. And stay in touch with. Melinda's and she she does a good job, too Really Nice lady, okay Except that Item C79 violation property owner redacted, investigator Jean Medu. Violation addresses 938 17th Street North. Uh-huh. 79. C 79, yet. Brown number three, LLC. I'm sorry what? The Brown number three LLC case. I don't have the property owner. Yes, that's it. Okay. Okay. Good morning. I am Jean Madu, co-investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, Testifying and Reference to Item No. C 79, Case No. 20-25019, regarding property located at 938 17th Street, North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single-family structure and is occupied by its tenants. The case began on October 13, 2020 and is a codes-initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code and 410 Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on June 2, 2021. This property was last re-inspected on February 14, 2025. Zero out of four violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are permit required for removal of rare wall of structure, installation of new door and any additional trades. Secondly, the exterior roof of structure must be maintained in good repair and must resist water and deterioration from weather. The roof overhang and ragtotales have multiple areas of rotting wood with chipping and peeling paint. Third, all areas of structure with peeling, chipping and or missing paint must be covered with paint or other approved approved weather-proofing material. And fourth, fence located on properties and disrepair, fence is leaning and is not connected to top rail or is in general disrepair. Additional relevant facts regarding this case, Ares permit 21-0500430 is in process as of May 6, 2021. And this concludes my presentation. The permit has been in process since May 2021. Correct. Yes. I want to make sure I heard that I conclude your presentation. Thank you. Hi, your name and address please. My name is Laura Brown. I live at 2623. West Bay, I'll drive Southeast St. Pete 3 3705. Okay, Ms. Brown, you're your number 3 LLC. That's you. No, that is my parents. Yes. Okay. You'll have to forgive me for I review all the Kate potential cases over the weekend before this hearing. I didn't review this case because it goes back so far and there have been so many fines automatically certified. I don looking. So I just assumed I wouldn't even see the case. So other than what I've just heard, I am really kind of shocked. So fill me in on where we're at, where are there tenants in this building? Do you own this building? I would very much appreciate the opportunity to share with you. This all came to my attention at the beginning of this month because I happened to open my parents' mail and saw a letter and realized the date stated back to 2020. Are your parents still a record on? They are. So let me give you a little context. My father has severe dementia. My mother's his sole caretaker and quite honestly I believe my mother's succumbing to dementia as well. When I asked her about this she said it was taken care of by her contractor who at the time was Tom Simmons. I've reached out to Tom Simmons and apparently he developed lung cancer during that period of time and apparently became unavailable and didn't follow up. My mother never followed up. I see that the city sent multiple letters. I can't explain why those weren't answered other than that. They have let multiple things lapse in the last six months plus and I'm trying to step in and take care of things. So as soon as I found out, I went to the city. I went through the paperwork myself and let's look forward. I appreciate that. I appreciate that. It's just nothing else would fit this. Since I found out I went to the city to find out what steps I need to take, I'm sorry I didn't contact you, I didn't realize that that's who I should be in contact which which I've learned today. I knew I had to be here today, so I'm here. In the meantime, I've contacted a couple of contractors to look at the property to see if it's amenable, if it's fixable. Quite honestly, I don't think it is. It's in such disrepair, it really needs to be demolished. So my plan is to notify that they've had the tenant for 30 years, she pays sub-market rates and rightly so because the building is really not habitable. I believe after looking at it. So I've given the tenant notice, 60 day notice minimum, or maximum, to vacate the property, which hasn't been formally given to it's been verbally given to it. I know I need to follow that up legally, which I haven done yet. In the meantime I've had three different contractors eyeball the property again it's going to be too expensive to rehab so what I'd like to do and hopefully with some guidance from your department is to file for a permit for demolition and then probably put the property up for sale. And I do have power attorney for my parents if that's necessary. are they still try to make most of their own decisions? Maybe I can't give you a legal advice. I admire you for what you're doing and for taking over what's happened. So from my standpoint, I am going to grant you time to begin this process. Thank you. Again, stay in with your codes enforcement officer and even if for some reason something happens and you end up back before me it'll be down the road away. You should be aware that there are currently at least $11,000 in lean that have been placed over this long period of time on the property. My understanding is a lot more than that on the leans on this property. I'm showing only $11,000 on my case. I'm sorry? I'm just the last lean that was certified because there was that period where we weren't having meetings. Ah, okay, so the 11,000 is accurate. Go to this next page, and it goes on to the next page. So it's actually a hundred and a half. Oh, we didn't see the back page. You don't want to know. Okay, I'm going to grant you some time to go to the process. And as I said, am I here for taking an over and hopefully as a solution if it's demolished or whatever it may be. So I order that for item. am I here for taking an over and hopefully there's a solution if it's demolished or whatever it may be. So I order that for item C79 case 2025019 that further lean certification be deferred for 150 days or until July the 25th, 2025, 150 days just to the maximum I give. You've heard me describe what might be the process for all of the leans that are already on the front. Okay. Yeah, I'm going to consult with the Shenlai lady over here too. Thank you so much. Item C 294 property owner Hudson Gateway LLC investigator Joseph Brinori, Coates Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item C294 case 24179 7979 regarding property located at 64688 avenue north. It was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. Case began on October 3, 2024. It is a tenant complete case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on January 28th, 2025. Property was last re-inspected on January 23rd, 2025. Zero out of six violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are exterior door to apartment 3 is not weather tight waterproof. Interior walls and apartment 3 are water damage. There are holes and sections of the walls have been pushed in with water still present, seeping under baseboards. Permits may be required for any and all repairs to drywall, flooring, etc. Refraigirator and stove are networking properly in apartment 3. and then as of January 13th, 2025, We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. We're not working. replaced police contact construction services. Window is in disrepair not staying in track and not able to stay open. Sealing is steamed and cracked from water intrusion after roof damage during Hurricane Milton. Additional relevant facts, in this case are there are two post disaster emergency permits that are in process. One was applied for on December 13th, 2024 and the other on January 9th, 2025. And this concludes my presentation. Okay, great. Senator Namin address. Sure, it's Randall Cortner. It's 2215 Gulf Boulevard, Indian Rocks Beach, Florida, 3375. Cortner? Cortner, COR. Yes, sir. Okay, boy, this is a very new case in terms of your compliance states. I'm sorry. I see the owner or property manager. I'm sorry. Property manager. Yes, ma'am. Oh, you're property manager? Yes, sir. Very new case. Your compliance state was this month or in the middle of this month. So, understand the variety of violations. You have applied for two permits as I understand? Yes, sir. Okay. And because this case really your compliance date in terms of me was last week. I'm a little sensitive to the fact that it's a tenant complaint, but the fact that the compliance date was just a week ago, I'm gonna grant you some additional time to go ahead and get the process going, get the permits and so on, et cetera. Appreciate that, sir. Any other questions you want to fire at me or? No, sir. Just appreciate the help. They can touch with your codes and investigators. I order that for item C294. Case number 2417979. Lean certification. Be deferred for 90 days or until May the 26th, 2025. I am assuming that within that time frame you will get some permits and you've heard me mention what happens if there's a permits issue. Yes sir. These remains on hold pending you completing the permits. Yes sir. Okay. Thank you. Wish you well. Okay. Item C-91. Property owner, ACHU, Invest U investments LLC violation our investigator Jose Rodriguez. I'm Sorry, I'm Jose Rodriguez colds investigative for the city of St. Petersburg testifying the reference to item number C 91 case number 23 day I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. South and I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. It's a property of the single-family structure and is occupied by tennis. The case began on May 26 of 2023 as the Coals initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing a copy of the Coal Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on October 3rd of 2023. This property was last reinspected on February 19th of 2025. Five out of six violations have been corrected since this case began. No work has been completed since the last meeting. The remaining violation is. permit is required for a new window, and window of windows installed in alteration of structure by removing a window. Additional relevant facts regarding this case are, there's a residential renovations permit number 24-0200546, which remains in process. And the last action was ready for corrections as of May 21st of 2024 and this concludes my presentation Permit was sent back for corrections in May 2024 correct. That's the last action is ready for corrections as of May 21st of 24. Yes, sir Thank you. I was ready. Welcome. Hi, My name is Andrew again. Vegan. It's a Randall Cortner and it's 2215 Gulf Boulevard Indian Rock speech floor to 3378. Five. Okay, Mr. Carter, this is a completely different case. Yes, ma'am. You really want to be property manager? This one I should have studied harder in school, sir. Okay. This case has been before me, on multiple times I've granted 135 days. The case goes back to May 2023. This is not one I have a whole lot of patients for. And especially since the testimony is that the permit has been in process since May 2020. For war. Yes, sir. So, and for your information, I've certified a lot of fines against this property already. So unless you can give me some other ways, I'm in the mind to just continue to certify fines. What are you gonna do? Uh, just acting as the property manager here, I showed up just to respect for the city. The contractor is apparently ill in Orlando somewhere and from what I'm told, they're waiting on an architect. The plans that were given the city wanted like an architect to certify. So they're waiting to get those back. And again, I'm not involved in the process nor do I own it, but you know, I was born here and live here, and that respect wanted to be here. Yeah, it's a little tough to get the architect to do anything in 12 months, but anyway. I totally agree. I order that for item C 91, case number 23, 9574 that the BERS boardify an additional in in the amount of $5,250. Which is just sure. And on it. It's a crew. It's all I can tell you. Yes, sir. OK. And I wish you luck. Yeah, I'm going to do my best here, you know? Yeah, well, you got 86 owners I represent. They're not all awesome. And the five out of six done are great, except that this is pending. Yeah, okay. All right, have a good day. Item C272, property owner, twin, cam management, and constituents, investigators, right on Melendez. 7- right. Okay. All right. Okay. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All C, 272, case number 24, 629 regarding property located at 2818, 43rd Street South. I was running at the beginning of this meeting. This property used to be a multi-family, but now it's just one structure left and it's vacant. This case began on January 11, 2004, and it was a close follow-up case. After the adventuary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on July 2, 2024. This property was last reinspected on February 11, 2025 and four out of 13 violations have been corrected since this case began. They remain structured, I'm sorry. Yeah, the following work have been completed since the last meeting. The main structure was demolished. We know active permit. And there was a accessory structure permit on 2312001644 644 that expire and now is extended into May 2025. The remaining violations are the, Mr. Shaw, the violations that I'm going to read is for the remaining structure. structure 28, 2018 and a half for 41st tree. The front door is in this repair with missing and broken glass. Flajia's supper is in this repair. We write a word. The roof decking is in this repair. So the roof material is loose in damage in various areas. The cross space is open in various areas. The wood framing on the hot water heater is in this repair. Exterior walls are now maintained, and there is a sign of missing stucco and cracking various areas of the exterior walls. Additional reveling facts in regards to this case is on my last inspection I was not able to verify the secondary structure to see if some of these repairs was done because there's a fence around. Also, there's a demo permit for the front structure. There remains in process since April 2024, and that permit is 23-03-001970. And there is a temporary use permit for that property that was just filed on February 18 and is 0.02093 for some construction. But again, the main reason we are here is for that back structure. And also, the main structure was demolished. And there's no permit for that. And this will conclude my presentation. Okay. Thank you, Zarina. Hi, your name and address please. Morning, Derek Althar, 9998, 54th Avenue North, St. Petersburg, Florida, 33708. Oh, your last name? O-U-T-A-R. And your relationship to twin-key? One of the owners. One of the owners? Someone else going to testify or not? This is by new GC. So when we get there, he's going to testify. I don't need his name or address. Okay. Okay. All right, Strider. Four out of 13 done, but man, what a mess. So where are we and where are we going with this? So let me rewind from 23 from when we bought the property. We assumed all these code enforcement problems from the existing owner. So it was all on, there's a garage up as he touched that we had a permit to remove it. We reopened the permit to close it. We failed, we were supposed to go tomorrow yesterday and re-grade the land because Inspector says We need to grade the land in Potsod and even though we're splitting the land and putting two brainy homes. So he failed us on that inspection. So we're re-grading the land between today and tomorrow, re-inspecting that, that closed that out. On the ADU, what was going on with the ADU is it's from the existing owner. We can't touch that structure. We asked for a renovation permit. We've been back and forth with them The door that we're talking about everything they wanted boarded up So we boarded everything up because there's squatters and they were throwing garbage over it So we had a garbage problem with the code code works and also so took care of that now then the cities came back and said We want the ADU to be fenced in before we give you the permit so we fenced in the ADU So there's that we we fence it in because that's what they wanted. Now besides the renovation permit now they want a special use permit. So we've been to the 80 you. So there's that. We've been to them because that's what they wanted. Now besides the renovation permit now they want a special use permit because they don't want that structure by itself and not until get the renovation special use permit then they will issue our demo permit for our house. So I'm literally just sitting around waiting for either to do illegal work and keep on going with the code enforcement or even requesting permits. So City of St. Pete that's where Matt and then we're dealing with another department to split the lot. So until both structures are gone about lots we can't split the lot either. So the property is vacant right? It's a can be it's been vacant since before we bought in 23. There's nothing there so it's boarded up they didn't want to water because we had squatters living the airplane guns on workers so we boarded it up too so I can't test the property without permits So every time we're getting code code violations is because we need permits and this is since April and we're back and four back and forth And we just found out of special use permit now for that So we're waiting on that and they will not give us the demo permit We're gonna have to open and close even though the's gone. We can't even plan. We used to own the three houses across the street. We rehab that with ADU and we booked two reading homes. So we're going to build two reading homes again. We're not even there yet. So we're going over a year now with the city impermanence. So we can touch this up, but then we're going to get it red tag if we touch anything. And then code enforcement says we're not doing it, but it's an existing problem from when we purchase the property. We raised an interesting point from the standpoint that our codes compliance investigators are required by law to cite the violations. I mean, it's not an option for them. That is what they must do under the law. However, each case was then reviewed by staff, et cetera, et cetera. So. for them that is what they must do under the law. However, each case is then reviewed by staff, et cetera, et cetera. So in this particular case, I'm going to grant some additional time because number one, you've got some of the violations done and you're moving forward, but understand that you keep getting slapped with violations because the investigators under the law must do that. They have no choice. I order that for item C272 case 24629 that further lean certification be deferred for 120 days or until June the 25th, 2025. Within 128 if you you can solve that problems, we're in trouble. I got another question. Sure. There's two case numbers coming for the same property. So the original long list, laundry list of all the things that was on the main structure. When I spoke to them today, they said there's only one case. I want to make sure there was also a court day for tomorrow for this same property for all these things. So, is it just now we're dealing with the 80 problems and then we're dealing with the open. Okay. I do have one case for all the properties that was there. There's no additional case. So did we close additional one or no? This is it. Yeah. Okay. Because when I went to Coda for the last week, they let me reprint them and there's two different case numbers on it. So that we close the old case with the laundry list because the new case is only three items on the new. Yeah, case was closed because he demonized the structure. Okay, I wanted to make sure. Yeah. So now we're moving the ADU problems and the three permanent problems to one of these. As I pointed out many times before your best advisor or friend happens to be your investigator who can tell you at least the direction to go. OK. I understand she's been in communication with a lady the other partner that's involved. We've asked because it said one day it was the 26th. We asked the community to show up and they said yes. That's why I want to make sure I'm not showing up to our court cases and resolve issues. So OK. Thank you. You bet, I wish you well. Good luck. Item C70, property owner Chris Kavan and Philip Kavan, investigator Greg Foster. Good morning. I'm Greg Foster, I'm a codes investigator for the city of St. Petersburg. I'm testifying in reference to at number C-70 case number 2-3-209-80. This is regarding property located at 3553 Haines Road North. I was sworn at the start of the meeting. It's property is a single family structure. It's occupied by the owner. Case began on November 13, 2023 as it codes initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement's board order was censored by mail on April 2nd, 2024. The property was last re-inspected. February 19th, 2020, 5-0 out of one violations have been corrected, since the case began. Since the last meeting, I believe there's been some back and forth between contractors, building department owner. Again, there's a little triangle of miscommunication there. Right. The remaining violation is that after the fact permit required is required for a rear-car port addition. Please see the building and apartment. No addition or relevant facts. This concludes my presentation. It's all about the car port. Correct. I think there's a zoning issue setbacks. Couple feet here or there hi name and address Hi, my name is Karris Havin. I live at 3553 Haynes Road North St. Petersburg, Florida 3 3704 Okay, you and I have met a couple of times Lance. I thought this was gonna solve itself. What what's going on? At this, where we're at is there's, like you said, there's a zoning communications and then there's a building communications. Zoning had instructed, I get the mixed up on what they, I'm sure that's what's happening with them as well. But zoning, I believe, is saying we need gutters. I have a person on call to put the gutters on, but in order to put the gutters on, building has to approve the in process aftermath permit that is going in. Those engineering, my engineer has redone the plans a few times. They are calling it a covered porch, not a car port because of the setback zoning issues. My engineer is actually going into the city today. He's in St. Petersburg. We spoke on the phone last night so that I had a valid update to give you. He needs to speak to them building because they had requested a new CAD file because ours is from 2006 that's the survey file I had to learn that it's a 2d representation of our home so per that new CAD file his designs meet the setback requirements so that's where he needs to go into the office and understand the five-foot and three-foot setbacks We did rename it a covered porch versus a car port because of the terminology that's used with the setbacks that are in place. And this is not a new structure. This is a structure that we had that was damaged during Irma that we reinforced and reset up. So it is pitched, but it does need gutters because of the flooding, I guess they anticipate. So that is where we're at. I just would really like an extension to get these cats herded a little bit better for us. OK, I'm happy. I'm happy to grant that. Thank you. I order that for case number C 70. Yeah, C 70, case 2-3, 2-0, 9-8-0. That means certification be deferred for 120 days. Or until June the 25th, 2025. The reason I went on 120 days is this this is not an emergency and you're trying to address the issue so within 120 hopefully. Thank you. Done. Thank you both. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Item C 230, Property Owner, Lauren Real Estate Holdings, Investigator, David Walker. Before we go. I'm going to go any further. I'm showing four cases. It was 29, eliminated or deferred or where are we? You called for for 230 correct? 230? Yeah. Okay. I'm showing multiple cases. Oh, 232-31-232. Is that what you're talking about? Yeah. So 229 must have been. Are we going to do them all at the same time? Are we doing them individually? No, no, we take them individually. Starting with C229, is that the first one you called? No, C229. I think all 230. But I'm looking at my sheets and I'm showing four cases. 29 is number 159. Oh, yeah, sorry. 229. So yeah, 229. So all four is still active. At the same property. Didn't understand. All four. So we're going to go to two. We're starting with two. Two 29, yeah. 29, okay. Okay, fire away. Good morning. I'm David Rock Walker, Coates Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying a reference to item C229, case 239493 regarding property located at 2680 54th AF South. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. The property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on May 25th, 2023, and is a code's follow-up case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on August 29, 2023. This property was last re-inspected on February 21, 2025. Zero out of one violations have been corrected since the case began. No work has been completed since the last meeting. The remaining violation is observed work completed to the stairs to building four and five outside of the scope of permits. Permit 23-01001518 for building four and 23-01001519 for building five are to replace stair treads and stringers and replace handrails and observed and handrails. Observed entire bottom portion of the rare stair cases removed, scope of permit needs to be expanded to encompass the work completed and to change to current contractor. Additional relevant facts regarding this case are, building four has an in process ACOM permit for the stair repair since February of 2024. Under permit number 24-2001564. Building five has an approved ACOM permit under permit number 24-02001923 that expired on October 7th, 2024. This concludes my presentation. Okay, thank you. All right, name and address, please. Catherine Curtis. You have to speak up. Catherine Curtis, 4635, 83rd Avenue North, Penalse Park, 33781. Okay, I think you and I have met on a number of occasions, but at least according to my record. No, you met with Kelsey, Harbin, our manager. I'm the assistant community manager. Case goes back to 2023. I just for your background and information, I have granted on five different occasions going back to 2023 and coming into 2024, 2020 or five times for 165 days on this case. But I just heard doesn't change anything in my opinion. So unless you have some new input that's not in the testimony here, I'll give you my ruling on this case. I don't have any information. The only thing I can say right now they're in the process of Replacing all of the roofs for the 27 buildings But other than that, that's all I know at this time. I'm just kind of standing in for my manager who had an inspection today. I really have a little choice but frankly is over this course of time, aside from all the times I have granted an additional time, I have also had to certify fines because it goes way back to 2023. Therefore, I have no choice but to rule today that I order that for item C229, case number 23, 9493, that the board certifying additional lien of $7,000. Now, it accumulates each of these cases, it accumulates at the rate of 200 a day. So it amounts to a huge amount of money. I hear that you say they're in the process, that's great. But I really have a little choice as I granted all of this. So moving on. Item C230, violation address 26850, fourth avenue, South property owner, Lurin real estate holdings, investigator, walker. I'm David Rock Walker, codes investigator for the city of St. Petersburg, testifying reference to item C230, case 23-21734, regarding property located at 268504th, AF South. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on November 29th, 2023, and is a code's follow-up case. After the evident cherry hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on April 2nd, 2024. The property was last reinspected on February 21st, 2025, and zero out of one violations have been corrected since the case began. No work has been completed since the last meeting. The remaining violation is Joyce Roth and disrepair on the second floor balcony for apartment 239, is impacting both the first and second floor units. A permit will be required to repair balcony, access to balcony, and patio must remain secure to prevent use until final approved inspection is conducted. There are no relevant facts regarding this case. This concludes my presentation. Okay, thank you. I name it address again, please. Catherine Curtis, 4635, 83rd Avenue North, Penoes Park, 33781. Okay, Ms. Curtis, this case has been performing. Now this is a new case than the other one, but it still goes back to November 2023. I granted time last summer, additional time. And therefore, unless you have some additional information, I'm really left with little choice here I don't okay I order that for item C 230 case number two three two one seven three four that the board certify an additional Lean of seven thousand dollars And it still accumulates at 200 a day. Okay. So give me the next case for Lauren, please. Item C231, property owner, Lorraine real estate, holding LXI, investigator, David Walker. I'm David Rock-Walker, codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying a reference to item C231, case 23-22674, regarding property located at 2680, 54th Av South. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. The property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on December 14, 2023, and as the codes follow up case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on April 2, 2024. The property was last reinspected on February 21, 2025. Zero out of one violations have been corrected since this case began. No work has been completed since the last meeting. The remaining violation is the patio area at Building 11 for units 113 and 112 cannot be used under the current conditions due to the state of disrepair at the post on the far right side of the patio. A permit will be required for full repair and replacement. Additional relevant facts are there was emergency showing that was done but no permit was obtained. This concludes my presentation. Okay, thank you. Hi, your name is address again. Catherine Curtis 4635 83rd Avenue North, Penellas Park 337, 8-1. Okay, Ms. Curtis, just for the record, this case has been before me on three occasions in June in August and September last year, I granted up to 95 days, the correct violations and nothing's happened unless you can give me some new additional information. No additional information. Thank you for that. I order that for item C231 case number 226-7-4 that board certify an additional of $7,000. Okay, now my record shows we have one more learned case. Item C232, property on our learn real estate holdings, investigator David Walker. I'm David Rock-Walker, codes investigator for the city of St. Petersburg, testifying in reference to item C232, case 23-22684, regarding property located at 268054th Ave South. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. The property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on December 14, 2023, and is a code's follow-up case. After the evident cherry hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board order was sent to the owner by mail on April 2, 2024. The property was last reinpected on February 21, 2025. Zero out of two violations have been corrected since this case began. No work has been completed since the last meeting. The remaining violations are doors to both HVAC closets do not fully close. Doors and door frames for the HVAC closet for unit 15 are damaged with water and mold. It must be replaced. A report from a licensed professional may be required indicating the water damage intrusion has been located and corrected to FBC's industrial standards and may result in mold remit, remit, wow, sorry, in row and wow. Okay. Remediation, thank you. There are no relevant facts regarding this case. This concludes my presentation. Okay. I'm scared as your name would address again please. Catherine Curtis 4635 83rd Avenue North, Penoes Park 33781. Any additional information there? You okay? This is the newest case. I've only heard this case once before, but I did grant for the record 60 days at that time. So you get it corrected, you get it permit or whatever it was necessary. nothing has happened and we are now in 2025 I really have a little choice but to again order that for item C, 232, case number 2322684 that the board certify an additionally of $7,000. So all I can do is at the at this point, and it's only because they dragged back so far and we've granted time and my hands are really pretty much. No, I understand. Sorry to have sounded like I'm beating you over the head. No, it's... I understand totally. The next one is also Lauren Real Estate Holding. Item C300. This is for a different property. I know my lucky day. Yeah, I'm sure there were only four cases. This is the other property, my low. C300. Property owner, Lauren real estate holdings, investigator Joseph Brunori. I am Joseph Brunori, Coates Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying a reference to item number C300, case 2417505 regarding the property located at 54578 Avenue, North. It was sworn in at the start of this meeting. Property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on September 20th, 2024 and is a code's follow-up case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on January 28th, 2025. Property was last re-inspected on January 9th, 2025. Two out of four violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are. One of the stairways is in disrepair with damage and or rust to fascia sheet metal, covering the landing, exposing the structural steel in concrete. A permit is required for this repair. And there is a broken parking block with exposed rebar in the air being used near a landscape area. This concludes my presentation. Okay. Okay Ms. Curtis, name an address? Catherine Curtis, 4635, 83rd Avenue North, Penales Park, 33781. Okay, this unlike the other cases we were dealing with is a relatively new case. This was the compliance state was only late last month. Okay. So I want to look at two out of four violations I've been taking care of. You know what those two were or? I don't work there. I work at the Morgan. So I don't have a lot of information about the Milo property. I wish I could. Do you show what's up? Bees and junk. Oh, OK. All right. I'm much more willing to. There have been no lean certified in these cases yet. So I'm much more willing to say to you, I'm going to grant some additional time because the case is new. The track record for Lauren isn't great. So, being generous when I do what I'm going to do with this case and probably the one following. However, you can take that message back at this point in time. It's only because it's a very new case that I'm granting some additional time. Thank you. I order that for that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not saying that I'm not call the next case. Item C298, Property Honor, Law and Reel Estate Holdings, Investigator Joseph Bernoy. I'm Joseph Bernoy, Coates Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying in reference to item C298, case 2415752. Regarding the property located at 54578th Avenue, North. It was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. The case began on August 27, 2024 as a tenant complaint case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on January 28, 2025. Property was last re-inspected on January 9, 2025. One out of three violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are. As of 1024, 24 black mold has developed in the hall bathroom and maintenance has already removed the section of the damaged ceiling. The mold is visible in the opening as well as seeping through the other side of the wall into the entry closet. Photos have been uploaded to the case file and mold remediation port is from a licensed agent as necessary. Vent fan in the bathroom is in disrepair and the bathroom ceiling has been removed. Additional relevant facts regarding this case are on February 19th received an agreement signed by the tenant that she will move to another unit, an elderly tenant. She needed a first floor unit so they found one for her and they have an agreement that she'll move to that unit by March 15th so that they can begin the work Okay, Miss Curtis your name and address again, sir Catherine Curtis 4635 83rd Avenue North panels park 3378 one Again, this is a relative we knew K-8, but and I'm glad this tenant can move Yeah, have not certified any leans on this property to date. And I will not today granting and recognizing that some action is being taken. I order that for item C298, case number 2415752, the lean certification be deferred for ladies gonna move and so forth for, well for 90 days or until May the 26th, 2025. Okay, now do we have any more learn? I show a lot. Yes we do. Uh-huh. One moment. I show it 297. Does that, was that withdrawn? That is good. You gave me 298. 297 is closed. Okay, closed. Oh great. I love that C 301 property owner Lorin real estate holdings investigator Joseph Brenore. Okay let me you know Lonnie was 299 all simple. Okay great. Well, Lauren's making progress. Okay go Go ahead, number 300. I am just Bernorica. Three oh one. Oh, I'm sorry. Three oh one, go ahead number 300. I am just for Norrick. Three oh one. Oh, I'm sorry. Three oh one. Go ahead. Coates investigator for the city of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item C, 301, case 2418728, regarding the property located at 545-78th Avenue, North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. Its property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. Case began on October 25th, 2024 and as a code's follow-up case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on January 28th, 2025. Property was last re-inspected on January 9th, 2025. Four of nine violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are areas of stucco are cracked and falling away. Several exterior doors are in disrepair, including but not limited to the entry to the electrical utility room. Was open and the lock appears damaged. Exterior doors to the first floor locked maintenance areas are damaged. Some of the stairs are in disrepair including Benat limited to the treads at the bottom of the stairway closest to unit 112 are rusted and broken. Several areas around this building have junk including Benat limited to the open and unsecured electrical room a a refrigerator in the hall by unit 112, and furniture in the hall outside of unit 312, and as of January 9th, 2025, the junk remains outside of unit 312. Also, gutters in several areas causing well-builder stains on the structure, the poured concrete ramp step up into unit 101 is broken and disrepair. And there is a handicap parking block missing a large section with exposed rebar. This concludes my presentation. I mean, I do the four violations are corrected. Yes, the four violations that were corrected were paint on the exterior structure insect past trees branches hazardous after the hurricane had a tree leaning on this building and electrical disappear. I think that was just an outlet or something in the in the common area Okay, Miss Curtis name and address please Yeahcertus, 4635, 83rd Avenue North, Penales Park, 337, 81. Okay, now as I look at this case, the compliance date was actually last week. Okay. So, the new case at 4 out of 9 have already been done. I want to recognize that. Still a lot of work to do, but I'll grant some additional time. I order that for items C-301, C-301, case number 24, 18728, that further lean certification be deferred for 90 days, or until May the 26th, 2025. And there have been no lien certified to date. Okay, can Catherine go to lunch? Nope. No. What do you think about that? 90 days before. Item C302, property owner, Lorraine Real Estate Holdings Investigator Joseph Brunori. I am Joseph Brunori codes investigator for the city of St. Petersburg testifying in reference to item C 302 case 2418 739 regarding the property located at 545 78th Avenue north. It was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. The case began on October 24th 2024 and is a code's follow up case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on January 28th, 2025. This property was last re-inspected on February 18th, 2025. Five out of six violations have been corrected since this case began. The following work has been completed since the last meeting. Junk has been removed from the roof over the entry near Unit 207. The remaining violations are, laundry room doors are missing handles. Additional relevant facts regarding this case are, I spoke to maintenance on February 19th, 2025. He has the parts and the repairs are scheduled and this concludes my presentation We got one that's a winner there right Miss Curtis your name and address Catherine Curtis 4635 83rd Avenue North Penelope Park 33781 I thought you win this one too. I order that for item C302. Case number 2418739, then lean certification. Be deferred for 90 days or until May the 26, 2025. I'm sure you can get the doorknob on by then. Thank you. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to joke. Oh, it's okay. Anyway, do we have any more? That was it. That was it? Take lunch. Thank you very much. Thank you for coming. There's shelves. Yes. I'm gonna take a 10 minute break for staff to. Oh, you took my lunche comments, sir. Yeah. Not quite a. Ten minute break. All right, we will have a break for 10 minutes. We will reconvene around 10.30. Okay. you I'm the the and you I'm going to be a little bit more careful. Oh Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr the Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. I'm gonna go home. the to the you . the you I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm gonna have to go back to the hotel. . . . . you I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more patient. I'm going to be a little bit more patient. I'm going to be a little bit more patient. I'm going to be a little bit more patient. I'm going to be a little bit more patient. I'm going to be a little bit more patient. I'm going to be a little bit more patient. I'm going to be a little bit more patient. I'm going to be a little bit more patient. Thank you. . . . . I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm sorry. . I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. the Thank you. the to Yeah. I Hey I'm going to go back. Okay, we are back in session. Please call the next key item C7 property owner Kathleen Hunedance, 502, 4 Emerson Avenue Land Trust, Investigator, Anthony Rivers. I'm Anthony Rivers, Coals Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, Testifying and Reference Item Number C7, Case number 23-22778, regarding property located at 5024, Emerson Avenue, South. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property's multifamily structure is occupied by tenants. This case began on December the 18th of 2023, and is a tenant complaint case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on April 2, 2024. This property was last re-inspected on February 24, 2025, and three out of four violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violation is that it was cited for illegal dwelling units that do not have a certificate of occupancy. And as far as the violations that were already taken care of, they included outdoor storage, wall and fence disrepair. This concludes my presentation. Okay, thank you, Anthony. Hi, name and address, sir. First Paragon, I represent the property owner, attorney at Lewis Longman Walker, located at 100. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have is the big ticket. I was actually just retained the day of the property card interpretation appeal in late August, early September. And my first time before you was September 24th, or you granted an extension, since then, it's been difficult to retain an engineer contractor, inspector, et cetera, to, due to the hurricanes. However, we were able to find an engineering firm to assist with some inspections, which they have done. There is a ways to go. However, we need to get, you know, stamped plans from the engineer as built, so we're gonna apply to the city building department for, after the fact permitting to, you know, for accessory dwelling units and things that the code does permit. So. I can't be a little confused by your testimony. An accessory building, an illegal unit is a living unit or an accessory item. Yeah, so the units that we cited, we found that there were some units in the back of this property that were being occupied, probably two or three that had tenants there that had no certificate of occupancy and so this started as a tenant complaint actually and so that's how we got involved and as we dug deeper we found that those units at the rear of the property were not legal and during your last inspection there's still people in the occupied yes. I'm trying to get the right picture here. Three out of four have been corrected, but this one's a biggie. Yes, sir. And unfortunately, my client bought this property, thinking it was multi-family use. However, they were woefully wrong and now. I am here to help them. They, there's a language They're out of town as well. So we're trying to, like I said, get the engineering services to see what we can do with the property aside from demolishing the illegal units. And one of those things would be a permitted accessory dwelling unit, which is permitted in the zoning district. Okay. All right. I'll grant some additional time, Councilor, to see if you can sort it out if not the case will come before me again. So with that, I will order that for item C7 case number 2322 3, 227, 7, 8, that lean certification be deferred for 90 days, they make that 120 days till June the 25th, 2025. Now I need to point out to you, Mr. Gaurigan, that I had granted previously in last September 120 days. So that's 240 days, which means if I see the case again, I'm going to have real trouble not imposing the fines. They are accumulating $150 a day. And today, had I certified them, you would have, they would have been fine $27,300 in increases. Just to give you to give that client a picture. So, 120 days. Sir, thank you. Thank you. Thanks. Item C 221 property owner Owner P, K, C Property Investments, LLC, Investigator Zone 9. Jeane Medell. Okay. Good morning. I am Jean Medoucote's investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, Testifying and Reference to ITEM numbers. Okay. Good morning. I am Jean Medoucote's investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, Testifying and Reference to item number C, 221, case number 24 dash 7700 regarding property located at 201, 7th Avenue North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is partly occupied by its tenants. This case began on May 1, 2024 and is a C-Click Fixed Case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement's board order was sent to the owner by mail on September 3, 2024. The property was last inspected on February 14, 2025. Zero out-of-one violations have been corrected since the case began. Additional sorry, the remaining violations are permits may be required for interior renovations at commercial property to include but not limited to plumbing, plumbing relocation, and interior walls or doors. Additional relevant facts regarding this case was ACOM Permit 24-08001853 has been voided as of 20th of February 2025. No work or inspections have been performed. And this concludes my presentation. Let me understand the permit was boydied this month. Yes. Okay, thank you. Hi, name an address, sir. Good morning. My name is Philip Kraft. My address is 2 through 9, 176 terrorist drive east, Reddington shows. U-3708. Okay, see. Yes, I'm the manager. I'm the manager. OK, I'm gonna manage you up. OK, heard the testimony of the city. Case goes back to just last year. Permit was voided this month. What's going on? Can I go back to the stado? I just did give a little bit of history of that side. OK, or? Well, a little bit, but I want to or well a little bit but I want to okay well initially we got the notification that we needed a permit for we installed a new toilet and vanity and we didn't realize that we had to have a permit was filed but it was filed on the residential permit so we couldn't go forward with that. But you did the work. Yes. So we couldn't go forward with that. As the contractor had changed it over to non-residential or commercial. They said I would do that. Storm hit, he couldn't come out for months to even look at the work. The employee who actually did the work for him was let go or left the company. So he got to the point where we couldn't get them to change the permit over. So I went to the city and asked for some guidance. I sent a notarized letter of termination to the contractor and then that was, I did that, I got one in January, sent another one in February and then I had that, I went to the city, they said they can't process it until I give them the information of the new contract, because they both have to be filed together. You have not found one yet. We have found one, but not in time for this. And yeah, and well permitting is said, get the new contractor, submit a new permit. So essentially what's happened. Sorry? The city permitting to permit is said, getting new contractors to submit a new permit app. Yes, yeah, because when, so I sent the notarized certified letter to the contractor saying, I was terminating their services, because that's apparently what I, not legally what I have to do, because even though I'm the owner, I can't go and cancel the contractor I have to go through that process which I did And I think that is what has triggered the Avoiding of the permit. We now have someone else who will come and Submit the permit Yeah, Denny's plumbing at clear water who was said they would do it Denny's plumbing we're gonna. Yeah, there's, yeah, Denny's plumbing at Clearwater. Who was it? Said I would do it. Denny's plumbing. Working with Denny's. All right, I'll just make a note of that. All right, let's, no leans have been certified on the property so far. Technically I can certify 24,000 today. They are accumulating at the rate of 200 a day. I will not certify any today. graduate some time to get the new contract to get the permits. Permit straight now. I order that for item C221, case number 247-7000, that lean certification, you have a contractor? You have a con, the lean certification be deferred for 90 days or until May the 26th, 2025. We're not able to get a permit by May then we'll have some problems. Okay, thank you very much. I asked a question or I don't have that. If I can answer it. Okay. On the violation notice that was read out, it doesn't specify a precise violation and says permits may be required for this. And that's also been a difficulty with getting contractors. they're like, what is it? Yeah, we want to ask you, but I'm like, I don't know that exactly. Agile that one. Yeah, so anytime that we cite for permits, there's going to be things that we can obviously see that work was working done, but a lot of times there's a lot of stuff we can't see as well. So we put that in there that way. You know what work was done on the interior or exterior that maybe we did not observe. And we're trying to get ahead of coming back later and saying, okay, well, you did this, this, this, and this. But now we see, you know, this other issue and you never got your permits for that. So you've done the work. You understand the full scope of everything that was done at the property and the goal should be to get a permit to cover that full scope. But we always don't have that information, depending on the type of property, commercial property. understand the full scope of everything that was done at the property and the goal should be to get a permit to cover that full scope. But we always don't have that information. Depending on the type of property, commercial properties have different standards and single-family properties. So varying requirements could be out there and we encourage the property owners to work with the permitting department specifically because we don't want to speak on their behalf or something that they may exempt for certain reasons. So it's just, I understand the frustration of maybe being vague language, but it's really to encourage you to work directly with the permitting department because they are the ones that are going to be issuing that permit to resolve the issue. Yeah, I understand. It's just that I'd hate to get the position where, I think I've done everything. I've got all the permits and then someone comes and says you didn't get a permit to explain it. I'm like I didn't know I needed that. Now. I'd hate to get the position where I think I've done everything. I've got all the permits and then someone comes and says, you didn't get a permit for the XYZ and I'm like, I didn't know I needed that. Mark, who's the owner of the business, that this business has not been operational since August, or since the meeting we had, because we can't get a permit properly. So he basically has a space that he's paying grant on with that business. Yeah. So we're trying what we can. Miss Roberts last time, Angela was great. And I worked with Mr. Rome and Miss Brown. And everyone's been great about telling me that vague thing. The biggest hiccup that I have had helping fill out is that just like he had mentioned, Randy Carter did a job for air quality control. He's no longer with the company. And this was last August. Everything seemed fine at September and then October rolled around and I can appreciate your concern about the hurricane and the start of before the hurricane and I agree 100 percent. But since October, the contact I had with the company, she evacuated and I caught up with her at the end of the year and with Randy Carter no longer working there, they just seemed to be rescheduling, not showing up. He goes, I have to see the work before I pull permit. The guy doesn't work for me anymore. With that said, my fault, I take full responsibility for believing in this company and thinking it was all going to work out. The last interaction I had with them was on February 6th. And it's just not going to happen. So I've been talking to Peter from Denny's plumbing at a clear water, and he wants me to tell him this afternoon exactly what the city needs, and he will make it happen. If you don't mind, I have a list here of the permits and all this stuff we've pulled, Old Northeast Tavern has been in business for 20 years. We're just trying to give it a facelift, kind of worn out, kind of need to revive it. It's kind of like bar rescue without John Taffer. But through the years, we've always done everything right. And I have everything here to prove that. This is new to me. I'm taken over the business. My business partner focused more on the back end. So this is all new to me. I want to do it right. We're just looking. We want you to do it too. From the Coads and Compliance Department, we can advise when it's over to the Planning Department or the Permitting Department, you have to deal with that. But our staff can tell you what you need to do. Give you some direction, point you in the right direction. Your best friend happens to be a Coads and Forrestment, but you just heard from the director of the department. Yes, and thank you. And staff is available to answer those questions. You have no idea how many hours above and beyond that the staff of this department spends on the phone or out in the field trying to help people answer questions. It's amazing. I see it, you don't. So your information and your advice is available to you if you ask the people starting with your investigator. The Ministry of Shorts and the whole board, thank you so much for your time, your information, and given us the opportunity to speak. Like I said, everyone I've dealt with has been very friendly and very cooperative, and we'll just get with Miss, I'm sorry, I don't know. Yeah, if we can just talk and maybe exchange emails, I'll email you every day until you tell me to stop. Mr. Solotip, I may just quickly, I understand that you're working through the process, but this is for everybody in the audience as well, the importance of getting those permits before the work begins. Because when you're trying to backtrack or you're trying to go to a different contractor, again, they didn't do the work, so they're not aware of exactly what was done. And oftentimes, that requires sight visits to see exactly the scope of work that was done, so it's vital to get those permits done beforehand, and then that eliminates a lot of these headaches trying to unravel the work that's already been completed. I understand 100 percent and thank you. And that's why I have a list of everything we've done in the past, every expansion, every upgrade we've done. We honestly didn't believe. And I'm sorry I got fill involved. It's my, I'm leasing the space. And I hate wasting this time and please, I'm closed. I want to get this done and passed just as much if not more than you do. It cost me money every day. I just, please believe I'm not wasting your time. I didn't think I needed to pull permit to put new toilets and I put new commercial flow, good stuff. Now you got some direction and a little more time. I'm helping advice. Which I appreciate. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Appreciate you coming in. Thank you. Yes, here we go. Thank you. Item C 106 property owner Yes, here we go. Item C 106. Property owner Luis Young, investigator Jose Rodriguez. 106 case number 24 dash, 1318, regarding property located at 1664, 12,000 new south, and I was one in the start of this meeting. It's property of the single family structure that is occupied by tenants. Case began on January 25th of 2024, and it's a citizen complaint case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board's order was censored on about mail on May 28th of 2024. The property was last re-inspected on February 19th of 2025. Zero out of six violations have been corrected since this case began. No work completed since the last meeting, the remaining violations are. Repair all areas of Fence and Disrepair. Repair Security Door, it means Entrance and Disrepair. Repair Garage Door and Dis. And as of February 19th, the 25th, the garage door is now detached. Painting our areas of structure, where paint is chipping, peeling, rustling, and where bare wood is present. Remove our junk trash and debris. A legal premises agent is required for property. And repair our areas of fascia and softness and disrepair. There are no additional relevant facts regarding this case and this concludes my presentation. I thank you, Jose. Sir, name an address. David Rubin. I live in 1664, 12th Avenue, South. I also live in Arizona and in Illinois. And your relationship to Louise Young's program? I'm the beneficiary of the property. I'm going through four probates that have never been done. That's why I'm not going to keep taking my money and throwing it in this house and not knowing what's going on. I'm finding out for my lawyer that I pay him for four probates. Hang on. It's in the state. Are you the petitioner in a state that's currently open? Yes. If he's a petitioner in the state, we can hear. We can hear from him. Okay. I think I heard you say you don't plan to do anything immediately. You can find it whatever you want. I've just put out too much money into that property and I can't even get it to go through the probates. Is it tenant in the property? I'm the only person in the property. You're in the property? Yes. I'm trying to stay in the property and fix it up. It is my problem, Mr. Rivman, that it's a citizens complaint. I'm very sensitive to citizens complaints, because it's obviously a neighbor who's about up to here with whatever the fence the debris whatever This case has been before me before I don't know whether it was you or someone else, but it was before me in September I granted 90 days at that point to remove the trash to do some of the work and obviously nothing has happened It's 13 months since this case was first brought to us. And so it's very difficult for me to keep granting additional time. The lines continue to build which makes no sense either. But if you have no plan to go ahead and repair this stuff and I mean I understand you don't want to put money into it or whatever I'm not picking you on that I'm just saying if there's no plan you leave my hands kind of tied and all I can do is allow the fines to to accumulate but I mean I don't even know there's not gonna be a solution to it so that's the only solution is the fines just keep bad enough I'm just trying to find out if they're sending mail who were they sitting it to? Can't answer to anybody. Nobody tells me anything. No, that's not my head. There's a director's code. We can check while we're doing that. I guess they just wanted to explain that there's not a whole lot I can do here since I'm not saying you should go do it or whatever. I'm just saying the circumstances I'm coming I have no problem fixing this property I have no problem going ahead and taking money out of my other homes at fixing this property but I've got an issue with the federal right now against someone up in New York that keeps having the mail sent to them and I have no idea what's going on until Mr. Rodriguez brings the paper to me and hands it to me then I know. Mr. Schultz. Sorry about that, yes. So we're sending the mail to the address listed on the property appraisers website which is I would assume is the last address mailing address for Luis Young. It in Buffalo, New York so we have that one and then one we're also sending mail to the actual property itself at 1664 12. I'm not receiving any. There is nothing coming there except for whatever Mr. Rodriguez gives to me. And as far as that address in New York, that is incorrect because Alzina Yon right is deceased. Everything comes to me. If I don't receive it, I can't do anything for. I'miding in the property. I'm residing there and I have not seen anything from the city of St. Petersburg, but a water bill. Beatrice, the record shows it is going to the property as well. It is, but it's being addressed to Debra Williams, so we can add another name to the case so that he can receive the mail at 166412 having yourself but we are required to send the mail to the owner of record since the property appraiser hasn't been updated with the new mailing address that is still where we have to send the mail to. Okay. Debra Williams does not stay there. If we correct addresses or whatever you can work with the staff with that. My problem is your testimony is that basically you don't want to dump a bunch of money and do anything on this right now period. I have no issue with that. The problem I have is I had to call the city to find out that there's a $27,600 lien. Yeah. Mr. Schultz. I never knew anything. Yes, sir. So the notices get mailed to the address of record per property price. But that's a legal requirement that we have. Regardless of if the person's not living there, if that's the address that they're providing, that's where we have to send notices to. It appears that we've added the additional address of the property itself, just to make sure notices were sent there. And then on top of that, we post all of the hearing notices, the results of hearings, physically at the property as well. So that would show when we post that, that there was a hearing coming up, or the results of the hearing, the fact that there was a lien that was certified, those all get posted physically at the property each month. That is how you knew to be here today. I'd received that because Mr. Rodriguez met me leaving the house and gave me the paperwork. I'm Mr. Irwin. You appeared before me in September and I granted three months' extension at that point. I'm based on your testimony today. I really have no choice but to add to the fines already placed on the property. You've heard me describe what process you might follow later on if you wish to address those. I'm doing four pro baits right now. You're not going to do anything about it. I can't do much about it either. I understand. Well, I'm just saying I'm I'm paying out $3,000 per per pay and then I I'm not even getting in some of this information. I have to call in and find out something. Well, I I'm not getting any control. I'm not helping. I am basing in on your testimony today, which is okay. For the moment, anyway, and I'm going to repair this stuff and do it, and that's fine. That's your choice. I order that for item C106 case number 241318, that means certification that the board order and certify an additional lien of $5,250. It accumulates at the rate of $150 a day while it remains out of compliance. That's all I get. Standing on the probate. Five. Until then. I wish you well with the probate. Get your notice righters, St. Jude, Great Commission Church. I'm Carl Gordon. Coz investigated for the city of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item number C 38 case number 24 dash 6 9 2 0 regarding property located at 2012, Auburn Street, South. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and occupied by tenants. This case began on April the 18, 2024 and is a citizens complaints case. After the evidentiary hearing and copy of the Code of Forestman Board, order was sent to the Onab by mail on July 30th, 2024. The property was last reinspected on February 19th, 2025. One out of two violations have been correct since this case began. The remaining violation is work active and are completed without an approved permit and or final approved inspection including the installation of a fence. Additional relevant facts regarding this case is a permit has been applied for was applied for on May of 2024. And it is currently in the in process status on June 11th, 2024. The permit was ready for corrections. So the corrections are needed at this time, and also they are currently working with the historic preservation department with this permit, and this concludes my presentation. Going back, it was sent back for corrections in June? Yes, so June, June 11 to 2024. The permit was cited as ready for corrections. Okay. Thanks, Carl. Hi, folks. Name an address. Edward Nesbitt, 4526. Yarmouth Avenue, South St. Petersburg, V37011. Mr. Nesbitt? Nesbitt, yes. And your relation to St. Jude? I'm the pastor. Very good pastor. Thank you. OK. One out of two violations have been corrected. I'd love to hear that one. The permit problem, apparently. What are we doing about that one? Well, to it all short we've been meeting with the historical and they were supposed to get back to me with some information. Our last meeting was just before the storms hit. They came out and yeah, just before, yeah. But I know they got their hands full with everything going on at the storm. So that's real justice was in that waiting pattern to see what would be the next step, whether the defense, a portion of the defense being unacceptable and another little part of the defense may be encroaching on city property what we're going to do. So I had already mentioned in my, I said what we would do is the best thing for us was to remove the fence to take it down but let us know how much to take down. And we would do that. But that's pretty much where it is. It's interesting. The citizens complain. It's a neighbor or something. But the citizen complaint was they wanted access to their backyard from our driveway. The church has a two-block driveway, believe it or not, that goes from late view, 22nd Avenue to 20th Avenue, and we've been, we put a gate in there to keep people from coming through. So she complained, we told her plus the city informed all the neighbors what was going to happen. That we were going to close off the that for us, it's a driveway, they call it an alley. That we were going to enclose it. But we enclose it because of safety. People coming through, they hit the building twice. The other thing was the vandalism in the cemetery, which is the historic site, and the dumping, just illegal dumping in that. So that was the reason for it. Go going forward, what's the game plan? All I need to know is what historical is going to tell me. You know, whether it's going to be acceptable, do we need to get a variance? in historicals probably snowed under at this point. No? The story? We need time. What we need some time. No, the historic preservation did submit comments and it's ready for corrections from historic as well. Oh, they did? Yep. This was from May, though, 2024. Oh, okay. The Historical Society or the Historical Group submitted comments to you. Do you remember those? No, nothing in writing. I mean, we met with them about May. They came out. What are we waiting for from them? So the comments from historians say that the properties of local historic landmark and exterior changes such as fencing require a certificate of appropriateness. So the application can be found online submitted to history at St. Pete.org with required submittles and they need to submit a survey of the property to confirm the fence will be installed on the subject property, a site plan and photographs of the area where the fence will be installed. Okay. So you got to submit for a certificate of... Appropriateness. Appropriateness, thank you Beatrice. Okay. Pastime, I'm going to grant you time to go ahead and do that. I want to recognize fact that other problem was taken care of. I'm sensitive to the fact that you have a neighbor complaining, but I think it needs to be more resolved and stored by historical and whatnot. So you've heard the recommendation is that you need that certificate of appropriateness. Okay. I will grant you enough time to go get that. When that happens, then this case may just disappear. Depends on what happens with the request. So I order. That for item C 38, case number two four, 692, zero. Any lean certification be deferred. We're 120 days or until June 25th, 2025. I picked 120 days because it may take a while to get the certificate of appropriate. I don't know what's involved in that, so I've given you a large window. And I hope that somehow that's resolved in this case disappears and I never see it again. All right. Bless you. Appreciate it. Item C132. Property owner 44412 LLC Investigator Monique Wattling. Violation Address 1-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6, 12 LLC. Were they here Monique? Somebody checked in. Well, if you want to sit. Yep, we can move on. Item C3... Oh, wasn't that the man who asked when his was going to be coming up? What was it? That was number 20. The one that we're skipping out. I don't know where you want. Okay. Item C 307, property owner, pacifica, emerald bay, LLC, investigators, a ride on Melendez. It's a rate of before we get going. I'm showing three cases. Correct. Well, I guess let's read the first one to see where it goes. Right there are three different apartments so. Okay thank you. Good morning I am Sir Adam Melendez going to investigate it for the city of St. Petersburg testifying a reference to item C 307 case number 24. 13957 regarding property located at 39.138 Avenue South. This property is a single home. I'm sorry, I'm missing something here. I was learning at the beginning of this meeting. This property is commercial and is occupied by tenants. This case began on August 6, 2024 and it was a tenant's complaint case. After the adventurary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on January 28, 2025. This property was less respected on February 12, 2025, and zero out of two ballots that have been corrected since this case began. The remaining ballots are, um, bedroom ceiling is damaged by water. There is evidence of mold or mail due. This washer is now working. Additional revelant facts in regards to this case is, um, I have two phone calls from the untenant, um, and, you know know work is not being done. This concludes my presentation. Okay. Okay. Thank you. It's right. A name and address. Amanda Andrales, 3901, 38 Avenue South in St. Pete, 3716. Could you spell the last name? Andra, this is a like alpha November delta Romeo alpha delta Gozulu Thank you And are you an owner or manager regional manager and also Monica Huerte? She's the new property manager that I told you guys last time that she was starting you're re I'm sorry You're relationships are specific regional manager regional manager and is the property manager that I told you guys last time that she was starting. I'm sorry, your relationship to Pacifica? Regional manager. Regional manager and is the property manager going to testify? Yep, this is Monica. You got to testify? Yes. OK, I need your name and address, too, please. It's Monica Warte spelled H-U-A-R-T-E and it's 39-01, 38th Avenue South, St. Pete, 3-3-7-1-1. 33-7-1-6. Okay. This tenant has said the ceiling is moldy and it's dishwasher doesn't work. Yep. I know, I understand. We have several. I need to jump. No, no, I know, I know, I know. Right now we're actively inspecting all the units. She's been here about two weeks. We've inspected over 100 units and have the sculptal works and pictures. We're trying to focus on the emergencies with transfers and things like that of the most important ones where the units were not in the best shape. 21 age, I know that we have worked on a couple of things, but the majority of drywall, we're working on the leaks first. So they are taping off any leaks that they're repairing right now, and then we're going to go in with the second person to do the drywall. We do have several violations that are coming up, especially tomorrow, I believe. We have seven in there. We have some other cases. I'm only dealing with this. Yes, with today. If we can have 120 days with the respect we're trying to get a full picture because we're working with FEMA, they're actually going to be renovating our units and placing residents that were displaced in those units. But we have to focus on getting a full scope of work and the ones that are emergencies will be transferring. If we can have an extension of 120 days, then I'll have a full picture on all the violations for you guys with the progress. We are actively working on them. Okay, I'm a little troubled by 120 day requests for 90, 95 days. Well, it's just, any time I understand. Going into this, why is your case for a tenant who's paying rent? This one I can get in a transfer. It's not a broader scope and look at all the things, but in this particular case, I think you should be able to address it faster than that. I am not certified any leans to date, although they do accumulate at 200 a day. And the compliance state was this month. Given that fact, I don't want to slap a bunch of fine thumb, but I'm not particularly interested in 120 days. So, but I'm willing to do with this particular case. We'll talk about the others later. I'm willing to say I order that for item C 307 case number 2-4, 1-3957, that lean certification be deferred for 45 days or until April 11th, 2025. So that means in 45 days, fix the guys dishwasher. Well, this one in particular, they changed their locks, so we have to go through the process with. Good luck. Yeah, so, yeah. Okay, there are some of the other cases and more serious, but. Yeah, we did try to go into that one and it's heard some of these other cases This is not a rocket science to read. It's not it's not let's move on. Yes, sir Okay, item C 308 property owner Pacifica Emerald Bay. I'll see investigators are item. Melinda's Good morning. I am so right. I'm Melinda's investigator for the city of San Pires for testifying and reference to item C 308 case number 24 144 a seven regarding property located at 3901 38 Avenue, so I was running at the beginning of this meeting this property is a commercial apartment complex and is occupied by tenant this case began in August 13, in 2024 and it was a tenant's complaint case. After the adventurer hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board order was sent to the owner by mail on January 28, 2025. This property was last re-inspected on February 12, the touch in 2025, and zero out of four violations have been corrected since this case began The remaining ballations are interior wall and the living room are damaged by water, the base floor, by the entrance door, and living room area are damaged by water. There is water spot by the AC event, and the AC unit is not working properly. There is ice inside the AC unit and on the outside condenser. There is a peeling paint in the washer machine plumbing area. There is light cover is missing on the stairs. How water heater drip pan is missing. And this will conclude my presentation. You're ready over the two that were taken care of. What was over the two violations that were taken care of? It was, I had zero out of four. Oh, I'm sorry I had two out of four. I thought you said zero out of four. No, zero out of four. Okay. Hi, again, I have to have your names and addresses. I'm in Andrade's 3901 Southwest 38th Avenue South in St.P. 33711. The manager? It's Monica Watte 3901 38th Avenue South St.P. 33711. Okay this is a different tenant right different yeah okay. Game plan. If we can have 45 days, we, 1, 1. Okay, this is a different tenant, right? Different, yeah. Okay. Game plan. If we can have 45 days, we'll get a knocked out. Okay, 45 days? Yeah. Yeah, this one shouldn't be. We already inspected this unit. And manager agrees. Okay. Bobra Sita, she's inspecting so many units. We're going to get it done. That's great. I order that for item C 308 case number 2414487, that lean sort of case would be deferred for 45 days, or until April the 11th, 2025. Okay, we're rolling. Item C 309 property under Pacifica Emerald Bay, LC investigators are item Melandes. I am so right. I'm a land is going to be a guy for the city of San Pidesburg testifying in reference to item C 309 case number 24 145 13 regarding property located at 391138 Avenue South. I was running at the beginning of this meeting. This property is a single I'm sorry. This property is is a multi commercial apartment and is occupied by tenants, this case began on August 13, 2024 and it was a tenants complaint. After the adventuary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board order was sent to the owner by mail on January 28, 2025. This property was last re-inspected on February 12, 2025. Zero out of six values should have been corrected since this case began. The remaining values are the AC unit is now working, the bathroom tile wall inside the shower, show shipping and peeling paint. The top drain plug is missing. There is missing and peeling paint in various areas. The bedroom door latch is missing. All the small detectors are missing. Port floor wood is in this repair. We've run a wood. The bedroom ceiling is damaged by water. And there is an open hole in the wall by the kitchen cabinets. Stove burners are not broken and there is missing parts inside the oven. And this will conclude my presentation. You say about burners, stove burners? The stove burners are now, they are broken and there is missing part inside the oven. Okay, thanks, Raida. Hi, I need your names and addresses. Amanda Andrade's 3901, South-West, 38th Avenue, South. St.P.33711. Monica Wartet, 3901, 38th Avenue, St. P33711. Okay, I look at this way. You know what bothers me about this one is smoke detectors. Now we're talking about safety. This was a tenant complaint. It sounded like they all want a complaint. But smoke detectors are safety and that one disturbs me a great deal. It doesn't sound like a difficult thing to deal with here. No, we did have a pattern where we were doing inspections of smoke detectors being removed by tenants. I can't say if this is the case for this one in particular, but we did place an order in bulk for missing smoke detectors. That's one thing because it was a common finding as we're moving forward with the unit inspections. And this one we can also knock out in 45 days except the rod in wood. I just want to get a contractor to check the rod in wood because I don't know if it's the structure that we need to pull per man or if it's just the rod in wood. I had to grant a little bit more time but you know, Megan knows about the detectors and the other thing is we're heading for warmer weather in air-conditioning units I've heard on several of these units. I can't blame the people for complaining about that. So, I order that for item C309, case 2414-513, that lean certification be deferred for 60 days, or until 26th, 2025. Okay. Appreciate it. Okay. So, and thanks for coming in. Yeah, get all the pay. Yes, please. And then we're gonna go back to 29 now. Positioning on number 132. There you go. Number 132. We're just going to go backwards real quick. Item C 132, property owner 44412 LLC, investigator Monique Wadley. One three two. Got it Monique. Go ahead. I am Monique Wadley. Codes investigated for the City of St. Petersburg, Testifying in reference to item C-132, Case number 23-22379. This is regarding property located at 1601, Fifth Avenue North, and I will sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is vacant. This case began on December 11, 2023, and is a code to follow-up case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on April 30, 2024. This property was last re-inspected February 20th, 2025. One out of six violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are exterior walls of a commercial property have several areas with broadened wood. There's holes cut out to install PVC pipes running of electrical cord into the structure. Windows around the property do not properly open or close. There's a broken window glass. The wooden fence located on the property is not in good condition. It has broken slats and it has rotted wood throughout. And the metal post on the southwest corner of the structure is rested and is in good condition. And this concludes my presentation. Okay, Vanique, what was the one violation that was corrected? There was some exterior door glass that has been repaired. Thank you. All right, so your name and address? My name is Kenneth Keith. My address is 17105 Gulf Boulevard 314 North Reddington Beach, Florida 33708. Okay, in your relationship to 444? I own that LLC and I own the property. I apologize for the blemishes on the 56. I apologize for the, what's begin to that mic? Oh, I'm sorry. I apologize for the fact it's 5th Avenue North and 16th Street and it's been in disrepair. I had to go through two lawsuits to Remove the person that was in there kind of a squatter He was Trespassed and the and the police have removed him. I've now full access to the property. I have a general contractor David Griffith Who's going to do the work even this week? I'll take care of the fence and anything outside and apply for a permit this week. If I can, I get all this done within 60 days. Within what? Well, maybe 90 days would be a better task for, because there is some electrical work to do inside and AC work. It can right yes correct the and I have to find out if there's a permit requirements to your work the citing things will be something I think I just just for your information the case goes back to 2023 it's been before me a number I'm not that anyone's appeared and so there's been quite a few leans that I have had to impose on the property I don't know where that yes, I won't impose anymore today because it sounds like finally we're gonna move in a direction right direction I'll order that for item C132 case number two three two two three seven nine that lean certification be deferred for 90 days or until made the 26th, 2025. Go 90 to give you enough time. Sounds similar if you're probably going to make a stab at it. Yes, thank you, sir. Okay. item C142. C142 property owner tie life LLC investigator who's covering Petrina Miller. Carl Gordon. I'm going to go to the car and get the car on. Morning again. I'm in Carl Gordon. Close and get the... I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. I'm going to go to the office. of family structure in Naccapapa, Tinneth. This case we get on March 15, 2024 is in a co-sfollow-up case. After the air identity hearing and copy of the code of the board, order was sent to the owner by mail on May 28, 2024. The property was last reinspected on February 18, 2025. Zero out on one violations have been correct since this case began. The remaining violation is advertisement and rental of a property for transit accommodations. I'll come see for less than a monthly term is prohibited. With then the neighborhood traditional single family zoning district. Additional relevant facts regarding this case are as the properties listed on Airbnb and two times on VRBO. Airbnb and one VRBO listing are at 30-day minimum and no recent reviews. Second, VRBO listing has three-night minimum, recent review at the end of January for a short term stay, and multiple future short-term bookings on the calendar. As of today, it is showing that a 30-night minimum is showing as of today. And a calendar shows no future booking. However, no proof of cancellation has been given or proven. And this concludes my presentation. OK. Thank you, Carl. OK. Okay, thank you, Carol. Okay. Okay. Okay. Hi, sir, are you naming it as... Alex Petro, 2785, Basel Drive Sal, St.P.33705. Petro's? No. Petro. Petro. Yeah, no, no, no, S. Got it. Okay. Just pulled it in and I gave her the, well, I gave her this information and I'm going to email it to her today. The basis shows that the violation has been cleared. I'm sorry, like the gentleman said, he saw the dates changed with 30 days minimum, which is right here, but it's very tiny. That's why we have to send it differently to Kylie. She's expecting it tomorrow morning. Okay, because the case goes back away and it was deferred a number of times by the department for whatever reason. There have been a bunch of lean certified on the case. I don't know where they were that property. I've certified in the past, I guess, because no one attended hearings or for whatever reason. However, because- Yeah, me. Yes, sir. So, I just wanted to bring to your attention. So last month, I think I ran up here from another meeting to give some additional information as this case was being read in. And while I understand Mr. Petro has advised that they are in compliance today, you know, this is a case that has been ongoing, this specific one for months, but this is the fourth or fifth time we've cited this property for this violation. And previous to last month's hearing, they basically changed the ownership from one LLC to another LLC in order to what I can only assume was kind of restart our process. But I advise that that hearing that there's a requirement within chapter 162 of our state statutes to notify us that they are transferring that property and that that new owner has full understanding of what that violation is. That never occurred. And in addition to that, the mailing address associated with that new LLC was the exact same as the previous owner. So I just would like to present that to caution that while today at this moment, this is in compliance, history tells us that it's not going to stay that way. And that we have evidence as Mr. Gordon referenced that prior to this morning, there were bookings that were out there in the future. There was a listing that was in violation of our ordinance. And obviously these daily fines have been accruing during that time as well. So just want to provide that information from the city side. Yeah, and I thank you for that input. Any other input from you regarding, okay, not clear to violations like that? I was in the look at the history of this case and I have dealt with it since March of 24, which is mean we're coming up one a year and it's been multiple, as you have heard, multiple problems and whatnot. I see no reason not to impose an additional lien or additional fine. I should say open above the ones I've imposed and hopefully there won't be any future cases on this one, but I order that for item C142 case number two four for six one eight that the board certifying additionally of $8,750. And I trust that we'll never see this case again. And there is a process as you can go through. You probably heard me outline. I'm a classical question. Sure. Joe brought up the fact that I was supposed to notify the city of the relationship. Change or something? Correct. Yep. There's a provision within the state statute that if you're selling a property with an active code violation, the city would need to be notified and to ensure that you've notified the next owner. However, in this case, it was almost a mute point because you were transferring just from one LSC to another and the mailing address and everything was exactly the same, even though the name of the managing member was different. But because that notification ever happened, the case moved forward. The city to do that. Excuse me? Who do I contact in the city to do that? You would contact the code department. Code, yeah. That's all I need to know. Yeah. Okay. Good. Thank you. You're bad. How do I contact who do I contact in the city to do that you would contact the code department? Code yeah, that's all I need to know. Yeah, okay You're bad Item C 102 property owner Nissan Holdings. I'm Jose Rodriguez, co-investigated for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying a reference to item number C 102, case number 24, dash 5382, regarding property located at 1725 Prescott Street South, and I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. Property is a single family structure, and is occupied by tenants. This case began on March 25th of 2024. It was a code's initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code of Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on July 2nd of 2024. This property was actually inspected on February 24th of 2025. One out of five violations have been corrected since this case began. Following work has been completed since the last meeting. Structure has been painted. Vegetation removed from rear structure and hand rail at east side of structure has been repaired. The remaining violations are roof decking and disrepair in various areas. Repair or replaceented south side of structure and disrepair repair support being the disrepair east side of structure east out of property forgive me if replace the permit will be required replace handrail the south side of structure due to its stability and repair all areas of exterior walls and disrepair There are no dissonar rather facts regarding this case and this concludes my presentation Okay, so the one violation was the painting and the patient was removed the paint Yeah, and yes, so some of those other violations that were corrected Fell under the umbrella of one main violation so there were were items that were corrected, but did not resolve the whole violation itself. Yes, sir. Thanks, Jose. Yes, sir. Hi, name and address. It's ICOIN, 1041 Paragon, place, riverview, 33578. And you've relished shift in Nissan holdings? He's a friend, I'm just doing a favor trying to help. Ouch. We wouldn't need an authorization to represent. He didn't give you a formal authorization former anything that said you can represent him? No. It was all done in the last second. He wasn't aware of the violations for a long period of time because it was sent to the management company. Well, you can inform them the case really goes back to July of 2024. So it's been eight, nine months. According to this, he's received notices on a month after month. So... If the owner can get a form completed and back to us before the end of the hearing, we could hear. Okay, did you hear that? the owner can get a form completed and back to us before the end of the hearing, we could hear from him. Okay. Did you hear that? If the owner can get a form completed that authorizes you before the end of today's hearings, which would be late in the afternoon, we could still hear the case. Otherwise, I really have no choice but just to certify additional links. They have been leans certified already already so it's not new But they do accumulated a hundred and fifty dollars per day There's nothing I can do except certified additional lean unless I hear the case today Let me try how where do I get the form? All right, make a note that then before we quit today, I'll have to review the case Downstairs. Yeah, you can go if you talk to those downstairs. They might be. Yeah, I already have that. Okay. No, the file. Sorry, I can't hear it. Okay, so someone's made a note we got to check back before the end of the day, right? Okay. Item C252, property owner, ORIS Ford, investigators, a item Melendez. Okay, it's right now. Good morning. I am so right now. So right now Melendez is called investigator for the City of San Pidesburg testifying in reference to item C. Two fight to case number 24 26 18 regarding property located at 41 10 and 13 Avenue South. I was running at the beginning of this meeting. This property is a single home and is occupied by tenants or family members. There is this case began on February 14, 2024 and it was a co-initiated case. After the event, every hearing, a copy of the co-inforce member ordered, was sent to the owner by mail on May 28, 2024. This property was last re-inspected on February 14, 2024. zero out of seven violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are the roof is in disrepair and apartment is required. Facia's suffice is, Facia's suffice is in disrepair with rotted wood and is not properly maintained. There is peeling and missing paint in various areas. exterior wall tiles are in this repair we brought a wood and it's not properly maintained. There is peeling and missing paint in various areas. Esterial wall tiles are in this repair. We're broken or missing tiles. Accessory structure roof is in this repair. We lose in or missing materials that permit is required for the repairs. Fesha suffered at the accessory structure is also in this repair. Inoperable vehicles are stored on the property with expire register tag. Accessory structures are missing and I'm sorry, accessory structure is missing and missing and peeling paint in various areas. And additional prevalent effect in regard to this case is the owners tried to give FEMA assistance. They got a tarp over the roof to protect it for more leak. But and this will conclude my presentation. You'll try to get assistance from them. Yeah, he'll explain more to you in regards to that. Gotcha. OK, thanks, Rayna. Hi, name and address please. My name is Wainman Ford, address 41, 10, 13th, everything south, St. Petersburg, Florida. Norvis is, who is your mom? Was a mother, yes. OK. All right, you've heard the testimony of the city. Where are we? What's going to happen in the future, et cetera? I'm working on probate right now with the lawyer, trying to get everything figured out and what I need to do next. I think one of the vehicles that she was talking about has been removed. Who's living in the property? Tenon or a family? Me. Yes. That's a family, I guess. Yeah. OK. OK. The vehicle's has been removed. You know, you're going to have to get permits for some of this stuff. What's your long-term view here? Well, I guess I can't get a permit unless my name is under deed or whatever. I'm trying to get a permit, but it's like the roof or whatever, but if you own the property, you can go up and do the roof yourself or whatever. Otherwise, you can't get a permit. You're right. Correct. So looking at that, what are you thinking? I'm thinking that I can do some, get some of the repairs done, try to work on the list of items that she have, you know, so I can try to work towards resolving the problem. Okay. Is it in pro-bater or anything? The lawyer, we have talked, but it's not have went before Judge or anything of that nature. Do you have a lawyer who's going to hand it on? Yes. Did he give you any idea when he would go to court? No, he did not say, not at this particular time, no. I'm going to try to meet with him. I don't know whenever I can get to his office and whenever he has an opening and see can we push it forward. OK. Well, I'm going to grant you some time here because I think you're trying to find a way to solve the problem. I just need you to make sure the attorney understands in part that until it's transferred into your name you can't get the permits etc. So that's what that's complicated and it is accumulating a potential lien of a hundred dollars a day for every day it's out of compliance. So it could cost a lot of money in the in the long term. There are no lean certified against the two date. If I were to certify today, it would be $12,800. So I'm just throwing that out, because I'm not doing it, but I just want you to know it's a cumulative. So you need to make sure this attorney realizes the bubble that you're sitting on or the property is. OK. So I will grant you this. I order that for item C252, case number 242618, that any lean certification be deferred for 120 days or until June the 25th, 2025. You can tell the attorney have been granted 120 days by me, the magistrate, but it is still accumulating at $100 a day, the potential fine. And that would be certified at the end of 120 days unless he's taken action and filed in the court and something's happening. Okay. So given the attorney a large window, I would rather make it tighter, but I'm trying to be courteous to you, given you a large window, but you need to tell how the attorney's got to move. Okay. All right. Okay. Thank you. I'm going to leave. 120. Item C 29, property owner Kenneth Burton and Lee Arthur Burton, investigator Carl Gordon. Violation address 2, 3, 1, 1, tree lane drive cell. Okay. He said he had a hearing problem. Good hearing problem. You can go downstairs to get a device. If you go downstairs, the clerk can get you a device, a hearing device, and then we'll just call your case when you get back up here. Quality can take down. Thank you. OK. So we'll hop back to that one. It's great. I didn't know we had that. That's great. We're going to be coming up on lunch pretty soon. So when I rush a couple more cases of the cam. I think we're going to go through. I think it'll depend on where we're going to go. You guys are going to give up lunch? All right. How many cases we have left? I don't know how many we got. We're up to 57 now. How many left? So I don't know what the number was. More than about 20. Oh, yeah. Well, if you guys want to give a lunch, don't bother me any. We've been doing about 20 or 10 an hour or so. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Everyone agrees. I'm a staff that I worry about, not me. I'm okay. Everyone's okay. Okay, we'll keep going then. I need to run. Guys locked out, we're not going to lunch. That makes it faster. I need to. No, I'll leave now. You're welcome. Okay, next case. Item C, 240, property owner, Haven, Oosing, investigators, or item of Melendez. Okay, Zarena. Good morning. I am Zarena Melendez, co-investigator for the City of San Pidesprat, testifying in reference to items C240, case number 24, 72, 17, regarding properly located at 24, 34, Quincy Street South. I was running at the beginning of this meeting. This property is a single home and is vacant. This case began on April 24, 2024 and it was a close follow up case. After the adventurer hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on July 30, 2024. This property was last re-inspected on 214, 2025, and zero out of seven violations have been corrected since this case began. the remaining solutions are exterior wall, are in this repair and not properly maintained. There is bare wood in various areas of exterior wall. Exterior walls wrap is in this repair or not secure in various areas, broken tiles on exterior walls. There is sign of right-of-of-wood in various areas of the exterior property wall there is open holes in various areas of exterior wall there is chipping and peeling paint in various areas and paint is This means on every secure board as to expose what I'm sorry. Hold on a second. Sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Exterior stairs in the back of the structure are in this repair, including but not limited to broken lattice. The broken lattice, I'm sorry, that was removed. The pole not installed properly. Rails are in disrepair. We brought word. The stairs landing is in this repair. The stair fascia is in this repair. The roof refters are in this repair, we write a word. The light cover on the back stairs is missing. And there is junk doors, boxes, and other miscellaneous materials throughout the front of the property and back yard. Additional revelant prex in regards to this case is there's a permit 1911-001492 active. And it will expire in December of 2026. but there's no work going on on the property. There have been very little minor things done at the property. And also, I have not been able to do a thorough inspection because there's a there is a beehive keeper. And also there's a six foot fence in the front yard yard so you are only limited to see some, you know, some things. And if the owner wants to do a re inspection with him pressing, I'm very happy to do that to give up better current, you know, inspection information. So this will conclude my presentation. Is there any, did you say there was a permit issued? There was, the permit have expired before but this permit is from 2019 and it just got active into, to, to, to, in 26 but no work have been done on the property. Okay. Okay. Hi, name and address please. Good morning. My name is Haven Yusig and the address that we're talking about is 2434 Quincy Street South St. Pete 33711. The record I need your address is my address is 2460 Quincy Street, South. St. Pete. Oh, come on. And that's where I receive mail. Okay. I'm so sorry, what was your name? Haven, Yusig. The property owner, and David Yusig. Okay. Property owner. He's empty, right, vacant. Yes, sir. What's the game plan? Boy, a lot of them. That's the active permit is that I'm the homeowner and doing the repairs myself and obviously it's process. But there's been, there has been work done recently. I am open to her coming out looking at it, if she gives me notice. Yeah, there's actually some progress being made. I'm actually gonna have probably a building inspector come out and inspect some of the work I've been doing. What is some of the stuff you have? Well, one of the walls that's exterior, that's this array, rotting, whatever. I have to replace some of the foundation work to rebuild the walls properly to make it sound. It's a 100 year old house. And so that's process. Some of the exposed trusses that are rotten, it's because there's a process that I need to go through because I'm gonna be putting a deck on and that old deck is gonna come off, which isn't, I mean it's holding up but it's going to be removed because I'm putting a new deck on and the the the entrances are going to be extended out over this new deck so I'm not cleaning up those old entrances just yet because it's a process of going through to you know know. That kind of work will require a permit as well. Yeah, I have active homeowners permit. Yeah, and some of those things I will hire a license contractor to do for specialty work and such. Yeah, that sounds like it might be a good idea. Yeah, so as a process, I was unable to make the last meeting. I did notify code enforcement because the medical emergency with my wife, so I wasn't able to represent myself properly. And I did notice that there was a lean that occurred while I wasn't here. Regrettably because it didn't make the January hearing, I had no choice but to put the lean on it. It was accumulating 150 days from the, okay. And continues till until it's, but what I'm a little bothered by is okay, there's a permit, but Zareda has said within the permit nothing's happening. Correct. And you recall or you may have heard me say, when there's a permit issue, our code's case is put on hold provided that there's action within the permit if there is not the case is right back up. Right. So I think you're in that little gray area. Yeah. I plan on having some inspections within a week or two coming out, the building inspectors coming out. So I can move forward and keep the permit active and getting stuff accomplished. I will be living in this house this year. I'm just not putting it off. I have an expanded family and we need the space for this home. We are gonna be living in it. Granted, we don't get leaned to death in all this, you know what I mean? And I have a question about the lien. Is does that get removed after all these things are been fixed or is this just stay on to the properties title? Or? The lien right now totals 13,500 that I have had to certify. There's a process outlined earlier where you can one appeal to the code enforcement board for reduction or elimination of the lien down the road. There's a time period before you can do that. What was the other thing that they can do with the potential lien besides appeal to the board of something else? So if they're going to maintain ownership, then they were the ones that caused the lien, the lien release hearing would be the option. So the property's got to be brought into compliance first. And then they would apply for lien release once it's in compliance. Okay. Can't do anything to it. I understood. Got you. Keep in mind if nothing happens within the permit, the code case is right here in front of you. Yes. Okay. So for the moment, I'm going to grant you some time. I appreciate that. Rather than throw another slap, another $5,000, but remember, it is accumulating on 150 a day. Gotcha. And so also gives the rate a chance to and re-inspect the property and whenever she can on her schedule. I order that for item C240, case number 241, check that. Case number 2-4, 7-2-1-7. That further lean certification, be deferred for 60 days or until April 26, 2025. Hopefully within the 60 days there's a lot of action, she will investigate, et cetera, et cetera, and I won't see the case again, but keep in mind, if there isn't the case, the still air and it's still accumulating. Understood. But the burden is there. OK. Wish you well. Appreciate it. Mr. Wolffs, yes, we are going to push through lunch. Can we get about 10 minutes just to grab quick snack from the venting machine and other water, and they will push on through. You know, that's exciting because my wife sent me lunch. Yeah. grab quick snack from the venting machine and another water and then we'll push on through. You know, that's exciting because my wife sent me lunch. She said, I've seen the number of cases you're going to have. I'll bet you don't get to go to lunch today. So here's lunch. Please, go ahead. We're going to recess for how long, director. I think 10 minutes is good. 10 minutes? Yes, quick 10. 10 minutes. Thank you. Anybody want part of my lunch? Anywhere taking a minute. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to start with the first one. I'm going to start with the first one. I'm going to start with the first one. I'm going to start with the first one. I'm going to start with the first one. I'm going to start with the first one. I'm going to put it on. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to put it on the top right now. Yes. I'm going to go to the next room. I'm going to go to the next room. I'm going to go to the next room. I'm going to go to the next room. I'm sorry. Thank you. I'm going to go to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. you I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. I'm going to the beach. you you I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you Okay, we're back in session. Thank you for your patience. Let's call the next case and keep rolling. Item C75, property owner William Stec, investigator Greg Foster. Good afternoon. I am Greg Foster, codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg. I'm testifying today in reference to item number C75. This is case number 2322614 regarding property located at 4835 Taylor Street, North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on December 14th, 2023, as it codes initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing and copy of the Code and Fullerton Sport Order was censored by mail with a compliance date of May 28th, 2024. The property was last re-inspected on the 19th of February. Four out of six violations have been corrected since the case began. Since the following meeting or since the last meeting, there has been a significant more more more painting that's been completed. Some of the violations that were corrected were porch, disrepair, fence, walls. Property looks great. Other than the remaining violations are that there is still, the parking area is not maintained. It has a couple cracks in it and there was no apron, so he needs to get an apron. So the parking apron is also in disrepair and does not meet the standards, repair replacement, over-recar permits. No additional relevant facts, this my presentation. Okay. My name is Russ. All right. William Stec. 2018-48 there is North. Same Pete. Okay. Four out of six. Great. Yeah. Yeah. The parking area of the apron. What what's your game plan on that one? Man, it's been like that since 1947 or whenever the house was placed there. So, anyway, I guess I got to go down and get a permit for it. And not quite sure how to make that happen, but I can get somebody to get it done. Yeah, I don't know how you do that either. Obviously, until it's done, the case, this case is against you. So yeah, yeah, I'm not trying to get a lien against the place for 30 grand to my business guy. Hit by the hurricanes, got flooded, lost all kinds of stuff. And I'm still trying to make this happen. Well, there is a process to address the lead down leans down the road. Yeah you've heard me describe that. All right. Let me give you more than willing to give you a little more time to to address the apron issue. That's the issue. That'd be helpful. Probably easy to do. and I do compliment you for four out of six. So I ordered that for item C75 case 2322614, that further lean certification be deferred for 120 days or until June the 25th, 2025. Hopefully in 120, you can figure out some angle on the apron. The parking area I'm assuming from what Greg has said is probably fixable yourself, but the apron's going to take the permit, I guess. Yeah, I think it's just got cracking it or something. Yeah, it's really repaired. So work with Greg on that but you've got 120 days now. All right, I appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you. Such a base for sure before that, okay? Say again. Item C 98, property owner Andrew Hitchcock, investigator Jose Rodriguez. Okay, Jose. I am Jose Rodriguez, co-investigator for the City of St. Petersburg. Testifying a reference to item number C98, case number 24, dash 7211, regarding a property located at 950, 9th Avenue South. I was wanting to start this meeting. The property of the single-family destruction is occupied by owner. The case began on April 22nd of 2024 in the citizen complaint case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by Mel on July 30 of 2024. It's probably the last re-inspected on February 19th of 2025. Forgive me, one out of two violations have been corrected since this case began. No work completed since the last meeting. The remaining violation is removed and or properly stored or junk trash in the brief or slash outdoor storage. There are no additional relevant facts regarding this case and this concludes my presentation. Okay, so what was the one violation that was eliminated? Inoperable vehicle that was removed from the. Yes, sir. That was just some junk outdoors. Is some items out outdoors that it needs to be removed or stored properly? Yes, sir. Okay. Thanks, Jose. Yes. Excuse me, sir, your name and address? Andrew Hitchcock, property address. 950-970, St. Petersburg, Florida-33705. Well, came to St. Hitchcock the testimony of the city and one thanks for getting a one violation take girl. That vehicle off of there. What are you gonna do about the junk? Apparently it's a citizen's, your neighbor's complaining I guess. Right, right, right. It's a lot of changes going on in the neighborhood. So, you know, I respect my neighbors and I definitely respect the city. I've never had been in this position other than the last time I came. You pulled my name, I once had 12 properties, and I've still never been in this position. But I ended up missing the January meeting. One of my kids, mom, came to me and I completely forgot to go to the doctor's office. So by the time I realized I called, but the damage had already been done. So, doing the hurricanes and all that stuff we had, I was going through helping the neighborhood and the church, which is the supervising as well. So, with the net time, I ended up catching a hand injury, some kind of rattle nerve, so that kind of slowed me down. So, yesterday I did make a little bit of progress. I'm been on to me yesterday with my birthday. So my kids ended up taking me out. So here I am 10, 30 at night, trying to make some of the remedies go away. So I did start a little bit last night. And one of the biggest issues that I'm having, I understand Mr. Rock-Reeze, now he is right, Some of the stuff can't go to trash. Some of it can't. Now, majority of the stuff is what I work with. You got work ladders. Now, and what I'm asking the city, I have a blind spot on the side of my house. It's a big area. I got a lot about three stories high. Now, what I'm asking from the front, you can't see it. From the side, you can't see it. If you come in my house and you go around the back and you go on the side, then you can see it. So what I'm asking, he said, like properly stored, if I utilize that spot to where everything is visible in my yard is up to colds, given the fact that this is what I work with can I utilize that spot this out of sight? Good and they never see it. No, sir I can't really answer because I've never seen the property and don't know whether you can answer that Are you familiar with what of same as our biggest that? I don't know sir, but I'm willing to meet the his cock at a property and we can discuss it at that point I appreciate it. Mr. Soil and the graduate some time time, Jose will come out and take a look at it and advise you. Right. But you have to take his advice. No, definitely, definitely. I do not go against the city. This is no win-win situation. I got one other question. The lien has been enforced and I understand I got to go before a release hearing. I understand that. I'm asking from this point till I I rectify it whatever time you give me can we hold on accessing additional fees? Yeah As long as I give you some time while the fee accumulates. It's not imposed. Okay, okay Okay, so if I give you another days or whatever, nothing accumulates against you in the 45 days. It's there and if you do not come into code. Then it's imposed. I got you. Okay. So I order that for item C-98. Case number two four seven two one1, then lean certification be deferred for 60 days or until April of 26, 2025. I appreciate you. If you got 60 days, follow the advice who's gonna give you as to what you need to do, but then you need to do it or the case is here. Yes, I can. Okay, you guys, we got it. You need to go. Please grab your paperwork. Please grab your paperwork. Yes, sir. OK. You guys, we got you. Please grab your paperwork. Please grab your paperwork. Yes, sir. Yes, ma'am. Now, be sure you receive the paperwork before you leave the room for whatever decision is made today because that's the only written document you've got. OK. We're jumping back to item in the line 38. They came back with their hearing device. It is gonna be item C29, property owner Kenneth Burton, Lee Arthur Burton, investigator Carl Gordon. C29. C29. All right. All right. I'm Carl Gordon, co-investigated for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying and wrestling to item number C29, case number 24-5272 regarding property located at 2311, tree lane, dry and soft. I was sworn in at this hour of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and occupied by owner. In This case began on March 25th, 2024 in a Citizens Complaints case. After the evidentiary hearing and copy of the Cold Enforcement Board, order was centered on by mail on July 2nd, 2024. The property was last re-inspected on February 19th, year. The year. Okay, thank you, Colonel. Okay, sir, your name and address please. It is Burton, twin-deil eleven, three-lane drive south-saint Peterburg, Florida, 3G712. Kenneth Burton? Yes, sir. Yeah. Okay, Kenneth, you've heard the testimony of the city, what's your plan on dealing with the walls? We did what happened last time I came, I had an attorney by Mr. Down the Court, and how you say you give me some paint for people with some paint, and I'm not gonna make a long story short, I call him, it seemed to be a number about to die any day now, get somebody else, now that was three months ago. So I'm still trying to find somebody to help me with the paint. I called, went down to the city, nine of them. With the kill, Bernsey, you might not want to call some people, call a few people, they say they will help me out. So now. I'm not going to find somebody to help me with their paint. I called, went down to the city, and I'm going to kill Bernace. You know, I'm going to call some people, call a few people, and they say they will help me out. So now, I guess I need some more time to try to get that straight now, if possible. They say they will supply some people or what? Yes, Mr. Kielbore, they say, call a few people already. And they say, since I'm out there, give me some, see if it's special, to give me some system with that. OK, if I give you some more time, which I'm inclined to do, you've got to realize it's a citizen complaint, which I'm very sensitive to, because that means some neighbors are not happy with your appearance, I guess. Okay. And so, citizens complaint, I take more serious. I'll grant you some additional time. Okay but I need you to find some helpers or something and get it done. Okay. All right. So I order that for Item C29 case number two four five two seven two That further lean certification be deferred for 60 days or until April of 26, 2025. Now I went 60 days because you need to recruit some people number one, number two. I urge you to get it done as soon as possible because 60 days from now we start to get the rainy season. Okay. But I don't want the case to come back. So somehow you need to solve it within 60 days. Okay. As long as we understand each other. Okay. Okay. Great. Thank you, Berser. So. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. All right. Item C 288 property owner A, VB AR LLC investigator Joseph Brunori. I am Joseph Brunori, a codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, test and Reference to item C288 Case 218462 Regarding the property Located at 1200, 102 Avenue North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a Commercial Structure and is Occupied by tenants. This case began on October 21, 2024 is an Attentive Complete Case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Coot Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on January 28th, 2025. This property was last re-inspected on February 21st, 2025. Two out of three violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violation is regular water intrusion has created mold as evident on the window and vent and window photos in the casefell or remediation report from a licensed mold removal company will be necessary. An additional relevant facts regarding this case are it was related to an exterior wall case that that has since been closed and then yesterday I did receive by email from the property manager of Mold Assessment Report and also a remediation proposal for the work to be done. And this concludes my presentation. And you guys have your yesterday? Yes. Okay, great. All right, name and address please. First name is Edward, last name is Bayez. The address is 1200 and second avenue north. St. Petersburg, Florida, 33716. Your address? No, sir. I need your address. My address is 994314 street north. St. Petersburg, Florida apartment 203. Okay, and your relationship to AVBH? The service manager, sir. Okay, great. Good. Okay, two out of three done, wonderful. Game plan on this last one with the mold window. I just got to report yesterday. I just want to know how much time you guys could give me to remediate the issue. What do you need? If you give me like 20 days, we can get it done. I'll give you a little bit more than that simply because that's optimistic. But I order that for item C288, case number 2418462, that lean certification be deferred for 45 days or until April 11th, 2025. All right, thank you. All right, thank you. Whether or whatever, but if you're intent on doing it, I'm trusting you will. Yeah, we'll get it done. Okay. Thank you. All right, thank you. Item 258, property owner, Jamaica, Rochelle Harris, investigators, a right of the city of San Petersburg. Testifying in reference to item 264. Case number 2319301 regarding property located at 3458. I was running at the beginning of this meeting. I was running at the beginning of this meeting. This property is a single home and I believe this property is vacant. You go see a dress of the properties arena. What is the address again? The address for this property is 34 five eight Queensborough Avenue South. So the last time I was there, it was vacant. I'm sorry. Hang on, I'm confused. We had a case number. Okay. It is C258. Okay, I'm on that. Mr. Shelton, what number? It doesn't match. Yeah, we just, they got the forms. Could we call the next case, Ms. Mullin? This is grabbing her fact sheet. So number 44, okay. Item C134, property owner Michael Bow. Bow. That's to getator Carl Gordon. Okay Carl. Yes, I'm Carl Gordon, co-investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item number C, 134, case number 23-3529 regarding property located at 851-10th Avenue South. I was warned at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and an occupant by the owner. This case began on February 27, 2023 and as the COS follow up case. After the evidentiary hearing and copied the Code of First and Board order was sent to the owner by mail on October 31, 2023. The property was last reinspected on February 18, 2025 and zero out of one violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violation is enclosure of car port without an active approved permit. Additional relevant facts to this case is that a permit was applied for on March the 12th, 2021. It is currently still in the in process status. October the 3rd, 2023, the permit was picked up for corrections and it's still waiting on the corrections to be made. In this concludes my presentation. October 20th. October 23rd, 2023. Big up for corrections. Yes, all right. We still waiting on the corrections to be made. Okay, thanks, girl. Hi, name is address. My name is Michael Baugh. 851-10th Avenue. It's my home. So I'm just waiting on zoning. Oh, Mr. Shulf's. Yeah, which was zoning here. There is a comment from zoning from September of 2023 requesting corrections made. So there There are, there's a comment here that says it was not addressed and the applicant must address previous comments. What is that? Okay, September 23, you were notified. September 23, that's last September. Right. I'm sorry, a year ago last September. Right. Exactly. You were notified of what again be itress? So it looks like zoning has concerns about the setbacks and you need to make corrections addressing their comments. And it doesn't show that anything transpires. There's nothing to correct. Okay. There's no corrections. So the last... But I enclosed a previous, I mean that's the case. There's no corrections. So the last I enclosed a previous I mean that it already existed existed structure I enclosed a structure that was existing. And it said I didn't move the structure I just put stuff I enclosed it right so did you enclose it without a permit. Yes so the comments from the zoning zoning division are the addition was completed without a permit and it is not meat, the required setbacks. I didn't move it. The structure has always been there. So if it was? The structure has been there, I just enclosed it. But when they looked at it, they all so reckoned I am assuming now. No. And I said also didn't meet the setback requirements. That wasn't the initial reason that showed up in the investigation and inspection. So, okay. There are two problems here. But there's two opportunities. I don't have problems. Right. Absolutely. Thank you. Opportunities to correct it. Yeah. And I've heard your case as you know twice. Yeah. At a twice time. No. Yes. Absolutely. So I guess I got to say to you. Now what? I'm just waiting for them to be able to take their I come here every single time with my my plans. I have all of the stuff to to open this thing up. I enclosed a structure that was already there. That's it. And it's inside of my property. Mr. Bob, the last time you came here when the plans was in July 23rd, 2024. I haven't seen you since July, last July. Yes. That was when you may you may have waved the plans and I said great and I'll grant you 45 days to complete it. We are now at February 2025 and nothing extra inspired since then. So you already done the plan waving and I granted you time on that one. I have. So what are we waiting for? What is, what's, what, I'm just waiting for them to accept my plans. As far as the permit goes, I don't see anything in here that shows that plans have been resubmitted. So have you gone down to the building department and submitted anything new? Since 2023. I came and picked up the plans. I'm just waiting for them to want to take them. So you've picked up and they kicked my subcorrections and now you have to make the corrections addressing their comments and resubmit the plans. So I think it would be worthwhile for you to go down to one forestry north to the municipal services center and ask to speak to someone in zoning regarding your permit and ask them exactly what more needs to be clarified on your plans in order for you to get your permit. Okay. What I see in all of this is somewhere along the line, you either got got lost in the process you lost the process or didn't follow through with it But at this point in time you're holding the bag and you're the one that needs to take the action I can go ahead and slap fines. I mean I can do a lot of things But the bottom line is we want you to really just correct it all and get it done. I want it too. I dragged on way too long. I agree. Okay. So what you were just instructed by staff was to go down to zoning or planning. Zoning. Zoning. Discuss with your plans what exactly is going on down there. I will grant you some additional time. Okay. But in granting you the time, I will also make a note in your record that if you fail to do what's necessary within that time, I will be looking at imposing, well, thousands of dollars and fines at that point. So, I need you to act, okay? Okay. And you know what you got to do. You're just told. Exactly. Okay. Therefore, I order that for item C134, case number two, three, three, five, two, nine, that further lean certification be deferred for 45 days or until April the 11th, 2025. Now 45 days and my judgment is generous amount of time for you to get on down there. I hope you go this week because there may be some complications. But if this case comes back to me after the 45 days I'm going to be looking at finding you and I don't want to do that. I don't want to do it on there. Okay. Thank you. You've got clear direction. Okay. Thank you. Sir. You're welcome. I'm glad you're welcome. Are we ready to go back to Zeridus? Yeah. You want them like that? Are we ready to go back to Zeridus? Yeah. Item C, 258 property and owner, Jameka Rochelle Harris, investigators, Zeridum Londas. 58, got it. Dorado. Good afternoon. I am Sir Reddameland, the co-investigator for the city of San Petersburg, testifying and reference to item C258, case number 24, 2413 regarding properly located at 2338, 36 avenues, 36 trees south. Our surname at the beginning of this meeting, this property is that single home and is occupied by owner. This case began on February 9, 2024, and it was that calls follow-up case. After the adventure, everyone hearing a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by May 28, 2024. This property was last re-inspected on February 11, 2025. Zero out of one violation have been correct since this case began. The remaining violations are, after the fact that the permit is required for completing work, front, new door, pergola and windows, there's a permit, 22, zero, five, zero, zero, two, zero, five, 2 0 5 a the expire without final inspection additional revenue fact in regards to this case is The previous owner sold the property without having a final inspection on the renovation and Unfortunately, you know the case followed you know with her so and that's what we had and I believe I read a note where the pergola one of the pergola was approved to stay because there's two pergola and one was approved to stay but then the other one still on the review. So. It's caught in the middle. Right. The last time the previous owner was here, the manager, no, the real estate, I think it was here with the owner. And they tried to work this out where the permit would be active and get a final inspection done. But after that, everything stopped, nothing else happened. And this will conclude my presentation. OK. So I guess I would ask. I mean, the new windows and all that, that's all done. Everything's done. Right. The renovation was completed. Yeah. So how so how do we help this person? This is, you know, I'm not going to slap a fine on her. Beatrice, what do we do with this? So unfortunately, sir, the responsibility to close out the permit is now gone onto the new owner. So if we could grant her time to, I'm not sure if we want to take testimony first to find out where she is in finding a contractor to take over this permit and then they would just need to get an approved final inspection. So she can't do it herself as the owner? I, that one, that what I don't know, I would have to check with building services considering that the permit that this is originally for was pulled by a contractor. So I don't know if they would allow her to I would have to ask Okay, so I when I'm gonna do is grant you some time to see if you can Undo the mess that you've kind of inherited. Yes, and building services is where you need to go sorry. Jimmiko R Harris 2338 36 streets out St. Petersburg 4 to 3 3 7 11. I'm sorry, Sarah. She got any more testimony. No, right before the storm. I knew the architect came out and they said it was going to work on it, but I didn't know which one which perlerc got approved. It's two, one above the garage and one above the porch. I think that the one over the porch was the one that was approved because it's smaller. The other one, but I can't remember, I had to go back in the case and check, but I know one was a proof and I believe it was a small one. But again, I had to double check and to make sure. And I had put in for a variance and I haven't heard anything back from that either. So I guess that wouldn't, you approved the one that was smaller. Walk, we could talk about that after the hearing. I know that permitting was working with the, like I said, with the previous owner because they were trying to get all this approved and there was some notes done on the permits that I would have to go back and review that with her. All right, Ms. Harris. What I'm going to do is grant some time work with the rate on this. On Ravela eventually I think you're going to have to go into the permitting process or whatever. I don't know. All I know is if you're willing to pursue it, I'm willing to give you the time. Thank you. Missed you. Yeah. So Beatrice just verified is the larger one that was approved. No, excuse me, the larger one of the two structures exceeds the allowable. Oh, okay. So is the small one above the garage is approved? That was correct. Yeah. So the small one was approved and then the other one is too large and it's right in front of the structure. That's the one that zoning has asked for corrections. Okay. I could give time for missing. And they went back to a contractor, I assume. Well, whatever. Right, that would have been under that contractor from the previous owner. So if we can give Ms. Harris time, I don't know if she already has a contractor or anyone lined up. No. Okay, let me grant some broad amount of time here as a rate of advisor and kind of pointer of the direction. I order that for item C258, case number 24, 2413 that lean certification be deferred for 90 days or until May the 26th, 2025. Somewhere in 90 days. Thank you. Got to be an answer. OK. OK. You're good. You're good. Item C92, property owner Annie Adams estate investigator Jose Rodriguez. Jose. Yes, sir. I'm Jose Rodriguez co-investigator for the city of St. Petersburg, testifying the reference to item number C92, case number 22, dash 1, 2, 5, 1, 0 regarding property located at 1110, 10th Avenue South, and I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single-family structure, and is occupied by tenants. It's case being on June 9th of 2022, the citizen complaint case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code and Forth and Boards order was sent to the Honourable Mel on August 1st of 2023. It's probably last re-inspected on February 18th of 2025. Two out of nine violations have been correct since the case began. Following work has been completed since the last meeting. There's been facial replaced in various areas on the detached structure. Their main inviolations are paint our areas of structure where paint is chipping, pilling, missing, and where wood is present. Bear with us present. Repair our window glass and frames and disrepair. Repair our place, all window screens and disrepair. Repair our areas of roof and disrepair. And as of the last inspection on the 18th, there's a tarp on the section of the roof, as well as the roof disrepair, and on the attached structure. Repair areas of exterior walls and disrepair. Repair door and disrepair in north side of structure, which is the main door, and door framing and all securing boards must have paint or protective cover and applied. There are no dissonal relevant facts regarding this case and this concludes my presentation. I don't think you will say. Yes, sir. Hi, your name and address please. Elycia Adams, 1110th Avenue,, St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705. Oh, Cayman's Adams. My knowledge is a two out of nine violations that were corrected, but. How are you related to the owner? Oh, my granny. Yeah, I'm sorry, Adams is state, so I assume. Okay, I assume the two out of it's great, but the major ones, the roof and so on, what's the plan for that? And I need to tell you, I don't know whether it's you that appeared before me, but I have seen this case before last year, several occasions, and granted up to 150 total days to solve the problem. So it's not that I haven't granted a lot of time on this case fast. I don't know whether you appeared before me without looking at the record or not. But I just want you to realize that we have granted that much time, and in fact, staff also deferred action on the case for periods of time. So I want to know what the plan is to solve the problem before I have to rule on what the fines are going to be. Well I just really got possession of the property as of last month. Are you the tenant? Yes, Ann. You're living in it? Yes. And you got possession out out of the. You are now the owner Yeah of the home Still working with the other siblings just really one other sibling That we're having an issue with I tarp the roof Because the quotes for the roof and it being so steep is very expensive Also, I'm kind of hesitant to put all my ex in one basket because of the one person that's in the estate that- You don't have title to the property. No, I have to get them to sign off to get the homestead and the other things that we discussed the last time I was here. So where's that going to go? Most likely in my favor because I'm doing everything by myself. But so the other sibling will sign off on it and you'll become so long or the property that's when you think that's going to happen? Well, we are having a family meeting March 10th to discuss everything and get the signatures. All right. I'm because this case goes back to 2022 before you probably got involved in it. Yes. When my grandmother was on hospice. Okay. And because I have already granted on several occasions 150 days, I'm reluctant not to impose a fine, however, I have certified leans in the passing and the property substantial leans. They are accumulating at 150 a day for every day this is out of compliance. I don't want to tell you what they would be today because I won't impose them and I will grant you some time, but it's not a lot of time to work with the sibling or who remember to resolve that problem so that you can then address the issues as the owner or whatever. But it's just, I need you to understand that the case just can't drag on forever. I understand. So with that, and you need to stay in touch with the investigator because at least he can point you in the right direction. I order that for item C 92, case number 22, 12510, that further lean certification, reason of hesitating is tarps in the roof and other stuff are bothersome and this is a citizen's complaint which means it's a neighbor and I don't blame them. But I ordered that lean, sort of further lean certification be deferred. 90 days or until May the 26th, 2025. Now I reluctantly do 90 days, Miss Adams, but I'm hoping that within the 90 days you can resolve it with the other air and move forward. But please keep in mind that the fines are accumulating and today I could have certified more than 23,000 and in 90 days it's going to be 90 days times 150. So somehow you need to resolve it before you ever get that point. Yes, sir. All right. It's best they can do. Thank you Jose 90 days on this like it's all I can do Item C 153 property on our skyway machineryinery, LLC Investigator Robert Hicks. I don't know what. Good afternoon. I'm Robert Hicks, Co-Zinvestigator for the City of St. Petersburg. Testifying a reference item, C3, case 24, dash 4686 regarding property located at 52 Dartmouth Avenue, North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. The property is a single family structure and is vacant. The case began on March 16 of 2024 and is a code's initiated case. After that evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on 9-3 of 2024. The property was last respected on 2, 22 of 2025. One out of five violations have been corrected since the too close to the area. The next step is to make sure that the area is not too close to the area. The next apron is cracked and in disrepair overgrown with grass and weeds in the front of the property. Additional relevant facts regarding the case is the demo permit 24-05002410 was applied for with application data 531 of 24 and remains in process and process per city records. The last action in plan tracking was on 8 6 of 2024 indicating providing a sign utility verification form for gas from the owner and this concludes my presentation. Okay, and that was never provided. Never. Okay. Okay, hi. Name it and rest please. You don't demetriize it tough. You'll have a 940 Royce Waterford Circle Temple, Florida. And your relationship to me? I'm the winner. There's Skyway owner. Yeah. Okay. Do you start your lesson? IZOTOV. That's why I said demet Yeah. Okay. What's the game plan? Yeah, so the game plan is to demo the structure altogether. We did have a little bit back and forth as far as getting some of the form sign and all that. So I think we have it all worked out. Would it have some delays due to Hurricane where a contractor couldn't really schedule his subs to be on time? I think we worked all this out. Would it have some minor disagreements in terms of scope of work and the cost of the projects? Because I have multiple sites, not just in Cedars, St. Pete. Some of the work was performed for Slesslesen's satisfactory, but I think we ironed all that out. So when the process of re-engaging and getting on the schedule to demo the structure, so hopefully it's going to be done the reason it will be soon. Any timing on the schedule? He's about four to six weeks out. Some guessing it's going to take another, I don't know, two, three weeks to really demo the structure and even it'll allow it. So, but yeah, I think it shouldn't take too long. And there's no question it's going to get demoed. Yes. All right. Okay, let me give you enough time to get through that. I appreciate that. Well, process and get rid of it. Sounds good. I ordered that for item C153. Case number two, four, four, six, eight, six, that means certification. Be deferred for, those 90 days, we're in two May 26th, We're in to May 26th. 26th. 2025. I was going to go 60. Just engaged something wrong. You got 90, but please get rid of it. Yeah. That's good. That will be enough. Thank you so much. Yes. Do you want to go back? I don't know. She hasn't. Did he get the form? Yes. Not with him. No. The answer is yes. If he could please. Okay. Be at rest. He did get the form. Sorry? He did get the form. Would you like to go back? Okay How's a Rodriguez? Okay I Believe the next couple of cases are all connected. Are they all Richard Martin? Yes there's no right way. Mr. Gordon. Martin, yes. So can we go to the next non REM property? Let me check what that is. There's the waiting. There's the waiting. I think that would be number 57. Leap Brandon Daniels. Mr. Schultz, could we take a five minute break while I find the investigators? Yes ma'am, you certainly can. That's great. And incidentally I show 13 cases. Alright, let's say it's time for the break. We'll be ready. Okay, five minute break. We'll start with 102 as soon as possible. Okay. I'm going to do a on the top right corner of the head. I'm going to put it on the top right corner. I'm going to put it on the top right corner. I'm going to put it on the top right corner. I'm going to put it on the top right corner of the head. I'm going to put it on the top right corner. I'm going to put it on the top right corner. you you . you I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing Owner, Nissan Holdings Group, LLC, Investigator Jose Rodriguez. Okay, 102. Yes, sir. I'm Jose Rodriguez, Coz Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg. Testifying and Reference to Item number C 102, case number 24-5382, regarding property located at 1725 Prescott Street South when I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on March 25th of 2024 and is a codes initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on July 2nd of 2024. This property was last reinspectedpected on February 24 of 2025. One out of five violations have been corrected since its case began. Following work has been completed since the last meeting. Structures been painted, vegetation removed from the rear of the structure, hand-rear, east side of structures been repaired. The remaining violations are roof decking and disrepairing various areas. Repair replaced dry event south side of structure and disrepair, repair support beam disrepair at east side of property. If replaced the permit will be required, replace hand rail at south side of structure or hand rail is capable of supporting normal load. Repair all areas of exterior walls and disrepair. There are going to go to the committee. I'm going to go to the committee. I'm going to go to the committee. I'm going to go to the committee. I'm going to go to the committee. I'm going to go to the committee. I'm going to go to the committee. I'm going to go to the committee. I'm going to go to the committee. I'm going. However, in regard to the hand rail, it's three steps and that's just something that property management or the property owner would have to verify. Prior to replacing the hand rail that's over there right now, that's not sufficient for the tenants that are over there. Yes, sir. Okay, thanks. Hi, welcome back. Itaikoin, 10-4-21, Paragon Place, Riverview, sir. Okay. Thanks. Hi. Welcome back. Itaikoan 10 421 Paragon Place Riverview, Florida 3357A Spell your last name. C OH en C OH en Okay What's the game plan for the property? and We Relationship again, oh Authorization for the form, but yeah, what what is your relationship to Nissan? He's a friend But he's Okay, what do they tell you the problem was he was working with a management company and they did not inform him of this issue. He just replaced a management company and found out about the issues about a month ago. Where is he? Shahar Nissan is in California. Okay. All right. So he just found out. We found out and immediately he started repairing the issues. We weren't really sure what the issues are. I was supposed to meet the gentleman here yesterday. I missed him by like five minutes, I guess. I saw the tenant and she said he just left. Yeah, because I was there. And if I may, Mr. Schultz, so the new management company that's responsible for the property right now, they have recently reached out. So Violation notices were emailed over to them and their response was relatively quick. So I will say that. So they did, there had not been any work in the past, but once the new management company did reach out to me, their response again was relatively quick and they did get out to the property and assess and actually removed more than just the vegetation that was on the violation, but there was a tree that impacted the structure or just a small area of the roof after the storms and that was, that section of that tree was removed at that time. So again, they were relatively quick to response. Once they reached out and realized what was going on. Great, great report. And I'm now going to accept the fact that they are going to move in the right direction for you. So I will grant enough time or grant some time for them to go ahead and continue to correct things. I order. I have that for item C 102, case number 24, a 5382, then the further lean certification, be deferred for 120 days or until June the 25th, 2025. 120 days is a long stretch, but I'm counting on them. I will be done in 30. Have them stay in contact with the investigator, Jose? Everyone question. If he does complete all the work by the end of the time frame, what happens with the existing leans? I'll explain it to Mr. Schock. Okay, Jose Ophelia. Thank you, Madam. Thanks for the drink. No problem. So believe we're jumping to number 57 in the queue. And then we'll return to Richard Barton at the end. So that is gonna be item C208, property owner Lee, brand and Daniels, investigator is going to be for zone 15. I'm sorry. Investigator Bonnickering. I'm sorry. The number again I apologize. 208, property located at 3928 Grove Street South. Gotcha. Thank you. I'm Bonnie Green, Coates Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item number C208, case number 24-2433 regarding property located at 3928 Grove Street South. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a multi-family structure and is vacant. This case began on February 9th, 2024, and is a code initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by by mail on July 30, 2024. This property was last reinpected on February 24, 2025. Nine out of 15 violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are disrepair for chain link fence and or wooden fence on property. See, sorry, multiple trees and plants are not properly maintained. Dead tree present on property. Evidence of stairs repaired for the accessory structure at rear of property no permit on file for repairs. Areas of exterior walls for the accessory structure have peeling chipping paint and or bearwood present. Areas of the exterior walls for the accessory structure are in disrepair. Fesha and Soffit are in disrepair. Do structure and disrepair. Facia and Soffit are in disrepair, doors and disrepair, and the interior of the accessory structure, the floors, walls and or ceiling are in disrepair. A permit will be required for repairs. And that concludes my presentation. Okay. Um, Bonnie. Um, thank you. And that concludes my presentation. Okay. Bonnie, I'm a little confused by this. You said the case goes back to February 24. Yes, the 9th of 2024. Yeah, and I'm showing a completion date of August. Okay. All right. I'm sorry. August 24. Okay. Now I see what was done. All right. Hi. Name and address please. Lead annuals 1034-6th Street, St. Petersburg, Florida. Okay, Lee, you were before me in September. Yes, sir. Okay, and I put you on what was called a short lease. It could tell by the numbers because they thought you were going to get this stuff done. What happened? I had, well, at that time, none of the violations were addressed. I got a letter in 10 in October and they asked for 45 days, but after the storms they acted, asked for extended amount of time. I was planning to sell it in January they backed out. So since January to now I've dressed nine of the violations. I'm planning on fixing everything. I know there's two permits. I've been meeting with contractors but the assess rest structure and the stairs. I know I need to get permits and I'm trying to meet with people, but it's slow going since the storms. And I'm out there, but I'm gonna sell my time with Bonnie and she'll, you know, just show me exactly what needs to be done, I'm in a process of painting, fixing the stereo walls, and Bonnie could test quite a bit of work's been done, and I'm in a process of doing it. Okay, and I want to acknowledge the nine out of 15 and what you're doing, so. Yeah. I want that to be. Thank you, Mr. Shulves. And I realize that you know, you have some problems with contractors I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do it. I'm not sure if you're going to be handled quickly. I thought I had a buyer, but since the storms, everything has changed. Yes. All right. I order that for item C 208 case number 242433, any lean certification be deferred for around 20 days or until June the 25th, 2025. That gives you a pretty good window and a first thing that you'll find a way to get it done. Thank you, Mr. Schultz. Item C202, property owner real 26 LLC, investigator for zone 11. Anthony Rivers. Two zero two. I'm Anthony Rivers, co-investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying in reference to item C202, case 24-7258 regarding property located at 1300, 26th Street South. I was one in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on April 24 of 2024 and is a a code-sinitiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on September 3rd of 2024. This property was last re-inspected yesterday or February the 24th of 2025. Zero out of one violation has been corrected since this case began. The remaining violation, it was cited for permit needed for the oversized shed located at the rear of the property. No additional relevant facts regarding this case and this concludes my presentation. Okay thanks Anthony. Hi, name and address please. Deon Truc 2400, Father Sound Drive, unit 313, Clearwater, Florida. Okay, and your relationship to real 26? Part owner. Part owner? Okay. What are you gonna do about that, Chef? Yes, I had a tenant. He's a tenant there. He's an army vet. He placed the shed without our, without notifying us, which broke the lease. However, I spoke with this counselor. We decided to let him stay. I'm also a general contractor. So I ended up the code enforcement needed me to move the shed off the setbacks before the storm. We had a surveyor set up, the storm happened and they pushed us back. I got the survey, so it surveyed, it meets the single clients and then I was told before I went down to the permanent office to submit after a fact permit. And then also the survey, they wanted me to come here first to let you know we got it taken care of and we're getting ready to move forward with that. Go around track. Sounds good. Okay. I just give you enough time to finish the project. Get it done. I order. The Frightened 202 case number 247258 in any lane certification be deferred for 60 days or until April the 26th, 2025. You bet. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yes. We do another swearing in for the people that came in late. Yes, ma'am. Please stand and raise your right hand if you plan on presenting any evidence. Do you swear for them that the evidence you're about to give is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Thank you. Where's Tammy? Over here. Oh, good cheese. Okay. Okay, next. Item C66, Suzanne M. Flores, investigator Greg Foster. Good afternoon. I am Greg Foster. I'm a codes investigator for the city of St. Petersburg. I'm testifying an item in reference to item number C 66. This is case number two, three, one, one, eight, seven, nine regarding property located at 50, 20, 20 second street north. I was one at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and is vacant. Case began on June 30, 2023 as it codes initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement's board order was sent to the owner by mail on October 31, 2023. Property was last reinspected 19th of February, 2025, zero out of five violations have been corrected since the case began. Property has been cleaned up since the last meeting. However, I'm not sure if it was sanitation or the owner. I think sanitation actually came out and cleaned it up. The remaining violations is that there's damage to the rear-facient soft fits. There's still some paint on accessory structure garage doors and some of the walls that's missing chipping or peeling. Rear walls on accessory structures have sign of rotten damage. Fence on the property has old rotten boards leaning not in upright stable position. And the rear walls, the side of the main structure so rotten deterioration molded, mildew present, areas not watertight, water resistant. No additional relevant facts, this concludes my presentation. Okay, thank you, Greg. Hi, name an address. Michael O'Neill. Bad dress, 50, and I'm not living there. I'm living in Pasco. Okay, I need your address. All right. 144-22 Shangri-LaLine, Odessa, Florida. Okay, and Mr. O'Neill, your relationship to Suzanne? She's my wife. Wife? Yeah, so I kind of put everything on time out. My brother said he was going to help me with it. And the last couple of months, we've been out there doing work, chipping away at it. We were cleaning it up. We got about like six trailers full out of there. And then we came back the next weekend and everything was, because the neighbors house had burned down. And. We got about like six trailers full out of there and then we came back the next weekend and everything was Because the neighbors house had burnt down and that damaged my fans it melted my trailer Had an enclosed trailer up back it got melted We started we had some fence panels and we started running the fence a little bit trying to fix the fence, but we haven't got anything done completed yet. They're really, really this time it's gonna get done. Like for real this time, I'm not gonna sound like an ass. But, okay, let it go and forward. We just got the boards. I just got the one by six as I need to fix the fascia and soft it. On the accessory structure? Or no, it's on the main. It's on the main structure. The main house. I pulled one board out, trying to see if I could cut it and fix it. And when I pulled on the one board, like three other boards came down, and it turned the hole that was this big, until like a 30 foot section. And I'm going to get it though, I just. Okay, if I said to you knowing all the things that you got to do, how much time do you think it's going take for you to get to do on what you're, what would you say to me? Um, hoping a couple months would be fine. Maybe if you... willing to let it go like that, I really appreciate it. Okay, um... yeah, even though it goes back to June 23 and these older cases, you know, I get a little spooky I understand sir. I'm truly sorry. It's not you said a couple of months. I should be fine I'm working right now part time It was better when I first got out of jail two months ago work Work seemed like it was going to be steady, but I'm doing remodeling work right now. So it shouldn't be a problem for me to take care of it. Okay, what's the game plan for the private is vacant, right? Nobody? Yes, sir. The game plan would be nice to be able to live there or rent it out. I just got a tax bill for not living there and it's so freaking much. Like, I really need to be living there so I can get the... Oh, well, I know what you mean. The discount, whatever. Homestead. Homestead in charge. Okay, I'm gonna grant you a request because I believe that you're going to hammer away at it. Thank you, sir. And I hope that I don't... If it's not all done by the time I come back, there will definitely be some checks on the list, guaranteed. Just keep in mind that unless it's really made some serious progress, you come back, you kind of tie my hands with... No, yes, sir, I understand. It is accumulating 150 a day, but I order that right in C66 case number two, three, one, one, eight, seven, nine. That I'm not violating 150 a day, but I order that for item C66 case number 2311879 that further lean certification be deferred for 90 days or until May the 26th, 2025. There's just three months to Yeah, but we got to go backwards again. Item C267. Violation address 344367. 344-367 New South property owner Edward and the contract in the United Kingdom of London. Who's 67, the rena? Good up to now. the I am Sir Redd, I'm a Landed Conviscator for the City of San Pidespur, Testifying and Reference to Item C. 267, Case Number 241691, Regarding Property Located at 3443, 16 Avenue South. I was learning at the beginning of this meeting. This property is a single home and is the report. The report was reported on the report. The report was reported on the report. The report was reported on the report. The report was reported on the report. The report was reported on last re-inspected on February 11, 2025, and zero out of one violation have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are, there's a plumbing permit, 20, 090055, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. the permit 20 0 9 0 0 0 9 5 5. I'm sorry. The permit 20 0 9 0 0 0 9 5 5. That one have a final inspection, but permit for plumbing and 21 0 0 0 0 4 1. I'm expired without final inspection. This plumbing was done on a addition that was added to the structure. And so we just need to get that final inspection down for the plumbing. And this will conclude my presentation. Okay, before that's already said there was something else that... Yeah, there was two permits, so one was closed to compliance. And then the remaining one is for the plumbing. Want me? Okay. Got it. Thanks. Okay. Hi, name an address. It would prep 344, 316,000 in South St. Petersburg, Florida. Okay, Mr. Pratt. Where are we in the plumbing permit? I don't know. Let me see. I just had my own house.odel. And I had all my plummet permits and everything closed out. The permit she's talking about, it was an old permit that I filed and they told me that I did it wrong. So I had to resubmit the whole project, which was just closed. That's the one she's referenced there. So the plummet has been closed out. That one should have been closed out with the city. So you get what I'm saying? Thank you. So prior to the one that I just closed out, there was a plumbing permit that I did that I did wrong. And they told me no, you gotta submit the whole project for the remodel. It wasn't there. What was done without a final inspection? The plumbing. The plumbing. That's the plumbing. There is an active, I mean, it's not active. There's a permit for plumbing that it don't have a final inspection. So if he did have another permit, then maybe he needs to get this drain out with permit in the permit. But if you see, what's the date on that plummet, you're talking to? For the permit? That's one that you're saying this open. It's no 11, 2021. And the one that I just had closed out was after that. So what I'm saying is, I don't know why the city still have that permit still open. Because I resuminit everything for the whole house and I got my final owner plumber. Just recently went in in last year. There is a permit for the addition and one for the plumbing. Okay. So. Theition permit is. Yeah, that's already closed. Right. Which is clue plumbing. I've been signed out for my plumbing in that permit. Like trade in the property. We're taking it together as a final. Well, but there's a permit for the plumbing, which wasn't in that permit. Apparently it's a separate permit. Okay, sir sir I did have a plumbing permit in that too that's been signed out for the one that she's referenced the references to them about. So my house is completely signed off it's been done the plumbing if you pull it up it has plumbing in there I got my final say everything. But we're showing a permit that has not been closed now. It should have been closed. Like non-involved, that's what I mean. Your testimony is that that permit was closed. But you're saying I'm a little confused here because I'm hearing two things. Okay. The plumbing that, she's saying that's open. Should have been closed when I resummit it for the new permit. But it has not been closed. It was never confined, I didn't ever close it. So it's still hanging over my head. And that is right now our problem. Mr. Schultz, there's two separate permits that covered plumbing. The first one, which is dating back to 2020, covered a sewer connection to a half bath. And then there was an addition, and that never received any final approved inspections. So the 2020 permit, half bath, sewer connection, no approvals. Fast forward, they got an addition permit that covered, I think, a new bathroom. And then that was then also, there was a plumbing piece to that that connected to the sewer. That did receive its approved file inspections. Now if he's indicating that the scope in the 2020 permit was covered in the newer permit, we'll need to confirm that with the building department, but from what I can see in reviewing of the permit documents, they seem to be two separate issues. All right. Now I see where it's coming from and I do too. All right. So what I'm willing to do is throw it back at you and grant you some time to sort it out with the permitting situation. We can't absolve you without you taking some action with permitting. Am I correct? I did, I'll read it. And Rick, am I correct in saying he needs to go back to permitting? Correct. Yeah. We can resolve the the case unless you do so all I can do is grant you some more time rather than slapping any fines I mean, I'm more than happy to do that and I'm sorry to tell you that but in this case the ball gets thrown back at you But I were to talk with her On the steps. I know it's not your fault. Well, I'm getting confused But at $100 a day accumulating, I could cite right now today, $3,500 bucks, and it goes up $100 a day. It's worth the money to go back to permitting and getting it straightened out of whatever. And I'm going to give you some time to do that, but keep in mind that if you come back before me because it hasn't been done in a review, the case I'll realize at that point, you a time you didn't do it so at that point I end up planning I don't want to do that. Well why I'm confused is Dundle I don't understand why they can't put up my permits are plumbing is done. The code's important doesn't issue the permits. You know we can't wipe away your permits or do anything with your permits. can assist me we're getting that old permit closed. Mr. Schultz, I mean, we're going to reach out on behalf of the property and to the building department just to confirm or to determine whether or not the scope of work that was covered in the earlier permit was then inspected with the newer permit. And if they say, yes, this was covered there, we did that inspection as part of that permit. That resolves this issue. Yes, thank you. But we will send an email to try to explain that process. That's great. I'm gonna go with the director lunch. But anyway, I will order that for item C, 267, case 9, 1. That any lean certification be deferred for 45 days or until April 11th, 2025. One more question. I got and posed 18,000 footies. You gave me 18,000 out of five. So if we find out that there was an error on the permitting side and that was covered, we'll administratively remove that lien because it was placed in error. All right, appreciate it. Thank y'all. You can't get much more help in that. No, I appreciate it. They give me the right around so I know if you reach out and they'll answer. Thank you. Thank you. I can get a director. Item C152, property owner, Carmelo, says loan, investigator, Robert Hicks. Robert. All right. Good afternoon. I'm Robert Hicks, co-investigator for the City of St. Petersburg. Testifying a reference to item C152. Okay. It's 20-8247 regarding property located at 50-57-4th Avenue, North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. The property is a single family structure and is occupied by tenants. The case began on April 7th of 2020, and has a codes initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of code enforcement board's order was sent to the owner by mail on 7, 2 of 2024. The property was last respected per record check on 222 of 2025. Zero out of one violation still remain. The main evilations is there were two permits. One permit 21-03001783. Per renovations is now active and it's good through 10-4 of 2026. The reason we're here is the OAC D per minute 21 dash 06002211 for AC. Still has no final improved improved approved inspections and that's in this concludes my presentation. Okay, this is the permit on the AC. Yes, yes, sir. How far back does that go? Well, this is 2021. Yeah. Yeah. Thank you. Okay, I name and address please. Hi, Lauren Sandslone, 47279th of North St. Pete. I'm a little frustrated with this case, ma'am, because. Relationship to the owner? My father. I'm the daughter. I'm sorry, I assumed you were the owner. But anyway, okay, you're dead. I'm a little frustrated because this case has been before me and before. It goes back to 2020. That's way too far back. I granted, on two occasions, additional time to correct the problem problem which seemed rather easy to correct and nothing happened. And so I look at this today and unless you have some reasonable explanation for what's happening, I really don't have any choice. And a case that goes back this far and that it already granted times, multiple times. So we did get a new contractor, the first contractor. I'm trying to do that happen. Five months ago or so. So we have a new permit that's open that I think he mentioned, but it doesn't include the AC component. This company who did the AC work, they don't want anything to do with the project anymore. Like we would like final inspection to be done and then see was the work done properly. What do we need to do to close that out? They don't want to do it. So I'm a little confused at what do I do because they do the install. They were paid. They're just saying that even though the company was paid, someone else took the money and that person did the work. they don't want to be held accountable. Okay, I can see where you're confused, but my problem is this case goes back years. And so whoever was this contractor or whatever, obviously failed, but the bottom line is that I'm struggling here to help you at all, frankly. The new contractor pulled permits for everything, but this component. So that's all good. He's not the issue at all. It was the original contractor. And then this AC contractor, which is his name, I don't, well, I guess his name is just on that AC permit. I'm not really sure. But I'm not sure how to get this done because I want to hold them accountable. I don't want to open. I don't want to get a new contractor. The work was already done. So a few of any advice. I appreciate it. I don't have any advice, frankly. In a situation like this, I think like either I run, I don't even know if I can hold if I can go to the permitting department and have it renewed and then ask for final inspection, have them inspect. I don't know if I need to do that or the contractor. You're not the property owner. I have power of attorney. I cannot take that advice. I don't know. Okay, I think it's OK because I mean, I think that's OK. But I dilemma frankly is because it's such an old case here. I really struggle. I have find people with a lot newer cases than this one. This should have been resolved a long time ago, especially since I had at least two occasions granted time for it. So fishing time, apparently according to the test number. So I'm really kind of here to you. I understand your problem. And I'm trying to sympathize with you. But, frankly, I'm sorry. It's my first time here. I'm not sure who is here before. My father's hearing appeared. He's not very good at understanding any of this stuff. He just gets very frustrated as understand. Well, but keep in mind this goes back to April 2020. Yeah. Five years. It's a long time. Right. I'm sorry. Here's the only thing I think in fairness to others and when fairness. This situation all I can do is I order that for item C152, case number 208247. But the board certify an additional lien of $1,000. Now, I've done that because I think it's called for. It could have been 16,800 today. And it accumulates in $100 a day until the case is cleared. So somehow I need you to do that, or the case will come before me again 30 days from now and I'll face the same dilemma and so will you. But I don't know what else I can do except obviously keep the big fine off of you for the moment because of the longevity Do you know like I mean? I mean, I eventually this will be resolved but what what happens when someone cert when you certify the loan like does anything immediately happen That's something the investigator can tell you what you with Lines that have already been certified is that your question right? Yeah, yeah Can you fill her in Robert? There's a system and a method where you can deal with that. I'm not saying what'll happen, but there's a system and here you can explain that to you. Okay. Okay. And please, that leaves more than 16,000 floating out there and $100 a day. Somehow we need to get it resolved. I'll go talk to the, I guess, the permitting department see what they suggest. Please. Okay. All right. Thank you. Appreciate it. Item C1. Property owner B.I.H. Real Estate LLC. Samija Calak. Investigator Anthony Rivers. I'm Anthony Rivers, codes investigator for the city of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item C1, case 24-7589 regarding property located at 5100 third avenue, South. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and is vacant at this time. This case began on April 30th of 2024 and is a code to initiate a case. After they have entered hearing a copy of the code enforcement board to order what sent to the owner by mail on July 30th of 2024. This property was last re-inspected on February 24th of 2025. Zero out of one violation has been corrected since this case began. The remaining violation is the need for and after the fact permit for building roofing electrical plumbing, mechanical, and approved inspections required. Additional relevant facts regarding this case our last record check showed an entry on June 3rd of 2024 that plan review had approved the plans that were submitted but we've seen no other or further recordings in the plan review activity. This concludes my presentation. Okay. Thanks Anthony. Hi, name and address. Eldon Kaelic, 1155 Greenleaf Drive, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. Okay, skeleton relationship to Bih H. So I own the company. The name that's on the paperwork isn't my name. It's my mother's name but she has no affiliation to the business B.I.H real estate ink that's my business, but the the name that's on there Samia Kaylek That's my mom, but she has no ties to the property or the business Okay, well, I only show the real estate license LLC Okay, okay and to the fact, premier everything's been done. What are you gonna do with this thing? I was gonna live in it, but things kinda changed. So I think we're just gonna sell it. Okay, but you still got this app to the fact permit floating on the roofing and whatnot, which will make create problems when you go to sell it. So I can give you some time, or somehow you got to address that permit thing. Yeah, so I've been here two or three times, just to figure out what's required of me. And at this point, I'm just looking for clarity in terms of what else is required from me, just to close this thing out. And I can't anybody tell them what's required of them, so it's closing out the permit. Isn't that it? We, of course. In the incident after the fact permit? Yeah, yeah. So we would direct them to the building department to check the status of his information that was submitted to the plans. It may just be waiting for maybe further review or just picking up and paying for the permit. Not quite sure. So Mr. Schultz right now all that we can see on our end is that the E plan review was approved but it hasn't been routed to anything. Sometimes that's indicative of there being a hold up on the applicant side, but we can't see that. So we would again, like just Mr. River said, recommend he go to the building department and check with them. Okay. I'd recommend that you just go to permitting. Check with them. If I give you some time, you got to go to permitting. So, you can get it straight down, get the case off your back. All right, I order. So, that for item C1, case number 2, 4, 7589, that any lane certification be deferred for 45 days or until April 11, 2025. Sometime in those 45 days, you got to get over permitting. And I mean, yeah, permitting in there. I went down there last time I was here and I still came away with nothing you know I still can't. I don't know what else to tell you. It's kind of not in our hands. Yeah. Sorry sir. You hear that he went down to permitting last last time and didn't get anywhere. What does that mean? So the contractor submitted the permits and as Miss Opera indicated usually when it just hits that initial E plan there was something missing on the contractor side that didn't get submitted so they can't continue on with the review. So getting in contact with the Billing Department determine what might be missing, getting in contact with the contractor to see if he received any feedback. You know, I can't say that this is anything caused from the hurricanes with the increased permitting applications because this was well before that, and that note was in there previously. So it's really just getting in contact with the contractor with the building department and trying to figure out why this did not move on in the next part of the stage of the review process. Again, I just granted 45 days to get that. I think I granted 45 days to get over there and see what you can work out. What's the worst case scenario is you're gonna end up performing about two months? You don't wanna do that? Yeah. Okay. Right. Are we ready to move on to the right places? Item C 11 property owner, R.E. Enterprise's Martin, LLC are incorporated investigator, Bonnie Green. I'm Bonnie Green, codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg testifying reference to item number C 11, case number 23-3198 regarding property located at 59354th Street North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on February 21st, 2023, and is a code initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on May 31st, 2023. This property was last reinspected on February 11, 2025. Zero out of one violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violation is two main business signs on property or in disrepair. A permit will be required for repairs or replacement. Additional relevant facts regarding this case, a sign permit is on file but expired on January 5th, 2025, without a final approved inspection. This concludes my presentation. Expired January 5th. Okay, thanks, Bonnie. Hi, your name and address please, Tammy. Tammy McGuire, 670, 34th Avenue Sal St. Petersburg, Florida, 3705. So, um, the contractor actually extended the permit yesterday. Okay. Okay. I didn't see it. Just got a text message while I was sitting here. So it probably didn't have enough time to see it because it was done at the end of the day. Okay, extended the permit. He actually did the work already or what? No, because the hurricane did more damage to the sign. I know it was. All right. Obviously, except the testimony. They extended the permit that puts our case pending. I mean in this case even with the extension based on when the permit was initially submitted there's been no inspections, there's been no work that's gone on. So it would still be before you, because there hadn't been anything happening within the past 90 days, even with an active permit. Oh. Okay, thank you for correcting me on that. You understand that, Tammy? Yes, I understand. Okay, even, all right. Because I'm looking here and I see your requests for 20 days, 20 days, 20 days, 20 days. Because you thought it was gonna get done. Yes, of course I did. Into the road at this point in time, I order that for item C11, case number, 233198, that the board certify an additional lien of $1,000. Thank you. Okay, you can make a note to tell me that it could have been $55,000 when you talked to Mr. Martin. Yes, sir. Mr. Martin, however. Yeah, Mr. Martin. Okay, next case. Item C-12, property owner, Richard Martin, investigator, Bonnie Green. I'm Bonnie Green, codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item number C-12, case number 24-2540 regarding property located at 218 South East Jefferson Circle, North. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a single family structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on February 12th, 2024, and is a code follow-up case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on July 2nd, 2024. This property was last reinpected on February 11th, 2025. Zero out of one violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violation is several areas of the wood and vinyl fencing is in disrepair. This concludes my presentation. All right, thanks, Bonnie. All right, Tammy. Tammy McGuire, 67070 34th Avenue Salis St. Petersburg Florida 3 3705. Mr. Schultz you did give me days to get this done last time. The fence is now fixed it wasn't done within the time allotted but it was done six days ago if Miss Green can come back out and re-inspect we can close that out. Oh, it's good news. We're going to arrange that. We gave you 15 days or so to go back out. Sounds good. I order that for item C 12, case number 2, 4, 2540 that lean certification be deferred for 20 days or until March the 17th, 2025. So Bonnie, that gives you 20 days to to, okay. Thank you. Great news. Thank you. Is it 20 days? Okay, 20 days. Item C14, property owner, REM properties, Incorporate Investigator Bonnie Green. Bonnie Green, codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying reference to item number C14, case number 22-23500, regarding property located at 320, 60 second Avenue North. I was sworn in and started this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is vacant. This case began on November 30th, 2022, and is a code initiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board order was sent to the owner by mail on September 3rd, 2024. This property was last re-inspected on February 11th, 2025. 10 out of 12 violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are electrical outlet must be in working order and interior wall is in disrepair with holes or missing areas. This concludes my presentation. Okay, thanks buddy. Tammy? Tammy McGuire 670 670, 34th Avenue, style St. Petersburg, Florida, 3705. Mr. Schultz? Yeah. I don't get this one. Okay. This goes back to 2022. I have granted on six occasions a 140 days total, including requests from you, the recent ones, not the old ones before your time, a 15 days, a 15 days, a 25 days, because it seemed like this was going to be handled. It would be quite simple. Yes, unfortunately, at the mercy of Mr. Martin, like if I could make the decisions and have his money to get the things done, they would be done. And I apologize. There's nothing that I- You don't have to apologize. I just shake my head. Electrical oil is a little wall stop. And he's done 10 out of 12. But how far do we continue to go with this thing? So, I'll send a message back, I guess I order that for item C14, case number 22, 235-00, that the board certify an additional lien of $10,000. Now you put down in your notes, Timmy, that it could have been $31,200, so that leaves 21, 2 hanging out there and they're still accumulating at a rate of 200 a day. Yes, sir. We're looking at this next month. Vingo. Okay. I understand. Okay. Next. Item C 16, Property Owner REM Properties Incorporated properties incorporated investigator Bonnie Green. I'm Bonnie Green, Codes Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item number C16, case number 24-1259. Regarding property located at 320, 60 second Avenue north, I was sworn in that started this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is vacant. This case began on January 18th, 2024. And it's... in Avenue North, I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is vacant. This case began on January 18th, 2024 and is a code follow-up case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the code enforcement board's order was sent to the Under By Mail on April 30th, 2024. This property was last reinspected on February 11th, 2025. Zero out of one violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violation is a permit is required for the new windows installed on the second floor of building. This concludes my presentation. Okay, thanks, Bonnie. Tammy McGuire, 670, 34th Avenue, Sal St. Petersburg, Florida, 337-05. Mr. Schultz, I've told you several times that Mr. Reed was going to be doing after the fact permit for us for that window. We had tenants up there that would not allow him access to do his measurements because he was doing after the fact permit he didn't originally install the windows. They're evicted now. He was there yesterday to take the measurements. And if you could graciously give us like even 15 days to get a permit pool, it doesn't take that long to apply for the permit. And we can get the last time you and I address this was in August. Yes'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry59. The lien certification be deferred for 15 days. Okay, next case. Well, question Lonnie, what happened to C 15? We're doing that one now. Huh? No, No. Yeah. Let's check then after C16. Okay. All right. C15. Okay. I'm confused. We're on C16. We just finished C16. C16 was number 50. Okay. So now we're going back to 15. And then it goes back to 15. Okay, C 15. I don't know why it was checked. I was. Item C 15, REM properties incorporated investigator Bonnie Green. I'm Bonnie Green, codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying and referenced. I'm number C15 case number 23-4440 regarding property located at 321 Southeast Boulevard North. I was sworn in and started this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is occupied by tenants. This case began on March 9, 2023 and is a tenant complaint case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board order was sent to the owner by mail on July 5, 2023. This property was last reinpected on February 11, 2025. 10 out of 14 violations have been corrected since this case began. the remaining violations are building is commercial with one unit upstairs authorized for dwelling. Downstairs unit is an illegal unit and removal is required. There's several windows with broken glass, numerous windows with missing window screens. And the last one is roof disrepair. There's missing shingles in several locations and the roof itself sags. This concludes my presentation. Okay, thanks, Bonnie. Tammy McGuire, 670, 34th Avenue, South St. Petersburg, Florida, 3305. Yeah, what do you got on this one? I have no comment, Mr. Schultz. I don't either because frankly I've given at least six times on this case and sort of the concern is ridiculous. So I order, I just can't figure out why this was handled a long time ago. I ordered that for item C15 case number 23440, that the board is certifying additionally in of $20,800. Now that doesn't save any money because that's what's accumulated so far on this particular case just because Understood makes no sense Item C 113 property owner REM properties LLC investigator, Joseph Brunori. 113. Yes, 113. Hang on a minute, Robert. 112 is closed. 112 is closed. Great. And we must have closed that one. Good. OK, 113. I'm Joseph Brinori, Coates Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item C113, case 2-3-18084. Regarding the property located at 8275, fourth street north. I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is vacant. The case began on September 28th, 2023, and is a code-sinitiated case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on January 30th, 2024. This property was last re-inspected on February 12th, 2025. One out of six violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are. Lated wall mount sign is melted and has fire damage. Plask commercial front door has been broken out. There's fire damage debris throughout the property and as of October 24th, 2024, there is junk and debris throughout the vacant property. There is peeling paint, smoked and fire damaged paint on the exterior of the structure. There are unpainted securing boards. There are numerous melted and broken electrical lines on the structure. And this concludes my presentation. What's the one violation that was corrected? The roof. Oh. Okay. So the fire damage didn't damage the roof of the roof was repaired. I think the roof was repaired. It was repaired. Okay, Tammy? Tammy McGuire, 670, 34th Avenue, Sal St. Petersburg, Florida, 337, 05. Mr. Schultz. Make some sense of this, will you? With electrical wires and things like that, the unpainted secaring boards, the boards definitely should have been painted. But we have a problem with people going in there and trying to strip the electrical stuff from the electrical from the wires and taking down the securing boards. Other than that, I don't have any other comments because I'm not trying to put you on the spot. No, it's September 23. Yeah, I mean, the building burnt down. He had intentions on, we started to do repairs and. Got any aid on the winter burn? They believed that the, from the fire report, I received, received, it looked like it was suspicious having to do with the tenant at the time who either look or store and They're no longer in the country so All right and just for your for the record or for your information twice last year I granted 60 to 120 days probably the year requested at the time I like to recognize the one out of six but sounds kind of silly so. At this point in time I'm really left with no choice but to say I order that for item C 113 the case number 231808 for I order the board to certify an additionally of $25,000. Now for your notes, it could have been $42,600 today. It is still accumulating at $200 a day. Yes, sir. So I think it would have been cheaper to fix the building. Just me. What else do we have for Tammy? Anything? Yes. Oh. Oh, Tucker. Yeah. Item C 140, property owner, REM properties incorporated investigator Carl Gordon. I'm Carl Gordon, co-investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, test of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and then occupied by tenants. This case began on June 27, 2022, and is a co-sinitiate case. After the evidentiary hearing, it copied a colon enforcement board order was sent to the owner by mail on April the 30th, 2024. The property was last re-inspected on February 18th, 2025. Seven out of eight violations have been correctly, since this case began. The remaining violation is broken concrete on the surface of the property. The disrepair is located on the south side of the property. It permit is required to install approved commercial parking area. And this concludes my presentation. Okay, thanks. Tim. Timmy. Tammy McGuire, 670, 34th Avenue Sal St. Petersburg, 3705. 7-8, you know, I sit here and go, why not the eighth and the case was disappeared? But I have already granted 60 days on this and it goes back to 2022 and I granted in 2024. Three requests, I didn't jot down on Tammy, but I'll bet they were 20 days each because she thought it was gonna get done. Yes I did. I know you can't go do it yourself. No. But ridiculous. And so I ordered that for item C 140 case number 2, 2, 1, 3, 6, 5, 7, that the board certify an additional lien of $25,000. For your notes, it should have been $47,300. Thank you. But it's still accumulating at $200 a day. Do we have any more for Tammy? Yes. Uh-huh. Tucker's got to get in on this. Okay. Item C, 191 property owner RE and properties incorporated investing in your Tucker Hodges. at that for now. I'm talking to her. I just got to get in on that. Item C191 property owner RE and properties incorporated in vestigated Tucker Hodges. Good afternoon, I'm Tucker Hodges. Couldn't investigate it for the city of St. Petersburg. Testifying the reference item C191, case 24-8885 regarding property located. At 2829-3870 North, I was sworn in, I started this meeting. This property is a single family structure and is occupied by a tenant. The case began on May 21, 2024, and as it codes follow up case. After the evidentiary hearing, it copied the code enforcement board's order, was sent to the Underby Mail on 932-2024. Property has last been inspected to two, two, excuse me, two, 22, 25. Zero out of one violations being corrected since this case began. Remaining violations are permit 20 dashes, zero nine, zero, zero, zero, eight, five, zero for electrical repair and upgrades,'m sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry who did the work and pulled the permit. He passed away before. So I was under the impression and so talking to Mr. Hodges today that I have to do after the fact permit, it's really hard to find someone to do that for electrical. But he told me that that does not need to be done. He told me how to handle it. So if I can have 20 days, I think we can get it closed out. Okay, let's see. Last month, yes for 20 days. I'll give you 20 more. Thank you. I ordered that for item 191 case number 248885 that any lean certification be deferred for 20 days or until March the 17th, 2025. Okay, Tammy. There's been no lien certified on that particular case either. No, sir, thank you. Item number C219 property owner, Richard Martin Management Corporation, investigators on 9, Jean Medu. What happened to C-190? It was closed. It was closed? Great. Okay. Another window. I'm sorry. What was that one? C-219. C-219. C-219. Okay. Okay. Who's got? Good afternoon. I am. Okay, who's got a good afternoon. I am Jean Madue, Coates Investigator for the City of St. Petersburg. Testifying and reference to item number C219, case number 22-6611 regarding property located at 1517, 14th Street, sorry, 4th Street North I was sworn in at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is vacant. This case began on March 22nd, 2022, and is a citizen complaint case. After the evidentiary hearing, a copy of the Code Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on February 28th, 2023. This property was last re-inspected on February 14, 2025. Eight out of ten violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are broken window glass and windows, table parts, words, scrap metal, tops, buckets, and other miscellaneous debris on property. There are no additional relevant facts regarding this case, and this concludes my presentation. Okay. 15 to 4th, okay. Tammy McGuire, 670, 34th Avenue, South St. Petersburg, Florida, 3375. Mr. Schultz, unfortunately, I don't have anything to say for this property, for either of the cases. I'm cases. They come in, they fix it. People go in there, he allows people to go back in there that try to not leave the property, break things. We've had people that want to buy it, we've had it under contract a couple of times. The last buyers couldn't get financed for it. And it's a big problem. The amount of leans that I've already placed on this property, it could have hired a 24 hour guard to sit there with a gun. But anyway, I'm just looking down on this 30 days, 20 days, 30 days, 15 days, 30 days, 30 days, 25 days, 20 days. Yeah, at one point they were making big progress, and then it went south. Yeah, all right. I order That for item two one nine case number two two six six one one at the board certifying additional lean of $7,000 I didn't save you any money on that thing me and it doesn't make a whole lot of difference because they're very certified leans of 136,000 on the property anyway. So 7,000 doesn't mean much. Right. But all the times we've given you. No. I use. I know Mr. Martin, yes sir, it's not personal. Item C, 220 property on a Richard Martin, investigator, Jeanne Medou. I am Jeanne Medou, codes investigator for the City of St. Petersburg, testifying and reference to item number C, 220 case number 23 dash 11394 regarding property located at 1517, 4th street north. I was sworn at the start of this meeting. This property is a commercial structure and is vacant. This case began in June 22, 2023 and is a tenant complete case. After the evidentiary here in a copy of the Code Enforcement Board's order was sent to the owner by mail on October 31, 2023. This property was last re-inspected on February 14, 2025. One out of 11 violations have been corrected since this case began. The remaining violations are. Sealing has evidence of water intrusion and holds in numerous locations. Stair trim and stair tread is broken, missing stairs spindles, several junction boxes and outlets have exposed electrical wires, several missing electrical cover plates, mildew in air vents, mildew in bathtub, missing cabinet, missing light globes. Floors are in this repair in the bathroom with missing floor tiles. Wooden floors have rotted wood. Windows do not open or are missing locks. Numerous missing window screens, evidence of pests in sex, exterminators report required. Numerous areas of wall disrepair, several interior doors and door casings are in disrepair. Repairs to ceiling, walls, plumbing and electrical are not done in a workman like man. There are no additional relevant facts regarding this case and this concludes my presentation. Very. I'm in Maguire 670 34th Avenue Sal St. Petersburg Florida 3 375. Same thing 30 days 25 days 15 days 25 days 20 days. I just don't understand why didn't bulldoze the property or whatever but but it's not for me to say I order that for KC 220, case number 2311394 that the board certify an additional $7,000. It continues to amount to $200 a day and that takes the current leans approximately 91,000 for your notes, Tammy. Yes. I'm sure Mr. Martin is probably well aware. Thank you. That's it? That's it. That's enough. Thank you so much for coming really. I mean that. Well thank you. Have a good day everybody. Yeah me too. I just don't get it. Makes no business sense. Money sense. It's dangerous to let the only reason that one wasn't hurt today is because it burned down on Sunday. Oh, is that right? But unless he has some way of beating the system and all the leans down the road He just dies of somebody else has to deal with it. I don't get it Be cheaper Did you just write down where you're done reading that I'll probably be okay? Okay I did it. Yeah, it's floor. I'm going to go to the next floor. I'm going to go to the next floor. I'm going to go to the next floor. I'm going to go to the next floor. I'm going to go to the next floor. I'm going to go to the next floor. I'm going to go to the next floor. I'm going to go to the next floor. I'm going to go to the next floor. Look at that. I'm seeing it. I get it good at this or what? Yeah, you can take this on. You're going to do it this way. Let me just throw this away. I'll toss it recycling for you. Oh, I don't know. What were you going with it? You can just toss it. I just dumped all my trash money in there too. Dumped you on them? No, I don't. I'm going to have to do the reading. Yeah, she was supposed to read the reading. Is that okay? No, do you want to have these with us today, but I have all today. I haven't done the reading yet. Oh, okay. Okay. Follow-up. Okay. Item number C2 has been deferred. I don't remember C3 Sherry A. Hudson trusty I'm received for James D. Kuroski. I Remember C5 has been deferred. I'm never C6 Michael G. Nevelle I'm number C8's been deferred. I'm or C9 Williams spite. I don't remember C10 Paul R Johnson. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm in the first seat. I'm Ian J. Wood. Ember C. 20. Clara M. Morsha. Mistate. Item number C. 21. Clara M. Morsha. Mistate. Ember C. 22. David G. Edwards. Ember C. 24. Mendeferred. Ember C. 25. Mood. Ember C. 26. It's been closed. and received 30's been closed. And verse 31, Joseph B. Davis, Jr. State. And verse 32, Jennifer T. of Farnbury. And verse 33, Joseph B. Davis Jr. State. Number C32, Jennifer T. of Farmbury. Number C33, Derrenza, Florence, Estate. Number C34 has been removed. Number C35, Annie M. Jackson Estate. And number C36 has been removed. Number C37, Derthea, Statue of the State. And number C39, Truco, Enterprises Incorporated. at remember C-40 U.S. Clubing and Urban Development. I remember C-41, Derrick. I remember C-42, Mabel Williams. I remember C-43, Jennifer Beaton. I remember C-44, Svindefur. I remember C-45, Svindclose. I remember C-46, Vicente Gonzalez, in Nita, Conde. Number C-47, Michael and Gruderin. Nversey 48, Spendaferd, Nversey 49, Curkley Acquisitions, LLC. Nversey 50, Lawrence A. And Margaret C. Myers. Nversey 51, Spendaferd, Nversey 52, Hayden Tubbs and Jacqueline Tubbs. Nversey 53, Spendaferd, Nversey 54, Eugene and Devertee Woman. Number C55 and Mary T. Boynton State. Number C56. and receive fifty-three has been deferred and receive fifty-four Eugene and Deverti woman. And receive fifty-five and Mary T. Boynton estate. And receive fifty-six, Joe C. Brockson estate. And receive fifty-seven, Joe C. Brockson estate. And receive fifty-eight, Lisa A. Clayton Davis. And receive fifty-nine, Lisa A. Clayton Davis. And receive sixty, James S. Cook. And receive sixty-one, Leo J. Corrig. Number C62, Denise Homes, LLC. Number C63, and I'm received 64. Number C65, it's been deferred. I'm received 67. It's been deferred. Number C60, it's been closed. Number C69, KNNZ, LLC. Number C71's been closed. Number C72, William G. Peters, Jr. And we're C73 has been closed and we're C74 has been deferred. Sorry. Did we defer one over two more in traffic? I guess so. And we're C76 has been removed. And we're C78, Christopher C. Vaux-Parr. Annembor C80, James C. Davis's state. Annembor C81, Jolene S. Johnson, Annembor C82, Nymissa Pallelolc. Annembor C83, Judith A. Ramsen's state. Annembor C84 has been deferred. Annembor C85, James M. M. Wade and number C86, correct applying investments LLC and we're C87, correct friend investments LLC and we're C88, Judy and John Group and we're C89, JHH Apple LLC and number C90, Anthony Ruggai and Nicole Antony and number C91, I remember C93, of affordable real estate. Number C-93. Affordable real estate network. Number C-94. Affordable real estate network. Number C-95 has been deferred. Number C-96. Shirley B. Brown. Number C-97. Antoine Evans Estate. Number C-99. Mark Well-Hixon. And we're C-100. It's been deferred. And we're C-101's been closed. Number C-103 has been deferred and we're C101 has been closed and we're C103 has been deferred and we're C104 and we're C105 has been deferred and we're C106, Louise, Tiong, and State and we're C107 has been deferred and we're C108 has been deferred and we're C109 has been closed and we're C10 has been deferred and we're C11 has been deferred and we're C12 has been closed and we're C114, it's been deferred. I number C115, I number C116, it's been deferred. I number C117, it's been closed. I number C118, August, St. Pete, 77777777 LLC. I number C118, it's been deferred. I number C120, Alan K. Dahlstrom. I number C121, flip it to you, LLC. number C122GFP3000LC. And number C123, Jackson Trust 1751, Jim McArthur Trustee. Number C124 has been deferred and receive 125. Brian Lombani, Trustee Enziag Lombani. I don't know where C126 has been deferred and receive 127 has been closed and closed and the C128 has been deferred. Number C129, Rablan, Rental's LLC. Number C130 has been deferred and the C131 has been closed. Number C133, 95 Central Hotel, LLC. Number C135, William Carpanza. Number C136, Greenwood Cemetery Association. Number C137, Hillary Hudson State.. N.C. 138 Luxury Housing Property LLC. N.C. 139 Michelle Phillips. N.C. 141, one vote was written. N.C. 141 has been deferred. N.C. 143, Tress, N.C. 330, Bay Area Property Management Investment. N.C. 144, Jeanette, Joquinta Wells. Number C145 is the M. Puppet East Corp. Trustee, AZP Northland Trust. Number C146 has been removed. And number C147, Ronda Renee Gary. And number C148, Darcy A. Goodson. Number C149, Donald A. and Jennifer J. Johnson. And number C150. Michael LePenza. I don't know. Number C152. That was right in. And number C154 has been deferred. And number C155 has been deferred. And number C156 has been deferred. And number C157, June A. Johnston. And number C158 has been deferred. I don't receive 159. Olten are a berry the third. And I'm receive 160. Olten are a berry the third. And I'm, June 8, Johnston. Number C158, it's been deferred. And number C159, Olsonar, O'Berry III. And number C160, Olsonar, O'Berry III. And number C161, Daniel J. Perram. Number C162, and number C163, and number C164, and number C165. Number C166, and number C167, and number C168, and number C169, and're C178. Number C171 and we're C172 and we're C173 and we're C174. Number C175 and we're C176. Number C177 and we're C178 and we're C179 and we're C180 and we're C181 and we're C182 and we're C183 and we're C184 Number C and we're seeing 185, and we're seeing 186, and we're seeing 187, have been deferred. And we're seeing 188, Lorraine Downward, and we're seeing 189, Frederick, E, and Thomas C. Miller, and we're seeing 190s, been closed, and we're seeing 182, Thomas L. Richards, and we're seeing 183s, been closed, and we're C-184s and closed and we're C-185s been removed. And we're C-186, Brenda Flerney, and we're C-197, is in close and receive one and a five has been removed. And we're see one and a six, Brenda Flerney. And we're see one and a seven, Ronda Gary and Cortez and Foster. And we're see one and a eight, it's been deferred and we're see one and a nine, Bernard Henry. And we're see two hundred, Geraldine H and Henry H. Hester. And we're see two zero one's been deferred and received 203 and received 204 and received 205 and received 207. Received 209 has been deferred and received to ten Dolores Peak Evans and received to eleven. It's been closed and received two 12s removed and received two 13s removed and received four teams been removed. And received two 15s been closed and received two 16s been closed and received two 17 dust 17 does send hook. And Per C2 18 Robert Anthony Martin, LA Jr. And Per C2 22, Joseph Travis. And Per C2 23. Elzana Torova to Tiznova. And Per't receive 224 dollars. I'm C225, Courtney C. Winters and Tracy and Winters of State. I don't receive 226. It's been removed. I'm received 227. It's been deferred. I'm received 228. It's been closed. I'm received 233. Julia Reardon. I'm received 234. The name is redacted. We are Reardon, number C C234, the name is redacted. Addresses 2544 Street South. And number C237, Hermana Bridgeman. Number C238, Fred H. and Marianne H. Gamble. And number C239, it's her vision LLC. And number C241 has been deferred. And number C242, or enterprises incorporated. And number C2432 or enterprises incorporated and receipt 243 or enterprises incorporated I think when this case be closed out It's the hex box Yeah, I fit it is then yes, is. Okay, so I don't... I just don't check. Okay, then I'll come back to that one. I'm number C245, it's been deferred and receipt 246. The name has been redacted, addresses 381915th Avenue South. I'm receipt 247's been deferred and receipt 248. Nelletta L. Blinks, Blinksney, trust Trustee 25268 Avenue South Trust. Number C249, Christenner Church of God. And receipt 250, Jabbar J. Edman. And number C251's been deferred. And receipt 253, Foxhole deferred, and number C256, clippered in Sonia, Green. Number C257 has been removed, and number C259 has been deferred. And number C263, invests, works, solutions LLC. Number C261 has been deferred, and number C262, Wanda Gail and Rodney Durene Lee. And number C263 has been deferred and received 264. MIHRAIR Group LLC and received 265 Morales, handy work and agent. Rodney Dwayne Lee. Annembracy 263 has been deferred. I'm received 264. MI Herrera Group LLC. Annembracy 265, Morales, H&W Work and HVAC Incorporated. I'm received 266, Multibus Properties Incorporated. Annembracy 269, Robert Rogers Jr., Annembracy 270, Robert Rogers Jr., Annembracy 271, Sheka Starks, in Cassandra County. Number C273, US Home Services LLC, trust number 220, 2, 0, 9, 3, 3, 7, 1, 1. I don't remember C274, Mary P. Wagman. I don't remember C275, Kevin Wells. Mercy 276 has been closed. Mercy 277, Mary and Lynch. I don't remember C278, John K. Bowman. Number C2-80's been closed. Number C2-81's been deferred. Number C2-82's is the Lombani Trustee. Ron Nani, Lombani Trustee. Number C2-83's been removed. Number C2-84, Beverly Hicks. Number C2-85, 245th, 1570 South, a little C. Number C2-86. and receipt 287's been closed and receipt 289's been closed and receipt 290's been closed. Receipt 291's been deferred and receipt 292's been deferred. receipt 293's been closed and receipt 295's been removed. receipt 296 and receipt 297's been closed and receipt 299's been closed. And number C303's been deferred and receipt 304's been closed and Number C 305, number C 306 has been deferred and c304 has been closed and c305 and c306 has been deferred. And then what is the 244 was the item number? So that is for a different case. Oh, okay. So item number 244 is Sharon Rattai. Yes. Lani, can we just go ahead and for the record, defer that I want to make sure there wasn't a confusion with. Okay. So item number C244 has been deferred. It could be, I didn't know. It could be a different case. Okay, and that concludes the read-in. Okay, I order that certification of leans be deferred for 25 days for the item numbers and cases as just read by staff. I further order to remove from the agenda the cases that are closed as read into the record by staff and all cases that have previously been acted upon in this meeting. Finally, I order that the leans for cases on the amended consent agenda be certified. This hearing is now adjourned. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Thank you.