I call the meeting of the Adams County Board of Adjustments to order. Master, can we have a roll call please? Mr. Martinez? Yes, Mr. Ellis? Yes, Mr. Nicole? Yes, Mr. McCullough? Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yes is our customer at this point. We all rise to state privileges. What do you buy? I buy two allegiance to the blood of the United States and America. And to the United Republic for the richest sense. I wish you a good one. And it doesn't have to be the justice of our own. There is no comma. Next will be the approval of our minutes. I'll make the motion. I'll keep that up. I'll do a problem. I'm sorry, Miss Hersch. Is he me? Yes. Mr. Martin. Yes. Yes. Yes. Is he me? No, that's not what I was just. That's your line. Yes. You're not going to look for a temporary bird. That's a thank you. Miss Hersch, do we clear up all the back means that we've had some issues with? Yes, me. We have had some issues with the law, good on us. We have happy dates. OK, at this point, Mr. Rusero, can you give us the verification jurisdiction? Thank you, Mr. Chair. The county turns office as we need portion of the case files on state and that finds that on the requirements of the SAS 5 interested in the Department of Transportation Board. Thank you. We sort of have three cases before the board today. Our first case, BSP 2007 dash, 0, 0, 0, 2, 6 case name, line, applicant, I mean, line, those were drawn, miss, the dialed on, I read in further on that. You know, if they just have to be with Todd, I'll go get it. Okay, hopefully it'll get very short down. It's going to our next case. Case number BSP 2007-0028, case number Gentry. Applicant is Taryn's Gentry's applicant here today. of the Okay, Mr. Gentry, for the record, would you please state your name, spell your last name, give your address and your affiliation of the case, please. My name is Trans Gentry, GNN-T-R-1, 8-8-9-11571, right now, I'm going to ask you for a last-6. I've been there, and I just like that. A little bit of a chance. Will you argue or they applicant? I'm not. I'm not. Okay, thank you. And Mr. Gentry, prior to this hearing, did you receive a copy of the staff's report? Yes sir. Okay. At this point in time, what we're going to do is we're going to turn it over to some Dowler to make staff's presentation, and when she's done that we'll give you a chance to elaborate and comment on throneshures out there. And then we'll open it up and you can decide. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This is Gentry, Case Number B VFPP 2007-0028. This is a request for a variance of 2.54% from the maximum allowed 7.5% block coverage to allow construction of an 800-80 square foot shed on a lot with a maximum of 10.04% block coverage in the A1 double district. Persuades a section 3-08-070-06-02. Parking is located at 11571 Brighton Road, zone A1, and it's one A-crime size. The feature landing spot visits this property as a state residential. This is a zoning amphibian area. Right here, road view is being located here. There's 20 avenue right here. And the Synchro-Cockery is just a pretty so very high in every surrounding area. There's a 3-I-2, a P-A-D, and then a cover city, a municipal fountain in the area as well. And there's an area near the Pockery. So again, it's like a city right here, and then this is the property. So that's Mr. Tetrisha, and there's a small garage. So the other use is on the other property. And you can find in the place another shed. The only accessory structure currently on the property is the 6th-century square of the garage, which is utilized by the applicants' leather, who owns the property adjacent to the east. The garage belonged to the applicant's parents and existed prior to the applicant's law being created. When the property was simplified, the flag called for the applicant's flag law was created around this existing garage, effectively locating the entire garage from the applicant's property rather than our disappearance property. The cast right away was dedicated to the right for the property that's certified in, a portion of the existing garage is actually located in the right of land as well. The garage is still used by the African's mother, even though it is located on the applicant's property and in county right of land. The applicant has stated he plans to tear down in the garage because mother no longer needs it. Including the portion of the existing garage maddener right away, the existing coverage would be 3,290 x 50, just 31 square feet over the maximum allowance of 7.5% building coverage. Adding the proportion would increase that coverage to 4,175 square feet, for full of the proposed lot coverage of 9.59%. Because the current request is 10.04%, which assumed the entire garage was on the subject property. Staff is recommending a commission which limits the lock of the ship on site to 9.59%. A representative from Denver Water responded with concern that the applicant would construct a proportion of the property line as their group's property line concerns in the past. Denver water requested and staff provided survey information to help determine whether the proposed shed be constructed over the property line. And then the water determined the shed was set back far enough in the property line that it would not impact them. Because this requirement has been resolved, recommended condition number three can be deleted. The United Power Company commented with the objections to propose variance, and no sensitive comments were received for this request. Just to be able to play a plan. So it only shows the back portion of the thought that it's actually known. This is the new thing, how? Or this planning of the Alpeling Registration. So that would be a South West corner. This is a survey done before the second, just to show you that all of the structures were existing. And so there's a graph that could let her use the design as property. And then I have some lines here to show you. This is the approximate boundary of the subdivision that would be the line in between the two lots. And this line will prove that the back of the plane is dedicated. So approximately one-third of that garage is now in the right way. This is a picture looking west into the side. So back to the road on this property. And this plane could be placed in another action back here. The property is legalized and performing with respect to law size and was created when the Amon Zone District permitted law to be cut with water or sewer to gain minimum of 1 acre of size. Today that minimum for law-zone A1 is 2.5 acres. This law is appropriately sized with a R.E. zone district with a lot coverage of around 12.5 percent. If the property was sold R.E., the applicant would not need a variance to construct a proposed 880 square foot shed. Staff police and spectrities that had disadvantaged to other lots with more acreage, but the faculty and their could construct accessory buildings much larger than the applicants for post shed. Even if they could actually utilize by the applicant's weather was removed, the applicant would only be permitted for 100 in 5 split feet of accessory buildings. If this site was on R1C, this is less than half of the accessory building allowance for an R1C lot, which could have up to 900 split fee to accessory buildings, on 1 6.58 crates of the applicant's boxes. Staff, the applicant indicated in place to tear down the existing garage when his leather no longer meets it. This would reduce the building coverage on the property to 8.59%, just 1.09% or 400% that 70% will be allowed coverage of 7.5%. Staff is suggesting the applicant has agreed to a condition which requires the applicant to remove the garage from the property when the applicant's mother or the applicant needs it, or when the victim is buying it, whichever occurs first and road-flighting, whichever occurs first, and it no cost to account. Staff believes the applicant has a reasonable request and a valid physical hardship which reminds the requested variance. The proposed check meets all other requirements of the AIMA's own district. Staff is regularly approval subject to eight findings, two conditions with recommended commission of the three deleted and one else. And that includes the separate ones. Thank you, Mr. Dahl. Mr. Gentry, your turn. Your turn. Well, I'd like to think about proper little things, so I thought, you know, the nice shit that I want to do the legally so I've been fighting those three. All the right channels to get this done. I'd like to make a fuller pick up out of the weather and shout stuff is clear to the players and one more talk to you to prove that. And that frankly large, I think I do plan to check down on my mom in some very 90th birthday and some of these long, and so I try to check it down right now. She still won't have to take tonight, so she's just not too much. I do pan-chair down, so I can get the spirits up. Just keep this in the clock and I'll go to the clock. Okay. Anything else you'd like to add at this point? I'll get the attack going. You deserve a gift, then. Okay. At this point, then I turn over to our board for the bill and we'll start with Mr. Antler. I have the question. The first is the balance you put the slide on showing the property. Hello? I'm in the survey. We have. Okay. Next up is the question. Hello? I'm the survey, let me help. Okay. Next up is the question. I don't find the Tri-Chani help with several food. Stake it. It could be correct. There is a wall there and Tri-Cis one that has to address the rest of the conflict that should be known. You will be used to the gun. You have self-gunned hand-locked sprayers. You have to have them as well. Okay, I'm going to have to accept it. You have to accept it. You have to accept it. You have to accept it. You have to accept it. You have to accept it. I'm going to talk to them and the garage is quiet space away from my needs field. I'm going to get a proof of my doctor in Dr. Ford. I'm going to help from them. I'm going to send these second batches to my new doctor. I'm going to send them back down and talk to them. And they tell me what they need in this cup and why. Send back, you drive, send back just this question of each production of the beach for a bunch of good things. Just a splash of the beach for a bunch of good things. That's another question. I was wondering, is the beach feel? The beach feel? Would it be better to show it on the edge of your eyes? Yes, okay. I wasn't sure it was on. I could create it. You see where the value was there? It's 25 a... I'll make sure this is about... I can't post a lot of site. And it's just a... I've done the site right. It's a deal. So where would you put it? A... Another reach for you. If you have a little place... I have room on the north side of the property still. Or you just... A bit further and more. This right now is contained in the house, 16th and 16th, December, 25th. It's a little more than 24 people in the media. But it's, those days, for now, I think you'll have 25 people, not the best shed is meant to be. My daughter, we haven't discussed this. I just noticed there's no other trucker. So he said the public health, there's a tricuny known. There's a tricuny known. Yes, and I talked to him about that. He's dealt with that. We got a copy of the permeability. We need to fill these empty systems in. We were just writing them out for years ago. It's like, I went out and copied it for as a sparky back band. During that was the end of it. I think it's in a baggy bag. I can take a little bit of it. Maybe in the back of the house. That's my major concern of the South Indian Park News. There's no identifying who the South Indian Law is. There's no one thought the occupying regional. I can't. Do we make a top unit that we can't do where the top one is? I can't copy the permit, but it doesn't talk about location. The interceptor? Right. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Yes, Mr. Chairman. The county also sends out what's called a development meeting. We do team lists to try county health department and try county health department also. The TANs are weekly meetings where we review new cases. In circumstances like this, we've implemented a new program where the cases are brought up on a project are similar to this. We go to the specifics. A tri-counting department was at those meetings. They did not state any concerns with this application. You have those with the rest of the board. In addition, the planning department has implemented a referral agency policy concerning a tri-counting health department, which requires the planning staff to send notifications to them as part of new development, which would require a new septic system or change to that septic system due to an increase in the house size, not for a garage. The reason for that is because the Tri-Counting Health Department the county and each time we send them a referral for their review. In this case, we had a member of the Tri-County Health Department at our meetings and they did a courtesy free review where we didn't have to try to the county for Tri-County does one thing. But there are total costs. We are charged at that rate. Yes sir. And also that fee was increased this last year. Are the commissioners on that? Yes. I mean, Tri-County is totally funded by how to scan a taxpayer dollars. Dover scan a taxpayer dollars and buy other scan the tax per dollars would be a lot more. A wrap up on me. Yes. And they do charge a fee for review of everything we send them. So we usually send them things that are absolutely necessary. And in cases like this where the septic system would not be increased, and you're 70-till, they're not actually in society. the set that system would not be increased, or near 70 children, and that's the answer to the side is, isn't it possible that there might not be enough room for a little placement? In this case, we didn't see that, that would be an issue, especially since try to call them being that up to us in our stack weeks. So, indeed, charge them for coming into our art facility, being present in our room tonight? Unbelievable. I think what Mr. Nichols trying to get at is when you look at that, you know, mailing list on the back might be helpful, but if TriKanigets is other form of notice notice that they're listed on, they didn't necessarily be mailing with, mailing, but they got some sort of, by interopposemail, or something, so that we would know that yes they did, get noticed they had been calling us down, they just chose not to comment. We'll make sure you put that in the stack report. You know this, we're still mailing sure with a table. You know, yes. There's two referrals, like other Sheriff's department, one of those two. Deputy Gable and the other guy's chair-stock. And I remember Mr. Light. Deputy Gable, get this in on his butt. Okay, Mr. Neckle. Okay. Left, okay. If you send a referral to Tri-County, they're small. They charge us a fee. If we send them a referral and they review it, they charge us yes, and they build us, I believe, three times or four times a year for those services. How much is the fee? The fees have increased, I don't remember the specifics, so I want to say close to $150. So here's that view. Can you hold it? Look back over here and show the commissioners all of these. They're charged. Yes, and in fact, push the feedback to be done. Yes, we had a study session with the board of county commissioners this past year where Tri-County Health Department is required to enter into a memorandum of agreement with the county establishing the review fees in criteria. We did have a study session with other those fees and it was adopted in a public hearing. Here's the other one, so I don't think that all of these tax is a bit of a sin of give us a please. Thank you very much. You just brought up another side issue on the stirred pantry. Any more questions Mr. Nichol? Only one somebody, garage urge, a culture. Actually I like to invite my people to come there and they have all the storage you have in them. My mom asked me what the building is on the front of have in my mom's little building, some of the problems that I'm storing in that life, get out of it. And then say, try talking to the train down. It's a job that the buildings can't do, just in the slides. But just, uh, pick up the life skills, you can tell the job that you made out of the life that you've used. So, the staff said, the coverage are you showing all the other buildings? This is on my side, yes. Oh, you're talking about it. Come on, I'll stand there. Okay. You can go down there. You need to get in the car. Why is that right, William? Oh, I'm about to stand by. So there we go. The most specific of the one that comes down because fire thought was about 34 hours. The honesty, I'm not just seeing it be 100, she's pissed up. That was a kind of sentence, but I've gotten pretty much the same idea that I'm getting pretty good at semi-times sanding that. I'll probably fix that. I'll put it in there. I'll put a base in there. I'll put sand back in. I'll just think that they get there. They probably got way. We'll push it down to there. I'll probably... No, I hear some commissioners in their lives that made a made a lot like that and then they're part of the compound. No, but we should build that. So, I said to the 10 years being and I'm a lot of free start, since it could be. First winter time it could be 100 years old then. I was staying at office for a year. I was like, is most of the asses healthy? No, we can't talk here. Can I know some things? I'm not going to talk to you about my own movies. I've been having work in my house for a minute. I was wondering where they are. I had to write about things. I was hearing people in my parents' house. I was wondering if there were any further questions. Okay, let's come down and show our team. Let's do it in our questions. We don't have... Well, I have one. You know, I just... I should have probably only 10 feet. Well, to me, it's in my room. Well, 30, 40 maybe I caught that people. I just wanted to make the thing about my next two pages. But I know that except the full size semi, so I thought it would be a bit of a problem. I'm seven feet out there. It's going to lie down. I think it's going to be a bit of a problem. Mr. Lewis, on the side of the mass. I'm not sure what I'm going to do. I can't get close to you. I'm not sure what I'm going to do. I can't get close to you. I can't get close to you. I can't get close to you. I can't get close to you. I can't get close to you. I can't get close to you. I can't get close to you. I can't get close to you. I can't get close to you. She's a little bit more like her. That house that she's been in is about nine years. That house that she's been in is about nine years. That house that she's been in is about nine years. That house that she's been in is about nine years. That house that she's been in is about nine years. That house that she's been in is about nine years. That house that she's been in is about nine years. That house that she's been in is about nine years. I have a couple different questions. First of all, are you both Tarence and Tarence Lee? Yes. Okay. That's why I make sure we are dealing with two different people. Father and son. Secondly, looking at to consider this recommended condition about this garage. I personally have some issues with the way this condition is being written.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Okay. Anybody else? Yes. Mr. Gentry, at this point, do you have any questions? I'll check. Okay. Let's open it up to the audience for comments. I have a signing sheet with TASS Gentry out here. Is that spoken of a favor? Is there anybody in the audience today we should have speaking favor this variance anybody in the audience we should have speak against this variance anybody in the audience seeking information on about this variance casing move on staff and follow comments that's your gentry okay the closeness portion of public hearing, printed over the board now is our time to discuss, make a motion, maybe to listen to us talk, but not say anything. Mark, board. With Jay, I would move motion. Okay? I'm going to move the weight to variance of 2.54% in the actual amount. 7.5% of the log carries to log construction. They have made their name sport, but still a lot of the maximum of 10.904% not carried to anyone, so the district was sent to section 3.8.07072, could be just a two to three-wack minute. Condition to the approval of one in two, and with the recommended findings, it won't be one recommended go to the discussion. Okay, we have a motion for approval and a second. Okay, let's go to the discussion. Mr. Archie, okay. I'll go and recommend permission. I want to give three one when you have three, two or three on them. Well, they said that that's been resolved, but the data is shown resolved by people in law. So, the bill will be revenue version. Reconmented to this, the one that you can't do. But, I would just, as I read through it, and that's where it's going to be, Mr. Gentry, the questions I was. I had a lot of problems, a lot of experience, but there's some problems with the way the recommended condition of it as soon as I read it. I think it's really loose and glad that he's okay with the terms of it, but I made me offer a friendly amendment, a historical that just makes it look good. Well, because it's stating that it shall be removed when it is no longer needed by the applicant's mother, or when it's there for a construction on the bright road, whichever goes first while, the part about when it is no longer needed by the applicant's mother just seems really loose. I mean, maybe she'll go on a vacation or not made it that week that could trip the condition. It needs to be tired. Um... Are you going to put that exploration out? Um... It feels alike. I'm more comfortable with that. Yes, that will be funnily. So that the garage on the front of the property shop is ruined. At the exploration, well, again, should we give them a time when we're in a lobby? Come on, pass us on Monday and get sighted on Tuesday because he's got a garage. Okay, we're doing such months. I'd be happy with that. Gradient from the property shopping room. Six months after I've become another passes. Or, we're necessary for a construction on right-hand road to check passwords. We need to go to the little building. Is that so? Next, the second, I do okay. Okay? Next, the second round. I do okay. Okay. This one, do we have any further discussion? Okay, at this point, it's been moved to a second, and I'll further discussion on Mr. Sh. And we have a... Can I call a vote please? Can I call a vote? Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. I'm going to have a quick look at my friends and back to conditions. What conditions have it turned to be changed? I have one. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I can't find the fact that two conditions were taken to the same room. They changed. I have one left. Thank you. Mr. Gentry, you've been approved. Do you have any further questions today? I'll thank you, Madam. Just continue to work with Mr. Dalmiss from Antoine Reston, the staff to get your permits met and a little good job and a way your mother continue to enjoy the longer full house and made his walk. Thank you. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for your walk. All right, moving along to our next case. Now I have an X case to order. This case will be as past 2007-00007. The case name of public services is the applicant. There's a public services call-o-ho. I see the applicant and some of the people take a table. Sir, if you could go ahead and state your name for the records by your last name, let us know your affiliation for the case and your fanatodeficent. Hello, I'm Steve Lyson, I'm a general manager for Republic Services Colorado. My last name is Phil H.I.C.P. I'll stop coming to the mine hall. He's transport that. I'm sent to the the final. He's trying to put that one. I'm going to send it to the applicant. Mr. Heisel, let us hear that. Yes. All the address. I have a business address. 74, 74, 75, and you're saying it's 84, that way. I'm going to the city. Thank you. Mr. Heisel, prior to this case, did you receive a copy of the staff's report? Okay, Mr. Fleming as well. Okay, thank you. At this point in time, we're going to turn it back up. And then it's going to doubt make her presentation and give you a chance to talk on the sure-most of flying pass-on thanks to the say-go-est today. So with that, thank you. This is Republic Service Case Number BSP 2007-0027. This is a request for two requests. One of variants of 11,852 square feet from the required one acre 43,560 square foot minimum lot size in order for a lot to be eligible to request re-zoning from Argoncy residential to I-1 industrial pursuant to section 3-24-07-1 and the second being a variance of 15 feet from the required 15-to-buffer yard landsgiving requirement to allow zero-feet of landsgiving along the north and east-couple lines where 15 feet of landscaping is required to pursuant to section 4-16-18-01. The property is located at 7557-884th Avenue, so means our one seat is 31,700 meets where feet is sized and the future landing traffic makes this site as residential. This is a building map of the area. This is the growth ministry in 8.5 minutes. The site is your high-leveled in red. Some of you guys want to see, there's some adjacent couple, some more. The properties of the east, the other one come with some east and west, all in part, see. Other buildings of the area are A1 and A1 and A1 and a little bit of A2. And this is the area being so the area is very clear. The lady for the avenue. The site can store is actually the application with the inside and there are different stay about this place. Apparently there's just a small house so we'll be planning to demolish. In addition to the variance requests, the applicant is requesting free-selling from Argoncy to I1, a condition that is permit for outside storage over 100% of the billing area, and a road replication to vacate the remaining portion of third-assume adjacent to this site on the west. If the lock size variance is denied by the Board of Adjustments, the applicant's pending planning commission and Board of County commissioners hearing dates will be cancelled because the applicant would not meet the applicable I-1 zone district requirements. The applicant currently owns the property to the west for the operator disposal company. The company has acquired the subject site because they need additional space for truck and equipment storage and employee parking. No buildings are proposed on a subject site and the existing abandoned home land site would be demolished. The applicant plans to place the gravel and recycle asphalt surface on the roof of the property for truck equipment storage. Paying for the truck part of the property for employee parking install landstaking along East and Fort Avenue and install windscreen fencing along East and property line and behind the landstaking along the front property line. The land skipping proposed does not meet the minimum 10% requirement. Thus, stock is recommending a condition to that effect. For the lock size variance, the opportunity is this variance to reason the property from R1C residential to I1 lighting industrial. The size is 3 quarters of the maker in size for one acre is required. The site will be utilized in conjunction with the adjacent 2.7 acre parcel, which is within the municipal boundary of Palmer City, and carries the zoning of I-2 in the city. Because separate jurisdictions exist between the two properties, they cannot be combined into one property by the county, but, with appropriately induced proposals, the good function is one site. Staff believes the multigerestictional challenge creates a hardship which warrants your lease because the properties of the function is one size and meet the minimum lot size. They cannot be combined to fully meet this requirement in the county without additional proceeding to cover cities. The applicant will be operating his business on two adjacent properties, which are together 3.4 to 8 gers in size, thus meeting the intent of the one acre minimum size for the island's own district. Stars' Lanscape Buffery are very true quest goes. The applicant is proposing to eliminate the landscaping buffery arch required along the north and east property lines. The property to the north at 8491 Rosemary Street is of our WNC residential and does not comment on this request and has existing buildings all on that property line. Because of those buildings, the two properties are already buffer and any lanes if you install them this area would like them never be seen by the adjacent owner. The property owner adjacent on the east side, which is residential is only in use, so it is a letter of support for both requested variances. The applicant plans to install six-foot-call wood screen fencing along the eastbound line to screen the outside storage room view from the adjacent residential property. This proposed fencing will be consistent with the fencing existing on the applicants adjacent site. Staff is support of the philanthropy from buffer repairs because the neighbors are not opposed to eliminating the buffer gnar. Any existing buildings of planned fencing will minimize the impacts of the proposed business on adjacent properties. In addition, the most prominent view to the site is from East-Dade Fort Avenue, with the applicant's proposals to install all of the requirements to be on site. The Public Works Department commented that 40 feet of right away, measured from the soundflying basis of bearing, would be required to be dedicated. The Public Works Department also commented that a site grading and drainage plan would be required prior to development. In addition to the prop NMR to the east, the prop NMR of property at the southeast corner of East 86W and Quebec Street, submit to the letter and support of the requested bearing system. the Apple can slide plan. This being slide here is being for that with a two-cell. So the proposing is that approximately half of the portion of the cup are for trucking roll-off cupking. And that would be the gravel circuit. And at least that's probably gravel circuit. And then this sort of shaded area would be a digital and employee parking. And that would be a digital display parking and that would be a paid enactal and then the prep portion would be landscaping with the proposed wood fence being looked to be here and then along with every line of fall. There's a picture looking north into the site so that house is proposed to be demolished. There's looking east from the site. Looking west from the site. And south. And then there's a picture of the applicant's existing property to the west. So they're proposing similarly similarly to keep the applicant a little bit deeper and then also similar effect. Staff believes the lot size variance is warranted because the site is intended to be utilized for the conjunction with an adjacent property which is open one acre in size, which means the intent of the lot size requirement. Staff also supports the elimination of the buffariat along the north and east property lines because the existing buildings along the north property line and the proposed pencil on the east property line which act as the existing buffer. The applicant is also enhancing the frontage along the state-of-fourth avenue, which will be consistent if not better than the landscape behind our current site to the west and the Great Land Group site. None of the parties involved took comment in an opposition to the request. Recommendation preceded number two has been satisfied and can be deleted. Staffers are planning approval subject to 11 findings, one condition preceded, three conditions and one counts. And that includes the septic work. Thank you Miss McDowell. Mr. Heisel, Mr. McDowell. Mr. Heizle, Mr. Flowne, and the staff summarized it really well. I think the offer is basically aspect of it. I don't know if she mentioned it or not. I think I mentioned it. Most of you have been around a little longer. Charlie, Mr. Nicolle, you used been around a little longer. Charlie, you know, is Jimmy Carter here? Is he a baby like a cage lady? And what's the other Charlie that you're talking about? She lives in the house and then she's gone. And she retired from jail and she lives in the house. And Charlie, you know. I think the case is fairly so if it's planetary, they chose not to try and kill it in the commerce city I think the case is fairly so, it's quite a hurry. They chose not to try and pull into the commerce city at this point. Not only the acceptance of the currency that they're having. I didn't put it in the meeting, I think the most people would be going to the commerce city in the country. So, I think the other thing is that they voluntarily annex the commerce city. The commerce city would impose lots of conditions the number of problems we use because what the city has been will do is basically match eventually the existing curve line. Come out, out, out, out. Rosemary when that does happen. The road can't really be widened until I happen. So if you chill these in the way, plus the house where I mentioned it, Charlie looks at it to be going away. So it probably is not going to happen. I, it was a challenge trying to figure out what the landscape requirements are both because we are dedicated by it way and also because part of this property is being taken by others. By other projects, by the other cases of the fear of semi-missile. If the applicant had its choice, he would simply that just makes it to landscape it. It's already on the side. I think the county is a little higher in terms of requirements, and they may have to actually cut back. I also think that, from what I remember, we are allowed to count on these right away. It's long as public works says it's part of our landscape. It's very important that we make, that we make sure that possibility when we come into the right approach. It's interesting. I didn't know how to write the landscape because everything was sort of up in the air until we get through here. So yeah, I guess we have your questions. I think it's a fairly simple, it's going to talk about case, case, case, case, case, So basically parking up before we start. You can really see existing parking before we start. And then the back room is for storage and full-offs. He is getting a project to turn out the house. And then he can tell that's already started. So I guess we would ask the question. Normally the chairman doesn't start when I went to Mr. Nickel or Mr. Nickel, Mr. Flaming, excuse me. What do you do? Mr. Flaming, you touched on some diagonal. You touched on something that has been troubling to me since I first reviewed this case and that is a diger's dictionary. I suspect others. Have you approached Connor City at all? Not really. I have not put to come to City about this problem. But I have a boat to come to City about another problem. The... I don't want to give the staff a compliment by little. The commerce department has staff that deserve the car. The annexation process, the voluntary annexation process, they put a property on the floor with the product on the seat. And what they demand if he was incredible. Now when they forcefully annex you, they just do it. Okay, tough luck. But you need a question, maybe. Probably a lot of fees, a lot of requirements. And it would have taken a long time. So now we get into this as a cheaper. Cheap, but it needs you to be careful. So then you get the answer. Is this parcel on the play? Well, yes, it is, but it is only fun. There is also a part that's why it couldn't be annexed without other parts of this B&X. They can annex the entire iron in the area if they feel like it. They just are chosen not to because when they bless the annex property, they get responsibilities for food and the streets. Absolutely. Iron dales are not there in repair. They'd rather pick off the digital top food as well, in time to make them. When they should, do all of them. Once they get an X, the car are in hell. If you looked at the map, she shows you what the zone is. I mean, it's a checkable. It's all over the place. That's what the city should do. It's a checkpoint. You should add X on the other place. So, is it part of the month that this parcel cannot be annexed at this point in time without other parcels being annexed more by voluntary? Okay. Okay. Okay. How does this play into... I mean, this whole not... I'm looking into this whole not- I just think it's not a thing and it, to me, seems like a self-created hardship. Tom White's not. It's not a... Yeah, it's just by itself. Just look at the property and its configuration account. It's surrounded by adjustable problems. It's a remainder property that was created by this app that looked as a gradient app. It's not a single residential cell of a bottle. And it wasn't created by the app. It was created by fire actions. I had a property. I just had to do a great thing. I was created by the applicant. It was created by fire actions. I had a copy of it. I was a copy of it. Any great thing? Now, the parcels were the public services today that are in Commerce City, with those voluntarily annexed in Commerce City and the past. I'm not sure if they were not. We did not build the building here. We bought a lot of two here. We brought it up to you. We'll build it. So I don't know how that worked out. So it's always been on our city since we've been there? Yes. Okay. We noticed a number of lowoffs in the back of the property today when we drove by. Can you comment about that? Yes, I can. We're tearing down the building, and we've received the permit. I went in and had this press vests of the maintenance out of there. And they brought the machine in. I don't know if you noticed a little bit of the building was tore down. Luckily, the truck driver went over. We had all the permits and everything from ex-alternative. Everything was signed up on. And he started in there with a big loader and the truck driver came over and said, there's a power still for house. So we put the roll-off so they're just simply falling. And, uh, constantly running the garbage business and doing some run-off landfill. So we're bringing up the landfill. I'm innocent. We're all landfill. I'm innocent. We're all landfill. I'm innocent. We're all landfill. I'm innocent. We're all landfill. I'm innocent. We're all landfill. I'm innocent. We're all landfill. I'm innocent. We're all landfill. I'm innocent. We're all landfill. It was Mr. Nichols' keen eye that saw those raw odds today. Actually, a storm lost my role up to the landfill. Now, those are there for the house of K.P. You saw that you made on the picture sure you can see where they turned out. Part of the steps. And they started breaking the house. That's actually KVN on the south end. I don't know if you have a burn on the north end. The point of the point of this kind of climb in the house is that you can go to the side. So see, can you see the back part? That part of his damage. And the start of that construction. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. That's how we do it. There's no doubt. That answers my questions from our comment. Mr. Lewis, Mr. Lewis, okay. Well, first of all, I asked the staff there at the United Registered First World War this morning. But did you say that a precedent number two was pretty good? Yeah. Excellent. You can start up. Yes. Yeah, yeah, yeah, recommend a condition preceded number two as the satisfying so it can be the move it. We didn't actually get the spark. That's why you can see it. I can call it on there. Go for it. I'm here to get curious now. I think it's one of the silliest missions I've ever done. I agree. But he has the foul of thought that says he doesn't have to get. Then he doesn't want to memorize. He doesn't have to get. Then he doesn't want to memorize. He doesn't have to get. Then he doesn't want to talk. Then he doesn't see. Then he doesn't feel like it's all right. I just had to get in the car. There's that state law. Yeah, it is. I'm not playing the game. No, I'm just asking. I've seen the scene of the hot in that menu. So it's a lot of nonsense. I was about to just ride my airs. I know you know it. I know you're not a major club. I know you're not. But it's... There's only been people killed off of that. It's a good case of the good idea that... You got to take it to the hospital. Yes. Mr. Lewis, more questions? Right. You were talking about the handspaking. Are you concerned about the post landscape? I don't get all. She may be right. I mean, I don't tell her she's wrong. I just rather than just, I think that you could fly with one key to the pilot's security line. That's not confirmed with the window. That's awesome. Yeah. I'm a dog. I've become a wham. All I did was use the lock size that we have shown to calculate 10% of the site and that's what the number came from. But you can easily strike a portion of that recommended condition number two, and have it say the landfifing proposal on the site's land shall be increased to me to county's minimum of the parkour of lands keeping up to 10% of the site. I'm long waiting for the soon-to-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be-be I think it's going to be the authority of some new board. I think Mr. Montoya is going to enlighten us on this point here. The square footage requirement that's listed in the condition, that's fine if we're silent on that and just think of that 10%. Because yeah, it comes with a card of 25 feet of landscaping in the front anyway. So that's okay. The county does not approve, the planning department does not approve, the least planning department does not approve landscape in the right of way. For the sole purpose, that if, that right of way, is ever constructed, the county would then have to pay the applicant for the damage to the landscaping that we required into install. And for those reasons, we required that the landscape be replaced on private property. And especially since we know that the public works department is going to ask for right away that that land's keeping me placed outside of that future right away area. So you want us to ask you even in the 20 feet of the lead stretcher? That's what the one. That's the way that traditionally the land'sping has been handled, yes, but there's nothing saying they couldn't landscape that extra 20 feet. It's just not required so that the county doesn't have financial liability. If they came in and said they wanted to, the landscape's 25 feet up their front yard, for example, and a portion of that was in the right of white, we would enter into an agreement with them saying that if that landscape being right away was ever removed, it would be not at the cost of the county. You could do that. As long as we count for the last day. No, you would not be able to. If that were the case, you would have to ask for that as part of today's variance. So trustability over trees that we're all supposed to be hugging. Mr. Niple, you seem we're all supposed to be hugging. Mr. Napoli seemed like you're ready to jump in. Well, I had a question that follows up on the list of lists. On your top-man hero, preliminary pilot, is it going to make some big deal whatever to the side time? Look, have you prepared this proposed driveway for the lion's group? uh... and you just drive is up to the night show right to show So here's showing 50 feet left. Now I show you. 30 feet and then that's for another 5-20 feet. It's right here. OK. Now past county, the already existing site in the lion's keeping are you asking for anything additional hurt? That's not the other lot. It's in Car State. There's no way we could. No, on the... Oh, that's right. Theot of a lot. It's in Commer City, there's no way we could. No, on the... oh, that's right, the property honestly. Okay. No way, but no. Yeah, okay, that's a shock. Okay. So here, you're proposing 30 plus 20. That's correct, because I don't think there's no way to corrupt the wife. And we'll have to come here and let's not do it because the wife is a pretty small tribe. So it's quite easy to be a tribe. Okay. Would it be a good village condition on this set, the landscaping should be done as shown on the site, and if they display them into the county, for any landscaping they would love to like to be, is this still a medical public question by the person that you would put a display on the flat? Are you going to have to buy it over there to do the sites? Tonight, we need to unlock that. And that's why the condition we've perceived in number one is right. So that's the adi-clip. All right, that's not locked. Okay, we're probably not locked. We suggest that the furniture is still going to the side. Come to Slanskipin, do it for the police. We recommend asking someone on this plan with a disclaimer on the path plan. The Canada will sponsor plenty of costs of food on the 20 feet in the dark. The dark will be a problem. Not working. That's all right. We can make it a step to this. Sure, that's fine. That's up to me. Right, and the way it's shown now, there's 50 feet of land keeping that would be proposed to land. Which I think is much better than having 23 degrees and 30 feet of land. And that's fine. I mean, there's would be proposed to like. Which I think is much better than having 23 degrees and 33 degrees. And that's fine. I mean, there's also a slight chance that the party can have commissioners to require them to pay that portion, just like in my next door. We don't know. OK. OK. You look confused, sir. Are you understanding that, Booley? Yes. That's fine. Yeah, I wouldn't want to put the leaves out of the pumpkin. Let's get to the right side. Okay. Sorry, bro. While we're on it now, Mr. Ron, Toyota, there seems to be a dispute as to what land you're counting for the landscape, climate change, or Mr. Fleming. seems to be the speed of this to land your counting for landscape requirement between the mr. Fleming, how, how, how pass out here. The way I'm understanding it is the applicant would like to landscape approximately 20 feet of future right of way and also 30 feet of zone property with tree shrubs and the type of grass is being proposed. And in order to need the 10% rule on this property, you would have to increase it according to shannions calculations, which is about 3,786 square feet total. Do shannions calculations take into account that twenty foot right away? She is deleting that from the overall size, so the number here reflected does not include the right away. So that the ten percent is that number of their site if right away is granted. It also does not include landscaping proposed in Brighton Way. If Shannon included the right of way in the calculation, how many square feet will they be talking of landscape to make the 10% threshold? Well, it would definitely be over their 10%. Because I figured out if they, if you only count the landscaping that would be on the property after the right-of-way dedication, they would have to move the fence back about nine feet. So if there are 20 more cutive lands, you'd be in those two areas. But if you're counting, if you're going to have the right-of-way in the county, you've got more area. It looks like you would add about 2500 square feet minus the driveway width. Okay, so you'd be approximately 4100 square feet of a quiet landscaping and if you had the right way. Now Mr. Fl the line and they're coming off. Because the way I understood very interesting is that you know what you've got. Now what you learned about let the Kaggle pose later. And maybe that's the wrong way to do it. Well, I did that. I keep up with about 20 feet, also about 27 feet. I'm sure what Shara did, obviously. She took the 20 feet off, then figured this growth footage from there, despite she came out with it. I thought mine was a bit illogical and fairer approach. And what is your, what is the number that you calculated? I don't have a peer, but it came out of 27 or 28 feet. So I was 5, exceeded 25, so they'd be happy. I ran through the rock. I think she did it wrong, I think. I thought what I was doing was a very decent thing. I wasn't. And I think she's right. I did take off the plate plate. Because today, as we stand, that plate plate is still part of this box. Correct. Law and... And maybe assuming everything gets approved, it's still part of the property until such time as it's dedicated indeed to Dr. Kim, some other entity, in the county or the city of the Comer City. So I'm assuming you both will look at this is a point I'd like to make is if we use a smaller property which is minus the 20 feet, the applicant has to install less landscaping. And that's the way we calculated it. The applicant wants to install more landscaping, that's fine. That's not a big deal. But there needs to be 10% of landscaping on the site after the right away is taken. I mean, he could put in 50% landscape in his likes and he's not even out of jet. And the regs and performance standards state that it's 10 on the issue that it's part of the discussion. So essentially you're giving them the more liberal interpretation. We're being more lenient than yes. If these were like to reach about 20 feet, it could go on just right away, turn it away. But what you're saying is start the landscaping at the current edge which eventually will be right away sometime down the road, maybe not even while the public owns this, you go from that point to 30 feet back, not from that point to 50 feet back. You're essentially asking for, if you look at the, if we can get his schematic back up there, it's on there, dude. I follow now. Alright, now if you look over here, you can see where there's the three black dots, like a boom-a-boom. Those three black dots mark the 30 feet. But that 30 feet starts from the point beyond that to where if the right way been dedicated today they're saying we want 30 feet from that point to the north. You're saying we want to start at the present boundary line and go 30 feet in which would leave 20 more feet inside the property that is on landscape. You want to go 30 feet from the current southern long stage knowing that at some point in time you're gonna lose that 20 feet. You're trying to see if you realize that 20 feet now I'm hedging your back that it's never going to be needed over a flight away. I think it is going to be over my own, but you're right about what I want to do. The other thing is if you look at this line here that you just tried to do, you're the only person that brings his own pointer. If you look at this line here, this is probably about 5 feet back from the existing top of the line. That's what the common line is on the adjacent part. So I simply write it and that's what's going to get ripped out. And then there's going to be an X plus V of the area in the line of the way. And the V will be split off. Yes, your Mr. Rack. And close the alphabet. The U-Mank. What is currently landscape? This kind of a city. How could I fly to the beach? This kind of landscape is from about that line. So that's the second line there. That's the... That's the... I don't know if it's landscape. I don't know if it's that. That's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the- that's the I'm going to make a motion, I think. Just to give the board a discussion at this point. Well, here we go. This is out of order. To none of them, I'm not making the eyes of the dog here. There's something. I'm just saying that what looks to me like common city victims used when they annexed. So they caused this problem. And they were offensively solved the problem once they annex this. I don't think it will be very important for them to make it landscape. Any other women is existing or has a chasing problem. I think if we break them in line, the common sense of the problem is, that's what I'm going to have. I feel that if he wants to have a landscape, some that will be possibly be turned in right away, if he gives a display, that's kind of the thing. The comments that he has left in kind to the kind of operating ladder scaling, they have pick and choose where they have X. They each have to hear next that as it is. And they haven't created the possibility of any more of these. And I'm sure they will. Actually, so I think it's pretty much all of their response, but I'm also more going to die this way. I'll even look at the other questions that I'm going to pick. It's not going to be a lot bit of a point of going out. But does that create another variant situation? Not for us. Mr. Montoya, do you look like any deway? Mr. Nichol has a good point. It could also occur that during the Board of County Commissioners hearing the County Commissioners decide not to require that right away. But just that permits that eventually this site will be in Commerce City, and in Commerce City, choose to take it at that time, and they may do so. And that's another approach we can take is just leave it as the applicant that's suggested and say they have to meet the 10% lock coverage for landscaping as is required. And at the time of changing this permit, which is requested after this hearing, and after the Planning Commission, the Board of County Commissioners Chair for the Conditional and Mispermint, then we would know what's required to be submitted, and the staff would ensure that that plan would be appropriate. We know the proposal to the person, I'm proposing, look at the situation, whatever they have to put to match the existing solid. If I make a motion for submission, I would say to the max that whatever the person can be, I think that's a question for the county attorney's office if they think there's any issues with that. That's a minister's trigger to mine. We have to be ready to give various... That's not a very else president before us. Why is he being... Well, the buffer yard. Mr. Lucero, I think at this point, I need to weigh in. I'll be up the county to arrange office. I'm just checking to see if you're going to ask you a question to the applicant staff. There's something called a caring portion. Oh, oh, let me come round the appears that with the application for this, is a 15-pushed, very friendly, by 15-pushed, okay? And this is for the last year of being a landscape people. I'm going to ask Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. I'm asking Mr. Heisen. Are you proposing shifting some of this landscape into another portion of the property? When you're out with your request, it's for variants of a 15 feet required 15 foot buffer yard and we've spent it a good deal of time talking about the landscape and the percentage overall. One of your Mr. Nickel state is that he's comfortable with matching commerce city, but then that puts us in a situation whereby if you match commerce city, you're not following the Adams County performance standards and there's no way you're going to get to the 10% pot. The 10% requirement is regardless of where you start. And that's become my question, Mr. Lucero. Is does this create a third day in situation? What's the first to do? I mean, where side plans bring those to a big request of the good? What's the first thing you're going to do? The last thing you the first one. The last one is the last one. The last one is the last one. The last one is the last one. The last one is the last one. The last one is the last one. The last one is the last one. And we've been talking about the SAW, which with the input quest to do is do the lineway as well as some of this. So they've really... So I don't think this 10% I think this is staff talking. I'm talking in the second wreckage, they're saying this could be the idea. According to the wreckage, the bomb is dangerous. Which is born as never a kind of adoptive in a by-law city. So we're not tied to the bomb and it's dangerous. I'm like this only. I'm like that, that was a sound of me now. So the zone is a little bit. It's a sunny day. There's nothing in the bottom of the bar. But listen, it's snuggling in the water for a couple of hours. I'm going to be on a dress later today. But I guess what I'm saying is to do this clean, to be fair to you in the county in the upper case. I just don't see it making my own skin. Things don't need to making my own skin. Things don't need to be in the leaves of it. People would tell them to leave 20, 30, 30, 30, 30. They don't want it to be out. They want to make it look nice. They want it to be out. I think we can use common sense of what we do in the arts. And that would part with a lot of extra things. They're going to have to do what the bottom side of the end. And nobody's arguing that you not have common sense today with Dr. Ackel. But when you said that last time, Mr. Montoya jumped in and said that they still need 10%. It was a good word. Which would we then, do we have the power to expand the scope of this variance? Or could they need to come and apply for a third variance? Well, you're out of the pass. Mr. Chairman, I think you do raise a good point. I mean, I apologize for some of my earlier comments. It appears that I wasn't confused because we are looking at, or we've been discussing what will be landscaping on the south edge of this property. And for that, it's my thing that there is no application for variance along the plan. the control of the zoning regulations by demanding the national transport. And I'm willing to make the most of the pass to the court by the time to get the officer taken to court, that's fine. I think we have the authority to expand their belief. I think that the company has asked by his side. The line wasn't going to include the other thirty-fifth. But I made the other thirty-fifthly law I said that I'd do the same. I'd still like to hear the end of the rest of the Sarah's answer. Well, I would say that this board has the 42 moon and grant variances for those applications that I'm currently before. I'm not sure that the board has the discretion to expand the school of applicants in the college. Very request. Mr. Flaming, you've got to apply. I don't want to bother with the 10% if you'll apply the 10% to the property as President could think of. That means the 20 feet or 5 feet or 10 feet or whatever the county decides they need. It doesn't count against us and won't accept that. And I know that's a fair standard because, and that's what the county uses in general is that when the county, the county wants a wide of way and I have a 2.5-acre site, which is with the minimum in a paid one zone. And the county says we want 5, I have a 2.5 Aversight, which is with the minimum in a paid one zone. Yes. When the county says we want 5 feet of extra Ryda Blade, which drops with below the 2.5 A, you know, the acre requirement, the county doesn't count. It doesn't say, no, I don't need a variance because now I'm below 2.5 A, because we took the Ryda Blade that your growth Ry away, the flow we required is what is a putter. And we did the same standard. Say here you want 10% before you have to give me the flow you're required to give right away. I think that's a fair standard to use. And then we'll set out a fair mixture with that. So you're saying you would agree if this board proves it to landscaping of 10% before the right-of-way Dedication which actually puts you at about about 4,100 square feet. It's gonna be part of that It's gonna be in the proposed right-of-way. I mean willing to negotiate What that far did you hold that you hold the county harmless? And that's correct. I think a mystery must go ahead. What is the county harmless? That's correct. I think a mystery must have heard what is the county's position. That acceptable to the county. Yes, it is. Okay. Mr. Nippel. Okay. Now let's move back to our questions. Mr. Rood is doing a few of the questions. That was that. Let's get back there. I'll just go back up to that. I thought I made you. That's right there. I was going to put back up to that. I thought I made you a little bit earlier. And then that's it. That's it. Any other questions? Mr. Martinez. I'm going to put back up to that. I'm going to put back up to that. I would like to make a comment to Mr. Reimers. He goes to have the night for a good prop. He'll let me make a move. I'm just trying to... And it does have the nice little bump in there. And it's a little bit of food. It's up here. Okay. Let me see you, right? Um, couldn't you step and up that flyboard shows the sign up there? It's up here. You know, not so... Commanding, right there. The theater? Look at that. Oh, my gosh. Come on, come on. Okay, now when you propose this driveway where is it going to help? Turn your property. Lovely. Right here. Okay, so you're going to access it from the street that phone with the other piece of property. Yes, there might be one in the back, part of it. We'll pull. Okay, whatever. We're just talking about the street. On the front, yes, it will come right off of the street. Okay. So then you'll be moving this fence. Yes, ma'am. We're going to have to move the back. You move the back. We're not going to be escaping in the fence. Yes. We're not going to be escaping in the sun. Okay, that's all. Mr. Merkel. Done. Good. Thank you. I'm just going to spend on questions. I don't have any else at this time. All right. At this point in time, there's no more questions from the board. We're going to open it up to the audience for comment. I do see on the sign-in sheet one person gave a shirk all right this I'll just put this man's death is here to speak in a favor this gentleman would like to come forward and speak I'm sorry. Oh, you want to speak against it? Don't ever do that to a lawyer or judge. At this point in time, first of all, how do you pronounce your last name? It's true. It's pretty cool. It's pretty cool. Do you wish to speak? I'm not sure. Okay. I think I can go back and sit there. Can you actually just point? That doesn't mean you can't speak. What do you do to Johnson? That doesn't mean it can't speak. Well, you can't say it's us and it'll not speak us. If you want to talk about the race, you didn't get it. I... Okay. At this point in time, is there anybody else in the audience wishing to speak in favor of this variance? Against this variance. For information only. Nobody. Okay. Mr. Heights, any other information here Mr. Flaming would like to add? Mostly. Staff, anything else you'd like to add? Just a little bit of this, we've got to take the like, be clear if I like that 10% is. If not, we'll do a little bit of... Fliterify, please. Because I don't use the side-hand, if not, we'll leave it alone. Flutter five please. Because I don't use the side as you do. It is the same. These gentlemen have a lot more steps to go through. It is, the side as it is today, it would be 3,360 square feet, that's 10%. And that's what, just to be clear, that's what would be expected on the site point. How many? 3,360 square feet. That's 10% of the site as it exists today. Now it is 10% of the site, including the food by the way of the kitchen. It includes the 28th of the cell that's being asked for by the Public Works Department, and it does not include third half new, which is in between this parcel and the adjacent parcel. And how did that drop? We've added more. How did we drop it by 4 hours? Good for you. How did we drop it by 4 hours per week? Because we took out that composed big kid and friends there at Avakin. That's a lot of land area, which if you look at the site after like assuming that all of the land use requests are approved, the site would actually be bigger than it is today because it would be making it around the farm. And this calculation is consistent with the rules, rights, performance standards, biolog, whatever applicable stuff we're looking at. Yes, if the applicant came in today and asked us how much land's keeping doing in my property, that's the number they would get as it exists today. My question becomes how did we line up higher to start? That's it. I was using the site as it would result from all of the land he's request. Windman would ask for a change in this program. So if you look at the map, right now, there's a bathroom. All of the facilities are here because of the plumbing. There's no part of a project such as this that has very intimate land use case that goes before the board of county commissioners. We look at what the end result is in order for the county to issue a bill, uh, changing these permits are a bill they commit. And in order to do that, we have to project that their request would be granted the way that they're proposing, uh, since the planning staff is recommending approval. And if during that process, I'm not going to make cases as denied, I'm going to have to adjust that number accordingly in order to issue that change in the experiment. But as it stands today, if the applicant came in and said, how much landskeeping do I need on my parcel without asking for any other entitlements, not having to go through any other public land use hearings, the answer would be $3,360. What's that result? I don't know from... So I guess the my question is for the The other half is already making it. They're also wanting to vacate the line. Oh, and we get it from the... You can't. They can't fill out. They can't vacate. No, I'm not. That land told us. I'm about to understick. It's the shore. This is just half. The other half is already in this flat of harbor city. The other half is already in this flat of conversation. The other half is already trying to go across. Look, look, number is obvious. We're actually going to do this. We're going to find this making road which is breaking. Yeah, yeah! We're going to just walk. We're going to walk. We're just starting out. When you start to happen to them, Mr. Finding is done really well for your client. He's rocking away the land and the last land that's keeping. Okay. Um, anything further at this point? Okay. The path we're going to close the section of that. Public hearing and open it up for discussion, motions, by the word, etc. Okay. Discussion, motions by the board, etc. Okay, that's good. Oh, I, I, I as a test move, I almost look at doing a separate pools, two various areas as we separate, separate. I'll make a test move, can you hear me? I move in the case the case ESP 2007 and the 27 that we approve the variance. of the 11,000-8.22 from the required 1-8 minimum lot size in order for a lot of the eligible to request rezoning from R1C residents of the island, industrial percent, section 3.47, and hold one in two. Second, they have variants of 15 feet from the required 15 foot upper yard landscaping in the required amount the last zero feet of landscape in the line of the north. In East Park, the line of the 15 feet of landscape is required for such a 4.168 to the bottom line. With the recommended findings, and for the 11th with the recommended condition of the front end, line recommended condition for sequence number one, eliminate number two. from the one recommended condition, proceed with number one, eliminate number two. Recommended condition number one, recommended condition number two, two, and three, the 10% which includes a proposed right-of-the-advocation in this. Mr. Ab Bell explained to us so that there would be 3,336 people at the remindsgate area of Washington. Also, one recommended note to the audience. And also, number three, the site grading and gradients, but I'm new with my private stuff. And number two, I forgot to include the... ...signate the... ...froshing... ...weaver from... ...county requiring limbs. The waiver from county requiring them to be on the honor of the county. I'm getting a minute. Get a little light on this. That makes sense. Sorry. You know what I mean. We get... Can the helper lift the man who steps against the guy? That's your can. Yeah, that's it. We're sure I have one on this. Yeah, I didn't do the regular man who got the guy. Yeah, I went't do the regular meeting. I didn't know if I could get in there. Yeah, I went back to the... I'll figure that out. Okay, I'm going to discuss it. We have to have a motion in a second. Now, discussion. First of all, before we begin the discussion about Mr. Hersch, can you read back your understanding of motion in a second so that everybody is clear? We need to help Mr. Montoya and I speak dialogue in case of the prosecutor. I'll take a stab at it. You should have a ticket to the recommended conditions. Can you do that up to the recommended conditions? Just wait a second. What do you understand it to me? Well, I have a few people. I have a document with a document in 20 and a fact. I'll give you a document. I have a document in the edition. It seems to be in the next room. I'm going to be in the next room. I'm going to be in the next room. I'm going to be in the next room. The R3, also three out to two. I recommended condition number two with three, the land-steaking shall be installed, the land-steaking on the site plan. Shall be installed to include 10% of the site or 3,360 square feet. And the applicant shall include a disclaimer on the plaque, which would hold the county homeless and identify them from liability for the landscape being sold in the right way. Mr. Martini, that's what it is. Mr. Martini, this is that which you understood the second to be. I can see an apple from the book, that's it. Any other discussion? And I see my guest moment with the election out to the end. Let's get you to the next one. Step three, please. Any other discussion? All of it. Any other roll call vote please? Yes, coming. Yes. Can I get one of the things? Yes. Can I get one of the things? Yes. I'm grudging you, Mr. Paisel, you have a lot of work still ahead of you, but I'm sure you've probably So we could have moved to today. We did. Thank you very much. You're welcome. All right. Now let's back to our meeting. Oh, well, you're on the end a little bit cooler. At this point in time, too, we had many decisions pending before this point. Is there any old business pending before this board. Is any old business pending before this board? Okay, at this point in time new business and my understanding is that there isn't a business. I would see new business on the agenda. Item number eight, page two. Move, finish. Oh, yeah. Your pages are missing. Oh, they're right there. I'm going to go to the business that the board could be carrying a train charge so you can be the election of Oxford. You will have elections a lot pursuant to our by-laws. Okay, there's second. Okay, to me to do roll-caught, the left-right-just I named. On favor, I, my, okay at this point I will step down as chairman without having to post martial law. I will turn the gavel over to Mr. Russo, pursuant to the terms of our bylaws, Mr. Russo, take it away. We are scheduled to let officers at this point meet and I'll take nominations for President at this time. Excuse me. Oh, Chairman. In a second. Oh, we can give a call. Please. Mr. Ego? Why? Mr. Walton. Hi. Is he leaving? Yes. Mr. Ego? Yes. Mr. Ego, please. Oh, that's right. Please, please, please. Please, please. Thanks, sir. Okay, then. I'm ready to move. Please take it out. Okay. I'm going to go up here. And now I will, um, ask for a nomination for Vice Chairman. I'm going to go up here. I'm going to ask for Vice Chairman for chairman for the rest of the QSN. That's second. There's been an elimination for the Marchingness and vice chairman. In a second, can we get a little call please? Yes. Yes. Can we? Yes. Yes. Yes. That's why I can't use. Yes, chairman. Why can Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes footprint. Yes. Riggle in a second. Thank you, local. You listening? Yes. Mr. Riggle. Yes. Mr. Riggle. Yes. Mr. Riggle. Okay. Can we hold the play? Actually, we have all been elected. All right. Okay, now I can make the motion. I mean, we have the motion to make sure. There's any other business. I don't know the rules. Okay. I hope you have the motion to make sure. Thank you. We're right here. you