Um, today's city commission, um, the city of Northmont Beach, uh, community redevelopment agency board meeting for March 18th, 2020, 2025. It says 2024 here, by the way. Five. Yeah. I just want to make sure that I'm not the only one. I have 20. I'm still a year behind. All right, Adam, 25. Just to come here behind. So if you can read the role so we can begin. Well, the board chair, Michael Joseph, board vice chair, Lindsay. Here. Board member, for Tunis Muckler. Present. Board member, Philis Smith. Board member, Danielle Lejon. Absent. Board member, McKenzie Flurmond. And board member Jay Turnoff here. Okay, next agenda item is public comment. Do we have anyone here for public comment? Seeing none, we go to third agenda item approval of minutes. Do we have a motion? Motion? Motion in a second. All in right you're not passed unanimously next action item item is action item CRA 2025-01 approval interlocural grant for CRA community policy program this is CRA director so if I may have a point of oh I'm not sure I should be voting on these because I Was not given a review of this so I'm not sure that's My my my mistake if if you Would like to you know step out to use the bathroom or something during the vote that's fine. If you, I mean, I'll present a- Is there a confidant where you just haven't- No, I just say, I was never offered an opportunity to have a gender review. So I'm not sure if I should vote on something. I don't know. No, no, no, no, no. I'm not saying, I'm not, okay. Maybe none of us should vote on it though because I know we have a majority but No, I'm voting on tonight is so important. No, I understand. No, no, no, I If I may yes, I'm sorry. Why don't I why don't I get didn't you call everybody and give them an opportunity I'm sorry We called and and commissioner smuggler was nicely said yeah like set a meeting with me. And then I thought I had it on my calendar and I didn't and we never ended up meeting. And I didn't realize until, like, I made that. And I didn't realize until, like, I made that. It's my, you know, I take responsibility for that. I would like to do is give you guys a reading of it. It's fairly straightforward. It is important like no, Senator Smith said go ahead. I'm sorry director. Do your best. OK. a reading of it, it's fairly straightforward. It is important, like Senator Smith said. Go ahead, sorry director. Do your best. Okay. Can I present with the record, Mr. Chair? Under for all you have to vote, you cannot abstain. So that's why the executive director said if you want to leave the room and not be in the room to not vote. You could do that, but you can't sit on the desk and say I'm not going to vote. All right. I mean, I'll go to the bathroom when it's time to vote. Only if you need to go to the bathroom. Only if you want five minutes, ten minutes to go speak with them right now. Well, no, well, we can't do that. Well, he's going to go to the bathroom. He's going to go to the bathroom. I think with all of you, I don't have anything particularly. Is there anything on the agenda because this has happened before where I didn't get for two times. Remember, I said, and I just don't feel we should run a CIA with four people when there's seven of us. And you're talking about committing to a two-year contract on one. And the other one, the standing operating procedure, It procedures really doesn't have anything to do with us, with dress code and with your time machines and timing in and timing out. But the one with the police, I think, is important because I don't remember discussing that. And it says in 2015 or 2019, we agreed. If we agreed in 2019, then I don't understand why it's coming forward. So now so there's a question. Okay, so in regards to action four, I'll table that issue for the following meeting. On the policy, on action items, CRA 2025, or two approval CRA standard operating procedure. I think he can have a straightforward. It is. I just wanted to know, I do have a question for that. Was it a requirement from the county that we have that because we've never had it before. And it is a, it's really has punching in. And if you go for lunch and you have to get approval if you take me day off, I mean, I read the whole thing. But it did not a bit apply to us. no, but just for procedure purposes, can I get a motion? I'm motioning. And I just want to say something. I mean, I'm seeing here it's for interlocal agreement for CRA community policing program. I certainly don't want to delay any safety issues to our residents. Would a delay to the next CREB? Is this a time-sense and an issue? Because I agree with your sentiment. So just so we can move forward and do it in a proper way. Let's out-motion, I'd like the motion to table it to the next meeting. Do I have a second? Second. All in favor say aye. I want to hear if it's okay to hold on or is it time-sensitive? You can you can move it forward what I can do tonight is give you this my sort of Discussion about it and then at the next meeting after you know if you have questions about it They want to ask me about we can have a offline discussion privately, and then we can just vote without having another discussion about it if that makes sense. So we just so we be so clear, it was a middle of vote. I know you asked for additional time. You didn't vote. I voted in favor of what's your vote on just tabling it to, so are you commission? So I'm okay with tiling it, but I, no, we're gonna, he's gonna explain it. He's gonna explain it. What was your vote on paper? What we have the majority? Yes, yes. Yeah, we're gonna he's gonna explain it. He's gonna explain it What was your vote on tabling what we have the majority? Yes, yes, yeah, yeah, okay, so we're tabling the issue, but however you can speak or maybe we should table it after he speaks and see no So to reconsider after I think if you like Okay, so may I yes, just remember I I think that this we got to tighten up our our ship a little bit, you know I think that leaving out Commissioner Smuggler was actually a pretty huge thing I mean I am like, you know very naggy so I call everybody even if they don't want to call me And I just wanted to make sure that like moving forward that we have all the commissioners on the you know on the agenda brief F***ing f***ing f***ing f***ing f***ing f***ing f***ing f the schedule it. And it will take partial responsibility for not following up as well. But I just didn't, I just, it just went in one year or the other. I just wanted to schedule it's a very good question. I'm not sure if it's a very good question. I'm not sure if it's a very good question. I'm not sure if it's a very good question. I'm not sure if it's a very good question. I'm not sure if it's a very good question. I'm not sure if it's a very good question. I'm not sure if it's a very good question. where there's only five of us. So there's something the matter is that the time, is it the context, is it we're not performing? Because I remember day one that we talked about what happened at the Omni. And maybe us not seeing anything that looks like that, we're seeing new windows, new refrigerators. I'm wondering what is the content not bringing all seven of us? Is the time not bringing it? I feel very misrepresented as a resident for my CRA that we don't have the full staff here month after month. No, well, no, that's not necessarily true. I can't know what situation is. I don't want to assume anything. I want to be respectful. If you weren't here and I didn't have the information, I'm not going to assume that you're not interested in what's being presented. No, no, I'm saying. Or that it's the issue is in the director's standpoint. I just think that if you're not interested in what's being presented, I'm not going to assume that you're not interested in what's being presented. being persistent. No,'m saying. Or that the issue is in the director's standpoint. I just think that if the discussion has to be had, I think you should wait to figure out why the reason. No, I'm bringing up what I feel as a resident and as a board member. I didn't say that that was it. I said, could that be, what's the reason? Could that be possibility that that's the reason? Because the CRA, the first thing I learned, and we're going way back, that's one thing that's the most important thing that you could get in big trouble. You've got to know the content and what you're doing. I think in anything we do here, we can get in big trouble. It's not just CRS. Well, this one's big. This one's big. I just want to be clear. But I just feel and we don't eat every month. So I'm asking if you can find out what the problem is. I'm asking if we can rectify the problem. And I'm asking as one of the board members to see more on me unless unless spreading the money with no visual nothing I think about North Miami how they had in their CRA how they change their whole their whole element. There are citywide agency by the way it's it's almost the entire city that's the CRA. Well we have a section that should show us something though. But I'm not going to go belabor the point, but there's certain deficiencies on the way that CRA is designed. The fact that parts of on one side of the CRA and other side of the, it's not like certain aspects we can't. Like during the quarter of off of one-segment third, I wish both the size from going down from golden glades all the way down. Oh, I agree. That map should be changed. Even on the West Dixie, I think there should be some writing around because at the end of this certain blight, that's not included in that. I agree, but I think before, not before, maybe in conjunction, we should see some improvement that shows a visual improvement. I'm agreeing absolutely, but I think, you know, in conjunction of changing how far it goes, we should see some visual improvements that change the landscape of North Miami Beach in the CRA with projects, with major projects. Something significant, A, I'm not saying some, give me A, give me one, give me something. Look, we just took a tour of Mackin's property. Luzo, I see the difference. I mean, I remember where... But they were building a... They didn't ask for CRA money, Mackin, when he brought the projects before us. They did not ask for penny. So I'm just saying that more can be done. That's more now. Well, but they didn't. They didn't. They didn't. And it wasn't that the CRA initiated it to bring them. They asked them in the end in my opinion because they can. But also, and I've had this discussion with the director, the way that we've nuanced this to the point and to your own to discussion, I'm saying, you made it that their matching has to be at a certain level. Because of the high cost, a lot of them just don't feel that it's worth taking the risk, or even doing a work because it's such a high level to reach. Because when we've gone to, I mean, the director could speak to that. And I'm not trying to go too much into it right now, because but I don't think we're as friendly as a CR re as other CR re's are. That's what I'm saying. That's as friendly as a CRA as other CRAs are. That's what I'm saying. That's the director maybe a Mr. Old's new way of looking at things. He'll turn around the incentives to something that will be so favorable that we can see it. And the only thing I'm I'm just putting this on record because I see it as I rush over here to to be here at four o'clock. I'm just telling you that I see that we need to do tighten up with getting information. We need to tighten up. We can finish the sentence right there So if I could through the chair I'll address You have a couple different issues in that and I apologize about the agenda that was my No, no, that no, there are certain things happening. But we're going. But let me address the bigger question, which is, for you to start, could you start with number one? What about the life of our CRA? That's key. Right. So that was the last item on the agenda, but I can move it up to the beginning. So there's. So we're agreeing to move on. We're doing discussion. I am number six, right? Right. And we're discussing that currently right now. Discussed nine of number six. So this is about House Bill 991. I'm sure you guys, a lot of you, have probably been up in Tallahassee recently. As some of you know, like, CR as well as a group of other CRAs throughout the city and the county have, throughout the county. And the South Florida region have hired lobbyists to go up to Tallahassee to speak against House Bill 991. This bill is sort of dressed up in clothes that make it appear to be like a minor tweak of how CRAs are operating, but there's some language in it that's very, very, sort of deadly for the entire CRA program within the state of Florida. What it says is that all CRAs shall expire on their expiration date as of June 1st or July 1st, sorry, or they shall expire at 2045, whichever is easier, which is, which is sooner, or which is not the part that is concerning. The part that's concerning is it also says that all CRAs shall take no new projects. And then the way that they've defined a new project is something that is not in your current fiscal year's budget. So you can imagine what that means, no new bonding, no new projects. That means that after your current fiscal year, you're basically done. Even though you still exist for the lifetime of the CRA. So what we've done and my partner, Jason, has been in Tallahassee working on this. And we've had briefings with a number of the senators, a number of the house people. The, it appears that this bill may pass the house. We are hoping that it will not pass the Senate. And even though it has come through the first Senate committee, it has two more committees to go and the co-sponsor of the bill was the chairman of the first Senate committee it went through so It had some opposition from The even the sponsors party there that that The some of the members you know disagreed with the substance of the bill, but still voted yes on it So it did pass. We're hoping that it will sort of go to sleep quietly without coming to the floor. But that's still a possibility at this point. And it's likely to pass the house of the last house, committee. Question. What is the current status of us reapplying for our CEO? Right. So what? That's a new. Right. I understand that this has moved. and like like times pass certain things like this have come up. But what are we doing to get prepared for. So if this bill does pass, we will need to have our extension of life by July first. So that's my goal going forward. On the next CRA meeting, I'm going to bring you the finding of necessity, which you will be able to look at and approve that or finding of necessity and or assessment of need. So an assessment of need is used for when the the CRA's boundaries These aren't changing, but the lifetime is changing. A finding of necessity is what's used if you're expanding the boundaries. So I know I've talked to some of you about your desire to expand the boundaries. I've talked to others of you who don't desire that. They just would prefer that it remain the shape it is. What I think I can do is present two options at that point, and you can make a choice either ahead of the meeting or at the meeting. And we can pass that along with the redevelopment plan, that will then be transmitted to the county. The county will likely be having four to five more of these CRA applications. So it's likely that they'll be something of a special CRA session. That being said, the county is also in a budget crisis right now, as you've probably heard, they're trying to cut 10% out of all their budgets, like the city did last year, just because the COVID money is no longer there and for whatever reason that was, became sort of operationalized. So there's a pretty good chance that there'll be a cohort of CRAs traveling together for this extension before the July 1st deadline. Thank you. I'd like to ask you, Mr. Old Two questions. One is what happened with the resolution to have a date set, a set date for applying after the fact. We were going to have that be one of our requirements. For applying to for the CRA grants. You can come three years years later and say which we gave to the gentleman because he was entitled and I had told you could we make sure that we implement date time? Yes. So I will, I said I would add that to the grant application. So that's I'm working on that premise right now. So no grant applications for after the fact funding have even been considered since you made that request. And you know, I- But now do we have to am asking the attorney, do we have to pass anything that that's one of our regulations? After fact there's a limited amount of time. No if it's part of the application. It's all already. That's already in the application. That was really nice real question was what do we do with the money that's in the if they do pass it and you're done at a certain date and you can't take on any new clients and there's still money in the fund, what do we do with that? So if there's nothing in the budget to spend that money then and the CRA then Sunset's for example, That money would then return to the city and the county, as well as all the assets of the CRA. So, I'm sure, but I think that would happen at the sunset date of the CRA. So, I think before we would have to make sure to use it all. to make sure to use it all. We would have until September to set up, I guess, a budget allocation. And I'm not really sure how you would allocate the next years and next year's budgets since you don't know what you'd be having in them. But. No new projects doesn't mean that that's a good time to give to current businesses that need refurbishing and not a new project. Well, I mean, I think we could definitely, you know, find ways to allocate the money that's in the current budget. It's the problem is if you know, if the CRI is extended for several more years and then the new projects would be things that come into the budget as that next fiscal year comes around, I don't understand that it would be possible for this bill to pass in that form. I believe there's like a constitutional sort of federally, constitutionally invalid premise to it, which if, you know, I'm going to be a- I've seen things that- You can play a big conversation- The legislature are non-constitution, I begin with, but vice-chair- You may have a comment. Okay, I think that we should see, like, make the most out of whatever time we have right now to see what potential it could be before we decide to renew. I think that the meeting should be, I see that, like, you know, you, I mean, I still get calories and invites as a member. So I see that the meetings have been, you know, has been spaced out. And I think that if you want to brainstorm and bring ideas and bring things over and have the redevelopment advisory board also be active and us be active, like we can start to put things in monthly so that we have some motion in here. And we feel that it's worthwhile that we're giving up certain tax money to put into the CRA for the redevelopment. So I would propose that I'd like to see, I don't know, my board would agree, but I would like to see a monthly meeting with some progress and let's really get brainstorming and pushing and putting things in so that we can really make the most out of what CRA is really meant for. So we do have an April meeting on the agenda already. That one will I'll be bringing you the Snake Creek Promenade project, which I have now, it's been a long time coming, but I've gotten traffic. Well, it's been since like 2007, I think. But I have traffic engineering completed finally like this month that confirms that like where I'm going with it is possible, which I think that you know wasn't I wasn't 100% on that. I have a costing for the construction costs for it. So I think I can bring you something that will be able to move on in terms of that project. That would be between the, basically, the library and the monastery. So that would be a big infrastructure project. It would also contribute park space to what is the comp plan now is sort of suggesting we're deficient in park space. This would add new park space for those new tall buildings that are coming in on that street. So I think that's a that's a big infrastructure project as you're requesting. I have another one on the Plaza of the Library, on the amphitheater parking lot side of the library. Part of the Snake Creek project was also to look at the All Wars Memorial Park and figure out how do we get people into that site? Because right now it's a beautiful space but nobody goes there. It's very underutilized. And so I've been working with a landscape architect to try to figure out. And this would be, this would be like phase two of that project. It's also expensive. so we'd have to figure out how it would get paid for. And then on the other side of that project is the the tenor center which the city's moving through the the P3 process on that side. So ultimately you would have sort of nodes on both sides connected by like a beautiful sort of pedestrian bicycle greenway. And, um, sort of nodes on both sides connected by like a beautiful sort of pedestrian bicycle greenway and That'll be April meeting so Chair Spin you know what I'm excited to hear that okay some things was substance. Yeah, so from now on can you Can you list your discussion items a few of them? So we know. We know that you're working on. Well, yeah, sure. I can. I think what they want to do is here a run of a run a show of what the projects that are coming down the pipe because this doesn't really show what's being worked on. I know you guys do a lot on the background and it's very nuanced. So for the next, sorry. I try not to put too much forward to get you too excited when something doesn't happen, but maybe you guys would prefer more. I've been actually, this whole city has been working on what's called the CIP dashboard. I'm sure you've had a chance to take a sneak peek at it already, I hope, if not, you should. Basically, what it is is every project in the city gets its own web page. And so all the CRA projects will be put as well on that site. And you know, you'll have the Snake Creek project and the library part. I'm excited. The agenda is put on the agenda is put on the computer and why wouldn't the CRA be built on the computer so Commissioner Smuckler would have been able to. Oh, we had no idea that we just didn't have the break. We just we missed the break. I don't know this is a scheduling. Right. I didn't even realize until last night. Oh, I thought she didn't get it at all. No, I mean, no, I don't. I did not have an agenda review. and it wasn't until like last, yesterday, yesterday that I realized that we were having a meeting today, so, but I didn't get a review. Anybody can look at my agenda, but if you're not reviewing it, it doesn't like you said many times that we need to review it. So just so we can go because I thank you for that discussion item number six. I know that the one that we're going to leave to actually vote on, which is action at number five, CRA 2025, that approval CRA standard operating procedures. Can you break down that? So standard operating procedures. This is, we instituted these before I was here. This was a recommendation from the county's office of management and budget. Part of it is adopting the city's procurement code, which I really wish I didn't have to do, but unfortunately state law requires it. It would be a lot easier if I could just, you know, do whatever I wanted. But anyway, it's, it's, so part of it is those types of things. Also, the procurement code was referenced, or not the procurement code. The standard operating procedures were referenced several times in the auditor's report and are applied to the auditor's. So when they did the operational audit of the CRA, the things that they were picking up on as inconsistent or improper spending, a lot of those things were like, we were buying a table at a gala event or something that didn't have to do with redevelopment. And the auditors kind of went through and dinged us on a lot of this stuff. Now, I know many CRS by tables at Gala events. It's very common. Many cities do. It's a, this is sort of like an area that isn't totally clear coming out of the state law. And but coming out of the Office of Management and Budget, they're very clear that it has to have a redevelopment purpose. And so what we did is clarify the language in the operating procedures. So, I feel pretty clear on it myself, but my next, my successor who comes in, they'll want to be able to read through and say, oh, we're not allowed to buy staff lunches, right? Like, we're not allowed to take commissioners to lunch. We're not allowed to, you know, we can, but we have to pay for it ourselves, of course. Right, so, things like- Which actually shouldn't either. You shouldn't be paying for lunches for us. Well, then I won't do that. I have never lost a lot of money. I have never got a lunch. Nobody's got a lunch. Nobody's a lunch man. Everybody buys a lunch break. I have never got a lunch break. I've always had lunch in my body. I've always had lunch in my body. I've always had a very clear. Everybody buys a lunch break. We're going to Dutch. Anyway, that being the... I meant staff lunches. So, if you're all out to lunch, you all pay for yourself are, those were our findings of the audit report to me. Many of those things have sort of already been addressed internally, but now they're on paper. And, you know, I think it's just clarifies things. It's really, it's not, it's not a huge deal, but it kind of is when that's the issues that the county's bringing up. One of the main issues is the singer building and the expenditure of money. That was the top item in that audit report as you remember and just to sort of bring you up to speed on where that's at. We are in the process of closing on the singer building. We're waiting for the last title insurance and signing the papers. So hopefully that will allow the city manager to, you know, reallocate that money as needed into programs that you all are able to have authorized and will now be able to see come to fruition. Hey, this is required. This is required. Do I have a motion? I make a motion. Do I have a second? Sorry. All in favor say aye. Aye. Pass it. Okay. Now you can do a quick discussion on item number four. All right. And of course, you'll set up the meeting with our chair member, Osmukler, and regards this specific issue. All right. Yeah. So we'll catch up on this after the meeting. So this is, I've been watching some of the zoning meeting. So this, this, this is, I've been watching some of the zoning meetings. I've been watching some of the city commission meetings where you are voting on these larger developments that are being proposed in the city. And in, in 2015 and 2021, the zoning laws have changed so that now that's what's available and now that's what the land is valued at. So we're not going to have a lot of one story buildings being built. We're going to have a lot of many story buildings being built. And what that means is, A, there's a big tax increment on all of that, and B, there's going to be new residents and businesses and trouble that come from those new buildings. So I have heard what you have all said, which is if these buildings are built within the CRA, who's gonna pay for the problems they bring, right? There's also potential, it's life, right? And it's not just problems, but there may be problems, right? And so- Even if it's minor, it's still the point is has to go there. And so that is and you know, I understand like the CRA has to be a partner with the city. The CRA cannot just give the city money to spend on operations in terms of everyday stuff. What the city is specifically allowed to do by state statute and through our redevelopment plan is what's called community policing enhancements. So through my meetings with the deputy chief and the acting Major Wilson, what we've sort of developed and the city manager's office, what we've sort of developed is an idea of like what are things that the CRA in particular really can benefit from in terms of like an enhanced policing presence rather than just more policing. So what we kind of came up with was like a sort of a four three-pillar idea of like what types of activities might an enhanced policing do in the CRA. So the first one of those is very obvious community business, a business sort of, I'm sorry, I forgot my business outreach. So like in the days of old, you know, police would go from door to door on a beat and the businesses would know their police officers, they would, the business, the police officer will stop at the business, check in on the business owner, present themselves in a very sort of amicable and community oriented fashion, help that, help that owner with any problems they have if the owner knows things about what's happening in the area, they'll tell the police. And then the police can say, look, your business is not designed very well in terms of crime prevention. Maybe you would want to add a different light or a camera or better locks on your doors, those types of things. And here's the CRA program that helps you do that. So there's this sort of like meeting the community where they're at and going door to door and being that sort of on-bedspin for the city and for the CRA in those businesses and with those business owners. That's the first thing. The second thing is homeless outreach. So CRA has a number of street homeless that are sort of chronically homeless living in the CRA. For Boulevard. Hanford Boulevard is a hotspot. We have the Walmart that is, the Walmart not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not that's not That Walmart parking lot. So we do have a- It's a car, see, all right? No, we don't, we don't own one. We don't ask the ones at the corner. That's not, but it's- That's why I'm asking you, Zach, he's saying how far this is. It's directly across the street and the library is where the bathrooms are. So like, you know, there's people aren't fixed in place, they move. And my point is, we have a large population of, fairly not a large population, but a population of homeless people that live or are in the CRA. I do believe that I don't know what's going to happen with Walmart, but I do believe in North Miami Beach. We're voting tonight on something in our agenda that is about the homeless that they become. Actually, they have choices. And if they don't adhere to the choices, they can become where they'll be. I'm aware of that. And that's partly what this is about as well. So the state has passed a bill that says the city can be sued if the city doesn't remove the homeless people in a timely fashion. So whatever your thoughts on that bill are and the way that the Tallahassee's working versus the local government's working, it is a fact of life now. And as you said, like the city is putting together a program for it. So these officers would be trained to be participating in that homeless outreach. They would go to classes that would allow them to more competently and compassionately fulfill that role. And then of course they would have contacts with the homeless trust and the people who are, the people who are the wraparound services in that area. Before you get before we start with the record. That the record show chair member, McKinsey, Flormon has made has appeared. So but just to wrap it up because I know this is, we're gonna be, you know, to land a plane. So I mean, can I untable it and bring it back? And I'm fine either way. I'm willing to bring it back. Reconcited. So you are the one. Right. So I will second your reconsideration. OK. Stephen, are they allowed to reintroduce it over there? To table it. Because we tabled it. The tabled it. So everyone was in the firm. I think I's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. I think that's what I'm saying. Okay, pass your names. Okay, so it's back on out now you can do you want to you want me to finish I got 13 considering all in favor say I I Any opposed? Okay passes you names. Okay, so it's back on now you can so do you want to you want to you want me to finish? I got yeah 13 more minutes. I don't have to take the whole time Five more alright, okay, so third third third peg of the stool would be parking enforcement and traffic citations for derelict vehicles I've I think on desks, you'll have the set of maps. I've mapped out of different types of police incidents throughout the CRA. And you can see the first two are like a hotspot are like a hot spot of all the police incidents and the individual incident dots themselves. But then as you go through, you can see there's a one page for violent incidents. The CRA has about 31% of the violent police incidents that's rapes, homicides, of course, you know it, of violent. Compared to the populations, as it compares to the city as a whole in the space that the CRA incorporates. The CRA is 14% of the city, it has 31% of the incidents of violent homicide. So that's more than double the rate of the rest of the city. Which makes sense because it's the blighted area of the city. Right. So. I mean, even though we would go. It's so, so I think these are, these are important sort of data that you can look through. The drug incidence, the reason I include this one is just for your edification, but you can see most of the drug incidents are happening near City Hall, so I don't know why that is. I was surprised actually. No, but there's a lot happening over on the west side of Hanford Boulevard as well, which I think is a well-known sort of drug. Vice-chairs. Director, what is the mental health incidence? So those are Baker Act and March Man Act. Baker Act is somebody that is involuntarily committed to a mental institution. March Man Act is involuntary commission to a drug program. So it's similar to Baker Act, but for drug addiction. So those two, I recategorize as mental health. I think the fraud incidents are obviously happening sort of randomly throughout the business sector. And then you can also see that the DUIs are really strong on 19th, which is interesting I thought. I'm not sure, you know, I thought there would be more on 163rd Street, but 19th Avenue is a real hotspot for DUIs. And then you have sort of a smattering of these sort of petty incidents like noise animals. These are things like threats, that type of thing. So I've included those on here as well. And if any of you are interested in like a deeper dive into any of this, I can, you know, the police I'm sure would also be happy to make your day on that as well. So that's, that was, I was mentioning that because of the vehicles. There is a predominance of abandoned vehicles in the CRA area and that currently is like really sucking the traffic police time from the whole city into the CRA to like deal with the CRA specific issue, which I think we could really deal with it as a CRA. Look, because I want to land a plane. There's this truck over on or this trailer off of this game. One, this is a band. I don't know. And it has graffiti on it. It has graffiti on it. That's the county. That's the county? Yeah, I think. It's the county. And I'm looking at the map and I'm like, wait a minute, isn't that where that is? It's on Biscay between like 163rd and 163rd. Yeah, you can't miss it. If you go down, you see this big. I've seen it. Yeah, I'm like, I thought that was, I didn't know that was that. I think it used to be like the melting pot. We're trying to treat it so it's melting pot. It's a name I couldn't think of it. It's melting pot. It's I think that's technically in the city of North Miami. Maybe. Okay, so a melting pot. Yeah, it's I think that's Technically in the city of North Miami, maybe yeah, we should get that because that's been there for a long long That's you give me give me a police and I get them on there right away. Well the chief is here that being said do I have a motion? On the item I make the motion second. Action item interlocal agreement policing program number four. And before you guys vote just let me say real quick this this item will be subject to the new bargaining agreement that's made with the police. I when I printed the agenda I don't think I had the new numbers. So let me just read in. No, we're not in numbers. What's up? I know, but I think I'm saying the numbers have changed since that, yeah, changed recently. So let me. 152,255. So the 100 and 100 and the first year 2025 cost remains the same. The second year will be more because of the bargaining agreement. That would be 319,202,21. And I'm asking for you to allocate up to $325,000 per year for the second year of this because that's how much it's going to cost. All right, so we have a motion in a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Passes unanimously. Now we go to any announcements. I think I've made all my announcements on the fly. So we have a point of privilege for or chair members, McKinsey, Florida. You're calling me chair member. Chair member, you're chair member. Board member. Sorry, board member. No, it's okay. I actually like the ring. All right, board member. It sounds pretty good. Yes, good plan. Board member. Anyways, I just wanted to let our board know that I am the new liaison to redevelopment advisory board. So I just wanted to put that on the record. I look forward to having some profound discussions with our CRA team and looking forward to moving our agenda items forward. Thank you. For the member, I just put in a request with the director that I'd like to see that the REB meets monthly. Okay. All right. All right. So we so now we're going to last item because we have a very very busy commission conference. Item number eight, enjoyment, do I have a motion adjourn? Move. Second. Thanks. All of you say aye. All right. Thank you. We'll be on in the next 10 minutes, 10 minutes, because I want everybody to be here for our commission conference.