for Tuesday, April 8th, 2025. City Secretary Hall, would you please call the roll and ensure we have a quorum? Commissioner Cargo. Here. Commissioner Canmore? Here. Chairman Brownie? Here. Commissioner Poe? Here. And Commissioner Mareman. Here. Chairman, there is a quorum. Conduct the meaty. Thank you, Miss All. Do any of the planning and zoning commissioners have any comments concerning items of community interest that would like to share? Okay. That said none. We'll move over to the city manager's report. City manager right? Nothing to report, Mr. Chair, but thank you. Thank you. Item five, public comment, audience and presenter social. Sorry. We'll review the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Consider the approval. Have everyone had a chance to review the minutes? If you've had a chance and I will entertain a motion. I move that we approve as presented. I'll second. I have a motion and a second. We'll start down there. Or. Or. Or. Okay. Minutes are approved. Next we'll go to a public hearing. We'll conduct a planning and zoning commission. We'll conduct a public hearing to solicit comments from citizens and other interested parties, concerning the adoption of the updated city of Portland Unified Development Ordinance. Director of Public Services, Ms. Munoz. I'll open to public hearing now. Thank you, Chairman and good evening commissioners. There's a little bit of an echo. A little bit of an echo. It's kind of weird. Chairman, can I get you to call the time for that? Oh, yes, I'm sorry, it's 602. Thank you. Alrighty. This evening's presentation will cover agenda items 7 and 8 and will be given by Miss Erica Craigcraft and Mr. Dan Sefco with Freesten Nichols. As the city's consultant planners, Dan and Erica have helped develop our comprehensive plan. Oh, I am so sorry, please excuse me. This agenda item is for our unified, our code ordinance, I apologize. So this will cover agenda items. Oh, I'm so sorry. 7 and 8. That is a different presentation. So it will be given by Miss Craig Kraft and Mr. Sefko there with Freason Nichols and as the city's consultant planners they have helped develop our comprehensive plan which is plan 2040 and many of you may recall it was adopted a couple of years ago. The proposed unified development ordinance amendments that you will hear tonight aim to implement the goals outlined in the comprehensive plan. At this time, I'll hand it over to Ms. Graycraft. Great, thank you, Ms. Minios. I will share my screen. Let me know if you can see that, all right. Yes, we can see the screen. Thank you. Okay, great. We'll get evening members of the commission. Again, my name is Erica Craigcraft with freeze and Nichols and I'm joined with Dan Seth go this evening. And so today I have an overview of the proposed amendments to the UDO starting with the background and purpose of the amendments, a summary of the major changes that are proposed, a preview of the next steps, and then we'll leave some time for Q&A. The UDO refers to the Unified Development Ordinance, which is the city's zoning and subdivision regulations. Zoning regulations apply only in the city limits, whereas subdivision regulations apply in both the city limits and in the ETJ. On the right side of the screen, you can see a screen shot of the chapters that are included in the city's UDO. This is available on the city's media code website today. This UDO update has three main purposes. The first is to ensure alignment with current state laws, things have changed in the last several years. We'll be looking for opportunities to streamline and clarify the development process. And then as Ms. Munoz mentioned, we are looking to implement the comprehensive plan that was adopted back in 2023. So I have a summary of the top 20 most significant revisions. I'm happy to come back to any of the items that maybe you have questions about or would like some more information on all of the edits that are proposed to the UDO are available in the markup draft and that's available on the city's website and also in the packet that I think you have today. So the first of those is regarding site plans. Site plans are currently only required for non-residential development. So this amendment would expand site plans of middle requirements to both multifamily and to mixed use developments to be sure that the code's requirements are being met. Next, we outlined a four-step process to clarify the planned unit development or PUD process. And we also removed the minimum size requirement for a residential PUD, which would allow for more flexibility. You'll notice pretty significant markups in the subdivision procedures chapter. We removed some of the specific sub-minor requirements for a plat application. So things like the scale or the north arrow or the specific information that's required to be shown on a plat. And that information would instead be on a checklist maintained by city staff. The reason for removing that from the code and putting it in the checklist is so it can be administratively maintained. If there are any changes that will be easier to keep updated so there doesn't have to be a video amendment every time the checklist changes. Next, today all of the plots are reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. In the last legislative session, the state legislature authorized cities to delegate that that plan approval to city staff. The proposed UDO draft would authorize city staff to approve any plan that approval to city staff. The proposed UDO draft would authorize city staff to approve any plan that meets the requirements of the code. So that would only be for a plan where no waiver or other deviation is needed from the standards. Also, planning is considered a ministerial action anyway, so basically if the the requirements of the code, the cities required to approve it. Also. a ministerial action anyway. So basically if the submittal meets the requirements of the code, the city is required to approve it. Also staff can always defer the plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission if they wanted to for any reason. Also applicants can appeal if the if the Ministry of Official denies the plat they can still appeal that. So based on those reasons we do recommend authorizing City staff to be able to approve the plats that don't require any type of waiver and that is consistent with what we're seeing most cities do as they update their codes since that state law changed. And lastly for the subdivision section, we made some updates to the maintenance bond language. And the purpose of the maintenance bond is to guarantee the quality of public improvements that are installed as part of the subdivision. The current code says that the amount of that maintenance bond is 100% of the cost of construction that it can be reduced to 25%. the proposed amendments, we did change it to just always require 25% and that is in line with the city's current practices. That's also in line with what we're seeing other cities more commonly do. And because of the purpose of a maintenance bond being to protect in case the infrastructure fails, it's not likely that 100% of the infrastructure is going to fail because this has already been inspected by the city. So we think that production to a standard 25% would be more appropriate. And we did outline the processes for how those steps happen for the public improvement installation, inspection and acceptance. One of the other more significant amendments is the addition of the new leisure and entertainment district zoning overlay and that aligns with the city's vision for the LED district. I did want to point out that these changes don't affect these standards that were approved as part of that LED district back in 2022. Those are mainly related to the alcohol sales and hours of operation. So those are still included as they were in 2022. The main purpose of this change to the O'Reilly is to limit the type of uses that are permitted in the area. And that's intended again to support the city's vision of having a vibrant area that helps to increase the tax base. In addition to limiting the uses, the proposed amendments also would eliminate the requirement for minimum off street parking in this area to help encourage infill development and walkability in the area. That's only for non-residential uses, so off-street parking would still be required for any residential use in the area. And this is an overlay district, so the base district that would apply is the old town too or OT2. Those standards would still apply unless it's specifically modified by this overlay. The city had a meeting last week, a community meeting with the LED property owners last week to talk about how this overlay would affect them, particularly in relation to nonconforming uses. And so I wanted to share some highlights from that conversation for against specific to that LED area. So the uses that you see on this list are permitted today in that base district old town too, but they would no longer be permitted in the new proposed LED district. Some of these uses are existing today, for example, the professional office and storage facilities. So as I mentioned earlier, the district is envisioned to be a vibrant area. So we're looking for uses that are going to create foot traffic and generate activity outside of regular business hours. And we're trying to help to increase the economic growth and build the tax base in this area to reduce the tax burden on the city's residents. So these uses have been identified that they may not necessarily meet either or both of those goals. Next the uses in the left column you see here are permitted today by right in Old Town 2, but with the new LED overlay they would require a special use permit or SUP. Uses in the right column are uses that are not permitted today in old town too, but that they would be permitted in the LED. So these are added new uses that would be permitted. Also I did want to note that there are a number of existing residences in this area. There are no changes that are being proposed to any residential uses in this area other than adding for the triplex and quadplex that's listed in the list on the right. I mentioned some of these uses are existing today. So I wanted to summarize the city's nonconforming use provisions and how those would apply to these uses. These provisions are in chapter 8 of the current UDO and no changes are proposed to this chapter so this is available on the city's website if anyone would like to review it. So some of the common questions if you have a use that is no longer permitted looking back back on the list that we just went through, any existing use can be continued. And you can continue that as long as you would like. However, operations could not be stopped for a period of more than one year. So if the use was ended for more than a year, it would be considered not conforming and not able to resume at that point. If you have a use that was permitted by right, but now it requires an SEP, it's still considered conforming, so no changes are needed for that use. If that use wanted to expand, however, an SEP would be required. If you have a use that would change, a nonconforming use that would change to another nonconforming use. For example, I mentioned professional office would be one of the uses made nonconforming. It could change to a different professional office. So the business itself could change or it could change to something that's less nonconforming, basically something less intensive. But once it became a conforming use, it can't go back to non-conforming. And lastly, if you want to expand a use that's no longer permitted, you can expand the use within the current building. If you want to expand beyond your current building, then an SEP would be required. So moving on to the overall amendments, not specific to LED that these are back to the overall video. So you'll notice some edits in the permitted use table, including adding the triplex and quadplex housing types. These are intended to support what we sometimes call missing middle or medium density housing variety. And that's something that we talked a lot about during the comprehensive plan process to support attainable life cycle housing options. And these added housing types also have design standards to be sure that the quality of the design is consistent with Portland's neighborhoods. We also specifically addressed short-term rentals or STRs. These are commonly known as Airbnb's or other similar uses since we're seeing more of these uses pop up. It included standards like a registry that the city can keep track of requiring annual inspections and some other restrictions like requiring an owner to be on site if if there's a single night rental. We also added standards for accessory dwelling units or ADUs. And similarly, there are supplemental standards for this use. Things like you can't have more than one ADU per lot. And the ADU can't be more than half the size of the main house. And again, some of these changes are to help support life cycle housing where maybe there's an older parent who can live in the accessory dwelling unit or adult children to give some more options. For subdivisions, we specify that the city can require a developer to over-size-imp but the city would have to reimburse the developer to be sure that the developers only paying for their fair share of the impacts. This provision will be particularly applicable in the western part of the city and the ETJ, where future growth is expected to be sure the infrastructure is installed to meet the expected future growth, not just to serve an individual development. In the street standards, street standards section, we added a connectivity index requirement, that's the graphic that you see here. It measures the frequency of intersections within a development to help encourage connectivity both for pedestrians and for vehicles. And we added a TIA or traffic impact analysis requirement to be sure that future development mitigates its impact on a surrounding area. For example, if you think of a Chick-fil-A or another use that generates a lot of traffic, they may be required to have some increased QAIN or a turn lane to help increase the traffic that they're causing. The added provisions for a stormwater pollution prevention plan, which is required by TCEQ. These plans are intended to help prevent pollution of waterways, primarily coming from either construction activities or industrial operations. The city requires park dedication today for any major subdivision development. And so we've recently added a proposed requirement for those dedicated parks to be improved in accordance with city standards and then also for trails to be dedicated in accordance with the comprehensive plan, which is the map that you see shown here showing some future parks and trails in the western area. The amendments encourage shared dryways for adjacent sites to reduce the number of curb cuts along major roads and require cross-access between adjacent sites so you can get between adjacent developments without having to go back into the road. We added provisions to allow residential clustering, which is where smaller lots can be used if there's open space that's being preserved. This development results in the same overall number of units in the development if at least 30 percent of the site is preserved or there's a 10 percent bonus in the number of units if at least 40 percent is conserved. The intent of this provision is to preserve open space in natural areas while still allowing for more housing variety. We have added design requirements for mixed use development. These are fairly similar to the requirements for multifamily and non-residential development, but more focused on creating a walkable urban form. And a residential proximity slip to limit building height near residential areas, self-support compatibility around neighborhoods. And lastly, we made some edits throughout the sign section, and that's intended to support compliance with current case law. You may have heard about a court case several years ago called Read versus Gilbert, and that determined cities cannot regulate signs by the content that's shown on the sign, but rather the sign type, its size and its location in the city. We also can't treat similar signs differently based on the type of use that it's used for. So for example, a event banner that's used for a church event should be the same as any other event banner. So you'll notice some changes through that section just to ensure content neutrality and compliance with law. So in summary of our upcoming next steps, of course, we're having our public hearing just eating with the Planning and Zoning Commission and following this meeting, we'll ask that the City Council hold a public hearing and its first reading next week April 15th and then consider a second reading on May 6th. So that wraps up my presentation, but I'm happy to take any questions that you may have or go back to any slides that you would like to see. Thank you. Chairman, if I may, I just wanted to add that we are proposing an effective date for these proposed amendments of June 1st and just as a reminder, any projects that are submitted before then are or in the process are vested under our current codes. Thank you. Thank you very much for that presentation. I did have one speaker sign up card and Mr. Jeff Howard I believe. Mr. Howard if you'd like to speak and what's not what you're thinking. Hi everybody is this on there? Jeff Howard I live over in the old town district area and I own one of the largest pieces of property over there Just from the meeting tonight. I have a few questions that like the non-use of it. I don't know how broad this is it says office warehouse space So I'm wondering that's not allowed or I'm very curious of questions about repair shop and office warehouse. So I currently would say that I own an office warehouse, I think. So that's not allowed over there. And that's a question. I have a retail business here, and I'm curious about that. I would think, you know, I'd love to move my retail shop over there, which I do, but I also warehouse a lot of my products and I repair kites. And now it says repair shop. I'm guessing that's a broad term. Is that what that means? During the public hearing, I mean, generally we don't answer those things. It's just a public hearing, but I think I can address that by just saying any existing use is going to be non-conforming, but it can continue. But I'm not there right now. Right. But you would have to, in order to comply, you would have to start the process of construction or development of that lot sometime before the passage of this ordinance. Okay. Okay. Wow. Okay. And I think we have to go back to the purpose of the old town overlay. And that is, as Eric pointed out, it's really about generating foot traffic for retail spaces in that area, for the old town area. and then you go back to the very beginning of why the city's invested so much over there now is because the tax revenues and the property values have been depressed for decades and we had tried a number of things, we had tried a number of committees and different tactics to try to encourage redevelopment of that area. It just didn't work. And so the city made the decision to invest. But the investment area, which was further verified by the vote of the citizens, to create this area where alcoholic beverages could be sold was to create a, you know, an LED, a leisure entertainment district. And, you know, think about, you know, town center, Sugarland, or Fredericksburg, or Wemberley to create that environment to have those kinds of things, you have to have businesses that are conducive to that kind of activity. So things like that that are not, would not be permitted in the future, would be things that are typically not things that generate foot traffic. So we're sitting here trying to get into this amount of the park going in and bringing my business. I would always dream about it. That's why I purchased the property. And I've spoke with Brian Villatt many times and storage units and I went, no, that's not what you guys are going to put in. But now I'm thinking, am I going to put my business over there? Am I allowed? I mean, that would be my dream to bring the foot traffic from the park and come up to the entertainment area and come to the restaurants and come to a brewery or maybe I'm building the buildings and it brings in these types of businesses to generate that foot traffic. And I was hoping I would, but now I'm reading this and I'm very curious if maybe I'm not bringing in enough foot traffic. I think we'd have to look at the exact use after this past. What you're going to be doing in that business, so you're going to have retail sales. Will there be retail sales? Oh, yeah. We have retail sales. The retail sales generally would satisfy the ordinance. It's primary use. Which is retail. OK'm just I'm just curious I'm just looking at the way that I am able to operate so that's I'm just so it's pushing pushing back on what I was thinking of putting in there You know allowing those buildings. I think it's fantastic what you guys have done though. Please don't get me wrong I'm trying to add into it. That's why I've delayed for many years, because I thought, you know, hearing that this was gonna happen, and now I'm going, oh, now it's only retail, so I'm just curious. No, thank you, Mr. Howard. I mean, we've, you know, spoken with you about three or four different options for your property over the years. Everything that you have proposed would be allowed under these regulations. Okay. As long as the primary use remains retail. It's just warehouse space that it would not be permitted. Yeah. The combination of sales and display and repair, those are uses that would be permitted. Sounds fantastic. The use we don't know until you make the application. Yeah. Exactly what you intend to use it for. Yeah, I mean, living over there and being in that community of DreamDabatted, where I live now, you guys, it took me 16 years to get there. And I think it's a great area. And I'm glad you guys are putting all this into it. I really am. putting it in where people can walk through and be able to get through the neighborhoods is so important. I think we have a wonderful place over there so thank you for putting all your work in. Thank you very much Mr. Howard. Appreciate it. Miss Hall, were there any other cards or speakers? There were no comments received via email or our e-comment platform. Thank you very much. That being said, I will close the public hearing at 626 PM. And we'll move to item number eight. The Planning and Zoning Commission will consider revisions to the city of Portland Unified Development Ordinance, which we just got presented. Yes, Chairman, as the presentation before you provided we are proposing several amendments to the unified development ordinance and we're available for any questions you and the commissioners may have. Anyone have any questions for any of this or the consultants? I do. Sarah. On the LED, I know that I had mentioned this before, and I believe you've captured it, as far as allowing alcohol at drinks, alcohol cells, drinks in the LED kind of like pearl street in Sugar Land, is it going to be open container in the area area and then do you have any time frames? So I may ask Mr. Wright to help me with this, but we're not proposing any changes to the existing LED overlay that were already approved Did you want to add anything? I think everything was originally in the LED area in the minds of society. That doesn't change, okay. Okay, and going back to the gentleman that was here, I also need a little bit of clarification and I just want to make sure that I understood the presentation. The, for example, I was looking at the map, there are, I think, some storage facilities. So for the existing, they're going to have the opportunity, they're changed their use, do a sub, or are they gonna be grandfathered in? I kind of, it was a little complicated. Yes, Commissioner. And Miss Craycraft may bring the slide back up, but it would be considered a existing nonconforming structure, and that those rules and guidelines are already in our unified development ordinance, she has it back on the screen but basically they can continue their use as long as it doesn't stop for a full year. And what that really means is if for example a storage unit was not rented at all and they essentially abandoned their business for a year then that use wouldn't be allowed anymore. And then they would have to reapply. And it's also important to note that that use runs with the land, not with the property owner or the tenant. And so that use can continue even if the property changes hands. Perfect. Thank you. I did see that there's going to be a separate requirement for like a studio and there was some examples like dance, music, etc. I would have fitness studio come under that umbrella. Well, you know, the purpose of the SEP process is to give the City Council a second look. So it's difficult to try to second guess what the council would decide, but I can tell you that the intent is to create walking spaces. And so some of these uses could kind of go either way, and that's why they're in the category of special use because the council would want to take a second look at those use system to make sure that they fit kind of what the intent of the district. Okay. Thank you. And we want to solve the information for accessory dwelling units. I think that's great. Adding them to the video. My only question on there was. And this might be a building code question. Would they be required like a separate meter for like their power. You know, you have the front house and you have the back unit. I know that that's been an issue before in the past to do like a down alone. Person living in the back separate from the front. No, they shouldn't be required separate meters unless it's a request from the property owner because essentially they still own both units. They're not going to be separately owned units. So it'd be one bill. They're not going to know. That's all I have right now. Anyone else have any questions? No others? I'll accept the motion. I moved that we were supposed to motion that. Oh, I'm not sending one else. I have any other questions. I don't know. Okay. So. I'm sorry Mr. Chairman, before we go forward. So. I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman, before we go forward. So I don't see the changes in here in the bed and breakfast for a minute use table. Has that been changed? They've been changed on our website. They weren't changed at the time of the printing of the packet. I'm not sure that they have a there copy. That's correct. They were printed before. Let me just talk about that. Thank you. On page 61, which is far the use table, under over-night accommodations, we see a bed and breakfast. That's kind of near the top of the page. So, that particular use, we're proposing to change that use, so that it is permitted in all residential zones. The bed and breakfast concept and we've done that for a number of reasons. One is that there's, there has been ongoing controversy, legal controversy in the state over short-term ripples and how short-term ripples might relate to bed and breakfasts and how there's a different bed and breakfasts are distinctly different because they typically have the owner living on site. It's not just a rental property. This is an opportunity for for some people who are later in life for perhaps single widows to take a large home and make use of a bedroom or two for overnight accommodation. And so in the interest of making sure that we are complying with current court cases giving some versatility without the kinds of short-term rental problems that neighborhoods tend to talk about and that's the loud parties and the uncontrolled people in a neighborhood. This is different. This comes with a number of restrictions and if you look at, I'm not sure if we've made the changes yet at Erika, but on our website. Yes, sir. Those changes have been made. There's a list of restrictions that keeps this to an activity that is not objectionable to the rest of the neighborhood. I just want to point that out so that you understand that we are proposing those changes. Thank you. Thank you, Randy. So Sarah, within the motion related to number one, which is what I'm going to recommend, state adoption of the proposed amendments to include the bed and breakfast, line out of this on in the packet or no, ma'am. It would, I believe you would just be a motion that recommends a city council an adoption of the proposed amendments. As presented. Got it. Thank you for that clarification, Wendy. Okay, so I moved to adopt a motion that recommends to the city council the adoption of the proposed amendments as presented. I'll just take it. teach you. Go ahead. Four. Four. Four. I'm four. All right. Motion passes. Item number nine. Planning and zone commission. We conduct public hearing and solicit comments from citizens and other members. The party is concerning adoption. Planning and zone commission will conduct public hearing to solicits comments from citizens and other Inherited parties concerning adoption of the 2021 editions of the International Building Code, International Existing Building Code, International Fire Code, International Residential Code, International Mechanical Code, International Plumbing Code, International Field Gas Code, International Swimming Pool and Spa Spa Code, International Property Management Code, and the National Fire Prevention Association's 2020 edition of the National Electric Code, meaning the code of ordinances for the City of Portland to adopt local amendments, for active development services, as I'm not worried. Yes, sir. You've got all ten of them. Thank you so much. Before I begin this presentation, just wanted to take a quick minute to introduce. Oh I'm sorry, got to close the other public here. We're going to open the public room. Thank you. All right. I just wanted to introduce very quickly a group of our team here at the city of Portland that have worked very hard on the previous agenda item and on this current agenda item. So in the audience with us today, we have our Fire Marshal, Mr. Thomas Pinder. We have our building official Marco Flores. We have our permit technician Abigail Haso, and we have our senior planner, Mr. Mark Baker. So with that, this evening's agenda will cover, our presentation will cover agenda items 9 and 10, and we are happy to answer any questions at the conclusion of the public hearing. So as Chairman Browning recited all 10 codes, a quick update of the codes we're going to discuss this evening. The International Code Council updates codes on a three-year cycle, and most jurisdictions update codes every six years. The City of Portland is currently utilizing the 2015 additions of these codes with local amendments. We will be looking at all ten of these codes today and these codes provide regulations that specify the minimum standards for design, Construction, quality of materials, use, occupancy, safety, and maintenance of various buildings to protect life, health, property, and public welfare. Updated codes also help influence our ISO scores. As lower ISO scores can reduce insurance rates from municipalities based on new structures being at a lower risk of serious fire and structural damage. The proposed local amendments for your consideration this evening are nearly identical to those of our largest neighboring city. The city of Corpus Christi spent over a year of contractor engagement and we're adopting the results of the process to be consistent regionally. I will touch more on our recent contractor engagement at the end of this presentation. So just like our previous agenda item, we have also listed all the proposed code amendments on our website at portlandtx.gov for the public's review and comment. And the 10 codes with local amendments were proposing for adoption include the 2021 editions of the International Code Council for Buildings, existing buildings, residential, fire, mechanical, plumbing, fuel and gas, swimming pool and spa, and the property maintenance codes. Additionally, we're proposing the 2020 edition of the National Electric Code. Over the next few slides, I will highlight a few significant changes in some of these codes. In the building code, a few changes include the addition of type four heavy timber in tall wood buildings. The code also added flexibility for illuminated egress past for high rises and it also clarified the posting of certificate of occupancies in certain buildings. The residential code defined a homeowners permit and it added a clause for natural gas services. It also better defined the backflow testing and certifications and we updated locally the certain design criteria based for our region. On the electrical side, it improved safety for one and two family dwellings. It added flexibility for the location of existing upgraded boxes and it expanded ground and fault arc protection areas and added surge protection for one and two family dwellings. In the fuel and gas section, it prohibited threaded bushings, revised minimum burial depths from 12 inches to 18 inches, and it prohibited a spring type gauge to test the pressure. In the swimming pool and spa section, it added design safety requirements for splash pads and created construction fencing for the commercial swimming pools. In our fire code, we added a section for an emergency disconnect for charging stations and added a section for indoor fireworks or special effects. And to wrap it up very similar to our previous agenda item, here is a list of our important dates. Last week, as I mentioned, we held a developer's round table to solicit feedback on the proposed code adoption and local amendments. What we heard from that meeting is that most, if not all of the area, is already utilizing these updated codes as they're working mostly in the city of Corpus Christi. So it was a good discussion and we were happy to have the crowd that we had and there was no fundamental issues expressed during that meeting. Last week we also held a workshop with city council and we also received some feedback from them as well. They just had questions about backflow and electrical connections and with that that, at the close of the public hearing, I'm happy to answer any questions that you may have. Saul, do we have any speakers? You'll be fine. There were no comments received. Thank you very much. I will close the public hearing at 6.4pm And we will move on to the next item item 10 which is basically the deliberation of the Presentation we just received Do we have any additional questions for so? Anyone else? Not always except a motion. I'll make a motion to adopt a motion that, oh sorry, I'll make a motion to, for the adoption of the proposed codes and local amendments or to recommend to the city council, adoption of the proposed codes and local amendments. I'll second that. Okay. We have a motion and a second. Let's start down here. Petra. Four. Can I know? Four. Four. Four. Very good. Motion passes. I see nothing else on the adjournment but the adjournment. 641. Do you?