Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Good afternoon. We're going to call to order meeting number 3062 special closed session meeting of the City Council Madam City clerk will call please Councilmember Schnell here mayor prison Gallagher here mayor Lombard here councilmember Clark and councilmember Goblins will be arriving shortly Thank you next we have public input at this time any member of the public may address the council on matters Which are on the closed session agenda if any member of the public who are participating through zoom wish may address the council on matters which are on the closed session agenda. If any member of the public who are participating through Zoom wish to address the council please raise your hand and if you're calling in please press star nine to raise your hand. Madam City Clerk, any requests to speak? No, Mr. Mayor. Thank you. Close session update, Mr. City Attorney. Yes, the City Council will be convening a closed session to discuss items one through five as they appear on the closed session agenda. The discussions will include conferring with its real property negotiators, Al Doshindler, Nicole Bernard, Ryan Swantec, Kenneth Begui, and Jerry Craig is noted on the closed session agenda items five A through five E. Thank you, sir. We will now recess to close session. I'm going to do to order meeting number 3062, the regular meeting of the City Council and the Council acting in its capacity is the local reuse authority. Tonight's presentation of colors and invocation and pledge of allegiance are by our American for the new year's pandemic. We will be back with a new new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's new year's Color Guard, attention, put. Carry, colors. Color Guard, colors. Color Guard, colors. Color Guard, boy. Oh, boy. Oh, boy. Oh, boy. Please join us with the Pledge of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Chaplain, post. I'd like to start off by a little prayer out of Book of Proverbs chapter 3, verse 5 and 6. It says, trust in the Lord with all your heart, lean not until your own understanding, in all your ways acknowledge Him and He will direct your past. So we remind it as individuals that there is somebody who's in charge and He asks us just to have faith, have trust in him, and he'll make decisions for us as we look to him for guidance and this experience we call life. So most time we come before you tonight, asking for your Holy Spirit's guidance, wisdom and inspiration as we begin this meeting. Help us to engage in meaningful discussion, allow our city council members to grow closer as a group and nourish the bonds of community. Fill each one with the spirit of knowledge, understanding and wisdom. Also bless each council member with the spirit of love, compassion and grace as our city council members make important decisions that affect the lives of our testing community. Finally, we ask that you continue to remind us that all that we do here tonight, all that we accomplish is for the pursuit of truth, for the greater glory of you, the most high. And for the service of our country and community, we ask all these things in your name most high, and all of God's people said, amen. Right? Pee! Close colors. Oh. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you as always to our American Legion post for being here. Our meetings always start off a little bit nicer when they're here to present. Next we have a presentation portion of our agenda this evening. We have one presentation which is the Navy North Hanger status update. I'm going to make some introductory remarks and then invite IEM or Concoming's up to make a presentation. And before IEM comes up, I just wanted to recap where we've been over the last eight months or so since November 7th when the fire started. When the crisis erupted, we took immediate action to protect the health and well being of our residents and to get our community back on track. Here are some key steps that we took. First, schools were cleaned, inspected, and reopened along with our parks and roads. Second, we launched a community inspection remediation program that prioritized the safe removal of debris from ground level areas where the greatest potential for human contact existed. Third, 24-7 air monitoring started immediately, and we were all relieved in the Orange County Health Care Agency announced that no airborne asbestos from the fire had been detected. Fourth, we commissioned an independent study that found there was no letter asbestos contamination in test, and that could be attributed to the Navy North Hangar Fire. Fifth, we protected our city's fiscal future by securing pledges from the Navy to repay the city up to $88 million, which covers 100% of the cost that our city incurred due to the Navy fire. Sixth, we worked with State Senator Josh Newman and co-authors Senator Tom Umbur, Senator Dave Minne, and Assemblymember Coddy P. J. Norris, who authored and secured the bipartisan passes of SJR 13, which is Senate Joint Resolution 13, that seeks up to $100 million in federal disaster funds for our community. We've accomplished a lot, but we didn't do it just on behalf of the city. We did it with all of our partners. I want to thank our partners from the county, state, and federal levels. There is some work still to be done, of course. And from the city's perspective, we've been advocating for the last several months to launch a program to inspect and remove possible fire debris from rain gutters and rooftops and neighborhoods near the hangar. Following an extensive review, the Navy and the environmental regulators recently approved moving forward with an above ground remediation program. The Navy tells us that they identified funding to conduct the program and they are finalizing a planning and procurement process, which we hope will allow this program to start soon. At the same time, the Navy is also making progress on the cleanup of the hangar site itself and has begun to safely remove the onsite debris. The Navy is managing that process, which will take several months to complete and that will all take place on the base property. But that said, I'd like to invite Colin Cummings up from IEM to give an update. Good evening, Mayor Lumbard, Mayor Pro Tem Gallagher, City Council members, City staff and attendees. Thank you for the privilege and opportunity to present to you this evening. My name is Colin Cummings. I am with IEM or Innovative Emergency Management. I serve as an Operations Section Chief, and I'm here tonight in order to be able to give you a North Navy Hanger update. Current updates, ground inspection or remediation process that we began almost eight months going on nine months now continues as residential inspections continue we've reached now a milestone of over 1500 residents is completed as far as the bag debris removal according to the Navy's work plan that has all been removed from the hangar site, offsite and accordance with the direction that they provided inside of the Navy work plan. The hangar doors located at the North Navy hangar have been dismantled. They are done with the ones on the south side and they're moving to the ones on the north. At this point, containment structures are starting to be erected at the hangar. They look just like scaffolding and they are going to look erected at the hangar. They look just like scaffolding and they are going to look very similar to the plastic sheeting that we previously had around the hangar just going up and over the top of the actual open parts of the hangar while they create their negative pressures containment areas. The cause of the fire is still under investigation. Hanger mitigation. The Navy has assumed the majority of duties and responsibilities for the North Hangar at this time. IEM continues to coordinate and monitor progress at the site. Data collection as far as air monitoring and surveillance continues around the hangar and reports collected do not show any release of elevated risk to harm or public according to environmental health agencies. One thing that has changed from some of our briefing before to now is the Navy has created a website that now contains all of the pertinent information to include the DTSC work notices and other documents that have been created. Located here is the QR code that is a direct link to that site. A finance update at the U.S. Navy's request, the city undertook emergency response and recovery efforts for the Navy North Hangar fire. To date, we are now seeing impacts of about $86.8 million and total pledged about $88 million. And here is the breakdown of all those costs from debris clearance to agency costs and supplies equipment and security. And that concludes my update. Thank you, Colin. It's good to see you all though. I think I promised you along ago that you'd be going home soon. So hopefully we can get that expedited. Thank you for everything that I am done on behalf of the city and the Navy. So we all know this is significant. Incident is not yet done. We have done a lot of work in the last eight months and Colin just kind of recapt where we're at financially and with the work that's going on on site. Thank you for providing me QR code. I encourage residents or any interested parties to go on the Navy's website. They are updating the progress regularly. That is now the home base for updates on the project if you're interested. I just want to thank some folks here. So I want to thank OCA who battled the fire, the experts at IEM, CTEH and ATI, who have been on site from the beginning and helping us to remediate the community. Also appreciate the commitment and support from our partners at the Orange County Board of Supervisors, the Federal EPA, the State Department of Tox Excessances control the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Orange County Healthcare Agency, and the Navy itself. We also appreciate the hard work by US Representative Young Kim and Representative Luke Correa, who have continued to advocate for residents at the federal level with the Navy. And of course, want to thank our residents for your patience. This has been a long road and we've got a lot of work left to do, but we have turned a corner. We've got a couple of last steps remaining and we're looking forward to getting the incident closed as soon as possible. So thank you for that, thank you, Colin, for being here tonight. Appreciate it. Could we let the public know where they can find that QR code or where it is on the website so that people can- Yeah, the slide's going to be on the website, our city website under the agenda or under the hangar tab, which both, okay, two spots on the website, Tuscany.org, and there's a hangar incident tab there too. So it's just for clarification, Mr. Mayor, the QR code will be on the hangar page or the slides from the presentation. It might be more accessible to put the QR code. It will definitely be on the slides from tonight. I can check and see if we'll have the QR code on our website already. But if you Google Brak, B-A-R-A-C, you will land on the Navy's website. I'm hearing from Council and I agree with this. Let's get the slides posted to our website. Let's also make the QR code very readily available to anybody that's looking for it. Yep. Thank you. I'm not going to be able to address the public. I'm not going to be able to address the public. I'm not going to be able to do our website. Let's also make the QR code very readily available to anybody that's looking for it. Thank you. Anything else? Okay. Thank you. Next we have public input. the court participating through zoom, which to address the council, please raise your hand. And if you're calling in, please press star nine or raise your hand. I have one request to speak so far if you're interested in speaking and have not yet filled out a form, come to the city clerk up here and fill one out please. Mr. Pete Beatty, you are up, sir. I had to smile because I started using QR codes in the year 2000 on my websites. And at that time, people said, nobody's ever going to use those things. But anyway, I'm glad to see it. First of all, I want to thank all the support from the City Council on the group that I put together, the Test and Military History, which you know was trying to save something out at the hangar for the memory of the people that served out there, and most of all the people that served out there, and most of all the people that didn't come back. And there's a lot of things that have to go into this, and you guys are the root of it. I mean, I want to thank you about Houston, about you saying, I'm not done until it's done. That gave me a lot of reassurance going forward with this, because it's going to take a long time to get what we want. And we hope the Navy, when it turns that building over to you, that we can be part of making that a museum in some place where people will come from all over the country to see the things that happened in this location. And also the people like that delivered newspapers down there. I know people that did that when the LTA was there. I mean, this is a military town. And again, that's all I can say is thank you very much for all the work you guys are doing. Thanks. Thank you, Pete. Madam City Clerk, any other requests to speak? None at this time, Mr. Mayor. Okay, going once, twice. All right, we'll move to the closed session report, Mr. City Attorney. The City Council took no report about action. Next, we're moving to regular business portion of the agenda. We have one item tonight, which is the development updates for former Marine Corps air station, Tustin property recipients otherwise known as the Tustin legacy development. This is a moment that has been a long time coming. Now the last time we had this meeting which we call the LRA meeting which the local reuse authority meeting was in 2021. It was virtual given the COVID restrictions at the time. And I don't recall when the one was previous to 2021. It was virtual given the COVID restrictions at the time. And I don't recall when the one was previous to 2021. But essentially for those of you that are here and don't know what's going on, I think most of you here to actually present to us, which thank you for being here. But those you watching are those that are here that are just sort of stumbling upon this event. This is an opportunity for the City Council acting in the federally designated local reuse authority for the base property and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the federal and the I think it's also going to do an introduction to us. Testing unified school district. We have a couple of community college districts out there. And so this is the opportunity for us to have some dialogue with our partners and say what's going on? What are you doing next? And how can we help you? I'm going to introduce now our city manager, although Schindler, who's online, to further introduce the item. And sorry if I stole any of your thunder there although. Not at all. Thank you, Mayor. Thank you for that introduction. It cues it up quite nicely. Council also thank you and good evening everybody. It's a pleasure to be here to provide a little background on this item and to welcome our development partners and community members to this event. As we all know, it's been a long time since the base closed with not too many public presentations on the various development projects overseen by the city and other partners. The local reese authorities just one of many hats the city wears. The local reese authorities a federal designation charged with leading the reuse planning effort and implementation of the former Reen Corpse bare-spatian test and no formal meeting of the local reese authority occurred from 2002 until February of 2021 when the city council decided to invite all of the development partners to a meeting to discuss their projects and progress. Although it is virtual, we believe the updates from the city and its partners were a great resource for the public and businesses or developers interested in coming to the testing legacy. A 2024 meeting of the local lease authority was requested by Mayor Pro Tem Gallagher and Council Member Gomez in late 2023, which was confirmed by the full council due to the benefits of the 2021 meeting. Staff is invited all of the entities that presented at the 2021 meeting to present this evening. Everyone accepted the invite to present their updates tonight, except for the county of Orange. The entities you will hear from this evening are public agencies and nonprofits that have land where they oversee specific types of development projects that correlate with the reuse plan and specific plan for the test and legacy. These presentations will touch on existing and future development on some of the remaining property at the test and legacy. These presentations will touch on existing and future development on some of the remaining property at the test and legacy. Following each presentation, the council may ask questions or clarify elements of the presentation. The public will be invited to comment at the conclusion of all presentations. The order of the presentation is will be the Orange County Rescue Mission, South Orange County Community College District, Rancho Santiago Community College District, testing the Unified School District with the last presentation being by City of Tustin Staff related to City property development updates. Once the city presentation is concluded, I will share a closing slide and look ahead to more public communication on development progress at the Tustin Legacy. I will then turn it back to the mayor for general council comments and public comment. With that, I'll hand this back to the mayor. Thank you, Mayor. Thank you all, though. I just to reiterate what all those just said, sort of the logistics here, we're gonna wait to do public comments until after all the presentations, that's important for the way this is agendas that we wait until I open public comment for for some of that feedback if you want to comment on anything. And I just want to also sort of underscore something that was said. This item was requested by Mayor Portem Gallagher and Council Member Gomez last year. The rest of the Council supported it. That's one action in this Council's effort to really become more transparent with our community to highlight what's going on on the base to elicit feedback from our dedicated community members like Mr. Bady here. There's a lot of things that the community wants to have happen out on the base. There's a lot of things that the city has to do under state and federal law. And this discussion is one part of that overall dialogue that we are introducing tonight. There will be follow-on meetings, there will be a dialogue, like I say, that we're opening a back and forth discussion with our community. So I think Mayor Pro Tem and Council Member for starting this, again, after 2021, three-year hiatus, but more to come. This is just one touch point in this discussion. So thank you. With that, I'm going to call the presenters in order, Mr. Brian Crane, Orange County Rescue Mission. Next is South Orange County Community College District. So you can be ready in 15 minutes or so, but. Nope. Three minutes. Three minutes. Thank you Mayor, thank you Mayor Pro Tem, Council Member, City Staff, residents. My name is Brian Crane. I'm the president of the Orange County Rescue Mission. Just gonna give a quick overview of what we've been doing on the property. As you may know, it was in 1996 that the OCRM was selected as a service provider for the Marine Base. We broke ground in 2002 and took six years to build the village of Hope, which was opened in 2008. Today, the village of Hope is a seven acre campus, which provides housing for up to 387 formerly homeless men, women and children. And over 3,139 people have transitioned to stable housing since graduating from the rescue mission program. We have an on-site cafeteria that accommodates 344 people, the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of and our 8,000 square foot warehouse receives donations of food, clothing, and household items. It was designated as a resource to receive donations on behalf of the county during several events, most recently during COVID-19 when we received donations that were designated for the county. Also on site, we have the Tusson Hurt Family Clinic, which to date has seen 25,000 patients with 223,000 encounters. And we are fully developed. Although if we had a need, it would be for next step housing for people that come out of our transitional programs. So an additional five acres could be developed by OCRM at our expense to provide formally homeless men, women and families with safe and affordable independent housing where the programmatic and community elements that help them reach self-sufficiency during the transitional phase are continued. And that's my contact information. You aren't kidding when you said three minutes. I told me to keep it quick. Thank you Mr. Crane. Do we have any questions that remind everybody that public comment will be after all the presentations but any questions from Council? I have one question first to comment though. Brian left out that he's also formed a pretty unique partnership with Mariners where they're coming in and really working side by side with the the house community there and I just thank you for doing that for Tess and legacy and creating it because it's open to anyone absolutely Yeah, that that has been a fruitful partnerships and Mariners, Mariners Church holds Services on Sunday mornings at 8 30 and 10 that is open to the public. I would encourage anyone to come It's also an opportunity to see what goes on at the rescue mission. And my question was, you mentioned next step housing. Yes. What is that? What would be the number of housing units that you'd be that would accommodate the graduating seniors each year? What would be the number you'd be looking for? Well, a minimum of 20, I would say. But this is the one need that our program has. Is that we operate alumni housing throughout the county, most notably. We also have a program called the Tusson Veterans Outpost, which is in Tusson 4 military veterans. But when people come out of our program after they're 18 to 24-month time, they are beginning a new life of self-sufficiency and having market rate housing nearby is hard to find. So we like to be able to provide housing where for the next two years they would be in a safe environment at a rate that they could afford as they progress towards self-sufficiency. Thank you. Yeah, come on. Thanks for the presentation, Brian. So the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the out of the program. I don't have those numbers in front of me. I know anecdotally, on the last survey, there were maybe two families that had moved out of state to Idaho and Utah. The rest were all in Orange County. Really? At the time. That's great to know. Yeah, thank you. That's my Michelle. Hey, Brian. All right. OC Rescue Mission is great. Again, it truly is a great mission. My daughter goes to Arnth Lutheran and she's part of the National Charity League. I think Councilwoman Littysha Clark's daughter is also participated in. It truly is a village of hope. When you look at 3200 lives touched, I've been to the graduation ceremonies, which are very heartfelt. And you look at the touch and legacy which we're talking about. We've got retail, we've got housing, we've got commercial, we've got entertainment. But it's so important at the center of this is heart in caring for others. And I think that's something that Tustin has always been focused on is, you know, it's important to generate revenue and to generate tax revenues to reinvest back into the city. But again, at the center of what Tustin does is community and it's hard and really appreciate what you guys do. One quick question I had is how long is the typical program? Like is it structured it's 24 months or it just really depends upon the type of care that needs to be delivered? It's we say it's typically 18 to 24 months it sort of depends on your situation coming into it everybody develops an individual treatment plan as they come in to determine one of the biggest factors in determining how long you will be there is every single adult student who comes through the program. If they don't have their high school diploma already, they get it while they're there. And the majority of them do it through TUSD and adult school. So that's a wonderful partnership, by the way. I think at the last adult high school graduation there were maybe 32 graduates and 16 of them were from the village so that's a fantastic partnership so the answer to your question is sometimes if you have to work a long time if you come in with almost no credits it's going to take you a little longer but that's kind of the difference between 18 and 20. Right and part of the graduation the program is actually job placement as well and I'm going to leave partner with a bunch of the local businesses. So again, I'm kind of a, kind of a, a sale for, for you guys is to, you know, again, if they're businesses out there that are looking to partner with the OSE Rescue Mission to try to help these wonderful people that have gotten their lives back on track to, to give them opportunities to work in the community. You know, please, please do so. So thank you. Brian, thank you for kicking us off those. Thank you. Very, very good. Appreciate it. Thank you. Before I call the next presenter up, that format, I'm sure you've all prepared to slice that you're going to present. But that format of telling us what you may need to enable your success out on the base is very critical for this council to hear, this local reuse authority here, so that we have context for when we're driving by your properties and seeing what's happening, what's not happening, we need to know what you need as well. So thank you. Next is Southampton County Community College District with the A-TEP site. Good evening Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Council Member, Staff, and guests. It's my pleasure to be here this evening. My name is Juliana Barnes, and I am the Chancellor of the South Orange County Community College District. So tonight we, you see the outline here, but what I'd like to say is that from the last time that we presented on Zoom, you'll see that there's been a lot of progress that has occurred at A-TEP and we're really excited to share that with you this evening. Just as a reminder, the South Orange County Community College District is comprised of two colleges, Saddleback College and Irvine Valley College, and of course, the Advanced Technology Education Park that are known as A-TEP. One thing that not everybody realizes is that we also offer classes at about 130 sites in our community. And you see the various areas served there. We are the largest of four community college districts here in Orange County encompassing about 382 square miles and serving over 1 million residents. And you see that we serve about 50,000 students each year. So we're really proud of that. So with me tonight we have our vice chance of business services, Amory, Gable and our wonderful director of facilities planning, Mary Ople, and they will share the rest of the slides tonight. All right, I'll go through these really quickly. Just to kind of reorient the audience and any of those who may be on the phone. The area that we're talking about is there circled in red, the blue area in neighborhood A. And then here kind of zooming in a little bit more. This is the area that we have. So we currently have an agreement with the city for just over 60 acres. The differentiation between what we call fee land, which is the light blue, that's the land that has been cleared by the navy and has been deeded over to the district. The other area that's a darker shade of blue, 31.3 acres, that's what we call the life-hoc area. So that's lease and furtherance of conveyance. And the differentiation is that life-ock area has not been found suitable by the Navy in order to turn the land over. So that's what that fast is. And that here's a little bit of a fast timeline that we're looking at. We were hoping that the final fast would be issued in 2018, but unfortunately there were some additional chemicals that were found in the area. So I'm just going to say PFAS. So I am not going to try to pronounce that myself. But now the Navy needs to remediate the water for the PFAS that they have and they're still remediating the TCP123. So at this time we don't know when the additional acres or the life-hack area will be turned over to the district. It does pose some challenges that I'll go over a little bit later in the presentation. So with the city we have what we call a development agreement. that development agreement was revised kind of in 2013 and It gives our district the ability to Develop the land the entire 60 acres But with that we have a requirement that 51% of what we develop is for educational use and 49% is for non-educational use. You can see there that we have phased how much educational versus non-educational use to where we were able to up front more non-educational in the early stages of development and then later when we get to that point it'll basically be a 50-50 but overall we are targeting a 51-49 percent development. Here are the categories and the land use restrictions that we are following. This comes from the city specific plan. You guys I'm'm sure, are familiar with that. So anytime we're looking for non-educational, we're following everything there on the right side of the screen, we're allowed uses. Anything that comes to us that doesn't meet one of those categories, we tell them that it doesn't follow the specific plan. And so we can't entertain any bids for future development with that. As far as develop part property, I'm going to turn it over to Mary. She's going to cover this area. We actually started our first phase of demolition and demolished the existing buildings that were on the land that we owned in fee so approximately 35 buildings. Then our first phase of new construction was in 2018 where we did infrastructure on the entirety of our fee land as well as the portion of the life box so that we could create both utilities and traffic streets for our future development. Moving forward we also created design guidelines both for our developments as well as any of our private partners that we were going to have on that. They were really in line with test and legacy so we had a seamless integration within that entire area. In 2018, we also finished our first educational facility, which was about 33,000 square feet. It's our idea building, integrated design, engineering and automation. It really caters to career technical education programs. From there, we moved on to our monument and wavefinding signage to basically put out give us a president's in test and legacy so you'll see our signs out there so then since our last update what we've been working on is we worked with the city of test and that we went ahead and moved forward with demolition of whatever remaining buildings were out there on the life of land. So even though we don't own that land, we did do the demolition to grade so that we could at least clean up the site and make it safe for all of us. Our first tenant onsite was the Goddard school. So that is a private preschool approximately 15,000 square feet that was completed in May. They got their state licensing and were able to open in July of this year. So currently we're building what's called Savabak at A-TEP. It's about 50,000 square feet. It's a single building, but it's got two hubs. One is culinary, and the other is auto-tack, which is demo repair transportation logistics. So we are excited to have that program open in July next summer. So that will be starting classes there. And our other private partner that we have now is Advantage. So if you drive down Red Hill at Victory, you'll see the construction fences have gone up. So we're very excited for them to start construction this fall and complete sometime in 2025. Okay, so with the development agreement, this kind of gives you an update of where we are square footage. So you can see there in green is the square footage that we have currently completed and how much we have available for non-commercial. So we're at completion of 64,533 square feet and that has opened up 250,000 square feet of non-commercial. We are maxed out right now. So the rest of the development that we're trying to do related to the fee land is educational because of that constraints that we have there with the development agreement. So what does that mean for us? with the development agreement. So what does that mean for us? So what we've done here is just kind of shown what is highlighted in blue are the three parcels that we have that have not been leased out. I will say parcel number three is our parking lot for our two buildings. So even though that's available, it's Feline, it's probably would be the last thing that we would lease out because if we lease that out that means that we have to build a new parking lot and we you know spend a significant amount of money on building that parking lot for our two buildings that we have there. So really we have six and a half acres that's what's in blue number one. And then number two is about 2.6 acres. And those are the two main parcels that we are focused on at this point in time. Some of our challenges with developing the property, first and foremost is the life hot piece has been extremely challenging. We can't find any tenants that want to be a sub lease to a sub lease or to a sub lease. You know, so we, the Navy owns the property. You guys have it from the Navy. We lease it from you. And then if we lease it, there would be another lease that comes in. So from a financing perspective and from any other, you know, potential perspective tenants, that is extremely difficult. We can't, we haven't successfully been able to find anybody that wants to lease the land and be the third sub-leaser on that area. So that's why we focused on all the fee land. And I would say the other aspect of what we're finding is when we originally went into the development agreement, you know, colleges were growing leaps and bounds, the pandemic had not hit and the shift to online education really hadn't occurred. Now moving forward to today, many colleges are moving more towards an online education, so they don't need the brick and mortar schools that they once did. So in order to try to find those educational tenants has really been a challenge for us and trying to maintain the partnership with testing unit fights coal district as well. So we're kind of balancing all of that to where we are abiding by the spirit and the needs and the agreements with the city of testing related to our development agreement and the agreements with the City of Tustin, related to our development agreement and the city's specific plan, and the needs of the Tustin unified as well as for our district. So that's a little bit of the challenges that we're facing. You had asked us to address some of the things that would help us. One of the things that would help us is if we could maybe look at that percentage of that 5149 and see if there's something that we could do to shift that percentage for us for those two pieces, well two to three pieces of parcels that we have in Finland right now. So with that, I think I'll open it up to questions. Thank you for that. Thank you. Stay with it in 15 minutes. I thought there was more of you than one when you started. There you are. Thank you very much. Couple of questions, a couple of comments, you all start off and then pass it off to my council colleague. So first I wanna thank you for your presence out there. Since the last meeting we held in 2021 there has been a lot of visible progress on another community is very thankful. You see it happening, you see the demolition, you see the buildings going up, and also the idea of building in the partnership with IVC and legacy magnet in the academy is really just a value add out there. So thank you for that. What I'm hearing you loud and clear on the expedite conveyance to sort of clear some of that life rock restriction and then also the education versus non-educational balance and metrics and the agreement. Just a question for you because we as a city we hear all the time from educational uses that are looking for homes whether it be charter schools or other public schools are looking to relocate and they come to the city and we don't have necessarily the zoning for that but the educational use requirement under your agreement does have zoning and applicability there. So how should we go about as a, from a partnership standpoint, you know, presenting those as a process in place that the college district has, embedding proposals, I just want to get a little bit of insight as to how you're doing things out there. Yeah, definitely. We have brokers that we're working with. So anybody who's interested, you know, you can send them our way, but then we would send them to the brokers. And we do have, you know, a full vetting to where we're looking at their usage, what's the square footage, you know, because that's the other thing is the development agreement is based upon the square footage. And so, you know, if you're, if you have a, you know, sporting facility that's primarily related to education, but it's all outside, you know, let's just say tennis courts, for example. That's not a building. And so the way it is right now, we currently wouldn't get square footage for that. So that's a little bit of a a hindrance force as well but we fully look at we look at finances of the tenants to make sure they're going to be able and long-term to be good tenants we look at the partnerships and really the partnerships with our district because any tenant that comes in, we have what we call educational matrix to where we require them to either provide internships for our students or work study for our students or scholarships to our students. So that way our students are benefiting from any tenant that goes out there. It could be if it's a higher education institution, then it's, you know, you kind of look at would they get guaranteed admission into, you know, that next step or something like that. So all of that kind of goes into it. And then it's really does it make economic and I would say economic sense for the district to do it and would it be a good partner moving forward for the district to where it doesn't harm any of our other relationships that we have within this city of testing. Okay. From our perspective, I think speaking for myself, I think the council would agree with me. Our goal is to get the legacy project developed. And so if there are ways that we can pull levers within the development agreement to relax requirements that will get us where we want to go, we definitely want to hear that. So thank you for sharing that. And I also think within the construct the 51.49 educational, non-educational understanding that educational uses will unlock the non-educational uses and allow you to develop more. I think our priority, my priority is to see the district that fully any opportunities for educational uses out there that will then unlock that land in the future. So I'm looking forward to working with you guys on that. I'll open up to council any comments, questions? Council Member Gomez? I would say that there is probably some discussion that can be had. You mentioned something like tennis courts. If you have tennis classes, that's an instructional use. If there's other outdoor spaces that are being used for classroom meetings, or if you have a garden out there and you're teaching horticulture or something, those obviously would be something that we would consider as, at least from my perspective, that those would be considered academic uses and that could be helpful in your square footage. So I think that there's probably some discussion that we might be able to have that we can see what we can work out on some of those spaces. As a former community college dean, I appreciate where you're coming from, and I think that there's some room that we can make some adjustments. So, yeah. Thank you. That's from Clark. Thanks for the presentation. I'm wondering if you back to the presentation. I'm going to go back to the presentation. I'm going to go back to the presentation. I'm going to go back to the presentation. I'm going to go back to the presentation. I'm going to go back to the presentation. I'm going to go back to the presentation. I'm going to go back to the presentation. I'm going to go back to the presentation. I guess that corner there and I've received a lot of positive feedback because folks just didn't know what was you know going on in that area of town so I think it just it looks great at night and it's very prominent during the day so I just wanted to highlight that and the cost is significant. So now you know everyone who's tuning in they know that this is the A-TEP site and you can see from the signage and now you know what everyone who's tuning in, they know that this is the A-TEP site, and you can see from the signage, and now you know what they do. I visited the Goddard School's beautiful, really just state of the art, and I know they're still enrolling students, but I actually took a tour to see if I could enroll on my sign, but a beautiful site. And I think there's a tone that's being set on the the campus in terms of very high quality Even you know the partners outside of the educational realm that You all want high quality facilities at at and that's demonstrative through What God or did and I know advantage is you know going to follow suit So I'm just wanted to say that and then just one more thing Mr. Mayor In 2021 the tone was very much we were trying to prove something you know, going to follow suit. So I just wanted to say that. And then just one more thing, Mr. Mayor, in 2021, the tone was very much we were trying to prove something, you know, in a way that our partners could develop in spite of challenges and barriers. But this just has such a different tone. It's more celebratory. And so I want to thank you all again for bringing this because we're able to kind of brag to the community. All that's being done from our partners on this site. And so it just has a different tone. It was very heavy in 2021. It feels lighter. And I do appreciate the portion where they're asking now, how do we continue on the progress? And then one last thing, sorry, Brian, is there a way maybe that the district can partner with you all in terms of offering courses to your attend residents to go beyond the high school diploma but maybe taking some college courses and getting some credit. Okay, great. All right, thank you. Thank you. Mayor Perchand. All right. I thought you were going where I was about to head, but I think you gave me a perfect segue. I noticed you said five acres for 20 units and your site one is 6.5 acres directly adjacent to Orange County OC Rescue Mission. So maybe they could build the units and then they can go to college and it will be student housing. I did see student housing as an approved use I think, right? Correct. Okay. So anyways, I guess before I jumped into that because I saw that perfect bridge, but I did want to agree that I do remember our last LRI meeting and it was much different and we were not pounding the tables, but we wanted to kind of light a fire. And I do appreciate your group responding to the call because I have seen the progress and I know you guys are out there working. So I do appreciate that. I have a question. So the life, this is an issue that not only are you facing, but we're facing on City Land. And I guess my question would be if that could be cleared in an expedited fashion or we could get some type of commitment or date do you believe that that would allow you to move quicker do you think that there are opportunities that are being foregone because of that absolutely okay I've questioned the PFAS and I think it would be helpful to have staff come back and try to explain that more because we have PFAS everywhere in Orange County and as long as you're not drinking the water directly from underneath there, I can't quite understand why that is a hold up and I just hope that it's not stuck on someone's desk and there couldn't be some pressure we could apply because it would help you and it would help us and move things quicker. So those were the two points. My final one was, so I've also, I think the mayor sort of, or at least that reminded me of this, is that I've heard from charter schools and private schools that are interested. And I've always directed them to your site because of the educational requirement. And it sounded like from your process that it is, you know, we check these boxes and if we can meet this criteria and the economics makes sense, it move forward. But you made a comment at the end as long as it's not in conflict with your partners. And I guess I'm trying to understand, is it a very transparent process where those entities can move forward or what does that look like? So it's, that may have been too strong of a wording, but it's when you're going into a long-term agreement with somebody, and these are 75 to 99 year agreements that we're trying to do, we're looking to do. We're looking at everything. And so what's in the best interest of the district? And how does any particular tenant going to impact the district's instructional programs and services? So you know, when I said in conflict with our other partners, it really is looking at is it going to negatively impact the instructional programs and services that we already have in place? And that is something that I think we have to look at very closely as well as the economic piece. You know, we have a lot of people coming in and it's like it's a deal breaker unless we can you know buy the land. Well, you know, we're not for a little 2.6 point acre that's right in the middle of our entire development, we're not going to sell the land. So that's a deal breaker from, you know, from our aspect. So it really just depends on what the economics are, what the financial outlook for the entity is and how well it integrates with our instructional programs and services. So I'll just close my comments with saying I appreciate you coming and being and sharing all this with us but also telling us how we can help you. I would say I think I would encourage the district to look into these educational opportunities. That is why we set this up. That's why it was built in the specific plan to unwind that is difficult. I would really encourage I think a charter school or private school is in line with that. But also it serves our community. We have thousands of units per the state that we need to develop in the test and legacy. And these people, it's a diverse group that needs different offerings. And I think there is an opportunity there. So I really like us to run that to ground before we start really expanding that too much into non-educational. Thank you. Anything further? After the OSE Rescue Mission that was a little bit more of a grilling. Hopefully you took it and good spirits. You know this really is us. This is the first opportunity we have as a council on many years to ask you some tough questions and to get you know answers directly from our partners out there. So hopefully that's coming across. So we are interested in moving things forward. So thank you. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Next, we have Rancho Santiago Community College District. Hello, good evening. Thank you for inviting me here today to speak on behalf of Rancho Santiago Community College District. My name is Tay Kim. I'm a director of facility planning and construction for the district. So our property on 15991 Armstrong currently houses the Orange County Sheriff's Regional Training Academy. It started way back in 1959 through various partnerships to date. It's graduated over 5,000 candidates and at the current site itself it has graduated over, I have an update on this, 3200 graduates today. And it served over 62 different public agencies or law enforcement agencies throughout its 24 years of service. The building was constructed in 20, I mean, yeah, 2005 and was completed in September of 2007. Little background on the property, similar to the other public agencies, it was acquired through a deal with the testing base. There's 15 acres that we acquired in 2003. It's supposed to be used for educational purposes. This is the original concept that was presented back in 2003. It included the Sheriff's Training Academy to the South portion of this diagram. And also a phase two which included a public safety institute to the north of this diagram. This is the current site as you can see about 80% has been developed and about 3.25 acres remain undeveloped. So since 2021, the district has initiated a feasibility study to determine the best build out of the remaining portion of the undeveloped area. We're looking at programs such as fire technology, academy training, space for the middle test preparation, physical agility, Fitness and Skills Assessment, Wellness Facilities, Instructional Classrooms, and Labs, and other programs that could potentially fit within that 20,000 square foot public safety institute building. Now, we're in the midst of this feasibility study, and in what we're finding out is that in order to do a full blown fire academy, we would need about seven to eight acres in totality. Right now we have one of about three and a quarter acres and there's some challenges associated with that as well. Obviously within high density residential development area, you would not include a burn tower, right? So those are services that you would have to locate somewhere else within the county as well. And the district continues to look for additional funding sources and partnerships. And we are on the ballot for a general obligation bond as well. So depending on how everything goes, the Board of Trustees will have to make a determination on what needs are the most pressing for the district, right? And come up with a priority list in terms of what facilities needs need to be addressed. And that concludes my presentation. I think that was only two minutes, not three. Thank you, Mr. Kim. Brevady is great. So it sounds like just summarizing what I heard, the obstacles facing Santiago Community College District are more what do we want to do here, not restrictions on the land or obstacles as far as you know how the property currently sits with what owner it's. You have it, you're just trying to figure out what you want to do with it. So that's correct. Correct. To figure out what program should go within that 20, fit within that 20,000 square foot building. Yeah. And then there are some limitations on land as well, right? So if a full fire academy worked to be studied at near this location, it would require additional land. Sure. And I just on my own regard, I wanna thank you for the Sheriff's Regional Training Academy. Great partnership, testing PD officers go through it. I'm a graduate, 22 Romo. So it's always fun to see the recruits, I'll run around the base and thank you for what you're doing to keep our community safe. Open up for further comments. Anybody want to, council member Snow? So other restrictions, only to public safety, safety like training or it can be open up to other things outside of that. I think it's open to administrative and classroom educational use is what we're allowed to develop on that site. Is that that answer your question? Yeah, no it does. No, thank you. Further questions, comments? Here, Pro Tem. Maybe. No, thank you. Further questions, comments? I'll try to. Maybe I need catch it. What was the schedule for the feasibility study when you think that'll be wrapped up? It's it should be wrapped up by the end of this year. Okay. We're actually doing a Depending on the various option a total cost of ownership analysis so that we can understand the financial aspect of the different Options that we're exploring. Okay, thank you. Any additional questions, comments? All right, thank you for your presentation. Appreciate it. Thank you. Next, we have the Test and Unified School District. I'm going to go to the next floor. Good evening. Mayor Lumbard, members of the city council. My name is Harold Solens. I'm the chief financial officer for testing unit flight school district. I'm joined this evening by our director of facilities, Mr. Tom Razzuti. I'm pleased to be with you this evening to update you on the land uses on our properties located in the testing legacy area. So as part of the land conveyance testing unified has four properties one that was designated for the construction of a K five elementary school and the other campus serving a six 12 grade students for the legacy properties. The two schools in the legacy area are two of our most districts most sought after schools. Both are in high demand and attendance from the outside boundary is facilitated through our district's transfer process. We have two remaining undeveloped parcels, including a life lock which was discussed earlier, equally approximately nine acres to accommodate future district development, which will review later in the presentation. So Heritage Elementary was constructed on a 10 acre site back in 2011 to serve grades levels K through 5. Now with recent legislation, we're at at a grade level with transitional kindergarten. This site includes the administrative spaces, library, multi-purpose room, as well as outdoor areas. Since it's open, the site enrollment has continued to grow steadily and currently serves approximately 579 students up from 528 students just a year ago. Along with capacity demands related to increased enrollment, the demand for specialized spaces has increased based on changes in state legislation, including the expanded role that schools play as the center of our community. So the mission of heritage is shown on this slide without going into a lot of detail. a detail, essentially heritage emphasizes producing students for a good citizens and who learn leadership characteristics through collaborative activities and opportunities that we provide. Heritage was designed to provide project-based learning opportunities focused on STEM or STEAM, science, technology, engineering, arts, and music. In addition to the classroom, the program is sponsored on the campus's innovation lab. We also offer pull-out music opportunities and annual musical productions that occur in our multi-purpose room. And so with that, I'm gonna turn it over to Mr. Resudy. He'll talk about legacy. Good evening. I had the pleasure of talking about legacy-magnet academy, which is the facility that I think was especially since our 2021 presentation. We've seen a lot of growth at both facility-wise and just as a campus culture itself. So just some quick details about legacy developed on an approximately 32 acre property and was completed in 2020. Welcome to our first cohort of students in grade 6 through 9. In the fall of 2023, we finished, completed our gymnasium and CTE career technical education building. The gym is pictured on this slide and it provides our students with expanded spaces for recreation and physical activity. In addition, the space provides state-of-the-art learning spaces that move forward the school's magnet focus, which is tied, standing for technology, innovation, design, and entrepreneurship. And our legacy-magnet academy students continue to distinguish themselves in areas such as business enterprise competitions and robotics competitions nationwide. This past May, we actually celebrated our first graduating class, our class of 2024. So we're very excited about that. Again, there's a slide with the legacy-magnet academy mission. If I'm just doing a quick summary of it, it's in summary to produce both college and career ready individuals through unique and innovative educational structure. And just some more details showing that our current square footage is 79,817 square feet. And the school is master plan for $118,000. We currently have 27 classrooms as well as the additional spaces that you see there. And I just wanted to point out on this slide you can see one of the center pieces of legacy Magnet Academy which is our outdoor amphitheater that we're very proud of. This space doubles both for artistic performance space and also space for aspiring entrepreneurs to present their products and ideas. And I wanted to note the large video wall that you can see there. It's really cool. And if I can give a quick plug, I just wanted to remind the council that the Tuskton Public Schools Foundation will be hosting our district celebration of schools at this space on September 25th, 2024. The evening will be highlighted by the presentation by our superintendent, Dr. Mark Johnson. On behalf of the district, we would love to see all of you there. And then just a little bit on our program. Much like heritage, the enrollment has continued to grow. Through our tide program, much like Heritage, the enrollment has continued to grow through our tied program, both through additional grade levels that were added and then increased demand district wide. From 2023-24 to now, the enrollment has grown from 905 and this year it's well over 9.50. We do have plans for a second 24 classroom building. The planning for that is dependent upon a combination of both the student demand but also probably more importantly the financial resources to be able to build that building. And then just wanted to move on to a couple of ongoing challenges. And I think this is the portion where we talk about some areas where we can work together. I think obviously the best meet the needs of our students. We continue to be challenged with providing all the additional support spaces that are required. We talked about how we have special room know, we have special, you know, room set aside now for wraparound programs and things like that. And then as we explore our future development plans and as the testing legacy area continues to grow, one area we'd like to, you know, work with the city on is making sure that we're evaluating safe routes to schools. You know, we have a, we have a bit of a barrier with Test and Ranch Road and want to make sure that we're working with the city on getting our students to school as safely as possible. And just wanted to touch on the hangar fire as an example of a major event that was unforeseen that we all had to respond to. The district believes that through our partnership with the city, the response was very successful. But, you know, also, they're, you know, they're continuing unknowns about that, about the response to that. I know we got an update tonight, which was, which was very encouraging, but as, you know, we, we deal with the disposition of what remains of the hangars. You know, we, it creates questions for us about how we may need to react in the future. And then the last item in terms of challenges is when we look at future development, and we know in working with city staff that there are some potential plans for increasing the density and the number of dwelling units in the legacy specific plan area. And as those plans materialize and move forward, we definitely look forward to the opportunity to work with the city so that we can work together to help us get the additional resources that we would need to have our schools meet that challenge. And with that, I'm gonna turn things back over to Mr. Sellins. Okay. So as it relates to the undeveloped parcel, so undeveloped parcel one, this is approximately just under 7.7 acres. And we're currently evaluating our options for the largest of the two remaining parcels. This being that one. And so this includes the viability of a district education center on that property. Other plans for the futures, however, they materialize may in fact our plans for how this. This parcel is developed in the future. But we do anticipate having a plan for this parcel within the next 12 months. And so similarly, there's no current plan in place for the parcel located in the life-ock area. As discussed earlier, with some of our partners and the challenges they face with moving towards conveyance until we sort of have some certainty around that matter planning will not sort of move forward. And then once the point that we do reach conveyance will incorporate that smaller parcel into our plans going forward. And so before I ask for questions, I just want to say on behalf of the district, we really appreciate the partnership with the city. We know that the city and the schools are the driving forces behind good living, good businesses in the community, and we really appreciate the support of the city in our endeavors. So thank you. Thank you both for your presentation. I do have a couple questions. So I think the last slide or the second last slide talked about the undeveloped parcels. I recall and I may be my memory may be fuzzy, but the district at once upon a time was planning on moving its administrative offices to that site. Has that changed? Not entirely. So we're exploring that. I think we're we have greater momentum in the exploration of that. So I think that is the intention currently, the facility that the district is located in Oldtown Tustin. We have some structural issues in that building and so we are going to need to come up with a solution pretty shortly. Okay, so that's part of this next 12 month process. Correct, absolutely. Absolutely. I have two children at Heritage Elementary, I have two at LMA. So these schools are very personal to me. If I keep having children, we're probably going to be bursting at the scenes of those schools. It's another issue. So Heritage is already over enrolled as far as I can tell. And as we build out the legacy, I think it's very apparent to me and the community that we're probably going to need another elementary school at some point. Are you aware, can you share any discussions that have been long term planning for facility needs for elementary school specifically? Yeah, great question. So one of the things that we're engaged in is in 2019 we had a facilities master plan that was completed as such as we move forward with some of the new changes in legislation adding grade levels with universal decay. We are in the process of updating that facility's master plan which will look at our enrollment projections in all areas of the district and so that will sort of provide the roadmap for additional facilities that may be needed to support that growth. Okay, and in the same vein, I know there's some funding obstacles for the second portion of LMA. Correct. I think that building is going to be bursting out. It seems pretty soon too. So, I wanted to underscore the partnership that the school district and the city have really collaborated on building the last few years, and I wasn't always that way. I think this council is a big part of that as well as the school board. So if there are things that you all need in order to move progress forward on the base, let us know. Please, especially on the facilities master plan. If the opportunity couldn't be better, the timing couldn't be better right now. If the school district's thinking about building another elementary school That's the sort of planning that we're doing out there and building our community so we can you know collaborate and just don't be shy Obviously I know there's discussions that happened at the staff level that wanted to hear that from from me And then on the safe routes to school issue test and ranch road I understand that's an issue Did you want to share for anybody else that's listening the city is prioritizing moving forward in our pedestrian bridges There's one plan for testess and Ranch Road at Moffitt. Still two. Well, who's in charge of that from the staff? Well, maybe a year or two, I know it's probably more than that. But we understand the issue. In fact, you know, the city reached out to the school districts on crossing guard measures on Valencia. And you know, our expectation is that we continue that dialogue and find collaborative is that we continue that dialogue and find collaborative solutions where we can partner on safety. The students are constituents, your constituents, the same community, same people. Absolutely. They're looking forward to that. All right, I'll hold off until later, perhaps any other comments? Councilor Montgomery? You mentioned on one slide that there was a need for support space to expand. Can you elaborate a little bit on that? So support spaces as Mr. Rizzi mentioned, those are typically wraparound services as we sort of moved away from the COVID pandemic. Our students returned to us with some greater needs in those areas. And so when we think about the spaces to provide those services, typically what you'll find districts doing is taking a classroom and converting that to provide wraparound services, but depending on sort of the nature of those services, confidentiality, privacy, those type of things. And so we need to really look at creating spaces that are more conducive to providing those support services. And unfortunately, when you look at a campus like Heritage to add some additional spaces, you're taking up outdoor spaces. And so you're really sort of impacting that side and sort of creating congestion on that side and taking away some of those areas. So those are some of the spaces, some of the other ones, the expanded learning opportunities programs and those are funds that we received to expand before and after school opportunities. So those themselves require some additional spaces as well. And so those are the type of additional support spaces that we're talking about on our campuses. Well, it sounds more like a community school's effort. It's what you're talking about. Very absolutely. Secondly, is enrollment increasing or decreasing? So we are declining enrollment district, however, when you look at this particular area, there's a demand for these schools. And so that's why you see the impact on capacity. In other areas of the district you are seeing a decline however you're not seeing as great a decline as you see in some of our neighboring districts because they're still developing happening in our city you know pretty significantly we have because we share a border and students within our district from Irvine, Orange, Santa Ana as well as Tustin. We're drying from a lot of areas. So when Santa Ana creates apartment complexes for low income families, those are some of those are students that come to us. So it creates additional impacts to some of our sites that were built in the 60s that were not necessarily Developed for you know a particular size of population of students And so we're out to to re-examine even some of our older spaces Even though we are experiencing decline. Okay, so you're accepting transfers from other districts Is what you're saying no no So we do accept transfers for other districts because that's one way that school districts offset declining enrollment. So when we have families that want to come to our district and we have capacity to do that. But what I was talking about is, and I'll use, there's an apartment complex called First Point, and it's located in Santa Ana. Well, those students are zoned for testing unified and so those are students that go to S-Toc Elementary and CT and so you know those bring in additional students but those students come with additional needs as well and so we have to sort of re-examine those school sites and make sure that we're providing the supports and services for that new population. Okay. Thank you. Yeah, absolutely. That's my wish. No, the name clerk. Great. Thank you, the partnership. I appreciate it. I've got, you know, two daughters. They went to Pioneer. Actually, my, my youngest is graduated from Pioneer and, and then PCE. So great experience for both my kids and school district. Quick question. I was taking a look. So you've got 8,000 square feet of school that's actually being utilized at the legacy magnet and you're looking to grow about 120,000 square feet. How many more students can you accommodate before you're kind of busting at the scene? So if you've got 905 students, I'm assuming another 300 or 400 until your maximum capacity. Yeah, great question. So yeah, I'd say probably another two to 300. We may be able to, but again, it obviously impacts the space. And when you look at the educational model of legacy and the type of experiential work, I mean, the more sort of dense those classes get, the more challenging it becomes to facilitate those programs. Can you explain how long, how much run, what do you think you have into actually hit maximum capacity at this school? Well, part of it is we look at, and we sort of control, because as you sort of build, the, as you look at enrollment from the time the site was built, we didn't have a full school, we didn't offer all grade levels. And so we're now that we've had our first graduating class, we're sort of approaching that capacity. Fortunately for us, that second classroom building that Mr. Resudy spoke for, that's already sort of gone through the plan and design phases and has already been approved. So that is essentially what we would call a shovel ready project. We would just, again, as we look at available resources and sort of going back to the facilities master plan, sort of the needs going forward, then that would be sort of the triggers that would have us move forward with that. And the last question is as far as modeling for future facilities. I mean, we're going to be building out the test and legacy and adding 5, 6,000 new homes. Do you have a rough idea of how many schools, both high schools and elementary schools that you would need to actually add to actually service and support those new students and families? So great question. So we don't have that at this point. And the reason being is if you have 6000 new homes built, there's a student generation rate for each of those homes and they don't all generate sort of students, particularly, you know, the challenge we have sort of in the Orange County area is new homes don't necessarily mean, you know, dual income with kids, usually it's dual income, no kids. And so those homes don't necessarily mean you know dual income with kids usually it's dual income no kids and so those homes don't actually or those homes don't necessarily guarantee students will be generated from there so that's something as we go through the planning and our enrollment projection process will help to define further but part of that is partnership with the city, getting the information in terms of the plans for development that are going to occur so that we can update our projections to accurately reflect what we anticipate and then what our facilities need will be to support that. Thank you. Yeah. Elisabeth Clark. Thank you. One to say congrats on your first graduating class. I know a lot of us were anticipating that when we first toward the space. And do you know how large the class was? It was less than 100. I do. I knew that question was coming. Oh, OK. It was a small graduating class. The first class was 75 students. OK. OK. Wonderful. LMA students, they take college courses, community college courses? I do not believe LMA is dual enrollment Beckman does offer dual enrollment. I thought LMA. Olmaid Higgs, I.M.C. classes. Oh, I do think I'm okay. I can't correct. So is a partnership with Irvine Valley College and I'm thinking shared use for classroom spaces. If some of the students are already taking courses with I.V.C. maybe it might free up a little space of partnering. I mean, IBC is right around the corner. Absolutely, and I will say the community college districts are being great partners, and so I think that's a great point for us to collaborate on. Great, thank you for the progress report. It's wonderful. It wrote down. All right, thank youell. All right. Thank you for the presentation tonight. There definitely needs to be a partnership, a continued partnership going forward, certainly understanding what the needs are for future schools. I'm very concerned looking at the numbers and I know this has changed fairly quickly with Rina and state requirements. That number has shot up as far as what that future looks like. And I understand it's very difficult to see what is the timing of that. But I hope that we can work together and try to put some plan to paper because right now we're working through an economic model. And I haven't seen any land allocated for a new future school. But from what I can see or hearing tonight, this certainly seems like the probability is higher than it is low that it needs to happen. So hopefully that's something we can work through over the next year or so. You mentioned safe routes. I know, I live in Greenwood very close to LMA, and I know a lot of the community members have talked about being able to access directly across Moffitt on Tusson Ranch Road. And you spoke of safe routes and that's what I thought up because right now they have to go, you cross Tusson Ranch no matter what, but instead of going all the way down to Valencia, you could cross. That would require the city to open up that gate and the street that is already paved and ready to go. I guess is that, could that be rolled into a safe routes program to be able to open that up and allow those communities, including levity and green wood and Anton and Amalphie and all these others to come in that route? Yeah, so that actually has been something I think that is sort of in the initial exploration. And obviously with any sort of changes you have to look at, but the impact are you may solve one problem by opening it up, but you could create traffic and congestion issues in that moth of the area. That could pose a risk to say for us to school as well. So that is a conversation that we've begun with the city to explore what are some opportunities. Well, I'd like to convey on behalf of the community in that area, they would love to see that. And I'm, they think that it would be safer for their children. And I know our public work's director has committed, he'll get the gates open tomorrow if we need so. And then I'm curious, the way I understood Heritage and LMA is that it's the home school if you live at Tussle Legacy, that's what the Meloroo for and then it's a lottery for any spots available. So right now, roughly, what is the percentage of those schools of Tustin Legacy Residence versus Non-Tustin Residence? Legacy residents. Great question. So we don't have that data yet. That is data that I did request tab. So as soon as we receive that data, because it's gonna be new and different because we just started the school year. As soon as we will pass out along to the city staff. Okay. Yeah, because I think that's certainly, you may be at capacity now, but as legacy grows, maybe that percentage changes. And so we may not have to necessarily, this may not be an emergency. Correct. If the percentages are favorable. Correct. And I will add to that, that, you know, as you see with the successive year, you see we do know that the non-sort of legacy area residents that attend those schools, those populations do diminish because the demand becomes greater for the local area. Right. Okay. I think that was it for me. Thank you. Just one follow-up to that question. I think what you're saying me. Thank you. Just one follow up to that question. I think what you're saying makes sense. But as the outside area student population diminishes because the close to the proximate areas are increasing, you sort of lose that whole magnet academy vibe, right, is then just the neighborhood school. So I think that's something that we are cognizant of as a city, too, that if that's the program for that school We might need to again talk about other countries as well. Okay. Thank you. Thank you Thank you. You have a lot of information looking forward to those numbers of course, but thank you for answering all of our questions Appreciate it. Thank you All right next Last but certainly not least because we can really badger you guys is the city of Tusson. Thank you Mayor Lombard, Mayor Pro Tem Gallagher, members of the City Council. Acting as the LRA, it's my pleasure to be here before you this evening to share updates on projects at Tusson Legacy within the city's economic development conveyance. My name is Ryan Swantak, Acting Deputy Director of Economic Development. So the first project before you this evening here, this is the Landing at Tustin Legacy. It's located within neighborhood D South. You can see it denoted in the purple down there. This has been a great partnership with Brookfield Homes and it's been very successful and actually achieved full build out just a couple weeks ago. So we're very excited. It's a very walkable community with a small block design. This is the first development within neighborhood D South and it's comprised of about 404 sale homes with three different products So you have a mix of single-family detached homes town homes as well as flats Which offer a number of opportunities for buyer profiles as well as entry-level Opportunities with one and two bedroom units there. So it's been very successful and the city also has a profit participation agreement with the developer, which one's final accounting is accomplished. We could see additional land sale proceeds to the city as well. The next project is very exciting for I can already see the council, the residents, city staff as well. This is always a winner. I might finish on this slide. This is bark barracks. It's the dog park at Tuston Legacy. Everyone was there for the groundbreaking all council members. It was a fantastic time. That just occurred July 25th here. We anticipate opening that park in the first quarter of 2025. So very exciting for the community. It'll also contain an area for large dog parks. Large dogs, excuse me, as well as small dogs. So we're very excited that is located within the existing first phase of the Tustin Lengacy Park. So that's repurposing an existing asset of the city to get more value out of that. Another active project here in neighborhood D South is really the final infrastructure to complete this community and this neighborhood down here. Another active project here in neighborhood D South is really the final infrastructure to complete this community and this neighborhood down here. This consists of grading utilities in terms of wet utilities as well as dry utilities and the installation of the final roadways there. This one lock parcels as well as open space opportunities. You'll see the continuation of in the area that we'll discuss. The first project that this will unlock parcels as well as open space opportunities. You'll see the continuation of testing legacy park as we go through these slides as well as two private property development parcels that we'll be looking at in some of the features within this open space. We're anticipating completion of of these projects in the area that we'll discuss. The first project that this one lock is a senior congregate care facility, which is certainly needed within the community. The developer is Confluent and the operator will be Morningstar. They have other facilities within Orange County. This is approximately six acres and you're going to have about 264 units with a mix of the continuum of care for independent living assisted living as well as memory care and Currently negotiations are ongoing. We would anticipate wrapping those up here By the first quarter of 2025 as well as all the entitlements and you can see renderings here of the building You do have a multi-story building there, and then you also have on the perimeter cottage units, which offer a different living experience for the independent living there. The next active project is a city project with the Armstrong Avenue pedestrian bridge. And if you've been out to test and legacy on Armstrong Avenue, you may have noticed the mounds out there. Those may take up to a year to settle. So as soon as those search are charged, to test and legacy on Armstrong Avenue. You may have noticed the the mounds out there. Those may take up to a year to settle. So as soon as those search are charged, then we will get out there with construction of those bridges. And that will also allow us to get out and construct test and legacy park. We're estimated a construction start a second quarter of 2025. It's a very interesting bridge. As you can see, it also have LED lighting for night features, which can change colors. It's a concrete edge grater design with a number of wood accents there. So it'll be a fairly attractive bridge. The next park and open space there where the bridge lands is Tuston Legacy Park Phase 2. It's approximately five acres, and we'll be comprised of four ecologically themed zones there, which will contain a playground within the Meadow Mounds, shaded plaza areas, a great lawn for movies in the park or other activities, as well as art installations on an art walk scattered throughout Tustin Legacy Park, which will also be looked to, we will also looked to extend that into the first phase. And you also have fitness pods throughout. So a lot of interesting features for the neighborhood and surrounding community. Currently, we are at about 100% construction documents, so it's kind of the last round here, and then hopefully assuming those bridge-mounted settle will be out to bid here and moving along on this project as well. Also within neighborhood D South, we have an exclusive negotiate and agreement with the Irvine company to construct multifamily housing. This would be up to 1336 units, which would also include 25% affordability within the project. This project's been going for quite some time. Original requests for proposals were received here in 2021. The city was dealing with another developer which did not culminate in a deal. So we moved back to the developers that had proposed on the site and re-engaged with the Irvine company. The ENA was executed this past May. So we are negotiating the DDA, which is a disposition in development agreement, and the entitlements are being processed, and hopefully those will be before the council by the end of the year here. Another area is up by the MetroLink station, which we call Neighborhood G. This is actually planning area 15A of this Patustin Legacy-specific plan. We have about presentation which we call neighborhood G. This is actually plan an area 15A of this test and legacy specific plan. We have about 180 gross acres. This is identified as a transit oriented development, which would include a mix of residential as well as commercial uses. And you can see there's quite an abundance of open space there. of the continuation of Tuston Legacy Park, linking to the Metroling Station. You also have about 14 acres of a recreation park that's in design as well. The initial phase for a request from proposals was released last year in September, 2023. That's still an ongoing process. That is the first phase of development along Moffat Drive. So that's still under review. And the city's also developing preliminary infrastructure design and plans which are also underway for that area. Another we have is called cornerstone 2 and this is actually in the lower left hand corner opposite of the first phase of legacy park. There's about 52 gross acres that comprise this site. the city is currently evaluating long-term ground leases as well as land sales. The city did recently release a request for qualifications for broker services for a number of different uses out there that could comprise the site in terms of commercial and entertainment type uses. That was recently released. The city continues to move forward in terms of infrastructure design as well on this site. Another active project here within the city is the Tustin Legacy Specific Plan Amendment. And this is largely in response to the city's updated housing element and rezoning requirements for the regional housing needs allocation, Reena, which I believe has been previously mentioned as well. So in the various areas, the city will be adding additional units and up in neighborhood G, which we've just discussed would be 200 additional units in neighborhood D north. There would be just over 1900 units and an additional 100 units within neighborhood D south. And as you can see on the map here, these are total numbers that would occur the city council. So we have a couple of other things that we can do. We have a couple of other things that we can do. We have a couple of other things that we can do. We have a couple of other things that we can do. We have a couple of other things that we can do. We have a couple of other things that we can do. We have a couple of other things that we can do. We have a couple of other things the city's property. So, something that up and looking at the remaining property within Tustin Legacy within the city's per view of the economic development conveyance. There's approximately 480 acres. And the numbers that you see below are based on the existing specific plan without any amendments that we had just mentioned for the housing element, which would increase the available units. So currently existing from the last adoption being the 2017 Tustin Legacy specific plan, there are 2,925 base residential units, and that includes projects such as those mentioned under the Irvine company, as well as everything denoted in the dash lines here. And there's up to about 7 million square feet of non-residential use commercial uses available as well. And 80 plus acres of parkland. You can start to see some of the open space within neighborhood G. The city is trying to achieve a goal of 170 acres overall within Tuston Legacy. And there's 80 remaining, but that's not necessarily stopping us by any means of potentially doing more open space. And you've heard certainly life rock from some of our partners and the city experiences the same challenges in relation to the lease and furtherance of conveyance. It's worth noting that really the timelines are out of the control of the city. And I think that's really a good idea to have a little bit of an advantage. It's worth noting that really the timelines are out of the control of the city. As the Navy kind of goes through these properties and tries to get properly working environmental remediation. That is really at the purview of the Navy and trying to get through that process until we have adequate and working, but just a little bit of history, about 75% of the base was applied for no cost economic development, economic development, conveyance to the city. And we received quite a substantial amount in 2002, about 1100 acres in total, and 174 of those acres in 2002 were life-ock properties. Some of which were later transferred to the South Orange County Community College District and other partners that have been up here speaking as well. So we've heard about those challenges. So really, the property can't convey until the environmental remediation systems are working in a proper manner. And unfortunately, some of those standards change over time and push out or delay those transfers. and the other areas that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that are in the area that And as mentioned by our other partners, these lifehock areas certainly do impact the city's development and create many irregular parcels as well for development. So here's a graphic that you can see in 2002 with the carve out areas. You can see those denoted in the red. It's worth noting that the 85 acre parcel 18 is in blue. The city does not have a lifehock over that. So that is a separate was a design to be a separate public benefit conveyance will further describe that here in the next few slides. But you can see about nine of these carve out areas and where they originally were in 2002. And fast forward to 2024. You can see a number of those have conveyed and transferred about nine out of the 11 car vans, but we still have significant portions of acreage at the base that are subject to those life-hawk areas, or carve out areas in the case of parcel 18 there, which you can see outlined in black, which is still maybe owned, as well as the others. The city just does not have a life walk over that parcel. And at this time I'm going to call it my colleague Ken Peggy to discuss some of the South Hanger improvements as well as the parcel 18. Thank you, Ryan. Good evening, Mayor. Council. I'm just going to touch on a couple of the projects within the life walk properties that Ryan just discussed. So the Southanger have a few slides here. So as Ryan mentioned, this building is owned by the Navy, at least to the city part of that, those bigger life rock properties in the dashed red that you see on the map here. The cities use this since about 2012 for temporary events. There's very limited occupancy available in the building due to fire egress and a variety of other issues, there's no power, there's no water, there's no bathrooms, so very limited events that can be held in there. In 2013, the North Hanger had a partial riff collapse, and so that led the city to in 2014 the following year start a reuse assessment, a study of the South Hanger and structural evaluation. And that was being done by Paige Intermbo, who's a historic preservation architect, who's also worked on some other hangars throughout the state and nation. That study recommended a variety of levels of improvements to the building, anywhere from $20 million all the way up to $100 million plus and that was back in 2014 dollars. The city kind of went through all those levels of recommendations. We had actually incorporated a lot of those recommendations and levels of improvement, improvements into our capital improvement program budget. We're working through kind of getting to a package, a do a reasonable package to move forward on a project that could bring power back to the building and do some basic structural improvements. So put that out to bid in 2023. Ultimately those bids were rejected for a variety of reasons being that we only got a couple of bids on that project and that they were much higher than the engineers estimate at that time. So at that time, the city kind of took a step back and say, okay, how can we reevaluate this? Are there bigger packages, smaller packages that we could move forward with? Working through all of that until, up until November 2023, where on November 7th, obviously, the North Hangar fire occurred. So the question we often get, and I know it's in the community, is what was the city's initial response, immediate response, and how are you going to continue to protect the South Hangar moving forward? This has been a collaborative effort with all city departments, with IEM who you heard from earlier, Orange County Fire Authority. I'd go a lot of credit to Director Grisso for really putting this forward and kind of getting some achievable standards and objectives that we'll talk about here. But in terms of what we did right off the bat, you know, we got full-time security in and around the building. We have rented security cameras all throughout the exterior of the building. There's about six camera stands that have two cameras on the beach that goes to a live virtual security guard and also our onsite security has the ability to tap into those. We also have rented exterior lighting that's co-located with those cameras. We're looking at options for vinyl fencing and wire around the south hangar. We've also brought temporary electricity to the building to help power some other improvements, like improvements to the roll-up doors throughout the building that will help OCFA and our police department access the building in a better fashion. And so you can see the cost for the last fiscal year, 2324, obviously since the North Hanger Fire, and then our projected cost for this current fiscal year of 2425. And we'll look at some of the future fiscal years moving forward. So that was kind of what we did right off the bat. And so what are some of the other improvements that we're looking at as potential future improvements to the building just again to keep protecting and securing the building moving forward? So I talked about temporary electricity. This will be looking at permanent electricity and lighting. So we're in design on that right now. There was kind of some existing plans that we were looking at under that package that we went out to bid with. That we're looking at reshaping and kind of looking at more of a permanent electricity package to power some cameras and lights. And you can see on the right hand column is an estimate of what those improvements would cost and again I want to re-emphasize estimate at this point. We're also looking at permanent exterior cameras to replace those temporary cameras, a fire panel, additional hydrants, fire water and emergency access improvements to again all support more access and for OCFA and some of our public safety friends. We're also looking at a fire protection study and technical report, not just looking at the exterior, but also looking at maybe improvements to the interior of the building that could be improved. So you can see the design of that's just about $320,000 with the construction estimate on those anywhere from four to six million dollars. So what these two tables are showing is on the left, if we just kept everything kind of as it is today, which would be those immediate response, rentals, you know, nothing permanent, you could see how the costs accumulate over the next five to six fiscal years, in terms of that would be security, those rented cameras, rented lighting, temporary power. This is all coming from the existing capital improvement project for the South Hanger rehab, which is approved under this year's budget. On the right are what the cost could look like if we actually implemented some of those items that are under design right now. So if we finished design on those, we wanted to bid and actually construct some of those improvements. You can see how those costs stack up over the next five to six fiscal years. I just want to reinforce that this is just to protect the building. This is not making any improvements to making more leasable, to make a lot of more people in there, to make more permanent occupancy, just to keep it as is, kind of from an ongoing protection standpoint. Just for community and council awareness, we know that we're not the only hanger in town, we're not the only hanger in the country. There was actually 17 of these built at one point throughout the country. One just briefly touched on Moffit Field Hanger 3. So Moffit fields up in the San Jose area in Sunnyvale. This is actually a base that was transferred to NASA. And then NASA has sub-least portions of that to planetary ventures, which is a subsidiary of Google. And so planetary ventures was really originally supposed to rehab all three hangers up there. Hanger one is a steel hanger, and that was fully stripped down to its bones and is now undergoing full renovation, which you can see on the photo. The second hanger two, and three are very similar to the hangers we had here in Tustin. Hanger two is undergoing a lot of renovations to that structure, but hanger three 3, actually, unfortunately, was stabilized originally. It had a lot of rough issues, but actually is actually undergoing demolition at this current moment. And so the environmental documentation of that has been completed. The demolition's underway. You can see a photo of it there on the bottom. And that cost, we've estimated. We've heard it's a very secret process from planetary ventures or Google is about 20 million to $40 dollars just for a hangar three demolition. So next steps on the hangar, you know, we would look at agendizing a discussion of the South hangar on the current status in the future. We would give a lot of notice to the legacy community and the general public will in advance of that. We would look for direction on all the security and fire protection measures that you heard really feel this evening. How to continue funding those for the short term or long term improvements. And then, you know, how do we want to continue or not continue using the building as it is for short term or long term uses. Obviously, anything else the council or community wants to discuss at that point. But this would come at a future date, but obviously presenting information here tonight for the council and the community. Switching gears a little bit over to parcel 18. Ryan touched on this briefly, but parcel 18 is just kind of a strange animal. This is owned by the Navy, but not least to the city or anybody else. It is kind of a hole in the donut and we'll kind of get into the history of why. Back in 1995, when we were going through the original base closure process through the LRA process, the county of why. Back in 1995, when we were going through the original base closure process through the LRA process, the county of Orange submitted an application to the National Park Service for a regional park. In 1996, when the LRA and the city council approved the reuse plan, we incorporated a regional park public benefit conveyance, meaning that would go straight from the feds to the county for a specific type of use, a regional park use. In 2012, the county kind of had to dust off its plans and say we really can't pay for this park, so they actually incorporated some revenue generating uses at that time that ultimately wasn't accepted by the federal government, so it was never really going to come to fruition. And so late 2021, we had this first LRA meeting and a subsequent LRA meeting later that year where the LRA actually removed the county's regional park use from that site from the reuse plan due to years of county in action. You know you've heard from the South Orange County Community College District you heard from the city that we've taken leases on these properties that are still owned by the Navy. The county was unwilling to take a lease, unwilling to maintain the property. And so the LRA removed that use and also directed staff to start the reuse planning process. And early in 2022 the Navy and National Park Service kind of concurred with the actions that the LRA took removing that regional park use. And again in early 2022 we started this reuse planning process and then obviously in November we had the North Hanger fire. So what is the reuse planning process? It's the question we always get. So really the goal here is to develop a new land use and circulation plan to inform the Navy of how we want them to dispose of the property. So although our city manager mentioned that one of the hats the council wears is the LRA hat. So the LRA is a planning entity. So we're charged with coming up with a plan to tell a Navy how to dispose of property. Problem is with this site, there's obviously a lot of issues with it, but any new revenue generating uses that are introduced to the site, whether that's residential or commercial uses, may require a monetary contribution to the Navy. We don't know if that's a monitor door basis, or per square foot basis, so one time at the front at the back. We like to tell a tale that every time we go down to the Navy offices there's a check on the wall from five point which is heritage fields at the time where they paid the Navy for their property in Irvine. The city got its property at no cost. So this property when it is conveyed comes with some monetary expectations. The city itself, again separate in the city from the LRA, may be interested in accepting all of partially teen, some of partially teen or none of it, or again, we're just going through a planning exercise. If the city was interested in taking property, it would more than likely be incorporated into our existing economic development conveyance. Anything that we wanted to take for public uses would likely be at no cost. Revenue generating uses would be at that cost that I talked about and then anything the city is not issued and taking Whether some of it or all of it would be auctioned off by the Navy, but we're with under that plan that the LRA adopts So the steps in the process you know there is not a codified process, but we've kind of outlined this in previous presentations to the council and the community There's obviously you know the portions of it that are no longer applicable. Obviously, North Hanger evaluation, but we're going through public use evaluations, whether they're city facilities or parks that are needed. We're going through land use and circulation alternatives, looking at infrastructure requirements. We have to come up with a property value based on the land use plan going to public meetings, getting public feedback on that. Ultimately, getting to a project description for Sikua Nipa, which is the environmental portion of it, then negotiating with the Navy to figure out what exactly their revenue expectations would be, and that would all culminate in a new reuse plan, specific plan amendment focused on parcel 18, and encapsulating those new uses. So the next step to this site, just like we talked about in South America, the next steps for parcel 18. Looking at early next year, having multiple public meetings on some alternatives, getting to public's feedback on what they would like to see out there, that would ultimately culminate in the council slash LRA adopting a preferred reuse plan alternative. So what we do is we take that preferred alternative and then hand it to the Navy and say, hey, here's what LRA would like to do. It's for their review and ultimately acceptance and then start having some of those preliminary negotiations over any monetary expectations. And then kind of TBD is getting to all the environmental sequinipa process, getting to that specific plan amendment. But as Mr. Swantick and many others have mentioned, the ultimate conveyance of that property, ultimate development of that property because it would be Navy- way to convey it to that property, and it can be a good way to convey it to that property, and it can be a good way to convey it to that property, and it can be a good way to convey it to that property, and it can be a good way to convey it to that property, and it can be a good way to convey it to that property, and it can be a good way before we go to Aldo, maybe provide some comments from Council on the city's presentation. Thank you, Ken. Thank you, Ryan. There was a lot there. And so for those that are watching online or in the room, I think the big takeaway is that the city's got a lot of work to do as the LRA, partially 18, which is the area around the North Hanger, 85 acres. Obviously we had the hangar fire last year, but we were starting to get engaged in discussions with the Navy and we're looking forward to the next, 12 months really getting those ramped up and talking about the land planning exercises that need to happen out there for those 85 acres. In tandem, we're talking about the south hangar and taking steps immediately after the hangar fire, the north hangar fire to secure the south hangar site, and we're taking extra measures now and potentially in the future to really make that site secure. But those cost figures that were displayed on these slides, as Ken said, are just to secure the site. And it's expensive, right? $10 million with the next few years with very little revenue generation is something that this council and future councils are going to have to tackle. Whether the preserving the south hangar is a realistic option given the cost. So those are unpleasant conversations that frankly the city hasn't had in the last 25 years, but we are committed to having those discussions now because the community deserves it and we're gonna be transparent about it and involve the community in those discussions and our decisions, but we're embarking on a new era of having difficult discussions in public. So strap up. Get ready here. Thank you Ken and Ryan again. Go further comments on the city presentation. Oh, yeah. Councilor Clark. Thank you. I think I know the answer to this question, but Chad, is Chad here? There he is. Art commission, are they weighing in on all of the future possibilities of art projects at the parks that are online for development? OK. And then I just wanted to make a comment to reiterate the importance of these public meetings that are coming up. But personally, I'm really excited. I mean, I get asked about the future of the, in the past, hangers, but the hangers now, all the time. So this is really an opportunity for us to hear from the community. And I just want to emphasize that we really believe these public meetings are important. And it's not something that we're going to brush over or try to have very quickly. We want to really hear quality input, meaningful input from the community. So, you know, folks like Pete and other folks that come on a regular basis kind of commenting on what they like to see. This is going to be their opportunity to really have some in-depth conversations with the council. So I just wanted to say that. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Thank you. Commons, Councillor Marguer木. Yeah. I want to thank everyone for being here tonight and sharing the progress of what's happening out on the legacy. I think sometimes the community doesn't think we're doing anything, but I think there's lots of progress and that you can't really see from a street. So I want to thank you all for doing that. And I am looking forward to some more community input as to what they might be able to see out there. And I think, did somebody reference this video that is available for people to look at? It's on the website. Yeah. So please go out and look at that if you haven't seen it yet. And I know Ryan and I talked about this months ago to have this presentation and there was a little fire that happened in between. So that delayed what we wanted to see, but I'm glad we finally were able to do that. But thank you all for being here. Thank you. And just reminding the council of the LRA and everybody else that we saw through the public comments. So if you want to speak to us on this agenda topic, you can. Any comments right now on the city presentation or anything else before we do public input? Councillor Marcello. Yeah. You can, Ryan. I just wanted to thank you. I know how much work has got into this and to Councilwoman Gomez's statement. It's like you see a lot of dirt out there and you wonder what's going on. There's a ton of work that's gone on by economic development and the planning group and we're looking to accelerate that pace. The other thing when you take a look at all that dirt, it is how much value is there. I mean, we got 1,600 acres, there's 75% of 1,600 acres that were given over to the city. There's a ton of economic value that's going to be poured back into the residents. So again, really want to thank you. Also, I'm glad they were able to discuss the complexities around the south and the north hangar. I get those questions all the time as well from friends. They say, hey, what are you guys doing with the south hangar? It's a very complicated situation. There's a lot of costs that goes into it, and again, as much as we'd like to potentially keep the South Hanger, we need to have this open dialogue with the community to figure out, is it economically feasible to continue to maintain? The South Hanger, can we actually generate enough economic activity, again, to benefit the larger community. So again, I really appreciate you guys taking the time to really shed some light again on some of the difficulties and challenges that we've got. Hey, Pro-Joh. I talk so much about the test and legacy. I don't need to add too much here, but just to kind of pile onto the Southanger, I think that conversation is certainly well deserved. The timing needs to happen soon. I just wanted to point out and I'm sure Ken and Ryan you guys would already be doing this, but I want to say it anyways. But when we do get to those presentations, certainly being prepared to educate on what those renovation costs are. We do have, as you pointed out, some good comparable projects that we could escalate. But also some of the planning work that's been done around other uses, there's the UCLA study that was done, not ULI, NAOP, NAOP, that's right. Okay, so there's been some other work out there and I think it's a great opportunity to just kind of get the community up to speed on I mean the past are pretty clear right you renovate it, private, take it down. Right and so I think we can bring that information so that everyone has kind of an even playing field and can provide their input. So I know you'll be ready for it. Thank you. Okay. Mr. City manager, do you have closing comments before I open up public input on the side of? Thank you, Mayor. A lot of it was covered by the council. So it looks like we're in sync in terms of where it'd like to go. Just want to reinforce that that I and staff are here to support you and the vision for the legacy through our public outreach. You'll also see enhanced increased social media website and community outreach. They're all in the works now so we can get that going. And then I think most importantly, we'd like to make this type of local reuse authority project update as an annual meeting so that we don't wait another three years. So we get that calendared so that we have regular updates for the council and the community With that I'll turn it back over to you there Thank you all Okay without moving to public input for this item if any members of the public wish to address the council Please submit a request to speak for them if you're participating through zoom please raise your hand Madam city clerk do we have any requests to speak? Anybody last for two hours and so long since I talked to us No, we do not Mr.. Mayor. Okay, anybody in the room? I am going to recess after we do this, I have somebody can get up and do it with a need to. All right, we close public input and bring it back to the council. Mayor, sorry to interrupt you. One person did raise their hand. Okay, we'll reopen public comment and bring that person in. The speaker is Lulu. Hi, good evening, good evening everybody. Hi, go ahead. Hi, so I had actually a few questions about some of the remediation at the hanger. I had actually been looking into it prior to the hanger fire. And I was able to find that some of the contaminants that go into that basin, the way that those bases were made back in the 40s, where they were almost like a baseball diamond. Everything used to drain into one main basin. And so that was the basin that all the chemicals were kind of streamlining to for all of the work that was done on the base for however long it was active. So there was arsenic, there was cyanide, there was 1.1 diafloro, there was a lot of different volatile chemicals that when you light, okay, when you light, you know, if you pour 409 and you light it on fire, it turns into a gas. It's just the way that things work. So when even if it's in the ground, you can't see it, you light it, it's going to create a gas. And that's why the gas was burning orange, like a reddish orange, it was a chemical fire. And that's why it kept burning. And so, I did a lot of research on this and I'm also very familiar with PFAS and Pophos because I'm in the semiconductor industry. And I specialize in testing and services and analyzing the different standards around the different test methods that people are utilizing to set those standards for environmental remediation, for land use, for occupation, for residential, so on. Now I had my house tested about six months after the fire by a third party, and that test result came back with a very large number of volatile chemicals that were in my home, and those testing standards were done incorrectly. They were tested to new standards, which are standards that are done for manufacturing and business. They're not for residential and chemicals like 1.1 diaflora were found in my home, which require massive evacuation. I've reached out to the governor. I've reached out to a number of different people regarding this and I'm being ignored. I'm also a chips of America's supplier. And I'm also somebody who's working on trying to get funding for an NFO to help start a manufacturing chips institute or at least a simulation of a digital process of one and just start a school. And I think this land use would be excellent for something of that nature and I actually pitched it to the EDA. So I'd like to know if you guys can help me out to get some a better answer about the usage of the land there. Thank you for your comments. We can't respond to public comments directly unless a council member wants to but we'll take it under advisement have staff discuss it Any other requests to speak no mr. Mayor anybody in the room? Okay closed public comment again and Public input again and bring it back to the council for discussion we do have a staff recommendation To receive the presentations provided by our partners, direct staff on communicating information, providing during the presentations and direct staff on the desire for future meetings of the LRA and meeting formats. Or other comments as we deem appropriate. Mayor Pro Tem. I'll keep this short, because I think it was well covered. I think the South Hangar was certainly something, that meeting was certainly something that needs to be done. So I'm glad to see that was in there. Having the LRA just be a set standard annual meeting. So I get to see Brian Crane once a year. I think it's fantastic. I do, I would want to add something or I'm interested to see my council colleagues things. But this is such a massive undertaking, the test and legacy. In the financial impact, it couldn't be, I mean, there's nothing greater on our community, not only economic impact, but the community impacts of what it creates as far as value and opportunities for our residents. And the fact that we have such limited access to not only talk about it as a council in public, but also to get the community engaged. And so I really think that this topic of the TUSD and Legacy deserves to be discussed on a monthly basis through some type of standing committee. The City of TUSD does not have any committees, but I know I'm board chair for OC SAN, and we have multiple standing committees, and it's a fantastic process where you have a subset of the, I mean, you're all familiar, but for the public, you have a subset of the elected body that's meeting on a regular basis and digging in, and then reporting back to the broader body. And that way there could be a subset that's really deep in the details and coming to that with some insights and thoughts. And it's just a way to facilitate these really complex decisions that have to be made, but also so that the public could engage on a monthly basis. And also that the council as the entire body could be kept up to speed on what's happening because for meeting once a year on some of these topics, it's not enough. We got to keep our foot to the gas pedal because every month matters. And so I really think there should be some type of standing for me. I'm not suggesting my action is not that or my motion wouldn't be that we create that now, but that we ask the staff to come back with some options on what that could look like. It doesn't need, there may be other options. So that was one, and then the second part, which is some study sessions. Some of the ways that we are delivering this disposition, I think could be talked about broader, whether we do bigger pieces. I know this is something that has been talked about broader, whether we do bigger pieces. I know this is something that has been talked about for a long time, but I think we need to really take some of these big chunks like the South Hangar and do some study sessions where we dive in and we get all the information and we make a decision. We do it in the public. The public can provide input. But things like master development, how we're delivering infrastructure, the area around, parcel 18, the north hangar. Those are big chunks that could be broken out into study sessions, not in a month or two months, but maybe one per quarter gives that opportunity to dive deeper. So those were the two items, some type of standing committee and some study sessions over the next 12 months. I support both those ideas. I didn't hear a motion, but we can do that in a second. For the comments. Councilmember somebody going for Clark? Mayor Patel, Gallagher, did you motion to? There was no motion. No, I wanted to hear from my colleagues. I can motion it. Well, I was going to motion but I'll second. If the motion is just what staff's recommending, I did want to ask if all those suggestions that this be an annual report or presentation if that's incorporated in the recommendation, Mr. City Attorney. Mainly because I want to ask if it's possible for the presenters to have an option to present via Zoom. So I mean, I don't think we ask anyone to come and present to us every year. So just the option, but I don't know if it's allowed. It's certainly allowable. I don't believe it's part of the motion yet, but it could certainly be incorporated, including the direction if you wish to allow remote participation. So I agree with your recommendations. I like that point about Zoom. For those partners that are in the room, it won't be this long every time. We're really trying to set a baseline and then get updates as we move forward. The study sessions, as I understand what you just said, was for the LRA or the city of TUSD and to have council meeting items where we say, we dive into the south hangar. That's as I would. Not appreciating everybody in. Yes, okay. It was not intended for the broader group but more on the city council. We really appreciate the in-depth presentations that we had tonight and in 2021 and then the progress that's made. But if we're meeting on a regular cadence, we don't need to over bake the cake. All right, further discussion, and then all anybody else wanna? All right, do you wanna make a motion since you tried to be foreign to do it? All right, I'll move the staff recommendation with the addition that staff return with options related to a standing committee focused on the Tusson Legacy City Property Own specific. the city property owned specific and also to come back with options for quarterly study sessions and that the annual LRA include an online option for participants. I'm sorry. We have a motion in a second. Madam, see the clerk roll call unless there's further discussion. Any further discussion? Thank you. Madam, see the clerk. Councillor Emersonal. Hi. Councillor Emerson, Mr. Gomez. Yes. Councillor Emerson, clerk. May I put some Gallagher? Aye. Mayor Lumberg. Aye. Motion passes 5-0. We did it. Thank you. We are going to recess right now for 10 minutes to allow people that do not want to stay for the rest of the meeting to leave and we will take a break up here as well. So we'll start back at 9-16. Thank you. Okay, welcome back. We're going to reopen the meeting. Next we have the consent calendar, which is items two through 19. All matters listed under the consent calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion without discussion. We have public input for the consent calendar items. If any members of the public wish to address the council, please submit a request to speak for them if you haven't already. Any members of the public who are participating through Zoom who wish to address the council on items 2 through 19, please raise your hand. And I'm going to poll item 8 and Mr. City Attorney is pulling item number 19. So if anybody is speaking on those, they can take them now or later. Any request to speak? Madam City Clerk. Mr. Mayor, we have Lulu. Yeah. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go it. And so is my community. And I would like to get very involved because I also have a corporation that's involved in semiconductor manufacturing that has a lot to do with these PFAS and POPOS chemicals. And we need to kind of have some understanding or better understanding as a country and a nation in order to handle them. And I'm trying to work with a group of people to try to understand how to better those processes. So understanding and working with the city would be probably very beneficial. And I would like to understand how we go about opening those discussions. And I work with all the big players for semiconductor manufacturing. And I'm in the supply chain and I would love to bring some of that business back to the city of Tustin. My company is currently registered in Irvine. However, we can obviously move locations. But I would like to try to understand how it can work with you guys to try to bring a better understanding of what's happening in that area because that can also bring some funds to the area that could bring a manufacturing institute could bring. I think they're offering about 500 million per location for a design and the military bases that all need to be re-cleaned or environmentally. We may be able to call some kind of a fund through tech hubs and chips of America to try to put something together to bring money back to all the bases and the barracks that are closed that are usable. And so I just want to know how do we work with the city. This is all new to me. I, you know, I'm not a very political person. I don't understand all that stuff. And so what do we need to do to try to help? I mean, we measured toxic chemicals in our residential area and nobody is testing properly and nobody is paying attention or even looking at the reports. I'd be happy to send them to you guys so you guys could look at them. I think it's critical that the city look at that because these people could get very sick. It's really not a joke. And I can bring specialists to the table to help you guys break down the risks and doing that. And understanding how to properly clean it and also getting the funds to do so. Right now, the money that's coming to the city, if you, $10 million is not gonna clean anything up, it's not gonna secure what, a building that has to come down. I mean, there should be a super fund for the city. There are mass amounts of funds for a school and a cleanup. And I think I can help bring that to the city with your guys' help. Okay, thank you for your comments, your time is up. I will respond to something in a second here. But thank you for your comments. Madam City Clerk, any other requests to speak? No, Mr. Mayor. Okay. Just as a general comment, you know, that public comment wasn't really for the consent calendar. But if anybody needs to reach out to the city, the city council's contact information is on our website, testnc.org. There's information on the Navy North Hangar fire and resources available to residents on the website. There's still a tab related to the incident. The Navy has taken over on-site, but if you want to reach out to the city directly, you can contact us through the website, test and see it out. Thank you. All right, no other requests to speak about the city clerk? Okay, we're gonna close public comment on the consent calendar and any discussion or other entertain a motion. Reminding folks that eight and 19 have been pulled. I'll move it. Second. Move the balance in second. Madam City Clerk, roll call please. Council Member Schnell. Aye. Council Member Gomez. Yes. Council Member Clerk. Aye. May your person be Gallagher. Aye. May your member. Aye. Motion passes 5-0. Thank you. I'm going to go to the recommendation. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. the recommendation of my council agrees. Under the recommendation one, last clause of the first paragraph it says as well as wave the exclusive negotiating agreement extension deposit for both 90 day periods. I'd like that to be amended to say wave the exclusive negotiating agreement extension deposit for the first 90 day period. And to bring the second 90 day period waiver back to council. And I actually know, bring the second 90 day period waiver back to Council and I actually know Bring the second 90 day period give the city manager discretion to exercise the second 90 day period So essentially what we want is what you know what I'm saying my motion is to wave the first Extension deposit but we need a touch point before we authorize the second one city manager has an authorization Does that make sense? I kind of bumbled that, but did everybody hear that query? By forget the two fees, basically. Okay, I'll second. Okay, thank you. Ocean in a second. Any discussion? Madam City Clerk, roll call please. Council Member Schnapp. Aye. Council Member Gomez. Council Member Clark. Aye. from the Gomez. Yes councilmember Clark. Mayor Potson Gallagher. Mayor Lumbergan. Motion passes 5-0. Thank you. Thank you for your patience as I fell over myself trying to do that. Okay. All right item number 19 was pulled by Mr. City Attorney. I'll head it over to you Mr. Kending. Thank you Mr. Mayor. The California Government Code requires that a verbal summary be provided before final action is taken on salaries, salaries schedules and compensation paid in the form of fringe benefits affecting a local agency executive as defined in state law. Item 19 on the agenda proposes a revision to the executive management and management salary resolution. As it relates to local agency executives, the resolution would create a new job classification of deputy city manager real property with an hourly salary range of $99.94 to $127.55 effective August 20th of 2024. The position would carry with it the standard executive management benefits and the combined cost of the salary and benefits are estimated to be between 260260,000 to $330,000 per year. There are no other changes proposed by resolution 24-49 and that concludes the required verbal report required by the Brown Act. Thank you. I'm going to pause because we have a council member who left and I think she might be interested in Taking action on this So I'm gonna go check on her little check on her Twice step in I think the technical term is wrong pipe. All right, so I'm going to make a motion to approve staff recommendation. I just wanted to make a comment that I think this, the creation of this position is critical in aligning with our priorities as a council and as a city. We just had the LRA, the meeting timing is very appropriate. I think this gives the necessary cloud organizationally to get the vision accomplished out there in the legacy. And so it's one piece and an ongoing ramp up, but appreciate staff bringing this forward. Second. Motion and second. Any comments for the comments? I'm going to go ahead and go ahead and see what happens in the next couple of weeks. I'm going to go ahead and see what happens in the next couple of weeks. I'm going to go ahead and see what happens in the next couple of weeks. I'm going to go ahead and see what happens in the next couple of weeks. I'm going to go ahead and see what happens in the next couple of weeks. motion passes. Thank you. Next we have other business. Mr. City Manager do you have a report tonight? Yes thank you Mayor. Thank you Mayor and Council just want to give a quick update regarding the Orange County Water District Pipeline Improving Project underway in our old town. The first phase of work of night work along Main Street is wrapping up this week. The Orange County Water District is completing the pipeline installation between C Street and prospect Avenue. Staff worked with the Orange County Water District to minimize the impacts on both our community and businesses alike. We requested that the Orange County Water District agreed to a second phase of work occurring at night again along Main Street between Newport and Prospect Avenue. That will be picking up following the Labor Day holiday and will continue through October 10. We'll continue to share updates with our community through our social media platforms. My second and last update is I'm also proud to announce that our finance department received the prestigious excellence and finance reporting board from the government finance officers association for fiscal year and 2023 annual comprehensive financial report. Now this isn't our first time. It's actually our 37th consecutive year that we've been awarded this which speaks to the fiscal professionalism of finance team. But that I'd like to extend my thanks Jennifer King our finance department director and her finance team. So thank you for that and that concludes my report. Thank you, Mr. City Manager. Mr. City Attorney, do you have a report? I have no further report this evening. Thank you. Councilmember gosh, we missed a meeting. So we've got a lot of stuff here on July 18th. I attended a webinar with a sponsor by ACOC and Cal Optima just to get updates on Cal Optima services in the county on July 27th. I attended the 99 ranch market grand opening. It was wonderful. It was very well attended. And if you haven't visited the market, please do so. But take your time. There's lots of to see and to purchase. On July 31st, we had concerts in the park. And along with a couple of my colleagues, we presented the checks to the nonprofits from the chili cookoff. On August 3rd, there was the Cal Optima back to school resource fair, and it should be noted that the Cal Optima membership in Tustin is 23,317 folks, which represents nearly one third of our population. The event had 5,224 attendees, which is a record number for Cal Optima Health events. There was a number of partners, the list is a page and a half long, but it was an opportunity to distribute essential back to school supplies and get resources. And I'll just give you a few numbers. They distributed 4,500 pairs of shoes. 1500 backpacks with school supplies. 542 bike helmets. 1,000 Cal Optima Health hygiene kits. 1,000 boxes of food. And 106 cases of diapers, which meant was over 24,000 diapers, which some of the people on this die is know what that means. They were able to connect 21 families to different community partners for different resources. They provided 101 vision screenings, 111 eye classes, 33 dental screenings, 55 haircuts, and 23 sports physicals, which is really important if you have an athlete, they have to have that physical. So it was a nice way for some families to get that done. They assisted with 238 Medi-Cal and CalFresh applications. They served 800 sandwich lunches, 2,000 energy bars, 2,000 ice cream bars. I got none of that. Nor did I get any Porto's pastries at 32 large boxes. I did get a water though. And you know, again, there were lots of different things for the families to do. The obstacle course supported by first five. This was co-sponsored by the Orange County Department of Education. But I also want to thank the city staff who made this event possible. I know it was very difficult to organize and to be sure everything went well. But when we serve the most vulnerable of our residents, we help everyone. So thank you again. On August 7th, I attended the Test and Police Department promotion. So welcome to our new officers and congratulations to those who were promoted. I also attended the Chicano Art Collection at the Old Canterbury Hospital. I'm very excited to be here today. this is a great place to come and welcome to our new officers and congratulations to those who were promoted. I also attended the Chicano art collection at the Old County Courthouse. It was a great exhibit and this was a collaboration with the county in several of our school districts. This was hosted by Supervisor Sarmanto. I attended the grease play at Broadway in the Park sponsored by the Tusson Area Fine Arts Council. On August 15th, I attended the Superheroes event sponsored by the Tusson Community Foundation. They honored many in our community and I just want to highlight a few. Ken Higman was nominated by our Senior Center. Ken has been a welcome addition to that board. His enthusiasm and care for our seniors is second to none. Jerry Craig, or Jerry's, oh he left, okay. Jerry Craig from economic development was nominated by the Tuston Chamber of Commerce. I've seen Jerry work on numerous projects and his commitment to the city of Tuston is unmatched. Nathan Jürgen was nominated by the Tuston Community Foundation for his volunteerism to Tuston and to the Foundation's activities. McKenzie Newman was nominated by TUSD and PD for tireless efforts in making sure that projects, they need to get accomplished, get done completely and timely and effectively. Carol Merritt was nominated by the Voices of TUSD for keeping the group going, especially during the pandemic and in finding a new director. The Voices of TUSD have regularly performed at community events, group going, especially during the pandemic and in finding a new director. The voices of Tusson have regularly performed at community events and I've had the privilege of knowing Carol for many years when we were both PTA presidents. Lastly, Sissy Oberlin, the voice of Beckman High School, Sissy is the go-to person at Beckman, not only for the faculty but also for the students. They recognize and search her out for a friendly face when they need something. There is a bug in here. There are many others that were recognized with certificates from the local elected leaders offices and red superhero capes. Congratulations to all the newly crowned or caked superheroes. Thank you for all you do for our community and our residents. Later that day, I attended the Orange County Vector Control Policy and Procedure Meeting to discuss and recommend adoption of the District Strategic Plan and the Workplace Violence Prevention Plan. The entire committee met later and recognized five and ten years of service to our trustees. We received updates on vector operations and outreach activities. There is an uptick in vector-borne diseases, so please remove any standing water and use insect repellent and wear long sleeves and pants when outdoors in the evening. I know that's hard to take given the heat. Later that day, I attended the sunset market, which again continues to grow and become more popular each month. Thanks again to the staff for the organization of the event and the community for supporting this inaugural effort. A couple of notes, Kelly Chang, an Olympic Beach volleyball player, has her family in Tussin and if you watched during her match, they were going and watching her family react to the match. So congratulations to Kelly on a great Olympic performance. I also wanted to congratulate two Tuston restaurants, Taco Masita on El Camino and fond of Moderna in the flight mess hall. They were both recognized in the, the 100, I think it's 101 best taco places in LA. And this is by the LA times. And so they did it kind of all by regions. And they were only probably, I don't know, maybe eight or nine in Orange County, but two or more in Tuston. So go visit them as well. I also want to make a comment, Superior Property Services got our graffiti contract and I've known the CEO for many, many years. He is a Tuston resident and I've known him and his family for many years and as a resident, as he is a resident, I'm confident there will be a little extra pride in care in the execution of that contract. Lastly, I don't usually make personal comments from the dias, but I have to remind my husband, this will be the last anniversary that I will spend on this dias. I promise. So thank you. Yeah, I'll have to have a shall. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mayor. The only people left here are staff. And that the testament to how much they care about the city. And I want to say there's so much effort that went into this meeting. Staff works tirelessly and I have to really thank economic development. I have to thank all though our city manager, but Ryan and Ken, I know how much work and effort went into closed session, open session, and for Russist staff, we are so blessed to have the folks that we have supporting the city to try and make it the best that we possibly can. Again, these meetings do not happen. We show up here, we wear our Sunday best, but the folks that are here are the ones that make it happen. So I just wanted to pass along my thanks. July 17th was on the Transit Quarter Agency ad hoc committee where we talked about the 241-91 Express Connector, which is going to help alleviate traffic. I think it starts construction in 2025. It'll help alleviate the construction for the 241-91 connection there. And then we had to have a conversation about traffic modeling to assess the best way to mitigate kind of the flow of traffic during peak hours. And then we had a recommended action where we authorized a payment of $300,000 to a consultant to help us figure out, again, the West best way to price things and do those dynamic pricing. July 17th went to the Prestige Medical Ribbon Cutting and the Prestige Medi Spa is the duestetic work. So clinical cosmetic procedures, injections, sculpting and more, so helping to keep Tustin beautiful. July 18th, the city manager when I met with the developer, developer to discuss the 17th Street Lincoln Financial Center redevelopment, looking to do more housing there, so it's something that's very exciting, so any more housing and Tustin. July 25th, went to the Bark Barracks ground breaking, which Councilwoman Gomez had mentioned, and then attended the TCF Superheroes and handed out lots and lots of capes to lots of superheroes that are doing great work in and around Tustin. So again, thank you and staff, thank you for everything you do. Appreciate it. Council Member Clark? In light of my technical difficulty, I'm going to keep my report short. I just want to thank Erica and Carrie, who helped lead and organize the girls in government this year. We had through their efforts purchase blazers for every attendee. And we have 15 extra blazers. And they had the foresight to reach out to Erin Nielsen with the TUSTA Community Foundation and where we could possibly donate the blazers and she had the idea of donating them to the TUSTA High School Model United Nations program which is the only high school I believe in TUSTA to have an MUN program. So we were able to donate all of the blazers to that program and they were very, very thankful. And as you can imagine, they probably have some girls that wouldn't be able to purchase a nice new blazer from Johnny Jeans at that. But it's going to help in all of their activities and their events that they go to, so they'll look professional and feel good. And I didn't know this was a thing because I wasn't in MUUN in high school but the girls often coordinate their outfits. They like to look the same. So it worked out perfectly when we didn't even know. So I just wanted to thank you all for leading that effort and I was happy to join you in the donation and I was going to conclude my report. I must do it. Thank you. Hey, Coach. So that Councilwoman Gomez can get home to celebrate what's left of her anniversary. I'll defer my comments next meeting. Thank you. Please, probably a small name. So. I will also just thank staff for the meeting tonight. I know a lot of work went into it. You guys have been working real hard. And we've got a lot of work left to do, but we appreciate it, Council. So thank you. And with that, I'm going to adjourn this meeting. The next meeting is scheduled on Tuesday, September 3rd, 2024, for the closed session meeting at 5.30 pm, and the regular business meeting at 7 pm. Thank you, have a good night. Thank you.