I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm going to go to the next one. I'm going to go to the next one. I'm going to go to the next one. I'm going to go to the next one. I'm going to go to the next one. I'm going to go to the next one. I'm going to go to the next one. I'm going to go to the next one. I'm going to go to the next one. I'm going to that to the answer? I will show you the bottom line. I'm sorry. Yes, chair. We have one person signed up, Lydia Blair 508, Marine way. Okay? And this will be in something other than our public or our conduct public hearing, which will be coming later on the zoning case. No, it's about that. I was about that. That item in your head, actually just speaking in the public hearing. She said it's not about that. No, it isn't. Oh, sorry, I just said. It's okay. You're sure you got it? You're not. You're not. I'm not going to with the first one. So I'm going to put it on the 8th considering that I'm a final 5 for these states and this will be the only issue any 24 single family lots of 2,000 areas. We have 4, 2,000, 3 days of grant. So, and well with the solar panel residential. Yes, hi, I am excited tonight commission to introduce to you David Gonzalez. David is our new community development director. He has been on staff with us just over a week, two weeks, and has hit the ground running so much so that he is going to be presenting these two plots to you tonight. So he comes to us from Mount Pleasant and prior to that from the city of Rockwall and has quite a lot of experience. So you all should be able to grill him really good tonight. I appreciate you And he's more than capable. So anyhow, David Gonzalez. Sheen, thank you. Thank you, Mr. Dell. Mr. Chair and members of the commission at this meet, this particular case here is the final plat. This is regarding the states of Bristol Valley edition. It's a 42.903 acre portion. Do I owe you? I think I can go slow. Thank you. Thank you. And this, as you can see here, the final plan, as you may recall, was a part of the preliminary plaque from your Lakewood Meadows edition of approved back in 2022. What this final plat will do is to establish single family residential home sites for this area. You can see where's the pointer. It's kind of a nice thing. It used to this. Great. All right. So this is the site here. And you have McDonald road that runs North and South I guess this way and then else you'll give the Falcon Point edition that's located here So this is just south of the Falcon Point edition it's zoned Plan development or PDSF which is for planned development district single-family residential uses and The wrong way sorry about that. And so, and once again, this is a better view of the final plan. So, you have 24 lots that are laid out along this one street that's coming off of McDonald Road. And it turns around to the cul-de-sac. And of the 24 lots, this doesn't meet your zoning requirements for the PD that's established in the PD. Also, additionally, the site will have to extend its water and sewer lines off of McDonald Road. And what you'll see as well would provide a repacket. As a part of that is a is the extension of the water line and up sizing actually if the 12 inch line that will be up size to an 18 inch line that's going to require a developer's agreement as well in order to be able to take that on and essentially what the city is doing here is we will participate with the upsizing from the 12-inch to the 18-inch line and that that was all part of an impact study that occurred with the city and with that of the upsizing of that that six inches will be funded through the collection of the impact fees for that drainage as typical will be taken look at during the building permit process as well as your tree skate plan to make sure that the trees that are being removed will be mitigated in that manner. The park fees associated with this, now your park fees are with this. That's going to be your cash and the land as well as the park land dedication and what that amounts to is 84,000. 963 dollars. And that would be selected at the time that the final plat is approved. And prior to the city signing of the plat and the following of the plat. Once again, again did mention the development agreement. It's something that this will go to the city council for to take a look at the trail system. When the tech look at the trail system and see how that design and layout is as well as specifications for that particular property and also to put in the language for the upsizing of the water line for those 12 inch to the 18 inch line. With that in your packet you also have the compliance matrix. This shows the all the density-dimensional apartments associated with the lots, how it's compared with the PD itself. And so with that, this conformance to the zoning as well as subdivision regulations, which you have here as well is the future land use plan map. This is the location once again of the states of Bristol way. It does meet the comprehensive plan, the future land use plan map for the designation of rural estates. And with the final plaque, obviously this is administrative function. What that means is that per state law, it goes through through your body as well as the City Council. And you either can approve with conditions or deny the plan. And if you did not apply, obviously, there's some certain things you'll have to identify associated with specific statutes and ordinances. Staff has not identified anything of that condition. When this is approved and it is filed, or when it's approved rather, there's 365 days of the happen to be able to file this with county now. With that being said, we won't issue any building permits until we actually have the plaque that's filed in hand. And so that is what we have now and what we have as well in your packet will be your conditions of approval. Should you decide to approve this? this. We have this outlined for you and with your motion you should indicate the these following condition of a one that the addition of a 30 by 30 landscape easement to be located in a lock one block L and this was part of the Lakewood reference in Lakewood Meadows preliminary flat as well as the 15 foot pedestrian access easement. This gives us access between Bristol Way, drive, which you can drive, but the one access can have and the one of your floodplain. So those were instituted during the Lakewood Plenary and Plac agreement. And also the development agreement that needs to be a condition as well as you move forward with this. With that, the applicant I believe is here this evening. And yes, Mr. Joyce is here this evening. And I'm available for any question that you have. Let me just ask this question. Is there. Is the next item sort of a continuation of this one in many ways, or is it pretty in many ways, yes, but separate applicant. So I won't go through in depth like this. Okay. When we get to that one, but yes, it's side by side. Okay. Let's go ahead and air for Mr. Choice. Thank you. Good evening, Mr. Chairman, commissioners Ryan Joyce, 767 Justin Road, Rockwell, Texas 75087. Thank you for your time this evening. Mr. Chairman, dance to your question. This is under two different ownership groups. And so that's why they're full of files separately. And so there's two separate applications for that. But as Mr. Gonzalez stated, I mean, everything we're doing here complies with our preliminary plat and it follows that along. We're eager to get started. Our engineering plans are just about wrapped up with the city. So this is just kind of the last step before we actually start construction inside. So I'm happy to answer any questions you have. I don't really have a lot for you guys tonight, but I'm here and available. You'll have questions. I have a question for staff. zoning change, it's important, I think for the public to know this was done many years ago or a number of years ago. So it's not like this is a zoning case, it's a removal of a five flat. So maybe just talk a little bit about that just to see. Yeah, so the zoning was approved back in October of 2019. Okay, and yeah. One question. A question. I don't know if this would be for a city engineer or possibly law enforcement, but a lot of our cases that we have talked about cul-de-sac length. I believe we have a 600 foot cul-de-sac linked ordinance. And this is much longer. Any concerns with that or has that been addressed everyone comfortable with that? So we did, we can bring up our Fire Marshal. Come on up, Brandon. Since he doesn't get to come to the microphone very often and he loves it. He loves it so much. Good evening. So everything that we've done the review, I mean, everything's meeting the code requirements and also basically the city design specs. So I mean, if it is over 600 feet there should be some type of character. Okay. Good. Just a follow-up on that. So is there a turn? I'm just trying to understand if it's over 600 feet, what mitigates or what makes it compliant with your funds? It's basically the code of second variant that compliance with it. You know, I don't want to be a regular in something. I know it's well over 600 but basically that code is that meets the requirement there just that we want. Good. Thank you. I thought the requirement was it had to be within 600 feet. So if it's over 600 feet, we should put a turnaround in the middle of the road. And so normally that's what we've seen in several other proposals. So I'm just trying to understand how this could be more than 600 feet, but still in contact. That's one question. So the zoning for the property itself actually provided or would have provided any variants or sign up in the fire department for that excess of link in the street and having the colisex there at the end. the final plan is essentially just another step along that path. So we're not changing anything. We didn't change the length of the street or anything that wasn't already previously approved. It was the only step. So maybe the question is, what is there a variance that was approved? So it's fine, just trying to understand. Sure. We will confirm if there was one that was stated at the time that the preliminary plot was approved by function of the preliminary plot being approved by the City Council. They've had a they have had a look at this and approved the plot, but we can also clarify that as a variance when it goes before the the City Council. They'll be the ones to actually state the the granting of a variance. Yeah. You're welcome. Along the lines of how we guide here not to question about what we should go forward with the trail that was established. Is that on any of these? On the diagrams that we're looking at here can we show where the trail is? It's mentioned in the preliminary flat for Lakewood Meadows. I'm sorry, I was in it. It's Reeflex. You do it. You're up. Yeah, no, it's Mr. Del was indicating it. Now that was all established in the preliminary plan. Okay, but it doesn't show on this representation of the planal plan. No, it does not. Mr. Chairman, there's actually the pedestrian access easement is right here between these two lots. And so that trail will come here, and then we'll come across and wiggle around through this open space and then tie back up with our next case right down in this area. So that trail will come through here, and it will be a nice meandering trail that runs kind of through this open space and then ties back in down here. And I assume that the developers agreement will provide stipulation at this trail and for the public, right? Yes, and that's actually a pedestrian access easement that's shown right here on the plat is already shown as a pedestrian access easement on this plat. So that will be open to the public. Okay, are there any common areas that are restricted to the commoner's cessation or anything. No, sir. I mean we've got our entry feature will be located our entry feature be located up here. We'll have a common area sidewalk that runs right here that'll be open to the public. This is all curbing gutter street So we'll have sidewalk that runs along the front of all these houses. That's all within public right away So that will be open to the public. There are no private Spaces to speak that will be associated with this. Well, there is the green belt down the middle line This is the green belt area. Okay, hit the road button. This green belt area right here. So this is our property line that runs right along here. This green belt area. I guess it's technically private open space, but it does have pedestrian access here. It pleases a commission to dedicate that to the city parks department. We're more than welcome to do that. We're more than happy to do that. Let's take it. That would be a matter for the park board to take us. And to be approved by council. City council outside, but I think. Yeah. If we have any action on it, I mean, I give it a recommendation. You do not. Okay. All right. Well, it's moving along. So I know we decided pretty soon. So. Thank you for that presentation. Any more questions? So as I understand it this is an application for approval of the final plaque and I understand that the staff have looked at all of the requirements in the ordinance and the meets all of our rules and regulations for approved proof that is correct. I'm assuming that some variants was previously granted for the COALSAC late to resuming that. Then I think it's really just a ministerial function as far as I'm concerned. So I will be in favor of reading the final plat and proving this. How is the conditions that the staff have outlined? Do we need to read it out loud? No. One emotion. Yeah. I'd like to make a motion that we approve with the three conditions that staff has identified here. I'll second. Second. All in favor? Roll up. Okay. I wouldn't like to know that that just as a follow up, not obviously it's a reason to recommend approval or then I like to understand if there was a variance on that. by your trust to be able to turn around and also if staff can take an action to talk, speak with the park board about this green space being dedicated. Okay, we'll ride along to the next item. Let's see if I can line it. Okay, case FP 2020 409. Consider an act on a final plot. The Bristol Valley base addition containing 103 single family lots of seven common areas the 184.428 takes are of land and zone PBS land development district for single family residents are used okay Yes sir once again thank you mr. Chairman and and this this is essentially the same location just down Will's south you can see 180 about 180 for acres here you're looking at about 103 single family lots once again this was part of the PD that was approved back in 2014 and then also a portion of the PD that was approved back in 2014. And then also a portion of that PD of another PD that was approved in 2019. This, the lower portion is 2014, where you're going to see the, the lot, a lot differential here versus what you have up here for the 2019 lots. This was associated with the Polar Advice for the Lake Meadows addition, as you saw from the previous case, as well as Falcon Point VIII addition. And so this is the plaque that we're looking at. Once again, 103 lots, they'll have to extend once again, water and sewer to the site, upsizing the water line, same as from a four, from 12 inch to 18 inch line. And this does dedicate as well some open space and common areas for this particular site. I think they have six of them that have been located on here. here. The tree skate plan, once again part of the preliminary flat process, those will be taken a look at during the building permit portion of that or the mitigation of that per lot as well as drainage. The developers agreement, same thing that we mentioned from the last case that we need to go before the council or the up sizing of the line. Park fees in this particular instance, we have 103 locks. You have $306,400, $633 and $39 cents that will be due at the time of final plaque approval. With that, the matrix, the compliance matrix is located within your packet. All the information in there showed to be that the final plaque does conform to the zoning and well, some vision ordinance and this as rule of states for just area as well and with that the you have the option of approval approval with conditions will denial and once again staff is not identifying any conditions in here that would would for may a denial. With this, the, once again, file platenics be filed within such a strong way of approval. And we also need to have filed, filed prior to the building permits being released. We do have the conditions of approval listed in the packet when your motion should include the three conditions that we have a tie line here for the common areas to be maintained by the HOA. Identify the common area for a lot of 40 block that block that and then also for the development agreement that will go to the council in regards to the up signing of the water line. With that, let's begin of the applicant's hearing to answer your questions. I'm available to the question as well. Okay. Thank you. Good evening, Mr. Chairman. Once again, commissioners, right. Enjoy 767, Justin Road, Rockwall, Texas 758, 7. I can even just say did I would say did over one thing I did want to kind of mention is with both of these projects we've also been working with the city it's come to come to our attention that the city does not have a tornado warning system. And so we have been working closely with city staff and have put together a package for them and we're actually going to be providing the city with a fully expandable computerized system with that tornado warning system as well as the first tornado siren to go up. And it will go up in this area and those are three 360 degree rotational sirens that will you know they blast off and sound of born and they're controlled here at the central the police station and the fire department they have access controls remote controls the city manured process that are offered to self--owned and pretty sure it gets pretty technical. But that is something else that we are doing. We we we we've heard that thousands need and so we're happy to have research that system and see exact same system that they have up in Rockwall and that would be a great beneficial I add to the city. I don't believe that's anywhere in your package. That's just something that I wanted to bring up and something we have then. We have submitted emails and and submit to the city for that system. So we are providing that additionally with these developments just being a good neighbor and want to be supportive of the city of me. So I'm happy to answer any questions you guys have. Thank you very much. Okay. Thank you. Questions from Mr. Joyce? I've got a question. I'm not sure really who this would go to, but in I guess this was part of the documentation from when the 2000 probably the 2019 approval. Exhib exhibit C talks about improving McDonald Road. I'm just wondering is that a stipulation? It says improvement, Donald Road, a county road from intersection of 550 to the entrance of the subdivision. Are we requiring the developer to make improvements to McDonald Road itself. So all that staff and so we've discussed that with staff and so that. So we typically that the the language in there and what was the intent we believed back in 2019 was that that portion of the roadway that was there was an area that was in the county prior to annexation there was an area there that showed to be county and the intent was while that was in the county to build a bring that road in the sense of an extent that road has been improved so I think the language in there from 550 to the end of the point is not the intent of going all the way down the county road outside the settlement to 550. So we feel that that more should have been satisfied for the area that's within the with them. So, I'm just going to start with the next slide. I'm going to start with the next slide. I'm going to start with the next slide. I'm going to start with the next slide. I'm going to start with the next slide. I'm going to start with the next slide. I'm going to start with the next slide. I'm going to start with the next slide. I'm going to start see the grade rectangle. That property was in Rockwell County when the first phases of Falcon Point were included in a fine development and that concept was that reference that is mentioned in your packet refers to that entrance right there and then extending from the southern part of that gray rectangle up to 5.5. And that has actually been satisfied that road has been built. The other item on that agreement is this says the the first phase should be no more than 100 lots or there are a couple of phases. I didn't see hear anything about any phase schedule or anything. So the development shall be limited to the first phase no more than 100 lots and I don't have a problem with 100 versus 103. I'm just wondering. Let's skip for required to be met now where we can only have 30 lots on a single point of access. So they actually are proposing multiple points of access to provide much required now in our target. This, I don't know how it's labeled, but it looks like a rose that ties it back to. It's not going to go. It's the last eight or ten lots or something that I sort of bought but I'm sold. So that that road there that I'm seeing it's just straight as an arrow and it crosses what a floodplain. Yes, sir. So so this actually ties so we talk about multiple points of access this ties back into the backside. So this is the existing Falcon point face to right here. So that's your third point of view. That's, yes, yes, yes. So that's why this comes across and then it ties back in right here to the, these are existing homesites right here. So this roadway that's getting constructed across there, I mean, is it got, like what kind of design requirements to handle, you know, the 100 year flood or whatever? So we conducted an extensive flood study on this property and have the flow requirements for that flood study. That's in the final stages of approval with the city engineer right now. So it's just it's not part of this. It's not that those plans are breached by the city. I can just remember that when we this is a long time ago when Fuffalo Creek got built out and they went in the first phase over the other side that is a real concern you know the citizens that somebody's gonna get washed away off their bridge. Anytime there's a significant drainage level like this in all of us quite a bit of engineering design, the piano review, and the generations back both between the two engineers. Right and we know that there's a lot of development that's going to the Northeast. I mean, it's going to change the flow in this. Yes, they do have to prove out several different types of firearms based on bill well commissioned. That's probably the There's nothing to question. It was just mentioned here that we've got a stiffer requirement in terms of egress and that and now 30 lots and it is second pointed entry exit. So the first one that we just approved wasn't that more than 30 lots. Yeah, it's. So what are the ones. All right. Thank you. Obviously the lower sector, I mean, you have a cul-de-sac off in a dollar road services, but maybe 12 lots or something there. Yes, sir. So the balance of the 103 inches is 90. They're served by the two points of egress. That is correct. You've got a primary point of egress here That is correct. You've got a primary point of egress here, off in the Donald road. And then your secondary point of egress actually comes from Falcon Point and then loops around and then swoops down here and then comes back down this way. So this is our secondary point of access from the Falcon Point entry. We're in the preliminary class. You just gotta go ahead. Can we take questions from the public at this point? That's what you're called sharing this thing. This isn't a public here anything. It's a ministerial option. Yeah. OK, we're just going to have to rely on what stats presented us and what we've gotten. Sorry about that. I guess my, I'm going to comment on what is a kind of recurring theme. While this is ministerial, it was rezone years ago. I still get help but feel like we do exacerbate a problem of facilities water. As an example, by building 103 homes, having said that, this is more for the public, this was rezoned years ago. And unless we have a violation of an ordinance or something that is not conforming what was approved. We don't have a legal ability to deny it. So I feel like we exacerbate a problem of facilities, which we share, and I'm just being honest with everybody, but I'm trying to communicate what what can we do and what can we do as a P and Z's commission and what we're being asked to do today essentially is a, they call it a ministerial function that means again unless there's violating an ordinance which this does not seem to violate anything. It seems to be compliant with our ordinances. Um, our, we have no ability to deny it. Because we don't want to, you know, because we don't want it. It's, it's already been re-zoned. We have some requirements that they're meeting the requirements. And today we're simply being asked to move it to the next phase. So if anybody wants to add or disagree, please do, but I want to try to communicate. That's the best thing. I know. Can you make it really quick? Yeah. Okay. I mean, I live in the bottom. You'll need to live in the bottom. C wider to four, back and bird lane, back and point. I understand what they were saying about the road that was supposed to be been redone, but it doesn't go all the way to their development. It stops at fucking points. So the hot mat, the road is just, excuse my language, cracked. Earlier in the year, when we had all those rains, I live on that creek of the back it came up into my backyard 100 feet so your building is a flood that's gonna make it even worse for us over there I'll show you the video my backyard well thank you for the comments and it's now part of the record. You might want to send an email or letter into staff, but we don't have the final word on this city council gets with this and another week or so. I have one question of use. Please. Good. So, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, zone, but it's up to this, my entire south zone, or fence line backs up to this. The flood is, flood zone, we attempt to talk to them, the dollar road floods as it is now comes through there, as he says there's, there's a big concern about the flooding, but that's really not as big a concern I have is there were the traffic on the dollar road itself. Everybody who lives in 40 comes down the dollar road and the event is 16 and 70 miles an hour if they're not going to widen or do something with McDonald road That's going to be kind of an issue and I guess the plating of purples so part of this property was a plated or approved way back and then part of it was approved Just a few years ago because I was at all the meetings above of these how are we dividing what was improved in 2019? How are we dividing that into two separate flats? When it was approved, there's a 138th flat there. The property behind me was approved many years earlier with Falcon Point when that was approved. So there's a dividing line now where we've got two separate properties work before. The preliminary crap, but approval for the 10838ers, the Queen B and Falcon Point bread there on McDonald road. That had a green space and all kinds of trails and all that stuff. Now you've got to split into two separate packets. So I don't know how that weighs in. You might be able to. Yeah, absolutely. So I've got a problem addressing the comments. Thank you guys for coming up and providing those questions. So this is just, this is our phase one. So that's why it's divided up. And in order to facilitate the secondary point of access, which is why we had to dip into, well, be considered the Falcon Point zoning is dipping into that. So this is simply just phasing this out and into multiple phases. So this would be phase one of the Bristol Valley project. We have phase two, and phase two may get split up into phase two and phase three, which would be kind of the balance of that. As far as the flood control goes, actually during our flood city, we, and in surveying, we came across that as far as the flood control goes actually during our flood city we in surveying we came across a couple of man-made levees that were actually protruded out into the floodplain area. One of them was approximately in this location right here and there's another one approximately down here in this location right here which was causing a lot of water to back up in this floodplain area so we are with our grading plans have shown to remove those manmade levees. They're not part of the original flood study. And so that should help the water flow through a little bit better and not back up as much as it has been lately. So definitely an improvement of those manmade levees were put in place of sometime between when the city did their initial flood study and when we did our arch on the site surveying and topography analysis. So, now it's we're here to be good neighbors. We're here to take concerns and address those concerns that the best we can and you know, those man made levies is a perfect example of finding something that was done on a property that umbe notes to city staff or city engineering or or P and Z or council or anybody you just might just go out there and did it. So correcting that issue will help solve a lot of problems. Okay. It's the staff is there a drainage study that has yet to be evaluated, completed, approved? Yes, there is. It has not been stamped yet. That is all in the process with the city engineer. That he's evaluating the utilities, the road, and drainage. Okay, so the feedback that we've gotten from folks today should be part of that work effort. Yes, absolutely. Make sure we're not hurting people. Yes. And I made a note we'll have a city engineer available at city council to address some more detail as appropriate. Thank you. Any question for staff? Any comment regarding how the final flat is coming forward from preliminary flats that were done in different times? Sure. You want to talk? You want to take that and you want me to? Yes, so the process when that can come in, want to take a look at a property. In this case, they zone the property. First, preliminary flat is there to be able to establish if you have adequate public facilities. You have water and sewer, where those lines are coming in from, where your easements are going to be located. And once you have that, then you can move forward to your final flat and your construction documents. So your civil will come in and that could change something. But hopefully what you found is that you found that three of your preliminary plat to answer those things. Now one thing that like Mr. Joyce had indicated, the leddies, there's no way that, the said there was no way that we would know that. So is that can affect anything from the final plat sample? But it's probably not as far as your benchmarks and so forth where you have your your your loss laid out. So the the plan development ordinance for the larger track to the south, it was approved 20 years ago. Okay, enough. And 18 years ago, and then the area that's north of the Korean people, it was just six years ago. Okay, good. Yes. Within the confines of those PV ordinances, because they each come with, you know, a prescribed area, are we looking at, at plants that are drawn on those two ordinances? I mean, like, we haven't, like, mixed and matched. Yes, and, and that's one thing we provided in staff for the two warden, so from 2014 and 2019, that establishing the concept plan as it was indicated where you had the area shown for the area that was in question for the roadway. But that also showed where we had the differentiation in the lots from the, except from the half acre lots and your one acre lots and the you've indicated is that line comes in right here essentially is where you've got the 2014 ordinance here and the 2019 ordinance here to the north. He's out in four. I'm sorry. I did a seat 2014. 2004. I'm sorry. 2014 ordinance and the 2019 ordinance. In the 2019 ordinance, which has the larger one acre lots and be on the right hand side. Correct. That included also the area that was above the creek. Yes. Okay. Now I understand. All right. Do you want to go ahead and take action on these? I'll make a motion that we approve with the conditions that staff have noted. I'll start the gun with you. with the conditions that staff have noted. I'll start the conversation. About a second by one. All by one. Okay. We'll be doing that. Okay. At this time, we are going to move into executive session. Can I read it right off the camera? Okay. Let me right off the camera? Okay. So I don't floor executive session. In accordance with the Texas government code chapter 551 sub chapter, the claims, any additional recess and executive session that close meeting to discuss the following section 4a section 551.071 consultation with an attorney on a matter in which we give you the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas disciplinary rules professional conduct state of bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this subject who are regarding one zoning subdivision regulations or comprehensive plan standards and two base number Z8 2020 402 bar. So we will adjourn and do that. We can be ran so that folks can say and then please see it here. Okay. And I don't know how long it'll take. I wish I could tell you in advance. Last time we did this at least an hour. Maybe we can do it unless we do more. I'm going to say, well, boy, I'm going to be in the position. You know that well. We're reconvenient open session. I believe it's just one hour. We were help. How many do you have us go out at seven? Well, 7616. Okay. Good. In accordance with the Texas government code chapter 551 the planning zoning commission reconvene into regular section to consider any action if any on matters discussed an executive session and we have no action. The zoning case is VA 2024 O2R, inducted public hearing and act on an application to change the zoning classification from A agricultural district to PDSF plan development for single-family residential use for property addressed 6717 cell at them 549 further described in fact 15 A Roger the survey has to be 31 severe peace law, welcoming Texas. Thank you chair. We will be taking this item up next. It'll look familiar to you. This is 14 approximately 14 acres that is situated between the Latter-day Saints Church, which is at Dennis Bailey and 549 and the horse farm to the east of there. So the property is situated right here. It's addressed as 6717. It's actually owned by the Yardley, Carolyn Yardley and Alan Dowell. You have met Mr. Dowell before he's spoken at public hearings on this property when they have occurred in the past. The applicant is KFM engineering. Mr. Knight is here representing the engineering firm who's representing the owners of the property. They are requesting a change of zoning from the Ag District to plan development for single-family residential uses based on the SF-43 zoning district. For this iteration of the application we mailed notice of public hearing on August 16th and we did receive some responses which are included in your packet and noted on the map here on the screen. The concept plan included in the development standards is shown here. You took this item up. I believe in July. No, yes, in July. And made some, quite a bit of deliberation on it and recommended denial of the application that gave quite a bit of feedback for the applicant to take into consideration. And they did do that and have made this new application to try to address the commission's concerns. And I'm going to highlight some of the key features of this concept plan. And then the next screen, I believe, is the original application, and then we'll look at the new application on the next screen. So the original application, as shown here, was included 12 one acre lots on the 14.6 acres with a midpoint turnaround to break up a 1300 square 1300 linear foot cold as sack. area requirements of the SF-43 district were met for the most part. One notable exception was the front yard setback. They were requesting to be able to do some 30-foot setbacks and some 40-foot setbacks where the SF-43 requirement is for 50-foot front yard setbacks. The density of the development was less than one acre because of the right of way and this proposed detention pond, which would be an HOA common area right at the entrance at 549. So the commission had some concerns about the uniqueness, the the straight alignment of the street, the setbacks, open space, concern about the this swell, this detention area right here, being filled and built upon later and connectivity by way of trails within the within this small neighborhood. So the applicant took those feedback items into consideration and provided this revised concept plan. The notable features here are a reduced lot count from 12 down to 10, retaining the pond and actually turning it into a more formalized and landscaped detention area with a trail coming off of the sidewalk and meandering around the detention pond and then crossing over the median to get to the sidewalk to be able to go down and access this other detention pond or ultimately be able to get to 549 and maybe by some stroke of luck get across 549 to get to the trail that's on the other side of 549. The street was some curvatures were added to the street. Some embellishments were added at the midpoint turnaround. It previously didn't have these landscaped wedge wedges right here and here and let's see what else. Oh the setbacks. The setback has been the front setback has been set at 50 feet for all lots and the plan development standards address a few more features so we'll get into those here in a second. So I think we covered all of that. We got the the lot count the density is decreased a bit because the lots flanking this proposed detention pond are one and a half acres. This one here is and this one here are both approximately one and a half acres. Actually, the one at the front is, the one at the back is the smaller of the two. It's a one and a half, and this one's a little bit like close to 1.6 acres. So the original application included four variances. The new application includes one variance. And this is an excerpt from the development standards that talks about the changes that they made after after coming before you in July. They added some stricter fencing requirements and also see the city's waterline requirements were adhered to. There was some concern at the commission about the looping of the waterline possible looping of a waterline. So they made mention of that that would be a that that would be the condition ultimately that the waterline would be looped and then to remediate some of the aesthetics, they reduced the lot count, added some open space and embellished the street alignment and turn around. So the cul-de-sac link is the remaining variance being requested. I apologize. I left the wrong concept plan here on the screen. It should look like that one. But this is just a blow up of the radius of the turn around the radiance requirements of our fire code and the fire truck can make its way around both of those circles. So the development standards stick pretty closely to the SF-43 requirements. Of course we've talked about the lot count. There are some building standards regarding masonry element on the amount of stucco, the alignment of garages and detached garages, requiring those to be offset, according to what we do require in the SF43 standards. All ornamental rod iron fencing and the cul-de-sac would require that variance for length, street lighting will conform to the outdoor lighting ordinance. Sidewalks are four feet and width, a minimum of four feet from the curb, all varied utilities. The entry feature, as you guys know, gets reviewed by the Architecture Review Board. Drainage standards will conform to our engineering standards of design in the city. Engineer would be involved in approving those any drainage plans when the plan set comes in. The civil plan set comes in with the final plot. There will be an HOA to maintain the two common areas. And we've already discussed the cul-de-sac length. And so as far as zoning compatibility goes, properties in the area to the west is the church, which is the SF43 piece right here. To the north is the hills of Buffalo Creek and east is ag, that's the the horse farm right here and to the south, those cobblestone farms, which is an sf43 plan development. So this change does seem to be in general compliance and conformity with the surrounding zoning classifications. As far as the revised ordinance matrix, this is the original one showing the four variances that were originally requested, those were the front setback, the driveway links, which is a function of the front setback, and then also the cul-de-sac link. Now we are down to just the cul-de-sac link as a variance. The future land use plan The Future Land Use Plan indicates that this area is planned for rural estates. Rural estates is defined as large lot single family development on lots and excess of one acre of developable area. And the concept plan that's submitted in your packet is in substantial conformance with that rural est's designation. And the current ag designation and our SFE 3.0 district are also conforming zoning districts to the rural estate designation. So whenever a proposal comes in that involves a rezoning. We can refer back to the comprehensive plan or some questions to ask to determine if the proposal is in conformance with or is appropriate. And so those questions we've covered them before with regard to this project. So I'm not going to go into detail on these. They still all apply. They all the same questions apply about whether it's providing something unique, if it's within walking distance to important things, if they're providing pedestrian and bicycle connections, and how taking into consideration how the development will impact the city fiscally in terms of taxes, infrastructure, services, etc. And then asking how does the development deal with the environment and is this a type of type and quality of development that will be acceptable for the long term. Those are the types of questions that the comprehensive and suggests that you should consider as you're applying your measure of discretion. And as you guys know, an development process following a rezoning, a preliminary plot and a final plot and improvement plans are required to create the subdivision. And at that time, that swim applicant demonstrates how the neighborhood will connect to the city's infrastructure, sewer, to the site from a tenage line on Dennis Bailey. Near the corner of Dennis Bailey in 549, water is available in multiple locations to the site. We have a 12-inch line, an 8-inch line, and then another 12-inch line. So their engineer, Jim's team, has several options to investigate in terms of water provision. So if the commission makes a motion tonight for approval, we, the staff are suggesting a few conditions for that. That all the lots must contain at least one developer will acre. You've met that condition. So you don't have to state that as part of your motion. That the engineer sitting engineer would approve. Oh, we're not filling the pond. So skip number two. Yeah, this is a, I apologize. I should have replaced this slide. And I'm going to click right, click right past that because those are old conditions. So placing more that you have, you have one listed in your packet, I believe, which deals only with the cul-de-sac. So, I believe that will wrap up my presentation. The applicant, as I've mentioned, is here tonight and then this does require public hearing. Any questions or facts? We'll hear from the boat. What are the size of a lot in the hills? North. Hills of Buffalo Creek? They aren't all the same size. I'm going to go back to that aerial. Oh, it's not shown on the aerial. I apologize, Joe. I don't know the specifics of those lot sizes. They seem to be bigger than I have. They're larger in general. So could you use a pointer to tell us where the water is going to lead or how it's going to live? I can't because I'm not an engineer. Do you know? I think I have a microphone. Okay, we'll hear from that. Okay, so let's go ahead and hear from him. You're welcome. Mr. Chairman, there's a commission on each of them night. KFM engineering. And we're pleased to be back in front of you tonight. I think the meeting earlier this summer gave us some very significant direction that we need to change to try to meet some of your. Your guidelines. We tried to do that. Mr. Chairman, directly to your point on the water, we had a connection point that stuck to us in front of the church there on our adjacent boundary and we're still going to connect there, bring the water line across them. We're also going to go cross five, 49 to connect. Create a two-loop connection system to divide two points of thinking into the property. So just wanted to dress that right off the bat but one thing we did do, obviously the density changed. We went from 12 loss to 10 loss. The two open space loss that show the detention ponds on there, both of those will happen to improve to make them more functional and not just be stock tanks. And so we want to activate those too. We want the trails around them benches around them landscaping and then bring them in and make them a real benefit to the community will be open to the public. The trails will be open to the public, the open space, but they will all be maintained by the HOA. We have worked very diligently with the, to make sure all the emergency access vehicles have significant abilities to turn around. So the creative roundabout there in the middle of the property, we wanted to not just put around about in there, he gets emergency vehicles, but we wanted to beautify it and to create something that was unique and special there a little bit. We think about landscaping that and doing some improvements there with some hard escapes and softscape. We can really do something fairly nice for the property. The, I think Aaron did a wonderful job presented. We backed it down until we had the one variance now. When we understand, we always knew that that, that cold as sack link in there was, was a challenge, but we tried to soften that and make that as best we could. We've site planned and this massing all the lots to know that the homes would be there. We have significant interest in people who lots to know that the homes would be there. We have significant interest in people who want to be on the property and so we're very excited about it. We didn't want to really dense project 12 was push any way but then we think it feels right. It feels good because we only have a handful of carters that are going in and out. I don't know if I can work this fancy. This is way beyond my technical experience. So there's the updated plan, a little cleaner plan. Obviously, we have the one and one and a half acre lot tracks. We have the two HOA lots with trails and amenities. The intermediate turnaround, the errands so appropriately a point of two. We had range from cold, we don't have a situation where we have a lot of flood, we have, we have an obligation there that we have to do that. And those retaining those ponds and beautifying them and activating them with some landscaping, and some heart-scape, you think will be a real benefit as well. We've worked really hard on tree preservation, trying to preserve all that. There's not many trees on the property, but in there not necessarily the trees are there not necessarily the ones that we want to see all the time but they're trees and we want to protect those and we want to use those to screen and help with our neighbors our neighbors kind of see exactly what they see today and I know there was a lot of discussion to ask about making sure we comply with the city's requirements on the ornamental for the fencing so we're 100% combined with the city's fencing regulations. We've tried to do the best we could to present you a project that not only we would be proud of but you would be proud of. And so we're here to answer any questions we can to help you do the process and obviously as we go forward, we've listed you at Final Piper, we have a long way to go assuming that everything works out in your support, we had a long way to go to go through council, then we have to go through plenary plan and final plan and construction documents so there's be a while to get to that process. Just a question, I'm looking at the design and I think it was in the previous design as well. You have the row of trees that line the street. Is that on individuals, the individual lot? So those are supposed to be responsible for those? That's correct. That's correct. Now, those are shown artistically. Obviously, we have driveways there and things there. But we are going to make the commitment to put landscaping along those trees. I'm up so along that right away there to soften that roadway as well. And I'm not sure if I have another exhibit here that might show it. This is the general entry on the skip passes. And if this one shows a better idea of what the, some of the landscaping would look like once we got in there with the runway constructing. Is there water in these two ponds now? It depends on what type of the day it is. I think today, yes, there is one in the middle one, but there's no one in front because there is no one in front. Okay. Okay. So the- I was going to naturally spring. The one in the middle. I've never seen it go dry and I've been doing a whole lot. I'm going to make a couple of the cows that we drank that a bit. It's even during the drop time it's full. It's perfect for the menety for us to create some type of community interaction engagement there. That was a great recommendation. We got from the commission last time. And we took that heart. It's actually going to be a big value to proper. Right. Okay. So you're representing the other. We can call you back up. We need to, but I think we should go ahead. Yeah, me questions for you to the public hearing. No, I don't think so. OK, so at 834 PM, we'll open the public hearing. Does anyone wish to speak in favor or against this proposal? I speak the G.R. You heard me. You're welcome to speak again. I mean, please. I'm Al Al, of course. You know, I'll let us call you. Come on out. We're going to do yourself. Some people might not have been here the time before. Anyway, I've been through all kinds of phases. We're namely through that. I'm sorry. Al Al, 67, 17, South, 17 South FM 549 Rockwell, 753-2. Light up a minute. But anyway, I've been through all the different stages of the different designs and everything like this. This is the one I most proud of. I like the fact that it retains the original pond. I've been around that pond. I've actually swam in that pond, believe it or not, when I was little. And of course we've hunted the properties and we've raised cows and horses and everything else. I really like the design. The guys have come up with on this one, more so than any which had so far. I know it's gonna be a tight deal for them on 10 houses or 10 lots, but I think it's actually a better fit for these. Thank you. Anyone else wish to speak. 825 will close by by hearing the commissioners. discussion. Oh, no. I mean, I, I've been here through each one of your presentations. I believe less of you may one last month. I miss last. But I was familiar with the original plan that we've got in there and you're new in today. And I have to say, I'm kind of wowed. I mean, I think you listen carefully to what a variety of us said and almost all those points are incorporated into this. And that's what we like to see in an applicant. We're trying to make Keith the best place possible. And I'm, this would be a subdivision, I'd be proud of. So thank you, did a really good job. Thank you. I feel like I'm the EOR of the mission. Let me first say, I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. makers, let's say, and horse farm may not always be a horse farm, but that's, you know, much larger property in the hills. The reason why I ask is those properties are definitely larger. I do feel that with with 10 houses, the density is higher than those. And so having said that, a lot of good improvements and I commend you on that. It is a somewhat, it is a unique property in that it's relatively narrow compared to the length of the overall property. And consequently that makes it kind of unique and maybe different than other properties that have, let's say, the same amount of acreage. But I do feel a little concerned about the fact that some properties around it have larger lots. The hills may be a good example of that because that's where it's at. But yeah, comments? Yeah, I like this one a lot better than what we had there on the ledding. Did follow the situations and comments that we had in the vote. So yeah so I look at this I see a lot of the suggestions that we made have been incorporated in this this is a nice looking you have have the framework of a really nice boutique neighborhood. I mean, the pond is gonna be a nice amenity to particularly the residents, but others it might wander in from the trails. The way that you did the turnaround is very attractive. It's the beginnings of a very nice, so I'll call it a boutique neighborhood because it's a smaller neighborhood. It's something I can get behind with if you'd entertain one change is would a lot count of eight work. That's that's where I would. Like, unfortunately, I think we're at the world razor. I turn and he could hit me in the back and tell me to hit me. Yeah. We had more people interested in buying a lot to try to handle. We had lots of, so. But I think we're right with the cost of the infrastructure. I think we'll write about this part. You know, originally the the push is for larger lot, you know, up to three acre lots. And this this property doesn't really, I mean, that's that was the original thought is, oh, we'd love to have three acre lots in this parcel. It doesn't lend itself to that realistically. But you know, if we could get if we could get some, there's two nice lots here. If there was some room on the lot count, that's what it would take to get me 100% behind. Would you allow me to speak just that? That's. Please. You're there. Questions for the advocate. Let's give this to your name and address. John Ergon, 463, Keystone Bend, Heath, Texas. for the ethic. Let's give this to your name and address. John Ergon, 463, Keystone Bend, he, Texas. So during the moratorium, I was here on a different project and met Alan, you know, or her down and speak. And when I saw this, you know, the property came up. I knew exactly what it was. I've been looking for a primary residence largered lots. I have three boys, three five and eight. And we're on a five acre, you know, five or half acreed lot in heathen crossing. And so when this came up, I, you know, those those looking hey, how can we, you know, one make heath a nicer, you know, nicer bigger lots, larger lots? I've been looking for three to five acres personally for since 2022, like, hard, you know, looking multiple offers that have been a lot of properties. This project came up, you know, I got, I got Jimmy Cameron involved because I originally wanted to take the back section as a larger piece for my family, very high end, you know, in a neighborhood. And what we're looking to build is more of a state style, you know, a lot. Well, when that came to, you know, came into a situation, you know, we had the water restrictions, we had certain things that I don't want to read the five-acre lot to take care of, right? You know, due to just landscape taking care of this facility. So part of this design had an SNL on the letter and say, hey, you know, can I come out with my boys? Can we look at this land? He openly let me take my side by side. We went back there. We looked at it and really fell in love with the property because one, you have Ridge Lakes, which is right there, you have several phases in savage lakes. And in the style home, the Oaks above the way across the street, it's older, big lots, take up a ton of water, right? But this particular property had more sentimental of like, hey, this property's been in Dal family for 100 years. And he talked about it. It then, Alan's keeping this thing up himself and going to this whole property. They're taking care of cattle. They're getting the upkeep. And I liked that. I really want this five five acres and going through the moratorium, going through all of the stuff and I was looking at it from a personal perspective and that's where I said, we can do this to help keep making nicer place, one, designed to live, two, we can help Allen and I know that I'm not ever leaving here. I'm big in Lake Point Church, our community, and our family's rooted here in my wife's grip here. So we want to move the right way, and we try to do everything we could in this development to bring a custom home, Keith and Crossing originally feel, not a track builder feel by any means whatsoever. And so this thing has a little bit of sentimental to me because I stepped into this originally on a personal deal. I wanna come and do some bigger lots, and that's what we initially wanted, some three acre tracks. But with the water issue of knowing, you know, we barely can keep our half-acre stuff alive, you know, and where that is, we tried to do this, where it's best for the city, you know, from that aspect, but also what's best for the community from a visual standpoint. And so that's, you know, I wanted to speak, you know, this is how this project even came to light was, it was a personal deal. I wanted to be on that back hold of the sack and really couldn't see how it worked with where we're at, you know, from a water restriction standpoint. So we try to make this as nice as we could for the community and I think that's done by going down to 10 months 10 months. So just clarify, you're part of the development group? I, yeah, well, I'm, this is how this thing got started. I got care about not about the development. I just wanted to clarify it because we already had a public hearing and I wouldn't make sure you're representing the developer. I'm just, I was speaking, you know, for, you know, telling you how this project got started. Thanks. Thank you. Well, I'll kind of echo some comments. I think that Harry had made and Bob also, and I think you're to be commended by what you've done. And like they said, we like to see applicants that listen to what we tell them. And I know from talking with the city staff, you've worked with them and they've worked with you. So I think I'm in favor of approving this. I've come to the conclusion that there's only so much you can do with this piece of land. It's small and it's not gonna have a significant impact economically on the city or the water I don't think at this point and minimal impact. I think traffic wise. So I like what you've done. I think you've made it as unique as you possibly can. I mean, it's not perfect. Would we like to see large or large yes, but economically speaking as you said, you're probably right on the cusp right now of making it economically feasible. And so given all of that, I think you've done a really good job and I think it's there's some uniqueness to what otherwise was really not a unique piece of property from just the way it was laid out. And I think you did a great job. So, yep, I'm in favor of supporting you. Well, echo what Wayne said. I mean, we can't make the lot any wire. So we're all of us are stuck with design constraints that revolve around that. I think you'll have come a long ways in providing us with some of the things that we asked for and inside the plan development ordinance, I think you'll have come a long ways in providing us with some of the things that we asked for. Inside the plan development ordinance, you've given us a much higher end product with the pincings. For example, additions to the H.O.A. the community space, the accents there and the middle. I just I think that it's good enough to get my minute. So I'll make a motion that we approve it with the condition that was at the point the public act linked with the condition that's recommended by the staff. I'm sorry, I can't. Got a second by Harry, all in favor? Okay, those opposed? Okay. Thanks, Mike. All right, so that concludes our business to see me in a believe. Thank you. When we do everything we can make this make nice and you're live in. We sure did. Thank you. Great for all of us. Thank you.