I'm sorry. Being there pointed out to begin the Wednesday, September 4th, 2024 Board of Architecture Review Meaning. And first we're going to ask if anyone has would like to speak on any of the docket items, please fill out a speaker's form and bring them up to Ms. Helman. And if you are a member of the community, you have three minutes. And if you are a member from the Civic Association, speaking on behalf of the Civic Association, you have five minutes. Now we move on to the agenda. First item on the docket is the consideration of the meeting minutes from July 16, 2024. Are there any modifications to the minutes as submitted? Any member of the public that has modifications or corrections to the minutes submitted. Saying none, may I have a motion, please. I move to adopt the minutes from the July 16th meeting. I have a second. Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed, say nay. Eyes have it. Move on to the consent calendar, Mr. Conkey. Thank you sir we have a few items in the consent calendar this evening. First item is item number three, BAR 2024-00279 Oldenstarch District request for alterations at 309 North Alfred Street. Applicant is Jacob Hedgeman. the city of the city of the city of the end of the year. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. The first is the last one. know seven is B.A.R. 2024-00302 Oldenstark District request for signage at 101 South St. East of Street Unit A. Thank you. Are there any member of the board that would like to remove any of these items from the consent calendar? No. Any member of the public that would like to remove any of these out in from the consent calendar? None. May I have a motion on the consent calendar, please? Miss Dandion, would you like to make a motion? I'm motion to approve the items on consent calendar. Is there a second? A second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. I second that all those in favor say aye I the opposed a nay I Have it if your items are number one around three through seven that are on its consent calendar your item has been approved. Thank you for coming What's next Mr. Conkin under items previously deferred? Yes, sir. We have one item Tonight that was previously deferred. Item number eight and nine, year 2024-00222, Oldenstark District request for addition and alteration at 729 South Pit Street. Applicant is Ashley Bohn. And coupled with that is BER 2024-00234, Oldenstark District request for partial demolition encapsulation at 729 South Pit Street, Applicant is Ashley Bohn. the report. We will start with the request for a partial demolition and encapsulation. 729 South Pith Street. Applicant is Ashley Bone. The applicant or the representative here to speak on behalf of the application. Welcome. Please state your name and address for the record. to the staff report. Yes. You agree to the conditions on the staff report? Yes. Do you want to give us a presentation or you just want to answer questions? Answer questions. Okay. Thank you. Remember the board has questions for the applicant. We will. Any member of the public has questions for the applicant? Yes. We will. Any member of the public has questions for this applicant? No speaker forms, Ms. Helmne. Okay. About that, we will close the public hearing group and move on to board deliberation. And who would like to begin? It's San D.I. So could you tell us what changes you made? I remember we discussed the roof. Ice. Yeah, the drawings. So the roof is now extends back to meet the existing roof to try to deal with the or to, you know, better to address the issues with water that were raised. And then, trying to find the right page. Yeah. I think that's the primary change. Those are anything else? I'm going to put it on the table. If I could just to interject your first one minute, just, um, someone, can you pull up this page here number eight of the staff report? Just want to make sure the board understands some of the modifications. Now go up. So there's some of the changes. Sorry, we have a little bit of technical difficulty. Some of the changes also include some reconfiguration of windows that were the board. You may recall the board asked for some simplification of windows that windows were a little large and sort of unbalanced. So the windows have been, have been balanced a little bit. The form has also been cleaned up as it goes on the north side, even though the north side is not really visible from the alley very much. But there was some concern, I think about a step, a step in the roof over there. There we go. There we go. So you can see here the windows top is the previous one, the bottom is the new one. So the windows are just kind of look a little bit more like the house than they did before. And I think I don't think I'm missing anything. I think that's most of it. Just kind of simplified the room form. And I think made the windows, yeah, there you go. That's the previous one. And then you can see where it has become more simplified. So I just wanted to point out some of the modifications. Thank you. And we can act clear for us, Mr. Colkey. Any other board members or comments? I appreciate your working with staff. I think it's a much nicer submission. And the roof is tied in nicely. I think it'll be a nice addition. Well, they were a big help. Yeah. Good. I would say the same that we appreciate you having the patients to work with staff and to get this. That will mean that in a comical way, Mr. Kunky. And work with staff and try and making this, it is a much nicer renovation. And so I appreciate all the hard work you guys have put into this. Thank you. I don't believe I was at the meeting when we considered it last time. I have a concern. I reviewed the application as it is now, and I think it looks nice. So I'm inclined to support it. Right, thank you. Ms. Sandion, would you like to have a make-emotion party, please? Sure. Same here. I move to approve Paris staff recommendations. Is there a second? A second? Mr. Colchie? Yes, sir. Sorry, too many pieces, too many pieces of paper flound around here. Okay. Miss Indian. Hi. Mr. Scott? Hi. Miss O'Neil? Hi. Mr. Spencer? Hi. Congratulations Alnino. Hi. I'm Mr. Spencer. Hi. Congratulations. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. Colchie, what's next under new business? Thank you. So now we move on to new business tonight. First item under new business is item number 10 and 11. First is BAR 2024-00266. Parker Gray, excuse me, request for alterations at 1008 or Noko Street. Applicant is Cody Stadler, Stadler Design LSE. And BAR 2024-00295, Parker Gray. Requests for partial demolition and encapsulation at 1008 or Noko Street, Applicant Cody stoutler stoutler design LLC Applicant or the representative here to speak on behalf of the project Welcome please stage name and address for the record please. Hi evening. I'm Cody stoutler my address is 9207 volunteer drive Alexandria you raise or not Have you read staff recommendations? I have. Do you agree with staff recommendations? Yes. OK. Would you like to make a presentation or just answer questions? I can just answer questions. OK. I see. Remember the board has questions for this applicant. Looking at your section, it looks like your new gapal roof is basically on top of the existing CMU, right? You're not really raising the side walls higher than the highest CMU point. Correct. Yeah, the CMU is currently misaligned, so bringing up one side with blocking to align and then building on top of that. Okay, that sounds good. And then you're going to be facing the CMU with flag stone? Yes, yes. Okay. And then how does that, what is that condition of the corner? Is there a corner piece for the flag stone or is that? I think the intention is that we'll find corner pieces for the flag stone. Okay. So that we don't have an ugly budgetary in the corner. Any other questions from the board? Seeing none, here are there any members of the public that would like to speak or ask questions whether it's applicant? Any speakers on the phone? I just want to tell them that we'll close the public hearing and move on to board deliberations. Mr. Scott, Mr. Vice Chair, would you like to begin? Yeah, I mean, I think it looks fine. My only question is this, the treatment on the exterior is that all flagstone there or is it that lattice that we see in the photo now? It's all flagstone. It's the the texture the way the texture renders. Yeah, it'll all be a flagstone. And orange a large format facing flagstone not a stack. Is it a natural stone or a natural not simulated? Okay, thank you. Miss Sandion, you have any comments? I'm not sure if you can see it. Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? Is that the same thing? That would be good. I think that's all for me. Mr. Doninho, do you have any additional comments? If not, would you like to make a motion? I'm motion to approve this application with staff recommendations. Is there a second? Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. I think there's demolition. There's demolition Mr. Compe. Sorry, I was trying to get to my button. Sorry, there's demolition on the roof, right? Thank you, though. Thank you, Mr. Scott, for catching up on us. Just talking to me with my button here. Yeah, that's all you struggling at. Thought I can get it through without you. I'm not sure if you can see the comments. Yeah, right. Exactly. Okay. Miss Andion. I. Mr. Scott. I. Mr. New. I. Congratulations, sir. Mr. Conkey, what's next on the new business docket. So the next item of the docket tonight is actually one that we'd like to defer. So I'd like to get the ask the board to vote under deferral. We push that to the end. The very last item. We can't it's not the applicant is not here tonight. Yeah, I know we just do that at the very end. Okay, we can do that so we can get through the rest of the docket items. Sure, absolutely. Thank you. Okay, so then that puts us to number 13 and 14. This is BAR 2024-00280 Oldenstark District. Request for addition and alterations at 622 and a half South St. Aces Street. Applicant is Michael A. Mitchell Construction LLC. And BAR 2024-00307. Oldenstark District request for partial demolition and encapsulation at 62 and a half South St. Aces Street, applicant is Michael A. Mitchell Construction LLC. Welcome. Thank you. Please state your name and address for the record, please. Michael Mitchell, 61-03 Kirk, and the court in Springfield, Virginia. Have occupation as a contractor. Okay. I'm a member of the community of the state of California. I'm a member of the community of the state of California. I'm a member of the state of California. I'm a member of the state of California. I'm a member of the state of California. I'm a member of the state of California. answer questions. Answer questions. Okay. All right. All right. Who has questions from this applicant from the board? This Sandy, looks like you're ready to push your button. One question. So I understand that this is going to have a flat-roof correct TPO. Are you gonna bring the gutter up all the way? The existing gutter. I see there's a line, the pipe basically, to, is that what you're gonna use? Yes, you need to mash up the gutter. That's all my question. I have a question. Seeing, it looks like this structure of the roof that you're playing on this is a flat roof for the most part. Yes. How is it draining? It exists. Which way is it sloping? To the back of the house. Sloping so it's going to all slope towards the back of the house right over the doorway area. To when drain that's there? Yes. Okay. And how does it tie into the other roof? Or it doesn't knot it ties in under the soft bit. The height of it. Up up on the second floor. The second floor, yes. Oh, it'll tie right back in there. The gutter gets cut and the rafters will go back in onto the wall. They're resisting wall. And then it'll be a TPO roof on top of that. OK. Is downing you? You only have questions? I'm going to bring up the side elevation, I think, we'll help to clarify what you're talking about. PJT now. I'm sorry, that didn't clarify anything for me. It's not shown there, but it's in the picture, the gutter. I think it just goes up. And yeah. Yeah. That's why I had to question because I looked at that drawing. It doesn't clarify anything for me. It's drawing shows that, so I think the condition that you're referring to at the best that we have saw. Yes, I understand. Mm-hmm. I was having to read. Should we have any questions, Miss? The O'Neill? I didn't. Okay. I just had a couple of questions. It's so it looks like your addition will have somewhat of a little bit of a cantilever over the back door. Is that right? Do you have a trim detail at the bottom there? Or is it just going to be siding above a soft that how are you going to do that treatment at the bottom edge of the addition? Yeah. I mean on the outside edge that projects beyond the door. Okay, and. Okay, so ended the same. And in terms of the board thickness is at the same as what you have on the rear the existing rear addition of the house. Okay, the profile, the existing rear addition of the house? Okay, the profile of the board. Okay, thank you. See, you know, the question is, is there any member of the public that has questions for this application? Seeing none, we would close the public hearing and go on to board deliberation. And I will call on Ms. Downinho, would you like to make a motion or start to deliberation? I can make a motion to approve this application with the San Fracament Dations. Is there a second? Second. Mr. Colkey. Yes, sir. Ms. Andian. Aye. Mr. Scott? Aye. Miss Onio? Yes, sir Miss Andion I Mr. Scott I Miss El Nio I Amidstess Spencer. Hi, congratulations. Thank you for coming out What's next Mr. Conkey Okay next item on our agenda tonight at number 15 and 16. This is BAR 2024-00281 Old Mistorec District. Request for alterations at 1250 South Washington Street. Unit 219. Applicant is great day improvements to Rutter Perez. And BAR 2024-00282 Old Mistorec District. Request for partial demolition and encapsulation at 1250 South Washington Street. the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I'm going to go to the next floor. Welcome. You say your name and address for the record, please. My name is Scott Humphrey. My address is 1250 South Washington Street. The units 219 and 221. Thank you, Mr. Humphrey. Would you like to make a presentation or just answer questions? I was just willing to answer the questions this was all done by architects and the engineering people and we're in closing a porch or a balcony porch exactly like the other seven that are in the eight unit. And so I know I'm not an expert at the engineering. I'm not an expert in anything other than this has been approved by the condominium management people and if my 97 neighbors and the condominium are happy with it, I'm happy with it. I just want to get it in close so that it will look and be as appealing as the others. Thank you, sir. Have you read the staff recommendations? Have you read the staff recommendations? I said it. Yes, I have. You agree to staff recommendations? I did. Thank you. Does anyone remember the board has questions for the applicant? Is there any member of the public who has questions for the applicant? Is there any member of the public who has questions for the applicant? May I have someone to make a motion or start the deliberation, please? I would be glad to make a motion to approve the item's number 15 and 16 with staff recommendations. Is there a second? Second. Mr there a second? Second. Mr. Comkey? Yes, sir. Miss Andian. I? Mr. Scott? Yes. Miss Andian. I. Mr. Spencer. I. Congratulations, sir. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you coming out Mr. Comkey what's next? Okay, move it move it too fast for me here I didn't wish 17 who 17 is next This one is just 17. BR 2024-00293, Oldenstark District, request for alterations at 330 North Columbus Street. The applicant is Christine Braulting. Is the applicant or the representative here to speak on behalf of the project. So, the representative is going to be on behalf of the project. Let's push it to the back of the counter. We have one item left still. We'll do that and then circle back. The next item is at an abrate team. Okay. BAR 2024-00304, Oldenstark District, request for partial demolition and encapsulation at 804 Prince Street, applicant is neighbors, Cabanas Johnson, Trustee. Welcome. Mr. Chairman, members of the board, pleasure to be here. My name is Outerbridge Horsey. My address is 1228 and a half, 31st Street, Northwest Washington, Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Have you read this staff recommendations? Yes, I have. You agree to staff recommendations? I do, including the recommendations of archaeology, I'll extend. OK. Would you like to give a presentation or just answer questions? Happy to answer questions. OK. Remember the board that has questions for the South African? Any member of the public has questions for the South African? It's Hellman, are there any speakers for him? I'm sure he does. He just wants to answer questions. That being said, we will close the public forum and go on to board deliberation. May I have a motion from someone or would someone like to begin the deliberation? I can make a motion if no comments. I motion to approve for staff recommendations. Is there a second? I'll second that. Mr. Comkey. Is there a second? I'll second that. Mr. Colkey. Yes, sir, and this is demolition, but it's just one thing. Just complimenting the chair and his observation that it's a walk-off vote. Okay. Thank you, sir. I'll take that. This is Andy and... I. Mr. Antioch. I. Mr. Scott. Yes. It's on the new. I. I. Congratulations. Thank you very much. Mr. Con Katie looks like we may have two items we may have to defer. The board can hit the board. The applicant does not have to be here in order to to hear the case. So for number 17. That one yes that will be that with the staff is asking for the referral for that so we'll need you to vote on that one. Yes I know that one. Yeah but 17 I mean they aren't here they have not requested a deferral. So we can move forward with the I'm not sure if you can do that. I'm not sure if you can do that. Um, Aaron here. They have not requested a deferral. So we can move forward with the. All right. If you'd like. We have the staff report. Members feel comfortable without the client without the applicant being here. I'm comfortable with that. I did have a question though for Mr. Kongy about the window standards. And just as an FYI, I don't recall if it was this case or not, but somebody was in touch with staff, with another staff member, and whoever it was was told, oh, your case is deep into the docket, you don't need to get there right at seven. So again, I don't know if it was this case or not, but just as an FYI, somebody may be thinking, oh, I'm number 17 on the docket, I don't need to get there till 930. For sure. Anyway. OK. My only question was, these are double pain windows, or double, not single pain windows. That's correct. This application is for double pain windows, yes. So is that why it's before the board? That is why it's before the board, because this is, as we noted in the application, I'm sorry, in the staff report, it is technically an early building built in 19 to 19 to album 1921. The staff report notes the 1974 major renovation that changed the style of the building and that's why staff is recommending approval based on the 1974 date for the change. But the reason that it is before the board is because it is technically an early building. So, I mean, policy doesn't allow for double-main. So the historical facade that dates to the 19 teens has been modified, such that it's not really recognizable as an early building? Correct. I mean, if you look at this picture here, you can see the picture on the left is what it looked like prior to 1974. And then you can see in 1974, it was dramatically altered. Windows were, when the styles were changed, the Ruseb divided it into? No, no, no, it was still, it was a twin. But no, it didn't change the footprint of it. They just dramatically changed it to a game-all-roof. As we say, they colonialized it in 1974. And so that's dramatic difference in the style. That's why staff was saying, while it is technically an early building, we believe that it's really significantly in 1974. So the logic to why we would want a historical looking window, a single-pin window on an early building may not apply in this instance. That's the opinion of staff? Yeah. OK. I mean, I can live with that, but I'm interested. But it's ultimately our decision. Yeah. Of course, yes. That's why it's here at the board tonight and not with an administrative approval. Right and I think what you know what we were thinking, you know, for buildings that haven't been altered as much, that would encourage them to even though they may have modern windows to go back to a single pane so that we can, you know, bring the building back to its original condition, but... All right, who would like to begin the deliberation? Is Sandion? I moved to approve with the staff recommendation. Is there a second? I second. Sorry. Mr. Nia? No, I was just coughing. Laughing that came across as a second. You guys move fast tonight. You guys are making their heart on me. No, I can second that. Okay. Thank you. Were you coughed? All right, Mr. Conkey. Reserve the right to make that be a cough. Um this is not demolition. So this is not a roll call. Oh yeah. No removing the windows. Now this is a window replacement. So it would become a demolition if the windows were being larger. Kind of the wall area was getting removed, but it's just a replacement window. All right, just being a little conservative. All right, so got a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. I oppose, St. A. Eyes have it, congratulations. What's next under other business, Mr. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. We have the motion to accept the request. I move to approve the request. Second. All those in favour say aye. Aye. Opposed say nay. I have it. It's next under other business. Mr. Cullin. That is all we have tonight. It's remarkably under other business Mr. Cullin. I'm sorry. That is all we have tonight, guys. It's remarkably fast for a long docket. Thank you guys. That's a journey. Wow.