I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to put it on the top right corner. I'm going to put it live and recording a chamber. It's can you hear us? Yes, you can be heard. All right. Thank you. Good morning. This is Louirdes from the Chambers. We need actually four for a quorum. Right now I only see Daniel Guerra, our chair, present. Our applicants are also present. We can give them a few minutes to see if the rest of the, there's another board member just joined us, who brought up a suit. So let's just give them a few minutes. I say, I'll probably join us this morning. I'd like to welcome the applicants to the board. And please architects to share your screen, put up your presentation as far as perhaps you're rendering and new construction, exterior paint colors for those that are proposing exterior paint. And no worries if we do not get four, it goes with staff's recommendation, You do not need to return to the board. So your item does proceed. So I see a look of concern in some of the faces of the applicants, but no worries. You would just proceed with your building permit. I see another board member. Good morning, Rebecca Cruz. And we need one more. We need four, four core. And that's what we're waiting on. Our applicants are present. All three. We have three items this morning. All three are present. Applicants are present. So let's see who else joins us this morning. We need one more member. Good morning, Rebecca. I see you, Wavy. Lord, is I think, uh, I think our fourth member has joined. Havvy, Adbina, indeed. Okay. So we are ready, Mr. Chair, Mr. Gera, uh, whenever you want to proceed. Good morning, everyone. Good morning. OK, we've got a minute call this meeting to order. And if we could all stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. A Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Excellent. Okay if we could please have roll call starting with staff. Luis Cabrera. Marcus, like what? Alex, would you say the attorney's office? Excellent And then if we could have the board members Rebecca Cruz Good morning. So proud of the new rules mute. I think he's trying to tell us that yeah, something. So, brother, you're on mute. Yeah, I had to request to be unmuted. Oh, he's needing not a host. He chose him as co-host. Try unmuting now, it's a rata, there you go. Okay, I'm here. All right, so let's try this over again. We have Rebecca Cruz with us. And who else? I'm here by end up. Vice-chair by end up here and Sabrata and myself Danugera is that it? Okay, but that is for it. We have for them. Excellent. So if we could begin with the swearing end of the folks that will be giving testimony. Good morning, everybody. Everybody who's going to be testifying or making a presentation, I need you to please turn on your cameras so that we can see you in real time. I see a few that I don't see on, but I'm gonna go ahead and ask you to also please unmute yourselves if you are going to be speaking. Good morning. Good morning. If you could please raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give? It will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I do. I do. I do. Thank you very much. We can proceed. Excellent. And if Mr. Bearer then could give us the first item. Thank you. Welcome. Good morning. I like to remind the architects or applicants to please share your screen with your rendering, your color presentation. For example, the first item is the exterior paint. I'm not sure who's going to be presenting that, but Mr. Pedro Rodriguez, Do you know who is, you're muted also. Do you know who's going to be presenting that so they can see it up on the screen or I'm assuming then that everybody is indeed looking at it in their computers. Yeah, I don't have any renderings with me. So. Okay. More members, do you need assistance or do you all have views of these colors? I believe we have it here. Very well. Out for C. The applicant is Valencia South Miami Condominium Association, Inc. Property owner Pedro Rodriguez, location 6-001 Southwest 70th Street. The request is for exterior renovation Basically, it is indeed just, shouldn't say just, but it is for exterior painting. We have the zoning district transit, supportive development district, mixed use five, is where this building is located, it's a six story building. The intent is to change the look and it will consist of four colors in total. Three of them will be basically for the body. We're all familiar with Valencia and it's six story building with its different towers, even the center tower where the entrance, which is towards the center of the building. So we have three body colors, Sherham William 7643, 1015 and 7551, and then one accent color, Sherham William 0019. The code does allow for actually two body colors, one for the trim, two for the trim, accent colors, so forth, and then accent colors, and no more than the trim not being no more than 30% and so forth. So in this particular case, when reviewing the application, the elevation, which I was hoping to be on the screen, but if you are looking at it, it basically illustrates the proposed exterior paint color scheme for the building. It establishes a reservation that the paint color selected by the applicant coincides with the regulations and the code listed above. There are three color selected for the body, as I mentioned, sheeram William 7643, 1015, and 7551. And there they are in order, the three are the body colors. And then you have the accent color in more than 25% of the facade. The fourth color, the accent is the aqua and these are indeed by Sharon Williams and the code does not dictate it actually allows any manufacturer. So with that said, stabs recommendations for approval and with any suggestions from the board. It's very hard to tell on the rendering that was provided. This printout really illustrates Greek Villa. If you see looks like a gray, you know, Greek Villa is a cream like color. So on the left you have a better presentation of what these colors really look like. Thank you. I'll turn it over to the applicant if you wish to add anything further. And on the small little window, you have the existing colors. Thank you. Thank you, Lordeys. Okay, would the applicant like to make comment? No, they should do very well. Thank you. Okay, thank you, Lord. Okay. Would the applicant like to make comment? No, she did very well. Thank you. Thank you very much. We'll go ahead and open this up to public comment. Is there anybody in chambers are on zoom that would like to comment on this item? I don't have Mark as a voice, but there's no one in the chambers, but Mark is an eye. Yeah, there's nobody here but staff. Excellent. See, nobody on Zoom will go out and close public comment. Board members, Mr. Cruz, would you like to comment on this? Yes, I really love the color. So I think it's gonna be really pretty and aesthetically pleasing. I'm excited to see the change. Thank you, Mrs. Prada. No, I don't have any comments. Vice Chair Vaina. Good morning, Pedro. I have a couple of questions. I'm not sure that the colors and the numbers are well represented on the image. I think you might understand correctly, number seven speaks of the decorative element which I'm assuming is the coordinates of the roof, the roof light. Okay, and so I think seven are a lever and the same color, Greek villas. So if you have the stream at at the they are right. Yes. Okay, and so you seven and 11 are the same color your your roof trim is going to be did is going to be the same as that whole vertical element where the number seven is and that's going to disappear, you know, there's not going to be any contrast there, which is different than you thought in the picture. No, let me correct that. This has been simple on the Confiem Board member for once yet. That's seven is only for that small square accent there. Okay. What is the color of the trim at the top? I'm sorry. What is the color of the trim at the roof line? The correct. The Greek that's 11. That's Greek. Right, but at the bottom says 17 is Greek, B last 7551, but also 11 is Greek, B last 7551. Yeah, that's the same. Correct. So what I'm saying is... If you get a small square, that's that square accent, that that's the Greek building color. The whole the whole vertical panel is skyline steel. So so actually the whole vertical or the seven seats is actually a number two then? Correct. Yeah, you can see on the left, the opposing column. Got it. Okay, it's just that was confusing. Yeah, I don't have any issues with the color. The only thing that I would say is that if at any point in the building, we cannot see in the rendering or in the image here, not to change colors on the outside corners of changing opposites. I don't know if that makes sense, if not, I could further explain. Meaning, if you paint the, let's say, let's take, for instance, number one, which is a clear color here, if you take this, this whole area and you change color in the inside corner that looks really good. But you should not change any colors in the outside corner of that value there. So if you could somehow agree to that, that would be very helpful. I don't know if that makes sense in what I'm explaining. Let me know that this is the suggestion, Javier. You know, if we have to look it open, but I don't think you do you understand it. Yeah, say it one more time. Javier, I'm sorry. Let me try it again. Give me one more second. Let me try to draw here on the screen for you. Well, while we do that, I just want to go ahead and just ask both Pedro and Vin. You guys swear that the testimony you're giving is the truth correct, because I don't believe you guys swore in. Yes. Yes. Okay. Thank you. And while by the way, and I was going through this and I'd like to welcome board member Corral. It's joined us as well. So we had now five members. I understand and I appreciate the importance of getting projects through the bureaucracy and process of approval. I do have to say that this was my home. I would want more of a rendering showing more than dots of numbers that could better, particularly what this is going to look like when it's complete to approve it. I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I- we appreciate my environment. I appreciate Vice Chair Bayana taking the extra effort to help, but visualizing this with these dots and understanding what the color scheme is going to look like is not necessarily how I would have done it. I think what you're looking at is a scanned image. So it appears almost black and white to you. When in fact we did we did present a full color rendering from the certainly designed team. So I would expect so, but so, but it's not what we're seeing here. So this is, you know, for the board members who are having to make this decision, I just find it not to part. So thank you, by Trevina for your extra effort. Right, so what I'm saying is here, if you take this whole facade, which is let's say blue in this case, and then you take the next facade to the left of it, which would be let's say red, it's totally okay to change colors at that corner because it's an inside corner. But what I'm trying to say is that, if at any point we're not seeing the building that the intent is to choose colors in a plane that is an outside corner, like this one right here, it would look really bad. So if we could just agree that that would not happen, I would be, you know, all right. Yeah, so you want that whole section of the one color. Yeah, the next one. I got it. Yeah, you could. Yeah, you could put it any color you want. It's just that it doesn't really look good when you change colors either in a completely flat plane or in an outside where the colors are changing. And it just doesn't look good. The color application to a facade looks better when it's suggested that it's a volume that you're looking at Yeah, next sense Okay, that's all I have Thank you, Mr. Bayana, or remember, Carole The only comment I have is don't forget you have to play with light and shadow Especially the orientation from the sun And so that becomes another principal thing in terms of the colors. How that changes that the time factors move on. And so, uh, take that into consideration when you are selecting again the colors of whatever you're going to do in terms of that light and dark shades. Because depending on the orientation of the building, it's nothing just like the landscape or the orientation of the trees, wherever that shadow falls, it will have an impact of how things look on the ground plane, the same thing in terms of the elevation. And this is the reason why what Danny was saying is, I'm having hard time really seeing the difference in colors from that aspect because you did not pay enough attention from the rendering point of view, but that has been said, and that's all I've got to say. Okay, with that said, I appreciate again, by the chair by the end of this effort, I am having a difficult time visualizing this. I guess the intention is to move in a completely different direction with the color scheme of the building and to make it more of a lighter tone. I like the combination of colors. I don't really see how it's going to look on the building and if there's a better rendering or something that could be shown to be great, but that really concludes my comment I don't really see how it's going to look on the building. And if there's a better rendering or something that could be shown to be great, but that really concludes my comment. I don't know much more to say there. So I guess at this point, I would ask if we could have a motion on this. I'll make a motion to prove with comments. We have a second. I'll second. Well, first and second. Ms. Cruz, how do you vote? I vote yes. Move forward. Board members of Rada. Yes. Vice-Chirvayana. Yes. Board member Grouw. Yes. And I too vote yes. Thank you gentlemen for your presentation. We look forward to the new colors. Thank you. Dear Ron. Hey, moving on to the next item. I'm gonna ask architect Tony Rodriguez. If you would please put up and share your rendering. Yes, I am. Thank you. Next item, DRB 2025, 0110, applicant Antonio Rodriguez, property owner, PAP, live LLC, location 6752, Southwest 77th Terrace, the request is for new construction and there is the elevation in the rendering where you can see the the materials and the color contrast and so forth. The zoning district residential single family to use and what we have is a lot size just under the 10,000 requirement within the RS3 zoning district. The lot size 9,376 as I said, score footage fails to meet the 10,000 requirement of a R&RS3 zoning district. However, although the lot fails to meet the requirements, and this would be for area. Lot frontage is okay with the, what is the width of this lot? I believe is 75. So it meets the requirement. So it fails to meet the score footage. So only an area but pursuant to section 20-4.8D, nonconforming lots of records. This section allows the, although this provision will apply even though the lot fails to meet the requirements for area genera applicable in the district provided that that your dimensions and requirements, other than those regulations for the districts, which the lot is located. I'm trying to skip, so I don't know if I'm making sense, but obviously the land is what fails as far as area, and this section of the code, again, 20-4.8D non-conforming lots of records allows for a home to be built and designed as per the section within the district which is section 20-3.5H of the land development code. So we have a 30% allowable of the 9376 that equates to 2013 allowable and they are proposing just under with 2812 29%. The FAR is 4,040 square feet proposed where 8.45% is the maximum allowable which equates to 4,219. As far as the impervious, the allowable is 47.5 which equates to 4,453. And the proposed impervious coverage is 4,407. As far as the elevations, you have the smooth texture to stuck all walls, painted in white, and you have the proposed flat cement tile limitation which shingles in the dark around. The landscape has been designed by a landscape architect as required in the code for a two-story residence. The plans indicate 14 trees provide an total three are required for a lot within the that's not a corner lot and we have three trees for the swill area. They are beneath of power lines along 77th Terrace. The true removal is required to be submitted to the planning and zoning department consistent with the tree disposition. Not just for trees, but remember palms also. This is a condition in staff's report. And additionally, the proposed two-story must comply with the Florida building code. At this time. The applicant is requesting approval of the building design and the landscape from the DRB. Staff's recommendations for approval with the following condition. Submitted of the Tribunal application is required. And any comments from the board. Thank you. Welcome, Mr. Rodriguez. Thank Thank you Lord. It's a good morning. My name's Antonio Rodriguez. I'm the architect of record. So this is a really nice neighborhood very lush wooded area between 67th Avenue and 72nd Avenue and between sunset and 80th Street and we tried to do something that would really be in keeping with the neighborhood. It is traditional like the owner requested but we did incorporate a lot of organic elements with the with the Carl Stone detailing and and you know the railings we went with like an imitation wood along with the with the that ties in with the garage door and the front doors a real wood door and we did go with the darker window frames. But yeah, we wanted something that would interact with the neighborhood. We did create the little veranda in the front on the ground and on the second floor. And we feel this will be a good addition to the neighborhood. So if you have any questions, we also have the landscape architect in attendance. If you have any questions for him. Thank you very much. I'm Daniel. We'll go ahead and open this up to public comment. Is there anybody in Chambers? I don't zoom. I would like to comment on this item. There's nobody in Chambers but staff. Seeing no one on zoom, we'll go ahead and close public comment. And we will now go to the board members, Ms. Cruz. It looks lovely. I think it's going to look really nice. I like the colors and the design. Thank you. Thank you very much, Ms. Cruz. Board members, Abraada? I don't know any comments at this point. Thank you very much. Mrs. Abrada, uh, Vice Chair Valleena. Good morning, Mr. Rodriguez. How are you? Good morning, sir. Um, very lovely home. Um, feels like a home. Very warm and lots of like the colors are like the, the palette that you you selected, I like the roof lines, everything is great. I do have a question. I know that this, you know, us architects always make the disclaimer of the renderings as for reference only, but, you know, we pay a lot of attention to what the house looks like as she can tell everybody is very keen to your design.. And so what type of details you think may change along the way that may hinder your process? Or do you think that the design is pretty much set as it is being rendered? No, it is pretty much set. And honestly, it's incredible when the house gets built that usually does look exactly like the rendering. We try to make sure to follow through during construction, so that everything gets executed as per plans. The renderings are great, helped to the contractor too because they know what it's supposed to look like. So if it doesn't look like the rendering, then they have to fix it. Yeah. So another thing that I usually ask is, in the rendering process also oftentimes, we don't render the landscape as it actually is. I don't see any large trees in the front. I'm not sure I haven't seen the landscape, so I don't know if there's any large trees in the front. So I'm assuming that the landscape is not true to the design, is just for static purposes. Correct. Yeah, we typically ask that they don't do. In this case or it's a very lush area in the front, but it would really cover the house and for purposes of the, you know, approval of the of the house itself, you know, we have to leave the landscaping out of it. We do have a full set of landscape plans that that the detail of landscaping. Yeah. Okay, just for the rest of the board, for the record, you know, this happens often and so, you know, it's good that everybody is in the know so that, you know, we know what we are getting actually. I'm assuming that the details that may or may not change is like the stone, alignment, you know, little trims and things like that, but colors, textures, the whole palette will remain as these as we move along, right? Yes, absolutely. Okay, yes. Thank you so much, I love you, thank you. Appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you, Vice Chair. I'm going to have to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go to the next slide. I'm going to go is for a particular homeowner, correct? Yes. Let me say this. This is the difference between a landscape plan that out shines and looks great because you got to give kudos where kudos belongs. This landscape object which I don't know, which eventually I like to get to know because he seems like a young man that is coming up in the ranks, I could be wrong, but when I see a drawing and the drawings and the details and obviously it is for a particular line where as opposed to designing for a developer, we got to take into consideration. But the plans are very well thought out. The only thing I'm concerned with was the relocation of the beachy palms and so forth. If you're placing them where there's not going to be a problem with any of your proposed trees or the existing trees around the neighborhood. And that I will leave it up to the LA that wants on site that he can check and so forth. Okay.. The other thing I think that you need to be done and only from the perspective of easy read which trees were invasive. I can pick it up immediately obviously because you show the zeros where there's no calculation for mitigation. But Mr. How you pronounce that instrument? Drosensky? Drosensky? Yes, sir. But here we have Damien Cavalero, which is a landscape designer for this project. Okay. When you say that he's the landscape designer, does he work for you? We work together. We collaborate on this project. So are you the designer in terms of you doing installation? Is that what you do, sir? No. No, okay. So, but now I got to tell you, the drawings looks good. The only area I was concerned was about the Royal Pond Tree, but that Royal Pond tree I believe it belongs to your neighbor, not you. Yes, it's on the neighboring property. It's behind the other thing that I liked about your plan. You show the adjacent plan material. So in the end, I'm saying all of this because it's very rare that I find a set of documents that come before us that look as good as this. We'll cut out only thing I'm wanting to recommend which I'm even I'm doing it by the way I'm now talking to you one professional to another is every time we design the one thing that we forget who's going to maintain this how is it going to be maintained and what is the end thing of the design that you're looking for what are the height of the the strokes you intend to look for? Are you letting that go so it can go bigger? Or is there a look that you wanted to look? And that's one of the biggest problems that we have as professional LAs that we have this vision. And the guy that's going to maintain it always screws it up for us. It is a fact of life. So it's something that, and I'm just mentioning that because I'm going to this, Madame Morpheus is how I can be able to do something like this and be able to expand to the individual that's going to maintain it. What is the look that I'm looking for? What is the design idea behind it? And usually it starts out well, but it gets destroyed later on because of poor maintenance. So congratulations, very nicely done. And that's all I gotta say about this project. Nice house, Mr. Architect. Thank you, sir. Thank you, sir. Thank you very much. I believe our board members have hit the points that I wanted so thank you very much. With that I'll call for a motion. I'm ordered. Wait a second. Dr. We have first and second is Cruz. How do you vote? Yes. Board members of Rada. Yes. Vice Chair Diana. Yes. Board member Crow. Yes. And I do vote yes. We look forward to your successful delivery. Thank you very much. Thank you, sir. Thank you, everyone. Thank you. Thank you. Moving on to the next item. The third item. The third item. for review this morning, DRB 2020-011. Applicant. the third item. The third item for review this morning, DRB 2025-011, applicant, Javier Estrada, property owner, MB621LC, location 60-21, Southwest 60th Street, and the request is for new construction. One story. Within the RS3, the one story home, Please share the rendering. The one-story home within the RS3 zoning district is just over the lot size with 10,000 53-square feet. 10,000 53 square feet and it meets the lot with just over the 75 with 77.50 feet. The design, I'm sorry, Mr. Corral has to recuse himself and he did. Yes, although this is one story home, the landscape portion is not required to be designed by a landscape architect, although this one is designed by Mariano Corral, and as I stated, he has recused himself. The, and we still have a quorum of four. The building design is guided under section 23.5E, one story of the land development code. We have a 35% allowable for building, which equates to 35 19 square feet. The proposed 3504 square feet, as far as the impervious. It allows a 50%, which equates to 5,026 square feet and the proposed coverage for impervious is 4,867. The elevations show the materials and the paint color. We have a sloped roof for in 12 with a typical 1 foot 6, 6-inch overhang. We also have the rendering that illustrates the arcade white, Sherham William's 70100 and the board and batten at a darker color, or Sherham William's 7969. Last in contrast, the proposed front door, the garage door, the windows and the sliding doors. They also have the coming a dark bronze color. The building height is at 159 to the average roof, therefore it's also in compliance meeting the 25 or no more than 25 feet I should say. As far as the landscape architect and the landscape plan, they've been prepared by Mariano Corral. And we have the plan's indicated total of nine trees provided and there is seven on the site. And three trees, no, I'm sorry. How many trees on the swell? Two, Two proposal pigeon plumb trees to be planted on the swell area along 60th Street. A Tributable application has been submitted. It actually denotes tree number one to be removed and that is a tropical almond 60 inches D.B.H. and approximately 50 feet in height. It's located in the front yard of the home. This is a condition in staff's report. Obviously that we comply with, the applicant complies with the mitigation requirements. Additionally, the proposed one story building design is comply with the Florida building code. The applicant is requesting approval of the one story and the landscaping from the DRB board. And staff recommendations for approval of the following conditions. I keep looking at my screen because I think the architect is having some issues trying to share that elevation with us or the rendering. Staff recommendations approval of the following conditions should comply with section 24.F the landscape requirements and the mitigation requirements for the removal of that one tropical almond tree that's located in the front yard and any comments and suggestions from the board. Good morning, Mr. Till the architect you are having problems aren't you? I you're muted. I cannot hear you. Good morning. Good morning. My name is Julian Chu. I am the architect. I apologize for not being familiar with the procedure. I'm not a presenter or bring up the renderings up to your screen. I hope that you bring it up to you. I can bring it up to you. Okay. Yes. You'll be with me a second. I'll go ahead and share this screen. Well, Mr. Vyna does that. Could I please confirm that you you testimony you were about to give. Mr. Chiu is the truth. The whole truth. Yes. Thank you. Amir, if you all consider the screen. Thank you, Mr. Bayana. My pleasure. Is there any base that you'd like me to navigate to?? I mean, so you can expand to the project or or no, no, no, that's that's quite all right. The rendering appears to be a lot darker than it is on my on my drawings, but yes, that that that's fine. That's fine. As you can see, it's a one story, proposed one story, a single family home. The colors are blended with the neighborhood. We wanted to, we only are proposing basically two colors, which is the dark bronze and white, doors windows, and entry door as well as the garage door. They're all within the same hue of the the or which is the side of the house that has the button board on the left side of your screen with one of the better windows. The rest of the house is continuous around with being in white, with the dreams also being in white. We're quite pleased with it, and I hope you like it too. So if you have any questions, I'll be more than happy to ask. Thank you very much for your presentation. We'll go ahead and open this to public comment. Is there anybody in chambers or in zoom that we'd like to comment on this item? There's nobody in the chambers but staff. And seeing no one on zoom, we will go ahead and close public comment. Let's go ahead and have the board members. Board member crop or crew. Sorry. The only comment I wanted to make is I recently came across another property that did the same highlight of one dark color on one of the walls and it looks really nice. So, you know, I'm pretty pleased with with the outcome of of your selection and it looks like a nice project. I like the the pool in the back and it just looks like a really good single story home for the neighborhood. Thank you. Thank you. More member crews. More members of Rata. Yeah, I think it's a nice little house. I like the articulation around the windows. And I only concern that dark bronze might be little too jarring, but other than that, I think it's a good looking house. Thank you, Senator Bartbembert-Obrado. Vice-Cerviana. Thank you. Yeah, I don't have a problem with the house. The only suggestion that I make is it's something that I'm going to personally, I'm having a standing, semi metal roof done. I have the same color, is a really, really good color. It looks a lot lighter when it gets hit by the sun because you always get this sort of like reflective, it that reflective but you know it's my finish but it does look lighter with the light which I think is going to be a little bit of a different effect on the walls as they are very close supposed to you know for the 12 angle that you have. I would suggest that you just talk to your general contractor when it comes to the penetration of the roof because like I said, it's something that I'm going through right now and it affects the alignment of the seams or the ribs of the roof line. And so you wanna make sure that they actually take the volumes that you have, for instance, the volume in the garage and the volume of the left hand side. And those ribs are a line center or, you know, evenly with the balance on both sides. Otherwise, they'll avoid the ribs and the penetrations of your plumbing stacks. And you may end up with a different alignment of the room that you may not want. So, I would suggest that you have that conversation with or make some notes on your plans for them to look into that and take that into consideration. But other than that, I think your house is good. Point taken, Thank you. Thank you. Mr. Bayana. Yes, my only comment is in terms of the utilities coming into the property. I see the the subject take under the driveway and the drain field off to the side. I'm not sure what the condition is with the FPNL modifications in this area. I'm trying to remember from when I went through that neighborhood. I just want to make sure you had a coordination of that process to make sure that you're not going to have any kind of conflict with the utilities coming into the property. Okay. Other than that, I have no comments and I would ask for a motion. Can you do a drive-over or a septic tank? You can do a load-bury septic tank. You can drive-way or a septic tank. Yeah, it's a septic tank that is a traffic approved. Okay. May I ask a question? I don't know this. Do you know if there is a drain field to move with the driveway on it? We don't have the drain fuel is not over the driveway or under the driveway. I said, say, it's all around the actual extensions of the of the drink fuel system. No, no, I understand completely. I'm just asking if you know, you have any knowledge of a drain fuel that can be driven over because I don't know that and there's always, you know, my bowler. No, I'm not aware of Mr. Lina. Right. Yeah, I am okay very well and I'm sure that we're taking caution to protect the drain field from that root system of that tree off to the left. So with that said, can we have a motion? I move it. Do we have a second? I'll second. And with that, Ms. Cruz, how do you vote? I vote yes. Mrs. Rada? Yes. Vice-chair Viana. Yes. And I too vote yes. Thank you very much for your presentation. We look forward to your successful delivery. Thank you all. Have a great day. You as well. Thank you. And with that said we will move into the approval of the minutes from February 18th. Has anybody have any comments? Have you had an opportunity to review the minutes? Move it. Move. Do I have a second? and I'm going to move it. Do it. Second. Second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed. Hearing none. Our next meeting. It will be April 15th. And at same time, same station. Thank you all for your help today. And I look forward to seeing you on the 15th. I got one second. If I may, Danny. Yes, sir. I do have a comment. If you're minding, I need to help of our board members for a moment to think about this. One of the issues that I've been talking to of a few landscape architects is the requirement for the number of shrubs as a minimum requirement. And whether it's here or Miami-Dade County, they say 10 shrubs per tree. So let's look at this thing for realistic and re-very quickly for a minute. If we have a lot that comes in, we put three trees, they only have to put 30 shrubs. The good thing about our mortiers that we do have in the ordinance that we can request for more to make it look better. My request is for you all to think about this, especially architects and again, I mean speaking to other landscape marketing, what will be a proper increase in terms of shrubs shrubs to make the house better from that perspective. Thank God that we had another landscape architect presented before that was a private home. Yes, it was not for a developer, but it gave a really nice look to that home. And it's just about placement and so forth. So this is just foot foot thought. If you can help me out, because I eventually was gonna talk to Marcus about this, come up with some ideas for him to present to the planning board and then we, that could go to the commissioner, but we need to increase the number of shrubs for the minimum requirement for, whether it's for a developer or a private home, whichever. So it's just that, and I want you to think about 30 shrubs, doesn't go far, doesn't give you the look that you, and technically they're meaning code. So I just want you all to think about that and help me out. And if you don't think it's important, that's fine. I'm going to be pursuing this a little further, but that's all I got to say. Thank you. Thank you for that, Ms. Gral. I don't know if anybody else has a comment on it. I think to me, it's an interesting perspective, but I think it's also a very project, or property specific. I don't know, you can, I don't know that you could do one shoe fits all there. Well, that's what we have right now, Danny. That's a problem. It's the same thing. It's a fair question. Can you tell us how to comment? With a mother code? Well, sorry. The code is always minimum requirement. It's not the ceiling. So if you try to make the code as a ceiling or more than minimum requirement, then it doesn't have that. The code is not set for minimum, more than minimum requirement. The code is always the minimum and then we can request more than what the code requires. And I get your point to, brother, but the issue here is that we can, well, no, we can say what we want and we ask them to do more. And, I know Luris and staff will follow up because that's the deal. But technically what I'm trying to see if we could have a little bit more as a minimum requirement. Maybe it's 20 shrubs per tree or maybe it's 30 shrubs per tree because from a technical point of view, someone can challenge us and say, hey, your code says minimum requirement. That's what I gave you, and I have no reason why to put anymore. I mean, that's a challenge. I think that's a factor of how this board is set up. This board doesn't have any teeth so we can all make recommendations and You know, so that's a different issue political issue, but that's not the if you have say 20 20 Shr. But tree and then someone comes in with 10 trees or 15 trees on the property and you're talking about That many times 20 times that many trees, that could be a little bit, I don't know, maybe that's too much shrubs. So it's a project specific, and I think we just, we just don't seem to have that authority to require more than what's minimum required here. That's an issue. It's not so much as the number of straps. Number of feet on the head. You hit it right on the head, man. Okay. Does it matter? Just one last question. Does it matter location of the shrubs? Mariano, I mean, like, is it more important to have it up front than in the bathroom? Well, that's what I'm always pretty good. I always pretty good at that. I want the front to look really nice because of the neighborhood. And what you're doing the backyard I really don't care because everybody has their own taste. But she brought the hit it. What he said, that's why our board has now been diluted that we don't have a time. care because everybody has their own taste. But you brought the hit it. What he said, that's why our board has now been deluded that we don't have a time. What we used to in the past, they say, hey, this is the way it is. You got to bring it back. Let's take a second look at it from that out. And this is what we are today. And so again, I'm been speaking to a lot of landscape architects and and they feel that, I mean, see you, Miami Beach has gone to way overboard with three different heights that you have to provide. I've always believed that designers should be the one to come up with a proper design. But once again, if we have a minimum requirement of just 10 shrubs, is that enough? And to brother brought another point, if they're 10 trees, that's 100 shrubs. Well, think about it. It's about the, if we have a lot that it's 100 feet, and we put them at two feet on center, this half of it on one side. You still have three other sides. So you follow what I'm saying, maybe it's not enough. I don't know. I, this was food for thought for you guys to think about, help me out because I'm really thinking about all this and maybe I should just leave it alone and call it a day. I'm all about making things better. That's all. any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? Any other questions? about making things better, that's all. Healthy discussion. Anyone else have a comment? Okay, to be continued. Is there anything, any other new business? Nope. Okay, we will see you on April 15th. Thank you very much, everyone. Well run, everybody. Thank you. Bye. Bye.