I'm going to go ahead and move. Okay. I'm going to go ahead and move. Okay. Calling this meeting order. The December 12, 2024 meeting of the city of Edgewater. I've reviewed the minutes from the previous meeting and they're approved. If this is your first time attending one of these hearings to say no I'm not a judge. I'm an attorney that doesn't represent the city when said the city has brought me into kind of act like a similar to a judge. I am here to call balls and strikes. You're probably here because the city alleged that you violated their code in some way. I'm here to determine whether or not that is the truth. And if so, what the appropriate response is. This is not a court of law, so I'm not going to hold you to formal rules of evidence, but you're basically through process rights will be protected, so you'll be able to say your side of the story that said I may interrupt you if things get a little off track So I'm gonna ask you to stick to speaking about what we're here to talk about the case we're here to talk about At this point if you could if you intend to speak At this hearing if you could please raise your right hand You swear or affirm to tell the truth the whole truth and not the bet the truth Thank you The so deserve this closure of xpartake communications. I've had none For some of these cases have reviewed the Reports were provided online for the individual cases and this time I will I will move to the first item for which somebody is present, which I believe are 7B and C, 2024, Guava Drive. Yes, if you could please stand at the microphone and state your name and address in your relationship to the case. It can be a business address. You're okay with me. Keeping a copy of this. Copy keeping this copy. Yes, sir. That is your copy. And if you want to, I've also gave a copy to staff if it ever wants to be entered into record. I'm free to show yours or the copy I gave to Mr. Pogany is identical to the one you have. First and foremost, my name is Tracy Barlow and I'm a real estate agent with a Barnett group and I am here today to represent Mr. Daring Courier, which is the principal holder of the CDK Holdings II LLC, and also the property owner at 2024 Guava Drive. He apologizes he could not be here tonight, he could not get out of Washington. Quite simply, we believe this case is a misinterpreted, whereas a newer employee has misrepresented the intent of the code in the requirement regarding who is required to have a business tax receipt and certificate of use. So it looks like on about July 12th of 2024 a new employee tamara cook with the agents or the department that issues the business tax receipt had sent an email to code enforcement to start a case on CDK holding OLC. Okay sorry can we go back a little bit? Yes okay to begin with I just the process goes I'm going to ask you to put your name in your address and such on the record and then you win to your case. Okay, I'm sorry. But the city actually has to prove their case first. Okay. So the city has alleged that you violated sections 11-2 and 11-9 of the city's code that is the property owner by letting the city, those sections of the code for not having a business tax subsidy and not having a certificate of use. Do you admit or deny that allocation? We deny the allocation. Okay. At this point then we'll allow the city to place their factual basis into the record as to why they brought you here at all. Okay. And I understand you stated that you're a real estate agent for the homeowner or not the homeowner, property owner, corporation. Are you an attorney? I am not an attorney, no sir. Okay. All right. City, but whoever, the officer, Officer Pogany, if you could provide a factual basis for the violation. CDK Holdings, CDK Holdings II, LLC is the owner of the property located at 2024 Guava Drive and Edgewater, Florida. The property's been found in violation of section 11-2. Business tax receipt required in section 11-9, certificate of use required of the city of Edgewater's code of ordinances. On July 12, 2024, we received an email complaint from tomorrow at Finance in reference to this rental building not having a business tax receipt or certificate of use to rent the units out. They were originally contacted by finance in April of 2024 about needing to get their licenses but never did so. The violation was forwarded to code enforcement. A courtesy notice was issued to the owner for business tax receipt and certificate of use. On July 23rd, 2024, a computer check revealed that the license still had not been obtained. I called tomorrow to see if she had spoken to the owner about the licenses and she advised she had not. A notice of violation was issued for business tax receipt and certificate of use. The notice of violation was posted in the yard in front of the business and it was mailed certified to the owner. On August 13th, 2024, a computer check revealed that the licenses still had not been obtained. So a citation, number 0791, notice of hearing was issued for the business tax receipt required violation and the certificate of use required violation. The citation was posted in the yard in front of the business. A copy was placed at City Hall and it was mailed certified to the owner. On September 10th, 2024, a computer check revealed that the business tax receipt and certificate of use license still had not been issued. Staff recommends a special magistrate find CDK holdings to LLC in violation of Section 11-2, business tax receipt required in Section 11-9, certificate of use required of the code of the code of ordinances and assessed the citation fine of $300, $150 for each violation and assess an additional fine of $100 per day for the certificate of use violation for each state of violation exists past September 22, 2024 and for a lane to be placed on the property if not satisfied. Okay. What kind of business is it? I see in the pictures that it looks like a kind of industrial storage? It's like a big building that's divided into like five smaller, you know, you can run a business out of there, you know, small business or something out of each of the bays. So it's a multi rental building. Okay. You know what business tax category, that what business tax category would you classify them under? That's the, tomorrow, does it under the accommodations on in this chapter on page. Commendations for rent in 11-7 the business tax petrol is that it? Yes, that's it. Page three of the paperwork Mr. Barlow gave you. Okay. As I was sharing, the case was originated at the request of Tamara Cawke, which is in the finance department, which I believe is a now-many-just-the-business tax receipts. And that was on or about July 12, 2024, and requested code enforcement to issue a notice of violation because CDK holdings LLC did not maintain a business tax receipt or certificate to use for commercial rental property. So, to go back is we think those are a handful of you reference balls thrown and not strikes, you know, against this. Mr. Courier, president and the of the CDK holdings to is he's the property owner. Okay, he does not occupy the property. He does not run a business from that property. He's the property owner and he essentially leases the property to allow businesses to occupy businesses at that property. So Mr. Courier pays property tax as well as plays a state rent tax as well as county rent tax. Okay. It is the interpretation that the business tax receipt and certificate of use is intended for the actual business operating at the permanent location and not intended for landlord or property owner is defined by code. So if we start by going to page one of the document that you that I have provided under 11-1. Once again, Mr. Courier is a property owner. He does not occupy a permit location there. So number one, it references that the property owner or that it references to maintain a permanent business location. So any person who maintains a permanent business location or branch office within the city, and he does not, he's a property owner. Does he own the building? He owns the building. But a permanent business location for a place where he's renting out commercial businesses. He creates and we'll get on through this, and there's a, further on, there's a definition of a business, as intended for this code. So a little history on the business tax receipts is a year prior to 2007 used to be called occupational license in 2007 state statute change and the city was required to change to amend as well and go to a business tax receipt because it's a tax. It's not a use, it's not a permission, it's a tax. So essentially by a state statute, if someone was to come in and drop money on the finance desk to remit their tax or a business tax receipt, a city cannot withhold issuing a business tax receipt. They receive the money for the tax, they have to give a receipt. So City of Edgewater at that time during the amendment which was during 2007 took effect of January of 2008 is they created what to cause certificate of use program. And the whole purpose of that was the intention of that was for the City to have the opportunity to not only regulate what businesses were in town but also be able to regulate if a business had a previous code violation and give the city an opportunity to come into a life safety inspection. The purpose of life safety inspection is to create safety for the employees of that business or for anybody that patronize a business. So that's just a little background history on the transition of occupationalized business tax receipt. So number two, any person who maintains a permanent business location or branch office within the city, he doesn't maintain a business location. CDK2 holdings does not maintain a business location there. Number three, any person who does not qualify in their provisions above he transacts any business or commerce. He doesn't transact any business or commerce. He doesn't transact any business or commerce. He creates opportunities for entrepreneur business to lease from him and to do those activities as described in one, two, and three. And those businesses are required to get a business tax receipt, not the property owner. Okay. Businesses pay him. What's that? Those businesses do pay him. They lease from him. He's a property owner. He's a so. They pay him. Right. So if you're running a, if you if you own a multi-unit residential building, facility and you do nothing other than be the property owner that owns the building. You're saying that would not subject them to a business tax receipt. It wouldn't subject anyone to a business tax receipt because they are living there and not conducting business there. So if you were selling, if you had a cond owned a multifamily apartment building without any kind of like management office. Your compare at this point, your career is apples and oranges and we'll talk about that. And that's 11.7. That's the section of the accommodations for rent. So 11.7 of business tax schedule where it talks about accommodations for rent. So that's required to business tax receipt as well as many warehouses. Because of these type that are reference, you would not utilize for a business to and require them to get a business tax receipt. So for an example, a military tell room, you couldn't have a business established in that hotel room and where you would charge that business, conducting business in this city, to get a business tax receipt. So currently the way it stands now is Mr. Kerr, the pays property tax, rent tax. They had requested for him to get a business tax receipt and then every occupant that comes in to that building, they also get a duplicative business tax receipt, which is a version of double taxation on the same parcel of land or the same use. So, I did so law firm. I don't know if you know this, but you need a separate business tax receipt for every attorney and also a tax receipt for the law firm itself. And that reference is in there correct. Okay, so so so my point here is she requires. What's that? Do you understand that's a double tax issue? And that may if the attorneys could do that. And I say every community is, and I've recognized every community's a little difference on how they interpret their code there. But keeping in mind that she has required that the issue of business tax receipt for no commercial rental property. So if you go through the schedule, the accommodations for rent, I wouldn't consider fitting into the category of commercial rental property. So that's 11.7, as you go through there. So then if you go back, go further. So further down page 18, and it kind of gives the definition of certificate of use, shall mean that method by which the city grants approval for any business to occupy any office and draw. Once again, he does not occupy the businesses he leases to that are required to get the business tax receipt. They do occupy and they are required to get the business tax receipt and certificate of use. Okay. So, for example, if he owned that same building and he did not and he did and he did not lease it out to a business, but leased it out to an individual store cars that did not operate a business. You know, he probably wouldn't be required to get that business tax receipt because someone storing their classic cars is there is not conducting business, okay? So then you go on down to, once again, he's already paying property tax, he's paying rent tax to the state and the business is occupied to the business tax receipt. And if you slide it page 19, it really gives a good length test, if you will, to evidence of engaging in business. So if you go down to B, one at contributes to one business for the purpose of this article shall be any person deemed to be in business and thus subject to the requirements of this chapter. Selling any goods or services. He does he's a property owner that leases it. He's not selling a good. He's not selling a service at all. The second part is soliciting business of offering goods or services for sale or hire. He is not offering goods for service for hire or sale. The businesses that occupy there are, and they are required to have the business tax receipt and the certificate to use for inspection. So based on that, in, like I say, it's, this code has been in place since 2007. It's been interpreted very similar to how I've explained until most recently, someone has brought a different interpretation without any amendment to the code to the point that it's brought rise throughout this community that recently the local Chamber of Commerce has sent out a has received a no complaints that sent out a survey to the edgewater businesses is is everyone else experienced in this change that nobody knows where it came from. So it's Mr. Couriers and my opinion as well interpretation that he doesn't operate a business out of Edgewater just because he's a property owner and he creates an opportunity for other entrepreneurs to start. The other part of this as it relates to the City Edgewater and the economic concerns is there's many investors, property investors, that have the ability to create these properties, to create opportunities for these entrepreneurs to come in here to start their business and grow. I can share a numerous of these entrepreneurs that couldn't afford to buy their own building, but starts here and grows here. With initiatives like this, it's a grave concern that those investors will no longer come here and create those opportunities by building those warehouses where these folks can start. As a matter of fact, it, similar situations occurred at the county that effective January this year, the county, sunset, all requirements for business tax receipts. I don't want to see that happen here in Edgewater. It very well could, but at least you have the certificate of use that you still have the opportunity to manage those businesses. that happen here in Edgewater. It very well could, but at least you have this certificate of use that you still have the opportunity to manage those businesses. Yeah, I just have a couple things I like to add. Number one, Mr. Barlow talks about how this is, business tax receipts going to keep businesses from building. If you look at page three, you'll see that the cost is there for the business tax receipt. We're not talking $10,000 for business tax receipt. You're looking at at the most, like $150 quick math, you know. If it's for you, if it's one for the whole building, you would be 30, 39 for years. Exactly. Yes. And then the certificate of use price added on top. You're talking probably, I don't know, probably 60 bucks, 80 bucks. So the fact that this is going to keep businesses from coming into Edgewater because they have to get a business tax receipt. We're talking $60 or $80. So number one, number two, he goes to the definition of what a business, all the time he spent in section one page one about how this isn't a business. I would like to ask Mr. Barlow is he charging rent to these people in these or is this a charity thing that he's doing to help the community. He's all the things that they charge. They were charging rent so so therefore he has a building that he's running out for the purposes of making money. It's a business. Regardless of how you spin it, the definition on there, it's still considered a business, it's there to make money, and that's what it's doing. Okay, your honor. Is that, is that it? That's it. Okay, okay. Okay, in that, in that same sense, if I myself Tracy Borla does not create an LLC, I purchase a home and I rent that to yourself and my now in business and require to have a business tax receipt because I charge rent and if so what category would I fall in for being a owning a single family residential home that I rent to you as a family member. It appears that that would be covered and that there's no charge for one to two rental. It'd be covered which part under accommodation section. Partments motels motor course cottage hotels and boarding houses. Accommodations for rent. I assume that's what the city would argue. Is that no charge for one to be rental units, which makes sense that as you get more and more rental units, it becomes a business. It is. So just one rental unit would be a business. So you're here to testify today that there would be, and it doesn't need to testify. Oh, I mean, sorry. And there's no testimony as to the law or any of that. I'm just reading the code. And okay. So just to make sure I understand the argument. The argument is that as owner that rents out commercial units or commercial industrial appears units. That is not a business as defined under section 1-11, or that to the extent it is a business, both because of your 1-11 and also under 11-, I think it was 11-11. It is point 1. Yeah, the evidence of engaging those services. And they didn't solicit selling any grudges or services. And or they did, it is not a business because it does not fall under any of the categories under section of the title. Is this the argument you're making? Correct. Because you're a property owner and you lease your property doesn't automatically engage the intent of this code that it's a business whether it's a commercial property or residential property. It's the business that conducts business from that permanent location is by definition. And like I say, the, obviously, the certificate of use, which is a use fee for those inspections, is on the responsibility of the business that operates from that permanent location versus a property owner that creates the opportunity for that business. So that way you're, they're not creating the opportunity for that business. So that way you're not creating the opportunity for no money. They're creating it for money. Excuse me. They're creating an exchange for money. Right. They are receiving money from the businesses. They could be. So if he did not receive business money from the business, would eliminate him from. No, it's having a business. Actually, you're leasing them out, would eliminate him from having a business. They actually see them out, right? And they're paying rent. They're paying their reimbursement. Yes, they're paying for rent. Okay. Okay. So I guess that would be my other question is if, if he'd loaned a unit to a business, to operate a business, would that preclude him from having to operate a business with that, reclude him from having to get a business to tax receipt. Chris, are you asking if he would exempt him? Or several, so there's the local code, but there's also the state statute about business to tax receipt, as you mentioned. Correct. And I'll allow that to be answered at a different time when there's a different situation. But based on what I've heard, I'm going to hold. I think this is the common amongst the most common view, at least, amongst local governments. And I've represented a few of them, is that that is a business to have a location in which people are playing you to lease out individual units, so in a building in which people are leasing for me. And that it does fit into the accommodations for rent category. It seems three to ten units but it does not appear, it's at least two, it's more than two rather. So, so A, business tax receipt is required. I'm also going to, you've already stated that they, that they rent, that they lease it out the units to individual businesses. So that already I would say conducts a business as term and under section that 11-1. And we don't need to get into the presumption created by section 11, section 11-11-1. And that said, because I've made that holding, the business is subject to this ordinance. At this point, so I find that there is a violation. I uphold both violations. And the next question is what the proper result will be. So do you, knowing that I found a violation? Well, you believe your client will be getting a business tax receipt or certificate of use? He's got two options to appeal to a jurisdictional court or to get a business tax receipt. And so, at this point, I'd request that we offer him a 30-day extension to bring this into compliance before fines are assessed and or accumulated. I don't have a problem with that. Okay, so I'm going to find a violation and I stated your objections correctly as to the as to why this is not a violation that you do not believe that the business of renting out, or you do not believe the act of owning a building and renting out units constitutes a business. And that the if it did constitute a business that business does not fall into the category discussed. Is that, are those correct? That last part. I understand what you're stating, yes, but I don't understand your last reference. No, I just wanted to make sure I was, yeah, I was directly summarizing your arguments. Correct. Yes, yes. It's a still here, I believe it's my, okay. So I'll find the properties in violation. I will give them until October 12th to come into compliance And otherwise issue the staff recommended sanctions I thank you very much for your time and your consideration on the extension. I will move on to item F which is 2425 pine tree drive. If you're here for that if you could please come up, state your name and your address. Hi, Holly Collins 2425 pine tree drive. Edgewater. Are you the owner? No, I've been there for about five and a half years. Hey, do you know if they're okay with you? Yeah, I told it. Yeah, I told him I was gonna be here today. Okay And You're here because they find they violated for you. Yeah, okay So one moment apologies I had a lot of pull up from the the the the the the the The city is alleged that you violated section 10-84 of their code as described. Do you admit or deny that violation? No, we do have one, yes. Okay. One moment. That's a recent picture. That's not a statistician. Yeah. You have a heat alert us that was okay. Because the basketball hoop's in. The guy that you ever put out there the day that there was steady they were doing all the lines. He said that was fine because they had a boom truck and he said I asked him what we needed all the way down. Because we had it like, you know, it's like, you know, it's like, you know, it's like you're going to have it up every day. Is that a permanent installation? No, we just had it tied to the tree, so nobody steals it. And our boys play right there because we're on an incline. On our driveway, we have an it's easier for them to play right there. I actually have the picture of when they were saying that it was in the right away because of the fire, the emergency vehicles and if they had to drive by. I'm which I understood and I moved it back. I have a picture. I had to drive a pretty big truck and it's on off the road. And they were saying that the basketball hoop is in the right away of road. Okay, sorry. But the violation is for the basketball hoop, right? Yes. Not the truck. Yeah, basketball hoop. Okay, which basketball hoop is there? The basketball hoop is there and but it's it's not that the basketball hoop is in the road. It's in the it's in the right away area, which is which is includes the basketball hoop is in the road. It's in the right away area, which is, which includes the portion just a budding road. It's stormwater portions, right? So from my meter, my water meter back is our property, correct? Yes. So if you line up where it's at with our water meter, it's right at the hoop is actually at the water meter line. Okay. Is there any way you could move it back closer to your house? Yeah, but would we were told that when the kids play that because they can't go to whistle stop. They get these little kids can't go up there and play. They're getting bullied by these older kids. I've had two of my sons and their friend chased out of there by a 17 year old. their own community. I don't know if you're a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid or a kid We laid it down, like we just chained it up so it didn't get stolen. Yeah, we can keep moving it. Like it's fine. I just don't want to be because we were, they did the code, brought us the violation and it was rain. They were out there playing it was summertime. They were out playing. It started pouring and then we had them on camera. I think it was you that came and put the second one. It was pouring. I wasn't going to go out and move it during the rain. And we always pull it back and we had it laying down forever, but then they played it this battle again. So for the city, it says they're not allowed to store it. So my question is, would they get violated if they were actively using it? They're not supposed to put it in the right way to begin with, but we don't... If they're out there, if they got it set up and they're playing with it, as long as it's not in the rims extended out into the road, you know, we're not gonna give them a hard time about it, but it needs to be moved when it's done out of the right way. We've never had the rim in the road though. Right, and he's not saying you did. It's just the rim can't be out into the road and we need to move it. No, but also like I'm this well we push it right there by the tree You're not able to if you're not able to actively keep it if you're not able to Take it in the second you're done right then it's gonna be risky to leave it out there because I will be all living By polar Florida so if we know when the rain's coming then I'll kiss your feet But we don't but But I mean, it's, you know, if I was the only reason that it didn't get pulled out. And then I come out and there was a citation on the garage. Okay. Okay. So it was a pretty violation. I mean, I'm fully violation. Whatever I have to do. I'm sorry. No, there was a notice for us. The first one was notice to fix it. We did. They came out signed off, closed it out. And then it was I think like eight, 10 days later or something like that that the boys were out playing. It was at the end of summer. They were all out playing and I guess they happen to be driving behind. So I'm going to find a violation. And then you'll have 10 days to come to compliance. And then from here on out they can really have. So that's not in compliance right now in the hoop store. That's still in the right away. You got a 15 foot right away or 10, yeah, you got a 15 foot right away off the road. So your water meter probably sits back it's closer to that pond tree. It's another foot back. It would be more than that because it wasn't. It's right at the top of the hill, literally like literally right at the hill. I mean, which, if that's where that you guys want it, I don't care, I'll pull it up to the tree and put it on the other side of the tree. We just wanted to keep it there because we want to be able to keep it chained because everybody, I mean, they're coming at missing everywhere through edgewater and I don't want the boys to go out there and be gone. is a joke going around stealing these kids basketball hoops. But we just got it chained up and you can see there's chains. We've had it to where they could play. But I have no problem. It's on wheels. It's very easy to move. OK. Keep it. It seems like the city will be able to keep violating you if you don't think you're not. Move it out of the way. But as, as they're playing it, it is okay for them to have it as long as the rim is not to the road and the back some. Again, it's not, you're not allowed to put it in the right of way. It's like a super bowl party. You're not allowed to park in your front yard, but if 15 friends come over and they park on your front yard, we're not going to stop and force on the spot. We just want it taken out of the right away when they're not playing with it. I was even thinking about taking the hoop off and putting it on my gable and the peak of that right by the garage put it up there. But then I don't want my garage door old, danged up, big old. I'm going to find a violation. I'm going to pull the citation five of $75 and in the future they can be they can really hammer you. So, you know, try to be cautious about it. Okay. Okay. Thank you. So much. And you have 10 days to get it move it out of the line. It sounds like it won't be a time at all. Okay, I'm going to go ahead and move forward to age, which is 502 sandpiper core. Are you here for five? Is it 502 sandpiper core yours? Yes. If you could come up and speak, say your name and your address. My name is Eric Janssen, I reside at 502 sandpiper core. I'm going to ask you to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to ask the committee to the city is alleged that you violated section 10-121 of their code by storing the trailer in the right away. Is that correct city? That's correct. Mr. Janssen, do you admit or deny that violation? That trailer is there. I mean, you can see in the picture. I can see the picture yes. Yes. Yes. Okay. That's still there today. No, that trailer is not there today. And as I was explained that I called day after the violation, I was telling them at that time that trailer was being worked on. That spot right there is probably the flatest spot that I can work on in that trailer. The arms broke or the foot's broke on the foot of the front of the trailer which you cannot see from that picture. That's why I had that trailer parked there. Normally it is in the driveway and at that time my other trailer was in the driveway. So I had to have that trailer parked there to work on it for a small period of time. After I got the violation that trailer was moved. Okay. That was the, I see the issue was that it was from back in April. It happened in April and then they were you violated it was from back in April. It happened in April and then they were you violated you because it happened in August. I own a landscaping company and these two trailers move daily. So, you know, it's not like they're sitting there being stored for long periods of time. If I come home and I gotta go somewhere, you know, unfortunately, there's only a little bit, if I have two trailers now, one's at the black one is on the side of the house. So there is no problem with that. It's back where the code, you know, it complies with code and then the white one's moving into the driveway. So it's just, this was a time that I didn't have my truck, so I couldn't move some of these things. I said I was working on that trailer trying to get the leg put on the front and that was the spot that I was using it for the meantime Well, it's now in compliance Yes, I'm gonna find that the part that the property was in violation and now is in compliance So you do you have any position regarding the fine? No, sir. So one thing that they can do is that if it happens again, sorry, I found you in violation. So if it happens again, they can hit you with a repeat fine, which basically means they can find you in the end of the day for day basis. But it sounds like you did come into compliance, I understand that you have a lot of moving to do. I don't know if you can try to find some solution other than where it is, you know, the right of way, some legal solution. But if you can, that would help you from avoiding appearing before me. But what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna not issue the citation file. I'm gonna withhold the issues and the citation file. I appreciate that. But they can hammer you if it happens again. Oh yes, is that just possibly in the future. Somebody come knock on the door. Give me, you know, just say, hey, look, I understand. It's not gonna sit there probably more than 24 hours You know like I said at times when I have to come home. I have to drop a trailer I can't be moving these things around you know, I only have one truck and two trailers So it's just it creates a little bit of problem and I understand try not to park there as much as possible You know, and if I have to a lot, so it's, you know, I'm kind of damned if I do damned if I don't, you know, even if I was to back it up in the yard and disconnect it next to the black one in my yard, it'd still be considered violation. So I mean, I tried to, like I said, address these issues every time I can and the future I will do my best to make sure that I am in compliance. Okay. I'll let you that be between you and the code enforcement. Okay. Hopefully I don't see you. But yeah, that's it. Funding violation and I'm getting the happy issue that fine. We're holding the citation file. Thank you. Sorry. Thank you. Thank you. We're good. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. hearing and issue the staff reconmaning sections. And we're adjourned. Good job. adjourned.