you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you I'm going to get a quick look at this. I'm going to get a quick look at this. I'm going to get a quick look at this. I'm going to get a quick look at this. I'm going to get a quick look at this. I'm going. Call on the workshop to get, oh, we are in May 7th, Miss Sealey. Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. We have a few things on the agenda starting with old business. We have the second reading of an ordinance to amend the text of section 1497 of chapter 14 storage let's start over I'm not sure we have any new information we do not as a matter-of-the Mayor and Council, and nothing has changed since I presented this Wednesday two weeks ago, and since you passed an old first reading this past Monday two weeks ago. Is that really a word right there? Surridge, yes, sir. Surridge. Okay. There's a few steps back in the ordinance that make you pause. Happy to go through any part of it. I think we do. Thank you all. I do have a quick question just about it. All we're saying on this, what the point of this is, as I had somebody ask me, you're saying you have to be 12 inches above the nearest manhole. So in the event, let's say we're in an older section of town and there's a little bit of a slope or a change or whatever. This would only apply, I guess, really on a new, like a new construct. If we're a certain, you mean it, you're going build a slab or whatever up enough and obviously if there's not some type of fall or enough fall, you know, we have a pump for that, you can put it a pump or something. That's, and we gave them the option of providing all the methods. They're all backflowers that you can put in sewer lines. They just don't work very well. But they get clogged up with other products that people can put down along. Right. We did give them the option of presenting that to engineering should they need to. You get that. Thank you all. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mark. Item B is a second rate of ordinance to re-zo one 15 north broad. This is this is city planner, Kenny Thompson. So now we have to have to have just a really jump the gun. That was just really excited to be there and talk to you all. About the second rating, it's going to be fantastic. So Monday night, we will be coming before you. This is the second rating for 115 North Broad conditional use. This is the bull on property. and the conditional use is really just for the manufacturing other goods belts, things like that. There's been no information, no new information since the first reading. I'm going to be happy to go back through or answer any other questions on my head on this. Any questions for Kim? I heard that place does a lot of famous people's Straps for the guitars A lot A lot Really I know some of the names, but there's some a lot of people They have a lot of nice things to them They certainly do, they've become in the town to pick them up in person Let me know They just might find my way downtown They have been some in town we just didn't know. Thank you, Kenny. All right, thank you. Moving on to new business, item A is a resolution to submit an application to receive fiscal year. 2025 G. Supplemental Local Maintenance Improvement Resurfacing Grant, City Engineer Todd Powell. Anthony Bayer, Council. On March 20th, the City of C, the location from the George Park Interpretation of the Pintitio, 3.74,1925, got a grant amount. This is the recovery surfing assistant. For roadways and the city limits, if it's approved, the grant application will need to be entered into the local maintenance improvement grant website by June 15th. For this supplemental, a local management required in order to receive the funds. The remitent avenue project has been awarded by the council, therefore this grant amount could be very beneficial to apply this project. This will allow splawk funds to resume designated for rich avenue. Regains on other yearly resurfing projects. It is just a refresher of the Ringen Avenue project, the limits from each pine tree to Smith Avenue. And the request action is recommended to the council to set resolution to apply for local maintenance improvement grant and to vote to apply for the GGOD Ilme grant amount at $4,4,925 in 13 cents. This will offer as a mayor or mayor for Ken's to sign a letter or a crystal g-goth sign that the elevator application and also sign resolution. Are there any questions? How was that amount? The state does that. We don't have any input. They go by the link of roadways we have in the city, which is 159 miles per roadway. Is this something that we get every year or go after every year or is this a unique one? Well we go after the research and project every year. This is a supplemental to that. So it was just the last two years we received this supplement. And it can only be used for resurfacing? It can be used for resurfacing, sidewalks, don't wear a drainage also. You can also be combined with over the years so you can combine it into a large project. Isn't that S-word, is that sidewalks? Can you use it for connecting certain areas with sewage? Connecting certain areas of sewage? Yeah, to get rid of their ditches and put connected with a sewage pipe for the city already has. You mean storm water drainage? You can make storm water? I'm talking about sewage connecting up to a sewage in areas that we don't have. This is a sewage. But the stormwater. Yeah, but I'm just thinking if you put pipes up under the stormwater, just go down, right? The thinking I believe in this was since we already had Remington ready to go, it would allow us to plug Remington in here, get this money, and then that gives us spot dollars that originally we would have spent on remitended now we can take our time to figure out what we want to do with that. I was just wondering, oh because we can use a splash money for anything right? Right. Okay. Okay, any capital. Okay, that's what I needed to know because I was thinking of a splash money. Could you show the map again? Yeah, yep, that was it. Okay. Do I have any questions for Todd? Thank you Todd. Okay, thank you. Item B is a resolution to authorize a change order for the Rimmie-Tan Avenue Street Scape Project, Executive Director of Injury and Inspection to Mark Park. Thank you. Cheryl Sheely. Mayor and Council thanks again. I'm really kind of excited to bring this to you all. It's been about a year since I first appeared before you with the proposed idea of the current project as it stands. We got input from the five of you as well as other stakeholders in the area about concerns with connectivity and lack of sidewalk connections. So the other critical individual that spoke to me about concerns along that roadway was Chris Jones concerning emergency vehicles and the fact that the roadway now being resurfaced is slightly narrower than the current surface of pavement is, the lane width is slightly narrower and they need a spill-off area as well to address, to allow vehicle vehicle traffic to exit the roadway or get all onto the show or safely so that they can have the thoroughfare when needed to get access to wherever they're going with emergency vehicles. So after some discussion it was decided that a road widening project would be undertaken or examined and I'm going to show you some images of this just a moment but currently the the winning bid is $5 million $100,000 in change. This proposed change order is a collective of actually two change orders which I will show you both of those. The net amount in change orders of the Scrooge Company is $1.15 million, and the net amount to the other entity involved in this is SAK for $289,000, making the total expenditure to the city just over $1.4 million. the combined total of the work being proposed in addition to what's already in the scope of work for Remington is combined with a negative amount of 751,000 that you see there where we're taking out sewer lining out of the contract with Scrokes and we're getting the exact same product with SAK for $289,000 which is a savings of $462,000. So that's why I'm bringing both of these to you. You all remember the scope of the project and here you can see some of the lane widening. This is essentially a net widening of 12 feet the entire length of the road one. Okay? I know these images are their engineering drawings, I know they're a little bit hard to see. Why do you widen it? How much? 12 feet. Six feet on each side. Yes, now what you'll see, if I'm going to take you through this, but what you'll see is that you may have three feet on one side and four feet on this side because the road already allows the lane striping will allow. But the overall net effect is the painted lines of the lanes plus six feet on either side that we're done. So keep in mind that this change order is a lane widening. We have talked about bike lanes to service connectivity. That will be in a separate bid packet because that striping is not a part of the scope of what currently exists and really cannot be included in this change or so that we've brought to you in a separate packet. The asphalt will be on the ground, all the improvements will be there but the striping will have to be in a separate packet. I'll show that to you just a second. So I'm just this is kind of taking you down the roadway from Smith Avenue or actually from Schlye Street all the way down to Panty Boulevard and you can see how the how the width varies the the crown of the road will essentially remain the same it may shift a foot or as much as a foot and a half from one side to the other but essentially the roadway width will be true to the 10 foot 6 inch plus lane widths and then another 6 feet on the other side. When we bid the restriping you will actually see something like what I showed you in a previous presentation where you will have a two-foot gourd area where it is a safety zone and then you'll have a four-foot lane on each side of the roadway for bicycle or other traffic. So what I'm asking you to approve is a resolution for the mayor and or the mayor pro-tent assigned for both SAK and the sewer changes in their contract and they were already working in the city as well as a change order for the Scrooge contract where the Remington Avenue project is concerned. I'm sure you have questions. I'll be able to answer anything you'd like. I think that would be a little safer. Sir, I said I think it would be a little safer. I think that would widen it. I think it will be, especially for the bikes. And this is truly a shoulder widening. So it is not just asphalt. There is actually a very significant concrete base under that to handle all types of vehicle traffic traffic and then asphalt on top of that. And we looked at a number of different options. How wide is the road now? Namely it is 24 feet. It's going to be, it will be 22 plus 12, 36 feet in width. I know between 34 current and current and orchard that it's pretty narrow so current right now is very wide it's four days right there where where the roundabout is going to be yes up to orchard it is very narrow The right way is narrower there and as a result of that, you will see both the ditches get shallower, but on one side they will actually be storm pipe that goes in from slice street all the way up to Gishai of the entrance to Mitchell Placing process street, which is not quite the church or the horse out of the road. Right now if you pull off you pull off in the ditch. Right and this will fix it. Explain to me how we're saving money by widening the road. We're not saving money by widening the road. We're saving money by moving the lining of the sewer portion of the contract and taking that completely out of Scrokes contract and we're giving it to SAKA. SAK. Scrokes had a budget of over $750,000 in their contract for that. The exact same work we're having done by SAK, which are specialists in that field and we're already doing work and they're doing the exact same thing for $208,000. How much is the cost of the extra widening? The extra widening is just over $900,000. The utility work is the balance of that 1.4 million. So we have a number of utilities that are underneath the edge of roadway, and we must replace them. But otherwise we're gonna be digging them up in four or five years. So there's one for the widening. This road this road was engineered to aspect that did not allow an ambulance to pass. This road has not been wide enough but you had graph shoulders to pull off and that's what people have been doing. But with all the work that's going on utility work that's going on there's no doubt that this problem needs to be addressed along with the currents the other the other concerns that you all had, this was the resolution we'd try to solve then. So you were saying the back lines right there at the curbing. Is that for walking too? I mean, do we have a side walk down there? We don't have a side walk. It's just back. It is technically a bike plan. And can walkers. I mean, it's not safe for people to walk in it. I'm not going to advise if they should walk there. People walk on the shoulder of the road now. Yeah. And this would obviously be some level of safety above what they currently are doing, but it's not advisable anybody walk there. So how much would it be to probably, you look you look that it because I remember Mr. Baker talking of a miss sir. Yes ma'am. Just seeing talking about it about the sidewalk how much would it be for that compared to how much it would be for that roundabout. So the sidewalk is in the range of three to three and a half million dollars. Just one sidewalk.. Yes, ma'am. How much? There's a lot more ditch to fill with the sidewalk because the safety zone between the two forces, just like we're having to do with some of the storm piping that's there, forces to do that. And all the other great changes that are there than that we incur all the numbers we have, it's well in excess of the amount. So we're paying extra to the roundabout right? Pay an extra for the roundabout. Yes, to put it there just to have a roundabout. We're paying a little bit more more to just resurface. No, man. We're solving a lot of issues with that roundabout. So right now that is a very odd and I'm going to say dangerous although we don't have the people are usually they have a heightened sense of weariness they approach that area but the slope of that roadway along with the fact that it's for a way in coming into there and all those odd angles of those other intersecting roadways makes it pretty difficult. The roundabout will be much more level in fact to the eye will appear level I think it slopes just over 2% and it should improve safety, slow traffic down dramatically, which has been another large complaint on that roadway. So there were a number of reasons for doing that. Not to mention that we still believe we will receive the grant funding, which has no match from the Department of Transportation for $500,000 for putting in that roundabout. So all of that was the reasoning for putting that in, and that's a very, very collapsed version of that. I have one more question, because someone, well, several people had talked to me about this. We're resurfacing those streets, right? And then it looks like within a certain short amount of time they're cracking or splitting or I know right here in front of this building was resurfaced before, you know, not what, 10 years ago. I mean, it's been a little while. It's been a little over the next half. But, you know, if I've been living on a street for 40, something years and it have been resurfaced, this one is tur- I mean, it's just cranking. Everybody is talking about how the streets, that the paving looks good, it's steel, but the cranks are coming. And I'm trying to figure out, is there a layer of what the resurfacing should be? Because I know just about the same person doing it all, that it should last or guarantee of that it will last so long or they just do it no guarantee yesterday anything. There is a warranty that goes with it. Some cracking is expected. I don't know of any roadway that is failing prematurely. Now that doesn't mean they're arning. I'm just not aware. Nobody's brought that to my tin. So the cracking isn't failing. No man. It does it does happen. Now, exactly when that happens, what I can share with you is that when we use soil cement base, and I'm not trying to talk to everybody's head, but when we use that, you would get failing and failure that really demanded full reclamation. In other words, excavation of all the base and everything. And the modern methods that they use today have improved that command. They're a good example of a complete failure with the arc see drive. If you go see that, it looks like very large patches with what looks like half inch cracks between them, and they're in alligator back design through the whole roadway. You will see that occasionally on some of these intersections. But generally speaking what you see is as the road ages and as it deteriorates from the heating of moisture changes and temperature changes, you do get cracks. Those spheres are there the day it's put down, just like concrete. And they get worse over time. But that is a gradual process. This road's, it's been well over 10 years since this was resurfaced. I don't know when that was, but I've been here 10 years and it was already an existing roadway when I started here. So, you know, there may be some examples of premature failure, but I don't know that. And I would say if those occurred within a short period of time, we would be in touch with the contractor. And we've had instances where contractors put things in incorrectly that we've had in the place. We've had instances where contractors put things in incorrectly that we've had to make them resolved. And the reason I was saying it was short period of time because we don't get rose surfaces mostly what 40 to 50 years. The current resurfacing plan schedule it could be. Uh huh, the current plan. Right. is available. One thing to keep in mind with this change order when Mark originally brought the Rimmington Avenue Street Scape Project, this particular plan with the, what you call the by-plane to the side, that was something that we had all talked about before. He said that it would be coming, it was not in that original plan you approved. And he said it would come back as a change order. So this is that change order that puts that element in the plan. About a little confused because I mean, and maybe I'm not fully understanding it, but after fighting for sidewalks for well over a year, we couldn't find four feet to put a sidewalk. And now we've found 12 feet to expand the length. So it's not that we couldn't find four feet. It's that we couldn't find 12 feet on one side, which is what would be required. So this, as you see, you've got areas where we put two feet on one side and 10 feet on the other. We've got areas where we put four feet on one side and eight on the other and all the way down the roadway. The problem with the sidewalk is we have to have a safety zone between the edge of pavement and the curb. And you're almost mandated to put in a curb for that safety zone. Or set the sidewalk back ten feet. So we have places where we simply don't have that much room. And in order to move the roadway over, then we have to rebuild the entire road. So it gets even more expensive. So before we were actually proposing, at one time, in the large version of this project, put sidewalls on both sides, we can put one on one side, which is what I have proposed to you all before, but that is about 3 million plus to do that from the roundabout all the way down the room in Concord. And it would still be my hope that we do that. I would hope that this council would consider committing between 800 to a million one a year to do it in segments as we can. We have it fully around the roundabout, all the way down to Smith, and we all want that connectivity, especially to these farmers. I think with the resourced and with the grind and the road down and resourced and over that, it will hold a lot better. Yeah, and there are areas of this roadway, and I think for give me, I can quote you, but there's about 20% of this roadway, 25% that will be full replamation. So where they dig down and take up the base because the base is failed in spots as well. And some of that will be in patches and some of that may be in a length of 100 yards, but there are areas of this road that are going to come up. the majority of his resurfaced. You talk about people walking into bike lanes, I see more people walking there than I will see bikes. You sure will. And would it be a sit back a little further that's going to make it a little safer? Because right now I mean they're right on the edge of the road. Yes sir. I agree with you. What is the G dot spec for I mean whatever it was designed to met whatever turned like G dot requirements correct. The road initially yes yes as far as I know it did I I really don't know that for certain but as far as I know we have no spec for the city, but we've always used D-NOT spec. Right. Which is two of whatever code that would allow, ambulance says, or whatever navigate roadways. Well, for years, you know, we had dirt roads all over town. And so that was not near the consideration it is today. And more and more vehicles are built with low profile tires, very low to ground, and it is more problematic to try to keep them all last. So that is part of the consideration. But it is a real concern with one of the larger fire stations and the E911 centers right there on Remington to make sure that vehicles can fully exit the roadway. And at least give them a lane. You know you don't both have to get fully off the driving or travel lane but both opposing traffic and traffic moving with you needs to be able to move off the other two have a lane. So is the lane with getting wider or is there just a bigger shoulder? It's a bigger shoulder. The lane with is going to remain still 10-6. Okay because bigger lane with increased speeds increase speeds because it's not so much more interested in widening. No, everything we've done on this roadway, and I'll hurt me to give that presentation between the traffic light around about the Biden Island. All those things are designed to try to slow traffic down on this road. You can speed on rim too if you want to. The guy sitting right down there by, he'll get you. So you said that they do have a war to you? What is that war to you now? That's Grugs' give. It's 12 months. That the road? OK. Yeah, it's 12 months. That's a typical construction warranty. If there are defects, there could be additional warranties I'm not aware of, but as far as I know, it's 12 months. Well, maybe I just suggest, even if I'm not here, that if we're going to do this, we look at these roles and how long they last. And we may not, you know, know we're doing them 50 years. They do last, but they are some of them so bad. Even Remington is a terrible road that's all to it so I understand that but we need to look at when the roll starts going bad after this may resurface you know after it has been resurfaced because it does happen if you can bring you that to me we'll bring you some pictures I don't I don't know if any of the failed proof maturely as far as I'm under aging as they shoot. I don't know what failed me and I don't understand what they should. I just think they, because you know, anything can be what they should, because that's the standard someone has set. But I'm just saying that they are, I'll bring you, I'll let you know. I'll tell you soon. Let me know where they are. We'll certainly look into it. For wait for four to 50 years to resurface again, I know that's what we are doing. Yeah, and most of these roads have lodged in the ground 30 years. Obviously the heavy or the traffic load equipment they're going to do you're ready. But they really should not be stretched to 50, because right we are replacing them right now. That's about the cycle that we're working on. Any other questions? Sorry, just the backup on the actual money. What are so, there's a call savings that we're approving and then an increase. The total amount is 1.4 and change. Of an increase increase. Yes so we're signing a change order to Sproaks for 1.15 we're signing a change order to SAK for 289,000 in change. So those two numbers together are the total increase. We take an off 700 and that is the net. That is the net. That is the net right there. Where are they going to start? If they don't start soon or cars going to disappear on the My haunting is because I'm Monday is the start. Thank you all. Thank you. We'll move on to a resolution to award a bid for JetA refueling truck and we have airport manager Robert Petty here. Good afternoon mayor councilman. Here with you this afternoon to consider the resolution for a new beginning fuel truck for the airport. Last year we were authorized at 27,000 for a new jetty fuel truck that provides us with the option of ability to service vehicles away from the truck. This truck that we're currently trying to replace is about 80% of the fuelings on the airport. We call it the new truck. We have an older truck that uses a backup truck, but it's actually in a little bit worse condition. So this particular fuel truck that we're looking at, it does about the $40,000, $5,000 gallons a year, which brings about $810,000 a year at our $2 for a gallon markup. We're looking to go with the lowest bidder, which is sky marker fuelers at $301,600, which is a difference from the $270,000 that we received of $31,600. So we're looking for, this is information on the truck itself, this is our current fuelerer. It's requiring a about a $15,000 filtration system to do next year. It's also on average taking up about $7,600 in maintenance costs to keep the truck running. The new proposed truck is the Skrymark Truck. It's a 5,000 gallon refueler. It will offer us the opportunity to do everything that the old truck does, but if they added capacity in the truck, it'll reduce the amount of downtime the truck has in between fuelings. It will also take the demand off the underground storage tanks by about 40%. So we're requesting as the adoption of resolution by council for the total amount last year 270,000 plus the request of 31,600 to be authorized by the mayor approaching the sign. On this one, can you go back a couple of slides? So was it the amount keep on one more? So this one says truck pumps probably 405,000 gallons annually. So that's 810,000 is what we would. So we're going to make $810,000 off this truck. So that gross revenue will gross 405 on gross 405 on it. Sorry. Yeah. And that's based on our two dollar gallon. Right. So that would be the profit because at the 405,000 gallons at, you know, $5.25 again, that's 2.1 in sales. So that would actually be our profit. Correct. So it will pay for itself in about four months. Well yeah that's an option. One of the, it should have paid for it. We're looking at potentially increasing fuel sale by maybe ten cents a gallon to help out. I'm prepared for the truck, but yeah, if we can do it by the cost of just the annual revenue generated from the annual revenue. The old truck, I know you mentioned this in the airport meeting, it still has value and we're looking to sell that to reclaim the funds on it still has a value it's just for the amount that we use it it would be better at a smaller airport somebody else could buy it is what my point is. We're looking at a trading value of about $5,000 for the truck the truck is still operational work out around $15,000 to $20,000 for it. So what we are anticipating to do is to get the new truck, which takes 150 days to get that truck. And then once we receive the truck, we resell the truck and hopefully recruit some of that to $15,000 to $20,000. How many years did trucks usually last? 25. This is year old truck. The problem is the chassis, the weight. That's the first one or the second one. The old one you were seeing, okay. It doesn't operate as often. It's a slower pumping truck. So we tend to use the newer truck. We have larger aircraft that have to be serviced and we have multiple aircraft, especially during quills season. And it's 20 years old, the newer one. The new truck is 20 years old, or 25 years old. And I guess I'm just looking at, in which I have said many times before, is that we, as the city, put a lot of money into an airport, and I know you say it brings in money from tourists and people who come here and all of that, but yet it's money coming out of our electric fund that's going over to the airport in which the people are having to pay for it and it's not paying for itself. That's the only thing I gotta say. It's not, we shouldn't have to put all this money because if you wanted to get a new truck, the airport should already have that money if it was paying for itself. And I just don't think that it's a, you know, I'm not saying, do not get it, but I'm saying that we have got to figure out a way to make this airport work to pay for itself. That's why I'm saying, it have some excess monies because I know there's a way, we just got to find it. And so the city will not have any come from this electric fund to pay for all of this stuff. The next item on the agenda, Council Member Chastain, we have you down for that. It's the appointment for DTTA with you. The next item on the agenda counts from Board of Justice. We have you down for that. It's the appointment for DTTA with you. Why? So we have you down for that. It's the appointment for DTTA with the wife. So we have a vacancy on the board with Anne the Hood from the Center for History Center moving. With the wife has expressed interest. She supplies so that would be the recommendation I believe from the board. So we'll have that down for Monday night. Okay, I'm guessing I'll just need to read this. Yeah, I can answer any questions if you might, hasn't? We currently serve on the Main Street Advisory Board and based on previous discussion, if you all prefer that she bring herself off of that board, then the recommendation would be for Deborah Smith to fill that spot. And April is here to cover that. If you have any questions about that, Deborah operates the Tom's Fill suit toward. Tom is who what? The suit toward. Case of Thomas Hill. Okay. Sorry. I got an e-mail about her on the day from some people that came for Rose Show, done how great that was. Thank you for sharing that one, though. Yeah. And you know, she was just named also the USA Today's 10 best number two ranking for best food for cross-formation. So it brings out lion tourism, Chomsville, and it ended up being our fifth 10 best in this year. She always says a big group. I don't see where I'm at. Yeah, I have many questions for April about that appointment to make sure you advise your board. And then finally for the next citizens appointment, Mayor Wobble, we have you down for this one. This is the Mayor's appointment for the library board. And it's not in your packet. There is a blank resolution in there, but we did receive the application for Mr. Scott's recommendation, Robert Jones, this afternoon. So with the approval, we'll have him on the agenda for that. Who's seen as that film? Adrian Burns, the way that I believe their bylaws are sent out to the family with this half they have to, they can serve a couple of terms, but then they have to come off, and then they can go back at some point and serve again but she's just at the end of her second term. Yeah. Any questions about any of those appointments? Alright, that's all we have for the agenda for Monday night. We do have the staff report if you'd like for us to move into that for the sake of time, because I don't believe we had any citizens to be heard. All right, we'll go ahead and move on to that item then the staff report. It's an overview of the Council Regional Airport taken place in the last year and last four months of the airport. Last year we started the runway line, the site project that would correct a hump, if you will, on the primary runway 422. That was completed in October just before quail season. With the existing lights along the side, we were able to operate the runway and continue the operation of the airport. Normally throughout the quail season, then we picked it up in March and then just recently completed April 28th with the runway edge lighting on the runway. That project included grooving, paving, milling, and that pump out in the middle and the edge line itself. It also included some sign boxes for wayfinding on the airport as well as some lights along the connectors that connect it, run away from the taxiway. That project, we had an ungrateful about $627,000. And that was mostly due to the close milling of the asphalt that was done on it. And the close tolerance is used on the paving process. So we're looking at, hopefully, we can see that some of that money comes back to the airport if it was used or a can from non-discretionary FAAG.A aviation manager is looking into that force. Last year also the implement of the lowering of the moody military operating area over the surrounding airports in our area. We were just on the cusp of that. We're glad to say that it really did not impact our operations throughout the year and so and talking with Steve Bryant, the aviation state manager. He said that those airports directly under the moon are not directly impacted as well. It turns out most of those operations take place at night. Most of it is helicopter activity out of of the nuclear force base,. It's not really impacting a lot of our IFR instrument flight rule traffic. Best air planes are coming in to the airport on an instrument flight plane just by navigating by instruments along. You have a meeting on that. May 15th. That's correct. The F-35 is going to be stationed at the new year-force base, replacing the AT&N board hall. And the Grimm talk about those operations now is going to impact our local angles. We also sold the ILS system at the airport, the instrument landing system last year. That has helped us to save about $22,400 annually in maintenance costs as well as in data line for that that that's a navigational system. We're actually trying to move now away from radio based navigational aids that are on the ground that bring people to the airport and move to a GPS based system where we're not having to pay for any of the maintenance or equipment on the ground. It's all space-based. The airports decided about the south-post development area. We're moving forward with that. This Thursday we have a preliminary meeting with the designer for that. It's out of the military. And we're going to try to give some of our folks who have been invited to come out, who are tenants on the field, who have shown interest in building hangers, to come out and join us, discuss some requirements for that. that the project was the project that was awarded to us the design with our $625,000 match last year. And also this year we're gonna be doing the design work for the Taxiway Alpha Lightning System, which is the Taxiway that's parallel to the primary runway, which we just completed this year. Thank you you skipped the metal one. How much money you gonna make? If once those hangers are built and the design of the apres include 300 by 100 foot hangers, which we completed a similar complex back in 2017. And based on those cells from the from the aircraft are in foot hangers which we completed a similar complex back in 2017 and based on those cells from the aircraft They're in those hangers once we fill those hangers We're expecting about and just fuel cells alone about 700 to 900,000 and And that's well about for profit about 200 to 400,000, based on a $2 market. A year? A year. That's not including the ground leases that we would obtain those revenues from them once we sell them or rather lease them space on the ground. 200,000. Well, that would be at about 31 cents a square foot is what the going market rate is and that's about $3,100 more per hanger. 30-1-what? 31-100-1 per hanger. And they can build their own hangers. Currently, we're opening up to ground leases and have them, some of those companies have had interest in specific hanger designs that would come at them with an office area and a hanger large enough to accommodate some of their newer aircraft that they're looking at. So as of right now we do not have any kind of, any kind of resources in the airport area of finances that is not being used. Any profit that's not being used. This just showed you some of the layout of the airport, the highlight area is the new project that's coming in the tax rate alpha and you can see over there on the left hand side the Southwest quad area of a high currently dean steel that we would be building the Southwest building area. for the investment from the city of $7,250 to match with the design, again, is just approved. And these lighting systems tend to get impacted about every 20 years. And the tax we offer, lighting of shillin is age with a number of issues that work current experiment. Future activities include a wildlife perimeter fence. We'll design for next year, constructed in 2027, that will reduce the possibility of wildlife hazards on the airport, also will help to increase security of the field. And this year, GDOT is expecting to move forward with putting what's called 1200 arrow on our airport, which is a tracking system. You can see here that generates reports and helps to have better statistical control of what's coming in to the airport, how long does it stay, how long does it stay, what type of aircraft in this work? That's all I have in question. With all these improvements building this new hangers and fuel we should see our airport to make money in the next. Yeah, you know, and all this should certainly help add more revenue, particularly the ground leases. So we'll take them off the electric? That's the goal for everything to support itself. Thank you very much. I know they have been wanting to. A lot of people have been wanting to build hangers, put hangers and now that cause their planes are in poultry and other places now. That's true. Yeah, we've experienced a few folks that have approached our airport about Billy Nanger's where we just didn't have a range-based building to. And the mulchery has just built a larger hanger to accommodate a number of folks. In fact, since the last three, four years, they've almost doubled their capacity of the airport and mulchery. So, and they've taken on a number of aircraft there. So, we hope to do the same with the air bell men and the force that needs fuel cells, which holds us to grow. And they're inside that military. I'm like surrounded by it. They, they in that military circle, we're right outside of. Yeah, absolutely. And that's a benefit to us.. I know you may not know some Montreal Airport doesn't take care of itself. The City take care of it too. It does the airport, the FBO is privatized so an individual owns the FBO that does the fuel sales but they don't manage or the fuel or the buildings. That's one of the greatest expenses for the airport is the building fields maintenance. All right. We are adjourned. I'm on deck. We're all here.