Let's start the CRA Commission meeting. Special CRA Board Committee for May 20th, 25th, 4PM. Call the order, director. Board Chair Michael Joseph. Board Vice Chair Jay Trinnell. Here. Board Member Fortuna Smuckler. Present. Board Member Phyllis Smith President. Board Member Danielle Jean. Board Member Mackenzie Fluramon. Board Member Lynn Sue. President. Also, President is Executive Director Adam Old myself and a CRI attorney, Steven Zalquitz. Thank you. Next item on agenda is public comment. Do we have anyone from the public here for public comment? Saying none, we move forward closing public comment. And we're going to action item three approval minutes. We have a motion in a second. Motion. We'll have a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. I just have it. Next action item is action item number four, CRRA 2025-07, approval in an in-b-CRA assessment of need director. Okay, thank you. And I again apologize for the rush on this one. This item is urgent as I've said, you know, you know, at the last meeting, there was a bill going through Tallahassee that potentially put a deadline of July 1st on the passage of this document that appears to be dead. But I'm, you never know. And this legislative session has thrown a lot of curveballs. So in the, in an effort to be fully prepared, should something come our way. I think it was just my intention that we could look at this, get it done early and hopefully pass it as sooner rather than later. Just on the rare chance that this, the CRA bill in Tallahassee revives and somehow you know we were we were caught sleeping. So that's why I. More on that. So the bill SB 1242 and HB 991. But both of those bills died and cannot be heard again in the special legislative session. But there was for a brief period of time, they pulled some language out of HB991 and inserted it into a Senate bill that was totally unrelated. The Senate was, I think, they said no, we don't want that in our rural infrastructure bill. This has nothing to do with rural infrastructure and they pulled it out again. But I think the fact that it touched it at one point in the past might give them the opportunity to sort of make the claim that that bill now is HB991, which to me it legally it doesn't make sense, but I'm not a lawyer. And I think also it would definitely be litigated, but I'd rather just avoid that possibility if we don't need to litigate it than let's not. So this is the assessment of need. As you may remember back in early 2000s, you passed a finding of necessity that authorized the CRA to exist. Or the finding of necessity really authorized you to pass the documents that let the CRA exist. The finding of necessity said there is slum and blight conditions in the CRA boundaries. And therefore, we should create a CRA that happened in, you know, from between 2005 to 2007. And now we have run up against our sunset date in 2028. And if we want to continue the CRA to exist, we have to pass what's called an assessment of need. It's not exactly the same as a finding of necessity. It's a requirement that the county put in place back in the 20 teens and has a specific list of what they're looking for. It's essentially again a finding of slum and blight conditions. All right, Dave. Do I have a second? Second. Okay. Does this extend where is the area living in? So the assessment of need does not. And in discussions with the city attorney, the assessment of need simply. Sorry, the CRI attorney. The assessment of need is just the finding that the existing CRA has blight. If we want to extend and we do, I've expand and I know that we want to look into that. Those require finding of necessity for each of those areas. So one of the reasons why I got this too late was I was trying to have those ready for you by this time. I don't have it. So what I thought would be better to do is do the assessment of need, extend the lifetime, and then we can come in and add the, you know, the different areas and we can hash those out individually without the sort of idea of the clock is taking. The assessment of the timeline. And this does not extend the CRA, this authorizes us to extend the CRA, which you would then have to do via an interlocal agreement with the county. So sorry, go ahead. All right. Do I have a motion or second? All in favor say aye. Aye. Next action item is, as I have it, next action item is action item number 5.5. Okay. Order strategic partners, I will see. This is, this is, can I go back to that one and read the title of the resolution? I was going to suggest that please, please do, please, please do it. Thank you, Steven. Sorry. Um, I, uh, I learned my lesson on this. Michael hungry. No, no, I just, no, no, I, uh, I understand that the, um, that we're going to follow the procedure. I don't know. I've never actually read that that's a procedure, but I'm doing it just because why not? Do for us. This was the previous resolution that you voted on. A resolution of the Board of Commissioners of North Miami Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, CRA, with attachments accepting and proving the assessment of needs study prepared by Florida Strategic Partners. partners, LC attached and incorporated as exhibit A, the study for the extension of life of the CRA. Finding with the study area constitutes a slum or blighted area as defined in section 163 Florida statutes. Finding that there is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of lower moderate income including the elderly elderly, and finding that the rebuilding, rehabilitation, conservation, and redevelopment of the study areas necessary and is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals, and welfare of the residents of the city of North Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County. Further, directing the executive director to transmit a copy of the study to the city and to the county for further legislative action. Okay, thank you. That was a one question. This will come back to you at the city. You'll pass it again there and then it'll go to the county and they'll pass it there. This is the next resolution. This is CRA resolution number 2025-08. A resolution of the chair and board members of the North Miami Beach Community Redevelopment Agency for approving the agreement with Florida Strategic Partners. I'll see as the executive director to provide services for a not-to-exceed amount of 175 for basic services plus additional amount for additional services. Authorizing the executive director to execute the agreement with Florida Strategic Partners LLC, authorizing the executive director to take all action necessary to implement the terms of the agreement in providing an effective date. This is a renewal of my contract as your executive director, but the real reason why I put this on here was because Commissioner Flourmont had asked me to prepare a report of the things that I've done. And so, you know, what have I been doing since I've been here? I'm happy to go through this individually with all of you or we can do it here. I think, you know, as I started doing this, I saw there was, you know, there's been a lot of work that's going on sort of behind the scenes. And, you know, I'll bring you a handful of items at the meetings, but there's a lot of work that's going on through the CCNA, through different means that have been approved in the past that's still ongoing. and new things that haven't been approved yet, but I need to get them to a place where they're in a quality to... ongoing and new things that haven't been approved yet but I need to get them to a place where they're in that quality to bring forward to you. So you know I'll start. I'm not sure the will of the board but I'm happy to do whatever you offer to I guess present all the documentation in the and schedule those meetings with the. I can do that. I mean, I think, you know, it's fairly straight. For the people that for the people, the members that do need it, just so they could see what has occurred that's far. That's that's right. And I think it's, you know, it's fairly straightforward. There's like, you know, pages's pages of different categorized actions that I've been working on. Also happy to field questions. I don't know. I know you're moving quickly, which is a line, but let me know if anybody has comments or questions. Okay. Jane Nunn. All right, Commissioner, board member, Chair. Thank you, board Chair, good afternoon. The question that I have for you is, in addition to compiling this report, can you highlight what are you doing for residential, for the residential portion? Yeah, what are some of the things there? Yeah, and I was you know, I found the old CRA Some of the things that were done prior things like the The welcome signs what was that something that we scratched out the entryway? So in May of 2023 the there was an item put forward at a workshop I believe and the way so CRI had hired the wayfinder sign? The wayfinder signs? Yeah so that that had been sort of designed and put forward and there was a disagreement at the commission level about the sort of branding of the signs. My understanding was that the city was going to undertake a rebranding and at that point, then the signs would be sort of updated to reflect that rebranding and then brought back to you to approve the actual placement of signs. You know, if you would like to move that forward apart from the city's rebranding effort, I think we could do that too. I don't think that would make no sense. That would make no sense. I agree that it would be good to do all the branding at once. Because I think that how it's going to be doing the renovations. It doesn't make any sense. There may have been several efforts at branding in the past. And none of them were 100%. But push the envelope with the people. Yes. Push the envelope. Yeah, that's what I would say. Because when you talk about behind the scenes, The C know, the CRE is all about eliminating blind and so, you know, we appreciate the fact that you're working diligently behind the scenes, but I think we're all can agree that we want to see more forward movement and a more rapid taste. Yeah, yeah, I got you. So the, in terms of residential that you talked about, that's part of what would be on the, on the expansion of the CRA boundaries. Right now, the CRA is almost entirely mixed use or commercial. So we have a couple areas in Coronad-El, in particular where there is housing that does, there are some housing needs down there. And CERIC can help those individual properties. The problem that we run into is how to sort of make sure that the services are getting delivered. A lot of that housing is like naturally occurring affordable housing, you would call it, whereby the rents are less expensive because, you know, the buildings haven't seen a significant rehab in a period of time. Rehabbing those buildings is important, but we also have to make sure that we aren't displacing the residents that live in those buildings. And this is a balancing act because you also, you know, if, for example, there were a building that was severely run down and hadn't had any rehab to it, the board would need to ask itself like, is that the type of landlord and property owner that we want to be patronizing and helping, even though it would support the residents of that building is it or you know maybe there could be a way where you know there's been a good faith effort to sort of keep the building up just up to speed but the rents are low so that the landlord can't make that that that final push it needs and in that case I think it think it would make sense for CRA to come in and help the landlord get the rents, keep the rents low as that landlord is rehabilitating the building. That's something that CRA can and should be doing, I think. Boardman, does that have a question you. No, I just want to identify that I'm going to vote no, only because of my frustration tonight. This is more than the first time that I haven't had the material review. And I just feel that the way I look at it is that that's something prior to getting here. I would like to know the answers. I would like to study the actual report that we got back and see if we're going to approve it or not approve it. I also feel that in the two years the movement we've seen the ideas are good the movement is not there so I just want to explain it so that Mr. Overno we had a conversation this afternoon and I'm going to vote no on this. Thank you. Commissioner, turn off. No, I'm good. All right, so we gotta do have a motion. So moved. I'm second. Second. All of you say aye? Aye. Any opposed? One opposed. Next action, I have number six, CRA 2020 approval of plantation. I guess we have the resident or this only. The proper, my property. Please read, director, please read out the. Yeah, thank you. This is a resolution of the chair and board members of the North Miami Beach Community Redevelopment Agency approving the facade and business site improvement application of plantation FPLLC and a grant in an amount not to exceed $16,800 for property located at 1390 Northeast 163rd Street, North Miami Beach, Florida, authorizing the executive director and NB-CRA attorney to negotiate and finalize a grant agreement with plantation FPLLC, authorizing the executive director to execute the grant agreement, authorizing the executive director to take all action necessary to implement the terms of the grant agreement and providing an effective date. This is a facade grant for painting of the building and parking lot improvement of what is the dollar tree site right now on 163rd Street. Do you want to have an applicant come up? If you'd like to come up and just say a couple words, that would be great. Please. Just talk about what you're planning to do with the. Yeah, you're watching me out. Good afternoon. What are we trying to do really is to first fix the building, there's some cracks and the appearance, it looks like it's out of date and put a fresh paint. That's regarding the building, the front and sides. And the parking parking lot which is really in bed shape. I believe that if it's going to look better, we'll attract better people to come in, we'll increase business for my tenant and obviously for us and I'm sure it's going to benefit the city. Oh, name and address. Thank you for clarifying that. Mine. Remember, yes. My name is slow model and my address is the business. Yes, the business, the business is 1390. Notice the 163rd Street. Thank you. I have a quick question. Before board members, you have a quick question. Thank you for being here. I know you have a homeless problem in front of that building at night, right? I have a little bit behind. And also, there's also a trash issue with the trash can that's there it's like so small and people just dump anything is there anything that we can do to help in that what we did I can try to answer what we did is I hired a loan company that do loans and they come twice a week and clean up the parking lot, the area and be paid them separately just for the cleaning. Twice a week, they are there. Choose day and Fridays. I had a motion to approve. I have a question. Through the board. Yeah, through the board, Chair, please. It floods on the side where the parking is. Will you be paying that as we're doing that drive was well on the side of the building? Yeah, it goes like four or five parking spaces. Yes, that's in there. So will you be fixing it so will you bring the pay bring it up a little bit so it won't flood or have a little more pitch or something when you're improving? I, that's the company that's going to do it. They're going to probably, they're going to have to come here to get all the approvals and if there's something necessary to do. Okay, could we make note of that because that is a flood, that flood something awful right there, right? We had, we had a problem with that and I just got a jet ink company that came in and ran through Jets. It hasn't been done. Oh, that's right. Is there a trend? It hasn't been done. It hasn't been done in years. Whoever dealt with it was my partner which passed away last year. And so for me everything is new. I start from I never been here. He was here probably before me. And when I checked with this company, they checked and we never, ever run jets through the sewer system. Okay. So we got a jetting company, they came in and they did the board members mark as a target. I, so I don't know you, oh, I thought you. I have a question for the executive director. The parking lot is next to the, you own the parking lot. Yes. So the parking lot is next to it. He's going to fix it and then we're going to have really what might look like light because one will be fixed and that? The city owned parking lot. That's what I was wondering. That's why I asked him if he owned it. So is that where the city owned starts next? So there's his parking lot. Then there's two lots that are not paved. One has a building on it that is city owned, small building. And then the city owned parking lots start on the other side of it. So that is, you know, there is an opportunity to also pay and and restripe the city parking lots if that's a big. And would that be possible to have matching funds from the city and us to to pay that? Would that be possible? So,, Attorney. Yeah, I think that's an attorney question. I'm sorry, so that again, please. Would it be possible? The, he's going to pay, that is a strip store. So he owns the corner and he's going to pay. The rest of it looks like blight. But the city owns that. Is it possible for the city to apply for co-payment of the CRA so that it won't look really look like blighted area? It sounds to me like it's a public works issue. And it would have to be the city acting in the city's capacity. I think we have the city's attorney here who may be able to speak to that as well. If the city owns it, I think the city needs to take care of it. All right, I'm just asking if the city doesn't have funds because right now the city's looking at any way to get money. May the city apply for CRA as an entity or no? I don't think I've ever seen that in my previous experience, but could never they could lend money to the city to do something. There's a cooperation statute 163-400 which allows for great cooperation between the city and its CRA. We've used that many times. We used it in fact recently with the purchase of the singer building. Yeah. But I'm asking because when it's done, you're going to see why I'm not talking off the top of my hand. And perhaps even the CRA could provide a grant under that agreement. I don't think they would need to apply under the program. That would be a conflict of interest. That would be a conflict. If you guys were applying. Well, just to be clear, outside of that, okay, so just because I don't want to belabor the point regarding the applicant, best of discussion that we can't have in regards to that particular point. We'll look at the statute. Okay, and 50% went to 80%. How do we determine that when we're cooperating with the governor? So the facade grant has a special 80% because pretty much we want as many facade grants. I mean, I think the facade grant is very popular for that reason. That's the reason. Thank you for coming forward. Thank you. And I think that's a great idea to partner with the city and the CRA for that. I don't know if it's legal. I don't see why not. I just wanted to, even though you said that they did the jets and they haven't been done before, but you know, you mentioned that you're gonna have the area all repaved and you said that you were gonna, somebody would come to the city, which I'm not sure do you need a permit for repaving? No, for repaving. No, not the jet for that. For the repaving. You need a permit? Yeah, the repot, oh yeah, oh yeah. But the point is that the building official may not know that that actually floods. And even though you said that, you had the repaid. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. But the point is that the building official may not know that that actually floods. And even though you said that you had the jet pass by in there, maybe in six months in a year, that you know, that's, you know, get flooded again. They said, they said to me to repeat that every 18 months. Okay, but what I'm saying is please let the Pave the repaving company know that there's a problem there So for whatever reason you can't do it in 18 months That at least they can pave it in a way that won't cause So much flooding so I don't know if this is appropriate time to talk about it, but there's an opportunity for CRA to specifically enhance the services of the VACTOR and JET trucks within the CRA area. So if there was no drain, I think that would be a pretty, that would be a civil infrastructure project. We'd have to dig a drain there or repay it so it's to pay it differently. If there is a drain though, I think that's just a sort of type of thing that happens all the time. And it can, you know, a little simple fix could go a long way in terms of like not having flood water come into your business. This is something I explored at City of Miami is like actually buying a vactored truck and having a dedicated person to use it because we had projected like 10 years of construction that was just continuously filling up the storm drains. And that's something that I could explore here. I don't think you guys need a whole that door truck just for our CRA here, but it's like the highest return on your investment in terms of hurricane preparedness is getting the leaves and debris out of those drains. It's something that I think is like I really recommend it. Also, the marine biologists have put out that it's actually the highest return on your investment in terms of like the sanitation in the waters of the bay, which I was really surprised, but I know Aventura has like a really serious program about cleaning the storm drains and go for it. Okay. No problem still, but. I have a motion. Second. All the favour say aye. All right. Next. Next. just quickly I reviewed the statute. The CRA could actually pay for the repaying of that city street or. We don't have to apply. You don't have to apply. It would just be an interlocal agreement. Agreement will be due to the agreement. The city and the CRA. Okay. So that would be. Can I say something about that? Wait. very careful of what we're doing if we're looking to extend our life looks up. Yeah, we don't want to, and that's, and to, to that point, I don't want to mess up our accent. No, we don't. I'm very grateful for what we're doing if we're looking to extend our lives. Yeah, we don't want to, and that's, and to, to that point, I don't want to mess up our accent. No, we don't have to do it now. I just want to pay attention when he does it so it doesn't look blighted. And we have other things that we're talking about, including maybe doing something with that parking lot as far as fees for parking. So it's not as, not as simple as a yes. But the only thing I wanted to say is, I don't believe there's a drain. I believe when they come to pay, you need to change the pitch on those parking spaces. Thank you. That's what it is. Thank you. Thank you. I've been there too many times that I know. All right. Next action item is discussion item. We have one of RMA report FY 2024 to 2025. So this was also again per Commissioner Flora Mons board member Flora Mons request to have RMA also provide a report on what they've been up to. I can go through this or you can read it. It's, you know, it's, they work with me, have least weekly meetings with them, and they do some coordination with different contractors. Right now they're out looking for getting FDOT permits to find out about putting banners on 163rd Street Commissioner Jean had requested that a long time ago and where it's it takes that there's a bureaucracy in place so everything is slow but that's that's one thing that they're working through as well as all of the other stuff in this packet. They helped with snake creek coordinated with Burmaya, Ajameal, who was the main consultant on that. So I can answer questions. How much is the contract for RMA? Right now, I think it's 116. It's up for renewal, I think in August. So I'll be bringing that back if you want to, you know, have a discussion about it before their contract renews. I mean, the biggest thing I think is shared by everyone that we want to see. The roof is great, but we want to actually see because none of these things necessarily translate into tangible things that we're able to see on the city side, on the city level. I know I feel your pain. I also want to see those things happening. I think, you know, we were at the leadership retreat last week. And I think sort of the one of the clear items that came up again and again is like there's this like layer of layers and layers. I guess I should say of sort of like regulations and requirements and programs and people. And I think we're getting to the point where a lot of the stuff that we put in motion is starting to break ground a little bit more. So for example, the singer building took a year to move that to the CRA, but it's finally at the CRA. So I'm walking through there with a contractor to get us price and a scope for rehabbing that. Things like that unfortunately take time. And I wish I could move everything as fast as I know you want it. That's board member turn off. Are you done, Daniel? I just wanted to say thank you for all the business outreach that you've been doing. So, kudos in that area. Thank you. Okay. thanks. My concern is, is that I believe when we first hired you, we talked about their contract. It was 300,000 men. 300,000 to 150 now. And 15, I think your words were, you don't really need them. Is that still true? Well, my words were, I don't know exactly what they were doing at that point, because I hadn't been here. And I think when I came back to you with the budget, my recommendation was to dramatically reduce the amount that we were spending with them. Well, then the specific words were, we can do that function, and that was told to us. Yeah, I think that's... That's a discussion we're going to have when it comes in August. And my thing is that we can have more, because our next commission, next board is on a 20th of... What it? June 17th right we can have a more discussion on that and seeing what the possibilities are if we could if we do it we did it ourselves and you could come up with a yeah I think that's that's definitely a conversation that's worth having and maybe we should I should take the pulse of each of you sort of before that yeah in, in time. Board member former. Thank you, board chair. Quick question is, so we don't have to do a renewal. It's just the contract is over in August is what you're saying. There's no need per se. Yeah, well, I mean, there's no obligation. Right. So which is different than other city services that we must provide or we should provide. I mean, you know, that's not really to speak to my feeling about the contract. I just wanna make sure we're getting the most out of it. Yeah. And that it's not just one of those contracts that people forget about and the checks keep getting cut. Yeah, no, I do have meetings with them every week and we go through, I mean, we go through like a list of like six or seven items on each meeting. So, right. And there's the, you know, the actual deliverables, which is very key. Speaking of banners, we have some banners that are on Hanford and on the like those are faded. Yeah, we were talking about those in the office today and you know that it's an issue that's come up. You know, I think Commissioner Jean brought it up. I know others of you have made comments about them. I agree like they're they need to be changed. I have been putting off figuring out what to change them to if there's any any of you have ideas I'd love to. I mean honestly even if they were reprinted. Even if they were a reprint of the same thing it would be better than what we have now. Yeah we couldn't reprint those if not so well. We now, I'm just taking from there. We can do that. Do we want to give him direction to do that? We just kind of just did. He just has to re print. I just want to make sure that we're good. The thing is, we're not doing it. We're just reprinting. I don't want to be able to see it. All right. Yeah, I can re print those. The other point I was going to make is you said you were going to bring your annual report. Yes, that's a item five. Sorry. What what tab is that on? I don't know. Five. Okay. Thank you. And he wants to review individually with each person if you'd like the McImpointment that's what the conclusion was. Thank you. Yeah, it's I would just like to say that RMA don't forget when they were here, RMA was here during COVID. So we had very it was like on zoom, et cetera. So board member Sue and then we'll close it out. Okay. RMA did, I mean, this is a question for everyone. Did RMA do our kaleidoscope theme branding? It was never done. It was never never executed or it was never approved. I think we never even, okay, approve. All right. So our- years ago, years ago. It was never done. It was never executed or approved. Okay, approved. All right. So are we planning on using RMA as the branding? Well, no, I think we're going to have a discussion. And likelihood is that we don't have to renew with them. And we're going to have options discussed at our next meeting, what we can do ourselves and moving forward. That's what basically. Yeah, and I think, you know, one of the things that came out of the workshop in 2023 was sort of that the CRA had been funding, like branding work, because, you know, it had money and it needed to do branding, which I think makes sense. But some of that probably should have started at the city level first. And then I think so, CRA did this branding and then at the time when we came to approve it, I wasn't here at that point, but at the time when you all were asked to approve it, it became clear that like it didn't match the city's brand and and then and then you know I think you don't need one extra one extra piece of weird branding happening every four years that the series I would love to see our branding done to coincide with our 100 year well that's good but good. That's why I want us to, like I said, one thing I want to, because I'm closing this out, one thing at our next mission, board meeting, sorry, board money at the 17th. One, I want to know a full report of how much we paid our RMA over the years, to actually get the report in regards to the kaleidoscope, the full report on that so we can have in front of us. Not to say that I'm using as a barometer to see where, like, I'm basically using as a barometer for at least for myself and just to educate my board members of what can be done, what we can do and because of the 100 year anniversary is coming. So if you can bring that forward next. And I can have them come and be present as well as if that's, you know, if that's of interest. And last point, Board Member Mejah. Thank you, thank you. So we had the CRA had won the Florida Redevelopment Award and I know that the conference is coming up. So I wanted to see if you can maybe if there's something that we can do to submit for this award. I don't know what category if if any, we can qualify for, but also that all the board members get the information for the conference, which is happening in October and West Palm Beach. I think it would be a good educational moment for all of us. Yeah, and there are opportunities to take classes up there, which might be of interest to you all. It's yeah and it's 14 through 17. It's closer this year. Yeah, so you'll get that information to us once. So before I adjourn because we're you know announcements, one thing I want to ask before and I mentioned this to the director a couple of weeks ago because I saw this being implemented in other cities I thought it'd be too big for us because I saw it sitting behind me the entity like those those they have now these signs that are interactive off of this game where you can tap and there and you can like figure out where you are in the city they have it it in my off of this game. Like, I like right. They have it in, they also have it in Amateur. I want to see what these are different. No, no, these are like standalone. Like they're plugged in on the sidewalk. They're lit up. Yeah, it's about them at the, yeah. So I want us to see if possible, see if the CRA, what can the CRA do possibly getting a pilot program and just that aspect. Especially down on digital kiosks. Digital kiosks, it's like, it's one of them too. I saw it in the city of Miami Beach and I know they're going to probably have... they have it in the city of Miami. Miami Shores is looking at that as well because it's a very interactive thing. We're walking through starting areas, it's an attractive thing. And I just find it kind of cumbersome that every time we do an event, we have to go in there, switch up like the paperwork and everything where we can just, we can update it digitally, it'll make more sense. So just so you can look into it. Yeah, I mean, I think that's, I definitely can look into it. I started researching it after you mentioned it last week. I know there's a couple that just went up in the design district. I started researching it after you mentioned it last week. I know there's a couple that just went up in the design district. So I haven't been to see them yet, but like as you requested, I'm gonna go down there and check. And they have shared revenues. They have shared revenues. It's a sponsorship and it's like, it can pay for itself over time. I'm not saying it fully paid for itself, but I still think it's.... I'm sorry, Mr. Bob Bourd chair. Matt. Yes, Board Member. Thank you, Bob Bourd chair. Can we give direction that in the next 30 days that the executive director come back to us with a proposal on what I could look like in North Miami Beach, CRE. Because what it's sounding like now is, yeah, I'm going to go take a look. It does not. I think he's, you know, I mean, I'd be happy to come back. That's fine. Yeah, can we make that an official request? All right, we'll do it as a, okay, we have a motion in a second. On paper say, all right. All right, we got you got the direction and it doesn't have to be Ike or could it be a digital Yeah, I don't think that's I don't know I don't think that's that's but but just if you can follow me. Okay motion. Does that have to be I could it be a digital. Yeah, I don't think that's I don't know. That's but just if you can follow me reframe our motion or do we know? Okay, so just to just to be clear I like I we don't have to do it. I like we don't it's fine. I like I like all right. So we're on to announcements next boardman action. number eight, which is June 17th. And next item is action number nine in German. Do I have a motion to say? Motion. Announcements next boardman action item number eight, which is June 17th and next item is Action number nine in drum and do I have a motion to second stop second all in favor say aye. All right. Thank you. you you I'm going to do a littleail. call blocking apps are free, some are not. Search your online app store and read the reviews. Also, ask your carrier about call blocking services. You can also check your phone settings to find features like the Do Not Disturb setting. Call blocking won't catch every unwanted call. Report unwanted calls to the FTC. Tell us the number on your caller ID and any number you're told to call back. Learn more at FTC.