Good afternoon. This is the May 8th, 2025 meeting of the Special Magistrate for the City of North Miami Beach. Please turn all cell phones to silent. There are no firearms permitted in the chambers. Please remain quiet during a presentation and if you need to speak, please step into the hallway. The special magistrate is empowered under Florida State law in North Miami Beach. City code to hold hearings on code violation cases and opposed fines of up to $250 per day for noncompliance on new cases and up to $500 per day for repeat violation cases. In your case, you may approach the podium and state your name and address. The city within presented case and you will have the right to question the city or any of the city witnesses. After the city presents this case you will have the opportunity to present a defense. Once both parties have presented their cases the special match three will make a ruling. All those that are here to testify must be sworn in. If you're going to testify, please stand and raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give at this hearing is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. If so, say I do. Thank you, you may be seated. See you will call us first case. First case, I'm number two. The case BB-24-0093WP, Chief Building Inspector Ortiz, and sprite the property at 17750 Northeast 19 Avenue. Also the property is C-DN Property Management LLC. There's a non-home state of property. Ownship was termed by tax record. Property was cited for Leo Construction. Notice was achieved by certified male and posting. Good afternoon, Jona. Who will wait for the city of Miami Beach, building the development? We've reached an agreement before this healing, with the owner on the property. We want to grant in 30 days to comply. Sir, can you keep your name and your relationship to the property? My name is Carlos Medina and owner of the property. I know this other company, CDM property management, allows you. Okay. And you understand the nature of the violation? Yes, sir. And it's your understanding that you could do what's needed to be done within 30 days. Yes sir. Okay. My up. Okay. So what based on the agreement of the parties, I'm going to go ahead and set a compliance date of 30 days and in the event of non-compliance, they'll be a daily fine of $100 today. Okay. Thank you. All right. Yeah. One last chance. You sure are 30s? Okay. Yeah. Okay, so thank you. All right, yeah. One last chance, you sure are 30s, okay? Yeah, it's okay. You got it. Okay, so thank you, thank you all. That's it, thank you Mr. McKee. Next case, agenda item number 20, which is BV 240121WP, Chief Building Inspector Ortiz, Spector Property Address, and 151-00 North East 14 Court. Owners of the property is Roy Cheyenne, LeBron Bonilla, Pedro, Pruto, sorry. This is a non-home-stated property ownership was termed by tax record, property was cited for a little construction No, it's achieved by posting My place let me go for daddy 15 100 nori'sories and the 14 call. Yes. So, a good afternoon, you know, who are for the city of Miami Beach with the department. We reach an agreement with the contractor who represent the property and we are granting sixty-eight on line. They are working in the in the permit and the drawings for the evaluation. Good afternoon, sir. Please tell me your name. I start with the and Mr. Suleyde, do you have the authority of the owner to be here? Yes, sir. And do you understand what needs to be done to bring the violation? Yes, sir. And is 60 days sufficient as the building has advised? A building department has advised me. Yeah. I'm trying to do the best I can. You know, I just come on to the vote and this one. Yeah, well, that's why we're here today, as you heard me ask the gentleman before you. Let me know if that's enough time. Otherwise, if you think you need 75 days or something like that, now's the time to tell me. If it's possible to get a little longer, I take it. We don't, I try and do the best I can do in 60 days. Well, the reason that I'm asking that is that if you don't do it on that day, the city's going to be fine. And the owner is going to have fines running against his property and possibly a lien. So I want to make sure that that's enough time since the owner's not here and you've represented to me that you have his authority to be here. My goal is to let me and my position. 60 days for applying and then the life of the permit. I got you. Yeah, so I believe it's more than 60 60 days you can get. That can be not. Perfect. So then what I'm going to do is based upon the agreement of the parties and the update provided to me by the building department advising me that it's 60 days to obtain the permit and then you'll have the life of the permit which is 180 days absent some either written extension or an approved inspection. I'm going to go ahead and set the compliance date for 60 days from today and if you're not in compliance then the fines will start at $100 a day. Thank you. I appreciate owner. However, there's two different address. So I'm going to do six and seven and then eight through ten. So the next two cases, the item number six and seven which is CC CCOM240235 co-compliance officer economyhane, Inspector Property Addressant. 1949, Northeast 163rd Street. Ones of the property is R and O 163rd Investment LLC. Does not home state of property. Ownership was determined by tax record property was cited for parking area maintenance as well as paint building. Notice was achieved by certified mail and posting. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. 49. Okay, this one has parking and painting issues. Yeah. Just waiting for the city. The city is going to present first, and then I'll give you an opportunity to tell me your side of the story. Co-compliance Officer Alicia Crimey with the city of North Miami Beach. Property address 1949 Northeast 163rd Street is in violation of section 24-92 A1 in reference to parking area maintenance and section 16-1.4 F in reference to paint. paint. The violation was observed inside it on July 16th, 2024. The first inspection on February 21st, 2025, and the most recent inspection was on May 6th, 2025, and there was no compliance. The city recommends 30 days. Hey, do you have any photographs? Yeah. Thank you. I'm going to go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead and go ahead parking area, but they have to complete the bath. Okay, so is the painting, the exterior surfaces the rear of the property? Yes. Okay, and this is what they've started in the front. Correct? Yes., huh? It's a different factor. It's making some of your pipes. Oh, yeah. There we go. Yeah. So it looks more, it looks to me from these photographs that it's more than the rear. Yes. It's the side and it looks. Well, that's the back of the property. That's the back. Yes. And then I saw photographs of the front of the property. Yes. They started painting and redoing the windows. And is that the surface lot that we're talking about? There's like, piece number six. Yes. So it's the parking in the rear and the stopper. Sorry, I'm sorry. Sorry. Yes. The stopper is parking. OK. Good afternoon, sir. If you could, please tell me your name, your relationship to the end, your relationship to the property. The Ross Crossover. I'm Donor of the property, Jeff. OK. And so we're going to just focus in on 1949. I know that at first, youed with the photographs that were up on the screen. You tell me those were for 1925, but do you recognize? Yeah, the photographs for 1949. And do you understand what needs to be done to bring the property into? Yes. Okay, and do you think that 30 days is sufficient or do you need more time? I need more time. Can I tell you the reason? Absolutely. So which is the chance? We just start remodeling. As you see on a recent picture, next picture, we did the whole front. We changed all the windows. The storefront looks different now. Waiting for the job to be finished. And we're going to apply the permits to repay the building. As far as the parking lot, we last year, We just connected with the mandatory connection to public sewer. That's why the parking lot looks like that. But we have a tenant who is also waiting for the permit in this building. It's a bar and they apply the bridge shaft. So they're going to be breaking it again. So I don't know how, I mean, we don't want to fix something. And then as soon as they get the permit, they're going to break it. The permit is in the system for them. It's a, do they have the term permit? Yes. It was approved by the county. OK. How does the permit number? Sure. Did she want it? Yeah. So it just doesn't make sense to do double. And I need you to identify yourself, mate. Sorry. number. So, if you want to, yeah. Yeah. So, it just doesn't make sense to double. And I need you to identify yourself. Oh, yes. Sorry. You're just wanting to just tell us who you are. I'm sitting in the bag and I work with Rose Fresh. Okay, perfect. So, yeah, if you have the The permit is VG busy 24 0164 and half. So now let me go back to the city for a second. So is the 30 days to obtain the permit or is it 30 days to complete all the work? Well, I can amend it to obtain the permit but but I'll extend it to 60 days. Is they're going to need a time? They've been waiting for the permits, I think, since December. Because if they have the Durham permit, they're waiting for the tenant to come. They're going to rip up that area and then resurface it, they're not going to really do it. the surface it and not going to really do it. Just minute. Yeah, I'll give them the life of the permit once they receive it. But reasonable time to obtain the permit. Look, if Girm has already approved it, is the city, how does that work with the city as far as additional time? You know those other passengers? Yeah, the police matter. The day, the day, the day of your plan comes down to our review. Are you aware of the defense? I'm thinking. It was done. It was already submitted. It says it's in the review already. It's more like blood. It was done. It was already submitted. It says it's in the review already. You haven't come back the first round of comments yet. I think they did. Okay, so now they're going to be revising them and resubmitting them. I think they did already. Okay, so now the ball bounces back over. in seven, five, seven in seven, five to seven weeks in a state. Where's nothing that I don't know. At least there is any. I think they would have caught that on first round. I guess now they're just addressing the comments. If the city had. Do you think 60 days I mean it looks like you're getting close we can do 60 days and if we have two then we can get an extension. Right? Yeah. Is it a separate permit for the painting? Is that something we can do? We've got a door of wisdom which give us like I would say 30 days. Probably. As soon as they done close the permits with the windows. They a premium inspection inspector requested additional screws. Okay it was three four days ago and as soon as they they done they will apply for the same thing and it's basically two walls. Alright so in the parking case which is ending in 0 5, which is number six on the docket, I'm going to based upon the testimony from what I've heard today in the review of the photographs, set a compliance date of 30 days, and in the event of noncompliance, then there'll be a $50 they find. For the parking? Take it, switch to it. You're right. Thank you for correcting me. For the parking, so we'll go backwards. backwards for the parking? I think it switched it. You're right. Thank you for correcting me. For the parking, so let's go backwards. For the parking, 0, 2, 3, 5, which is case number 6, based upon the testimony from the parties, I find that the violation does exist. I'm going to set a compliance date of 60 days, which is to get that permit, and then you'll have the life of the permit. And then the event of non-compliance, there'll be a daily fine of $50 a day. In the paint case, which is 0237, based upon the testimony and a review of the photographs depicting that the condition still exists, I'm going to set a compliance date of 30 days and in the event of non-compliance, with this order for the paint, there'll be a $50 day fine. So if you can get them all done before those compliance dates, great. There's a problem with the 60 left this city. Thank you. Thank you. They're here for the next one as well. Oh, oh, that's right. Sorry. The next three cases, the next three cases, gender item number eight, nine and 10, which is CCOM240238, 0239, and 0240, co-compliance officer kindly inspect the property address at 19 25 North East 163rd Street. So the property is R and O 163 investment LLC. There's a not home state of property ownership was returned by tax record. Property was cited for derelict property as as well as paint building and parking area maintenance. And notice was achieved by certified mail and posting. Co-compliance officer Alacia Carney with the City of North Miami Beach property address 1925, Northeast 163rd Street is in violation of section 9 dash 5.2a in reference to derelict property, section 161.4F in reference to the paint and section 24-92A1 in reference to parking area maintenance. The violation was observed inside on July 16, 2024. The first inspection was February 21, 2025 and the most recent re-inspection was on May 6, 2025 and there was no compliance. The C recommends 30 days for the paint violation. The same 60 days and then the life of the permit for the parking area maintenance and then 30 days for the derelict property. Can you... What is the derelict property? Yes. The tenets in 1925, it's a restaurant. They leave their boxes and stuff outside. So, can I do that? Yes, please. We addressed the authority of the tenant and the things she's in compliance. Okay, so we're going to start in the beginning again, kind of. So I need to say your name. Rose, Krasnoldo and the owner of the property. Okay. And will you be a... Stylian device. I won't keep that question. Okay, so we'll talk about the derelict property first. Those are the photographs that were taking, I guess, earlier this month that showed the boxes and things that's been renewed. Yeah. Okay, so what I need for you to do is reach out to the officer, have them come out and inspect. I'm going to set a compliance date of 30 days on that violation, so that'll give you enough time to pay something. Else's out there or she sees it's still dirty or something like that. But make sure it's clean when you call and you can go out there and close it. So based upon the testimony for 0, 2, 3, 8, I'll set a compliance date of 30 days. And in the event of non-compliance, that'll be a daily plan of $50. Going on to the painting and the parking, is it similar issues to the other properties that you specify what we've been painting? It looks like the rear of the property. Yeah. So you should go. Clean sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. days and in the event of non-compliance there'll be a daily fine of $50 per day. And then last is the parking issue for 1925, which I understand that you've started on. The front is already done. And that the back will be done shortly. It days sufficient. Okay. So then based upon the testimony from the parties as well as the view of the photographs, the picked thing that the condition does still exist, I'll set a compliance date of 60 days and in the event of non-compliance, they'll be at the early fine $50 per minute. That was you the best. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next case, Jenna Island number 16, which is BV240114WP. She's building a specter, Valdes, inspected property address at 1066 North Miami Beach Boulevard. Ones of the property is HNS Investment LLC. There's a non-home state of property ownership was termed by tax record. Proper decided for a legal construction. Notice was achieved by certified mail and posting. Good afternoon, Your Honor. I will go off for the seat of Miami Beach, Beledipatina. The property was signed for complete rule of the commercial food preparation kitchen, which include counter-truck, three sinks, plumbing, fixture, piping, and interlational new appliance. The city would like to recommend 60 day to comply. And then the life of the permit. And is anyone here for H&S investments? Do you have anyone signing? and then the life of the pyramid. And is anyone here for H&S investments? Do anyone sign in? I'm not sure how to say this. It looks like it says Wheat. L-E-A-T. Early on, they were, they were somebody, but... Okay, let's reflect that. Although somebody signed in, the individual has left. I'm looking at the photographs and description of the violation. I find that a violation does exist for interior renovations without the permit. So I'll set a compliance date of 60 days and in the event of non-compliance there'll be a daily fine of $100. Thank you. Thank you. Next case, it's gen i number 22, which is BB 250001 US. Chief building inspector or teeth inspected property address at 209 0 North East 135 lane. Owners of the property is max Charles Rieger. This home state of property ownership was determined by tax record property was cited for unsafe structure and notice was achieved by certified mail and posting. Good afternoon, Your Honor. Good morning, I'm the city of Miami Beach. The city would like to recommend 30 days to comply. The property was signed initially because portion of the Truton has collapsed and there is hanging on loose a part in the the record I'm looking at the electronic file and the notice of the violation of the certified nail and some photographs. I'm depicting the condition as the inspection has specified. Thanks, but the Acity Abidding Officer Transicotti here present, he won two thirty five also about the actions. And also I saw the red tag. Keep it taken. Okay. I would. How you doing? Good. How you doing? Somebody called. Yeah. That how yesterday. Yeah, that was my mother. That was your mother. And the reason why I want you to come, is if I would like to hear exactly what you're going to be doing or what you have been doing in that house. Because she said that you have been doing repairs. And I just want to make sure that if you are doing repairs to stop doing it without a permit. Or find out if you need a permit to do those repairs. But what I understand, I don't need a permit if I put everything back to where it was. You just say material and put everything back. In the same way it was. From the state of Florida. OK, that's a trailer, no? Yeah. Okay. Yeah, we don't have jurisdiction in what is the trailer. So whatever you do outside that trailer, then you have to make sure that you have a permit. However, okay, we don't have the jurisdiction with the container, but the Steele. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I have a number here. Well, let's just take a pause for a minute since he has testified he's under a, I don't know. I need you to state your name first. I'm Max Rieger. So you are the owner? Yes. Okay. Good afternoon sir. Good afternoon. All right. So now, now you can see I just need it to know who you were. Okay. I got a, this say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going to say that I'm going saying whether I change anything. I gotta put it back like original. Excuse me sir can you repeat that code number please? Can you repeat that code number please? 15C dash 2.0081. 0.0081. Yeah, it's all original now. 40 years old, it's never been changed. It's not drive-over or anything. And so if I put it back, the same way. You have a violation and you have an unsafe structure there. In order for us to remove it, you understand that we have to make sure that it's safe. Yeah. OK? By the time you call for inspection, because we have to go and verify that it's safe, yeah, please make sure you have that paperwork with you. All right. Yes. And for the record, the, uh, sort of the code that you quoted, uh, it doesn't say what, what you interpreted it as. That code simply tells you that it is a requirement that you use those same materials. It doesn't say that if you use those materials that you're excused from the normal process of perda. Because you guys would make that determination. Right, but that doesn't mean that you can go ahead and do those repairs without dealing with those cold issues. You may not as far as a permit. Correct. Because I won't give me the problem. Listen, please. We are here to help you. In any way, we want to produce any hardship to you. They're going to do something. Whatever you do in there, before you close, We hope you do anything. I mean keep going. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. the tissue inside that container. But with my knowledge, I can tell you, if it looks safe or not, it's the only determination that I can do. Because at the end of the day, the one that has to remove the unsafe structure is me. But I gotta make sure it's safe. Even though we don't have your decision of permitting inside that container. And it doesn't look good that container. Let me tell you. It's a bad wall. That's bad wall? Yeah. At the end. Are we gonna, you know, we working together with this? Yeah. All right. That's all I have to say you are not sure. I guess my question is the city is requesting That I enter a compliance date of 30 days. So what needs to be done within 30 days Mr. Regor is that enough time 30 days? Could I get 60 days? Because I had 30 days and it went back quick. Well, as long as it remains vacant, I have no issue with it. Somebody goes in there, then that's a separate issue that you have to deal with the building department. So I'll set a compliance state face. My other guys, can we ask a courtesan inspection before the 60 days? Yeah, you don't need my permission. Yeah, I want to know actually what we would. Certainly encourage the parties to work together. All I could do is take the facts and find out the law. The testimony I heard today what needs to be done. and so I'm going to set a compliance date of 60 days and in the event of number the next case which is Bb23. Next case. Jenna Ion number four. Which is BB 23 0078 WP. Senior building inspector Rosenkoff. Inspector property address at 3665 North East 167 Street. Parliament 209. One of the property is Victoria Elise Rope. This is a non-home-stated property. The ownership was determined by tax record, probably decided for a legal construction and it was achieved by posting. Grafenogono, who offered the city on Miami Beach with the department, the city would like to recommend 30-day to to renew and pre-open the permit. This case BD-23-0561R. The permit is expired. Okay, and so then once they renew it, they would to lie for the premium for call for the final. The interior renovation. Well, it's an exciting. So good afternoon, ma'am. If you could please tell me your name and your relationship to the property. Yep, that's where you'll be okay. Property winner. Oh, you did. Okay. Hi, good afternoon. so it looks like there was some work done. We have an expired permit and the city's requesting that the permit be renewed in 30 days. Yep. Is that sufficient time? We're renewed. Permit renewal. Yeah, we need to define a subcontractor. So in the process of finding that individual change over from one subcontractor to the other. Okay, do you think 30 days is enough? I'd like to request 60. That's possible. So is there any issue from the city with 60? Six. Okay. So what I'll do is I'll set a compliance date of 60 days based upon the testimony I heard review of the electronic file, photographs and in the event of non-compliance there'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. Okay one question I have. Sure. There's two others that are under it. Would those be part of that permit? That's a question for the city. Yes, yes you know there are part of the other part but this is a master permit. So the master permit rule the order and sub permits One of the master permits is part they need to renew and one day renewal the subs also are part of the of the process so Yeah, that expired to the Yes the way. Yeah, that expired to me. They're taking back onto the mass. Yes. That's what you've got to get. That is how renew the mass department within 60. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Next case, Gina item number 25, which is VV 230039 WP. Chief building inspector Ortiz, Inspector Property Address at 16065 Northeast 9th Place. Onus of the property is is William Zamora, Brenda Denise of the Lord. There's a home state of property ownership was termed by a tax breaker. Property was cited for work without a permit and notice was achieved by certified male and posting. Yeah, it's a ratification still not in the dollar this was for in addition that was added to the house. One button. Okay. Have any permits issued or nothing? No. Can you please tell me your name and your relationship to the property? My name is Andrew Williams-Morraora. I'm the owner of the house. Hey, Mr. Zamora, the city issued a violation for an addition that was done without approved permits. And it's been out of compliance now for quite a while. Yeah. Then there's a, I purchased a house and I'm trying to get the permit for the house. They have no plans for the house. I had to contract our architect so they built all this for the house. But when we present the plans to the city, something else came out that we have to add the laundry room, the windows. that wasn't the architect didn't add it. So they're already working on it. They're still working on it. I just have a letter from them to say that if we can have some a little extra time to present the whole plant updated with the laundry room and the kitchen and the windows. Plus the bathroom added. when I, two years ago, about the house and the house, I just bought it like that with the issue. So it looks like the city first inspected and the notice of violation was issued on March 21, 2023. Yes, the problem that when we initially bought the house, I was like, you know, I had some hardship and financially I couldn't hire an architect, but I worked things out and I had the money and I had to pay, but after that, I had to rehire the same guy to upgrade this because we have some other stuff to add it to the plant. So that's what I'm trying to work on this month. Maybe I can just, you know, just to get the permit out and get this fix right away. Well, I appreciate your effort, but it seems to be a little late because the violation of this first, the first time was December 12, 2023. So there was a compliance date set, and I know the dollar method but I missed how many days is it that it's compliant? a half. That's like 500 days out of compliance. That would be 25,000. Yeah, that's why I'm trying to hurry this guy up to present this plant for me to fix this issue right away, especially this month, because I mean time is up, it being up since a long time ago. You know, unfortunately, we've come to a ratification. Hearing this got to be legal issues for some other good faith efforts to persuade me to continue the hearing in ratified fines, but I haven't really heard anything other than we're trying, but it's been 500k. They're working on it right now to update the the plant that we initially work on, but I mean they're having done it. They haven't finished it yet. Well, at this point, Mr. Zamora, I'm going to grant the city's request and ratify the fines and only encourage you to get this done as fast as possible and then reach out to city staff and administration to work out some type of settlement agreement. What do you do? But, you know, at this point, it gets 500 days. That's a long comment. There you go. Okay. So thank you for coming in. All right. Thank you. I wish you the best. All right. Thank you. All right. Thank you. I wish you the best. All right. The next case is also a ratification case, which is number 23, BB 240039WP, Chief Building Inspector Valdez, Inspector Property Address at 16909 North West Forfe Avenue. One of the property is Vellma Darsch. This property has been out of compliance with what was last heard on April 4th, 2024, and total fine to date of ratified would be $26,400. 26,400? Yes. I'm going to go to the city of Miami Beach and I'll be back in a minute. I'll be back in a minute. I'll be back in a minute. I'll be back in a minute. I'll be back in a minute. I'll be back in a minute. I'll be back in a minute. I'll be back in a minute. I'll be back in a minute. I'll be back in a minute. I'm Sal Darmesh. I'm a property manager for my mom. We know about this, the city has been very helpful, very kind. The owners, the tenants, they hired the architect, they gave a retainer. So in good faith, they stopped paying them. So now there's a whole bunch of violation. I already have running tab of 49,000. In good faith, I don't want to give them so much hardship. They promise that they're going to do it, they do it, they have it. So now you could see a letter that they hear that I can't take the, I can't control the behavior. So now I have an attorney that is going through this and they're going to be starting to eviction if they don't comply to the city code I went to the city and I did ask them because it's a public place that they are I ask them to shut it down until they go ahead They're doing business in North Miami Beach without proper license and so on so far I asked the city they say you need to bring an engineer saying saying it's not safe and stuff. I said, look, they haven't combined. They did a whole bunch of stuff. And I can't get an engineer in there because they don't allow me to go by myself, but not with an engineer. So I asked two things. One, to give me expansion. If it's possible, I know you guys have been very, very kind. the Dime extension is 60 days, so I can go to the court and have this done properly. Or another exam is shut the building down. Shut the building down, let them put their stuff in, put the red tape, call it a day, let them put their act together, and that's all. That's what I asked the city. Or give me 60 days, let me clean this mess up, because we have dealing with fire issue. I don't want to be at 11 o'clock, dude. I went to the city. They told me, no, you need to bring an engineer and this and that. I have an issue to go in the building with the engineer. I know from electric to construction, to all this thing, everything needs to be done. The building needs to be up to code. And they're making money in that business right now. They're making money, the building is open 24-7. I don't know what they're doing in there. It's not on my business. I just went from the space. At this point, I asked two things. One, in the 60 days, or put the rate tip, shut them down for the cup. This is two things out. I already have a tab of 49,000. For another buy. For this violation, yeah, you could see the papers you want to take a look at it. All the things that I'm asking for the court, there is a construction of salier, failure of compliance, business tax receipt, they never did. They have no rights to do business in the state of North Miami Beach unless they have a tax ID because it's a privilege to do work in the city of North Miami Beach. Stop all work, failure to provide tax business for the 9,000, remove their garbage, the producing garbage that they need to remove all that stuff, providing liability insurance and on top of that for violation of fire department. All this needs to be cleared before they even do to make a dollar in that building. So it's up to you, Chuck. Well, some of the things you're asking is not within what I'm here for today. I'm here to ratify the fines that have occurred today. Okay. I do have some questions faced upon your testimony as well as the eviction proceedings. I just want to be clear, you've retained an attorney. Yes, you haven't filed it yet. No, no, it's retained. They have the thing, they told me that they'll put their act together in three more days. And if they don't, then I have to submit the attorney's going to go ahead and give them the notice to cure. And so I cannot go there, it can't take the law in your own hand. You have to give him to go through the proper channel. And I don't wanna give them a hardship. They're a bunch of things that they're entrepreneur, but they have no respect to the law. That's the bottom line. They have no respect to the law. I'm asking for 60 days, just to be patient this time around. I'm sure these guys, they see me there all the time. I come there once a week, once a thing. They did their term, they did all that stuff. And I consult with them. They've been very, very patient. But at this point, I think being too kind, and it's time to whether they need to step it up or just make the property, that's the end of the day. And they're supposed to be here today. I'm the last one. They're supposed to be here today and they never showed up. So they really don't, I'm not their babies. I can't control their behavior, Johanna. So I'm asking 60 days, let me clear up. If not, when I come back next time, you could go ahead and do a, but this is the end of the line. Well, there were certain obviously concerns from the building department as to safety of what's out there. There's other departments that appear to be involved, which is the finance or the BTR, but certainly, in that case is not performing, but I don't know if one has been issued or not, but I think you're asking for a cease and desist, which is not within my power today because I'm just here for the radical. But it's in their power. So that's something that they can explore separate apart. I can't order them. No, no, I appreciate them. Listen. I just don't want to be at 11 o'clock. New saying that landlord did not do it proper. Where do I? Where do I? So my question to you is, there are fines that are before me today to rat a phone. I'm asking 60 days to continue the hearing. 60 days to come here if I did not resolve this issue, then throw the books on me. Because by then, the attorney should, by now, have the hand out and with the sheriff, because it takes process. It takes 45 days for the sheriff to come to the thing and to lock it up. Well, this is my question for you. Yes. I'm inclined to grant the ratification today, because I don't see what the 60 days would do other than getting access to the property. I also think that if I ratify the fines today, you have a higher damage claim to show the court for the eviction of their default. Yeah, that's the 49,000. I'm supposed to collect from them, but unfortunately, let's get the building first going. The building needs, it's not safe. They open the second floor, they did all their electric, they did all that stuff without permits. Now, it's the time has come that they need to. They're making money. I personally think that the building is unsafe. I personally think that it should be, all these things should be ratified, and I need to see this help. I'm asking you that. I have to go through the court system. I will then assist by ratifying the fines today. I have $26,400. It's $49,000. $49,900. I call this. That was what I asked originally. And you said no. There are other cases that are open. Everything that we heard from. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, no, I'm not here to give them a hardship to dependents. I'm giving an opportunity to make it right. They went and they got an architect and they gave a retainer because I get a letter from the architect and verify and they gave a $10,000 and they stopped. Okay, they stopped. Okay, fine. They keep telling me, we're drawing, we're doing it today tomorrow, whatever. At this point, there is no more tomorrow. You know, whether you do it or you don't. If you can't afford to, if you're not making a business in this business, then you should move. That's the bottom line. And I'm asking the city, if you put the right tape, you guys, just tell them, listen, you haven't done put the right tape. I went to the thing and I asked them. Then let them come and chase us. Now I'm chasing them to do, and by now I have to go to the court. That's the only thing I can go with the bags and guns, and that's no more talking. It's out of my hand at this point. I'm asking 60 days, because it takes 45 days, just for the sheriff to come in there. And by the time I have to give them a reasonable power, which is 20 days, and then 60 days for them to 45 days for the sheriff to come and put the paper. And then I have to go back and make the building safe again. And that's going to cost me more arm and a leg, which is my problem, not the court problem. Whatever you. I just didn't know if the city had anything because I'm ready to make my room in but I'll keep the city there From from the city side We we are at the end of the road in that case At the end of the road one thing that you can do It won't change anything related to this But if you are that concerned about unsafe conditions there Make make a formal complaint about the plaintiff, you know, by the for me, and then we had the duty of officers of the city to go and check. If we, peacefully, can identify that there is hazard over there, we have the authority to shut it down. I promised you I went. However, however, I don't know who asked you for engineering assessment and all that stuff. If we can visually, can know the term that, you know, there is a whole roofalling of something that is so obvious that represent a big hazard for the people in there or for the public. Then if you still consider that it's unsafe, you have to come up with an engineer saying it, that it's unsafe and what it's unsafe and how you can mitigate whatever issues. I get it at this point, there's no need of going to engineer because one the I'm not telling you Yeah, to make a your main if there is a time or not a time and telling you how the things are I went to the city I spoke to your chief I already told you what to do, okay? We're not gonna go back and forth on this mr. Darwish While I find your your arguments persuasive as far these are the filing of the eviction, the fact remains that this has been going on for quite some time and has not been evicted. I am concerned about the safety of the building based upon the testimony and the photographs that I saw. I don't see how delaying or ratification hearing for 60 days is going to, in any way, make this building safer or bring the building into compliance. So I am going to grant the city's request, ratify the clients in these case. I understand there's other issues and other cases that are open from the city for BTR or other code issues and I think it's time to have the tenants vacate the premises so that you can complete it get everything into compliance and meet with the city to discuss the fines and the mitigating factors that you and the difficulties that you've encountered in trying to bring the violation from clients. But just like yourself saying you don't want to be on the news, I don't want to be on the news. I totally understand. I totally understand. I did my best to able to not to give them so much hardship because they went and they did the thing and they put $10,000 they give the architect. But ultimately it's your responsibility. Absolutely. I get it. So you know I wish you the best of luck. I hope that you get a judge that can pass track this based upon this open case, the fines in this case as well as the other cases and the fact that they're not operating with a business. I encourage you to meet with the building department. I have the odds are that they're complaint about an unsafe structure so they can red tag it and do whatever they have to do. But I really, you know, I sit here and just really hope that you can get this done fast. Absolutely. Honestly, I just want the building to be safe. I don't want to sleep one day and see something happen because it was on the mic. Unfortunately, I went to the city, I didn't speak to them, but it is what it is. I appreciate I'll be on it with the court system is gonna take over now. At this point, whatever happens, it's out of my hand because they have violated all those things. All right. I agree. Thank you so much for your time. Bye. Bye. Save the best for last. Next case is in the item number one, which is CC CBTR 240049 Co-compliance officer Pierre, Inspector Property Address at 951 North East 167 Street. Unit 215. Ones of the property is part co-group LP. It's a non-home state of property. Oneship is termed by tax record property recited for operating without a business tax receipt. Notice was achieved by certified mail and posting. Good afternoon, your honor. Good compliance officer. I'm Steve L. Dissikinoff, Miami Beach. Overseas address 951, no East 167 Street. Unit 215 is in violation of Section 12. Dash 1.1 in reference to business tax receipt. The violation was observed inside on December 27, 2024. The first one I speak on was on January 8, 2025. And the most recent one I speak on was on May 6, 2025. And there was no compliance. The city would come in 30 days. Is anyone here for a park called Group 931 North and it's 167 Street 213. It's 201 and nobody's appeared on behalf of the ownership. Based upon the testimony from the co-compliance officer that the violation is not in compliance, I'm going to find that violation does exist and it should be corrected within 30 days. In the event of non-compliance, there'll be a daily fine of $50 per day. Thank you. Thank you. Next case, item number three, which is BV23, 0193 WP. Chief Building Inspector Ortiz, Inspector Property Add property address at 206-3 North East 169th Street. Ones of the property is the 4-POM House LLC. This is a non-home state of property. Ones of the turn by a tax record, property was cited for new construction. Those with chief eye posting. Good afternoon, Yoano. We are for the city of Miami-B. We will debatlin. I recommend 60 Day to comply. Okay, and the nature of this violation is? Initially, was signed by Kishen and Baton Kremorling, which include the AmiPis. And also for the installation of Huracan Impact Windows. After that, Gilrose and Coffin, Spatio of the City, performed a courtesan inspection on the property. He said in the report that it's a period that the reset duplex in the property due to two different matters, new impact windows in Tallinn, one of the units have two bathrooms and one bathroom, one kitchen, one kitchen, one-door renovation, and there is another unit in the same location. This unit is one bathroom, one bathroom, which a kitchen renovating with a different AC unit. No permit, no permit is on process. So this has been going on for well over here? Yes, yes. So, was it in December in December 1st, 2023. So is anyone here before Palm's House in LLC, 2063 Northeast 169 Street? It's 205 and nobody's appeared. So based upon review of the photographs, the officer's testimony, I find that the violation does exist and I'll set a compliance date of 30 days to obtain the permits. In the event of non-compliance, they'll be at the early final $100 per minute. Next case, to the item number five, BV24009EP., 0, 9, EP. Chief field inspector or T, Inspector of property address at 35, 22 Northeast 171st Street unit 104. Ones of the property is Jason and Shay Osborne. There's a homestead of property ownership was termed by tax broker, property decided for the expire permit and notice was achieved by certified mail and posting. Good afternoon, Your Honor. We welcome the city of Miami Beach, the department. The expired permit in question is BM22-95 for installation of two impact windows and one impact door. In April 2024 in Speto, Gil Rosenkoff, an executive inspection on the property. They meet Mr. Osmoor. He explained what he need from the contractor for close the permit. Last week, Mr. Oble, Osmoor visited our office. We again explained the process to close the permit. He agreed to to comply, but nothing has happened. Not, I mean, did you speak with the stratum as far as time wise, whether it be 10 days, 30 days, 45 days? I, I, he said he promised to do everything before before the hearing. So I will, I would like to recommend Saturday to comply because probably it's the time-friendly in the evening. And this violation, if I could look at the electron file here, it was March 18, 24. March 18, 24. Jason Osborne or anyone on his behalf, the 3522 Northeast 171st Street, the 104. At the record, we reflect that nobody's appeared for Mr. Osborne based upon the testimony. From the city as well as review of the photographs, I find that the violation does exist for the be expired permit and I'll set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of not compliance that we have the final $100 Thank you. Thank you. The next three cases to the item number 11 12 and 13 which is CC CC O M 24 0401, 0402 and 0403. Procompliance Officer Akami, inspected property address at 2100 North East 164 Street. Owners of the property is Southern Bell, tell and tell co-tax admin office. There's a non-home-steaded property ownership was determined by tax record property was cited for graffiti litter and paint building and notice was achieved by posting. Co-compliance officer Lacey Akrime with the City of North Miami-V's property property. I just 2100 northeast 164 street is in violation of section 9 dash. the . The . The . The . The . The . The was on December 2, 2025. The first reinspection was on March 20, 2025. And the most recent reinspection was on May 6, 2025. And there was no compliance. The city recommends 30 days. And have you had any conversations before the steering that the representative saw them about? Telephone company? No. And is this building abandoned? I see the cars parked there, and I see people working there, but no response. OK. Is anyone here for Southern Bell for 2100 North? Please. 164th Street. OK, it's 210. Nobody's here on behalf of the property owner. So based upon the testimony from the Co-compliance Officer that the violations have not been corrected and have still had a compliance. I'm going to set a compliance date in the We need to pay 30 days in the event of non-compliance. They'll be daily fine of $30, 30 days in the event of non-compliance, there'll be a daily fine of $100 per day. For the litter, base 04-02, find that the violation does exist and based upon the testimony of the code compliance officer that the conditions have not been corrected, I'll set a compliance date of 30 days in the event of non-compliance that will be at the early fine of $100 per day. And in the final case, which is the painting in 0403, based upon testimony of the officer that the violation has not been brought into compliance. And based on her testimony, I find that the violation does exist. And I will set a compliance date of 30 days in the event that not compliance, but the daily compliance. Thank you. Thank you. Next case, Jenna, item number 14, which is CCBVWP22007. Chief building inspector Ortiz, inspector property address at 16465, North East 22nd Avenue, unit 610. Onus of the property is Jose P. Moreno. This non-home state of property ownership was termed by tax record property recited for a legal construction and Notice it was achieved by posting Good afternoon, you know Who I'll put the city on department. The permit, the permit BD-20401-R is expired. I would like to recommend 30 day to renew the permit and call for the final inspection. If you have any conversations with Mr. Moreno or anyone on his bed? No, sir. and for how long has the permit been in the the the the the Marano, anyone here on his behalf? six months. Okay, Mr. Moreno, anyone here on this behalf of 164-665 North East, 22nd Avenue. It's 12-13 and nobody's here. On behalf of the property owner, faced upon the testimony, from the city that the permit has been in expired status for six months. I'll grant the city that the permit has been in expired status for six months. I'll grant the city's suggestion, find that the violation needs to be cured within 30 days to renew the permit in the event of non-compliance that the adiely fine of $100 per day. Next case, Jenna Idle number 15. Which is BV240017EP. Chief building inspector Ortiz. Inspector property address at 1260. North East 157 Street. One of the of property is Alex St. Gerard. There's a non-home state of property ownership was returned by tax record property was cited for an expired permit and was achieved by certified mail and posting. Good afternoon, Your Honor. The city will like to table this case for 90 days. Okay. Based upon the city's request and the fact that nobody's appeared for Mr. Singh. Gerard the 1260 northeast 157 street will continue this matter for 90 days. Thank you, Yona. Thank you. Next case, General Eiman number 17, which is BV 24 0 2 0 7 WP. Senior building inspector, Rosenhoff, inspected property address at 1590 North East 1 1 3rd, Terris. Notice that the property is well-neur investment LLC. There's a home state of property. Ownership was termed by tax record. Property was cited for new construction. Notice was achieved by certified mail and posted. Good afternoon, you know, or for the city of Miami Beach, build the bottom end. The city would like to recommend 30 day to comply. And what is necessary for compliance? They need to apply for a permit for interremoving. Is this an end? Yes, it's an after the fact permit for interrenovation, which include dry walls, mechanic and electric features, and they need to apply also for a standalone roof. We need to assess with an inspection if they need to apply for the process too, but I live for the roof. And this violation was issued on... Was issued in November 27, 2024. And have you had any contact with the property? No, sir. Is anyone here for will their investments night 1590 notice 153rd terrace? It's approximately 216 in the afternoon and the property owner or representative has failed to appear based upon or review the photographs to picking the conditions of the property as well as the testimony from the city that the violation is not in compliance. I'll set a compliance date 30 days in the event of non-compliance, there will be a daily fine of $100. Thank you, Anna. Thank you. The next two cases, gender item number 18 and 19, which is case CCC, RES 250172 and 0174. Co- compliance officer Pierre and Inspector Property Address at 151-51 North East 14 Avenue, Ones of the property is Irvin Yerike, RC Gonzalez. There's a non-home-stated property. Ones of the store by tax record. Property was cited for landscape maintenance as well as litter. And notice was chief I posted. Good compliance officer Nisli Pio, the city of Miami Beach, Proveci address 151, 51, no East Focinab, is in a version of Section 24-120K in return of Suleonetskip, Section 9-3.2 in return of Suleonetskip, the version was observant on February 5, 2025, the most recent inspection was on February 20, 2025. The first inspection was on February 20, 2025. And the most recent inspection I just spoke to the resident before the hearing is the devolution in compliance. It requires a new inspection. I will do tomorrow. So do you want me to make a ruling today? Or do you want to continue this for 30 days? 30 days. 30 days. To continue it? Yes. So you can do the inspection. Yes sir. Okay. Then based upon the city's request on base number zero, ending in 0172 and in 0174, based upon the conversation between the city and the property owner that the violation hopefully is in compliance. I'll continue both of these cases for 30 days. Thank you, sir. Okay. Thank you. Next case agenda item number 21 which is BV 230033WP, chief field inspector or chief inspector, probably addressed at 2454 Northeast 136th Street. On this property is P. Ort, Bokoski, Veronica. There's a non-home state of property. I'm sure it was turned by tax record property recited for you. Construction notice was achieved by posting. Without a new owner, we are for the city of Miami Beach, build the development. I would like to recommend 30 days to apply for the roof permit and then the life of the permit. The initial citation was for the fence, the wood fence, and then for the roof. This violation was issued, the plan? What's issue February 29, 2024? Anyone from onish that to your about the permit. And so again, the city is a request in how much time? 30 days. Is anyone here for Piazzora Klauski, Veronica, I guess it's alive. 24.50, not least 136 feet. It's now 2.19 and nobody's appeared on behalf of the ownership. Based upon the testimony from the city and the review of the photographs, I find that the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the public to ask the is agenda item number 24 case, BV 220047 WP. Chief building inspector or T suspected property at 16416 Northeast 32nd Avenue. Owner of the property time-side is a man well and Ashley Pason. This is a Homesteaded property. This case was last heard on June 8, 2023. The property's been out of compliance for a total of 653 date. Excuse me 300, 653 days to date. If ratified the fight amount would be 32,650 Good afternoon, a young the city will would like to They will this cave for 30 days Thank you I think that includes today's calendar. Thank you very much Mr. Ruff. Thank you. Thank you. I think that Thank you very much Mr. Raft Thank you so much for the short notice on and yeah