A couple of things, so we still have that framework before we go out of town. And the standard short date down, we got a charge of 845. And then I call on the day the losers are going to be thirsty and not. She said, I call 5th issue, we can't do anything about it. I call it a new tell you how to use a pen. And I call it a English, or English. English. Let me work on it. Chef is really that Don tree called the best. Every time it's created, I'll just give it an insight. It should tell. You know, you're a new child. Good. Stay there, nice. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, that's good. Oh. Thank you. We'll call tonight's planning commission meeting to order. Mr Aslan, if you call roll. I've got that cap. We'll call tonight's planning commission meeting to order. Mr. Johnson, if you'd call roll for us. Matthew, Steve Donahue, Kevin Meadows, Kieberdallan, Steve Rosen, Gary Donahue, William Flippett. I'm Mr. Chair Flipett. Okay. We have a long. And Mr. Chairman being the organizational meeting. We will open the floor and my computer work here. First item on the agenda is the election of officers and we will open the floor for nominations for the Office of Chairman. Madam Secretary, I nominate Mr. Rose and continue to chair and for now a year. And let's see, Matt Seal is not here. Stephen got here. Yes. Kevin Minnes is not here. He read out on. Yes. And Mr. Flipett. Yes. Okay. So Mr. Rosen is now the chairman out to meeting over to you. Great. Thank you. Thank you. That's a little shimp thing. Thank you very much. It's hard to believe it's been here. That was pretty quick. But thank you very much. I appreciate that. Okay. We need to go over the by bylaws. We have to open the floor for nominations for Vice Chair. Oh, okay. We'll open the floor for nominations for Vice Chair. I'm on Mr. Rosen? Yes. Second. Second. Second. Second. Second. Steve, not here? Yes. Mr you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. So Mr. Chairman, we'll see on pages 106 of your board packet. You'll see some small, slightly revised to the 2024 model. Mr. Chair, I have a brackets to do. The next question is from Paul. That's four of your packet, Article seven, under meaning 7.2, there was a change. The secretary shall notify the members by left, electronic mail or phone, at least five days before a special meeting, stating the time, place, and purpose of the meeting. This was a change originally. It was notified by mail and a written notice to all members. We don't send anything by mail anymore. So I just update that I'm there. On page five, there is a new section after request of the commission, individuals of the public, desiring to speak. hearing or during the general public common hearing must first provide our identifying information on a sign-up sheet prior to immediately call to order. Only residents of Cumberland County or individuals who know the real property in Cumberland County are permitted to speak at a public hearing or during the general public common hearing. This is the same thing that the board supervise currently has in their biobics as well. On the side of sheet, is there now space? I know there's a rather main district. Is there space? Is there a net? We do have a right to address now? Is that what this is saying? Is that going to be included? Does this have to say that in front of information? In-department, and in a head-to-head person. Yeah, sometimes they write it, sometimes they don't. I'm just wondering if this is not requiring and put their address here or not. So it just has identifying information. We can require that. I believe it's on, that sign-up sheet. Some people do some people don't, but we do normally ask when they get up to speak that they provide their address. Yeah, okay. That's... and require that. I believe it's on, that sign up sheets, some people do some people don't, but we do normally ask when they get up to speak that they provide their address. That way we do know that they either leave the county or they'll stay that they own property. They can just wait in your way, it's fine. Okay. All right, thank you. All right. Is this the time to address situations like that? Are you going to finish up and then go back and ask the commissioner? Up to you. We can start now if it's regarding dissection. It is, regarding as. Sorry. And section similar to it in 7 or 10, 10, 3. Sure. A couple of things. One is that this does not address anybody who may be representative for the property owner such as an attorney or an architect or a manager or a facility or something like that that would like to speak for the resident. It doesn't account for that. And the way that this green thing would not be about to speak. The second thing is what about residents in neighboring counties that may be affected by the project? They also do not be allowed to speak for them. Is that how we want it? As I understand this, they would not be able to speak because they're a resident or a property or a resident in county. I think you have a legitimate concern about some of our regents, some of them in attorney or architect, that's a very important. I mean we have people speak all the time, they are residents. There is chemical we're trying to handle, I've seen it through us, so that more residents would be able to speak and we wouldn't be barred down of people who have no property. We're representing the citizens of Cumberland County. We're not representing citizens of Powhatan, Prince Edward, Buckham, or citizens of Washington State, or stay or whatever. Most localities now have adopted this. We are not the first one to be doing this. Or has been this for a number of years. Goodsland has the same provision. It's as an attorney or a manager or somebody that has a request for CD or a project before, they would be allowed to speak because they have invested interest in the project. Well, that is the same as it does not say that. We're just making that up right now. We've always had people I know we've always had people out of this set but this is only for a public Yes. Yes, you're right. And you want to a public hearing. Designed to speak out of public hearing or during general public comments. But a proct, an attorney, a representative, a company, a project manager, representative, a company, whatever, is not speaking, doing the public hearing hearing. They're speaking to us, person, the project. They're not speaking to one's Republican to make a comment on it, but what are they? They are actually in their official capacity to make an appraisal measure. Is there any issue. Just ask. If you're talking about 10.3, this is 10.4, this is citizen design, the speediness on West Union, this is technical presentations by qualified persons of four-hole firms and allow universities, and are interested city of the city. Yes, so that's how we'll deal with it. So that would be one new as well, or at least a new practice. Because right now we have solar company, give us a big long presentation. We don't have it summarized It's based on the right shoulder. I understand. I understand. I'm just saying that if we want to practice what we've been doing, then we need to change this length. How do you think it should read? Well, that is a good question. I'm not sure if I'm not in the's some gaps and where there are some issues with how we currently do it. I mean, I would like to see there be a way or... I mean, I think of something like a... I mean, I'll give you a scenario. Let's say grandma always owns a property, right? But grandma's a impersonal. And so the daughter comes and speaks, but she doesn't live in her residence, is there? She's all of her. She's all of her most likely being through the abuse of power or attorney or she was born in. She is a family member. Guardian for Frank Long. So I was supportive of her being able to speak. Yeah, I've said. Yeah, what you're about to say. I think what this is saying is someone that's not, she's not a partner in the team and thinking of the right. She's not a resident. Yeah. But she has most likely, and no situation like that, she would probably power her attorney, which would make her, and her name shower, and kept it propending, she could speak. And the discretion is left through to Jim. Correct. Is that right? The discretion is left there Right. The first is for for. Well, that's not important or it says. It says the chairmanship summarizes the matter before the commission allow technical presentations by qualified persons or firms and allow interested citizens to speak. You'll be talking about the solar, or like a technical presentation by qualified persons or firms, deck covers. That will equal, that will be on the tip or a manager or a blogger. Yeah, that will cover like green solar coming to speak and out. Yeah, that will solar life. Yeah, here. Exactly. That happened with the resident. Remember, one of the landowners down there brought in an expert on aerial use. How much of a new trip would be going into the reservoir based on what they were asking to do, the buffering to do. He was saying that if you wild them, you cut the grass and remove the clippings. The less new tricks would be going in graduate or a graduate or a graduate or a graduate or a graduate or a graduate or a graduate or a graduate or a at contradicts 10-3, for example, in 10-3 it says individuals are public-sqs to speak during public hearing or during a general public comment period must first provide, so for worth information, sign up sheet, all this kind of stuff, right? 10-4 says the general is to summarize, qualify persons of birth, the next sentence, citizens desire to speak may sign up. There's a difference between may and months. So, if you don't get to speak, if they let say something. Can it, is it possible for them to speak without sign up? So I can take that one. Okay, well then 10-4 should be changed. Okay, so this is the fourth. ideas for you to explain. If you take out that one, you can take out that one. But I guess it's addressed in the moment before. If you take out that sentence starting with citizens, they would be more compliant with 10-3. Because then you have 10-4 with address, so many of those who are of all of that person to the earth and semi-adapt to you. And give a statement of the discretion of the time I'm also about to announce that you're currently. Yes. What did you want to say in the shot? I'm sorry. I just wanted to clarify. So Article 7 is regarding regular meetings and general citizen comments. So we can clarify 7.4 and take out in that first sentence public hearing and just reference General Citizen Comment Period. And that will clarify section 7.4 and then if we go to article 10 on page 6 10.3 and remove during general public comment period on that first and second line and then that will clarify 10.3 and then like Mr. Metta's was just saying on 10.4 take out that second sentence where it says citizens desire to speak may sign up with the Secretary prior to the meeting. If you want to take that side, you want to change it. How much is it taking it out of there? It goes where? with the Secretary prior to me. If you want to take that, sorry, because you want to change it. I know this. I'm just taking it out because we're dressed up at the comment here earlier. And I really don't see more. We need that in 10, 4, 4. Can I ask a question for Lenzard as you answer? What was the emphasis for this? Just to mirror the Board of Supervisors' by-laws as far as allowing public comments and hearings as far as you can speak. When was that change. Or is that been like the brewers has been for a few years. I would say. So 10.4 as we see here, mirrors with the supervisor's head. 10.3. 7.4 and 10.3. Yes. Here's what's in supervisors by the law. 4.4 is the college for scholarship to use. But the divorce edit for the college for scholarship to use is 10.4 similar to language with that on the board? That I don't know. I don't think so. I think 10.4 is the same as what the planning commission has because it doesn't have any red changes. So that I did not make any changes to that has stayed. 10.3 is new. I just added that here. Yeah, I'm just trying to see what's broken. I mean, as our meeting has been so out of order and so uncontrolled, we have to add some more stuff to restrict more speakers. Frankly, So uncontrolled, we have to add some more stock to restrict more speakers. Quite frankly, I don't know much about being such a non-resident and you're all the major factor. Right, I'm just going to have a look at how I'd be willing to conceit the non-resident issue. And that still doesn't address the issue of having to sign up. I mean, typically you, with good reason, say, is there anybody else in the end get a chance to sign up? And then let's just go. Can we have the answers? I know. But according to this, which we've always done, they've always had the signing sheet in the back that they've signed up, anyway. So we've been doing this, it's just not been included in the box. But we also met people that didn't sign up on that speak. Not every time, but every time we have. But we have. And that's basically been in the discretion of the chairman. Right. And the chairman only has to tell us anybody else. I don't sign out there with your speech. Right. They can steal the speech. Where's that sign and out? Simply. Well, if I can be promised that a citizen comes here, doesn't know that they need to sign up. Maybe the meeting started, doesn't say something here about Tardiness, and they won't be able to speak, and they haven't signed up on that sheet that we're going to let in half of the Kansas Speedport. It says right here, it's a chair of a discretion, and they can't speak.'m sorry, Mr. Chairman, we need to make a change to the wording that's in here. Because it must be provided on the sign of sheet cards and the meeting will be called to work. Yes, and that's what I'm trying to say. So we need... And we've never enforced that. So we need to take it? For not before. That's my point. That's what we need to take some time to get to the point where we have to change the last line of 10 to 4. Yeah, however the chairman may recognize someone at cash or on a flight. And that's just under public hearings that that's not under the meetings exception. Okay, just just comment. But that also contradicts that's in 10.4 but also in contests. And your verdict and three. Yep. exception. But that also contradicts that's in 10.4 but also in context. So if that is the case, if that's the wish of the commission that we need to strike where it says prior to the meeting being called to order in in both 10.3 and 7.4. Our question, yes. We send notes at, you know, on about the meeting. And it says they can call, you know, the applications are here. They can call them, any questions, you know. What I'm saying is that, you know, a person could show up and could fake to speak and just not build up the procedure. We know what we see there every month, but someone that was coming in from one particular thing, they would have no way of really knowing the procedure until means call the order and the chairman says, everybody that speaks are assigned up. They also have two weeks before the meeting to make a phone call or check a website or send an email as well. The weather says come to the meeting if you have the information. Any questions, the information is on our website. You can call with questions or you can send any. All. The letter says come to the meeting. If you have, you know, the meeting. For having questions, the information's on our website. You can call the questions where you're considering all the members of the organization. I just think that if someone takes the time, you can all want to want to want to our meetings. They all have to be allowed to speak. If I go, can I go? I think. If they're kind of guys, and I'll give you that. Okay. Are you, will you be comfortable if we add 2 10.3 the same sentence it's in 10.4 about the chairman being able to recognize people that haven't signed up. And allowing them to speak. Well, that accomplishes what you're after, right? I think that we should change must to should and then add the line, the chairman has the discretion to allow others that did not get a chance to sign off or didn't sign off or something like that to speak. I accept that. I don't have a problem with that at all. I think it's important to let everybody speak. We want to hear what they have to say. Can I make another suggestion? Yes. Can we remove prior to the meeting being called to order and say prior to the public comments section of the agenda? making a statement by signing out. Or prior to the end of the public comment section of the agenda because I feel like we need to remove that section of prior to the meeting being called to order because again it still contradicts itself in the same paragraph. Right. How does that address someone who walks in late? They won't get after that. Right. I don't want our bylaws to contradict themselves with state-era. Right. Yeah. That would be right. So how do you think it should read? If we look at let's say 7.4 we're talking about regular general public comments. Individuals of the public desire to speak during the general public comment period must first provide our identified information on a sign-up sheet period. Only residents of Common County read the visuals, known in rural property, Common County of Women's Speed Cate, remove public hearing at the general public or during the general public common period. That way doesn't mention anything about they have to sign up prior to the meeting being called to order or prior to the general public comment period just as they have to provide their identifying information on the sign up sheet. So it has come, sorry, it has happened sometimes where the public comment section has come the chairman has The chairman has asked, was there anyone else who wishes to speak? It's not the chance to sign up. They get up, they speak, and I will as soon as they're done, go and get their information and put it on the sign up sheet. We're after the meeting. I will get their information. So that kind of solves that problem. Does that work for everybody? I'm just let you all know something new. I guess, still we can get them to, you know, five more information. So, all right, so 7.4. And I would be okay with them. Oh, you want to speak? Okay, great. Here. Can you sign this up? Make sure you have your information. Right. You want to speak? Okay. So again, 7.4 reads. Individuals of the public desire to speak during the general public comment period, Ms. First Provider, identifying information on a sign-up sheet. Only presidents of Combo-Lin County are individuals. Only for a property in Combo-Lin County are permitted to speak during the general public comment period. All right. And then 10.3, individuals of the public wishing to speak during a public hearing must first provide their identifying information on a sign of sheep hearing. Only residents of Cumberland County or individuals known for their real property in Cumberland are permitted to speak at any public hearing. Here it is. That's on the back. You move in with that. That's on the front. Okay. And then 10.4, the Chairman shall summarize the matter before the Commission, allowing technical presentations, five qualified persons or firms and allow interesting citizens to speak. We're taking out the sentence that says citizens' design to speak may sign up with the Secretary prior to meeting. And then time allowances will be at the discretion of the chairman. The chairman will accept written statements and other documentation pertinent to the matter we addressed, however the chairman may recognize someone that has a rivalry. And that's specific to public hearings own. Are we not good with that? Yes. Okay. All right. Thank you. No problem. All right. So going back to page five, article nine, and a horrors of business, I just made a few changes based on what we have been doing in the past. article 9 for the orders of business. I just made a few changes based on what we have been doing in the past. The way that our agenda has already been advertised. So 9.1.4, we have the approval of the agenda. And then 9.1.7, we have our quest to set public hearings. And then under 9.1.3, the general public comment, we have that as three minutes per person. And that is all the changes to the violence. We've already hashed out our numbers. And I was to wear that in 30 minutes total time. So that's basically saying 10 as it is. Yes. And in the last exception is granted by the commission. Say that again please. In less exception is granted by the commission. I'm attacking and attacking with hands too. I'm hit to talk to them with that. Do a new terrible comment here. During the general comment period, they get 3 minutes each for 30 minutes maximum. 12 people signed up, two people aren't going to get heard. Do you want to take out that maximum 30 minutes total? Well, I think we need to take a look at it, either extended or take it out, because what's the point of allowing people to come speak to the public hearing and then say, well, I'm like, it wasn't a tentative. So this is just general public comments. We've never read any of them in the town. We're really looking again at the dump, right? And I expect there to be a mass of people. Yeah, and this is just public comments. This won't be public hearings. But I will say. But they'll sign up in their public comments. For my understanding. Right, but I will say that in my 20 years, being employed with a government company, I don't remember a single time where the planning commission has ever said, OK, we've reached 30 minutes, we're not taking your public comments. Right. So have no problem with taking a month. Well, so why do you have it there? I don't know. It has been in there since I've been planning and zoning administrator. Well, why don't we say something because I understand when it's never happened. That doesn't mean it's not ever going to happen. So why don't we put something in there that the commission of the chairman at their discretion can extend it for another 30 minutes, 30 minutes or something like that. I have needed. So I will rework this and see. So I will take the maximum of 30 minutes to then move back to the end of the sentence. Yeah, yes. You can say, at the chairman's discretion. This can be extended. I disagree with you. If we have more people, if we have 13 or 14 people signed up, at the end of the three minutes, I'm going to start throwing darks so that we can keep you know because this is probably there so we don't run into you know I'm gonna pop in the morning kind of things. Okay. Okay, I can make that change. So the sentence will be 9.1.3. Yeah, 9.1.13. General public comment. Item's not pertaining to a public hearing matter and up to, but not more than three minutes per person. A maximum of 30 minutes total. This can be extended up to an additional 30 minutes after the chairman's discretion. That's great. Okay. You can solve the sentence to make it this kind of home through it. Yeah. They got the answer. I got the answer. Mr. Chair, I know I moved here with my dog. What was it? I mean, you can do that, but I have another question. Okay. Okay. Okay. So under Article 2, Purpose 2-1, the primary purpose, the Commission of Service and Advisory and Passionate Board of Certified Revenue and Plans, ordinances, capital improvement programs, we don't do that anymore. Yeah. We are supposed to by law. That's not what we've been instructed that we can do now. But are we ready to change this or we need to take back the support? I have to board members and board members have given the county administrator their your garage that we are too being involved in the CLP not in. And that the CLP is to request or to be presented to us prior to the County Administrator and form it in a five or three to three, and just give it a us. They had conversations with them going into the Seattle people and I spoke with Mr. Stelson today all of that and I was assured that we will be back involved in it. This this is basically from the state code. Because it was about the state of the field. That is not followed if we crack out. Pardon? If that's not followed, then we can crack out. We can just reject the whole CRP. I mean, that basically is what happened last year when you presented it to us. Well, I miss Johnson called me for the bacteria. I was before I met him, said we were going to have to look at it and approve it, and I was like, that's not what you're going to be. I was just going to happen to you. And Mr. Rosen was in the Sonson's Pran in the cabin every time. And in fact they had the crates that they don't see that be. And this is taught by representatives from the state and called the Magdalen State. And most likely, the state the newness of the county of the strike. Now realize, but the board was not happy with the last year. So it's going to come back the way it used to be. Okay, all right. Just to share when I move to adoption of your 2025 training commission bylaws as presented with the changes that have been noted. Second. Second. Sorry. Sorry. Steve Donnelly. Yes. Kevin Meadows. Yes. Kebron Allen. Yes. Steve Reisen. Yes. Swing Clement. Yes. Okay. We have the meeting schedule. Yes, sir. Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission on page 7 of your board packet. You'll see the proposed 2025 meeting schedule. Generally, your regular meetings are held on the third Monday, each month at 630 in the courthouse and workshops are held poorly on the second Monday at 6.30 in the board meeting room, the basement and the admin building. There are only a few exceptions to that with tonight being one of those because of the holiday and then February 24th is also going to be an exception. February 24th and then January 12th of 2026 will also be an exception. I'm going to take a one other one. I think the workshops are starting at 6. I think it's important to have a good time. So maybe we'll see join in one more step. We've joined in. We've joined in. Okay. That's a lot of six. Yeah. So we've got the workshops. February 10th, May 12th, August 11th, and November 10th. And then we do have your regular meetings scheduled throughout the year. So far, G- will get only two that were not on the third Monday. So, and just while we're talking about meeting dates, over the next three months, we do have two meeting dates each month. Yes, so we've got, tonight we have January 27thth which is a workshop at the school with Green Ridge. We have February 10th which is your second workshop with Green Ridge at the school February 24th which is your regular meeting. March 3rd is your joint workshop with a board supervisor at Green Ridge at the school and then March 17th which is more regular reading and will also be your public hearing for green rage application and that will also be available. So we will be busy next week. This term and I move approval of the adoption of the 2020-25 negations gave the alleged percentage. Thank you. Steve, I'm here. Yes. Kevin Metos. Yes. Keyberd Allen. Yes. Steve Rosent, with Swing Flamengo. Yes. Yes. Okay. Excuse me. Okay, excuse me. All right, and we have approval of the agenda, please. Shall we move? Is that me? Steve Donney? Yes. Kevin Metis? Yes. Eberdame? Steve Brezen? Yes. Swim Flippant. Yes. Okay. Okay, requests for you this evening. First is an condition we use for mid-24-02 for the Cumberland Fire and the MS Telecommunications tower. You'll find that on pages 8 through 55 of your packet this evening. As part of the radio upgrades, the radio system upgrades to the Fire and the MS system. The county has received a hundred-foot-tell communications tower from the state police and that does require conditionally used permit. You'll find that application in your packet. A risk relief on page 13, you'll see a map. Originally, we were looking to direct that tower in the field behind the sheriff's office. I was behind the sheriff's office in the bank. There's a nice flat area that's back there. However, after meeting with the state police, we were told that that location would not work. That the tower needed to be at maximum 50 feet from the building itself because of the type of wiring for something with the ice bay and or ice break. I'm not sure it wasn't at meeting, unfortunately, but it needed to be a lot closer to building than we've originally proposed it to be. So if you turn to page 14, you'll see another map there with a little red star, and you'll see that it's literally right next to the building behind the building in the parking lot Again as a hundred foot tower. It's a last tower. I was told And this will allow for the wires to be plugged in directly into the side of the building where the IT Room is and it'll also be connected to the generator right there. So this site was chosen when the state police visited on January 7th of this year. So they are also the schematics for the tower that included from the state police that are in this packet for you. And I'm requesting that we set this for public hearings on February 24th. The next one I have for you is in Resoning. It's 24-02 for the CUMLIN industrial park. Staff is requesting that the economic development of NORI owns the industrial park in Bairer requesting be resumed from M1 industrial to M2. You'll find on pages 56 through 72 of your packet. Just a printout from the ordinances that have the permitted uses for both the M1 zoning district and the M2 staff the commission and have many years, previous commission members have for many years, suggested that this industrial park be resumed in order to attract more in different businesses to the industrial park. Also, it's not a request to set public hearing, but just wanted to remind you guys that at the last meeting we had set the couldn't amendment for the VGA ordinance update for public hearing original. We're going to have that hearing tonight, however, because the December meeting of the planning commission was postponed, that did not allow and have time to get that meeting advertised or that hearing advertised for tonight so that will also go to bed. So we have three co-occurrence. Correct. Yes sir. And that is what I have for you for the best public hearing tonight. Okay. And we've motions for both. These are going to do them together. This is one. This is one. This is one. Mr. Johnson. Yes. So I got the question. It's right. Can you point to me where the m2s allowances are? Oh here we go 64. 65. 64 at the very bottom of the page. Yes. So many ACEs and structures, so that's permitted by right and in midway on page 65 it has permitted uses with conditional use purpose. So the M2 zoning district allows those uses in the M1. So all the uses that are permitted in M1 are also allowing. Yes, I was just trying to look, see if those any hilarious issues that might pop up like he did in tune. The manufacturing of rock stuff. Contribute? that comfortable? Sure. Sure, I'm going to move that we set a public hand for GP 24-1A Showcase in RAC 24-1A Showcase at our 50-more meeting. Second? Second. Steve Donnie-Hugh. Kevin Mettos. Yeah. Keep your down. Yes. Steve Rosen. Yes. Wayne Flippen. Yes. I'm going to old business. So again, I mentioned this a few minutes ago. The couldn't limit 24 or 4 for the BZA will not be held tonight, but it will be held on February 24th. I do have some updated cost-free reservoir photos and I wish I could take credit for these because these are quite amazing. I obtained them, I did not take them, but they are quite lovely. For the solar update, the not much has changed. Construction is still ongoing. We were in the Kumberland road sites, the Dunne and Rallet. With, of course, holidays and the weather, knot much has been going on, but I do expect that to start picking up again. So, here is one photo. And you can see on the bottom right that is the main entrance that's coming in from the dam and on the bottom left that is the parking lot for the boat ramp. And this is a little bit farther south on the property. The boat ramp is going to be kind of bottom right. And you can see kind of just how expansive and reservoirs getting. We are actually at 3.05 elevation. So it's spreading out quite nicely. A question, yes. Just me being strange. What is it in the back center of that photo? Looks like a cloud burst coming out of the ground. Or something like that. So that is how clean and how myro, or something, it's in another, it's in another county. You can see it. Pretty clear day. Yeah. Yes. Okay. This is probably one of my favorite pictures because it's a little bit of higher ups so you can see exactly how the fingers of the reservoir are spreading out here. So on the, in the middle of the photo here, we'll check and use a little pointer here. You see the bogram, you see the tower on kind of the middle right, and then you see the dam off to the right as well. Looks like right off the boat, and where those trees are going to be soft. Yes. Yes. That's all I'm going to do. That's all I'm going to do. That's all I'm going to do. That's all I'm going to do. That's all I'm going to do. That's all I'm going to do. That's all I'm going to do. and the aloe vera got enough oxygen in the water. I think they're planning to bring some fish in February or March. Okay, but they look still looking at, what are they looking at? Opening up to people using it. That I don't know. I had some people over for dinner at the internet they said that they heard sprangles, and I don't have a heard that. So that sounds pretty optimistic. Well, I don't know. I wish I could tell. As soon as I know, I'll let you know. Okay. So here we have a photo of the dam itself and you can see the tower here. And if I could zoom in, you can see how the water was pushing out. It was quite icy for sure. And then here we have her picture with the geese, the geese were loving the water, so nice picture of the day. That's a good big gift for you to do the scale of the whole thing. Yes, I don't know if you can tell, but there is a truck on the dam on the left hand side. So yeah, Yeah. So those, we have about 75 pictures. Right. And I picked five. That was the hardest thing for me was to only choose five to put in here. But yeah, those were the best ones I know. So, that's what I have for all of this. Okay. The television shows are shared. Future-to water prices last week in Richmond. They had a, the RICO County had a new story. Came to Liverpool's Channel 6 or Channel 8, but the RICO addressed the water prices in Richmond and in the RICO County that they were experiencing tied in into Cops Creek that Cops Creek would be able to release more water and provide the over-turning of bad water levels at their water treatment range. I think they were just trying to sell their 288 million that they said they spent about this great, good, lovely, but I found it in her letter. Huh, did I hurt her now? I'm sorry. Right, new business. All right, so we have a Portland Mr. Simpson is not here unless the seed thing, so we'll go on to the planning department monthly report, which you can find in concrete is 78 for 82 of your packet. So we currently have four pending applications. Fork we have the CD-2401, which is the Green Ranger Cyclone in Supposo Facility. The CP-2402, the Cumberland Fire and the MS Radio Tower, REC-2404-1, DALY at all, which I believe for the heavier public hearing on tomorrow night. And then REC-2402, the Compaulant Industrial Department. For the month of December, of course it was, I wanna stay slow, but between holidays and snow days and things like that, we were as productive, I would say, as other months, but we did have one commercial accessory zoning unit issue, three residential primary, three residential accessory, and three farm structure curve its issue. There were two subdivision zoning, I'm sorry, subdivision flats approved, and we have 43 pending. There are two, sorry, one, two, three, four, four, six surveys of existing lots that were approved in 26 pennies. So, have three commercial EMS projects open and one residential EMS permit that was issued. And then, of course, on the bottom of the page 80 and on the top of the page 81, you'll see other potential code limits that will be coming down the pipe as well. For the building inspections monthly report, go find out at this 84, 83, 84 of your packet. For this stepma, there was a total of 32 permits issued. See, total fee is collected of $3,247.28 total estimated value of the projects were 394,292.23 cents and a total of 8 certificates of occupancy issue. Year-to-date it was a total of 922 permits This is a government's issue. Toes B is collected of 187,948 dollars and 16 cents. For a total estimated value of the projects of $44,311,641.65 cents. The total of 84 certificates of occupancy issued. So total of 84 new homes that were finalized as you can. And that's what I have for you. I think 80 of those 84 with a lot of my house. OK. Any general citizens comments received me? Okay, I'm going to let you speak to see. Appreciate it. And I didn't bring any darts. I'm Betty Myers, I live by 77 lead runner. I found your discussion about my old very interesting tonight because if you all were the 10th award meetings now then you would never would change your mindballs in January of last year. That's all I got to say. Thank you. Thank you for speaking. Any pressure comments this evening? May I have a motion please? This term Chairman, I move that we adjourn to our workshop on 27 January, 2025 at 16. It's 6.30 in the couple of middle and household cappour. Second? Second. Mr. Unser Steve Donney-Hugh. Yes. Kevin Meadows. Yes. He was Allen. Steve Rosen. Yes. Wayne Clippin. Yes. Thank you.