All right, it's 6-0-1. It's 6-0-1. I'd like to call this voting session to order. We've already got a couple of questions. A little bit of silence. All comments? Recording and comment. Mr. Oz. Ms. Krzysztofsky? Here. Mr. Lyskiewicz. Here. Ms. McDermott? Here. Mr. Perry. Here. Ms. Smith. Here. Ms. Davidson. Here. Mr. Barton. Here. Mr. Lombardo. Here. We have ten of 11. All right. Any deletions or additions to the voting session, gentlemen? Mr. Chalk, a request that we leave number four on the agenda. And I can read my email address and everyone's input. All right. What motion is there a second? And I will have, I guess we can have discussion on it. Is there a second to remove number four? I'll second. OK. Just for posteriorly noble fours, motion to adopt the resolution allocating American Rescue Plan Act funds to Dallas, Arizona, Fall Fair, trading as loser county fair. And this week never be good. It's something you would have to say. Yes. So this is the email I had sent out to all the council members. And I said, I'm impressed that we hold off and voting on giving out the ARP money until we have a little question and say answered. According to the project list, that was emailed yesterday. So that was as of my dad. We have a bunch of internal projects that are possible. They are over 10.1 million dollars. We have to get an answer from Booth, which I don't know if we did or did not. We cite Michelle Sparrowton, I spoke with Booth a section in the briefly. We sent those recordings from the department for her to do an analysis of whether so that they would be able to be able to make a further analysis. She could give us recommendations on certain projects that she knows are questionable. I did not have an opportunity to reach out to the department heads that have questionable programs, but are well. So we have to get an answer, Barry, and now I find it, you know, that we've already formed with the coordinate decision. So we have the 1.4, possibly 1.4 million left out of the American West Defense. The interest earned. I'm not sure how we can send that. Maybe not. I'm going to say again, I think we've been repeating this over and over and over again about the interest in this. You do not have to meet our current requirements that we do for the 1.4 million that I'm calling our principal that we still have to meet. So the interest, there are no attachments to the interest. We're also looking at the revenue loss and shifting where the revenue was at as of today, the public can shift $4 million. So we would have a total right now between the ARPA principal, the interest money and the loss revenue of approximately 10 million dollars. Arbitin Trist, there's no requirements that are required as to the 1.4 million. So what you're saying is the arbit money is the arbit money, but the end and that has the requirements. Correct. The interest earned from it is separate and free and clear of the arbit requirement. Correct. So the internal project was just submitted to the Food to CFN because you'd be eligible under Farquamani with this over $10 million. It's $10.9 million. That's not including the 911 or the EMS, which that to be determined. So you have no idea how much that can cost. Also we had mentioned that there are other projects that Sherwin-Bardo had sent over a list of four today. So we just received four letters in May from different municipalities stating that they are requesting or they're requesting more money to help them with their projects. Kingston, Burrow, Pits and ambulance, Wkes Garci, and Wilkes Garci, please. Wilkes Garci, he's asking for a final truck. And we have Pits and Merrow asking for fire arms ammunition, radar speed machines. That money right there is about $1 million. Now we didn't even see those yet. Had them know that there's no other quest ever in the app there. Now originally, council was the one who were the ones who just stopped it on half of the spending on our university clinic. We had to come up with a way of how we're ready to get this money out. We knew that there was going to be my leftover. We didn't know how much. So now we know that there's approximately 1.4 million that we've been over. How do we decide to spend that money? Are you ready to say, I'm going to give up 500,000 to this one, but I'm not going to help look for a single fire truck. That's $250,000 of the rescue. And you may say, well, you already gave money to Kingston and Kingston, and we did. We also gave to the Dallas area fair. They received $100,000 for water and soil infrastructure. All of these entities already have received money. They received $100,000 for water and soil infrastructure. All of these entities already have received money. How do we decide who was going to get more money? Are we going to open up an application process again? What is that going? We have until December 2024 to allocate the money. And then we have until 2026 for all projects to be completed. What has had lasted in the last meeting is that we need to be able to get our internal county projects completed before we get it out because this is the one life experience of creating these projects done. And if we don't get them done, then we have to raise money somehow. And that's by raising taxes. So I think it's prudent that we get all the information before we make a decision or get it out anyway, anyone to anywhere right now. And again, those letters came in in May, our last meeting was May 28. Two of these letters were before that. We did not receive them. Where we don't usually receive them. Who about them? By five, you just received them. I received them. And it has come on one to share and the vice-chair. I knew other words were coming. I wanted to send them as a group. That's correct. Okay, so we knew that there were things out there that was not disclosed to us. So you want us to vote on something tonight when we didn't even know what other projects were out there. How is that there? How can you make an informed decision that we don't have all the information? Mr. Barton. Thank you. Thank you, and I know several other people in the administration and council members agree with this stat. We do need to focus on our own Moosor County internal projects. And in my opinion, this is my opinion. It wouldn't be prudent at this time to open up a new round of applications to be received. I have to stop thinking we have enough time to be received to consider all of the outside identities in the county that are looking for additional money or just for the first time looking for money from the ARPA grant. And I just don't think we have enough time for to entertain all those outside projects at this time. And I am a proponent of what Manager Crock-Mose doing is seeking disinformation from the county heads, department heads and directors and managers to see what kind of projects are out there now. Moves is analyzing those internal projects, the signature knowledge of what you're not. But this is my opinion. In the meantime, we have, I look at the loser county fair as a quasi-interval project and in recent days, it's not a well-expert city fair, it isn't a city fair, it's a loser county fair. And I've been out in county fairs like the North County fair, down there which is tremendously large. If those are kind of fair is open to all those are county residents. It's just a wonderful venue, a wonderful place to go. I'd be September when they hold it. And the damages that were suffered there, which are specifically enumerated in the packages here tonight. Where due to active God, there was a major storm that went through there after the art program, and he was allocated. And nobody could ever predict what was going to happen. And there was a tremendous amount of devastation done out of the fairgrounds. So, I am a fan of holding back all of the private entities up there, all those requests until we satisfy the other internal county projects that are going to come forward soon. But in the meantime, I do consider loser County fair that is absolutely an important entity that discounts the support for the sake of all loser County residents. So what you're trying to say is that that's more important than a fire truck to what's their city considering that the loser can pick up our dallies there. So that's a matter of fact. Had AY and beer festival out there tuned for a soap that was in such bad dire shape. I'm not saying it doesn't make improvements. I'm not saying it's not a worthy cause. I'm not saying that. What I'm saying is we need to take, which I had requested, just take two more weeks, let's get the answers that need to be, how do you decide that you're gonna give money out to one and out to another when they're requesting it? I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Okay. I'll be going. That's my not mistakes. Lee and I completely agree. I think there are multiple priorities that we have to check into first and a lot of information that we still need to receive before making this decision. I don't think there's any issue with table any for another two weeks to find out the necessary information. You made very valid points tonight. Mr. Walgreens, I agree with plan Brittany. I mean, I believe it's up to all of council to some of what a loser-in-count project is. Not just to members. That way, that's a decision that we as an element have to mean. I mean, you can't just put that on the plate. And we've got applications before that we didn't even know about. How has that fair to everybody else? The original art of application was fair. I mean, it's not an application process, but it still is an application process, because they're coming to us asking for money. And I don't think it's fair for certain people who comes to council? I think that it should be of the council's will, which will at least be informed that there's other applications and other interests out there, not just being decided on. I think it's of all council members. Just for the contrary, I just want to let everybody know how I could... myself and Brian didn't try to hide any information from anybody, it was just a matter of trying to get these projects grouped into one thing. And as they came in, we were trying to put them together. Again, posterity, one of the organizations that apply for money is an organization that I have a member of. And not that I'm able to support them. But they didn't even tell me I actually didn't even wasn't even aware of it until today when I was checking through my emails just to make sure that I didn't miss any before we sent them out. So I was not trying to hide anything from anybody. This was not any type of situation like that You know, I think they're all great causes. I mean, it's all emergency services which I it's something that I do for a living So it's not that I Maybe we could give the money to all the One thing that I would say though is that the organization but mr. Hans I think you're quite a fan. Sorry about that. That's OK. The organization is that I sent today the four of that requested more funds or four organizations that I believe already received funds. And they were for similar situations. I think that the difference between those organizations and this one is that, you know, just as Councilman Thornton said, that there was an act of God and this is something that, you know, is truly an emergency need. They also receive money and the fire truck is an apparently emergency secret books for our decision and why it is. Okay. Here you go. Mr. Laskach. I just hope your idea is your truthful and don't have ulterior motives. So all the information that I provided is not the truth. Do you know all the numbers of what we have left? Just can you tell me right now? Definitely. How much money we have left. Can you tell me right now? Definitely. How much money we have left? And again, you need to be able to give to all those projects. And I hope we can. But I'm not willing to make a decision on one when we don't know what the other ones. Can we help with one spend it? How should we decide how we want to make the decision to spend it? OK, let me speak, perhaps. So I agree with Mr. Thorden that the remainder of the money, if able to be used, should be used for the rest of the county projects, period. We had an arc around. We'll never get through another round. I don't believe. And everybody knows that the first one had a lot of major glitches. Couldn't get on, wouldn't register your vote. It was a nightmare actually. And I think I endured the most out of it. With that being said, here's a county project with the fore age involves a lot of kids, there's a lot of good for the county, promotes so much in the back mountain, and we're gonna thumb our nose at it. I just can't understand the reasoning, only because I think there's an accident, I'm gonna call Yano, that only because I think there's an accident right now the call you know that's what I think what's the problem with waiting two more weeks all right that yeah it's not mr. Rolomis Mr. Rolomis Mr. Rolomis and a miss Smith I apologize now I know for the web tape to the bridge project we did have you day interest or more that you know there's anything left in that wonderhouse, like the approximate idea, even if we split it with our point. And there is, but I don't know that I'm happy exactly what we're going to get there. Okay, thank you. Ms. Smith. Hi, two things. One, attorney scheme. In order to qualify for the ARCMI. Is it true that the damage for loss of revenue has to have been related to COVID in order for to be improved project and the ARCM? There are a lot more conditions than that under the ARCMI. Is that one of them? Michelle, are you on? Miss Faraday, why? I apologize. Yeah, I apologize. Okay, God. Yeah, I apologize. I'm not going to miss the analogy. The 10 million inter�ind blood, if I can trust your question, that could be useful for anything. The 10 million in law for everything. We can claim that as a one-sided exception. So that could be useful for anything. And obviously the end for this is well, right, Michelle? Correct. The other idea of this could be you. We can just can be used for anything as well. When we had our call with Boots today, Robbin Boots, I told her, Moza and Largane, that we have gotten above and beyond putting these on down to the couch, to be municipality within our county. She said all of her other clients, but we have gotten them in the county. And I don't agree with the council member who said, you don't have time for another funding round. We don't. We're running out of time because of funding to be extended. But yes, to answer the other part of your question, how do you fund a contract to tie back your COVID? So there is a, there are pages of categories that both provided and I certainly forward that. But we do have to, it doesn't have to, the project has to show some kind of a lot due to COVID. Right, so that means that it was met and it followed under natural disasters and we're talking about the doubts there in the fair in particular. Well, I think it's obvious like we are. I'm just looking for the legal, categories. So it seems that we might be able to use the law, structural, or the interest revenue for this project, but not necessarily art from preschool, because it can't tie back to COVID. You can solve this problem. No, I am not. No, it's an academic natural disaster. It's actually an acceptable category under a department. OK. The second thing that I wanted to say, well, is done it. If we're going to consider this, I do think it's fair to consider all of the applicants equally and take two weeks, this councilman has even said, to make sure that we have all the information and all the numbers that we have. The worst case scenario would be to spend more than we have. We can't do that. We owe better to our citizens than our people here than being then irresponsible. I don't think two weeks is simply thumbing our nose at any project. I think it's doing our due diligence, which we were elected to do. Thank you. Any other calls, members? This may be our name. Michelle was still in the show. With the work we've lost, it's all of that money Thank you. Any other calls, members? This may be our way. Michelle, this is so early. Michelle, with the work we've lost, it's all of that money, because then we can use it on account of projects. It's all in that remarked so far, by projects that we already submitted. I believe we're more of a mention before. We're in the process, because there was some funding awarded before we had moved on. Some projects were awarded money under the Rev. Blue Law. However, we were working with Blue to take some of those projects that were awarded under revenue law and we program them to another eligible activity. So there is some funding there but I don't have a final dollar amount because we're not done. You weigh that. Thank you. So what I wanted everyone to think about is there's a lot of members we don't really have to pay your answers. That's what we're trying to get. I know we're going to probably have maybe a couple projects that will fall through and we have that way and that's something we'll have to do just for now, for that time, but for right now, we don't know what we have. That's a thing. We have rubber gloves. We do that you can use it on camera projects. What were those kinds of projects that were submitted? I'll do the council members don't know. I really don't remember. But now I've had a new project that I want. So I don't believe the revenue loss was used on internal projects. Michelle, that was before Ooth got involved, I think. Did that grind in at 7? There was that formula. There were, I can't say with 100% sure where those internal projects came from. But those internal projects were awarded either at the meeting before or after. I wouldn't say they were awarded either prior or immediately after, it was the only subfunday opportunity. So it wouldn't be the middle of March or April. So the close came from all this, they couldn't have been all different categories of funding. I don't have that list in front of me. So again, whatever request is that we just hold off a little bit longer. I hope that we have all of them ready. If we get all this money, then we can certainly give it out. But how do we decide that we're going to be 500,000 to 1,000, maybe 250,000 to the other? Again, a fire truck, EMS is very important as well as the counter fare. I just had asked two more weeks. Go on, question. There's a motion on the second. The motion is removed. The motion was to remove number four from the agenda. There's a first and a second on it. Here, and one more time. There's a motion on the floor to remove number. We're passing the agenda, and the motion is to remove number four, the Dallas Air Inferra training as a loser and county fair from the agenda. Very good, thank you. Okay. Welcome. Chairman. Good. That doesn't mean it can't come back. That's correct. That's correct. Okay Mr. Haas this is to remove yes to remove correct Mr. Haas your role with yes Yes. Yes. That's what I thought. I heard you. Mr. Krishnamasky. Yes. Thank you. Mr. Laskavid. No. Mr. McDermott. Yes. Mr. Savitino. Well, strong support for the fair. I will vote to remove it. Yes. Mr. Smith. Well, I'm also a strong supporter of the fair. I believe we need to do our due diligence to vote for a move it for today. Mr. Davidson? Yes. Mr. Thornton. No. Mr. Willowage. On the strong support of the fair, and I do want to find any possible way to fund it, I just need me to look at all the options that all the projects are going to be. Mr. Lombardo. No. It's 3-0. It is. It's 3-0. Okay. Number 4 is removed. Any other additions or deletions from the agenda. Is there a motion to adopt the agenda? Motion. Second. Motion the second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Agenda is adopted. We will now have public comment on voting session agenda items only. I have a few slips out here. I have Mr. Pugh. No amendments on number four. They could just remove,'m not supposed to be. A lot of you speak at the end in the meeting. That's okay. Good work. All right. Mr. Fitzgerald. It's on number two, so we can't speak at all. No, you can speak at the end if you'd like. Okay, John. You could just do that. Okay. Thank you everybody. Mr. Mangus? Another agenda. Not a agenda? Okay, thank you. Mr. Griffith? Yes. Mr. Chair. Make sure we can hear you in the background. Good. We're good. Thank you. Number five, I want to talk about it. And number five deals with want to talk about it. And number five deals with modifications to the American Rescue Fund awarding projects. One of the projects is the Industrial Authority for the parking garage, wherever from parking garage. And I know it doesn't specifically state it's tied to the hotel sterling project that was approved by Council of Guaranteur Archer Money as well for their funding, but I do believe that the two are working together. One is important as the other when you get the hotel project done, the riverfront parking garage will be tied into it. The concern I have is when that project was brought to council for heart of money. Council was told that money was available. They were going to have all the other who get the rest of the funding. And they would be able to move forward with the project. I think that is the come off of you, Jim, as well. Until you guys get something from that developer that said he has funding in place, he promised this council he had funding. I remember Councillor Boehme, they're going to be growing there. About where is the funding? You have the funding more than one time. Over and over, we were told constantly by Mr. Baruch that the funding was available. All we need was a additional $5 million. We took the $3.90 from our UDAC fund, which I strongly opposed to because I thought we should use that $3.00 for county roads and bridges which we desperately need. We ever wrote it in Huntsville Dam, it's almost impossible, which is a county road. Yet we can't take $3 million for our county money or any art by my name to fix roads so our residents could drive safety. But we're going to give somebody a project extension to 2025 without knowing if this person who's the developer of that hotel has the funding yet. I think we need to bring Mr. Brue back in here and ask him where the funding status is in that project before you give me extension for the parking garage. That's on number five. Any other members of the public? Public comment? The audience? Mr. Chair, can I ask a question? Everybody in that comment, right? I'm not clear on that. A question said, will Mr. Ripon? Well, we suggested that we could use that money to do roads. And I was told that at the beginning our company could not be used for roads. Not a lot of us is related to a sewer project. Okay. All right, thank you. No, I know the $3.00 million you gave me. Could be used for roads. Okay, that's the bottom line. I wish I could write it. Yeah, yeah. Okay. Anybody else in the audience? Call the comment. Anybody? Anybody on the Zoom? No. All right, moving on. Motion to approve the minutes of the May 28th, 2024, voting session. So we'll check in. Motion to second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Minister of Proud. Number one, motion to adopt the ordinance. And then you can 2024. Visible your budget for Luzana County for MHDS. So moved. Second. Miss Stevenson, Mr. Rollovich. Local? Mr. Krznyowski? Yes. Mr. Laskavich? Yes. Ms. McDermott? Yes. Mr. Perry? Yes. Mr. Sabatino? Yes. Ms. Smith? Yes. Ms. Stevenson? Yes. Mr. Thornton? Yes. Mr. Willowicz? Yes. Mr. Hose? Yes. Mr. Lombardo? Yes. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.ino. Yes. Miss Smith. Yes. Miss Stevenson. Yes. Mr. Thorken. Yes. Mr. Haas. Yes. Miss Krishnowski. Yes. Mr. Lombardo. Yes. Your unanimous. Number three, motion to introduce the ordinance and then in 2024, Capitol Planned Food, Zarmt County Sheriff, Manager Kropler. I'll be introducing the actual ordinance, Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. Number four, motion to adopt the resolution of proving modifications to American Rescue Plan Act funds and worried projects. Motion. Second. Motion to second. I just have a question. Go ahead, Mr. Clerk. That's the, uh, this motion addresses the large group of projects, right? That's correct. And as are all, and I understand just time extension. The only question I have in this way is the question for Ms. Care, Ms. Farrell. large group of projects, right? That's correct. And as it all, that is just time extension. The only question I have, and this might be a question for Miss Sparrick. Some of the delays for the extensions of time extend well into 2025. And my only concern is if some of the projects go south in 2025, and they can't be completed by all the rules of ARPA by the end of 26, and we ended up with hanging on to some of that ARPA money. And I know one rule was we had to allocate all of the ARPA money by the end of 2024 in a here market, rather. So if 2025 comes and goes, and some of these projects never really got off the ground, and we really can't give them the money. I don't think we could use the money then. And my question is, could we use the money at 2025 or 26 other projects, or do we need to return that money back to the federal government? What we could do is say, and I'm just throwing this off the top of my head, say we allocated a project and it was a stormwater project. If that project doesn't get completed, the county could, it is my understanding that the county could use that money for a stormwater project. Like it doesn't have to necessarily be a price-wise drive, but it would have to be in that same eligible funding category. That was my understanding that I got for a vote. That's in the regulations that have been published. It has to be in the same category. So even if a project won't be finished in 2025, you can use that money for an internal project, for example, as long as it's a same type of project. And also, basically, we're signing it to categories, not individual projects, basically. That's a very different way of thinking. Sorry, that was just's a very aware. Sorry. And if we don't finish the project, first of all, 26, we're not going away. All of the funds have to be extended by 1.31 to 25. Right. And if we don't spend it in an internal project in that same, same on. Got it. Thank you. That's what I'm looking for. I don't know why that was hard. In San Canterbury, it still goes back to the federal government, right? If we're not done by 26, I'm going to stay change of rules. Mr. Septino. I'd like to offer a amendment, move to a amendment, the City of Walshary Industrial 3 project, instead of an extension to March 31st of 25 to make it to say November 15th of 2024. So that gives us some time to reallocate it before it gets locked to a category. Hmm, I think it's a great seat to a category. That's a great suggestion. I'll second it. All right, there's a motion of second on that. Is that not much? The manager's problem, what was that? Is that something that they would be appropriate for this? I mean, I certainly... Well, that's a really good opinion. We can use that whatever day council feels like. We're extracting one. You're many in the resolution for that one particular project. Got it, all right. So I have a question. Go ahead and start it. So that's a great idea to back up four months or so. What would the entity, would the entity that requested this have anything to say about that? Would they say, well, that doesn't work for us? I don't know why council changed that. I don't know how I handle that. Mr. Peru is here. The police should be on from that. If they were on here, they could be either online or in person. Mr. Peru is here. God, whoever wants to come up and speak on us. Before you see his man's eyes on him. God, whoever wants to come up and speak to us. So before you see this, Nancy is a member of the Smith. It seems to me for concern about that, then we need to amend all of them that are beyond November 31st, 2025, or 2024 rather, and there's quite a few of them. I mean, that logic doesn't make sense, but if we're going to give it to one, we should be doing it to all of them. I mean that logic doesn't make sense but if we're going to give it to one we should be doing it all for them. Just to speak on that I think the problem with that is that you know I feel like there's I don't mean to say this in a negative way but they feel like they're signaling out this project because of the concerns that were addressed in it. Most of the other projects if not all of them and maybe they are aware as well, and they may address this when they come up and speak, but they're aware of what the deadlines are, and they have to make sure that they meet them by that criteria point. They're already coming to us for one extension, and those other projects that have come to us for extensions are doing the same thing. I'm sure that we've told them in conversation, hey, this is your only extension, you're not getting a number one. So I don't know, Andrew Brokermar, who's there, wants to speak on that a little bit more. We seem to be assuming, and what we're seem to be assuming in his comment earlier, that they are inexorably interconnected. That's an assumptionorably interconnected. That's an assumption at this point. Secondly, the money that was given to the sterling wasn't part of money. It came from the FEMA. You did a good job. You did a good job. But we had already spent money on that. And it's still my opinion that because we spent that money, that we've attached to that on that site, legally, that site is now assigned that money because there are other requirements. So not quite sure how we are making the assumption that they are inexperienced. They don't necessarily think that it's fair to treat him as the same. When it reality is a funding, he's not the same, and the funding is very different for requirements. Mr. Willow, which time does he listen? Okay, there's a question for Mr. Newman, but the reason we're extending is because I believe they're applying for more money. If I'm not mistaken. That's what I have read. But it's certainly more of a... For the I.E.A. For the summer, they're applying for more money. They can't finish one project. One second. The parking garage. Yeah, from a different source. Not that. Okay. All right. Miss Stevenson a go ahead. I didn't have on the question. Okay, I apologize. Go ahead. Mr. Newman or Mr. Maroukwarmer? I'm sorry. I'm going to start on. Okay. Go ahead. So I'm Larry Newman. I chair the City of Wolfe's very industrial development authority. And we have requested an extension of this ARP grant because the total project budget of 3.7 million for this garage, which is a public garage, it will serve not just the proposed hotel, but all of the development, including the river common, which is controlled by user count 8 to 9. In that quadrant of account, all of that development requires additional off-street parking to support the development goals of that area. And so it will support the development of the COSO call project. It will also support the development of the residential units that are being created in that area. It will support the river common as a recreational asset, and it will support entertainment assets such as the Iron Temple. So the project is in in order to actually get through that process so that we can actually commence construction. That's just the fact that is there. I'm happy to answer questions about that and obviously Mr. Baruch gets here as well. Thanks for questions Mr. Mark. Thank you Mr. Chair Mr. Nulman I just have a little question. So the amendment on the floor now is to move the extension time for you from the end of March next year to the end of March next year to the end of March. March 31st, 25. Yes. Back to November 30th, 24th. With those four months, Amber Hanger, the progress or success of these projects. Yes. And well, could it possibly derail the project? Yes. Okay. Thank you. Mr. Rollin, which is real quick. What are the chances that you will be approved for the additional funding from the other source? So it is impossible to say right now. I have a question, Miss Smith. Can you explain why you just said yes, but it would be thrown off the rails and it could be completely re-wrote? Can you speak more on that? I mean, just yes, there are answers and always have a complete answer. I answer something. That's in states that are going to serve people. But, um, they, number one, high place hotel franchise requires that the certain somebody parking spaces be available in the media. So we have a combination of service, some service parking that's privately owned and this particular parking. So if we can't supply the certain amount of parking for the hotel, if the chairman of this whole project and all the evidence that we're going to achieve at this point, then I can primarily attribute to the UDI grant that you awarded, and just add a whole new momentum to the project. I just made, I make to work one second. Mr. Griffith has a habit of getting up here and making this statement. I never said all the financing was in place. Once we got the grant, it was going ahead. Never said, I wouldn't say it because I know it's wrong. We're currently in process of negotiating with the bank right now, but I don't have a firm current letter, but the three nine that was given to us by Luzor and County has added a lot of strength to the proposal and the project, and I'm very hopeful today much more than I was once ago. Mr. Centino. Mr. Rude, we gave you that money in January. This Council voting period, that might be in January. How do you made any progress in getting additional funding at this time? Yes, no matter how you're doing it. So I just completed, we just completed a second marketing study for a particular bank who's looking and lending us $39 to get this project started. So you have no additional funding to announce it. It's not a good thing as a second set. Right, we're in position. We're in position to get the project done. Once we get the work from the bank. All right. Any other questions from Council members? Do you have Mr. Los Gavish at Miss Smith? I just kind of think we're on a slippery slope because we're targeting one person for an extension of time where we allow allow so many others the extension. I think it's a bad idea to single one project out. I just don't think it's true. I miss Smith and Mr. Seventeen. I'm not going to, this is not my original comment, but I agree with Kevin. I do feel like this being singled out particularly, but certainly my actual comment that I had was that you What I understood that answer to me was that you had moved forward with your negotiations with bank and completely that second study that something they required for you to obtain in front of you. You might have been correct. Yes. Thank you. Mr. Santino. We have in the past, single out of people, we did it for the Wyoming Valley Sanitary Authority and shortly thereafter, we're a customer extension. So it's not unprecedented at this point to look at certain projects and look at the viability of that and ask the people to do this for shorter time. Wait, man, I have one thing that I'm not sure. As you're seeing in the project, you're seeing probably the most impactful project that's gonna hit the city of Luxberg and possibly change a lot of the economics in downtown. So I know, I think it's important just to be cautious about the way of receiving with the deliberations on this because comments coming out of this particular council to be cautious about the way of receiving with the deliberations on this, because the comments coming out of this particular council could cause problems for us with our lender. So I just would ask you just to be a little, you know, just, let us finish this thing out. You know, it's a complex project, multiple funding sources. You know, we have different components of project from a public garage, you know, out of tell. The garage just doesn't serve the hotel by the way, as Larry mentioned. We have all these little mix of these and I'm going to be taking place all summer that if you don't do something because you're out at the park and they very well they've failed. So I think we have to work together on this thing. And we're willing to do that and do what we have to do to accommodate the best interests of the county. But I can't tell you that the county involvement of this point has been very awful, very productive, and has really pushed this project to a point where it's more real today than ever was. Just started. Thank you. I, I, my pleasure to be here is if we move this day back four months and we heard that quick series to jeopardize the entire project going forward, which could have the economic devastating impacts for decades and come and stay in Wulksberg, I think that's four of us, I wish a lot of to continue with their request of March 31st. And that comes in goes and they, they improve, they progress where they should, then we pull that back then or take measures or whatever is appropriate then but sometimes I feel like we're finding all the ways we can to stop progress rather than speed support of your and doing everything we can to make sure these things go forward. Mr. Mollover, Mr. Saptino. Okay so be eligible activity that is negative economic impact. So this doesn't get finished. Okay, so be eligible activity to take it at economic impacts, I believe, right? So this stuff can get finished. If you utilize it for something else that is experienced, negative economic impacts afterwards. Okay, I mean, we have given everybody also one extension. This is it. That's all it is. Mr. Centino? He asked the partial law. I was going to ask what category is it? And if there is use for it, if we do not get the discussion. I mean, I'm willing to take back the motion. Okay. I'll cancel my second. Okay. Motion is second-hearted, removed. All right. Any other questions from council before we proceed with the vote? All right. The motion and second to approve the motion to adopt the resolution, approving modifications to American Rescue Plan Act on the water projects. This is the entire list, including the one that we just discussed with the original change of date. Roll call. Ms. McDermott. Yes. Mr. Perry. Yes. Mr. Savitino. Yes. Ms. Smith. Yes. Ms. Davidson. Yes. Mr. Savitino. Yes. Ms. Smith. Yes. Ms. Davidson. Yes. Ms. Thornton. Yes. Mr. Willow. Yes. Mr. Haws. Yes. Ms. Krznawski. Yes. Mr. Lyskanovich. Yes. Mr. Lombardo. Yes. We know. to an American Restonet flight act on the lead project for the Iron Temple Restoration Project. So we'll motion a second. Question? Roll fall? Mr. Perry? Mm-hmm. Mr. Savitino? Yes. Miss Smith? Yes. Miss Davidson? Yes. Mr. Thornton? Yes. Mr. Hoss? Yes. Mr. Krzyszardo. Yes. Mr. Hoss. Yes. Mr. Krznawski. Yes. Mr. Laskavich. Yes. Mr. McDermott. Yes. Mr. Lombardo. Yes. No. 6. Motion to adopt the resolution of proving a modification to a American resident plan act upon the water project for diesel-medicine and microwave transmission. Second. Right. Second. All right, well second by Miss Stevenson. Roll call. Mr. Sabatino. Yes. Miss Smith. Yes. Miss Stevenson. Yes. Mr. Thornton. Yes. Mr. Haws. Yes. Mr. Krishnowski. Yes. Mr. Laskavage. Yes. Miss McDermott. Yes. Mr. Perry. Mr. L? Mr. Gillen-Bardom? Yes. Humanitimists. Number eight, introduction of the assistance for budget amendment for e-wrap by the county management and the growth model. We are, my interducing is, I apologize. They both these microphones and I keep creating to turn it on. So I am introducing this ordinance, that's probably the office budget in finance, open up to 2024, budget to add the additional e-wrap to funding. So you can probably document in a direct line item. We recently received notice that the emergency management system program, which is the e-wrap to funding allocation has been increased by $2009,000 for the $200 and 25 cents. All right, any questions? All right. We'll be right to the number 90, introduction of the ordinance to budget amendments for VCE, the facility's poachagrant by the county manager, Mr. Carpone. Again, I'm introducing a budget amendment that's coming from the Office of Budget and Finance to open up the 2024 budget to increase the revenue and expense lines associated with the DCD State Facility Codeg grant in order to send their moving funds available. All right. Thank you. There's nothing further. We'll move on public comment. Anybody public comment? We have a couple of slips here. Mr. Pugh. Thank you. Your time here, Malibu, Moons and Kenneth Fair. I wish we were afforded the option to state of removing our agenda, but I'm sure that wasn't the intention. As we know, I'm President Lutheran County Fair and my wife would reach for labor and for office as a chairwoman. She didn't cut us, none of the labor sauce. What it does actually deserts the folks of the Dallas Lions, hearted-to- ex-Lions like silkworm lions, Dallas Roach, or Dallas to one of the Mac Mountain youth, your dash 365 and safe cooperative extension for age, link leave and ban, and the junior fair sponsors. No, do we have to be a big difference? I'm glad to see such a sudden involvement, everything, oh, wonderful. But what do we do with the fairground? What impact do we do with the fairgrounds? What impact do we have? How many people attend the fair as opposed to the wine fest that was brought up by Council mimic therapy? Quite a difference, I'm not sure. Of course our fair is up to what we can. We still have kids having four age. We still have the four age airsoft rifles out there doing their part. Because we get about a thousand people to the wine fest and about 50,000 people to the fair. So we were able to use that part. And of course, we've done the work we could. As I mentioned the last time I was out here with our people, our volunteers from our different clubs, replacing a water line to get it going. We're out there, our attractors, ready what we could, doing the work we can do. And for what we have to succeed is, yet she did, once in our 62 year history, donated $100,000 would be greatly appreciated for the art of funds, for the sewer project. That was very helpful and we appreciate it. You would have done it without you. But, then, and that was a disaster yet. Up until then, art service clubs have been very good about raising no funds to take care of our own needs. We're not here to be a burden, but we're not a taxidance authority. I can't raise the tax to buy a fire truck. I can't get an LSA grant. We are not a minister of authority. We're a nonprofit out there for the enjoyment of public. We run the Veterans event, the Halloween for the public. We did the license plate swap out, so you guys have done with your very legislators. We did your COVID testing, all for the Department of Health, the Lutheran County, and set up one in this town, one of the other, where the e-bag zone for schools and universities, we donate to the fire and EMS when they help participate at the fair. We have the road rewind festers, just note again, that's how they have raised the funds to get back to their community just like all these folks here. We teach your future leaders. There's over 1,500 members in a various club talk there. Plenty of them dug into their own pockets to do this. We did turn this repust in months ago. When we knew, and I worked hard as an EM8 coordinator volunteer to channel it What was submitted on behalf of Lutheran County Along with one home in Lackamon to get the totals up to meet our flood decoration And we made and requested an emphima come back and report the facility well documented However ultimately turned down so I hope you consider it in the future. I just want to say that the Bears and the 2011 study do $126 million a year at the time, about four losers or for the state. And I really appreciate if you consider that going forward. Thank you for your time. Thank you. Mr. Mangan. Mr. Sir. Thank you for allowing me to speak. Garont Poppick in Lanes, Joe Mang, and powder township. And most of you may know what I'm here. More than a year ago, I notified most of you along with some other county officials. First, they're inviting about my allocationation by the Child of the Use investigation popular. Whiteired was the victim in investigation and unfortunately I received four different decisions in this case. Child abuse, unfounded, child abuse, unfounded what happened. The workers slide off on a child abuse case. They said it was child abuse. What happened to my daughter? An attorney from the county decides to get involved, intercepts the case and changes the time found. It gets caught. Child line kicks it back, goes back to child abuse. He does it again. And I know you're most of you have information that I'm talking about. He changes it to unfounded. Again, final decision goes in as unfounded with the same force signature on it that always intended to sign a child abuse claim. So I have four different decisions of the same signature line over that period of time. Each of those people who signed that report said they never intended it for it to be an unfounded decision. I have confirmation, written confirmation from here that said those individuals had nothing to do and unfounded decision that should have always been indicated. I also have an email from the Northeast Regional Office. It advised me to have about the email today that they wanted to start an invested criminal investigation not because of the work that sort of knew they did their job But because what this attorney did changed in the decision to unbounded What does that do? Well that put this person back in school my daughter You haven't responded to my emails, so I have to go public Country-marison for me my daughter to go public, but this is the only way I'm going to get answers. There's some reason no one wants to put it in writing for me that this is a legitimate decision. If it is, put it in writing for me to tell me that this is a legitimate. You can't put it in writing for me because we all know what this person did was wrong and that's a cover of it. I'm asking you today I'm asked 100 times in email. Can the attorney make a decision for any children's youth case? Yes or no? Thank you Mr. Mangan. Just so you're aware, we are the legislative body of the county. So we can't make any decisions on items like that. I mean, you're going to have to take that up with the administrative personnel. And I actually, we certainly hear your concerns today, but there's nothing that we as council can do to order them to do with anything. As the administrative flow. Because that's against the charge. But this council, no. I mean Mr. Schiener here. Does Mr. Schiener virtually have the authority to make a decision in the case? Yes, Toronto? I would encourage council not to keep a plan on that. I'll see you in a couple weeks. We'll get back. More of our names, sir. Thank you. Okay, Mr. Griffith? No, I have nothing. Okay. Anybody else in public comment? But sir, see you at the municipality. My name is Kelvin Swarner. I live in Sweet Valley. I am the Secretary of the Dallas Area of Ball Fair Incorporated and and a 30 year volunteer at the Fairgrounds. And I just want to say that number one, we appreciate the $100,000 that helped us with our sewer project. That is a tremendously forward from running a lot of job journeys for all of our events that we have at the Fairgrounds. Second of all, the opportunity to submit for the catastrophic act of God that went through this past fall. I just want you folks to know that the fairgrounds are not closed. We are not closed. We are persevering. We are moving forward. That's why we have a wine and breakfast fundraiser. Half goes to the rubbery, the other half to the Dallas area of hall fair. That money goes towards back to the buildings and grounds. So we just asked that in two weeks that hopefully the reconsideration will lend to our favor. And we really appreciate those who have vocally supported the fair here on Council. Thank you. Thank you sir. Anybody else in the audience? Public comment? Anybody else zoom? There are motion to adjourn. Motion. All in favor? All in favor? Meeting's adjourn.