We agree convening the meeting of the electric and board of the electric and commissioners and we're going to start with public hearings. Our first public hearing is the fire services non-advalora and assessment final rate resolution. Madam Chair this is the final hearing for the fire assessment rate resolution. Fiscal note, the proposed rate for tier one is $90.69. Tier two is $8.31. This is the same rate that we currently have. Y-24. The expected revenue is 2336272. This rate is in line with the five year plan presented to the Board of County Commissioners in March of 2020. I'm Chair, I would do that we adopt the fire services final assessment rate resolution for fiscal year 2024-25. Authorized County management certified and on, add the Lauren assessment role to the tax collector. Second. Okay, we have a motion of second. Do we have any further comment from the board? Seeing none any public comment to this item the Fire Services non-advalorem assessment If you have public comment on this item, please come forward to the microphone. Sure, sure. Just to yeah. And it is, it is for on the fire services only. Okay. Okay. Okay, yeah, it's please introduce yourself and make your comments. Willie Thelosan, do you need my mailing address? No, no. This just your name's fine. THE, LOSN. So I've got a number of very small parcels and I don't quite understand some properties. It says that exempt properties are not charged the fire services fee. What is the definition of exempt, first of all? Well, if you go ahead and make all your comments, then we can answer the questions. So that's one comment. So I don't understand, because my neighbors' properties are exempt. Mine are in a rural area with no access. I think they have agricultural exemption, which I don't have a mine that're tiny properties. So I don't feel my properties are requiring anymore fire services and theirs and their exempt. So I would like some more clarity on how this tax works. And is it really fair? Should I stay here? Do we have any, just real quick? Do we have anyone else that would like to speak to fire services tax? No. Do we have anyone that can address that question? I would say you can just contact the property of Fraser and see about getting your parcels exempt. Okay. Are you all aware of what the exemption means? Fortunately we are a whole separate constitutional body from the from the tax appraiser and the tax system. Yeah yeah understand that. So you're just hearing citizens' concerns or questions. Okay, I appreciate your time. Yeah, yeah, I wish we had a full answer for you, but I would be real hesitant to try to answer a question. I'm not qualified to answer. Okay. Sure. Can I ask one more question? Sure, go ahead. So would it be that? Something the board would consider having a discussion with the property appraiser or the fire department whoever makes the assessment to make sure it's fair for all citizens of county or I wouldn't say citizens because I live in Putnam County, but all property owners. Yeah, um if you don't yeah, yeah Concludes your comments and then we'll address okay. Thank you All right that Commissioner Prisya? Sure. If I might, I guess to speak to your issue, I think it's a very complicated situation, but essentially we are the people who make the decisions about taxes, like what we're gonna charge for taxes, and if we're gonna have special assessments or non-Avalorem taxes that are related to specific things. And we put those to the property appraiser and then the property appraiser is responsible for determining who pays those taxes and who doesn't based on their exemptions based on their status. And so we do try to make our taxes fair for all of our citizens and make sure in fact that's why we often have things like for example our stormwater fee is stormwater and we make it that way so that everyone knows that that money is specifically for stormwater we're not going to use it for anything else we're not going to take your stormwater fee and divert it to you know doing something at the jail or something else like you know that if you pay that fee and that money is going specifically to that specific item, but at the end of the day, we don't get to make the decision on exemptions. That's the property or price order. So, Tommy? Madam Chair, Tommy Crosby, City County Manager, a little clarification. We do, this policy makers do make some decisions on exemptions. We have some exemptions for those that are low income and those are all laid on the ordinance. We passed an ordinance. We will get you the ordinance that lays out the exemptions. There are certain exemptions that are required by the state such as agricultural land and lands with certain size buildings on them. It's not a simple answer, but the property appraiser applies all of those exemptions to the, based on the parcel description and how the parcel is categorized. So they can help you with that, but also the Office of Management of Budget will get out to you the ordinance and let you outline which exemptions are available. And you can see if you qualify for any of those exemptions. Which I'll have to do that for next year. All right. Thank you, Tommy. All right. Seeing no further public comment, do we have any further comment from the board? Seeing none, I'll in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed? Like sign. All right. We'll move on to the next item to solid waste ad dev advo, non ad valorem assessment final rate resolution. Turn it over to Mel. Madam Chair, you're approving the waste assessment rates for fiscal year 24 and 25, which will allow the county to collect approximately 12.8 million in non ad valorem assessments to fund the Universal Curbside Collection, Rural Collection Center, and Solid Waste Management Programs. The estimated revenue is $7 million to account 148.76, 7600, 325.20, 1.7 million, 2403, 76, 76, 10, 325.20, and 4.1 million to account 403-76, 76-10-325-20 and 4.1 million to account 403-76, 76-20-325-20. And I ask Mo if those numbers correlate pretty much with the funding list above that? Yes ma'am. Okay. Because the numbers mean nothing to me. Rounding. Yeah. All right. I will entertain a motion at this time. All right. Adopt. Move to adopt the solid waste. Sorry. Move to adopt the solid waste final assessment resolution for physical year 2024 2025. Authorized the chair to certify the solid waste non-avolorum assessment role to the tax collector. All right. We have a motion on a second. Do we have any public comment on the solid waste non-advalorum assessment? Seeing none, all in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed like sign? Okay, now we will move to the stormwater non-advalorum assessment final rate resolution adoption hearing. Madam Chair, we do have an addition to the documents provided at your space is Exhibit C, which basically is the notification that we send to the tax collector. It was inadvertently not added as an exhibit, but is referenced in the resolution. The stormwater assessment rate of $60 equivalent residential unit will generate a maximum estimated $3.6 million in revenue and these are funds are split between environmental protection and public works Our final assessment resolution for fiscal year 2425 and authorized the chair to certify the storm on or non-advalorem assessment roll to the tax collector We have a motion and a second. Do we have any further commission comment? Do we have any public comment? Please come forward. Good. Good. I just want to clarify, I just don't want to do that. Do that mean that they come out and clean your ditches and you know and all that because we have to do that. I don't get none of that. No kind of no kind of support out there. Our ditches stop the roads met stuff when we get no support. What they tell us is that this private property, so they can't do nothing to help us. I don't know, do they come out there and look at it, but we've got a, um, car wash right down from our road. They got a, on the kitchen ponds. Once it runs over, it just floods our road out. Got it, got grass, got the dishes all stopped up or the dishes run everywhere. And I just want to clarify, do they come up and keep the dishes clean so the water could flow better to keep for messing up our roads. Sir, can you introduce yourself, so you have your name and let us know your address so that we can see you. I'm sorry. That's okay. My name is Isaiah Smith, Jr. In my address is 52 17 North West 190 Lane. Gayly of Florida 32653. It could be on another giga we got two properties there. But that's what it's done, but we know getting no countless report We will check into that and make sure that you're getting services that you're supposed to get I appreciate Okay, thank you, sir. Thank you. All right. Do we have any further public comment? Hi there. My name is a bond cots and I have my parcel number but there's not an address officially made yet. Okay. My parcel number is 04688-002-00. And I came in reference to my part of the property because I have no structures on that property. It's just vacant property no drains no septic or lights or anything no will is just vacant property and I was wondering how did that affect me. Is that all your comment and if so we'll address it after you sit back down okay thank you. I can attempt to answer that. Let's let's staff answer that. Go ahead. If you want to go ahead and all right, whichever. Okay. So let me cause begin. So as to the first question, stormwater system is obviously maintained that is part of our, our, our stormwater infrastructures maintained by public works. There may be ditches, they spent a lot of time, obviously, in basins where slow we've had historical flooding and we've been buying pumps, et cetera. But they also do a lot of cleaning out because obviously having clean ditches and clean basins help remove the water and get rid of the water quicker. So in this last storm we had, I know Ramon reported out to the board how well we survived with reduced flooding compared to in prior storms and the efforts that we've made to make the stormwater system better. So we will look into the particular address, but in general, all of the county property is maintained by public works and they've been spending a lot of effort in trying to prevent street flooding and ant home flooding, et cetera. You know the efforts we put towards that. In regards to the second question, it rolls from the first question is the board when and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and that's a county wide stormwater assessment. It benefits and protects all property. So while there may not be a structure or something on somebody's particular property being able to remove water downstream. So water continues to flow away from that property or any other property is a universal benefit to all of the property owners to at the level that we have set per unit, however that per units derived. So that's how it benefits that property owner. Great, thank you, Tommy. Anthony Johnson, Madam Chair. Madam Chair, I've always felt that this stormwater assessment has been somewhat precarious at best in that it's supposed to be a non-abbalarm tax which is supposed to benefit the property directly. I know you said that you can it benefits the property indirectly so it's legal to impose. I'm not here to talk about that tonight. But I'm going to talk about my street, which you have declared as a private street, which have coverts on it, that you don't maintain. You, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, and your special assessment districts, I was the one of them, my property. And so now I'm paying the stormwater tax, the stormwater infrastructure in front of my house, the county says it would not maintain. And I'm also paying an infrastructure sales tax. I consider the street that I live on to be infrastructure. It was built as a private street paid for about a developer who incorporated the cost of the street into the price of the home that I bought. And now you've opened that street up, which was a call to sack. And you're allowing people to use that street to get to their development, which and their development, I think, is exempt from snow and war. Southeast 18th Avenue, starting in the 2500 block. Check that out. So this stormwater text has always been one size, fit all tags that I don't think that's the way to go. It should be a case by case basis. I would love to see the strong water tags be levied. OK, it's by case. There's some places that get extremely extremely taken care of very well by the county with the infrastructure and the storm water. So they deserve to pay a stormwater salesman. But the ones that you just neglect and just don't do anything for, you shouldn't be charging a stormwater tax for that, those people for that. I mean the water just hits the ground, it's a rain tax. Basically, as it was once called, it runs off onto the ground and off onto the woods. So I wish you would consider taking the storm water and rethinking it and applying it to a case on a case by case basis. Mr. Johnson, before you leave, can you tell me if you live in the city or the county? Well, you know I live in the county. OK, I wasn't sure from your address. Sometimes people own properties that are not where they live. And that might be countered. OK. All right. Thank you. Madam Chair, probably need to also remind the board or the public that half of that Sirtax or more assessment goes towards water. And so the water quality is also the benefit to all the property. So it's taking that stormwater and making sure and that it's being, when it goes back into the rivers and streams that it's appropriately cared for and treated it as best they can and we run it through natural different type of environmental infrastructure to get it back into the water system as clean as we can. So clean water is half of that sort of tax use as well. I mean that's excuse me the assessment use as well. All right thank you. Tell me is there any further public comment on the stormwater assessment? Seeing no further comment all in favor all in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed, like, sign. All right. Move on to the last item on, well, not the last item, but last. Getting close. Sugarfoot Oaks, Cedar Ridge, Final Non-Advalorem Assessment Raids Adoption Hearing. This is the proposed annual Non-Advalorum assessment for FY 2425. The rate is $10 per unit per month. It is the same amount that is being currently charged. Proving this request will allow Sugarfoot Oaks Cedar Ridge Special Assessment District to receive approximately $99,240 non-advalorum assessment revenue, not adjusted for non-collectables, to fund community maintenance in the Sugarfoot Oak Cedar Ridge Preservation and Enhancement District. This district held its budget meeting on May 1, and this budget shall be incorporated into the FY25 County budget. I move we adopt the Sugarfoot Oak Cedar Ridge Special Assessment District final, non-ADVILORUM assessment rates and final rate resolution. I really have a lot of respect for this community. I'm glad to make this motion. I have a lot of respect for what you all are doing for your community. All right. We have a motion in a second. Is there anyone that would like to speak to the Sugarfoot Oak Cedar Ridge Final Non-Add Valorum Assessment rate? Seeing none, all in favor of the motion signified by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed, like, sign? I would note the commissioner, Christie, is out of the room. Okay, this one she left. All right. Now we are moving on to adoption of the fiscal year proposed milled rates and tentative budget public hearing and I assume this is when I pick up my script. Yes, ma'am. Yes, ma'am. OK. The Elatra County Board of County Commissioners convenes this public hearing on the Elatra County Fiscal Year 2025 proposed millage rates and tentative budget as required by Florida statutes, Chapter 129 and 200, and as advertised in the Truth and Millage or Trem notices. If anyone here in our audience is here for the purpose of contesting their assessment, a petition for adjustment with the Value Adjustment Board should be filed by 5 p.m. Friday, September 13, 2024. This information was included in the trim notices, petition forms, or available from the property appraisers' office. This evening, we will take a number of actions related to the adoption of proposed milled rates and budgets. The final but here public hearing on these minor matters will be held Tuesday, September 24th, 2024, at 5.01 PM in the same location, the Elatua County Administration Building Jack Durant Saludatorium. I urge you, if you have not already done so, get a copy of the agenda so that you may easily follow the proceedings this evening. Citizen comments will be taken following the overview of the tentative budget by the county manager and the assistant county manager for budget and fiscal services. The county attorney will now present an overview of the truth and millage legislation followed by the county manager's explanation of the proposed and rolled back millage rates. In 1980, the Florida legislature adopted what is known as the Truth in Millage legislation or trim as it's called. The goal of the legislation was to ensure that taxpayers were advised to the public hearings at which the local taxing authorities, budgets and milled rates were to be considered and adopted. Each year, the property appraiser completes an assessment of the value of all property and certifies to each taxing authority the taxable value of the property within its jurisdiction. Each taxing authority then notifies the property appraiser of its proposed milledrate, its rolled backrate, and the date, time, and place of the public hearing to consider the proposed milledrate and the tentative budget. Once the property appraiser receives the information, their office sends a notice by first class mail to every taxpayers on the assessment roll. The notice contains the information from the taxing authorities as to the proposed milled rate and the time and place of the public hearing. The notice sent to the taxpayers is called the trim notice. The trim notice lists what the taxes were for the prior year, what the taxes will be if the proposed budget changes are made, and what the taxes will be if no budget changes are made. This information is listed for each taxing authority. The notice also lists all voted levies for debt service. The purpose of the trim notice is to provide tax pairs with sufficient basic information to enable them to participate in the public hearing process. One of the requirements of the Truth and Millage legislation is to provide information about why proposed millage rates differ from the rolled back millage rates. The proposed millage for the Board of County Commissioners Countywide Levy is 7.6180 mills, which is 6.87% greater than the rolled back rate of 7.1286 mills. The proposed millage for the Board of County Commissioners Municipal Service Taxing Unit, Law Enforcement Levy, is 3.5678 mills, which is 7.78% greater than the rolled back rate of 3.3103 mils. Rolled back millage rate is defined as the millage rate which exclusive of new construction additions to structure deletions and property added due to geographic boundary changes will provide the same advalorum tax revenue for each taxing authority as what was levied during the prior year. The trim process requires that a notice of tax increase be advertised when the current year proposed aggregate milled rate exceeds the calculated aggregate rolled back milled rate. The aggregate rolled back milled rate is calculated by dividing the prior year estimated property tax revenue by the current year taxable property value multiplied by 1000. The current year taxable value does not include new construction and tax increment or CRA values. For the 2024 tax year, the proposed aggregate millage rate of 9.0866 is 6.9200% greater than the aggregate rolled back millage rate of 8.4985 resulting in advertising a notice of tax increase. The current year, fiscal year 24 property tax revenue for all taxing units, excluding voted millage, is 195 million, 157,224 dollars. The fiscal year 25, tenet of budget property tax revenue of $212,636,204 dollars is 17 million, $478,980 dollars greater than fiscal year 24. The increase in property tax revenue is necessary to fund the appropriations to operate the general county and MSTU law enforcement taxing units. Tommy Crosby, Assistant County Manager for Budget and Fiscal Services will now present an overview of the tentative budget for fiscal year 2025. I'm chair the total county tentative budget for fiscal year 2025 is 866,896,138 dollars, which is a net increase of $60,242,245 compared to the county managers proposed budget of $806,653,893. The details of the changes are reflected in the fiscal year 2025, tenet of budget included in your agenda packet. I'm chair, this concludes my comments on the changes that were made to the tenet of budget. I would be happy to answer any questions about the budget at this time. All right. We would care, can I? Really quickly. We don't typically have that large of a shift in the budget, but a lot of that was due to capital, capital increases in the capital infrastructure, right, that we're doing and increases in cost associated with construction. Right so most of those are capital in nature. We had the we added the courthouse we knew that it was going to come in quite a bit higher that was over $16-17 million dollars. $13 million for some work on the archer braid trail work. Those were the two big ones. We had other road surtax adjustments, transfer, et cetera. You were going to say that there's just one to identify. It's typically not quite such a spread between the proposed. Right. That's correct. They were capital and nature. Thank you very much, part. All right. I would now like to invite the citizens to comment on the fiscal year 2025 proposed milled rates and tentative budget. Please come forward to either podium if you wish to address the board. We do request that each speaker try to limit his or her comments to three minutes. This hearing will continue until everyone who wishes to address the commission has had an opportunity to speak. So we'll have citizen comment at this time. We also will ask that you introduce yourself if you want to make any comments. Welcome, Mr. Johnson. Anthony Johnson, Madam Chair. I guess I can start by saying, I guess, you still have your mojo working when it comes to these type meetings. This is where I don't know why people don't participate in this. This is where it happens. So the whole idea of the taxpayers being able to participate in the trim process. I don't know how you do it. It's working. It don't work on me for some reason. I don't want to stem wire. OK. But this is an extremely large tax increase. We know that. And the reason that you're given is because you need to fund the core services. But we all know that there are ways to fund core services. This is more than enough. The last year's budget was more than enough money. The last year's budget was more than enough, but there's all these extra pit projects and all of these other projects that getting funded also. So it's not just to fund core services. I mean, don't tell us that. I mean, tell me something nice, but not that. Okay. And there's a lot of folks out there that's going to be hurting from this, but they're your neighbors, but hey, they'll find a way, I guess. So this tax increase at this time just doesn't call for, it's not, I mean. And given, I didn't come to this morning's meeting, but I saw the consent agenda. All the money that was wasted through a consent this morning, millions of dollars of projects. Those could have easily been put on hold. Nothing pressing there, but so they try to justify this tax increase as You need a fun core services safety and fire. I mean that that you gotta do you could do better than that You can do better than that So I'm surprised more people aren't here to speak to this. They should be here. I'm amazed why they're not. They're complaining later. But from time to complain, they don't show up. And I don't blame you for that. No, I mean, that's that's one of us. But remember that. You did do a tax increase. So when you stand the road when you say you're cutting taxes it's not cutting taxes. It's a big tax increase right now. So hopefully the economy will hold up to it won't be the impact of this tax increase won't be too great. But you know you never know. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Johnson. I also agree. I don't know why more people don't show up to this. It is one of the most important things that we do as county commissioners has managed the budget. And so I do appreciate it when people do come. All right, do we have further public comment on the? All right, I will now close public comment. Sorry, Commissioner Busy, they've been from, okay. I'll now close public comment. I'm sorry, Commissioner Pazis, I have a different. I'll now close public comment section of this public hearing. It's Utah. Okay, so. All right, so any. We want to vote on the millage first. We need to adopt the millage. Okay, no, if there's any changes. Okay, I'm sorry Madam Chair, the budget document for you, the 2025 fiscal year to the budget includes the changes that were described earlier any additional judgments adjustments to the budget can be made by motion at this time. Anybody wish to change that? All right. You ready for me to move on? All right. Florida. So, head to Florida Statutes. Require the name of the taxing authority. The milled rate to be levied. The rolled back rate and the percentage change of a rolled back rate be publicly announced. Accordingly, the Elatio County Board of County Commissioners has determined that a proposed millage rate of 7.6180 mills is necessary to fund the tentative general county budget. The proposed millage rate represents an increase of 6.87 percent of the rollback rate of 7.1286 mills. Madam Chair, move adoption of resolution 2024-71 establishing fiscal year 2025 proposed general county milligrates. Second. Okay. Motion on a second. You've already had a public here. You've already had public comments. We will vote at this time. All in favor for the motion signify by saying aye. Any opposed? Like sign? All right. Any manager? No. No. Move adoption resolution 24, 2024 dash 73, establishing the FY 25 proposed municipal service tax and unit for law enforcement. Millage straight. We're on 24, 24, 72. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm jumping again. Yes. That's all right. This is a little complicated. Move the resolution. Move adoption of resolution 24, 2024, 72 adopting changes to the revenue estimate estimates and The FY 2025 Tentative general county budget second Okay, we have a motion a second. We've already taken public comment all in favor of the motion signify by saying aye Any post- Like sign. All right, county manager now. Florida statutes require the name of the taxing authority, the milled rate to be levied, the rolled back rate and the percentage charge change over rolled back rate to be publicly announced. Accordingly, the Elastra County Board of County commissioners has determined that he proposed milled rate of 3.5678 mills for the municipal service taxing unit law enforcement is required to find the tentative municipal service taxing unit law enforcement budget. The tentative millage rate represents an increase of 7.78 percent over the rollback rate of 3.3103 mills. I move adoption of resolution 2024-73 establishing FY 2025 proposed municipal service tax unit law enforcement millage rate. Right. We have a motion on a second. You've already taken public comment. All in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed? Like sign. Okay. by by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed? Like sign. I want to do this. I don't know the adoption of the resolution 2023-74 adopting change revenue estimates and the FY 2025 10 of municipal taxing unit law enforcement budget. Can't cut out on my order. All right. All right. All right. We have a motion to second. We've already taken public comment. All right. All right, we have a motion in a second. We've already taken public comment. All in favor of the motion signified by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed, like sign? OK. This concludes the tentative budget hearing. Reminder the second and final public hearing will be held Tuesday, September 24th, 2024 at 501 PM here at the Electric County Administration Building, Jack Durant's auditorium, 12 Southeast First Street, second floor. Thank you Madam Chair. Thank you. Thank you Tommy. All right. Now where am I? There we go. All right. So now we're going to go to the next floor. All right. Now where am I? All right. So now we have adoption hearing for amendments to the Unified Land Development Code related floor statutes and staff initiated. Oh, is it 530? Okay. All right. General Public Comment at this time if you would like to address the county commission on any any item that is Not on the agenda or on the agenda, please go forward Got to know and go to evening, Matt and Chair, Anthony Johnson again. I'm out of the chair. I want to talk about something that I think all of us are in favor of. We're going to agree on. And that is getting dark money out of our county politics. Dark money. Dark money. Dark money. It contaminates the whole process. Okay. There's no good, that comes from dark money, being injected into our process. People are being deceived by it, being just denied the ability to be able to participate participate in a process that's free and clear from say externality and the outside influence that doesn't doesn't just doesn't do the process in real good. So I think we need to I want to talk about that the effects of dark money and what it's having on our elections. I wish it was possible that we could pass a law of no-dog money law, okay, in the county, okay. And because that way we can actually have a process that's free and clear, open and fair, and the citizens get to determine the outcome of these county elections. That's where the process was intended to operate. This was to be the voice of the people, but no outside influence. And therefore, you have a true democratic process. Well, obviously, we know that doesn't happen now. So I want to try to, I thought I'd just bring that up as a way to just make it a way that there may be something we can do about that. And with the overhead, do we get the overhead in the evening meetings? Yeah. Yep. Yeah. Should be coming up momentarily. There we go. Now it's a five-two. We can't get, can't remove dark money, but we can try to negate it. And you can negate it by voting no on this whole at large voting for the county. Yeah, we want to negate the dark money by voting no. We don't want, we want the people to control their destiny by use, but within their districts, by voting no. We don't want, we want the people up to control that destiny by youth, but by, within the, within their districts by voting no, not being influenced by dark money. Yes, thank you. Hey, Mr. Johnson, next time you come up, if you could ask for the overhead first so we don't have that delay in the beginning, that would be great. That way he'll, he'll have it ready for you. All right. Thank you. Indeed, Mountain Jail. Anything you say. Thank you, sir. Do we have any more general public comment? Hi there. Can you move that microphone down so we can hear you? He's got up there pretty high. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. had gotten touched with the rebuild. And I have a niece and a nephew. We were actually at the house with so messed up and it's now is unlivable. And I've been trying to get some help and support to have it rebuild and get it fixed up really. It's now at the point there's no rebuilding and no being. As a matter of fact, they had the ID number change twice on it. And nothing has been done to it. We have a bipolar and artistic person that's supposed to be at an individual house and they've been homeless. And they haven't gotten any help or any assistance or anything. And I've been calling back and forth and trying to get help, trying to get some support for them. And as their child, as their provider, I have not been able to get any help or assistance. So if anybody could please looking to that or try to help us, certainly would appreciate it. I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry on their concerns and their issues and their filings with the federal emergency management as soon as they're perhaps we can get you in touch with that person if you would leave your con. Yeah, if you would leave your contact information with one of our staff here, then we can make sure that you get connected with that individual. I'll meet you too. Yeah, and I'm happy to also connect. Thank you so much. We're in this property located in St is this property located? Eastern Jonesville. And Jonesville. OK, all right. Yeah. Yeah, Miss Fields will be finished here shortly. And we'll make sure that we get your contact information because that will be there. OK, thank you, ma'am. Do we have any additional general public comment? All right. Seeing none, we will move forward with the adoption hearing from amendments to the Unified Land Development Code related to Florida Statutes and Staff Initiated Updates. Okay, good. Perfect. All right, we've we've got a motion moving staff recommendation. You're very welcome. I did we have to convene as a land of the bill. Yes, there's a couple things. I'm sorry, Madam Chair, you have to go through. Yeah, I just flipped the page and saw that. So first the the BOC now convenes is the Land Development Regulation Commission. And... In finding the amendments consistent with the Legislative County Comprehensive Plan for all of the backup and the presentations and no additions or changes since the last time we were presented this information, I would move that the Land Development Regulation Commission find the amendments consistent with the Legislative County Comprehensive Plan and adopt the amendments. Okay. We have motion a second. Do we have any public comment on these items which we've discussed at a couple of previous meetings? Seeing none, all in favor of the motion, signal by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed, like, sign? All right. We'll now reconvene as the Board of County commissioners. And. Moving approve the ordinance and authorize the chair's student on the land development code at amendments. Second. Thank you. I have also delegated a story for the signing of the Lura for all live local act applications to the County Manager. Second. Second. All right, so we have a motion on a second. Do we have any public comment to the motion? Seeing none, all in favor of the motion signified by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed, like sign? All right. Thank you. Thank you, Madam Chair. I just wanted to point out one thing in the backup which is new The heads as an effect your vote at all or I would have mentioned it prior But there is a Florida statute one two five point six six three a which requires now The business impact estimate to be included in backup for ordinances like this So I just wanted to bring that to your attention that you'll be seeing that in the future. Thank you very much. Great All right, we've already had public comment. Did county attorney, when we have any county attorney comment? No, ma'am. No, ma'am. We've already taken chair comment. We've had commission comment. I did have one item that I forgot to bring up. If you'll indulge me. I have talked to the state FDOT about a bike rodeo sometime around October, which they will come down and basically do most of the work for. But it provides kids with it. And we can ask like, I don't know, emergency fire rescue to maybe have a station or the school boards, they'd have little stations along a bike trail and they learn about bike safety and at the end of the rodeo they all get a free bike helmet and safety fittings on their bike and stuff like that. So if you guys are okay with that, I don't feel like there's going to be a whole lot of county requirement to this. It's mostly an FDOD thing, but I'm feeling okay with that. I'd like to move forward with a microdio plan with the FDOD. Can we bring that up at MTP? I am going to bring it up at MTPO, but I wanted to also bring it up here as well, because before I did that. I don't know, they approached me, so I was like, I'll see why not. And Matt and Chair, Jeff Hayes, Growth Management Director, in the past, we've usually funneled those through the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Board, who have helped get the word out. And they are also involved, but they asked me also, so it's fine. Talking about it, so. Can we refer to software for inductance? Sure, if there's anything that needs any sort of approval, we can do that. But we. Yeah. Yeah. I'm OK, right? Yeah. I just was bringing it up because they asked me about it. And I said, OK. So the DOT, I Grodeo, event to staff to bring back to us if we need to. Great, thanks Jeff. Thanks everybody. All right, a second on that. OK, second, any comments, public comment on having a bike radio? Seeing none, all in favor of the motion sickness, I'm sorry, I say aye. Any opposed, like, sign? Mr. Chessner, have anything because you weren't here for commissioning? Oh, yeah, did you have anything with that? Okay. All right. In that case, we will call this meeting adjourned. Thank you all for attending.