Music you I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. you you I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. I'm going to do a little bit of the same thing. you . Welcome everyone, happy new year. Welcome to this City Council meeting for this Tuesday, January 5th, 2021. We kicked 2020 out the door. I'd like to ask if Councilmember today, if you lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance. I'd be happy to. We got a flag. It is. Pledge of Allegiance to flag. To the flag. The United States of America. And to the legal report for which it stands. One nation under God. Under God. Under his own liberty. Just for all. Thank you. Member. Madam City clerk, please call roll. Mayor Males. Here. Mayor Pro Tem Johnston. Present. Council member Blackhurst. President. Council Member Pushing. President. Council Member Humbert. Here. Council Member Jordan-Elly. Here. Council Member Pollock. Here. Council Member Tadea. President. Council Member Watts. President? You have a choir, my honor. Excellent. Always good to have everyone here. Next approval of the regular agenda. Madam city manager, is there any changes on your end of the agenda? You're on mute. I box. You're on mute. I box. You're on mute. What a way to start the new year. I've been waiting for this all done. I'm not on that not on the administration side, you're on no changes. So, um, you know, premade and we did have a change of mayor Pro Tem, will you read that change for us? I'd be happy to. I, I, please, as you in the council, I'd like to make a motion to suspend, to, I'd like to make a motion to amend the agenda and suspend the rules pursuant to 8B, suspending rule 2B and moving item 14A and 11A in that order to be handled directly following item number five. Thank you. So that's just to clarify those are not following as well. That would be moving the executive session 14A and the general business 11A to be right after five. the next . We have a proper motion to approve the agenda with the amendment. Do we have a second? Councilmember Jordan Ellie. Thank you. Any discussion? Roll call vote Mayor Mousen yes may I put Tim Johnston yes Councilmember blackhurst yes Councilmember Cushing yes Councilmember Humbert yes Councilmember Jordan Allen yes Councilmember Pollock yes Councilmember Tudayo. Yes. Council Member Watts. Yes. Your Honor, motion passes 9 to 0. Thank you, everyone. Next is the consent agenda. Madam City Clerk, will you please read that into the record? please read that into the record. Item 3A approval of the December 1st, 2020 City Council minutes. Item 3B approval of the December 8th, 2020 City Council minutes. Item 3C, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Brighton, Colorado, designating the City of Brighton website as the public place to post notices and agendas of regular, special and other open meetings of the city council, any board, committee, commission, authority, or local public body of the city and designating city hall as the secondary location, post notices during exigent circumstances or in the event of any emergency that prevents the public from accessing notices online for the calendar year 2021 Thank you We have a motion Pleasure to counsel Councilmember or mayor pro tem Thank mr. Mayor like to make a motion to approve the consent agenda as read Mayor Pratton. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, to make a motion to approve the consent agenda as read. Thank you. We have a proper first to approve the consent agenda. Council Member Fishing. I'd be happy to second that. We have a proper first and a second. Any additional discussion? Roll call vote. Mayor Mell. Yes. Mayor Pratton, Johnston. Yes. Council Memberz. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Johnston. Yes. Council Member Blackhurst. Yes. Council Member Cushing. Yes. Council Member Humber. Yes. Council Member Jordan-Malley. Yes. Council Member Pollock. Yes. Council Member Tadeo. Yes. Council Member Watts. Yes. You're on a motion passes 9 to 0. Thank you very much. Next ceremonies item 4A. So we're in in new board and commission members. So this is based to CESA. Who do we have to do this item? Good evening Mr Mr Mayor. Good evening, City Council. Happy New Year to everyone. I'd like to ask our city clerk, Natalie Ho, to begin this item. This whole. Thank you, City Manager, by St. Sessa. I'm waiting. Kristen, do we have a look at the City Manager by Stassissa. I'm waiting. Kristen, do we have, it looks like we have John and all of our here. Do we have Jeremy? I do not see Jeremy unless it's under another name. If he is under another name, if he could raise his hand. If he is under another name, if he could raise his hand. I don't see anyone raising their hand. Okay, thank you very much. We will swear in John Morris and Oliver Shaw. If you gentlemen could raise your right hand and repeat after me. I state your name. Hi, John Morris. Do solemnly declare and affirm. Do solemnly declare and affirm. That I will support the Constitution. That I will support the Constitution of the United States. Of the United States. The Constitution of the State of Colorado. The Constitution of the state of Colorado. The Constitution of the state of Colorado. And the office of. And the office of. Planning Commission member. Planning Commission member. And will faithfully perform. And will faithfully perform. The duties of the office. The duties of the office. I'm about to enter. I am about to enter. Thank you so much gentlemen have a great night. Thank you. I'm mayor I'm not sure in a quarter minute. Okay. I'm not sure Mr. Shaw realized he was supposed to be taking the oath during that so I think we probably need to ask him to take the um Yeah, I wasn't I think I had some sound issues there. So if we can do that again for Mr Shaw Absolutely Raise your hand on a pd after me I state your name I have a shop Do solemnly declare and defer Do solemnly declare and confer Do solemnly declare and affirm. Do solemnly declare and confirm that I will support the Constitution. I will support the Constitution of the United States of the United States. The Constitution of the state of Colorado. The Constitution of the state of Colorado and the office of Colorado. Constitution of the state of Colorado. And the office of. And the office of planning commission member. Planning commission member. And will faithfully perform. And will faithfully perform the duties of the office. The duties of the office. I'm about to enter. I'm about to enter. Thank you so much, sir. Thank you so much sir. Thank you. Thank you. Congratulations Mr. Shaw and Mr. Morris for thank you for your willingness to serve on the planning commission and everybody that serves time that you all take. We also ask the community to be involved in and see if there's a board or a commission that is something that you would be willing to serve in because we need people in especially in certain commissions. So please, please consider that as a plea to the public. Thank you. Next on the agenda is public invited to be heard on matters not on the agenda. So for technology, can let us know if anybody has either hit star nine on their phone or raised their hand on the Zoom or whatever other method that we have to virtually comment them in the public. You're on or we do not have any hands up at this time. Okay. Thank you for checking on that. We'll move forward from there. So next item will move on the amended agenda item 14A. So mayor progams. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, give me one moment. No problem. There we go. I'd like to make a motion to go into an executive session for discussion of a personal matter under CRS section 24-6, that's 402, parentheses 4, parentheses F, and not involving any specific employees who have requested discussion of a personal matter under CRS section 24-6-402, parentheses 4, parentheses F and non-volving. And these specific employees who have requested discussion of the matter in open session, a member of this body or any elected official, the appointment of any person to fill an office of this body or an elected official or personnel policies that do not require the discussion of matters, personal to particular employees regarding the city attorney. Thank you. We have a proper first to go into executive session. And we have a second. Council member Kushin. I'll second that motion. Thank you. We have a proper first and a second to go into executive session. Any discussion? We'll call vote. Mayor Mell. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Johnston. Yes. Council Member Blackhurst. Yes. Council Member Pushing. Yes. Council Member Humber. Yes. Council Member Jordan Alley. Yes. Council Member Pollock. Yes. Council Member Tadeo. Yes. Councilmember Pollock. Yes. Councilmember today. Yes. Councilmember Watts. Yes. Your Honor motion passes. 90's. Thank you. We will go into executive session and we will return to the open meeting for those that are going to the executive session. There should be a link being emailed to any moment. I think Kristen emails that link. So go into that link and then we will return to the original meeting link thereafter. . . . . you . you I'm going to be it on the top right corner. I'm going to put it on the top right corner. I'm going to put it on the top right corner. The time is now 7.01 pm and the executive session has been concluded. the The time is now 7 o 1 p.m. and the executive session has been concluded. For the record, the participants in the executive session where all of the city council. Our city manager, Jane, I used to say so. Legal counsel from source, uh, Cory Hoffman and also,SA, Cory Hoffman, and also city attorney Jack Majorik. For the record of any person who has participated in the executive session believes that any substantial discussion of any matters not included in the emotion to go into executive session occurred during the executive session, or that any improper action occurred during the executive session and violation of OBA meetings law would ask that you state your concern for the record. Okay. With that, moving on. Next, as we move through our amended agenda, will be item 11A, which is a discussion in possible action after the follow up to the executive session matter. Mayor Pro Tem, would you go ahead and leave that one? Yeah thank you Mr. Mayor if it pleases you in the council I'd like to make a motion. Please do. I'd like to make a motion to immediately put our city attorney on paid administrative leave based on section 11 of his contract and appointing our deputy city attorney as acting city attorney also immediately and until further notice. We have a proper first or we have a proper emotion to place the city attorney on paid leave and to bring the deputy city attorney as the acting city attorney. Do we have a second council member Humbert? Mr. Mayor, I second that motion. We will proper first and a second. I'm sorry. Mr. Mayor, I second that motion. We'll go proper first and a second. Thank you very much. Any additional discussion to this matter? Okay, roll call vote. Hey, I'm else. Yes. May I put on Johnston? Yes. Councilmember Blackers. Yes. Councilmember Cushing. Yes. Councilmember Humbert. Yes, Councilmember Jordan-Elly. Yes, Councilmember Pollock. Yes, Councilmember today. Yes, Councilmember Watts. Yes, you're on a motion passes 9 to 0. Thank you very much. If the technology will let Lima in. So she can be a part of the meeting. Give that a moment to occur. And then we'll move forward to the rest of the agenda. All right. Thank you very much. Next item on the agenda is item 6A and ordinance of the city council of the city of Brighton, Colorado, approving a zoning map amendment of an approximately 5.535 acre area of land to be known as the water treatment plant expansion property, generally located in the Northwest Quadrant quarter of section 15, township oneself rain 66 west of the sixth principal meridian, city of Brighton, county of Adams, state of Colorado, to a zoning designation of public lands. So, let's see here. First of all, I'd like to verify with our city clerk that the necessary postings and publications were done. Thank you, Your Honor. If you could just open the public hearing really quick. Oh, I meant to sorry. Let me officially open the public hearing with quick. Oh I meant to sorry let me officially open the public hearing with my virtual gable now. Thank you yes you are the notice of public hearing was published on the City of Brighton website on December 11 2020. Thank you very much so yep this is a public hearing Thank you very much. So, yep, this is a public hearing. Next city manager by East Assa, who will be presenting today. Yes, yes, Your Honor. Thank you. Good evening to everyone again. Presenting I believe will be our senior planner, Mr. Mike Tilka and also to help address any questions and perhaps also give some of the presentation as well. We have the Utilities Project Engineer Matt Amadeh. So Mr. Tulka. Thank you city manager and thank you Mr. Mayor. Well, good evening, Mayor. Member of 10 council members has mentioned on Mike Toka. Other community development department's planning division and I'm here as your city staffs representative for this item. The applicant, as mentioned, is the City of Branch Utilities Department, Matt Emaday, is the representative here tonight, and the City of Brighton is the property owner. Getting started, as for the City's strategic focus area, this application can be thought of to fit under recognizable and well-planned community. For those unfamiliar with the location of this item, I've just highlighted it in red on the map with a circle. It's generally located to the southwest of the intersection of Bromley Lane in Judicial Center Drive. Looking a bit closer at the property on the right hand corner of your screen, it is in approximately 5.535 acre property comprised of a current plated for lots. The property owner desires to expand the city's water treatment facility onto this property. And as such, the applicant is requesting a zone change to public lands as their zone district. A zone change is necessary as the applicant desires to use the property for land use that is not allowed under the existing zone district. For those in the audience unfamiliar with the process, rezoning is the second step in the land development process and the city clerk's favorite step in that process. A replat will be required before site development can occur as the applicant desires to combine the existing lots. The replat will be administratively reviewed and approved per the city's land use and development code, and a site plan, also administratively reviewed and approved will be required to ensure the proposed developments compliance with city codes and policies. When considering this zone change, the city council should use the review criteria outlined in the land use and development code section 2.03B. In summary, those include, but are not limited to alignment with the comprehensive plan and other plans and policies of the city, supporting and compatibility with uses and character of the nearby areas, the ability to be served by the appropriate city and agency facilities, and that it will serve a community need that warns this zone change and then any other recommendations by appropriate reviewing agencies and entities. As the rezoning is reviewed, it is important to refer back to their criteria in section 2.03b to ensure consistency in review. be to ensure consistency in review. As for a bit of background on our proposal, currently, the property has a zoning designation of town center, which is a commercial designation, and that's under the Bromley Park Plan Unit Development Second Amendment that PUD. The subject property was annexed in 1985 as part of the Bromley Park annexation that covered a good deal of that section of the city. As I mentioned, it's currently planted as four lots. Those are lots one, two, three, and four of the existing Bromley Park PUD, Sen. Amendment rezoning, it was Zoned Town Center, commercial, and that's, it is remained as sense. The property was planned at that time to be developed as four commercial pad sites. The applicant, the city's utility department, is seeking to re-zone it to allow the expansion of that existing water treatment plant, which as you see on the aerial is to the immediate west of the subject properties for tonight. And again, it's important for council to consider the rezoning under the entire scope of uses that could be allowed in that new zone district, not just that plant that is currently being proposed by our utilities partners. So to aid in determining if this area is right for rezoning, let us look at the surrounding uses in zone districts shown on the left hand side here. To the north, across Bromley, we have industrial warehousing and distribution uses zoned as the K-Mart Distribution Center PUD. To the south, we have the city's Bikenscape Park zoned as public lands, and then we have a small drainage track zoned as part of the PUD Second Amendment. To the east, we have a landscaped open space track and drainage pond also zoned as part of the Bromley Park beauty second amendment into the west. We have that existing facilities plant that's zoned as public lands already so that's what we have surrounding our subject area in properties for tonight. Moving on, the future land use portion of B Brighton or Comprehensive Plan has designated this area as appropriate for mixed use commercial. While the rezoning of the property to public lands is not generally compatible with this use designation, the property is surrounded by public land zoning to the west and south already. The property is not adjacent public land zoning to the West and South already. The property is not adjacent to any future commercial development. Additionally, to the immediate east, there is a permanent drainage pond in open space that supports existing development in roadways. To the north, that former K-Mart Distribution center site has new tenants and it is likely to continue with its current operations for some time. So it will stay in that manufacturing industrial capacity. Given these factors, it is unlikely that our subject 5.535 acres would be deemed prime commercial land anymore. The Comprehensive Plan, it has provisions that seek to expand retail housing and employment opportunities throughout our city. The use of this property for a public utilities facility that will directly support and allow such future development of our city can be thought of as a way that's this rezoning does support provisions in the comprehensive plan, even if it is not in direct alignment with that future land use map, which is only one section of our comprehensive plan. Land use and development code, such in 4.05 E states that quote, the public lands district is specifically intended to promote necessary public services in Cloak's proximity to the lands, uses in buildings they support and quote. And it is, and that it is intended to provide public and semi public facilities and convenient locations, efficient formats in a manner that protects the character and context of the surrounding areas that the use of this site is permitted only with the design that ensures it fits in to the context of the area and with the development patterns of the area. Moving on, her or our Land Use and Development Code, this city council in making its decision shall use the following criteria as found in section 2.03 feet. So for the record, how read those criteria ending of a brief response. Number one, the proposal is in accordance with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan and any other plan policy or guidance adopted pursuant to that plan. As stated earlier, the properties rezoning will help support the policies of the plan. the property's rezoning will help support the policies of the plan. Number two, the proposal will support the development in character with existing or anticipated development in the area, including the design of the street civic space is another open space, the pattern scale and format of buildings and sites in the integration transitions and compatibility with other uses. The development of the land has an allowed use under the public land zone district, along with the city's specific development codes, the newly adopted ones last year, will ensure that the site develops with the context of the area in mind. As mentioned earlier, the surrounding uses are compatible with the use of the property as a city fatalities facility and others as allowed in the zoning district. Number three, the city or other agencies have the ability to provide services or facilities that may be necessary for anticipated uses in the proposed district. This rezoning will allow for the city to serve new growth if it is developed as an expansion to the existing facility and other uses on the site in surrounding areas can be served. Number four, the change will serve a community need, amenity or development that is not possible under the current zoning or that was not anticipated at the time of the initial zoning of the property. The use as a public utilities facility for water treatment would serve a community need and it is not possible to develop the property under the existing zoning. And lastly, number five, the recommendation of our land use and development code. public notice and comment. It's not necessary to state that all mailings were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the proposal as required by code. These mailings were sent on December 11th of last year. It included a detailed letter describing the proposed rezoning as well as a the subject area for those receiving that letter. Public hearing sign was also posted on December 11th adjacent to Bromley Lane, and notice was published on the city's website that very day. As of the beginning of this meeting, planning staff has not received any inquiries or comments from the public regarding this project. City staff from our communications and engagement team has published public hearing information on various forms of social media in the days leading up to this meeting. As four recommendations, our planning commission heard the request on December 10th of last year and recommended approval unanimously. All required forms of notification in additional ones on social media took place before that planning commission meeting. Staff, including our Development Review Committee, finds that the proposal meets the review criteria found in section 2.03B of the Land Use and Development Code and is therefore recommending approval of the zoning map amendment for the property to public lands. Staff has prepared a draft ordinance for approval of this proposed rezoning if council deemed it necessary to use that and it was included in tonight's meaning packet. At this time this city council has four options it can make after reviewing this application. Those are two, one, approve the zoning map amendment, the ordinance has drafted two, approve the zoning map amendment, the amended ordinance, or three, deny the zoning map amendment, the ordinance with specific findings to justify that denial? Or for, continue the item to be heard at a later specified date if this council feels it needs additional information to ensure compliance with our land use and development code in those criteria. Thank you all again for your time and attention this evening. And I look forward to any questions. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Thank you, Mr. Tilka. You wanna share your screen? First of all, I know the city is the applicant, so I don't really need to ask if they have anything to add. And then I need to also ask if there's questions of the applicant from the audience. So the technology can confirm if anybody's got questions regarding this or move ahead. You're on or we do not have any hands up. Thank you. And then is there anybody here to speak on behalf or against the request? I see none also. And then next questions from the council comments. Council member Watts. Just wanted to say just one of the thank Mr. Tilker for the great presentation. And just haven't seen him in a while. I heard from him in a while. So I just wanted to say it was great to see you again into the presentation, but it was awesome as always. And any question I would have had was definitely already answered in that presentation. Thank you. Happy New Year. Thank you. Yeah, echo that. It's great to see Mr. Tilka. I was wondering I hadn't seen him in a while. So Councilmember Pollock. Thank you, Mayor. Thank you, Mayor. Thank you, Mr. Tilt, that was a wonderful presentation, certainly understand it. At this time, if I'm able to, I would like to make a motion to approve the amendment. And Maryanne, we can't, we're still in the public hearing part, so we can't do that yet, but I'll try to keep you in mind when we get to that point. Thank you. Who else has questions? Questions only first. Okay. Oh, councilmember Jordan-Elli. Yes, Mr. Toka. Good to see you and kind of an off off the road question, but this water will serve what part of Brighton? All of it all the way down to the plant or which a good evening Councilmember Jordan-Elli and thank you happy new year. I think that question is probably best directed to our Utilities Project Engineer, Matt Amadeh. Good afternoon, Mayor Counsel. Yeah, as Mike said, so this water, it'll be at the treatment facility and after it goes through the treatment process, it's actually pumped up to our tanks that you see just off bridge or Bromley there. So it'll actually go up and then it just distributes through the entire system. So everybody will get it. You know, we do have that Thornton interconnect down south. So you do have to know that, you know, it's also pushing water into the system, but generally this water will be provided to everybody. Oh good, because I always I'm going to get some of that down the road. Thanks. But I'll have questions. Okay, with that, I will officially close the public hearing. And I know councilmember Pollock would like to make a motion. I would thank you, Mayor. I would like to make a motion to approve the amendment ordinance as drafted. Six a right. Six a right. Six a yes. Thank you. We have a proper motion to approve 6 a do we have a second. Councilmember walk. Yes, sir. Thank you. I look to definitely second that. Proper first and the second. Any additional discussion to this matter. All right. Roll call vote. Mayor Males. Yes. May I put him Johnston. Yes. Councilmember Blackhurst. Yes. Councilmember Cushing. Yes. Council member Humber. Yes. Council member Jordan-Malley. Yes. Council member Pollock. Yes. Council member today. Yes. Council member Watts. Yes. Your motion passes 9-0. Thank you much. Thank you much. Move on the head. Item 7a, an ordinance of the city council of the city of Brighton, Colorado, amending certain sections of Article 4. No, excuse me, Article 2-4 of the Brighton Municipal Code pertaining to city council. So this is based assessor. Do we have our acting city attorney here for this? Yes, we do, you honor. I just would to answer any questions that you may have. Lena? Thank you. Hello, Mayor and members of council as the city manager mentioned, you had previously had a presentation regarding this in a recent study session. This is, if you remember, the ordinance to amend the code sections, specifically sections 30, 40, and 60 of article 2-4. There will be a resolution if council is to approve this on first reading. There will be a resolution being presented at the next council meeting to amend the rule changes to your procedures. So this is just to amend those code sections. And I'm open to answering questions as best as I can. Thank you for joining the kind of last minute away. Councillor Mayor Pro Tem, I see your hand. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Yeah, this was put together very well by our former city attorney now. And you and your team, Mr. McLean, I just want to say, I read through it all, I hope we all did, and just saw the bold words and the changes. There's more to come, and we need to work on this. And I'm going to say this again on public right, we need to set up a committee, and I would love to be part of it. Two, three, four, I don't care how many and like really go through those rules and some of the code stuff individually and then bring it back to council It's really important and a lot of it has been covered here. There's a lot more so but other than that I'd love to make a motion. I love the idea of forming a committee that you'll dive deeper in this and have council involvement. Well before you make any motion, is there any other question? Councilmember Humbert? Yeah, I think that my concern might be addressed by a committee, but I kind of think that we should try to revert back to meetings that last no longer than four hours. And I see head bobbing. I don't know if that's a yes or no from the mayor pro tem. I think if we were to do that, it's either adjusting our start time or or adjusting the hard end time that we have 11 o'clock to make a 10 o'clock. So that's something to consider. It wouldn't be the hard end time in case we have a special or a executive session, but but I think that I think we should talk about that. Oh, that's great. That's a great. The only way to serve on that committee. And I won't go any further than that. I can give you a long argument. I won't. No problem. Have some member, Jordan Nilly? The only thing I'll add is I talked to a previous council member and it's been going this way forever. I mean, sometimes they used to meet till 1 a.m. So we're not doing anything new. You know, Well, we don't think well at 1 a.m. So that's why we have some of these in place. I'm just saying it was not like we're doing something new. Anybody else? Council member Cushing. Thank you, Mayor. Yeah, I mean, prior to this, we met from 7 to 11. And now we moved it back to 6, but we're still kind of going to the same time so I understand council member Humbers point. I would advocate that we move it back to the 10 and allow to additional 30 minute extensions. I think 15 minutes, I mean, if we're going to extend, let's extend, right? I mean, 50 minutes isn't really even enough time to finish much of anything. So I would argue maybe we set it to 10, allow for two 30 minute extensions upon motion and approved by the majority of council. And I would also like to see if it's possible to add a time limit on how long we speak. I know some of us have gotten long-winded in the past. And I would advocate that we set like a 10 minute a rule that we speak for 10 minutes. And we have two rounds. You know, each council member can speak twice and then that's it and we move on. That's my thoughts. Thank you. I think, Calvin, you make a great point. Council member pitching to everybody else, but I think that having this discussion as a committee to really dive deep into this is really going to be key to making this right. I think we should still consider approving this as put together, but still put a committee together and see what else we can do. It includes that kind of stuff like what you said, the role extension in a half hour increment, but move our end time to 10 o'clock and I do like that. I'll remember what's. in a half hour, but move our end time to 10 o'clock. And I do like that. That's a member of Watts. Thank you, Ms. Mayor. I appreciate Council Member Kishin's comments on that. I agree with that. I know we don't want to really get into this right now. I want to kind of get that committee form and do that, but I agree with that. But I was going to mention about the limiting the time on Council speaks on the subject. So that don't think anybody really gets long winded. I mean, I'm looking at a couple of the squares right now, but I would like to add that if there is gonna be a time limit, I'd like to be in control of that buzzer, that would shut them off if possible, please. If there is gonna be a buzzer. I'm gonna advocate for a gong, but that's gonna leave it that to the committee here. No, but I agree with all this. And I think with, like you did at your point, I think we should go ahead and get this part approved and then get that committee formed. Because I think that's an awesome idea. And I would love to see that we have maybe a goal, a vision setting session again and have it as where we discuss this one subject of it. And have more of those vision settings, but have one where we can just sit down and really go over this part of it and get all of council involved because there are a lot of things that could be looked to be in change, not that they're bad, it just, you know, with the times. So, and I'm all for starting at noon, also on Tuesdays and ending at 11. That's all. oh my gosh. That's all thanks. I'll hit that buzzer now. Thanks. Gong. Okay. Council member Lackers. Mayor of this is the group you time. I'd like to make motion to approve seven a. Is that correct? Yes, seven eight. We're a proper motion to approve seven a is that correct? Yes seven a We're a proper motion of approve seven a Councillor Mayerburg them. I'd be happy to second and would like to make a comment quickly. Yeah. I totally agree with all of you. This is what we need to do this quicker than what it's been discussed for two years now and it's time to make it happen with the committee and a couple of the ideas coming from Councillor Humberton Councillor Cushing and makes them. But I'm definitely would like to second this move this forward and whatever we do with the city attorney upcoming it needs to be like the number one priority is to help with this as we go forward. Make sure we change. Thanks. That will be the proper first and the second additional discussion. Right. Roll call vote. Mayor miss. Yes. May I put it to him, Johnston? Yes. Council member blackhurst. Yes. Council member kishin. Yes. Council member Humber. Yes. Council member Jordan Ellie. Yes. Council member Pollock. Yes. Councilmember Humber. Yes. Councilmember Jordan-Elly. Yes. Councilmember Pollock. Yes. Councilmember today. Yes. Councilmember Watts. Yes. Your motion passes 9-0. Great. Thank you very much. All right. Next, ordinance is for final consideration item 8a. I mean, we've already talked about these on ordinance of the city council of the city of Brighton, Colorado, I'm ending certain sections of Title 3 of the Brighton Municipal Code pertaining to that sales tax code. And this is a final reading. City manager based assessoror would we have the. Yes, we've got presentation, but I guess this is more follow up. Yeah, we because this is a second reading your honor and again, as the city council knows, there are no changes. This is finally, as you said, so staff. It has no presentation to give to the city council. However, we are here to answer any questions that you may have. And with us for this item for ABA, we do have our sales tax supervisor on a list. Excuse me. You said it one more time. Just with it. There you go. I'm going to try. And then our finance director, Maria Austrom. I will practice next time. Thank you. And you're on with that. I'll turn it over to them and to see if the City Council has any questions and we're here to and happy to answer any questions that you may have. Thank you. Thank you City Manager and Good evening City. Thank you, City Manager and Goodie Me City Council. As the City Manager just said, this is a second reading. There are no changes from when you first heard about this in December. So just as a reminder of this ordinance addresses those tax collection in particular by online sellers, remote sellers marketplace facilitators. It makes the rules clear and fair with regards to sales tax collection by remote sellers and market place facilitators. And then the ordinance also includes some cleanup items to the licensing code. So with that said, Maria and I are available for any questions you may have. Thank you. Any questions or comments from the council? Remember we did have a vote on this in the past. May I break them? If you please you may or I'd like to make a motion. Please. I'd like to make a motion to approve item 8A. Motion to approve item 8A. We have a second. Council member, today. Thank you, mayor. I'd be happy to second that. We have a prop first and a second. Any additional discussion? Okay, we'll call it. I'm going to go to the next floor. We'll call them. Mayor Males. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson. Yes. Councilmember Blackburns. Yes. Councilmember Cushing. Yes. Councilmember Humber. Yes. Councilmember Jordan-Nellie. Yes. Councilmember Pollock. Yes. Councilmember today. Yes. Councilmember. Councilmember. Councilmember. Councilmember. What. Yes. Your animation passes. Thank you. Move ahead. Item eight. B. An ordinance of the city council of the city of Brighton, Colorado, approving a lease agreement with almost home. And for city own real property located at 22 South 4th Avenue, which is the historic city hall and authorizing the city manager to execute said lease agreement on behalf of the city and this is a final read. City manager do we have I guess the same kind of thing. It is the same your honor, you know, in City Council. We've given this presentation to you in the past. This is final, there are no changes. But under these next three items, we do have here available for you to help answer any questions that you may have. We do have our Senior Management Analyst, Nicole Samson, and also our finance director, Marie Austro. So with that, I will turn it over to either Miss Samson or Miss Austro. Good evening. So this is the second reading of the ordinance regarding leasing space at historic city hall to three nonprofits. The first one is almost home. The second one that you will see is Rocky Mountain Quarter Horse Association and the third one is American Highland Catalos Association. The first reading on these ordinances was on December 15th and there are no changes from the first reading. The rental rates on all three leases is $5.71 a square foot and each lease ends December 31st of this year. While this rental rate will not recoup the full cost to operate historic City Hall, it goes a long way to offset the cost of the city would be to cover if this building were vacant. I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Questions for Samson or Miss Osterman? I'm some member of Blackhurst. When you say this won't recoup the full cost of operation, does that mean for the entire building or does that mean if you took their size of their lease area and pro-rated that with a total cost would have covered their total cost figured with their square foot. Does that make sense? Yeah, and that's a good question. What we figure is at about $21.65 a square foot to operate historic city hall. So they are paying $5.71 a square foot. So, more towards the second part of your question was that ultimately it's not paying, certainly isn't paying the whole cost of historic city hall. And it's more of a, we're giving them a per rated lease rate. So I guess I have to follow up with that. You're killing us that it costs $21 plus per square foot for us to have janitorial and electric service for that building. Yes. Yes. Hi. Thank you, Councilor. That's a great question. for that building? Yes. Can I? Yes. Hi. Thank you, Councillor Over. That's a great question. So it's more than janitorial and utilities. We, you, you may recall, we invested a lot of money into this building over the last five years. And have some COPs outstanding. We made some investments in the HVAC system. We made some investments in the HVAC system. We made some investments in the booth. And so all of those costs are factored in. It makes the building better, but it's an expensive building to pay for right now. Yeah, that makes a lot more sense. Yes, yes, yes, yes, it makes a lot more sense. But I just have to make this final comment. It's kind of ironic that for all of the years, the city used that building for office purposes for the most of the city except for the police department. And we didn't invest anywhere close to that. As soon as we move out, let's take up a new residence. We put millions in a whole new heating and air conditioning, new windows, like you say, new roof. I just find that ironic. Thank you. I appreciate it. You next, Mayor Potem. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Great questions, Councillor Blackhurst. I mean, I'm willing to give $15 a square foot to almost home. And I've said this before, we're giving them $15 for square. And I, the great point to made, Councilor Blackhurst, but why it's that much and well answered Director Osterman, Samson, I just, they're still the, I love that we're helping almost home. That is a crucial organization that affects our residents. And so I'm going to advocate one more time because this is my last chance that we do not go forward with the other two leases. But this one I definitely all in with almost home. So I'd like to make a motion and I'll blow the eight on the other two when they do come up. But the I'd love to make a motion if that pleases you, Mr. Mayor. Sure. Could like to make a motion to approve item 8B. I'll first approve 8B. Second. Remember, Humbert. I will second that, but in every one of these items A through C, D, I'm sorry, there's an error in the address. It's not consistent. Then we need to go through and search for the word street and replace it with avenue. It's fourth Avenue. And at some point we can get somebody can complain about that, but I think having the proper legal official postal address is probably pretty important at least. And I went through and I looked into some places. So the best way to do it is search to the document and find each street and change it to an avenue. That's it. Well, I'll second the motion, but with that along with it. The great catch council member, Humbert. I saw it in the ordinance, but I did not notice that. And at least until you just mentioned that, I pulled it up and sure enough there it is. So we will need to get that corrected before I can sign on that. All right. Point of order, you're on right believe because of that. I think we need to, I need to withdraw my motion and make a new one, is that correct? We need to, could you help us with that? Do we need to do that? I think these would be what we would consider like a scribe there's error and we could fix them after, you know, after the before you sign them. We are allowed to make certain changes at the discretion of the city attorney and I would consider this just a scribe there's error and we will fix them before they go to signature. If that's acceptable to you all. Okay. The great fine counts are Humberton. I'm fine to leave my motion intact with that legal advice. Thanks. I live a proper first and second. Is there any additional discussion? And this is specific to the almost homelys. Council member Jordanelli. Yeah, I wanted to ask you a question. This is specific to the almost home lease. I'm from member Jordan Ellie. Yeah, I wanted to ask how long are those COPs? Are they 30 year, 20 year, 10 year, what are they? They go through the year 2034. I think off the top of my head. Okay, thanks. Yes. All right. Anybody else? Okay, roll call though. Mayor Mills? Yes. Mayor Pro Temp Johnston? Yes. Council Member Blackhurst? Yes. Council Member Cushing? Yes. Council Member Humber? Yes. Council Member Jordan-Elly? Yes. Council Member Pollock? Yes. Council Member Tadea? Yes. Council Member today. Yes. Council Member what? Yes. Your Anemotion passes 9 to 0. Thank you. Next item. 8c an ordinance of the city council of the city of Brighton, Colorado. Approving a lease agreement with Rocky Mountain Corridor Horace Association for city-owned real real property located at 22 south 4th Avenue the historic city hall and authorizing the city manager to execute said lease agreement on behalf of the city and this is a final reading so then anybody have any questions towards this specific lease agreement? Councilmember Blackhurst. I would just like to carry on from Mayor Pro Tem, John says comments on these next two with a couple of points. I don't disagree with his, his, the principle of what he's saying. But, but here's some things to think about. Number one, this is pretty late in the game for us to tell a tenant, oh, by the way, you're out of there because we've changed our mind on how we price this. That's not fair. Number two, even though we have a lot of money invested in that city hall building, that's not prime real estate. No kid yourself. To have an office building in an office rental within that building, I seriously doubt and maybe Anne could give us more specific information, but I doubt we would be able to draw quote the going rate just because of limitations, limited visibility, it would take a special client. And I'm not sure that getting $5 square foot isn't better than getting zero. I think this is something we need to work on to what our staff to work on during this coming year to try to achieve something a little more equitable. And I think they know what our council's feelings are. I'm not sure we're ever going to be able to get market value. I mean, we still have space so we can't use there. So those are some thoughts. I'm not sure we're ever going to be able to get market value. I mean, we still have space so we can't use there. So those are some thoughts. I'm not disagreeing with the concept. The mayor pro tem is put out there in terms of they should be a little more equitable. But these are nonprofits. We say we're agricultural friendly. Orses and cows are agriculture. I think there's a little bit of a double speak if we treat them like everybody else. Thank you. Thank you council member of Blackers. I would concur. You're never gonna, with this kind of real estate and the way it's put together, you're not gonna get lead recovery on the market to get those, at least out the way we ended it. But I do want us to always consider getting that closer to that market as close as possible. Otherwise, I don't see us filling those spaces. But next, Mayor Podem. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I definitely respect those comments from Councillor Blackhurst and the Mayor. I do. I understand. And that is a pragmatic look at this. We've been talking about this building for years, probably years before. And we constantly are can-kicking down roads with this. And this is kind of another one of those. But I always want, I'm going to say this for the next two items that we have in front of us and I'll say this for more issues as we go forward. I'd like us to all ask ourselves if we went out to the public to our residents and we put up to a vote. All of these leases right here and we said I'd like you as taxpayers to pay $15 a square foot extra compared to any bit of value to actually run that building for these two organizations. That is different than almost home. Almost home is something that deserves that $15 of taxpayer money because that's what we're doing. Always remember that. They deserve it. They need it. And I'm telling you, these other organizations, they would be voted down by a larger margin than the recall. It would be a landslide victory if we took this for my side of this. If we said hey would you pay $15 a square foot for the next year for out of historic city hall? So what I'm saying, for a quarter horse association, which most people don't know exists, and the Highland cattle, American Highland cattle. Yeah, we've put enough money into agriculture with not enough return already. And I think that if we talked about this city going down that agricultural path and we let the citizens vote on it. They would overwhelmingly say no, we don't want to continue down that path with our tax money. And I just want to consider that as we go forward. I also wouldn't going to vote no on this item and the next because I don't believe that this will, this is going to be a year away, another year away. Who knows? A year from now, many of us might not be on council. But it'll be another council that deals with this. And it's just, the city hall needs to be either sold, or we need to get market value, or we need to use city, run city facilities and move them into there. But I'm not gonna ever be okay with this lease or the next. Well, I know I'm not going to change to many minds here. So I'm always standing more time. But I'm really considered that if you would, the taxpayers would not be okay if they're watching us as close as I wish they were on us paying for those leases. They're too low. But I also want to say one more thing is Miss Samson, you've done a great job and direct roster. You've both done good jobs and trying to get the price up because it was worse before, but I still don't think we're there. So I'm gonna still remain. I know, thank you. Thank you very much. Remember Humbert? Yeah, I seem to remember from last time and I'd like Miss Samson and Miss Ostrom to tell me if I'm right, but it's my understanding there. All of these are nonprofits, number one. They do give scholarships, which come back into our community, number two, but number three, that these leases are for one year. And I thought it was my understanding when we voted in the first time, two weeks ago, that we were going to warn them that the rents were going to go up. warn them that the rents were going to go up, not necessarily exponentially, but more than incrementally for those particular nonprofits next year. This gives them a year to find more real estate. Am I wrong? I thought that was a discussion it was made. I don't think I was hallucinating. So you're correct. First of all, they are all nonprofit organizations and some of them do offer scholarships. The two here, I do believe offer scholarships to those usually through 4- H type programs. And then your third question, you're correct. For my notes, it says that council would be like to move them up to $10 a square foot. And so we've been notifying these nonprofits that your lease ends December 31st of this year. If you do not think you're gonna be able to be paying at a level of $10 a square foot, please start looking now. Thank you. Glad to find that. Next, Councilmember Cushion. Thank you, Mayor. Yeah, so I mean, I think the thing has kind of been said that we need to remember is that real estate is kind of commercial real estate is kind of in the toilet. There's not a, I don't think we have a line of people wanting this space. I mean, we've got the depot, which has been, you know, it's a beautiful building and we don't it's been sitting empty we have nobody who wants to move in there and so it seems to me that leasing out to the space that's likely to just remain empty to a nonprofit that's you know a good cause seems to make sense to me if there were other nonprofits that we're lining up wanting space. I think that might be a consideration, but I don't think we have, you know, I don't think we have other people clamoring you get in there. So it seems to make sense to me that we lease it and you know, fill up that space instead of leaving it empty. Just a lot of... You have good points. Remember to Dale. Thank you, Mayor. I agree with a lot of what has been said, first of all, yes, like Council Member Cushing just said, the commercial rules that market is not doing well and we don't, I mean, I would like to see the city reach out to see if there are other organizations that would like to take residents or you know rents space in the building because we may not I mean the ones that are there we're telling them $10 a square foot they may leave because of that but do we have somebody else that's willing to pay $10 a square foot that, but do we have somebody else that's willing to pay $10 a square foot? That's a big question, but yeah, I would like to see some, some, some effort, you know, in that direction to see if there are others that might be interested. And, you know, in regards to the comment, Mayor Pro Tem made about the residents not wanting us to spend their money in that way. So to speak, I think that they would be even more upset if we push away somebody who is willing to pay something rather than nothing during that one year term that we can be looking for someone else. And I do like the fact that I mean, I know almost home is a great organization. I believe that the other two are also very good organizations and probably do a lot of really great things. They're up to the scholarships that people mention and whatnot. But to get top dollar real estate in this day and age in the commercial world is very, very difficult. Anyway, that's all I have. Thank you. Thank you. Anybody else? Remember. Jordan Ellie. So I don't think we got this answer last time. Who actually does the leasing of the property? What is the buck stop? I'm a little confused by your question. It's the city that's entering into the lease. So you would the city manager directs us the staff to do what the council wants done. So we don't really have a realtor. We just kind of wing it as a city. You are. That's what we that's what we talked about last time is that we don't have a plan. So anybody that's all negative on commercial, I'm telling you commercial is the easiest thing in the world, because there's so many negotiation points. You can just negotiate the heck out of those leases and throw anything in the tank in there to get to get incentives. So I go back to what I said last time we talked about this is we got to get a plan and like I said, all these amount give me a commission. My point is commercial real estate is going for 40 bucks a square foot in Denver. I know a lot of people drive 20 miles a pay 15. You know, we just start marketing this thing and we don't have a plan. So I'm just going back to what I said last time. All the tenants are on a year notice. I'm fine giving them a year. Take make up your mind. But in the meantime, let's get our plan nailed down and let's get some marketing going on this property. And God knows what can happen in commercial real estate. I mean, I'm pushing miracles in commercial real estate because of the because of the negotiation factor. You can negotiate so many things in the deal. So anyway, I remember talking about this film. Okay, thank you. Next, anybody else? I'm before council. Well, let's see. Manager, I used to assess. You have something to say. Yes, thank you. Thank you. I have been listening to the comments. And staff is is well aware of the remarks made by the City Council at the last meeting. And obviously, this is something that we will be working on this year and to see what we can do to make improvements. But again, we thank you for your time. And this is something that we will research further and we're hoping to improve as we move forward. Don't take it personally. No, no, not at all. Your Honor, you made some really good points. And we concur with you. We really do. But again, we're doing our best right now to at least we are getting more than what we've done in the past. I think our staff has done a great job. We've made it so that everybody is the same. If you recall, in the past, many of these contracts were all different. We're looking to make them all commit to the same type of agreement that we've done in the past. We've done a better job in terms of the administration of this agreement. And we're going to move forward with many of the recommendations that the City Council has made. And we'll come back and we'll do our best to improve this. Again, I know this is a property that we still have to take a look at, and I know it's an issue that the city council will need to address, whether they want to continue to have it as a city property or use it as a least space for nonprofits or any other thing. So for now, this gives us a little bit of time to look at this matter a little closer and then come up with some good solid recommendations for the city council to consider. Okay, so thank you, Your Honor. Okay, any key points, thank you. All right, decided to be for council. Mayor Potem. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I need to, I need to relay another comment is the idea of us saying yes now is another year of this. Do you all understand that this was the easiest way for us to get a few extra dollars. We have to hire somebody to book into all, have you all seen the emails? And what, we all asked the question. And our city manager did a great job of getting us the answers with her staff. How much land do we own? What properties do we have? Have you seen the list? We need to put this on a, we need someone that is a professional because what Councillor Tornelli is saying, I totally disagree with Councillor Tadeo saying that we're not gonna be able to get more. We didn't try because we haven't gone out to the market. We have to go to the market and see, I guarantee you we could get more. But the easiest thing to do is say, hey, we're gonna add a few more dollars here, set another year at least. And it's only a few more dollars extra. And of course they're gonna say yes and want this. Of course they are. I think the more I hear about this, the more outrageous this whole thing is, is that we're back here again. I'm telling you, we've been here before and we keep on kicking that can. And now we're kicking the can with taxpayer money for another year. So I guess one question is, if we hired somebody to actually do this job and go out to the market and see what's up, could we get them? Are these leases sealed for a year? So they get this for a year sealed? Like we can't move on that property for a year. the property for a year. Meaning we can't kick those tenons out. We can't give them a 30 60 day notice and market the stamp thing and see what's real because I don't believe it's real that we can't get the money out of this more. I don't believe that I think we can get way more money out of this. We can't do the same BCs, but. Sure, we could simultaneously start marking this right now, saying that there's current space available in historic city hall. So if we were to go up and market it, we would have the availability at this point, depending on how much space someone needs to start leasing it at a higher rate for anybody starting now. I'm not sure we would need to kick any of these current lease tenants out in order to offer that. So we're not marketing open space that's in Old City Hall right now. We're not marketing that at all. At this point we hadn't been marketing it. No. Okay. So that's a concern. And it's not directed to you, any of you, that's a concern. We, let's discuss hiring somebody to do that this job because it's more important. I did not know we'd never marketed any open spaces in there. So, and the other question just for taxpayers, since I mentioned it, is that $21 per square foot based on the open space also or if those open spaces were filled with that $21 per square foot go down for each tenant. No, it's $21 square foot to just keep the lights on and keep that building open right now because of the investments we've made in it. Whether there's people in it or not, it's really about $21 to square foot. Okay, perfect. Thank you very much. I won't talk on the next item. I know I've taken up a lot of time on this and I'm a no on this one. I'm a no on the next. So I hope that we move in a better direction that he's building. And maybe I can ask a point of clarification. The reason we've been marketing this right now is I believe there's a question that council had posted staff to find out if we were going to put in some city services specifically the court services in that building. And we hesitate to create more leases until we have any answer for you. Great point, great point in a sense. So that's totally true. We have not given you the correct direction with the votes to move in any other direction. So I appreciate that very true. And one more thing, City Council, and finance director, remind me, please, and correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't we looking if we haven't already hired an individual to take a look at these properties to help us do just that to consider whether or not this facility is feasible for lack of a better word to in order to make it into another city facility aren't we looking at that right now in amongst other buildings that we have? You are correct. We're about ready to put that scope out for RFP to hire a consultant to look at all city properties and come back to council and make recommendations on kind of highest and best use. And whether that best use might be a recommendation to sell the property or to change it to a different use. You are correct. So that yet has to come City Council and those are all things that respectfully will take a little bit of time. But as you know, we want to make sure that we give you the best recommendation that we can. One that has been reviewed by a professional individual and can come back and give us some good solid answers. So if you can please bear with us for just a little while, we sincerely appreciate it. What's the potential timeline on that, Jane? Oh my goodness. I guess I have to... Brown, I'm not going to stick you to an exact timeline. Oh, I hate that kind of question because I do. I think it'll take a... It's not going to be an overnight type thing because we have, as you know, we have quite a few facilities. So depending on how we, we write this, hopefully it won't take longer than a few months because we do own quite a few number of buildings. Your owners, you well know. So, um, maybe sometime in the summer, we could expect to hear back about this. Yes, definitely. How about greater human discussion in a work session? Yes. Yes. I think that's a big desire of this council right now. Yes, and we, that is why we're doing this, to honor. And yes, we will come back. OK, thank you. And remember, Blocker. To move this along, let's go to vote. And I would make a motion to approve eight B. It would be eight C. We've already done B. Okay. C. C is C. Yes. Yes. All right. Councilmember today. I'm going to go to the second. Yes. Yes. All right. Councilmember today. Thank you. I would love to second. First and second. Any additional discussion. I know we talk a lot. Okay. We'll call them. Mayor. Yes. Mayor. Yes. May I approach them, Johnston? No. Council member blockers? Yes. Council member Cushing? Yes. Council member Humber? Yes. Council member Jordan Alley? Yes. Council member Pollock? No. Council member Chadea? Yes. Council member Watts? Yes. Toronto motion passes seven to two. Thank you. the city council. Yes. Yes. Yes. Thank you. I recall that might have been the same. When we initially talked about this. Next item 8D. In ordinance of the city council of the city Brighton Colorado. Approving a lease agreement with American Highland cattle. For city owned real. Property located at 22 South 4th Avenue at the historic city hall. Toronto approval a lease agreement with American Highland cattle for city-owned real property located at 22 South 4th Avenue at the historic City Hall. You know authorizing the city manager to execute said lease agreement on behalf of the city. So I think we've had the discussion. I just want to see if the unless there's anything else you want to say let's go ahead and out this for consideration. Council member, today. I would love to make a motion to approve item 8D. Proper first, we have second, the member, Jordan Ellie. I want to second it with a comment that I know a year may seem like a lot to some, but really a year is nothing when you think about the big picture. And if we can spend the next year getting this thing solidified, it's going to be worth the time, worth the effort. Just to nail this thing down for good and get it done right. So I second the motion. I'll be first and a second. Any discussion? We'll call vote. Mayor Mills. Yes. Mayor Prattam Johnson. No. Councilmember Blackers. Yes. Councilmember Cushing. Yes. Councilmember Humber. Yes. Councilmember Jordan Alley. Yes. Councilmember Pollock. No. Councilmember today. Yes. Councilmember Watts. Yes. No. Yes. What? You're on a motion passes seven to two. Thank you very much. I think a break is 807. We will reconvene 817. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm gonna be coming for you. Never. Oh, never. Oh, never. Never. Never. Oh, never. Let's pass the time in this world that's a new orn-made out of girl giving out a cover and for all that dumb things out of school The girl getting back over And we're all wrapped up in time to show To be alive Just like the last time It's the real life Where she wants I'm going to be on the the resolution of the City Council of the City of Brighton, Colorado, accepting change order number two of Durand X excavating incorporated and improving amendment number two to the contract for Core City Pipe Replacement Project number 20-006235 to Durand X excavating the city's budget for the city. 0.0.6235. To do and ex-activating incorporated up to the requested amount of. 111,549.59 cents. And authorizing the city manager or designate to sign a member number two on behalf of the city. And the city clerk to attest there too. So Mrs. Feist, Dessessa, who do we have to present on this? Yes, we have our utilities engineer, Mr. Roy Galli for this item, your honor. He will give a presentation. And this is a very important amendment that needed to be done. And with that, I'll turn it over to Mr. Galley so he can explain to the city council the reasoning behind this amendment. Great. Thank you city manager. Good evening mayor and city council. Tonight we bring forth to you the core city pipe replacement construction close out presentation. Within the strategic plan this falls under supportive and sustainable infrastructure and also financially responsible. Some of the introduction will go over a background of what this project is and the replacement program itself will go over the scope of the 2020 pipe replacement project and then also the summary of the change orders that were incurred during the project itself. So some background as you might remember, City Council awarded an approximate $2.4 million contract to Durand excavating on June 16th, 2020 and contracts were signed on June 29th, 2020. The annual core city pipe replacement program Program upgrades existing infrastructure to current standards and established neighborhood. What we deem or call Core City. So the picture to the right, the yellow border that you see is what we call Core City. It basically is most of the older part of town. And within that yellow border, the blue and red lines indicate the undersized and aging infrastructure. So the blue is the six inch lines and the red are the four inch lines. So this is the second year of the project. We did do this project back in 2018. As you can see in the purple box that's down there. That was done between Jessup and Bromley on Fulton 1st and 2nd Avenue. So these were existing 4 and 6 inch lines and the reason that we picked this location to start with is our operators had noticed we had water quality complaints in the area. So we wanted to take care of those lines. The 2020 Piper replacement project, we selected the area located in the black box. That's just because we had mostly four inch lines. We had insufficient looping in this part of town. We had frequent breaks in the area and during the summer with these long runs of 4-inch line we do see low pressures at these residents. So what is the Piper Replacement Program? This is the second year of this that will hopefully continue on as the years come. It's a great program that has real effect on the residents and the community. And we will need to find and have continued funding for this project or this program to continue. So the benefits of the pipe replacement program. The first thing it does is it improves water quality. Iron pipe that we mostly see as the older pipe in town has interior to percolation. Minerals and materials absorb chlorine and they'll stick to the inside of the pipe and when we have fire events or need to shut down the system for maintenance and reopen sometimes that velocity can make these to percolation pieces come off, which can lead to colored water or cloudy water seeing that residence faucets. The second thing is the enlarge size can increase flow. The foreign sections lines right now can't meet current daily demand requirements, and that's why we see the pressure drops, especially with the flow restrictions from the tuberculation. AWWA standards recommend that the new pipes that we install be a minimum of 8 inches. Valves are another issue that we see as things get older. Valves are usually installed at the same times as the pipes and they're prone to the same aging issues as the pipes. Except they're prone to the same aging issues as the pipes. Except with valves, you lose the loss of functionality. The valves just stop working. You can't isolate the system. And it becomes harder to shut down the system when you have a main break. The next is increased fire protection. The existing line sizes and fragile condition as the pipes get older could create a potential safety risk if we ever were to see a fire. And the last thing is we improve structural integrity. The existing pipes are prone to breaks. This is a great example over the holidays we had multiple breaks on fourth avenue. I think on Christmas day. And then we also had a break on southern street on New Year's day. So the cost of getting our operators in and fixing I think on Christmas day and then we also had a break on Southern Street on New Year's Day. So the cost of getting our operators in and fixing that that main break definitely is a consideration. So these two pictures are just standard cross sections of the to perculated pipe that we have from our city files. This is an old cast iron pipe and what you see on the inside of the pipe is the tuberculation from the minerals and the material build up that happens on the inside of the pipe. Now while it doesn't look pretty, the water meets all of the state requirements for safe to drink. It's just when those things break loose, that's when you get the colored water. So we're uncertain about the pipe condition and the rest of the core city, but the pipes were installed about the same time. So we're certain we're gonna run into more of this as we move on. So waterbreak examples, the picture that you see on the right is a main break that we had during this project on the existing pipe. The hole you see is one of our taps for a residence service line. And during excavation on Egbert between 10th and 11th, the corp stop got pulled out of the pipe. So as we started excavating to expose this pipe to the first locate what exactly happened and then to to start trying to isolate the system so we could fix this break. We noticed that the existing pipe had an eight foot long longitudinal failure that you can see in the picture as well. Again with the valves being as old as they were, we had issues ultimately shutting down the system. This main break took us 23 hours to finally isolate to fix and we really had to start putting some torque on some of the existing vows to finally get it to turn and isolate this main so we could fix it. So the project recap for this 2020 P pipe replacement project, it mitigated issues for 148 households and businesses in Corsity, including Brighton High School. 12 residential blocks and associated site streets were improved with new piping, new vows, and new fire hydrants, which greatly will improve safety and reliability along with water quality in the area. And our goal with this project and what we will do each time we have one of these projects is to get as much done as we can within the budget available and the weather restriction time limits. When you start getting into colder weather, we run into issues with asphalt and also having pits open with frost and freeze protection. So summary of the changes to the contract and while we're here tonight, we did have some asphalt and concrete quantity overruns and those were due to helping public works improve the driving quality of the roads. The associated to your warranty we have with this contract will closely be followed by the public work street really rehabilitation program. In the core city project improvements provide an opportunity for utilities and public works to work together to facilitate public works ongoing street upgrades. Since all of our infrastructure is buried we have to work with them to make sure that we patch back or give them back the best road conditions we can with our infrastructure. We also installed new hydrants for improved fire protection and pressures. And finally, we did run into some field repairs as that eight foot long longitudinal water break showed that we're unanticipated during the construction activities that we had to fix. So Bay, the 2020 financial summary, this is the contract breakdown for you. The initial contract amount was just under 2.4 million at $2,399,883.40. We did have one previous change order of $12,075. This final change order that we're bringing forth to tonight is for $111,549.59 for a final contract amount of $2,523,500 and $7.99. So going into a little bit more detail for you on these change orders, the fire hydrant additions was probably something with lessons learned that we should have just added to the original contract when we got in and excavated and started looking at the hydrant conditions and the hydrant lateral conditions they were in worse shape than we thought. So these new hydrants were installed to accommodate the higher pressures and flows. And because of the age, many of the existing hydrants were not properly seeded in a required replacement. The second largest and the largest cost overrun here is for the asphalt pavement improvements. The asphalt additions necessitated by multiple elements. During excavation, we encountered many areas within the project limits where we had thin and very unstable existing asphalt, which we ended up stabilizing and strengthening for public safety. And to continue to work closely and help facilitate the public works future rehabilitation project. We also had some cave in sections where existing sandy soil did not hold structurally. And this picture is to go along with those cave in. The main line for the pipe is seen running down the middle of the road and this first patch that you see heading to the curb while it looks like it might be for only one service it is really for two when we started getting into it the service lines were close enough together that for the drivability of the road for the safety of the public instead of having a patch for a service line followed by existing asphalt followed by another patch we decided it makes more sense just to remove all that and do one patch section itself. So finally our staff recommendation staff recommends approval of a final change order of 111,756 and 59 cents. So with that we will take any questions from council. Thank you, Roy. Questions from the council. Let's start. Mayor broken. Thanks, Mr. Mayor. Oh, yeah, just, is there any metro district attached to any of this core center of the city that the residents himself have to pay for their own piping. I do not believe so now. Okay, and is there has the core center of the city as it's called ever paid for any of the pipes in ward one. In Ward 1, past 27th Avenue, all of us should say that. In any Ward 1 development, past 2008, as any tax dollars gone into any pipes in Ward 1, since 2008, any new developments. Since 2008, I don't know, I've only been here since 2015. Prior to my time. So sorry, I'm not going to be able to answer that question for you. Okay, thanks. No, I'm not only to put you on the spot, I do this every time, and I'm going to continue to do it. I want all the council, anyone listening, anyone watching to understand that in all of the new developments in word one, since 2008, nobody from the city of Brighton pays for any of our pipes. We pay for it with a until we got the Metro District lowered that just started a few days ago, where we're actually going to get a bill that's lowered from the past year. Councilor Watts and my constituents, we help pay for your pipes, but we pay $500 a month for our Metro District Tax on average around $424. And now we're being asked as representatives of Ward 1 to say, okay, I know you pay that Metro District Tax and you pay for your own pipes, but we're also going to help you out here with a change order. I voted no on these before. I'm going to continue to vote no just because of the unfair advantage. I'm not an at large member of this council. I'm not somebody that represents the entire city. And I hope we all feel this way about our awards and represent them that way as much as we can. I'm seeing some shaking heads and I I have to tell you, that is the way this works. No one from the city has ever voted for me or voted against. It's only in your ward. You represent your ward first. Just like in the Sixth Congressional District, I'm hoping Jason Crow is representing the Sixth Congressional District of Colorado first, then the rest of Colorado, then the nation. We all have to represent our awards. And I'm telling you, this is not right what has happened out here in World War I. So I'm gonna be a no vote. I appreciate what has been said about the pipes in the center of the city. I don't care about the change order itself. I only care about representing our constituents as we should and telling you, World War I's not happy about it shouldn't be so hope we all do that in the future with any of our award issues because this is just not okay other than that thank you very much. Next, what do you have? Remember, Jordan Nilly? Yes, so I was curious you shut off the water for about eight hours a day on people. Is that what happens? So when we made connections to the existing system, we had to shut down the system to make that tie in. So we tried to do our best to keep it within a four hour window during the middle of the day. If we had areas where we were running into more issues construction wise, then yeah, sometimes we ran a little bit longer than four hours, but we tried to minimize that downtime as much as possible. That would be each day? It wasn't each day, no. No. So the way this project worked is we tied into the existing system to begin with. So we made a cut to the existing pipe, hooked onto the existing system, turned everybody back on on that street, ran the pipe down for the first block, tested it, got passed passing a test, on back to pressure and chlorine. Then we ended up coming back, turning, we had to turn them off for about four hours to do service connections. So we had two lines that were live at one time on one street. And while the new line was live, we then took each service and switched it over to that new service. So there was some downtime, but it wasn't every day. Well, that's real good. So you went from what, tenth to... So the 2020 project was on 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th from bridge to scale. And has from fourth to ninth ever been done? We have not done fourth to ninth yet, no. Okay, so those could be in the future. That those are definitely in the future. Yes, we have quite done fourth to ninth yet, no. Okay, so those could be in the future. That those are definitely in the future. Yes, we have quite a bit of a pipe. And this PVC, it won't coagulate anything on the interior. You won't have the tuberculation like you see on this cast iron. Cast iron loves to hold stuff together. The plastic pipe from what we've seen with stuff installed has very little to perculation on the inside of the pipe, which is why a lot of municipalities are moving more towards PVC. That's great, thanks a lot. You're next, what else? Remember Blackhurst? I'm going to move to the floor. I'm a black. Yeah, I like to make a motion to approve 10 a. Proper first to approve 10 a. Do I have a second? Number 100. Second. to the second any more discussion? We'll call vote. Mayor Mouse. Yes. Mayor Prattam-Johnston. No. Councilmember Blackhurst. Yes. Councilmember Cushing. Yes. Councilmember Humber. Yes. Councilmember Jordan-Elly. Yes. Councilmember Pollock. Yes. Council Member Humbert. Yes. Council Member Jordan-Elly. Yes. Council Member Pollock. Yes. Council Member Tadea. Yes. Council Member Watts. No. You're on our motion passes seven to two. Thank you very much. Moving forward, we have General Business, we have the review of COVID statistics. So Mrs. Vice-Decessa, is this the Michael Martinez show? I learned to unmute myself first. So yes, yes, Your Honor. I'm very pleased he doesn't he doesn't excellent job for us. And at this at this time mayor city council. I'd like to ask our assistant city manager of economic development and community engagement Mr. Michael Martinez to give a report to the city council on this matter. Mr. Martinez. You city manager good evening mayor and council and if I could make a motion to end the meetings at eight o'clock, I'd be happy to throw that out there since we're talking about that this evening. Happy new year everybody. Unfortunately, we still are in the midst of a pandemic. So tonight I'm just going to give you a quick update. Discuss some of the things that have happened over the last few weeks since it sounds like we have a lot to discuss. A lot of new things, a lot of changing things, of course, as this thing has always presented. And then I'm happy to take questions. One thing that I will mention, and I'm sure you know this, we discuss this at the last update, CARES Act funding has basically ran out. We did get an extension of spending the CARES Act funding. Fortunately, unfortunately for us, Adams County did a wonderful job of spending their entire allocation. I heard today that they have no more dollars to spend, so really it's just reconciliation at this point. The original intent of doing this every regular meeting was so that you could make decisions more specifically for spending on CARES Act funding. So I mean, of course, I'll let you decide that's ultimately your decision. But however you think I'll be more most effective in presenting this information, whether it's in a study session, whether it's continuing these meetings, whether it's in the 400 emails that I send you each each week. However, I can be most effective in presenting this information to you. Please let me know. I'm happy to do that. So I'm going to share my screen really quick. I'm going to go back to the computer. Well, there you go. Need to. Get back on this here. We thought earlier. Yeah, my computer is stuck. I got a new monitor and it's sticking some of my screens here. Can I try it one more time? All right. Can you see the screen? Yes. Okay. This isn't a good way to start the new year. I'm stuck. Okay, tell you what, let me share a different screen here. Okay, how about this screen? Looks the same to me. See it. Is it moving? Yes. Okay, great. So we're on the right one here. Okay, so I'm going to quickly share with you the state of Colorado's numbers overall. I mean, I'm sure that you've all heard our numbers are doing actually pretty good. We're going down tremendously from where we were in the peak of this in November. So on the screen right now to your right, you'll see basically our numbers. You'll see in green the seven day moving average and then purple is the case growth. So we're doing relatively good in terms of where we are daily and our seven day moving average as well is something that we're definitely keeping an eye on. There is a little bit of an uptick that you'll notice towards the end of December. That's something to keep an eye on as we move into the next few weeks. Of course, there's always concern that we're gonna experience a post-holiday bump. We fortunately didn't see that in November, but we're keeping our eye out for that slight increase that we're noticing over the last week or so. But in terms of where we are in Colorado today, we have 343,435 confirmed cases with 3,937 deaths, unfortunately due to COVID-19. Here's another interesting slide that I wanted to share with you. This is our total seven day moving average and positivity rate. And this is really what the state is basing the decision to move back into level orange for those of us who are in level red. It really is a good point. Right now, our seven day moving average level orange for those of us who are in level red. It really is a good point right now. Our seven day moving average from a positivity standpoint is at 7.74% as a state. And so I think the difference of what you'll start to see moving forward in terms of where we fit within the dial or what the state takes in the consideration for restrictions is gonna be more statewide and not necessarily so much each county. The governor made a comment that he's really looking to streamline things based on state numbers so that we're more consistent. So we're gonna start taking a look more in depth at state numbers and focusing on those since it sounds like more decisions are gonna be made based on those numbers. So today are seven day moving average for our positivity rate is 7.74, which is a tremendous and a tremendous decrease over the last few months. We saw days up to 15, 16 percent. And of course early on when we weren't testing as many people we were really only testing sick people. I mean we had days that were as high as 26, 27 to be statewide. This is a hospitalization number statewide. We're doing much better here too. And this is really the key indicator of things that we're looking for in terms of where we fit with restrictions. And knowing that our hospitals have sufficient capacity and aren't being over-ran is the key thing that we've looked at in the past and that we're going to continue to look at right now we have 924 confirmed patients in the hospital, but that's down significantly. That's basically half of where we were just about a month ago. why decisions are being made to allow us to relax some of these restrictions and start to get back to some sort of business. So in terms of where we're at in Adams County, we have 41,506 cases and 536 deaths and you'll see on the graphic there where we are daily. We're doing much better in Adams County. We are seeing a little bit of an uptick. We think that's again to be expected. We hope that it's just a minor blip and that it doesn't lead to another wave, but we're optimistic that our numbers are getting significantly better in Adams County. In terms of hospitalization rate in the county, right on the graphic to the right, you'll see kind of where we are overall of folks of three day rolling average of hospitalizations. We have 126 Adams County residents hospitalized currently, which is a wonderful number. There have been points where we've been above 300. So we're happy to report that. In my opinion, the best statistic that I'm going to present to you tonight is the statistic you see on your left. We learned today that Platte Valley Medical Center has three patients in the hospital currently with COVID and one suspected, so we'll call it four patients. And only one patient on I, in ICU at this point, on a ventilator. And you've heard this point on a ventilator and you've heard me say this a million times and you've heard me give this presentation that's by far the lowest number that we've seen since the start of the pandemic so that is excellent I'm extremely happy about that and I'm super optimistic hopefully we can keep that momentum. So in terms of where we're at in Brighton we have 3,214 total confirmed cases. Unfortunately, we experienced 96 deaths in our community. You'll see on the graphic there, kind of where we are, in the middle of December, it got kind of dicey. I mean, there were days where we had, we were upwards of 50, 60 cases reported per day, almost 100 at our highest day. But we're significantly lower than that now. We're in the tens to 15s per day, which is phenomenal. This is another good statistic that I wanted to show you. This is our weekly incidence rate per 100,000. So this is kind of the benchmark of where we are compared to other communities. Of course, populations change. Some counties are smaller, some cities are smaller, some cities are bigger, but if you take it over 100,000, this kind of gives you a baseline of where you can compare yourself. And right now we're at 347 weekly cases per 100,000, and that's sharply down from where we were, even just a few weeks ago, we were up towards the 600 mark at our peak, we were at the 800 mark. So we're seeing less transmission in Brighton. And again, this is something that correlates with what's happening in Adams County and in the state. So in terms of where we are on the dial, as you know, we've now moved into level orange, but there's a caveat to that. We still technically fall within the level red numbers according to the framework. So even though our numbers tell us we're in level red, the state overall is experiencing a decline as we are too, which puts the entire state at orange. So that was the reason why the decision was made to keep or to move folks in level red into orange statewide for consistency. But these are the metrics that are considered for the dial in order to move up or down. So the first one is the two-week cumulative incidence rate per 100,000. As I mentioned that 100,000 per 100,000 is kind of the benchmark. In Adams County, our 14-day incidence rate right now is 601. In order for us to get to actual level orange, we need to be below 350. So we got a long ways to go there, but the good news is, in early November, we were up to almost 1500. So we're seeing a significant decline. And we hope that that number consistently goes down so that we can get into actual orange numbers because there are some things that go along with our actual numbers that will help our businesses out that I'll mention in a little bit. But as you can see, the percentage of two-week incidence rate over time change is actually really good. We're going down 5% for APHOD 12, Douglas 6, but in Adams County, we're doing great there. The other two statistics that are taking into consideration when looking at the dial is the two-week average positivity rate. So it's the average test positivity rate. We're doing good. We're doing much better here. Adams County is at 10%. That puts us right in that level orange range, which is wonderful. That number was significantly higher as well. And so that is a very encouraging statistic, because that means that even though our testing numbers are still pretty high, we're still seeing a lot of folks getting tested, the actual positivity rate is going down, meaning less transmission in the community. The percent of change in hospitalization rate, a person with COVID, is the third statistic that has looked at on the dial. We're doing excellent there. We've had a pretty significant sustained decline in the amount of hospitalizations in Adams County to the tune of we're down 60%. So excellent number. We have to keep that number up for 14 days. Obviously we're doing that. That's the best metric that we can look at. So some of the other developments that have happened since I had the fine opportunities speak with you. Vaccinations are underway. Yay. We're finally doing that statewide. Colorado is actually in a really good place. We're in the top five percentage of our populations being vaccinated. So that's really good. We have means we're getting the vaccine out as soon as given to us in Colorado. We've got a really good plan. So I'm happy to report that Colorado is doing a great job with vaccinations. We're currently in phase one A and one B. So the new phase one B, which I sent to you in the email last week, allows for additional folks, such as folks who are above the age of 70 or 70 or older to receive the vaccine at this point. So over the next month, we'll start to see more of that age range as well as some more of our first responders and folks who fall within that 1B. There's actually a sub 1B category. They call the line the dotted line. So we'll have more folks who fall under that into different categories under the dotted line. We're able to access the vaccine within the next month or so. Our team is working with Platt-Belly Medical Center to make sure that we're coordinating at every minute to potentially whether it's using city facilities to do this, whether it's putting together additional programs to get as many of our residents vaccinated as quickly possible. We're doing that daily. As I mentioned in Colorado,'re doing good so far we have 120,510 first doses that have been administered in the state and that's at 279 different locations in Colorado. Another exciting development which I sent you in email yesterday is the fact that we're opening a new rapid testing site at Riverdale Regional Park. And this officially, the official word went out today that this is open. So it starts tomorrow, it goes Wednesday through Saturdays from 9am to 2pm. It's basically the exact same thing that we were doing as a community that we were posting our CARES Act funding, but this time the county is actually paying for this out of their general funds. So this gives us an excellent opportunity for our residents and it's not just two days a week, it's Wednesday through Saturday. It is first come first served, so it'll work exactly like our testing site did where we ask that folks get there early, they'll have a car cut off. They're still kind of working on the nuances of that. But we're really excited about this because this obviously is in our backyard and this gives us a more constant method for rapid testing in the community moving forward. Tri-County Health has also rescinded the previous public health order. This kind of makes sense because of what the state has done in terms of moving us down the color and health order. This kind of makes sense because of what the state has done in terms of moving us down the the color and the dial. The previous public health order really no longer had merit. So you'll recall that that public health order included the curfew. So we're no longer under those curfew or under those restrictions. So happy to report that that happened last night. or under those restrictions. So happy to report that, that happened last night. Many of you ask about the five-star program and it's still currently under development, via Adams County. The interesting thing about the five-star program with what the state has currently done, moving those who are in level red until level orange, even though our numbers are still level red numbers, is that it limits what the five-star program can really do for businesses. So for example, if a county is in level red with their numbers, but we're allowed to operate in level orange, in order for the five-star program to really be effective, our numbers have to actually be in level orange for us to be able to move our businesses in level yellow. So we're not quite there yet. As you saw on my previous slides, we still have a long way to go in terms of getting that per 100,000 rate down. We're about halfway there. The guess is, it's gonna take us a month or so at this rate in order to get us to where the five- star program is actually effective, but nonetheless Adams County is committed to doing this so that when we are able to move into actual level orange, our businesses will be able to move into level yellow restrictions, so basically opening up 50% as compared to the 25% they're operating at now. And I also am excited to report and I mentioned this in my email as well, that City Hall is now open. So we are reopened as of today for limited services. So if we have folks who need to pay a water bill or who need to speak with somebody in person, City Hall is currently open 8 to 5. We do encourage appointments. And so if you do have a need to meet with staff here, please give us a call. You can call the main line or you can call the department directly. But of course many of our services are available online. We're happy that we have been able to put the pretty much the entire gamut of services online so folks can do the majority of business there. And that's going to that's going to be around even as we move out of the pandemic. It's the fastest I think I've gone to my presentation. Any questions? Sharon with screen. Thank you Michael for the presentation. No Stephanie tonight looks like right? Stephanie is here for questions as well. Okay. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This This this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this