Health Department and our pledges will be led by Joe DeGonzalez, Director of Emergency Services. Will you please stand? Would you pray with me? God of grace and God of glory on your people, for your power. Help us to recognize your power, Lord, and your blessings in the world around us, and in the people around us. We ask your blessing upon our commissioner's court and pray that all that is said and done today would be pleasing to you. We pray your blessing upon our county, bless our state, Lord, and bless our nation. Help us to renew our trust in you. We pray your blessing, Lord, on all those who serve this nation both at home and abroad and especially for those who stand in harm's way. Give your holy angels charge over them that no harm would come to them. Bring them home safely to their families. For Jesus sake, amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God, individual with liberty and justice for all of us. Texas flag, honor and Texas flag, I pledge allegiance to the Texas one on the right, one in the visible. Thank you, gentlemen. Item one is for public input. For items not posted on the agenda, if there's any member of the public that would like to address Commissioner's Court, we ask that you please complete a public comment form. They're available on the side table. I want to remind everyone to please turn off your cell phones and pages. In consideration of our guest time, we're going to first go to agenda item 14A, which is approval of a Constable bond for Jesse Flores, is the kind of Constable precinct one in the amount of $1,500. The chair will so move. Seconded by Commissioner Eads, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Cine? Motion does carry unanimously. Next, we'll go to item 14b, which is a ceremony to administer the official oath of office to Jesse Flores, who is appointed to the position of Dent County Constable precinct 1 on April 30, 2013. And we have besides Jesse Flores, obviously. We have Justice LeP of Peace Joe Holland here to administer the oath. And Jesse, if you'd like to bring your family up to, that would be appropriate. Why don't you introduce them too. Come on up. Sure. Yeah, there you go. Are you making mistakes? I apologize. Right. It's an honor to be here today. Thank you for having me today. This is my family, my full support, the reason of my existence. I'll start off with the youngest, my daughter Tori, and my son, Anthony, and my wife, Carrie. I'm glad to have you with us this morning. Joe, if you wanna come up and do the honors, do you want, yeah, let's get you up here, and we've got a bunch of picture taking, so, Joe. I still wanna appreciate the buildings of the court. I have things to do before morning as we use the word of to this. Okay. Raise your hand please. Or he after me. I, Jesse Boris. I just do so. Do solemn and square. Do solemn and square. God will faithfully execute the duties. And I will pray for the execution. So the office of comfortable, pre-sliced ones, are dead to counter-textes of the office of Council, the Free State of Texas, and will to the vestibibility of the reserve and defend the Constitution and law of the United States, and the Free state of Texas. And I'm very excited to tell them that. So I'm going to have to re-write this. Applause. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank saw some cameras gone. Do you want to come up closer and take some pictures? Or did you get what you need? Okay, come on up. That's okay. You want Joe Holland in there too? Since see, come on Joe. He wants to be. That'll devide you to go on on. You welcome. Congratulations. Nice to meet you. Okay. Yeah, we got to get the necessary paperwork signed here. Okay. Let's go on to item number two, which is a consent agenda. Members need to pull item two B. We don't have any intro departmental transfers today. Also going to pull item two F. Do we have a motion for the remainder of the consent agenda? Motion by Commissioner Marchins. Seconded by Commissioner Eads. All in favor please say aye aye Opposed say nay motion does carry consent agenda today consists of approval of order making appointments we have a new hire in the county jail we have a new hiring communications at the Sheriff's Department we have a new hire one new hire for the sheriff to promotions within a new hire, one new hire for the share of two promotions within the shares department. One new hire in Constable Pristinct 6 and one new hire in public health clinical. Two C is approval payroll, two D is approval budget member quest 100910 for contract labor for the hotel occupancy tax funds tourism grant 2013 in the amount of $10,200. 2E is approval of budget member requests 100920 to transfer funds from justice information system to countywide technology office furniture and equipment in the amount of $4,290. And lastly 2G is approval of building used requests from Kenny Bowman to use the courthouse on the square lawn on May 25, 2013, in September 7, 2013 from 538-30 for the purpose of a concert and art show on each day. Two F is approval of budget map request 1-0- quest 100890 for vehicle equipment for costable per se and for the amount of $8,344. When you receive some communications from, well, both Donna Stewart and Beth, I mean concerning this budget amendment. Donna Stewart's memo said she was going to give us some information concerning the budget amendment because she was not going to be here today. And she thought that some statements on the budget amendment documentation were not quite correct. And she sent him the following email below that she attached the agenda packet. His request would give him $2,272 more than was recommended for the vehicle by the vehicle assessment committee in almost $2,912 more than what was recommended for the sheriff's decision. Constable Birch sent the email saying I received the budget of my request to transfer funds from various line items including transferring excess funds and cars and small trucks to the vehicle equipment. The background section states that there is not enough money to outfit the vehicle when it came in. This email was sent to Don Asturut by Constable Birch. You further state the budget of a surge that it would be equipped as previous tojos that had been ordered for your office. I'm sorry, it's from Don Asturut to Tim Birch. Here's my recollection of what happened last year. You appeal the funding for your vehicle, which was recommended by the vehicle assessment committee, and was equipped $34,000. You stated in court that you only wanted to receive the same equipment that was on the sheriff's tawholes. You also said that you weren't asking for something that would stand out above and beyond what everyone else received. I explained that the workshop, during the workshop that the sheriff's vehicles were budgeted at 33,360 plus 5,793 for a video camera and tough box which you weren't asking for. Therefore, $34,000 budgeted for your vehicle was actually slightly more than what we gave the sheriff's at 33,360 for a similar vehicle last year and in this year when your department submitted requisitions for new vehicles, you did not requisition them the way that they were recommended by the vehicle assessment committee and or budgeted by our department as fully equipped vehicles. You have ended up having to process budget amendments in order to order the equipment separately. Unfortunately, when you order a vehicle and equipment separately, it would be more expensive. And then that fliming's email just yesterday said a prepared and analysis for the equipment requested in the budget amendment for possible four compared to the doctor budget during budget discussions. Constable four indicated it was acceptable to budget 34,000 for a patrol SUV with the same dealer installed equipment as budgeted for the sheriff's office. Subsequently, the vehicle was requisitioned without the dealer installed emergency equipment and the budget amendment is now being requested. The attached analysis is an attempt to compare the budget quote for the sheriff's office to what was now being requested with the items compared side by side by side is very difficult to match all items. Therefore, each side by side analysis has laid equipment that may be similar in function, but are listed separately. As you aware, once budgets are adopted each department has the flexibility to buy the make model the best suits or needs with the type assigned to the capital item, SUV, van, pickup, et cetera. For law enforcement, each elected official has flexibility to order emergency equipment that best meets the requirements within the established budget. There is no established uniformity between departments or not necessarily between types of units within the department based function requirements. the function requirements. Constable Birch is here. I guess when I'm trying to get to is can we in the future not only budget these altogether but order them all together so that we don't have to do a subsequent budget amendments and it appears that it costs more money to do this way. Am I thinking crackling? Yes, and just unfortunately, we try in the vehicle assessment committee, we have representative of each department that have cars. We ask what their needs are, assess those needs and try to get as close to their needs as possible. If they change those needs after they've given, after we've recommended something, you know, there's nothing we can do about it. You know, I respect Constable Birch. If he wants to add additional items to this call, get a different package. But the vehicle assessment committee did exactly what they were supposed to do and the request at the request of the people who serve on the committee. Now, obviously every department, elected official in the department has a right to request different items. My concern with the request, I have no concern with the court request. My concern was with when he's saying that money's requested will impact this year's budget and next year's budget. And due to the fact that we will not be able to purchase the item necessary when we transfer funds to meet this equipment requirement. And so I have some concerns about that. And I'll let you know right up front Comfort virtue that I may not be supporting when you ask for more money for these because I believe at the time that We requested that call we did what we could to make sure you had all the equipment that you need and if you didn't that wasn't enough Then you should have let us know Maybe you didn't know at the time Come on up maybe maybe you didn't know at the time. Come on up. Maybe you didn't know at the time that what you needed. But you know, I think the vehicle assessment committee did their job in making sure that the equipment that was requested the money was there. I understand that and I am in no way questioning, you know questioning what you authorized out of the vehicle assessment committee. But what I am making reference to is when I outfit the Tahos that we have in our precinct, I wanted the equipment to mirror that equipment so I don't have to deviate from that. And when we addressed that as far as the package that they were ordering for the Sheriff's Office, when I talked to people within the county, they said okay, you know the Sheriff's Office basically is ordered in their Tahoe's the same way you equip yours. Well when it came in under that package, if that's my mistake I'm sorry I'm remiss at that and check that package out completely because I've always entrusted it to the county they do a very well you know very good job in ordering these vehicles. When it came in unfortunately it did not have everything that I have matched up on my vehicles. And that's why I requested the extra amount. When I say it's going to impact the budget, it's impacting me because I'm having to move some money around it. I would have spent on some other things. I can make do with, you know, I can make do with that. And that's why I wanted to move the money around so that it mirrors my equipment. In the future when I requested, I will make sure that everything matches up completely before I submit any request. And you know, it managed me, whatever you want to do. I'm sorry, you know, I didn't match it up, but that's what this request is all about. But you know, this is your first time ordering. So there you go. You know, they said it's a high moon period, but I don't give you a high moon period. Hey, I don't finish. It's all I can take. I was looking for clarification, constable and I appreciate your being here. Yeah, well, it's not I'm not blaming this on anybody except for myself because I should have checked it and I should have made sure the equipment matched up and that's why I'm moving it around as far as the amendment and it won't happen in the future. But that makes sense. Obviously we want you to have the committee to feel you need. I was just looking for clarification. I'm going to move for a pool. I'm going to ask you just a couple of questions to clarify. Commissioner Mitchell, are you saying that we requested one thing at the vehicle assessment committee and then when it came down to buying it we asked for something else. We had a package that we put together for each of the cars and that is what's recommended. Now when they order the cars they can obviously. They can order something other than what's recommended. Yes but they have to pay different because we we budget that item for each call. And I think we budget 34,000 for each call. And he has obviously caused more. So he's needed more money. And that's not unusual because there are a lot of departments that we budget something to decide that they want something different. That they want to take it out of their rest of the budget. That's fine. But I'm just saying, when you come to me asking me for more money. I'm gonna remind you that Okay, so but I guess my question is That Interim of time between you ask you with the vehicle assessment committee and then when it actually comes down to buying it There can be a change of circumstance Let me change the price to right and who is I mean was this bet as a result of like market forces, the cars now more expensive or? No, actually vehicle assessment committee reviewed his request with an unquipped vehicle when it was appealed in Commissioner's Court. That is when it was during budget discussions when it was decided that it would be an equipped vehicle at 34,000 Of course, there's always changes in pricing, but this one actually just has a little bit more equipment on it Then what we had planned for the sheriff's vehicles Like you originally a court you originally recommended an un-equipped vehicle. He appealed it No, no, no, no, no, it was we're trying to quit his equipment that's a little bit sheriff and other law enforcement me so what's the difference I mean just what's the additional that's about two thousand uh that's twenty three hundred all yeah yeah I understand but what are you what else are you asking for it's just a few lights that are on there that that that we had put on there based on other agencies as far as I requested them as far as officer state. I feel like it was an issue. And if one of the other packages that might have been a little bit more expensive, if they would have requested that, which I didn't, because it would have caused you more order in that package as opposed to me putting these aftermarket items on after the vehicles came in. So we didn't change from what the vehicle assessment committee offered. It was just when that package, that package doesn't offer the things that we put on our vehicles and we have for years. I think I remember I was supportive of you getting the additional items, but I thought, but I didn't request it at that time, Commissioner Coleman. So that's the problem. I think when you appealed it. Yeah, and that was the problem so there's a difference between what you appealed and what you want to purchase We didn't ever get the amount that was appealed It was not in the budget for me to use as far as it goes. That's why I had to move things around for the amendment You see what I'm saying right one. I'm trying to I mean just to clarify My point is to all okay, even though I think I was supportive of getting the link, to me, this doesn't matter, policy. If we denied his appeal, right? But should we then allow our people to kind of... Well, I hope this doesn't have a negative conversation, but like kind of, you know, game the system to then reallocate funds within his budget for the stuff we said as a body that we shouldn't, that we don't think is appropriate. Well, but I don't think that's the only person has done this. I mean, many people that we deny something, they've been able to tie it. Right. And then later on down, and later on down in the year, they transfer money to the line item so they can buy what we denied in the budget. So this is not okay. Okay. And I think purchasing in the budget office do a good job of identifying whether or not that's taking place. Yeah. Beth, is there anything else you want to add? I'm seeking your input. Just one way. No, the last paragraph of my email. I tried to just state what our policy is, is that there is, you know, if we say that if budget is approved with an SUV, you know, the Tahoe, the expedition, you know, those decisions are made by each elected official. And then the equipment list on each one is also decided by each elected official. So when the requisitions come in, we are ordering what they requisition as long as they're getting the main categories within budget. But I thought. So I think that's kind of where some of the disconnect of thinking is, is that the budget is approved in one way and then they're requisitioning that something else. But it's my understanding that elected official has that leeway to do that. They do. And so that's how we're processing them. Just to determine whether we're giving the money to do it. Well, in commissioning. It's not a major issue. I know. I know. And if I would have researched the packages, Commissioner Coleman, and went to one different package, it would have had that amount in there. But when we talked about it in open court last year and you said, okay, let them come in, if it matches up as far as the sheriff's vehicles, it was gonna be fine. I didn't have a problem. But when it came in, they didn't, it lacked just that $2,300 worth of differences in equipment and that's why I requested that. And it's not, anybody's fault except for myself, okay? But it's not that I'm trying to it's not that I'm trying to go against policy whatsoever It was just it was my mistake. Well, it's not particularly to this instance I'm just saying my point I guess and I don't want to belabor the point is man. We agonize over those appeals right and We spend a tremendous amount of time. We have all those hearings. We have a night meeting and It seems like I Guess my comment is it may be a little bit of a you know we borrow trouble over nothing if we say we're not gonna do it And we wind up doing it anyway We have to look at every every department that comes in that we deny something Advising we have 1500 employees plus and that's tough. I understand what you're saying. I think he ordered this. I think the official has. Hey. I've argued all sides, depending on who saw the phone. Sure, exactly. Exactly. I believe the constable is operating in good faith with the court and trying to file the policies. I do too. And I don't mean to admonish you, council, I'm just trying to get some clarification. I'll be the first to admit, this is my first term, and I'm sure I'm going to take some lumps before it's over with. I call the question. I'd like us to. Thank you again. And now, my point, giving sure you guys was just trying to figure out, because I read through all the different stuff and I was trying to wrap my head around it because I remember specifically us talking about this during the budget process. I'm not sure that pulling this item has given great clarity to it but we have a motion in the second on the floor. Are there any other comments or questions? Are you ready to vote? I think we're ready to vote. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Aye. Oppositing. Motion does carry. Thank you for being here constantly. Okay, 5 a is approval of the bill report payments from CSED community corrections TIP shares, training shares, forfeiture, VIP interest, DA check fee, in-da, forfeiture funds are represented for recording purposes only. We also have the auditors monthly financial report from month of March that was sent to you via email that is also presented for recording purposes only Morning Judge, good morning commissioners. I have three additions to this week's bill report to from general fund one from Indigent Care Fund and those are all the corrections I have. We sent a bill report, the email that you send a correct to bill report, but I'm not sure. Let me make sure everybody saw that. Do we have a motion or are there any questions? Okay. Motion by Commissioner Marchant, seconded by Commissioner Coleman. Any questions on favor, please say aye. Aye. Poussinine. Motion does carry. Five A is approval of exemption from the bidding process for the Texas Association of Local Health Officials. Roll call software application is a professional service and compliance with Section 262.024A4 of the local government code. Do we have questions or is there a motion? Thank you. Motion by Commissioner Marchins, seconded by Commissioner Coleman. Hearing no questions, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, any? Motion does carried. 70 is approval of budget and it costs 1009000 for mobile phone for public health and environmental in the amount of $682. Motion by Commissioner Mitchell. Seconded by Commissioner Marchand. Hearing no questions, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, sen. Motion is carried. 7B is approval of Budget Amendment Quest 100930 to allocate funding for ground sprain as part of public health plans regarding West Nile Virus mitigation 2013 including the transfer of funds from non-departmental and appropriated regular contingency to contract labor for Public Health Environmental in the amount of $20,000. We have Dr. Bing Burton here today. I think it wants to give us some information Good morning, Dr. Burton So this is a major step for us for West Nilevirus, and it's an important one. I just want to make sure that we're all on the same page. So if you decide to pass this budget amendment and put that funding in place, then if it happens that we find a positive mosquito, my understanding is you would have us proceed with ground spraying. We're not going to wait for another meeting and ask if we all agree on that. That's the understanding. That would be a profession for me. Whatever you know I mean. Yes. Whatever your professional opinion. Absolutely. And is your professional opinion that we do the ground spray in that vicinity? Yes, sir. You talked about that earlier, right? I have. Now, the one thing I haven't mentioned, it is the CDC recommendation when you do ground spraying that you do it on three consecutive nights. There's been a good deal of discussion of that. We're inclined to do two consecutive nights. So I just wanted to alert you to that because I don't think we've had that conversation Two consecutive nights in a limited area. Yes And like a half mile radius target area CDC says three nights They're recommending three nights initially everybody was just doing one night There are entomologists now. are saying two nights is plenty. So. We learn as we go. Dr. Perkins, what do you have to make? Do we have a hot spot? Turn on your microphone. And then we have that half mile. What's an estimated cost of that spring? The estimates we have is about $800 a night. Okay, so we've got plenty of money and... Yes, are full of wealth. Okay, and this one will make sure. This is really just for the unincorporated areas, because the city will be doing our responsibility as unincorporated area. And I said this is plenty of money. It could be a long summer. And I don't know how many pauses we'll have, but. But in other words, you have enough to attack it, not. Yes. Multiple. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. Multiple sites. should we have those? We've been working with purchasing and they're arranging for bids and so we should be ready to go. Right. At this point in time, the positive identification of West Nile virus and mosquitoes has been in cities, predominantly, Louisville Farmland. Did you have Louisville City of Flower Mouth by now? Those cities are spraying. We're not saying here that we have identified anything in an incorporated areas at this point in time. We have not. Any other questions or comments? The only thing I want to ask is I know Andy has special districts as well but if we coordinated with any of those directors or any of the fellows like for the 380 districts or Montana or Castle Hills because those are unincorporated areas but you know they're they're probably the communication I'll be happy to do whatever you'd have us do we have not been in touch with any homeowners associations if they have that all right well I'll probably call Andy and then we'll all discuss it with you later. That's a proper. If we do identify in those areas, we should give advanced information to them that this is gonna take place when and all that's hard business. Again, referring to everybody to our county website because it's folks are work for hard to keep that current. All right. Approval. We have a motion for approval by Commissioner Eads. Okay. We didn't. Seconded by Commissioner Coleman. Hearing no further questions or comments, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Cine. in favor, please say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, Cindy? Thank you, Dr. Burton. A day is approval of combining two part time positions into one full time position for technology services that's expanding slot 0, 0, 6, GS is full time position. Chair is going to move for approval. No, we'll talk about that. OK. I'll hold my motion until I go ahead. I'll get it to 4.2. Go back to full time in six months. Good morning, Judge and Commissioners. We're making this request now because it's really a perfect time, a perfect storm to speak. Currently we have four part-time GIS technician positions. All of them are graduating and leaving at the same time. So, we're making this request to combine two of the part-time positions into one full-time position. So, we'll be eliminating one county slot. We'll have, if this is approved, two part-time positions, one full-time position. The actual number of hours decreases slightly because the part times are budgeted at 22 hours. The full-time position would be budgeted at 40 hours. So it's a small decrease in the number of hours and because of that there's a small decrease in the annual salary also. Another real big benefit is the reduction of just all the maintenance costs associated with the employee and computer lease payments, software licensing and things like that. So there's approximately about $1,500 a year just in computer and software savings. Also scheduling wise it's much easier to, when we have projects to know that a full-time employee is going to be in their seat as opposed to trying to balance the availability of two part-time employees and their school schedules and things like that. So it'll better help us meet our demands and provide better services to the county. All right. Any other questions? Do we have a motion? Joe Moose. Motion by Commissioner Marchant. Seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. Okay, no further questions. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, Cine? Thank you, Kevin. Ms. K, thank you, Kevin. 9 a.s. approval of accepting a Susan G. Coleman grant to provide free mammogram screening to eligible low-income 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m. 9 a.m at 9 a.m. for the replad of Burns Branch Estates Lots 9 R 1 and 10 R 1. Approval. Motion by Commissioner Eads, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, sen. Motion is carried. 12 a.m. approval of the law enforcement services agreement between US Army Corps of Engineers and did in Texas for the 2013 summer patrol services. Motion by Commissioner Marchant. Second. Second. Second by Commissioner Mitchell. Here are no questions. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Cine. Motion does carry. 13 A is approval of legislative policy statements. I really don't have any for you today. Just kind of interesting that on House Bill 14 by PITS was laid out for consideration last Friday and it was essentially killed on a point of order as it should be. This is the one that under the guise of providing more transparency in government. It really just costs a whole lot of money and doesn't accomplish anything. And the man had the best of intentions when they started, but I don't think it ended up that way. It's not to say that it won't be brought back to the House floor this week but as of right now it's not doing well and that suits me just fine. I don't have any other legislation for you to be considering Commissioner Mitchell. Yeah, I just want to bring attention to the conference of urban counties. Our staff there has worked tirelessly to own all these bills for us on behalf and so is Jim Allison and Texas Association of counties. When we can't make it to Austin, they send emails to let us know which bills and I usually call Mary. And she's usually already in first. And she wiped out a letter And she's usually already in first. Wacked out a letter. She called already on the issue. Anything that I send, I share with members of the court. But I want to thank them for all their hard work and they especially worked hard on this one. So I just want to call that to the attention of my citizens. Well, Jim Allison with CUC has been a big help to me for many, many years in trying to analyze these bills. What are they really saying? What is really happening with this legislation? So he's helped me in that way and I've helped him because I think we are one of the few counties that really responds when he says contact the members of the committee or contact your elected representatives and senators on this issue because they need they need to understand that it's good for this reason or it's bad for that reason or how it's going to affect the counties and I'm sure Jim is frustrated because many times he sent those emails and there aren't very many kind of that respond but I assure you we do. The bill that we had as represented is Simmons to carry that had to do with the traffic regulations that we were asking for the reduction. It appears that there's another substitute bill substituted by the chairman Larry Phillips and Donna Donnelly, representative from Kaufman County, I can't remember his name. His bill is rising to the surface and basically gives pretty much not carte blanche that's wrong word but gives the ability for the special district and the commissioners court without input of the citizens of that district the opportunity to enter into an agreement for traffic regulations. And so with, yeah, I got a call from Representative Simmons on Saturday. They were working on Saturday. They were on the floor. And that bill was getting ready to come up. And he basically said, you know, what do you want me to do? And I said, well, I don't think you're in the driver's seat here. And I said, you know, we need to support anything that could give at least some kind of protocol and county involvement in that regulation. And I would tell you that that's the only thing you've got to vote on, and vote on. I mean, I've talked to- What was the final- I'll come at the end of the day, Dean. He never did call me back, so I've got to find out from him. But if that's the case, the bill that we worked on, this will supersede it. And so now there will be no requirement. If the bill passed, there will be no requirement from all those special districts of a petition or any kind of input from the citizens to the- Then be handled by an ICA, essentially. Yes. So I just want to bring you up to date on it. Well, we're at that point in the session where everything is a moving target and it's really hard to keep up with. But I assure you, any communication that I send on legislation, I'll be sharing with members of the court. Okay. So there will be no action other than the discussion we just had on 13 a today 13b is approval of the reappointment of Jody Gonzalez is the County Fire Marshal and approval bond is required by local government code chapter 352 I'm a approval motion by commission Eids motion by commission Eids second and back to Mr. Mitchell and after much careful thought and consideration all in favor please vote aye aye putt and if both a nay motion does carry 13c is a proof of the reappointment for Mr. Mike Sweet to the Environmental Advisory Board. Chair also move. Seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed to the motion is carried. 13D is approval of appointing Ellen Carlin to card, Don Armic Donald, Marilyn Stevens and Don Beckle to to the Denton County Historical Commission. Motion by Commissioner Eid, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, sen. Motion does carry. We've already done 14 A and B. 14 C is approval of the end user license agreement and professional services agreement between Denton County and Tyler Technologies for Odyssey, jail manager, integration toolkit. We have a motion for approval by Commissioner Marchion, seconded by Commissioner Coleman. Appreciate your email communication on this, Kevin, it really does help. All in favor of the motion, please say aye. Aye. Opposed say aye. Aye. Opposed, in any? Motion does carry. I should say we also appreciate justice to the piece, Becky Herbos, humor. 14D is approval of amendment 7 to texture, resource sharing, and the denim common integrated justice system, court administration system between Debt and County Texas. And the Texas Conference of Urban County CUC. Motion by Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Marchand. Are there any questions? Here none on favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed? Sen. Motion does carry 14 years approval of the agreement between North Central Texas Council of Governments and then kind of Texas for participation in the 2013 digital aerial foot photography project is recommended by Kevin Carr director of technical services. For approval. Motion by Commissioner Eid seconded by Commissioner Marchand. Kevin I just have one question. Is this, Is this what the appraisal district uses also? Yes I believe they use the same data. We don't purchase it for them each entity licenses the data separately. Okay. Okay. Yeah. That's kind of changed over the years since it the technology first became available and I just wanted to make sure this was still all shared throughout the county, all the cities, and everything. Yes, ma'am. That was a good one. Google. Google? Yeah, really. They still can't find my house. But anyway, we have a motion. I'm serious. We have a motion in a second. Any further questions or comments? Hearing none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Sainte? Motion is carried. Thank you. Thank you. Lastly is 15A, which is executive session under Texas government code 551.087, deliberation regarding economic development and negotiations, closed meeting to deliberate the offer of a financial other incentive to a business prospect regarding commercial or financial information that the governmental body has received from a business prospect that the governmental body seeks to have locates they are expand in and near the territory of the governmental body located in Denk County Commissioner of Crescent One and with which the governmental body is conducting economic development negotiations with that. We are in executive session. Commissioners, court is reconvened from executive session. There'll be no action on item 15A. So with that, we are adjourned. Everybody have a great day. You have a great day.