Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Dent County Commissioner's Court for Tuesday March the 4th is now in session. This morning, a vacation of be given by James Wells, our County auditor and our pledges will be led by Laurie Fickling, Chief Administrator for Commissioner Prussing for Will You Please Stand? Our dear Heavenly Father, we thank you for this opportunity to gather and conduct the business of the county. Please bless these proceedings and bless everyone that's present. Also ask your mercy and loving hand over all those who are suffering from bad weather today, both in Texas and across the US. Please protect them all and protect their property. We also ask you to give your wisdom and guidance to the voters today in the state. We ask you to make the voters know that this is a solemn duty that they do and give them your wisdom. Bless all those who are running today every candidate and bless their efforts. No matter what the outcome, but these with them and those that are elected, be sure to give them guidance and help them to know always that you're overseeing what their actions. We ask you to forgive our sins and bring us all back safely next week and cross name. Amen. allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands when they shall under God in the visible liberty and justice brought. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I want to remind everyone to please turn off the cell phones and pages. Members, item 2 is a consent agenda. Is there anything on the consent agenda we need to have some discussion on? Did we have a motion for approval? Motion by Commissioner Coleman, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Cine? Motion does carry. Consent agenda today consists of 2A, which is approval of the order making appointments. We have a promotion of technology services, rehire and tax office, new hire in the county jail, two new hires in jail health. A demotion in road bridge east, a new hire in juvenile post adjudication and one promotion in juvenile post adjudication and on promotion in juvenile post adjudication. 2B is approval of the Intra Departmental Transfers to see as approval of specifications and authority to advertise for a healing road culvert replacement project. This is bid number zero to one four two two three three. 2D is approval of building use request from the Che and bland to use the court us on the square lawn or the courtroom if in climate weather for a wedding ceremony on Saturday, July 27, 2014 from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. 5A is approval of the bill report payments from CSCD, community decreptions, T.A.I.P. shares, training shares, forfeiture of VIT, interest D.H.E. Check the in D.A. forfeiture funds are all presented for recording purposes. Only we also have the auditors report for November and December that are submitted also today. Good morning, James. Morning, Judge. Commissioners, that's the bill's be approved with the one deletion noted on separate page. Morning, Judge, commissioners, as the bill is approved with the one deletion noted on separate page. Any questions from our auditor? Do we have a motion? I move for approval. Motion by commissioner Coleman, seconded by commissioner Marchant. All in favor, please say aye. Aye opposed, any? Motion does carry. Six A is approved by the award of bid number 0142232 sale of property located at 306 North loop 288 then Texas to J. Virgil Strange on Beth Lennon. Good morning. We are pleased to bring you this bid this morning. It does meet our minimum bid requirement. So we only received one, but that's acceptable meeting our bid of requirement. The bidder does have 30 days to inspect, and then we will work with the civil DA for closing. We all say hurry now? Yeah, I'll say, I'll move for approval and say, I'm glad we've gotten this building sold. You know, it's like your children's toys. You know, one building comes in, one building must go out. Now my children's toys, it's two that need to go out. We have a motion by Commissioner Collins, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Cine? Motion does carry. Seven a is approval. Budget member quest 1-0, 0-5-1-0 for operating equipment to purchase wearable video and mobile video equipment, including the transfer of $2,000 from non-departmental and appropriated regular contingency for Constable precinct five or total amendment of $4,840. Commissioner Marchin? Is there anybody here representing? Yes, he's back here. Just out of curiosity and because I don't know, okay? And the reason why this red flag went up in my head is that I have a son that works in the IT department, City of Louisville, and he works with first responders, and they are currently looking at video camera, body cameras for their department, which none of them had them. They just had the car camera now. And I was asking him about the product and if he had heard of it. They're looking at a taser or a Panasonic unit. You had made mention of making reference to House Bill 3389. I read through that bill and I didn't find, could you clarify to me, we're in the bill that says that law enforcement has to use some type of video type of to make sure that they are not profiling. I didn't see. What I saw in House Bill 3389 have to do with the qualifications of a constable as well as the complaint process are sustaining F5. Is that a certification? Well, it depends on how you report on the racial profiling as for what tier you report. Right. And this mainly sets up the commission for the reporting. In other words, establishes, could you clarify to me the reason why I'm interested in it. I'm not sure first of all if every law enforcement officer within our agency within our county has what you're asking for. And if it's a requirement under a house bill, is there an expectation that we're going to be starting getting an influx of these requests from law enforcement Law enforcement through the Constable or through the Sheriff's Department I know that majority if not all of them have the video cam And with this along with that or I'll forget it is Is the video cam that you're asking for it? Is it a direct input into the computer? Or is it a DVR? Or did how do you save under our policy as well as whatever the statutory policy is on how long you have to save that video image? Or is it like the shares department? Does it go to a server that's in our technology department. So did you get educate me just a little bit? I'll try to. Okay. I'm not just myself too, but under House bill 3389 article 2.132, it's mainly regarding traffic stops. There's a requirement depending on how you report racial profiling. And we're a tier one reporting agency. So it's required that we make a traffic stop that that traffic stops recorded and the information is saved or stored for 90 days. That's okay. I didn't find that article in there. So you can show that to me. So if that's the case, so that's either through a video cam on the dash or dash cam, let's call it that. Is that the minimum requirement? So is that why every vehicle in the county should have a video cam to meet the requirements of this law? If they conduct traffic stops on a routine basis. Some agencies that are certified peace officers don't conduct traffic stops. Let's say like an arson investigator or something like that. So they are not required on this bill to have it. But routine traffic stops are part of our daily function, even though our main priority is to serve civil process. So do you currently have cameras now? We have old vid mics, and I brought one to Sophia. I wanted to see it. We don't have any video cameras in our cards. We had when Doug took office or council boards took office. We had five vehicles that were equipped with video cameras. They were the old VHS style. Right. Right. They were outdated four of the five units didn't even work. Um, so he decided there were some funding that had been promised by the shares department. So we went ahead and took those cameras out, that funding fell through. So at that point it was a little late in our budget to get them in our budget. And this was my fault. I made him stay. I started in January and I had to have this Rachel profiling report the first one that I did in March, I think that the initial profiling report, the first one that I did in March, I think. So I filed that and this year when our racial profiling came up, I was reading through the information of this house bill and saw that it was a requirement that those traffic stops are recorded visibly. the requirements of the recording to the commission or requirement if you're going to have traffic stops. You understand it because my understanding of this House bill and it may be totally wrong was to set up the process that if you are going to have a complaint filed against you towards it to this commission that you had to do had the complaint in a electronic, filed electronically the proof. And I guess that would be through a digital camera or whatever. I'm just, I'm just need to know where this is going to go. If there's a requirement, then we're not meeting that requirement of the law. How many agencies within our county's not meeting that? And what's the financial impact of that? And the next thing is, I know I'm throwing up this all at you. The standardization of it. I know that the in the standardization of it means a lot to me like what is the sheriff's office using? You know, let me help you out on this little gap. Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Office of Standards and Education. What does it mean when an agency reports as a racial profile in tier one partially exempt? Each agency must select a reporting option that applies to their particular situation. When an agency chooses to report as a partial exemption or Tier 1 reporting, the agency is stated it routinely performs traffic stops or motor vehicle stops. And the vehicles that routinely perform these stops are equipped with video and audio equipment Low enforcement agencies that routinely perform traffic stops are motor vehicle stops and who have their vehicles that routinely perform these stops Equip with video and audio equipment can report under this Yeah, not a shallow, but but it can report under this. Yeah. It's shallow, it's. But also Donna Beds didn't, doesn't someone else, I mean the other commissioners, there was another commissioner that came in when those items were pulled, I think that the, a constable, I'm sorry, that have those video. And it might be pre-63. Do you have them? And you came in later in in Gala after the funding was fooled, right? Yeah. What type of what brand are those? We probably come up here. And I apologize for taking the time on this, but I need some understanding and clarification. What we did run, or commission or more shot, when the funding fell through for us as far as the audio and video, and that's a rather expensive elaborate system that the Sheriff's Office has. So I came to y'all, y'all graciously provided us with what they call the VIVE system. It's a very, very good system that the guys use. They can take it. A lot of it is not just traffic stops, but it's when they're making day-to-day contact with the public. It saves you complaints because you're just one C and N issue away from, you know, y'all know how that goes. So y'all graciously provided those for us. The guys are very happy with them. And I mean, as far as the traffic stops, no constables offices out here, you know, have traffic units around the highway doing that every day. I don't know as far as precinct five, but my guys don't, but those have been very good for us. and you don't have to have a separate server for those. So I recommend the five views it. I mean, I don't know if you all look at those. Yeah, who main is that? Do you have a maintenance contract with that when we approved it? Who maintains those? We maintain them and you keep all the audio and video for 90 days. Well, I understand that, but the maintenance on the the equipment. It goes straight back to it comes straight back from. One year one year one year one year warranty. One year warranty. It comes with the one year warranty on it. Okay. Okay. I guess my question would be did you talk with anybody else, the Sheriff's Department, or any other constable to try to get some across the board standardization equipment that we are using? Thank you. Thank you, constable. this particular system and they liked it. They liked the video resolution and the recording device itself is really good. And it's got a one-year guarantee on it. The thing we liked about this particular system is rather than just wearing it on, it's got two cameras, it's got a car camera that stays mounted inside the car. So when you make a traffic stop, it records that. When you pull the mic or the recorder out of the docking station to put on your body, that actually make the contact, then it transfers. The blue tooth? I mean, you know. Now, the camera recorder records into the docking station and is uploaded into this, into the docking station and is uploaded into this, into the body camera. So when you pull the body camera out of the docking station it automatically begins recording from that point forward. So you get the entire stop face to face with the, with the citizens. It's just stored on a memory card or whatever. Exactly. Back in it, downloads whatever you, you had. Correct. And then you, you don't have to have similar to their system. You can download it under our own server and save that folder for 90 days. They still fulfill the requirements of that house bill. So you maintain, so it would be maintained on an SD chip or a memory or in the camera and then you download that to your computer. I can tell you under Senate Bill 7 several years ago they required people to take documentation for racial profiling and they either at that time required you to have it on video or engage in a fairly onerous paper system where you took a pretty evasive questionnaire of what was going on. I think it was decided at the time that it was much easier to do it via video to because check the officer and protect the person who was being stopped. We still have to file a report anyway even with the recording, but it's a very short, concise report compared to what we do have to file. And again, I'm not against this at all, please, but it's understanding it's more education for me. And I'm wondering why we're not piggybacking on what the sheriff is doing, our proposing to do. Proposing to do, is currently doing our proposing to do, so we could standardize what we're doing, as well as standardize the method, as well as standardize a protocol, I'm just wondering. Other than everybody having something to think about? Yeah, yeah, yeah. They're using the Arbor Trader, is that the camera system for the vehicle and do you have body at all? Okay. But he is correct by saying that, you know, with all the litigation out there these days, we've been able to do that. Yeah, I do. The only reason we prefer to have them that way is because they download to Kevin's servers, we can't touch them. After they're gone, we can't touch them. And that's the way I like it. I don't like to be able to have having any other way. I want it to go to a third, you know, to Kevin. And so you're saying that if you have a standalone system, you have the ability not only to store, but you have the ability to edit. Right. Which can be challenged by any good. You know, it won't, and the possibility of that to happen and won't be't be but it's just I just don't want to take that chance I would just prefer that that Kevin hand little And you know that you can still get your Documentation you need to go to the DA's office you can still run disc and everything But it's all done through him and I just prefer it that way but but you know as far as the cameras. Yes If they're out there enforcing traffic stuff Profile and they definitely you know, it's a good great thing, great tool to have. Would you have concern? Well, again, my concern goes with standardization. I mean, bet is there a way to lump all that together to where we're getting the best bang for a buck and then having standardization, everybody using the same protocol or. You know, the ones we did for the Sheriff's Office, the arbitrators, we were able to get us a good price off of a co-op contract for those. So we're getting the lowest discount that you can get in the state. So there's not a five by ten more, there's not an additional discount. As far as if there's any kind of maintenance or sharing the parts between departments, we really don't do that. Now I've not looked at the pricing on these to see you know if there's a better way to buy those but getting everybody the same not a big impact on purchasing. Which is we're constantly looking at all the different manufacturers. I'm going to see which one's going to do us the best. You know we're obviously looking at the camera, the front and the obviously the back of the police car. You know you want to see your inmate back there that type of stuff at all. And so we're looking at a lot of different innovative ideas to do that. We're also looking at the cost saving part of it. You know, now that everything's going digital, everybody's getting into pricing wars with each other. Which we're going to come out benefit. I just wonder why the other law enforcement agencies, you aren't collaborating and trying to get a standardization of all those all those Because I see here is the main difference I see here is for the constable's unit they take it out in there Yeah, sure I understand and I understand that a Lot of what we do obviously is in a lot of what we do obviously is in compared to the Sheriff's Park Course There's R2 where we do move out some evictions with reliability areas but take that with us and go inside the house and all that worry if you have a camera in the car you've got the audio recording but you don't have the video recording that's why we like it because it benefits us more that way with now the Sheriff's Department not that they're not inside houses and things, but you know that's 90% of what we do. So I'm gonna go ahead and move approval. I'll second. Thank you. I'll appreciate the input. Ron you have any more coming? You have any more questions or comments? I did but that's okay. I'll second for purposes of discussion then. If you want to. We have a motion by commission. Mitchell second back, commissioner Coleman. Ron did you have something? I had what would this fall under for looking at standardization of the purchasing of that equipment? Would that fall under vehicle? What would it fall under? I guess we could take it under that. I don't know Beth we want to take on that extra. We've been meeting not Dick yes a commissioners court. What what I mean I mean the vehicle assessment committee has been meeting and looking at all the equipment on vehicles. This is on an officer So it's a little bit different Big difference in price between the ones in the vehicle and the ones on the body as well. But the other needs are different. And I'd be happy to do that. I can see where their needs are different. So, yeah, me too. My concern is the standard is that everybody following the same kind of protocol on getting the best thing for the budget. And we want to do that also so the equipment could be used from cars to cars on the vehicle assessment committee. So my discussion at that though I understand that was how can we look into standardizing that equipment. A lot like Hurden cats. Then we need to heard. Why do we? I mean, we do have the bid mics that currently we currently use. You have to turn them on and wait a second and hear a beep and then hit a recorder. I mean, we have the ability right now to do it. If you need more time or we certainly understand that? We will, but I'm asking for, sir. I'm just asking for us to take some care of our fiscal responsibility and our end, and that's what I was asking for. And so- I'm inclined to be supportive of what's being requested here, but I'm also thinking that I would like to add that to the responsibilities of the vehicle assessment committee to take a look at it. Just to make sure we're going about the, I mean, technology as we all know changes rapidly. And are we going with the best model? And do we need to standardize or are we doing fine the way we are if the vehicle assessment committee would take a look at that You know we're swinging in the budget again. This is the time to look at it. So we have we have a motion in a second In favor beth I was just gonna say we probably want Kevin Carr to join us for that discussion because of the servers and the story. Okay. Any other questions or comments? We have a motion and a second in favor. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Sainine? Motion does carry. Thank you for being here. We appreciate the help. The questions are on. 7C is approval. Budget Member Quests. 7C is approval of budget member quest 100540 to increase revenues and by utilizing fund balance to cover equipment maintenance service agreement for the forensic lab with university in North Texas including the creation of a new line item for fiscal year 2013-2014 for sheriff forfeiture fund in the amount of $42,243. This is for recording purposes only. Motion by Commissioner Mitchell. Seconded by Commissioner Merchant. In the amount of $42,243, this is for recording purposes only. Motion by Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Marchant. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, aye. Aye. Motion does carry. Seven days approval of Budget Amendment Quest 100550 for road maintenance equipment to purchase a Volvo EW 180D wheeled excavator for road and bridge precinct one in the amount of $238,382. I move for approval. Motion by Commissioner Coleman. Second. Second by Commissioner Marchand, questions or comments? I'll in favor please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Cine? Motion does carry. All right, I believe you missed 7B. I apologize. The mobile phone data deal. I missed one. Yes ma'am. I'm sorry, you're right. 7B is a budgeted amendment request 100520 to upgrade an existing mobile phone and add a monthly data plan for the unit for the mobile mobile phone dispense line item for Constable, pressing three in the amount of $650. Members, I sent you some information yesterday that I had asked Kate Linus to put together. And here again, back to the point that you brought up with the camera for the constable. We've got all these requests that are coming in for changes in telephones. And our own policy says that it's up to the commissioners court to, at budget time, to be making these decisions. And we've got these requests coming in, not just from constables, not just picking them in here. Yeah, so the only point I'm making here is maybe we're doing this and handling it just fine, but I would like to ask Kevin Cardigan involved here on this issue too, we've got all these budget amendments coming in for mobile phone expenses. Some people, they're on different data services, different plans. I guess too. Obviously, if a request comes into budget, they're going to look at it from a budget standpoint. There are some commissioners court approves something purchasing is going to make sure it happens. Because that's basically the instruction they received. But it's our responsibility to take a look and see if we are doing this the most occult effective way. And maybe we are. I don't know. But I would like to get Kevin card to help us figure out, again, do we need some standardization here? Kevin has dealt with Sprent and ATT and all these different phone companies on different issues, concerning phone service today in County. And Kevin, I would like for you to take a look at this whole process and help us figure out, you know maybe what we're doing is just fine. I don't know that but we're in a budget process and this is the time to take a look at it. We have more and more phones being requested all the time, some through Sprint, some through Verizon service, different data plans. This body court needs to decide how far down in whatever office, whether it's possible or whatever office, are we going to say it's okay for the staff to have mobile phones? Does an administrative assistant that, to my knowledge, spends the majority of their time in the office, do they need a mobile phone? That's a question for us to decide. Back to your reference about kids, Commissioner Coleman, just because they request something doesn't mean they're gonna get it. Great. To me, I mean, I know, I think like the points commissioner Marchont made regarding standardization, I think this is something it would be easier to do to standardize as opposed to maybe the video equipment because, you know, all the different, all the possible some are more concerned about traffic, some are more concerned about, you know, but I think it should be fairly easy well I may be famous last words but to you know standardize everybody's mobile phone plan I mean I know this that every my AT&T plan that I've had for years I piggyback on Terrent County government's discount because they ask me what I do and I tell them I'm in government and so they put me under the Tarant County government discount plan so AT&T so there is opportunity in that for your iPad or your first. For the iPad or your phone. Phone. My phone. My own personal phone. And so I'm sure that- because I take advantage of it through Tarrant County. And I say, well, I'm in Denton County, so it doesn't matter. Your government work will put you under that. And so you personal phone? Because- I have AT&T myself with my personal phone. My personal phone. I don't have a county. So I don't either. They still do it. So and well my point is by our own policy we do reserve the right to assign the appropriate usage plan for all county paid wireless phones. And I think here at budget time it's a good time to bring this up and take a look at it. Maybe what we're doing is just sign, but we're getting more and more requests like this, not just from constables. And we have different people that have different usage, you know, various plans ranging from 54, 99 to 199, 99 for data lines. I don't know. Kevin, we've given you a lot to look at. I copied Kevin in on the email that I sent you all with a research that Kate's done up to this point. And if he comes back, says, we're doing just fine. That's fine with me, but I budget time is the time to look at it. I think to the term of Judge, what has happened in the past, if we've allowed everybody to, when they had money in their budget, to buy additional things. And so of course if they've got money in their budget, they purchase things. And then the next year, yeah, getting questions, their budget. Right. So we do have to sit down and decide how we want to handle this. Set of policy is standard for what we want to do. In the meantime, since we don't have a policy, I'm going to move approval. Okay. We have a motion by Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Eid's, Commissioner Coleman, did you want to add something? I agree with you, Commissioner Mitchell. To me, I was just going to add as a suggestion that instead of if it's like hurting cats and we can't get everybody to agree, what would y'all think about just saying, look, if you qualify for a phone, we give you a stipend. And whatever deal you cut is what you get as opposed to us figuring out data plans in the phone they buy. I don't have a problem with that. And then we have the standardization and we know what the budget on to. Then, you know, if they, you know, if they go crazy over on their data plan, they pay for it. Yeah. I think it's a good way to help. You know, it would, I think it would have some self-imposed austerity perhaps. Okay. We can look at, we can look at all of that. Kevin, you taking this in? He's taking notes. Okay. But that may be problematic as well. But I mean, I think that's a way to do it. And if you're going to do it, just give them a stipend. Or set bill in the county. No, then I give them a stop and they would be responsible for their own phone. For their own bill. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. I got you. A lot of government agencies are doing that. So would be worth looking at. Yeah, I think that maybe the one comment about the standardization. I think it'd be easier to standardize budget amounts and the level of people, the lines as far as the equipment and the plans, just like our own personal funds, they change every week or every month. And so when their plan comes up and they're ready for an upgrade, I mean, the plans are different. And so to get them all on one plan is not going to happen because you can get them all on them today. And the next week it's going to be different. There'll be a different promotion that's a better plan that based on the usage. And that we do have three different contracts, but they're all government contracts so we're getting deep discounts on those. Well, maybe a stipend. I don't know. Budget time, so the time to bring the issue up was today. Okay, we have a motion and a second for approval of 7v. Is there any further comments or questions? Hearing none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Aye opposed, Siné. Motion is carried. say aye. Aye. Aye opposed, in any motion, this carry. Thank you. Okay. Eight a is approval to discontinue the use of payroll deduction for a legal shield of volunteer employee benefit. We asked Amy Phillips to do a little survey on this. We'll call on Amy. Thank you, Judge. On page 185, you can see the results of the survey about, well, almost 50% of the participants responded, which is a pretty high response rate. It looks like not all of the employees who enroll have used it since they enrolled. Those that have have been satisfied with it. Those that have not, some of them are considering using it in the future. Most employees did not, that responded, did not favor discontinuing the payroll deduction. Another question that you asked when this was on the agenda before was since this is a group rate that we get through payroll deduction, if we were to cancel the payroll deduction, would the price go up? The price for the people who are currently enrolled legal shield said they would leave that the same, but the people, but any new participants would not be able to take advantage of the group break that they get through payroll deduction. Questions or comments from members of CO. I say we leave it. I don't think legal sheet shield is productive. I can see where it appealed to some participants, but I'm always kind of weary about marketing things to our employees. But it is what it is. I don't hear any motions, so I'm assuming there's no action on this item today. Okay. Thank you. Appreciate the survey work, Amy, Thank you. Appreciate the survey work. Any thank you. 10A is approval of the final plat for TWM edition, one block A, Commissioner Pristing four, but calling Stephen Belnet. Morning, Staden. This is just a final plan, a single lot final plan for the TWM edition. I move for approval. The motion by Commissioner Eid, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. Are there any questions and members of court? Very none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Aye. Post-in-e. Motion to carry. 10V is approval of requests for public hearing on April 8, 2014 to consider the replad of a council tractor addition. Lots 11 and 12. This is Commissioner Prussin for. This is for approval. Motion by Commissioner E. Seconded by Commissioner Marchin. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, aye. Motion is carried. Thank you, Stephen. 12a is approval of one, the memorandum of understanding between US immigration and customs enforcement, ICE, and the Denton County Sheriff's Office for joint operations and two memorandum of understanding between US immigration and customs enforcement, and the Denton County Sheriff's Office for the reimbursement of joint operation expenses from the Treasury for Fitcher Fund. Motion by Commissioner Marchant, seconded by Commissioner Ease. Hearing no questions, all in favor, please say aye. Aye, opposed any? Motion is carried. 12v is approval of the 2014 North Central Texas Council of Governments, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division, Local Project Proposal and the amount of $112,852. Chair, a move for approval. Second. Thank you. By Commissioner Mitchell. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed to the name? Motion to carry. 13A is approval of one property schedule number eight, including exhibits and attachments between different kind of texas and key government finance incorporated. Two, S program it with key government finance incorporated and key bank national association. Three, authority for Kevin Carr director of technology services to sign exhibit five. The acceptance certificate upon receipt of equipment, and a form of requisition cost property and disbursement schedule for release of escrow funds for first annual payment funding from Auditor Line Item 01672610905 is any appropriate action. Questions? motions? motion by commissioner marchin. Seconded by commissioner Coleman. Hearing no questions on favor please say aye. Aye. Aye. Post and in. Motion does carry 13b as after due notice and public hearings conducted on January 3rd, 2014. Consider and take possible action regarding one. The creation of one or more county energy transportation reinvestment zones pursuant to chapter 222.1071 of the Texas Transportation Code and to the appointment of an advisory board to serve in an advisory capacity to Commissioner's Court regarding such county energy transportation reinvestment zones pursuant to 22 2.1072 Texas Transportation Code and 3 they're approval of the application submission of a cert's grant to text that by the due date. I'll move for approval. Okay. Okay. Do we have our committee? Yes, ma'am. We do. You want to? I'll call it. It draw on the back up? Okay, just to make sure we establish that. It's a combination of obviously citizen representatives and industry representatives as required by the thing that they all satisfy the requirements. They're all didn't count any residents and satisfy file the requirements is requested by TechStyle. And a statute. Two non, three industry and two non industry, Echo Fraga and Reginald Jones. And all of our industry representatives have a long history of community service as far as their government relations, representatives of the industry and that we're excited about having them. Great. Okay, we have a motion. Is secondary no further discussion? All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, in any motion? Is Kira, 13c is approval of the reappointment of Mr. Scott Corbett to the Child Protective Services Board. Motion by Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Eads. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Ceneen. Motion is carried. 13D is approval of reappointing Mr. Jerry Alford to the Transportation Commission. Chair of the salmue. Seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, Sennid. Motion is carried. 13E is approval to request approval of requests to switch cellular service providers upgrade to smartphones and ad data plans to all phones assigned to Constable Person 4. I will so move since we've already discussed all of this. I'm going to so move. We have a motion by Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Marchant. Did you want to add anything constable? I just esteemed members of the commission. I just wanted to bring it up that I am trying to be more fiscally conservative and change from sprint, which was actually when I did the research was more expensive than Verizon. When I go, when I'm asking for the data plans, is the reason being is because a lot of times in the field and the guys when their computers go down, you can't ask somebody to use their personal cell phones because if you do, that becomes a matter of open records that that would be subjecting their phones to so when I go to the data plans I've actually saved quite a bit of money and I'm sure you've looked at my minutes I use quite a few minutes, but that's always been on a you know The unlimited and actually with Verizon it's saved us quite a bit of money because when I changed over It gave us a discount on every phone. So I'm good this year. It's going to impact the budget $243 next year. But if you were to look down the line, if I would have been on Verizon up to them now, it would have been relatively no impact whatsoever. So that's why I'm trying to make this change. I have no problem as far as your standardizing. But I do it. We get in our area, we get quite a few calls dropped with Sprint, and that's why when everybody told me about Verizon, I did go. Now I am joining forces. I'm trying to not be the dinosaur right there on the planet. Nobody else is on. So that's why I'm asking for your consideration. Thank you. Thank you. We have a motion and a second. Are there further questions or comments? Hearing none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, sen. Motion does carry. Thank you, Constable. 13F is approval of resolution filed in the district court of Denton, kind of Texas to collect the link with taxes on the following property and it gives the cause number here. And actually we can take 13G at the same time. It's just both of these properties, we don't actually three of them, 13FG and H. They're all property that went to a sheriff's sale and didn't sell. Thank you. We have a motion or approval by Commissioner Eid, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. This is for 13 FG and H. Questions or comments? Hearing none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, sitting. Motion does carry. 14 A is approved of a 2013, 2014, and a local cooperation agreement for library services between Bill County, Texas and the Carroll and Public Library City of Carroll. Motion by Commissioner Marchin, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed to need. Motion is carried. Okay, ladies and gentlemen, we've conducted a business for the day. Once you're reminded, everybody, if you haven't, go vote. And we are adjourned. Everybody have a great day.