Good evening ladies and gentlemen this is the eighth July 8th 2024 meeting of this Building and Standards Commission. The Commission will conduct this business in accordance with the Postal Agenda. The first agenda item is the reading of the purpose of the Building and Standards Commission. ordinance number 694 on May 27, 1968. Its duty is to hear and approve or deny appeals the chief building official with respect to the repair, vacation, or demolition of any building or structure, or portion thereof in the enforcement of chapter 126 of the code of ordinances. It also considers approval or denial of appeals of the building officials interpretation of the international building codes. Mission is made up of five volunteer city residents, along with two alternates who are appointed to two year terms. The members are qualified as nearly as practicable and and one are more of the fields of building construction, architecture, engineering, sanitation, our health. Next to GenDydom is approval of the minutes from the January 8, 2024 Building of Standards Commission meeting. As everyone has a chance to read the minutes. Yes. We have any changes or corrections. No. If no, do we have a motion? I'll move that we approve the January 8th, 2024 commission meetings minutes as submitted. Second. Motion is made by Greg Adams. Greg Adams and seconded by 4-0 and 4-0. And in all in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? The motion is adopted. Next agenda item is item 24 dash 172A. Located at 309 Wolf Street. We have three on nine wolf street. We've pleased here the city staff report. Good afternoon commission. I'm Inspector Woods with the City of McKinney Co. Compliance Office. We've been dealing with three on nine wolf a little bit over three years. The property initially burned down. It was a total burnout. And then the property on the attempted to repair the property. But since then, there's been a halt in repairing the property. So we've come for you guys today to request and approve a two demo depropathy. So you were asking for demolition at this point. Yes sir, we've already had an initial meeting with the presenters prior to before you guys within the last six to eight months and their property owner has won against those orders to repair or demotor property. Thank you. Are there any questions of city staff? Okay, this is a couple of questions. There are no others wishing to speak on this item and I will close public hearing and open discussion among the commission. Is there a motion? the a couple of questions the pictures that we're looking at that is the building as it stands today yes sir and nothing has been done the The property owner has attempted to make repairs, but they've been halted for, I would say, over appears of 180 days. Almost appears like one of the photos shows that there's no foundation to the area wall in a pure box. Yes. It's, uh, it's, it's made more progress since this photo, but let me see what that is. The property owner is not here. I'm going to have an opening. Any other questions? Oh, I'm good. This goes back over the way to 2021. So if... I move that the Commission find that the structure located at 308 W. 309 W. Sorry. 309 W. Street is in violation of the standards set out in the city ordinances as specified in the report by city staff and adopt the report of city staff as it's finding. Order that the owner of the property must remove or demolish the structure and have a lot clean and graded with proper drainage within 30 days. Now we have to take the ordered action within the specified time. May result in the city taking action to demolish the structure Any grade the lot and establish a lien on the property Is there a second to that motion? I'll second it Motion is going to be by Russ Colburn and seconded by Zigg Adams. Great Adams all in favor say aye Aye opposed Motion is adopted. Next agenda. Item is item 24-1729 located at 500 North McDonald Street. Please hear the city staff report. Yes sir, with the property located at 500 North McDonald Street, it's a similar case status as far as the property being in a dilapidated state of more than three to four years. We're currently requesting permission to demo the property as well. We also have a representative here from the property owners. There have been any attempt to rectus? No sir, the church has raised monies to try to voluntarily demo the structure itself but the structure has been verified to have as best as so that's driven up the cost of that demo. this is the building and the front of us number of times. At least some time in on. Yeah, that's when the case actually started October of 2019. and we'll be back in the next week. Thank you. We'll be back in the next week. We'll be back in the next week. Thank you. Are there any questions for the city staff? This is a public hearing item. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to speak in favor or against this item. Ralph Evans on behalf of St. James Church, we are in agreement that the building should be demolished. We have a contract ready to demolish the building and with it as best those report that through a curveball that we were not prepared for. But in the interim we have already applied for a TURRS grant with the City of McKinney through Miss Jennifer Arnold. And it's almost completed. There's one item that she needed back from us. So we would respectfully ask that you give us just a couple more like another month. To let that process go through, see if we can get this asbestos abated and this building torn down on our own. And I know this has been going on for a while, but we have the money to do it now with the exception of the asbestos and with the city of McKinney's help, with the turrs grant, I think we'll be able to knock it down and I won't have to come see you guys anymore. I think we'll be able to knock it down and I won't have to come see you guys anymore Thank you already obtained a demolition permit through the city Yes, the contract is already got the permit and with that permit It's hadn't completed because the asphalt as best. So it's like an asterisk on it Yeah, so we need to get that done and then we're ready to go to go. City staff is asking for 3090. Is 3090 going to be enough time? I think it's a complete permit. And then 90 days to demolish. I think so, yes. Is there a, is there a, as best as best as mitigation company you already have online to do the work who's certified and qualified? Yes, sir. Okay. Yeah, I think he was here last time. The demo contract was here last time, the Especial Sky. He actually sent us a report without even seeing the building. And he actually came out in person to review the building and gave us a secondary, an actual estimate to do it. So we're on track. So. Thank you very much. Is there anyone else in the audience would like to speak in favor against this item? There are no others wishing to speak on this item that I will close to public hearing I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do that. There are no other, no others wishing to speak on this item that I will close to public caring and open discussion in months. It seems like it's not 3090. Yeah, I think 3090 would be good on your time. And if he's saying they have the money, it's just. It's just finalizing the paperwork. Finalizing the paperwork with the city and get going. Okay. I move that the commission find that the structure located at 500 north McDonald's Street is in violation of the standard set up in the city ordinances specified in the report by city staff in the adopted report of city staff as it's funding. The order that the owner must obtain a proper building permit within 30 days and have the effective and within 90 days that the owner must obtain a demolition permit and have a lot of clean and graded with proper drainage within 90 days of this order. Our action is not complete within the 90 days. The commission will may review the item and may grant additional time if a plan is scheduled. Proof of substantial hardship and proof of substantial progress. the right of the second the go ahead. motion has been made by Russ gober in a second by Jim Garrison. All in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion is adopted. Next to agenda item is item number the city's property. Next agenda item is item number two four- one seven three zero. Located at eight oh one North Tennessee Street. We please hear the city staff report. Yes, the property located at eight oh one North Tennessee Street. That was first notified of the property's conditions on the 2nd of February of this year. From there, the property was tax-substandard. And the property owner was being given due process to bring that property into compliance. on April 24th, there was a fire was notified of a cylinder failure in the front of the building that you see right here and that portion was since the demolished on that date. So we're here now to continue through the BSC process and allow that property owner to either repair the entire structure itself or to demotivate. And we're recommending the 3090 with this property as well. And I do have updated photos and the engineering for but I don't have one for each of you. Okay. Okay. Make it. Here I see. Okay. Okay. Yeah. If you've been in contact with the owner? Yes sir. And the owner is extra present today. I've had no issues working with the proper owner Mr. Anderson. He's been great in cooperating with the city in this process Thank you, are there a public hearing item. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to speak in favor or against this item? Hi, my name is David Cox. I'm with Carri Cox Company, commercial real estate here in McKinney. And the owner Mr. Anderson has hired us to help him dispose of this property. So I was going to come and answer any questions you guys have and let you know of some of the progress that we've made so far. What you're looking at is the engineering report, which we walked it with an engineer last week and to get an opinion on the stability of the structure after the demoed part of the building up front. And you can see in the report, he feels really good about the building being structurally sound. So Mr. Anderson's game plan is to sell this property. Our evaluation and the engineering evaluation tells us there's more life left in this building I've been doing this 27 years and walk through a lot of old buildings and it's I Think there's life left in it So the game plan would be to find a user or developer that would take this rehab to the finish line and either use it for their existing business or as a lease property. It's unoccupied now. It's unoccupied now. I'm assuming it's unoccupied now. Did you go to photo three? What section of the building is that? Is that in the rear of it? Or that's that's back in one of the corners. One of the processes is it's going to need a new roof and we're talking structural. They'll have to remove a lot of support choice. Some of the building has, as you can see here, wood, but I have the majority of the building. This was what was the main problem. This was the main problem and of course it's gone. Okay. There's some pictures They may be in that engineering report that show what it looks like today But the majority of the building has Masonry and steel construction. There construction there's not much wood in it. Oh there you go. That's the demo portion that was caved in that you saw in that first shot. Is that supporting those supports for masonry wall or the is that supporting those supports for a masonry wall or the the two of twelve and angle there there was a suggestion I don't know if it's from the city or someone on the site that we've sure that wall up so Mr. Anderson the owner of Winnehedded did that. The engineer's opinion was it was a little bit overkill but it's fine. No problem. I'm assuming that's an unreinforced masonry wall. I'm sorry, is that again? I'm sorry to say that again. I'm assuming that's an unreinforced masonry wall that's supported there. There's joy still in the inside of that. Around on the inside. Would you have been in there? Burn it. It was just one end this morning, so it is a support. But I want to say that I want to say that the fire may just recognize and this is an additional safety. the it says here the building is approximately 92 years old. There's 17,800 square feet under roof. It's a little smaller than that after the demo. It's closer to 15,000 now with the removal of the front piece. City the city is asking for 3090. Is this something that can be well on its way, let's say, at least within the 90 days. I would say well on its way. I don't think you'll finish it in 90 days.. Now and the process to Mr. Anderson would like to sell the property. Okay, so find a buyer, get that process going, have them fully understand the city process. So I would think well under way as a fair statement. Sold, maybe, I would say maybe closer to six months to actually change hands. But maybe it's done in 90 days. Is there going to be any more work on it now before he sells it or no? No, we just want to fully understand what needs to be done. And like I said earlier, we're in buildings every day and this has a fire sprinkler system in it, which is pretty rare for this style of building. The electrical has been upgraded and there's a lot of assets in this building that are very expensive. Well, somebody is going to understand that the value of that. And we really feel strong as somebody will take it to the finish line and actually make it usable. OK, but basically you're looking at this as an as is sale. Yes. Yes. Okay. Unless some other kind of arrangement is made. Yeah, and a developer may come along and say, we're going to scrape the site and build something new. So if we go put a roof on it and they scrape it. Is the building currently safe? As far as being boarded locked, fenced, whatever. As right now. Is it fenced in? It is not finished. But it's boarded up and... It's boarded up on our interports. Don't at all. You can still walk into this bar area and the other exterior boards of the beer but you cannot access as you get enough of intertorch strengths. So, I have any more work done on it. Thank you. All right. Thank you. Please have a seat. Is there anyone else in the audience who would like to speak in favor or against this item. There are no others wishing to speak on this item that I will close to public hearing and open discussion among the commission. 3090. In adjustments to it. It depends on when it sells that you can see any kind of progress after it sells. That's about it. It's been one ninety-eight things and it doesn't sell. It means the ninety-eight is going to sit here again. It doesn't sell in the year. That means you have improvement here. Might be back. We're Dimes. I really knew. Can we make any alteration or modification to the 3090? And is it the secure building? Is it as it been listed for sale? Yes. Okay. Yes. I mean, it could sell tomorrow or in 2026 Just sitting there With flexibility in the days I'd be more at say something like honor. He's say that within honor he's I mean, it's a zone light industrial, right? No light manufacturing. No 120 or 180 days. See that? Old within that period. I think so, regardless of who owns it. Orals of walls. Action. If not, they would have to do that. I think so regardless of who owns it. Orals of walls, action. If not, they would have to. Hopefully if it can't be done within that period, they're within closing, closing or something. Let's go 180. That's six months. So I'm agreement. six months. It's out on the green light. We'll see if I can take this. I'm going to go ahead and see if I can get the right to the right. It's a cool looking building. Yeah. Say 180 days. I actually do have a question for City. Is there any benefit by requiring maybe a chain link fence to go around the premier just for safety aspects since nothing's going to be done? We're talking about half a year potentially. It could be an additional requirement because I think it would also have the problem with unowned individuals in the area. That seems to be a problem at this side of his way. So that definitely would be considered a matter of the city, not against it at all. But I think with the fancy people, I'd like to see if you want to put up. And the orange fancy mess, I'm not going to throw up or if you want to have a minute. would the city be the one to make that request or would that come from the commission? I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I would, I three days that they have been something to do. Yeah. 180 for permits to be pulled. Either demo or a planned place. Yeah. Permits pulled in a planned place and honored. You don't sell it, they'll have to come back. You can. Okay. Okay. Those solid, but. Thank you. I see what this is. to I'm going to put it in here. I'm going to put it in here. Yeah. I'm going to put it in here. Yeah. I'm going to put it in here. Yeah. I'm going to put it in here. Yeah. I'm going to put it in here. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah Okay. Okay. I move that the commission find that the structure located at 801 North Tennessee Street. And violation of standards set up was city ordinances specified in the report by city staff and adopted a report of city staff as its finding. What are that de-owner must put up a chain link fence around the property within 30 days and within 100 80 days have permits in plans, permits pulled and plans in place for reconstruction. Permits are not pulled and plans are not placed within 180 days. The commission may review the item and may grant additional time if a plan, a schedule, roof-up substantial hardship, and proof-up substantial progress is given. I'm going to take the ordered action within the specified time. May result in the city taking action to demolish the structure. It's going to grade the lot and establish a lien on the property. We're second to that motion. I'll second that motion. As we've been by Russ over and seconded by Jim Garrison. All in favor say aye. Aye. to be bain by Russ Overland and seconded by Jim Garrison. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. O.C. Nay. Motion is done. Next, Jan the item is item number. item. Next, Jan the item is item number 1724-1731 located at 821 Lindsay Street. We please hear the City staff report. Yes, sir. this property burned. I want to say in 2021 as well. I've made several attempts to contact the owner upon being successful on a small percentage of those. My last contact with the property owner, one of the other name is Ms. Jackie, because the original property owner, he passed and she stated that they did not have the funds to make any kind of repairs to the structure. So we're here today to request a third and ninety for this property, a third and eighty to obtain. The necessary permits and 90 days will actually complete those repairs or demolition. And I wanna say this is the first time this property has been presented to the RBSC. there's nothing on the inspection report that's satisfactory. Is this site secure. This site as far as gaining entry to the actual building yes but we go back to perimeter it's not offensive to where you can't walk up to and in an in an event that the commission wanted that that demo order to be sooner the city would not be against it. If we wanted to go 30 to, uh, to do that as well. Should you have been in contact with the property owner? Yes, sir. You don't have to fundraise now for it. They don't have, I don't think they even have an active congregation to raise those funds. The property is owned by the Shiloh Church of God. So there's no church board or officers. I don't know where. Okay. I think most of these are going to be this way due to COVID kind of kicking in at one point. This is before I got here too, but that's what I've been told is that the city kind of took a certain stance against issues of this matter dealing with COVID and after you have the 2019, 2019, 2021's and all those like this. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do that. The thing needs to come down. Inspection report did all said unsatisfactory on all of them, right? When you're on your inspection report. So. We're looking at a demolition. The structure needs to be demolished. But I always, we're not, the city I always like to give the property on the opportunity to bring that property to the point that they have. That's the first time. Whatever. We change. With $30.90? Yeah. All right. Everybody good with that? Yes. Thank you. Are there any other questions for city staff? This is a public hearing item. Is there anyone in the audience would like to speak in favor or against this item? There are no others wishing to speak on this item than I will close the public hearing and open discussion among the commission. Yeah, I think so. I move that the commission find that the structure located at 212.821 Lindsey is in violation of the standards set up. The City ordinances is specified in the report by city staff and adopt the report of city staff as it's finding. What are that the owner must obtain a proper building permit within 30 days and have the work expected and completed within 90 days. Or that the owner must obtain a demolition permit and have the lot cleaned and graded within proper. With proper drainage within 30 days of this water. with proper drainage within 30 days of this water. Fruction is not complete within the 90 days. The commission may review the item and may grant additional time of a plan, a schedule, proof of substantial hardship, and proof of substantial progress is given. Failure to take the ordered action within a specified time, may result in the city taking action to demolish the structure, and it greatly allowed us to establish a legal property. It's the second to that motion. I'll second it. Motion has been made by Russ Cohlmer and seconded by Greg Adams. Greg Adams. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed. Motion is adopted. The next item on the agenda is the next item on the agenda is 24-1732 located at 2624 Jacques Lane. Good afternoon commissioners my name is Christopher Smith. I am the Code Compliance Manager for the City of McKinney. I here to speak to you about 2624 jox lane. This property has had ongoing substandard structure issues since about 2019. Back in February of 2024, the property sustained fire, second floor fire, that damaged the structure significantly. The backside of the structure was largely left unscured until June of this year, exposing the interior to all the brains we had throughout the spring. So it's done significant damage to the interior of the structure as well. Initially, we were bringing this case before you'd asked for the $30.90, but I can tell you that owners as a Friday pulled up a permit for alteration remodel. So at this point what we would look for would just be the 90 days to have the structure repaired and inspected. I'll be right back. Do you have any questions of the staff? Bring your inspection on the rear of that. You said it was opened up fire. Is there structural damage to the house? Yes, and we have some interior photos of the structure too on the jump drive. That'll be helpful. Most of what we put it also has a pull. You can see the fences need to work because of the, it serves as the enclosure, but we can just kind of show you the photos that were taken as part of the permit process as well. It's kind of see for yourself where it's at currently. Yeah. There. There you go. I'm going to go to the first and second. You said the structure of the fire was in the rear of the structure. I believe that's where it started correct. The second story, rear. Complete with a boot. the complete with a boot. There's roll down. This one picture here of the drive for a with the boat and then it's boarded up. Is that the garage? That is the garage, yes sir. It has since early June been secured. The windows have been boarded up on the back and the garage but from February till June. Well they've been boarded up multiple times but with moving in and out of the demo and stuff like that back with that taking several months and the only way to really discard that other than dragging it down a poor stairwell and everything through that nature we outloaded it outside of a window frame that was largely detached that you can see right there and then then kind of move from that side of that pool into the back where we could go in place where we could put a roll-off dumpster. It almost appears that there's any structural damage. It'd be the rough. The rough numbers? Yeah. And the city was trying to look for that too. So I've been in touch with the city over the fact over whether we needed to get a structural engineer involved or architect poll. Then that's with my second meeting with the city. I went in there and I took pictures and I said, hey, look, it's a couple of pieces of decking that needs to be replaced that are smoke-ren. It's a couple two by fours around some of the framework and stuff like that. Some of the other stuff that's damaged to the actual structure is just smoke. It's not to the point where it's reached that incendiary point where I even need to replace a lot of the rafters and that's why they agreed and then they issued a permit based on that. Okay. And then what you have in front of you gentlemen is kind of the stuff that's kind of taken place to this incident and actually occurred. So it took two months just to even get through the insurance process and everything like that just to even start moving with it. And then for the last six weeks we've ran into a different communication with the city and trying to get the permits pulled and everything like that. As far as currently I have windows going in this week I have everything's being encapsulated as far as I'm alone one second. Let me just finish up with this part and we'll move up. You start to run down things. We're gonna be asking you. Okay. Right. Thank you. Are there any other questions as to any staff? Anything else? I will after we hear from you. This is a public hearing item. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to speak in favor or against the item? All right. So my name is Mike Eastep. I'm resident of McKinney for almost 30 years and I'm the brother-in-law of Beth Stom. You've addressed this matter to Craig Stom. Craig deceased the week before the fire. So Craig's no longer with us and Beth's trying to struggle with this longer with us and Beth's trying to struggle with this as the city has stated there's been things in the past that that also need her to rest but we're kind of looking at this like it's an opportunity to try to get this this place to where it's a good neighbor site and the people in a neighborhood myself included in that area are happy with how it all is. So the night of the fire, I met restore pros. They were on the scene and they were the only ones there to kind of offer out a hand to help. That week Beth signed an agreement with them to take over the restoration of the property. And she's a retired school teacher with City McKinney, a special ed. She's not a construction person. She doesn't know anything about all this whole process. I'm kind of in the field, but I don't know anything about fire restoration. So it's a deep subject. I'm glad we hired these guys. With that said, I know that you have a lot of complaints. A lot of people want to see this thing, it's straightened up and as well as Beth does. And so we're hoping that with some of the recent milestones that we've hit and progress and got our permit that we've turned a corner on this thing and Cody Adams is here with Restore Pro Season to give you a snapshot of what's happened today and also what the plan is going forward, I think it means 90 days. Okay, go ahead. All right, gentlemen. Kind of like I was saying what you have before you, I guess it was the breakdown of what actually occurred after the fire took place, where there was kind of that two-week lapse, or that two month lapse where the adjuster came out and because of the mortgage situation with her home it took over two months just to kind of get that first check to kind of come through. I'm projecting that I'll be done with this project by a Hintiseptember however I know it is construction and I know the dealings that I have had to deal with and the hoops I have had to jump through, jumping through that mortgage company just to receive payment and chunks and stuff like that. So we're supposed to have the first mortgage company inspection hopefully by the end of this week. They haven't confirmed with us, we ordered it last week from them and then as far as what they do and what they determine, kind of determines the progress of our workflow. Can I, you know, I'm just kind of estimating when I do this that, you know, they want me to hit certain thresholds 25%, 25%, 25%. Well, they could deem that that first section of the work of encapsulating windows and demo doesn't meet that first 25% I haven't seen that happen but you know I'm estimated they're gonna come back it okay now it's 30 45% complete and then we'll get into kind of the second stage of of doing everything that's the necessary for it getting the plenums installed for the HVAC system and they're getting the city back out there to Confirm that everything's been done, but right now all the electrical has been done duck work spin hung There was massive amounts of demo. We've done work even on the exterior of the house on the pool or we've done some Sub pump work and getting some debris out of that from the fire There's been What else is taking place? We're also encapsulating everything this week as well. So we're down to the point where we're just, you know, we're kind of waiting on that permission from the city until we could just, we kind of went to a halt for this last six weeks. Kind of, okay, well, what can we do? Where are we going to sit? Where are we going to do with everything like that? So we got a little bit of what we could do, done. And I wanted to make sure that they could still see everything. They could still see all exposed electrical. They could still see all exposed mechanical. And that way, they could make their own intricate decision on what needed to take place. IE, they kind of went, I guess it was my recommendation. But I was like, there's not a lot of structural problems to this place. So it might have looked that way initially, because as you can see in that photo how damaged that dry wall was and that's the way the entire upstairs looked. So by the time I pulled everything out, I got under everything and kind of figured out what was kind of going on with it. It's not that. I mean you can see the decking above that ceiling there is in fair isn't pretty good shape. You know there's just a couple pieces on that outside siding that That have some issues with it And I believe actually those are some of my pictures Being posted up there, but so I don't know I don't know what's in the library But I could kind of show you there's just a couple pieces of decking that need to be replaced as far as like the roof structures concern But you you've actually basically as far as like the roof structures concerned. Well, you've actually basically cleaned up the inside, taken up, she brought in the driveway. I mean, all that is as a building inspector been in there to see. He's been in there since I've rerun wires and since I've rerun plums throughout the place. Okay. Permit was a place for a few times. Yeah. So what kind of permit you have current residential alterations permit? Was that the one that was approved on July 5th or? Yeah, they sent me the approval actually on July 3rd. I didn't get it till late that day and it'd be in the holiday paid for it on Friday. Right The permits include the pool Where's that is that's a separate deal. This is just with the structure include the pool. Where is that? That's a separate deal. This is just with the structure of the house. The pool was just empty. It had some debris and stuff like that. Being said, she doesn't have any power or anything like that with the city. You know, we just wanted to make sure that there wasn't any standing water and some stuff like that. One of the they they cited that and one of their violations. So we just took care of that. So, yeah, I do have a question about the pool. So where is it on the food chain as far as being addressed? I mean, right now it's cleaned out. It's, you know, other than having water because there's no running water on the property. Okay, so I did drive by there today when I did an aerial view and saw the pool and there is standing water in there and the fence is all destroyed. It's not only a health issue, but it's a safety issue. To me, the pool has been emptied since the photos were taken. Not what I saw today, but make my way. The rain overnight. So it's more a pretty deep today. It's got some bigger, bigger issue for the say, well, as big of an issue for the city would be to fix that, get that fence secure along the back, just so kids can get in. Okay. That would be high priority for us as well. So it's time to clean. Okay. I didn't notice that that was done. Let's give them the one. Okay. And I did see a lot of trash bags back in the driveway. I guess from the demo Is that correct? Yeah, and we were just moving out a lot of some of that old duck work and stuff like that So it's just kind of it's been a work in progress He's been back there to clean with this trailer, you know, I mean that's just gonna kind of happen throughout that point of construction I'm trying to consolidate it all to that back alley in place I can try to get that kind of covered off or blocked off better or at least maybe we can leave it in the portion of the yard or something of that nature or even do something where we're doing something with the garage but do a recent storm that wind blew out the garage door. So that's why now that that's boarded up and that kind of defeated that plan in the interim. And back to the pool is the And back to the pool is the intent to reconstruct it or demo that or what the intent is to put it tear off and replace it? Replacement down to the deck? That will be deck in just certain areas and then there will be brand new underlayment, brand new drip edge, any ventilation that needs to be done with it. I started in this industry in roofing and so just add, put in the appropriate amount of ventilation, i.e. early birds, whatever, complying with their HOA compliance, whatever I can do on net units for the net free air that needs to come through there. I just tried to make it as simple as possible. I did try to go into detail on each and every item of what was going to take place. It sounds like it's going to take to the end of the year. To the end of the year? I mean, best cases in September. Best cases September, I would say worst case October, November. Yeah. But. In the year. But I usually move things a little bit quicker. Now that everybody's on the same page on the same side, I can do that. So. It's speaking to Cody about it. And the things we put priorities on, I know you get a lot of complaints and things like that. So we could hit the things that probably matter most of the neighbors. You know, get the fence, get the different things. Certainly all the trash. It's a kind of a continuum of everything they do in their generate trash. And that goes out the window and lands in the pool. But we're all in that out as it occurs. But the idea would be to prioritize, get the thing sealed up, get it so that the house is back to, you know, you tilt it on, sealed up, running air conditioning, that kind of thing. We'll get the sightings, we'll take care of it on the inside, get the roof done, get the things that the neighbors know that's most take care of first. I don't explain the attention to the inside get it get the root done get the things that the neighbors know it's most take care of verse I don't need to take attention to the inside. What's the end game? You finish you get your you get your C of O, is it go up for sale? Does somebody move in? Well, there's a different rent. So I'm going to continue living there. I mean, this is the home of J.D. or kids or home. I'm going to have 30 years. I'll go up with, ultimately, show sale to house. Well, we're open, not be close with us. Okay. It's good. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Please have a seat. Is there anyone else in the audience would wishing to speak on this item, then I will close the public hearing and open should just as well. You're not going to be finished or make sure that there is progress along the way. Yeah, I don't see how they're going to finish it in September, but if we're seeing progress. Yeah, they're moving forward then. When I think of if we may, I mean, a 30 day like on the exterior like defense, and give them a time period on that. You can do 30 days of the time. You have to fix the fence. I think it's the only thing as far as keeping it. Look like it, yeah. Paul, you drove by it. So it's just a fence that was torn down. There's a lot of sections to repair or replace the fence. I don't think to do just some kind of barrier. Something that people out there, because there's no way I would build a new fence. Still on the fence. Yeah. Yeah. How is it? Is it alley access for the garage? Yeah. Yeah. And then 90 days. Yeah. Yeah. Don't keep up on them. I think you've been a bit. Yeah, don't keep up on them. And I think you've been of it for more than 90. It's been a year, more than 90 years. I mean, it won't be bad. As long as stuff, you know, when 90 days goes and nothing gets done. Yeah. First hand on them. All right. And do 90 days, 30, 90, 30 out of pain-linked fence or emceeing to their choice, get a fence to have for something and to fence up the hole. Yeah, because that's a huge liability. Yeah. Me not for us but for them. We're here. We're here. We're here. I move that the commission find the structure located at 2624 shock lane is in violation of the standards set out for city ordinances as specified in a report by city staff and the capital report of city staff as it's finding. What are that the owner must install a fence around the pool area within 30 days and they have the work expected and completed within 90 days or that the owner must obtain a demolition permit and have a lot clean and graded with proper drainage within 30 days of this order. If construction is complete within the 90 days to commission, sorry if the construction is not complete within the 90 days to commission, may review the item and may grant additional time if a plan, a schedule, proof of substantial hardship, proof of substantial progress is given. Failure to take the ordered action within the specified time may result in the city taking action to demolish the structure, clean and grade the lot, and establish a lane and a property. Is your second to that motion? I'll second that. Motion has been made by Russ Cobra, and seconded by Jim Garrison. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion is adopted. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to show you. I'm going to make a motion to adjourn as there are nowhere the agenda items. I say from the motion. Meeting adjourned.