This meeting is being recorded. Good evening. This is the Council's July Legislative Session in which we introduced new legislation and get final consideration to legislation previously introduced and heard. This legislative session is being conducted as a hybrid meeting which is available in person and virtual via WebEx. It is also available to the public through live stream on the Howard County Council website and broadcast on channels 44 and 99. The council will hold a hybrid public hearing on Monday, July 15, 2024 at 7 p.m. on the legislation introduced this evening. Testimony can be given in person or virtually via WebEx. Written comments on the new legislation can be sent to Councilman at HowardCountyMD.gov. Anyone wishing to testify the public hearing will have several options available. You may sign up in advance to the Council's website or you may sign up in person in front of the Bannock Room via laptop Monday, July 15, prior to the start of the public hearing. When signing up to testify, you will be asked if you are a student, so you can be called up early to testify. And whether your testimony will be provided in person or virtual VIA WebEx. If you select virtual, you will be provided instructions for logging into the WebEx session. If needed, the council will hold a work session on new legislation on Tuesday, July 23rd, 2024, and 9.30 AM in the Sea Vernon Grey Room. Public participation for these meetings will be available virtually via WebEx and viewed live stream through the County Council website. At this time, I'm going to do a roll call for the council members. Dr. Jones. Good evening, everyone. You look very handsome in your red, white and blue for the council members. Dr. Jones. Good evening everyone. You look very handsome in your red white and blue for the July. Well thank you very much. I just want to make note for that for everybody who might be watching as well as those of you who are here tonight. Okay Ms. Rigby. Here. Mr. Youngman. I'm here when I'm just Maddie Warty. There you go. Well you what do you have on red, white and blue too? Knainda. I felt like a football. But not white is nice. Nothing close to red, white. Do you have a minute to get one of that help? OK. And I am here as well, Deb Young. And Ms. Walsh is absent tonight. All right. We will now recite the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America to the public for which it stands when we use an ungodly indiscible liberty and justice for all. Moving on to our agenda, we will begin today's session with approval of journals and minutes. I move to approve the journal of legislative session, June 3, 2024. Second. Don't let him. I move to approve the journal of legislative session June 3, 2024. Second. Don't let him. Yes. Don't let him. All right. Ms. Herick, can you please call the vote to approve the journal of legislative session June 3, 2024. Chair Young. Yes. Dr. Jones. Yes. Ms. Rigby. Yes. Ms. Rigby. Yes. Yes. The motion to approve the journal passes. I move to approve the minutes of a legislative public hearing of June 18th and the legislative work session and joint meeting with the Board of Education of June 25th. Second. Ms. Harry, can you please call the vote to approve the minutes previously noted? Chair Young. Yes. Dr. Jones. Yes. Ms. Rikby? Yes. Mr. Youngman. Yes. The motion to approve the minutes passes. With the council administrator, please read the legislation for introduction. The following legislation is introduced by the chairperson at the request of the county executive and less otherwise noted. Council Resolution 78, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of David A. Balderson to the Board of Social Services. Council Resolution 79, 2024. A resolution confirming the appointment of Ashton Vaughabow to the Asian American and Pacific Islander Commission. Council Resolution 80, 2024. Resolution confirming the appointment of Hannah Chang to the Commission for Women. Council Resolution 81, 2024. Resolution confirming the appointment of Matthew Dedeo to the Housing and Community Development Board. Council Resolution 82, 2024. Resolution confirming the appointment of Shay Yadans, shant, I am so sorry, dinshy to the Recreation and Parks Board. Council Resolution 83, 2024. Resolution confirming the appointment of Hazel, a demand to the advisory board on consumer protection. Council Resolution 84, 2024. Resolution confirming the appointment of Tneak Duncan to the Housing Commission. Council Resolution 85, 2024. Resolution confirming the appointment of Rashida George to the Adult Use Cannabis Advisory Panel. Council Resolution 86, 2024. Resolution confirming the appointment of Rashida George to the Adult Use Cannabis Advisory Panel. Council Resolution 86, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of theodore or heart to the Public Ethics Commission. Council Resolution 87, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of Jimmy Jennings to the Housing and Community Development Board. Council Resolution 88, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of Mabel, XRN, Lue to the Environmental Sustainability Board, Council Resolution 89, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of Shaygan Lee, Lue to the Advisory Board on Consumer Protection, Council Resolution 90, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of Christopher Maynard to the Adult Use Cannabis Advisory Panel, Council Resolution 91, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of Christopher Maynard to the adult use cannabis advisory panel council resolution 91 2024 resolution confirming the appointment of Valerie B. Manteek to the Human Rights Commission Council resolution 92, 2024 resolution confirming the appointment of Mayor Carmen Perez Sarabia to the law Alonza Latina Commissionolution 93, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of Lucia. Rayna to the Adult Use Cannabis Advisory Panel, Council Resolution 94, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of Charles Allen Sharp to the Adult Use Cannabis Advisory Panel, Council Resolution 95, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of Shannon Beasley, Tate to the Human Rights Commission, Council Resolution 96, 2024 resolution confirming the appointment of Sean Thompson, Thomas to the Howard County Commission for Veterans and Military Families, Council Resolution 97, 2024 resolution confirming the appointment of Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State, 2024, resolution confirming the appointment of David Dresden to the Multimodal Transportation Board, Council Resolution 101, 2024, resolution confirming the reappointment of William Vido to the Board of Directors for Economic Development Authority, Council Resolution 102, 2024, resolution confirming the reappointment of Gregory, Shuckman to the Commission on Disabilities, Council Resolution 103, 2024, resolution confirming the reappointment of Dr. Andre Watkins to the local behavioral health advisory board, Council Resolution 104, 2024, resolution confirming the reappointment of John Way to the local behavioral health advisory board. Council Bill 38, 2024, enact amending the pay plan of Howard County providing pay scales for members of the International Association Firefighters Local 2000 to be effective July 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, providing classification code for the Office of Agricultural Administrator and amending classification codes for the Consumer Protection Administrator, providing for the application of this act and generally relating to the pay plan for Howard County. Council resolution, council bill 39, 2024, an act pursuant to section 1.111E of the Howard County Code of proving provisions in a collective bargaining agreement between Howard County and the International Association of Firefighters, Harris County Local 2000 that are in conflict with the provisions of Title I, Human Resources of the Harris County Code, where the employee manual and generally relating to the collective bargaining agreement between Harris County and the International Association of Firefighters, local, Harris County Local 2000. Council Bill 40, 2024 enact adding certain positions that are appointed by the chief administrative officer and removing a position that is no longer appointed by the director of the Department of Community Resources and Services and generally relating to the appointing authorities for executive exempt positions in the Howard County Code. Council Bill 41, 2024, an act pursuant to Section 612 of the Howard County Charter, approving a multi-year agreement between Howard County, Maryland, and E plus technology ink for hardware and software support offered by Cisco and NetApp, authorizing the county executive to make changes to the agreement under certain conditions, authorizing the county executive to execute the agreement and generally relating to the agreement. Council Bill 42, 2024 enact pursuant to section 612 with Howard County Charter approving a multi-year lease agreement for the lease of approximately 16,416 square feet of space in Howard County, Maryland, and authorizing the county executive to take certain actions in connection with the lease agreement. Council Bill 43, 2024, an act requiring that the owner, occupant tenant or other person in charge of a property or premise shall provide certain entry and access, allowing certain entry in the instance that certain eminent dangers exist and generally relating to enforcement of the subdivision and land development regulations and the zoning regulations. Council Bill 44 2024 enact make an emergency appropriations pursuant to section 610B of the Harrow County Charter and amending the annual budget and appropriation for physical year 2025 to provide additional spending authority received from the Interagency Commission on School Construction and Capital Projects E-1058 systemic renovations and E-1059 roofing and declaring that this act is an emergency bill necessary to meet a public emergency affecting life, health, property. Council Resolution 105, 2024. Resolution amending the Howard County Board of Education budget as adopted by Council Resolution 48, 2024, to account for additional funding received from the state of Maryland for capital projects, and generally relating to the Board of Education budget for fiscal year 2025. Council Resolution 106, 2024, introduced by the chairperson at the request of the Howard County Council. Resolution setting the compensation for the Howard County alcoholic beverage hearing board. Council bill 45-2024, introduced by the chairperson at the request of the Howard County Council. And act demanding the compensation of the members of the Board of Appeals and generally relating to the compensation for the Board of Appeals members. Council Bill 46, 2024, introduced by the chairperson at the request of the Citizens' Election Fund. An act demanding citizen election fund provisions of the code to clarify the role of certified candidates for County Executive or County Council in the Citizens Election Fund System and generally relating to Citizens Election Fund System. Council Bill 47, 2024, introduced by Liz Walsh and establishing the Office of Inspector General specifying the selection term, qualifications and responsibilities of the Inspector General providing for the referral of certain matters, specifying the funding and powers of the Inspector General providing for the referral of certain matters, specifying the funding and powers of the Office of Inspector General requiring certain reports, establishing the Inspector General Advisory Board, specifying the composition, powers, and duties of the Inspector General Advisory Board, specifying the selection, term, and responsibilities of the Inspector General Advisory Board and generally relating to the Office of Inspector General. Council Bill 48, 2024, introduced by Liz Walsh, and act supporting the creation of the Office of Inspector General amending the process for whistleblower complaints, repealing certain duties of the County Auditor, amending the composition of the Harris County Ethics Commission and generally relating to supporting the office of the Inspector General. Well, I felt like that was budget legislation. Thank you, Mr. Heritage. I did, that was quite a bit. Yes, it was a lot. So that concludes our legislation for introduction. I am almost like I hate to even say the next words. But can you please read the legislation for final consideration? And council members, unless there is an objection, Ms. Herod will read all of the appointment resolutions together, except CR69-2024, and we will vote them together. No objection. Ms. Herod, can you please proceed? Council Resolution 70, 2024, appointment of Mary, Catherine, Cochran to the Recreation and Parks Board. Council Resolution 71, 2024, appointment of Matthew J. Gallagher, S. Gwyer to Public Ethics Commission. Council resolution 72, 2024, appointment of to Meredith Hollywood to the Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday Commission. Council resolution 73, 2024, appointment of Sean Layman to the recreation and parks board. Council resolution 74, 2024, appointment of Linda F Stewart to the Public Ethics Commission. Council Resolution 75, 2024, reappointment of Francis F. LaPresti to the Animal Matters hearing board. I move to approve council resolution 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, and 75, 2024. Second. The previously read council resolutions have been moved and seconded, is there any discussion? Seeing none, Ms. Herrick, can you please call the vote. Chair Young? Yes. Dr. Jones? Yes. Mr. Rigby? Yes. Mr. Youngman? Yes. I do have to say once again that the people who come in to Howard County and agree to serve on these commissions and boards are absolutely phenomenal and we are so lucky to have such talented people in Howard County and I just want to thank them for agreeing to serve and the council resolutions pass. Council resolution 69, 2024, the appointment of Reginald Avery to the Alcohock Beverage Hearing Board. I moved to table council resolution 69-2024. Second. The motion to table 69-2024 has been moved and seconded. Ms. Herod, can you please call the vote. Chair Young? Yes. Dr. Jones? Yes. Ms. Rigby? Yes. Mr. Youngman? Yes. The motion to table 69, 2024 passes. Council Bill 48, 2024, introduced by Liz Walsh. Inspector... I don't know. Council... I'm so sorry. Bill 35. That would have been interesting. I will be the final consideration right now. I know. Turn the page. We have the bill sponsor here. Sorry about that. Turn the page. Council Bill 352024. Multi-year installment purchase agreement for 86.16 acres. 80 long corner road. Mount Erie purchase price $2,905,400 owned by Edward E. Day. Revocable living trust. I move to approve CB 352024. Second. CB 352024 has been moved and seconded. Is there any discussion? Seeing none, Ms. Herk, can you please call the vote. Chair Young? Yes. Dr. Jones? Yes. Ms. Rigby? Yes. Mr. Youngman? Yes. CB 35 of 2024 passes Council bill 36 2024 amendment to memorandum of agreement for local 3080. I move to approve CB 36 2024 Second CB 36 2024 has been moved and seconded in a discussion. No,, Ms. Hare, can you please call the vote. Chair Young? Yes. Dr. Jones? Yes. Ms. Rigby? Yes. Mr. Youngman? Yes. CV 36, 2024 passes. Council Resolution 76, 2024, adopting the school capacity chart. I move to approve CR 76, 2024. Second. CR 76, 2024 has been moved and seconded. Is there any discussion? No. Ms. Herod, can you please call the vote on CR 76. Chair Young? Yes. Dr. Jones? Yes. Mr. Rigby? Yes. Mr. Youngman? Yes. CR 76 passes. Council Resolution 77, 2024. Adopting the housing unit allocation chart. I move to approve CR-77, 2024. Second. I move to approve amendment one to CR-77, 2024. Second. Thank you, Mr. McBee. So this amendment prohibits the activity center allocations from being granted by DBC until the activity centers are defined by DPC. And I first I apologized to my colleagues for sending you a description of, and you have it, very late in the day to day today about the purpose behind this, although I think you probably would have figured that out from the discussion that we had at the work session last Tuesday. I was quite concerned that activity centers had not been defined in our zoning code yet, even though it's been a year since we have passed the general plan, well not quite a year. And I found out at the work session that activity center allocations have been granted already to developers in the commercial activity corridor. And I was quite concerned about that because as we know, as a council, and as it was also reiterated during the general plan process, the commercial activity corridor has not been successful in creating commercial activity. So that has been a source of concern, I think, for all of us. And there was even a bill that ended up addressing that. This is at the same time that we have created these activity centers. And all five of us worked very hard on trying to come up with definitions and expectations for activity centers that are not reflected anywhere yet except in general plan. And just to give you some examples of things that we were hoping to see in activity centers were developments that would create job opportunities through new mixed use activity centers that serve as destinations and include a mix of uses that complement and support one another and improve the jobs housing balance. I mean, that's just one example, but I can't remember exactly who it was that actually went in and amended that. It was one of us, I think, because it looks like something that we were all working on. Require activity center redevelopment to provide convenience, retail, and other local serving amenities at the neighborhood level, which was important to all of us as well in creating these activity centers. And here we are apparently or here as DPC, granting allocations to the commercial activity corridor developers who are not doing that. Consider establishing housing scenarios that support four sale units to households making 60% or less of AMI that are financially feasible for the developers. Require mixed use activity centers to reflect home ownership opportunities. Ensure coordination of Hoco by design and the HCPSS capital planning so that school capacity projects are planned in activity center areas, especially in the Gateway Regional Activity Center, identified for transformation on the future land news map. So none of the HOKO by design policy statements have been folded into the zoning regulations. But as I just mentioned, we did learn that these allocations, these activity center allocations have already been granted to developments along the root one corridor. I think the thing that really bothers me is that we've spent all of this time coming up with, well, actually, we counted them up. I think it was, let's see, 150 statements, descriptions of activity centers, 40 of which were actual principles that have been set forth. And none of these statements are being considered when granting these activity center allocations because DPC has not put anything out there regarding activity centers, even a zoning regulation amendment, which would have been a simple enough thing to do following the enactment of the general plan. So my question here is, does the general plan matter at all? If we are granting housing allocations under the status quo and not seeking to implement the years of planning, feedback and careful review that went in to the general plan. And I include all five of us here on the Howard County Council when I say, planning, feedback and careful review, because we spent many hours, many amending the general plan to include these definitions, to redefine these definitions, to make these definitions what we wanted to see. And now these allocations are being given out, willing early to groups of developers on Route 1. And I'm not even sure that that's where we should be putting all this stuff, but that's where we should be putting all this stuff, but that's a different issue. So that was my reason for filing this amendment and I hope that you all will support it. Is there further discussion? No. Okay. I want to ask. So I think the premise of the amendment makes sense. You know, like we all debated for a long time on what an activity center should be, and you listed out what it should be, and now people can pull these allocations, and not have to do any of that. Exactly. The problem is, and what I didn't put together, when we did the the general plan or even when you and I talked was we got rid of the old chart. So we've now dropped this activity center bubble over projects that can't get an allocation and there's no indication of when DPC or us are going to create that code and I don't want to halt projects that are in process and like there's no where in order for them to get allocations because the allocations used to be geographic and now they're not. That's my comment. And I understand that, but I also think that there's, apparently, even though I know I've spoken to DPC a number of times, I've talked to members of that department over the last nine months since the general plan was past asking them, begging them to put something in the code that reflects all the work that we did on these activity centers and nothing. I would not stop and I don't think that this amendment would stop, which's already in process. But I can ask Mr. Cook if that would be the case. Would this amendment reach back to what was already in process? If they haven't gotten their allocations yet. It doesn't say so on its face so generally I would say. It would apply prospectively upon becoming effective. If the council wants to make it retroactive or exempt something then. I would not want to. You can do that by an amendment to that amendment. Yeah, no, I agree with Mr. Youngman that you can't, well, we shouldn't reach back to the entities that have already been given allocations because that's already been promised. They were already making the plans. We don't know where they are in the process. And that is the way that that's where we're at now. But I also don't see apparently any way to put any pressure on DPC to actually include all of this language that we spent so much time and effort. And they did too describing what these activity centers are, unless we pass a piece of legislation somehow forcing them to do so. I don't think we could do it in the context of this because it's a different approach, but I don't know that any, I don't know, I don't want to speak for anybody else, but if we passed code here and it wasn't the detailed sort of like right and subdivision code from the council, because I don't know that we know how to do that. But, you know, incorporated in, like, you know, between now and the time DPC comes up with X, Y, or Z, here's the framework of what an activity center is supposed to look like, and what it's supposed to incorporate. I, maybe there's something like that we can do, but I just, the problem is, and I never thought of it, was we got rid of not only the old chart, but the methodology of the old chart. You know, existing communities, the rural West, you know, downtown Columbia, and now we have this, and if you're just sitting there as a property owner and you weren't even involved in the the process we've now dumped you into this activity center thing and the only allocations you could get are not attainable until the government does something else, which the government has not indicated any progress to do. Well, the government certainly could do it. I would assume, given that they're the ones who wrote the 363-page General Blambok that they could, they're familiar enough with what, and if they're not, I now have a chart. The shows where the 150 mentions of the activity centers are and what the 40 principals are specifically that discuss the activity center. And they certainly could start there. It's, it shouldn't be that hard to do. And I don't, we don't know why they are not proceeding with a ZRA at the very least. At one point, I believe somebody from DPC did say something about doing a zoning regulation amendment, but we haven't seen anything nobody's talked to us about that. This was the total highlight of the actual general plan. We did spend an awful lot of time. Well and it says right here and I'm looking at the February 29th 2024 letter from Linda Eisenberg, who is the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning that was attached to the paper copy of the general plan. And this letter specifically says, this plan focuses most future commercial and residential growth into activity centers, areas targeted for mixed use compact development while prioritizing community characters, character in other areas of the county, strengthening the county's commitment to environmental preservation and conservation blah, blah, blah. strengthening the county's commitment to environmental preservation and conservation blah blah blah. But this is, this was the focus of the entire plan. I absolutely get it. My only problem is between now and the time we can pass something, the DPC can write something, like whatever needs to happen, we're stripping existing rights away from existing property owners. And that we can't do. I just don't, you know, what if we can't come up with something that we can all agree on? I just, I never put together that we were taking this allocation chart away, replacing it with this other allocation chart. And there would be some... Yeah, like all this other stuff had to happen before the allocations would come back and you'd have properties that basically can't get allocations. So... Well, they could, if our Department of Planning and so on, we'll just put together... But I'm not willing to strip away some ones. I'm not willing to strip away some ones. The existing rights they had up until the time we passed the general plan while we wait. I mean, we can complain, shame put on the spot. We can try to do their job for them. But it doesn't change the fact that we inadvertently, I think, you know, we weren't trying to do that. But when the old shirt went away and we changed that whole methodology, we basically took rights that property owners had away with nothing to drop in its place. I don't think I certainly never envisioned that our Department of Planning and Zoning would take this long to define activities centers. You said I. I am so disappointed. Yes, Ms. Rigby. The general plan was passed seven months ago. They are currently working on the Gateway Plan, which we knew during the general plan passage. We've received updates on the Housing Incentives work group. And then the two things that haven't been started yet, as far as I'm aware, are the APFO and new town task forces. So it just seems a little premature to say that it's been so long when it's only been seven months. We really do. We have our Regional Activity Center, which is the biggest, most important one that we are doing in that plan, which was absolutely delineated in the plan. And that one is getting its whole own incredible definition. And that's what's in process right now. So to me, it's premature to say that it's been so long. So that's where I am. I will also just note that we've been in discussion for about 15 minutes at this point. Thank you. Well, to me, it's overdue. And given all the time and effort, the years of planning that DPC did, thinking about and considering and writing about activity centers, they could have been prepared to do something very shortly after this plan got approved. And I'm really sorry that we're in this position now to have put all this time and effort into defining activity centers only to see that there's nothing in the law anywhere that actually carries this out. And allocations are being given on route one for these activity centers that don't do all the wonderful things that we were hoping they would do. Okay, Ms. Haer. I'm sorry, Dr. Jones, did you? Okay, Ms. Haer, will you call the vote? On amendment one to CR 77, Chair Young. Yes. Dr. Jones. I definitely understand the concerns that have been discussed. I also agree with Mr. Youngman that holding up projects or holding up allocations for projects, maybe detrimental to what we want to see as accounting going forward with these projects. I would also like to reiterate what Miss Young said. It would be nice to have a definition. The timing of everything as Miss Riggby said is important as well. So maybe this is, I don't know, with the million things at DPC and everyone upstairs and third floor and second floor and first floor of the George Howard Building are doing, we would very much, I believe, as a council, like to see a definition in the near future of activity centers and other things in addition to all that you're doing. But I won't support this amendment in fear of it holding up certain projects, so my vote is no. Ms. Rigby. So I present the primary way that we receive and that affordable housing units are created in our community is through our inclusionary zoning law. This has a higher standard in TODs which are located along Route 1 along our rail lines. So I think with that in mind, and then also picking up that following this line of reasoning that any passage of a general plan or an adoption of the allocation chart from it would essentially function as a moratorium. You know, that I really do disagree with some of the principal points of this argument. I think you can have things, what's the saying? You can have it done fast, you can have it done well, or you can have it done cheap, but you got to pick two. I would love it fast, but I prefer it done well. And I prefer it done at a pace that is acceptable to the limited tax dollars that we have to expend. So my vote is now on this amendment. Mr. Youngman. You know, it's funny when I vote last, everybody that talked before me is right. Different votes, different perspective, but everything everybody said here is right. Yes, this would create a moratorium that we didn't intend. And yes, TPC is busy, and I get it, but we sketched out what the activity centers were supposed to be in the general plan. It's not like they're starting from scratch. And because this kind of came out of nowhere, I don't want to support kind of creating this moratorium, but I think the message that I hope DPC is hearing from all of us, regardless of our votes on this, is we need a definition of activity centers where this is going to come back in a couple months, and we will put a moratorium on it. And it won't be our fault. So I think this is well intentioned and we need to get our act together on defining the activity centers because we did, it was a big leap in exchange for a lot of things that we're not going to get if they give all these allocations out before anybody has to comply with the stuff in the general plan. But for now, I'm a no on the amendment. Amendment 1 to CR 77 fails. So CR 77, 2024 has been moved and seconded. Is there any further discussion? No, Ms. Herkin, you call the vote. Chair John? No, I vote no. I will not vote to pass a housing allocation chart that has activity centers in it that are undefined. The Department of Planning and Zoning has received millions of dollars over the last six years to use for consultants to do all of this work that has been mentioned. And in the last two general following the last two general plans that were completed, comprehensive rezoning was completed within a year. A singular zoning regulation amendment should be, the Department of Planning and Zoning should be capable of doing that. And again, my vote is no. Dr. Jones? Yes. Mr. Rigby? So most jurisdictions around us and in the state of Maryland are approaching After following their general development plans. They are approaching their zoning through many small area Development plans and they're doing these small area plans so that way they can have really robust engagement and that it can be a very Community-led process. I truly hope that that is the approach that we take here versus sort of one big throw everything out and then throw all the new paint back on. I truly hope that we take a rational, reasonable step-by-step process like many of our neighbors are doing. My vote is yes. Mr. Kingman. Yes. CR772024 passes. Council bill 372024 introduced by Kristiana Rigby. School Facility Search Arge amendment for single family detached dwellings. I move to table CB372024. Second. The motion to table CB3720 2024 has been moved in second. Ms. Herr, can you please call the vote. Chair Young? Yes. Dr. Jones. Yes. Ms. Rigby? Yes. Mr. Youngman. Yes. The motion to table CBE 37 passes. Let's skip all the way to the end. Oh look at this and so this concludes our July legislative session and we are adjourned. Happy Fourth of July everyone. This meeting is no longer being recorded.