Bruce. Lathrop, Mayor (District 4) Richardycz, Mayor Pro Tem (District5) RichardHale, Council Member (District 1) Monte. Lewis, CouncilMember (District 2) RichardBarakat, Councif9Member (District. 3)  CIT YOF BRADBURY  City of Bradbury Agenda Memo  TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: SUMMARY  Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council  Kevin Kearney, City Manager December 18, 2018  DISCUSSION ON COMMUNITY SUPPORT FUNDS  As a result of the Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury findings for the City of Bradbury, the City donated $3,000 in Fiscal Year 16/17 to support organizations that provide housing and shelter to those in need. Although this was a mandatory one-time donation, the City Council decided to budget and allocate $3,000 to similarly donate to Union Station Homeless Services, Foothill Unity Center, and Friends in Deed (Formally Ecumenical Similar to last year, the City Council budgeted $3,000 this fiscal year to donate to support community homelessness. It is recommended that the City Council direct staff on how to expend the budgeted $3,000, which has been set aside for a charitable donation.  Council of Pasadena Area Churches).  DISCUSSION  Approximately two years ago, the Los Angeles Civil Grand Juryinvestigated cities oni their response to homelessness issues during the 2016 El Nino time period. As a result of their findings, the City indicated that it would support organizations that assisted with providing housing and shelter to those in need. This resulted in the City committing to donate $3,000 during the 2016-2017 fiscal cycle. The City ultimately donated $1,500 to Foothill Unity Center and $1,500 to Union Station Homeless Services to fulfil the City's During the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 budgeting cycle, the City Council decided to still allocate $3,000 fori future donations, even though the Civil Grand Jury's requirements had been fulfilled. Ultimately, the City Council decided to split the donation equally three ways  obligations to the LA Civil Grand Jury.  FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 12-18  AGENDA ITEM # 7    Discussion on Community Support Funds  Page 2 of2  to Union Station Homeless Services, Foothill Unity Center, and Friends in Deed. All three nonprofit organizations provide homeless services as part of their program of services. The Institute for Local Government provides local governments with advice when public institutions are considering donating public funds to charitable organizations. They recommend following their best practice circumstances which may determine 1. A charity provides a service that complements or enhances a service that the 2. When there is an identifiable secondary benefit to the public agency; or 3. When the charity provides a service the public agency could provide but chooses Additionally, it is recommended that these finds are included in the minutes about the Making donations to charitable causes that are far away from the City (for example, to help the victims of a hurricane in a distant state) also present special challenges. Because of the distance, it can be more difficult to justify the contribution as creating  Standards for Donations  appropriateness for a contribution:  public agency also provides;  not to.  benefits to the agency associated with providing resources to a charity.  benefits to the jurisdictions residents. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS  Funds in the amount of $3,000 have been budgeted this fiscal year but have not yet been spent. Expending the full budgeted amount will not have a significant fiscal impact.  STAFF RECOMMENDATION  Iti is recommended that the City Council direct staff on how to expend the budgeted  $3,000, which has been set aside for a charitable donation.    RESOLUTION NO. 18-34 AI RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, PRE-RELEASED CHECKS) (REGULAR CHECKS)  APPROVING DEMANDS AND WARRANTS NO. 15263 THROUGH NO. 15276 AND DEMANDS AND WARRANTS NO. 15277 THROUGH NO. 15304  The City Council of the City of Bradbury does hereby resolve as follows:  Section 1. That the demands as set forth hereinafter are approved and warrants authorized to be drawn for payment from said demands in the amount of $3,078.30 (pre-released Checks) and $317,082.99at  December 18, 2018 from the General Checking Account. PRE-RELEASED CHECKS (due before City Council Meeting):  Check Name and  Description  Amount $1,080.00  (Due Date) (11/13/18) (12/3/18)  15263 Bradbury Estates HOA  Refund of HOA Fee for 62 Deodar Lane Acct. #101-00-4800 301 Mount Olive Dr Irrigation 2410 Mt Olive Lane Irrigation 2256 Gardi Street Acct. #200-48-6400 City Hall Cleaning Service for Nov 14 &28, 2018 Acct. #101-16-6460 Telephone/VOIP Service Acct. #101-16-6440 Dental Insurance: City Manager (family) Acct. #101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. #101-13-5100 Management. Analyst Acct. #101-16-5100 Vision Insurance: City Manager (family) Acct. #101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. #101-13-5100 Management Analyst Acct. #101-16-5100  15264 California American Water Water Service for:  $117.82 $26.69 $34.89  $179.40 $210.00 $572.49  15265 Molly Maid 15266 MegaPath 15267 Delta Dental  (11/29/18) (12/1/18) (12/1/18)  $131.43 $42.88 $42.88 $61.07 $23.66 $23.66  $217.19  15268 Vision Service Plan  (12/1/18)  $108.39  Reso. No 18-34 Page 1of7 December 18, 2018    RichardBarakat, Mayor (District 3) RichardHale, MayorPro Tem (District 1) Monte Lewis, Councils Member (District 2) Bruce. Lathrop, Councils Member (District 4) Elzabeth Bruny, Councif9Member (District5)  BRADBURY  City of Bradbury Agenda Memo  TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT:  Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council  Kevin Kearney, City Manager December 18, 2018  Recap - Meeting with Department of Fish and Wildlife 2. City of Arcadia: Coyote Management Plan 3. City of Torrance: Coyote Management Plan 4. Daily Breeze Article: Torrance's Coyote Management Plan Not Working, Residents Tell Council After Pet Deaths  ATTACHMENTS: 1. Wildlife Watch PowerPoint Presentation  SUMMARY  On Thursday, December 13, 2018; City Staff and members of the City Council met with representatives of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (F&W) to talk about the potential of setting up a community meeting for residents to discuss bear nuisance issues During the meeting, F&W had brought up their Wildlife Watch program (found at itp/widlife.ca.govwidlife-watch). In essence, the program is designed for local agencies to first develop a management plan before a community meeting is held. After the plan is developed, F&W trains community volunteers in wildlife management techniques to go door-to-door and advise other residents in the wildlife management This item displays two of the management plans brought up as an example during the meeting, which includes the City of Arcadia and the City of Torrance. All plans through F&W's program to this point have only dealt with coyote management. F&Whas advised that a document from the City of Pasadena is being developed in dealing with bears, but  within the City.  techniques that they learned.  it has not been finalized or made public yet. FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 12-15  AGENDA ITEM # 8    Recap - Meeting with Department of Fish and Wildlife  Page 2 of2  Although the City does not have a coyote management plan, it does appear that the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments is in the process of developing a cooperative regional solution. City Staff has already expressed preliminary interest in developing a The development of a first known bear management plan in the region is a considerable undertaking that should first be discussed before moving forward with such a plan. Additionally, the crafting of a plan will take time, and it should be discussed if a community meeting should be held before a plan is developed or after one is completed.  document or being a part of a working committee on the issue.  STAFF RECOMMENDATION  Itis recommended that the City Council discuss with Staff on how to proceed with either  a Community Meeting or a Wildlife Management Plan.    ATTACHMENT #1    -  9 € -  9 I  - -  e I  -    I  I  lE 00 E E E @ S N 3 a €  € o df a E o £  E  I a I  I  e - A I A  9 I I I  e C E  E 35 A    E 5 - 3  im 8  8 M o C 2 8 :   e E I E E 8 €  e  C  e E g €  a I €  E o e  60  5  8 : dt I  3   8 00 I 8 0 € 8  2V 9 3 - la )    E - - f  I  50 -  I    d0 E @ E e 00 a = E E e 00 a I  e 6  I  m 3 - n E E  lD 62 3 E E C 0  0  à I  E 6 00 - m L  I  t t E LJ E  @ @  5 b0    5 E @ s  o D -  I  I  E - E  00 I 9  @ e L à 9 5 a  E I   U : I  O 00 0 C  e a  I  3  @ V J 00 , 3 a 3 2 N B 2 e e - la I à  N    m lD 5 o a - 9 d0 E 3 0 f e E  bo 5  Y - f C @ - 8 00 8 Dn 3 I E E 8 8  I  2 E    E  U  :    S a 8 I  b0 € :  a in de V -  a  5 e  S  E @ 3 O E 3  D E - = la 5 @ I E bo a D 9 5 a n @ B a a i5 - E I 8 8 8 3 e @  S DD  e  8 0 N  e    E e de t lD M  6 o = a a in E 8 e € 5 de E - : 8 8 D e de 2 W t g E f E a I  E  l0  E m  S 2  e    o 0 6  a  a S @  8  o 3 D n e 3 1 E @ E I  a f 8  E -    - -  I  8 - I E la M o E 3 - a de e C a I la 3 0 6 0 3 8 3 € e - I E 8 o - 9 I  E e de E € S S a S I I E le E : O I 0 T 5 I  a  A    13 C a - 1S o 3 @ 9 8 I 10  D 9  1 O b0 n iM b0 3 0 - o @ C  a  lDe E E B 5  -  I  a S E e 0 E  3  D S 8 le N N la  @ e    @ E S  - : o E 1s I S 8 8 a 6 b0 a 5 E L o - : a E a 3 : N 0 I 1 &  e à à $ I  a  I  3 2    9 l9  e U - a E N e V -  =  a  E $ I 3  0 de I 33 E 3 I  8 e )  I  C    = 0 M 3 @ n e 6 a de a E 3 e E d6 e de 8 1 o e 5 3 e Y o E 4 a 8 o - e E 36 8 S 3 6 2 3 E D 1 il  C E  o 3 o  9 1y U e E L    U 3 e E I o D -   6 I : E  8 E  E 3 8    6  5  à 10  I a  5 à I  7  9  O - 5 3  e 9 € @ E I I E 8 E 2 I  E by  a  E 3  e I E I a 8 E lC 2 le a  I I I I  00  t 6 5 I 9   0    a  E e b0 bg 0 6 C 9 a E 9 De N 8 a L - e E e E E by € 10 bo n E V E 6 00 a M a C o e la o 5 2 C 0 9 @ 9 a @ a 1 b0 - n 5 8 8 @ E E C  O o 6 E E e L E C E 8 I € O DN I B € a1 @ 3  S S  5    E E 8 e e B e n M 3 - - - n @ o @ 3 + E o 1n @ J 0  3 8 8 D 10 8 9 de R C  D 20 a  E S  5 @  6  5    ATTACHMENT  #2