GSYO BRADBURY  AGENDA  Regular Meeting of the Bradbury City Council To be held on Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at the Bradbury Civic Center 600 Winston Avenue, Bradbury, CA 91008  Pursuant to Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-25-20, the City is allowing Council Members, Staff and the public to participate in this City Council meeting by means of a Zoom video or telephone call. You will be able to hear the entire proceedings (other than the Closed Session) and to speak during Public Comment, Public Hearing, and other authorized times. Members of the public must maintain silence and mute their microphones and telephones except during those times. The Zoom information is ntps/1S02webzcomus/82602800A6. One tap mobile + 76699009128,88260280046#, or dial (669) 900-9128 and enter code 882 6028 0046#.  OPEN SESSION 7:00 PM  Each item on the agenda, no matter how described, shall be deemed to include any appropriate motion, whether to adopt a minute motion, resolution, payment of any bill, approval of any matter or action, or any other action. Items listed as "For Information" or "For Discussion" may also be subject of an' "action" taken by  the Board or a Committee at the same meeting. CALL TOORDERPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  ROLL CALL: Mayor Bruny, Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop, Councimembers Barakat, Hale and Lewis APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA: Majority vote of City Council to proceed with City Business DISCLOSURE OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 1090 & 81000 ET. SEQ.  PUBLIC COMMENT minutes.  Anyone wishing to address the City Council on any matter that is not on the agenda for a public hearing may do sO at this time. Please state your name and address clearly for the record and limit your remarks to five Please note that while the City Council values your comments, the City Council cannot respond. nor take action Routine requests for action. should be referred to City staff during normal business hours, 8:30 am 5:00 pm, The City of Bradbury will gladly accommodate disabled persons wishing to communicate at a City public meeting. Ify you require special assistance to participate ini this meeting, please call the City Manager's Office at (626) 358-  untils such time as the matter may appear on a forthcoming agenda.  Monday through Friday, at (626) 358-3218. 3218 at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.  ACTIONITEMS* 1. CONSENT CALENDAR  All items on the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a Council Member request otherwise, in which case the item will be removed and considered by separate action. All Resolutions and Ordinances for Second Reading on the Consent Calendar, the motion will be deemed to be "to waive the reading and  adopt."  Page 1 of2 CC Agenda 081721    A. Minutes: Regular Meeting of. July 20, 2021 B. Resolution No. 21-16: Demands and' Warrants for August 2021 C. Monthly Investment Report for the month of. July 2021 Discussion on Redistricting Services  2.  In response to an RFP for redistricting services, Bear Demographic & Research responded with a proposal for $70,000. After discussion with City Staff, their proposal was reduced to $50,000. It is recommended that the City Council approve the expenditure of up to $50,000 for redistricting services, and direct the City Manager and City Attorney to draft and enter into a contract with Bear  Demographics & Research. Matters from the City Manager Matters from the City Attorney Duarte Community Education Council (CEC) Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop League of California Cities Duarte Education Foundation Councilmember Barakat LA County Sanitation Districts Foothill Transit Councilmember Hale Councilmember Lewis California JPIA Director of Bradbury Disaster Committee Area "D" Office of Disaster. Management Items for Future Agendas  3. 4.  Mayor Bruny  San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) San Gabriel Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District  5.  ADJOURNMENT  The City Council will adjourn to a Regular Meeting at the Bradbury Civic Center, 600 Winston Ave., Bradbury, / ACTION ITEMS Regardless of a staff recommendation on any agenda item, the City Council will consider such matters, including action to approve, conditionally approve, reject or continue such item. Further 7, Claudia Saldana, City Clerk, hereby certify that Icaused this agenda to be posted at the Bradbury City Hall  CA 91008 on Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. information on each item may be procured from City Hall. entrance gate on Friday, August 13, 2021 at 5:00p.m." Claudia Saldana CITY CLERK - CITY OF BRADBURY  Page 2 of2 CC Agenda 081721    MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY HELD ON TUESDAY, JULY 20, 2021  EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 25-20:  Pursuant to Govemor Newsom's Executive Order N-25-20, the City is allowing Council Members, Staff and the public to participate in this City Council meeting by means of a Zoom video or telephone call. Participants will be able to hear the entire proceedings (other than the Closed Session) and be able to speak during Public Comment, Public Hearing, and other authorized times. Members of the public must maintain silence and mute their microphones and telephones except The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bradbury was called to order by Mayor Bruny at 7:00 p.m. followed by PRESENT: Mayor Bruny, Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop, Councimembers Barakat, Hale and Lewis (remote)  during those times.  MEETING CALLED TO ORDER:  the Pledge of Allegiance.  ROLL CALL:  ABSENT: None  STAFF: City Manager Kearney, City Attorney Reisman (remote), City Engineer Gilbertson (remote), City Clerk Saldana Councimember Hale made a motion to approve the agenda to proceed with City business. Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop seconded Councilmember has the responsibility to disclose direct or indirect potential for a personal financial impact as a result of participation in the decision-making process concerning City Attorney Reisman stated he was aware of none. Julissa Zepeda, District Representative for Assemblywoman Blanca Rubio, 48th District, introduced herself to the Council. All items on the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a Councilmember requests otherwise, in which case the item will be removed and considered by separate action. All Resolutions and Ordinances for Second Reading on the Consent Calendar are deemed to "waive further reading and A. Minutes: Regular Meeting of June 15, 2021 B. Resolution No. 21-14: Demands & Warrants for. July 2021 . Financial Statement for the month of June 2021 D. Resolution No. 21-15: Resolution to Incorporate al List of Projects Funded by SB1:The Road Repair and Accountability Act (Bradbury Road/Wild Rose Avenue Widening. Project)  and Management Analyst Musa  APPROVAL OF AGENDA:  the motion which carried unanimously.  DISCLOSURE OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY Incompliance with the California Political Reform Act, each City  GOV. CODE SECTION 1090 & 81000  ETSEQ;:  agenda items.  PUBLIC COMMENT: CONSENT CALENDAR:  adopt."  Minutes CC Meeting July 20, 2021 Page 1 of6    MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT CALENDAR: APPROVED:  Councimember Hale made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop seconded the motion, which was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Bruny, Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop, Councilmembers Barakat, Hale and Lewis  NOES: None ABSENT: None Motion passed 5:0  BRADBURY ROADWILD ROSE. AVENUE City Engineer Gilbertson (RKA Consulting Group) stated the  STREET WIDENING PROJECT:  centerline of Bradbury Road/Wild Rose Avenue is the jurisdictional boundary between Monrovia and Bradbury after an annexation was processed through LAFO in January 2018. The City of Bradbury desires to improve the segment of Bradbury Road/Wild Rose Avenue between Winding Oak Lane and the main entrance to the Bradbury Estates. This segment ofE Bradbury Road is a narrow curvilinear two-lane roadway with limited shoulder areas due to the presence of large hedges, severe slopes, mature trees, and a steep hillside. The current roadway width presents hazards and challenges to large moving trucks, horse trailers, and construction vehicles entering and exiting the Estates main gate. This situation has been exacerbated due to the prohibition of large vehicles using the narrow Wild Rose bridge in Monrovia westerly of the main entrance. The widening of the roadway will provide a safer means of access for all vehicles using the main Bradbury The existing curb-to-curb street width of approximately 23 feet will be increased to a proposed uniform curb-to-curb street width of 36 feet. Due to the steep slope along the Bradbury side of the street, this widening will require the construction of a large retaining wall (up to a maximum height of 13 feet) along There are seven (7). mature Oaks trees in conflict with a proposed roadway widening that will require removal as part of the project. In addition, a row of ten (10) Avocado trees and a large hedge in front of 302 Bradbury Road is in conflict with the proposed widening and will also require removal. In order to accommodate the additional roadway width, 1,919 square feet of property needed to be acquired from 150 Deodar Lane to be utilized as street right-of-way. The Easement Deed has been executed by the property owner and requires the City Council to formally accept the dedication prior to recordation City Engineer Gilbertson stated that the total project cost is anticipated to be $525,000. The City's available restricted funds inF FY 21/22 are $191,274. In FY 22/23 the City's available restricted funds will be $403,386. If the City Council elects to proceed with this project, Staff would finalize the plans and  Estates entrance.  the 150 Deodar Lane property frontage.  TREE REMOVALS:  EASEMENTS:  with Los Angeles County.  FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:  specifications this fiscal year.  Minutes CC Meeting July 20,2021 Page2of6    The questions remains about when construction should start with the restricted funding shortfall. The City Council may elect to use general funds to cover the remaining amount ($233,726) this fiscal year or to proceed with the project in FY: 2022/23 by utilizing general funds to cover a smaller shortfall ($121,614). The City Council may also elect to try and wait another year or two until additional restricted funding becomes available; however, staff will need to check on the audit requirements for Itis recommended that the City Council 1) accept the Easement Deed for public road purposes for 150 Deodar Lane (APN 8527-026-025) and 2) authorize staff to proceed with the preparation of final plans and documents for the widening of Bradbury Road/Wild Rose Avenue between Winding Oak Lane to the main entrance to the Bradbury Estates. City Manager Kearney recommended that the City Council move forward with the project. Councilmember Barakat agreed that it would be best to move forward and asked if the City could pay itself back. Councilmember Lewis suggested to get the plans done now and revisit the project next fiscal year, when more restricted Councilmember Hale made a motion to accept the Easement Deed for public road purposes for 150 Deodar Lane and authorize staff to proceed with the preparation of final plans and documents for the widening of Bradbury Road/Wild Rose Avenue between Winding Oak Lane to the main entrance to the Bradbury Estates. Councimember Barakat seconded the motion, which was carried by thet following roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Bruny, Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop, Councilmembers Barakat, Hale and Lewis  holding such funds for extended years.  RECOMMENDATION:  DISCUSSION:  funds will be available.  MOTION:  APPROVED:  NOES: None ABSENT: None Motion passed 5:0  DISCUSSION ON REDISTRICTING:  City Manager Kearney stated that while the process of redistricting may seem simple for a small city like Bradbury, the overall process is guided by a myriad of State and Federal laws and regulations. This includes Elections Code S 21000 & 21600, the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, AB 849 and AB 1276 (Fair Maps Act), and SB 443, among others. Reliance on City Staff to conduct and certify a redistricting process that meets all laws and regulations could lead to pitfalls and future potential challenges, as opposed to certification from a specialized demographer who understands the legalities of  such a process.  Minutes CC Meeting July 20, 2021 Page3 3of6    ANALYSIS:  Every ten (10) years, local governments use new census data to redraw their district lines to reflect how local populations have changed. Assembly Bill No. 849, adopted in 2019, requires cities to engage communities in the redistricting process by holding public hearings and/or workshops and doing public outreach, including to non-Engish-speaking areas/communites. Districts must be redrawn every ten years tot that each district is substantially equal in population. This process ensure that each City Councilmember represents To the extent practicable, district lines shall be adopted using  about the same number of constituents.  the following criteria:  (1) Geographically contiguous districts; minimizes its division; manner that minimizes its division; artificial barriers; and apolitical party.  (2) The geographic integrity of local neighborhoods or communities shall be respected in a manner that (3) Geographic integrity of a city shall be respected in a (4) Easily identifiable boundaries that follow natural or (5) Lines shall be drawn to encourage geographic compactness. In addition, boundaries shall not be drawn to purposes of favoring or discriminating against The timeline for redistricting is based on a municipality's election cycle. Since Bradbury's next General Municipal Election is on June 7, 2022, the deadline to complete the City Manager Kearney stated that normally the U.S. Census Data would be available in March/April; however, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is estimated that the data will be released by September 30th. Despite the fact that the release of the U.S. Census data has been delayed, it is still expected that municipalities get started on the redistricting process to meet Itis recommended that the City Council direct Staff to release an RFP to solicit services for a demographer to perform Bradbury's redistricting. It is expected that Staff will return with ar recommended Award of Bid at the next City Council meeting Councilmember Lewis asked what has changed since the last U.S. Census 10 years ago. City Manager Kearney replied that he did not know since this is his first redistricting. Councilmember Hale stated that no one is going to show up for the community meetings/workshops. Councimember Hale also stated that the City has to send out an RFP to find out how much it actually costs to hire a consultant. The City Council budgeted $15,000 for Redistricting but it will probably cost al lot  TIMELINE:  redistricting is December 15, 2021.  CENSUS DATA:  the December 15, 2021 deadline.  RECOMMENDATION:  on August 17th.  DISCUSSION:  more.  Minutes CC Meeting July 20, 2021 Page 4 of6    City Manager Kearney stated that hiring a consultant will Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop made a motion to direct Staff to release an RFP to solicit services for a demographer to perform Bradbury's redistricting. Councilmember Barakat seconded the motion, which was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Bruny, Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop, Councilmembers Barakat and Hale NOES: Councilmember Lewis ABSENT: None Motion passed 4:1 and it looks nice.  provide al layer of protection fort the City.  MOTION:  APPROVED:  MATTERS FROM THE CITY MANAGER:  City Manager Kearney stated that the new City's website it up City Manager Kearney reported that Steve and Lisa Bailey are leaving soon (Aug/Sep) to relocate to Washington State. VCA isa aware and will find us a new Building Official. An RFP for a part-time Finance Director will go out this week. Mayor Pro- Tem Lathrop inquired if Lisa could work remotely. The City Manager replies yes, which would make thet transition easier. City Planner Kasama is having hip surgery on July 26th and will The City Manager will be on vacation starting July 23 and will City Attorney Reisman gave an update on the receivership for 243 Barranca Road. City Attorney Reisman stated the judge ordered that the City will get a full reimbursement for attorney  be out for two weeks.  be back in the office on August 4th.  MATTERS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY:  fees in the amount of $12,000.  MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL: MAYOR PRO-TEM LATHROP:  MAYOR:  Nothing to report  Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop reported that Mike Misik's home at 535 Mount Olive Drive was burglarized on July 9, 2021 and the Sheriffs Report was not clear. City Manager Kearney stated that the report only stated Suspicious Circumstances - Open Door or Window." There was no mention ofa burglary.  COUNCILMEMBER BARAKAT: COUNCILMEMBER HALE: COUNCILMEMBER LEWIS: ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS:  Nothing to report Nothing to report Nothing to report None  Minutes CC Meeting July 20, 2021 Page5of6    ADJOURNMENT:  At 7:32 p.m. Mayor Bruny adjourned the meeting to a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, August 17,2021 at 7:00 p.m.  MAYOR- CITY OF BRADBURY  ATTEST:  CITY CLERK - CITY OF BRADBURY  Minutes CC Meeting July 20, 2021 Page 6 of6    RESOLUTION NO. 21-16  ARESOLUTION OF1 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFI BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS. AND WARRANTS NO.1 16551 THROUGH NO. 16563 AND DEMANDS AND WARRANTS NO.1 16564 THROUGH NO. 16587  (PRE-RELEASED CHECKS) (REGULAR CHECKS)  The City Council of the City of Bradbury does hereby resolve as follows:  Section 1. That the demands as set forth hereinafter are approved and warrants authorized to be drawn for payment from said demands in the amount of $1,830.97 pre-released Checks) and $54,770.92 at August 17, 2021  from the General Checking Account  PRE-RELEASED CHECKS (due before City Council Meeting):  Check Name and 16551 City of Los Angeles  Description  Amount $191.65  (Due Date) Public Works/Sanitation (7/22/21) California American Water (8/3/21)  LARA Membership Fees for FY2021-2022  Acct. 101-30-6030 Service Address: 301 Mt Olive Drive Irrigation 2410 Mt Olive Lane Irrigation 2256 Gardi Street Acct. 200-48-6400 Name Plate for Sophia Musa Acct. 101-16-6200 Dental Insurance: City Manager (family) Acct. 101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. 101-13-5100 Management Analyst Acct. 101-16-5100 Vision Insurance: City Manager (family) Acct. 101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. 101-13-5100 Management Analyst Acct.. 101-13-5100  16552  $136.10 $64.82 $60.76  $261.68 $21.99  16553 Shaffer Awards (7/22/21) 16554 Delta Dental (8/1/21)  $131.43 $42.88 $42.88 $61.07 $23.66 $23.66  $217.19  16555 Vision Service Plan  (8/1/21)  $108.39  Reso. No. 21-16 Page 1of7 August 17,2021    Check Name and (Due Date) 16556 The Standard (8/1/21)  Description Basic Life and AD&D: City Manager Acct.. 101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct.#101-13-5100 Management Analyst Acct. 101-13-5100 07-July-2021 Cleaning 14-July-2021 Cleaning 21-July-2021 Cleaning 28-July-2021 Cleaning Acct. 101-16-6460 Business Internet Acct. 101-16-6230 Street Lights for Mt. Olive/Gardi Acct.. 200-48-6400 City Hall Utilities Acct. 101-16-6400 City Hall Utilities Acct.. 101-16-6400 Office Supplies Acct.. 101-16-6200 Fees Duet for Case No.: 21PDSC00747 Margarita Morales, 706 Winston Ave. Acct. 101-23-7450  Amount  $9.25 $9.25 $9.25 $105.00 $105.00 $105.00 $105.00  $27.75  16557 Molly Maid  (7/29/21)  $420.00 $149.98 $32.34 $334.49 $16.32 $10.94 $38.25 $1,830.97  16558 Spectrum  (8/9/21) 16559 Southern California Edison (8/12/21) 16560 Southern California Edison (8/12/21) 16561 The Gas Company (8/13/21) 16562 Staples Credit Plan (8/15/21) 16563 Superior Court ofCA County of Los Angeles (8/5/21)  Total Pre-Released Checks  REGULAR CHECKS: 16564 Best Best & Krieger  Riol Hondo-San Gabriel Watershed Advocacy July 2021 Professional Services Acct.. 102-42-7630 (UUT) Street Sweeping for July 2021 Acct. 200-48-7290 Service Address: 600 Winston Ave (City Hall) Acct. 101-16-6400  $943.59  (8/9/21)  16565  Burrtec' Waste. Services (7/31/21) (8/9/21)  $313.14 $385.61  16566 California American Water  Reso. No. 21-16 Page 2of7 August 17, 2021    Check 16567 16568  Name and (Due Date) Frontier (7/31/21) Jones & Mayer (7/31/21)  Description Fire Alarm Line May, June and. July 2021 Acct.. 101-23-7420 CityAttorney: July Retainer Acct.. 101-15-7020 1901 Royal Oaks Acct.. 101-15-7020 243 Barranca Receivership Acct.. 101-15-7070 Chadwick Ranch Acct.. 103-00-2039 Code Enforcement (409 Deodar) Acct. 101-23-7450 Pollution Liability Insurance Program Acct. 101-16-6300 Monthly Cell Phone Allowance Acct. 101-12-6440 Acct. 103-00-2039 Annual Conference Registration For Sophia Musa Acct. 101-16-6020 Transportation Services for Aug 2021 Acct. 204-40-7325 (Prop C) Electronic Page Updates, Images, Graphs & Tabular Matter Acct. 101-13-6225 Acct. 101-25-7000 City Hall Monitoring for Sep 2021 Fire & Intrusion Systems Acct. 101-23-7420  Amount $355.24  $2,650.00 $715.00 $422.50 $2,047.50 $200.00  $6,035.00 $132.00 $75.00 $2,880.00 $120.00 $704.07 $1,954.00 $954.17 $122.34  16569 16570 16571 16572 16573 16574 16575 16576  California JPIA (7/26/21) Kevin Kearney (Aug 2021) (7/30/21) MMASC (8/11/21) City of Monrovia (8/4/21) Municode (8/10/21) (7/31/21) Post Alarm Systems (8/5/21)  Michael Baker International Professional Services- Chadwick Estates  Pasadena Humane Society Animal Control Services for. July 2021  Reso. No. 21-16 Page 3of7 August 17,2021    Check 16577  Name and (Due Date) Priority (7/1/21)  Description  Amount  July 2021 Landscape Services: Bradbury Civic Center Acct. 101-21-7020 Royal Oaks Drive North Acct. 101-21-7015 Lemon Trail Acct. 101-21-7045 Mt. Olive Drive Entryway & Trail Acct. 101-21-7035 Aug 2021 Landscape Services: Bradbury Civic Center Acct. 101-21-7020 Royal Oaks Drive North Acct. 101-21-7015 Lemon Trail Acct.. 101-21-7045 Mt. Olive Drive Entryway & Trail Acct.. 101-21-7035 Audit oft the City of Bradbury Fort they year ended. June 30, 2020 Acct.. 101-14-7020 City Engineering Services Acct. 101-19-7230 Development Projects Acct. 101-19-7230 Acct.. 200-48-6410 Mileage Reimbursement Acct. 101-16-6050 License Renewal - Sonicwall 1year Comprehensive Gateway Security Suite Bundle for TZ300 Acct. 113-20-8120 Custody Charges for. July 2021 Safekeeping Fees Acct. 101-14-7010  $204.12 $402.40 $134.14 $542.38 $204.12 $402.40 $134.14 $542.38  $1,283.04  16578  Priority (8/1/21)  $1,283.04 $17,000.00  16579 16580  The Pun Group, LLP (6/30/21) RKA Consulting Group (7/8/21)  $1,029.00 $7,297.50  $8,326.50 $941.92 $38.42 $466.40  16581 16582 16583  Southern California Edison Street Lights  (8/3/21) Sophia Fryre (8/5/21) TeamLogicIT (8/5/21) U.S. Bank (7/31/21)  16584  $69.75  Reso. No. 21-16 Page4of7 August17,2021    Check 16585  Name and (Due Date) U.S. Bank Corporate Payment Systems (7/22/21)  Description  Amount  Kevin Kearney' Visa Card: AED: Superstore (First Aid) Acct.. 101-24-6470 CSFMO. Job Posting (Finance Director) Acct.. 101-14-6210 Midwest (Snake) Tongs, Inc. Acct. 215-23-7411 League of CA Cities Registration Acct.. 101-12-6020 Beenverified.com Acct.. 101-23-7450 North American Rescue (First Aid) Acct.. 101-24-6470 Claudia Saldana Visa Card: MyFax (June 2021) Acct.. 101-16-6230 USPS (stamps) Acct.. 101-16-6120 ($55.00) Acct.. 101-20-6120 ($55.00) Big Lots (bottled water) Acct.. 101-16-6450 Sophia Musa Visa Card: Target (toilet paper) Acct.. 101-16-6450 Amazon.com (First Aid) Acct.. 101-24-6470 Target (paper towels) Acct.. 101-16-6450 Grainger (Biohazard Bags) Acct. 101-24-6470 Rite Aid (bottled water)) Acct. 101-24-6470 Broadvoice (City Hall Telephone) Acct.#101-16-6440 PurpleAir PA-II Acct. 113-20-8120 June 2021 Professional Services: City Planner (Retainer) Acct. #101-20-7210 City Planner (Hourly Services) Acct. #101-20-7240 Plan Check Services Acct. 101-20-7720  $66.72 $400.00 $115.52 $50.00 $52.44 $53.44 $738.12 $10.00 $110.00 $4.39 $124.39  16585  U.S. Bank Corporate Payment Systems (7/22/21)  16585  U.S. Bank Corporate Payment Systems (7/22/21)  $16.31 $44.78 $18.51 $119.04 $4.99 $169.94 $281.98 $655.55 $3,900.00 $1,815.00 $2,021.28  $1,518.06  16586  VCACode Group (7/16/21) (7/19/21)  $7,736.28  Reso. No. 21-16 Page 5of7 August 17,2021    16587  California American Water Service Address:  $1,133.35 $54,770.92  (8/9/21)  1775 Woodlyn Lane (Royal Oaks Trail) Acct.. 200-48-6400  Total Regular Checks  AUGUST 2021 PAYROLL:  ACH  Kevin Kearney (Aug 2021)  Salary: City Manager Acct. #101-12-5010 Withholdings Acct. #101-00-2011 Salary: City Clerk Acct. #101-13-5010 Withholdings Acct. #101-00-2011 Salary: Management Analyst Acct. #101-16-5010 Withholdings Acct. #101-00-2011 PERS Employee Share Acct. #101-16-5100 Finance Director (July 2021) 11.92x $84.76/hour Acct. #101-14-5010 Withholdings Acct. #101-00-2011  $10,560.00 (2,464.90) $5,583.33 (1,476.09) $4,633.75 (890.87) (312.78) $1,010.11 (96.46)  $8,095.10  ACH  Claudia Saldana (Aug 2021)  $4,107.24  ACH  Sophia Freyre (Aug 2021)  $3,430.10  ACH  Lisa Bailey (Aug 2021)  $913.65  Total June Payroll $16,546.09  ELECTRONIC FUND' TRANSFER (EFT) PAYMENTS FOR AUGUST 2021:  EFT  Aetna (Aug 2021)  Health Insurance for Aug 2021: City Manager Acct.. 101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct.. 101-13-5100 Management Analyst Acct.. 101-16-5100 State Tax Withholdings SDI Acct.. 101-00-2011  $1,565.52 $961.98 $396.32 $879.28 $261.45  $2,983.82  EFT  EDD (Aug 2021)  $1,140.73  Reso. No. 21-16 Page 60 of7 August 17, 2021    EFT  Dept. ofl Treasury (Aug 2021)  Federal Tax Withholdings Medicare (Employee's portion of Social Security and Medicare is matched by the City) Acct. 101-00-2011 City Manager Acct. 101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. 101-13-5100 Management Analyst Acct. 101-16-5100 Unfunded Accrued Liability UALI Payment (Classic) UAL Payment (PEPRA) Acct. 101-16-6240 GASB-68 Reports and Schedules Acct. 101-14-7040  $2,120.86 $2,701.62 $631.84  Internal Revenue: Service Social Security  $5,454.32  EFT  California PERS (Aug 2021)  $1,643.31 $864.46 $664.48 $783.75 $16.08  $3,172.25  EFT  California PERS (Aug 2021)  $799.83 $700.00  EFT  California PERS (Aug 2021)  MAYOR- -CITY OF BRADBURY  ATTEST:  CITY CLERK- CITY OF BRADBURY  "I, Claudia Saldana, City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 21-16, was duly adopted byt the City Council of the City of Bradbury, California, at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of August,  2021 by thet following roll call vote"  AYES: NOES: ABSENT:  CITY CLERK-CITY OF BRADBURY  Reso. No. 21-16 Page 7of7 August 17,2021    Remitp payment andn make checks payabieto: STAPLES CREDITPLAN DEPT.1 11- 0005337241 POE BOX 9001036 LOUISVILLE, KY 40290-1036  INVOICE DETAIL  Staples:  BILL TO: CITYOFE BRADBURY  SHIPTO: CITYOFE BRADBURY 600V WINSTONST BRADBURY CA 91008  Acct: 60111 10005 5337: 241 CLAUDIA SALDANA  Amount Due: Trans Date: DUEI DATE:  Invoice #: 2872519241 $29.99 -$10.00 -$10.00 $9.99 $0.95 $10.94  $10.94 PO:  06/30/21 1.0000 EA 1.0000ST 1.0000ST SUBTOTAL TAX TOTAL  08/15/21 Store: 100088887, WESTBORO, MA $29.99 $10.00 $10.00  PRODUCT STAPLES EXTRAHEAVYWEIGHT COUPONDISCOUNT COUPONDISCOUNT Purchased by: CLAUDIA! SALDANA Order #: 9833679255  SKU# 121962 558100 558100  QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE  nee Chock # 16562  Page 7of8  1-800-669-5285 SlaplesCommercialaccountonine.com    usoank. U.S BANCORP SERVICE CENTER P.O. Box 6343 Fargo, ND 58125-6343  CITY OF BRADBURY ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-0448-0277-2711 STATEMENT DATE TOTAL ACTIVITY  07-22-21 $738.12  I  "MEMO STATEMENT ONLY" DO NOT REMIT PAYMENT  00000183301 SP 0.560 106481369620999P KEVIN KEARNEY CITY OF BRADBURY 600 WINSTON AVENUE BRADBURY CA 91008-1123  JULS0DN  peR Cluk#16585 NEW ACCOUNTACTVITS  DOST TRAN  DATE DATE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION 06-23 06-21 AED SUPERSTORE 800-544-0048 WI 36-30 06-29 PAYPAL *CA CM FOUND 402-935-7733 CA 07-07 07-06 MIDWEST TONGS, INC. 816-5374444 MO 07-12 07-09 EVO'BENVERFEDCOM 855-9046471 NY 07-12 07-09 NORTH. AMERICAN RESCUE LL GREER SC  REFERENCE NUMBER 43/4911300842625 5047 2409215118085288/029 8641 400.00 A0041T8/200126197 5999 115.52 490841T9072545.85155 5968 94651.900830263397 5047 53.44  MCC AMOUNT 66.72  PUR ID: 63103264416 TAX:0.00 PUR ID: 29387012 TAX: 0.00 PUR ID: 63128825490 TAX:0.00 PUR ID: opsntoeabzce4 TAX: 0.00 PUR ID: 11355231859857649428 TAX:0.00 PUR ID: EC2154720 TAX:3.03  07-09 07-08 CACITIES REGISTRATION CACITIES.ORG CA 401341900AC.ASI6 8699  50.00 52.44  Default. Accounting Code:  ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246.0446-0277-2711 STATEMENT DATE DISPUTED. AMOUNT  ACCOUNT SUMMARY PREVIOUS BALANCE PURCHASES & OTHER CHARGES CASH ADVANCES CASH ADVANCE FEE CREDITS TOTAL ACTIVITY  CUSTOMER SERVICE CALL 800-344-5696  $.00 $738.12 $.00 $.00 $.00 $738.12  07-22-21  $.00  SEND BILLING INQUIRIES TO: C/OU.S. BANCORP SERVIÇE CENTER, INC U.S. BANK NATIONAL. ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 6335 FARGO, ND 58125-6335  AMOUNT DUE $0.00 DOI NOT REMIT  2005 U.S.E BANK  PAGE10F1    usbank. U.S BANCORP SERVICE CENTER P.O. Box 6343 Fargo, ND 58125-6343  CITY OF BRADBURY ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-0470-0126-4883 STATEMENT DATE TOTAL ACTIVITY  07-22-21 $124.39  HPale 00000183501 SP 0.560 106481369621001 P CLAUDIA A SALDANA CITY OF BRADBURY 600 WINSTON AVENUE BRADBURY CA 91008-1123  "MEMO STATEMENT ONLY" DO NOT REMIT PAYMENT  JULS0  Check # 16585 NEW ACCOUNT ACTMVITY  DeR  JOST TRAN  DATE DATE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION 06-24 06-23 MYFAX *PROTUS IP SOLN 866-563-9212 CA 07-20 07-19 USPS PO 0522740820 DUARTE CA 07-21 07-20 BIG LOTS STORES #4170 DUARTE CA  REFERENCE NUMBER 892161174100742091 5968 4174612970011728985 9402 110.00 2413/461201002781629 5310  Mec AMOUNT 10.00 4.39  PURI ID: 33956378 TAX:0.00 PUR ID: None TAX: 0.00 PUR ID: TAX: 0.00  Default Accounting Code:  ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-0470-0126-4883 STATEMENT DATE DISPUTED AMOUNT 07-22-21  ACCOUNT SUMMARY PREVIOUS BALANCE PURCHASES & OTHER CHARGES CASH ADVANCES CASH ADVANCE FEE CREDITS TOTAL ACTIVITY  CUSTOMER SERVICE CALL 800-344-5696  $.00 $124.39 $.00 $.00 $.00 $124.39  $.00  SEND BILLING INQUIRIES TO: C/O U.S. BANCORP! SERVICE CENTER, INC U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 6335 FARGO, ND 58125-6335  AMOUNT DUE $0.00 DO NOT REMIT  :OPYRIGHT 2005 U.S. BANK NATIONAL/ ASSOCIATION  PAGE10F1    usibank. U.S BANCORP SERVICE CENTER P.O. Box 6343 Fargo, ND 58125-6343  CITY OF BRADBURY ACCOUNT NUMBER 4248-0446-5320-2800 STATEMENT DATE TOTAL ACTIVITY  07-22-21 $655.55  "yll'n'l '" 000001834 01 SP 0.560 106481369621000P SOPHIA MUSA CITY OF BRADBURY 600 WINSTON AVENUE BRADBURY CA 91008-1123  "p"  "MEMO STATEMENT ONLY" DO NOT REMIT PAYMENT  RULSG  Dee Clackt16585 NEWACCOUNT ACTVITY  POST TRAN  DATE DATE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION 06-23 06-22 TARGET 00003020 DUARTE CA 06-24 06-23 TARGET 00003020 DUARTE CA 06-24 06-23 GRAINGER 877-2022594 IL 07-07 07-06 RITE AID 05528 DUARTE CA 07-15 07-14 BROADVOICE 888-325-5875 CA 07-15 07-14 SP * PURPLEAIR HTTPSPURPLEAI UT  REFERENCE NUMBER 41640/17207000190 5310 416A0/1740700/48346 5310 4/54211752792160846 5085 119.04 494900118238008158 5912 4635T850704683502 4814 169.94  MCC AMOUNT 16.31 44.78 18.51 4.99  PUR ID: 0000XX0000000001 TAX:1 1.52 PUR ID: 113-1881280-97834 TAX:3.89 PURI ID: 0000000000000000 TAX: 1.72 PUR ID: 6513531876 TAX:9.21 PUR ID: 000681591 TAX: 0.46 PUR ID: 3141045058 TAX:0.00 PUR ID: opsntqtiebi0uo TAX: 23.65  06-23 06-22 AMZN MKTP US-213YZ9EF2 AM AMZN.COM/BILL 4A306172063150423 5942  5732 281.98  Default Accounting Code:  ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-046-5320-2600 STATEMENT DATE DISPUTED AMOUNT 07-22-21  ACCOUNT SUMMARY PREVIOUS BALANCE PURCHASES & OTHER CHARGES CASH ADVANCES CASH ADVANCE FEE CREDITS TOTAL ACTIVITY  CUSTOMER SERVICE CALL 800-344-5696  $.00 $655.55 $.00 $.00 $.00 $655.55  $.00  SEND BILLING INQUIRIES TO: CIOU.S. BANCORP SERVICE CENTER, INC U.S. BANKI NATIONAL. ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 6335 FARGO, ND 58125-6335  AMOUNT DUE $0.00 DO NOT REMIT  2005 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION  PAGE10F1    0 AA  $A  $A  8 0 888  6    Revenues 2020-21 Budget 430,000 14,000 10,000 6,000 1,200 26,000 20,000 38,000 3,000 40,000 18,000 20,000 140,000 2,000 1,000 40,000 10,000 1,500 70,000 85,000 90,000 3,500 6,500 900 1,300 50,000 50,000 200 4,820 500 100  Acct. Number General Fund:  2020-21 YTD @ 6/30/21 44,815 #DIV/O! 460,910 107% 17,713 127% #DIV/O! 10,245 102% 10,080 168% 6,305 525% 23,316 90% 19,077 95% 29,339 77% 3,503 117% 47,376 118% 19,634 109% 23,346 117% 144,160 103% 612 31% 4,901 490% 32,094 80% 34,060 #DIV/O! 6,180 62% 1,635 109% 14,578 #DIV/O! 4,844 #DIV/O! 73,539 105% 103,845 122% 51,245 57% 9,913 283% 7,989 123% 900 100% 3,240 249% 98,084 196% 23,083 46% 15 8% #DIV/O! 4,820 100% 50,427 10085% 48,000 #DIV/O! 100 100% #DIV/O! 1,433,923 121% 6,322 63% 2 #DIV/O! 6,324 78,209 32% 78,209 32% 2,724 91% 100 33% 2,824 10,182 145% 364 10,546 135%  2021-22 Budget 665,476 470,128 18,000 11,000 8,000 3,000 27,000 19,500 39,500 3,550 47,500 20,000 22,500 145,000 1,200 2,500 40,000 10,000 1,635 65,000 100,000 100,000 9,000 10,000 900 2,500 100,000 16,268 50,000 100 4,820 2,000 100 500 2,000,409 56,716 5,000 5,000 75,000 75,000 4,000 150 4,150 11,000 500 11,500  2021-22 YTD @7/31/2021 8,401 1% 0% 0% #DIV/O! 946 9% 0% 3 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 41% 0% 0% 0% 14% #DIV/O! 0% 0% #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 2,767 4% 2,663 3% 3,816 4% 914 10% 2,333 23% 900 100% 0% 16% 2,740 5% 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 3% 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%  Account Description  101-00-4000 Operating Transfers In 101-00-4010 Property Tax-Current Secured 101-00-4030 Property Tax-Current Unsecured 101-00-4050 Property Tax Prior Year 101-00-4060 Public Safety Augmentation F 101-00-4070 Delinquent' Taxes 101-00-4100 Sales & Use Tax 101-00-4110 Franchise Fee-Cable TV 101-00-4120 Franchise Fee-SC Edison 101-00-4130 Franchise Fee-SC Refuse 101-00-4140 Franchise Fee-SC Gas Co. 101-00-4150 Franchise Fee-Cal Am' Water 101-00-4160 AB939 Refuse. Admin. Fee 101-00-4190 Real Property Transfer Tax 101-00-4200 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 101-00-4210 Dist & Bail Forfeiture 101-00-4220 Fines-City 101-00-4350 Business License 101-00-4360 Movie & TVI Permits 101-00-4370 Bedroom License Fee 101-00-4410 Variances & CUPs 101-00-4420 Lot Line. Adjustment/Zone Changes 101-00-4440 Subdivisions/Lot: Splits 101-00-4460 Planning Dept. Review 101-00-4470 Building Construction Permit 101-00-4480 Building Plan Check Fees 101-00-4485 Landscape Plan Check Permit 101-00-4490 Green Code Compliance 101-00-4500 Civic Center Rental Fee 101-00-4530 Environmental & Other Fees 101-00-4540 City Engineering Plan Check 101-00-4600 Interest Income 101-00-4700 Sales of Maps & Publications 101-00-4800 Other Revenue 101-00-4850 Cal-Am Loan Repayment 101-00-4900 Reimbursements 101-00-4920 Sale of Prop. Al Funds 101-23-4950 Vacant Property Registry Fee 101-24-4610 Donations Utility Users Tax Fund: 102-00-4600 Interest 102-00-4830 Electric Deposits Fund:  9,223 5,742  Total General Fund Revenues 1,183,520  10,000 10,000 244,209 244,209 3,000 300 3,300 7,000 800 7,800 1of3  103-00-2039 Chadwick Ranch Development Long Term Planning Fee Fund: 112-00-4490 Long-Term Planning Fee 112-00-4600 LTP Fee Interest Income Technology Feel Fund: 113-00-4520 Technology Fee 113-00-4600 Technology Fee iInterest Income  3 3 8 8  46%    Revenues 2020-21 Budget 1,200 22,500 23,700 13,500 13,500 25,094 300 25,394 20,813 20,813 5,000 5,000 240,000 11,000 251,000  Acct. Number Gas Tax Fund: 200-00-4200 TCRAI Funds 200-00-4600 Gas Tax Interest 200-00-4260 Gas Tax SB1 Gas Tax Fund: 201-00-4000 Transfers In 201-00-4260 Gas Tax 201-00-4600 Gas Taxl Interest Prop. AF Fund: 203-40-4260 Prop. ATransit Funds 203-40-4600 Prop. A Transit Interest Prop. CF Fund: 204-48-4260 Prop. C Funds 204-48-4600 Prop. C Interest Transportation Development Act Fund: 205-48-4260 TDAF Funds 205-48-4600 TDA Interest Sewer Fund: 206-00-4000 Transfers In 206-50-4600 Sewer Fund Interest 206-50-4606 Winston. Ave. Assessment STPL Fund: 208-00-4260 STPL Funds 208-00-4600 STPL Interest Recycling Grant Fund: 209-00-4260 Recycling Grant Funds 209-00-4600 Recycling Grant Interest Measure RI Fund: 210-48-4260 Measure RI Funds 210-48-4600 Measure RI Interest Measure MI Fund 212-48-4260 Measure MI Funds 212-48-4600 Measure M Interest Measure WI Fund 213-48-4260 Measure W Funds 213-48-4600 Measure WI Interest Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund: 215-23-4260 COPs Funds 215-23-4600 COPs Interest  2020-21 YTD @ 6/30/21 0% 136 #DIV/O! 25,865 115% 26,001 110% 15,815 117% 412 #DIV/O! 16,227 120% 21,669 86% 444 148% 22,113 87% 17,974 86% 171 #DIV/O! 18,145 87% 4,587 92% 10 #DIV/O! 4,597 92% 240,000 100% 6,319 57% 67,433 #DIV/O! 313,752  2021-22 Budget 200 35,000 35,200 30,000 300 30,300 25,000 200 25,200 23,000 450 23,450 5,000 5,000  2021-22 YTD @7 7/31/2021 #DIV/O! 0% 26 0% 26 0% 0% 0% 0% 26 0% 0% 26 0% 2,178 9% 0% 2,178 9% 413 8% #DIV/O! 413 8% #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O!  Account Description  10 #DIV/O! 10 #DIV/O! 0% 99 198% 99 2% 13,499 87% 561 70% 14,060 86% 15,295 96% 335 112% 15,630 96% 50,506 84% #DIV/O! 50,506 84% 100,000 100% 2,200 73% 102,200 99%  10 10 5,000 100 5,100 18,000 300 18,300 16,500 400 16,900 50,500 50,500 100,000 2,500 102,500  0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 0% 9% 11% 0% 11% 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 0% 0%  5,000 50 5,050 15,572 800 16,372 16,005 300 16,305 60,000 60,000 100,000 3,000 103,000 2of3  1,632 1,632 1,844 1,844    Revenues  Acct. Number County Park Grant: 217-00-4210 County Park Grant 217-00-4600 Grant Fund Interest Income  2020-21 Budget  2020-21 YTD @ 6/30/21 324 539 539% 863 863% 20,148 45% 50 33% 20,198 45% 50,000 #DIV/O! 38 #DIV/O! 50,038 #DIV/O! 2,186,265 107%  2021-22 Budget  2021-22 YTD @7/31/2021  Account Description  100 100 45,000 150 45,150  500 500 24,994 75 25,069 100,000 127,983 100,000 127,983 2,534,088 190,829  0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 128% #DIV/O! 128% 8%  Fire Safe Grant:  219-00-4260 Community Wildfire Protection Plan 219-00-4600 Fire Safe Grant Interest Income Covid-19 Fund: 220-00-4215 COVID 19 Revenues 220-00-4600 Interest Income  Total Revenues 2,034,213  3of3    Expenditures 2020-21 Budget  2020-21 YTD @ 6/30/21  2021-22 Budget  2021-22 YTD @7/31/2021  Account Description  General Fund:  101-00-5000 Transfers Out City Council Division: 101-11-6100 Events and awards 101-11-6110 City Newsletter City Manager Division: 101-12-5010 Salaries 101-12-5100 Benefits 101-12-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-12-6025 Expense. Account 101-12-6050 Mileage 101-12-6440 Cell Phone City Clerk Division: 101-13-5010 Salaries 101-13-5100 Benefits 101-13-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-13-6050 Mileage 101-13-6210 Special Department Supplies 101-13-6220 Election Supplies 101-13-6225 Codification 101-13-7000 Contract Election Services Finance Division: 101-14-5010 Salaries 101-14-5100 Benefits  240,000 240,000  100% #DIV/O! 300 245 82% 4,000 3,000 75% 4,300 3,245 75% 120,000 124,080 49,455 48,927 99% 3,500 295 8% 1,250 760 61% 1,000 418 42% 1,000 825 83% 176,205 175,305 61,424 63,512 103% 26,126 26,424 101% #DIV/O! 115 55 48% 275 0% 500 0% 5,000 2,197 44% #DIV/O! 93,440 92,188 14,000 14,895 106% 1,357 1,304 96% 50 394 788% 1,000 1,231 123% 4,500 5,735 127% 18,500 29,150 158% 725 700 97% 40,132 53,409 133% 31,800 31,800 100% 2,500 24,260 970% 2,150 #DIV/O! 1,100 750 68% #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 167% 102% 56% 0% 113% 0% 50% 29% 333% #DIV/O!  #DIV/O! 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 8% 8% 0% 2% 0% 8% 8% 8% 8% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 0% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% #DIV/O! 343% 0% 0% 4% 8% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% #DIV/O!  6,500 3,000 9,500 50,747 4,065 5,000 1,500 1,000 1,000 67,000 5,583 30,000 2,329 100 275 500 3,000 15,000 99% 115,875 7,912 15,789 1,355 400 1,000 4,500 19,000 700 42,744 31,800 3,000 500 1,715 3,000 2,000 40,300 1,715 55,605 4,634 14,286 1,178 1,000 200 500 300 700 3,000  101-11-6500 Community Support homelessness)  103% 126,720 10,713  25 75  99% 185,967 14,878  102  101-14-6210 Special Department Supplies 101-14-6230 Contracted Computer Services 101-14-7010 Contracted Banking Services 101-14-7020 Contracted. Audit Services 101-14-7040 GASB Reports City Attorney Division: 101-15-7020 City Attorney Retainer 101-15-7070 City Attorney Special Service 101-15-7075 Development Code Update 101-15-7080 Seminars & Training General Government Division: 101-16-5010 Salaries 101-16-5100 Benefits 101-16-6010 Seminars & Training 101-16-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-16-6040 Transportation & Lodging 101-16-6050 Mileage 101-16-6120 Postage 101-16-6200 Office Supplies 101-16-6210 Special Departmental Supplies  102  City Attorney-Planning. City Attorney-Code Enforcement  35,400 58,960 48,308 15,488 1,000 200 500 300 700 1,000 1of4  49,334 8,736 225 149 201 3,329    Expenditures  :  2020-21 Budget 10,000 4,500 2,500 200 1,200 35,000 3,200 2,300 1,200 3,200 500  2020-21 YTD @ 6/30/21 4,475 6,291 2,566 200 36,352 7,029 2,143 1,153 4,840 4,387  2021-22 Budget 45% 10,000 140% 6,291 103% 2,600 100% 200 0% 104% 39,187 39,065 220% 7,380 93% 2,100 96% 1,200 151% 4,500 877% 500 #DIV/O! 15,000 #DIV/O! 6,000 88% 80,000 3,102 88% 80,000 3,102 63% 500 387% 500 0% 500 92% 46,800 90% 120,000 136% 15,000 11% #DIV/O! 2,000 56% 185,300 70% 10,000 63% 7,000 121% 10,000 86% 12,000 49% 7,000 15,000 82% 61,000 100% 126,940 106% 3,000 163% 12,000 #DIV/O! 106% 141,940 185% 110 495% 500 96% 400 0% 200 81% 5,500 94% 1,000 #DIV/O! 89% 7,710  2021-22 YTD @7/31/2021 150 800 #DIV/O!  Account Description  101-16-6230 Computer & Website Services 101-16-6240 PERS UAL Payment 101-16-6241 PERS Replacement Benefit Contribution 101-16-6242 PERS SSA218 Annual Fee 101-16-6250 Copier & Duplications 101-16-6300 Insurance 101-16-6400 Utilities 101-16-6440 Telephone 101-16-6450 Building Operations 101-16-6460 Building & Cleaning Service 101-16-6470 Maintenance & Supplies  0% 2% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 27% 4% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% #DIV/O! 0%  Redistricting Street Signs  131,296 131,410 75,000 65,821 75,000 65,821 500 500 500 46,800 90,000 80,941 15,000 20,460 134,460 287,760 161,519 10,000 7,000 10,000 12,000 7,000 46,000 125,121 125,120 3,000 12,000 140,121 147,891 100 100 375 200 5,500 1,000 7,275 2of4  100% 170,550 45,827  Engineering Division:  101-19-7230 Contracted Engineering Services Planning, Zoning & Development Division: 101-20-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-20-6120 Postage 101-20-6210 Special Department Supplies 101-20-6240 Environmental Filing Fees 101-20-7210 City Planner Retainer 101-20-7220 Contracted Building & Safety 101-20-7240 City Planner Special Service 101-20-7245 General Plan update 101-20-7075 Development Code Update Parks & Landscape Maintenance Division: 101-21-7015 Royal Oaks Trail Maintenance 101-21-7020 City Hall Grounds Maintenance 101-21-7025 Trail Maintenance 101-21-7035 Mt.Olive Entrance & Trail 101-21-7045 Lemon/RO Horse Trail 101-21-7060 Street Tree Trimming Public Safety Division: 101-23-6210 Special Departmental Services 101-23-7410 Contract Services Sheriff 101-23-7420 City! Hall Security 101-23-7450 Code Enforcement 101-23-7757 AEDI Purchase Emergency Preparedness Division: 101-24-6010 Seminars & Training 101-24-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-24-6030 Memberships & Dues 101-24-6100 Events & Awards 101-24-6470 Maintenance & Supplies 101-24-6480 Civic Center Generator 101-24-7245 Hazard Mitigation Plan  317 1,935 42,900 14,966 7,039 4,443 12,124 10,345 3,430 560 #DIV/O! 37,941 11 #DIV/O! 3,182 19,578 185 495 360 4,465 944 6,449    Expenditures  2020-21 Budget 12,971 300 13,271 10,500  2020-21 YTD@6/30/21 5,817 5,817 10,463  2021-22  2021-22  Account Description  Budget YTDG @7 7/31/2021  Animal & Pest Control Division: 101-25-7000 Animal Control Services 101-25-7010 Pest Control Services Intergovernmental Reiations Division: 101-30-6030 Memberships & Dues  45% 0% 44% 100%  11,450 500 11,950 10,500 9,572 92% 1,063,336 83,108  0% 0% 0% 91% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%  General Fund Totals 1,300,700 1,190,418  Utility Users Tax Fund:  102-15-7075 Development Code Update 102-42-7630 NPDES Stormwater Compliance 103-00-2039 Chadwick Ranch Development Long Term Planning Fee Fund: 112-20-7245 General Plan Expense Technology Fee Fund: 113-20-4500 Permit Digitizing 113-20-7730 Website Gas Tax Fund:  73,431 91,186 73,431 166,000 166,000 20,000 2,000 10,000 10,222 14,000 21,287 9,000 8,000 1,000 4,000 5,000 27,000 27,562  124% 52% 96% 510% 102% 152% 140% 123% 0% 70% 45% 102%  90,000 90,000 75,000 75,000 2,000 3,000 10,000 13,000 11,000 10,000 1,000 4,000 25,097 51,097 81,615 81,615  91,186 85,688 85,688 19,270 865 #DIV/O! 10,200 12,617 9,877 2,818 2,250  Deposits Fund:  113-20-8120 Capital Equipment-Server & Copier 200-48-6400 Utilities-Select System 200-48-6410 Street Lights 200-48-7000 PW Contract Services 200-48-7290 Street Sweeping 200-48-7750 Wild Rose Project SB1 Gas Tax Fund: 201-48-7745 Royal Oaks North Curb Extension 201-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 201-48-7755 City' Wide Slurry Seal 203-00-7600 Sale of Prop. A Funds 204-20-6030 Memberships & Dues 204-40-7325 Transit Services 204-48-7750 Wild Rose Project Transportation Development Act Fund: 205-48-7735 Royal Oaks & Mt. Olive Trail Rehab.  668 668  5%  0%  0% #DIV/O! 353 704  Prop. Al Fund: Prop. C Fund:  60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 900 9,000 9,900 5,000 5,000  100% 100% 42% 94% #DIV/O! 89% 80%  378 8,448 8,826 4,014 4,014  900 9,000 36,570 46,470 1,057 5,000 5,000  2% 0%  3of4    Expenditures  2020-21 Budget  2020-21 YTD @ 6/30/21  2021-22 Budget 665,476  2021-22 YTD @7/31/2021  Account Description  Sewer Fund:  Transfer Outt to GF  206-50-7601 Mt. Olive Lane Sewer Project 206-50-7602 DUSD Message Board 206-50-7606 Winston Ave Project 208-48-6555 Citywide Slurry Seal 208-48-7750 Wild Rose Project Recycling Grant Fund: 209-35-7300 Recycling Education Measure RI Fund: 210-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 210-48-7755 City' Wide Slurry Seal 210-00-7760 Return of Funds Measure M Fund 212-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 212-48-7755 Citywide Slurry Seal 212-48-7756 Bridge Repair Measure W Fund  673,396 253,946 40,000 35,160 40,000 51,750 753,396 340,856  38% 88% 129% 45% 665,476  0% 0% 0%  STPL Fund:  1,055 1,055 5,000 88,739 88,739 58,470 58,470 84% 50,500 0% 50,000 131% 56,500 68% 106,500 0% 1,000 66% 30,934 100,000 100,000 78% 2,535,192 84,833  5,000  7,200  144%  0%  0% 0%  213-42-7630 NPDES Stormwater Compliance Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund: 215-23-7410 Contract Services Sheriff 215-23-7411 Contract CSO Services & Supplies County Park Grant: 217-21-7650 Civic Center Park Fire Safe Grant 14-USFS-SFA-0053: 219-21-7761 Community Wildfire Protection Plan 220-00-5000 Operating Transfers Out 220-00-6215 COVID 191 Expenses  60,000 50,506 50,000 53,500 70,053 103,500 70,053 1,000  0% 0% 0%  50,000 32,901  Covid-19 Fund:  44,815 #DIV/O! 5,223 #DIV/O! 50,038 #DIV/O!  0% 3%  Total Expenditures 2,648,927 2,059,806  4of4    Elizabeth Bruny, Mayor (District. 5) Bruce Cathrop, Mayor Pro-Tem (District 4) RichardHale, Council Member (District 1) Monte. Lewis, Councils Member (District 2) RichardBarakat, Councils Member (District. 3)  BRADBURY  City of Bradbury Agenda Memo  TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT:  Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council  Kevin Kearney, City Manager August 17, 2021  DISCUSSION ON REDISTRICTING SERVICES  ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Proposal: Bear Demographics & Research  2. Rose Institute PPT: "Local Redistricting in California in 2021:  The Same...But Different." 3. Local Government Redistricting Toolkit  SUMMARY  During the July meeting, the City Council authorized Staff to release an RFP for redistricting services. The RFP yielded one response, from Bear Demographic & Research ("Bear"), in the amount of $70,000. After some discussion with Staff, Bear Iti is recommended that the City Council approve the expenditure of up to $50,000 for redistricting services, and direct the City Manager and City Attorney to draft and enter  reduced the proposed price to $50,000 (Attachment #1).  into a contract with Bear Demographics & Research.  ANALYSIS  Every ten years, local governments use new census data to redraw their district lines to reflect how local populations have changed. Assembly Bill No. 849, adopted in 2019, requires cities to engage communities in the redistricting process by holding public hearings and/or workshops and doing public outreach, including to non-English- Districts must be redrawn every ten years SO that each district is substantially equal in population. This process ensures that each city counciimember represents about the  speaking areas/communties.  same number of constituents.  FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 8-17  AGENDA ITEM # 2    Discussion on Redistricting Services  Page 20 of2  To the extent practicable, district lines shall be adopted using the following criteria: (1) geographically contiguous districts (each city council district should share a common boarder with the next), (2) the geographic integrity of local neighborhoods or communities shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division, (3) geographic integrity of a city shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division, (4) easily identifiable boundaries that follow natural or artificial barriers, and (5) lines shall be drawn to encourage geographic compactness. In addition, boundaries shall not be drawn for purposes of favoring or discriminating against a political party. While the process of redistricting may seem simple for a small city like Bradbury, the overall process is guided by a myriad of State and Federal laws and regulations. This includes Elections Code S 21000 & 21600, Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, AB 8498 & AB 1276 (Fair Maps Act), SB 443, among others. Reliance on City Staff to conduct and certify a redistricting process that meets all laws and regulations could lead to pitfalls and future potential challenges, as opposed to certification from a specialized The timeline for redistricting is based on a municipality's election cycle. Since Bradbury's next election is on June 7, 2022, the deadline to complete the redistricting is December 15, 2021. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused some delays though. Normally, the U.S. Census data would be available for cities in March/April; however, it ise estimated that the data may not be released until September 30th. While the U.S. Census has experienced delays, it is still expected that municipalities continue working toward redistricting by the applicable deadline, even while awaiting U.S. Census data.  demographer that understands the legalities of such a process.  FINANCIAL ANALYSIS  The last redistricting in Bradbury was completed in 2010/2011. Although tracing final costs is difficult to determine, $50,000 was originally budgeted for such services. The City has budgeted $15,000 this Fiscal Year for redistricting. Bear's original proposal was for $70,000. After discussion with Staff, the company agreed to reduce the total estimated cost to $50,000 (Attachment #1). This cost would be $35,000 more than originally budgeted, although Staff would work with the company to try to further  reduce costs throughout the process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION  Iti is recommended that the City Council amend the budget and approve an expenditure of up to $50,000 for redistricting services by Bear, and direct the City Manager and City Attorney to draft and enter into a contract with Bear Demographics & Research for  redistricting services.    ATTACHMENT #1    BEAR  DEMOGRAPHICS & RESEARCH  City of Bradbury  RFP For REDISTRICTING SERVICES  PROPOSAL August 10, 2021    2  00 E  € 9s 00  318vna JO ALIO  3  VIAOINOW JO AIIO    TABLE OF CONTENTS  COVER PAGE.  CITY OF BRADBURY COUNCIL DISTRICT MAP.  TABLE OF CONTENTS. SECTIONI-COVER LETTER. SECTIONII- QUALIFICATIONS. PROJECTTEAM RESUMES.  4-5 6-22 6-8 9-21 22-28 22-24 25-27 28 29-36 37-40  SECTION III-P PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK. PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK. PROJECTHOURSI BYTASK. PROPOSED SCHEDULE SECTION IV-] REFERENCES.  SECTION V-C COST OFI PROPOSED SERVICES.  3    BEAR - - DLHOGRAPHICS à RESEARCH  August 10, 2021 Kevin Kearney City Manager City ofl Bradbury 600 Winston Avenue Bradbury, CA 91008  RE: RFP For REDISTRICTING SERVICES  Dear Mr. Kearney:  Please accept this submitted proposal as an indication of our genuine and sincere interest to serve as the consultants for the 2021 City of Bradbury redistricting process. As noted in the proposal, I have served in leadership positions on several projects in the past, including the 2001 California State. Assembly map, the 2002 Los Angeles City Council and Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education (LAUSD) maps, the 2012 Los Angeles City Council map, the 2012 Central Basin Municipal Water) District map, the forthcoming 2021 LAUSD, 2022 City ofAlhambra, 2022 City of Carson, 2022 City ofl Menifee, 2021 City of San Bernardino, and 2022 Chino Basin Water Conservation District maps, as well as more recent 2020 Census-related litigation as an expert My colleague David Ely, owner of Compass Demographics, is al key collaborator on this proposal and has worked on district formation, redistricting, and census-related projects since the 1980s, including the geographic and data sets for the Statewide Database for four decades and too many projects to list here (see Mr. Ely's Curriculum Vita). In our capacities as the Technical Director, Executive Director, or consultant for previous redistricting and district formation efforts, we provided each process with the administrative and technical expertise to draw a transparent, community-based, legally sustainable plan, including a variety of options and scenarios requested bya appointed or elected officials as they deliberated on draft maps and a final plan. We have also partnered with Tizoc DeAztlan, President of DeAztlan Consulting, who has a decades-long practice specializing in public relations and community outreach services. Mr. DeAztlan will provide outreach services under the scope ofwork, including leading the public and The team's approach to redistricting is one of collaboration, working with, and taking direction from the Mayor and City Council to develop a plan ofaction that is structured and meets the Bear Demographics & Research LLC. 10061 Riversidel Drive, #144, Toluca Lake, CA 91602  witness.  community engagement process.  323.708.2478- ajwestal@gmailcom Federal EIN 86-1486515  4    Bear Demographics & Research LLC  Page 2 of2  objectives, criteria, and timeline developed and adopted by the City. This includes satisfying all requirements of local, state, and federal laws, as well as the County Registrar of Voters, at the highest level of excellence and technical capabilities. Our key objective is to maximize public participation under the direction oft the Mayor and City Council in compliance with the California FAIR MAPS Act (AB 849 and AB1276), while providing the entire spectrum of possibilities and options to the City of Bradbury within the legal parameters of redistricting - as the Mayor and Our previous redistricting work history indicates that we are thoughtful and flexible individuals who reliably meet deadlines. Over the last few decades, we. have performed the tasks required in less than a four-month period for several jurisdictions including when dictated by a Charter or municipal code. This is critical given that the 2020 Census PL 94-171 data will not be released until August/September 2021, creating a truncated process. Our consistent ability to complete the task within the time frame allotted by state law, while providing plenty oft time for the Registrar ofVoters to complete the redrawing of voter precinct boundaries prior to the 2022 Election cycle, will be paramount to meeting the needs of the City of Bradbury under this scope of work. The attentiveness and accountability necessary to produce a trusted and quality map is something our Our understanding of redistricting and the Census over the last four decades, including the importance of outreach and public engagement, will be invaluable to the Mayor and City Council in order to provide best practices for maximizing technical expertise, multi-lingual public input, and collaboration built on ethical competence, communities ofi interest, compactness, contiguity, and local, federal, and state legal requirements - resulting in a transparent, open, non-partisan, and community-based redistricting process conducted by the Mayor and City Council for the residents Wel look forward to the opportunity toj personally discuss this bid proposal ini more detail with City staff and the City Council. Please do not hesitate to contact us ifyou need any further information.  City Council deliberate toward a draft and final map.  team excels at.  oft the City ofBradbury.  Thank you for your time and consideration.  Respectfully Yours, - Andrew J. Westall Principal & Owner  Bear Demographics & Research LLC. 10061 Riverside Drive, #144, Tolucal Lake, CA 91602  323.708.2478 Ajwestall@gmail.com, Federal) EIN 86-1486515  5    Section II - Qualifications  FIRMI DESCRIPTION  Bear Demographics & Research LLC 10061 Riverside Drive, #144 Toluca Lake, CA 91602 323.708.2478 westall@gmal.com  Andrew Westall, Principal & Owner (Management Contact)  After more than two decades in the public sector, Andrew Westall opened a new firm, Bear Demographics & Research LLC (BDR), in 2021 that specializes in redistricting, demographics, publicp policyc consulting, and local ballot measures. BDRI has teamed up with seasoned experts and subcontractors in the fields of redistricting, demography, and outreach, including: David Ely of Compass Demographics who has specialized in redistricting for more than three decades; and Tizoc DeAztlan of DeAztlan Consulting who has specialized inj public and community outreach for nearly two decades. The offices of BDR are located in the Toluca Lake neighborhood of the City ofLos Angeles as indicated. The firm has no current employees. No services are excluded from the Scope of Work. Current redistricting clients include the Los Angeles Unified School District, the City ofLos Angeles, the City of Alhambra, the City of Carson, the City of San Bernardino, the City of Menifee, the Chino Basin Water Conservation District, and the Equal Representation  Project.  OmmniraioilChariandl Project Team  Andrew J. Westall Project Managet/Demograpner  David Ely  Tizoc DeAztlan Outreach Director  Technical Director/Demographer  TEAM MEMBERS  ANDREW. J. WESTALL  Mr. Westall has been involved in the redistricting process at the local and state level in the State of California since the late 1990s under the initial tutelage of UCLA's Dr. Leobardo Estrada, a renowned national expert on ethnic and racial demographic trends, particularly in the Latino/a/x community; and Dr. J. Eugene Grigsby III, a renowned social justice advocate and current President & CEO of the National Healthcare Foundation. During this time, Mr. Westall authored the publication Reapportionment, Redistricting and the Latino Community: 2000 and Beyond" for the NALEO Educational Fund as his master's thesis. The publication was distributed to hundreds ofLatino/a/x elected and appointed officials from across the United States at the 2000    Section I- Qualifications (cont.)  NALEO Educational Fund National Conference in Denver, Colorado.  Asastaffr member to then-Speaker ofthe Assembly Robert M. Hertzberg, Andrew Westall worked with Assembly consultants (including Mr. David Ely) out of Caltech to build the data sets for the Statewide Database and the 2001 redistricting process, prior to the drafting of plans. He drew 43 oft the 80 State Assembly seats in the adopted 2001 California State Assembly map, as well as several draft plans for State Senate and Congressional District maps. Mr. Westall's state experience also includes expert affidavits and testimony during the successful State Supreme Court litigation process with respect to the State Senate district boundaries after the plan was approved. Throughout his tenure with the California State Assembly, Mr. Westall also participated in the technical development and creation of the 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2004 State Elections data sets In 2001-02, Andrew Westall served as the Technical Director for both of the appointed Commissions that recommended the LAUSD and City Council maps to the Los Angeles City Council. During this time, Mr. Westall built the data sets used by each Commission, as well as worked with Commissioners on several draft plans, the final recommended plan, and all associated In 2011-12, Andrew Westall served as the Executive Director for the Los Angeles City Council Redistricting Commission. During this time, Mr. Westall was also the line drawer for the Central Basin Municipal Water District (as a subcontractor to DeAztlan Consulting), as well as provided pro-bono line drawing and analysis for the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor with respect From 2018 to the present, Mr. Westall has provided expert testimony and affidavits on behalf of the City ofLos Angeles and the State of California with respect to the 2020 Census in successful litigation, including on the issue of adding a question regarding citizenship and the attempt to remove non-citizens from the PL 94-171 database that will be forthcoming by the U.S. Census Bureau on September. Bear Demographics & Research LLC serve as redistricting consultants to thel LAUSD, Equal Representation: Project, City ofLos Angeles, City ofAlhambra, City ofCarson, City of San Bernardino, City of Menifee, and the Chino Basin Water Conservation District. Mr.  that also reside on the Statewide Database website.  technical reports.  to the 2011 California Citizens Redistricting Commission process.  Westall's resume is attached. DAVIDELY  Mr. Ely is the Founder and President of Compass Demographics, a consulting and database management firm specializing in projects involving Census and Election Data. Mr. Ely has extensive experience in the management ofredistricting projects, the analysis of voting behavior, David Ely has served as an expert and testified on behalf of numerous jurisdictions in the United States as well as private plaintiffs in numerous cases involving voting rights and districting issues, and his opinions have been cited and relied on in multiple legal opinions. He has also served as a consultant and expert on behalf of defendant jurisdictions in voting rights litigation challenging election systems or districts. Mr. Ely has also served as a consultant to construct databases, draw district lines or prepare presentation maps and reports for the many jurisdictions in conducting  and demographic analysis.  7    Section #- Qualifications (cont)  their normal redistricting. These have included statewide congressional and legislative redistricting in California, as well as a variety of County Boards, City Councils, School Boards, Water Districts, Regional Transit Boards and others following the 1990, 2000, and 2010 Census. Mr. Ely's most recent clients in the State of California include the City of Fullerton, the City of Garden Grove, the City of Carson, the City of Coalinga, the City of Richmond, and the City of  Malibu. Mr. Ely's Curriculum Vitae is attached.  TIZOCDEAZILAN  Tizoc DeAztlan is the President of DeAztlan Consulting, LLC., and has spent most of his career consulting and advising Southern California government, non-profit, private, and corporate agencies. He has consulted and managed public relations, community outreach, and media Mr. DeAztlan specializes in Latino/Spanish speaking media markets and community affairs spearheading programs on issues of water, land use, culture, health, wellness, redistricting, and education. A go-to-person for coalition building and partnership creation, Tizoc maintains a consistent and measured community-centered approach. His adeptness at understanding all angles and creating the best option forward has led to a long track record ofs success for his clients. Mr. DeAztlan understands that while there are traditional outreach methods that must be utilized, each community is unique and as such his multi-lingual team must be adaptive to provide access Tizoc has consulted on redistricting for the California Latino Legislative Caucus and has worked alongside municipalities and commissions to maximize community involvement to meet and or exceed all obligations established under the California Voting Rights Act and the California FAIR Most recently, Mr. DeAztlan has led efforts toi increase census participation through multi-layered public education and outreach by producing and implementing culturally competent collateral in  campaigns at the federal, state, and local levels.  to each resident regardless of language and technical capabilities.  MAPS Act.  English, Spanish, and Tagalog. Mr. DeAztlan's s resume is attached.  8    Andrew Westall westall@gmal.com linkedin.com/in/andrewwestal  323-708-2478  Summary  Current Clients: the Los Angeles Unified School District, the City of Los Angeles, the Equal Representation Goal: Tol help government and residents navigate the complexities of laws and regulations, in order to find Expertise: Redistricting, Demographics, GIS (Maptitude and ArcGIS), Political Campaigns, and Elections/ Redistricting Law; Cannabis Regulations, Taxation, Enforcement, and Social Equity; Local Ballot Measures (e.g., Taxation, Bonds, Charter Amendments, Housing, Elections Reform, Cannabis, etc.); City Management; Planning, Land Use, Housing, Homelessness, Environment, Economic Development, Community Development, Neighborhood Services, Recreation, and Transportation policy, financing and development; Public Finance, Budgeting, Labor Relations, and Grant Funding; and Community Outreach, Diversity, Inclusion, Equity, and  Project, the City of Alhambra, and the Chino Basin' Water Conservation District. consensus on difficult issues for the betterment of society and quality-of-life.  Intergovernmental Relations. Experience Principal & Owner Bear Demographics & Research Jan 2021 - Present (5 months +)  Specializing in redistricting, demographics, GIS (Maptitude and ArcGIS), political consulting, cannabis regulations, local ballot measures, land use/city planning, and city/county management consulting. Current clients include the LAUSD, the City of Los Angeles, the Equal Representation Project, the UCBA, the City of Alhambra, and the Chino Basin Water Conservation District. Deputy Chief of Staff (2012-16) and Co-Chief of Staff (2016-20) Office of Los Angeles City Council President Herb J. Wesson, Jr.  Apr 2012- Dec 2020 (8 years 9 months)  Co-manager: and supervisor fort the City Council President's personal staff of 27 employees with oversight of Council District 10 (pop. 275,000); administrator and supervisor of all discretionary funds, contracts, city planning, and publici improvement approvals/projects for Council District 10; lead staff member fort the Councimember's legislative portfolio; and chief strategist for community and media Lead staff member and strategist fort the City Council for eight years with oversight of the management, organization, and publication of the City Council agendas three times a week, while managing teams ofu up to 50 employees across multiple departments on thei issues of budget, revenue strategies, ballot measures, pensions, recreation and parks, environment and utilities, intergovernmental relations, public safety, cultural arts, labor, housing, planning, economic development, infrastructure, cannabis, and  response.  transportation ini the City ofl Los Angeles.  9  Andrew' Westall page 1    Lead staff member for the Ad Hoc Committee on the 2028 Olympics and Paralympic Games, the Ad Hoc Committee on Police Reform, the Board of Referred Powers, and the Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee chaired by the Council President; staff member for the Ad Hoc Committee on COVID-19 Recovery and Neighborhood Investment, and the Southern California  Association of Governments. Executive Director Nov 2011 - Mar 2012 (5r months)  Los Angeles City Council Redistricting Commission  Chief Executive and Financial Officer for the City of Los Angeles' City Council redistricting process with oversight of six staff members employed and monitored twenty-seven contractors during the Commission's work; organized twenty-two public testimony hearings at various city and non-city facilities, as well as comprehensive citywide outreach with more than 5,000 attendees and 6,551 written public comments; organized 11 additional regular and special Commission meetings; and issued a 950-  page report tot the City Council on time and under budget.  Senior Deputy  Office of Los Angeles City Councimember Herb J. Wesson, Jr.  Nov 2005- -Nov 2011 (6 years 1 month) Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority.  Chief strategist and manager of all planning, economic development, transportation, and housing policy recommendations, funding acquisition, and projects for Council District 10; and staff member fort the Lead staffr member for the Housing, Community, and Economic Development Committee chaired by the Councimember for six years with oversight of $2 billion yearlyi in operational budgets, contracts, and construction projects by the Housing Department, Housing Authority, Community Development Department, and the Community Redevelopment, Agency, including development andi implementation of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan; and staff member for the Transportation Committee.  dhaen Adjunct Professor Pasadena City College Jan 2003- May 2010 (7 years 5 months)  Part-time professor teaching Political Science and American Institutions withi instruction to over 2,000 students. Classes taught at PCC, John Muir, Blair, Pasadena, Temple City, and San Marino High  Schools.  Assistant to the Speaker California State Assembly Jan 2001 Nov 2005 (4 years 11 months)  Legislative staff member for Speakers of the Assembly Robert M. Hertzberg, Herb J. Wesson, Jr., and Fabian Nunezi in the areas of electoral strategy, GIS mapping, demographics, statistics, and redistricting; demographer and analyst for State 2001 redistricting process; chief line drawer for 43 oft the 80 State Assembly districts in California in 2001; drafter of alternative plans fort the Board of Equalization, State Senate, and House of Representatives; provided guidance and negotiated between various state legislators and legislative caucuses with respect to final district boundaries. Participated in  10  Andrew' Westall page 2    the technical development and creation of the 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2004 State Elections data sets, as well as the 2001 State Redistricting data set, that reside on the Statewide Database website.  Technical Director Nov 2001 - Apr 2002 (6r months)  City of Los Angeles Redistricting Commission for the LAUSD  Chief line drawer for the 7 LAUSD Board of Education districts, thel largest independently elected school district ini the United States. Submitted technical reports and developed, maintained, and updated  website.  Technical Director Nov 2001 Apr 2002 (6 months)  Los Angeles City Council Redistricting Commission  Chief line drawer fort the 15 City Council districts; organized 16 publict testimony hearings in every region oft the City with more than 3,000 attendees and over 5,000 written public comments; submitted  technical reports and developed, maintained, and updated website. Office of Speaker of the Assembly Robert M. Hertzberg  Field Representative  Feb 1999- Dec 2000 (1 year 11 months)  Staff member and Speaker representative at community events, forums, meetings, and other policy discussions int the areas Istaffed -1 transportation, the environment, water, health care, land use, and other issues affecting the San Fernando Valley; lead staffer for the summer intern program overseeing twenty-plus interns in each oft two consecutive summers; database programmer and developer of filing  systems, phone logs, and phone books for the Speaker.  Consultant NALEO Educational Fund Sep 1997 Jun 2000 (2 years 10 months)  Chief researcher and author of publication on reapportionment and redistricting of legislative and congressional districts after the 2000 Census, emphasizing the Latinola/x community in seven states; Presenter of publication at the 2000 National Conference in Denver, Colorado distributed to hundreds of  elected and appointed officials. President  Graduate Students Association (GSA), UCLA May 1997- Jun 1998 (1 year 2 months)  Chief Executive and! Financial Officer for the Graduate Students Association, the official student government of approximately 10,000 graduate and professional students; elected position; author of numerous editorials (see publications); successfully advocated for the construction of new graduate student housing near campus and free ridership for students on the Santal Monica Big Blue Bus  (implemented one year after graduation).  Education  11  Andrew Westall page 3    UCLA University of California, Los Angeles Master of Arts - MA, Urban Planning  1996-1 1999  Emphasis in environmental, transportation, and recreational public policy, municipal finance, city Chief Executive and Financial Officer for the Graduate Students Association, the official student government of approximately 10,000 graduate and professional students; elected position; author of numerous editorials (e.g. civic participation/voting. public transit, pedestrian safety, etc.) and' Winter 1997 Viewpoint columnist for The Daily Bruin; successfully advocated for the construction ofr new graduate student housing near campus and free ridership for students on the Santal Monica Big Blue  planning, demographics, GIS mapping, and redistricting.  Bus.  University of California, Davis  Bachelor of Arts - BA, Political Science-Public Service  1993-1 1996  Emphasis in urban, environmental, transportation, economic, and social public policy, as well as various ethnic studies disciplines (e.g. African-American, Chicana/Chicano, and Asian-American: studies). Served in leadership positions for twoy years as ritual officer and President of the Sigma Delta chapter of the Chi Phi Fraternity. Published an opinion-editorial in The California Aggie on racial justice.  Skills  Redistricting - Demographics . Geographic Information Systems (GIS) . City Management . Strategic Planning . Community Outreach . Public Speaking . Land Use Planning . Project Management  Honors & Awards 2017 City of Los Angeles  Award of Merit: Comprehensive Plan Award: Large Jurisdiction - APA California West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert Park Community Plan and Implementing Ordinances  Social Change and Diversity Award - APA Los Angeles Cannabis Social Equity Program City ofl Los Angeles  2018  12  Andrew Westall page 4    VITA DAVID R. ELY Compass Demographics, Inc. 6575 N. Vista Street San Gabriel, CA 91775 (626)807-0719  E-mail: ly@compass-demographics.com  Employment: 2007 to present  David Ely is the president and founder of Compass Demographics, a consulting and database management firm specializing in projects involving census ande election data, redistricting Director of Research for the Redistricting and Reapportionment practice of Pactech Data and Research, Pasadena, California. As Director of Research, Mr. Ely testified or consultedi to counsel in a variety of litigation involving the configuration of election districts as well as providing database construction and redistricting consulting for numerous jurisdictions. California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, CA with al B.S. in Social Sciences and Mechanical  projects, demographic analysis, and analysis of voting behavior.  1986 to 2007  Education: Engineering in 1987. Redistricting Consulting alternative redistricting plans. 2020 Malibu City Council District Analysis 2020 Mission Springs Water District Board District Formation 2020 Richmond City Council District Formation 2019 Compton Unified School District Trustee District Formation 2019 Carson City Council District Formation 2018 Coalinga City Council District Formation  Activities include database construction, demographic and voter analysis, development of districting plans, public hearings and presentation of plans, technical assistance, and analysis of  2018 Coalinga-Huron Recreation & Parks Board Member District Formation 2017 San Marcos Unified School District Trustee Areal Formation 2016 Upland City Council District Formation 2016 Costal Mesa City Council District Formation  13    David R. Ely, Vita, page 2 (Redistricting Consulting, cont.) 2015 Garden Grove City Council District Formation 2015 Fullerton City Council District Formation 2014 Saugus Union School District Trustee Areal Formation 2014 Whittier City Council District Formation 2014 Sulphur Springs Schooll District Trustee Areal Formation 2014 Lancaster Elementary School District Trustee. Areal Formation 2012 Los Angeles Unified School District Redistricting 2012 Los Angeles City Council Redistricting 2012 Pasadena Unified School Board Districting 2012 Pasadena City Council Redistricting 2011 Bay Areal Rapid" Transit (BART) Board Redistricting 2011 California Legislative Redistricting 2011 Los Angeles County Redistricting 2008 Ceres Unified School District Redistricting 2008 Madera Unified School District Redistricting 2008 Merced Elementary School District Redistricting 2008 Merced High School District Redistricting 2005 Hanford Joint Union High School District Redistricting 2003 Oakland City Council and Oakland Unified School Board Redistricting 2002 Los Angeles City Council Redistricting 2002 Los Angeles Unified School District Board Member Redistricting 2002 Pasadena, California, City Council Redistricting 2001 California Legislative Redistricting (Senate, Assembly, and Congressional) 2001 Los Angeles County Supervisorial Redistricting 2001 Bay Area Rapid Transit Board Member Districts Redistricting 1992 Rancho Mirage, California, City Council Redistricting  14    David R. Ely, Vita, page 3 (Redistricting Consulting, cont.)  1992 Three' Valleys Municipal Water District Redistricting 1992 Los Angeles Unified School Board Member Redistricting 1992 Los Angeles City Council Redistricting 1992 Pasadena, California, City Council Redistricting 1991 California Congressional Redistricting 1991 California State Assembly Redistricting 1991 Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Redistricting 1987 City of Boston, Massachusetts Redistricting 1986 Los Angeles City Council Redistricting  1987 to 2012, California State Legislature, Redistricting Database construction  Litigation Analysis districting plans.  Activities include database construction, demographic analysis, expert witness testimony, surname matching, geocoding of registered and actual voter lists, and construction of llustrative 2000-Present Provided analysis on numerous voting rights investigations not listed. Vaughan V. Lewisville Independent School District (2020), expert witness (Texas) Kumarv.Frisco Independent School District (2020), expert witness (Texas) Terrebonne Parish NAACP, et al VS. Govemnor ofLouisiana et al (2019), Special Master Tyson V. Richardson Independent. School District (2018), expert witness (Texas) Yumori-Kakuv. City of Santa Clara (2018), expert witness (California) Loya V. City of Santa Monica (2018), expert witness (California) Luna V. Kern County (2017), expert witness (California) Patino V. City of Pasadena (2015), expert witness (Texas) Garrett V. City of Highland (2015), expert witness (California) Rodriguez V. City of Grand Prairie (2015), expert witness (Texas)  Ramos V. Carrollon-Farmers Branch Independent School District (2015), expert witness (Texas)  15    David R. Ely, Vita, page4 (Litigation Analysis, cont.)  Rodriguez V. Grand Prairie Independent School District (2014), expert witness (Texas)  Navajo Nation V. San Juan County (2014), expert witness (Utah) Solis V. City of Santa Clarita (2014), expert witness (California) Jaureguiv. City of Palmdale (2013), expert witness (California) Gonzalez V. City of Compton (2012), expert witness (California) Fabela V. City of Farmers Branch (2011), expert witness (Texas) Benavidez V. Irving Independent School District (2008, 2013), expert witness (Texas) Benavidez V. City of Irving (2008), expert witness (Texas) Avitia V. Tulare Local Health Care District (2008), expert witness (California) U.S. V. City of Euclid (2007), election data consultant (Ohio) Bexar Metropolitan Water District (2007), election data consultant (Texas) U.S. V. City of Springfield, Massachusetts (2006) U.S. V. State of Missouri (2006), election data consultant State of Georgia V. Ashcroft, (2004) election data consultant Gomez V. Hanford Joint Union High School District, (2004) California Sanchez V. City of Modesto, (2004), California  U.S. V. City of Philadelphia and Philadelphia City Commission (2006), Pennsylvania  Governor Gray Davis V. Kevin Shelley, (2003) data analysis and declaration (California)  U.S. V. Alamosa County, (2002), expert witness (Colorado) Cano V. Davis, (2002), election data consultant, (California) U.S. V. CityofLawrence, (2000), expert witness (Massachusetts) U.S. V. City of Santa Paula, (2000) voting rights litigation (California)  U.S.V. Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, (2000) voting rights litigation (California)  U.S. V. Passaic (2000) voting rights litigation (New. Jersey) U.S. V. CilyofLawrence, (1999) voting rights litigation (Massachusetts)  16    David R. Ely, Vita, page 5 (Litigation Analysis, cont.)  Bonilla V. Chicago City Counci(1992-1998), expert witness (Ilinois) Ruiz V. City of Santa Maria, (1992-1998), expert witness (California)  Garza V. County of Los Angeles, (1988-90), Constructed databases and designed remedial plans for  Los Angeles County Supervisorial Districts  17    TIZOC DE AZTLAN 78115 Calle Estado #206, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tzoc@DeAztianconsulting.com 310-699-3201  EXPERIENCE DEAZTLAN CONSULTING La Quinta, CA HIGHLIGHTS President 2010 -A Present  Responsible for setting and directing the strategy and vision for a full-service public relations, research, and governmental affairs firm. The use of community centered collaborations, culturally competent digitalmediatools, and sophisticated messaging are critical to the firm's approach. Under his direction, the firm has built and managed effective communications strategies combining traditional field operations with the most up-to-date media platforms. His bilingual team conducts surveys, public advocacy, and designs collateral including direct mail, posters, booklets, banners, as well as offers full video services from scripting to production. Maximizing the use of social media channels, Tizoc's expertise and assembled team routinely builds a new online community or grows an already existing social channel. This extended client identityi isr reached across multiple platforms through custom content, engagement strategies, and advertising campaigns. The team has created effective virtual meeting strategies as well as developed COVID-19  safe protocols for in-person meetings.  LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY Los Angeles, CA  Research Project Manager/Grant Acquisition and Management Specialist Generate and implement media and community outreach efforts for The Leavey Center for the Study of Los Angeles "LCSLA." Effectively promote and foster positive relationships with City, County, State, and National government, corporate, and community organizations. Advocate LCSLA's capabilities to Legislators and their staff; cultivate constructive partnerships. Develop and produce televised weekly seminars that attract elected officials and leaders. Expand the presence of LCSLA through representation at public events. Conduct Research for an integrative study on leadership and community in Los Angeles. Track and analyze public policy and legislation for studies on local health, government, transportation, education, economy, and governance. Implement existing grants including hiring and overseeing of field staff, creation of project literature, reporting to grant representative,  2009-2010  18    and write reports on expectation and progress for existing grants. Lead and  manage compliance effort for grant proposals. FORDHAM UNIVERSITY New' York, NY Development Services Coordinator 2006-2009  Served as advocate and liaison between Communications, Alumni Relations, ITand Stewardship departments; develop: strategic tactical plans to improve efficiency and data integrity of University database and record systems. Directed donor acknowledgements and produced progress reports to In earlier role, directed diverse marketing projects to support annual fundraising efforts; coordinated market research, monitored web site, and developed promotional material and direct mail campaigns. Spearheaded launch and execution of key marketing projects that led to notable increases  support the $400 million Excelsior capital campaign.  in gift contributions.  NEW HORIZONS FAMILY CENTER Glendale, CA Government Program Administrator 2004-2006  Served integral role for a progressive non-profit Development and Management team responsible for the expansion of community services to the under privileged community of Glendale; conducted prospect research and gift solicitation. Member of Grant writing and acquisition team that was successfully awarded grants from the City of Los Angeles, The County of Los Angeles, The State of California Prepared and administered budgets for city, county and state contracts. Tracked and monitored Youth Program goals to meet or exceed government grant guidelines. Tracked legislation pertinent to children and mental health organizations. Key representative for all public relations events such as galas andi forums. Collaborated with local Fire, Police Departments, and School Districts to plan festivals, child health days, and other community events. Booked health and human services leadership to speak at community events, and piloted centers Higher Education for Me program. Coordinated fundraising efforts with Glendale and Los Angeles City Councils, California State Assembly, Senate Members and County Supervisors. Championed multimedia events and gained PR exposure via  press releases, television, print and Internet campaigns.  RAND CORP Santa Monica, CA Field Researcher 2000-2002  Initial group of researchers to work on the Los Angeles Family and Neighbor Study. Field research was conducted in randomly selected homes through-  19    out Los Angeles County to study the effects neighborhood has on a family's health, religion, economics, education, culture, and inter-family cohesiveness. Specialized in impoverished, and Spanish speaking communities. This study's datal has been used for the creation of Los Angeles  County health and human services public policy.  EDUCATION FORDHAM UNIVERSITY New' York, NY BACKGROUND Bachelor ofA Arts, Communications and Media Studies  EXTRA RUN WITH LOS MUERTOS CIRRICULAR Founder/Race Director  This annual day oft the dead celebration was created to promote health and wellness in the Latino Community. Through varied programming includinga 5k run, art show, clinics, and block party, the festivities bring together organizations, teams, and thousands of participants from around the  country.  THE MOBIUS CONFERENCE Founder/ Executive Director  Ac conference fori thought leaders, artists, and scholars to engage, connect and share evolving topics in art, politics, and culture. The core mission of Mobius is to create spaces for dialogue amongst varied disciplines. Past conference participants have included civil rights icon Dolores Huerta, Actor Emilio Rivera, and internationally renowned Burkinabè architect Francis  Kéré.  SELECT CLIENT BUILDING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES  LIST Riverside County, CA Sacramento, CA Commerce, CA Carlsbad, CA CITY OF COACHELLA Coachella, CA CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Palm Springs, CA Coachella, CA  CALIFORNIA MEDICAL, ASSOCIATION CENTRAL BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CHELSEA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION  COACHELLA STAKEHOLDERS ASSOCIATION  20    COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS COLLEGE OF THE DESERT FOUNDATION  Palm Desert, CA Palm Desert, CA FIELD WORKS Washington, DC GOLDENVOICE Los Angeles, CA IMAGINE SCHOOLS Riverside, CA LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY LEAVEY CENTER FOR THE: STUDY OF LOS ANGELES Los Angeles, CA SANDSTONE PROPERTIES Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles, CA  SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION, AND EDUCATION PROJECT  21    Section III = Proposed Scope of Work  Having served several different jurisdictions in a similar capacity with over 75 years of combined experience in the redistricting process, the team is poised to approach this project with a determined structure and timeline that fully develops all of the City's abilities and opportunities to maximize public input, while delivering the expert guidance, technical reports, and tasks necessary to complete the Mayor and City Council's work in a non-partisan and transparent manner. Although the 2020 Census PL 94-171 data will not be released until August/September 2021, the City of Bradbury will have enough time to meet the state legal deadline of December 15, 2022 to implement new City Council districts for the June 2022  General Municipal Election. General objectives include:  Collaborating, working with, and taking direction from the Mayor and City Council to develop a plan of action that is structured and meets the objectives, criteria, and timeline developed and adopted by  the City in coordination with the City Attorney's Office and City staff.  Providing the entires spectrum oftechnical and geographicp possibilities and options tot the City within Maintaining flexibility, efficiency and nimbleness to ensure all deadlines are met consistently and Continuous and open lines of communication with the City Attorney's Office, City staff, the Mayor and City Council, and members of the public (at the direction of the City). This can be achieved by email, With respect to analytical resources and quantitative capabilities, the project team uses Maptitude for Redistricting by the Caliper Corporation, as well as has expertise in ESRI ArcGIS, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft Access, Excel, Word, and SQL and OCB database platforms. With respect to databases, the firm has access to Census data going back to the 1990 Census including all sets ofPL 94-171 data, as well as American Community Survey data and historical statewide elections data (1990-) on the Statewide Database hosted by UC Berkeley. For the optional user-friendly online mapping and digital interface tool, Below is a standard methodology for the City process that serves as a baseline ofthe many steps necessary to complete the City's work with plenty oft time for the Registrar of Voters to begin the redrawing of voter precinct boundaries prior to the 2022 Election cycle, essential for the City to satisfy its legal requirements. As ofthis date, the Census Bureau is anticipating releasing 2020 Census data int the "legacy format" in mid- August, with the State anticipated to release the official dataset publicly by September 20, 2021. This data will include the reallocated prison population data to the inmate's point of origin as of April 1, 2020 as required by state law (AB 420 (Davis, 2011), AB 849, and AB 1276) for the redistricting process. 1. Work with the City Attorney's Office and City stafft to finalize and gain staff approval of consultant- 2. Work with the City Attorney's Office and City stafft toi identify all scope of work written tasks that shall be translated into any languages. All written translation will be conducted at the City's cost unless otherwise neogitated (see cost options). All materials that require translation shall be submitted to City staff ort thei requisite vendor atl least seven business days in advance of publication. 3. First City Council Meeting - Train the Mayor and City Council during a regular meeting on the  the legal parameters ofr redistricting and redistricting.  within budget.  phone, virtual online meeting, or in-person.  our team uses DistrictBuilder by Azavea.  developed training materials and presentation on redistricting.  22    Section Il- Proposed Scope of Work (cont.)  redistricting process, federal Voting Rights Act, California Voting Rights Act, California FAIR 4. Create a user-friendly digital interface that allows the Mayor and City Council, and members ofthe public to draw their own district boundaries. The DistrictBuilder program will also guide the user inc complying with all applicable laws and requirements to the extent practicable. (online mapping 5. Work with the City Attorney's Office and City stafft toi finalize and gain staff approval oft the digital interface for public distribution and made available as al link ont the City'sv website. (online mapping 6. Work with the City Attorney's Office and City stafft to finalize and gain approval of public training 7. Upon receipt oft the 2020 Census and PL94-171 data, work with the City Attorney's Office and City staff to finalize and provide data summary and geographic files in standard map and data formats (e.g. ArcGIS, Maptitude, MapInfo, .DBF, etc.) for public distribution with downloadable files available on the City's website. This shall include updating the approved digital interface. 8. Analyze whether the 2020 Census data requiresmodifications to the City Council districts and report 9. Work with the City Attorney's Office and City stafft to finalize and gain staff approval of consultant- 10. Second City Council Meeting Present 2020 Census findings to the Mayor and City Council during ai regular meeting, including redistricting process updates and updated digital interface presentation ifneeded. Present digital interface and public workshop presenation to the Mayor and City Council during a regular meeting, including redistricting process updates and updated digital interface 11.C Conduct outreach for a public workshop to the public (e.g., evening and weekend) on redistricting and the digital interface in an objective, non-partisan informational manner. Verbal translation for training workshops and written materials will be provided by the City as required by state and 12. Provide training via a public workshop to the public (e.g., evening and weekend) on redistricting 13. Conduct outreach for two public input hearings (e.g., evenings and weekends) to the public on redistricting in an objective, non-partisan informational manner. Verbal translation for input hearings and written materials will be provided by the City as required by state and federal law or 14. Evaluate draft maps prepared by the the public to determine whether they are population balanced and satisfy the requirements ofthe Voting Rights Acts, including all other applicable laws, and share  MAPS Act, and all other applicable state and federal election laws.  tool option)  tool option)  workshop materials and presentation of the digital interface.  the findings to the City Attorney's Office and City staff. developed 2020 Census materials and presentation.  presentation if required.  federal law or otherwise negotiated.  and the digital interface in an objective, non-partisan informational manner.  otherwise negotiated.  findings with the City Attorney's Office and City staff.  23    Section IN- Proposed Scope of Work (cont.)  15. Work with the City Attorney's Office and City staffto finalize and gain staff approval ofa written summary of all public input submitted at the public input hearings, in writing, as a proposed map, or during other Mayor and City Council conducted comment periods prior to the release ofa draft 16. Propose new district boundaries to the City Attorney's Office and City staff based on feedback provided by the community and criteria set by the Mayor and City Council that are population 17. Work with the City Attorney's Office and City staff to finalize and gain staff approval of the proposed initial draft maps and accompanying technical report for public release and presenation to 18. Third City Council Meeting - Present staff recommended initial draft maps and accompanying technical report to the Mayor and City Council duringa ai regular meeting, along withj public comment and submitted proposed maps analysis. Proposed draft maps and technical report will be published 19. Conduct outreach for two additional public input hearings on the initial draft maps. Verbal translation for input hearings and written materials willl bej provided by the City as required by state and federal law or otherwise negotiated. (full-service outreach services option) 20. Make modifications to the initial draft maps based on input from the Mayor and City Council and the community in coordination with City Attorney's Office and City staff. 21. Work with the City Attorney's Office and City staff to finalize and gain staff approval of revised final draft map: and accompanying technical and written reports summarizing all public input on the 22. Fourth City Council Meeting - Present consultant recommended, and City Attorney's Office and City staff approved, revised final draft map and accompanying techincal report to the Mayor and City Council along with public comment: and analysis of all available public input. Proposed revised final draft map and technical report will be published seven days in advancei in accordance with the 23. Fifth City Council Meeting Adoption of final map and ordinance by the Mayor and City Council at a regular meeting. Proposed final map and technical report will be published seven days in 24. Assist the Mayor and City Council, City Attorney's Office, and City staff in all facets of implementing the final district boundary map, including all deliverables needed for the Registrar of Voters to implement new voter precinct boundaries and City Clerk and City Council archives. 25.Actively participate in all meetings and public hearings scheduled by the Mayor and City Council that address the redistricting process in accordance with local public health rules and orders. The team is located in Southern California and is available toj particpate or meet inj person as required. 26. Provide additional Census, PL 94-171, Statewide Database, and American Community Survery  map.  balanced and satisfy the requirements of federal, state, and local laws.  the Mayor and City Council.  seven days in advance in accordance with the California FAIR MAPS Act.  proposed initial draft maps.  California FAIR MAPS Act.  advance in accordance with the California FAIR MAPS Act.  demographic data upon request as practicable during the term of the contract.  24    4  3    V    5  DE    2021 City Council Redistricting - City of Bradbury  Bear Demographics and Research LLC  Andrew. J. Westall Project Manager  Project Start Date: August 18, 2021  Milestone description Approvald ofT Training8 & Presentation! Materials Approvalo ofT Translation! Methods & Documents First City Councill Meeting Create Online Mapping Tool Approval of Mapping Toola and Public Workshop materials presentation Approval of2 20200 Census materials and presentation Second City Council Meeting Pubic Workshop Outreach PublicV Workshop PublicH Hearings Outreach Pre-Draft Maps Public Hearings Evaluate Publicly Submitted Draft Maps Approval of Written Summaryof Publicl Input Approval ofD Draft Maps and Technical Report Third City Council Meeting Publick Hearings Outreach Post-Draft Maps Public! Hearings Fourth City Council Meeting Fifth City Council Meeting Deliverablest to County Registrar ofVoters  Aug  Sept  Oct  Nov  Dec  28    Section IV-I References  CURRENTREDISIRICTINGCLIENTS  Los Angeles Unified School District Redistricting Commission (2021)  Luis Sanchez Chair LAUSD Redistricting Commission City ofLos Angeles 2001 N. Spring Street, Room 285 Los Angeles, CA 90012 323.376.9370 usasanchez@laciy.org Cityof Alhambra (2021-22) The Honorable Lauren Myles City Clerk City of Alhambra 111 South First Street Alhambra, CA! 91801 626.570.5090 myleg-lyolalhambaorg CityofCarson (2021-22) John Raymond City of Carson 701 E. Carson Street Carson, CA 90745 310.952.1773 naymond@arsoncagov  Assistant City Manager-H Economic Development  Chino Basin Water Conservation District (2021-22)  Toyasha Sebbag  Administrative Services Manager Chino Basin Water Conservation District 4594 San Bernardino Street Montclair, CA 91763 909.667.4573 sebbag@cbwcd.org  29    Section IV- References (cont.)  City of San Bernardino (2021) The Honorable Genoveva Rocha City Clerk City of San Bernardino 201 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA92401 909.384.5002x3212 rocha_ge@sbcity.org City of Menifee (2021-22) The Honorable Sara Manwaring City Clerk City ofl Menifee 29844 Haun Road Menifee, CA 92586 951.723.3708 mvageepolmenire.s PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE ANDREW. J. WESTALL California State Assembly Map (2001)  As staff member to then-Speaker of the Assembly Robert M. Hertzberg, worked with Assembly consultants out ofCaltech to build the data sets fort the Statewide Database and the 2001 redistricting process, prior to the drafting of plans. Line drawer for 43 of the 80 State Assembly seats in the adopted 2001 California State Assembly map, as well as several draft plans for State Senate and State experience includes expert affidavits and testimony during the successful State Supreme Court litigation process after the State Senate plan was approved. Guest speaker for the Orange County Business Council and the National Hispanic Caucus of State Legislators during this time.  Congressional District maps.  The Honorable Robert M. Hertzberg State Capitol, Room 313 Sacramento, CA 95814 818.371.6764  State Senator, District 18 and former Speaker of the. Assembly (2000-2)  omazemagivesmneagow (Norma Zendejas - Executive Assistant and Scheduler) ntips/statewidedatabase.or/reporeports/califoria smliaiassmhLhn  30    Section IV- References (cont.)  LosA Angeles City Council Redistricting Commission/City ofLos Angeles (2001-02)  Technical Director and chief line drawer for the 15 City Council districts; organized 16 public testimony hearings in every region ofthe City with more than 3,000 attendees and over 5,000 written public comments; submitted technical reports and developed, maintained, and updated website.  Report available upon request. Jackie Dupont-Walker City ofLos Angeles 2001 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 213.494.9493 dupontw@aol.com  former Vice Chair (2001-02 and 2011-12)  ntip/redistricting20lactvy.orypOT/PDHILACIYILA9420CI-a20Councl-a20Redistricting*620C City ofLos Angeles Redistricting Commission for the LAUSD/City ofLos Angeles (2001-02) Technical Director and chiefline drawer for the 7LAUSD! Board ofE Education districts; submitted technical reports and developed, maintained, and updated website. Report available upon request.  ommision*20Report-*20040502.pdr  The Honorable David' Tokofsky Los Angeles Unified School District 333 South Beaudry Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.392.3846 avdtokoby@gmal.com  Board of Education Member (ret.), SthI District (1995-2007)  tpsy/ckrep.lacity.onlmsdss200202-0800PDE  Los Angeles City Council Redistricting Commission/City ofLos Angeles (2011-12)  Executive Director for the City ofLos Angeles' City Council redistricting process with oversight of six staff members employed and monitored twenty-seven contractors during the Commission's work; organized twenty-two public testimony hearings at various city and non-city facilities, as well as comprehensive citywide outreach with more than 5,000 attendees and 6,551 written public comments; organized 11 additional regular and special Commission meetings; and issued a 950- page report to the City Council on time and under budget. Report available upon request.  Thel Honorable Herb. J. Wesson, Jr. Los Angeles City Council President Emeritus City Councilmember (ret.), 10thDistrict (2005-20)  City ofLos Angeles 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012  31    Section IV- References (cont)  323.828.8590 wesonnlu@gmail.com  pisigalhasbam.eAREBACITTMAERANESRTSNMNTNT Elections Reform and Consolidation (Oct 2013 -Dec 2018)- Charter Amendments la and2 2  Dr. Fernando J. Guerra Loyola Marymount University 1LMU Drive Los Angeles, CA 90045 310.993.1440 cmandoguera@mucdu  Chair (ret.), City ofLos Angeles Municipal Elections Reform Commission  htps/sibslrklsiv.anlssismstiniaathesisandsend&shnumhr13-134 tpssibsltklasiv.alsibdsismasdniadtfk-afoismanlkenichmumlrIs-IO. ps/sibsletlasiyaylesibasisomasdineaadffe-sfsisumanssendAefnumhrIs-IOe. tpsy/ctvclerklacivarylacivelerkcomnetimdescfmfie-sefiviewrcnil&ehnumber-1-LIO0- htpsy/citvclerklacivyrlacipelehkcomnestindescm?te-xefiviewreriksinumber-18-1800-  S1 S2 S5 S1  Proposition HHH - $1.2 Billion Supportive Housing Bond (Apr 2015-1 Dec2020)  Miguel Santana  City Administrative Officer (ret.), City ofLos Angeles President & C.E.O., Weingart Foundation 700 South Flower Street, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.458.2386 miguelasantana2015@gmail.com  htpsy/cityclerk.lacivyrylacipelekcomnetindexcfmftexcriecinumber-16-1800- tpsy/citvyclerklactvyry/acivelerkcomnetimdexcfnlte-sefiaviewreord&ehumber-16-1800-  S2 S5  32    Section IV- References (cont.)  Raise The Wage LA (Feb 2014- Oct 2018)-E Hotel Living Wage. Minimum Wage. and Airport  Living Wage  The Honorable Herb. J. Wesson, Jr. Los Angeles City Council President Emeritus City Councilmember (ret.), 10thDistrict (2005-20)  City ofLos Angeles 2001 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA90012 323.828.8590 wessonhyl0@gmail.com  itips/cityclerk.lacty.org/acityclerkconnecVindex.fm/fa-scfiviewrecord&cfnumber-14-1371- ittps/cityclerk.acivorylacityclerkconnect/indexcfm/arsefiviewrecord&cfwuber-14-1371 itips/cityclerk.lacy,ory/acityclerkconecVindexcfm/arcfiviewrecord&cfnumber-15-0817  S7  S1 DAVID ELY  County ofLos Angeles (2011)  Worked with thel Boundary Review Commission and County staff to design and build data sets for use with County redistricting software, as well as distribution toj public, and analysis by legal team.  Laura W. Brill Outside Counsel Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 1725 Los Angeles, California 90067 310.556.2700 brll@kbkfirm.com  htps/lacounty.gov/gogovemmentgewmohy-statistics/maps  City ofGarden Grove (2015-16)  Supervised Council District Formation process, including building database; creating educational and informational presentation materials for community meetings, Public Hearings, and online access; processing public input, producing draft maps, and creating standardized maps and reports for draft maps as well as] publicly submitted district plans; and assisting City staffint thei transmission  of adopted plans to County election officials fori implementation.  Maria Stipe Deputy City Manager City of Garden Grove 11222 Acacia Parkway Garden Grove, CA 92842  33    Section IV- References (cont.)  714.741.5106 marias@ci.garden-grove.ca.us tps/ppctv.rmapsycouncl-districtsy Cityof Costa Mesa (2016)  Supervised Council District Formation process, including building database; creating educational and informational presentation materials for community meetings, Public Hearings, and online access; processing public input, producing draft maps, and creating standardized maps and reports for draft maps as well as publicly submitted district plans; and assisting City staffi int thet transmission  ofa adopted plans to County election officials forir implementation.  Brenda Green City Clerk City of Costa Mesa 771 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714.754.5221 orenda.green@coastamesaca.gov  City ofLos Angeles Demographic Analysis. 2020 Census. and Redistricting (2016-Present)  Sharon Tso  ChiefLegislative Analyst City ofLos Angeles 200 N Spring Street, Room 255 Los Angeles CA 90012 213.359.8867 naron.so@lacity,org  Compton Unified School District Board District Formation (2019)  Barrett Green Attorney, Compton Unified School District LittlerLaw) Firm 2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-3107 310.772.7264 bgreen@littler.com districts  ittps/www.complon.XiZca.usboardl/establishment-ol-board-districtslestablishment-of-board-  TIZOC DEAZTLAN  California Medical Association (2011)  Consulted and provided analysis on State and Federal outcomes of redistricting efforts. Worked alongside the offices of elected officials and community advocacy groups to track testimony and  provide forecasting.  34    Section IV- References (cont.)  David Pruitt  Former Vice President of Political and External Affairs  California Medical Association 1201 K Street, Suite 800 Sacramento, CA 95814 916.716.9511 megaeputcomalingeon Central Basin Municipal Water District (2012)  Managed outreach efforts for a District that serves 1.6 million people from 24 cities and unincorporated areas. Worked directly with the Board of Directors and staff to create a plan (subcontracted to. Andrew Westall as an individual) that assured that all redistricting guidelines and timelines were met. Conducted outreach through earned media, as well as direct communication with residents, and advocacy groups. Planned, promoted, and managed bilingual community input  meetings in each district. Sharon Kumar Deputy Board Secretary Central Basin Municipal Water District 6252 Telegraph Road Commerce, CA 90040 323.201.5500 natona@entralbasinorg City ofPalm Springs(2018)  Worked with the City Council, Staff, and Voting Rights Commission to assure that residents had access to redistricting information and the ability to participate. Planned, promoted, and managed bilingual community input events that provided background and training in map creation. Produced bilingual informational material and provided in field distribution. The outreach efforts resulted in as significant increase in meeting participation as well as map and survey submittals from the  Latino/a/x community. The Honorable Grace Garner City Councilmember City of Palm Springs 32001 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 760.323.8299 grace.gamer@palmspringsca.goy  itips/www.arcgis.com/apps/wchappvicwer/index.htmld-da5a0djeehe4dbdbi73325c30d6le. I  35    Section V- References (cont.)  Cityo ofPalm Springs Spanish Social Media and 2020 Census (2020-2021)  Amy Blaisdell Communications Director City of] Palm Springs 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262760.323.8250 Amy.Blaisdel(@palmspringsca.gov  City of Coachella City Manager Search and Resident Outreach (2021)  The Honorable Steven Hernandez Mayor City of Coachella 53-990. Enterprise Way Coachella, CA 92236 760.398.3502 hemandezcoachellorg  36    Section V-I Proposed Cost of Services  The Proposed Cost of Services listed below is all-inclusive oft the work and costs that the project team will undertake. The only exception to this proposal is the translation of documents into any required languages, and thet team would be happy to work with City staffto ensure such translation occursi in ai timely manner as outlined int the! proposal. Thej projectt team can provide several options as well, including an online mapping tool and developing and maintaining the City'sredistricting Wel look forward to discussing this proposal further with you. Once again, thank youi for your time  website as a separate site from the City's current website.  and consideration. Cost ofServices $35,000 $15,000 $50,000 Optional Services $7,500 $7,500  Demographer, Technical, Mapping Consulting (including meeting attendance)  Outreach Services  Total Cost of Bid Proposal (not to exceed)  User-friendly online Mapping Tool (DistrictBuilder)  Website Development and Maintenance (ifseparate from City website)  $2,500-3,000 Written Translation (depending on the language)  Additional Services contract.  $250 per hour for additional emographic/mapping/technica. services not within the scope oft the $175 per hour for additional outreach services not within the scope oft the contract.  $300 per hour for cdisincting/demogmpnic legal expert witness analysis/testimony after the  expiration oft the contract. Houriy Rates by Classification Project Manager Technical Director Outreach Director  $250 per hour $250 per hour $175 per hour  37    3  8  SA 3    d8  6A  3  o  $A 4    29    ATTACHMENT #2    /  3 3  -  00  C M U a  o  a  E  - a  A   - u  - -     @ S a  @  o 3 o a  @ E e  @  U  I  2 E  E E e @ df de a e 5 o b0 a  a 0 S @ 5 K  de ) o0 3 - 3 : B  I  E E S - - a -  6  - 2  E 3 D E I  I 3  o  E  I    2  a  Y e 5  : 1  - C 5  -    LJ  la - @ o @   2 a a L C @  I  C 00 E 09  0 3  - -  9  I    8 n 9 - 6 E E 3 e  3  9  -  00  a b0 o e 8  o 5  a - -  D  U O 4 E s S a J  S -  o f 3 of> 8  e a f -  a 9 I - - L 9  b0 E  -  - 8 e      6  0  E 8 la a - E 0 a O /  0  2 9 I   - -  9 1  a  > a I  J  C - E O  a  T 1 -  5?  e I I 4    de E C E I 8 - I  9 E E C E I I 8 E I n E df E 1n a I  8 S O 9 f E a so 9 I 3 € I I I  - @ e  in  of 8 t I  * 0 - 3 € S 0  @ I 8 de o E 5 5 de 8 3 5 M E I 8 ) I e a I 8 0o = e N > B de ( 6 a I 1 3 o € 8 D € m de I D E E E I 6 of E à 8 of 2 & 00 31 8 E de I 8. - I  W E 9 -  @ E E  3  8 8  - S  V o 0 C C - E o @ @ 1n  E -  m    o E - -  00  L 5 9 E  00  3 -    0 f a =  00  L d I  E 3 -    - 8  0 -  S @ 00  E I I E @ E I  3 0 7 V . a 5   e  C  0 e ) E 3 9 8   m 4 a  e e E  > I  00  5 o 9 8 3  8  DE 8 n I   m 5 m -      -  -  a  - 8 9  C  9 lE  O N n   a  e  > - o à - @ T 3 E  00 E C a E 3 I  a  e 3  D  - 8  I 5 W -  8 E J    b0  - - a C  00  S E 8  O N  3  E E - 3 -  C @  S    00  5 0 a 2 S 3 5 3 E - E C S 8 00 6 a 2 R A 0 @ le & 1 3 vi  I a a 9  a  00 P  &  a  0 - 3  b0  I E  I  > 1n - e 9 Nf - 8 -  B  -  2  T I  e  I  -    E o a o - - = t I e à E o e D lB 8 I e 3 @ o a B D f e - 20 @ e 5 8 00 a 8 = a o e -  I  S n  C de b0 D im E E a 6 in E e 3  s 5 D e e  S a  -  E E 9 - 3 -  1 de  .  E E - 9 0 D 3 C  5    E 9 8 - 0 a e a @ E E  00  o  C  €  e * 1o le  U a : 5  0 e 00 S @  10 : @ de J 8o o. e € S 3 - 0 E 5 D0 la a E 8 of O I o N I 8 I 8 1 E 00 C la 88 à : d8 I 2 3 4 f -  e @  L -  Y  E  L S 8  I  3 -  D  -    @ b0 a -  d0 8  a  O e C s E E a 0 - e la 3 3 S I e à e U I I  0 I E of 0 6 5  N a U, a - Z  5 m  - C  2 8  - - - -    a  1  e E 8 f e 3 E E e I e 6 3 a 8g  8 C 1n N Y n 00 E 5 00 o o0 - ) S in N J E  00 E 8 N a E E E 8 S de  1 S  L E 9 -  E 0 E W = I 8  - -    0  S S la 0 ld @ o a a  A - e  E 9 9  a  - l0 C m  s  1 3 l @ 0 € = @  o 8 I  S : 6  a I I I  E * O 9 2 E 6 a E a 8 S @ a e I E I o I de 8 N E E à  ! a  -  - S  9 w  T a L -    e E e E  - @ a e le a > 6 2 2 3 8 n 3 a & a t C 00 S 6 @ E  - - - a  S a  n 3  00 8  b0 D  09 00 E I E   :  0 V 9 w - - -  0  -  3  D f 6 00 C E N o N  et la a O s t N  -  b0 3 N 3 M in m G T    3  8 5 @ f E E -  E 9  9 3 8 E C S I  a e @  - S -  - 3 € C e et E o bo o E I f E f a 3 e * la T 0 6 a I o 8 de do o  I  a E E 00 in B o e - o - N 0 3 l@ E D- o  -  Y   o of of E  9 - - 5 4 M  f I  N 8 y 2 2  2  2 -    I 6 C 8 = U à de o $ 8  E @ : m € @ 6 C D - E o à 00 E € 00 E o e I I 5 8 S f de @ e E 8 a $ I f e e E o 00 lB 0o a D e of D 3 e 0 e E 9 @ - A  a I-  :  -  00 D 3  a  S E  a of  - S  ls 5 I  a - a & I 6 1 f E e  C de 0 : A I  . E 9 - M w -  = 0 la E E 1n o de oo 6 = N o @ -  - - I  o    8 T I a la 3 0 o b0 E E 3 - E o C C a E E e : E € e e 0 C C   a  a  8   n . S C -  - 9 - M L E  E e a E a e @ N E E a  E  0 5 8 8  la & 00 D O C C B E 0 E  I E 6 N 5 ) e    2 e I  o  E a E e  3  S a  e 3  0  n a  E  3 E 9 I  20 €  I  -  L - -  0 U S  = 8 @ a  -    - @  o  o o o a 0  D - 3 10 n 6 E E 2 D € e I  0  a  o L C a  I  a S  S 0 O -  C dy 9    e o 3 e de  - E - e N  I  C - 0 de E 2  M  -    ATTACHMENT - #3    Local Government Redistricting Toolkit  A Resource for California's Local Governments in the 2021-2022 Redistricting Cycle  ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ASIAN LAW CAUCUS    Table of Contents  The Importance of Local Redistricting. Legal Requirements When Drawing District Maps  Federal Requirements California State Requirements  L 8 13 16 20 22  Public Outreach and Transparency Requirements. Best Practices for Local Redistricting Timeline and Deadlines Local Redistricting Commissions  Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus By: Community Advocate Nicole Wong (former staff) Senior Program Coordinator. Adria Orr Program Manager & Staff Attorney. Julia Marks  Last updated December. 2020  With thanks to. Jonathan Mehta. Stein, now with California Common Cause, and the ACLUof California for allowing  AAAJ-ALC: to adapt some content in this toolkit from their materials.  1    The Importance of Local Redistricting  Redistricting, or the redrawing of district lines, isa once-in-a-decade opportunity to ensure a fair democratic process at the local level. Redistricting helps determine whether communities have a voice in city and county governments and directly impacts the pipeline for future leaders at the state and federal level. To ensure that communities are meaningfully represented by their local governments and that elected officials reflect the full diversity of California's population, it is crucial that local governments create a redistricting process that is as fair, transparent, and accessible as possible, especially for stonalyunoerepreened  communities.  AB 849 (Bonta), known as the FAIR MAPS Act, passed in 2019 to improve and standardize the local redistricting process and incorporate best practices that California already uses for redistricting at the state level.1 Local governments now have clearer guidelines around the drawing of district maps to ensure fairness and prohibit partisan gerrymandering. The FAIR MAPS Act also created public outreach and transparency requirements to ensure that all communities know about and can directly shape the drawing of their city or county's district When local governments invest time, attention, and resources into a comprehensive and accessible redistricting process, much is possible: elected officials better understand the needs and makeup of their constituents, communities deepen their trust in local government and become more invested in public decision-making processes, and all residents have the opportunity to feel represented ati the local level. This is the power of local redistricting.  lines.  Legal Requirements When Drawing District Maps  Federal and state law provide clear guidelines for how local governments draw their district lines. When drawing district lines, local governments must comply with the requirements established by the United States Constitution, the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, and now  the FAIR MAPS Act.2  1AB: 1276 (Bonta) passed in 2020 and made technical fixes to AB 849, including clarifying changes and updates to the redistricting timeline to leave adequate time for the elections process andt to accommodate possible delaysi in the delivery of census data. This Toolkit has been updated to reflect changes to the law made by AB: 1276.  2Cal. Elec. Code 55 21500, 21601,21621.  2    Federal Requirements  Substantial Equality of Population  In a series of court cases ini the 1960s, the Supreme Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment oft the United States Constitution requires that all districts within a political jurisdiction have The Supreme Court requires substantial equality of population because drawing districts of exactly equal populations is difficult and often at odds with the other goals of a line-drawing body. Drawing district lines that keep communities ofi interest intact, that reflect public testimony, and that are reasonably contiguous and compact may result in districts that have How much deviation in population is allowed between districts? The Supreme Court has stated that deviation of up to 10 percent is only a minor deviation and is not enough to showa violation oft the Fourteenth. Amendment.41 Maps with population deviations above 10 percent Note that the appropriate measure of population when considering substantial equality of population is total population, not alternative measures like the number of voters or the citizen voting-age population (CVAP).61 This reflects the principle that a city council represents all ofa  "substantial equality of population."3  slightly different populations.  can bej justified onlyi in limited circumstances."  city'sresidents, not merely those who are eligible to vote.  Reynolds V. Sims, 377L U.S. 533, 579( (1964); see also Gray V. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963). Please notet thatt this section describes the standards for non-Congressional districts, such as city and county districts. Ther requirement isr more: stringent for Congressional districts. See Kirkpatrick V. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526, 528 (1969). 4White V. Regester, 412 U.S.755, 764 (1973)("TW)e do not consider relatively minor population deviations among state legislative districts to substantially dilutei the weight ofi individual votesi ini thel larger districts so as to deprive individuals int these districts oft fair and effective representation. we cannot glean an equal protection violation fromi the singlet fact that twol legislative districts in Texas differ from one another by as much as 9.9%"). See e.g., Mahan V. Howell, 410 U.S. 315, 325 (1973) (affirming population deviation of 16.4 percent because deviation was "based on legitimate considerations incident to the effectuation ofa rational state policy"). 6The Supreme Court decided in Evenwel V. Abbott, 578 US_ - 136S.Ct.1120 (2016), that the' "one person, one vote" principle of the Equal Protection Clause allows as state or locality to designi its districts based ont total population. Observers read thel language of the decision as discouragingi the use of other metrics, but the Court did not rule out the use of other metrics. Wel know of nol locality in California that has used any metric other than total  population.  3    Requirements of the Federal Voting Rights Act of1965  The federal Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 19657 stands for the idea that every voter should have a chance to cast a meaningful ballot. To achieve this goal, Section 2 oft the' VRA prohibits election systems and practices that have the effect of diluting the voting power of racial, ethnic, and Various districting and redistricting techniques have historically been used, and are still used, to dilute the political power of racial, ethnic, and language minorities. The two most common  language minorities.8  techniques are "packing" and "cracking."  "Packing" refers to concentrating as many people from a minority group as possible into as few districts as possible. This limits the total number of districts in which they have influence. For example, ifa a community could be! 55 percent of two different districts, but are concentrated together such that they are 80 percent ofj just one district and 15 "Cracking" refers toi fragmenting concentrations of minority populations among multiple districts to ensure that they have no effective voice in any one district. Ifa community could be 60 percent of one district, but isi instead split soi iti is 20 percent of four  percent of another, "packing" has occurred.  different districts, "cracking" has occurred.  To prevent packing, cracking, and other discrimination in our elections systems, the VRA prohibits district maps that unlawfully dilute the voting power of any racial, ethnic, or language minority group."Amapi may' violate the VRA even if the map drawers did not intend to discriminate against minority voters. 10 It is enough that a map results in minority vote dilution  fori it to bei found unlawful.  752 U.S.C.A. $1 10101 et seq. 952 U.S.C.A. $1 10301. 10G Gingles, 478 U.S. at 44.  852 U.S.C.A. 51 10301; see Thornburg V. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30, 44-45 (1986).  4    Diagram: Packing & Cracking  Here is an example of three ways a districting body could map four districts within the Int this simplified hypothetical, minority voters are represented by blue dots. The first example "packs" blue voters. The second "cracks" them. The third example does  same city.  neither, thus avoiding minority vote dilution.  00p000 000000  888888  000000 000G00   54  0000 050090  9 C  000000) 000000  PACKING  CRACKING %minority residents Packing Cracking Neither D1 11% 33% D2 11% 22% D3 89% 33% D4 11% 33%  56% 0% 11 56%  888888 000060 0000p0 000050 000000 NEITHER! PACKING NOR CRACKING  How can a district map be drawn that complies with the VRA?  This is a complicated area ofl law, but in simple terms, the VRA requires the following: If a cityi is home to (1) a politically cohesive minority group that (2) has experienced difficulty electing  5    candidates ofi its choice because the majority votes opposite to its interests and (3) has experienced discrimination historically, the citys should draw a district in which that minority group is over! 50 percent of the district, if (4) the minority group is geographically compact What is the appropriate measure ofpopulation for creating a majority-minority  enough to do so.11  district?  As discussed above, the requirement that districts be substantially equal ini their population is based on total population, because elected officials represent their whole constituency, including children and people who are not eligible to vote. However, the population measure that is used to determine whether there is vote dilution is not total population. Instead, the measure used is the "citizen voting age population" (CVAP), meaning the population of the district's residents who are United States citizens and 18 years of age or older. 12 Essentially, CVAP represents registered voters plus those unregistered individuals who could register to vote if they SO choose. The effectiveness of a minority population in a district is measured by whether the eligible voters of that population represent a majority of all eligible voters ini that Any demographer hired by local governments should be able to provide extensive data on the CVAP in the city in order to analyze the types of districts that can be drawn and ensure What kinds of districts can be drawn to empower historically disenfranchised  district.  compliance with the VRA.  communities?  There are various approaches to creating districts that empower historically disenfranchised communities. The appropriate districts for a particular jurisdiction depend on the size oft the  11 To challenge a district map on the grounds thati it violates the VRA, a plaintiff has to show three conditions in court: (1) A minority group is large enough and geographically compact enough that it could make upt the majority ofa district; (2) that minority group is politically cohesive, meaning thatr most or all ofi its members votei ina a similar way; and (3) majority voters vote as a bloci ina a way that usually defeats the minority's preferred candidates. Gingles, 478 U.S. at 49. Ift these three conditions are: satisfied but the district map does not include: a district, or districts, in which ther minority groupi in question is over 50 percent of thep population, then a court willl look at the "totality of circumstances" to determine if there is vote dilution. See e.g., League of United Latin Am. Citizens V. 12 Romero V. City of Pomona, 883 F.2d 1418, 1426 (9th Cir. 1989) ("eligible minority voter population, rather than total minority population, is the appropriate measure of geographical compactness"), overruled in part on other  Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 425-26 (2006).  grounds.  6    communities in the jurisdiction, how diffuse or compact they are, how politically cohesive they are, and input from community members indicating their common interests and desires for their particular districts. With that said, below are four common frameworks that local governments can utilize to ensure that racial, ethnic, and language minorities are afforded an Majority-minority district. A district is known as a majority-minority district" when "a minority group composes ar numerical, working majority" of the district.13 As discussed earlier, the Voting Rights Act requires a majority-minority district under a very specific set of circumstances Crossover district. A district is known as a "crossover district" when a racial or language minority is not large enough to compose the majority of a district but isl large enough that when the minority group's votes are combined with those of similarly-minded voters from the majority population, the preferred candidates oft the minority have an opportunity to win. The Supreme Court has held that the Voting Rights Act does not mandate the creation of crossover districts but that jurisdictions "that wish to draw crossover districts are free to do so."14 Minority coalition district. A district is known as a "coalition district" when two racial, ethnic, or language minority groups can be combined to form a majority of the district. Although the Supreme Court has not addressed whether the Voting Rights Act requires the creation of coalition districts, some federal circuit courts have held that coalition districts must be created when two racial, ethnic, or language minority groups, taken together, meet the requirements for a vote dilution claim. 15 In other words, if two racial, ethnic, or language minority groups are politically cohesive, have experienced difficulty electing candidates of their choice, and have experienced discrimination historically, the local governing body should draw a district in which the two groups combine to form over 50 percent of a district, if the groups are geographically compact enough to do sO. The Ninth Circuit has implicitly recognized that vote dilution could  equal opportunity to participate in their elections:  thati indicate minority vote dilution is occurring.  13 Bartlett V. Strickland, 556 U.S.1,13 (2009).  141 Id. at: 24.  15 Campos V. City of Baytown, 840F. 2d: 1240, 1244 (5th Cir. 1998) (holding that blacks and Latinos may be combined to meet first Gingles condition ofa a geographically compact minority); Concerned Citizens of Hardee County V. Hardee County Bd. of Comm'rs, 906 F. 2d! 524 (11th Cir. 1990) (blacks and Latinos combined tot forma majority-minority district, meeting first Gingles condition, but upholding district court rulingt that blacks and Latinos were not shown to be politically cohesive, failing second Gingles condition); but see Nixon V. Kent County, 76F. 3d: 1381, 1386 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that Congress didr not intend for multiple minority groups tol be  combined to meet thet first Gingles condition).  7    occur based on failure to draw a coalition district. 16 The California Supreme Court has written Influence district. A district is known as an "influence district" when a racial or language minority group is not large enough to compose the majority of a district but is still numerous enough to influence election outcomes in that district. While the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that the Voting Rights Act does not guarantee influence districts to racial and language minority groups, 18 just as with crossover districts nothing prevents a districting body from creatinginfluence districts ifi it SO chooses. The California Supreme Court has written  approvingly of coalition districts.17  approvingly of influence districts.19  The Acceptable Use of Race  The Supreme Court has declared that redistricting may be performed "with consciousness of race.' "20 Indeed, it would bei impossible to properly undertake a districting process without consideration of race given the many protections afforded to racial, ethnic, and language minorities by the federal Voting Rights Act. Furthermore, understanding the racial, ethnic, and language communities of aj jurisdiction has always been part of determining that At the same time, the Supreme Court does not permit racial gerrymanders, where districts are sO bizarrely shaped that it is clear the line drawers predominantly considered race in creating the maps and there is no compelling reason for the way race was used. 21 So where is the line? In the words of the Supreme Court, "The constitutional wrong occurs when race becomes the dominant and controlling consideration."22 This is whyl local governments should look at other factors in addition to race = such as shared history and language, common social networks, shared interest in schools, health, and public safety, neighborhood boundaries - that indicate whether members of racial groups also form  jurisdiction's communities of interest.  communities ofi interest.  16 Badillo V. City of Stockton, Cal., 956F. 2d 884, 886, 891 (9th Cir. 1992) (acknowledging that "[H]ispanics and blacks together could form a majority in as single-member district" but affirming lower court's holding that plaintiffs didr not meet Gingles conditions fora a vote dilution claim becausei they failed tos show Hispanic and Black  communities int the contested district were politically cohesive). 18 League of United Latin American Citizens V. Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 446 (2006). 21 See Bethune-Hilli V. Virginia. State Bd. of Elections, 137S. Ct. 788, 797, 800-801( (2017).  171 Wilson V. Eu, 10 Cal. 4th 707, 715 (1992). 191 Wilson, 1 Cal. 4th at 715. 20 Bush V. Vera, 517 U.S. 952, 958 (1996).  22 Shaw V. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899, 905 (1996) (emphasis added).  8    California State Requirements  When cities and counties in California draw or redraw district lines, they must comply with the US Constitution and the federal Voting Rights Act and they must use redistricting criteria mandated by the California Elections Code, which are ranked in order of priority. 23  Ranked Redistricting Criteria, for Cities  1 2 3  Geographic Contiguity Neighborhoods and Communities ofi interest  Does each district have a single unbroken border? Are neighborhoods and other communities ofi interest kept whole (intact within the same district)? manmade boundaries, such as streets, rivers, highways, and rail lines? Are districts relatively compact?  Easily Identifiable Boundaries Do districts follow easily identifiable natural and  4  Geographical Compactness  Charter City Exemption: Charter cities that have adopted redistricting criteria ini their charter do not have toi follow these ranked criteria, if their charter provides two or more traditional redistricting criteria and/or their charter excludes consideration of other redistricting criteria. 24  Ranked Redistricting Criteria, for Counties  1 2 3  Geographic Contiguity Neighborhoods and Communities ofi interest Places Intact  Does each district have a single unbroken border? Are neighborhoods and other communities of interest kept whole (intact within the same district)?  Cities and Census-Designated Are cities and other census designated places (e.g.,  unincorporated territories) kept whole and/or divided  as little as possible?  4  Easily Identifiable Boundaries Do districts follow easily identifiable natural and  manmade boundaries, such as streets, rivers, highways, and rail lines? Are districts relatively compact?  5  Geographical Compactness  23 Cal. Elec. Code $52 21621(e), 21601(C),216210c). 24 Cal. Elec. Code $21500(c).  9    What is Contiguity?  A district is geographically contiguous if its perimeter can bei traced in one, unbroken line. A district consisting of two or more unconnected areas is not contiguous. Two areas of land separated by water may be considered contiguous if al bridge, tunnel, or regular ferry connects  them.  What are Communities of Interest?  During redistricting, al local government should aim to keep neighborhoods and communities of interest intact within a single city council or supervisorial district. Communities ofi interest are the overlapping sets of neighborhoods, networks, and groups that share interests, views, cultures, histories, languages, and values and whose boundaries can be identified on a map. Relationships with political parties or elected officials and candidates are not considered  communities ofi interest.  The following elements help define communities of interest:  shared interests in schools, housing, community safety, transit, health conditions, land common social and civic networks, including churches, mosques, temples, homeowner associations, and community centers, and shared use of community spaces, like parks racial and ethnic compositions, cultural identities, and households that predominantly similar socio-economic status, including but not limited to income, home-ownership, shared political boundary lines from other jurisdictions, such as school districts,  use, environmental conditions, and/or other issues;  and shopping centers;  speak a language other than English; and education levels;  community college districts, and water districts.  While local governing bodies likely know many of the communities of interest int their jurisdictions, there will inevitably be some communities that they do not know well and some that they do not know at all. Al holistic picture of the communities ofi interest in any city or county takes shape only through extensive publict testimony from a diverse set of community members. See the Best Practices for Local Redistricting section below for recommendations on  how local governments can collect comprehensive community input.  10    What is Compactness?  There are various social science measures of compactness, but most courts have applied an intuitive moW-t-when.you-see-t test that looks at geometric shape to determine if a districti is compact.25 Courts may also use a functional analysis, such as analyzing whether citizens in the Local governments should give local governments the proper amount of weight. In California, cities and counties must prioritize the other ranked criteria above compactness.27 They must also comply with the US Constitution and the federal Voting Rights Act. In manyi instances, keeping communities ofi interest intact, complying with the Voting Rights Act, and/or following geographic boundaries can only be achieved by drawing maps that have somewhat unusual  district can relate to each othera and can relate to their representative. 26  shapes.  Compactness & Gerrymandering  Recognizing the many factors line-drawers must consider, Courts understand that districts will not have simple geometric shapes. 28 Maps may be challenged for being non-compact where they have an extremely irregular shape that may indicate racial gerrymandering and there is evidence that race played the predominant role in map creation. Courts use a very detailed analysis that looks beyond shape, considering the history of discrimination, line-drawer statements, and whether maps reflect communities of interest and other redistricting criteria. Iti is quite rare for districts to be successfully challenged in court on the basis of compactness. On the next page are two examples where courts looked at compactness when deciding  whether a map was based predominantly on race.  25 See e.g., Lee V. Cityo ofLos Angeles, 88 F. Supp. 3d 1140, 1150 (C.D. Cal. 2015) (noting that district: shaped like a "fat turkey" has' "a relatively compact and contiguous shape"); Cuthair V. Montezuma-Cortez, Colo.. Sch. Dist.,7F. Supp. 2d: 1152, 1167 (D. Colo. 1998) (determining thata a disputed district was compact using a "simple visual 26 See, e.g., Wilson, 1 Cal. 4th at 715 (interpreting the compactness requirement ina a since-repealed California 28 See e.g., Bush V. Vera, 517 U.S. at 962 ("The Constitution does not mandate regularity of district shape."). See also Cano V. Davis, 211 F.Supp. 2d 1208, 1222 (C.D. Cal. 2002), aff'd, 537 U.S. 1100 (2003) (finding that an oddly shaped district was not a racial gerrymander, since its shape was based on a variety oft traditional redistricting criteria in addition to race, including communities of interest together and keeping local political subdivisions  inspection"). constitutional provision).  27 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21500(c), 21601(c), 21621(c).  intact).  11    Examples of Compactness  Reasonably Compact, Multiple Factors Considered In Cano V. Davis, 211 F. Supp. 2d 1208, 1222 (C.D. Cal. 2002), a court found that Congressional District 51, which at the time included al long stretch that ran along the U.S.-Mexico border and connected Imperial County with south San Diego County, was "reasonably compact." The court found that the district was "no more irregulari in shape than any other district created by the legislature, and certainly [did] not constitute a showing of bizarreness that would support an inference that the [district was] racially gerrymandered." As a result, the district Not Compact, Race Predominant Factor In Shaw V. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993) and Shaw V. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899 (1996), the United State  Congressional District 51  San Dego  Imperial Brawley EICentro Calexiço. MEXICO 100N Miles  Mtional City Chulà Vista Pacifiel Ocean  was allowed to stand.  Supreme Court considered North Carolina Congressional District 12, an African American majority district. The district is the skinny, bright pink district on the map below. The Court found that the map was predominantly shaped by racial considerations because it was "non- compact by any objective standard that can be conceived" and reportedly' "the least geographically compact district ini the Nation," "29 and the Court had evidence that the line- drawers had created such a bizarre district because they had subjugated all other redistricting  considerations, including compactness, to a desire to intentionally separate voters by race. 30 The district had to be redrawn.  Athens  Columbia,  29 Shaw V. Hunt, 517 U.S. at 906. Hunt, 5170 U.S. at 916-18.  30 The Supreme Court deemed North Carolina's: 12th Congressional District a racial gerrymander meriting strict scrutiny andr remanded it to ai federal District Court. Shaw V. Reno, 509 U.S. at 641, 658. The District Court held the district passed strict scrutiny and the Supreme Court, considering the districta a second time, reversed. Shawv.  12    Partisan Gerrymandering Is Prohibited  Under the FAIR MAPS Act, cities and counties are now prohibited from considering partisan and party advantage when redrawing district lines or drawing district lines for the first time. 31 Removing partisan gerrymandering from local districting and redistricting, helps ensure at fair  process that focuses on the needs and interests of communities.  Counting Incarcerated People  Under state law, in the 2020 redistricting cycle incarcerated individuals32 will not be counted as part oft the population in the county where they are incarcerated. If data are available regarding the last known place of residence of incarcerated individuals, they willl be counted ini their city and county of last residence for the purpose of redistricting. 33 Local governments may contract directly with demographers to procure this data, though it is likely to be available through the  Statewide Database at UC Berkeley.  31 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21500(d), 21601(d), 21621(d). 33 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21500(a)(2), 21601(a)(2), 21621(a)(2).  321 Incarcerated individuals refers here to people held ats state correctional facilities that are controlled byt the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Cal. Elec. Code S5 215000)2,216010)010/2,216210)2)-  13    Public Outreach and Transparency Requirements  Cities and counties should ensure that the local redistricting process is accessible and transparent. By taking active steps to encourage robust public participation, cities and counties will have stronger community of interest testimony and be better equipped to draw district  maps that reflect the needs of their diverse constituents.  Public Outreach and Engagement  Hearings  By law, cities and counties must hold at least four public hearings that enable community  members to provide input on the drawing of district maps:34  At least one hearing must occur before the city or county draws draft maps.35 At least two hearings must happen after the drawing of draft maps.3 36 The fourth hearing can happen either before or after the drawing of draft maps. To increase the accessibility of these hearings, cities and counties must take the following steps: At least one hearing must occur on a Saturday, Sunday, or after 6 p.m. on a weekday. 37 Ifar redistricting hearing is consolidated with another local government meeting, the redistricting hearing portion must begin at a pre-designated time. 38 Local public redistricting hearings should be made accessible to people with  disabilities.39  There is flexibility around how local redistricting hearings are conducted:  City or county staff or consultants may hold a public workshop instead of one of the  required public redistricting hearings.40  34 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21507.1(a),: 21607.10/,21627.10. 35 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21507.10)4,21607.10)4. 36 Cal. Elec. Code 552 215071012,21607.102: 37 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21507.1(a)2)D),: 21607.10/2X0,21627.10)2/0). discussion before moving tot the redistricting hearing. 39 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21507.10)2)c/,21607.1a)2)C, 21627.1(a)2)C. 40 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21507.1()2)e),2160710121e,21627.1(a)2)e).  38 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21507.1(a)2)d),: 21607.10)2/4,21627.10)2)0). Ift thel local body is discussing another agenda item when ther redistricting hearing portion is set to begin, they may first conclude the agenda item under  14    Alternatively, local governments can designate an advisory commission to carry out the  redistricting hearing required before draft maps are released.41  Translations  Cities and counties must offer live translation of public redistricting hearings or workshops in applicable languages (defined below) if a request is made at least 72 hours in advance. If less than five days' notice is given for the hearing, then cities and counties must be prepared to  fulfill translation requests received at least 48 hours in advance.42  "Applicable Languages"  For cities, applicable language refers to "any language that is spoken by a group of city residents with limited English proficiency who constitute 3 percent or more of the city's total population over four years of age for whom language can be determined." Cities can find the list of applicable languages for their city by visiting the Secretary of State's For counties, applicable language refers to any language that the county must provide translated ballots in under Section 203 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965.44  local redistricting website. 43  Outreach  In order to engage underrepresented and non-English speaking communities in the local redistricting process, cities and counties must make a good faith effort to do the following:45 Share information about the local redistricting process with media organizations that cover news in that jurisdiction, including media organizations that reach language Share information via good government, civil rights, civic engagement, and community groups/organizations that are active in the jurisdiction, including groups that are actively  minority communities.46  involved in language minority communities.47  41 Cal. Elec. Code 55 19040.00.10049002 21627.1(a)2)0). 42 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21508(b), 21608/0),21628/b). 43 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21608(h), 21628(h). 44 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21508(h). 45 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21508(a), 21608(a), 21628(a). 46 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21508(a)(1), 21608(a)(1), 21628(a)(1). 47 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21508(a)(2), 21608(a)(2), 21628(a)(2).  15    Public Feedback  Members oft the public must be allowed to submit testimony and draft maps  electronically or via writing. 48  Ensuring Transparency  Notices  The date, time, and location for any public redistricting hearings or workshops should be noticed on the internet at least five days in advance, although local governments can publish the agenda online at least three days in advance if feweri than 28 days before Draft maps must be published on the internet at least seven days before adoption, although the draft map may be published online at least three days in advance if there Each draft map prepared by the city or county must be accompanied by thei following information: total population, citizen voting age population (CVAP), and racial and ethnic characteristics of the citizen voting age population of each proposed district.51  the deadline to adopt the maps.4 49  are fewer than 28 days before the deadline to adopt the maps. 50  Recording  Cities and counties must provide an audio or audiovisual recording or a written summary of public comment and council deliberations at all public redistricting hearings or workshops. The recording or written summary must be made available within two  weeks after the public hearing or workshop.52  Website  Cities and counties shouid create a dedicated redistricting web page and maintain it for at least ten years following the adoption of new district boundaries. This web page  should include:53  48 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21508(e), 21608(e), 21628(e). 49 Cal. Elec. Code $5 21508(c), 21608(C), 21628(c). 50 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21508/d/0,21608.d)4,216284d0. 51 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21508/d/2,21608/d). 52 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21508(f), 21608(f), 21628(f). website or on as separate website that they maintain.  53 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21508(g), 21608(g), 21628(g). Local governments can host this web page on their own existing  16    An explanation oft the redistricting process for that jurisdiction in English and Procedures for a member oft the public to offer verbal testimony during a public hearing or submit written testimony directly to the governing bodyi in English Acalendar that lists the dates of all public redistricting hearings and The notice and agenda for each public hearing and workshop. 57 Either the recording or written summary of each public hearing and workshop.5 58 Each draft map that the city or county considers at public hearings. 59 The final adopted district map of the city or county. 60  applicable languages.54  and applicable languages.55 workshops. 56  Best Practices for Local Redistricting  Building Public Awareness through Robust and Translated Outreach Create outreach & publicity materials and distribute them through a variety of To maximize the number of residents who are informed about the redistricting process, a jurisdiction should produce outreach & publicity materials and distribute them as widely as possible. A: successful district map-drawing body (whether iti is a city council, a school board, or some independent body) should heari from all of the communities and neighborhoods within a jurisdiction's limits, regardless of their language abilities, resources, or previous levels of engagement in local politics. The map-drawing body should spread the word about its work in local newspapers in various languages, at meetings of local community groups, in multilingual robo-calls, on digital marquees at local schools, ini flyers sent home with school children, and sO on. Simply publicizing the process on the jurisdiction's website andi in a small number of  channels.  newsletters and community newspapers is not enough.  54 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21508(g)(1), 21608(g)(1), 21628(g)(1). 55 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21508(g/(2), 21608(g)(2), 21628(g)(2). 56 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21508(8/(3), 21608(g)(3), 21628(g)(3). 57 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21508(8)(4), 21608(g)(4), 21628(g)(4). 58 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21508(g)(5), 21608(g)(5), 21628(g)(5). 59 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21508(g)(6), 21608(g)(6), 21628(g)(6). 60 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21508(g)(7),: 21608(g)(7), 21628(g)(7).  17    Ensure that outreach & publicity materials are distributed in multiple languages. Ajurisdiction should prepare outreach & publicity materials in a variety of languages sO that word about redistricting spreads to all of the jurisdiction's language communities. Outreach materials about the redistricting process, information publicizing upcoming redistricting workshops and hearings, and the designated redistricting web page itself should bei translated. Ajurisdiction should translate outreach & publicity materials into at least all applicable languages which they are required to offer live translation in at public redistricting hearings or workshops. Translated materials should be shared with civic, cultural, and community organizations, posted online, and sent to ethnic news media sources, including print, web, and radio outlets. Ideally, translated materials should be shared with leaders from the relevant language communities before they are released publicly to make sure the materials are Actively promote local redistricting via social media and local influencers. Create eye-catching and clear draft social media content to promote engagement in local redistricting. Call upon local elected officials, artists, community leaders, etc. to post about local redistricting on their social media channels. Purchase boosted ads on Instagram and Facebook to spread the word. Lastly, consider launching a social media campaign to alert community  accurate, accessible, and culturally competent.  members to this process.  Maximizing Public Participation through Frequent and Accessible Hearings and  Workshops  Hold more hearings than the legal minimum.  The map-drawing body in aj jurisdiction undergoing a redistricting process should hold a large number of hearings both before the drawing of draft maps and after the release of draft maps but before adoption of ai final map. The statutory minimum is four hearings total, at least one during the first phase and at least two in the second. Four hearings, however, is likely not enough to gather input from a diverse set of community members. Holding more hearings provides community members with multiple opportunities to contribute and enables them to  participate even if they learn about redistricting late int the process.  Hold hearings in diverse locations.  The map-drawing body should bring redistricting hearings and workshops directly to the community and meet residents where they naturally congregate. This means hearings should  18    be held in a diversity ofl locations, all of which should be accessible by public transit and be ADA-compliant. The map-drawing body should avoid holding all hearings in a single location, like a city hall building. This does not make hearings accessible to residents in all parts of the jurisdiction, especially those who do not have ready access to a car. Government buildings can also feel formal ori intimidating to community members who aren'tused to conducting business int those locations. Holding hearings in highly-trafficked community spaces such as libraries, community centers, or places of worship in different neighborhoods and parts of town maximizes accessibility and helps create a comfortable environment. Offer the public diverse hearing days and times.  To allow residents with a variety of job and family commitments to participate, hearing dates and times should vary. Weekday hearings during business hours should never be used. If possible, hearings scheduled for weekday evenings should be held on different days oft the  week and should be mixed with weekend hearing dates. Create stand-alone redistricting hearings.  Redistricting is a transformative experience in aj jurisdiction's political life - it merits a different kind of treatment than the jurisdiction's other business. While a routine amount of public input may be acceptable for other items on the jurisdiction's agendas, iti is insufficient on ai topic that isc critical to the jurisdiction's political future. Local governments should avoid embedding redistricting hearings in city council or school board meetings, and create standalone hearings instead. Local governments should also consider embedding these hearings into community meetings and events that engage diverse constituents who might not otherwise attend a city Livestream and/or record all hearings and post on the districting webpage. Although cities and counties may provide a written summary in place of an audio or audiovisual recording of redistricting hearings and workshops, posting a recording of hearings is helpful because it allows residents to follow mapping conversations and decisions more closely. Livestreaming the proceedings also increases the accessibility of redistricting meetings, as people can watch from home in real time and potentially even participate virtually if needed. Recording hearings may present logistical challenges when hearings are held in community spaces instead of city! hall buildings. Those challenges should be planned for and budgeted for  council, board of supervisors, or school board meeting.  ina advance.  19    Host numerous workshops to inform the public and gather community of  interest testimony.  In addition to formal public hearings, local governments should endeavor to host a number of educational and nformation-gathering workshops int the community to help residents identify priority communities of interest and draw them on a map. City or county staff should come prepared with large blank maps of the jurisdiction, laptops to access Google maps for reference  (or printed maps that include key roads and thoroughfares), and pens. Offer technical. support to help residents submit district maps.  The redistricting process can be a fairly technical process. Local governments should be prepared to hold workshops that help residents understand redistricting criteria and how to submit a map whether it be via paper, excel, or a digital mapping software. Detailed tutorials and assistance ini the form of workshops and office hours should be offered SO community members can ask questions when drawing their district maps. If possible, cities and counties should reserve local computer labs at libraries or community centers to give residents greater  access to relevant digital mapping software.  Budgeting to Enable Robust Outreach and Accessible Hearings  Budget the money necessary to do redistricting right.  Ajurisdiction should budget for, among other things: finding and reserving diverse hearing locations, providing translation services to the public, paying city or county staff to work on evenings and weekends, doing robust outreach and publicity, and creating a webpage with a number of functionalities. The jurisdiction should consider whether to hire outside contractors for some tasks and services, such as scouting meeting locations, preparing outreach materials, engaging community organizations to educate members and encourage their participation, and providing translation services. One primary cost aj jurisdiction will incur when redistricting is the hiring of a demographer. It is tempting to think of that as a "necessary" cost while outreach and accessibility costs are "optional" or a "luxury." Ini truth, outreach and accessibility are essential ift the jurisdiction wants its residents to understand and believe in the process.  20    Timeline and Deadlines  Local governments now have more standardized redistricting calendars. Counties, charter cities, and general law cities can begin releasing draft maps starting three weeks after the Statewide Redistricting Database is available with the most updated census data. 61 Local governments can hold public redistricting hearings and workshops to gather input before releasing draft maps, and should start the process early to get robust public testimony and  engagement.  As a general rule, counties and cities must adopt districts no later than 205 days before the next regular election that occurs after. January 1 in each year ending in the number two (2032,2042, etc.).62 However, special timelines apply for the 2021-2022 redistricting cycle, because of  anticipated delays int the release of census data.  For cities or counties with their next upcoming regular election between Jan. 1, 2022 and. July 1, 2022, district maps must be adopted no later than 174 days before the For cities or counties with their next upcoming regular election on or after. July 1, 2022, district maps must be adopted no later than 205 days before the election.  election.63  Charter City Exemption: Charter cities that have adopted alternate redistricting deadlines either by ordinance ori in their city charter before October 1 in each year ending in the number one  are exempt from these redistricting deadlines.64  Process for Missed Deadline  Ifc cities and counties do not adopt district maps to meet their redistricting deadline in time, the city or county in question must petition the superior court of the relevant county for an order to adopt district boundaries. If thej jurisdiction fails to do this within five days after the deadline, then any resident of the city or county can file the petition instead and will be eligible for reimbursement by the city or county for their reasonable attorney's fees and costs. 65  61 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21501(a), 21602(a), 21622(a). 62 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21501(a), 21602(a), 21622(a).  63 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21501(a), 21602(a), 21622(a). Thet forms for gathering signatures in lieu ofaf filing fee mayr not ber made available until at least 28 days after the adoption of ai final map. Accordingly, ifa county or city adopts maps at the end oft the redistricting window, thes signature inl lieu process willl be shortened and the number of  signatures required willl be reduced. 64 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21622(b). 65 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21509(a), 21609(a), 21629(a).  21    Ift the superior court finds the petition to be valid, the following process will be used to adopt  new district lines:  The superior court will adopt district boundaries that align with the ranked criteria that cities and counties are required to use under the California Elections Code (see "Ranked The superior court, if needed, may order a change in electoral deadlines to ensure new district boundaries are in place ini time for the next regular election. 66 The superior court may appoint a special master to help the court adopt district boundaries and the city or county will payt the cost of this special master and other Either the superior court or the special master will hold at least one publicr credistricting The special master will be given access to necessary resources and experts to carry out The special master may hire redistricting experts or relevant consultants, independent experts in the field of redistricting and computertechnology, and The special master may request support from the city or county to use or produce any data, computer models and programs, and technical assistance. The superior court may help the special master in securing necessary personnel and facilities for their work and assist with submitting a request to the city or county for funding to cover expenses that the special master or their staff incur.  Criteria" section above).  associated costs.67  hearing before the court adopts the final district boundaries.68  the successful drafting of district maps:69  other necessary personnel to assist them.  Charter City Exemption: Charter cities are exempt from this process if they have specified in their charter an alternative method for adopting city council district boundaries int the case ofa a  missed redistricting deadline.70  66 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21509(b)(1), 21609(b)(1), 21629(b)(1). 67 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21509(b)(2), 21609(b)(2), 21629(b)(2). 68 Cal. Elec. Code 55 21509(b)(3), 21609(b)(3), 21629(b)(3). 69 Cal. Elec. Code S5 21509(b)(4), 21609(b)(4), 21629(b)(4).  70 Cal. Elec. Code $21629(c).  22    Local Redistricting Commissions  Redistricting Commissions Defined  What is a redistricting commission?  Aredistricting commission is an independent body made up of members of the public that will recommend or even decide the next district map. 71 By allowing everyday residents to take the lead instead of elected officials, local governments can reduce the risk of political biases influencing final district boundaries, increase public trust ini the redistricting process, and spur greater future involvement in local decision-making. General law cities, charter cities, school districts, community college districts, special districts, and counties can create these  commissions via resolution, ordinance, or charter amendment.72 What types of redistricting commissions are there?  Local governments can create three types of redistricting commissions which vary in their Advisory Redistricting Commission: This redistricting body makes recommendations to the Hybrid Redistricting Commission: This redistricting body may recommend two or more maps for the legislative body to choose from and adopt without modification (except where needed Independent Redistricting Commission: This redistricting body has the greatest level of decision-making power because it can adopt district boundaries for a given legislative body. 76  functions and level of decision-making power:73 legislative body about new district boundaries.74  inc order to ensure compliance with state or federal law).75  71 Cal. Elec. Code 523001. 72 Cal. Elec. Code $523000(f), 23001. 73 Cal. Elec. Code S5 23000(a)-(d), 23001. 74 Cal. Elec. Code $23000(a). 75 Cal. Elec. Code $23000(c). 76 Cal. Elec. Code 523000(d).  23    Requirements for the Formation of a Local Redistricting Commission  Advisory Redistricting Commissions  Eligibility Restrictions  The following individuals are ineligible to serve on an advisory redistricting commission: elected officials of the local jurisdiction and family members, staff members, and paid campaign staff of  elected officials of the local jurisdiction."7 Appointment Process commission.78  Local jurisdictions may decide how members are appointed to the advisory redistricting Other Commission or Commissioner Requirements and Restrictions  Local jurisdictions are free to enact additional requirements or restrictions on the commission, Charter City Exemption: Charter cities are not required to follow the eligibility restrictions identified for advisory redistricting commissions. 80 However, advisory redistricting commissions in charter cities are required tot follow the same redistricting deadlines, requirements, and restrictions that would apply if the legislative body oft the charter city completed the  commissioners, or applicants.79  redistricting process.81  Hybrid and Independent Redistricting Commissions  Eligibility Restrictions  1.1 These individuals are ineligible to serve on a hybrid ori independent redistricting commission: A person who has been elected, appointed to, or run as a candidate for an office of the local jurisdiction within the last eight years, or has a family member who has done s0.82  77 Cal. Elec. Code $23002(c). 78 Cal. Elec. Code $23002(b). 79 Cal. Elec. Code $23002(d). 80 Cal. Elec. Code 9 23000(f). 81 Cal. Elec. Code $21630. 82 Cal. Elec. Code $23003(c).  24    A person or their spouse who has done one of the following within the last eight years or a person with a family member other than their spouse who has done one of the Served as an officer of, employee of, or paid consultant to a campaign committee or a candidate for elective office of the local jurisdiction.84 Served as an officer of, employee of, or paid consultant to a political party.85 Served as an elected or appointed member of a political party central Served as a staff member or consultant to, or has contracted with, a currently  following within the last four years:83  committee. 86  serving elected officer of the local jurisdiction.87 Been registered to lobby the local jurisdiction.88  Contributed 500 dollars (or more) in a year to any candidate for an elective office  oft the local jurisdiction.89  2. All members of the commission cannot be registered to vote with the same political party." 90  Appointment Process  Local jurisdictions can decide how members will be appointed toi the commission given that the  following requirements are met:  There must be an open application process that is open to all eligible residents. Commissioners cannot be directly appointed by the legislative body or an elected official  of the local jurisdiction.91  Restrictions on Commissioner Conduct Amember of the local redistricting commission cannot:  Endorse, work for, volunteer for, or make a campaign contribution to a candidate for an elective office of the local jurisdiction while serving on the commission. 92 Serve asa candidate for an elective office of the local jurisdiction, following service on  83 Cal. Elec. Code S9 23003(d)(1), 23003(d)(2). 84 Cal. Elec. Code S5 23003d)(1)(A), 23003(d)(2)(A). 85 Cal. Elec. Code 55 23003(d)(1)(B), 23003(d)(2)(B). 86 Cal. Elec. Code 4.2.034018.2004190, 87 Cal. Elec. Code S5 300901010.2200012104 88 Cal. Elec. Code S5 23003d)(1)D), 23003(d)(2)(D). 89 Cal. Elec. Code S5 .009010,0.200302102 90 Cal. Elec. Code S5 23003(f). 91 Cal. Elec. Code $23003(b). 92 Cal. Elec. Code $23003(e)(1).  25    the local districting commission, if one of the following conditions is met:93  Less than five years have passed since their appointment to the commission. 94 The election for that office will use district boundaries that were adopted by the commission on which the member served, and those boundaries have not since been readopted by a commission following the end oft the member's term. 95 The election for that office will use district boundaries that were adopted by a legislative body following the recommendation by a commission on which the member served, and those boundaries have not since been readopted by a legislative body according to the recommendation of a commission after the  member's term ended.96  Forf four years from the date oft their appointment to the commission, do the  following:97  Work as a staff member of or consultant to an elected official or candidate for Receive a non-competitively bid contract with the local jurisdiction. For two years from the date of their appointment to the commission, become  elective office of the local jurisdiction. Register as a lobbyist for the local jurisdiction. appointed to an office of the local jurisdiction. 98 Other Commission Requirements and Restrictions  The commission is prohibited from drawing districts to favor or discriminate against a The commission must adhere tot the Ralph M. Brown Act and California Public Records The commission must follow the same redistricting deadlines, requirements, and restrictions that the local legislative body must follow. The local jurisdiction can also place further requirements and restrictions on the commission, members of the  political party, incumbent, or political candidate.  Act.99  commission, or applicants. 100  93 Cal. Elec. Code 523003(e)(2). 94 Cal. Elec. Code $23003(e)12)(A). 95 Cal. Elec. Code $23003e)2/B). 96 Cal. Elec. Code $23003le)12)C). 97 Cal. Elec. Code $23003(e)(3). 98 Cal. Elec. Code $23003(e)(4). 99 Cal. Elec. Code $23003(h). 100 Cal. Elec. Code $23003().  26    Charter city exemption: Charter cities are not subject to the above requirements for hybrid and independent redistricting commissions. However, hybrid and independent redistricting commissions in charter cities are required to follow the same redistricting deadlines, requirements, and restrictions that would apply if the legislative body of that charter city To learn more about best practices and the process of establishing local redistricting commissions, see the report "California Local Redistricting Commissions" (Heidorn 2017), which  completed the redistricting process. 101  can be found on the California Local Redistricting Project website.  101 Cal. Elec. Code $21630.  27