G BRADBURY  AGENDA  Regular Meeting of the Bradbury City Council To be held on Tuesday, February 16, 2021 Closed Session Immediately Following at the Bradbury Civic Center 600 Winston Avenue, Bradbury, CA 91008  Pursuant to Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-25-20, the City is allowing Council Members, Staff and the public to participate in this City Council meeting by means ofa Zoom video or telephone call. You will be able to hear the entire proceedings (other than the Closed Session) and to speak during Public Comment, Public Hearing, and other authorized times. Members of the public must maintain silence and mute their microphones and telephones except during those times. The. Zoom information is: ntps/SO2webzcomus/83983867567, One tap mobile +16699009128, 83983867567#, or dial (669) 900-9128 ande enter code 839 8386 7567#.  OPEN SESSION 7:00 PM  Each item on the agenda, no matter how described, shall be deemed to include any appropriate motion, whether to adopt a minute motion, resolution, payment of any bill, approval of any matter or action, or any other action. Items listed as "For Information" or "For Discussion" may also be subject of an "action" taken by  the Board or a Committee at the same meeting. CALL TO ORDERIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  ROLL CALL: Mayorl Lewis, Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny, Councilmembers Lathrop, Barakat and Hale APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA: Majority vote of City Council to proceed with City Business DISCLOSURE OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 1090 & 81000 ET.SEQ.  PUBLIC COMMENT minutes.  Anyone wishing to address the City Council on any matter. that is not on the agenda fora a public hearing may do so at this time. Please state your name and address clearly for the record and. limit your remarks to five Please note that while the City Council values your comments, the City Council cannot respond nor take action Routine requests for action should be referred to City staff during normal business hours, 8:30 am 5:00 pm, The City of Bradbury will gladly accommodate disabled persons wishing to communicate at a City public meeting. Ify you require special assistance to participate int this meeting, please call the City Manager's Office at (626): 358-  until such time as the matter may appear onai forthcoming agenda.  Monday through Friday, at (626) 358-3218. 3218 at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.  ACTIONITEMS 1. CONSENT CALENDAR  All items on the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a Council Member request otherwise, in which case the item will  Page 1 of3 CC Agenda021621    be removed and considered by separate action. All Resolutions and Ordinances for Second Reading on the Consent Calendar, the motion will be deemed to be "to waive the reading and  adopt."  A. Minutes: Regular Meeting of January 19, 2021 B. Minutes: Adjourned Meeting of February 1,2021 :. Resolution No. 21-04: Demands and Warrants for February 2021 D. Monthly Investment Report for the month of January 2021  2.  Winston/Lemon Trail  RKA Engineering has developed a few options to review with the City Council regarding a possible walking trail on the streets of Winston and Lemon Avenues. It is recommended that Discussion of Development Standards and Design Guidelines for Front and During their January 27, 2021 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed development standards and design guidelines for front and street-side yards. They also made recommendations, in the form of Resolution No. PC 21-295, for City Council review. After City Council discussion, Staff can return at a later date with a drafted ordinance with any Introduction of Ordinance No. 373: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Bradbury, California Amending the Zoning Provisions of the Bradbury Municipal Code Relating to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUS) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUS) in Accordance with State Law and After a series of City Council Study Sessions, a draft ordinance on ADUS, JADUS, and ALQs was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their January 27, 2021. This item reviews the Planning Commission's recommendation on the draft Ordinance No. 373, and Staff Agreement for Continued Government Relations Advocacy Services with Best Given the recent successes by Best Best & Krieger (BB&K), it is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with BB&K and appropriate Appointment of Applicant to Public Safety Committee Primary Seat for District For the last few months, Ms. Janet Barakat has been an active participant of the Public Safety Committee and has recently expressed interest in joining the Committee. Additionally, there are a few Committee members who have been absent from meetings for more than 6 months. It is recommended that the City Council confirm the appointment of Ms. Janet  the City Council provide overall direction to Staff on how to proceed.  3.  Street-Side Yards  proposed regulations.  4.  Provisions Related to Accessory Living Quarters (ALQs)  recommends approval of such ordinance.  5.  Best & Krieger  $11,323.08 for lobbying services for the 2021 calendar year.  6.  3 and Removal of Inactive Public Safety Committee Members  Barakat and remove inactive members from the Committee.  7. 8.  Matters from the City Manager Matters from the City Attorney  Page 2 of3 CC Agenda021621    9.  Matters from the City Council  Brief reports of individual Councilmembers activities relating to City business occurring since  the last meeting. Mayor Lewis California JPIA  Director of Bradbury Disaster Committee Area "D" Office of Disaster Management Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny Duarte Community Education Council (CEC) Councilmember Lathrop League of California Cities Duarte Education Foundation Councilmember Barakat LA County Sanitation Districts Foothill Transit Councilmember Hale 10. Items for Future Agendas  San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) San Gabriel Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District  CLOSED SESSION  CALL1 TOORDER/ROLL CALL  PUBLIC COMMENT - REGARDING CLOSED SESSIONS ONLY RECESS TO CLOSED SESSIONS REGARDING:  A. Pending Litigation Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(4) (Based on existing facts and circumstances, the legislative body of the local agency has  decided to initiate or is deciding whether to initiate litigation.  (3p potential cases).  ADJOURNMENT  The City Council will adjourn to a Regular Meeting at the Bradbury Civic Center, 600 Winston Ave., - ACTION ITEMS Regardless of a staff recommendation on any agenda item, the City Council will consider such matters, including action to approve, conditionally approve, reject or continue such "1, Claudia Saldana, City Clerk, hereby certify that I caused this agenda to be posted at the Bradbury  Bradbury, CA 91008 on Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 7:00 p.m.  item. Further information on each item may be procured from City Hall. City Hall entrance gate on Friday, February 12,2021 at 5:00p.m."  ClauhS-Dlama CITY CLERK- CITY OF BRADBURY  Page 30 of3 CC Agenda021621    MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY HELD ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2021  DRAFT  EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 25-20:  Pursuant to Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-25-20, the City is allowing Council Members, Staff and the public to participate in this City Council meeting by means of a Zoom video or telephone call. Participants will be able to hear the entire proceedings (other than the Closed Session) and be able to speak during Public Comment, Public Hearing, and other authorized times. Members of the public must maintain silence and mute their microphones and telephones except during The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bradbury was called to order by Mayor Lewis at 7:00 p.m. followed by the PRESENT: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny, Councimembers Lathrop, Barakat and Hale  those times.  MEETING CALLED TO ORDER:  Pledge of Allegiance.  ROLL CALL:  ABSENT: None  STAFF: City Manager Kearney, City Attorney Reisman, Cody Howing (RKA), City Clerk Saldana, Management Analyst Musa Councilmember Hale made a motion to approve the agenda to proceed with City business. Councimember Barakat seconded Councilmember has the responsibility to disclose direct or indirect potential for a personal financial impact as a result of participation in the decision-making process concerning Councimember Barakat stated that he needs to recuse himself from the decision-making process concerning Agenda Item #2 (Appeal of the Planning Commission Decision for 734 Braewood Drive) because he resides within 500 feet of734 Braewood Drive. All items on the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a Councilmember requests otherwise, in which case the item will be removed and considered by separate action. All Resolutions and Ordinances for Second Reading on the Consent Calendar are deemed to "waive further reading and A. Minutes: Special Meeting of December 9, 2020 B. Minutes: Regular Meeting of December 15, 2020 C. Resolution No. 21-01: Demands & Warrants for. January 2021 D. Monthly Investment Report for the month of December 2020  APPROVAL OF AGENDA:  the motion which carried unanimously.  DISCLOSURE OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY Inc compliance with the California Political Reform Act, each City  GOV.CODE SECTION 1090 & 81000  ET SEQ,:  agenda items.  PUBLIC COMMENT: CONSENT CALENDAR:  None  adopt."  E. Conflict ofl Interest Code  Minutes CC Meeting January 19, 2021 Page 1of7    F. Resolution No. 21-02: AF Resolution oft the City Council oft the City of Bradbury Authorizing Application for, andF Receipt of, Local Government Planning Support Grant Program Funds Councimember Barakat made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Councilmember Hale seconded the motion, which was carried by the following roll  MOTION TO. APPROVE CONSENT CALENDAR: APPROVED:  call vote:  AYES: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny, Councilmembers Lathrop, Barakat and Hale  NOES: None ABSENT: None Motion passed 5:0  COUNCILMEMBER BARAKAT RECUSED: Councilmember Barakat recused himself from the decision- APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION City Manager Planner Kasama stated that Minor Architectural  making process regarding the appeal for 734 Braewood Drive because he lives within 500 feet of the subject property. Review Nos. 18-009 and 20-007 were referred to the Planning Commission for the exterior finish of the residence, the re- landscaping of the front yard, and the expansion of the driveway at 734 Braewood Drive. The Planning Commission considered the project at its July 22 and August 26, 2020 meetings, and continued the hearing for the homeowner to provide complete plans and material samples. These were presented at the December 2, 2020 meeting. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 20-290 to conditionally approve the project with additional stone veneer to be added to the garage, additional landscaping to be planted along the north property line to screen the recreational vehicle parking area, and repaint the house with a color that is more compatible with the neighborhood. The homeowner appealed the Planning Commission Decision on December 11, 2020. All aspects of the proposal comply with the Development Code and the project is Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Itis recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 21-003 to approve the appeal and amend the Planning Commission decision to allow the house to be finished with the Mayor Lewis stated that the City Council is puzzled about the controversy as all four Councilmembers stated that they have Nicholas D'Amico, Attorney at law, representing the homeowners of 734 Braewood Drive, stated that his clients also object to planting additional landscaping along the north property line to screen the recreational vehicle. Mayor Lewis opened the discussion for public comment.  DECISION FOR734 BRAWOOD DRIVE:  RECOMMENDATION:  color Larkspur.  DISCUSSION:  no issue with the color of the house.  PUBLIC COMMENT:  Minutes CC Meeting January 19, 2021 Page 2of7    Kevin Stiver, 722 Braewood Drive, property owner to the north, stated his objection to the 35-foot long, 9-foot high recreational vehicle being parked right along the shared property line. Mr. Stiver stated that the RV would stick above the fence by at least 4 feet. Mr. Stiver also said that if someone was to live in the RV they could look right into his bedroom and bathroom Mr. D'Amico stated that no one is going to live in the RV and the parking location meets all code requirements. City Planner Kasama added that the Bradbury Municipal Code does not allow people to live in RVs, sO there would be no privacy issue. Melani Jayasinghe, 734 Braewood Drive, stated there are no City guidelines regarding RV parking and that the only issue was the screening with additional landscaping. Mayor Lewis asked Melani what her concern was about planting trees. Is it about cost? Melani replied that it would be unfair, because no one else in the City had to it. Councimember Lathrop stated that painting the window frames a contrasting color would enhance the appearance of the house. Melani replied that 9 out of 10 neighbors are fine with the way the house is painted right now and that the additional stone veneer the Planning Commission asked for has been Councimember Hale stated that he no issue with the color, but thought that screening the RV was an issue. City Planner Kasama stated that there are no setback requirements for RV Councimember Lathrop stated that he is fine with the color, highlights would be nice, and that the RV: screening is an issue for a future ordinance. The City does not have regulations right Mayor Lewis closed the discussion for public comment. Councimember Lathrop made a motion to approve the appeal and amend the Planning Commission's conditional approval. Councimember Hale made a substitute motion to approve the appeal in regards to the color, but to require the additional landscaping to screen the RV. Councimember Hale asked the ifthe City Council could require the property owner to pave the driveway all the way to the back of the property. City Planner Kasama stated that there is already an accessory structure in the back of the property. Melani added that the property is not level and that trees would have to be removed. Councimember Hale's motion died due to al lack of second. Mayor Lewis seconded Councilmember Lathrop's motion.  windows.  added.  parking.  now.  PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED: FIRST MOTION: SECOND MOTION:  Minutes CC Meeting January 19, 2021 Page 3 of7    RESTATE MOTION:  Councilmember Lathrop made a motion to approve Resolution AF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION WITH A CATEGORICAL EXCEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYACT (CEQA) TO APPROVE AN APPEAL. AND AMEND THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ADPTING RESOLUTION NO. PC 20-290 TO CONDITIONALLY APPROVE THE EXTERIOR FINISHING OF THE RESIDENCE UNDER MINOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NO. MAR 18-009 AND TO AFFIRM THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF THE RE- LANDSCAPING OF THE FRONT YARD AND EXPANSION OF THE DRIVEWAY UNDER MINOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NO. MAR-20-007 Mayor Lewis seconded the motion, which was carried by the  No. 21-003:  AT734BRAEWOODDRVE following roll vote: AYES: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny, Councilmember Lathrop NOES: Councimember Hale ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Councilmember Barakat Motion passed 3:1  APPROVED:  COUNCILMEMBER BARAKAT: UPDATING ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NO. 12-01: (FILM POLICY)  Councilmember Barakat re-joined the Zoom meeting. Management Analyst Musa stated that in accordance with Bradbury Municipal Code Section 13.01.340, the City of Bradbury issues film permits to businesses and individuals who wish to film on public or private property within the City limits. Filming activities include, but are not limited to, all onsite preparation (prep), filming and all breakdown (strike) activities. Itis important to include, in writing, the desired role of the Community Services Officer (CSO) to formalize the filming Itis recommended that the City Council approve the updated Mayor Lewis made a motion to approve the updated Film Policy to include the role of the Community Services Officer (CSO). Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny seconded the motion, which was  process in the City of Bradbury. Film Policy to include the role of the CSO.  RECOMMENDATION: MOTION:  carried by the following roll vote: AYES: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny, Councimembers Lathrop, Barakat and Hale  APPROVED:  NOES: None ABSENT: None Motion passed 5:0  Minutes CC Meeting January 19, 2021 Page 4 of7    MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITHT THE CITIES City Manager Kearney stated that the City of Arcadia solicited OF ARCADIA, BRADBURY, DUARTE, MONROVIA, bids to implement the continuation of the Coordinated SIERRA MADRE, THE COUNTY OFL LOS ANGELES, Integrated Monitoring Plan (CIMP) for the Rio Hondo/San AND COST SHARING OF THE AGREEMENT WITH Arcadia, Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia and Sierra Madre, the  ANDLOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION CWE INC. FORI IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM ("CIMP") FOR THE RIOI HONDOISAN GABRIEL RIVER WATER QUALITY GROUP: RECOMMENDATION:  Gabriel River Water Quality Group's Watershed Management Program (WMP) Plan. The Group, consisting of the cities of County of Los Angeles as well as the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, has agreed to prepare al Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to aid in the administration, implementation Itis recommended that the City Council approve the Memorandum of Agreement with the cities of Arcadia, Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia and Sierra Madre, the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District regarding the administration and cost sharing of the Agreement, with Bradbury's cost share totaling $211,148.52 It_is also recommended that the City Council approve an amendment to the 2020-2021 budget to increase account number 102-15-7075 (Utility Users Tax Fund) by $42,229.70 to In2013, the Bradbury City Council approved al Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the cities of Arcadia, Azusa, Duarte, Monrovia and Sierra Madre, the County ofl Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for cost sharing and development of both the Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) and the CIMP plans for the Rio Hondo/San Gabriel River watershed. These plans were submitted to the Regional Board on July 28, 2014. On June 29, 201, the CIMP In2 2014, the Bradbury City Council worked with the group to approve a three-year contract with two one-year optional extensions to CWE, which was set to expire in December 2020. The City of Azusa was a party to the original CIMP contract in 2014; however, the City of Azusa declined to participate in this Annual costs would be divided among participating agencies based on the MOU's cost sharing formula. The City of Bradbury's total cost for the monitoring program is approx. $211,148.52 over five calendar years, which translates into $42,229.70 each year, starting this year. Yearly costs will come from the City's Utility Users Tax Fund, which has sufficient Mayor Lewis asked if these costs will be ongoing beyond the next five years. Cody Howing, RKA Consulting Group, replied yes. Councimember Lathrop inquired if there were any non- recurring costs. Mr. Howing stated that the monitoring costs will  and cost sharing of the CIMP.  over the next five (5) years.  cover the costs for this calendar year.  BACKGROUND:  was approved.  new contract.  FISCAL IMPACT:  funds to cover these costs.  DISCUSSION:  remain at the same level.  Minutes CC Meeting January 19, 2021 Page 5of7    Mayor Lewis stated that the MOA cost sharing is al bad deal for Bradbury, but we are in a position to pay for it. Councilmember Barakat stated that the City of Duarte is bigger in size, has a much larger population and commercial property, and Duarte pays the same as Bradbury. Cody Howing stated that the shared costs are for the monitoring and that is why every city Councilmember Lathrop stated that according to Section 9 of the MOA the City of Arcadia can add another city without consent from the other parties. City Attorney Reisman stated that adding another city would reduce the cost for the other parties, sO why would they object? Mayor Lewis agreed with Councimember Lathrop and suggested that the City Council should approve the MOA with a modification that all cities have Councimember Lathrop made a motion to approve the Memorandum of Agreement as modified (SECTION 9.F = Additional Participants). Councilmember Hale seconded the motion, which was carried by thet following roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny, Councilmembers Lathrop and Hale NOES: Councilmember Barakat ABSENT: None Motion passed 4:0  pays the same amount.  toconsent to adding another participant.  MOTION:  APPROVED:  MATTERS FROM THE CITY MANAGER:  City Manager Kearney stated that the City Council needs to pick a date for a Special Meeting during the first week of February to approve the contract with a consultant for the City's Housing Element Update. The Special Meeting was scheduled  for Monday, February 1,2021 ate 6:00p.m.  MATTERS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY: MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL: MAYORLEWIS: MAYOR PRO-TEM BRUNY: COUNCILMEMBER LATHROP: COUNCILMEMBER BARAKAT: COUNCILMEMBER HALE: ITEMS FORI FUTURE AGENDAS:  Nothing to report Nothing to report Nothing to report Nothing to report  Councimember Barakat stated that he was selected to sit on a committee to review new County Sanitation rates.  Nothing to report  Councilmember Barakat would like to discuss regulations for motor home parking in the side yard setback areas.  CLOSED SESSION None  PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING CLOSED SESSION ONLY:  Minutes CC Meeting January 19, 2021 Page 6 of7    RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION  A. Pending Litigation litigation. One potential case).  AT7:25 PM:  Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 45956.9(d)(4) (Based on existing facts and circumstances, the legislative body of the local agency has decided to initiate or is deciding whether to initiate The City Council instructed the City Attorney and City Manager as to how to proceed. No formal votes were requested or Mayor Lewis adjourned the meeting to a Special Meeting on  REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION:  taken.  ADJOURNMENT:  Monday, February 1, 2021 at 16:00, p.m.  MAYOR-CITY OF BRADBURY  ATTEST:  CITY CLERK- CITY OF BRADBURY  Minutes CC Meeting January 19, 2021 Page 7of7    MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY  HELD ON  DBAFT  MONDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2021  EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 25-20:  Pursuant to Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-25-20, the City is allowing Council Members, Staff and the public to participate in this City Council meeting by means of a Zoom video or telephone call. Participants will be able to hear the entire proceedings (other than the Closed Session) and be able to speak during Public Comment, Public Hearing, and other authorized times. Members of the public must maintain silence and mute their microphones and telephones except during The Adjourned Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bradbury was called to order by Mayor Lewis at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny, Councilmembers Lathrop, Barakat and Hale  those times.  MEETING CALLED TO ORDER:  ROLL CALL:  ABSENT: None None  STAFF: City Manager Kearney and City Attorney Reisman  PUBLIC COMMENT: APPROVAL OF SERVICES WITH JHD PLANNING, LCCI FOR COMPLETION OF BRADBURY'S 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT:  City Manager Kearney stated the City underwent two (2) Requests for Proposal (RFP) in 2020 for the City's Housing Element Update. The first RFP resulted in zero bids. Staff released a second RFP that resulted in al bid from Kimley-Horn in the amount of $194,150. At the December meeting, the City Council deemed Kimley-Horn's bid too high for the scope of work and rejected the bid. The City Council then directed staff tos seek any competent professional to perform the necessary services to timely adopt the Housing Element Update. After conversing with consultants, staff received a proposal from Staff feels that JHD Planning, LLC is qualified to perform such services, as they have prepared approximately 100 certified housing elements since the 1980s. Additionally, the consultant has experience preparing Housing Elements for smaller cities like Hidden Hills, La Habra Heights, Rolling Hills Estates, Palos City Manager Kearney added that Karen Warner Associates, who prepared the City's previous Housing Element Update, was too busy and did not submit a proposal. City Manager Kearney stated that the City has applied for a non-competitive grant in the amount of $65,000 to cover the cost of the Housing Element Update.  JHD Planning, LLLC for $63,000.  Verdes Estates and' Villa Park.  GRANT:  Minutes CC Meeting February 1, 2021 Page 1 of2    RECOMMENDATION:  Itis recommended that the City Council approve the proposal from JHD Planning, LLC in the amount of $63,000 and approve the Professional Services Agreement with JHD Planning, LLC tou update the City's 6th Cycle Housing Element. It is also recommended that the City Council amend the FY 2020-2021 budget to include an additional appropriation of $63,000 to Councimember Lathrop had a comment regarding Section 6.7 (Indemnification and Hold Harmless) of the Agreement. Councimember Lathrop questioned why the City should indemnify the contractor. City Attorney Reisman stated that iti is not unreasonable and a standard clause to indemnify each other. The City is getting a tremendous price and willingness by the contractor to get it done in time and there is no reason that the City Council should not approve the contract. Councimember Barakat made a motion to approve the proposal from JHD Planning, LLC in the amount of $63,000, approve the Professional Services Agreement with JHD Planning, LLC to update the City's 6th Cycle Housing Element, and an amendment to the FY 2020-2021 budget to include an additional appropriation of $63,000 to account 101-20-7245. Councimember Hale seconded the motion, which was carried  account number 101-20-7245.  DISCUSSION:  MOTION:  by the following roll vote: NOES: None ABSENT: None Motion passed 5:0  APPROVED:  AYES: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro-Tem Bruny, Councilmembers Lathrop, Barakat and Hale  ADJOURNMENT:  At 6:13 pm Mayor Lewis adjourned the meeting to a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 7:00 p.m.  MAYOR - CITY OF BRADBURY  ATTEST:  CITY CLERK- CITY OF BRADBURY  Minutes CC Meeting February 1,2021 Page 2 of2    RESOLUTION NO. 21-04  AI RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS AND' WARRANTS NO. 16312 THROUGH NO. 16326 AND DEMANDS AND WARRANTS NO. 16327 THROUGH NO. 16340  (PRE-RELEASED CHECKS) (REGULAR CHECKS)  The City Council oft the City of Bradbury does hereby resolve as follows:  Section 1. That the demands as set forth hereinafter are approved and warrants authorized to be drawn for payment from said demands in the amount of $1,685.82 (pre-released Checks) and $38,215.34 at February 16,  2021 from the General Checking Account.  PRE-RELEASED CHECKS (due before City Council Meeting):  Check Name and 16213  Description  Amount  (Due Date) California. American Water (2/2/21)  600 Winston Ave (City Hall) Acct. #101-16-6400 301 Mt Olive Drive Irrigation 2410 Mt Olive Lane Irrigation 2256 Gardi Street Acct. #200-48-6400 06-Jan-2021 Cleaning 12-Jan-2021 Cleaning 20-Jan-2021 Cleaning Acct. #101-16-6460 Disability Access and Education Fee Quarterly Report for. Jul-Sep 2020 Acct. #101-00-4350 Disability Access and Education Fee Quarterly Report for Oct-Dec 2020 Acct. #101-00-4350 27-Jan-2021 Cleaning Acct. #101-16-6460 Dental Insurance: City Manager (family) Acct. #101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. #101-13-5100  $347.55 $123.46 $45.38 $26.47 $130.00 $105.00 $105.00  $542.86  16314 Molly Maid  (1/20/21)  $340.00 $12.30 $9.60 $105.00  16315  Division of the State Architect (9/30/20) 16316 Division of the State Architect (12/31/20) 16317 Molly Maid (1/27/21) 16318 Deltal Dental (2/1/21)  $131.43 $42.88  $174.31  Reso. No. 21-04 Page 1of6 February 16,2021    Check Name and 16319 Vision Service Plan  Description Vision Insurance: City Manager (family) Acct. #101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. #101-13-5100 Management Analyst Acct. #101-13-5100 Basic Life and AD&D: City Manager Acct. #101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. #101-13-5100 Management Analyst Acct. #101-13-5100 Street Lights for Mt. Olive/Gardi Acct. #200-48-6400 City Hall Utilities Acct. #101-16-6400 City Hall Utilities Acct. #101-16-6400 Office Supplies Acct. #101-16-6200  Amount  (Due Date) (2/1/21)  $61.07 $23.66 $23.66 $9.25 $9.25 $9.25  $108.39  16320 The Standard  (2/1/21)  $27.75 $36.76 $168.67 $25.26 $114.97 $14.55 $5.40  16321  Southern California Edison (2/16/21) 16322 Southern California Edison (2/16/21) 16323 The Gas Company (2/16/21) 16324 Staples Credit Plan (2/15/21) 16325 Dept. of Conservation (12/31/20) California Building Standards Commission (12/31/20)  Fee Report: Strong Motion Instrumentation and Seismic Hazard Mapping Feet for Oct-Dec 2020  Acct. #101-20-7220 SB1473 Fee Report Form Building Standards Administration Special Revolving Fund Oct-Dec 2020 Acct. #101-20-7220  16326  Total Pre-Released Checks  $1,685.82  Reso. No. 21-04 Page 2of6 February 16,2021    REGULAR CHECKS: Check 16327  Name and (Due Date) Best Best &Krieger (1/22/21) Jones & Mayer (1/31/21)  Description  Amount $943.59  Riol Hondo-San Gabriel Watershed Advocacy December 2020 Professional Services Acct. #102-42-7630(UT, City Attorney: January Retainer Acct. #101-15-7020 243 Barranca Receivership Acct. #101-23-7450 Chadwick Ranch Acct. #103-00-2039 Code Enforcement Acct. #101-23-7450 Zoning/General Plan Acct. #101-15-7075 Monthly Cell Phone. Allowance Acct. #101-12-6440 Transportation Services for Feb 2021 Acct. #204-40-7325 (Prop C) Animal Control Services for. Jan: 2021 Acct. #101-25-7000 Service Call: Restored FACP System Radio Communication City Halll Monitoring for Mar 2021 Fire & Intrusion: Systems Acct. #101-23-7420 Feb 2021 Landscape Services: Bradbury Civic Center Acct. #101-21-7020 Royal Oaks Drive North Acct. #101-21-7015 Lemon Trail Acct. #101-21-7045 Mt. Olive Drive Entryway & Trail Acct. #101-21-7035  16328  $2,650.00 $3,139.90 $5,525.00 $450.00 $125.00  $11,889.90 $75.00 $704.07 $448.98  16329 16330 16331 16332  Kevin Kearney (Feb 2021) City of Monrovia (2/4/21) Pasadena Humane Society (1/31/21) Post Alarm Systems (1/21 &2 2/5/21)  $247.50 $122.34  $369.84  16333  Priorityl Landscape Services, LLC (1/1/21)  $204.12 $402.41 $134.14 $542.38  $1,283.05  Reso. No. 21-04 Page 3of6 February 16, 2021    Check 16334  Name and (Due Date) RKA Consulting Group (1/20/21)  Description Chadwick Ranch Acct. #103-00-2039 Bradbury/Widrose Street Widening Acct. #200-48-7750 Winston/Lemon Trail Acct. #101-19-7230 City Engineering Services Acct. #101-19-7230 Development Projects Acct. #101-19-7230 Street Lights Acct. #200-48-6410 Computer Services Acct. #113-20-8120 Custody Charges for Dec 2020 Safekeeping Fees Acct. #101-14-7010 Claudia Saldana Visa Card: MyFax Acct. #101-16-6230 USPS (stamps) Acct. #101-16-6120 Acct. #101-20-6120 Alliance Forl Innovation (Govapalooza) Acct. #101-16-6020 Kevin Kearney' Visa Card: League of California Cities Acct.. 101-12-6020 Information Forecast/Virtual Conference Protecting your City from' Wildfire ACCt.#101-24-6020 Beenverified.com Acct.. 101-23-7450 Broadvoice Acct. #101-16-6440 Sophia Musa Visa Card: Rite Aid (City Hall supplies) Acct.. 101-16-6450 Quality Matrix International, Inc. Ham Radio Certification Acct. #101-24-6010  Amount  $140.00 $2,250.00 $1,863.75 $1,029.00 $7,985.25  (1/21/21)  $13,268.00 $839.39 $595.00 $29.75  16335 16336 16337 16338  Southern Calif Edison (2/2/21) TeamLogici IT (2/1/21) U.S. Bank (12/31/20) U.S. Bank Corporate Payment Systems (01/22/21)  $20.00 $110.00 $149.50 $279.50 $325.00 $495.00 $52.44 $169.68 $1,042.12 $30.46 $75.00 $105.46  16338  U.S. Bank Corporate Payment Systems (01/22/21)  16338  U.S. Bank Corporate Payment Systems (01/22/21)  $1,427.08  Reso. No. 21-04 Page 4of6 February16,2021    Check 16339  Name and (Due Date) VCA Code Group (01/20/21)  Description  Amount  Nov 29-Jan 02 Professional Services: City Planner (Retainer) Acct. #101-20-7210 City Planner (Hourly Services) Acct. #101-20-7240 Management Analyst (temp) Acct. #101-16-5010 Acct. #101-16-6400  $3,900.00 $1,072.50 $1,147.00  $6,119.50 $222.19 $38,215.34  16340  California American Water 600 Winston. Ave (City Hall)  (2/8/21)  Total Regular Checks  FEBRUARY 2021 PAYROLL:  ACH  Kevin Kearney (Feb: 2021)  Salary: City Manager Acct. #101-12-5010 Withholdings Acct. #101-00-2011 Salary: City Clerk Acct. #101-13-5010 Withholdings Acct. #101-00-2011 Salary: Management Analyst Acct. #101-16-5010 Withholdings Acct. #101-00-2011 PERS Employee Share Acct. #101-16-5100 Finance Director (Jan 2021) 21.83x$ $82.94/hour Acct. #101-14-5010 Withholdings Acct. #101-00-2011  $10,000.00 (2,235.61) $5,118.67 (1,284.45) $4,583.33 (879.41) (309.37) $1,361.61 (174.18)  $7,764.39  ACH  Claudia Saldana (Feb 2021)  $3,834.22  ACH  Sophia Freyre (Feb 2021)  $3,394.55  ACH  Lisal Bailey (Feb: 2021)  $1,187.43  Totai December Payroli $16,180.59  Reso. No. 21-04 Page! 5of6 February 16,2021    ELECTRONIC FUND' TRANSFER (EFT) PAYMENTSFORI FEBRUARY: 2021:  EFT  Aetna (Febz 2021)  Health Insurance for Feb 2021: City Manager Acct. #101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. #101-13-5100 State Tax Withholdings SDI Acct. #101-00-2011 Federal Tax Withholdings Social Security Medicare (Employee's portion of Social Security and Medicare is matched by the City) Acct. #101-00-2011 City Manager Acct. #101-12-5100 City Clerk Acct. #101-13-5100 Management Analyst Acct. #101-16-5100 Unfunded Accrued Liability UAL Payment (Classic) UAL Payment (PEPRA) Acct. #101-16-6240  $1,565.52 $961.98 $792.86 $252.76 $1,916.66 $2,611.90 $610.84  $2,527.50  EFT EFT  EDD (Feb 2021) Dept. of Treasury Internal Revenue Service (Feb: 2021)  $1,045.62  $5,139.40  EFT  California PERS (Feb2021)  $1,570.07 $799.11 $663.75 $508.72 $15.55  $3,032.93  EFT  California PERS (Feb2021)  $524.27  MAYOR-CITYC OFE BRADBURY  ATTEST:  CITY CLERK-C CITY OF BRADBURY  "I, Claudia Saldana, City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 21-04, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Bradbury, California, at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of  February 2021 by thei following roll call vote:"  AYES: NOES: ABSENT:  CITY CLERK - CITY OFI BRADBURY  Reso. No. 21-04 Page 6of6 February 16, 2021    usbank. U.S BANCORP SERVICE CENTER P.O. Box 6343 Fargo, ND 58125-6343  CITY OF BRADBURY ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-0470-0126-883 STATEMENT DATE TOTAL ACTIVITY  01-22-21 $279.50  lwpapPparnwAMImP 00000371901 SP 0.560 106481293742104P CLAUDIA A SALDANA CITY OF BRADBURY 600 WINSTON AVENUE BRADBURY CA 91008-1123  "MEMO STATEMENT ONLY" DO NOT REMIT PAYMENT  FEB0121  NEW ACCOUNT, ACTIVITY  POST TRAN DATE- TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION 12-24 12-23 MYFAX *PROTUS IP SOLN 866-563-9212 CA 01-05 01-04 USPS PO 0522740820 DUARTE CA  REFERENCE NUMBER 2469271603581007246390 5968 241974610050101208395 9402 110.00  MCC AMOUNT 20.00  DATE  PUR ID: 33846171 TAX: 0.00 PUR ID: None TAX: 0.00 PUR ID: TLG Govapalooza TAX:0.00  8641 149.50  01-07 01-06 ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION 303-909-9052 AZ 489.30910082008700050  CK#16338  Del  Default Accounting Code:  ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-0470.0126-4883 STATEMENT DATE DISPUTED. AMOUNT 01-22-21  ACCOUNT SUMMARY PREVIOUS BALANCE PURCHASES & OTHER CHARGES CASH ADVANCES CASH ADVANCEI FEE CREDITS TOTAL ACTIVITY  CUSTOMER SERVICE CALL 800-344-5696  $.00 $279.50 $.00 $.00 $.00 $279.50  $.00  SEND BILLING INQUIRIES TO: C/OU.S. BANCORP SERVICE CENTER, INC U.S. BANK NATIONAL. ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 6335 FARGO, ND 58125-6335  AMOUNT DUE $0.00 DO NOT REMIT  COPYRIGHT 2005 U.S. BANKI NATIONAL ASSOCIATION  PAGE10F1    usbank. U.S BANCORP SERVICE CENTER P.O. Box 6343 Fargo, ND 58125-6343  CITY OF BRADBURY ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-0446-0277-2711 STATEMENT DATE TOTAL ACTIVITY  01-22-21 $1,042.12  pl'" u y  00000371701 SP 0.560 106481293742102P KEVIN KEARNEY CITY OF BRADBURY 600 WINSTON AVENUE BRADBURY CA 91008-1123  "MEMO STATEMENT ONLY" DO NOT REMIT PAYMENT  FEB010021  NEW ACCOUNT: ACTIMITY  POST TRAN  DATE DATE., TRANSACTION DESCRIPYION. 12-23 12-22 CACITIES REGISTRATION CACITIES.ORG CA 01-07 01-06 INFORMATION FORECAST 818-8884445 CA 01-08 01-07 VOBENVERFEDCOM 855-9046471 NY 01-15 01-14 BROADVOICE 888-325-5875 CA  REFERENCE NUMBER  MCC AMOUNT 8699 325.00  PUR ID: opsntcny8cswj TAX:0.00 PUR ID: 42440559280 TAX: 0.00 PURI ID: 11355231822074953142 TAX: 0.00 PUR ID: 2792881472 TAX:0.00  210/4100.001528417 7399 495.00 A00AT0O/AT3TIRSAT7 5968 24455101407049407246 4814 169.68  52.44  CA# 16338  Dee  Default Accounting Code:  ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-0446-0277-2711 STATEMENT DATE DISPUTED. AMOUNT 01-22-21  ACCOUNT SUMMARY PREVIOUS BALANCE PURCHASES& OTHER CHARGES CASHADVANCES CASH ADVANCE FEE CREDITS TOTAL ACTIVITY  CUSTOMER SERVICE CALL 800-344-5696  $.00 $1.042.12 $.00 $.00 $.00 $1,042.12  $.00  SEND BILLING INQUIRIES TO: C/OU.S. BANCORP SERVICE CENTER, INC U.S. BANKI NATIONAL ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 6335 FARGO, ND 58125-6335  AMOUNT DUE $0.00 DONOTI REMIT  COPYRIGHT 2005 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION  PAGE10F1    usbank. U.S BANCORP SERVICE CENTER P.O. Box 6343 Fargo, ND 58125-6343  CITY OF BRADBURY ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-0446-5320-2800 STATEMENT DATE TOTAL ACTIVITY  01-22-21 $105.46  Mlillll 00000371801 SP 0.560 106481293742103P SOPHIA MUSA CITY OF BRADBURY 600 WINSTON AVENUE BRADBURY CA 91008-1123  "llr  "MEMO STATEMENT ONLY" DO NOT REMIT PAYMENT  FEB01.2021  NEW ACCOUNT ACTIVITY  POST TRAN TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION 01-11 01-08 RITE AID 05528 DUARTE CA 01-21 01-20 PAYPAL "QUALITYMATR: 402-935-7733 CA  REFERENCE NUMBER 2431061008380017254 5912 4625102042202001 8249 75.00  MCC AMOUNT 30.46  DATE DATE  PUR ID: 00171257 TAX:0.00 PUR ID: 60821809 TAX: 0.00  CR#16336  nee  Default Accounting Code:  ACCOUNT NUMBER 4246-0446-5320-2600 STATEMENT DATE DISPUTED AMOUNT 01-22-21  ACCOUNT SUMMARY PREVIOUS BALANCE. PURCHASES & OTHER CHARGES CASH ADVANCES CASH ADVANCE FEE CREDITS TOTAL ACTIVITY  CUSTOMER SERVICE CALL 800-344-5696  $.00 $105.46 $.00 $.00 $.00 $105.46  $.00  SEND BILLING INQUIRIES TO: C/O U.S. BANCORP SERVICE CENTER, INC U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 6335 FARGO, ND 58125-6335  AMOUNT DUE $0.00 DONOT REMIT  COPYRIGHT 2005 U.S. BANK NATIONAL  PAGE10F1    Remitp payment andn make checks payableto: STAPLES CREDITF PLAN DEPT11-005837241 POBOXS 9001036 LOUISVILLE, KY 40290-1036  INVOICE DETAIL  Staples  BILLTO: CITYOFE BRADBURY  SHIPTO: CITY OFE BRADBURY 600 WINSTONST BRADBURY CA 91008  Acct: 6011 10005 5337: 241 CLAUDIA SALDANA  Amount Due: Trans Date: DUEDATE:  Invoice #: 2741106191 $8.03 $47.99 $56.02 $5.32 $61.34 Invoice #: 2742438831 $63.99 -$34.00 $29.99 $2.85 $32.84 Invoice #: 2752019551 $37.99 -$17.00 -$2.00 $18.99 $1.80 $20.79  $61.34 PO:  01/05/21 1.0000E EA 1.0000EA SUBTOTAL TAX TOTAL  02/15/21 Store: 100088887, WESTBORO, MA $8.03 $47.99  PRODUCT 2021 ATAGLANCE 6X35LOO AVERY EASYF PEELI LASER ADD Purchased by: CLAUDIA! SALDANA Order #: 9826284990  SKU# 24428861 209908  QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE  BILLTO: CITY OFE BRADBURY  SHIP TO: CITY OFE BRADBURY 600 WINSTONST BRADBURY CA 91008  Acct: 6011 10005 5337: 241 CLAUDIA: SALDANA  Amount Due: Trans Date: DUEI DATE:  $32.84 PO:  01/06/21 1.0000EA 1.0000ST SUBTOTAL TAX TOTAL  02/15/21 Store: 100088887, WESTBORO, MA $63.99 -$34.00  PRODUCT HAMMERMILL COPY PLUSF PAPE 122374 COUPONDISCOUNT Purchased by: CLAUDIASALDANA Order #: 9826284990  SKU# 558100  QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTALI PRICE  u f  BILLTO: CITYOFE BRADBURY  SHIPT TO: CITY OFE BRADBURY 6001 WINSTONST BRADBURY CA 91008  Acct: 6011 10005337241 CLAUDIA SALDANA  Amount Due: Trans Date: DUEI DATE:  $20.79 PO:  01/15/21 1.0000E EA 1.0000ST 1.0000ST SUBTOTAL TAX TOTAL  02/15/21 Store: 100088887, WESTBORO, MA $37.99 -$17.00 -$2.00  PRODUCT VERBATIM PINSTRIPE 8GB US COUPONDISCOUNT COUPONDISCOUNT Purchased by: CLAUDIASALDANA Order #: 9826999189  SKU# 1913050 558100 558099  QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE  nee Chek# 16324  Page 7of8  1-800-669-5285 StaplesCommercialaccountonline.com    AA  6  SA  f 00    Revenues  Acct. Number General Fund:  2019-20  2019-20  2020-21 Budget  2020-21 YTD @ 12/31/20 44,815 5,498 6,613 4,602 12,131  Account Description  Budget YTD @ 06/30/20 495,000 466,415 18,500 17,859 12,000 10,674 7,500 1,500 23,000 25,750 19,000 18,321 37,000 38,058 2,600 38,000 40,285 18,000 19,267 14,000 19,714 140,000 141,339 1,500 2,000 40,700 35,412 15,000 1,600 5,000 25,000 73,112 250,000 88,887 250,000 91,735 5,500 27,000 1,050 1,000 135,000 53,417 77,712 68,873 400 200 4,820 3,000 100  101-00-4000 Operating Transfers In 101-00-4010 Property Tax-Current Secured 101-00-4030 Property Tax-Current Unsecured 101-00-4050 Property Tax Prior Year 101-00-4060 Public Safety Augmentation F 101-00-4070 Delinquent Taxes 101-00-4100 Sales & Use Tax 101-00-4110 Franchise Fee-Cable TV 101-00-4120 Franchise Fee-SC Edison 101-00-4130 Franchise Fee-SC Refuse 101-00-4140 Franchise Fee-SC Gas Co. 101-00-4150 Franchise Fee-Cal Am Water 101-00-4160 AB939 Refuse. Admin. Fee 101-00-4190 Real Property Transfer Tax 101-00-4200 Motor' Vehicle In-Lieu 101-00-4210 Dist & Bail Forfeiture 101-00-4220 Fines-City 101-00-4350 Business License 101-00-4360 Movie & TV Permits 101-00-4370 Bedroom License Fee 101-00-4410 Variances & CUPS 101-00-4420 Lot Line AdjustmentZone. Changes 101-00-4440 Subdivisions/Lot Splits 101-00-4460 Planning! Dept. Review 101-00-4470 Building Construction Permit 101-00-4480 Building Plan Check Fees 101-00-4485 Landscape Plan Check Permit 101-00-4490 Green Code Compliance 101-00-4500 Civic Center Rental Fee 101-00-4530 Environmental & Other Fees 101-00-4540 City Engineering Plan Check 101-00-4600 Interest Income 101-00-4700 Sales of Maps & Publications 101-00-4800 Other Revenue 101-00-4850 Cal-Am Loan Repayment 101-00-4900 Reimbursements 101-00-4920 Sale of Prop. AF Funds 101-23-4950 Vacant Property Registry Fee 101-24-4610 Donations Utility Users Tax Fund: 102-00-4600 Interest 102-00-4830 Electric Deposits Fund:  94% 430,000 234,394 97% 14,000 15,709 (62) #DIV/O! 89% 10,000 6,945 93% 6,000 1,075 72% 1,200 112% 26,000 96% 20,000 103% 38,000 19,657 3,213 124% 3,000 106% 40,000 107% 18,000 141% 20,000 11,804 101% 140,000 71,695 150% 2,000 93% 1,000 87% 40,000 17,112 0% 10,000 102% 1,500 #DIV/O! 0% 292% 70,000 16,366 36% 85,000 29,682 37% 90,000 30,536 2,793 51% 3,500 9,084 34% 6,500 900 86% 900 1,112 111% 1,300 40% 50,000 43,077 89% 50,000 14,571 125 31% 200 0% 4,820 100% 4,820 1,231 41% 500 15,856 #DIV/O! 100 100% 100 500 #DIV/O!  55% 112% #DIV/O! 55% 110% 384% 47% 0% 52% 0% 0% 0% 59% 51% 20% 346% 43% 0% 0% #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 23% 35% 34% 1,510 43% 3,219 50% 0% 742 57% 86% 29% 15 8% #DIV/O! 0% 3171% #DIV/O! 0% #DIV/O! 51% 38% 38%  2,257 1,866 30,900 #DIV/O! 1,635  402 3,460 2,060 #DIV/O!  Total General Fund Revenues 1,672,682 1,277,612  76% 1,183,520 605,526  18,810 14,859 18,810 14,859  79% 79%  10,000 10,000 244,209 78,209 244,209 78,209 3,000 300 3,300  3,830 2 3,832  103-00-2039 Chadwick Ranch Development Long Term Planning Fee Fund: 112-00-4490 Long-Term Planning Fee 112-00-4600 LTP Fee Interest Income  252,530 252,530 3,490 367 3,857  8,000 400 8,400  44% 92% 46%  1,233 62 1,295  41% 21% 39%  1of3    Revenues 2019-20 Budget YTD @ 06/30/20 18,500 1,000 19,500  Acct. Number Technology Fee Fund: 113-00-4520 Technology Fee 113-00-4600 Technology Fee Interest Income  2019-20 7,094 913 8,007 1,211 #DIV/O! 191 #DIV/O!  2020-21 Budget 38% 7,000 91% 800 41% 7,800 1,200 23,700 15,943 13,500 13,500 25,094 12,397 300 91% 25,394 12,613 91% 20,813 10,283 92% 20,813 10,384  2020-21 YTD @1 12/31/20 3,553 215 3,768  Account Description  51% 27% 48% 0% 71% 67% #DIV/O! 8,335 62% 134 #DIV/O! 8,469 63% 49% 216 72% 50% 49% 50% 0% 0% 100% 33% #DIV/O! 97% #DIV/O! 6 #DIV/O! 6 #DIV/O! 73 73 6,593 306 6,899 8,779 180 8,959  Gas Tax Fund: 200-00-4200 TCRAFunds 200-00-4600 Gas Tax Interest 200-48-4260 Gas Tax SB1 Gas Tax Fund: 201-00-4000 Transfers In 201-48-4260 Gas Tax 201-00-4600 Gas Taxl Interest Prop. Al Fund:  74 #DIV/O!  25,000 28,773 25,000 30,175 15,000 18,653 15,000 18,866 23,000 20,741 308 23,308 21,221 19,000 17,204 19,000 17,414 5,000 5,000 600,000 600,000 885 10,551 1192% 600,885 610,551  115% 22,500 15,869  121% #DIV/O! 124% 213 #DIV/O! 126% 90% 156%  203-40-4260 Prop.. A Transit Funds 203-40-4600 Prop. A Transit Interest Prop. C Fund: 204-48-4260 Prop. C Funds 204-48-4600 Prop. C Interest Transportation Development Act Fund: 205-48-4260 TDAI Funds 205-48-4600 TDAI Interest Sewer Fund: 206-00-4000 Transfers In 206-50-4600 Sewer Fund Interest 206-50-4730 Mount Olive Drive Assessment  480  210 #DIV/O! 5,000 100% 13 #DIV/O! 5,013 100%  101 #DIV/O!  5,000 5,000 11,000  3 #DIV/O! 3 3,652  100% 240,000 240,000 102% 251,000 243,652  #DIV/O!  STPLFund: 208-00-4260 STPL Funds 208-00-4600 STPL Interest Recycling Grant Fund: 209-00-4260 Recycling Grant Funds 209-00-4600 Recycling Grant Interest Measure R Fund: 210-48-4260 Measure RI Funds 210-48-4600 Measure RI Interest Measure M Fund 212-48-4260 Measure MI Funds 212-48-4600 Measure MI Interest  20 #DIV/O! 20 #DIV/O! 3,182 64% 187 #DIV/O! 3,369 67% 86% 1,019 #DIV/O! 93% 88% 462 #DIV/O! 91%  5,000 5,000 15,000 12,885 15,000 13,904 16,500 14,483 16,500 14,945  5,000 50 5,050 15,572 800 16,372 16,005 300 16,305  0% 146% 1% 42% 38% 42% 55% 60% 55%  2of3    Revenues  Acct. Number Measure W Fund 213-48-4260 Measure WI Funds 213-48-4600 Measure WI Interest Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund: 215-23-4260 COPS Funds 215-23-4600 COPs Interest County Park Grant: 217-00-4210 County Park Grant 217-00-4600 Grant Fund Interest Income  2019-20 Budget 60,000 60,000 100,000 152,399 982 100,982 156,972  2019-20 YTD @ 06/30/20  2020-21 Budget 60,000 #DIV/O! 0% 60,000 152% 100,000 156,190 155% 103,000 157,567  2020-21 YTD @ 12/31/20  Account Description  0% #DIV/O! 0% 156% 46% 153% 46% 46% 7% 23% 7%  4,573 466%  3,000  1,377  180 180 45,000 215 45,215  165 165 208 208  92% 100 92% 100 45,000 97% 150 0% 45,150  46 46 3,068 35 3,103 50,000 #DIV/O! 38 50,038  Fire Safe Grant:  219-00-4260 Community Wildfire Protection Plan 219-00-4600 Fire Safe Grant Interest Income Covid-19 Fund: 220-00-4215 COVID 19 Revenues 220-00-4600 Interest Income  Total Revenues, 2,650,462 2,449,688  92% 2,034,213 1,210,385  60%  3of3    Expenditures 2019-20 Budget  2019-20 YTD @ 06/30/20  2020-21 Budget  2020-21 YTD @ 12/31/20  Account Description  General Fund:  101-00-5000 Transfers Out City Council Division: 101-11-6500 Community Support (homelessness) 101-11-6100 Events and awards 101-11-6110 City Newsletter City Manager Division: 101-12-5010 Salaries 101-12-5100 Benefits 101-12-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-12-6025 Expense Account 101-12-6050 Mileage 101-12-6440 Cell Phone City Clerk Division: 101-13-5010 Salaries 101-13-5100 Benefits 101-13-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-13-6050 Mileage 101-13-6210 Special Department Supplies 101-13-6220 Election Supplies 101-13-6225 Codification 101-13-7000 Contract Election Services Finance Division: 101-14-5010 Salaries 101-14-5100 Benefits  600,000 600,000 4,000 6,000 10,000 109,268 120,000 46,174 3,500 1,500 1,200 1,000 162,642 176,089 61,424 24,702 50 275 500 7,000 12,000 105,951 15,449 1,371 600 500 4,000 18,000 725 40,645 31,800 5,000 1,100 37,900 48,308 13,107 1,000 200 1,000 300 300 2,500 500 15,000 3,717 3,000 1of4  100% 240,000 240,000  100% 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 58% 57% (30) -1% 507 41% 377 38% 450 45% 99,262 56% 35,831 58% 14,975 57% #DIV/O! 28 24% 0% 0% 468 9% #DIV/O! 51,302 55% 8,384 60% 908 67% 349 698% 400 40% 3,226 72% 0% 700 97% 13,967 35% 15,900 50% 14,810 592% 1,550 500 45% 32,760 93% 52% 2,114 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 120 17% 2,309 231% #DIV/O! 3,027 30% 3,670 82% 2,488 100%  3,000 75% 6,451 108% 475 #DIV/O! 9,926 99% 48,193 104% 4,853 139% 1,233 82% 910 76% 900 90% 108% 176,205 56,305 92% 29,978 121% 12 #DIV/O! 122 244% 157 57% 314 63% 3,063 44% 0% 89,951 85% 13,160 85% 1,172 85% 37 6% 1,231 246% 4,317 108% 15,300 85% 700 97% 35,917 88% 31,800 100% 4,190 84% 0% 35,990 95% 45,810 95% 15,436 118% 0% 150 75% 0% 151 50% 690 230% 814 33% 0% 9,383 63% 4,219 114% 2,557 85%  4,000 300 4,300 49,455 27,958 3,500 1,250 1,000 1,000 61,424 26,126 115 275 500 5,000 93,440 14,000 1,357 50 1,000 4,500 18,500 725 40,132 31,800 2,500 1,100 35,400 48,308 25,271 15,488 1,000 200 500 300 700 1,000 10,000 4,500 2,500  110% 120,000 70,000  101-14-6210 Special Department Supplies 101-14-6230 Contracted Computer Services 101-14-7010 Contracted Banking Services 101-14-7020 Contracted Audit Services 101-14-7040 GASB Reports City Attorney Division: 101-15-7020 City Attorney Retainer 101-15-7070 City Attorney Special Service 101-15-7075 NPDES Stormwater Compliance 101-15-7080 Seminars & Training General Government Division: 101-16-5010 Salaries 101-16-5100 Benefits 101-16-6010 Seminars & Training 101-16-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-16-6040 Transportation & Lodging 101-16-6050 Mileage 101-16-6120 Postage 101-16-6200 Office Supplies 101-16-6210 Special Departmental Supplies 101-16-6230 Computer & Website Services 101-16-6240 PERS UAL Payment 101-16-6241 PERS Replacement Benefit Contribution    Expenditures  2019-20 Budget 5,000 56,000 4,500 6,000 4,000 3,000 400 167,832 113,126 130,000 130,000 1,000 500 500 46,800 250,000 114,219 15,000 26,000 339,800 179,126 10,000 7,000 10,000 12,000 43,000 82,000 118,522 118,521 3,500 6,000 128,022 138,790 100 375 500 5,500 5,000 11,475 18,085 300 18,385 2of4  2019-20 YTD @ 06/30/20 200 903 18% 19,811 35% 3,606 80% 2,087 35% 3,601 90% 3,695 123% 13 3% #DIV/O! 80,950 62% 75,000 33,383 80,950 62% 75,000 33,383 #DIV/O! 427 43% 500 0% 500 0% 500 46,800 100% 46,800 46% 90,000 13,530 90% 15,000 4,150 #DIV/O! 63,000 0% 53% 216,300 7,515 75% 10,000 3,723 53% 7,000 4,356 44% 10,000 6,681 56% 12,000 1,417 3% 7,000 #DIV/O! 23,692 29% 46,000 16,116 74 #DIV/O! 100% 125,121 2,887 82% 17,308 288% #DIV/O! 108% 140,121 67 67% 360 96% 0% 4,856 88% 857 #DIV/O! 8 #DIV/O! 0% 6,148 54% 17,653 98% 0% 17,653 96%  2020-21 Budget 200 1,200 35,000 3,200 2,300 1,200 3,200 500  2020-21 YTD @ 12/31/20 200 100% 0% 36,352 104% 3,739 117% 1,121 49% 684 57% 2,530 79% 3,804 761% #DIV/O! 67% 45% 45% #DIV/O! 158 32% 0% 0% 19,500 42% 18,385 20% 8,044 54% 5,534 9% #DIV/O! 51,621 24% 3,110 31% 2,858 41% 4,195 42% 3,984 33% 1,409 20% 560 #DIV/O! 35% 5 #DIV/O! 62,560 50% 1,754 58% (2,114) -18%- #DIV/O! 62,205 44% 35 35% 0% 360 96% 0% 835 15% 0% #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 1,230 17% 2,259 17% 0% 2,259 17%  Account Description  101-16-6242 PERS SSA218 Annual Fee 101-16-6250 Copier & Duplications 101-16-6300 Insurance 101-16-6400 Utilities 101-16-6440 Telephone 101-16-6450 Building Operations 101-16-6460 Building & Cleaning Service 101-16-6470 Maintenance & Supplies 101-16-7600 Operating Contingency Engineering Division: 101-19-7230 Contracted Engineering Services Planning, Zoning & Development Division: 101-20-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-20-6120 Postage 101-20-6210 Special Department Supplies 101-20-6240 Environmental Filing Fees 101-20-7210 City Planner Retainer 101-20-7220 Contracted Building & Safety 101-20-7240 City Planner Special Service 101-20-7245 General Plan update 101-20-7075 Development Code Update Parks & Landscape Maintenance Division: 101-21-7015 Royal Oaks Trail Maintenance 101-21-7020 City Hall Grounds Maintenance 101-21-7025 Trail Maintenance 101-21-7035 Mt.Olive Entrance & Trail 101-21-7045 Lemon/RO Horse Trail 101-21-7060 Street Tree Trimming Public Safety Division: 101-23-6210 Special Departmental Services 101-23-7410 Contract Services Sheriff 101-23-7420 City Hall Security 101-23-7450 Code Enforcement 101-23-7757 AED Purchase Emergency Preparedness Division: 101-24-6010 Seminars & Training 101-24-6020 Meetings & Conferences 101-24-6030 Memberships & Dues 101-24-6100 Events & Awards 101-24-6470 Maintenance & Supplies 101-24-6480 Civic Center Generator 101-55-7030 Hazard Mitigation Plan 101-24-7245 Hazard Mitigation Plan Animal & Pest Control Division: 101-25-7000 Animal Control Services 101-25-7010 Pest Control Services  67% 131,296 87,429  3,000 12,000  100 100 375 200 5,500 1,000 7,275 12,971 300 13,271    Expenditures  2019-20 Budget 9,200  2019-20 YTD @ 06/30/20 10,459  2020-21 Budget 10,500  2020-21 YTD @ 12/31/20 9,643  Account Description  Intergovernmental Relations Division: 101-30-6030 Memberships & Dues  114%  92% 57%  General Fund Totals 1,843,852 1,517,817  82% 1,229,240 701,177  Utility Users Tax Fund: Deposits Fund:  102-15-7075 NPDES Stormwater Compliance 103-00-2039 Chadwick Ranch Development Long Term Planning Fee Fund: 112-20-7245 General Plan Expense Technology Fee Fund: 113-20-4500 Permit Digitizing 113-20-7730 Website  26,000  91,920 252,530 252,530 2,800 #DIV/O! 14,748 147% 576 3% 1,257 #DIV/O! 16,581 55% 9,370 104% 9,691 121% 588 20% 4,384 110% #DIV/O! 1,610 #DIV/O! 25,643 107% 0% #DIV/O! 0% 0% 0% 0% 8,449 #DIV/O! 0% #DIV/O! 8,449 42% #DIV/O! 4,768 95% #DIV/O! 4,768 95%  354%  8,555 91,970 1075% 166,000 44,398 166,000 44,398 20,000 2,000 10,000 2,000 14,000 9,000 8,000 1,000 4,000 5,000 27,000  19,270  96%  10,000 20,000 30,000 9,000 8,000 3,000 4,000 24,000 19,000 19,000 9,000 9,000 900 19,000 19,900 5,000 5,000  865 #DIV/O! 4,300 215% 3,961 9,126 7,409 4,972 1,566 13,947  113-20-8120 Capital Equipment-Server & Copier  1% 0% 65% 82% 62% 0% 39% 0% #DIV/O! 52% #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 378 42% 4,928 55% #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 5,306 54% #DIV/O! 0% #DIV/O! 0%  Misc. Technology Expenses  Gas Tax Fund: 200-48-5000 Transfers Out 200-48-6400 Utilities-Select System 200-48-6410 Street Lights 200-48-7000 PW Contract Services 200-48-7290 Street Sweeping 200-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 200-48-7755 City' Wide Slurry Seal SB1 Gas Tax Fund: 201-48-7745 Royal Oaks North Curb Extension 201-48-7755 City' Wide Slurry Seal Prop. A Fund: 203-00-7600 Sale of Prop. Al Funds 203-40-7625 Transit Services Prop. C Fund: 204-20-6030 Memberships & Dues 204-40-7325 Transit Services 204-48-7745 Royal Oaks North Curb Extension 204-48-7755 City Wide Slurry Seal Transportation Development Act Fund: 205-48-7720 Lemon/RO Horse Trail Project 205-48-7735 Royal Oaks & Mt. Olive Trail Rehab. 205-00-7760 Return of Funds  900 9,000 9,900 5,000 5,000  3of4    Expenditures  2019-20 Budget 2,619 705,087 404,275 580,000 5,125 1,292,831 412,046 5,000 14,000 14,000 27,000 27,000 60,000 100,000 100,000 55,000 155,000 152,399 1,000 72,000  2019-20 YTD @ 06/30/20 2,619 5,152 3,182  2020-21 Budget  2020-21 YTD @ 12/31/20  Account Description  Sewer Fund:  206-50-7600 Mt. Olive Drive Sewer Project 206-50-7601 Mt. Olive Lane Sewer Project 206-50-7602 DUSD Message Board 206-50-7605 Lemon Ave. Project 206-50-7606 Winston. Ave Project Recycling Grant Fund: 209-35-7300 Recycling Education Measure RI Fund: 210-48-7755 City' Wide Slurry Seal 210-48-7745 Royal Oaks North Curb Extension 210-00-7760 Return of Funds Measure M Fund 212-48-7755 Citywide Slurry Seal 212-48-7745 Royal Oaks North Curb Extension 212-48-7756 Bridge Repair Measure' W Fund 213-42-7630 NPDES Stormwater Compliance Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund: 215-23-7410 Contract Services Sheriff 215-23-7411 Contract CSO Services & Supplies County Park Grant: 217-21-7650 Civic Center Park Fire Safe Grant 14-USFS-SFA-0053: 219-21-7761 Community Wildfire Protection Plan 220-00-5000 Operating Transfers Out 220-00-6215 COVID 19 Expenses  100% 0% 101% 64% #DIV/O! 0% #DIV/O! 0% #DIV/O! 0% #DIV/O! 0%  #DIV/O! 39% 0% #DIV/O! 129% 41% 144% #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O!  57% 673,396 260,767 40,000 40,000 51,750 32% 753,396 312,517 5,000  7,200  60,000 100% 50,000 95% 53,500 98% 103,500 1,000 50,000  0% 32% 17% 0% 8%  52,399 1,000 4,546  17,228 17,228  4,116 44,815 5,223 50,038  Covid-19 Fund:  Total Expenditures 3,603,583 2,493,681  69% 2,452,591 1,276,293  52%  4of4    . Montgomery Lewis, Mayor (District. 2) Elzabeth Bruny, Mayorg Pro Tem (Districts) Richardale, CouncifMember (District 1) Richardg Barakat, Councif9Member (District 3 Bruce Lathrop, Councif9Member (District 4)  CITY OF BRADBURY  City of Bradbury Agenda Memo  TO: FROM:  Honorable Mayor and Members ofi the City Council  Kevin Kearney, City Manager  INITIATED BY: David Gilbertson, City Engineer  DATE: SUBJECT: SUMMARY  February 16, 2021  Winston/Lemon Trail Analysis  At its November 17, 2020 meeting, the City Council directed the City Engineer's office to analyze Winston Avenue and Lemon Avenue fori thei installation of a walking trail.  ANALYSIS  Staff has developed five (5) options for the Winston Avenue walking trail.  Option 1 (west side improvements  The limits oft the Option 1 walking trail are from the northerly terminus of Tentative Parcel Map No. 73673 (expired) to Lemon Avenue. Option 1 is proposed to be a 6' wide decomposed granite (DG)trail ont the west side oft the street with trail fencing ont the street side of the trail. There is insufficient parkway width available in order to construct the walking trail, therefore, a 3' street dedication is required. This option would also require the removal and reconstruction of the existing private decorative front yard walls and mailboxes on the west side of Winston Avenue. The existing private driveways would also require reconstruction in order to provide an ADA compliant path of travel. The estimated cost for the Option 1 walking trail is $375,000 ($166,000 for construction,  $207,950 for right-of-way acquisition). Option 2 (west side improvements)  The limits oft the Option 2 walking trail are from the northerly terminus of Tentative Parcel Map No. 736731 to Lemon Avenue. Option 2 is proposed tol be a4'wide DG trail on the west side oft the street without trail fencing. The walking trail for this option would not be  FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA_ 2-16  AGENDA ITEM # &    Winston/Lemon Trail Analysis February 16, 2021 Page 2of3  ADA compliant due to insufficient width, existing driveways, and the restrictions at the existing power poles. This option would also require the removal and reconstruction of the existing private mailboxes but the existing front yard walls and driveways would  remain.  The estimated cost for the Option 2 walking trail is $65,000.  Note: There may be sufficient Rule 20A power pole undergrounding funds available to remove the existing power poles along the east side of Winston Avenue. However, the trail would, more than likely, still not be ADA compliant due tot the other restrictions.  Option 3 (west side improvements)  The limits oft the Option 3 walking trail are from the northerly terminus of Tentative Parcel Map No. 73673 to Lemon Avenue. Option 3 is proposed to be a 6' wide DG trail on the west side oft the street with trail fencing. This option would shifti the existing westerly curb 2.5 feet closer to the street centerline in order to avoid the costly right-of-way acquisition. In addition, the existing easterly curb north of city hall would also shift 2.5 feet away from the street centerline in order to maintain sufficient lane widths. This option would require the removal and reconstruction of the existing private mailboxes on the west side of the street but the existing front yard walls would remain. The existing private driveways would also require reconstruction in order to provide an ADA compliant path of travel. This option also requires the removal of seven (7) significant Oak trees on the east side Its should be noted that there would still be 'point" ADA restrictions at each power pole  of Winston Avenue due to the shifting oft the easterly curb. unless the poles were removed with Rule 20A funds. The estimated cost for the Option 3 walking trail is $250,000.  Option 4 (east side improvements)  The limits of the Option 4 walking trail are from Royal Oaks Drive North to Lemon Avenue. Option 4 is proposed tol bea6 6' wide DG trail ont the east side oft the street with trail fencing. This option would require the relocation of two (2) existing fire hydrants and the City's monument sign. The existing private driveways would also require reconstructioni ino order top provide an ADA compliant path oftravel. This option also requires the removal ofs seven (7) significant Oak trees on the east side of Winston Avenue in order to construct the  walking trail within the existing right-of-way.  The estimated costi for the Option 4 walking trail is $220,000.    Winston/Lemon Trail Analysis February 16, 2021 Page 3 of3  Option 5 (east side improvements  The limits oft the Option 5 walking trail aret from Royal Oaks Drive North tol Lemon. Avenue. Option 5 is proposed tol be a 6'wide DG trail on the east side oft the street witht trail fencing. South of city hall, the walking trail would be adjacent to the existing curb. North of city hall, the walking trail would meander in order to avoid the existing Oak trees. This option wouid require the reiocation of two (2) existing fire hydrants and the City's monument sign. The existing private driveways would also require reconstruction in order to provide an ADA compliant pathoftravel. This option would require the acquisition ofap pedestrian easement for the meandering portion of the walking trail north of city hall. The estimated cost fori the Option 4 walking trail is $250,000 ($202,500 for construction,  $47,500 for right-of-way acquisition).  Staff has developed one (1) option for the Lemon Avenue walking trail.  The limits of the Lemon Avenue walking trail are from the westerly city limits to Winston Avenue. The walking trail is proposed to be a 6' wide DG trail on the south side of the street with trail fencing on the street side of the trail. There is sufficient parkway width available in order to construct the walking trail. The existing private driveways would require reconstruction in order to provide an ADA compliant path oft travel.  The estimated cost for the walking trail is $145,000. PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION this report are available at City Hall. STAFF RECOMMENDATION  This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of  Itis recommended by staff that the City Council provide direction to staff.  Attachment: Trail Exhibits Cost Estimates    OPTION 1  WINSTON AVENUE  ROYAL OAKS DRIVE NORTH TO CITY HALL  R/W 3' 5' DEDICATION  & 15' 12'  R/W 8'  CITY HALL TO LEMON AVE.  R/W 3' - 5' DEDICATION  £ 15' 10'  R/W 10'  -  6' WDE DG TRAIL WTH FENCING  REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT FRONT YARD WALLS  REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT DRIVEWAYS (FOR ADA ACCESSIBILITY)  POWER POLES TO REMAIN 3' PROPERTY ACQUISITION  REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MAILBOXES  EXHIBIT A OPTION 1 CITY OF BRADBURY 2/2/2021 NIS SNZNEZ EXHO1 XACAD/393034 WINSTON LEMON TRAL'PWEPXBTADNE  RKAP CONSULTING GROUP  CA-91780 DATE:,  SCAIE    OPTION 2  WINSTON AVENUE  ROYAL OAKS DRIVE NORTH TO CITY HALL  R/W 5'  £ 15' 12'  R/W 8'  CITY HALL TO LEMON AVE.  R/W 5'  £ 15' 10'  R/W 10'  REMOVE (UNDERGROUND) POWER POLES WITH RULE 20A FUNDS (OPTIONAL)  4' WIDE NON-ADA DG TRAIL WITHOUT FENCING DRIVEWAYS REMAIN (NOT ADA COMPLAINT) REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MAILBOXES  EXHIBIT B OPTION 2 CITY OF BRADBURY  RKAV CONSULTING. GROUP  DATE:, 2/2/2021 SCALE NIS "SCNZALEZ DRAVE XACAD/393034 WINSTON LEMON TRAL'PHCEXHBTBDNG  SHES: EXHO2    OPTION 3  WINSTON AVENUE  ROYAL OAKS DRIVE NORTH TO CITY HALL  R/W : 5' 2.5 a  £ 15' 12' 24.5'  R/W 8'  CITY HALL TO LEMON AVE.  R/W 5' 2.5' L  € 15' 10'  R/W 10' 2.5'  25'  6' WIDE DG TRAIL WITH FENCING SHIFT WEST CURB 2.5'  SHIFT EAST CURB 2.5' NORTH OF CITY HALL (SOUTH OF CITY HAL TO REMAIN) REMOVE 7 SIGNIFICANT OAK TREES  REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT DRIVEWAYS (FOR ADA ACCESSIBILITY)  REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MAILBOXES  REMOVE UNDERGROUND) POWER POLES WITH RULE 20A FUNDS (OPTIONAL)  EXHIBIT C OPTION 3 CITY OF BRADBURY  RKAV CONSULTING GROUP WWWIKAORIPCON  DATE:, 2/2/2021 SCALE: NIS. PSNZNEZ SHEET: EXHO3 ACAD/,393034 WINSTON LEMON TRALPWSEXHBTCDMS    OPTION 4  WINSTON AVENUE  ROYAL OAKS DRIVE NORTH TO CITY HALL  R/W 5'  E 15' 12'  R/W 8'  CITY HALL TO LEMON AVE.  R/W 5'  £ 15' 10'  R/W 10'  6' WDE DG TRAIL WITH FENCING REMOVE 7 SIGNIFICANT OAK TRES RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATE CITY MONUMENT SIGN  REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT DRIVEWAYS (FOR ADA ACCESSIBILITY)  EXHIBIT D OPTION 4 CITY OF BRADBURY  RKAV CONSULTING GROUP  KAGROUPCOM CA-91700 DATE: 2/2/2021 SCALE: NIS DRAWA - SCONZALEZ SHEET: EXHO4  XACAD/393034 WINSTON LEMON RALPHC'PReBIDDHC    OPTION 5  WINSTON AVENUE  ROYAL OAKS DRIVE NORTH TO CITY HALL  R/W 5'  £ 15' 12'  R/W 8' ESMT  CITY HALL TO LEMON AVE.  R/W 5'  £ 15' 10'  R/W 10'  6' WIDE MEANDERING DG TRAIL WITH FENCING VARIABLE WIDTH PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT PROTECT SIGNIFICANT OAK TREES  REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT DRIVEWAYS (PER ADA ACCESSIBILITY)  RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATE CITY MONUMENT SIGN  EXHIBIT E OPTION 5 CITY OF BRADBURY DRAW NTS SCONZAEZ FXHO5  RKAV CONSULTING GROUP  91780 DATE: 2/2/2021! SCALE  SHEET  XACAD/393034 WINSTON LEMON RALDHC'EXHBIEDHE    LEMON AVENUE CITY LIMITS TO WINSTON AVENUE  R/W 6'  € 14' 14'  R/W 6'  6' WIDE DG TRAIL WITH FENCING  REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT DRIVEWAYS (FOR ADA ACCESSIBILITY)  REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MAILBOXES  EXHIBIT F LEMON AVENUE CITY OF BRADBURY DRAWNE NIS SGONZALEZ!  RKAU CONSULTING GROUP  CA-91700 DATE PCOM  SCALE: 2/2/2021  SHEET: EXHO6  XACAD/393034 WNSTON LEMON RALDWC'EXHBITEDNG    RKAE CONSULTING GROUP 398 Lemon Creek Drive SuiteE Walnut, California 91789 (909) 594-9702- (626)331-8323 Fax: (909) 594-2658 PROJECT TITLE Lemon/Winston Trail Study LOCATION OWNER City of Bradbury ESTIMATED BY ITEM NO.  OPTION 1  COST ESTIMATE WORK SHEET SHEET 1of1  DWG. NO. 393034  DATE 1/28/2021  Winston Avenue Royal Oaks Drive tol Lemon Avenue  CHECKED BY DGG DESCRIPTION  APPROVEDI BY CAH  DGG ESTIMATED AMOUNT 5,000.00 5,000.00  ESTIMATED UNIT UNITI PRICE  QUANTITY 1 1 75 4400 585 975 4 4 2 585  1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Mobilization 2 Traffic Control 3 Unclassified Excavation 5 Trail Fencing  LS $ 5,000.00 $ LS $ 5,000.00 $ CY $ 75.00 $ 5,625.00 SF $ LF $ 20.00 $ 11,700.00 SF $ 24.00 $ 23,400.00 EA $ 150.00 $ EA $ 750.00 $ EA $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 LF $ 75.00 $ 43,875.00  4 4" Thick Polymer Coated DG Traily w/ Border (585 If) 6 Remove and Replace Existing Driveway 7 Adjust Water Meter Cover to Grade 8 Relocate Existing Mailbox 9 Remove Existing Tree  6.00 $ 26,400.00  600.00 3,000.00  10 Remove and Replace Front Yard Walls/Pilasters  A Right-of-Way Acquisition B Acquisition Services C Appraisals CONSTRUCTION: SUB-TOTAL 10% CONTINGENCY ENGINEERING DESIGN TOTAL  2106 1 5  SF $ 75.00 $ 157,950.00 LS $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 EA $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00  $ 127,600.00 $ 12,760.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 374,310.00  CONSTRUCTION: MANAGEMENT ANDI INSPECTION  FADOCSIRKAIFORMSICOST.XIS    RKAL CONSULTING GROUP 398 Lemon Creek Drive - SuiteE E Walnut, California! 91789 (909) 594-9702- (626): 331-8323 Fax: (909) 594-2658 PROJECT TITLE Lemon/Winston Trail Study LOCATION OWNER City of Bradbury ESTIMATED! BY ITEM NO.  OPTION2  COST ESTIMATE WORK SHEET SHEET 1of1  DWG. NO. 393034  DATE 1/28/2021  Winston Avenue- Royal Oaks Drive to Lemon Avenue  CHECKED BY DGG DESCRIPTION  APPROVEDBY CAH  DGG ESTIMATED AMOUNT 5,000.00 3,750.00  ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT PRICE  QUANTITY 1 1 50 2650 0 0 4 4 2  1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Mobilization 2 Traffic Control 3 Unclassified Excavation 5 Trail Fencing  LS $ 5,000.00 $ LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CY $ 75.00 $ SF $ LF $ 20.00 $ SF $ 24.00 $ EA $ 150.00 $ EA $ 750.00 $ EA $ 1,500.00 $  4 4"Thick Polymer Coated DG Trail w/ Border (5851 If) 6 Remove and Replace Existing Driveway 7 Adjust Water Meter Cover to Grade 8 Relocate Existing Mailbox 9 Remove Existing Tree  6.00 $ 15,900.00  600.00 3,000.00 3,000.00  CONSTRUCTION: SUB-TOTAL 10% CONTINGENCY ENGINEERING DESIGN TOTAL  $ 36,250.00 $ 3,625.00 $ 9,500.00 13,000.00 62,375.00  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION  FADOCSIRKAIFORMSICOSTXLS    RKAL CONSULTING GROUP 3981 Lemon Creek Drive Suite E Walnut, California 91789 (909) 594-9702- (626) 331-8323 Fax: (909) 594-2658 PROJECT TITLE Lemon/Winston Trail Study LOCATION OWNER City of Bradbury ESTIMATED BY ITEM NO.  OPTION 3  COST ESTIMATE WORK SHEET SHEET 1of1  DWG. NO. 393034  DATE 1/28/2021  Winston Avenue Royal Oaks Drive tol Lemon Avenue  CHECKED BY DGG DESCRIPTION  APPROVED BY CAH  DGG ESTIMATED AMOUNT 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,625.00  ESTIMATED UNIT UNITE PRICE  QUANTITY 1 1 75 4400 585 1,615 4 6 2 740 500 7 1 150  1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Mobilization 2 Traffic Control 3 Unclassified Excavation 5 Trail Fencing  LS $ 5,000.00 $ LS $ 5,000.00 $ CY $ 75.00 $ SF $  4 4" Thick Polymer Coated DG Trail w/ Border (585 If) 6 Remove and Replace Existing Driveway 7 Adjust Water Meter Cover to Grade 8 Relocate Existing Mailbox 9 Remove Existing Tree (West Side) 10 Remove and Replace Existing 6" Curb 11 Remove and Replace Existing 6" Curb and Gutter 12 Sawcut, Remove, and Replace Existing AC Pavement 1850 13 Remove Existing Oak Tree 14 Relocate Existing Fire Hydrant and Valve 15 Relocate Existing Chain Link Fence  6.00 $ 26,400.00  LF $ 20.00 $ 11,700.00 SF $ 24.00 $ 38,760.00 EA $ 150.00 $ EA $ 750.00 $ EA $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 LF $ 35.00 $ 25,900.00 LF $ 50.00 $ 25,000.00 EA $ 3,000.00 $ 21,000.00 EA $ 4,000.00 $ LF $ 15.00 $ 2,250.00  600.00 4,500.00  SF $  6.00 $ 11,100.00  4,000.00  CONSTRUCTION: SUB-TOTAL 10% CONTINGENCY ENGINEERING DESIGN TOTAL  $ 189,835.00 18,983.50 18,000.00 e 20,500.00 247,318.50  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT. AND INSPECTION  FADOCSIRKAIFORMSICOSTXLS    RKA CONSULTING GROUP 398 Lemon Creek Drive SuiteE Walnut, Califomia 91789 (909) 594-9702- (626) 331-8323 Fax: (909) 594-2658 PROJECT TITLE Lemon/Winston Trail Study LOCATION OWNER City of Bradbury ESTIMATEDE BY ITEM NO.  OPTION 4  COST ESTIMATE WORK SHEET SHEET 1of1  DWG. NO. 393034  DATE 1/28/2021  Winston Avenue Royal Oaks Drive to Lemon Avenue  CHECKED BY DGG DESCRIPTION  APPROVEDI BY CAH  DGG ESTIMATED AMOUNT 5,000.00 5,000.00  ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT PRICE  QUANTITY 1 1 100 1,025 2,000 7 9 7 2 150 1 2  1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Mobilization 2 Traffic Control 3 Unclassified Excavation 5 Trail Fencing  LS $ 5,000.00 $ LS $ 5,000.00 $ CY $ 75.00 $ 7,500.00 SF $ LF $ 20.00 $ 20,500.00 SF $ 24.00 $ 48,000.00 EA $ 150.00 $ EA $ 750.00 $ EA $ 3,000.00 $ 21,000.00 EA $ 4,000.00 $ LF $ 15.00 $ EA $ 7,500.00 $ EA $ 4,500.00 $ 9,000.00  4 4"Thick Polymer Coated DG Trail w/ Border (1,025lf If) 5,650  6.00 $ 33,900.00  6 Remove and Replace Existing Driveway 7 Adjust Water Meter Cover to Grade 8 Relocate Existing Mailbox 9 Remove Existing Oak Tree 10 Relocate Existing Fire Hydrant and Valve 11 Relocate Existing Chain Link Fence 12 Relocate Existing City Monument Sign  1,050.00 6,750.00 8,000.00 2,250.00 7,500.00  13 ADAI Ramp  CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL 10% CONTINGENCY ENGINEERING DESIGN TOTAL  $ 175,450.00 $ 17,545.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 13,000.00 219,995.00  CONSTRUCTIONI MANAGEMENT ANDI INSPECTION  FADOCSIRKAIFORMSICOST.XLS    RKA CONSULTING GROUP 398 Lemon Creek Drive SuiteE Walnut, Califomia 91789 (909) 594-9702- (626)3 331-8323 Fax: (909) 594-2658 PROJECT TITLE Lemon/Winston Trail Study LOCATION OWNER City of Bradbury ESTIMATED BY ITEM NO.  OPTION 5  COST ESTIMATE WORK SHEET SHEET 1of1  DWG. NO. 393034  DATE 1/28/2021  Winston Avenue Royal Oaks Drive to Lemon Avenue  CHECKED BY DGG DESCRIPTION  APPROVED BY CAH  DGG ESTIMATED AMOUNT 5,000.00 5,000.00 7,500.00  ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT PRICE  QUANTITY 1 1 100 1,225 2,000 7 9 0 2 150 1 2  1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Mobilization 2 Traffic Control 3 Unclassified Excavation 5 Trail Fencing  LS $ 5,000.00 $ LS $ 5,000.00 $ CY $ 75.00 $ SF $  4 4"T Thick Polymer Coated DG Trail w/ Border (1,025/) 5,650  6.00 $ 33,900.00  LF $ 20.00 $ 24,500.00 SF $ 24.00 $ 48,000.00 EA $ 150.00 $ EA $ 750.00 $ EA $ 3,000.00 $ EA $ 4,000.00 $ LF $ 15.00 $ EA $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 EA $ 4,500.00 $ 9,000.00  6 Remove and Replace Existing Driveway 7 Adjust Water Meter Cover to Grade 8 Relocate Existing Mailbox 9 Remove Existing Oak Tree 10 Relocate Existing Fire Hydrant and' Valve 11 Relocate Existing Chain Link Fence 12 Relocate Existing City Monument Sign  1,050.00 6,750.00 8,000.00 2,250.00  13 ADAI Ramp  A Pedestrian Easement Acquisition B Acquisition Services C Appraisals CONSTRUCTION: SUB-TOTAL 10% CONTINGENCY ENGINEERING DESIGN TOTAL  1,000 1 2  SF $ 25.00 $ 25,000.00 LS $ 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 EA $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00  $ 205,950.00 $ 19,595.00 14,000.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 252,545.00  CONSTRUCTIONI MANAGEMENT ANDI INSPECTION  FADOCSIRKAIFORMSICOST.XIS    RKAV CONSULTING GROUP 398 Lemon Creek Drive SuiteE Walnut, California 91789 (909) 594-9702- (626); 331-8323 Fax: (909)5 594-2658 PROJECT1 TITLE Lemon/Winston Trail Study LOCATION OWNER City of Bradbury ESTIMATEDBY ITEM NO.  COST ESTIMATE WORK SHEET SHEET 1of1  DWG. NO. 393034  DATE 1/28/2021  Lemon Avenue- - Westerly City Limit to Winston Avenue  CHECKED BY DGG DESCRIPTION  APPROVEDI BY CAH  DGGI ESTIMATED AMOUNT  ESTIMATED 1 1 75 5100 925 1,750 9 8  QUANTITY UNIT UNITI PRICE  1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Mobilization 2 Traffic Control 3 Unclassified Excavation 4 4"T Thick Polymer Coated DG Trail w/ Border 5 Trail Fencing 6 Remove and Replace Existing Driveway 7 Adjust Water Meter Cover to Grade 8 Relocate Existing Mailbox  LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CY $ 75.00 $ SF $ LF $ 20.00 $ 18,500.00 SF $ 24.00 $ 42,000.00 EA $ 150.00 $ 1,350.00 EA $ 750.00 $  5,625.00  6.00 $ 30,600.00  6,000.00  CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL 10% CONTINGENCY ENGINEERING DESIGN TOTAL  $ 114,075.00 $ 11,407.50 $ 12,000.00 $ 8,000.00 145,482.50  CONSTRUCTION: MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION  FADOCSIRKAIFORMSICOSTIS    D. Montgomery Lewis, Mayor (District2) Elizabeth Bruny, Mayor Pro-Tem (District 5) Richard G. Barakat, Council Member (District 3) Richard' T. Hale, Jr., Council Member (District 1) Bruce Lathrop, Council Member (District4)  CITYOF BRADBURY City of Bradbury City Council Agenda Report  TO: FROM: DATE:  Honorable Mayor and Council Members Kevin Kearney, City Manager By: Jim Kasama, City Planner February 16, 2021  SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN  GUIDELINES FOR FRONT AND STREET-SIDE YARDS  AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 BACKGROUND  In continuing to work on updates of the Development Code, the Planning Commission began a discussion at the October 28, 2020 meeting on issues related to front yards. This was in response to a project that had been referred to the Commission for guidance due to the lack of regulations for driveways, circular driveways, the maximum amount of hardscape or impervious surfaces, and the types of materials to be allowed; e.g., artificial turf, gravel, and other decorative materials. The Commission directed staff to check the regulations of 12 cities: Arcadia, Azusa, Duarte, Glendora, Hidden Hills, La Verne, Malibu, Monrovia, Rolling Hills Estates, San Dimas, San Marino, and Sierra Madre. The applicable regulations were discussed at the December 2, 2020 meeting along with draft regulations for the City of Bradbury. The Commission held a public hearing and determined that the proposed regulations are acceptable and adopted the attached Resolution No. PC 21-295 tor recommend to the City Council the preparation and approval of an ordinance to amend  the Development Code to add the proposed regulations.  DISCUSSION  The regulations of the twelve cities were reviewed and those that apply to the issues are as follows. If certain cities are not listed, it is because those cities' regulations do not address the matter. For each issue, the proposed regulations for the City of Bradbury are provided. Staff is presenting this material in a discussion format rather than presenting a  draft ordinance.  AGENDA ITEM NO. 3    1. Landscaping VS. Hardscape = How much of a front yard should be landscaping and how much should be hardscape, i.e., driveway and walkways? Arcadia - hardscape, including artificial turf cannot exceed 40% of the front setback Duarte At least 50% of a front yard shall be landscaping and at least 50% of the Malibu - impervious areas on a lot are limited by lot size; lots less than % acre = 45%, %4 acre to % acre - 35%, and over % acre - 30% with a maximum of 25,000 square Rolling Hills Estates = maximum front yard coverage by structures and hardscape is based on street frontage; less than 50' -4 45%, 50' to 74.99' = 40%, 75' to 99.99' - 35%, 100' to 149.99' - 30%, and 150' or more - 25%. Hardscape also counts towards overall lot coverage (i.e., in addition to structures, decks, and satellite antennas) San Dimas - Up to 50% of a front yard may be hardscape.  area.  publicly visible area of a street-side yard.  feet.  San Marino = impervious surfaces can cover up to 25% of a front yard by-right and up to 45% with Planning Commission approval of a conditional use permit, and maximum walkway widths are based on street frontage; 8% of the lot width at the street or 4 feet, Sierra Madre = 50% of the front yard must be landscaping with plant materials such as trees, shrubs, vines, ground covers, flowers, and lawn, and excludes driveways, For the City of Bradbury, the maximum amount of hardscape (e.g., paving, gravel, rocks, boulders, decomposed granite, and any other non-living material) should vary by zone as follows, because the larger-lot zones have larger front and/or street-side yards, less area of the large-lot front and/or street-side yards needs to be paved for  whichever is greater to a maximum of 8 feet.  walkways, landings, porches, patios, and similar areas.  driveways and walkways: R-7,500 - Maximum 40% hardscape R-20,000 - Maximum 35% hardscape A-1 - Maximum 30% hardscape A-2-N Maximum of 25% hardscape A-5 - Maximum of 15% hardscape  City of Bradbury - City Council Agenda Report  February 16, 2021 Page2of7  Discussion of Front and Street-Side Yard Development Regulations    2. Should there be a maximum width for a driveway? At the street and on site? Arcadia = in the front andlor street-side yard, driveways are not to be wider than  necessary to access the garage. Azusa = maximum 20 feet.  Duarte = maximum 12 feet for a one-space parking area, and 20 feet for a two-car Monrovia - the maximum width cannot exceed the width of the parking area; e.g., 9 San Dimas - maximum on-site width is limited to 2 feet wider than the garage door(s) Sierra Madre = maximum 10 feet for a one-car garage, and 20 feet for a two-car For the City of Bradbury, the maximum widths should vary by zone because of the wider lot widths of the larger-lot zones. The maximum widths are for the on-site driveways and 30 feet will accommodate three-car garages on the larger lots. The widths within the public right-of-way are for the flat portions of the driveways. R-7,500 - Maximum of 20 feet for both on-site and within the public right-of-way R-20,000 - Maximum of 30 feet on-site and 20 feet within the public right-of-way A-1 - Maximum of 30 feet on-site and 25 feet within the public right-of-way A-2 - Maximum of 30 feet on-site and 25 feet within the public right-of-way A-5-1 Maximum of 30 feet on-site and 25 feet within the public right-of-way 3. Should there be only one driveway access per property? Are there circumstances for which an additional/circular driveway is to be allowed? Arcadia = minimum street frontage of 100' required to be allowed a circular driveway, only one circular driveway per lot, minimum width 9 and maximum width 15, and the Azusa - only 1 driveway per lot, except by approval of a minor use permit, and circular Duarte - maximum 1 driveway per street frontage, except that circular driveways are allowed on the side of lots that have a minimum street frontage of 100 feet. Monrovia - a minimum lot width of 75 feet is required to have a circular driveway, and if  parking area.  feet for a one-car garage or carport, and 18 feet for two cars. and the width at the street is to be determined by the city engineer.  garage.  inner edge at the apex must be 25' from the property line.  driveways are not allowed.  City of Bradbury - City Council - Agenda Report  February 16, 2021 Page 3 of7  Discussion of Front and Street-Side Yard Development Regulations    the garage is in front the driveway is to be setback 45 feet from the property line. If the garage is to the rear of the house, then the driveway is to be setback 25 feet from the San Dimas maximum of 1 driveway per lot, except that circular driveways may be allowed in the front portion of lots with at least 100 feet of width at the property line. Sierra Madre = minimum lot width of 80' required to be allowed a circular driveway, maximum width 12, and design is subject to approval by the city engineer. For the City of Bradbury, circular driveways should not be allowed in the R-7,500 zone, and in the other zones the lot must have a minimum width/length of 100 feet along a public right-of-way and be subject to design review approval by the Planning Commission or approval of a conditional use permit, with policies for distance  property line. A circular driveway is to be screened by landscaping.  between the driveway approaches and from side property lines.  R-7,500 - Not allowed  R-20,000 - With a minimum lot width/length of 100 feet at a public right-of-way and A-1 --With a minimum lot width/length of 100 feet at a public right-of-way and subject A-2-With a minimum lot width/length of 100 feet at a public right-of-way and subject  subject to design review approval by the Planning Commission  to design review approval by the Planning Commission to design review approval by the Planning Commission  A-5-1 Not allowed in the front setback  4. Should contemporary materials and methods such as stamping, scoring, pavers, and colored concrete be allowed as decorative features for driveways and Arcadia = driveways should be enhanced utilizing different textures including, but not limited to, brick, flagstone, interlocking pavers, tile, stamped concrete, decomposed granite, and grass-crete, also landscaping pockets should be provided adjacent to Duarte - driveways must be cement or of approved impermeable pavers, and Monrovia = driveways are to concrete or an approved material and with decorative paving or scoring, and walkways may be of concrete, pavers, brick, or steppingstones Sierra Madre - driveways shall be paved with either asphaltic or concrete pavement and this requirement shall not exclude the use of brick or special stones for decorative purposes, and some permeable materials are allowed to reduce stormwater runoff.  walkways?  buildings and walls or fencing along driveways.  walkways are to be cement, pavers, or decomposed granite.  with gravel.  City of Bradbury - City Council - Agenda Report  February 16, 2021 Page 4 of7  Discussion of Front and Street-Side Yard Development Regulations    For the City of Bradbury, contemporary decorative materials and methods should be allowed, but the materials and methods should be consistent with the architectural style of the house. Decomposed granite and grass-crete are also materials that are currently in favor for walkway and driveway accenting because these materials are more natural in appearance. The City's Design Guidelines, which were adopted in 1995, should be updated and referenced by the applicable sections of the  Development Code.  5. Should artificial turf be allowed in front yards? And, ifso, how much?  Arcadia = maximum 15% of a front and/or street-side yard may be artificial turf, but not within 10' of a sidewalk or 20' of the curb if there is not a sidewalk, and not within the public parkway. The blades must be at least 1%2" tall and green with at least an 8-year no-fade warranty. In addition, there are extensive standards for the materials, style,  installation and maintenance. Azusa - not allowed.  Duarte - may be used for up to 40% of the required front yard landscape area and visible street-side yard area (At least 50% of a front yard shall be landscaping and at Rolling Hills Estates - it is allowed for up to 25% of the landscaping area but is considered hardscape and as part of the maximum front yard coverage; see issue no. San Dimas = up to 80% of the landscape area with blades that are at least 1%2" tall and San Marino - not allowed, all front yard and parkway areas that are not impervious Sierra Madre - not counted as landscaping and is subject to approval by the Public For the City of Bradbury, the use of artificial turf should be limited in areas visible to the public as follows, with qualitative standards to be added to the Design Guidelines and referenced by the applicable sections of the Development Code: R-7,500 - Not allowed in front and street-side yards, and not allowed in parkways R-20,000 = not within 20 feet of a front and/or street-side property line, and not A-1 - not within 20 feet of a front and/or street-side property line, and not allowed in  least 50% of the publicly visible area of a street-side yard)  1, and it is not allowed in public parkways.  of two-tone green.  must be vegetative or plant material. Works Department for permeability.  along public streets  allowed in parkways along public streets parkways along public streets City of Bradbury: - City Council Agenda Report  February 16,2021 Page 5of7  Discussion of Front and Street-Side Yard Development Regulations    A-2- not within 20 feet of a front andlor street-side property line, and not allowed in  parkways along public streets  A-5-1 not allowed in parkways along public streets allowed as part of front yard landscaping?  6. To what extent should stones, boulders, gravel, and other non-living materials be Arcadia = large stones and boulders are considered hardscape and per issue no. 1, hardscape is limited to 40% of a front and/or street-side yard, and the use of decorative Azusa = may be used for up to 15% of the total required landscape area, and artificial Duarte - may be used for up to 50% of the required landscape area (At least 50% of a front yard shall be landscaping and at least 50% of the publicly visible area of a street- Rolling Hills Estates = such materials count toward the maximum of hardscape allowed; San Dimas - may be used for up to 20% of landscape area (50% of front and/or street-  materials is encouraged.  or synthetic materials are not allowed.  side yard) see issue no. 1.  side yards must be landscaped) San Marino - not allowed in parkways.  Sierra Madre - not allowed for driveways and walkways. Driveways may have brick or special stones as decorative features. Walkways are required to be of concrete or a better material such as brick, exposed and polished aggregate, or inlaid stone, timber inlays are prohibited. Stones, boulders, and gravel may be allowed for stormwater For the City of Bradbury, such materials (e.g., paving, gravel, rocks, boulders, decomposed granite, artificial turf, and any other non-living material) are to be considered hardscape and should be used sparingly in front and street-side yards, and not allowed in public parkways. As hardscape such materials are to be limited  retention purposes per the city engineer.  as follows (see issue no. 1): R-7,500 - Maximum 40% hardscape R-20,000 - Maximum 35% hardscape A-1 - Maximum 30% hardscape A-2- Maximum of 25% hardscape A-5-1 Maximum of 15% hardscape City of Bradbury = City Council - Agenda Report  February 16, 2021 Page 6of7  Discussion of Front and Street-Side Yard Development Regulations    ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT  Itisr recommended that the proposed regulations are exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) which provides the commonsense rule that CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that the project will not cause any impacts. The proposed regulations would restrict development activity and cannot cause environmental impacts.  CITY COUNCIL ACTION  The discussion is not expected to be concluded at this meeting and should be continued with direction to staff to provide additional material, such as diagrams, plot plans, and qualitative standards, as well as how the proposed regulations could be refined for further consideration by the City Council. When the Council determines the proposed regulations are acceptable, an ordinance will be drafted for the Council's consideration at a public  hearing. ATTACHMENT Resolution No. PC 21-295  City of Bradbury - City Council = Agenda Report  February 16,2021 Page7of7  Discussion of Front and Street-Side Yard Development Regulations    ATTACHMENT  PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC21-295 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTHI ITS FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION WITH AN EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE PREPARATION AND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE BRADBURY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ADD REGULATIONS FOR FRONT YARDS AND STREET SIDE YARDS IN REGARD TO LIMITS FOR HARDSCAPE AND NON-LIVING LANDSCAPING MATERIALS, DRIVEWAY WIDTHS AND MATERIALS, AND CIRCUMSTANCES  FORA ALLOWING CIRCULAR DRIVEWAYS    PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-295 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION WITH AN EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE PREPARATION AND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE BRADBURY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ADD REGULATIONS FOR FRONT YARDS AND STREET SIDE YARDS IN REGARD TO LIMITS FOR HARDSCAPE AND NON-LIVING LANDSCAPING MATERIALS, DRIVEWAY WIDTHS AND MATERIALS, AND CIRCUMSTANCES FOR ALLOWING CIRCULAR DRIVEWAYS WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to update the City's Development Code, and to initiate the updates. The Planning Commission directed staff to provide for review the front yard regulations of neighboring cities and cities that are similar to the City of  Bradbury.  WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the applicable regulations of twelve cities ati its October 28, 2020, December 2, 2020, and January 27,2021,meetings,  and directed staff to propose regulations for the City of Bradbury.  NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, FIND, AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION A. The Planning Commission finds that a duly noticed public hearing has been conducted at the regular meeting on January 27, 2021, in accordance with the  provisions of the Bradbury Municipal Code relative to this matter.  SECTION B. The Planning Commission finds that there is consistency between the General Plan and the proposed regulations as they further the goals, policies, and  programs of the General Plan.  SECTION C. The Planning Commission finds that the information in the agenda report, and the testimony given at the public hearing are incorporated in this Resolution  and comprises the bases on which the findings have been made.  SECTION D. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed regulations are exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) which provides the commonsense rule that CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that the project will not cause any impacts. Proposed regulations that would restrict development activity cannot cause  environmental impacts.  SECTION E. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council the preparation and approval of an ordinance to amend the Development Code to add  the following proposed regulations:    1. The maximum amount of hardscape (e.g., paving, gravel, rocks, boulders, decomposed granite, and any other non-living material) should vary by zone as follows, because the larger-lot zones have larger front and/or street-side yards, less area of the large-lot front and/or street-side yards needs to be paved for driveways and walkways:  R-7,500 - Maximum 40% hardscape R-20,000 - Maximum 35% hardscape A-1 - Maximum 30% hardscape A-2 - Maximum of 25% hardscape A-5- Maximum of 15% hardscape  2. The maximum widths should vary by zone as follows, because of the wider lot widths of the larger-lot zones. The maximum widths are for the on-site driveways and 30 feet will accommodate three-car garages on the larger lots. The widths within the public  right-of-way are for the flat portions oft the driveways.  R-7,500 - Maximum of 20 feet for both on-site and within the public right-of-way R-20,000 - Maximum of 30 feet on-site and 20 feet within the public right-of-way A-1 - Maximum of 30 feet on-site and 25 feet within the public right-of-way A-2. - Maximum of 30 feet on-site and 25 feet within the public right-of-way A-5- Maximum of 30 feet on-site and 25 feet within the public right-of-way 3. Circular driveways should not be allowed in the R-7,500 zone, and not in the front or street-side setbacks in the A-5 zone, and in the other zones the lot must have a minimum width/length of 100 feet along a public right-of-way and be subject to design review approval by thel Planning Commission or approval ofa a conditional use permit, with policies for distance between the driveway approaches and from side property lines. 4. contemporary decorative materials and methods should be allowed, but the materials and methods should be consistent with the architectural style of the house. Decomposed granite and grass-crete are also materials that are currently in favor for walkways and driveway accenting. These materials are more natural in appearance. The City's Design Guidelines, which were adopted in 1995, should be updated and referenced  by the applicable sections of the Development Code.  5. The use of artificial turf should be limited in areas visible to the public as follows, with qualitative standards to be added to the Design Guidelines and referenced by the  applicable sections of the Development Code:  R-7,500 - Not allowed in front and street-side yards, and not allowed in parkways  along public streets  -2-  PC21-295    R-20,000 - not within 20 feet of a front and/or street-side property line, and not A-1 - not within 20 feet of a front and/or street-side property line, and not allowed A-2. - not within 20 feet of a front andlor street-side property line, and not allowed  allowed in parkways along public streets inp parkways along public streets inj parkways along public streets  A-5-r not allowed in parkways along public streets  6. Materials such as paving, gravel, rocks, boulders, decomposed granite, artificial turf, and any other non-living material are to be considered hardscape and should be used sparingly in front and street-side yards, and not allowed in public parkways. As  hardscape, such materials are to be limited as follows: R-7,500 - Maximum 40% hardscape R-20,000 - Maximum 35% hardscape A-1-N Maximum 30% hardscape A-2. - Maximum of 25% hardscape A-5-N Maximum of 15% hardscape  SECTION F. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 2021.  Chairperson ATTEST: City Clerk  1,Claudia Saldana, City Clerk, hereby certify that thei foregoing Resolution No. PC 21-295 was duly adopted by the Planning Commission oft the City of Bradbury, California, at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of January, 2021, by the following vote:  AYES: NOES: ABSENT:  -3-  PC21-295