CITY OF SARASOTA Planning and Development Division Development Services Department MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY January 12, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Planning Board Terrilll Salem, Chair Members Present: Dan Clermont, Vice Chair Members Damien Blumetti, Michael Halflants (arrived 1:34 P.M.) Kathy Kelley Ohlrich (via Zoom) Planning Board Members Absent: City Staff Present: Mike Connolly, Deputy City Attorney Kevin McAndrew, General Manger, Development Services Mark Miller, Senior Arborist, Development Services Amy Pintus, Development Review Planner Ryan Chapdelain, General Manager, Planning Department David L. Smith, Manager of Long-Range Planning Brianna Dobbs, Senior Planner, Planning Department John Nopper, Coordinator, Public Broadcasting Karen Grassett, Sr. Planning Technician, Development Services 1:32:56 P.M. I. CALL: MEETING TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL PB Chair Salem called the meeting to order and General Manager McAndrew [acting as the Planning Board's Secretaryl called the roll. PB Chair Salem, PB Vice Chair Clermont, and PB Member Blumetti were present; PB Member Ohlrich appeared via Zoom; and PB Member Halflants was not present. PB Member Halflants arrived at 1:34 PM. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE This item was inadvertently skipped. III. CHANGES TO THE ORDER OF THE DAY There were none. IV. LAND USE ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: At this time anyone wishing to speak at the following public hearings will be required to take an oath. (Time limitations will be established by the Planning Board.) 1:34:02 P.M. A. Reading ofthe Pledge ofConduct Secretary McAndrew read the Pledge of Conduct. Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 2 of 12 Attorney Connolly recommended time limits for the presentations that will follow and administered the oath to those wishing to testify at the public hearings. The PB members approved the time limits by consensus. 1:36:07 P.M. B. Legislative Public Hearings 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application No. 22-PA-01: A request to amend the Sarasota City Plan (2030) by revising the Future Land Use Chapter Residential Future Land Use classifications to clarify that accessory dwelling units are to be considered as secondary uses. (David L. Smith, AICP, Manager of Long-Range Planning) Staff Presentation: Manager Smith appeared and noted the first two public hearings are large-scale Comprehensive Plan Amendments that are to be transmitted to the State. for review and comment prior to adoption public hearings before the Planning Board and City Commission; and described the process for adopting large-scale Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Manager Smith discussed application 22-PA-01 stating the City Commission recently adopted a zoning text amendment to allow accessory dwelling units citywide; said the City Commission directed staff to process a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to make the language in the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the revised Zoning Code text; and stated staff was requesting the Planning Board recommend to the City Commission both transmittal and adoption of application 22-PA-01. PB Chair Salem questioned why playgrounds, parks and churches were included in the proposed text. Manager Smith stated that was existing language; pointed out parks are currently permitted uses in single family residential districts; noted schools and churches require Conditional Use approval in single family residential districts; and said accessory dwelling units are considered secondary uses in residential districts. PB Member Ohlrich commended staff on the quality of the packets; and questioned if the action requested today would rectify the unintended consequences of the approval of the zoning text amendment for accessory dwelling units. Manager Smith stated the proposed revisions to the language is to make the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the Zoning Code. Attorney Connolly stated the unintended consequences that resulted from the adoption of the zoning text amendment was a different issue; pointed out the proposed text revisions to the Comprehensive Plan being considered today would bring the Comprehensive Plan into consistency with the Zoning Code; and stated City Attorney Fournier was preparing an ordinance for consideration by the City Commission that would address the unintended consequences of the recent zoning text amendment. Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 3 of 12 PB Member Ohlrich questioned why the opt-in provision was not being removed from all sections of the Comprehensive Plan; and questioned if staff agreed with Attorney Connolly's memo that stated accessory dwelling units do not increase density. Manager Smith stated the last major update to the Comprehensive Plan included opt-in clauses; and stated staff agreed with Attorney Connolly's opinion that accessory dwelling units do not increase density. Discussion ensued. PB Vice Chair Clermont questioned if allowing accessory dwelling units citywide overrode the opt-out clauses. Manager Smith stated that was correct. PB Chair Salem pointed out providing accessory dwelling units was not a requirement; and questioned if accessory dwelling units were included in impervious surface calculations. Manager Smith confirmed accessory dwelling units are not required; and stated accessory dwelling units are included in impervious surface calculations. 1:49:12 P.M. Citizen Input: Mr. Ronald Kashden appeared via Zoom and stated he represented the Laurel Park Neighborhood Association; stated the adoption of the zoning text amendment relating to accessory dwelling units diminished the existing rights of thei neighborhood; and said the City Attorney was processing a corrective ordinance. PB Member Blumetti questioned if existing accessory dwelling units are grandfathered in. Discussion ensued. Attorney Connolly noted State statutes require accessory dwelling units to be rented to low-income residents; said City Attorney Fournier was working on an ordinance: regarding the grandfathering issue; and pointed out that issue is not a part of today's discussion. 1:56:13 P.M. PB Vice Chair Clermont made a motion to find 22-PA-01 consistent with the Sarasota City Plan (2030) and recommend the City Commission approve transmittal and adoption as identified in this report. PB Member Blumetti seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 1:56:23 P.M. 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application No. 22-PA-02: A request to amend the Sarasota City Plan (2030) by adding a Property Rights Chapter and revising applicable text. (David L. Smith, AICP, Manager of Long-Range Planning) Staff Presentation: Manager Smith appeared and stated the proposal is to add a Property Rights Chapter to the Comprehensive Plan due to the recent passage of HB 59 by the Legislature; noted the amendment must be adopted prior to adoption of any additional large-scale amendments; and stated the Legislature had provided a model element and that language was used in the proposed language. Minutes of the! Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 4 of 12 PB Member Ohlrich questioned if the language is verbatim; and if not, what were the changes. Manager Smith stated the proposed Goal and Objective language was not in the model; and said the Action Strategies that were in the model are verbatim. Discussion ensued. PB Vice Chair Clermont questioned the language pertaining to mineral rights and asked if his neighbor could mine their property. Manager Smith stated permitted uses in the zone districts were still applicable. PB Vice Chair Clermont questioned what the point of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment was. Manager Smith stated it is a legislative requirement. PB Member Halflants questioned if the language constituted a taking. Attorney Connolly stated it does not. PB Member Blumetti had no questions. PB Chair Salem stated problems associated with phosphate mining was likely the reason for the verbiage related to mineral rights. 2:04:49 P.M. PB Member Blumetti made a motion to find 22-PA-02 consistent with the Sarasota City Plan (2030) and recommend the City Commission approve transmittal and adoption as identified in the report. PB Vice Chair Clermont seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 2:05:37 P.M. 3. Zoning Text Amendment Application No. 22-ZTA-02: A request for Zoning Text Amendment approval to modify Map VI-1001, Primary/Secondary Street Grid, found in Section VI-1003 of the Zoning Code. (Briana Dobbs, AICP, Senior Planner) General Manger Chapdelain and Senior Planner Dobbs appeared. General Manger Chapdelain discussed prior changes to the primary street grid; and stated a map with the proposed changes outlined and a matrix explaining the rationale was provided in the backup. Senior Planner Dobbs discussed the purpose and intent of primary streets and the characteristics of secondary streets. Discussion ensued. PB Member Blumetti questioned why there were gaps on Ringling Blvd and US 301 north of Boulevard of the Arts. General Manager Chapdelain stated the gap on Ringling Boulevard was due to an access point that was approved as part of a previously approved rezoning; and said the gap on US 301 north of Boulevard of the Arts is to provide for greater development flexibility in that area. PB Member Halflants questioned if retail is required on primary streets. Senior Planner Dobbs stated retail is not a requirement. PB Member Halflants stated standards should Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 5 of 12 be required in the zone district versus the designation as a primary street. Discussion ensued. PB Vice Chair Clermont stated he was pleased to see the updates noting issues have been addressed. PB Member Ohlrich discussed the Limelight District boundaries and questioned why the designation of Lime Avenue extended south to Ringling Boulevard when the Limelight District ends at Fruitvillle Road. Discussion ensued. PB Member Ohlrich stated the map was inaccurate pointing out streets with dead ends that are not reflected. Senior Planner Dobbs pointed out the updated map is based on the City's GIS database which includes unimproved rights-of-way. PB. Member Ohlrich stated she agreed with PB Member Halflants' comments; and questioned what the vision for the Limelight District was that required the changes to the primary street grid in that area. General Manger Chapdelain stated the proposed changes were not necessarily associated with the Limelight District; and noted a number of the changes in the area were to eliminate the existing primary street designations in residential areas, private property, and unimproved rights-of-way. PB Chair Salem questioned why the primary street grid does not extend north of 10th Street. General Manger Chapdelain stated the primary grid street mapi is based on areas that have a downtown zoning designation and downtown Future Land Use designation. PB Member Blumetti questioned why the primary grid street designation for 7th and 9th Streets between Orange Avenue and Osprey Avenue stops. General Manager Chapdelain stated staff was leaving options for access to properties in that area open. Discussion ensued. 2:26:10 P.M. PB Vice Chair Clermont made a motion to find Zoning Text Amendment 22-ZTA-02 consistent with Section IV-1206 of the Zoning Code and recommend approval of the Zoning Text Amendment to the City Commission. PB Member Blumetti seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 2:27:03 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 21-5396: An Ordinance of the City of Sarasota, Florida amending the Zoning Code (2202 Edition) of the City of Sarasota; Article III, Decision Making and Administrative Bodies, Division 3, Board of Adjustment, SECTION III-302, Membership, Terms, Transition, Vacancies, Removal, to provide for appointment of an alternative Board of Adjustment member and to modify the Conflict of Interest restrictions placed upon Board of Adjustment members; providing for severability of the parts hereof; providing for reading by title only; and providing for an effective date. (Mike Connolly, Deputy City Attorney) Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 6 of 12 Attorney Connolly stated the City Commission had requested the same revisions that were recently made to the membership requirements for Planning Board members be extended to the Board of Adjustment; said the three proposed revisions provide for: 1) an alternate Board of Adjustment member, 2) allows Board of Adjustment members to make presentations in front of other City boards, excluding the Board of Adjustment; and 3) and to reduce the amount of time that no former member of the Board of Adjustment can appear before the Board of Adjustment as agent or attorney for an applicant for a variance or any other interested person for a period of two years to one year after leaving the Board of Adjustment; pointed out there was no staff recommendation due to the fact the City Commission directed the revisions be made; and said the motions could be separated out by issue. The Planning Board approved dividing the issues into three separate motions by consensus. PB Member Blumetti made a motion to approve an alternate member of the Board of Adjustment be appointed. PB Member Ohlrich seconded the motion. PB Member Halflants stated his objection to the preference that the alternate member have prior experience on the Board of Adjustment. Attorney Connolly pointed out that is preference rather than a requirement. Discussion ensued. The motion passed 5-0. PB Member Blumetti made a motion to approve the provision that Board of Adjustment members are able to make presentations in front of other City boards, excluding the Board of Adjustment. PB Member Halflants seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-1 with PB Member Ohlrich voting no. PB Member Blumetti made a motion to approve the reduction in the amount of time former Board of Adjustment members can appear before the Board of Adjustment from two years to one year. PB Member Halflants seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-1 with PB Member Ohlrich voting no. 2:34:05 P.M. Attorney Connolly called upon Mr. Daniel Kennedy, Ms. Kathleen Sherrow, Ms. Laura Sperling and Mr. Mark Libowitz (representing Thomas Holderness) who had applied for Affected Person status. All four were present and the Planning Board members granted them Affected Person status by consensus. Attorney Connolly administered the oath to those that had not been sworn previously. Secretary McAndrew pointed out a revised recommendation and motion has been provided at today's meeting regarding 21-SUB-01. C. Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings 1. Residences on Datura (2338 Datura Street): Subdivision Application No. 21-SUB-01 is a request for subdivision approval to construct four single-family homes on a 1.25 acre lot with a street address of 2338 Datura Street. The subject property currently consists of two vacant lots. All access is taken from a proposed private Right of Way off Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 7 of 12 Datura Street. The properties are zoned Residential Single Family 3 (RSF-3) and the Future Land Use classification is Single-Family (Low Density). (Amy Pintus, Development Review Planner) 2:36:51 P.M. Applicant Presentation: Ms. Erin Tumolo, PE, Morris Engineering, appeared. Ms. Tumolo discussed the proposed subdivision stating it is a four-unit subdivision on 1.25 acres; said the subdivision would be served by a private street and private utilities; reviewed the proposed on-site stormwater management system; and stated the Applicants agree with the revised staff recommendation. PB Member Blumetti questioned if access issues were the reason only four units were proposed while the density supported seven units. Ms. Tumolo stated the lot configuration limited the number of units that could be reasonably constructed on the site. Attorney Connolly pointed out that per the Zoning Code any development with three or more units requires Final Plat approval. Discussion ensued. PB Vice Chair Clermont questioned how the stormwater runoff would be managed and the impact on the trees; particularly the grand tree proposed to be significantly trimmed. Ms. Tumolo described the proposed stormwater management system noting thati restricted the options for placement of structures on the site. Phil Smith, Landscape Architect for the project, appeared and pointed out the road width required for emergency services access also restricts that number and location of units on the site; said some minor modifications will be made to the site plan in order to preserve some off-site grand trees; stated the portion of the grand tree being trimmed was less that five percent of the entire canopy; and pointed out 80t of the trees proposed for removal are exotic and/ or in poor health and therefore no mitigation is required. PB Chair Salem questioned if the proposed configuration would have the least impact on the trees. Ms. Tumolo confirmed that was correct. PB: Member Ohlrich discussed the stormwater report noting she did a site visit and was informed by a neighbor of significant flooding in the area; requested an explanation of the functions of the dry linear pond; questioned who would be responsible for monitoring the Operation and Maintenance guidelines; and how the nine trees on-site that require mitigation will be mitigated. Ms. Tumolo stated the Homeowners Association is responsible for ensuring the Operation and Maintenance guidelines are followed. Mr. Smith stated Sheet L3 of the site plan contains the mitigation plan. PB Member Halflants noted the size of the proposed cul de sac and questioned if it could be reduced; and stated rezoning the property to multi-family would provide better flexibility. Discussion ensued regarding the various requirements that must be met; the possibility of reducing the amount of impervious surface by placing a landscaped island in the cul de sac; the process for rezoning and changing the Future Land Use classification; and previous subdivision approval. Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 8 of 12 3:07:44 P.M. Staff Presentation: Amy Pintus, Development Review Planner, appeared and stated the Future Land Use classification does not support a rezoning to multi-family; said the current zoning allows for seven residential units however only four are proposed due to access issues; noted the proposed road would be private; and discussed staff's revised recommendation and motion. PB Chair Salem questioned how the trees would be protected when each lot is developed individually. Attorney Connolly reviewed the steps required in the Zoning Code for subdivision review and approval; pointed out the Planning Board can make recommendations; and stated once approved the project would go through the building permit process that includes review by the City Arborist. General Manager McAndrew pointed out the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions includes a provision that the Homeowners Association must review and approve architectural and landscaping plans. Discussion ensued. PBI Member Ohlrich questioned if trash pickup and policing can occur on a private road; and how the city could ensure the Homeowners Association does not get disbanded in the future with the street becoming the City's responsibility. Attorney Connolly confirmed trash pickup and police services could be provided on a private street; and stated the City Commission would have to approve the street becoming a public street. Discussion ensued regarding the Planning Board conditioning that the street remain private in perpetuity. Attorney Connolly noted the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions are binding for a period of fifty years. PB Member Blumetti noted the lot coverage maximum of 35 percent per the zoning code; pointed out the site currently allows for two 9,000 Sq ft. + structures; and stated he felt four smaller structures would be more compatible with the neighborhood. Discussion ensued regarding preservation of the trees. PB Member Halflants stated he felt the impacts to the trees are a high price to pay for a minimal increase in density. PB Vice Chair Clermont questioned if the location of the structures could be reconfigured to minimize the required road length. Discussion ensued regarding a private driveway versus road frontage; subdivision requirements; and road width requirements for emergency vehicles. The Planning Board Took a Twelve Minute Break 3:33:46 P.M. Affected Persons: Mr. Daniel Kennedy appeared and stated his opposition to the proposed subdivision based on stormwater runoff concerns; impacts to the trees; and the size of the cul de sac. Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 9 of 12 Ms. Kathleen Sherrow appeared and expressed concerns regarding the impacts to the trees; the location of fencing; and drainage on the site. Ms. Laura Sperling appeared via Zoom and stated her concerns regarding drainage, the location of a swale; the impacts on the trees; noise; the location of the proposed cul de sac; and the potential for accessory dwelling units. Mr. Mark Libowitz (representing Thomas Holderness) appeared and stated concerns regarding the impacts on the trees, the potential size of the structures, and drainage; and stated he spoke with the developer who has agreed to meet with the neighbors. Citizen Input: Ms. Flo Entler appeared and discussed recent redevelopment in the Arlington Park neighborhood; stated the new homes would increase traffic in the area; discussed the impacts on trees and wildlife in the area in general due to the redevelopment; and impacts on infrastructure. 4:05:24 P.M. Affected. Person Rebuttal: There was no Affected person rebuttal. Staff Rebuttal: PB Member Blumetti questioned if the fire access would be an issue if only three lots were proposed. Development Review Planner Pintus stated access to the lots is an issue as well. Discussion ensued regarding street access versus fire access; what constitutes a subdivision; potential reconfiguration of the proposed lots; frontage requirements; and flag lots. Attorney Connolly pointed out the Planning Board members are considering what is proposed and can make recommendations regarding potential revisions to the project but cannot redesign the project. PB Member Ohlrich stated her concerns regarding the location of the cul de sac and requested the applicants address that at rebuttal. PB Member Blumetti questioned why a Community Workshop was not held. Development Review Planner Pintus stated that was not a requirement. PB Chair Salem noted the code addresses off-site stormwater runoff. Applicant Rebuttal: Ms. Tumolo and Mr. Smith appeared. Ms. Tumolo stated the stormwater runoff cannot negatively impact surrounding properties; pointed out the proposed stormwater management system would improve the drainage; noted the site has to meet the existing grade of adjacent parcels; said the site is challenging due to the configuration; noted the substantial cost of providing access; stated the applicants feel this is the best design and layout; said some minor modifications could possibly be made to accommodate more trees; and pointed out the design and layout will undergo further review as part of the building permit process. Mr. Smith discussed staff's proposed additional condition that addresses trees; stated the stem proposed for removal from the 62" grand oak is not a part of the main stem Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 10 of 12 and will not negatively impact the tree; and presented a graphic depicting potential siting of structures to avoid the: remaining trees. Discussion ensued regarding tying the approval to the graphic just presented by Mr. Smith; placing conditions on the recommendation for approval; and protections for grand trees in the code. Senior Arborist Miller appeared and reviewed the four conditions in the code under which a grand tree can be removed and mitigation requirements. PB Member Halflants stated due to the size of the cul de sac the structures would have to be very small to save trees. PB Vice Chair Clermont noted the Homeowners Association will have to approve landscaping and questioned if the Homeowners Association had more authority than the City Arborist. Senior Arborist Miller stated that was correct. PB Vice Chair Clermont pointed out the Florida Legislature has restricted the ability of local government to regulate trees and questioned if the project was designed based on that legislation. Mr. Smith stated tree preservation is done on a case-by-case basis. PB Member Blumetti stated the project needed further study and said seeing a sketch that is binding would be beneficial. PB Member Halflants questioned if the drainage would be going to the road. Ms. Tumolo confirmed that is correct and pointed out it would be less than currently due to the on-site stormwater management system that would be installed. PB Member Ohlrich stated she too was concerned about drainage. Ms. Tumolo stated the code addresses that issue and discussed the proposed stormwater management system. PB Member Ohlrich noted the cul de sac was on the property line and questioned if pervious bricks could be used rather than asphalt. Ms. Tumolo pointed out the curb and gutter system will contain the stormwater runoff on-site and noted pervious bricks would be difficult to maintain and would not change the stormwater management requirements. Discussion ensued regarding the applicants coming back with additional information showing the buildable area of each lot; saving more trees on the site to assist in mitigating tree removal that is occurring citywide; the opportunity for the applicants to meet with the neighbors; and the potential for redesigning the retention areas. 4:37:27 P.M. PB Chair Salem closed the public hearing. PB Member Halflants stated the proposed project was not the best use of the site; and said the site could be better developed with less infrastructure. PB Member Blumetti said he agreed with PB Member Halflants and PB Vice Chair Clermont; and stated he favored continuing the public hearing SO the applicant can come back with the footprint of the proposed structures. PB Member Ohlrich stated she agreed with PB Members Halflants and Blumetti. PB Vice Chair Clermont stated he wanted to see the buildable area to confirm the trees must be removed. PB Member Ohlrich noted the Planning Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 11 of 12 Board cannot change the applicant's project; stated the Planning Board can recommend the City Commission deny the project; and said if the applicant agreed to come back with additional information the Planning Board might recommend the City Commission approve the project. PB Chair Salem discussed the costs associated with developing a site; pointed out fewer lots would result in larger structures that are not compatible with the area; and suggested the applicants attempt to protect more trees if possible. Discussion ensued. Attorney Connolly requested if the Planning Board continues the item it be scheduled for a date certain; noted the Planning Board has the option of recommending conditions with better detail; and pointed out the Planning Board could recommend denial. Discussion ensued. 4:47:02 P.M. PB Member Blumetti made a motion to continue the application. Discussion ensued regarding the applicant's S preference and an appropriate continuance date. Ms. Tumolo stated the applicants preferred going forward to the City Commission with additional conditions included in the recommendation. PB Member Halflants seconded the motion. Discussion ensued. The motion passed 4-1 with PB Chair Salem voting no. Attorney Connolly announced the public hearing for Application No. 21-SUB-01 has been continued to the March 9, 2022, Planning Board meeting to be held at 1:30 P.M. in the City Commission Chambers, City Hall, 1565 1st Street. 4:53:44 P.M. V. CITIZEN's INPUT NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: At this time Citizens may address the Planning Board on topics of concern. Items which have been previously discussed at Public Hearings may not be addressed at this time. (A maximum 5- minute time limit.) There was no citizen input. 3:54:16 P.M. VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. December 14, 2021 PB Member Ohlrich confirmed she had submitted changes for clarity. The PB approved the minutes as revised by PB Member Ohlrich by consensus. 4:55:43 P.M. VII. PRESENTATION OF TOPICS BY STAFF Items presented are informational only (no action taken). Any issue presented that may require future action will be placed on the next available agenda for discussion. Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting January 12, 2022, at 1:30 p.m, in the Sarasota City Commission Chambers Page 12 of 12 Secretary McAndrew noted the requested information regarding a parks inventory has been emailed and hard copies provided to the PB members; said there are seven items scheduled for the February 9, 2022 PB meeting; reviewed the items scheduled for that agenda; explained the purpose of the legislative item on that agenda; and pointed out PB Member Blumetti will not be attending the February 9, 2022 PB meeting and no alternate PB member has been appointed yet. Attorney Connolly pointed out the City Commission could still potentially appoint an alternate member prior to the February 9th PB meeting. Discussion ensued. 4:59:49 P.M. VIII. PRESENTATION OF TOPICS BY PLANNING BOARD Items presented are informational only (no action taken). Any issue presented that may require future action will be placed on the next available agenda for discussion. PB Member Ohlrich thanked staff for the parks inventory and said she would follow up with staff if she needs additional information rather than placing the discussion on a PB meeting agenda. IX. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:00 P.M. PAs MAAull Kevin McAndrew Terrill Salem, Chair Development Services Department Planning Board/Local Planning Agency [Secretary to the Board]