BOOK 38 Page 11795 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SARASOTA CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 1, 1995, AT 6:00 P.M. PRESENT: Mayor David Merrill, Vice Mayor Mollie Cardamone, Commissioners Delores Dry and Nora Patterson, City Manager David Sollenberger, City Auditor and Clerk Billy Robinson, and City Attorney Richard Taylor ABSENT: Commissioner Gene Pillot PRESIDING: Mayor David Merrill The meeting was called to order in accordance with Article III, Section 9 of the Charter of the City of Sarasota at 6:00 p.m. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson gave the Invocation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. CHANGES TO THE ORDERS OF THE DAY = APPROVED #1 (0020) through (0048) City Auditor and Clerk Robinson presented the following Change to the Orders of the Day: A. Please move forward to immediately follow Approval of the Minutes, New Business, Item VIII-3, Approval Re: Modified Site and Development Plan for the Mote Marine Turtle Display Mayor Merrill asked if the Commission had any objections to the change. Mayor Merrill stated that hearing no objections, the Change to the Orders of the Day was approved by unanimous consent. 2. ADOPTION RE: MEMORIAL RESOLUTION NO. 95R-816, NAMING AN UN- NAMED STREET ON KEN THOMPSON PARK TO BETTY MOTE ROSE WAY = ADOPTED #1 (0053) through (0196) Mayor Merrill requested that Dr. Kumar Mahadevan, Executive Director of Mote Marine, join him before the Commission. Mayor Merrill requested that City Auditor and Clerk Robinson read Memorial Resolution No. 95R-816 in its entirety which stated that Betty Mote Rose served on the Board of Trustees of the Mote Marine laboratory and gave unstintingly of her time and financial support for more than twenty-seven years until her death in October 1993; and that the Commission finds naming the un-named street immediately adjacent and easterly of Mote Marine Laboratory on Ken Thompson Parkway as "Betty Mote Rose Way" a fitting way to honor and recognize the contributions made to Sarasota by Betty Mote Rose and the Mote family. On motion of Vice Mayor Cardamone and second of Commissioner Patterson, it was moved to adopt Memorial Resolution No. 95R-816. Mayor Merrill requested that City Auditor and Clerk Robinson proceed with the roll-call vote. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. Dr. Mahadevan recognized in the audience William R. Mote, Honoree and President of Mote Marine Laboratory; and Mote Marine Laboratories Board of Trustees Chairman Michael Martin, Chairman Emeritus Bob Johnson, and Member Roy Palmer. Mr. Martin came before the Commission and stated that naming the requested street "Betty Mote Rose Way" means a great deal to Mr. Mote; and thanked the City for being such a good friend to Mote Marine. 3. PRESENTATION RE: "MY IDEA WORKED" EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION PROGRAM AWARD GIVEN TO CHRISTINA GONZALEZ, PARKING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION #1 (0199) through (0270) Gibson Mitchell, Director of Finance and Chairperson of the "My Idea Worked" Awards Committee; Larry Lovejoy, Employee Services Manager, and Christina Gonzalez, Parking Enforcement Specialist I, came before the Commission. Mr. Mitchell stated that the "My Idea Worked" Employee Suggestion Program was initiated in September 1994; that the purpose of the program is to encourage and recognize employees who propose innovative ideas or procedures that, when adopted and implemented, will result in reducing expenditures of public funds. Mr. Mitchell continued that Christina Gonzalez will be the first employee to receive the "My Idea Worked" Award for her suggestion to paint the City's handicap parking spaces uniformly with thermo- plastic; that the thermo-plastic will initially cost more but last longer and provide better visibility to the public; that the improvement to the handicap spaces will allow an officer's citation to hold up in court since the ground and the signage will be consistent; that the annual savings generated by the use of thermo- plastic on handicap parking spaces has been determined at $1,000. Mr. Mitchell presented Ms. Gonzalez with a certificate of achievement plaque and a check for $100. Mr. Mitchell stated that the Administration plans to begin a campaign to notify all employees of the "My Idea Worked" Employee Suggestion Program. Mr. Lovejoy distributed "My Idea Worked" logo coffee mugs to each of the Commissioners. BOOK 38 Page 11796 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11797 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: APPROVAL RE: MINUTES OF THE STATUTORY MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1995, AND MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1995 - APPROVED (AGENDA ITEM I) #1 (0270) through (0272) Mayor Merrill asked if the Commission had any changes to the minutes. Mayor Merrill stated that hearing no changes, the minutes of the statutory City Commission meeting of April 14, 1995, and regular City Commission meeting of April 17, 1995, were approved by unanimous consent. 5. NEW BUSINESS: APPROVAL RE: MODIFIED SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MOTE MARINE TURTLE DISPLAY - APPROVED (AGENDA ITEM VIII-3) #1 (0279) through (0320) City Manager Sollenberger stated that Mote Marine received Special Exception 93-SE-04 for a Marine Mammal Rehabilitation and Research Facility on January 4, 1993; that the site plan originally approved did not include a turtle research center; that Mote Marine has applied for a building permit to allow for two turtle tanks and a research facility in conjunction with the existing visitor center; that this item would normally be handled administratively; however, a requirement in the lease between the City of Sarasota and Mote Marine requires that it be brought before the Commission for approval; that the Administration recommends approval of the modified site and development plan including the turtle display tanks. On motion of Commissioner Patterson and second of Vice Mayor Cardamone, it was moved to approve the modified site and development plan for the Mote Marine turtle research center. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. 5. BOARD ACTIONS: REPORT RE: PLANNING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY'S REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 5, 1995 = NO ACTION TAKEN (AGENDA ITEM II) #1 (0321) through (0571) Jane Robinson, Director of Planning and Development, and Judson Boedecker, Chairman of the Planning Board/Local Planning (PBLP) Agency, came before the Commission. Mr. Boedecker presented the following item from the Planning Board/Local Planning Agency's regular meeting of April 5, 1995: A. Ordinance No. 95-3863 = Eliminating time limits in the Commercial Business, Newtown (CBN) Zone District Mr. Boedecker stated that the PBLP found proposed Ordinance No. 95-3863 inconsistent with the Sarasota City Plan because it was not in keeping with neighborhood preservation; and the PBLP recommended that the City Commission initiate a mandatory rezoning of the commercial property along Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Way that is eligible for the CBN Zone District. Mr. Boedecker continued that many members of the Newtown community attended the PBLP public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 95-3863; that the consensus of the attendees, both homeowners and business owners, was that the time restrictions should be retained; that Jetson Grimes, on behalf of the Newtown Business Association, specifically stated that the local businesses felt strongly that there was a need for time restrictions on closings, as currently provided for the CBN Zone District. Commissioner Dry stated that she spoke with Mr. Grimes subsequent to the PBLP public hearing; that Mr. Grimes had indicated that a modification to the time limit may be necessary; and asked if the language of the time limits can be modified? city Manager Sollenberger stated that Ordinance No. 95-3863 as drafted would entirely remove the time limit restrictions; that the Administration's recommendation is to set the item for public hearing; that the Commission could discuss modifying the time limits after hearing public input. Commissioner Dry stated that a public hearing before the Commission would satisfy her concern of providing the community with an opportunity to express their comments regarding the time limits. Commissioner Patterson stated that eliminating the time limits would change only a facet of the CBN Zone District ordinance which is already in effect. Ms. Robinson stated that is correct. Commissioner Patterson asked for the number of properties affected by the CBN Zone District and if the public has been noticed of the pending rezonings? City Auditor and Clerk Robinson stated that the public was noticed in July and August of 1994; that 59 properties are eligible for rezoning to CBN; that 6 of the 59 eligible property owners have decided to "opt out". Commissioner Patterson stated that based on that information, she would assume that 53 of the 59 eligible property owners want to take advantage of the rezoning with the time restrictions included. Mr. Boedecker stated that the PBLP got the same indication from the individuals who spoke during the public hearing before the PBLP. BOOK 38 Page 11798 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11799 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. Mayor Merrill stated that hearing no motion, the Commission would continue to the next item. 7. CONSENT AGENDA NO. 1: ITEM NOS. 1, 2, 3, AND 4 = APPROVED (AGENDA ITEM III-A) #1 (0571) through (0583) 1. Approval Re: Authorize the Mayor and City Auditor and Clerk to execute the Estoppel and Subordination Agreement between the City of Sarasota, J.H. Floyd Sunshine Manor, Inc., and Nationsbank of Florida, N.A. 2. Approval Re: Authorize the Mayor and City Auditor and Clerk to execute a contract with Venice Construction Cleanup, Nokomis, Florida (Bid #95-54), for the trimming of palm trees located Citywide 3. Approval Re: Authorize the Mayor and City Auditor and Clerk to execute a contract with Len Tran, Inc., d/b/a Turner Tree and Landscape, for the landscape improvements for the Mound Street Project 4. Approval Re: Authorize the Mayor and City Auditor and Clerk to execute the subgrant application for the fourth year continuation of the Federal Anti-Drug Abuse Subgrant Mayor Merrill asked if the Commission had any objection to approving the items in Consent Agenda No. 1? Mayor Merrill stated that hearing no objections, Consent Agenda No. 1, Item Nos. 1 through 4 inclusive, were approved by unanimous consent. 8. CITIZENS' INPUT - ADMINISTRATION TO REVIEW AND REVISE THE ADMINISTRATION REGULATION REGARDING BOMB THREATS (AGENDA ITEM VI) #1 (0584) through (0854) Ernie Babb, 1886 Bahia Vista (34239), came before the Commission and stated that while meeting in the Commission Chambers on Wednesday, April 26, the Board of Adjustment was informed of a bomb threat received at City Hall and were told to evacuate the building; that people were gathered along the sidewalk at City Hall on First Street, at the exit doors, and in the parking lot across Second Street; that some people sat in vehicles in the City Hall parking lot; that many people remained in the building; that the evacuation was not handled appropriately; that many people waited for further instructions which never came; that no one seemed to be in-charge of the evacuation. Mr. Babb distributed to the Commission a copy of Administration Regulation No. 071.A001.1293; and stated that the regulation is out-of-date; that the procedures indicate people should be 300 feet from the building which the sidewalks are not; that people who are not qualified to make a determination on whether or not the bomb threat is real have been given that responsibility in the procedures; that having a bomb squad from the Public Safety Department in charge of such incidents and conducting interior searches of City Hall would be more appropriate than having untrained employees perform those functions. Mr. Babb requested that the Administration be directed to revise the procedures; that a better practice should be in place at the City to handle dangerous, serious incidents such as bomb threats. City Manager Sollenberger stated that people should not have been standing close to the building; that he was out of the office on April 26 and was contacted at home regarding the bomb threat; that the city Manager has the authority to make decisions on many matters; however, prior to exercising his authority in matters of this nature, he consults with individuals who have the related knowledge neçessary for him to make an appropriate decision; that John Lewis, Director of Public Safety, who had been in contact with the bomb squad, was consulted prior to making the decision to evacuate City Hall. Commissioner Patterson stated that she had a lengthy discussion with Mr. Babb earlier in the dayi that the City Manager should have the authority to make decisions on such matters; however, she is concerned with, i.e., Procedure 4 which states, "Searches will be conducted by the employees most familiar with the area being searched. 1 Commissioner Patterson continued that the details of the regulation need to be reviewed. Mr. Sollenberger stated that the language will be revised; that the practice of the City has been to notify the bomb squad whenever a bomb threat is received; that the bomb threat last Wednesday was not the first received at City Hall. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that a better procedure for evacuating the building should be established; that she called the Commission Liaison's Office to get her messages and was informed that the City had received a bomb threat; that the secretary should not have been answering the phone; that the people in the building, obviously, did not know what to do; that the fire alarm should have been sounded to alert all individuals present at City Hall to evacuate the building; that stronger procedures are necessaryi that all bomb threats should be considered serious. Mayor Merrill requested City Auditor and Clerk Robinson to explain the public hearing process. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson stated that at this time petitioners have 15 minutes to address the Commission and 5 minutes for rebuttal; that any citizen who has signed up to speak has 5 minutes. BOOK 38 Page 11800 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11801 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. All individuals wishing to speak during the public hearings were requested to stand and were sworn in by City Auditor and Clerk Robinson. 9. PUBLIC HEARING RE: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 95-3868, AMENDING CHAPTER 36, VEHICLES FOR HIRE, ARTICLE II, TAXICABS AND OTHER VEHICLES FOR HIRE TO INCREASE THE MAKIMUM RATES AND FARES AUTHORIZED FOR TAXICABS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR THE SEVERABILITY OF PARTS HEREOF IF DECLARED INVALID; ETC. (TITLE ONLY) - PASSED ON FIRST READING (AGENDA ITEM IV-1) #1 (0855) through (1043) Gibson Mitchell, Director of Finance, came before the Commission and stated that proposed Ordinance No. 95-3868 is the result of a request by Diplomat Taxi and Yellow Cabs of Sarasota for a rate increase and amends the Sarasota City Code to permit an increase in the maximum rates and fares authorized for taxicabs; that the last taxicab rate increase was granted by the City on February 20, 1990, when the rate was increased $0.30 from $2.40 to $2.70 for the first mile; that the request is for a $0.20 per mile increase to the base mileage rate which is currently $1.30 per mile and a $0.20 increase in the meter drop which is currently $1.40; that the requested increase would permit the cost of a taxicab fare to increase a total of $0.40 for the first mile; that this represents a 14.8% increase over the current rate of $2.70 for the first mile; that the Yellow Cab company indicated that operating costs have increased over 20% percent in the last four years; that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) has increase 18.3% from February 1990 to February 1995. City Manager Sollenberger stated that the Administration's recommendation is to pass proposed Ordinance No. 95-3868 on first reading. Mayor Merrill opened the public hearing. The following people came before the Commission: Dale Spencer, 2023 Princeton Street (34237), representing Yellow Cabs of Sarasota, stated that operating costs have increased dramatically over the past two years; that Sarasota County's heavily subsidized public transportation has made it difficult for the taxicab companies to increase their customer base; that he feels the rate increase is justified, reasonable, and warranted. Jorge Resendiz, 1795 Oak Lakes Drive (34232), representing Diplomat Taxi, stated that Diplomat Taxi supports the rate increase; that the requested increase would be a maximum rate increase; that individual taxicabs companies could charge lower rates; however, the ability to increase the rates as requested is necessary for companies with extensive operating costs. There was no one else signed up to speak and Mayor Merrill closed the public hearing. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson read proposed Ordinance No. 95-3868 by title only. On motion of Vice Mayor Cardamone and second of Commissioner Dry it was moved to pass proposed Ordinance No. 95-3868 on first reading. Mayor Merrill requested that City Auditor and Clerk Robinson proceed with the roll-call vote. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. 10. PUBLIC HEARING RE: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 95-3869, AMENDING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SPEED RESTRICTED AREAS IN SARASOTA BAY BY DELETING A REQUIREMENT THAT SPEED BE MEASURED IN NAUTICAL MILES PER HOUR AND REPLACING SAME WITH MILES PER HOUR: EXPANDING RESTRICTED AREAS TO INCLUDE MEASUREMENT FROM SHORELINES; MAKING RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF MAIN CHANNELS WITHIN SARASOTA BAY: SETTING FORTH FINDINGS: PROVIDING FOR THE SEVERABILITY OF THE PARTS HEREOF: REPEALING ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; ETC. (TITLE ONLY) - PASSED ON FIRST READING; DIRECTED THE ADMINISTRATION TO EXPAND THE AREAS CONSIDERED TO INCLUDE PROTECTION FOR THE BOATS MOORED AT THE SARASOTA SAILING SOUADRON (AGENDA ITEM IV-2) #1 (1044) through (1577) City Attorney Taylor stated that proposed Ordinance No. 95-3869 is the result of the direction given to the Administration at the April 17, 1995, City Commission meeting to proceed with changing the speed limit in Sarasota Bay from nautical miles to miles per hour (mph) within 150 feet of any dock, wharf, bridge or shoreline of the corporate limits specifically in the areas of Golden Gate Point, within the internal waterways of Bird Key, and in the waterway adjacent to Ken Thompson Park near the Sarasota Sailing Squadron; that the proposed ordinance accomplishes the following: 1. makes it unlawful for any person to operate a boat, within a channel, at a speed in excess of 6 mph when posted as a speed restricted area; 2. makes it unlawful for any person to operate a boat within 150 feet of any shoreline, at a speed greater than 6 mph when posted as a speed restricted area; and 3. changes the speed measurement from nautical miles per hour to statute miles per hour. BOOK 38 Page 11802 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11803 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. City Attorney Taylor stated that the amendment with reference to speed limits within channels provides flexibility so that, in cases where it may not be prudent to designate a no wake zone through the State, the City can locally designate the channel as a restricted speed area at 6 mph; that the City would not have difficulty applying the proposed restriction in the channel along Ken Thompson Park since that channel is not part of the intercoastal waterway. City Manager Sollenberger stated that the Administration recommends passing the proposed ordinance on first reading. Commissioner Patterson stated that speed limit markings in the area along the new Ken Thompson seawall and the Sarasota Sailing Squadron were not depicted in the original drawings presented to the Commission; that as part of the motion made to set the proposed ordinance for public hearing, the Administration was directed to pursue a no wake zone in the referenced area since the Commission was told that 6 mph speed limit signs could not be posted. City Attorney Taylor stated that a dotted channel line from the Gulf of Mexico along Ken Thompson Park to the Intercoastal Waterway depicted on the nautical chart was assumed as a delineation of Intercoastal Waterway; however, after researching the matter further, he found that the Intercoastal Waterway does not include the portion of the channel along Ken Thompson Park; that although the State has jurisdiction to post a no wake zone in that area, the jurisdiction is not exclusive. Mayor Merrill opened the public hearing. There was no one signed up to speak and Mayor Merrill closed the public hearing. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson read proposed Ordinance No. 95-3869 by title only. On motion of Commissioner Patterson and second of Commissioner Dry, it was moved to pass proposed Ordinance No. 95-3869 on first reading. Commissioner Patterson asked if the actual locations of the speed limits are part of the ordinance? City Attorney Taylor stated no. Mayor Merrill requested that City Auditor and Clerk Robinson proceed with the roll-call vote. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. Commissioner Patterson asked if action was necessary to reverse the previously made motion directing the Administration to pursue a no wake zone in the area of the Ken Thompson seawall and Sarasota Sailing Squadron? City Auditor and Clerk Robinson stated that action is not necessaryi that adopting Ordinance No. 95-3869 on second reading would make the former direction no longer applicable. On motion of Commissioner Patterson and second of Vice Mayor Cardamone, it was moved to direct the Administration to expand the areas considered for posting the 6 mph speed limit to include the geographical area of the New Pass channel from the terminus of the present no wake zone to a point easterly sufficient to protect the moored boats at the Sarasota Sailing Squadron. Vice Mayor Cardamone asked if the location would be from the New Pass bridge to the Sarasota Sailing Squadron? Commissioner Patterson stated that is the general area; that a small no wake zone is currently posted in the fuel tank area for the property leased by Gulfwind Marine. City Attorney Taylor stated that the speed limit would start where the referenced no wake zone ends and continue a sufficient length east to protect the boats moored at the Sarasota Sailing Squadron; that the proposed ordinance is not site specific but a general authorization to post a 6 mph speed limit; that maps depicting the specific locations for designation of the speed limit will be presented to the Commission for approval after the proposed ordinance is adopted on second reading. Mayor Merrill called for the vote on the motion. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. 11. PUBLIC HEARING RE: 8T. ARMANDS KEY, NORTHEAST QUADRANT TRAFFIC ABATEMENT STUDY = APPROVED #1 (1577) through (2168) Asim Mohammed, Assistant City Engineer, and Joe Pizzalato, Traffic Control System Tech IV, came before the Commission. Mr. Mohammed stated that in January and March of 1995, residents of North Adams and North Washington Drives petitioned the City to reduce vehicular traffic on their neighborhood streets; that the Engineering Department conducted a detailed Traffic Abatement Study encompassing the north east quadrant of St. Armands Key and presented the results to the residents at a neighborhood meeting on April 4, 1995; that the results indicated 4,000 vehicles per day travel on North Washington Drive which is four times the amount indicated for a residential street in the City's guidelines; that 60 accidents have occurred at the corner of North Washington Drive and John Ringling Boulevard; that the Public Safety Department, the St. Armands Merchants Association, and 91% of the properties surveyed, support the installation of seven speed humps and a BOOK 38 Page 11804 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11805 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. multi-way stop sign as measures for traffic abatement; that a public hearing before the city Commission on the Traffic Abatement Study is required under the City's current traffic abatement procedures. City Manager Sollenberger stated that the Administration recommends acceptance of the Traffic Abatement Study and approval of installing five speed humps and one multi-way stop. Mayor Merrill opened the public hearing. The following people came before the Commission: Buck Fry, John Gill, and Peter Laughlin of N. Washington Drive (34236), Carol Krohn, 132 N. Washington Drive (34236), and Maurice Richards of N. Adams Drive (34236); representing St. Armands North East. Mr. Fry stated that his family has resided on North Washington Drive for 18 years; that his daughter was involved in an accident with a speeding vehicle; that the local mailman was involved in an accident with a speeding vehicle; that people may argue that North Washington Drive be considered as part of an evacuation route; however, any flooding occurring on St. Armands Circle would also occur on North Washington Drive; that people may also argue that North Washington Drive be considered as an intersecting route for a hurricane evacuation; however, experts note that intersecting traffic is not desired during an evacuation. Mr. Laughlin stated that he recently purchased property on North Washington Drive; that the street is heavily travelled and used as a major, shortcut route; that the drivers are aggressive and speed; that many vehicles coast through the three-way stop currently in place; that the traffic problem is serious; that 91% of the people residing on the streets affected support the traffic abatement measures proposed. Ms. Krohn stated that she purchased her home in 1982 and walks in the neighborhood; that the traffic has gotten increasing worse over the years; that she is horrified by the excessive speed and vehicle behavior witnessed; that drivers stopped at the existing stop sign are often passed by a vehicle directly behind or two or three vehicles behind them; that vehicles travelling at the posted speed limit are passed by other vehicles; that the traffic abatement measures proposed are necessary for safety reasons and to maintain integrity in the neighborhood. Mr. Gill stated that the character of the traffic has gotten steadily worse since 1950; that the drivers are very aggressive; that his mother can no longer cross the street for fear of being hit by a speeding vehicle and thus has become a prisoner in her own home; that something needs to be done. Mr. Richards stated that the traffic on North Adams Drive includes thru traffic, cement trucks, delivery trucks, taxis, construction vehicles, etc.; that the issues are speed, safety, and cut thru traffic; that left hand turn signals on local residents' vehicles do not stop the vehicles travelling behind them from passing on the left; that two of his neighbors have recently had near accidents; that on January 5, 1995, a speeding vehicle hit a tree and caused serious damage to his propertyi; that on February 6, a taxi came within 4 to 6 inches of the curb near his yard where he was cleaning up debris; that speed humps are necessary to control the excessive speed and discourage cut thru traffic. There was no one else signed up to speak and Mayor Merrill closed the public hearing. Mayor Merrill asked for clarification on the number of speed humps to be installed. Mr. Sollenberger stated that seven speed humps would be installed. On motion of Commissioner Patterson and second of Vice Mayor Cardamone, it was moved to accept the Traffic Abatement Study for North Washington and North Adams Drives and approve installation of seven speed humps and one multi-way stop. Commissioner Patterson stated that the support of the neighborhood residents is important and appreciated. Mayor Merrill called for the vote on the motion. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0) : Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yesi Merrill, yes. Mr. Monammed thanked Mr. Pizzalato for his work with the residents and the residents involved whose efforts helped expedite a resolve to this matter; that the traffic abatement measures should be implemented within two months. 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: ADOPTION RE: SECOND READING OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 95-3855, TO CONDITIONALLY REZONE FROM RMF-2 ZONE DISTRICT TO CRT ZONE DISTRICT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY: LOTS 15, 16, 17, BLOCK D, CORRECTED PLAT OF GOLF COURSE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA; A/K/A 2075 FRUITVILLE ROAD; APPROVING PRELIMINARY SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN 94-PSD-0 TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE STORY, APPROXIMATELY 5000 SOUARE FOOT BUILDING FOR OFFICE PROFESSIONAL USE AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; ETC. (TITLE ONLY) (PETITION 94-CO-09 & 94 PSD-O, STEPHEN D. REES, BOOK 38 Page 11806 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11807 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. ESO, AS AGENT FOR RICHARD J. REYNOLDS) ) - ADOPTED (AGENDA ITEM VII-1) #1 (2168) through (2430) City Manager Sollenberger stated that the City Commission at its meeting of April 3, 1995, found the proposed rezoning and Preliminary site and Development Plan consistent with the Tree Protection Ordinance and the Sarasota City Plan; that proposed Ordinance No. 95-3855 was passed on first reading with two stipulations: 1) the required residential dwelling units be brought up to Code within 30 days, and 2) the Administration report back at second reading on the potential of an ingress/egress on Fruitville Road; that Timothy Litchet, Acting Director of Building, Zoning, and Code Enforcement, submitted a report that the property on 2064 5th Street has been brought into compliance with the Code; that written responses from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and John Lewis, Director of Public Safety, agree with the original recommendation not to permit a driveway on Fruitville Road to serve the development. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson read proposed Ordinance No. 95-3855 by title only. On motion of Commissioner Patterson and second of Commissioner Dry, it was moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 95-3855 regarding 2075 Fruitville Road. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that she understood buildings in the Commercial, Residential Transition (CRT) Zone District on Fruitville Road were to face Fruitville Road; that the proposed office building does not; and asked for clarification. V. Peter Schneider, Deputy City Manager, stated that the language for the CRT Zone District in Zoning Code recommends but does not require that buildings face Fruitville Road. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that the developer will be permitted to remove a major tree without any efforts to save it; that the building does not face Fruitville Road which is a recommendation of the CRT Zone District; that curb cuts will be placed on and add traffic to East Avenue, a neighborhood street, rather than on Fruitville Road; that her objection is not against the building or the proposed use of the property, but that the plan could have been submitted in a manner more conducive to neighborhood protection; that she will continue to vote no on this item. Mayor Merrill requested that City Auditor and Clerk Robinson proceed with the roll-call vote. Motion carried (3 to 1): Cardamone, no; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. 13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: REPORT RE: RESPONSE TO CITY'S COMMENTS ON 60% PLANS REVIEW FOR THE JOHN RINGLING CAUSEWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - REVISED COMMENT ON ITEM 4 TO INCLUDE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SEND A LETTER TO TALLAHASSEE AND APPROVED THE ADMINISTRATIONIS RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE THE FDOT REPORT AND SUBMIT SEVEN COMMENTS (AGENDA ITEM VII-2) #1 (2432) through #2 (0446) Dennis Daughters, Director of Engineering/City Engineer, and Gerald Carrigan, Design Engineer, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), came before the Commission. Mr. Daughters stated that Chuck Wood of the FDOT and Project Consultant Doug Cox of Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan were present in the audience; that the FDOT has responded to the 60% plans submittal for the John Ringling Causeway Bridge Replacement transmitted by the City on March 21, 1995; that the Administration recommends approval of their responses with the exception of seven items. Mr. Daughters displayed on the overhead projector and explained the following Administration's recommendations: Receive FDOT's response to the City's comments on the 60% plans submittal and approval of their responses except Items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 20, and 21 with the following comments: Item 3 Request the FDOT to change their proposal in order that the sidewalks on the bridge itself be 10 feet in width rather than 8 feet. Item 4 Request the FDOT to further investigate alternatives to the standard "New Jersey Barrier", to accommodate the City's desire for views of Sarasota Bay. Items 5,6, & 7 Request the FDOT to continue the pathway at North Bird Key Park and authorize the Mayor to send a letter to the FDOT approving use of the 4 (f) lands. Item 8 Request the FDOT not install a temporary sidewalk on the south side of the west approach to the bridge. Item 17 Request the FDOT to resurface Gulf Stream Avenue from Golden Gate/Sunset Drive to U.S., 41 as part of the U.S. 41 (Gulf Stream Avenue to 10th Street) resurfacing project. BOOK 38 Page 11808 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11809 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. Item 20 Request the FDOT to allow the City to respond at a later date to the appropriateness of a fence at the southeast corner of the FDOT property at the east approach to the bridge for use as a contractor storage yard. Item 21 Confirm to the FDOT the City's desire to replace the eastern most end of the Tony Saprito Pier. Mr. Daughters referred to Item 3 and stated that the City originally requested that the FDOT expand the sidewalks on the bridge to 8 or 10 feet in width; that the FDOT expanded the sidewalks to 8 feet in width; that, subsequently, the City requested that the sidewalks be expanded to 10 feet; that the Administration is still recommending that the FDOT change the width of sidewalks on the bridge to 10 feet. Vice Mayor Cardamone asked for the total width of the bridge if the sidewalk width is expanded to 10 feet. Mr. Daughters stated that the bridge width proposed is 107 feet; that the total width of the bridge would be 111 feet if the FDOT decided to expand the width of the sidewalks to accommodate the City's request; that widening the bridge is not likely; however, the additional 2 feet necessary on each side to expand the width of the sidewalks could potentially be taken from other areas of the bridge. Mr. Daughters referred to Item 4, displayed a typical cross section on the overhead projector, and stated that the "New Jersey Barrier" is a 2 foot high, 8 inch wide concrete barrier which will be placed between the bicycle travel lane and the pedestrian walkway; that the outside wall which will be used on the outside edge of the bridge has yet to be determined, but is not anticipated to be a New Jersey Barrier; that the wall would be more of a pedestrian railing designed in an aesthetic manner. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that the importance of viewing the Bay from the bridge was repetitively expressed by the travelling public during the public hearings on this item; that she recently travelled over the Maximo Bridge in St. Petersburg on which "New Jersey Barriers" are used; that the view of the water from that bridge is obstructed for all lanes except the one closest to the edge; that the only view of the water from the inside travel is as it meets the horizon; that the obstructing barrier on the Maximo Bridge inhibits the view of boats on the water and the feeling of travelling over a beautiful bay; that the ability to view Sarasota Bay from the John Ringling Causeway Bridge is of paramount importance to the community. Mr. Carrigan stated that the FDOT has investigated several alternatives and has determined that the standard "New Jersey Barrier" is the only acceptable, crash-approved wall configuration that will meet safety requirements; that the "New Jersey Barrier" does not obstruct the view of the water from the travel lane on many bridges, i.e., the 45-foot fixed span Howard Franklin Bridge over Tampa Bay. Commissioner Dry left the Commission Chambers at 7:20 p.m. Mr. Daughters displayed engineering drawings on the overhead projector to explain in detail Items 5, 6, & 7, and stated that the pathway at the end of the bridge and the park lands is desirable and should not be deleted; that the City land which would be consumed by the pathway is not currently an active recreation area. Commissioner Patterson stated that the engineer drawings presented make it difficult for the Commission to visualize the area being discussed; that diagrams showing the areas of the bridge should be presented to the Commission, specifically in reference to the eastern portion of the bridge and the pathway connecting Tony Saprito Pier, Hart's Landing, etc. Commissioner Dry returned to the Commission Chambers at 7:23 p.m. Vice Mayor Cardamone agreed that hand-drawn diagrams would make visualization by the Commission easier. Mr. Daughters stated that he has a "bird's eye view" of the construction drawings showing the area referenced; that he will provide a color highlighted version to the Commission. Mr. Daughters referred to Item 8 and stated that the FDOT wants to include a temporary sidewalk on Bird Key to allow citizens to access the existing bridge structure for pedestrian crossing while the bridge replacement is under construction; that the Administration is recommending against the temporary sidewalk for three reasons: 1) the location is very close to the residential area, 2) no sidewalk exists currently, and 3) pedestrians can access the bridge via the sidewalk on the north side of Bird Key and bicyclists can utilize the striped shoulder either on the eastbound or westbound roadway; that there is no strong benefit of installing a temporary sidewalk. Mr. Daughters referred to Item 17 and stated that the segment on Gulf Stream Avenue from Golden Gate/Sunset Drive to U.S. 41 may not warrant resurfacing for structural improvement, but will be the only segment of the FDOT roads in the city not recently resurfaced, and resurfacing is being requested for aesthetic purposes; that the FDOT informed the City that the Golden Gate/Sunset Drive to U.S. 41 segment cannot be included as part of the bridge project; BOOK 38 Page 11810 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11811 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. therefore, the City is requesting that it be considered as part of the U.S. 41 resurfacing project, from Gulf Stream Avenue to 10th Street, planned in 1998. Mr. Daughters referred to Item 20 and stated that the vast land area owned by the FDOT on the south side of Hart's Landing near Golden Gate Point is a logical location for use by the contractor as a storage yard; that the City expressed its concern to the FDOT with having noise and visual impacts on adjoining residential areas controlled; that the FDOT's response was that the contractor responsible for setting up a storage area and maintaining control to the area will comply with all local noise ordinances; that the FDOT has offered to construct a fence along U.S. 41 to obscure the view of the FDOT property if it is used as a storage yard; that responding at a later date would provide the City an opportunity to gain input from the public on the appropriateness of a fence. Mr. Daughters referred to Item 21 and stated that the eastern most end of Tony Saprito Pier was severely damaged during the March 1993 storm; that the City used Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds to repair the pier in a short-term manner presuming that the FDOT would have to reconstruct a portion of the pier as part of the bridge project; that the current design of the replacement bridge goes over the Tony Saprito Pier; that the City feels the connection with the pier proposed will limit accessibility and should be reconstructed perpendicular to the existing seawall; that the FDOT responded that the issue of replacing/realigming a portion of the Tony Saprito pier should be addressed after the Bridge Development Report (BDR) is finalized and the specific location of the bridge columns are known. Mr. Carrigan referred to Items 5, 6, & 7 and stated that in response to the City's concerns on the pathway, the FDOT offered to delete the proposed pathway from the plans, or conversely, if the continuation of the pathway is still desired, requested a letter from the City Commission stating their position on using the 4( (f) lands; that the inclusion of the proposed pathway would constitute a revision requiring reevaluation of Section 4 (f) impacts by the Federal Highway Administration (FWA). Vice Mayor Cardamone asked for clarification of Section 4(f) impacts. Mr. Carrigan stated that Section 4(f) impacts are impacts to recreational lands and a requirement of the Federal Highway Administration; that the originally proposed pathway indicated no 4( (f) impacts to the area park lands; that a continuation of the pathway may create some impacts; that the FDOT will work with the potential impacts if the City deems the continuation of the pathway appropriate. Mr. Carrigan referred to Item 8 and stated that the FDOT would accommodate the City's request not to install a temporary sidewalk. Mr. Carrigan referred to Item 20 and stated that the land owned by the FDOT at the southeast quadrant of the bridge is a potential location for use by the contractor as a storage yard; that the specific location of the storage yard will not be known until the contractor submits plans; that the FDOT will fence the area to reduce the visual impacts, if the City so desires; that the contractor will comply with the City's noise ordinances and other ordinances in effect. Mr. Carrigan referred to Item 21 and stated that the FDOT will work with the City on the Tony Saprito pier issue. Commissioner Patterson asked if the "New Jersey Barrier" was the only crash-approved type of barrier in the United States or just the State of Florida? Mr. Carrigan stated that the John Ringling Causeway Bridge Replacement is scheduled for Federal funding and will be designed to Federal standards; that to his knowledge, the "New Jersey Barrier" is the only approved shape allowed for use on bridge projects of the type proposed. Commissioner Patterson asked if Mr. Carrigan was stating that no Federally funded bridge projects in the United States will move forward today or in the foreseeable using a barrier other than a "New Jersey Barrier" between the roadway and the pedestrian areas? Mr. Carrigan stated that he is not familiar with the design standards for bridge structures in other states; that he is familiar with bridge structures and the FWA requirements in this region; that the "New Jersey Barrier" is the only barrier available to the FDOT; that the FWA does not develop the standards; that the FWA approves standards developed by a specific state; that the standards are developed by the FDOT and approved by the FWA. Commissioner Patterson stated that this issue was already raised with FDOT District Secretary David May at an Metropolitan Planning Organization; that the Mayor should be authorized to send a letter directly to FDOT Secretary Ben Watts in Tallahassee asking for consideration of another type of barrier. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that she previously believed that the barrier standard was a Federal standard; that she feels more comfortable and confident with attempting to revise a State standard to accommodate the community. The following person came before the Commission: BOOK 38 Page 11812 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11813 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. Mark Smith, 5562 Cape Aqua Drive (34242), representing the citizens for Planning Regionally, stated that the Citizens for Planning Regionally is a committee comprised of members from various organizations including the Bridge Too High and Save Anna Maria Committees; that the design drawings for the Anna Maria Bridge are 100% complete, but construction has been delayed in the permitting process due to a wind speed safety issue; that the wind speed on vehicles travelling over the proposed John Ringling Causeway Bridge Replacement needs to be considered; that the bridge replacement was proposed to solve issues relating to traffic and evacuation; that the replacement bridge is the same width and number of lanes as the existing bridge and will not solve the traffic issue; that the evacuation issue can be serious if the window of opportunity to get off the barrier islands is lost. On motion of Commissioner Patterson and second of Vice Mayor Cardamone, it was moved to approve the Administration's recommendation presented adding to Item 4 that the Mayor be authorized to send a letter to Secretary Watts addressing alternatives to the "New Jersey Barrier". Mayor Merrill called for the vote on the motion. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. 14. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: APPROVAL RE: PROPOSED FRANKLIN MANOR PARK CONCEPT PLAN - APPROVED; AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATION TO PROCEED WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (AGENDA ITEM VII-3) #2 (0449) through (0742) City Manager Sollenberger stated that the changes previously requested by the City Commission together with those requested by the Parks, Recreation, and Environmental Protection Advisory Board have been incorporated into the concept plan submitted to the Commission for review; that the suggested changes do not impact the development budget which was previously presented. Mayor Merrill stated that the Commission previously requested that more sheltered picnic tables be located near the water; that only two sheltered picnic tables by the waterfront are depicted in the concept plan submitted; and asked for a professional opinion on whether the public would have a greater desire to use sheltered picnic tables located by the waterfront or located in the shadow of a high rise building closer to U.S. 41? Duane Mountain, Streets, Landscape Maintenance & Solid Waste Manager, and David Johnston, Landscape Architect, came before the Commission. Mr. Johnston referred to a display on the overhead projector of the Conceptual Master Plan for Franklin Manor Park and stated that the comments received by the Commission on the concept plan originally submitted were interpreted as a desire to "flip flop" the plan from a use standpoint; therefore, 75% of the picnicking facilities originally placed at the eastern end of the project were distributed in the western part of the project from the oak hammock area to the seawall; that locating the sheltered picnic tables along the sidelines provides a closer view and access to the water without physically obstructing the view of the water from other areas in the park. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that she expected the picnic tables to be located closer to the water; that locating the picnic tables in front of the trees would not obstruct the view from other areas of the park. Mr. Johnston stated that seven sheltered picnic tables are located from the oak hammock area forward to the water; that two of those are directly on the water and one is slightly adjacent to the water; that the County's standard, pressure-treated lumber picnic tables will be used and can be relocated at will along the waterfront in unsheltered areas; that the sheltered picnic tables could be grouped in multiple pods for group picnicking closer to the water; that those changes can be made to the construction documents. The following person came before the Commission: Doug Means, 1100 Hampton Road (34236), stated that his residence is adjacent to the proposed park; that the Franklin Manor property impacts his entire neighborhood; that he supports the plan as submitted; that many sheltered picnic tables by the waterfront would obscure the waterfront view from the park and the adjacent neighborhoods; that the oak hammock and the high rise buildings provide shade which is desired during picnicking. City Manager Sollenberger stated that the Administration recommends approval of the concept plan and authorization for the Administration to proceed with plans and specifications; that the bids received on the project will be presented to the Commission for review. On motion of Commissioner Dry and second of Vice Mayor Cardamone, it was moved to approve the concept plan and authorize the Administration to proceed with plans and specifications. Motion carried (3 to 1): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, no. 15. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: APPROVAL RE: AMEND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE U.S. 41 MEDIAN LANDSCAPING TO INCLUDE A PROVISION WHEREBY THE CITY WILL REMOVE THE LIVE OAKS WHEN THE TRUNK DIAMETER EXCEEDS BOOK 38 Page 11814 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11815 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. ELEVEN (11) INCHES - APPROVED; DIRECTED THE ADMINISTRATION. TO PROCEED WITH MEDIAN CONSTRUCTION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE (AGENDA ITEM VII-4) #2 (0742) through (1095) City Manager Sollenberger stated that the City requested and received a special exception from the Florida Department of Transportation District Secretary David May to allow for planting of eighty-one 5-inch caliper Live Oaks along U.S. 41 as part of the median beautification project; that the special exception was granted with the stipulation that the Live Oaks be removed or replaced when an 11-inch trunk diameter is reached; that Mr. May indicated that the FDOT has agreed to such a provision in the Landscape Maintenance Agreement; that the Live Oak scheme prepared by Mr. Johnston provides for the trees to be harvested, sold, and then replaced with smaller stock, if necessary, when the trunk diameter reaches 11 inches; that alternative tree plans have been prepared for review if the Commission does not support using Live Oaks or accepting the permit as stipulated. City Manager Sollenberger continued that the Administration recommends amending the FDOT Landscape Maintenance Agreement to include a provision whereby the City will remove the Live Oaks when the trunk diameter exceeds 11 inches. Duane Mountain, Streets, Landscape Maintenance & Solid Waste Manager, and David Johnston, Landscape Architect, came before the Commission. Mr. Johnston referred to a display on the overhead projector to explain in detail the Tree Staking and Root Control Detail and stated that a new product developed by Dupont has an herbicide with a long-term release of 8 to 10 years impregnated into the root control fabric which will prohibit root growth past the fabric; that the product was specifically, designed for street tree projects where avoiding root conflicts with utilities or infrastructure is desired; that the Dupont-tested product will provide a self- contained root barrier in the top 12 to 18 inches of soil which will make relocating the trees, if necessary, uncomplicated. Mr. Johnston continued that the standards of the FDOT may become more liberal by the time the tree trunks reach 11 inches in diameter. Commissioner Patterson asked if a record has been established whereby trees have grown successfully within the root control barriers and subsequently have been relocated? Mr. Johnston stated that the technology has had great successi that some of the irrigation equipment sold has the same herbicide impregnated in the plastic to inhibit root growth into the weep holes; that the product has been used in California for many years. Commissioner Dry asked for a maintenance cost comparison between Live Oaks and Sylvester Palms. Mr. Johnston stated that the maintenance on both tree types would be minimal after establishment; that the palms would require pruning three or four times per year; that oak trees require more intensive work every couple of years; that the overall maintenance effort would balance out; however, oaks offer a better majesty of the shade than palms. Commissioner Patterson asked for the approximate cost of relocating a Live Oak contained as. proposed when its trunk reaches 11 inches in diameter? Mr. Johnston stated that two or three trees could be relocated daily by one crew for a cost of $500 to $600. On motion of Vice Mayor Cardamone and second of Commissioner Patterson, it was moved to amend the FDOT Landscape Maintenance Agreement to include a provision whereby the City will remove the Live Oaks when the trunk diameter exceeds 11 inches and to proceed with the median construction as soon as possible. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. 16. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: DISCUSSION RE: INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE FOR INCREASE OF FEES FOR DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES = APPROVED ADKINISTRATION'S RECOMMENDATION TO PREPARE AND SET AN ORDINANCE FOR PUBLIC HEARING (AGENDA ITEM VII-5) #2 (1095) through (1241) City Manager Sollenberger stated that the City Commission has expressed its intent to increase the permit fee for demolition of structures in order to establish a fund to subsidize the cost of historic designation applications; that in follow up to the discussion at the end of the Commission workshop on April 18, 1995, he proposes increasing demolition fees by $50 to $150; that the fees generated by the increased cost of demolition permits would be allocated on a first-come, first-serve, as-available basis when historic designations are filed with the City; that the amount of the subsidy based on availability would be up to the cost of the application, which is currently about $400; that the number of demolitions in the past two years were 74 in 1993, 57 of which were residential and 17 commercial, and 58 in 1994, 39 of which were residential and 19 commercial; that the level of activity at a $50 increase would have subsidized an average of eight designations over the past two years; that based on previous discussion, the subsidy would be generated only through private demolitions and not City-initiated demolitions. BOOK 38 Page 11816 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11817 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. Mr. Sollenberger cited the following Administration's recommendation: 1. Increase the fee for demolition of a structure from $100 to $150. 2. Utilize the additional revenue generated from private demolitions only to provide a subsidy for Historic Preservation designations. 3. Use the subsidy on a first-come, first-serve, as- available basis. 4. Prepare an ordinance that amends the Standard Building Code, Section 103.7 Fees, to include these recommendations. 5. Set the ordinance for public hearing. Vice Mayor Cardamone asked why an ordinance is necessary to raise the fee by $50? Mr. Sollenberger stated that a demolition fee schedule is established in the local amendments to the building code which are adopted by ordinance; therefore, an amendment to the ordinance is required to change the fee schedule. On motion of Commissioner Patterson and second of Vice Mayor Cardamone, it was moved to approve the Administration's recommendations to prepare an ordinance and set the ordinance for public hearing. Commissioner Patterson stated that she hopes the $2,500 Historic Preservation budget request will be presented during the budget workshops for consideration; that the presentation put forth to the Commission by Mikki Hartig intended for the demolition fee increase and the funding allocation to work in conjunction to facilitate the Historic Preservation program. Mayor Merrill called for the vote on the motion. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. 17. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: APPROVAL RE: AMENDMENTS OF 1993-94 AND 1994-95 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - APPROVED; LIST OF RULES OF PROCEDURE TO BE PRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION AT A WORKSHOP (AGENDA ITEM VII-6) #2 (1241) through (2002) Don Hadsell, Director of Community Development, came before the Commission and stated that the Commission previously approved the Rosemary District Redevelopment strategy and directed the Administration to begin the process of amending the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program; that the proposed amendment would implement recommendations three and four which were to establish a Storefront Assistance Program on Central Avenue from Fruitville Road to Tenth Street and to establish a fund to acquire land in the Central Avenue corridor; that a policy manual for the Storefront Assistance Program is being prepared for presentation to the Commission in June; that the proposed amendment has been advertised and a comment period held; that no comments were received from the public; that a public hearing is not required for amendments to the CDBG grant application. The following person came before the Commission: Mary Ouillin, 407 Cocoanut Avenue (34263), stated that the recently installed curb cuts for wheel chair accessibility and sidewalks on Cocoanut Avenue are much appreciated. Ms. Quillin continued that the public notice on the two revised CDBG grant applications included a notation to direct comments to Mr. Hadsell by April 21, 1995; that historically, the Community Development Department has not included public comment with the submittal of the CDBG grant applications; that the application submitted last year stated no public comment had been received although she and another citizen attended and expressed concerns during the public comment meeting which was held. Ms. Quillin further stated that a public comment meeting on the 1994-95 CDBG was noticed for April 25, 1995, 5:30 to 7:00 p.m., at City Hall; however, City Hall was closed when she arrived at 5:45 p.m.; that the meeting has been rescheduled. Ms. Quillin stated that the amendment proposed reduces by $300,000 the Housing Rehabilitation program which provides low interest loans for low to moderate income families; that the reduction was based on an additional availability of funds through the County Housing and City Community Development consolidation; however, the reports from Tallahassee indicate changes to the programs at the State level which could affect local funding. Ms. Quillin continued that the Storefront Assistance Program originally established has been amended; that the match requirement of $2.00 in private investment for every $1.00 in City loan - - up to a maximum of $50,000, at a 0% interest rate, for a period of ten years was changed to a $1.00 city loan for every $1.00 in private investment; that the storefront funding is for use on the facade of a building; that facade-related improvements, i.e., painting, will not last 10 years; that the Commission should consider discounting building permits for developers who want to reinvest in the Central Avenue neighborhood; however, the $300,000 of funding for loans at 3% to 4% interest to low to moderate income families who want to rehabilitate their homes should not be transferred to developers at 0% interest over a ten year period. BOOK 38 Page 11818 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11819 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. On motion of Vice Mayor Cardamone and second of Mayor Merrill, it was moved to approve the amendments to the 1993-94 and 1994-95 Community Development Block Grant as noticed. Commissioner Dry stated that comments have been received regarding citizens who have attempted to acquire Housing Rehabilitation funds for private homes and were told no funds were available. Mr. Hadsell stated that funding is available; that processing the loan applications has been the problem; that over 240 applications were received in one day; that the City and County have been awarded over $1 million in State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) funds and $1.5 in Home Partnership Investment Act (HOME) funds since the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation program was established; that next year, receipt of an additional $1.7 million in SHIP funds is anticipated; that the intent of the Clinton Administration and Congress granting additional funding through the State and Federal programs was to permit the use of CDBG funds for other economic development programs. Commissioner Patterson asked for clarification of the interest rate and the length of the loans provided to homeowners for rehabilitation. Mr. Hadsell stated that loans for residential rehabilitation with terms up to 20 years are approved; that the 5% loan is the sole source of funding; that matching funds are not required. Commissioner Patterson stated that the change in the Storefront Assistance Program to a $1.00/$1.00 match with 0% interest for a period of 10 years concerns her. Mr. Sollenberger stated that the City is attempting to provide an incentive to induce economic development on Central Avenue; that the incentive proposed on Central Avenue is less liberal than that which the City provided on Main Street; that the incentive on Main Street was a non-repayable grant; that the incentive on Central Avenue is a no-interest loan, which has to be repaid; that the change in match requirement has been considered since discussions with various investors has indicated difficulty in making the projects financially viable with the higher match requirement. Mr. Sollenberger continued that the City received a letter from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) urging the use of CDBG funds for economic development. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that reducing the $300,000 in CDBG Housing Rehabilitation funding to establish the Commercial or Industrial Rehabilitation program will not actually reduce the funding available for housing rehabilitation. Mr. Hadsell stated that is correct; that the funds will be substituted by HOME and SHIP funding. Mayor Merrill called for the vote on the motion to approve the amendments to the 1993-94 and 1994-95 CDBG as noticed for the establishment of the Rosemary District Redevelopment programs. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. Commissioner Patterson stated that, historically, the Chair has passed the gavel when seconding a motion. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson stated that passing the gavel has been a long-standing tradition of the Commission; however, Roberts Rules of Order does not require it be done. Vice Mayor Cardamone asked if the Mayor intends to discuss with the Commission changes in procedure such as not passing the gavel. Mayor Merrill stated that Robert Rules of Order is the procedure adopted for City Commission meetings; that passing the gavel is not a requirement of Roberts Rules of Order; that he intends to use the change sparingly; that the Commission can suspend the rules of order on any occasion. Vice Mayor Cardamone asked how Roberts Rules of Order was adopted as the procedure. city Auditor and Clerk Robinson stated that the procedure was adopted by ordinance; that a list of traditional, standing rules of procedure and suggestions for new rules of procedure will be prepared and presented to the Commission for adoption in the near future. Commissioner Patterson requested that the prepared list be presented to the Commission for discussion during a workshop. 18. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: APPROVAL RE: DEFERRAL OF THE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION REPAYMENT OF $75,000 TO PERMIT THE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION TO USE THESE FUNDS FOR A SECOND MORTGAGE PROGRAM IN THE LEON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT = APPROVED (AGENDA ITEM VII-7) #2 (2010) through (3583) Don Hadsell, Director of Community Development, and Jack Conway, President of the Community Housing Corporation (CHC), came before the Commission. City Manager Sollenberger stated that the CHC has requested that the repayment of $75,000 due to the City be deferred to permit use BOOK 38 Page 11820 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11821 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. of the funds to finance a second mortgage program in the Leon Avenue Redevelopment project. Mr. Hadsell stated that the Commission previously adopted the Leon Avenue Redevelopment Plan and approved a purchase contract to sell 15 lots in the former Augustine Quarters project to the CHC for $75,000; that to make the property more affordable to low-income residents, the CHC is requesting that the City permit the CHC to use the $75,000 as down payment assistance funds; that a second mortgage would be placed on the property at the time of sale to assure repayment of the down payment assistance to the City; that upon sale to a subsequent purchaser, the City would recapture the amount of down payment assistance granted the initial purchaser; that terms on the second mortgage would be 0% deferred until sale; that allocation of additional City funding would be necessary if the proposal is accepted. Mr. Conway distributed copies of the progress report on the Leon Avenue Neighborhood Redevelopment with a detailed summary of the approach being used to sell the homes; and stated that the report had been forwarded to the Commission on February 6, 1995; that second mortgages and down payment assistance are important elements of the financing programs developed; that participating financial institutions have agreed to provide 95% mortgages at a fixed interest rate of 8% with no points; however, incorporating closing costs and other down payment costs into the mortgage has the effect of raising the monthly payment beyond the family's ability to payi that HOME and SHIP funds available to the CHC have been used for second mortgages in certain situations; however, Mr. Hadsell has advised that the HOME and SHIP funds should not be used for the Leon Avenue Redevelopment project because of the possible trailer effect of the Uniform Relocation Act as a consequence of the acquisition of the Augustine Quarters; therefore, the CHC is requesting use of the $75,000 due the City to provide second mortgages and down payment assistance to qualifying families. Mr. Conway referred to and explained the sample calculations and estimates contained in the Mortgage Calculations for Leon Avenue reference sheet; and stated that the CHC is attempting to achieve a first-time home buyer program for the Leon Avenue Redevelopment which creates an economically integrated neighborhood and increases the property values in the surrounding areas; that some of the homes will be sold at market rate with modest down payment assistance; that some of the mortgages will utilize a 20-year term second mortgage in addition to the first mortgage. Mr. Conway continued that houses 1, 2, and 3 are already under construction and should be ready for occupancy later this month; that the notice of commencement on the next five houses has been signed; that buyers for three of the next five houses have been secured; that one of the houses has been reserved for the Home Ownership for Police (HOP) program for which Century Bank will provide 100% financing to a police officer who will take his patrol car home for conspicuous presence; however, no police officers have put forth applications. Commissioner Dry asked for a clarification of "PMI". Mr. Conway stated that P&I is principal and interest combined in the mortgage payment; that taxes and insurance are listed separately; however, principal, interest, taxes, and insurance are all included in the total monthly payment. Commissioner Dry asked for the term of the mortgages. Mr. Conway stated that the term of the first mortgage would 30 years; that the term of the second mortgage would be 20 years; that the 360 month term included in the sample calculations and estimates for second mortgages is an error. Commissioner Dry asked if one or two payments will be required for the homes sold with a second mortgage? Mr. Conway stated that a single payment towards the first mortgage will be required for 20 years; that the principal payment reduces considerably after 20 years; that the payment on the second mortgage which begins after 20 years could be consolidated with the principal on first mortgage to retain a single payment; that both mortgages will be paid off after 30 years at which time the buyer will own the home. Commissioner Patterson stated that no payments are required on the second mortgage for the first 20 years; and asked if the second mortgage is amortized in the last 10 years of the 30 year period? Mr. Conway stated that a balloon payment or refinancing of the second mortgage may be required; that the details on the second mortgage have not yet been determined; that the details on usage of the HOME and SHIP funds in conjunction with the recent consolidation of the Office of Housing & Community Development are not clear; that a feeling of conflict with the Uniform Relocation Act regarding the land acquisition of Augustine Quarters has been expressed by Mr. Hadsell and HUD; that a more systematic program of how the HOME and SHIP funds can be used for down payment assistance or second mortgages will be formalized in the future; that the CHC would like to use the $75,000 toward the second mortgages in the interim. Vice Mayor Cardamone asked if a home buyer of one of the CHC homes decided to move after three or five years, would they have the right to put the home on the market and sell it? BOOK 38 Page 11822 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11823 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. Mr. Conway stated that is correct; however, the second mortgage would have to be satisfied at the time of sale. Commissioner Dry asked for the estimated amount of HOME and SHIP funding available? Mr. Hadsell stated that the City and County are in the process of determining those figures which he estimates at between $1 million and $2 million. Commissioner Patterson asked if bank appraisals on the homes have been obtained? Mr. Conway responded, yes. Mr. Sollenberger stated that the Administration's recommendation is to approve the deferral of the CHC repayment of $75,000 to permit use of the funds for a second mortgage program in the Leon Avenue Redevelopment project. The following person came before the Commission: Mary Quillin, 407 Cocoanut Avenue (34236), stated that the former Augustine Quarters was purchased and demolished for approximately $300,000 while five or six lots in the downtown north were available for use by the CHC; that the CHC sold those lots back to the City for over $76,000 of which $20,000 was considered "fluff" - = the City taxpayers reimbursed CHC for the property taxes paid and property maintenance costs; that the Commission subsequently approved a purchase agreement with the CHC for the Leon Avenue Redevelopment which had a $75,000 deferred payment. Ms. Quillin continued for clarification that "PMI" is the private mortgage insurance required by many lenders when a borrower's down payment is less than 20% of the purchase price; that PMI protects the lender by paying off the loan should the borrower default. Ms. Quillin further stated that the CHC is once again asking the City to forgive a debt and use that debt toward another project; that the $1 million to $2 million mentioned in HOME and SHIP funds are Countywide funds; that the funds will be shared between the City and the other unincorporated areas in Sarasota County. Ms. Quillin cited the following from an article in Quest, a publication of the Sarasota Herald Tribune: In the early years of the mortgage, most of the payment is for interest. On a 30-year loan at 7.5%, the principal payment does not exceed the interest until year 21. Ms. Quillin stated that the more money a home buyer finances, the less equity a home buyer accumulates; that she is concerned with the program proposed; that the City has no standing in court on the second mortgage; that the concept of providing a program to assist first-time home buyers is a great idea, but providing 100% financing is risky; that the details on the second mortgage have not yet been determined; that a potential balloon payment by a family of four with two people working making an annual income of $22,000 to $25,000 is not appropriate; that the program should be reexamined; that the program should be one that gives a helping hand, not a hand out. Commissioner Patterson asked if the financing packages available are assumable mortgages? Mr. Conway stated that the mortgages are not assumable; that the sale by the initial buyer would pay off the existing first and second mortgages; that a potential buyer would have to qualify for the financing package. Mr. Conway continued that 100% financing is not being offered; that one-on-one assistance is provided to the prospective home buyer in dealing with credit problems, prequalifying with the bank, and establishing a method of savings to accumulate the 3% down payment which is required for the purchase of the home; that down payment assistance is used to make up the difference between a 3% and 5% down payment; that no defaults have been experienced thus far. On motion of Commissioner Patterson and second of Vice Mayor Cardamone, it was moved to approve the deferral of the CHC repayment of $75,000 to pérmit use of the funds for a second mortgage program in the Leon Avenue Redevelopment project. Motion carried (3 to 1) : Cardamone, yes; Dry, no; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. Commissioner Patterson left the Commission Chambers at 9:02 p.m. 19. NEW BUSINESS: ADOPTION RE: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 95R-814, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 211 OF THE BOND RESOLUTION (AS DEFINED HEREIN), OF NOT EXCEEDING $20,000,000 WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS OF THE CITY OF SARASOTA, FLORIDA FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FUNDS TO EFFECT A CURRENT REFUNDING OF A PORTION OF THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1988- A, AS HEREINAFTER SPECIFIED; DELEGATING TO THE FINANCE DIRECTOR OF THE CITY, UNDER THE CONDITIONS STATED HEREIN, THE AUTHORITY TO FIX CERTAIN DETAILS OF THE BONDS HEREIN AUTHORIZED, TO APPROVE THE FINAL FORM OF THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT FOR THE BONDS HEREIN AUTHORIZED AND TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY IN CONNECTION WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 15C2-12 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND THE AMENDMENTS THERETO, TO APPROVE THE FINAL FORM OF AND EXECUTE THE PURCHASE CONTRACT WITH THE UNDERWRITER AND TO TAKE CERTAIN BOOK 38 Page 11824 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11825 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. OTHER ACTIONS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH BONDS; ETC. - ADOPTED (TITLE ONLY) (AGENDA ITEM VIII-1) #2 (3598) through (0134) Gibson Mitchell, Director of Finance, came before the Commission. Commissioner Patterson returned to the Commission Chambers at 9:03 p.m. Mr. Mitchell stated that the proposed resolution would authorize the issuance of Water and Sewer System Revenue Refunding Bonds which provide the city the opportunity to achieve a significant savings on bonds which would mature in 2008; that the details on the bond issue structure has been provided in the Agenda packets. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson read proposed Resolution No. 95R-814 by title only. city Manager Sollenberger stated that the Administration recommends adoption of Resolution No. 95R-814. On motion of Vice Mayor Cardamone and second of Commissioner Dry, it was moved to adopt proposed Resolution No. 95R-814. Mayor Merrill requested that City Auditor and Clerk Robinson proceed with the roll-call vote. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. 20. NEW BUSINESS: APPROVAL RE: PROCEDURE FOR CITIZENS REQUESTING TO SPEAK UNDER THE "CITIZENS' INPUT" PORTION OF THE AGENDA - APPROVED LIMITING THE SUBJECTS TO TOPICS DIRECTLY RELATED TO CITY BUSINESS (AGENDA ITEM VIII-2) #3 (0134) through (0235) City Manager Sollenberger stated that at the request of the Commission he, City Auditor and Clerk Robinson, and City Attorney Taylor developed and recommend the following procedure for citizens wishing to speak under the "Citizens' Input" portion of the agenda: 1. Citizens requesting to speak will be advised at the time of signing up that the subject they wish to address be directly related to topics of City business. The sign-up sheet will be revised to include a statement to this effect. 2. The agenda item entitled "Citizens' Input" will be retitled to "Citizens' Input Concerning City Topics." Mr. Sollenberger stated that this procedure will assure citizens have the opportunity to speak about topic of concern but will limit the topics to those directly related to the City. Mayor Merrill asked if reducing the time limit to three minutes was discussed? Mr. Sollenberger stated that the preference of the Commission on that subject was not clear; that the Administration would have no objection to incorporating a reduction in the time limit if the Commission so desires. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that the revisions recommended should be implemented prior to initiating a change in the time limit; that the subject could be addressed subsequently if the time limit becomes an issue; that she does not have a problem with the five minute time limit. On motion of Vice Mayor Cardamone and second of Commissioner Patterson, it was moved to approve the procedure as outlined. Mayor Merrill stated that the Commission should consider a three- minute time limit; and asked City Auditor and Clerk Robinson for the time limits used by other communities. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson stated that approximately 50% of the communities use a five-minute time limit and 50% use a three- minute time limit. Commissioner Patterson stated that the Commission should adopt the procedure as outlined; and discuss the issue further during the Goals Setting Workshop scheduled on May 6; that Sarasota County Commission allows a five-minute time limit during Citizens' Input; however, the County does not allow citizens' input on every agenda item; that she may be amenable to attempt a similar procedure. Mayor Merrill called for the vote on the motion. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. 21. NEW BUSINESS: APPROVAL RE: SOUTH SARASOTA TRAFFIC ABATEMENT STUDY - AUTHORIZED THE TRAFFIC ABATEMENT STUDY AND APPROVED OF THE PROCEDURE AND SCHEDULE PRESENTED (AGENDA ITEM VIII-4) #3 (0241) through (0520) Asim Mohammed, Assistant City Engineer, and Joe Pizzalato, Traffic Control System Tech IV, came before the Commission. Mr. Pizzalato displayed on the overhead projector Figure 1 which outlined the study area Mr. Mohammed stated that the Administration is requesting approval to conduct a Traffic Abatement Study of the area bounded by Mound Street to the north, U.S. 41 to the east, Sarasota Bay to the west, and Boyce Street to the south; that during the last three years 10 BOOK 38 Page 11826 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11827 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. traffic abatement petitions have been received from the area; that the procedure proposed by the Administration to implement a traffic abatement strategy includes establishing a task force comprised of representatives of the various neighborhood associations and petitioners to discuss and address potential traffic abatement solutions; that the purpose of the task force is to develop and approve a short list of solutions which will be presented at a neighborhood meeting; that the neighborhood meeting will be held to determine the solution favored by the majority of the residents; and that the recommendations of the task force will subsequently be presented to the Commission for approval. Mr. Mohammed continued that the physical layout of the area, demographic factors, and the surrounding land uses create a unique balance which can easily be altered by modification to one segment; therefore, conducting one unified Traffic Abatement Study for the study area defined is recommended. Commissioner Patterson asked why the study area stopped at Boyce Street? Mr. Mohammed stated that traffic abatement petitions on streets further south were not received. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that Southside School generates traffic in the area defined; that including the Southside School and Cherokee Park areas in the study area should be considered. Mr. Mohammed stated that the Administration is attempting to focus on a small manageable area and reduce the risk of unnecessary abatement; that a traffic abatement petition has not been received from Cherokee Park; however, he has no problem with expanding the study area further south. City Manager Sollenberger stated that the Administration recommends authorizing the Engineering Department to begin a traffic abatement study for the area shown in Figure 1 and approving the outlined procedure and schedule for the performance of the traffic study. On motion of Commissioner Patterson and second of Vice Mayor Cardamone, it was moved to approve the Administration's recommendation. Commissioner Patterson stated that the study area as proposed would be the largest unified area studied by the City to date; that Webber Street is a natural ending to the study area; that the Engineering Department could, at a later date, request an expansion of the study area, if appropriate. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that she agrees; that the Traffic Study in the area of Bay Road and Osprey Avenue will include Siesta Drive and the abatement measures could dove tail nicely into the study area proposed. Mr. Mohammed stated that the both residents and major business entities, i.e., Sarasota Memorial Hospital, will be involved in the effort. Mayor Merrill called for the vote on the motion to approve the Administration's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously (4 to 0 - ): Cardamone, yes; Dry, yes; Patterson, yes; Merrill, yes. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that she is impressed with the unified approach proposed; that this Traffic Abatement Study could serve as a pilot procedure which could potentially be used for future traffic abatement throughout the City. 22. OTHER MATIBBADAINIETAIIVI OFFICERS AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRTION TO REVISE SIDEWALK CAFE FEE SCHEDULE (AGENDA ITEM XI) #3 (0522) through (0555) CITY MANAGER SOLLENBERGER: A. stated that several of the Commissioners have received correspondence from one of the restaurateurs who is applying for an outdoor dining license under the City's recently adopted Sidewalk Cafe Ordinance; that justifiably and correctly the restaurateur has pointed out that the City charges $100 for the initial license and then $100 for a renewal each October; that in the best interest of public relations, he plans to instruct the Administration to prorate the license unless any objections are raised by the City Commission. Mayor Merrill stated that there was a consensus of the Commission to authorize the Administration to revise the Sidewalk Cafe fee schedule. 23. REMARKS OF COMMIBBIONERS ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA: MAYOR MERRILL TO FORWARD A LETTER TO FDOT PROTESTING DISTRICT 1 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING; ADMINISTRATION TO FORWARD TO "SARASOTA THINKS" A RESPONSE TO THEIR REQUEST FOR A $3,500 CONTRIBUTIONI (AGENDA ITEM X) #3 (0555) through (0805) COMMISSIONER PATTERSON: A. stated that the following items on which no action was taken had been received while she was still Mayor: BOOK 38 Page 11828 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. BOOK 38 Page 11829 05/01/95 6:00 P.M. 1. a letter from the Chairman of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council requesting the Mayor to notify legislators that the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has been shortchanging District 1 on funding related to transportation. Commissioner Patterson stated that the Commission should authorize the Mayor to forward a letter to the FDOT in protest. Mayor Merrill stated that hearing no objections, he will forward a letter of protest to the FDOT. 2. a letter from Sarasota Thinks, a project facilitated by the Selby Foundation, requesting a $3,500 sponsoring contribution. Commissioner Patterson stated that her name, as Mayor, was listed as a supporting member of Sarasota Thinks; that the letter should be referred to the Administration for a response. Mayor Merrill stated that there was a consensus of the Commission to forward a response to Sarasota Thinks stating that no funding appropriation is available in the budget. Commissioner Patterson requested that Mr. Sollenberger mentioned that the letter was referred to him. 3. a complaint from the co-presidents of the Sarasota Mobile Home Park Association in regard to the City not enforcing regulations requiring occupancy of each mobile home to be limited to two people per bedroom. Mr. Sollenberger stated that a letter has been forwarded to the Association expressing his intention to enforce the rules and regulations; that Robert Gerkin, Director of General Services, will be addressing the situation. B. requested a status report on the Little Five Points Park project. Mr. Sollenberger stated that the project is currently being bid; that the award for construction bid should be agendaed the first meeting in June; that construction is anticipated to begin in July. VICE MAYOR CARDAMONE: A. stated that attendance problems were noticed as she reviewed the annual report of the advisory boards; and asked if those problems are being addressed? City Auditor and Clerk Robinson stated that the majority of absences were excused absences. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that a member on a board which meets seven times in a year should not miss four meetings, excused or not; that the member should be asked nicely to attend or resign. Commissioner Patterson stated that she noticed a member of a board which met 13 times was present at only four meetings. Vice Mayor Cardamone stated that members who do not show up for board meetings are either not interested or the board is not necessaryi that the advisory boards should be reviewed. B. stated that she likes the "Get it Done" Commission Follow Up Assignments form; that she looks forward to seeing the completion status lines on each assignment checked off. C. stated that a letter and copies of advertisements were received regarding escort services operating in the City of Sarasota: and requested that the Administration review the material and report back to her on the following: 1. Whether the escort services are operating within the laws and ordinances of Sarasota. 2. If these types of business undergo any sort of scrutiny by the Police Department to determine whether they are operating legally as escort services or if they are a front for prostitution. 24. ADJOURN (AGENDA ITEM XII) #3 (0806) There being no further business, Mayor Merrill adjourned the regular meeting of May 1, 1995, at 9:23 p.m. a aee - DAVID MERRILL, MAYOR n ATTEST: Blle 8 Rebenson BILLY ROBINSON, CITY AUDITOR AND CLERK BOOK 38 Page 11830 05/01/95 6:00 P.M.