Book 58 Page 30143 04/24/06 6:00 P.M. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL SARASOTA CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 24, 2006 PRESENT: Mayor Fredd "Glossie" Atkins, presiding, Vice Mayor Danny Bilyeu, Commissioners Lou Ann Palmer, Mary Anne Servian and Ken Shelin, City Auditor and Clerk Billy E. Robinson, Attorney Michael Connolly, City Attorney's Office, and Deputy City Manager V. Peter Schneider ABSENT: City Attorney Robert M. Fournier and City Manager Michael A. McNees The meeting was called to order by Mayor Atkins at 6:02 p.m. NVOCATIONPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: City Auditor and Clerk Robinson 1. NON QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING (AGENDA ITEM I) City Auditor and Clerk Robinson repeated the Commission's Pledge of Public Conduct and administered an oath to all individuals wishing to speak during the public hearings. 1) PUBLIC HEARING RE: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 06R-1879, APPROVING APPLICATION NO. 05-PA-01 REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF SARASOTA [THE SARASOTA CITY PLAN (1998)] BY ADOPTING NEW ACTION STRATEGIES 4.8 AND 4.9 AS REQUESTED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUBSEQUENT TO THE DESIGNATION OF THE TAMIAMI TRAIL FLORIDA SCENIC HIGHWAY; AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL OF THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR A FORMAL OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT; ETC. (TITLE ONLY/APPLICATION NO. 05-PA-01, APPLICANT CITY OF SARASOTA) (AGENDA ITEM I-1) Senior Planning David Smith, Planning and Redevelopment Department, gave the Staff presentation and recommended the Commission approve proposed Resolution No. 06R-1879. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson read proposed Resolution No. 06R-1879 by title only. A motion was made by Commissioner Servian, seconded by Vice Mayor Bilyeu, and carried by a 5-0 vote to adopt proposed Resolution No. 06R-1879, which authorizes transmittal of Plan Amendment Application No. 05-PA-01 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for an Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report. (FTR 6:08) 2) PUBLIC HEARING RE: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 06R-1881, APPROVING APPLICATION NO. 05-PA-07 REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE CHAPTER OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF SARASOTA [THE SARASOTA CITY PLAN (1998)] TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.48t ACRE PARCEL OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LAUREL STREET WEST OF WASHINGTON BOULEVARD FROM THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TO THE DOWNTOWN URBAN MIXED USE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 05-PA-07; SAID PROPERTY HAVING A STREET ADDRESS OF 1938 LAUREL STREET; AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL OF THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR A FORMAL OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT; ETC. (TITLE ONLY) (APPLICATION NO. 05-PA-07, APPLICANT CITY OF SARASOTA) (AGENDA ITEM I-2) Chief Planner Douglas James, Planning and Redevelopment Department, and Larry Arnold, General Manager Public Works Business Center Operations, Sarasota County, came before the Commission. Mr. Arnold gave the Applicant's presentation. In response to a question from Commissioner Palmer concerning the details of the project, Mr. Arnold stated that the project is for the County to enter into a lease agreement with the Child Protection Center including a sublease with the Community Housing Trust, which has not been finalized by the Sarasota Board of County Commissioners (BCC); that the partnership between the Child Protection Center and the Community Housing Trust will result in residential affordable housing along with office activities of the Child Protection Center at the site located at 1938 Laurel Street. (FTR 6:10) In response to a question from Commissioner Palmer concerning the details of the proffer made by the County, Chief Planner James stated that a proffered rezoning application accompanies the application for an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan, also called the Sarasota City Plan, 1998 Ed.; that the rezoning application reflects a request for the development of the site under the Downtown Edge (DTE) Zone District with further proffer to limit the square footage of the development to 23,500 square feet of non-residential development. (FTR 6:11) In response to a question from Commissioner Palmer regarding the concern of the Laurel Park Neighborhood Association for the buffer between the proposed project and the neighborhood, Chief Planner James stated that the sideyard setback could be zero under the DTE Zone District, which may be oppressive to the adjacent property without an intervening alley or street. (FTR 6:13) In response to a question from Commissioner Palmer concerning the County's addressing the issue of buffers, Mr. Arnold stated that the County will continue to work with the neighborhood to assure the development is compatible with the neighborhood. (FTR 6:13) In response to a question from Commissioner Palmer concerning a proffer indicating the County will not develop anything incompatible with the neighborhood, Mr. Arnold stated that the County is willingly make such a proffer to indicate the development at 1938 Laurel Street will be compatible with the neighborhood. (FTR 6:13) In response to a question from Vice Mayor Bilyeu concerning the proposed Downtown Urban Mixed Use Future Land Use Classification and the proposed non-residential use, Chief Planner James stated that currently 1938 Laurel Street is a parking lot; that the proffer is for a non- residential development not exceeding 23,500 square feet in the DTE Zone District. (FTR 6:14) In response to a question from Vice Mayor Bilyeu concerning the location of the residential affordable housing, Mr. Arnold stated that the residential affordable housing will be worked into the project, assuming the project moves forward and the County enters into a lease with the Community Housing Trust and the Child Protection Center. (FTR 6:14) In response to a question from Commissioner Palmer as to if the residential use will be in addition to the 23,500 square feet, Mr. Arnold stated that the site design work has not be completed; however, the residential units will have to be incorporated into the 23,500 square feet or in a manner which is compatible with the neighborhood. (FTR 6:15) In response to a comment by Commissioner Palmer concerning the lack of residential use included in the application for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs, Chief Planner James stated that the application for transmittal to DCA does not include residential use; that the County could included additional detail in the rezoning after the transmittal to DCA. Book 58 Page 30144 04/24/06 6:00 P.M. Book 58 Page 30145 04/24/06 6:00 P.M. In response to a question from Vice Mayor Bilyeu concerning the 12-units of apartments referenced in the transportation concurrency analysis, Chief Planner James stated that the transportation concurrency analysis assumes a mix of office and retail; that the project was determined to have de minimus traffic based on the transportation concurrency analysis. In response to a question from Commissioner Servian concerning the use of 12-apartment units as a worse case scenario, Chief Planner James stated that normally a worse case scenario is analyzed; however, the proffer was for 23,500 square feet of non-residential use. In response to a question from Commission Servian regarding concern by the Planning Board/Local Planning Agency (PBLP) of the presentation made to the PBLP and the subsequent proposal, Mr. Arnold stated that BCC had not taken the most recent action at the time the project was presented to the PBLP; that most recently, the BCC directed the Child Protection Center and the Community Housing Trust to work together to obtain a location for the Child Protection Center and create a modest number of affordable units Downtown. (FTR 6:20) The following people spoke: Kate Lowman, representing the Laurel Park Neighborhood Association, concerning the lack of a specific plan coming forward with land use changes and indicating the Laurel Park Neighborhood requested a minimum six-foot setback from the western boundary, with foam wall to block sound and light, and four bump outs, one to allow the existing tree more land and water, and the other three bump outs for three new Live Oak trees. (FTR 6:25) Martina Guilfoil, representing the Community Housing Trust, concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1881. (FTR 6:27) Dennis and Graci McGillicuddy, representing the Child Protection Center, concerning the plans to build a state-of-the-art child advocacy center which will be run by the Child Protection Center, the desire to work closely with the Laurel Park Neighborhood to assure the project is compatible with the neighborhood, the willingness to include the setback in the plans and construct a foam stucco wall, but indicating the four bump outs raise a problem for the Child Protection Center and requesting the Commission not add the four bump outs as a condition to the agreement as other solutions may be possible. (FTR 6:29) Richard Sheldon concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1881 but disappointment the project is so disorganized. Chief Planner James gave the Staff rebuttal and stated that the proffer could be amended to include up to 12 residential units, which is consistent with the transportation concurrency analysis. Chief Planner James stated that the proffer could be amended to include up to 12 residential units, which would be consistent with Traffic Engineering Manager Freija's traffic analysis. Mr. Arnold gave the Applicant's rebuttal and stated that the Applicant is willing to revise the proffer and apologizes for any confusion. In response to a question from Commissioner Palmer concerning the legality of amending the proffer without readvertising, Attorney Connolly stated that no problem is foreseen; that the proffer is for the rezoning which is a support document to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1881; that the rezoning will come back to the Commission in a quasi-judicial proceeding; that additionally, more limitations are being added to the project. In response to a question from Commissioner Palmer concerning a provision for a buffer to the neighborhood, Mr. Arnold stated that the County agrees to an appropriate buffer for the neighborhood. (FTR 6:36) City Auditor and Clerk Robinson read proposed Resolution No. 06R-1881 by title only. A motion was made by Commissioner Shelin, seconded by Commissioner Servian, and carried by a 5-0 to adopt proposed Resolution No. 06R-1881 with a revision to Section 2 indicating a maximum number of 12 allowed residential units. (FTR 6:38) 3) PUBLIC HEARING RE: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 06R-1883, APPROVING APPLICATION NO. 05-PA-03 REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE CHAPTER OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF SARASOTA [THE SARASOTA CITY PLAN (1998)] TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF A 9.52t ACRES PARCEL OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SCHOOL AVENUE SOUTH OF RINGLING BOULEVARD FROM THE MULTIPLE FAMILY (MEDIUM DENSITY) AND COMMUNITY OFFCEINSTRUCTIONAL FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS TO THE DOWNTOWN URBAN MIXED-USE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 05-PA-03; SAID PROPERTY HAVING STREET ADDRESSES OF 295, 301, 325 AND 601 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE; APPROVING APPLICATION NO. 05-PA-03 REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE CHAPTER OF THE SARASOTA CITY PLAN (1998) TO INCLUDE THE PROJECT SITE WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN URBAN MIXED USE LAND CLASSIFICATION TEXT; AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL OF THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR A FORMAL OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT; ETC. (TITLE ONLY/APPLICATION NO. 05-PA-03, APPLICANT STEPHEN D. REES OF ICARD; MERRILL, CULLIS, TIMM, FUREN & GINSBERG, P.A. AS AGENT REPRESENTING QUINCY INVESTMENTS LLC, SWH INVESTORS, LLC AND JOAN M. LOVINGGOOD, AS FEE SIMPLE OWNERS AND CONTRACT VENDEES OF THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY) (AGENDA ITEM -3) Attorney Connolly stated that today, Staff received significant modifications to the proffered stipulations for the rezoning from the Applicant; that the modifications are intended to provide a greater specificity as to the project details to make the project more appealing to the Commission, Staff and the neighborhood; however, neither Staff nor the public have had an opportunity to review the modifications; that the Commission has the following four options: 1) Conduct the public hearing and complete deliberations as scheduled, 2) Conduct the public hearing but deliberate at a time certain in the future to provide Staff an opportunity to formulate a recommendation, 3) Continue the public hearing to a time certain in the future to allow the public and the Staff the adequate time to review the proffered stipulations and modifications, or 4) Readvertise and return the matter to the Planning Board/Local Planning Agency for review and recommendations regarding the modifications to the proffered stipulations. Attorney Connolly continued that hearing from Staff and the Applicant concerning if the modifications justify moving forward or postponing to a time certain may be appropriate. Ronald Burks, Manager, Quincy Investments, LLC, Stephen Rees, Attorney, Icard, Merrill, P.A., representing the Applicant, Michael Jacobson, Executive Director, Habitat for Humanity, and Donald Lawson, AIA, of The Lawson Group Architects came before the Commission. Book 58 Page 30146 04/24/06 6:00 P.M. Book 58 Page 30147 04/24/06 6:00 P.M. Attorney Rees gave the Applicant's response and indicated the Applicant is prepared to move forward with the public hearing as scheduled; that a closing on 4.5 to 5.0 acres of the total property is scheduled for tomorrow; therefore, the Applicant could be placed in a difficult position if the public hearing does not move forward as scheduled; that the request is to classify the land as the Downtown Urban Mixed Use Future Land Use Classification. In response to a question from Commissioner Shelin concerning the proffer for the rezoning, Attorney Rees stated that the Applicant is requesting the Downtown Core (DTC) Zone District for the density of 50 units per acre with a proffered restriction in the height of all four buildings to conform to height permissible in the Downtown Edge (DTE) Zone District; that neither the Applicant or any successor will submit a request for additional density or height under the proposed amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan, also called the Sarasota City Plan, 1998 Ed. (City's Comprehensive Plan). (FTR 6:52) Planning and Redevelopment Director Jane Robinson and Chief Planner Douglas James, Planning and Redevelopment Department, came before the Commission. Planning and Redevelopment Director Robinson stated that Staff has not had an opportunity to review the revised submittal and is not prepared to make a recommendation concerning the most recent proffer. In response to a question from Commissioner Servian concerning Staff's recommendation if the Commission chooses not to move forward as scheduled, Planning and Redevelopment Director Robinson stated that customarily the project would go through the process again for review by the neighborhood and the Planning Board/Local Planning Agency; however, Staff understands and would like to assist the Commission in facilitating the process. (FTR 6:57) A motion was made by Commissioner Palmer, seconded by Commissioner Servian, and failed by a 2-3 vote with Commissioner Shelin, Vice Mayor Bilyeu, and Mayor Atkins voting no to readvertise and return the project to the Planning Board/Local Planning Agency for review and recommendations regarding the modifications the proffered stipulations. A motion was made by Vice Mayor Bilyeu, seconded by Commissioner Shelin, and carried 3-2 vote with Commissioners Servian and Palmer voting no, to conduct and complete the public hearing as scheduled. (FTR 7:04) Attorney Rees gave the Applicant's presentation. Chief Planner James that Staff has not had the opportunity to do an analysis of the proposed proffers and, therefore, does not have a presentation. (FTR 7:22) The following people spoke: Pete Theisen concerning the traffic impact the project would bring to Wood Street and the applicant's unwillingness to address the traffic situation. (FTR 7:24) Todd Sak, representing Sarasota Memorial Hospital, concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 and presenting letters to the Commission from Gwen MacKenzie, Chief Executive Officer and Dr. Bernard Feinberg, Chief Medical Officer, Sarasota Memorial Hospital. (FTR 7:28) Nancy Reeves concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883, due to the potential encroachment of high-rise buildings into the surrounding single-family neighborhood with the DTC Zone District. (FTR 7:31) Scott Perkins concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 and indicating the height is not an issue as the neighborhood is buffered by backyards and the railroad right-of-way. (FTR 7:34) Juanita Rawlinson indicating a 2.5-day study of vehicular and pedestrian traffic revealed 9,736 cars on Wood Street and 8,329 cars on School Avenue at an average speed of 30 miles per hour and opposing proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. (FTR 7:38) Jim Grimes concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 due to the Applicant's outreach in explaining the attractiveness of the development and the affordable housing aspect. (FTR 7:43) Craig Noren concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883, keeping the focus of the issue on towers rather than affordable housing, and indicating the proposal is not in the best interest of the neighborhood. Mary Noren, representing Alta Vista Neighborhood Association, regarding concern for the individuals who will live in the high-rises and whether individuals living in the high-rise studio units will be happy with such small units. (FTR 7:51) Kevin Bowman concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 as the neighborhood is in need of a redevelopment and for the ability of individuals to live and work in the Downtown area. Andrew Starostecki concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. Bob De Cecco, representing local business, concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 due to the promise of affordable housing for service workers. (FTR7:59) LeRoy Skinner concerning opposition to the Applicant's last minute change to the proposal and to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. (FTR 8:01) Ed Bloom concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 which is an opportunity the City should not miss. (FTR 8:02) Marcia Dahlquist, representing Alta Vista Neighborhood Association, regarding opposition to the Applicant's changing the proposal at the last minute without allowing Staff and the neighborhood adequate time to review the changes to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 and concern as to if the Applicant can legally be held to the promise not to ask for additional density and suggesting a restudy but indicating development is not opposed. (FTR 8:05) Tracy Topjun, representing Alta Vista Neighborhood Association, concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883, which would bring Downtown into the single-family neighborhoods. Richard Allen concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 with two stipulations, specifically the Planning and Redevelopment Department approves the zoning density and the Applicant buffers the area to the east. (FTR 8:13) Richard Flath concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 due to the effects on the quality of life. Debbie Flath concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883, suggesting the City buy the land and expand Payne Park, and sending the project back to the drawing board. The Commission recessed at 8:20 p.m. and reconvened at 8:32 p.m. Book 58 Page 30148 04/24/06 6:00 P.M. Book 58 Page 30149 04/24/06 6:00 P.M. Maddy Nelson concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 due to the increase in traffic, noise, congestion, drainage along School Avenue and the difficulty for water resources and emergency services to keep pace with growth. (FTR 8:34) Kathy Kaminski concerning the fact the City bends over backwards to accommodate developers gain condominiums and parking spaces and opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 which will place high-rise condominiums next to single-tamily homes. (FTR 8:36) Brook O' Malley concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 George Zarris concerning the need for affordable housing for service workers and support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 Barbara Zarris concerning appreciation for the changes made by the Applicant, the Applicant's willingness to work with the neighborhood, and support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. (FTR 8:43) Don Pearson concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. (FTR 8:45) Susan Chapman, representing Hudson Bayou Neighborhood Association, regarding concern for the Applicant's changing the proffer at the last minute and opposition to proposed Resolution No 06R-1883. (FTR 8:48) Tony Souza, representing Downtown Partnership of Sarasota, Inc., concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883, which will add an affordable project to the City's inventory in an area which is not part of urban creep and indicating the area is zoned industrial and separated from the neighborhood by railroad right-of-way but also indicating the neighborhood has every right to be conçerned regarding neighborhood traffic, which is the major issue for the neighborhood. (FTR 8:52) Stan Zimmerman, representing Alta Vista Neighborhood Association, concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 and referring to Objective 1, Housing Chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, to enhance a City-private sector association encouraging the private section to provide new housing which is compatible with the City's neighborhoods, the General Characteristics of the Downtown Urban Mixed Use Future Land Use Classification included in the Land Use Chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and Objective 4, Neighborhood Chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Kelly Kirschner, representing Alta Vista Neighborhood Association, concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 due to the incompatibility of abutting the DTC Zone District up against a single-family neighborhood. (FTR 9:06) Heidi Rodeheaver, representing Garden Terrace Association, concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 due to the incompatibility of abutting Downtown Core Zone up against single-family neighborhoods. Olympus Zarris concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 and indicating more individuals with eyes on Payne Park will result in a safer Payne Park. (FTR 9:10) Jeannine Veautour concerning opposition to the high density, objection to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883, and support for making the 9.52+ acres part of Payne Park. (FTR 9:11) Carl Abbott concerning the necessity to discuss transportation when discussing urban planning, the increase in density required to get public transportation, and support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. (FTR 9:17) Patricia Varley concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 due to incompatibility and the effect on the quality of life of the residents in the area. (FTR 9:23) Charles Senf concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 as promises by the Commission for a Town Hall Meeting concerning attainablelaffordable housing, a signature park, and the small town feeling have not been met. (FTR 9:30) Carmela Firstenberger, representing Alta Vista Neighborhood Association, concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. (FTR 9:34) Andrew Foley, representing the Young Professionals Group (YPG), concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 due to the partnership with Habitat for Humanity and Sarasota Memorial Hospital to provide affordable housing. (FTR 9:41) Zac Chase concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 due to loss of families and children in the City resulting from the lack of affordable housing. Jose Guaita concerning support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883, recognizing the reality of Sarasota is not being able to obtain affordable housing. Michael Saunders indicating the greater need for the greater good is to provide affordable housing and support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. (FTR 3:25) John Steele, representing IMG Medical Group concerning the need for affordable housing and support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. Joe Barbetta concerning opposition to proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883, due to changes in the plan which should be sent back to the PBLP for review. (FTR 9:54) Diana Hamilton concerning hope for a diverse City, not being lead by fear, and support for proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. (FTR 9:57) Commissioner Palmer left the Chambers at 9:58 p.m. and returned at 10:00 p.m. Attorney Rees gave the Applicant's rebuttal. Chief Planner James stated that Staff has no rebuttal. In response to a question from Vice Mayor Bilyeu concerning the height in the DTE Zone District, Chief Planner James stated that buildings of up to five stories with up to 14 feet per story are allowed in the DTE Zone District. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson read proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883 by title only. A motion was made by Vice Mayor Bilyeu and seconded by Commissioner Shelin to transmit Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application No. 05-PA-03 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and adopt proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. In response to a question from Attorney Connolly concerning the inclusion of the proffer submitted today by the Applicant in the motion, Vice Mayor Bilyeu stated that the motion includes the recently submitted proffer. Book 58 Page 30150 04/24/06 6:00 P.M. Book 58 Page 30151 04/24/06 6:00 P.M. Mayor Atkins called for a vote on the motion, which passed by a 3-2 vote with Commissioners Palmer and Servian voting no to transmit Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application No. 05- PA-03 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and to adopt proposed Resolution No. 06R-1883. (FTR 10:32) 2. CITIZENS' INPUT CONCERNING CITY TOPICS (AGENDA ITEM II) No one signed up to speak. 3. OTHER MATTERS (AGENDA ITEM III) A. In response to a request from Vice Mayor Bilyeu regarding placing funding for the move of the Bidwell-Wood House and the Crocker Church on the Agenda of the May 1, 2006, Regular Commission meeting, Mayor Atkins noted Commission consensus to add the request of Vice Mayor Bilyeu to the Agenda of the May 1, 2006, Regular Commission meeting. B. In response to a request from Vice Mayor Bilyeu to add an Agenda item to discuss the April 17, 2006, Commission vote on density bonuses, Mayor Atkins noted Commission consensus to add the request of Vice Mayor Bilyeu to the May 1, 2006, Regular Commission meeting. C. * In response to a request from Commissioner Servian to place an item concerning action regarding six requests of Sarasota United for Responsibility and Equity (S.U.R.E.) on a future Agenda, Mayor Atkins noted Commission consensus to add the request to a future Agenda. 4. ADJOURN Mayor Atkins adjourned the meeting at 10:37 p.m. SOTA * FREDD "GLOSSIE" ATKINS, MAYOR - ATTEST 1 3 ILEY: - ROBINSON, CITY AUDITOR AND CLERK :