BOOK 56 Page 27437 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL SARASOTA CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 30, 2004, AT 6:00 P.M. PRESENT: Mayor Lou Ann R. Palmer, Vice Mayor Richard F. Martin, Commissioners Fredd "Glossie" Atkins, Danny Bilyeu, and Mary Anne Servian, City Manager Michael A. McNees, City Auditor and Clerk Billy E. Robinson, and City Attorney Richard J. Taylor ABSENT: None PRESIDING: Mayor Palmer The meeting was called to order in accordance with Article III, Section 9(b) of the City of Sarasota Charter at 6:00 p.m. City Auditor and Clerk Robinson gave the Invocation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. NON QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING RE : DOWNTOWN SARASOTA MOBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS = CONTINUED TO THE APRIL 19, 2004, REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING (AGENDA ITEM I) CD 6:00 through 10:58 Mayor Palmer repeated for the benefit of those present in the Chambers the Pledge of Public Conduct as follows: We may disagree, but we will be respectful to one another. We will direct all comments to issues. We will avoid personal attacks. Mayor Palmer stated that dealing with principles rather than personalities will be appreciated; that reacting in any manner to comments should be avoided; that all individuals should be treated with respect; that the Downtown Mobility Study has been ongoing for a significant period of time; that a recommendation will be based on input from the community, Staff, State organizations, and the consultants; that current problems should be addressed; however, sight of the overall vision regarding mobility in Sarasota in the future must not be lost; that mobility involves not only automobiles but also mass transit, pedestrians, bicyclists, etc.; that the responsibility of the Commission is to attempt to provide a plan which creates a friendly urban atmosphere in which automobiles do not drive every decision; that immediate solutions as well as long range solutions must be considered; that the current meeting will provide direction for continuing investigation; that a long range analysis of the current mobility status and the desired mobility status in 2025 is the objective. Mayor Palmer opened the public hearing and requested that Deputy City Auditor and Clerk McGowan explain the public hearing sign-up process. Deputy City Auditor and Clerk McGowan stated that all persons wishing to speak at the public hearings are requested to complete a Request to Speak form; that speakers at the non quasi-judicial public hearings will have five minutes to speak; that speakers will be timed and will be advised when one minute remains. All individuals wishing to speak during the public hearings were requested to stand and were sworn in by Deputy City Auditor and Clerk McGowan. Osama "Sam" Freija, Transportation Engineer, Engineering Department, Jason Collins, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, John Czerepak, Project Manager, Florida Department of Transportation, and Ben Walker, District One Community Liaison, Florida Department of Transportation, came before the Commission. Mr. Freija stated that he is the Project Manager of the Downtown Mobility Study; that the Downtown Mobility Study has been a long endeavor for Staff and the City and began with the City of Sarasota, Downtown Master Plan 2020 (Downtown Master Plan 2020). adopted in 2001; that a Transportation Chapter was included in the Downtown Master Plan 2020; that the City and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) partnered to develop the Downtown Mobility Study; that the project team includes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Powell, Fragala and Associates, Inc., Sprinkle Consulting, and the Renaissance Planning Group. Mr. Collins referred to computer-generated slides concerning the Downtown Mobility Study displayed on the Chamber monitors throughout the presentation and stated that everyone is an expert in the field of transportation; that many individuals have automobiles; that many individuals walk in the City; that everyone participates in the field of transportation and has an interest in the vitality and fruitfulness of the transportation network; that the City developed a master plan in the 1920s which included methods to address traffic congestion; that the Downtown Master Plan 2020 was adopted and included the following objectives: BOOK 56 Page 27438 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27439 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. Connecting the Downtown to the Bayfront; Improving alternative modes of travel to enhance the infrastructure of the modes; and Providing a strategic, pragmatic implementation over a 20-year horizon. Mr. Collins continued that several unique projects were developed as part of the Downtown Master Plan 2020 such as downsizing roadways, constructing roundabouts, and initiating improvements to alternative modes of traffic such as pedestrian, bicycle, and transit; that the task is to evaluate the Downtown Master Plan 2020 on a technical basis and to address the ability of the different modes of transportation to interact and the method to update and improve the transportation infrastructure; that the Downtown Mobility Study is sponsored by FDOT and the City and includes a four square mile study area in the Downtown from 17th Street to the north, Bahia Vista Street to the south, Tuttle Avenue to the east, and the watertront to the west. Mr. Collins further stated that public involvement was a significant component of the Downtown Mobility Study; that meetings were held with various advisory teams on a regular basis; that a wide variety of opinions were expressed and discussed; that three public workshops were conducted; that continued opportunities for public input exist throughout the discussion concerning the Downtown Mobility Study; that one topic discussed was grade separated pedestrian crossings; that the opinion is the concept of grade separated pedestrian crossings is not consistent with the objectives of the Downtown Master Plan 2020; that grade separated pedestrian crossings can cost in excess of $1 million; that grade separated pedestrian crossings often increase the distance to cross the street and are often not used by the public. Mr. Collins stated further that roundabouts will be a new traffic control measure in the City; therefore, starting at smaller intersections is important for acclimation in operating and negotiating a roundabout. Mr. Collins stated that 12 related projects were identified for the Downtown Mobility Study; that a modified Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) exists within the City limits; that the boundaries of the TCEA were reviewed and considered sufficient; that the adoption of a TCEA does not suggest traffic congestion is not a concern for new development; that traffic studies must be performed to address new development and identify problem areas for improvements; that impact fee revenues can create a systematic approach rather than small random improvements; that impact fees can be applied on a multi-modal basis to improve sidewalks and the transit infrastructure, enhancing alternate modes of transportation in the City; that a level of service (LOS) was calculated regarding the pedestrian network facilities identified in the Downtown Master Plan 2020; that US 41 north of Fruitville Road requires pedestrian improvements through a City/FDOT partnership in the near future; that constructing an unsignalized pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Tamiami Trail and First Street is recommended; that pedestrian crossing sleeves at both signalized and unsignalized intersections should include concrete bulb-outs, in-pavement flashers, medians, and textured pavement; that improvements to bicycle routes and lanes are required to implement recommendations of the Downtown Master Plan 2020. Mr. Collins continued that Ringling Boulevard is a good location for roundabouts which have safety features such as splitter islands, sidewalks, and crosswalks; that the recommendation is to construct a single lane roundabout at the intersections of Ringling Boulevard and Palm Avenue and Ringling Boulevard and Pineapple Avenue in the near future to improve pedestrian accessibility to the waterfront; that a three-leg, multi-lane roundabout is recommended at the intersection of Bayfront Drive and Gulf Stream Avenue; that abandonment of the east leg of Gulf Stream Avenue and the installation of slip lanes for each right turning vehicle are recommended. Mayor Palmer asked the definition of a slip lane? Mr. Collins stated that a slip lane is a bypass lane for right turning vehicles eliminating the necessity to enter the roundabout; that an additional southbound left turn lane from Bayfront Drive onto Main Street to enhance access into Downtown from the barrier islands is recommended. Mr. Freija stated that most of the improvements recommended in the Downtown Mobility Study are consistent with the recommendations of the Mobility Now! proposal; and referred to his November 3, 2003, letter to Robert Johnson, Johnson and Keopsel, P.L., concerning agreements regarding the four traffic improvement recommendations by the Bayfront Condominium Association (BCA) Traffic Advisory Board which were put forth in the Mobility Now! proposal as follows: BOOK 56 Page 27440 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27441 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. 1. to close the eastern leg of the Gulf Stream Avenue/US 41 intersection from US 41 to Banana Place; 2. to construct a southbound to eastbound left turn lane, and northbound to westbound left-turn lane at the US 41/Main Street intersection; 3. to add a third westbound lane on Gulf Stream Avenue from US 41 to Sunset Drive to create a southbound US 41 right turn, free-flow lane; and 4. to extend the right turn lane eastbound to southbound on Gulf Stream Avenue all the way to Golden Gate Point. Mr. Freija stated that the intent is to complete the recommended improvements as soon as possible; that Staff is working with FDOT to close the eastern leg of Gulf Stream Avenue by the summer of 2004. Mayor Palmer asked if the recommendations of the Mobility Now! proposal can be identified during the presentation. Mr. Freija stated yes; that the Downtown Mobility Study is consistent with the Mobility Now! proposal regarding the closure of the eastern leg of Gulf Stream Avenue; that conceptual plans have been sent to FDOT; that FDOT has provided conceptual approval and would like to have the Closure occur in the summer of 2004. Mr. Walker stated that FDOT has analyzed the proposed Closure of the eastern leg on Gulf Stream Avenue; that the closure is supported. Commissioner Servian asked if Gulf Stream Avenue will be closed completely between US 41 and Banana Place or remain a signalized intersection with just the westbound traffic being closed sO eastbound traffic can continue to the Downtown? Mr. Freija stated that two options were submitted to FDOT; that one option is a complete full closure of the eastern leg which will not allow eastbound or westbound travel to the Downtown; that the second option is to partially Close the leg allowing traffic into the Downtown; that approval has not yet been received from FDOT. Mr. Walker stated that final word regarding partial closure has not been received from the appropriate FDOT staff; that full Closure has been approved. Mayor Palmer asked the timeframe in which notification of approval or disapproval will be received? Mr. Walker stated that notification should be received within a week or two. Mayor Palmer asked the timeframe for implementation if the partial closure is approved within the next few weeks? Mr. Freija stated that implementation is anticipated during the summer of 2004. Mr. Freija continued that the installation of the left turn lane on US 41 onto Main Street and Bayfront Drive is outlined in the Letter of Understanding sent to the Mobility Now! Committee; that Staff discussed the construction of the left turn lane with FDOT; however, no funds have been identified to make the improvement; that FDOT expressed a desire to review the improvement prior to giving approval but conceptually supports the improvement; that the left turn lane should be constructed in the summer of 2005 or 2006. Mr. Walker stated that conceptually, FDOT has no problem with adding a left bound turn lane at the intersection. Mr. Freija stated that Staff agrees with the third recommendation of the Mobility Now! Committee for a continuous right turn lane on US 41 traveling westbound into the barrier island; that the project is included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the Sarasota/Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Congestion Management System (CMS) and funded for fiscal year (FY) 2005/06; that FDOT is reviewing the project; that FDOT has some conceptual concern regarding the manner in which traffic will weave and merge at the intersection; that Staff recommended extending the third lane between Sunset Drive and US 41; however, FDOT has some concern regarding the recommendation and would like to conduct an analysis prior to completely approving the extension; that FDOT would like to see the merging take place prior to rather than after the Sunset Drive intersection; that the findings of FDOT have not been finalized; that a continuous right turn lane southbound to westbound will be created. Mayor Palmer stated that the continuous right turn lane on US 41 traveling westbound into the barrier island is included in the FY 2005/06 CIP; and asked the possibility for the City in some way to BOOK 56 Page 27442 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27443 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. provide funding for the project up front and have FDOT or MPO refund the costs at a later time? Mr. Freija stated that FDOT would welcome the idea since the project will be a Local Agency Program (LAP) project; that a LAP Agreement would be required; that the Downtown Mobility Study was conducted with up front funds provided by the City; that FDOT is refunding the costs associated with the Downtown Mobility Study; that the City can provide upfront funds. Mayor Palmer stated that three projects identified as part of the Downtown Mobility Study could be constructed fairly quickly if upfront funding could be provided. Mr. Freija stated that is correct; however, the City should proceed with caution since the permitting process may take some time; that the timeframe may become an issue due to tourist season; that typically, work is not conducted in the area during tourist season due to the high volume of traffic. Commissioner Servian stated that a recommendation has been made for a signalized pedestrian sleeve at the Tamiami Trail and First Street intersection; that the intersection is non-signalized; that the understanding was pedestrian sleeves would not be allowed at non-signalized intersections; and asked the manner in which the project would be implemented? Mr. Walker stated that proceeding with a signalized pedestrian sleeve at a non-signalized intersection would be difficult to implement. Mr. Collins stated that the Tamiami Trail and First Street intersection has been discussed in depth; that a dedicated pedestrian traffic signal would provide a secure environment; that certain guidelines regarding the length of time necessary for pedestrians crossing the street must be considered; that during the time pedestrians are crossing, the traffic on Tamiami Trail may have the potential to back up onto the Fruitville Road and/or the Gulf Stream Avenue intersection; that the issue is sensitive since identifying a balance is necessary; that a signalized pedestrian sleeve should be closely coordinated with the traffic signal timings at the two adjacent intersections. Commissioner Servian stated that the idea of grade separated crosswalks was discarded; and asked if a split grade was considered such as lowering Bayfront Drive seven or eight feet? Mr. Collins stated that the first reaction is the project would be extremely expensive; that Bayfront Drive is close to the water table and water levels; that retention ponds and flooding would be issues to consider. Commissioner Servian asked if a wide architecturally beautiful pedestrian crossover beginning on the eastern side of the median at Gulf Stream Avenue with a gradual grade to cross over Bayfront Drive was considered as an alternative? Mr. Collins stated that many alternatives and options exist; that a person crossing the street generally desires the shortest route; that the location of the ramp access point and the connection to the adjacent land are key; that the longer and larger the structure the more expense involved. Mr. Freija stated that the Commission has previously raised concerns regarding maintenance of infrastructure; that pedestrian crossovers are typically costly to maintain; that pedestrian crossovers have steep ramps and are difficult for pedestrians to cross; that typically, the pedestrian crossing distance is a consideration with regard to analyzing pedestrian crossoversi that the crossing distance will increase for a pedestrian crossover with steep rampsi that research clearly indicates pedestrian crossovers are not used or favored by the New Urbanist since pedestrian crossing distance is increased; that FDOT is historically not supportive of pedestrian crossovers; that a pedestrian crossover was discussed in the area of US 41 and Webber Street; that the FDOT Safety Department spoke against and did not support the idea; that pedestrian crossovers separate the pedestrian from the land use anticipated at ground level. Michael Wallwork, P.E., Principal, Transportation Engineer, Alternate Street Design, P.A., came before the Commission. Mayor Palmer stated that Mr. Wallwork is a preeminent authority regarding roundabouts, has been utilized as a consultant by the MPO, and has constructed roundabouts all over the world which is the reason Mr. Wallwork was requested to speak regarding the issue. Mr. Wallwork stated that one of the techniques which can be considered is to install a signalized pedestrian crossing, albeit a short distance away from an intersection; that the pedestrian crossing is signalized from the curb to the median; that a 45 degree cut through exists on the median and then the pedestrian BOOK 56 Page 27444 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27445 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. crossing is signalized out from the median to the curb; that the red light time to the vehicle is limited to one side of the median and the other; that the pedestrian crossing the road presses the pedestrian call button and obtains the green light to cross to the median; that at a predetermined time, the pedestrian gets the signal to cross the other half of the intersection; that a pedestrian typically sees the crossing as one continuous movement from one side of the road to the other; that the only conflict is if two simultaneous calls to cross occur; that one of the pedestrians will be required to wait in the median for a short time; that the technique will considerably reduce the vehicle cues and yet still provide the majority of pedestrians a crossing in the minimum amount of time. Vice Mayor Martin asked if the technique has been observed on a State or Federal roadway? Mr. Wallwork stated that the technique is used a great deal in Australia, typically at schools; that the technique has been used in the States of Washington and Oregon as well as a few other places. Mr. Walker stated that he has no knowledge of the technique being used- anywhere in Florida. Mr. Wallwork stated a problem incurred with pedestrianization is if a four or six lane road is being crossed; that pedestrians will not cross a bad road; that the warrants for a pedestrian crossing will never be met; that identifying a particular route which encourages pedestrians to cross due to an obvious origin and destination is a planning decision which is necessary to make. Mr. Freija stated that a planning decision will be made this evening; that the last improvement suggested by the Mobility Now! Committee is the extension of Gulf Stream Avenue all the way to Golden Gate Point; that Staff agrees with but has some concern regarding the extension; that appropriate right-of-way is necessary; that the information compiled by the Consultant is being reviewed prior to approving the improvements. Mr. Collins stated that some complexities between multiple modes of traffic and the manner in which the modes relate exist within Downtown urban environments; that sensitivity in design is necessary; that the improvements can be performed in phases; that the roundabout for Tamiami Trail and Gulf Stream Avenue would be the ultimate project improvement under the Downtown Mobility Study; that the ultimate build-out would be a considerable project; that most of the project would be modifications to roadway and pavement; that the second roundabout at Tamiami Trail and Fruitville Road is a substantial project; that the analysis demonstrated a roundabout at the location with proper design can improve the efficiency of automobiles better than the concept of the existing signalized intersection; that the big factor for the project is the right-of-way consideration which would be dependent upon right-of-way acquisition agreements with the land tenants in the area; that the roundabout is a high priority but is considered long range if the project were to proceed to ultimate build-out. Commissioner Servian asked if the potential development which may occur to the west is realized and has been included in the design? Mr. Collins stated that the potential development which may occur to the west has been factored into the design since the fourth leg of the intersection would be a direct access into the property; that the roundabout would be similar to a gateway entrance into the City; that the landowners will be required to negotiate and work with the City on all four corners of the intersection; that additional modifications could be accommodated; that the roundabout could be skewed to one side of Tamiami Trail which would affect the cost of right-of-way either less or more than estimated; that right-on access with Tamiami Trail and Fruitville Road was provided; however, the design is flexible; that considering the design flexibility of the ultimate product as the Downtown Mobility Study is being discussed is important. Mayor Palmer stated that the roundabout at Tamiami Trail and Fruitville Road is one of the most expensive projects included in the Downtown Mobility Studyi and asked the difficulty of traveling through the roundabout at Tamiami Trail and Fruitville Road if a roundabout is constructed at Gulf Stream Avenue and US 41? Mr. Collins stated that the level of service and efficiency would be improved by constructing both roundabouts; that the next considerable project was a roundabout at US 301 and Fruitville Road; that the analysis for the proposed project was conducted using acceptable methodologies for traffic engineering; that the size necessary for the roundabout would be even larger than the roundabout constructed at Tamiami Trail and Fruitville Road; however, more importantly, the roundabout did not demonstrate a significant improvement in traffic operation; that the recommendation from the Downtown Master Plan 2020 for the roundabout at US 301 and Fruitville Road was not adopted; that nonetheless, identifying the congestion at the intersection is BOOK 56 Page 27446 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27447 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. necessary; that the intersection at US 301 and Fruitville Road is major; that improving the grid network of the street and improving alternative routes from the intersection is recommended; that an alternative route could be Lemon Avenue as an existing four lane facility up to Tenth Street which has minimal volume; that the key component of the project is the connection to Orange Avenue; that additional lanes are indicated on Orange Avenue; however, the suggested improvements are flexible; that improvements such as merge lanes, turn lanes, or a center turn lane are possible to significantly reduce the impact of right-of-way along Orange Avenue; that ultimately the decision would be reached in a more detailed engineering study with specific cost estimates and public meetings. Mr. Collins continued that Orange Avenue could be an additional route for people traveling north on US 301 up to 12th or 17th Streets; that currently a recommendation is identified to widen US 301 north of 12th Street; that identifying an alternate improvement is important to improve the grid network; that conversely, on the south side, an alternate route for westbound traffic on Fruitville Road approaching US 301 could be improved with alternative routes around Payne Park; that alternative routes around Payne Park would reduce the amount of traffic through the three existing signalized intersections of Ringling Boulevard, Main Street, and Tamiami Trail; that the modification would include signage, would be less disruptive, and would travel around Payne Park; that caution should be taken regarding the surrounding neighborhoods; that the projects are presented as a group and are referenced as the US 301 and Fruitville Road improvement; however, the improvement is area wide to reduce the stress currently occurring at the US 301 and Fruitville Road intersection; that each of the components of the project are consistent with the long range transportation plan; that the investment would be long term. Commissioner Servian stated that one suggestion as an alternate route is Lemon Avenue; that an existing proposal is to make the Lemon Avenue area residential; that running four lane roadways through neighborhoods is a sensitive issue. Mr. Collins stated that the ultimate design would be in conjunction with the developments; that Lemon Avenue is currently a four lane divided roadway with excess capacity; that appropriate accommodations will be made if the surrounding land uses change. Mayor Palmer stated that Lemon Avenue was constructed a number of years agoi that Lemon Avenue is not traversable into the Downtown due to ongoing construction; that Lemon Avenue has always been considered a major entry into the Downtown but has never worked in such a manner; that a significant amount of traffic does not travel on Lemon Avenue partially due to the lack of synchronization of traffic signals; that people do not feel Lemon Avenue is an easy way to reach Downtown; that once the Whole Foods Market Centre project and parking structures are constructed Lemon Avenue will become a more desirable route into the Downtown; that some US 41 traffic could be brought off onto Lemon Avenue into the Downtown if the traffic signals are synchronized. Mr. Freija stated that many projects were in mind at the time the improvements were developed, particularly the manner in which to bring people into the Downtown; that a project which will hopefully be constructed during the summer of 2004 or 2005 is a dual left turn at Tenth Street and US 41; that a second left turn lane will be added southbound to eastbound to encourage people onto Main Street; that appropriate signage and synchronization of traffic signals will be included; that the intent is to provide a smooth transition from Tenth Street onto Lemon Avenue into the Downtown if coming from US 41; that the project has been funded; that the wayfinding study is currently underway which will be brought forth to the Commission sometime during the summer of 2004; that the wayfinding study will identify the best methods to get visitors into the Downtown area through some future improvements. Mr. Wallwork stated that one way to encourage people to use an alternate route is to make the route easy; that roundabouts will assist in making the route easyi that roundabouts are psychologically more appealing than signalized intersections. Mr. Collins stated that design flexibility and specificity are questions in which different alternatives will be evaluated; that an opportunity exists to consider further an idea of a bus queue jump lane since one additional lane of traffic which is not being utilized to its full extent is available on the east leg of the Fruitville Road and US 301 intersection; that two through lanes exist traveling eastbound with three departure lanes; that some right-of-way within the existing curb line is available to allow a bus queue jump lane; that another location in which a bus queue jump lane was identified is located at the Tamiami Trail and US 301 intersection; that the ability to improve the transit infrastructure and travel time around the City will have an effect on the desire of people to ride transit as a preferred mode of transportation; that both improvements are seen as medium priority improvements, would be developed within a medium timeframe and BOOK 56 Page 27448 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27449 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. would necessitate further investigation; that the project would be developed through a coordinated effort between the City, Sarasota County Transportation Authority (SCAT), and FDOT. Mr. Collins continued that another project specifically related to transit is corridor improvements along Cocoanut Avenue from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Way (Dr. MLK Way) to Fruitville Road; that the SCAT transfer facility currently under construction is in a good location and is accessible for many people; that the corridor improvements could be developed in two phases with a significant amount of amenities to improve the route along Cocoanut Avenue; that the ultimate configuration which is considered long range would be complemented by anticipated development densities along the corridor; that the improvements are consistent with the previously recommended study from the MPO; that the majority of the project could be accommodated within the existing right-of- wayi that in summary, the City has excellent potential; that working with the people in Sarasota has been exciting; that a significant amount of input has been received; that many people have been interested and brought forth many ideas which is a good indicator of local community interest; that due to the recent economic growth in the area, the importance of upgrading the transportation infrastructure in the City through alternative modes and facilities while also improving the efficiency of the existing roadways is stressed; that recognizing the relationship between speed and safety is necessary; that speed and safety have an effect on accessibility of the waterfront; that in a downtown city, faster does not always mean better; that the recommended projects are interrelated; however, each project will go through a design and permitting process and will be subject to further scrutiny if the decision is made to move forward with any of the projects. Mr. Freija stated that a presentation regarding roundabouts can be provided by Mr. Wallwork which will ease some concern and answer questions. Vice Mayor Martin asked the manner in which the advisory committees involved in the projects came to consensus? Mr. Collins stated that some projects such as the roundabouts were debated; that agreement between all committees was not 100 percent which is expected in situations in which many people are involved; that many different ideas come to the table; that the majority of the projects were well supported. Vice Mayor Martin asked if the advisory committees signed off on projects? Mr. Collins stated that the advisory committees reviewed the concepts of the projects; that project sign-off was requested which is documented in the evaluation matrix. Mr. Freija stated that a common section was added to the evaluation matrix since different opinions occurred in certain cases; that the intent was to respect the differences in opinions; that the majority of the advisory committees agreed and voted in favor of the improvements. Vice Mayor Martin asked if Sarasota County Emergency Services and the Southwest Regional Planning Council have signed off on the improvements? Mr. Freija stated yes; that the roundabout provides a free flow at emergency time. Mr. Walker stated that the recommendations were endorsed. Commissioner Servian distributed and referred to an August 13, 2003, letter from FDOT to Dennis Daughters, Director of Engineering/City Engineer, indicating responses to recommendations concerning the Downtown Mobility Studyi that the first recommendation was the narrowing of Bayfront Drive; that the letter speaks very clearly the proposed four laning of 17th Street was considered for designation as the State and US Highway and would provide the alternative route; that the issue is disturbing since the Commission was told differently; that the appearance is FDOT is not supportive of many of the recommendations and asked if a change has taken place since the August 13, 2003, letter which would lead the Commission in a different direction to either accept the proposals or to identify alternative approaches. Mr. Freija stated that Staff met with FDOT sometime in July or August of 2003; that a full, detailed presentation was provided to FDOT; that FDOT agreed to provide a letter indicating any concerns regarding the Downtown Mobility Study; that certain concerns have been addressed and resolved throughout the processi that FDOT still has concerns regarding some improvements; that FDOT has not indicated the improvements would not be approved; that Staff asked if FDOT has any policy against some of the improvements; that in most cases, the response was no; that FDOT has concerns; however, the hope is the concerns can be eliminated by providing clarification during the design phase of the recommended BOOK 56 Page 27450 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27451 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. improvements; that design is the next phase; that the letter indicates FDOT is in support of a signalized intersection which was one of the alternatives shown at the workshop; that the other alternative is for the roundabout; that the study team preferred the roundabout since the roundabout: 1) provided a better level of service than a signalized intersection, and 2) meets the objective of the Downtown Master Plan 2020; that FDOT still has concern regarding the functionality of the roundabout. Commissioner Servian stated that the second recommendation included in the August 13, 2003, letter, is regarding the three leg multi lane roundabout at Bayfront Drive and Gulf Stream Avenue; that the indication is a signalized intersection would provide a safer crossing for pedestrians than in-ground flashers at a roundabout; that FDOT may have studied roundabouts which could be the reason for the concern. Mr. Walker stated that at a signalized intersection, pedestrians have sole crossing ability and all other traffic movements are stopped which is not the case for roundabouts; that pedestrians must trust the driver to yield in the case of roundabouts; that drivers are not required to come to a complete stop. Mr. Freija stated that the presentation regarding roundabouts which will be provided by Mr. Wallwork will address safety issues. Mayor Palmer asked for clarification regarding the March 30, 2004, memorandum regarding the Mobility Now! Committee's recommendations. Mr. Freija distributed and referred to the Mobility Now! ! Committee's list of recommendations as follows: 1. Close Gulf Stream Avenue east of US 41; 2. Construct left turn lane from US 41 south to Main Street; 3. Install pedestrian call button for extended time crossing of US 41; 4a. Provide continuous right turn from US 41 south to Gulf Stream Avenue; 4b. Extend the existing right turn lane from Sunset Drive to US 41; 5. Add right turn lanes from Golden Gate Point towards US 41. 5a. Change US 41 center turn lane into a northbound lane only; 5b. Make eastbound Gulf Stream Avenue curb lane optional left or right turn to US 41; 6. Widen US 41 at Splash store to extend right turn lane; 7. Add left turn lane from US 41 south to Fruitville Road; and 8. Construct an acceleration lane from Sunset Drive towards the John Ringling Causeway Bridge. Mr. Freija continued that Recommendation No.1 is to close Gulf Stream Avenue east of US 41; that Staff agrees with the recommendation; that the closure may be partial or full which is dependent on the best level of service for the intersection and pedestrian movement; that Recommendation No. 2 is to construct a left turn lane from US 41 south to Main Street into the Downtown, which is included in the Downtown Master Plan 2020; however, another left turn lane is proposed which will be north bound to west bound at the intersection which is to serve the Bayfront area; that Recommendation No. 3 is to install a pedestrian call button for extended crossing time of US 41; that Staff agrees with the recommendation; that recommendation No. 4a is to provide a continuous right turn lane from US 41 south to Gulf Stream Avenue; that Staff agrees with the recommendation with the consideration the lane might not extend all the way to Sunset Drive; that the lane might be required to merge prior to Sunset Drive depending upon the results of the FDOT weaving and merging analysis; that Recommendation No. 4b is to extend the existing right turn lane from Sunset Drive to US 41 which also depends upon the FDOT's weaving and merging analysis; that Recommendation No. 5 is to add right turn lanes from Golden Gate Point towards US 41; that Staff agrees with the recommendation; however, more information from FDOT is required; that Recommendation No. 5a is to change the US 41 center turn lane into a northbound lane only; that Recommendation No. 5b is to make the eastbound Gulf Stream Avenue curb lane an optional left or right to US 41; that Staff has major concern regarding Recommendation Nos. 5a and 5b; that accomplishing a mid-block crossing to connect east and west of Downtown is a goal; that the land use on both sides of the street supports pedestrian crossings; that Recommendation Nos. 5a and 5b consider vehicular traffic rather than pedestrians; that another concern of Staff and likely of FDOT is the alignment on the north side of Fruitville Road to the south side of Fruitville Road; that a through lane will serve as a left turn lane and a through lane traveling northbound; however, will be offset by at least eight to ten feet; that the recommendation may not be feasible or approved by FDOT from a safety perspective. BOOK 56 Page 27452 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27453 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. Mr. Walker stated that information was recently received from the consultant for the Mobility Now! Committee; that the information is being reviewed to ascertain if merging traffic through the intersection is possible from a safety perspective. Mr. Freija stated that Recommendation No. 6 is to widen US 41 at the Splash store to extend the right turn lane; that Recommendation No. 6 is part of the development agreement with the Ritz-Carlton Hotel and Condominiums; however, if the roundabout is constructed and the dual left turn lane is not needed or if development to the west comes in and dedicates right-of-way, Staff does not see the improvement necessary; that the reason the improvement was necessary is to extend and to add storage to the right turn lane which travels southbound to westbound; that additional storage is not necessary if a continuous right turn lane is created; that a continuous right turn lane is necessary if a dual left turn is constructed at Fruitville Road and US 41; that a continuous right turn lane would not serve the intersection if a dual left turn lane is not constructed at Fruitville Road and US 41. Mayor Palmer stated that Recommendation No. 8 is to construct an acceleration lane from Sunset Drive toward the John Ringling Causeway Bridge. Mr. Freija stated that an acceleration lane presently exists; that the acceleration lane could perhaps be extended which Staff will support. Mayor Palmer stated that people are concerned about making changes within the next year or two to try to improve the present situation; that if possible, Staff is requested to provide an idea as to the number of the recommendations which could be included in the improvement phase within the next year or two and the associated costs; that many citizens are concerned with the lack of access at the particular intersections; that some action is necessary during the first phase; that the second phase is long rangei that the improvements are being coordinated; that prior to leaving the meeting, an understanding of improvements which can be made within the next year or two is requested; that the intersection of Gulf Stream Avenue and US 41 is most impacted. Mr. Freija stated that the most problematic intersection is US 301 and Fruitville Road. Mayor Palmer agreed. Mr. Wallwork stated that an overview of roundabouts will be provided; that many people across the US have concerns regarding roundabouts due to inexperience; that educating people regarding roundabouts is important. Mayor Palmer left the Chambers at 7:22 p.m. and returned at 7:24 p.m. Mr. Wallwork referred to photographs regarding roundabouts which have been constructed in the US; that a roundabout is an island in the middle of an intersection which drivers must travel around; that drivers must reduce speed while driving around the roundabout; that a slip lane is included for trucks and other vehicles eliminating the necessity to enter the roundabout; that splitter islands are included as median refuge for crossing pedestrians; that drivers are required by law to stop at a pedestrian crossing; that pedestrian crossing signs are included; that roundabouts are not the same as traffic circles; that the New York Department of Transportation constructed a two lane roundabout in the middle of a traffic circle which has been an outstanding successi; that roundabouts can be small or large; that the Clearwater Beach roundabout located in Clearwater, Florida, carries the largest volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the US; that prior to the construction of the roundabout, two pedestrian crashes and one to two bicycle crashes per year were occurring; that no pedestrian or bicycle accidents have occurred in four and one half years since the construction of the roundabout; that 40,000 to 50,000 vehicles and between 4,000 to 8,000 pedestrians travel through the roundabout per day; that the roundabout was specifically designed for pedestrians. Mayor Palmer stated that the understanding is the fountain was removed from the middle of the roundabout and the edges of the roundabout were adjusted since people were having difficulty seeing vehicles on the other side. Mr. Wallwork stated that the fountain was removed and the entry and exit points were moved sO people could not sneak into the roundabout. Mayor Palmer stated that the initial concern of the Clearwater Beach roundabout was further north on the beach. Mr. Wallwork stated that one problem the Clearwater Beach roundabout caused for the City of Clearwater is an increase in the number of people able to get to the beach; that a sufficient BOOK 56 Page 27454 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27455 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. number of parking spaces are not available on the beach; that people rotate trying to find parking spaces; that the roundabout has caused a parking program since more people can travel through the intersection; that the City of Clearwater is now reviewing parking management due to the increase in people traveling to the beach; that a 1,000 space parking garage may be constructed or a trolley may be used to transport people from the mainland to the beach. Mayor Palmer asked if another roundabout was constructed further north of the beach? Mr. Wallwork stated that a second roundabout was constructed one mile north; that the local residents funded approximately $3,000 to landscape the roundabout; that the City of Clearwater has constructed ten roundabouts; that additional roundabouts are planned; that some problems were incurred with the Clearwater Beach roundabout; however, the problems no longer exist; that the roundabout is a successi that some roundabouts being constructed outside the US have four lanes and accommodate 8,000 vehicles per hour; that roundabouts can be plain or attractive; that approximately 80 to 100 multi-lane roundabouts exist in the US at this time; that many more multi-lane roundabouts are planned; that a benefit of a roundabout is four lane roadways are not necessary; that signature pieces can be included in the middle of a roundabout; that many reasons exist to use roundabouts; that generally roundabouts are used to serve more than a single purpose and can result in crash reduction, capacity improvements, speed control, pedestrianization, and beautification; that roundabouts are being constructed to save money; that roundabouts are less expensive to build in most cases; that the cost for electricity is reduced since traffic signal devices are not utilized; that roundabouts always have a lower crash rate than traffic signals and stop signs; that the reason roundabouts are safer is at a normal four way intersection 32 ways exist for vehicles to run into each other; that people run red lights, make bad left turns, make bad right on red turns knocking over pedestrians; that people running red lights kill pedestrians; that traffic signals are not safe; that roundabouts are safe since fewer places are available to hit people and the traffic moves more slowly; that the speed is controlled by deflecting the vehicle path; that the more curvature included in the roundabout, the Slower the traffic moves. Mr. Wallwork continued that a study was conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety which indicates conclusively roundabouts are much safer than stop signs and traffic signals; that the Federal Highway Administration performed a study and found roundabouts much safer than any other form of connecting roadways; and referred to computer-generated slides displayed on the Chamber monitors indicating crash statistics before and after construction of roundabouts in various parts of the US. Mr. Wallwork stated that pedestrians are crossing 80 to 97 feet at the intersection of Gulf Stream Avenue and Bayfront Drive which is a long distance; that pedestrians must walk fast to cross the road; that a multi-lane roundabout with two lanes will require a pedestrian to cross approximately 28 feet on one side of the roundabout and 28 feet on the other, reducing the crossing distance to 56 feet, which is performed in two stages; that the roundabout must be constructed to work for pedestrians; that roundabouts have been working very well at schools; that not a single child has been hit; that some roundabouts at schools are multi-lane; that anyone capable of driving a driveway can negotiate a roundabout; that upon entering the roundabout, the driver looks left; that the driver waits until a vehicle already traveling in the roundabout passesi that roundabout traffic moves slower than traffic traveling through an intersection; that bicycle lanes are included in some roundabouts; that roundabouts can beautify an unattractive road; that crashes, speeds, and travel time are reduced by roundabouts and business is increased; that roundabouts can create significant redevelopment; that the City of Clearwater has approximately $12 to $80 million of redevelopment coming into the area as a result of the roundabout; that roundabouts spark economic development, make an area more attractive, improve traffic circulation and are better for business. Mr. Wallwork stated that roundabouts have been used in other countries for a long time; that multi-lane roundabouts are the norm around the world; however, roundabouts are new and many people do not like change; that a study was performed in the US which indicated prior to installing roundabouts many people were opposed; that once the roundabouts were constructed, the people in opposition became supportive; that cities are continuing to construct roundabouts; that roundabouts work, are safer, are more efficient, have less delay, and are better for pedestrians and bicyclists; that roundabouts increase property values in many instances; that roundabouts are attractive as contrasted with signalized intersections which are not; that Staff provided statistics regarding the Gulf Stream Avenue and Bayfront Drive intersection; that approximately 44 crashes occur annually; that a roundabout would reduce crashes to approximately 14 or less per year; that pedestrians must wait approximately 90 to 100 seconds BOOK 56 Page 27456 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27457 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. to cross the signalized intersection; that a roundabout reduces time for the pedestrian to cross due to defined legal pedestrian crossings at every leg; that the pedestrian does not have a long wait since vehicles are required to stop; that the roundabout will reduce the vehicle queues by half. The Commission recessed at 7:43 p.m. and reconvened at 7:56 p.m. Mayor Palmer stated that interested persons expressed a desire to ask questions of the presenters; that any questions raised will be recorded by the presenters; that an opportunity for a response will be provided; and requested that interested persons come forward. Bill Couch, 1945 Fruitville Road (34236), Senior Vice President, Greater Sarasota Chamber of Commerce, stated that in 1993 a special State committee récognizing the different needs of cities and suburbs recommended legislation later adopted by the Florida State Legislature; that cities could create TCEAS and lift concurrency entirely in urban areasi that the action was taken for a reason; that strictly enforced concurrency was having a tendency to promote urban sprawl and discourage urban infill; that since the time, approximately 25 cities in Florida have adopted TCEAs; that the City of Sarasota adopted a TCEA covering almost all of Downtown in 1998 to encourage the development of compact, dense, mixed-use projects, which worked; that people are moving back to the Downtown and contributing to the vitality of the City; that millions of dollars are being poured into the City's tax base and being spent in shops, providing jobs for residents; that most people agree urban sprawl is a bad thing due to the negative impact on the environment; that people must live somewhere; that the City is an appropriate place for people to live and work; that a true environmentalist believes in cities; that the Commission is urged to keep TCEA in place. Michael Furen, Esquire, Law Office of Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A., 2033 Main Street (34237), stated that the recommendations of Staff and the consultants are supported; that the Commission is requested not to focus concerns on the temporary inconvenience of motorists in the City; that the City should focus on the long-term Downtown Master Plan 2020 which is to create pedestrian friendliness in the City; that pressure is necessary to develop a new culture which will encourage people to walk or bicycle rather than to drive automobiles; that walking or bicycling should become better alternatives to driving automobiles; that the TCEA is supported; that the hope is the Commission will take the long-term best interest of the community into consideration. Rod Warner, 3648 Tangier Terrace (34239), stated that every citizen meeting and workshop regarding the Downtown Mobility Study has been attended; that he has read the Downtown Master Plan 2020; that he does not reside in a high-rise condominium west of Tamiami Trail; that he is not requesting the Commission to abandon the first page of the Downtown Master Plan 2020 which is to connect the Downtown to the Bayfront while balancing the needs of pedestrians and vehicular transportation; that a Federal highway along the Bayfront keeps the Downtown pedestrians on the defensive; that the emerging power of citizens from the west side of Tamiami Trail is impressive; that the citizens are wealthy and retired with sufficient time available to hire engineers and consultants to. counter the engineers and consultants of the City and FDOT; that additional power is added by the residents of the barrier islands who are not City residents; that the State route through the Town of Longboat Key merits widening and improvement by FDOT; that the local residents are constraining the process since the desire is for the roadway through the Town of Longboat Key to remain as two lanes while asking the City to preserve four lanes along the Bayfront; that a Technical Advisory Committee of professionals endorses two-laning of US 41 along the Bayfront; that the assertions of the citizens living west of Tamiami Trail should be challenged before the opportunity is lost; that re-designation of US 41 should be extended beyond the City boundaries; that the advantages of not being under the scrutiny of the State and Federal government should be considered; that two lanes. on Bayfront Drive could be tested with paint stripes; that the MPO can direct funds to roadways which are not Federal or State routes as was done for 17th Street and Upper Manatee River Road; that the Commission should fairly represent all the citizens of the City. Dan Lobeck 2033 Main Street (34232), representing Control Growth Now, Inc., stated that traffic congestion is a significant concern for citizens; that a false issue is created by distinguishing between automobiles and pedestrians; that a Downtown which is walkable from one business to the next and also accommodates vehicles, provides places in which citizens can live, and includes shopping such as the future Whole Foods Centre Market is the desire; that the indication walking is a viable mode of transportation as an alternative to driving for miles on US 41 or US 301 is not sane thinking; that buses will BOOK 56 Page 27458 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27459 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. never take the place of automobiles; that buses get caught in traffic congestion as well; that having a dedicated bus lane is a waste of traffic capacity considering the schedule of the buses compared to all the automobiles which could use the lane; that the issue is not people versus automobiles; that citizens will always drive automobiles; that traffic will always be a concern for any community; that abandoning the TCEA is supported; that development must have some constraint with regard to traffic congestion; that a plan which encompasses the new growth management policies with a realistic look at the traffic projections of the City is necessary; that the City is proceeding in a dangerous direction. Karam Skaff, 675 Longboat Club Road, Town of Longboat Key (34228), stated that he is not an expert regarding roundabouts; however, he is an expert in dealing with roundabouts in Massachusetts 40 years ago; that few roundabouts remain in Massachusetts; that the Kimley-Horn and Associates (Kimley-Horn) report regarding roundabouts at Fruitville Road and Gulf Stream Avenue is unrealistic; that the expert consultants have failed to anticipate the disastrous results of the proposal by investigating problems which have evolved with dense automobile traffic; that an article in the Sarasota Herald-Tribune indicated roundabouts can be more efficient for vehicles and safer for pedestrians; that the opposite is true in high traffic areas. Mr. Skaff continued that a roundabout or rotary is located at the base of the bridge in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, leading to the mainland; that the heavy traffic patterns are similar to those in Sarasota; that a recent article in the Cape Cod Times indicated the rotary has been a concern for decades; that Federal officials indicated the traffic-clogged rotary has been a concern for decades; that the miles-long backups at the rotary led to accidents, dangerously delayed emergency response times, and hurt local businesses and the environment; that a backup on Fruitville Road extending back to US 301 waiting to get on the rotary should be imagined; that backups on Cape Cod have extended for 16 miles at times, usually every Sunday; that the accident rate at the rotary on Cape Cod is five times higher than the State average; that the rotary or roundabout has been referenced as an outdated traffic nightmare which will be replaced by an alternate to enhance safety and rid Cape Cod of a notorious congestion point; that the construction of roundabouts will only increase the traffic congestion the City is experiencing; that the government officials in Cape Cod should be contacted for information regarding roundabouts rather than utilizing a group of high priced consultants. Kafi Benz, Box 2900 (34230), representing Friends of Seagate Inc., stated that rotaries and roundabouts are two different things; that rotaries are designed for high speeds, have no safety precautions, and are dangerous; that roundabouts provide a feeling of safety and reduce fatal accidents; that injuries are significant if a vehicle is struck from the side or head-on; that vehicles struck obliquely in a grazing-type accident such as while traveling on a roundabout are safer; that the design and engineering of roundabouts are important; that roundabouts can make Sarasota proud; that roundabouts can reduce the blight on the beautiful Bayfront caused by the existing horrible, hideous intersection; that the hideous intersection can be transformed into a beautiful roundabout. Dick Sheldon, 526 S. Osprey Avenue (34236), stated that a question is the reason the middle of the roundabout is called the 'pedestrian refuge" if roundabouts are considered sO safe; that pedestrians must have the ability to Cross US 41 if pedestrian friendliness is the intent; that the traffic signals from Ringling Avenue to Main Street should have automobiles stop at the same time for approximately one minute every five minutes to let all the pedestrians get across the street; that the genesis of the roundabout program is driven by automobiles rather than pedestrian safety; that the safest pedestrian crossing should be chosen; that the pedestrians should come first. Jerry Francis, 888 Boulevard of the Arts, No. 506 (34236), stated that the proposals presented in the Downtown Mobility Study should be approved for further consideration; that the City must begin somewhere; that 40,000 people worked in Downtown Sarasota in 2002; that the number of people working Downtown currently is certainly higher; that over 20 new building projects have been approved with many of the buildings of a mixed-use nature; that the new projects will add over 1,100 condominium units and hundreds of thousands of retail and office space; that the numbers do not include the Quay redevelopment; that at the March 15, 2004, Regular Commission meeting, the Commission decided by a vote of 4 to 1 to keep Bayfront Drive as a four-lane roadway and eliminate the feasibility study for the re-designation of US 41 from US 301 to Gulf Stream Avenue to an alternate route; that comprehensive planning is necessaryi that the Commission seriously considered reducing the capacity of the sole north/south traffic artery carrying up to 60,000 vehicles BOOK 56 Page 27460 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27461 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. daily by over 50 percent which is a concern; that the idea was for people to travel another route through either Pineapple, Central, Cocoanut, Lemon, Orange, or Osprey Avenues, or Washington Boulevard; that 30,000 additional vehicles Downtown should be imagined if Bayfront Drive is reduced to two Lanes; that roundabouts are worthy of further objective study; that the two roundabouts on Ringling Boulevard may be unnecessary, that the roundabouts proposed may create rather than solve problems; that actions should be taken to solve localized problems; that a master plan is good as long as the plan is a living, dynamic document; that Sarasota will be a winning City with insightful leaders, strong Staff, and interested, involved citizens. Ken Shelin, President, Bayfront Condominium Association, 770 South Palm Avenue, No. 1104 (34236), stated that Staff has modified a number of issues and has agreed with the Mobility Now! proposal and the Bayfront Condominium Association; that the provisions in the Mobility Now! proposal could be implemented expeditiously; that the City should think more strategically and globally regarding transportation planning; that the City should have a strategic objective regarding traffic other than creating a pedestrian friendly Downtown; that the studies should involve the future impacts of various recommendations such as the redevelopment of the Quay property, or the impending impacts of the City of Sarasota Downtown Code (Downtown Code) i that the Bayfront Condominium Association is concerned the proposed Downtown Code will allow any and all land development without regard to transportation concurrency, that the delays which justified the TCEA have come and gone without any notice from City government; that numerous provisions of development agreements have not been implemented over the past 18 years; that the City's strategic transportation objectives should be reanalyzed; that the notion of "anything goes" should be rejected; that the City should be a movable City whether people travel by foot, automobile, bus, or bicycle. Roger Compton, 11 Sunset Drive (34236), stated that the roundabouts are supported; that the Mobility Now! proposal should be seriously considered and implemented immediately; that concurrency could solve traffic problems at the US 41 and Bayfront Drive area which should have been implemented over a year ago; that funding was supposedly set aside for implementing concurrency; that the crossing time for pedestrians across US 41 should be increased; that pedestrian Sleeves and crosswalk markings should be installed; that pedestrians currently do not have sufficient time to cross the intersections; that the changes could be implemented almost immediately at minimum cost. Rob Fulp, 4350 West Cypress Street, Tampa (33629), representing the Bayfront Condominium Association = Traffic Committee, stated that he is a professional engineer; that the analysis prepared by Kimley-Horn was thoroughly reviewed; that the Mobility Now! proposal includes good strategies which could be implemented at this time. Mr. Fulp referred to a March 30, 2004, electronic mail (email) from Ben Walker of FDOT to Robert Johnson, P.L., regarding the recommendations included in the Mobility Now! proposal; and continued that the improvements sought should be made at this time rather than waiting 5, 10, or 20 yearsi that some of the proposed roadway improvements were conditions made through a development agreement in the US 41/Gulf Stream Avenue area; that the Fruitville Road/US 41 roundabout may not be constructed for 20 years due to the magnitude of the necessary right-of-way acquisition; that the recommendations in the Mobility Now! proposal indicate methods to immediately increase current capacity. Bob Einsweiler, 11 Sunset Drive, No. 807 (34236), submitted a March 30, 2004, document regarding the Downtown Mobility Study; and stated that the diagrams and photographs of the Downtown Master Plan 2020 are encouraging; however, reading the text of the Downtown Master Plan 2020 is very discouraging; that the plan indicates design consideration was provided for each alternative evaluated to encourage pedestrian use such as traffic calming via narrower lanes, landscaped roadways, wide sidewalks, pedestrian friendly parking patterns, and connectivity to adjacent land uses; that nothing is mentioned about crossing heavily trafficked streets, which is the major problem of pedestrians; that improved circulation and accessibility for modes other than private vehicles without significant disruption for traffic operations is one of the primary objectives for the Downtown Mobility Study; that the corresponding "A" Street network should be implemented. Katherine Kelly, 1205 Cocoanut Avenue (34236), stated that the dedicated bus lane on Cocoanut Avenue appears counterproductive to the concept of the Neighborhood Action Strategy (NAS) i that the dedicated bus lane would result in a reduction in the width of the sidewalks, the designated bicycle lanes, and the right-of-way; that the Commission should maintain sensitivity BOOK 56 Page 27462 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27463 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. and common sense while considering the dedicated bus lane on Cocoanut Avenue. Maria Gelinas, 1325 Cocoanut Avenue (34236), Member, Central Cocoanut Neighborhood Association, stated that the dedicated bus lane on Cocoanut Avenue is a concerni that the dedicated bus lane would require signals which would take several cycles before returning to normal and would be detrimental to the traffic flow; that bus drivers would require extensive training; that the signals on the dedicated bus lane will cause a delay in the bus schedule; that the requirements would be impossible to enforce; that having a dedicated bus lane in the family neighborhood is frightening. Bob Johnson, 27 South Orange Avenue, No. 8F (34236), representing the Bayfront Condominium Association, stated that the TCEA was well intentioned; that the TCEA was adopted to encourage mass transit and carpooling as well as to provide special parking places for carpoolers, none of which have happened; that the TCEA is not managed well; that the level of service was projected long term; that engineers earlier identified a number of errors in employment, dwelling units, and hotel data, which were used for the MPO Congestion Management System (CMS); that numerous facilities are being constructed Downtown; that the Wall Street Journal recently indicated Florida was now the number three State for retirees; that in 2003, more people left Florida to return to Ohio than came to Florida which means the projected sale of new condominiums will not be reached; that the TCEA is an abomination; that the City must become organized and keep affairs in order; that a public contest should be held with the Ringling School of Art and Design regarding design of pedestrian crossovers; that the prize money will be personally raised. R. L. Tate, 111 Ritz Carlton Drive (34236), stated that the City officials are charged with preserving the uniqueness and character of Sarasota and are struggling with the issue; that extensive development is taking place in the City without the supporting infrastructure; that developers have been given a free pass regarding concurrence; the appropriate infrastructure is required by State law; that the long-term master plans are no longer relevant to the present or the future; that master plans require constant change; that the trend throughout the US is increased vehicular traffic; that additional road capacity is necessary for the future; that re-designation of US 41 is neither a practical solution nor will likely be approved by FDOT; that the objective to make the City more pedestrian friendly is supported; that crossing four lanes of Bayfront traffic is routinely accomplished in other cities by utilizing center islands, crosswalks, and overpasses; that expediting the Mobility Now! proposal recommended lane changes will improve traffic flow through the US 41/Baytront Drive intersection by 50 percent in two years at a nominal cost; that the City should investigate the results of roundabouts in other cities in which roundabouts are being removed; that roundabouts in other cities are being removed and replaced with overpasses. Ed Schmidt, 100 Sands Point Road, Town of Longboat Key (34228), representing the Citizens Advisory Team (CAT), stated that serving on the CAT was frustrating; that the expectation was to review options or alternatives rather than attempting to make the plan work; that no simple answers exists; that traffic congestion problems can be solved in stages; that the recommendations included in the Mobility Now! proposal are supported; that other options should be considered for the long- term traffic problem; that roundabouts are controversial and require additional study; that a one lane overpass for northbound traffic at the intersection of US 41 and Gulf Stream Avenue would take the traffic over the intersection west to the John Ringling Causeway Bridge; that the left turn would be eliminated; that the intersection would be two phased; that a 45 second signal in each direction would provide pedestrians 45 seconds to cross the intersection; that the green light time would be doubled for motorists; that the City is making progress; however, options should remain open. Ron Saba, 420 Partridge Circle (34236), stated that he has lived in various parts of the Country, now lives in Bird Key, has a business in Southgate, and is building a business Downtown due to the support and potential of the Downtown Master Plan 2020 and the Downtown; that many cities and transportation solutions have been observed; that an exercise regime exists of walking from Bird Key to Downtown and to Lido Keyi that the City is a beautiful area in which to live; that agreement is expressed with the visions for Sarasota; that the community has expressed support for a pedestrian crossover; that the Cultural Coast has the potential to develop an aesthetically pleasing, signature pedestrian crossover which separates the City from other beach communities; that the experience of getting to the Bayfront will be enjoyed; that further research is a worthwhile challenge; that a signature piece as a crossover on the Bayfront will be a welcome addition. BOOK 56 Page 27464 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27465 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. Marcia Dahlquist, 2757 Novus Place (34237), stated that the developments, transportation issues, and related activities have been followed through reading the newspaper; that many people may not remember the last time US 41 was diverted from Downtown, practically destroying Downtown; that the maps which appear in the paper should be enlarged for ease of reading; that the potential changes in transportation plans are impossible to follow; that nice pictures and statistics have been shown supporting roundabouts; that statistics are the art of having the right answer to the right question; that the failure of roundabouts in San Jose, California, has not been discussed; that City of Eugene, Oregon, was destroyed with traffic planning and rerouting at the taxpayers' expense; that the roundabouts suggested would work well; that the existing turn lanes should remain; that the roundabouts should be installed; that US 41 north and south should have an overpass sO the citizens who drive the route will have a brief glimpse of the Intercoastal Waterway and Bayi that pedestrians no longer travel only on foot; that provisions should be included for wheelchairs, skateboards, bicycles, etc.; that buses and bus riders are not important to the Cityi that a monorail should be installed down the center of US 41 stopping at all the major intersections with a shopping center or point of interest; that people would come from all over the world to look at and ride the monorail. Richard Thomas, 2322 Alameda Avenue (34234), submitted for the record a document outlining traffic improvement suggestions; and stated that the maps and charts are too small, too hard to read, and out of date; that the CAT has no representation from the north side of town; that improved pedestrian access is obtained through buses; that the MPO is currently working on the subject; that pedestrians should be banned from the intersection of US 41 and Bayfront Drive due to the danger involved; that bus jump lanes should be utilized by the buses; that the bus jump lanes are only activated when the buses go through; that a continuous right turn lane is available except when yielding to a bus; that in the State of Washington and in England, four lane main roads with roundabouts usually have an overpass or underpass to eliminate the cloverleaf intersections; that the main road goes right through; that a proper roundabout is not possible due to the space and Einances involved; that the traffic signals ruin the advantage of roundabouts as traffic must stop; that pedestrian sleeves are a good idea; that no left turns should be allowed at Eirst Street; that First Street should be blocked off with a safety island in the middle of the road; that the Sarasota County Area Transit (SCAT) transfer facility can have a large pedestrian sleeve Downtown; that buses must maintain a schedule and should be kept on US 41. John Sandefur, 1233 N. Gulf Stream Avenue No. 1001 (34236), representing the Bayfront Condominium Association, stated that the Downtown Mobility Study is for future work with a 20-year horizon; that all possible solutions must be explored; that pedestrian crossovers should be considered; that a skywalk beginning at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel and Condominium Plaza to the One Watergate garage and to the Metropolitan across US 41 to One Sarasota Tower, and terminating at Marina Towers with an elevator should be considered; that closing Gulf Stream Avenue will improve traffic flow for both a three-legged traffic signalization intersection and for a roundabout; that building a roundabout at the intersection of US 41 and Bayfront Drive is virtually impossible; that a detour must somehow be provided during construction; that Ringling Boulevard should be maintained as four lanes; that many bicycles and pedestrians on the same sidewalk can be in conflict; that pedestrian crossing sleeves at First Street and Oak Street will stop traffic and will be challenging to pedestrians as no traffic signal or stop sign exists; that the pedestrian sleeves at the recommended Gulf Stream Avenue roundabout crosses six lanes of moving traific; that the engineers should begin designing and constructing the Mobility Now! road improvements rather than studying the re-designation of US 41; that the road improvements recommended by Kimley-Horn are for the future; that the Mobility Now! recommendations for road improvements are for the present generation; that the intent of the State traffic concurrency law to match the road infrastructure to the size of a real estate development should be fully implemented; that the City should consider walking and trolley mobility by immediately starting trolley service along Main Street, in the vicinity of Marina Jack, and at the Golden Gate and the Hollywood 20 Theatre complex areas; that economics and less congestion is the reason many people have come to Sarasota. Bunny Heinzen, 1166 Cocoanut Avenue (34236), stated that the Downtown Mobility Study is unbiased; that Cocoanut Avenue is predominantly residential; that the bus does not stop unless someone is waiting to get on or off the bus at a particular stop; that constructing a bus lane down the middle of Cocoanut Avenue would result in the narrowing of Cocoanut Avenue causing more congestion; that generally, an individual lane for buses is supported; however, an individual lane for buses on Cocoanut Avenue is opposed; that Central Avenue has significantly more commercial enterprise and would be a better choice for routing BOOK 56 Page 27466 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27467 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. the buses; that the people living in the condominiums are not going to cross US 41 to get to the bus on Cocoanut Avenue; that the bus system should be located on US 41 due to the difficulty in crossing US 41; that a bus lane down the middle of the street in a residential neighborhood will not work. Nancy Richardson, 1221 N. Palm Avenue (34236), stated that she is a concerned pedestrian; that the traffic signals are not a problem unless attempting to cross US 41 to the Quay; that a walk signal is not available; that a person must depend upon someone with a nice soul who will allow crossing; that roundabouts were first observed overseas; that Princeton, New Jersey, was known for traffic circles which were a total disaster; that overpasses were constructed and the traific signals were removed; that tourists may not be able to maneuver around a roundabout due to the unfamiliarity of the circle; that the New Jersey Department of Transportation should be contacted to determine the reason the circles are being removed. Mindy Parker, 1789 Prospect Street (34239), representing The Downtown Partnership and the Association of Downtown Commercial Property Owners, stated that she has been a member of CAT; that not abandoning the TCEA is supported; that suburban living with ease of mobility is desired in the City; that the essential character of the Downtown is density and diversity; that pedestrian friendliness is only necessary if events are available to attend within four or five blocks; that Downtown has been on the verge of becoming dynamic in the past few years which is in part due to the TCEA; that the TCEA should not be abandoned. Pam Truitt, P O Box 701 (34230), was no longer present in the Chambers. Alvin Holmes, 1326 13th Street (34236), representing the Central Cocoanut Neighborhood Association, was no longer present in the Commission Chambers. Mr. Freija, Mr. Collins, and Mr. Wallwork came forward. Mr. Wallwork stated that roundabouts and traffic circles are vastly different; that according to studies, traffic circles are six times more dangerous than roundabouts due to high speeds; that a traffic circle can be maneuvered at 50 miles per hour (mph); that a roundabout can barely be maneuvered at 25 mph; that the most significant difference between a roundabout and a traffic circle is the size; that some traffic circles are approximately 600 feet in diameter; that a driver cannot see the exit point of a traffic circle upon entering; that the New York Department of Transportation has constructed approximately 35 roundabouts; that three of the roundabouts constructed were traffic circles which were converted; that many New England states have traffic circles rather than roundabouts; that the New Jersey and Massachusetts Departments of Transportation are considering converting the traffic circles to roundabouts; that a number of people concerned about the roundabout at Gulf Stream Avenue have driven through St. Armands Circle many times; that the traffic volume through St. Armands Circle could easily be modified to a roundabout at a very low cost by changing the entry and exit conditions and installing yield signs; that St. Armands Circle carries almost as much traffic as the Gulf Stream Avenue intersection; that the amount of traffic at St. Armands Circle could actually be increased if changed to a roundabout; that the roundabout at Gulf Stream Avenue would be slightly smaller, slower, and would have better entry and exit conditions than St. Armands Circle; that every statement personally made regarding roundabouts has come from the Federal Highway Administration, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and from studies performed in countries such as Australia, England, France, Germany, Denmark, and Holland; that every statement made can be supported. Mr. Wallwork continued that significant concern about pedestrian crossings was expressed during the deliberations of the Clearwater Beach roundabout; that the Clearwater. Beach roundabout carries approximately 42,000 automobiles per day and about 2,200 pedestrian crossings per day; that a crossover must be. a quarter of a mile long to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements; that the problem with pedestrian overpasses is the amount of land required; that pedestrian operated signals were installed at the Clearwater Beach roundabout; that the signals were turned on shortly after the roundabout was opened; that the signals began to back traffic up into the roundabout due to the increase in traffic; that the pedestrian operated signals were turned off three days after initialization; that two years later the pedestrian operated signals were removed as the majority of drivers would stop for pedestrians; that crossing guards are hired during spring break at Clearwater Beach to stop the pedestrians sO the automobiles can drive through the roundabout; that the lanes at the Clearwater Beach roundabout are only 9.5 feet wide; that roundabouts provide elderly drivers more time to make a decision due to slower speeds; that fire trucks were driven through the BOOK 56 Page 27468 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27469 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. Clearwater Beach roundabout; that the fire trucks could maneuver the roundabout relatively easy at a Slightly slower speed; that a well designed roundabout has never been removed in the Country; that poorly designed roundabouts have been modified and one removed; that temporary roundabouts were removed. Mr. Wallwork stated further that the roads are changing; that the goal of many projects is creating mixed use development; that the Art Deco District in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, began with a four lane highway; that the Art Deco District has had a large revival; that the four lane road has been reduced to a two lane road due to the support for pedestrians; that the traffic is slightly affected; however, the benefits to pedestrians and bicyclists are significant; that many cities all over the Country have made the reduction from four lanes to two lanes with significant results. Mr. Collins stated that multiple renditions of alternative projects were presented during the course of the Mobility Now! proposal; that the dedicated bus lane on Cocoanut Avenue should be addressed; that customers could be attracted to Downtown from Tamiami Trail and Central Avenue; that a person is willing to walk a quarter mile to a half mile to reach the Downtown; that ridership could be increased if a dedicated bus lane were located approximately one quarter mile east of the waterfront; that constructing a dedicated bus lane on US 41 would be difficult due to the already existing development; that people are encouraged to remain involved during the design stages of the development. Mr. Collins continued that the TCEA should be modified rather than abandoned; that confusion exists regarding traffic concurrency versus an impact fee; that the suggestion is to ensure developers pay the impact fees; that traffic studies are recommended as part of development; that numerous studies have indicated a person has lower than a one in five chance of survival if struck by an automobile at 40 mph; however, a person has a chance greater than four in five if struck at a slower speed. Mr. Freija stated that a full TCEA exemption was recommended in 1998 with implementation of a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program and creation of a Transit Trust Fund for developer contributions to implement the improvements required for the overall circulation of the Downtown; however, a Transportation Concurrency Reduction Area rather than a TCEA was approved at the time; that concurrency was created for environmental issues more than infrastructure issues; that Florida does not suffer the environmental issues of other areas; that sprawl was the major issue addressed by concurrency, that the Downtown Master Plan 2020 encourages a self sustained, mixed use Downtown; however, "A" designated streets are also encouraged Downtown and have reduced traffic capacity due to the addition of pedestrian crosswalks, pedestrian sidewalks, and parking spaces; that the only solution to implement the Downtown Master Plan 2020 is to consider a TCEA but to have developers contribute toward implementation of the improvements; that in 1928, at the time of the City's original Master Plan, traffic was a significant issue; that the traffic issue most likely will remain for generations. Mayor Palmer stated that clarification is necessary as to whether developers will. be prevented from participating financially or otherwise in providing for transit, transportation, pedestrian friendly infrastructure, etc.; that the current Transportation Concurrency Reduction Area will remain in place until changes are implemented; that the substantive suggestion for inclusion into the TCEA is for developers building in the Downtown to pay the costs for infrastructure, for TDM, etc.; and asked if the Commission is being requested to approve the elimination of the TCEA at the current meeting? Mr. Freija stated no. Mayor Palmer stated that a program is being analyzed to alleviate a number of different traffic concerns; and asked if a program will be brought back to the Commission with an opportunity for public input? Mr. Freija stated yesi and continued that extensive studies have been performed in Pasadena, California, called, "Use It Or Lose It"; that the lesson learned was to either use a project to benefit the City or lose the opportunity, that the intent of the Downtown Master Plan 2020 is for being a self sustained City by reducing the vehicle per mile traveled. Mr. Freija submitted for the record the terms of the contract from Trolley Systems of America; and further stated that the dates and times would be Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.i that the route will be the new parking lot which the City will lease from Michael Saunders and Company on Orange Avenue; that the route will be Main Street west from Orange Avenue to Bayfront Drive to Island Park; that pickup will be at the Island Park parking lot and then traveling back to Main Street; that the trolley will be BOOK 56 Page 27470 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27471 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. on a one month trial basis; that traffic management is being provided Downtown. Mayor Palmer stated that the trolley service will begin sometime in mid April 2004 assuming all goes well. Mr. Walker stated that Mr. Johnson was sent a request concerning several Mobility Now! concepts, the manner in which concepts are incorporated into the Downtown Mobility Study, and the State's position regarding the conceptsi that research was conducted on a significant number of the concepts; that suggestions and ideas are appreciated; that FDOT has design guidelines for roundabouts; that the roundabouts should be included in areas deemed appropriate; that the tinancial reality of receiving MPO funding for $17 million for a roundabout will take years if not decades to receive. Mayor Palmer asked for clarification regarding action which can be taken by the City on roadways under FDOT control. Mr. Walker stated that the freedom exists to request anything; that certain issues such as lowering the speed limit require a speed study; that lower signs can be posted but drivers will likely not adhere to the speed limits; that FDOT is hesitant to lower speed limits without any justification; that pedestrian crosswalks have parameters at signalized intersections; that mid-block crossings are not supported since drivers and pedestrians are not expecting a mid-block crossing; that the pedestrian must feel comfortable for the driver to yield; that FDOT is open to consider whatever the City requests. Mayor Palmer asked if installation of traffic lights at certain locations which are deemed by the City to require additional assistance would be considered? Mr. Walker stated that the request would be considered if the request met pedestrian warrants. Mayor Palmer asked the type of Deautification which could be included in the middle or sides of the roadways? Mr. Walker stated that curbed median exists on Bayfront Drive sO the flexibility is greater for beautification; that larger plantings can be included; that a landscape architect is on staff; that the compatibility factor will be compared with FDOT standards. Mayor Palmer asked for clarification regarding maintenance and street cleaning. Mr. Walker stated that FDOT should be informed if additional maintenance requirements exist. Mayor Palmer stated that Fruitville Road is the major artery into the City and is constantly filthy and dirty, which is a concern. Mr. Wallwork stated that the standards in the latest version of the Roadside Design Guide of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) have now been lowered sO trees can be planted closer to the roads than previously allowed. Commissioner Servian stated that a report was sought as to the types of improvements or changes the City can and cannot make on a Federal or State highway; that people may not adhere to a lower speed limit even if posted; that lowering the speed limit all along the Bayfront would help pedestrians cross Bayfront Drive and at other intersections without improvements; that the Sarasota Police Department (SPD) would have to enforce the speed limits. Mr. Collins stated that the speed limit should be in accordance with the manner in which the road is designed. Mr. Walker stated that the more specific list provided to FDOT will result in a more detailed response. Mr. Freija stated that FDOT requested a detailed memorandum indicating the types of improvements desired by the City; that the minutes of the March 15, 2004, Regular Commission meeting are being reviewed sO issues mentioned by the public can be included in the detailed memorandum. Commissioner Servian stated that assumptions were. made the pedestrian access to Downtown from Bayfront Drive cannot be improved, which may not necessarily be a true assumption; that many improvements have been identified which require exploration; and asked if a specific recommendation is for a cross-walk at First Street between Fruitville Road and US 41 and Gulf Stream Avenue and US 41. Mr. Walker stated yes. Mayor Palmer stated that some concern regarding the possible de-designation of US 41 at some point in the future exists; that de-designation of US 41 has been an ongoing discussion for over 20 BOOK 56 Page 27472 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27473 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. years; that the issue is not new; that clarifying the issue of control is necessary; and asked the requirements necessary from FDOT if the City or other joint groups decide at some point in the future to reconsider the re-designation of US 41 along the Bayfront? Mr. Walker stated that Staff is compiling a list of issues and concerns; that FDOT's bicycle pedestrian coordinator will begin formulating some ideas after reviewing the area. Mayor Palmer stated that the financial ramifications are obviously one concern as well as the Commission's control and ability to make decisions regarding the area. Mr. Wallwork stated that the City of Clearwater installed the roundabout on State Road 60; that FDOT was not supportive of a multi lane roundabout; that the City of Clearwater requested FDOT to re-designate State Road 60 in the City of Clearwater; that the City of Clearwater then constructed the roundabout; that a roundabout could be constructed at Gulf Stream Avenue quickly even with the assistance of EDOT. Vice Mayor Martin asked for clarification regarding the earlier indication of a feature which extends the pedestrian call button time? Mr. Walker stated that the pedestrian call button will provide the pedestrian the rate of two feet per second to cross the roadwayi that 30 feet of pavement would require 60 seconds; that walk time will be extended to 60 seconds by pushing the pedestrian call button; that a pedestrian could walk across the street within the given walk time; that the 20 second green light would be maintained if no pedestrians were present; that pushing the pedestrian call button alerts the system of the presence of a pedestrian. Vice Mayor Martin asked if the entire street light apparatus would become involved with the signalization? Mr. Walker stated that marked pedestrian crossings are being discussed; that a designated area to walk would exist; that the driver and pedestrian expectancy would be apparent if the pedestrian call button was utilized. Mr. Wallwork stated that two types of pedestrian crossings exist which are the markings and the basic signage; that in Portland, Oregon, and Seattle, Washington, which are significantly more pedestrian oriented, markings, signs, overhead lighting, and flashing yellow lights have been installed; that the flashing lights could be permanent or activated by a pushed button; that including the pedestrian markings and signs are considered the minimum; that the next level of pedestrian crossings include a push button which turns red, yellow, and green; that curb to median signalization can be utilized which is installed from curb to median, and median to curb; that some cities are making a planning decision based on the encouragement of pedestrians; therefore, installation of the pedestrian signal is desired. Mr. Walker stated that the State standards are generally higher than the Federal standards. Vice Mayor Martin asked if pedestrian overpasses are generally accepted in Florida? Mr. Walker stated that strong consideration would be given to overpasses if the City desired to install one; that pedestrian overpasses have been requested, seriously considered, and in some cases approved. Commissioner Bilyeu asked if a pedestrian overpass exists over US 41 at New College of Florida (New College) ? Mayor Palmer stated yes. Commissioner Bilyeu asked if the overpass is used? Mr. Freija stated that the overpass is used; however, New College is located on one side of the overpass and the dormitory on the other. Commissioner Bilyeu stated that the dedicated bus lane traveling down Cocoanut Avenue is opposed; that a bus route is planned traveling down US 41 from Manatee County. Mr. Freija stated that the bus route should be within the parameters of US 41; that the bus route should have the future density to support the route; that a dedicated bus lane along Cocoanut Avenue will eventually have the density to support the bus route; that a seamless bus rapid transit route traveling from Manatee County to the Sarasota County line is the eventual goal; that the studies being currently conducted may or may not support the idea. BOOK 56 Page 27474 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27475 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. Commissioner Bilyeu stated that the trolley system is supported; that the trolley should have a route extending to east Main Street. Commissioner Atkins asked if Mr. Walker is aware of the potential to re-designate 17th Street as the alternate US 41? Mr. Walker stated that he was aware of previous discussions of the re-designation of US 41 to 17th Street. Commissioner Atkins asked the timeframe in which the discussions were held? Mr. Walker stated that the discussions were held approximately one year ago. Commissioner Atkins referred to the August 13, 2003 letter to Mr. Daughters from FDOT; and stated that Staff has been indicating 17th Street will never be re-designated as US 41; that the indication by Staff is re-designating 17th Street as US 41 was never the intent which is another reason the traffic studies and the City's engineers are being questioned; that individuals who have indicated concerns regarding the issue should review the videotape of the meeting; that the entire process is based on a masquerade which is the reason for all the problems; that FDOT should closely monitor the process; that many concerns will arise as the process moves forward; and asked the manner in which the Trolley Park N Ride came into effect without the Commission's being aware of its implementation? Mr. Freija distributed an announcement regarding the Trolley Park N Ride, which includes dates and times, route, duration and cost of the trolley; and stated that the Commission will be made aware of the Trolley Park N Ride; that the Trolley Park N Ride is included in the FY 2004/05 budget but is not considered finalized; that the date of implementation is March 31, 2004. Commissioner Atkins asked for clarification regarding the announcement. Mr. Freija stated that the reason for providing the announcement is to indicate Staff is working diligently on the Trolley Park N Ride; that Staff is meeting with Trolley Systems of America on April 1, 2004, and will be providing a presentation to the Commission. Mr. Freija referred to the August 13, 2003, letter to Mr. Daughters from FDOT; and stated that the letter provides a response to the recommendation for narrowing Bayfront Drive which was prior to removing 17th Street as an alternative to US 41 and is no longer an issue. Commissioner Atkins stated that the issue remains a concern. Commissioner Servian stated that a conversation was held with the City Manager one week prior to the public hearing held at the March 15, 2004, Regular Commission meeting, regarding the de-designation of Bayfront Drive; that the City Manager requested she inform him if a feeling was a connection or nexus existed between the de-designation of Bayfront Drive and the re-designation of 17th Street as US 41; that the City Manager indicated a connection did not exist and a connection had absolutely never been considered; however,. the August 13, 2003, letter indicates otherwise; that Staff was not aware of the conversation which took place with the City Manager. Mr. Freija stated that the de-designation of Bayfront Drive and the re-designation of 17th Street as US 41 are two different studies; that the Capital Improvement Program and the City's Comprehensive Plan were used as a basis for the study; that at the time, Staff believed from a technical perspective, until directed otherwise by the Commission, 17th Street was considered an appropriate alternative for the re-designation of US 41 if the current US 41 is de-designated; that upon receiving the direction from the Commission at the November 6, 2003, Downtown Mobility Study Workshop, Staff no longer considered 17th Street as an alternative route for US 41; that Staff's recommendation at the March 15, 2004, Regular Commission meeting was not specific about identifying other alternative routes for re-designation of US 41. Commissioner Servian stated that the idea of not considering 17th Street as the re-designated US 41 further did not occur until the Commission decided not to de-designate US 41 at the March 15, 2004, Regular meeting. Mr. Freija stated that at the November 6, 2003, Downtown Mobility Study Workshop, the Commission directed Staff not to consider 17th Street as a potential re-designation for US 41 prior to the approval of the 17th Street extension. Commissioner Servian stated that is correct; and asked for clarification as to the result if the 17th Street extension was approved. BOOK 56 Page 27476 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27477 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. Mr. Freija stated that Staff did not consider 17th Street since the direction at November 6, 2003, Downtown Mobility Study Workshop, was not to consider 17th Street as a potential for re-designation of US 41; therefore, Staff sought approval for the Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study for the 17th Street project as a roadway extension project only and not as a project for a re-designation of US 41; that the 17th Street project was considered as a roadway project which had been in the City's CIP for over 30 years; that Staff was taking the lead to implement the City's CIP. Commissioner Servian stated that a question is which road will be considered as the re-designated US 41 since every letter from FDOT dating back to October 25, 2000, which was addressed to former Mayor Gene Pillot, up to the present time suggests no other roads are available within the City limits to which to re-designate US 41; that other available roads are already at a level of service D or F. Mr. Freija stated that recommendations were provided at the November 6, 2003, Downtown Mobility Study Workshop; that prior to the November 6, 2003, Downtown Mobility Study Workshop, Staff did not have a recommendation; that the recommendation was finalized at the November 6, 2003, Downtown Mobility Study Workshop; that the findings were presented to FDOT since input was desired prior to coming before the Commission; that during the 17th Street study, the intent was never to consider 17th Street as the re-designated US 41. Mayor Palmer stated that the re-designation of US 41 should be at University Parkway or the location at which US 41 and US 301 split off in Manatee County, if in fact the concept of de-designation of the current US 41 is reconsidered; that the Commissions of the Cities of Sarasota and Bradenton and Sarasota and Manatee Counties should meet to discuss which option makes sense. Mr. Freija referred to a conceptual, preliminary drawing of the roundabout displayed on the Chamber monitors; and stated that a concern heard was the roundabout may not fit within the existing right-of-way; that the roundabout does fit within the existing right-of-way; that comments indicating people in Sarasota will not have the ability to negotiate a roundabout are considered offensive; that Mr. Wallwork was involved in the most recent roundabout constructed in Sarasota, which is located at Hillview Avenue and Laurent Place; that no accidents or complaints have occurred; that the roundabout moves traffic and pedestrians in a smooth fashion. Commissioner Servian stated that while visiting a physical therapist located at Hillview Avenue, some people have been observed coming down Hillview Avenue toward US 41 in the southeastern corner of the roundabout traveling in the wrong direction on the roundabout if desiring to enter the Sarasota Memorial Hospital (SMH) parking lot; that some minor adjustment to the roundabout may be necessary. Vice Mayor Martin asked for clarification regarding road capacity and right-of-way acquisition costs with regard to the TCEA? Mr. Freija stated that rights-of-way are not available on many of the roadways; that the cost to construct a roundabout at the intersection of Fruitville Road and US 301 was astronomical; that $17 million to construct the roundabout is considered too expensive; that in 1998, an exclusive right turn lane was proposed between Gulf Stream Avenue and US 301; that the right-ot-way costs would exceed $18 million which was only for the right turn lane along the segment of the roadwayi that to implement the Downtown Master Plan 2020, certain improvements will take place which will mean elevated roadways above ground; that the Downtown Master Plan 2020 and the concept of New Urbanism do not support elevated roadways; that he is not aware of a city with successful elevated roadways. Vice Mayor Martin stated that a greater understanding of the issue concerning the dedicated bus lane on Cocoanut Avenue is desired; that he conceived the dedicated bus lane on Cocoanut Avenue as an excellent connector from the north neighborhoods into the Downtown; that concerns have been raised regarding the necessity to narrow the sidewalks to accommodate the dedicated bus lane; that no right-of-way acquisition is identified; that. sufficient right-of-way exists; and asked if sidewalks and bicycle lanes would be affected by the proposal? Mr. Collins stated that sidewalks and bicycle lanes would remain; that the suggestion is the citizens living in the area should provide input regarding the different widths of the sidewalks, bicycle lanes, and the travel lane; that design flexibility is available. There was no one else signed up to speak and Mayor Palmer closed the public hearing. BOOK 56 Page 27478 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27479 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. Mayor Palmer stated that based on the conversation heard, the motion which should be brought forward is to adopt the Downtown Mobility Study recommendations with two changes: 1) to eliminate the reduction of the Bayfront to two lanes, and 2) to include identifying the various Mobility Now! recommendations in the Downtown Mobility Study; and asked if Staff is clear regarding the recommendations identified for inclusion in the Downtown Mobility Study? Mr. Freija stated yes. Commissioner Atkins asked if 17th Street is part of the Downtown Mobility Study and if a vote for the Downtown Mobility Study would include a vote for four-laning 17th Street? Mr. Freija stated no; that de-designation or two-laning of US 41 is no longer being discussed; that 17th Street is not included as part of the Downtown Mobility Study. Commissioner Atkins stated that 17th Street is included in site plans in the Downtown Mobility Study Implementation Handbook, which is included as part of the Agenda backup material. Mr. Freija stated that the Implementation Handbook will be revised to reflect all the recommendations approved by the Commission; that the Downtown Mobility Study will not include re-designation of US 41 along 17th Street. Mayor Palmer stated that the motion does not include the 17th Street project; that the Commission previously addressed and voted on the 17th Street project; that 17th Street is not connected with the vote being taken at this time; that the intent is for all Commissioners to have a complete understanding of the matters requested for approval. City Manager McNees stated that neither a vote for nor a vote against the Downtown Mobility Study recommendations will directly or indirectly affect the 17th Street project; that the only way the 17th Street project and the Downtown Mobility Study were linked was in the conversation regarding the potential rerouting and/or de-designation of US 41 and its traffic; that the issue concerning rerouting and/or de-designation of US 41 and its traffic is no longer being considered; therefore, no connection exists between the Downtown Mobility Study and 17th Street. Mayor Palmer stated that the understanding of Staff's recommendation is to approve the Downtown Mobility Study with two changes: 1) to eliminate the reduction of the Bayfront to two lanes, and 2) to include identifying the various Mobility Now! recommendations in the Downtown Mobility Study. Commissioner Servian stated that the motion should include elimination of the concept of de-designating US 41; that she is not necessarily supporting all 10 recommendations. Mayor Palmer stated that the Commission is providing direction; that some items in the Mobility Now! proposal have been identified by Staff and incorporated into the Downtown Mobility Study; that the elimination of the de-designation of US 41 can be added as a separate item if necessary. Commissioner Servian stated that Recommendation No. 3 regarding the pedestrian network includes the crosswalk at First Street; that the pedestrian crosswalk at First Street is not supported; that a crosswalk is not necessary at Eirst Street if a pedestrian can walk one half of a block to a designated crosswalk. Mr. Freija stated that amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Engineering Design Criteria Manual (EDCM) will be necessary if changes are requested; that the amendments must take place in addition to exclusion from the Downtown Mobility Study; that the recommendations are taken from the Downtown Master Plan 2020, and are included in the EDCM and the City's Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Bilyeu stated that many recommendations exist in the Downtown Master Plan 2020 which the City is not undertaking. Vice Mayor Martin stated that the Downtown Master Plan 2020 has been adopted. Mayor Palmer and Commissioner Servian agreed. Commissioner Bilyeu stated that the Downtown Master Plan 2020 is not being followed to the letter. Mayor Palmer stated that changes will be necessary to the Downtown Master Plan 2020. Commissioner Bilyeu stated that the understanding is each recommendation will become a separate item which will be brought back before the Commission for public hearing if the Downtown Mobility Study is adopted at this time; that a concern is the effect on the Quay property and the Cultural District if the recommendations are adopted at this time; that some BOOK 56 Page 27480 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27481 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. recommendations are not supported and should go no further at this time; that roundabouts are supported; that the presentation provided regarding the roundabouts was excellent; that moving traffic to Lemon Avenue to reach the Downtown is a good idea; that the dedicated bus lane on Cocoanut Avenue is not supported; that including a roundabout at Tenth Street would be supported since no right-of-way costs are involved; that moving the Downtown Mobility Study forward is supported; however, some concerns exist; that a continuous flow of traffic is a concern since people are already complaining about traific traveling to St. Armands Circle. Vice Mayor Martin stated that a suggestion is to move to continue the discussion; that the Commission has been stimulated, if not overloaded; that many questions remain; that individual Commissioners may need to evaluate the ideas presented. On motion of Vice Mayor Martin and second of Commissioner Bilyeu, it was moved to continue the item regarding the adoption of the recommendations included in the Downtown Mobility Study and the direction to Staff to implement the recommendations to the April 19, 2004, Regular Commission meeting. Commissioner Atkins asked if Staff removed the recommendation for the roundabout at the intersection of Fruitville Road and US 301? Commissioner Servian stated yes. Commissioner Atkins stated that Recommendations Nos. 5 and 6 are not supported. Mayor Palmer stated that the list of recommendations should be reviewed; that the advantages and disadvantages of the recommendations should be identified and provided to the Commission prior to the April 19, 2004, Regular Commission meeting; that the hope is to have a copy of the minutes of the current meeting prior to the April 19, 2004, Regular Commission meeting; that continuing the meeting is appropriate since Commissioners have indicated a feeling of not being sufficiently comtortable to make a decision. Commissioner Servian stated that the Downtown Master Plan 2020 was adopted in January 2001, which was prior to her becoming a Commissioner; that by adopting the Downtown Master Plan 2020, a significant amount of flexibility is not available to remove an item without requiring an amendment to the Downtown Master Plan 2020 which was not understood; and asked the procedure regarding removal of any of the recommendations from the Downtown Mobility Study? Mr. Freija stated that flexibility exists; however, remaining within the objective of the Downtown Master Plan 2020 is necessary. Mayor Palmer agreed; and stated that otherwise, the Downtown Master Plan 2020 must be amended, which is possible; that the process of adopting the Downtown Master Plan 2020 was a very long process by the community which took many months; that amending the Downtown Master Plan 2020 is a serious undertaking. Commissioner Servian stated that an understanding of the full scope of work regarding an amendment should be provided. Mayor Palmer stated that the necessary steps to implement transportation improvements within the next two years to assist in alleviating some of the problems should be included in the list of recommendations. Mr. Freija stated that some improvements are already funded by FDOT. Mayor Palmer called for a vote on the motion to continue consideration of the Downtown Mobility Study to the April 19, 2004, Regular Commission meeting. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0): Atkins, yes; Bilyeu, yes; Martin, yes, Servian, yes; Palmer, yes. Vice Mayor Martin asked if additional public input would be accepted since the public hearing has been closed? Mayor Palmer stated that the public hearing was non quasi-judicial; and asked for legal clarification of the necessity for additional public input. City Attorney Taylor stated that the procedure in a non quasi-judicial public hearing has always been to take no additional public input once the public hearing has been closed. Vice Mayor Martin stated that the public input heard during the public hearing will be considered at the time a vote is taken; that the reason a vote concerning the Downtown Mobility Study is not being taken at this time is to receive further clarification. BOOK 56 Page 27482 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27483 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. Mayor Palmer asked if the necessary clarification can occur between Staff and the Commission without additional public input? City Attorney Taylor stated yes. Mayor Palmer stated that the understanding is no additional public input will be received regarding any of the items which have been discussed during the public hearing; that any telephone calls or emails regarding the matter will not be considered. Commissioner Bilyeu asked if clarification can be requested from Staff? City Attorney Taylor stated yes. Mayor Palmer stated that any emails received from the public should be forwarded to the Office of the City Auditor and Clerk for inclusion in the public record. Mr. Freija stated that the direction understood is the Commission would like to receive a list identifying the improvements, the timeframe in which the improvements can be implemented, and the implications if the improvements are not implemented. Mayor Palmer stated that the list should include improvements which can be implemented within the next two or three years at a maximum from the Mobility Now! proposal and the improvements identified by Staff; that a schedule for the improvements should be available. Commissioner Servian stated that the timeline and costs associated with the improvements which were recommended by the Mobility Now! proposal and forwarded to FDOT are requested. Vice Mayor Martin stated that developing a timeline for completion of a project is difficult if the funding has not been arranged. Mr. Freija stated that Staff is required to report back to the Commission during May 2004 regarding the Development Agreement with the Ritz-Carlton Hotel and Condominiums; that a better idea of funding for improvements will be available at the time; however, some direction from the Commission regarding negotiations with the Developer will be necessary prior to providing the report. Mayor Palmer stated that thanks are expressed for the excellent work of everyone involved. Commissioner Servian requested that Mr. Nallwork provide the Commission with a copy of his presentation; that the presentation will be extremely helpful in educating neighborhood associations of the beauty of roundabouts. Mr. Wallwork stated that the copy will be provided in approximately two days. 2. DISCUSSION RE: LIDO BEACH FEDERAL RENOURISHMENT PROJECT - CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE LITIGATION REGARDING THE ARMY 'S FEBRUARY 2, 2004, LETTER ELIMINATING FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN RE-NOURISHMENT PROJECTS = DECIDED NOT TO JOIN THE CLASS ACTION SUIT AND DIRECTED THE ADMINISTRATION TO MONITOR THE FEDERAL ACTION IN THIS MATTER (AGENDA ITEM II) CD 10:58 through 11:00 Mayor Palmer stated that the item concerns the Lido Beach Federal Renourishment Project and consideration of possible litigation regarding the US Army's February 2, 2004, letter eliminating Federal participation in re-nourishment projects. Dennis Daughters, Director of Engineering, City Engineer, came before the Commission and stated that at the March 15, 2004, Regular Commission meeting, an issue was brought before the Commission regarding the City's joining in possible litigation regarding a class action suit against the Federal government concerning the position the Federal government is taking regarding the re-nourishment of beaches; that the City Attorney's Office was authorized to review and develop the recommendation; that the recommendation is included in the Agenda backup material; that staff of the City Attorney's Office consulted. with various people; that the recommendation of Staff is to not consider joining the class action suit as the City does not have legal standing in the case. On motion of Commissioner Servian and second of Vice Mayor Martin, it was moved not to consider funding possible litigation regarding the Army's February 2, 2004, letter regarding eliminating Federal participation in re-nourishment projects. Commissioner Servian asked if the Commission will be kept apprised of the manner in which funding can be encouraged such as through lobbing efforts. Mr. Daughters stated that the Administration's recommendation is also for the Commission to direct the City Manager to monitor the Federal action regarding the matter. BOOK 56 Page 27484 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. BOOK 56 Page 27485 03/30/04 6:00 P.M. Commissioner Servian stated that the intent of the motion is to include both recommendations of Staff. Mayor Palmer with the approval of Commissioner Servian as maker of the motion and Vice Mayor Martin as seconder of the motion, restated the motion as to not to consider funding possible litigation regarding the Army's February 2, 2004, letter regarding eliminating Federal participation in re-nourishment projects and to direct the City Manager to monitor the Federal action regarding the matter; and called for a vote on the motion. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0): Atkins, yes; Bilyeu, yes; Martin, yes; Servian, yes; Palmer, yes. 3. ADJOURN (AGENDA ITEM XVIII) CD 11:00 There being no further business, Mayor Palmer adjourned the Special meeting of the City Commission of March 30, 2004, at 11:00 p.m. - mact C ANN R. PALMER, MAYOR ATTEST: BilyE Robnoon BILLY E. ROBINSON, CITY AUDITOR AND CLERK