MINUTES MERIWETHER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MAY 27, 2025 6:00 PM Commissioners Present: Chairman Adam Worsley, Vice Chairman Emmett Collins, Commissioner Gene King, Commissioner Jennifer Snelson, and Commissioner Bryan Threadgill Commissioners Absent: None Staff Present: County Administrator John Gorton, County Clerk Allyson Stephens, Finance Director Jamie Tarleton, Administrative Assistant Hailee Palmer, and County Attorney Michael Hill. Staff Absent: None. I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Adam Worsley called the Meeting to Order at 6:00 p.m. II. INVOCATION The Invocation was given by Mr. Bruce Brown. III. PLEDGE TO THE FLAG All. IV. ADOPT AGENDA The Agenda was. Amended. to Add #9 Under New Business - Airfield Lighting Grant and Add #10 Under New Business - City ofGreenville Football Field. A motion was made to Adopt the Agenda by Commissioner King and seconded by Commissioner Threadgill. All were in favor. V. PRESENTATIONS 1. Ricardo Samper, Coweta Judicial Circuit Public Defender Mr. Ricardo Samper, Public Defender for the Coweta Judicial Circuit, introduced himself to the Board, noting that as of January 1, 2025, the Coweta Judicial Circuit had been restructured. The circuit was split into two separate judicial circuits: the West Georgia Judicial Circuit, which now included Carroll and Heard Counties, and the Coweta Judicial Circuit, which encompassed Troup, Meriwether, and Coweta Counties. Mr. Samper stated that he had been appointed as the Circuit Public Defender responsible for overseeing Public Defense services across all three counties within the newly defined Coweta Judicial Circuit. Mr. Samper expressed his appreciation for the opportunity to address the Board and extended an open invitation to meet with any Commissioner who had questions or concerns. Mr. Samper stated that he would make himself available for meetings as long as court obligations allowed, and encouraged direct communication with his office. The Board thanked Mr. Samper for attending and for his willingness to maintain open dialogue with Meriwether County's leadership. 2. Andrea Newton - Chairman ofthe Historical Landmarks Committee for the Georgia State Society, United States Daughters of1812 Ms. Elaine Thames, State President of the Georgia State Society, United States Daughters of 1812, and Ms. Andrea Newton, Chairman ofthe Historical Landmarks Committee, appeared before the Board to present a historical marker initiative honoring General David Meriwether, the namesake of Meriwether County. Ms. Thames explained that the initiative originated in 1947, shortly after World War II, and was aimed at placing historical markers at courthouses named after individuals who rendered significant public service during the War of 1812. Although the program had stalled over time, the organization was now working to revive and complete this important historical effort. Ms. Newton provided a detailed biographical summary of General Meriwether's contributions. She explained that while he served honorably during the American Revolution, his recognition stemmed from the significant civil service he performed afterward. General Meriwether relocated to Wilkes County, Georgia, in 1785. He served as Tax Collector in 1794, and was commissioned Brigadier General in the Georgia Militia from 1797 to 1800. He also represented Georgia in the 7th, 8th, and 9th U.S. Congresses, and later served as an Indian Commissioner, helping to negotiate treaties with various tribes, including the Creek, Cherokee, and Choctaw Nations. Ms. Newton proposed the installation ofa historical marker honoring General Meriwether on the courthouse square. She noted that the Georgia State Society would fully fund the marker and that there would be no financial obligation on the part of the County. She shared an example of a similar marker placed in Union County and provided images for the Board's review. The marker would measure 24 inches wide by 22 inches tall and be mounted on a 7-foot post, installed in concrete. The Society requested the assistance of Meriwether County Public Works in installing the marker. While a dedication date had not yet been finalized, they were tentatively aiming for late October 2025, contingent upon receiving approval from both the County and their national organization. Commissioner King stated that it looked great and that he appreciated the work they had put into it. During the discussion, Commissioner King suggested including a QR code to allow the public access to additional information, photos, and biographical data not included on the physical marker. Ms. Newton appreciated the suggestion and confirmed that the Society had considered it, but noted that the national organization currently discouraged including QR codes due to concerns over long-term technological compatibility. The presenters provided a sample approval letter to County Administrator Gorton, which would be required as part ofthe national application process. Ms. Newton offered to serve as the point of contact moving forward and stated she was happy to provide any further documentation needed for the letter or Board approval. The Board thanked Ms. Thames and Ms. Newton for their efforts in preserving local history and honoring the legacy of General David Meriwether. VI. FINANCE REPORT Finance Director Jamie Tarleton provided the Board of Commissioners with an update on the County's financial status. She stated that bank balances had been updated earlier in the day and were generally holding steady, with no significant fluctuations to report. Interest accruals would be updated and refiected in the next meeting once approvals for the new month were complete. Director Tarleton reported that $350,000 had been transferred from the Fire District Fund to replenish the General Fund. Additionally, a new account for Lake Meriwether had been established, with an initial balance ofjust over $112,000. This account was designed to receive and track donations associated with the Lake Meriwether Fireworks event. Director Tarleton also noted that tipping fees would next be updated on a quarterly basis and that no changes were reflected in this cycle. The Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) and Transportation Local Option Sales Tax (TSPLOST) balances were reported, and Director Tarleton directed the Board's attention to the updated commitments section in the report. For SPLOST, commitments remained for the jail plumbing project and culvert replacements under Public Works. A new commitment item under TSPLOST was the purchase of a hot asphalt machine. Director Tarleton explained that as of this meeting, the 2020 SPLOST balance remained at approximately $768,000, and the 2020 TSPLOST balance stood at approximately $362,000. Director Tarleton confirmed that all Local Roads Assistance (LRA) funds had been fully allocated and itemized within the report. She closed by stating that all financials were healthy and tracking as expected. Following the report, Commissioner King inquired about the status of the audit, including the audit related to landfill and waste management. County Administrator Gorton replied that he would bring that up under Department Heads, which was next on the Agenda. VII. DEPARTMENT HEADS County Administrator John Gorton responded first, addressing a previous question from Commissioner King regarding the audit. He informed the Board that the auditors had emailed earlier in the day and were finalizing the FY24 financial statements. Administrator Gorton noted that only two or three final questions remained before the statements could be sent to print and submitted to RLGF, thereby releasing the pending LRA funds. He also confirmed that the landfill audit had been completed and that revenues aligned with what was stipulated in the contract. Although a 2-3% rate increase had occurred recently based on landfill volume, County Administrator Gorton stated he would revisit the agreement to confirm if renegotiation clauses existed. Commissioner King expressed interest in adjusting contract terms due to changing economic conditions, but acknowledged it might be a fixed-term agreement. Recreation Director Allan Fordham presented a comprehensive update on the department's current and upcoming programs. He reported continued progress in acquiring necessary equipment and infrastructure and officially announced that registration had opened for fall activities, including football and cheerleading. Registration was being managed through Google Forms and paper applications, with the data to be compiled into accessible spreadsheets for administrative efficiency. Director Fordham also provided a tournament schedule for the Recreation Baseball Program: June 5-8 - Multiple teams (6U, 8U, and IOU) to compete in Bowdon for the annual South Tournament, June 12-14 Meriwether would host the 10U Live Arm Baseball Dizzy Dean District Tournament, June 13-14 = Hosting ofthe I0U Baseball and IOU Softball GRPA Class CDistrict Tournaments, and June 24-28 Meriwether would host the GRPA Class C 10U Live Arm State Tournament. To support these events, the department is considering temporary solutions such as portable restrooms and improvements to concession facilities. Director Fordham also reported collaboration with the Chamber of Commerce, which provided a promotional link listing local accommodations and restaurants. This information was already posted on the GRPA website. Sponsorship interest was reportedly increasing as well. Commissioners expressed appreciation for the proactive planning and community promotion. Public Works Director Brian Griffith presented a series of updates on current and upcoming initiatives within the department. He began by reporting that the first tire grant resurfacing project focused on Rocky Mount Road - was nearing completion, with only the final asphalt top layer remaining. Despite recent heavy rainfall, the resurfaced area was performing well, and Director Griffith expressed confidence in its durability. Director Griffith then briefed the Board on preparations for a road widening equipment demonstration, requesting assistance from the Commissioners in selecting an appropriate road segment. He explained that the demonstration would involve the temporary use of specialized equipment to widen roadways by approximately two feet - one foot on each side by cutting into the shoulder and filling it with asphalt. Since the equipment was only going to be available for one to two days, Director Griffith emphasized the importance of selecting a manageable section of road to ensure full completion within that timeframe, thereby avoiding public complaints or unfinished work. The discussion turned to logistics, where Director Griffith noted that asphalt delivery capacity would depend on the number of trucks in operation. Without leasing any trucks, the County could likely lay about six loads per day, equating to approximately 6,000 feet ofi road. With additional leased trucks, output could potentially reach 12,000 feet over two days. He detailed the costs involved, estimating $1,400 per load of asphalt and $100 per hour for leased trucks, resulting in a total projected cost of between $20,000 and $25,000, not including equipment, which would be provided at no charge for the demonstration. Director Griffith encouraged the Board to consider road segments around half a mile in length, which would allow for complete widening on both sides and optimize the equipment's use. Discussion continued, and it was agreed that Director Griffith and County Administrator Gorton would collaborate to identify a list of candidate roads. Director Griffith committed to circulating this list to Commissioners and County Clerk Allyson Stephens within the next few days. It was also confirmed that TSPLOST funds would be a viable source of funding for this project by County Administrator Gorton, given its direct impact on road improvements. VIII. CITIZEN COMMENT None. IX. MINUTES I. Minutes, May 5, 2025, Regular Meeting at 6:00 p.m. County Clerk Stephens stated that one change had been made on page 12, due to a typing error found by Vice Chairman Collins. The error stated it was "$325 per gallon" when it should have said $3.25 per gallon. A motion was made to accept the Minutes by Commissioner King and seconded by Commissioner Snelson, with the correction. All were in favor. X. PUBLIC HEARING I. Case #P25-003-Request from Jacob Clare for the special use of parcel 172 073 001, 507 Dan Rd, Woodbury, for the proposed use of a 5-space RV campsite. A motion was made to enter the Public Hearing at 6:24 p.m. by Commissioner King and seconded by Commissioner Snelson. All were in favor. Building and Zoning Director Cassandra Jones presented the application. Mr. Clare, the property owner, requested a special use permit for a five-space RV campsite on a 5-acre parcel located at 507 Dan Road, which was in Vice Chairman Collin's District (District 3). The applicant had been informed during the building permit process that the site was previously registered only as a hunting/fishing camp and not as a legal RV park. The Planning Commission reviewed the request and recommended approval with several stipulations, including: required background checks for any adult staying more than seven days, a code of conduct posted at all times, a prohibition on permanent fixtures (e.g., decks), quiet hours enforcement, a 90-day maximum stay per camper with a 30-day offsite period before return, and a maximum of five campers on-site at any one time. County Attorney Michael Hill provided legal counsel before beginning the pros and cons ofthe Public Hearing = he suggested that the Board refer to their ordinances where it allowed 10 to 20 minutes, and due to the number of people wanting to speak - it was advised to set the time they wanted to allow to both opposed and favored speakers. A motion was made by Chairman Worsley to allow 18 minutes to speak during the Public Hearing, since there were six people signed up and that would allow 3 minutes roughly for each person. Vice Chairman Collins seconded this motion. All were in favor. Chairman Worsley then asked if there was anyone in the audience to speak for or against the request. Mr. Jacob Clare of 507 Dan Road, Woodbury then addressed the Board and stated he had believed the property was already legally permitted for RV use. He was staying on the property prior to its purchase and was told by the previous owner that it was a legal campground. He offered to comply fully with any required regulations. Public comments in favor were then heard. Ms. Cherry Thomas, 631 Madden Rd, Concord, GA, stated that she owned the property adjacent to the campground, and she expressed conditional support but voiced several concerns, including safety, overcrowding, property encroachment, camper abandonment, and fire hazards. She recommended tighter regulations on camper quality, tenant screening, garbage disposal, and curfews. Ms. Jefflynn Jones-Ayers, 510 Stribling Road, stated her family previously owned the land and spoke in support ofthe Clares. Ms. Jones-Ayers stated that the current owners had maintained the property respectfully and peacefully for over a year. Ms. Alise Clare, 507 Dan Road, was the co-owner oft the property, and she emphasized their intent to provide quiet, temporary housing for responsible workers, not a commercial vacation destination. She added that the septic system had been upgraded and approved by the Health Department. With no further voices in favor, they moved to voices that were opposed. Ms. Diane McClendon and Mr.John McClendon, 302 Covered Bridge Road, Woodbury, stated their concerns included a lack of oversight, the potential for noise, safety issues, and the unknown character of transient occupants. They were also concerned about how permanent power poles had been installed without proper inspection or permitting. Commissioner King asked Director Cassandra Jones how many RV places like this were in the County. Director Jones responded that they had one on Gold Mine and Ramsey's. Discussion continued about the provisions and regulations of obtaining a campground in the County. Commissioner Threadgill asked who set the occupancy limits. Director Jones stated that it would depend on the size oft the campers. Commissioner Threadgill asked who set those limits. Director Jones replied that it would be up to the Board to set them as stipulations. Commissioner Threadgill stated that meant there was nothing in place right now that set the limit on that. Director. Jones replied no, because it would be based on camper size, and there was nothing in the Ordinances to clarify that. Further discussion occurred regarding the Ordinances. Commissioner King asked how: many temporary poles were out there now. Director Jones replied that she had found out there were five permanent power poles out there. Commissioner King asked how those were put out there without going through the Building and Zoning Department. Director Jones replied that they were put in as temporary power, and it was released as permanent. Director Jones added that she had nothing to do with it. Commissioner King stated that someone had to authorize it. Director Jones replied that it wasn't tanyone from her department. Commissioner King expressed that a power company would not give them power unless they received proper authorization. Mr. Clare stated that the permanent power was handled prior to his purchase of the property. Commissioner King stated he didn't doubt that, but he wanted to know how it became permanent. Ms. Jennifer Jones, 1391 Imlac Road, stated for the record that references to "Mr. Jones" in historical documents referred to her uncle Frank Jones, not her father, Gary Jones. Ms. Thomas spoke again to urge the Board to adopt county-enforced stipulations to ensure long- term compliance and neighborhood safety. Chairman Worsley asked if anyone else would like to speak in favor or opposition, but there were no further comments. A motion was made to exit the Public Hearing at 7:01 p.m. by Commissioner Threadgill and seconded by Commissioner Snelson. All were in favor. Commissioner Snelson asked about the RV Camp at Lake Meriwether and asked if they performed background checks and allowed them to have small fires. County Administrator Gorton replied that they were allowed to have small fires, but they did not implement background checks. Vice Chairman Collins stated they had a max stay of30 days. Commissioner Threadgill stated that he thought they would need additional time to determine some of the questions that arose tonight, and didn't see it as best to make a decision yet without further clarification on things. Vice Chairman Collins agreed and stated that it was in his district, SO he would like to make the motion. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Collins to table the Public Hearing until June 24th at 6:00 p.m. to allow further time to research additional information. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Threadgill. All were in favor. Mr. Clare requested that it be a different date due to him not being in town on the 24th. County Attorney Michael Hill stated that his presence was not needed due to them not being allowed any further information from them with the Public Hearing being closed. Chairman Worsley stated he understood, but he would like to see the presence of the requestor ifhe does SO choose. Discussion continued about choosing a date that Mr. Clare could be present for. Vice Chairman Collins amended his motion from June 24th at 6:00 p.m. to July 7th at 6:00 p.m. for the Public Hearing for Case #P25-003 - Request from Jacob Clare for the special use of parcel 172 073 001, 507 Dan Rd, Woodbury, for the proposed use of a 5-space RV campsite. This amended motion was seconded by Commissioner Threadgill. All were in favor. 2. Ordinance Amendment 2025-01 - Amend Chapter 20, Article IV. Sections 20-116 through 20-119 of the Code ofOrdinances of Meriwether County, Georgia. - Recreation Advisory Board A motion was made to enter the Public Hearing at 7:05 p.m. by Commissioner Threadgill and seconded by Commissioner Snelson. AIl were in favor. County Clerk Stephens addressed the Board, stating that although the ordinance was initially amended in 2024, specifics regarding the Recreation Advisory Board were not fully finalized. With assistance from the County Attorney, the ordinance had now been placed into formal structure. The proposed amendment included reducing the Board from nine members to five, with one appointee per district. To establish staggered terms, initial appointments would be divided: Districts 1,3, and 5 appointees would serve two-year terms, while Districts 2 and 4 would serve one-year initial terms, after which all terms would be two years. It was clarified that members would serve at the pleasure ofthe Board ofCommissioners and could be recalled by a simple majority vote. A member's S seat would be declared vacant iftwo meetings were missed within a calendar year without cause or prior notice. The Recreation Advisory Board would be required to notify the Board ofCommissionérs ofa any member's noncompliance with attendance. The ordinance amendment also outlined that the Advisory Board would remain under the authority of the Board ofCommissioners for all matters concerning personnel, finances, usage restrictions, and operations. The Board must meet at least quarterly and shall elect officers, including a chairman, vice chairman, secretary, and vice secretary, annually. The secretary (or vice secretary, in their absence) would be responsible for notifying members of upcoming meetings, recording meeting minutes, and transmitting records to the County Administrator and County Clerk. A quorum would consist of a majority ofvoting members. The amendment specified duties such as providing written recommendations to the Board of Commissioners and County Staff on parks and recreation programs, conducting site visits and inspections of facilities, contributing to the development of a Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and carrying out other duties as requested by the Board. Chairman Worsley provided further context, explaining the change from a nine-member board - which had struggled to meet quorum to a five-member board with one appointment per district. There were: no public comments submitted in favor ori in opposition, and no one came forward to speak on the matter. County Administrator Gorton noted that upon approval, they would need to make the correction of"County Manager" to "County Administrator. " Chairman Worsley asked if anyone else would like to speak in favor or opposition. With no further comments, a motion was made to exit the Public Hearing at 7:09 p.m. by Commissioner Threadgill and seconded by Vice Chairman Collins. AIl were in favor. With no further discussion, a motion was made by Vice Chairman Collins to approve the Ordinance Amendment 2025-01 as presented, with the suggestion to change "County Manager" to "County Administrator. 9 This motion was seconded by Commissioner Snelson. All were in favor. Commissioner King asked when they would be able to make those appointments. County Clerk Stephens stated that she would include the appointment item on the next Board meeting agenda, scheduled for June 9th at 6:00 p.m. 3. Ordinance Amendment 2025-02 - Change ofOfficial Zoning Ordinance; Article 10- Manufactured Homes, Sec. 10.2 (c)-1. New statutes prohibit counties from regulating the age of a manufactured home. A motion was made to enter the Public Hearing at 7:11 p.m. by Commissioner Threadgill and seconded by Commissioner Snelson. All were in favor. Director Jones explained that the proposed change was in response to legislation passed by the Georgia General Assembly, which took effect in July oft the previous year. The existing ordinance contained language in Section 10.2(c)-1 that prohibited the placement of manufactured homes more than ten years old at the time of placement. The revision would strike this age requirement while maintaining other standards already in place, such as minimum home size, roof pitch, and exterior siding compliance with ICC (International Code Council) standards. Commissioner Threadgill discussed the historical reasoning for the original age limitation, which was tied to transportation restrictions on state highways. A short discussion followed between the Commissioners regarding the ordinance. Commissioner Threadgill asked ifthe County Attorney had read all of it. County Attorney Michael Hill noted that the ordinance provided to him had only been received shortly before the meeting and identified a possible inconsistency in the updated language. Specifically, he pointed out a contradiction between the proposed Subsection 1, which stated that manufactured homes must be placed in an "approved manufactured home space or an approved manufactured home park," and Subsection 2, which allowed for placement on "individual lots outside of a manufactured home park. 99 County Attorney Hill expressed concern about the lack of a clear definition for "manufactured home space," and advised further review. Director Jones clarified that the language in question had not been newly added but existed in the current ordinance. County Attorney Hill suggested the Board could proceed with removing Subsection (c)-1 regarding the IO-year age restriction while allowing Staff time to revisit and clarify the remaining language in a future amendment. The Board agreed this approach would allow for compliance with state law while reserving the right to fine-tune the ordinance language later. Chairman Worsley asked if there was anyone that wanted to speak for or against the proposed amendment. No members of the public came forward to speak in favor or in opposition to the proposed amendment. A motion was made to exit the Public Hearing at 7:16 p.m. by Commissioner Threadgill and seconded by Commissioner Snelson. All were in favor. A motion was made by Commissioner King to amend Section 10.2 of the Official Zoning Ordinance by removing Subsection (c)-1 and renumbering the remaining subsections accordingly. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Snelson. All were in favor. 4. Ordinance Amendment 2025-03 - Change of Official Zoning Ordinance; Article 7- District, lot and height standards - easements. A motion was made to enter the Public Hearing at 7:17 p.m. by Commissioner Threadgill and seconded by Commissioner Snelson. AII were in favor. Director Jones presented the proposed amendment, which had been reviewed and written with legal counsel. She explained that the amendment was necessary to address issues where developers were circumventing minimum lot size requirements by utilizing easements to access parcels from paved roads while actually entering from dirt roads. Since properties accessed via dirt roads must meet a five-acre minimum, and those accessed from paved roads may be as small as two acres, this loophole allowed for denser subdivisions than permitted by the intent of the ordinance. The redlined text in the draft ordinance represented legal recommendations designed to close this loophole and ensure consistent application ofl lot standards. After the Board reviewed, public comment was opened. Chairman Worsley asked ifthere was anyone that wanted to speak for or against the proposed amendment. Mr. Brandon Larry, 425 Wagers Mill Rd, Newnan, GA, spoke in opposition to the amendment on behalf of Chisel Mill Homes. Mr. Larry introduced himself as a soon-to-be- resident ofMeriwether County and explained that his company had a history ofbuilding aesthetically pleasing and moderately priced homes. He argued that the ability to subdivide land via easements was critical to maintaining affordable housing opportunities, particularly on long, narrow tracts ofland with limited frontage. Mr. Larry shared experiences with developments in other counties, including one with a 16-foot gravel road that effectively served multiple lots. He expressed concern that eliminating or reducing easement allowances could inhibit development and make land less accessible for working-class homebuyers. He emphasized his willingness to work collaboratively with the County and Building and Zoning Department to achieve development goals while maintaining responsible growth. During the exchange, Commissioner King raised concerns about how easements affect affordability versus profitability and noted that reducing easement allowances might not decrease lot costs but could limit the number of buildable lots, thus protecting the intent ofz zoning standards. Commissioner King also asked about the cleanliness and maintenance of easement driveways, prompting Mr. Larry to discuss his company's practice of recording precise mects-and-bounds descriptions and cooperating with the County for clear legal recordkeeping, although he acknowledged that homeowner maintenance responsibilities are not always explicitly defined. County Attorney Michael Hill clarified several items in the ordinance. He explained that similar counties like Heard and Coweta have easement-limited zoning tools such as "estate lot averages" that still restrict the number ofhomes accessed by private drives. He also addressed Commissioner King's question by confirming that the proposed ordinance included a requirement for perpetual maintenance agreements for shared easements. These agreements would be approved by Staff, recorded with deeds, and ensure that all parties share the cost of upkeep. County Attorney Hill also recommended a correction in the language ofthe proposed ordinance: Subsection 7.1(1)(b) should state that easements may not serve more than three lots "unless one or more of the lots have frontage on a public street and do not use the easement, 23 correcting the draft language that read "two ofthe lots." " County Attorney Hill confirmed that the changes were intended to address developers connecting dirt-road parcels to paved road access via easements to bypass five-acre zoning requirements. The Board acknowledged the need for further review and clarification. Chairman Worsley asked if anyone else would like to speak in favor or opposition. Following no further public comments, a motion was made to exit the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m. by Commissioner Snelson and seconded by Commissioner King. All were in favor. A motion was made to table the ordinance amendment until the June 24, 2025, Regular Meeting at 6:00 p.m. by Commissioner Threadgill to allow for additional information and review. This motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Collins. All were in favor. A temporary moratorium was discussed but ultimately not recommended by legal counsel. The matter would be reconsidered at the June 24, 2025, 6:00 p.m. meeting. XI. APPOINTMENTS 1. Appointment to the Pine Mountain Regional Library Board (3-year term which will begin on July 1, 2025, and expire June 30, 2028) Commissioner Snelson stated that she was excited to nominate someone that was a longtime resident of the County, with the addition ofthem being a librarian and the person being excited. Commissioner Snelson added that her name was Jamie Smith from Alvaton, and she had given her all the information and requirements for the appointment. Commissioner Threadgill seconded this appointment. All were in favor. 2. Appointment to the Planning Commission to fill an unexpired term, District 2 (This is a five-year term that will expire on January 5, 2027) County Clerk Stephens noted that the current appointee, Janet Steiner, was relocating outside of Meriwether County and was therefore no longer eligible to serve. Commissioner Snelson stated she would like to have time to find aj person. A motion was made to table the appointment till Tuesday, June 24th, Regular Meeting at 6:00 p.m. by Commissioner Snelson and seconded by Vice Chairman Collins. All were in favor. 3. Appointment to DFACS, District 3. (This is a five-year term that will begin on July 1, 2025, and expire on June 30, 2030) County Clerk Stephens stated that the seat was currently held by Ms. Melissa Wortham. Commissioners discussed whether to nominate a new individual or inquire ifMs. Wortham would be willing to continue serving in this capacity. It was agreed that County Staff would reach out to Ms. Wortham for clarification. A motion was made to table this appointment till the June 24th, Regular Meeting at 6:00 p.m. by Vice Chairman Collins and seconded by Commissioner Threadgill. AIl were in favor. 4. Appointment to Pathways Community Service Board. (This is a 3-year term that will begin on July 1, 2025, and expire on June 30, 2028) County Clerk Stephens informed the Board that this seat was currently being held by Ms. Jennifer Jones, who was in attendance at the meeting. However, County Staffhad not yet spoken with Ms. Jones to confirm whether she was willing to serve another term. A motion was made to table this appointment till June 24, 2025, Regular Meeting at 6:00 p.m. by Chairman Worsley and seconded by Commissioner Threadgill. All were in favor. 5. Appointment to CAFI to fill an unexpired term that will end on 12-31-2025 County Clerk Stephens informed the Board that the position was previously held by Mr. Blue Cole, who was no longer employed with the County. As this seat was not district-specific, the Board discussed possible replacements. Commissioner discussion led to a recommendation that either County Administrator John Gorton or County Clerk Allyson Stephens be appointed. A motion was made to appoint County Clerk Allyson Stephens for the appointment' S remaining term by Commissioner Threadgill and seconded by Commissioner King. All were in favor. 6. Appointment to the West Central GA Broadband Joint Development Authority. (This is an unexpired term that will end on 4-17-2028) County Clerk Stephens stated that it was previously held by Mr. Blue Cole, who was no longer employed with the County. It was noted that the Authority had not convened in some time. Discussion included input that Ms. Carolyn McKinley served in the other County-appointed seat and that meetings had historically been infrequent. When asked about the Authority's function, it was clarified that it focused on broadband and Wi-Fi expansion into the County. Commissioner Snelson volunteered to serve. A motion was made to appoint Ms. Jennifer Snelson by Commissioner Threadgill and seconded by Vice Chairman Collins. All were in favor. XII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Purchase of Storage Shed and Concession Stand for the Recreation Department County Administrator Gorton stated that this was an item tabled from the previous meeting. Staff reported receiving updated quotes for both a storage shed and a concession stand to be used by the Recreation Department. Two quotes were received for a 12'x32' storage shed: one from Sturdi Buildings in Harris County for $8,375 with a four-week turnaround, and another from Strickland Buildings in Luthersville for $10,976. Both include a standard door and roll-up door, but no windows. Additionally, County Administrator Gorton presented three options for concession stands: A 12'x12' shed with a 36"x60" concession window for $4,611.48 (within purchasing limits, but requiring SPLOST funding approval), A 12'x16' shed for $5,305.74, or a 7'x14' pull-behind concession trailer for $18,499. Staff recommended selecting the 12'x32' storage shed from Sturdi Buildings and the 12'x16' concession shed for a combined total of $13,680.74, to be funded through SPLOST with LGIP interest (approximately $12,750 available after the upcoming allocation). Final approval was contingent upon Health Department inspection and permission from the Board of Education, as the shed would be located on the George Washington property under County lease. Commissioner Threadgill asked if this was a portable concession stand. County Administrator Gorton replied that it was a sturdy built shed and could be moved by using a forklift and placed on the back of a trailer for transportation as needed. Discussion followed regarding the merits ofa portable shed versus a mobile trailer. Recreation Director Fordham stated the 12'x32' shed would be adequate for equipment storage, including the side-by-side, chalk machine, and other field maintenance gear. He expressed ambivalence about the shed-style concession stand but noted significant advantages with the mobile trailer: ease oft transportation, flexibility for use at events like the Cotton Fair or Lake Meriwether fireworks, built-in utility access (air conditioning, hot water heater, 50-amp breaker), and faster procurement to support upcoming tournaments. Commissioner Threadgill expressed concern about efficiency in using a non-portable shed. Director Fordham emphasized that a mobile trailer would better serve the Recreation Department': S needs and public engagement, especially for high-traffic events. While cooking equipment would remain outdoors due to cost- prohibitive fire suppression system requirements, the trailer setup would allow: for better food storage and serving infrastructure. Coca-Cola had committed to donating an additional cooler. Commissioners expressed support for the mobile trailer. Staffindicated that the total cost for the 12'x32' shed and the trailer would be $26,874, with an additional generator purchase bringing the projected total to just under $30,000. SPLOST funding would be used for this expense, with the next allocation projected at approximately $160,000. A motion was made to approve the purchase ofthe 12'x32' storage shed and the $18,000 mobile concession trailer by Chairman Worsley. This motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Collins. Voting in favor were Chairman Adam Worsley, Vice Chairman Emmett Collins, Commissioner Threadgill, and Commissioner Snelson. Commissioner King abstained. 2. Update on Joint Meeting with Municipalities for 2026 SPLOST County Administrator Gorton reported contacting all mayors ofmunicipalities within Meriwether County to collect proposed SPLOST project lists. Submissions were currently being compiled. Staff noted that intergoyermental agreements would need to be drafted and presented for approval at a Special Called Meeting scheduled for June 9, 2025. While the date was previously set during the May 5, 2025, meeting, no time was established. Staff recommended scheduling the Special Called Meeting for 4:00 p.m. on June 9, 2025. A motion was made to confirm this date and time, allowing Staff to notify the municipalities formally by Commissioner Threadgill. This motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Collins. All were in favor. 3. Approval of 2026 SPLOST Projects for Meriwether County County Administrator Gorton stated this item had been discussed during the previous meeting, but formal Board action was still required in order for County Clerk Stephens to proceed with drafting the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). Staff recommended the inclusion of the following general categories of projects for the 2026 SPLOST initiative: Building Renovations, Public Safety Vehicles and Equipment, Sheriff's Office Vehicles and Equipment, Public Works Vehicles and Equipment, Recreation Improvements, Information Technology Upgrades, Roads and Transportation Infrastructure. It was clarified that no specific individual projects would be listed at this time. Instead, the general categories would guide funding and planning, with additional detail to be developed in future steps. The proposed SPLOST would serve as a continuation oft the current program and would be presented to voters in the 2026 election cycle. The Board was also informed that either the Chair or Vice Chair would be required to sign documentation prepared by County Clerk Stephens in order to advance the IGA process on behalf ofMeriwether County. A motion was made by Commissioner Snelson to recommend the inclusion ofthe above-listed project categories in the County's 2026 SPLOST plan and to authorize the Chair or Vice Chair to sign the necessary documents. This motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Collins. All were in favor. 4. Update and Repeal Motion made during the May 5, 2025, Regular Meeting at 6:00 p.m. or the Hot Patching Equipment The Board revisited the motion approved during the May 5, 2025, Regular Meeting regarding the purchase of a 4-ton, one-burner hot patch trailer at a cost of $45,399.48. County Administrator Gorton recommended rescinding the motion due to new developments in availability and valuation. It was reported that the one-burner model was currently unavailable, with an estimated lead time of6 60-90 days. In the interim, the County would be required to rent a 4-ton, two-burner unit at a rate of $7,500 per month. Additionally, the original motion included a stipulation for the trade-in value was only $5,000, significantly below the anticipated estimate of $8,000-$10,000. Staff noted that the existing until still retains functionality, particularly as a stationary storage tank for CRS-2 emulsion, and recommended its retention. The current unit was capable of storing up to 250 gallons of CRS-2 emulsion and could maintain a temperature of over 90°F, making it suitable for use alongside any new patching equipment. Commissioners discussed the utility and potential value ofkeeping the current unit. It was generally agreed that the retained patcher would serve as a useful backup and storage option, particularly given ongoing needs for road maintenance and equipment availability delays. A motion was made by Chairman Worsley to repeal the motion made on May 5, 2025, regarding the purchase of the hot patching equipment, specifically rescinding the stipulation related to the trade-in of the existing patcher. The motion was seconded by Commissioner King. AII were in favor. XIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval to place a Historical Marker for David Meriwether at the Meriwether County Courthouse and allow the Chair/Vice Chair to sign a letter of authorization The Board considered a request for the placement of a historical marker commemorating David Meriwether at the Meriwether County Courthouse. County Administrator Gorton explained that the marker would need to comply with all applicable County ordinances, and the proposed location would need to be finalized. Chairman Worsley asked who was in charge of determining where to place the marker. There was a discussion regarding the appropriate placement of the marker on courthouse property. It was noted that existing markers were located on the Woodbury side ofthe property and that the new marker was proposed for the LaGrange Street (Highway 109) side. Greenville Council Member Ryan Moore spoke up by stating it could interfere with Greenville's Christmas tree placement, but it was clarified by Commissioner Threadgill that the matter remained under County jurisdiction regardless of City activities. Staff requested authorization to draft a formal letter granting placement approval, with permission for either the Chair or Vice Chair to sign the letter. A motion was made by Commissioner King to approve the placement of the historical marker for David Meriwether on Courthouse property, with the stipulation that it complied with applicable ordinances and allowed Staff to draft the necessary letter of permission and authorized the Chair or Vice Chair to sign the document. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Threadgill. All were in favor. 2. Request to Purchase Hot Patching Equipment The Board revisited the issue of acquiring hot patching equipment, following up on the motion made during a previous meeting to purchase a 4-ton single-burner combo trailer for $45,399.48. County Administrator Gorton reported that the originally approved unit was no longer available and recommended rescinding that motion. Instead, they proposed purchasing a 4-ton two-burner combo trailer, which was in stock and included more features. The total cost for the new equipment was quoted at $65,524.08. A credit of$7,559.25 was available for returning the previously ordered BAM equipment, although it would require $1,755 in freight charges to be shipped back to Texas. This brought the adjusted cost of the new trailer to $57,964.83. Staff further recommended including a road saw at a cost of$2,629.00, bringing the total purchase to $60,593.83. It was clarified that this figure already included the same components quoted in the original $45,000 price. During the discussion, Chairman Worsley expressed concern about the increase in cost and sought clarification on the breakdown of expenses. They questioned whether purchasing the new two-burner unit - which costs approximately $20,000 more than the initial plan = was the most fiscally responsible decision. However, it was pointed out that renting the unavailable single-burner unit for two months would cost $15,000, essentially closing the cost gap. Moreover, the new equipment offered considerable upgrades, which Vice Chairman Collins pointed out - including a spare tire kit, fire extinguisher kit, LED arrow board, and a 30-gallon emulsion spray tank - none ofwhich were included in the original single-burner model. County Administrator Gorton confirmed that the credit for the returned BAM equipment would be applied to this purchase. The unit was available in Lake City and would not incur additional shipping charges. Chairman Worsley agreed that, despite the higher initial cost, the upgraded unit would provide better long-term value and efficiency for road maintenance. A motion was made by Commissioner King to approve Staff's recommendation to purchase the 4-ton two-burner combo trailer and associated equipment, with the understanding that it would enhance the County's patching capabilities and eliminate the need for short-term rentals. Vice Chairman Collins seconded this motion. All were in favor. 3. Consideration of Master Agreement with EMC Engineering Services, Inc. and allow Chair/Vice Chair to sign County Administrator Gorton explained that the agreement would establish a standing relationship with the firm for on-call engineering services, enabling the County to engage EMC for various infrastructure, design, and consulting projects without the need to draft a new contract for each individual task. This master agreement would streamline future procurement and project initiation processes by allowing for task orders to be issued under the umbrella of this agreement. The agreement was reviewed and found to be in order by Legal. Staff requested Board approval to enter into the agreement and to authorize the Chair or Vice Chair to execute the necessary documents on behalf of the County. A motion was made to approve the Master Agreement with EMC Engineering Services, Inc., and to allow the Chair or Vice Chair to sign by Chairman Worsley. This motion was seconded by Commissioner King. All were in favor. 4. Approval and Authorization ofLMIG 2025 Task Order from EMCI Engineering Services, Inc. and allow Chair/Vice Chair to sign. A motion was made to approve and authorize the LMIG 2025 Task Order from EMC Engineering Services, Inc. and allow Chair or Vice Chair to sign by Vice Chairman Collins. This motion was seconded by Commissioner King. All were in favor. 5. Consideration to enter Agreement with EMC Engineering Services, Inc. for the Courthouse Roof and 3rd Floor, and allow the company to manage and oversee the project. County Administrator Gorton explained that EMC had previously conducted the assessment for the Courthouse, and as a result, reduced their typical 10% project management fee to 8%. All Commissioners had received a copy oft the Courthouse assessment for review, and the proposed agreement would allow EMC to take on full oversight of the project from initiation to closeout. Commissioners raised concerns about the cost and legal protections. Based on Staff estimates, the project was expected to cost approximately $1.2 million, making EMC's 8% management fee roughly $96,000 to $100,000. Commissioners questioned whether the 2% discount was solely due to EMC's prior assessment work or if any credit from the assessment fee was being applied. County Administrator Gorton committed to following up with EMC to confirm this detail. Chairman Worsley and Vice Chairman discussed the importance of ensuring that the agreement included enforceable warranties and legal protections for workmanship and materials. They emphasized that the County must not bear additional costs due to contractor or subcontractor errors. It was noted that the: master agreement with EMC had been reviewed previously by legal counsel and that EMC had accepted all recommended changes. However, this specific task order for the courthouse project would need separate legal review to ensure adequate liability protections were in place. County Attorney Michael Hill and other Staff clarified that EMC, acting as the County's representative or general contractor, would be responsible for drafting construction documents, advertising for bids, overseeing contractors, reviewing pay applications, and certifying project completion. Commissioners discussed the structure of master agreements and task orders, confirming that while general terms were controlled by the master agreement, each task order must still be reviewed individually to ensure its adequacy. A motion was made by Commissioner King to approve entering into the agreement with EMC Engineering Services, Inc. for project management oft the courthouse roof and third floor, contingent upon legal review ofthe specific task order. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Snelson. All were in favor. 6. Consideration of raising the current Vacation Time Accrual from 240 hours to 280 hours County Administrator Gorton explained that this change had been discussed at the April 22nd Work Session in response to challenges faced by department heads and long-tenured employees. Specifically, some employees were losing accrued vacation time because they were hitting the 240-hour cap, and the payroll system's monthly cutoff did not align well with their schedules, resulting in lost accruals even when vacation days had technically been taken. While the intention was to provide more flexibility for employees, some Commissioners raised concerns. Chairman Worsley, not present at the original Work Session, questioned the need to increase the cap, noting that employees were paid the same whether they worked to take a vacation day. It was argued that while an employee might not be able to afford an elaborate trip, they could still take time off without financial penalty. Commissioner Threadgill also raised the concern that raising the cap could create a cycle of continually increasing accrual limits in future years, without addressing the core issue. Commissioners discussed the possibility ofa allowing employees to "sell back" unused vacation hours as a more practical solution, especially for those who cannot afford to take time off due to financial reasons. Selling back a portion oft their hours could provide employees with funds to take time offi in the future, without increasing the accrual cap. The idea of managing accrued time through a buyback program was viewed as potentially more effective than increasing the limit, especially considering other fiscal priorities on the Agenda. After a thorough discussion, a motion was made to reject the proposed increase from 240 to 280 hours by Commissioner Snelson and seconded by Commissioner Threadgill. All were in favor. 7. Consideration of adding Veterans Day as a County-Paid Holiday County Administrator Gorton presented a comparative chart showing that Meriwether County was currently the only surrounding County that did not observe Veterans Day as aj paid holiday. The proposal, originally requested for research by Commissioner King, was intended to honor the contributions of veterans, including those currently employed by the County. It was noted that while Memorial Day was observed, Veterans Day had not previously been recognized as a paid holiday. Commissioner King emphasized the importance of celebrating both holidays. Commissioner Snelson made a recommendation to add Veterans Day to the County's paid holiday schedule beginning in the 2025 calendar year. Commissioner Threadgill seconded this recommendation. AIl were in favor. 8. Consideration of allowing employees to sell back Accrued Vacation Hours County Administrator Gorton provided the proposal that was prompted by feedback from employees and discussions at the April 22, 2025, Work Session. The Human Resources department recommended allowing employees with financial flexibility - such as being able to address personal expenses like home repairs while still preserving a reserve of leave time for emergencies or extended absences. A lengthy discussion followed. Chairman Worsley expressed concern about the fiscal implications of allowing up to 80 hours to be sold back per year, especially if a large percentage of employees chose to do SO at once. It was clarified by County Administrator Gorton, the program would begin with Fiscal Year 2026 (starting October 1, 2025), allowing time for the cost to be budgeted. While some Commissioners supported the full 80-hour option as a significant benefit and a means to provide employees with greater control over their time and finances, others advocated for a more fiscally conservative approach, suggesting that 40 hours would be sufficient. Another point of discussion centered on the required 160-hour minimum balance to participate in the buyback. Commissioner Threadgill saw this as aj protective measure to ensure employees had adequate leave reserves for emergencies under FMLA. However, Chairman Worsley raised concerns about fairness to newer employees who might not yet. have accrued that much leave but still faced legitimate needs. Suggestions were made to consider future policy refinements that could allow exceptions or a proportional buyback option based on accrued hours. A motion was made by Commissioner Snelson to allow employees to sell back up to 40 hours of vacation time per fiscal year at their current hourly rate, provided they maintain a minimum balance of 160 hours. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Threadgill. All were in favor. Commissioners recognized this as a positive first step in offering more flexible benefits to employees while maintaining responsible fiscal oversight. 9. Agenda. Amended to. Add - Airfield Lighting Grant County Administrator Gorton stated that the Georgia Department ofTransportation (GDOT) required confirmation of the County's financial commitment by May 30, 2025, in order to move forward with the grant. It was explained that the bids for the project had come in and were within the previously approved amount = specifically, the Board had voted on September 11, 2024, to commit up to $250,000 as a 25% local match for the grant. Commissioners expressed concern that the Airport Authority had not submitted the exact bid amounts and emphasized that the County had only committed to funding 25% ofthe total project cost, not a blanket amount of $250,000. There was general consensus that while the County supported the project, a precise commitment could not be finalized without seeing the actual winning bid. To ensure fiscal clarity and prevent any assumption that the County would provide a flat $250,000 regardless of cost, it was proposed that the approval be structured as a commitment to fund 25% of the winning bid amount, with the total not to exceed the $250,000 cap. After discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Threadgill to contribute 25% ofthe winning bid amount, not to exceed $250,000, and allow the. Airport Authority to execute the necessary documents via DocuSign to meet the GDOT deadline. Vice Chairman Collins seconded this motion. All were in favor. 10. Agenda Amended to. Add. - City ofGreenville Football Field Mayor Stargell and Council Member Ryan Moore appeared before the Board to discuss improvements to the City's football field and its readiness to host Meriwether County Recreation football games. Mayor Stargell outlined that the City was excited to partner with the County on this initiative and had taken steps to ensure the field would be ready by late July or early August. Improvements included replacing a wooden concession stand door with a steel one, repainting bleachers, installing new aluminum bleachers on the visitor side, repairing rails, upgrading electrical components, and ordering a new scoreboard. Councilman Moore detailed aj plan including handicap-accessible concrete paths, a four-foot fence behind the bleachers, and painting existing bleachers. The City planned to install additional fencing, a new sound system like that at Greenville High School, a 10x10 sound booth, and a roll-up concession door. These upgrades were estimated to cost around $70,000, funded by SPLOST and the City's general recreation budget. A key issue raised was parking. Mayor Stargell mentioned available spaces across various areas of the property and planned to coordinate with the Board of. Education for access. Commissioner King asked ift they had the funds to do everything they were planning on doing. Mayor Stargell responded yes, with Councilman Moore stating they could use SPLOST funds, as well as capital project money, as needed. Commissioner King asked ift they had approved this through their Council. Councilman Moore explained they were waiting for the Board to make a decision before they committed to spending the money. Commissioner Threadgill asked ifthis was the same football field that sloped off on one end. Vice Chairman Collins confirmed and stated that it was the old Greenville football field. Commissioners expressed concern over the lack of finalized bids or schedules and the field's readiness for the 2025 season. While Greenville wanted to be the primary host for football, the Board had already decided to use Flint River Academy's field for the 2025 season, with Greenville as a backup once the facility was deemed safe and ADA compliant. The Board emphasized they could not guarantee all games would be hosted in Greenville, but welcomed a shared use model once multiple fields were viable across the County. Commissioners also discussed broader recreation goals, including equitable use of facilities in various municipalities and building a centralized recreation complex in the future. Commissioner Snelson addressed the tone ofthe discussion and clarified that the County's role in recreation was not about benefiting the Board or receiving any form of gain. She emphasized that the decisions being made were entirely focused on serving the children and families of Meriwether County, not the Commissioners themselves. She stated that the conversation should not be framed as the City giving something to the County, but rather about providing a safe and equitable experience for all youth. She reiterated that the funds in question benefit the community as a whole and should not be characterized otherwise. Commissioner Snelson expressed her support for Greenville's effort and voiced appreciation for their investment, but reinforced that the Board must make decisions in the best interest ofall citizens, not individual municipalities. Recreation Director Fordham noted he preferred having a single location for football, in line with how other counties manage recreation. Still, the Board recognized the City of Greenville's effort and investment, Commissioner Threadgill commended their proactive approach, and emphasized their interest in working together once the field was confirmed to be ready and safe. Chairman Worsley exited the Board room at 9:22 p.m. and returned at 9:25 p.m. Following repeated references and insinuations made by Council Member Ryan Moore throughout the discussion, County Administrator Gorton addressed the Board to firmly clarify his position. He stated unequivocally that he was an employee of Meriwether County, not the City of Greenville, and that his responsibility was to the Board of Commissioners and the citizens oft the County as a whole. No vote was taken at this time, but Commissioners indicated they would inspect the field individually before making further decisions. XIV. REPORT FROM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR County Administrator Gorton provided several updates to the Board. He informed the Commissioners that he had attended a Department Head meeting and the final session of the Hazard Mitigation Plan, which would be brought back to the Board once it was ready for approval. He noted that Public Works and EMS Appreciation Days were held on May 21 and May 22, respectively, and that he also attended the most recent Industrial Development Authority (IDA) meeting. County Administrator Gorton had been in contact with the cities regarding proposed projects for the 2026 Special Local Option Sales Tax (SPLOST). He reported that plumbing work at the jail was scheduled to begin the week of] June 2, following a necessary delay while kitchen staff secured an alternate location to continue providing hot meals to inmates during construction. He further stated that Building A had now been fully occupied, with the Tax Assessor, Tax Commissioner, Building and Zoning, and District Attorney's offices all relocated and operating efficiently out oft the facility for the past two weeks. County Administrator Gorton commended the Public Works Department for their prompt and effective storm cleanup following the May 18th storm event. Crews were dispatched to impacted areas and worked quickly once the weather cleared. He also attended a meeting ofthe Lake Meriwether Fireworks and Advisory Board. No further items were presented. County Clerk Stephens spoke up and congratulated County Administrator Gorton's son, Ayden, on graduating from high school this past weekend. County Administrator Gorton returned the favor by congratulating County Clerk Stephens' daughter, Alyssa, on graduating from high school this past weekend as well. Chairman Worsley asked if Staffhad reached out to GDOT about flashing railroad alert signs and if they had gotten anything back from them. County Clerk Stephens stated that she had not received any feedback, but would get back with them in the morning. Commissioner Snelson also asked that her request be mentioned when County Clerk Stephens contacted them. County Administrator Gorton added that Trammel Bridge Road was shut down temporarily at the bridge, as it did not pass GDOT inspection, and they were waiting on that report. As soon as the report is received, Piedmont Paving would fix the bridge as needed. XV. REPORT FROM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Bryan Threadgill: Commissioner Threadgill opened his remarks by expressing deep concern regarding a recent medical emergency in Manchester, during which a patient in need of transport experienced a significant delay due to ambulançe unavailability. The response time from call to pickup totaled approximately 40 minutes. He emphasized the urgent need to invest in updated and reliable ambulances, stating that road improvements are ineffective if emergency services cannot reach patients in time. He stressed that the County must prioritize medical readiness to safeguard citizens' health and safety. He also addressed frustrations stemming from the response to the recent storm event, particularly in his district. He reported that County crews responded multiple times but were unable to clear downed trees due to delays from Georgia Power in removing power lines. Roads remained blocked for extended periods, and while County personnel were responsive and willing, Georgia Power's performance was, in his view, inadequate. Commissioner Threadgill recounted witnessing utility crews standing idle at a nearby fire station, with no meaningful progress until after dark. He noted this as part ofa broader trend, sharing that his area had experienced 13 outages this year alone, some lasting up to 48 hours. He called on the County to explore alternatives, such as introducing EMC services, and described Georgia Power's S reliability and customer service as significantly deteriorated over the past two years. Vice Chairman Emmett Collins: Vice Chairman Collins expressed gratitude to County Staff and all personnel for their continued efforts. He acknowledged the challenging work of departments such as Public Works and hoped progress would continue with road maintenance. Commissioner. Jennifer Snelson: Commissioner Snelson thanked Staff, particularly those who worked during the storm cleanup, including fire and volunteer personnel who went above and beyond by physically clearing roads. She also extended appreciation to the citizens who attended the meeting and offered input, regardless oft their position on the issues discussed. She welcomed continued public participation. Commissioner Gene King: Commissioner King echoed thanks to County Staff for1 their hard work and recommendations brought forward at the meeting. He acknowledged the differences in I opinion but emphasized the Board' S appreciation for Staff efforts. He highlighted the condition of Alvaton Road, noting it is a heavily trafficked route connecting Pike and Spalding Counties to Troup County and beyond. He reported resident complaints about vehicle damage due to road conditions and urged a comparative assessment of the road's condition against other high-traffic areas to determine needed improvements. Commissioner King also promoted the upcoming Meriwether County Rodeo, sponsored by Tower House Brewery in downtown Gay, taking place June 6-7.He noted the event would be held at the fairgrounds and encouraged attendance, describing it as a significant family-oriented attraction. Chairman Adam Worsley: Chairman Worsley concluded the Commissioner's reports by also thanking Staff for their work during and after the storm. He acknowledged the round-the-clock efforts by those who restored power and cleared debris. He humorously noted that while his own power only blinked three times before returning, he was aware that many others were not as fortunate and expressed appreciation for all who responded diligently. XVI. REPORT FROM COUNTY ATTORNEY County Attorney Michael Hill had nothing to report. XVII. EXECUTIVE SESSION A motion was made by Commissioner King to enter Executive Session for the purposes of Litigation, Personnel, Real Estate, and Tax Matters at 9:37 p.m. and seconded by Commissioner Snelson. All were in favor. Commissioner Threadgill exited the meeting before entering into Executive Session at 9:37 p.m.. A motion was made by Commissioner Snelson to exit Executive Session at 9:55 p.m. and seconded by Vice Chairman Collins. All were in favor. A motion was made by Commissioner King to return to Regular Session at 9:57 p.m. and seconded by Vice Chairman Collins. All were in favor. No action was taken during Executive Session. XVIII FUTURE MEETINGS & NOTICES Chairman Worsley read the Future Meetings & Notices before entering into Executive Session. XIX. ADJOURNMENT With no further business, a motion was made by Commissioner King to Adjourn the Meeting at 9:57 p.m. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Snelson. All were in favor. Approved by: Maonky Vokof Mhr boadof Cnmpsibners Attest: Hyson & pNad Date: CeunHyCE Mane 4,7023