PALACKT 1831 ELORIDE Planning & Zoning Agenda June gth, 2025 Workshop 5:00 PM Regular Meeting 6:00 PM CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, June gth, 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Agenda Workshop: 5:00 PM Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM 1. Approval of May 12th, 2025 meeting minutes. 2. Review, Discussion and Decision for Accessory Structure. (R-2) @ 250 Prado. Block 2 Lot 8- 9. For Drew Robertson - Owner; Contractor: Self 3. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & Fence. (R-1) (Historic District) @ 207 Avenue D. Block 107 Lot 9-10. For Tom Bradberry & Kim Harker - Owner; Contractor: GeoFlora Group LLC 4. Review, Discussion and Decision for Permeable Pavers. (R-1) (Historic District) @ 98 Bay Avenue. Block 193 Lots 6-10. For Phil & Rhonda Shelley = Owner; Contractor: William Ross Development 5. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & Accessory Structure. (C-1) (Historic District) @ 47 Avenue E. Block 3 Lots 1-2. For Miller Mart Inc. - Owner; Contractor: Rodney Miedema Other/New Business: City Manager to provide update on planning services. OutstandingUnresoNved Issues: 2nd Stormwater Workshop to be tentatively scheduled for July 14th at 5:00PM, pending discussion. Motion to adjourn the meeting. 1 PALACH 1831 FLORIDE Workshop Stormwater Best Management Practices City Planner Report Prepared by: Bree Robinson Subject: Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Workshop June 9, 2025 - Follow-Up to Joint Workshop held May 12, 2025 Workshop Summary & Key Discussion Points (5/12/25): City Planner reviewed background on how this topic came to Commissioner Grove clarified that the intent of the SWBMP program and definition was not to allow increased lot coverage. It is being misinterpreted as a tool to further develop properties, which was never the goal. City Planner emphasized that while stormwater systems can be beneficial, many require ongoing maintenance, which the City currently has no means to monitor or enforce. Without a City-managed permitting or inspection process, granting lot coverage incentives based on BMP installation can lead to systems being installed and later neglected - particularly as properties change hands. This results in permanent increases to lot coverage (ex: from 40% to 50%) without true long-term treatment or benefit. If incentives are offered, the City may be creating a future problem by enabling development beyond what would otherwise be allowed. Commissioner Grove reiterated that property owners are responsible for treating their own stormwater on-site, not directing it into the City's system. The City's stormwater infrastructure is intended to treat water on City property and should not be relied upon by private properties. She stated that rather than incentivizing BMPs with additional lot coverage, the City should enforce existing regulations and encourage BMP use through education or support. City Planner concluded that, given the consensus against offering tangible incentives, the City should consider: Strengthening the definition of impervious surface 0 Clarifying the definition of stormwater BMPs to align with City intent Commissioner Groves supported this approach, stating that the current definition creates an illusion of incentive that should be eliminated. P&Z Chair Joe Taylor agreed and emphasized that the City should not create policy that allows homeowners to exceed the 40% lot coverage threshold, further burdening the stormwater system. P&Z Member Greg Golgowski raised concerns about BMPS being interpreted to include concrete conveyances that simply route water into the City system, offering no on-site treatment. He recommended the City clarify acceptable BMP types. Commissioner Grove and Chair Taylor both noted that the City is a shallow bowl with a high water table, making effective stormwater management a priority. Consensus of the City Commission: BMPs should not be used as a mechanism to increase allowable lot coverage or intensify development. There is consensus against using incentives that could lead to development intensification. Commissioner Elliott commented that rather than creating new policies, the City should better define exceptions in the LDC to clearly reflect intent. City Planner agreed and suggested that the P&Z Board workshop potential amendments to close existing loopholes and eliminate unintended consequences. P&Z Member Bobby Miller requested that the City Attorney draft language for possible code revisions. O City Attorney agreed to do SO. City Planner will prepare comments and recommendations for discussion at the June 9 Workshop (5:00 PM). Resident Myrtis Wynn added that the City should not offer incentives that cannot be applied equitably to all property owners. Potential Code Changes Highlighted in YELLOW: Impervious surface coverage: Those hard surface man-made areas that do not allow, or minimally allow, the penetration of water, that reduce the natural rate or percolation of water or result in an increase in the natural quantity and rate of storm water runoff. Examples include but are not limited to rooft tops, parking, clay, asphalt, concrete, brick, compacted gravel, paved recreational areas such as pools, tennis courts, and landscape pavers. Exceptions: Pervious decks as described herein and items identified on a site plan as a best management practice to treat stormwater shall be allowed within open space and not considered impervious. Items serving aesthetic or non-functional purposes shall not qualify for exclusion from impervious calculations under this exception. Roofed or covered structures shall not be considered best management practices for the purpose ofi impervious surface exemptions. In no case shall stormwater BMPs be used to authorize additional lot coverage beyond the maximum limits otherwise established. Pervious decks are defined as decks with a minimum spacing of 1 inch between decking boards. Pervious decks shall be limited to an additional ten percent additional total lot coverage (i.e. ten percent additional total lot coverage above the code maximum for impervious coverage applicable to each zoning category; e.g. if max impervious coverage is 40 percent then a deck may be added which covers additional lot area up to a total of5 50 percent lot coverage when adding the total impervious lot coverage and the pervious deck coverage). (LDC, Ch. 101, Art. I, Sec. 101-8 Definitions.) Lot coverage means the area oft the lot covered by the ground floor of all principal and accessory uses and structures, including all areas covered by the roof of such uses and structures, measured along the exterior faces ofthe walls, along the foundation wall line, between the exterior faces of supporting columns, from the centerline of walls separating two buildings or as a combination of the foregoing, whichever produces the greatest total ground coverage for such uses and structures. Lot coverage shall also include all impervious surfaces such as drives, parking areas, walkways, swimming pools, patios, terraces and the like. Stormwater best management practice (BMP): The term "best management practices (BMP)" means those practices and principles designed to manage water from rainfall events, reduce nonpoint sources of pollution and in some cases, protect wildlife and habitat. Methods may include structural devices or nonstructural practices, such as, but not limited to compensatory storage, swales, gutters, rain barrels and rain gardens. Features that do not directly contribute to infiltration, detention, or filtration of stormwater shall not be considered BMPS. A City of Apalachicola Guide to Site-Specific Stormwater Best Management Practices is available to download from the city's website. (3)Stormwater best management practices (BMP's): a) Stormwater: impacts shall be minimized by using site-suitable BMP's that maximize infiltration of stormwater and prevent or minimize offsite discharge. Stormwater flow paths for property as it is planned to be developed shall be determined and berms, shallow depressions, swales, contouring, terracing, landscaping, rain gardens, rain barrels, paving materials, concrete pavers and other stormwater management practices shall be included in the plan to intercept, infiltrate and treat stormwater before it reaches wetlands, surface waters or the city's stormwater conveyances. Stormwater BMPs must be designed forlong- term functionality and shall not include enclosed or structural elements that are not integral to the water quality or infiltration function. b) Minimize soil exposure through organized scheduling of grading and construction activities; retain existing vegetation whenever feasible; stabilize all denuded areas after final grading; temporarily stabilize disturbed areas that are inactive and will be exposed to rain for 30 days or more utilizing stabilization techniques such as mulches, vegetation and 2 sod. Control runoff by diverting stormwater away from stripped areas or newly seeded slopes; minimize the length and steepness of slopes, protect outlets to prevent erosion. Install sediment trapping structures such as silt traps, sediment basins, filter fabric, perimeter dikes. Inspect and maintain control measures regularly. C) Best management practice methods may be in required open spaces. These practices shall be limited to those that maintain the open and pervious character ofsuch spaces and do not introduce permanent structural features unrelated to stormwater treatment. d) Guidance regarding state permitting requirements and exemptions may be found at the city's web site. Examples of BMP's and low impact development practices are provided in the city's May 2015 Guide to Site Specific Stormwater Best Management Practices can also be found on the city's web site. The highlighted changes could: Limit nonfunctional structures being labeled as BMPs Prevent BMPs from being a loophole for extra lot coverage Reinforce maintenance, purpose, and compatibility within open space/required setbacks The existing language in section (3)(a) already emphasizes that stormwater BMPs should: "maximize infiltration of stormwater and prevent or minimize offsite discharge... included in the plan to intercept, infiltrate and treat stormwater before it reaches wetlands, surface waters or the city's stormwater conveyances. This establishes the intent that BMPs are meant to treat water on-site, not just redirect it via impervious concrete swales to the City system. Next Steps Discuss the proposed clarifications with the Planning & Zoning Board at the 5/9/25 Workshop Ifsupported, City Attorney to prepare language for formal amendment to LDC for P&Z review at the 2nd Workshop, tentatively scheduled for July 14th at 5:00PM Consider integrating this clarification into future application checklists and review procedures for site plans involving stormwater BMPs 3 Background & Review Presented at5/12/25 Workshop: At the end oft the February 2025 Planning & Zoning Board meeting, the P&Z Board requested to be directed to workshop this topic. On April 8, 2025, the City Planner presented the issue to the City Commission and requested that the Commission formally direct the Planning & Zoning Board to explore Best Management Practices (BMPs) and potential incentives through a workshop setting. The City Commission instead recommended holding a joint workshop to provide more direct guidance and establish a clear starting point for the Planning & Zoning Board's efforts. This topic emerged in response to two recent Planning & Zoning applications that highlighted similar themes. In both cases, the parcels in question were either at or near the 40% maximum lot coverage, and the applicants proposed BMPS that took the form of a garage or outdoor covered area. In one case, a BMP was not required, but the applicant offered to install one in exchange for additional lot coverage credit/to meet the exemption noted in the impervious definition. The City's Land Development Code (LDC) provides that true BMPS are exempt from being counted as impervious surface (e.g., concrete swales, detention basins, underground stormwater vaults). A key question has been raised: Can a BMP incorporate a nonessential structural element to better align with the property owner's preferences, but still be exempt from the lot coverage requirements as a BMP? For example, can a garage with a sloped roof, gutter system, and underground stormwater vault be considered a BMP and thereby exempt from lot coverage limits? 101 6th Street - February 2025 (XZ Zone) The applicant proposed a BMP beneath a deck and roof structure. The roof was not approved as the lot already surpassed 40% lot coverage. A small amount of] pervious decking was approved as allowed by the extra 10% for pervious decking. The BMP system itself was approved. 92 Avenue E - April 2024 (AE Zone) ) The applicant proposed a BMP beneath an enclosed garage and storage area. The lot was already above 40% lot coverage. The Board requested more detailed site-specific information, including groundwater conditions. Revised plans were submitted but did not meet the 24-hour/25-year storm event standard. The application was subsequently withdrawn. Currently, the City of Apalachicola encourages the use of BMPs on all parcels and requires them in A and V flood zones per Sec. 115-1 oft the LDC. If the City Commission and Planning & Zoning Board wish to explore offering incentives for BMPs, distinctions will need to be made between commercial and residential uses, and between flood and non-flood zone parcels. Q: Why does the City limit lot coverage? 1. Stormwater Management Limiting impervious surfaces reduces runoff and helps prevent flooding by allowing more water to infiltrate the ground. Less green space for percolation would eventually overload the City stormwater system. 2. Environmental Protection Lower lot coverage can help preserve natural features like trees, open space, and soil permeability, which supports groundwater recharge and reduces heat island effects in urban areas. 4 3. Neighborhood Aesthetics Uniform lot coverage helps maintain the scale, spacing, and density of development within a neighborhood. Ex: Green space in the Historic District. Q: Should the City offer additional lot coverage in exchange for installing BMPs? Offering homeowners additional lot coverage in exchange fori installing stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) can helpful overall, ifi implemented carefully. This approach, incentive-based stormwater management, can help align development goals with environmental and infrastructure protection. Whose development goals does this serve? This type of policy can serve both private development goals (flexibility, value, usability) and public interests (stormwater control, infrastructure resilience, environmental protection), but only when carefully managed. Possible Benefits: Improved Stormwater Management - Private & Public ) Encourages the installation of on-site BMPs (e.g., rain gardens, pervious pavers, dry wells) on lots where otherwise they might not have been required, reducing runoff, pollutant loads, and easing the load on the City stormwater system. Increased Participation Homeowners are more likely to willingly accept and implement stormwater systems if they receive tangible development benefits (like a larger footprint for a home or addition). Possible Concerns: Enforcement & Maintenance BMPs must be maintained to remain effective. Ifi incentives are offered, the City must consider long-term impacts. Multiple properties reaching 50% lot coverage via BMP credit could significantly impact the City stormwater system. Without proper maintenance, BMPs can fail, leading to flooding or pollution. Some jurisdictions require recorded maintenance agreements, periodic inspections, and reserve the right to revoke development privileges if maintenance is not upheld. 1. Does the City want to encourage this type of development? 2. Does the City have the capacity to monitor and enforce BMP maintenance? 3. Would the City be prepared to revoke the lot coverage bonus if maintenance obligations are not met? (Demo a structure?) Oversight 0 Ensure stormwater BMPS are designed (and possibly installed) by qualified professionals. Consider requiring city approval of all plans. The program should be applied consistently. Make eligibility criteria and trade-offs clear for residential V. commercial and flood zone V. non-flood zone developments. Caps on Incentives 0 Set a maximum increase in lot coverage (e.g, 5-10%) to avoid overdevelopment, unintended impacts, or changing the neighborhood aesthetics. Examples: City of Milton, Florida The City of Milton requires property owners to provide stormwater management easements for access to facilities for inspection and maintenance. These easements are specified in maintenance agreements and must be recorded with the county clerk prior to permit issuance. Broward County, Florida 5 In Broward County, property owners are mandated to inspect and maintain their stormwater systems regularly. For instance, a local municipality requires property owners to inspect and repair their stormwater systems to full compliance every five years. This process includes professional inspections to ensure systems align with original designs and function properly. Possible Directives: > City Commission to direct P&Z to Workshop incentives for BMPs. O Q's: Why are additional incentives necessary? Is reduced flooding incentive enough? What incentives is the City willing to offer? How will maintenance be enforced? Example policy language: Homeowners may exceed the maximum impervious surface coverage by up to 5%, provided that they install an approved stormwater BMP on-site and execute a maintenance agreement recorded with the property." Ifthe BMP includes a roof structure or concrete pad, that structure should count toward the additional 5%, not be exempt. Should the extra 5% be limited for use on accessory structure or allowable for principal as well? > City Commission not to direct P&Z to Workshop incentives for BMPs. Maintain current requirements and rely on mandatory BMPs in applicable flood zones. Applicable Code: Impervious surface coverage: Those hard surface man-made areas that do not allow, or minimally allow, the penetration of water, that reduce the natural rate or percolation ofwater or result in an increase in the natural quantity and rate of storm water runoff. Examples include but are not limited to rooft ftops, parking, clay, asphalt, concrete, brick, compacted gravel, paved recreational areas such as pools, tennis courts, and landscape pavers. Exceptions: Pervious decks as described herein and items identified on a site plan as a best management practice to treat stormwater shall be allowed within open space and not considered impervious. Pervious decks are defined as decks with a minimum spacing of 1 inch between decking boards. Pervious decks shall be limited to an additional ten percent additional total lot coverage (i.e. ten percent additional total lot coverage above the code maximum for impervious coverage applicable to each zoning category; e.g. if max impervious coverage is 40 percent then a deck may be added which covers additional lot area up to a total of 50 percent lot coverage when adding the total impervious lot coverage and the pervious deck coverage). (LDC, Ch. 101, Art. I, Sec. 101-8 Definitions.) Lot coverage means the area of the lot covered by the ground floor of all principal and accessory uses and structures, including all areas covered by the roof of such uses and structures, measured along the exterior faces ofthe walls, along the foundation wall line, between the exterior faces of supporting columns, from the centerline of walls separating two buildings or as a combination of the foregoing, whichever produces the greatest total ground coverage for such uses and structures. Lot coverage shall also include all impervious surfaces such as drives, parking areas, walkways, swimming pools, patios, terraces and the like. Stormwater best management practice (BMP): The term "best management practices (BMP)" means those practices and principles designed to manage water from rainfall events, reduce nonpoint sources of pollution and in some cases, protect wildlife and habitat. Methods may include structural devices or nonstructural practices, such as, but not limited to compensatory 6 storage, swales, gutters, rain barrels and rain gardens. A City of Apalachicola Guide to Site-Specific Stormwater Best Management Practices is available to download from the city's website. Sec. 115-1. - City requirements. (1)Certain types of residential and commercial development trigger State stormwater permitting permits depending on size and type of proposed development. As an area of critical state concern, the city has adopted more stringent stormwater standards than state requirements. A more comprehensive overview of state permitting requirements and the relationship to the city standards may be found online at cityofapalachicola.com/Dullding.Dept.ctm: a. Residential. Applications for all new residential development in special waterfront district or areas of special hazard (A&V zone) must include a stormwater management plan which may consist of a best management practice (BMP) as part oftheir site plan. Proposed improvements that increase lot coverage shall also provide for stormwater treatment by indicating the stormwater treatment best management practice that will be utilized. b. Non-residential. Applications for all non-residential development exempt from State permitting pursuant to Rule 62-330 FI. Administrative Code for more than 4,800 square feet must provide a stormwater management system by an engineer to provide for treatment for a 24-hour 25-year event. Individual lots or combination oflots less than 4,800 square feet may treat stormwater with BMPS that include provisions for compensatory storage. (2)Stormwater runoff control: a. Only those areas necessary for construction activities shall be cleared. b. During construction, building debris shall be removed from the stormwater flow path and deposited in trash receptacles and temporary stormwater control barriers shall be installed and maintained. C. Temporary stormwater controls shall be maintained until permanent controls are installed. Permanent controls, when required, shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. d. Direct connection between building gutters and downspouts and onsite stormwater systems into the city's stormwater conveyances is not allowed. (3)Stormwater best management practices (BMP's): a. Stormwater: impacts shall be minimized by using site-suitable BMP's that maximize infiltration of stormwater and prevent or minimize offsite discharge. Stormwater flow paths for property as it is planned to be developed shall be determined and berms, shallow depressions, swales, contouring, terracing, landscaping, rain gardens, rain barrels, paving materials, concrete pavers and other stormwater management practices shall be included in the plan to intercept, infiltrate and treat stormwater before it reaches wetlands, surface waters or the city's stormwater conveyances. b. Minimize soil exposure through organized scheduling of grading and construction activities; retain existing vegetation whenever feasible; stabilize all denuded areas after final grading; temporarily stabilize disturbed areas that are inactive and will be exposed to rain for 30 days or more utilizing stabilization techniques such as mulches, vegetation and sod. Control runoff by diverting stormwater away from stripped areas or newly seeded slopes; minimize the length and steepness of slopes, protect outlets to prevent erosion. Install sediment trapping structures such as silt traps, sediment basins, filter fabric, perimeter dikes. Inspect and maintain control measures regularly. C. Best management practice methods may be in required open spaces. d. Guidance regarding state permitting requirements and exemptions may be found at the city's web site. Examples of BMP's and low impact development practices are provided in 7 the city's May 2015 Guide to Site Specific Stormwater Best Management Practices can also be found on the city's web site. (4)General design requirements: a. The storm water system shall be designed in accordance with Rule 62-330 F.A.C., and city standards for a 25- year, 24- hour event except that detention with filtration systems shall not be allowed and that off-line retention systems shall be used whenever the soil conditions will allow percolation oft the treatment volume within 72 hours. When soil conditions will not allow infiltration practices to be used, the storm water system shall consist ofa a wet detention system with a vegetated littoral zone. To enhance the htps//rspuliconeadnsdhnstatemicmat/asstmulastaitomnoa/moMalselected/2/ls htsvgeffectiveness: of the wet detention system, landscape retention pretreatment practices such as the placement of storm sewer inlets in grassed areas shall be employed in combination with the detention system. b. To provide flood protection, the additional volume generated by the development from a 25-year storm event 24-hour duration shall be controlled by a detention facility and released at a rate of discharge not to exceed the peak discharge rate from the site in its undeveloped condition. Special engineering features all be incorporated in minimize the transport of pollutants remaining in the detention facility. C. All detention facilities shall discharge design flow through structural discharge facilities. When direct discharge will degrade waters ofnatural streams, marshes, environmentally sensitive areas, shellfish classification waters, or lands naturally receiving sheet flow, the discharge structure shall direct the flow to an intermediate spreader swale system. d. No new untreated point sources of discharge will be permitted. (5)General information for engineered plans: a. The location of areas on the site where storm water collects or percolates into the ground; and the size, location and land use ofany off-site areas which drain onto, through or from the project area. b. A map showing topography at a minimum contour interval of one-foot, vegetative cover, soils and seasonally high-water table elevations. Also show the location of any soils boring or percolation tests. C. Details of hydrograph, side slopes, depths, elevations of all system components including wetlands, a topographical map with a minimum contour interval of one foot. d. An erosion and sediment control plan to retain sediment on-site. The plan shall describe, in detail, the type and location of control measures the stage of development at which they will be put into place and provisions for maintenance. e. A description of scheduled maintenance, ifapplicable, oft the storm water system. (6)Calculations to be submitted: a. All runoff calculations used in the design of the storm water system including a description ofthe methodology, assumptions and parameters. Include calculations showing discharges, elevations and volumes retained or detained and the volume of storm water treated for applicable design storm events. Ifa computer program is used for analysis, a copy ofthe printout shall be submitted. b. Computations of state-storage and stage-discharge for all structures. C. Computation of off-site inflows. d. Actual acreages and percentage of the project area for impervious surfaces, natural water bodies and wetlands, artificial lakes, retention or detention area, swales, pervious surfaces and total project area. e. Computation of pre-development and post-development runoff and storage. 8 f. Identification of the entity responsible for the perpetual care, operation, maintenance, and associated liabilities ofthe system. Ifthe entity is to be a public body such as a county, municipality, or special district, a letter or other evidence of acceptance must be included. Ifthe entity is a non-public body such as a homeowner's association or private corporation or person, documentation ofits existence, fiscal and legal ability, and willingness to accept the responsibility must be included. (Ord. No. 2020-03, S 3, 5-5-2020) 9 PALACHI - - 1831 ELORIDE Minutes May 12th, y 2025 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, May 12th, 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes Attendance: Joe Taylor, Jim Bachrach, Bobby Miller, Chase Galloway, Greg Golgowski, Lee McLemore, Myrtis Wynn Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM 1. Approval of May 12th 2025 meeting minutes. a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Lee McLemore = all in favor, motion carried. 2. Review, Discussion and Decision for Accessory Structure. (R-2)@ 170 21st Ave. Block 245 Lot 1-3. For Bruce Hoffman - Owner; Contractor: TBD a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Chase Galloway = all in favor, motion carried. 3. Review, Discussion and Decision for Addition (R-2)@ 154 Sawyer Lane, Block 118 Lot 7. For Kelly & LaDonna Wagers - Owner; Contractor: Self a. Motion to approve by Lee McLemore; 2nd by Jim Bachrach = all in favor, motion carried. 4. Review, Discussion and Decision for Fence (R-2)@ 276 Prado D-3, Palmer Pointe. For Brende Hicks - Owner; Contractor: Backwater Maintenance a. Motion to approve by Bobby Miller; 2nd by Jim Bachrach = all in favor, motion carried. 5. Review, Discussion and Decision for Accessory Structure & Fence (R-2)@ 242 Prado, Block 3 Lots 5-6. For Cutler Edwards - Owner; Contractor: Self a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Chase Galloway = all in favor, motion carried. 1 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, May 12"h, 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes 6. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Construction (R-2)@ 161 Ave K, Block 141 Lot 2. For Coastal Life Homes LLC - Owner; Contractor: Ronnie Gooch a. Motion to approve as address 202 13th Street by Chase Galloway; 2nd by Greg Golgowski - all in favor, motion carried. 7. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Construction (R-2)@ 161 Ave K (911 Address Needs Split), Block 141 Lot 1. For Coastal Life Homes LLC - Owner; Contractor: Ronnie Gooch a. Motion to approve as address 200 13th Street by Bobby Miller; 2nd by Chase Galloway - all in favor, motion carried. 8. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness (C-1)@ 45 Avenue D, Block 2 Lot 9-10. For Gibson LLC - Owner; Contractor: TBD a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Chase Galloway = all in favor, motion carried. 9. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness (C-1)@ 51 Avenue E, Block 1 Lot 1-8. For Gibson LLC - Owner; Contractor: TBD a. Motion to approve by Chase Galloway; 2nd by Jim Bachrach = all in favor, motion carried. 10. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & New Construction (R- 1)@ 98 12th Street, Block 84. For ABC School - Owner; Contractor: Riley Palmer Construction Co. a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Chase Galloway. All in favor = motion carried. Other/New Business: 2 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, May 12th, 1 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes The current City Planner, Bree Robinson, has submitted her resignation and is currently serving a 45-day notice period, with her final day of employment scheduled for June 6th. She will prepare the agenda for the June Planning & Zoning meeting; however, her last in-person meeting will be on May 12th. The City Manager will coordinate the June meeting or communicate the City Planner replacement plan. OutsandingUnresoNved Issues: N/A Motion to adjourn the meeting by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Bobby Miller. All in favor - meeting adjourned. 3 PALACH - 1831 ELORIDE Accessory Structure 250 Prado Official Use Only Date Received: 5/7/25 City of Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Meeting Date: 1/9/25 Fees Due: 1 50, Application for Development/Site Plan Approval Date Fees Paid: 5/2/25 OWNER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner Drew Robertson Contractor Name Drew Robertson/Owner Address 250 Prado Street State License # City License # City Apalachicola State FL Zip 32320 Email Phone 850-210-9257 Phone PROJECTTYPE New Construction Fence Addition Repair Alteration/Renoyation Variance Relocation Other Pole Barn Demolition Certificate of Appropriateness: PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address (911 Address): 250 Prado Street City & State: Apalachicola, FL Zip: 32320 Parcel ID #: 01-09S-08W-8360-0002-0070 Block: 2 Lot: 8&9 Zoning District: R-2 ] Historic District x]Non-Historic District FEMA Flood Zone: X OFFICIAL USE ONLY Certificate of Appropriateness: Required? Y N) This development request has been approved for a Setback Requirements of Property: Certificate of Appropriateness (ifa fapplicable), zoning, Front: 5 Rear: 25 Side: 75 ca land use, and development review by the City of Corner Lot? Y N Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Board and a Lot Coverage: 40 building permit is authorized to be issued. STAFF NOTES/RECOMMENDATIONS: oMN City Staff Date Approved NOTE: This is a conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC.) Please be aware that other documentation may be required by the Building Official. Applicant Initial Describe the proposed project and materials. Describe the proposed project in terms of size, affected architectural elements, materials, and relationship to the existing structure(s). Construction of new Pole Barn on southwest portion of parcel PROJECT SCOPE MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FL: PRODUCT APPROVAL # Siding N/A Doors N/A Windows N/A Roofing metal roof Trim N/A Foundation Pole Barn Shutters N/A Porch/Deck N/A Fencing N/A Driveways/idewalks N/A Other NOTE: Please have a site plan prepared to turn in with your application. At minimum, the site plan needs to contain: a North arrow, surrounding streets, lot lines, lot dimensions, setbacks, current structure dimensions, proposed structure dimensions, fence locations, andj fence heights. Applications requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness will also need to submit enderings/elevations ofo any proposed structures and note the materials proposed. More information may be requested by City Staff CERTIFICATION By signing below, I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge at the time of application. I acknowledge that I understand and have complied with all of the submittal requirements and procedures and have read and understand the following: 1. I/We hereby attest to the fact that the above supplied property address(es), parcel numbers(s), and legal description(s) is(are) the true and proper identification ofthe area of this petition. 2. I/We authorize staff from the City of Apalachicola to enter onto the property in question during regular business hours in order to take photos which will be placed in the permanent file. 3. I/We understand that the COA review time period will not commence until the application is deemed complete by staff and may take up to 10 business days to process. I further understand that an incomplete application submittal may cause my application to be deferred to the next posted deadline date. 4. I/We understand that, for Board review cases, an agenda and staff report (if applicable) will be available on the City's website approximately one week before the Planning & Zoning Board Meeting. 5. I/We understand that the approval of this application by the Planning & Zoning Board or staffi in NO way constitutes approval of a Building Permit for Construction from the City of Apalachicola Community and Economic Development Office. 6. I/We understand that all changes to the approved scope of work stated in a Certificate of Appropriateness: or Development Order application have to be approved by the P&Z Board before work commences on those changes. There will be no charge for revisions. Making changes that have not been approved can result in a Stop Work Order being placed on the entire project and additional fees/penalties. 7. I/We understand that any decision of the P&Z: Board may be appealed to the City Commission within 30 days after the decision by the P&Z Board; otherwise, the decision will be final. 8. I/We understand that a Certificate ofAppropriatenes is only valid for one year after issuance. They are renewable for six months without cause if requested, and for an additional six months upon showing of good cause by the applicant. The applicant must submit all requests for extensions in writing and provide appropriate support documents to City Staff, if needed. 9. I/We understand that P&Z Board approval is permission to obtain a permit for work and installation as indicated. I certify that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. 10. I/We understand that there will be no issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness without the property owner obtaining Homeowner's Association approval (ifi required) prior to the P&Z Board Meeting and/or before the beginning ofan work and in no way authorizes work that is in violation of any association rules or regulations. 2025-05-07 DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT - 0 -$0-56 07 6 vosla a 18 20 9" E 149,89%M) a K € - Co 24" a < - 34, NO0°19/24"W 149.09M) - 0. a S La A 2 IAAN PALACK 1 A 7 - 1831 ELORIDE Certificate of Appropriateness & Fence 207 Avenue D Official Use Only Date Received: 5is/25 Meeting Date: (/9/25 City of Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Fees Due: $25.00 Application for. Development/Site Plan Approval Date Fees Paid: 5122/25 OWNER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner Tom Bradberry and Kim Harker Contractor Name Joseph Drew Robertson (GeoFlora Group, LLC) Address 26 Sunset Terrace State License # CGC1534033 City License # 24-176 City Asheville State NC Zip 28801 Email drew@geofforagroup.comomicec@geolloragroup.com Phone 850-217-2927 Phone 850-745-4226 PROJECTTYPE New Construction Fence Addition Accessory Structure Alteration/Renoyation Certificate of Appropriateness Relocation Other Demolition PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address (911 Address): 207 Ave D City & State: Apalachicola FI Zip: 32320 Parcel ID #: 0108-0w83900102.00 Block: 107 Lot: 9 and 10 Zoning District: R-1 L - x ] Historic District [ 1 Non-Historic District FEMA Flood Zone: x OFFICIAL USE ONLY Certificate of Appropriateness: Required? Y/I N This development request has been approved for a Setback Requirements of Property: Certificate of Appropriateness (ifapplicable), zoning, Front: Rear: Side: land use, and development review by the City of Corner Lot? Y /N Street Sides: Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Board and a Lot Coverage: building permit is authorized to be issued. STAFF NOTES/RECOMMENDATIONS: - 1 City Staff Date. Approved NOTE: This is a conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC., Plelse aware that other documentation may be required by the Building Official. Apilicant Initial Describe the proposed project and materials. Describe the proposed project in terms of size, affected architectural elements, materials, and relationship to the existing structure(s). Proposed 6' tall fence, constructed of wood fencing plans (roughly 5/4 boards). Fence will constructed as drawn on the site plan. PROJECT SCOPE MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FL: PRODUCT APPROVAL # Siding N/A Doors N/A Windows N/A Roofing N/A Trim N/A Foundation N/A Shutters N/A Porch/Deck N/A Fencing Wood plank boards (Roughly 5/4 boards) Driveways/Sidewalks N/A Other N/A NOTE: Please have a site plan prepared to turn in with your application. At minimum, the site plan needs to contain. a North arrow, surrounding streets, lot lines, lot dimensions, setbacks, current structure dimensions, proposed structure dimensions, fence locations, andfence heights. Applications requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness will also need to submit enderings/elevations ofany proposed structures and note the materials proposed. More information may be requested by City Staff CERTIFICATION By signing below, I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge at the time of application. I acknowledge that I understand and have complied with all of the submittal requirements and procedures and have read and understand the following: 1. I/We hereby attest to the fact that the above supplied property address(es), parcel numbers(s), and legal description(s) is(are) the true and proper identification oft the area ofi this petition. 2. I/We authorize staff from the City of Apalachicola to enter onto the property in question during regular business hours in order to take photos which will be placed in the permanent file. 3. I/We understand that the COA review time period will not commence until the application is deemed complete by staff and may take up to 10 business days to process. I further understand that an incomplete application submittal may cause my application to be deferred to the next posted deadline date. 4. I/We understand that, for Board review cases, an agenda and staff report (if applicable) will be available on the City's website approximately one week before the Planning & Zoning Board Meeting. 5. I/We understand that the approval of this application by the Planning & Zoning Board or staff in NO way constitutes approval of a Building Permit for Construction from the City of Apalachicola Building Department. 6. I/We understand that all changes to the approved scope of work stated in a Certificate of Appropriateness or Development Order application have to be approved by the P&Z Board before work commences on those changes. Making changes that have not been approved can result in a Stop Work Order being placed on the entire project and additional fees/penalties. 7. I/We understand that any decision of the P&Z Board may be appealed to the City Commission within 30 days after the decision by the P&Z Board; otherwise, the decision will be final. 8. I/We understand that a Certificate ofA Appropriateness is only valid for one year after issuance. They are renewable for six months without cause if requested, and for an additional six months upon showing of good cause by the applicant. The applicant must submit all requests for extensions in writing and provide appropriate support documents to City Staff, ifi needed. 9. I/We understand that P&Z Board approval is permission to obtain a permit for work and installation as indicated. I certify that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. 10. I/We understand that there will be no issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness without the property owner obtaining Homeowner's Association approval (if required) prior to the P&Z Board Meeting and/or before the beginning of an work and in no way authorizes work that is in violation of any association rules or regulations. 2025-05-15 DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT M - 3 04 EE & 1 e 4y 2 a & a % : - & / - p - a 8 - 900 : 8 * - 8 3 e o 5 * V % A 3 a io 3H0 R 2 6 % 3 S 8 4 2 a o - - y R S 3 3 A 9 & - E o/ 9 5 W 6 8 - 2& g - R , 5 - N & 2 Ey 3N A - 5 RN PALACHT - - 1831 ELORIDE Permeable Pavers 98 Bay Avenue Official Use Only Date Received: sh/25 City of Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Meeting Date: b/ /9/15 Fees Due: Application for Development/Ste Plan Approval Date Fees Paid: OWNER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner Ph:lt Ronde Shelley Contractor Name wilam Ross Deyelopest Address 98 Bay Ave State License = C8C/24I3Ely License # City Apalachicals State Fl Zip 32320 Email rver maderaaO,mal. CON Phone Phone Gb2 871 2648 PROJECTTYPE New Construction Fence Addition Accessory Structure Alteration/kenovation Certificate ofAppropriateness Relocation Other Puvers pvPaLw Demolition PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address (911 Address): 9R ANe City & State: cola Zip: 32320 Fy Apalacs Parcel ID #: /- 8w - 8330- 0/93-00/0 Block: /93 Lot: 6-/0 Zoning District: xI Historic District [ Non-Historic District FEMA Flood Zone: HE VE OFFICIAL USE ONLY Certificate of Appropriateness Required? Yy N This development request has been approved for a Setback Requirements of Property: Certificate ofAppropriatenes (ifapplicable). zoning. Front: Rear: Side: land use, and development review by the Ciry of Corner Lot? Y/ AN Street Sides: Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Board anda Lot Coverage: 407 building permit is authorized to be issued. STAFF NOTES/RECOMMENDATIONS: - YOCK MACw luud o be Yemowdl beloue) hoa City Staff OKM Date Approved NOTE: This is a conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC.) Piease be aware that other documentation may be required by the Building Official. Applicant Initial Describe the proposed project and materials. Describe the proposed project in terms of size. affected architectural elements, materials, and relationship to the existing structure(s). install Pervnealole Pavers per drewina PROJECT SCOPE MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FL PRODUCT APPROVAL# Siding Doors Windows Roofing Trim Foundation Shutters Porch/Deck Fencing Driveways/Sidewalks atlackeD Sec c Hachd See Other NOTE: Please have a site plan prepared to turn in with your application 4r DhE E Mn needs to contain: a North arrow, surrounding streets, lot lines. lor dimensions seshacie am structure dimensions, proposed structure dimensions, fence locations. andmce EF Appinapts requiring a Certificate ofAppropriateness will also needios submit rendr S diemarisar E a proposed structures and note the materials proposed. More iformation - - ragncssad a CERTIFICATION By signing below, I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge at the time of application. I acknowledge that I understand and have complied with all oft the submittal requirements and procedures and have read and inderstand the following: 1. I/We hereby attest to the fact that the above supplied property address( es). parcel numbers(s), and legal description(s) is(are) the true and proper identification ofthe area ofthis petition. 2. I/We authorize staff from the City of Apalachicola to enter onto the propertyin question during regular business hours in order to take photos which will be placed in the permanent file. 3. I/We understand that the COA: review time period will not commence until the application is deemed complete by staff and may take up to 10 business daysto process. I further understand that an incomplete application submittal may cause my application to be deferred to the next posted deadline date. 4. I/We understand that, for Board review cases, an agenda and staff report (if appiicable) will be available on the City's website approximately one week before the Pianning & Zoning Board Meeting. 5. I/We understand that the approval of this application by the Planning & Zoning Board or staffin NO way constitutes approval of a Building Permit for Construction from the City of Apalachicola Building Department. 6. I/We understand that all changes to the approved scope of work stated in a Certificate of Appropriateness or Development Order application have to be approved by the P&Z Board before work commences on those changes. Making changes that have not been approved can result in a Stop Work Order being placed on the entire project and additional fees penaities. 7. I/We understand that any decision of the P&Z Board may be appealed to the City Commission within 30 days after the decision by the P&Z Board; otherwise, the decision will be final. 8. I/We understand that a Certificate of Appropriateness is only valid for one year after issuance. They are renewable for six months without cause if requested, and for an additional six months upon showing of good cause by the applicant. The applicant must submit all requests for extensions in writing and provide appropriate support documents to City Staff, if needed. 9. I/We understand that P&Z Board approval is permission to obtain a permit for work and installation as indicated. I certify that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. 10. I/We understand that there will be no issuance ofa Certificate of Appropriateness without the property owner obtaining Homeowner's Association approval (if required) prior to the P&Z Board Meeting and/or before the beginning of an work and in no way authorizes work that is in violation of any association rules or regulations. 5 22 25 DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT PHIL & RHONDA SHELLEY 5/18/25 98 BAY AVE, APALACHICOLA FULL SIZE PAVERS 3'WIDE 23.5ft S 32'X9.5' 32'X9.5' 4' T 1" PAVERS 1" PAVERS W A R 1'-> E 35.Oft PERMEABLE PAVERS 4'x5' FLAIRS 49.4ft Perimeter 280.Oft I Area 2192.2ft2 - 20ft (PERMEABLE) START a FINISH ERROR: 1.3% 5m Aqunoo upyue.y 'LoZ 'g Aeniqey:ejep xapul Agunwwoo dew aed epueansul pool Jer se 9ZV# B 6/ 3 ABVONNOE ENIT TIVLDI ISNOH L TE) 3V. euoz u! pejepol S! Ayedoud pelqns (x4) WO U JOHINON SO31S B AENWIHS g y SN VWHBINI INOZ G00TA S 1 M 9 U AIO C4 8 Op ? 8 S9NITld - NO ONITTEMG S KON GOOM ABO.S-Z - 9 E8Z My E6k. X0018 0gj ED OL 107 9 REP E82 3 DA 6 ITVOS OL. LON .E6L..) X0018 ag 6107 06 L9Z4# 96 E6L. X0078 (sxt) WOJ E 8J 1O7 W , o 3NIT SBLVMI HOIH- 9 NV3W 3IV/IXOSddV % $ E 6 bVBIES S 5 A 00 xfWC 09 E6L. 40078 6 C KON 078 A 0s L107 107 & L (WI),6V'92 JAIPO E.LO.LVOZEN 6 8315A W M308 o HBM L924# $ .€6L.X0078 OVAB: (yxy) WOJ s SEME: A $107 S CABR D 6 &s 6 5 F 6 Bo A A S E6L. X0018 6 a 1 / 4. 107 924# ( (X4) WO# 6 .€6L.X0078 IHIM An9 IM 9107 3Od WEMOd A 17773HS TIEd :OI AIIIIAT XIA8S IEFGN708 Ju 17 17d Quikrete Hardscapes and Masonry Group THE Professional Support Campus 11450 Technology Circle OUKRETE Johns Creek, GA 30097 404-634-9100 COMPANIES www.tremron.com HARDSCAPES & MASONRY GROUP TREMRON WE A QUIKRETE COMPANY Oct 4", 2024 Surface Infiltration Rate Olde Towne Permeable Pavers, EC01344 Report on the Surface Infiltration Rate of Olde Towne Permeable Pavers, EC01344, Dimensions: 6"x4", 6"x6", 6"x9", Thickness: 2-38" (60mm) on a mockup with 57 stone fori the base and 89 stone for the infill aggregate. Testing was performed in compliance with ASTM C1781 Standard Test Method for Surface Infiltration Rate of Permeable Unit Pavement Systems. A: summary of the test results is reported in the table below: Ring's diameter (in): 11 7/8 Weight of water (Ibs): 40.0 Density of water @ 80F (PCF): 62.22 Constant 0.5" head of water Test Area Time Infiltration (secs) rate (In/hr) Area 1 34.67 1,042 Area 2 30.67 1,177 Area 3 31.67 1,140 Average of 3 areas: 1,120 Sincerely, G on * No. PE050111 * PROFESSIONAL 2c ENGINEER CPIAFOA lestie. Hyes Carlos Eduardo Lopez, P.E. Corporate Quality Manager Pavestone LLC 11450 Technology Circle Johns Creek, GA 30097 carlos.lopez@pavestone.com Do 000 00 00 a * V / C 000 )0 (. ( - C ) V A 0 V V PALACKT y 1831 ELORIDE Certificate of Appropriateness & Accessory Structure 47 Avenue E Official Use Only Date Received: 5-13-29 City of Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Meeting Date: 6-9-25 Fees Due: $ 130. go Application for Development/Site Plan Approval Date Fees Paid: OWNER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner Miller Mart Inc Contractor Name Rodney Miedema Address PO Box 367 State License #CBCI252090 City License # City. Port St.Joe State FL Zip 2457 Email Pemils@prthulsndurs Com Phone 407--63-2336 Phone 352-24H-5305 PROJECTTYPE New Construction Fence Addition Accessory Structure Alteration/Renoyation Certificate ofAppropriateness Relocation Other Demolition PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address (911 Address): 47 Ave E City & State: Apalachicola Zip: 32320 Parcel ID #: 0l-09S-08w-0 9330-0003-0010 Block: 3 Lot: 12 Zoning District: < % Historic District *] ]Non-Historic District FEMA Flood Zone: < OFFICIAL USE ONLY Certificate of Appropriateness Required? YyN This development request has been approved. for a Setback Requirements ofl Property: Certificate of4 Appropriateness (ifapplicable), zoning, Front: D Rear: Side: land use, and development review by the City of Corner LotyN Street Sides: Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Board and a Lot Coverage: 401 building permit is authorized to be issued. STAFF NOTEAECOMMENDATON: N geos Do.A. - - lot is alfeocly OVey 80 City Staff aecasSov Wouc MaWhE Msyconfern - w OY ec. / OA 930/ SA eMls Date Approved NOTE: This is a conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC.) Please be aware that other documentation may be required by the Building Official. Pn Applicant Initial Describe the proposed project and materials. Describe the proposed project in terms of size, affected architectural elements, materials, and relationship to the existing structure(s). 8x8 DCA Shed on Exishnq Cencrete, No Electvic PROJECT SCOPE MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FL PRODUCT APPROVAL# Siding Plun# Scb Robin Builders * Statc Master Plan 23FBCAGV Doors Windows Roofing Trim Foundation Shutters Porch/Deck Fencing Driveways/idewalks Other NOTE: Please have a site plan prepared to turn in with your application. At minimum, the site plan needs to contain: a North arrow, surrounding streets, lot lines, lot dimensions, setbacks, current structure dimensions, proposed structure dimensions, fence locations, andj fence heights. Applications requiring a Certificate ofA Appropriateness will also need to submit renderings/elevations ofany proposed structures and note the materials proposed. More information may be requested by City Staff CERTIFICATION By signing below, I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge at the time of application. I acknowledge that I understand and have complied with all ofthe submittal requirements and procedures and have read and understand the following: 1. I/We hereby attest to the fact that the above supplied property address(es), parcel numbers(s), and legal description(s) is(are) the true and proper identification of the area ofthis petition. 2. I/We authorize staff from the City ofApalachicola to enter onto the property in question during regular business hours in order to take photos which will be placed in the permanent file. 3. I/We understand that the COA review time period will not commence until the application is deemed complete by staff and may take up to 10 business days to process. I further understand that an incomplete application submittal may cause my application to be deferred to the next posted deadline date. 4. I/We understand that, for Board review cases, an agenda and staff report (if applicable) will be available on the City's website approximately one week before the Planning & Zoning Board Meeting. 5. I/We understand that the approval ofthis application by the Planning & Zoning Board or staffin NO way constitutes approval of a Building Permit for Construction from the City of Apalachicola Building Department. 6. I/We understand that all changes to the approved scope of work stated in a Certificate of Appropriateness or Development Order application have to be approved by the P&Z Board before work commences on those changes. Making changes that have not been approved can result in a Stop Work Order being placed on the entire project and additional fees/penalties. 7. I/We understand that any decision ofthe P&Z Board may be appealed to the City Commission within 30 days after the decision by the P&Z Board; otherwise, the decision will be final. 8. I/We understand that a Certificate of Appropriateness: is only valid for one year after issuance. They are renewable for six months without cause if requested, and for an additional six months upon showing of good cause by the applicant. The applicant must submit all requests for extensions in writing and provide appropriate support documents to City Staff, ifneeded. 9. I/We understand that P&Z Board approval is permission to obtain a permit for work and installation as indicated. I certify that all work will be performed to meet standards ofall laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. 10. I/We understand that there will be no issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness: without the property owner obtaining Homeowner's Association approval (if required) prior to the P&Z Board Meeting and/or before the beginning of an work and in no way authorizes work that is in violation of any association rules or regulations. 5-13-25 n DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 9 0 A A - o 3D0 5 - No - N 6 Ro - 43 A 00 B D $ZOZ/1/01 31VO TAOHddy 091 A1I0013A GNIM 3IVWIITA SL EQV01 1001 "MOTV SHO0T 10# MOTTV 03418 EZ0Z 085 FON NVId AIIn AONVInoD0 0 TVM 1X3 ONIIVE 3813 8A 3dAI NOIIONHISNOS 6EVE9 'ON esueon pIpJo13 99ZE-929 (Z16) '3 'd uDBOA '3 ypauuay 3 OFL 9EV0E ADMYDIH Vo 'SNOA7 D9 LLLE SONIGTIAE NIRON 5 EZOZ/1/01 31VO 1AOUddV 091 FA1I0013A GNIM 3IVWIITA SL EOVOT J0015 MO77V SUO01 30 MOTTV f 03418 EZOZ 081 :ON NVId AIIn AONVdnoD0 0 TVM "IX3 ONILVE 3813 BA 3dAI NOIIONHISNOS 6EVE9 "ON esueon pIpJo1 992E-929 (Z16) 3 'd uD6OA '3 yauuay 30EL 9EVOE ADMYDIH Vo 'SNOA7 D9 LLLE ONI SHIQTIAE NIRO8 3 M à 4E DN : - 5 a 3 a - $ 2 # 6 % X e A 6 3 6 o E 8 & o 5 # 0 9 @ BEs BE a + 3 23 N E E a aus 4 & EZOZ/1/01 31VO WAOUddV 091 A1I0013A GNIM IVWIITN o SL OV0T 10015 MOTV S80015 J0 MOT7V d348E202 085 FON NVId AiIn AONVdnoD0 0 TTVM "1X3 ONIVE 3813 8A 3dAI NOIIONSISNOS 9929-929 (Z16) 6EVE9 "ON esueon DIpJol 9Ev0E Vo 'SNOA7 M '3 'd uD6oA 3 yauuay 3 OEL ADMYBIH D9 LLLE ONI 'ssaaTINg NIROH 5 £Z0Z/1/01 31VO WAOUddV 091 FALI0013A GNIM3IVWIITA E0V0T 001 "MOT7V S80015 10 # MOT7V 03 48 EZOZ 08 FON NVId AInIn FAONVdnO00 0 TIVM 1X3 ONIIVE 3813 8A 3dAI NOIIDNWISNOS 6EVE9 "ON esueon pIpJols 992E-929 (Z16) '3 'd upBoA 3 ypauuay 9EV0E v 'SNOA7 3 OFL ADMYDH D9 LLLE ONI 'SHIGTINE NIROH N 8 3: zb B à gi i. 5 NN 3: 5 2 g 88 5, 45 %b 2 N gasz a - A E % 6 e y 58 ad 2 3: - * 8 EpRa BE a a a: 0 e aw BEy 8 e : 3 U 9 5 BA a 8 85 235 hsI Shi 48 88 a 0 Sm 5 n RJ - . %e d- 3 E 9 Es $ 2 38 4 6 à Nz Piy e a > 3 5 8 W E & D E H 3 6 a E E 3 Py 5 3 a a 8 E à 5 1 3 - e B E g : J B a B & 33 3 Ep - B 3 B P e : - a 1 2 E 2 s € 4 B 6 b8 Ep - 82 # 9 N - a B E 3 3 a * Z E - 2 e * - 7 # 2 <5 8 % DB 3 - 3 > - - 3 % € & & - - B - & - I E - 34 6z 8 - 3 6 2 B 3 I e a & 3 * yi s 6 * 5 B & a - S. a E % B & B a - 3 W 5 3 8 a dE - - V 4 DE 1 E 5 à 5 L 3 5 b 3 Egi 863 & S) N Eh 95 1 A a 25 4 ) 5: 2 40 0 39 a N 0 & 55 3 & 1 & : EZOZ/1/01 131VG TAOWddV 091 A1I9013A ONIM IVWIITA S4 EaV0T 8001 "MOTIV S8001 107 MOTIV @3 418 EZOZ 083 FON NVId AITIn FAONVAnO00 5 0 TVM 'IX3 ONIIVE 3813 8A 3dAI NOLONHISNOS 6EVE9 "ON esueon pIpJol 99Z€-929 (Z16) '3 'd uDBOA 3 yauuay 9E70E vo 'SNOA7 3 OEL ADMYBIH D9 LLLE ONI 'saaanng NIROH - - 5 a J 6 - a Y K 3 0 X a - 3 A; G Df 6 au DD u u a : a e a à 3 3 3 5 SZOZ/1/01 31VG WAOUddy 091 :A1I0013A GNIM 3IVWIITA 94 EOVO1 8001 "MOTIV S8O01 J0 MOTTV o 03 418 EZOZ 081 ON NVId AInIn AONVdn3D0 0 TVM "1X3 ONILVE 383 8A 3dAI NOIIONHISNOS 6E4E9 "ON esueon pip1ols 99ZE-9Z9 (Z16) '3 'd upBoA 3 yauuay 9Ev0E V9 'SNOA7 - 3051 ADmyBIH D9 ILLE ONI 'SHEGTIAE NIBON E 4 a E S 3 L 4 3 - V W A W E - a. a: Si > # > & # aup 9 x au IP £ZOZ/1/01 31VG WAOHddy 091 A1IDO13A ONIM 3IVWIITA f EQV0T 80015 MOTIV S8OOT J0 MOTTV e S48 EZOZ D85 FON NVId AIn AONVdnO00 0 T1VM "IX3 ONIVE 3813 BA 3dAI NOIIONUISNOS 99Z£-929 (Z16) 6EVE9 "ON esueon pIpJo13 9EV0E Vo 'SNOAT 5 '3 'd uD6oA '3 yauuay 3 OEL ADMYBIH D9 LLLE ONI 'SHIGTIAE NIRO8 I e L a > 9 e as e 3 a A 8 35 8 3 B a L 9 5 s L : o J 3 W - A 5 gh 5 e 6 3 u a a 3 N 23 i a BH 89 5, 1 a I 10 E 8 Eu3 3 b5 - - gs : B a € B E 8 ga a I à 5 a & Be 8 5 B, E 35 - 6 8 6 ai 3 E E 5 2 L 5 a 3 a 3 3 : i Z X - a 12 A A 2 ' e - EE 6 N - Bu 228 8423 3555 ! EE a a - a . - - SZOZ/1/01 31VO TVAONddV 091 FAI0013A ONIM 31VWIITA SL E0V0T 8001 "MOTIV IS80015 10 # MOTTV 03 418 EZOZ 081 FON NVId AInIn AONVdno30 0 TTVM 'IX3 ONIIVE 3813 8A 3dAI NOIIDNHISNOS 6E4E9 *ON esueon pipiol 99Z£-929 (Z16) '3 'd uDBOA '3 ypauuay 9EV0E vo 'SNOAT 30F1 ADMYBIH D9 ILLE ONI 'SHIATIAE NIROR 0 df a 6 a s 3 Bs 8 9 e 0 : : 3) S + t 3 & 8 bobio d a 3 E Beel a 8 3 0 3 Lu La L 9 S io Raas 19 P D Z: - a 1 A a Ws - L a à - 8 9 3 $ D - 2 e do E 5 % le E E 5 E E 3 à 3 ll E 8 45 5 9 N 31 € 9 * E E 9 E a B 8 32 a 3 $ZOZ/1/01 31VG TAOUddy 091 FAIID013A GNIM 3IVAIITA SL FOV0T 4001 MOTIV S8O0T 10 # MOTV 03 418 EZOZ 081 FON NVId AITIn AONV.nO00 0 VM IX3 ONIIVE 3813 BA 3dAI NOIIONHISNOS 6EVE9 "ON esueon pIpJol 992€-929 (Z16) - '3 'd uDBOA '3 ypauuay 9EV0E V9 'SNOA7 3051 ADMYBIH D9 ILLS ONI 'sHaaTINE NIROR e - D aU € M A 5 b E E 4 5 EZOZ/1/01 31VG WAOHddy 091 FA1I0013A ONIM IVWIITA SL QV01 10015 "MOTV ISH001 107 MOT1V 0348 EZOZ 085 FON NVId AIIn AONVINO00 0 TVM IX3 ONIIVE 3813 BA 3dAI NOIIONUISNOS 6E4E9 "ON esueon pIpiol 99Z€-929 (Z16) '3 'd upboA 3 vpauuay 3 OEL 9EV0E ADMYBIH V9 'SNOA7 D9 LLLE ONI 'saaanng NIBO8 3a Ai L . & 3 & 9 a - 3 * a du B x a 1 33 a 8 I a 8 8 a - E & B 4 4 3) t2 EZOZ/1/01 131VG WAOUddV 091 FA1I0013A GNIM IVWIITA o SL EOV01 #001 MOT1V SH001 10 MOTTV - 348 EZOZ 083 FON NVId ATIN AONVdno00 a o TTVM 1X3 ONIIVE 3813 8A 3dAI NOIIONHISNOS 6EVE9 "ON esueon DIpJol 99ZE-9Z9 (Z16) '3 'd uD6oA '3 yauuay 30E1 9EV0E ADMYDIH vo 'SNOA7 D9 LLLE ONI 'SHIATIAE NIRON A * a a à t 3 E à E - a a 5 A6 5 3 3 95 A € e E E Py 5 5 2 P 39 a * E & a ege a3 u € e a : A & 3 3 a 3 D 3 a 1 e E a < B = b25 5 3 U X o & N 0 N a - E 6 % & %; U > A 1 B4 3 35 3 SE 31 3 3 P, I I 8 E & 3 a Ep 2 5 = *, € & P - I A 3 H & E, H Ey E & 8 , & so 3 E P 6 A e à 2 5 E : a EM 55 B - Ny a 3 a 3 2 9 3 E 5 > E gEAa % E % 1 8 3 8 6 3 5 8 - D - 5 2 - 3 2 à d8 € 2: - 3 O B A 6 : $ EPg a 6 E : a 9 5 5 E 5 € 4 à *8 I = € 8 3 1 x, E % B d E B 9 g - 3 a 8 1 a 3 A - Eas 8 E - 9568sa L a B a A 2 EZOZ/1/01 31VO WAOHddy 091 A1I0013A ONIM IVWIITA o FOV01 80075 MOTIV S8001 10 # MOT7V & 48 EZOZ 083 FON NVId AInIn AONVdno00 0 TIVM IX3 ONIIVE 3813 8A 3dAI NOIIDNWISNOS 99Z€-929 (Z16) 6EVE9 "ON esueon pipols 9EV0E V9 'SNOA7 9 '3 'd uDEoA '3 yauuay 3 OEL ADMyBIH D9 LLLE ONI 'saaanIng NIRON - D) C ) 0 e @ O0 tP £ZOZ/1/01 31VG WAONddV 091 A1I0013A GNIM 31VWIITA o SL EQV0T 1O015 MOTV S8001 10 MOTIV I 03 418 EZOZ 08 ON NVId AIn AONVanoDO 0 T1VM IX3 ONILVE 3813 BA 3dAI NOIONUISNOS 992€-929 (Z16) 6EVE9 "ON esueon pIPJo1 9EVOE vo 'SNOA7 3 'd uDboA '3 yauuay 3 OFI ADMYBIH D9 LLLE ONI sHaaTIN8 NIROR LC C o oe 8 3 3 € $ : 5 * 3 B4 28 E 8 dB - 9 - % 4 5 EZOZ/1/01 31VO VAONddV 091 A1I0013A GNIM 31VWIITA of SL E0V01 10015 MOT1V IS8001 10 MOTIV 03 418 EZOZ 08 FON NVId AIIn AONVIno00 0 7TVM IX3 ONIVE 3813 BA 3dAI NOIIONHISNOS 99ZE-9Z9 (Z16) 6EVE9 *ON esueon DIpJols 9Ev0E V9 'SNOA7 '3 'd uDBOA '3 yauuay 3 OE! ADMYDIH D9 LLLE ONI 'saaaTIng NIRON 1 a II e 9 II II I 4 @ @ @ 1 a EZOZ/1/01 3IVO WAONddV 091 :A1I0013A GNIM IVAIITA EQVOT 80015 MOTV S80015 J0 MOT7V S 418 EZOZ 085 ON NVId AnIn AONVdnoD0 o TTVM 1X3 ONIIVE 3813 BA 3dAI NOIIDAHISNOS 99Z€-9Z9 (Z16) 6EVE9 "ON esueon pIpJols 9EY0E vo 'SNOA7 3 'd uDEOA 3 yauuay 3 OEL ADmyBIH D9 LLLE ONI SHad7IN8 NIBON la L, S : 5 3 - A, S a 86 5 a & 9 e 3 A X a D 3 : M e E - a By e - 3 > 2 a 9 E 3 3 e B 3 3 3 a f 8 8 & C E 0 a 5; 33 e 1 1 d% 4 - : s : - : S * $ : A 5 Sy 5 8 8 3 a $ x x - 2 a - u: ? By a a - hode : au ereie e e - Cu 2 u x a 1 - 5 8 à - $ & d d S 5 - a B3 5 a 2 8 8 - 3 a 8a n : 3 lj 3 2. 3 @ 8 5 9 - I W : 8 Cu ( I I B - € : I * € I m 5 3 A 1 ahn Aet 5 : 5 a 0 9 e - 2 & E - 2 3 3 a! - S n a 3 - I 3 - 8 - 6 W à a 3 3 3 3 ef a 8 - 0 B B u 6 - - & e 8g 8 I : 0 - 1 10 - I I I I a I : 8 B a I 3 - 5 3 3 a a 8 3 4 € > > 8 ; - S E C: & : a a DE 3 A € W 8 a V 2 N a 55 N a R2 - 2223 25 3 D K I à A - 2 I a B e 1 P, P 3 P 6 3 5 * A 5 a a 3 P8 A f X 8 6: 3 N Ki 3 A u e - * - E 5. - 3 E & T W L y : E P 5 1 : 3 & 5 3 a : C a € 3 4 a à a 5 & a 9 3 3 9 x& 2 x 88 a 5 & E A 4 e 68 8 X 63 3 5 B 5 5 1 a 8 x E B E 6 : 8 9 1 3 3 1 B 6 3 e u 1 - 3 3 e: 8 B 5 N - * € E a - à 5 a : e & 4 - 3 i Es 5 & W - 4 8 - 2 W 9 - - - 3 a, a & * g + x x I - 3 M € à E - x € 3 & oi 8 A - & 5 e - - 9 e x x5 x - - LU a 3 de - do à 3 3 a 3 1 E # 6 Z a F aNE 3 % a - E - B 35 - B - 66 - 8 B 2 g sysy A U M a EL < - * s 2 : 3 5 3 B < - 83 E & > a - 5 : & 1 Zi - E S H 1 F u 9; W a B2 a à, a % g - - a 5 E # 5 6 a 4g 5 - D a - 3 % Si - 5 - a I 8 3 a 83 835 2 a 99 E 4 a a 8 3 8 3 55 5 a - E - - - M - Outlook Re: NEED INFO REGARDING SETBACKS From Bree Robinson <brobinson@dilyofapalachicola.com> Date Fri 3/21/2025 10:48 AM To Avadh Patel avachpatel@probuilttructures.com> P&Z is required for any structures to be placed. Since this lot is noncompliant in terms of lot coverage, you may not be allowed to make the noncompliance worse, but this will be up to the P&Z Board to decide. The deadline for submission to the April P&Z agenda is Friday, March 28th at 5PM. Bree Robinson Interim City Manager City Planner City ofA Apalachicola 192 Coach Wagoner Blvd. 0: 850-323-0985 babhandeholpsaliskson PALACA IORIDE Florida has a very broad Public Records Law. Most written communications. to or from State andl Local Officials regarding State or Local business are public records available to thep public and media upon request. Your email communications may therefore be subject to, public disclosure. From: Avadh Patel avadhpatel@probuilttructures.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 12:05 PM To: Bree Robinson <brobinson@cityofapalachicola.com)> Subject: Re: NEED INFO REGARDING SETBACKS Thanks for the clarification. counted the ISR and it is coming around 93-94% would that be good or we have to feel the pz application for approval? PROPOSED LOCATION OF 8X8 DCASHED ON EXISTING CONCRETE HE 2 3 3 - 6 7o. 4 6 a N6 #IRI A & ORE 3 Currentl Prepesedl Lot Property Owner: AIKey: N - Re oBuNT MLLERMARTI INC. NA Scale: STRUCTURLS Address: ParcelID: 1"=40' MLLERMARTI INC. Ptossasw:3BQPACRO Best Regards, Avadh Patel PROBUILT STRUCTURES RLM Management Inc. Florida Certified Building Contractor. Lic. CBC1252090 Main Ph. (352) 364 - 5305 Email: vadhpatel@probuiltructures.com Check Out Our Website at ProbultsStructures.com On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:37/ AM Bree Robinson <probinson@dtyofapalachicola.com> wrote: Hi Avadh! 1. Could you please clarify the specific setback requirements for an accessory structure on this particular property? Setbacks for your zone, C-1, are 0 on all sides as long as the property does not surpass 80% coverage. 2. Given that the entire surface of the property is concrete, how should the maximum impervious surface ratio (ISR) be calculated? Is this property fully covered, if it is at 100% lot coverage which would make it noncompliant. There is some green space on the parking lot area, which makes me think that this project was viewed as one parcel during the original construction do you happen to have any documentation from that original application? If not, my assumption is that since the lot coverage is noncompliant that it cannot be made worse by adding more structure on top of it, but the P&Z Board would make that decision. 3. Based on the information available, could you advise whether this location appears suitable for obtaining a permit? It seems suitable from a setback standpoint, but the noncompliant lot coverage might be an issue. P&Z approval will be required before any building permits may be issued. All structures are required to go to P&Z for approval using this form: 7-Applisation20.5.pdr The board meets once a month and will make decisions regarding what can be placed on the property. You would need the application and a compete site plan in order to apply. The below is a good start but is lacking property line dimensions and dimensions of green space. Let me know if you have further questions! Bree Robinson Interim City Manager City Planner City ofA Apalachicola 192 Coach Wagoner Blvd. o: 850-323-0985 atnanschshasastislaem PALACK 9 IORIDE Floridal has a very broad Public Records Law. Most written communications to or from State and Local Officials regarding State or Local business are public records available to thep public and media upon request. Youre email communications. mayt therefore be subject to public disclosure. From: Avadh Patel vadhpatel@probullstructures.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 11:21 AM To: Bree Robinson <brobinson@cilyofapalachicola.com> Subject: Re: NEED INFO REGARDING SETBACKS You don't often get email from madasachtinsusan Learnwhyt this isi important Dear Bree, Following up on our previous discussion, we've decided to propose the shed on the lot that includes the gas station. I have attached a photo showing the proposed location for your reference. Ihave a few more questions regarding this revised proposal: 1. Could you please clarify the specific setback requirements for an accessory structure on this particular property? 2. Given that the entire surface of the property is concrete, how should the maximum impervious surface ratio (ISR) be calculated? 3. Based on the information available, could you advise whether this location appears suitable for obtaining a permit? Your insights are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your continued assistance. PROPOSED LOCATION OF 8X8 DCA SHED ON EXISTING CONCRETE FASMEINE € * 3 3 - 6 - a 6 SR & C Pro Best regards, Avadh Best Regards, Avadh Patel PROBUILT STRUCTURES RLM Management Inc. Florida Certified Building Contractor Lic. CBC7252090 Main Ph. (352) 364 5305 Email: avadhpatel@probultstructures.com Check Out Our Website at ProbultsStructures.com On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:41AM Bree Robinson <brobinson@dtyofapalachicola.com> wrote: Good morning! More information on this request is needed - it appears that there are two lots in ownership, with a City alley running between them, SO they are legally viewed as two individual lots. What you are requesting is an accessory structure, which cannot be built before a principal structure. Per LDC: (2) Accessory. Accessory uses and structures customarily incidental and subordinate to permitted principal uses and structures. Accessorystructuresl maynot be constructed priort to principal use structures unless specifically identified as construction- related in nature. (Example: construction shed/workshop.) Accessory structures deemed to be construction-related in nature shall not be allowed to remain without a principal structure for a period of more than one year after a permit is issued. You could look at placing a shed on the lot with the gas station, but the other lot does not have a principal structure, sO you cannot build an accessory structure. Are you aware of anyl legal deed strictions or binding of that vacant lot to the main gas station when it was originally built? Bree Robinson City Planner City ofA Apalachicola 192 Coach Wagoner Blvd. 0: 850-323-0985 alhanshhslisislko 5 IORIDE Floridal has a very broad Public. Records Law. Most written communications! to or from State andl Local Officials regarding State or Local business are public records available tot the public andi media upon request. Your email communications may therefore bes subject to public disclosure. From: Avadh Patel <vadhpateleprohulttructures.com> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2025 10:48. AM To: Bree Robinson <brobinson@rlyofapalachicola.com> Subject: NEED INFO REGARDING SETBACKS You don't often get email from mdsipaschanstscn Learn why this isi important Dear Sir/Madam, lam writing to inquire about the possibility of constructing an 8x8 shed on a parcel of land adjacent to US Highway 98. The parcel has a service road connecting to a gas station, and we are proposing to build the shed on that service road. have a few questions regarding this proposal: 1. Is it permissible to construct a shed on the service road? 2. Ifs sO, what are the required setbacks for such a structure? 3. For site plan approval, do we need to show the parcel that includes the gas station? What information is required on the site plan? 4. What is the maximum impervious surface ratio allowed for this parcel? am attaching the picture of the parcel and site plan proposed. Address: 47 avenue tepadhichafona2ayo Customer name: Lisa Childers/ Miller Mart Inc. Parcel Id: 01-095-08W-8330-0003-0010 8 4 % A X % P. A & PROPOSED LOCATION OF 8X8 DCA SHED ON MAP EXISTING CONCRETE 8 : < 9 % 4 o 0 GAS STATION A Iwould appreciate your guidance on these matters. Thank you for your time and assistance. Best Regards, Avadh Patel PROBUILT STRUCTURES RLM Management Inc. Florida Certified Building Contractor Lic. CBC1252090 Main Ph. (352) 364 5305 Email: avadhpatel@probuiltstructures.com Check Out Our Website at ProbuitStructurescom