RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of the City Council of the City of Cherry Hills Village, Colorado held on Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 6:30 PM at City Hall, 2450 East Quincy Avenue, Cherry Hills Village, Colorado 80113 The City Council held a Study Session at 6:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order at 6:33 PM. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Mayor Katy Brown, Mayor Pro Tem Earl Hoellen, Councilors Doug Robinson, Dave Heller, Susan Maguire, and Karen Fisher were present on roll call. Also present were City Manager Chris Cramer, City Attorney Kathie Guckenberger, Deputy City Manager/Public Works Director Jay Goldie, Community Development Director Paul Workman, Police Chief Jason Lyons, and City Clerk Laura Gillespie. Absent: Councilor Robert Eber. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Council conducted the pledge of allegiance. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION PERIOD Richard Abels, 21 Covington Drive, asked what was being done to address traffic issues, especially in the northeast of the City. Pasquale Riggi, 27 Covington Drive, expressed displeasure with Council's handling of resident concerns during the BRAVE Academy public hearing. Karen Ogard, 27 Covington Drive, asked what Council would do to engage residents in the discussions about traffic issues. REPORTS FROM MEMBERS OF CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS None. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen moved, seconded by Councilor Maguire, to approve the following items on the Consent Agenda: Item 6a. Approval of February 4, 2025 Minutes Item 6b. Approval of February 18, 2025 Minutes Item 6c. Approval of March 4, 2025 Minutes Item 6d. Change Order #004 and Letter Amendment to Construction Contract with Essential Contractors to the 2022 Concrete Construction Contract for the 2025 Concrete Construction Project Item 6e. Change Order #001 and Letter Amendment to Construction Contract with Vance Brothers, LLC to the 2024 Chipseal Construction Contract for the 2025 Chipseal Construction Project Item 6f. Resolution 11, Series 2025; Approving a Drainage Improvement Agreement with the Janice A. Hunt Qualified Personal Residence Trust and Accepting a Non- Exclusive Permanent Drainage Easement Located at 1776 East Tufts Avenue Item 6g. Resolution 12, Series 2025; Approving a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Greenwood Village Regarding Law Enforcement Assistance with Fiddler's Green Amphitheatre April 1. 2025 City Council Minutes Page 1 of11 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS The motion passed unanimously. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA None. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS Item 9a. Public Hearing: Resolution 13, Series 2025; Approving a Site Plan for Renovations to, and the Expansion of, the Fitness and Wellness Center for Kent Denver School Located at 4000 East Quincy Avenue Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing at 6:49 PM. Director Workman presented Kent Denver's site plan amendment application for Council's consideration; the application was for expansions to and renovations of the fitness and wellness center; the applicant had provided the necessary affidavits verifying all public notification requirements had been met; the property was zoned R-1 and had been used for school purposes since the 1960s; over time the site had been constructed and reconstructed; the last building expansion was in 2018; the application stated this project was for the exclusive use of Kent Denver School students and faculty and their student enrollment was not projected to increase as a result of the proposed project; the project was necessary in order to provide upgrades to the fitness and wellness facility as well as upgrade the locker rooms which were 40 years old; the applicant's traffic engineer stated no additional trips were expected to be generated and the improvement would have no adverse impact on traffic; in addition to the increased building size the applicant proposed to reconfigure the parking area and add six parking spaces which were required by the Municipal Code for the increased building square footage; as part of the 2018 development agreement Council granted a total of 806 parking spaces; the current application proposed a total of 812 parking spaces; there were two recommended conditions for approval of the application; first was related to the relocation of some water easements for Denver Water infrastructure; the applicant was currently in the process of receiving approval from Denver Water; while that process could be lengthy there was no reason to believe the applicant would not reach an agreement with Denver Water; the second recommended condition was related to the relocation of a couple of fire hydrants; the ultimate location of the fire hydrants was dependent on the location of the Denver Water lines. Director Workman reviewed the criteria in the Municipal Code; Municipal Code Criterion 1: The proposed development is consistent with and furthers or implements the goals and strategies of the Master Plan, including preservation of the semirural character of the City; the future land use map in the Master Plan designated the subject property for government, religious, and educational uses; the application was consistent with the future land use map, met the Master Plan vision of being consistent with the established character of the area, and met the Master Plan goal of maintaining the existing land use; Criterion 1 had been met. Municipal Code Criterion 2: The proposed development complies with all applicable City ordinances and is consistent with other City policies and plans; the site plan had been reviewed and determined to meet the zoning requirements; during the referral process the City's building consultant and South Metro Fire Rescue indicated that the applicant does or will be able to meet the applicable Code requirements as part of the permit process and subject to the two recommended conditions; there were no known inconsistencies with other City policies or plans; Criterion 2 had been met. April 1. 2025 City Council Minutes Page 2 of11 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Municipal Code Criterion 3: The bulk and scale of any proposed buildings, structures, or expansions thereto is consistent with the context of the site and does not materially change the physical character or function of the surrounding area; the proposed changes were consistent with the existing architectural style on the site; the changes represented an increase to the functionality of the building and modernization of the interior and exterior of the structure; the physical character and function of the property, that of a private school, was not changing as part of the request; Criterion 3 had been met. Municipal Code Criterion 4: Drainage systems are designed to utilize natural materials and low-maintenance best management practices to the maximum feasible extent, and to appear consistent with the character of the surrounding area; the increases to the total impervious area had been reviewed by the City's civil engineering consultant, ICON Engineering, and recommended for approval; Criterion 4 had been met. Municipal Code Criterion 5: The proposed development will not result in unreasonable traffic congestion or create a safety hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic and adequate provisions will be provided to manage any traffic-related issues; the scope of the application did not propose to increase enrollment; the application did not propose to increase the frequency or duration of any events or activities; all previously agreed to terms through previous development agreements remained the same; a traffic letter that was provided indicated there would not be an increase in traffic as a result of the request; there were significant traffic mitigation measures in the current development agreement from 2018 that remained in place such as a traffic control officer in the morning; staff had proposed and the applicant had agreed to two additional items related to traffic; the proposed development agreement stated Kent Denver was required to make reasonable efforts to coordinate start and release times with BRAVE Academy to manage traffic congestion; ift the City determined that Kent Denver traffic caused material adverse impacts on City streets or public rights-of-way, Kent Denver agreed to participate in discussions about improving traffic congestion as required by the Community Development Director; the request to modernize and enlarge the structure had no apparent correlation with an increased risk for safety concerns; Criterion 5 had been met. Municipal Code Criterion 6: Construction will be timed and staged to minimize impacts on adjacent residential properties, including but not limited to lighting, visual impacts, vibration, and noise; construction was anticipated to start in Spring 2025 and run through Spring 2026; due to the interior location of the structure in relation to the property lines there would be minimum impact to adjacent residential properties; however, the applicant had submitted a construction staging plan that met the City's requirements as part of their building permit process; as part of that, the west access closest to Monroe Lane was the primary construction access point during the school year; during the summer break it would be a mix of west access and east access; the applicant had indicated they would abide by the City's construction hours as required by the Municipal Code. The City and Kent Denver had a long history of development agreements, the most recent being from 2018; the majority of the development agreement was not changing, such as traffic management plans, limitations on events, public notice, and student enrollment; some of the language may have been updated in the proposed agreement to reference current sections of the Code and create clarity, but none of the requirements already in place had changed; there were two new additional requirements the applicant had agreed to which were coordinating the start and release times with BRAVE Academy and letting City staff know 10 business days before that change became effective; Kent Denver had agreed to participate in discussions related to school traffic and school traffic impacts if they were having a material adverse impact on public right-of-way; the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing to discuss the request; the Commission asked some questions about the facility being open to the public and how the increased building size would impact any programming they might have; the applicant responded the building was intended to be used by the April 1, 2025 City Council Minutes Page3d of11 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Kent Denver students and faculty; since the new square footage was primarily locker rooms and weight rooms there was not an additional increase in capacity that would allow Kent Denver to increase capacity for programming; the Commission voted unanimously to reçommend that City Council approve the request subject to the two recommended conditions; as a part of the application staff had received a number of emails; one email did not express support or opposition but rather some questions about potential impacts to traffic; a second email asked about landscape screening for the addition; all other emails staff received were in support of the application. Mayor Brown invited questions from Council. Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen stated the application had been thorough and complimented staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission for their thorough vetting; he asked the applicant to address the landscaping concerns expressed by one of the public comment letters. Director Workman replied there were a fair number of mature trees in that location now although they would not go as far north as the structure was proposed to be; the City did not have landscape screening requirements in the Code; the applicant could address the proposed landscaping. Mayor Brown asked if the tree replacement ordinance applied to this situation. Director Workman replied it did not. Mayor Brown asked for clarification on the traffic mitigation measures. Director Workman replied he had been combining traffic mitigation and parking mitigation. Councilor Maguire asked for confirmation that the proposed development agreement replaced the prior agreement, and that the proposed agreement contained the same restriction on the use of stadium facility lighting, referring to an email from a neighbor. City Attorney Guckenberger confirmed the proposed agreement replaced the prior agreement; she would work on an answer to the question about lighting restriction as Council continued their discussion. Mayor Brown invited the applicant to make their presentation. David Braemer, Kent Denver Head of School, explained they had two goals, first to ensure they had a facility that best met the health, wellness, and fitness needs of their students, faculty, and staff; second to accomplish that in a manner that had the most limited impact on the campus and broader community; overhaul of the athletic center had been an identified need for years; they valued the campus's beauty, sight lines for neighbors, and resource for the community; the plan in no way facilitated an increase in student enrollment and would not extend the school's hours of operation or otherwise increase the number of people coming to the campus during the school year or the summer program. Bryan Schmidt, architect with Semple Brown Design, showed renderings of the proposed structure; accessibility would be vastly improved; the current locker rooms were 40 years old and had group showers and other things that were not appropriate in this day and age; the perceived mass of the building would be reduced by pushing down thel lower floor by five feet and the design would be tied to the rest of the campus; the mass of the building would follow the slope of the grade; Black Fieldhouse and mechanical systems would be screened; in order to push the building down five feet they would have a structural floor slab with full perimeter drain, some pumps, and PS pits to pump all the water out; there was a significant perimeter of trees that would abate any views from neighbors. April 1, 2025 City Council Minutes Page 4 of 11 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Mayor Brown invited questions from Council. Councilor Fisher asked about the new trees shown in the plans. Mr. Schmidt replied one or two trees would have to be removed to expand the building and they planned to put in many more trees. Councilor Fisher asked if they had any concerns with the budget caused by the delay. Jerry Walker, Kent Denver Associate Head of School, noted the school had a policy that when they removed a tree they planted at least two in its place and that would be carried forward with this project; they were working to get as much of the project done during vacation periods as possible, especially the demolition; they did not have budget concerns at this point. Councilor Robinson asked about construction vehicle access. Mr. Schmidt replied during school construction traffic would primarily use the west entrance next to Random Road; during the summer construction traffic would also use the main entrance near Colorado Boulevard. Mr. Walker added they planned to do as much heavy equipment work that would require use of the main entrance such as cranes and cement as possible during the summer months when school was out, but if those were needed during school it would be coordinated so that it did not impact drop off or pick up times. Councilor Robinson asked if they would begin as soon as classes ended. Mr. Walker replied there was a lot of work to do to prepare for construction such as removing equipment from the building, cutting off electricity, the easement process with Denver Water, repositioning of fire hydrants with South Metro Fire Rescue, sO that was either already occurring or would start as soon as possible. Mr. Schmidt explained they had submitted a permit application for the demolition site utility infrastructure grading, and a second permit for the construction of the new building, with the intention of starting on the demolition work while the new building permit was under review. Councilor Robinson asked about any concerns from staff regarding damage to Quincy Avenue by the construction equipment. Deputy City Manager/Director Goldie replied the right-of-way permit would cover that aspect and staff did not anticipate any issues at this point. Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen asked if Quincy Avenue was scheduled for mill and overlay this year. Deputy City Manager/Director Goldie replied it was tentatively on the schedule for next year. Councilor Maguire thanked the applicant for a well prepared presentation and application. Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen noted it did not look like the view for the neighbors or Quincy Farm would be impacted according to the renderings. City Manager Cramer indicated staff was working to answer Council's question about the lighting restriction and asked if anyone had the referenced email available. April 1, 2025 City Council Minutes Page 5 of 11 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Mayor Brown replied she did not, but she recalled several restrictions in the current agreement and deferred to Mr. Walker. Mr. Walker confirmed Kent Denver had agreed not to put in outdoor lighting for the stadium; his understanding was the proposed agreement captured all the restrictions of the previous agreements, unless they had been removed previously, such as the restriction on sophomore driving which had been removed by a subsequent agreement; they were still in agreement with the lighting restriction at this time but reserved the right to petition the Council for a change at a future date. He also noted regarding traffic mitigation the agreement required them to limit events that would exceed their parking capacity and notify the community. Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen asked if the new agreement superseded or supplemented the current agreement, from a legal significance perspective. City Attorney Guckenberger agreed those were distinctions of significance and stated she was completing her research and analysis now. Councilor Heller asked about amending the motion to ensure all restrictions were being maintained. City Attorney Guckenberger replied she recommended having the correct language in the proposed agreement to provide clarity for Council and the community. Mayor Brown opened the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing. Sheila Walker, 4701 South Dasa Drive, stated she was a Kent Denver trustee and a parent of former Kent Denver students; she was a developmental scientist and emphasized the need for updates to the locker rooms to be developmentally appropriate; Kent Denver had been very thoughtful about traffic mitigation; Kent Denver was an asset for the community; the leadership team and architecture firm had been very thoughtful and deliberate. Gina Fenton, 23 Covington Drive, expressed concern with increased traffic in the Village; this project would not increase traffic; Kent Denver set a very high bar for construction and environmentally sound buildings; Kent Denver was a good neighbor to the community. Jennifer Waters, 4201 South Dahlia Street, stated she was an alumna, a parent of alumni, past trustee, and neighbor; she supported the project; she appreciated Kent Denver's stewardship of the property. Shane Cordes, 45 Charlou Circle, stated he was the father of Kent Denver students; he expressed support for the project; it was thoughtfully designed not to impact views; it would not encroach into open space; it would greatly improve the attractiveness and function of the building; Kent Denver is an outstanding neighbor; the project would not increase the school size or traffic; Kent Denver should be embraced and celebrated by the City. Debra Tuchman, 4600 South Monroe Lane, stated Kent Denver was a great neighbor; she supported the project; Kent Denver had efficient and timely building contractors; she lived right next door and could not say she was excited about the construction but it was a clear need for the campus and she supported the project. Bart Bansbach, 1665 East Layton Drive, explained his family's history with the City; he was al Kent Denver alumnus; Kent Denver was an enormous asset to the City as an educational institution and a beautiful open green space; athletics played a vital role in student development, the renovation would not increase the size of the student body or bring additional traffic or disruptions to the neighborhood; the project was a thoughtful, responsible upgrade; he strongly supported the project. April 1, 2025 City Council Minutes Page 6 of 11 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Julie Cramer, 31 Viking Drive, expressed support for the project; she was a parent of Kent Denver students; the entire community used Kent Denver for open space recreation; Kent Denver was an extremely good neighbor; she was a trustee; the care and thoughtfulness of Kent Denver's leaders were unmatched; the design did not impact views or encroach into open spaces; the project would not increase enrollment or traffic. Sarah Pendergast, 22 Carriage Lane Drive, was a neighbor of Kent Denver; the leadership cared about maintaining the beauty of the campus; the project would fit as seamlessly as possible. Brian Wheeler, 5 Viking Drive, was a Kent Denver alumnus; part of being a good neighbor was maintaining and keeping up with your property; the project would be a benefit to the surrounding neighborhood; he expressed support for the project. Margaret Bathgate, 6376 East Tufts Avenue, stated she was a former trustee, a former board chair, and the parent of Kent Denver alumni; she was involved during previous large projects along with Mr. Walker; Mr. Walker was good to his word; the project had been thoughtfully conceived. Aaron Agron, 4600 South Lafayette Street, stated the project did not involve any development and would not involve any expansion of use, programming, students, density, or traffic; Kent Denver had been granted similar approvals in the past and had always been a responsible steward of that trust and would continue to be a good neighbor; the project would benefit the entire City. Matt Flavin, 3900 South Colorado Boulevard, was a neighbor of Kent Denver; Kent Denver was a great neighbor; he and his family benefited from Kent Denver's trails and open space; the planning process had a high level of consideration for the surrounding community; traffic would not increase; he supported the project. Mike Donnelly, 3920 South Birch Street, stated he was the parent of Kent Denver students; his wife was an alumna; he supported the project; the project did not negatively affect neighbors; Kent Denver was a great neighbor; the project would not increase the school size or traffic. Hearing no other comments Mayor Brown closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen reiterated his thanks to Kent Denver for the thoroughness of the application; Council appreciated Kent Denver being a good neighbor and keeping their campus open to the community; it was not a minor undertaking; Mr. Walker was the best head of operations he had seen in an independent school. Councilor Robinson thanked Kent Denver for the thoroughness of their application and the residents for the number of emails and thoughtfulness of their comments. City Attorney Guckenberger explained there was a patchwork of development agreements with Kent Denver; the agreements were consolidated in 2018; the proposed agreement built on the 2018 agreement and referenced the City's lighting Code, which prohibited stadium lighting; the proposed agreement did not contain the specific language originally from the 2003 agreement; Mr. Walker had agreed he had no objection on behalf of Kent Denver to modifying the language of the proposed agreement to add the prohibition if Council did not feel the current provision was adequate to satisfy any concerns; the additional language would be added to Section 2.10 of the proposed development agreement; the proposed addition for Council's consideration would be to add "Kent Denver agrees not to erect new or additional exterior or exterior-projected lighting on the stadium facility designated as Deso Field in the. Application, except as may be required by the application of the City's building and April I, 2025 City Councill Minutes Page 7 ofil RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS fire codes. at the end of Section 2.10 of the proposed development agreement; the language very closely tracked the language from the 2003 agreement with the update to call Deso Field by its name rather than "the property". Mayor Brown asked for confirmation that the current application designated the stadium facility as Deso Field. Director Workman confirmed it was on the first page of the site plan document, which was Exhibit D to the staff memorandum. Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen suggested simplifying the additional language to apply to all stadium facilities. City Manager Cramer cautioned that would increase the scope beyond the original 2003 language. Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen asked if the 2003 language had been only for Deso Field. Mayor Brown confirmed that was correct. City Attorney Guckenberger advised Council to add the language as a third condition to the recommended motion. Mayor Brown asked for a motion. Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen moved to approve Resolution 13, Series 2025, approving a Site Plan Amendment for renovation to and the expansion of the fitness and wellness center for the Kent Denver School at 4000 East Quincy Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall provide City staff with written evidence of Denver Water's approval of all proposed relocations of easements prior to the issuance of the building permit for this project. 2. The Applicant shall provide City staff with written evidence of South Metro Fire Rescue's approval of the types and locations of fire hydrants prior to the issuance of the building permit for this project. 3. That the Development Agreement shall have added to it Section 2.10 Exterior Lighting. Exterior lighting on the Property must comply with all applicable provisions of the City Code; provided, however, that during the summer, outside of the normal school year, lights in parking areas will be turned off by 10:00 p.m. except during Special Events. Kent Denver agrees not to erect new or additional exterior or exterior-projected lighting on the stadium facility designated as Deso Field in the Application, except as may be required by the application of the City's building and fire codes. Councilor Maguire seconded the motion. Mayor Brown invited discussion on the motion. Mayor Brown asked if staff was confident nothing else had been missed from previous agreements. City Manager Cramer replied Director Workman's work summarizing the changes between previous agreements had allowed them to conduct their analysis fairly quickly this evening; staff was 99% sure the additional language in the motion was what was being referred to in the email. Mayor Brown asked if Councilor Maguire was comfortable with that. Councilor Maguire confirmed she was. April 1, 2025 City Councill Minutes Page 8 ofll RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Councilor Fisher added she supported anything that benefitted notj just the health and wellbeing of students but also of staff; the support of neighbors and of the Planning and Zoning Commission was important. Mayor Brown called for a vote on the motion. The motion passed 5 yes to 0 no. Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing at 8:17 PM. Item 9b. Resolution 14, Series 2025; Accepting a Donation from the Cherry Hills Village Police Foundation on Behalf of the Cherry Hills Village Police Department Deborah Burger, 36 Cherry Hills Farm Drive, and Mark Griffin, 3236 Cherryridge Road, representing the Cherry Hills Village Police Foundation, presented a donation of $25,000 on behalf of the Cherry Hills Village Police Foundation, a designated gift from Patricia and Jack Future specifically for a K-9 dog. Council thanked the Police Foundation. Chief Lyons stated the dog's name was Shadow and Officer Michael Anderson had been selected as the handler; they would begin K-9 academy on Monday. Councilor Maguire moved, seconded by Councilor Fisher, to approve Resolution 14, Series 2025, accepting a donation from the Cherry Hills Village Police Foundation on behalf of the Cherry Hills Village Police Department. The motion passed unanimously. Item 9c. Board and Commission Member Terms Clerk Gillespie explained several board and commission member terms would end on May 20, 2025; some members desired reappointment and some did not; in addition, there was a resignation on the Art Commission; applications had been solicited in the Village Crier, on the City website, and City social media accounts; in addition to new applications, staff had one application from the last two years; the Parks, Trails and Recreation Commission section of the Municipal Code directed Council to appoint a member from each District. Council agreed to reappoint members who had served no more than one term and desired reappointment, and per the Board and Commission Recruitment Policy consider members who had served more than one term and desired reappointment along with any applicants. Councilor Heller volunteered to review applications, conduct interviews, and make recommendations. Council asked staff to ask Councilor Eber to volunteer. Item 9d. Hybrid/Virtual Meetings City Clerk Gillespie explained this discussion was a request from Council; conducting hybrid or virtual meetings outside of a COVID situation would be a change in Council's policy; benefits might be more flexibility for Council members to attend more meetings and have more Council members at more meetings; challenges included technology, security, staffing, and quality of the meetings; if Council wanted to allow hybrid or virtual meetings staff had a list of questions and considerations, and staff would bring back suggested amendments to the applicable Council policies. Council discussed allowing hybrid or virtual participation during quasi-judicial matters or executive sessions; how the live-stream would view members joining remotely; comparison of various platforms; security concerns; rules of etiquette; ensuring April 1, 2025 City Council Minutes Page 90 of11 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS members joining virtually had an equal opportunity to speak; other municipalities and organizations that allow remote participation; the benefit of more participation superseding technology issues; the number and type of Council meetings in Cherry Hills Village and in Greenwood Village; pros and cons of limiting the number of meetings a Council member can join remotely; costs to upgrade the Council Chambers system; a possible trial period; the preference of in person discussions; remote participation for boards and commissions; remote participation for members of the public. REPORTS Mayor Mayor Brown reported on the proposed rehabilitation treatment facility on Monaco Street; she had attended the public hearing and explained what she had learned from the applicant; the City could submit a letter of response to the application. Councilor Maguire asked if Chief Lyons had any concerns about the facility. Chief Lyons replied he did not have concerns at this time. Council agreed the City should submit a letter of response. Mayor Brown provided an update on the bills moving through the state legislature; she would attend the Metro Mayors Caucus tomorrow. Council discussed the state bills and possible counter arguments. Council discussed the inquiries about traffic during audience participation and the plan to conduct a traffic study in 2026. Members of City Council Councilor Fisher asked staff to include information on the community liaison in the letter regarding the Monaco facility; she wished everyone happy Passover. Councilor Robinson complimented Deputy City Manager/Director Goldie and Director Workman on their respective presentations. Mayor Pro Tem Hoellen complimented Mayor Brown on her report in the Village Crier; he asked Chief Lyons about security coordination with construction traffic at Kent Denver. Councilor Heller reported he would be attending the next Centennial Airport Community Noise Roundtable meeting and noted they were hybrid. City Manager and City Staff Chief Lyons reported the Citizens Academy would start on Thursday. Clerk Gillespie asked for Council's opinion on a proposed schedule for the Quincy Farm Big Barn ribbon cutting on May 20, 2025 before that evening's Council meeting. Council agreed. City Manager Cramer recognized Deputy City Manager/Director Goldie and Director Workman for their respective memos and presentations. City Attorney City Attorney Guckenberger had no report. April 1, 2025 City Council Minutes Page 10of11 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:44 PM. (SEAL) lllun OHawh Kathleen Brown, Mayor dhus Ein Laura Gillespie,/City Clerk April 1, 2025 City Council Minutes Page 11 of11