REGULAR MEETING APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2025 - 6:00PM FORMER APALACHICOLA MUNICIPAL LIBRARY 74 6TH STREET, APALACHICOLA, FLORIDA 32320 AGENDA You are welcome to comment on any matter under consideration by the Apalachicola City Commission when recognized to do SO by the Mayor. Once recognized please rise to the podium, state your name for the record and adhere to the five-minute time limit for public comment. Comments may also be sent by email to the City Manager or to Commissioners. I. Call to Order Invocation Pledge of Allegiance II. Agenda Adoption III. PUBLIC HEARING: 2ND Reading Tree Ordinance 2025-02 IV. Public Comment V. New Business 1. Resolution & Application Submission: DHR Grant for Phase III HCA Project (Middlebrooks Bldg.) 2. Resolution & Application Submission: DHR Grant for Phase IV (Harrison-Raney Bldg.) 3. Margaret Key Library Conceptual Landscape Master Plan Approval 4. AAHS Match Request and Resolution- Raney House 5. Proclamation- Professional Municipal Clerks Week 6. Proclamation- Mayor's Election Proclamation 7. CDBG-DR Hill Lighting Choices 8. 25 17th Street- Karen Dennis VI. Unfinished Business 1. 2nd Reading & Adoption: Tree Ordinance 2025-02 VII. Mayor and Commissioner Comments VIII. City Manager Communications - Report Attached IX. Finance Director Communications X. Attorney Communications XI. Consent Agenda- P&Z 3.10.25 Meeting Minutes XII. Department Reports - Included in Agenda Packet Adjournment Any person who desires to appeal any decision at this meeting will need a record oft the proceeding and for this purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made which includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Clerk's Office 48 hours in advance of the meeting. ORDINANCE NO: 2025-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APALACHICOLA, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF PART II, SUBPART B, CHAPTER 105, ARTICLE II, TREE PROTECTION, SECTIONS 105-21 THROUGH 105-30; CHAPTER 109, ARTICLEII, SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS SECTIONS 109-46 THROUGH 109-51 AND CREATING CHAPTER 111, ARTICLE I, SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS SECTION(S) 111-10 THROUGH 111-15; PROVIDING FOR PURPOSE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. FINDINGS: WHEREAS, the City of Apalachicola is al Florida Municipality dulyincorporated, with all the rights and powers as provided in S. 2(b), Art. VII of the State Constitution. WHEREAS the City to provide clarification and additional guidance regarding the protection of treeslocated within the City. The amendments provide for additional definitions, permitting considerations and enforcement; WHEREAS, the City of Apalachicola has determined that it is in the public interest to adopt amendments to its Land Development Code pertaining to Tree Protection and Site Plan Review; WHEREAS, included in this Ordinance is the relocation of the general Site Plan Review Regulations being amended in order to remove them from Chapter 109 and move them to Chapter 111 as indicated for clarity; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF APALACHICOLA, FLORIDA, that: NOTE: Struckthrough language is language proposed to be deleted, Underlined lanquage is amended language, and *** represents sections that have been skipped and that remain unchanged. Page 1 of 11 Chapter 105 ENVIRONMENT ARTICLE Il. TREE PROTECTION Sec. 105-21. Purpose and intent. (a) Trees are recognized to be a valued asset, providing a healthier and more beautiful environment in which to live. Tree preservation enhances the value and marketability of property and thereby promotes the stability of residential neighborhoods, making them more livable and desirable. (b). This article establishes protective regulations for tree preservation and a permitting process to ensure good management practices on private and city-owned property, including utility easements for continued healthy and beautiful trees. Sec. 105-22. Definitions. Tree. A woody plant having one or more well-defined trunks capable of being maintained with a clear trunk and normally growing to an overall height at maturity of a minimum of 15 feet. Diameter at breast height. The diameter of a tree trunk as measured four and a half (4 %) feet above ground level. Dead. In a state of irrecoverable decline with more than 50 percent of leaves, branches, andl limbs not alive. Drip line. The limiting line established by a series of perpendicular drop points marking the maximum radius of the crown of an existing tree, but not less than ten feet from thet trunk, whichever is greater. PatHiarehHeritage tree. Al protected native tree (section 105-23) whose trunk is 35 or more inches in diameter at breast height. Relocate. As used in article II, tree protection regulations and elsewhere in this Code, the digging up of a protected tree by a property owner from a place on the owner's property and the planting of the same tree in another place on the same property or in a public place. Substantial alteration. The heavy cutting of top branches (topping), cutting of major lower limbs (elevating), or significant trimming of a tree that alters the natural symmetry of the tree. The term does not include customarily accepted practices used by certified arborists for pruning shade trees. Sec. 105-23. Protected native trees. The native trees predominately foresting the City of Apalachicola are: Bald and pond cypress (Taxodium distichum and Taxodium ascendens), Eastern and southern redcedar Juniperus virginiana and. Juniperus solleicelaslicicold), Live oak (Quercus virginiana), Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), PecanCayalimenss, Sabal (cabbage) palm (Sabal palmetto), Page 2 of 12 Sashpme/Pnusel.o.#, Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), and Sycamore (Platanus occidentallsrand Wateroat@weusga. Individual trees of these: species having diameters of foureight or more inches at breast height are protected (hereinafter referred to as 'protected trees"). Other native trees and all nonnative trees are not protected. Sec. 105-24. Preservation of patrarchheritage trees. No patriarehheritage tree on privately- or city-owned property shall be removed or substantially altered by a private landowner or a department of the city unless: (1) Under a declared emergency (section 105-25(1)(c) or in the case of an imminent hazard (section 105- 25(2)), the demforememtoliveydy manager, or a-designee-in theirthe manager's absence the manager's designee (e.g., code enforcement officer), finds for a specific tree that immediate action is required to eliminate a condition endangering public safety or property. (2) In a non-emergency or non-imminent hazard situation: a. On private property, hepsmnigand.enneningboardcolncldent with the planning and zoning board's approval of a proposed development plan that is conditional on a tree permit application being approved, the city manager approves the issuance of a tree permit to a private landowner to remove or substantially alter a tree on a lot because not doing sO would make the lot undevelopable for any principal structure (section 105-26(1)(c)). b. On private property when no development is proposed or on city property, the city manager documents in writing his or her reasons for allowing removal or substantial alteration (sections 105-26(1)(c) and 105-26(2)(c)). Sec. 105-25. Activities exempted from or requiring a tree permit. (1) Atree permit is not required for the following exempt activities: a. Unprotected trees- --The removal, relocation, or substantial alteration of: Native trees not listed in: section 105-23; Native trees listed in section 105-23 that are less than foureight inches in diameter at breast height; Cultivated varieties of once native trees developed by selective breeding and sold by plant nurseries; and Nonnative trees, including invasive species. bDead trees when the code enforcement officer inspects the trees and agrees they are dead. b. As provided by State law (F.S.5 163.045), the pruning, trimming, or removal of a tree on ar residential property if the property owner possesses documentation from an arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture or a Florida licensed landscape architect that the tree poses an unacceptable riskt to persons or property. A tree poses an unacceptable riski if removal is the only means of practically mitigating its risk below moderate, as determined by the tree risk assessment procedures outlined in Best Management Practices - Tree Risk Assessment, Second Edition (2017). Ç. Pruning- --Pruning of unprotected trees, and light pruning of protected trees that does not substantially alter the protected trees. ed. Emergency-The removal or substantial alteration of any significantly-damaged, protected, non- patriarehheritage tree during or following a natural or man-made disaster (e.g., hurricane, tornado, high wind, flood, or forest fire) when the city commission or manager declares a state of emergency and determines that permitting requirements willl hamper private or public work to restore safety and order to the city. PermissienCity permission is required to remove or substantially alter a patriarehheritage tree (section 105-24(1)). In the interest ofe expeditiously addressing damaged heritage trees, the city's oral permission is sufficient, and written permission! is not required. de. Highway and electric utility rights-of-way-The removal or trimming of protected trees by: The Florida Department of Transportation along roads under its jurisdiction to maintain safe lines of sight at road intersections and alleys and horizontal clearance areas along roadways where errant vehicles leaving the roadway might travel. The electric utility along power lines necessary for the maintenance of accepted public safety standards and system reliability. (2) At tree permit is required for the following activities. Any removal or substantial alteration of a protected tree not exempted in section 105-25(1). Some specific situations requiring a permit include: Imminent hazard--The removal or substantial alteration of a protected tree when an applicant proposes that immediate action is required due to a condition endangering publics safety or property. Diseased or pest-infested tree-The removal or substantial alteration of a diseased or pest-infested, protected tree when an applicant proposes that doing sO will prevent the spread of the disease or pests to healthy trees. Storm-damaged tree-The removal or substantial alteration of a protected tree damaged by a storm for which the city commission or manager did not declare a state of emergency. Tree in decline-Thei removal or substantial alteration of a protected tree that has lost vigor and displays pale green or yellow leaf color, small leaves, poor growth, leaf drop, or dieback of twigs and branches. At tree in decline is not a dead tree. Sec. 105-26. Permits for removal, relocation, or substantial alteration of protected trees. Any person wishing to remove or: substantially alter a protected tree shall makesubmit an application to the code enforcement llerensisewpiatanibupotayheal.ie. At tree permit shall be issued to remove or substantially alter a protected tree only if such action is in compliance with these article II requirements and the section 109-5051 site plan requirements. Substantial alteration of a protected tree shall be allowed only under a declared emergency (sections 105- 24(1) and 105-25(1)(c)), when a permit is obtained in the case of an imminent hazard (sections 105-24(1) and 105- 25(2)), or when a permit is obtained in a non-emergency or non-imminent hazard situation to eliminate limbs that encroach on an adjacent structure. (1) Private property. a. Ifthe proposed tree removal or substantial alteration is in conjunction with proposed development the planning and zoning board reviews (e.g., a newly-proposed structure, the expansion of an existing structure where the footprint increases in size, the construction ofa driveway or walkway, or other such development that disturbs the land surface), the beardcode enforcement officer shall implement these tree protection requirements at the time ithe planning and zoning board reviews and decides to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the site plan. b. Ifthe proposed tree removal or substantial alteration is not in conjunction with proposed development that the planning and zoning board reviews (e.g., tree removal due to tree roots affecting the structural integrity of a building foundation), the code enforcement officer, city manager, or a designee shall implement these tree protection requirements at the time he or she reviews and deiesteaprovepcensaensiyapmovemakes a decision on the tree removal or disapprovetheprepesaksubstantial alteration application. Only the city manager shall make decisions on patrlarchheritage trees (subsection c). C. Ifthe proposal is the removal or substantial alteration of a patriarehheritage tree, the code enforcement officer shall provide a copy of the tree application to the tree committee appointed by the city commission. The committee shall review the tree permit application and make a recommendation to the deceisiermakertheplsmangand.enbsetina)OFtheely managerisubsectenonb)dlymanager, When ebaditedelsonmalef,appoalponss removal or maleaspeaeremoe albmlaialepsbstanta alteration of a patriarehheritage tree onis in conjunction witha development plan for a a privately-owned lot that is reviewed by the planning and zoning board, the city manager shall allow removal or substantial alteration of the heritage tree only-bemade when no principal structure could be legally built on the lot taking into consideration the location of the tree and such requirements as setbacks and minimum required size for single-family dwellings. Through the variance process the board of adjustment may consider reducing setbacks or minimum dwelling size if doing sO would spare the tree. When-theThe city manageristhedeeisionmakef,the-managersmanager's reasons for allowing removal or substantial alteration of a patriarchheritage tree shall be documented in writing. (2) City property. a. A person wanting to remove or substantially alter a protected tree on city property adjacent to private property owned by the person (e.g., to create an entryway to a proposed driveway on private property) shall apply for a tree permit. Cost of the permit and tree removal or substantial alteration shall be borne by the applicant. b. A city department wanting to remove or substantially alter a protected tree on city property shall make a request to the code enforcement officer. To document the request, the code enforcement officer shall prepare a tree application for the proposed action. Removal or substantial alteration of the tree shall not occur unless the code enforcement officer, city manager, or one of their designees approves the removal or substantial alteration. C. Ifthe proposal is the removal or substantial alteration of a patrlarehheritage tree, the code enforcement officer shall provide a copy of the tree application to the city manager and tree committee appointed by the city commission. The committee shall review the tree permit application and make a recommendation. The city manager shall make a decision on the proposal and document in writing the reasons for allowing any removal or substantial alteration. As a condition of approval, decision makers may require that certain protected trees or native trees listed in section 105-23 that are less than foureight inches in diameter at breast height be relocated from the area of proposed development to an undeveloped location. Under a tree permit, thinning of healthy protected trees may be justified ifs selective removal of trees improves the development ofr remaining trees and allows them to grow faster and in a fuller, characteristic form. To ensure that a tree permit is not prematurely issued for a proposed development that is never approved, the tree permit and building permit will be issued simultaneously. Sec. 105-27. Protection of trees during building operations. Within the dripl line radius of a protected tree, the following activities shall not occur during development, redevelopment, or improvement: deposition of debris and fill; storage of gasoline, oil, paint, chemicals, and other toxic materials harmful to trees; and attachment of wire to trees. Driveways and sidewalks of impervious concrete and asphalt may not be constructed within the drip line of protected trees. Sec. 105-28. Utility easement trimming. Electric utility companies and their contractors that perform vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming within electric utility right-of-way corridors shall do sO in accordance with the following requirements. As defined in State law (F.S. S 163.3209), vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming" means "the mowing of vegetation within the right-of-way, removal of trees or brush within the right-of-way, and selective removal of tree branches that extend within the right-of-way. (1) All tree management will be limited to what is necessary for the proper maintenance of existing and new utility facilities in order to provide safe and reliable utility service. (2) Prior to vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming, the utility shall provide the city manager with a minimum of five business days' advance notice. Such advance notice is not required for vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming required to restore electric service or to avoid an imminent vegetation-caused outage. (3) The electric utility shall meet with the city manager, or the manager's designee (e.g., code enforcement officer), to discuss and submit the utility's vegetation maintenance plan, including the utility's trimming specifications and maintenance practices. The plan shall identify any patriarchheritage trees that are proposed for trimming and the amount of trimming proposed. (4) Vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming conducted by utilities shall conform to American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 (Part I)-2008 (R2014) pruning standards and ANSI Z133.1- 2000 Pruning, Repairing, Maintaining, and Removing Trees, and Cutting Brush-Safety Requirements. (5) Vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming conducted by utilities must be: supervised by qualified electric utility personnel or contractors licensed to do business in the City of Apalachicola and trained to conduct vegetation maintenance and tree trimming or pruning consistent with these requirements or by certified arborists certified by the certification program of the International Society of Arboriculture. Trimming of patriarch trees may only be performed by certified arborists. Sec. 105-29. Reforestation fund. Fees collected for the lawful removal of protected trees shall be placed in a reforestation fund maintained by the City of Apalachicola. (Fees for the administrative processing of tree permit plcatonstee,sso0Ppet application) and fines for the unlawful removal or substantial alteration of protected trees (section 105-30) shall not be placed in the reforestation fund.) Reforestation fund fees shall be spent to establishacquire, install, and maintain, and promote a reforestation program on city property, primarily in parks, squares, and along highway and street corridors. Fellewingare-The city, by resolution, is authorized to set and change the referestaltionfundfeeesthatshal-be cellectedforremovalokefprelectedtres. Dlameteratbrestheleholpoladedeeremovedlinches, Feeforeaeh-treefs) 4t0-16 25 Grserhmicllstanss 35 BSamdaerfpataehire, 1,000 Fora-tree-permit: appleantotpropesigteremeveapatarehires,the.aimumiolalreiorestation-fund Recaleaedierseacvetsoveredeyhesplaton halaotewseed525000. Foratreepemitappieamtpepsnetoremoemoveepitiehire.themaimemiolalee and any corresponding reforestation fund fee colected-ereaeh-eacheteeveredfor permits applied for in this article, which resolutions are incorporated byt theapplealionshal-nshalotewseeds250.900PHorthemompatiareh-reesplusan dé#ional51,90000oreschpataréhiree-feference. herein. Sec. 105-30. Penalties for violations. Any person that removes or substantially alters a protected tree before a tree permit is obtained shall be charged a doubled permit application processing fee (8$100.00)for an after-the-fact permit. Ifa an after-the-fact tree permit is not issued because the tree removal or substantial alteration is not in accordance with these tree protection regulations, a fine in the amount specified in section D.keHthis-Cede10l- 143 shall be imposed. Each tree that is illegally removed or substantially altered is a separate offense. Any person that illegally removes or substantially alters a patriarch tree shall be fined up to $25,000.00. Commercial tree care contractors or general contractors are required to be licensed by the city in order for them to conduct business within the city. Commercial tree care contractors or general contractors hired by the City of Apalachicola to complete tree removals or substantial alterations must show proof of commercial general liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage witha provision that does not allow cancellation without 30 days written notice to the city. Two or more violations of any provision of these tree protection requirements by any commercial tree care contractor or general contractor may result in revocation of such person's license to do business within the city. Chapter 109 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ARTICLE Il. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION REGULATIONS Sec. 111-10109-46. Purpose and intent. The public health, safety and welfare require the harmonious, orderly and progressive development of land within the City of Apalachicola. The development of thel land is a vital stepi in the process of community development. Once land has been developed, the correction of defects is costly and difficult. Substantial public responsibility is created by each new development, involving the maintenance of streets and storm water management systems and the provision of additional public services. As the general health, safety and welfare of the community are thereby affected by the development of land, it is in the direct interest of the public that site development be conveyed, designed and carried out in accordance with sound land and water management principles. The purpose and intent of this chapter is to assure that new development within Apalachicola will not adversely affect the public's natural or financial resources, especially Apalachicola Bay or its tributaries. Sec. 111-11109-47. Applicability. This chapter establishes procedures and standards for the preparation, review and approval of plans to carry out development. Sec. 111-12109-48. Procedures for site plan application, review and decision. (1) Pre-application conference. a. It is recommended that the applicant meet with the city planner, building department and building official to discuss the proposed development prior to submitting a formal application. The purpose of this conference is to familiarize the applicant with minimum design guidelines and to minimize any potential adverse impacts of thep proposed development on the city's natural or financial resources. (2) Application. a. An approved site plan is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. It shall be considered unlawful for any person to construct, erect or alter a building or structure or to develop, change or improve land for which a site plan is required except in accordance with an approved site plan. Enforcement shall occur pursuant to Chapter III oft this Code for failure to obtain a permit or for failure to follow a permit. b. The site plan shall be prepared in accordance with requirements contained in this section. For a plan to be placed on the agenda of the next planning and zoning board meeting, the plan must be received by the building department and considered complete no less than 30 days prior to the planning and zoning board meeting. C. The applicant shall submit four copies of all parts of the site plan. Electronic copies of site plans and building plans may also be submitted if available. (3) Review. a. The city planner and building department shall review the site plan to determine whether all required information is included in the application. Ifa any required information is missing, the building department shall inform the applicant of any information require to complete the application. b. All site plans for architectural compatibility shall be reviewed by the planning and zoning board sitting as the architectural review board. (4) Decision. a. Based upon the information contained in the site plan application, the planning and zoning board shall approve, approve subject to stated conditions, or deny the site plan. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the planning and zoning commission may, in accordance with Chapter III, file a written appeal within the city commission. (5) Construction. a. Upon site plan approval and issuance of a building permit, the development shall be built in accordance with the approved site plan and site regulations. Deviation from the approved site plan shall require the: submission of an application for a revised site plan. Sec. 111-13 109-49. Fees. Application fees for site plan review, as adopted from time to time by the city commission, must be paid by the applicant at the time of application. Sec. 111-14109-50. Time limit on approval. Following approval of the site plan, the applicant shall have one year, unless to commence construction on the site. Notwithstanding the above time frame, site plans for multifamily development and new non-residential development shall be effective for two years. Any site where development has not commenced shall cause the site Page 8 of 12 plan to be re-evaluated by the appropriate bodies and any newly adopted regulations shall be imposed at the discretion of the city. Sec. 111-15 109-51. Site plan requirements. (1) Site plans or any portion thereof involving engineering shall be certified, sealed, and prepared by and/or under the direct supervision of a professional engineer, qualified by training and experience into the specific technical field involved and registered or licensed to practice that profession. (2) Site plans shall contain documents and maps indicating: a. General information: i. Name of project. ii. Intended use of site. iii. Legal description of the property, size of parcel in acres or square feet and thel linear dimensions of the property. iv. Name, address and telephone number of the owner or owners of record. V. Name, address and telephone number of the owner's designated agent or attorney. vi. Names, addresses, signatures and registrations of the professionals preparing the plan. b. Maps: i. Vicinity map, showing relationship of proposed development to the surrounding streets, wetlands and surface water bodies at a scale of not less than one inch equals 2,000 feet. ii. Site plan map with date and north arrow at a scale not smaller than one inch equals 50 feet. iii. Elevation survey and topography at one foot contour intervals, existing and proposed. iv. Building restriction lines (i.e., highway setback lines, easements, covenants, rights-of-way, and building setback lines, existing and proposed). V. Location of existing and proposed building and structure footprints. vi. Location, elevation, and dimensions and materials of existing and proposed drive areas, or other paving. vii. Location of existing and proposed fences by type of material (e.g., wood or metal), type of design (open or closed) and height. viii. Location of existing and proposed walls by type of material (e.g., brick or masonry). ix. Location of each proposed, off-street parking space (regular and handicapped) and how they will be identified on site with paint or curb stops, including a diagram showing traffic circulation on site and access and egress to adjacent street. X. Location of proposed, designated loading and unloading zones. xi. Location of temporary and permanent structures and features proposed in the stormwater management plan. xii. Species and size (inches diameter breast height) of existing protected trees andy which of these trees are proposed to be removed, relocated, or substantiallya altered. C. Proposed buildings and structures: Page 9 of 12 i. Number ofs stories. ii. Square footage grosses each floor. iii. Building height. iv. Multi-family dwellings. () Number and square footage of dwelling units and density (dwelling units per acre). (ii) Calculation of off-street parking spaces required by supplementary parking section showing the number of dwelling units and spaces. V. Commercial. Calculation of off-street parking spaces required by Chapter IV Zoning District supplementary parking section showing: () Projected number of employees on peak shift. (i) Ifa an eating and/or drinking establishment, seats and occupancy load and number of tables for service and number of stools at service counter. (li) Ifan office, studio or financial institution, floor space (iv) Ifa retail establishment, floor space devoted to merchandising. (v) Ifa child care center, floor space. d. Lot coverage allowed by the zone and calculations showing proposed lot coverage. Materials used to cover surface drive areas, walkways, patios and other areas counting as lot coverage. e. New multi-parcel (e.g., subdivision), commercial, and multi-family developments: i. Existing infrastructure (on-site, adjacent to site, and across or opposite any public right-of-way.) Surface drive areas and median/curb cuts to access driveways. Sidewalks, streets, alleys, and easements (note widths and type). Size and location of nearest water mains, valves, and fire hydrants. Sanitary sewer systems (size and invert elevations). Power, telephone and cable lines. ii. Proposed streets, sidewalks, and surface drive areas: Ifr required, engineering plans and specifications including elevation and dimensions for streets, sidewalks, and surface drive areas (driveways, parking areas and storage areas). Cross section of proposed street improvements Firel lanes. Locations of proposed surface drive areas, curb or median cut(s) to access driveways. Internal traffic circulation plan, including directional arrows and signs to direct traffic flow. Location of traffic-control signs and signalization devices. Locations of sidewalks. Coordination of walkways and driveway and their elevations with facilities in adjacent developments, including the elevation of the crown of the most adjacent road to ensure that lot filling and hardened surfaces are not elevated higher than local streets. Proposed streets and alleys. Page 10 of 12 When applicable, the location of service roads and access roads extended onto the site. iii. Proposed water and sewer facilities: Water. Size, material, and location of water mains, valves and fire hydrants. Engineering plans and: specifications are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Sanitary sewer: systems. Size, material, and location of lines. Engineering plans and specifications, with submittal of a profile where required, are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any commitments, such as contributions to offset public facilities impacts. Projected water usage in gallons per day, projected solid waste, projected number of school age children. f. Solid waste handling facilities. The location of the dumpster and access for refuse service collection, including dumpster pad screening, fencing and landscaping shall be identified. g. Dredge and fill. If any dredging or filling is intended in the development, a copy of the complete environmental resource permit application proposed for the Northwest Florida Water Management District shall be provided. h. Stormwater management plan requirements general: i. Sufficient information for the city to evaluate the environmental characteristics of the affected areas, the potential and predicted impacts of the proposed activity on wetlands and surface water, and the effectiveness and acceptability of those measures proposed for reducing adverse impacts. ii. If a State stormwater permit is required, the following shall be a part of the stormwater plan submitted to the city. ii. The design contained in any ten-two (10/2) self-certified general permit). Iv. A design that treats run off from the 25 year-24-hour duration storm event and ensures that post development runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads do not exceed pre- development conditions: The design contained in a complete application proposed to a State agency for: Ag general permit or; An environmental resource permits. For proposed development not requiring a State stormwater permit, a plan to control surface water runoff including: Temporary sediment control barriers and vegetative cover; Permanent best management practices. Sec. 109-24 109-52. [Historic Apalachicola Design Guidelines.] The historic design guidelines of the city, adopted by Ordinance No. 2013-03 on Aug. 6, 2013, are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set out at length, and a copyi is on file and available for inspection in the offices of the city and a copy is on file and available for inspection in the offices of the city and may be accessed at the city's website, htips/www.dityfapalachicola.com), Page 11 of 12 Subpart B - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Chapter 109 - HISTORIC PRESERVATION ARTICLE II. SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS ARTICLE 1H. H-GEAERAL SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS Sec. 111-1 through 111-9 *. Insert new Sec. 111-10 through 111-15 from Chapter 109 as amended above. Page 12 of 12 APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 5/6/2025 SUBJECT: Resolution to Support City's DHR Grant Application for Phase III HCA AGENDA INFORMATION: Agenda Location: New Business Item Number: 1 Department: Grants Contact: Bree Robinson Presenter: Cindy Clark BRIEF SUMMARY: The Historic Harrison Raney Building (HCA) is currently functioning as a museum and meeting space for the City. Access to the 2nd floor is limited to interior stairs that are not ADA compatible. Request authorization to apply for a phase III grant of $300,000 to complete needed ADA access to the 2nd floor in the form of an exterior elevator. DHR grants require that the City is to provide a combined 25% match of cash and inkind services. For a $300,000 grant, that amounts to $75,000. Only $18,750 of that match is required to be cash. It is the expectation that if funded, the City could apply for a TDC museum grant of up to $25,000 to help offset the construction costs provided the project is complete in the fiscal year in which the TDC grant is sought. DHR requires match confirmation and in the past, the City has met that requirement with a resolution of support. A resolution of support for this project has been prepared and proposed for your approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Motion to adopt Resolution of Support for the City's application to Department of State Division of Historical Resources Special Grant Category application of $300,000 with required match. FUNDING SOURCE: DOS DHR funding. Match source: general budget initially, reimbursable with TDC museum grant. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2025-02 STAFF'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval to adopt Resolution of support. Resolution 2025-02 Match Support Apalachicola Board of City Commissioners WHEREAS, the Harrison-Raney building (HCA) is a valuable City-owned historic resource in the City of Apalachicola; WHEREAS, the Harrison-Raney building is listed as an important historic resource on the State Master Site File (FR00339); WHEREAS, the Harrison-Raney building is in need of structural repair beyond the financial assistance currently available through existing grant funds; WHEREAS, the City of Apalachicola approved during a commission meeting on May 6th, 2025, a request to support submitting an application for $300,000 in Special Category funding from the Florida Department of Historic Resources which requires $75,000 in required cash and in-kind match; WHEREAS, the City of Apalachicola is a REDI Community and is eligible for a reduced cash match amount of $18,750 which is currently available for this project in the City budget; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION, that the board supports the grant application to the Florida Department of State, Historic Preservation Grants Program for repair of the Harrison-Raney building and certifies that the required match is available. This resolution adopted by the Apalachicola City Commission this 6thh day of May 2025. BY: Brenda Ash, Mayor City of Apalachicola ATTEST: Sheneidra Cummings, Clerk APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 5/6/2025 SUBJECT: Authorization to submit City's DHR Grant Application for Phase IV City Hall AGENDA INFORMATION: Agenda Location: New Business Item Number: 2 Department: Grants Contact: Bree Robinson Presenter: Cindy Clark BRIEF SUMMARY: Cost overruns in the phase II structural support grant ($395,000) from the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources (DHR) for the Middlebrooks Repair/Mitigation project will mean that the phase III grant to finish the upstairs ($340,000) will need to be used to make up the difference. Request authorization to apply for a final phase IV grant of $300,000 to complete needed repairs and ADA access to the 2nd floor. For a $300,000 grant, the City is required to provide a combined 25% match of cash and inkind services amounting to $75,000. Only $18,750 of that match is required to be cash. DHR requires match confirmation and in the past, the City has met that requirement with a resolution of support. A resolution of support for this project has been prepared and proposed for your approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Motion to adopt Resolution of Support for the City's application to Department of State Division of Historical Resources Special Grant Category application of $300,000 with required match. FUNDING SOURCE: DOS DHR funding. Match source: general budget. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2025-03 STAFF'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval to adopt Resolution of support. RESOLUTION 2025-03 Resolution of Match Support Apalachicola Board of City Commissioners WHEREAS, the Middlebrook building (former City Hall location) is a valuable city-owned historic resource in the city of Apalachicola and; WHEREAS, the Middlebrook building is listed as an important historic resource on the State Master Site File (FR00344), and; WHEREAS, the Middlebrook building is in need of structural repair beyond the financial assistance currently available through existing grant funds, and; WHEREAS, the City Commission voted May 6, 2025 to apply for the Special Category funding to complete phase IV structural repair with understanding of the required match, and; WHEREAS, the City of Apalachicola support the request for $300,000 in Special Category funding from the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources which requires $75,000 in combined cash and inkind match, and; WHEREAS, the City of Apalachicola certifies that the required cash match is available for this project in the City budget; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Apalachicola City Commission, that the board supports the grant application to the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources Special Category for Phase III structural repair of the former City Hall building and certifies the required match is available. This resolution adopted by the Apalachicola City Commission this 6th day of May 2025. By: Brenda Ash, Mayor City of Apalachicola ATTEST: Sheneidra Cummings, Clerk APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 5/6/25 SUBJECT: Library Conceptual Landscape Master Plan and Parking Lot Paving AGENDA INFORMATION: Agenda Location: New Business Item Number: 3 Department: Library Contact: Elizabeth Perkins perkinsi27egmal.com or 606-235-0201 Presenter: Elizabeth Perkins (PALS) and Sondra Taylor-Furbee (Library Advisory Board) BRIEF SUMMARY: When the Apalachicola Margaret Key Public Library was built in 2016-17, portions of the proposed parking lot and courtyard were left uncompleted. Last year, PALS, the library's friends group, working with Library Director Lucy Carter, commissioned a landscape master plan to complete this work and create usable outdoor spaces for library events and activities. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: We seek formal approval from the City Commission for this conceptual plan and acceptance of County Commissioner Anthony Croom's offer to use his paving budget to complete the parking lot paving portion of the plan. FUNDING SOURCE: No city funds are requested. County Commissioner Croom has offered to use his paving budget to complete the parking lot paving of the plan but the county needs formal city approval before they can begin the process. It is the intention of PALS, the library's friends group, to use money held in its construction account to complete the courtyard portion of the plan in the near future. ATTACHMENTS: A copy of the conceptual master plan, developed by landscape architect Sam Berkheiser and Liz Berkheiser of We Love Land. STAFF'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: AMKPL I PARKING + COURTYARD PLAN 80 12TH STREET, APALACHICOLA FL 32320 B LOVE LAND San + Lig 2 (850) 370 -0215 AMKPL I PARKING + COURTYARD PLAN 80 12TH STREET, APALACHICOLA FL 32320 Landscape Plan approved by PALS 09/24/2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Project Goals I Sense of Place 4 Site Opportunity + Analysis 5-6 Conceptual Master Plan 7 Site Design Elements 8 Preliminary Plant Palette 9-10 Proposed Sign Analysis 1-12 Sign Style Precedents AMKPL 2 AMKPL I PARKING + COURTYARD PLAN 80 12TH STREET, APALACHICOLA FL 32320 PROJECT GOALS Parking lot layout + striping Shaded outdoor seating Shade trees Community garden/ butterfly garden Signage at corner of 12th and 98 SENSE OF PLACE Asfés acsessible space hat pronefes comnuniy, connegton and learning AMKPL 3 SITE OPPORTUNITY + ANALYSIS Existing Parking Lot Ave E Crosswalk HIGHWAY 98 / AVENUE E Chapman (W)E6'18L 3.P0.2ZOLPN 3 Existing Public Sidewalk df Theater Connection + Public CHaphaant Overflow Parking Zone Sidewalk Existing Pooling Water Cleanup and remove Parking Lot drainage 6 existing asphalt Entrance! swale and courlyard paving 0 Exit 53 3 V e 10,546.91 sf(31.42%) Existing o - - % - Paving % ao & 6 6 . % Book a 12TH 2 3 17 Pd a V o 6 - Existing STREET drop 5 ( Sabal Palm View 2 16 * 2 uj o 3 High 15 Secondary Capacity 4 Entrance/ Exit <E S a 14 Foot Traffic 5 & 9 % - ? :: Headstart Primary & Existing Primary € N Program (?) Lot Existing bike rack Entrance/ Exit 21 Parking parking lot - - - Connection Entrance 6 0 TI 33 > - % e % 7 & APALACHICOLA Library à MARGARET KEY % S - 8 PUBLIC LIBRARY Entrance! 13 à Exit 33 * 9 a Existing I 12 9 ADA 10 G. 959 y 5'1 Building 5y 80'0). C0 Parking I Memorial 3S ZS49' 9 Setback ds £ NISVE 39VNIVO N Space -I B 0 bench Existing a 3) Property Line (W).26'691 M.90.92o1PS e at 3) Existing 5 Sidewalk 79 91 ABC SCALE V Notes: SCHOOL 5'10' 20' N Total Property Area 33,565.31 sf Existing Impervious Lot Coverage = 68.05% (22,839.91 sf) -An additional ADA parking space will be required -We recommend relocating the bike rack AMKPL 4 CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN Proposed Parking Lot Expansion HIGHWAY 98 / AVENUE E (W),86'181 3.P0.2ZoN Existing Shade Tree, y 9 Sidewalk typical Tree Pit with 20 9 S( U 3) Sabal Palm, Connection typical to drainage - Parking Lot area Expansion 3 Drop Curb N Suggested 19 a new location for Memorial 18 000 10 Bench 17 a 9 16 Existing 12TH 8 Sidewalk 44 15 STREET 14 7 6 APALACHICOLA Potential Existing Relocate MARGARET KEY Parking PUBLIC LIBRARY - Connection Book 5 to Lot + Main Chapman A Drop I Entrance 4 3 13 Proposed 2 g A Courtyard Proposed 12 V (see plan) (2). ADA 1 parking g spaces 2 d8 0 àt ( S a required Connection to (W),16'691 M.90,9Z01PS ABC School ABC SCALE Notes: SCHOOL 5'1 10' 20' N Total Property Area 33,565.31 sf Proposed Total Impervious Lot Coverage = 59.60% (20,005.19 sf) Proposed Parking Lot = 17.18% (5,764.97s sf) Proposed Courtyard = 5.89% (1,977.20sf) AMKPL 5 CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN Proposed Courtyard Shade Tree (Elms or Oaks) Pedestrian Dropcurb "No. Mow" 5' width Planting Mix Sidewalk Connection Proposed 5' width Bike Rack anchored in Existing concrete Sabal Palm Flexible Space +/- 20' x 25' for Proposed Events; Concrete E Sabal Palm with brick border 7 9) Site 4 2 Furnishings Conference Room (umbrellas Connection 8 optional) Mixed Pathway to Main Rear Understory Entrance 6' width Planting Connection Rear. Entrance / Exit to Chapman 5' width APALACHICOLA Building MARGARET KEY Setback 5' PUBLIC LIBRARY Shade Structure Foundation - 12'x 18' Planting N Medium Flowering Shrub (Vitex) Vegetative Concrete Screen Wall Pathway (Katrina Rose) Connection to Flexible ABC School Garden 4' width Spaces set in gravel V N AMKPL 6 SITE DESIGN ELEMENTS Hardscape + Garden Hardscape Options Limestone Unit Pavers Concrete with Brick Edge Site-wide Stabilized Gravel Option (PERVIOUS) Garden Boxes: Gravel (in garden) A Limerock (locally sourced) +. Landscape Fabric Modern - Charcoal Finish by Vego 42" x 83" AMKPL 7 PRECEDENT IMAGERY Preliminary Plant Palette *Native Plant Species Wax Myrtle* Dwarfl Fakahatchee* Sabal Palm* Little John Bottlebrush Saw Palmetto* Vitex Muhly Grass* o Katrina Rose Dwarf Pink Oleander Blueberry varieties AMKPL 8 PROPOSED SIGN ANALYSIS Sign Location Recoi m m endations Standard DOT Library signage at 12th St and Hwy 98 exists in both directions HIGHWAY 98 / AVENUE E (),S6781 3.P0.220HPN No Clear Site Lines from both Roadways for an 9 % - "angled" sign % 3 94 f 12TH % E 6 STREET o a 2 1291 a 'a 04 9 a * Recommended * - location and - orientation 2 à for New Sign' e S & APALACHICOLA 0s 91 5 f MARGARET a KEV : LIBRARY 09 2 5 11 Entrance X to Library & % S & - Property & * 6 $ g R & y S! 5v EZSL9'E 80'0) NISV8 39NIVO - 2 8 - (W),16'691 M.90,921PS ABC SCALE SCHOOL 5'1 10' 20' Notes: City of Apalachicola Code: Chapter 113; Article IV; Sec. 113-83; Zoning R-1: -12 square feet of signage is allowed with a maximum height of 8' (1 sign allowed) -Signage placement needs to remain on library property and out of City and DOT right-of-ways AMKPL 9 PROPOSED SIGN ANALYSIS Existing Conditions + Views Approximate Property Line Location -Many signs and utilities obstruct a clear view for sign placement at the corner of 12th Street and Hwy 98 Standart DOT library signage exists on Hwy 98 pointing towards 12th Street Vehicular Library Entrance Avenue E n :e Recommended signage location directs drivers where to turn to get into parking lot Notes: City of Apalachicola Code: Chapter 113; Article IV; Sec. 113-83; Zoning R-1: -12 square feet of signage is allowed with a maximum height of 8'(1 sign allowed) -Signage placement needs to remain on library property and out of City and DOT right-of-ways AMKPL 10 SIGN STYLE PRECEDENTS Stylistic Options for Revie W Please discuss and choose sign elements that you envision at the corner of 12th Street and. Avenue E. *We've included an asterix next to elements we think should be considered in the overall sign design. We will work to incorporate your requested. styles/ elements into an overall sign design of your choice. Pleasesee below for possibilities... 725 W WESTCHESTER Frankln PUBLICLIBRARY Pohirlanri Simsbury HAGEMAN BRANCH BOOK SALE FRIDAY 15 15 BOOK SALE KOY 16 PablicLibrary BAG SALE KOY 16 14 Sign elements: Sign elements: Sign elements: -Single brick pier* -Granite piers flanking sign -Brick piers flanking sign -Metal crafted sign, mounted -Wood carved, painted sign -Applique lettering (black) -Information board, mounted -Simple curved wood shape sign underneath* Està 697 GMYRNA PUBLIC PUBLICI LIBRARY Framingham PUBLIC LIBRARY LIBRARY Look here first. 100 VILLAGE GREEN CIRCLE 49 u FL T Sign elements: Sign elements: Sign elements: -Wood piers flanking sign -Wood piers flanking sign -Wood piers flanking sign -Carved wood sign, curved, simple -Carved wood sign, ornate -Carved wood sign with address -Uplighting* -Added slogan* N YEVEIS - Hennepin County Library X A TOWN OF PELHAM Manomet PUBLIC LIBRARY Branch Library North Regional OPEN 12StrandAvenue 530 Colonial Avenue Sign elements: Sign elements: Sign elements: -Wood piers flanking sign -Metal fabricated (long lasting) -Metal fabricated (long lasting) -Carved wood sign, round -Includes art* AMKPL 1 SIGN STYLE PRECEDENTS Stylistic Options for Revie W Please discuss and choose sign elements that you envision at the corner of 12th Street and. Avenue E. *We've included an asterix next to elements we think should be considered in the overall sign design. We will work to incorporate your requested styles/ elements into an overall sign design of your choice. Please see below for possibilities... FRIENDS of Supporling the LIBRARY Litelong Learning FRIEND OF THE MONTH MASTER GARDENERS FRIENDS MEETING Sign elements: -Wood carved, painted sign -Information board, mounted underneath* -Logo -Slogan AMKPL 12 APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 5/6/2025 SUBJECT: AAHS Match Request = Raney House AGENDA INFORMATION: Agenda Location: New Business Item Number: 4 Department: Contact: Ken Essex, President, Apalachicola Area Historical Society Presenter: Ken Essex, President, Apalachicola Area Historical Society BRIEF SUMMARY: The City of Apalachicola owns the property at 128 Market Street (i.e. Raney House Museum). Apalachicola Area Historical Society (AAHS) is applying for Phase II of a Special Categories Grant with the State of Florida for the continued historical restoration of Raney House Museum. The AAHS is requesting support from the community, organizations, and businesses in Apalachicola and Franklin county for this ongoing restoration project that began with Phase I initiated in 2021. As with all historic houses structural aspects of the house must be maintained to ensure long term preservation of this city owned property. The Raney House, a 187-year-old structure, is an essential part of the community and downtown Apalachicola's early history and architecture. Raney House Museum has garnered a long list of distinctions including placement on the National Register of Historic Places, being affiliated with numerous residents, including state senators, representatives, and judges. Request for a Resolution of the City Council Members of the City of Apalachicola, FL, authorizing the City Manager to Approve the Expenditure of $60,000 to be used as matching funds for a State of Florida Department of State, Division of Historic Resources special category grant for restoration repairs for Raney House Museum operated by the Apalachicola Area Historic Society. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve a resolution authorizing the expenditure of $60,000 to be used as matching funds for a State of Florida Department of State, Division of Historic Resources special category grant for restoration repairs for Raney House Museum, a city owned property. FUNDING SOURCE: DOS ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2025-03 STAFF'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: RESOLUTION NO.: 2025-03 A RESOLUTION: OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OF THE CITY OF APALACHICOLA, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE EXPENDITURE OF MATCHING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,000 FOR THE DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES GRANT APPLIED FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND REPAIRS TO THE RANEY HOUSE. WHEREAS, The City of Apalachicola, Florida has requested the StateofFlorida Department ofState, Division ofHistoricall Resources for financial assistance for therepairs to the Raney House, a city owned property. WHEREAS, In 2021 the Apalachicola Area Historical Society, which operates the Raney House Museum, was approved to receive $327,500 (including a 25% match) through a Florida Department ofState, Division ofHistorical Resources, Special Categories Grant. The city portion of the match was $40,000. WHEREAS, The current grant total request is $280,000, with a required 25% match. WHEREAS, the State ofFlorida Department ofState requires that a resolution be passed by the City Council Members approving the payment of the $60,000 matching funds. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF APALACHICOLA COUNCIL MEMBERS, OF FLORIDA THAT: 1. The City Manager ofthe City of Apalachicola, Floridai is directed to authorize a $60,000 expenditure as part oft the match for the Division of Historical Resources Grant. DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council Members ofCity of Apalachicola, Florida, on this day of 2025. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF APALACHICOLA, FLORIDA Brenda Ash, Mayor ATTEST: Sheneidra Cummings, City Clerk APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 5/6/2025 SUBJECT: Professional Municipal Clerk Week Proclamation AGENDA INFORMATION: Agenda Location: New Business Item Number: 5 Department: Admin Presenter: Mayor Ash BRIEF SUMMARY: In 1984 and in 1994, Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, respectively, signed proclamations officially declaring Municipal Clerks Week the first full week of May and recognizing the essential role Municipal Clerks play in local government. City Clerk Cummings received correspondence from Florida Associations of City Clerks (FACC) requesting the City acknowledge Municipal Clerk Week 2025. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Motion to recognize Municipal Clerk Week being May 4th-May 10th, 2025. FUNDING SOURCE: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Request and Professional Municipal Clerks Week Proclamation STAFF'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve and acknowledge the 1st full week of May every year as Professional Municipal Clerks Week. April 24, 2025 City of Apalachicola Mayor and Commissioners, Municipal Clerks Week recognizes the vital and appreciated services performed by Municipal and Deputy Clerks in serving the changing needs of their communities. Municipal Clerks Week was initiated in 1969 by IIMC and is endorsed by all of its members throughout the United States, Canada, and 15 other countries. In 1984 and in 1994, Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, respectively, signed proclamations officially declaring Municipal Clerks Week the first full week of May and recognizing the essential role Municipal Clerks play in local government. Did you know? One of local government's oldest positions is the Municipal Clerk. Municipal and Deputy Clerks' main function is to serve as the council's foundation. Municipal Clerks are dedicated, high-level professionals who often serve on the senior management team. This year, Municipal Clerks Week is celebrating its 56th anniversary. Join the IIMC and FACC in honoring Municipal and Deputy Clerks for continually striving to improve the administration of their duties, and dedication to serving our communities. Proclamation 56th ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERKS WEEK May 4 - 10, 2025 Whereas, The Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk, a time honored and vital part of local government exists throughout the world, and Whereas, The Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk is the oldest among public servants, and Whereas, The Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk provides the professional link between the citizens, the local governing bodies and agencies of government at other levels, and Whereas, Professional Municipal Clerks have pledged to be ever mindful of their neutrality and impartiality, rendering equal service to all. Whereas, The Professional Municipal Clerk serves as the intormation center on functions of local government and community. Whereas, Professional Municipal Clerks continually strive to improve the administration of the affairs of the Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk through participation in education programs, seminars, workshops and the annual meetings of their state, provincial, county and international professional organizations. Whereas, It is most appropriate that we recognize the accompishments of the Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk. Now, Therefore, I, Brenda Ash, Mayor of Apalachicola, do recognize the week of May 4 through 10, 2025, as Professional Municipal Clerks Week, and further extend appreciation to our Professional Municipal Clerk, Sheneidra Cummings and to all Professional Municipal Clerks for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent. Dated this day of 2025 Mayor Attest: APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 5/6/2025 SUBJECT: Mayor's Election Proclamation AGENDA INFORMATION: Agenda Location: New Business Item Number: 6 Department: Admin Presenter: Mayor Ash BRIEF SUMMARY: Supervisor of Elections submitted the 2025 Mayor Election Proclamation for approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Motion to approve Mayor's Election Proclamation from Supervisor of Elections Office FUNDING SOURCE: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Mayor's Election Proclamation STAFF'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve. CITY OF APALACHICOLA MAYOR'S ELECTION PROCLAMATION 1, the undersigned, Brenda Ash, Mayor of the City of Apalachicola, by authority of law and pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-4, do hereby proclaim that on Tuesday, September 02, 2025 an election will be held to fill the offices as follows: City Commissioner Seat 3 for a term of three years, and City Commissioner Seat 4 for a term of three years, and a Run-Off Election, if necessary, will be held on date determined by Franklin County Supervisor of Elections. Candidates wishing to qualify may do sO at the City Office from 12 Noon Monday, June 23 3, 2025 until 12 Noon Friday, June 27, 2025. City Office is located at 192 Coach Wagoner Boulevard, and regular officehours are from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday - Friday. Each Candidatemust payi to the City Clerk at the time of qualifying a qualifying fee of 4.5% of the first year's salary, must be a resident of the City of Apalachicola, and must also be a qualified voter ofthe State of Florida, County of Franklin, and the City of Apalachicola. All persons not previously registered to vote may register to vote anytime from now up to 4:30 PM on Monday, August 4, 2025 fori the General Election, book closing will be announced for the Run-Off Election, if deemed necessary, at the Office of the Franklin County Supervisor of Elections located at 34 Forbes Street, Suite 1, Apalachicola, Florida, hours 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM, Monday - Friday. The polling place will be at National Guard Armory located at 66 4th Street in the City of Apalachicola and will be open at 7:00. AMa and close at 7:00 PM. Vote-by-mail ballots may be obtained by contacting the Office of the Franklin County Supervisor of Elections at place and time noted previously. Only qualified electors will be permitted to vote. Early voting will be conducted from August 23, 2025 to August 30, 2025 at the Supervisor of Elections Office34 Forbes Street, Suite 1, Apalachicola, Florida from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM. All residents of the City of Apalachicola not currently registered to vote are urged to register and take part in this election. Brenda Ash, Mayor City of Apalachicola, Florida APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 5/6/25 SUBJECT: CDBG-DR Hill Lighting Choices AGENDA INFORMATION: Agenda Location: New Business Item Number: 7 Department: Grants Contact: Bree Robinson Presenter: Bree Robinson BRIEF SUMMARY: The City Commission requested different dark-sky compliant lighting options for the Hill sidewalk and lighting project - once a decision has been made the plan set for this project will be complete and ready to bid. The project engineers have been in contact with a few lighting distributors to put together some dark-sky' compliant fixture options for your consideration (distributor & contractor markups are already included in the cost estimates below): 1. AdCO.UAI-LED-Pos-IoP - $3,645.00 per unit 2. Lumec-Metroscape-LED-Post-Top - $3,645.00 per unit 3. UmC/COMO:EDPat-oP - $2,700.00 per unit 4. 350-LED-Post-Top - $3,799.55 per unit 5. M660-LED-Post-Top - $3,136.00 per unit 6. SL660-LED-Post-Top - $2,989.85 per unit RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Motion to approve lighting option for the CDBG-DR Hill Sidewalk & Lighting plan set. FUNDING SOURCE: CDBG-DR ATTACHMENTS: Lighting Visuals STAFF'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: - $ 3,645.00 Urban HADGO Post top UXIL LEDPosttop Project: The Hadco LED post top UX1 luminaire offers a simple modern take on Locatlon: thet traditional lantern, providing style and elegance to downtown areas, Cat.No: commercial developments, parks and residental communities. Type: Lamps: Oty: Notes: Ordering guide Example: UK-32-63-C-A12730-3-N-N-N-SPI Series LEDcount Gen Lens Finish Fastener Optics UX1 G3 UX1 324 32LEDs G3 Gen3 C Clear Flat Glass A Black HexHead 2 Type 2 48 48LEDs F FrostedFlat White AllenH Head 2H Type 2 w/HSS 64 64LEDs Glass Verde 3 Type 3 H Bronze 3H Type 3 w/HSS Green 3W Type 3 Wide Gray 3WH Type 3 Wide w/HSS 4 Type 4 5 Type 5 Color Drive Photo Future- Proof Control IntegralControl Temp Voltage Current Control Receptacle Options? Surge Protect 730'Warm 3000K A 120-277 3 350mA E 120VAC N None Dynadimmer SP1 740 Neutral 4000K B2a 347-480 5 530mA button eye R7 7-Pinl Receptacle DA 4Hrs, 25%1 reduction 10KV/10KA 7 700mA H 208/240/277 DB 4Hrs, 509reduction Surgel Protector 1' 1050mA VACI button eye DC 41 Hrs, 759reduction SP2 R 3-Pin1 Twist Lock 20KV/1OKASurge Receptacle DD 6Hrs, 25% reduction Protector N None DE 6Hrs, 50%1 reduction DF 6Hrs, 75% reduction DG 8Hrs, 25%1 reduction DH 81 Hrs, 50% reduction DJ 8Hrs, 75%1 reduction DL DALI SRD? Sensor ready driver, stendardcontfiguration SRD1 Sensorreadydriver. alternate configuration N None 1. The 1050mA (1)o current Is only compatiblef for 32LEDs (32)0 configurations. 2. Configurationsi with 347-480VAC (8) voltage arer noto compatible witho optional dimming or optional programming. 3. Configurations with 32 LEDs (32) at 350mA (3)a and 530mA (5) currents are note compatible with 347-480V VAC(B)voltage. 4. Only 3000K CCT andy warmer/below: arel IDAI International DarkSkyA Approved. DARKSKY WrD-feit-lopdm-oans-Dansty-po-hsaten 02/25 page 1of 4 BAA APPROVED Reduraitshtpalkiliea CerinedbyDinsiyas Intertek UX1 Post top LED Post top LED Wattage and Lumen Values for Clear Globes Average Type2 Type3 Type3W Type4 Type5 System System Ordering Total current Watts Lumen BUG Efficacy Lumen BUG Efficacy Lumen BUG Efficacy Lumen BUG Efficacy Lumen BUG Efficacy Code LEDs (mA) (W) Output Rating (LPWI) Output Rating (LPW) Output Rating (LPW) Output Rating (LPW) Output Rating (LPVI) Clear Globe 3000K 32-63-C-x-730-3 32 350 36 3651 BI-U0-GI 102 3427 BI-UO-GI 95 3341 BI-UO-GI 93 3398 BI-UO-GI 95 3341 B2-U0-GI 93 32-G3-C-x-730-5 32 530 53 5236 BI-UO-GI 99 4915 BI-UO-GI 93 4793 BI-UO-G1 91 4874 BI-UO-G1 92 4792 B3-UO-G1 91 32-G3-C-x-730-7 32 700 71 6604 BI-VO-GI 94 6199 BI-UO-GI 88 6045 BI-UO-62 86 6147 BI-UO-G2 87 6044 B3-VO-GI 86 32-G3-C-x-730-1 32 1050 108 9107 B2-VO-G2 84 8547 BI-UO-G2 79 8335 B2-U0-G2 77 8476 BI-UO-G2 78 8334 B3-UO-62 77 4B-63-C-x-730-3 48 350 52 5476 BI-UO-GI 105 5140 BI-UO-GI 99 5013 BI-UO-G1 96 5097 BI-UO-G1 98 5011 B3-U0-GI 96 48-03-C-x-730-5 48 530 79 7855 B2-VO-G1 99 7372 BI-UO-G2 93 7189 BI-UO-G2 91 7310 BI-UO-G2 93 7188 B3-UO-G2 91 48-63-C-x-730-7 48 700 106 9907 B2-U0-G2 94 9298 B2-UO-G2 88 9067 B2-UO-G2 86 9220 B2-UO-G2 87 9065 B4-UO-62 86 64-03-C-x-730-3 64 350 68 6958 BI-UO-G1 102 6753 BI-UO-GI 99 6795 BI-UO-G2 100 6786 BI-UO-G2 100 6920 B3-UO-G2 102 64-63-C-x-730-5 64 530 105 9981 B2-U0-G2 95 9685 B2-UO-G2 92 9746 B2-UO-G2 92 9733 B2-U0-G2 92 9926 B4-UO-G2 94 64-63-C-x-730-7 64 700 138 12589 B2-UO-62 91 12215 B2-UO-G2 89 12291 B2-UO-G2 89 12275 B2-V0-62 89 12518 B4-UO-G2 91 Cloar Globe 4000K 32-G3-C-x-740-3 32 350 36 4102 BI-UO-GI 114 3851 BI-UO-GI 107 3754 BI-U0-GI 105 3818 BI-UO-GI 106 3754 B3-UO-GI 105 32-G3-C-x-740-5 32 530 53 5884 BI-UO-GI 112 5522 BI-UO-GI 105 5385 BI-UO-G2 102 5476 BI-U0-G2 104 5385 B3-U0-G1 102 32-G3-C-x-740-7 32 700 71 7421 BI-UO-G1 105 6965 BI-UO-G2 99 6792 BI-UO-G2 96 6906 BI-UO-G2 98 6791 B3-UO-G2 96 32-G3-C-x-740-1 32 1050 108 10232 B2-VO-G2 95 9604 B2-UO-G2 89 9365 B2-UO-G2 87 9524 B2-UO-G2 88 9364 B4-UO-G2 87 48-G3-C-x-740-3 48 350 52 6153 BI-UO-GI 118 5775 BI-UO-GI 111 5631 BI-U0-62 108 5726 BI-UO-G2 110 5631 B3-UO-G1 108 48-63-C-x-740-5 48 530 79 8827 B2-UO-G2 112 8284 BI-UO-G2 105 8077 B2-UO-62 102 8214 BI-UO-G2 104 8076 B3-UO-G2 102 48-G3-C-x-740-7 48 700 106 11132 B2-UO-G2 105 10447 B2-UO-G2 99 10188 B2-U0-62 96 10359 B2-UO-G2 98 10185 B4-UO-G2 96 64-G3-C-x-740-3 64 350 68 7819 B2-UO-GI 115 7587 BI-U0-G2 111 7634 BI-UO-G2 112 7624 BI-UO-G2 112 7775 B3-U0-G2 114 64-63-C-x-740-5 64 530 105 11215 B2-UO-G2 106 10883 B2-UO-G2 103 10950 B2-VO-G2 104 10936 B2-UO-G2 104 11153 B4-V0-G2 106 64-63-C-x-740-7 64 700 138 14144 B2-UO-G2 103 13725 B2-U0-62 100 13810 B2-UO-G2/ 100 13792 B2-UO-G2 100 14065 B4-UO-G2 102 LED Wattage and Lumen Values for Frosted Flat Glass Average Type2 Type3 Type3W Type4 Type5 System System Ordering Total current Watts Lumen BUG Elficacy Lumen BUG Efficacy Lumen BUG Efficacy Lumen BUG Efficacy Lumen BUG Efficacy Code LEDs (mA) (W) Output Rating (LPW) Output Rating (LPWI) Output Rating (LPW) Output Rating (LPW) Output Rating (LPW) Clear Globe 3000K 32-63-F-x-730-3 32 350 36 2894 BI-UO-GI 81 2820 BI-UO-GI 79 2691 BI-UO-G1 75 2751 BHUO-GI 77 2542 BI-UO-GI 71 32-63-F-x-730-5 32 530 53 4150 BI-UO-G1 79 4045 BI-UO-GI 77 3860 BI-UO-G1 73 3946 BI-UO-G1 75 3646 B2-UO-G1 69 32-G3-F-x-730-7 32 700 71 5235 B2-U0-GI 74 5102 BI-UO-GI 72 4868 BI-UO-G1 69 4977 BI-UO-GI 70 4599 B2-UO-GI 65 32-63-F-x-730-1 32 1050 108 7219 B2-U0-G2 67 7036 B2-UO-G2 65 6712 B2-U0-G2 62 6863 B2-UO-GI 63 6342 B2-UO-GI 59 48-63-F-x-730-3 48 350 52 4341 BI-UO-G1 83 4230 BI-UO-G1 81 4036 BI-UO-G1 78 4126 BI-UO-G1 79 3814 B2-VO-G1 73 48-63-F-x-730-5 48 530 79 6227 B2-UO-G1 79 6068 B2-UO-GI 77 5789 B2-U0-G1 73 5919 B2-UO-G1 75 5470 B2-UO-GI 69 48-G3-F-x-730-7 48 700 106 7852 B2-U0-G2 74 7653 B2-UO-G2 72 7301 B2-U0-G2 69 7465 B2-UO-G2 70 6899 B2-UO-G1 65 64-G3-F-x-730-3 64 350 68 5940 B2-UO-GI 87 5820 82-U0-GI 85 5702 B2-UO-GI 84 5734 B2-UO-GI 84 5483 B2-UO-GI 81 64-63-F-x-730-5 64 530 105 8519 B2-UO-G2 81 8348 B2-UO-G2 79 8179 B2-V0-G2 78 8225 B2-U0-G2 78 7864 B3-UO-GI 75 64-63-F-x-730-7 64 700 138 10745 B2-VO-62 78 10528 B2-VO-G2/ 76 10315 B2-UO-G2 75 10372 B2-V0-G2 75 9918 B3-UO-62/ 72 Clear Globo 4000K 32-03-F-x-740-3 32 350 36 3251 BI-UO-GI 91 3169 BI-UO-GI 88 3023 BI-UO-GI 84 3091 BI-UO-GI 86 2856 BI-UO-GI 80 32-G3-F-x-740-5 32 530 53 4663 BI-UO-G1 88 4545 BI-UO-GI 86 4336 BI-UO-GI 82 4434 BI-UO-GI 84 4097 B2-UO-GI 78 32-G3-F-x-740-7 32 700 71 5881 B2-U0-G1 83 6733 B2-VO-GI 81 5469 B2-UO-G1 77 5592 B2-VO-G1 79 5168 B2-U0-G1 73 32-G3-F-x-740-1 32 1050 108 8111 B2-U0-G2 75 7904 B2-UO-G2 73 7541 B2-UO-G2 70 7710 B2-U0-G2 71 7126 B2-UO-GI 66 4B-G3-F-x-740-3 48 350 52 4877 BI-U0-G1 94 4754 BI-UO-GI 91 4535 BI-UO-G1 87 4637 BI-VO-GI 89 4285 B2-V0-G1 82 48-G3-F-x-740-5 48 530 79 6995 B2-VO-G2 89 6819 B2-VO-GI 86 6505 B2-VO-G2 82 6651 B2-VO-GI 84 6146 B2-VO-GI 78 48-G3-F-x-740-7 48 700 106 8823 B2-U0-G2 83 8599 B2-UO-62 81 8203 B2-U0-G2 77 8388 B2-U0-G2 79 7751 B3-VO-G1 73 64-G3-F-x-740-3 64 350 68 6674 B2-UO-GI 98 6539 B2-VO-GI 96 6407 B2-VO-G1 94 6443 B2-VO-GI 95 6161 B2-UO-GI 90 64-G3-F-x-740-5 64 530 105 9573 B2-UO-G2 91 9380 B2-UO-G2 89 9190 B2-VO-G2 87 9241 B2-UO-G2 88 8837 B3-VO-G2 84 64-G3-F-x-740-7 64 700 138 12073 B3-UO-G2 88 11830 B2-U0-62 86 11590 B2-UO-G2 84 11655 B2-U0-62 85 11144 B3-U0-62 81 Valuesf fromp photometrict tests performedine accordances with IESNAI LM-79 anda arer representative oft thec configurations shown. Actualp performancer mayy varyduet tol installation: and environmentaly variables.LEDa and driver tolerances, and fieldi measurement considerations. Itish Mighyrecommended: to confirmp performancev withaphotometriol layout. Note: Some data may bes scaledbased ont tests ofs similar (but not Identical) luminaires. Contact factoryfor configurations nots shown. VArtD-fout-fopoms-anslypecrharen 02/25 page2of4 4 UX1 Post top LED Post top Dimensions 18" 1 (45.72cm) - 1 M44A ANNN 28.1" EPA-0.45: sq. ft. (71.37cm) Welght - 25 Ibs Specifications Housing Optical system Dimming Options Containing no mercury or other hazardous Type 2, 3, 3W, 4 andl Type 5 composed of hlgh DA:4Hrs 25% Reduction chemicals, the UXIIsf fullyrecyclable. The housing performance optical grade PMMA acryllc refractor DB:4 4Hrs 50%F Reduction isc constructed of low copper die-cast aluminum lenses tos achieve desired distribution optimized DC:4Hrs 75% Reduction anda at tool less decorativet finiall holds down the toget maximum spacing. targeti lumens anda DD: 6Hrs 25%F Reduction spun aluminum roof. Concealed: aluminum wire way superiorl lighting uniformity. Optical systemisrated DE:6Hrs 50% Reduction inside of the cagel legi is protectedi from water with IP66. Performance shall be tested perl LM 63,LM DF:6Hrs 759F Reduction ahlght temperature sillcone rubber grommet. 798 and' TM1 15 (IESNA) certifyingi its photometric DG:8 8Hrs 25%F Reduction Roof: designedt to allowr natural run offo of water, performance. Street side indicated. DH:8Hrs 50% Reduction dirt and debris. Stainless steel screenk keeps large DJ:8Hrs 75% Reduction insects out and allows for natural water rund off. Lens Options DL:DALIPre-set: driver compatible with Fitter/Pod:" Two captive screws hold down the Option avallable for clear or frosted tempered flat thel DALllogarithmic controlsystem pod cover. Option for hex head or sets screws in glass lens (C: Clear or F: = Frosted). * Contactf factoryforD DALloptions. they pod.1 The pode accepts a 3", pole. The OD of podi is 3.5". Concealed: aluminumy wire wayinside of Driver Surge Protection the cage legl Is protected from water with a high Driver comes standard with 0-10V dimming Surgey protector testedin accordance with. ANSI/ temperature silicone rubber grommet. capability. Highpower factor of 95%. Electronic IEEE C62.45, per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2 Scenariol driver, operating range 50/60H Hz. Auto adjusting Category CI HighE Exposure 10KV/10kA1 waveforms Light Engine universaly voltagei input from 120 to 277VACrated for Line Ground, Line Neutrale and Neutral Ground, LEDgine composed of 5r maln components: Heat for botha application line to line or line to neutral, andi in accordance withU.S. DOE (Department Sink, Lens, LEDI lamp, Optical System, and Driver. Class I, THD of 20% max. Certifiedi in compliance to ofEnergy) MSSLC (Munlcipal Solid State Street Electrical components are! RoHS compliant. UL1012 CULus requirement (dry and damp! location). Lighting Consortium) model specification for Assembled on a removable cast plate with Tyco LEDI roadwayl luminaires electricall immunity LED Module quick disconnect plug resisting to 221°F (105°C). requirementst for Highl TestLevel 10KV/1 10kA. Composed of high-performance: whitel LEDs. Color The current supplying the LEDs will be reduced Optionals SP2:20kV/ / 10kA surge protection device temperature asp per ANSI/NEMAbIn - Neutral White, byt the driver ift the driver experiences Internal that provides extray protection! beyond the SP1 4000Kelvin nominal (3985K +/-2 275K or 3710K to overheating as a protection to the LEDs and 10KV/10kAI level. 4260K) or Warm White, 3000H Kelvinr nominal (3045K the electrical components. Outputi isp protected Luminaire Useful Life +/-1 175K or 2870K to 3220K). CRI 701 Min. 75 Typical. from short circuits, voltage overload and current overload. Automaticr recoverya after correction. Refer tol IES files for energy consumption and Heat sink Standard builti in driver surge protection of2.5kV delivered lumens for each option. Based on (min). Due tot the inrush current that occurswith ISTMT ins situt thermal accordance with Made of cast testinglne aluminum optimizing thel LEDs electronic drivers, recommend usingat time-delay UL1598 andl UL8750, using LM-80d data from efficlency and life. Product does not use any ors slowt blowf fuse to avold unwantedf fusel LED manufacturers and prediction cooling device with moving parts (only passive (false tripping) that cand occur with normal blowing orf fast methods, thel luminaire usefull engineering lifel Is expected cooling device). acting fuses. toreach 100,000+ hours with >L701 lumen maintenance @25C. Luminaire usefullife accounts forl LEDI lumen maintenance and all of these additional factorsi including: LED color shift,LED life, driver life, PCB substrate, solder joints, on/ off cycles, burning! hours and corrosion. Lifetime statements dor not Include the use of controls, Includingr networked controllers. WArD-Poit-lepoms0ansaype-hnaten 02/25 page3of 4 UX1 Post top LED Post top Specifications (cont'd) Hardware Finish Quallty control Alln non-ferrous fasteners prevent corroslon and Color in accordance with the AAMA: 2603 standard. The manufacturer must provide a written ensurel longer life. Application ofp polyester powder coat paint (4 confirmation ofl Its ISO 9001: 2008 andl ISO mils/100microns) withtimils /24 microns of 140012 2004 International Quality Standards Wiring tolerance. The Thermosetting resins provides Certification. 18 AWG wire, 6" (152mm) minimum exceeding a discoloration resistant finishi ine accordance from luminaire. with the ASTMD2244: standard, as well as luster Vibration Resistance retentioni in keepingy with the ASTMD D523 standard Meets the ANSI C136.312 2010, American national Options and! humidity proofi in accordance with the ASTM Standard for Roadway Luminaire Vibration D2247 standard. The surface treatment achleves specifications for Normal Applications. HS ar minimum of 20001 hours for salt sprayr resistant House finishina accordance with testing performed: and Certifications and Compliance side shield per ASTMB117 standard. CETLus Listedf for Canada andU.S. tot the SP2 20KV/20kAintegral LED products manufacturing standard UL1598 andUL8750: standards, suitable for Wet surge protector (optional) The electronic components sensitive to Locations. The quality systems of the facilitywhere manufacturedhavel been registeredbyULtot the electrostatic discharge (ESD) such as light emitting ISO 9001s series standards. LM80 & LM79 tested. diodes (LEDs) are assembledinc compliance with CCTs 3000K andwarmer are Dark Sky Approved. IEC6134051 1and ANSI/ESD: $20.20standards: so as to eliminate ESD events that could decrease the IPI Rating usefull life of the product. LED Performance The LED optics chamber is IP66 rated. Predicted lumen dopreciation data Warranty Syearimitedwarranty. Options available for Ambient Calculated Lumen Maintenance % extendedwaranties: contact factory. Temperature/c) Driver mA L7o! hours L70 perTM-21 06 60,000hours See slpnliycom/warrantes: for details 25°C upt to 700 mA >100,000 >60,000 >92% and restrictions. 25°C 1050 mA >100,000 >60,000 >89% Buy American Act of 1933 (BAA): Predietedpartormance: derivedfromLED: manufecturer'sdata: ande engineering designestimates. based onl IESNA LM-80m methodology. Aiulepimanyuyaat tofielda application conditions. L70ist thep predictedt timev whenLED This product is manufacturedi in one of our US performance depreciatest to7 70% MsapcAIeN IESNAT TM21-11. PublishedL70 hours limitedto 6 factories and, as of the date oft this document, timesa actualLEDt testh hours. this product was considereda commerclally available off-the-shelf (COTS) item meeting the requirements oft the BAA. This BAA designation hereunder does not address () the applicability of, or availability ofa a waiver under, the Trade Agreements Act, or (ii) the "Buy America" domestic content requirements imposed on states, localities, and other non- federale entities as a condition of recelving funds administeredbyt the Department of Transportation or otherf federal agencles. Prior to ordering. please visit www.signliy.com/baet tov view a current list of BAA-compliant; products to confirm this product's current compliance. 020255 SignifyHolding. Allrights reserved. aufatanasateren SgnilyerthAmere.Cer. Suite600 SignifyCanadaltd, Issubjoct tochange, without notice. Signitydoesnotgivo: anyrepresenta ation GENLYTE Bridgevater, 400CrossingBiwd, Markham, 281Hillmount ON, Road, orwarranty as tothee accuracyoro matwsctust.waNiN included 800- NJ08807 555- 800- Canadal6C283 hereina and shallnot beliablef for anya actioninrellance! thereon. Theinformation SOLUTIONS Telephone: 0050 Telephone: 668-9008 presentedint this documenti ist not MANAYeARAAT, anddoes not! formparte tofa anyg quotationorc contract,unless othervisea agreedbySignify. a (ignify business MAmwemswuweedarechaw UXI-LED- Post- Top- Gen3- DarkSky- -spec- sheet- en 02/25 pago4of4 www.hadco.com #2-$3.445.00 Urban LED LUMEC MetroScape by Signify MPTR PostTop Project: Lumec MetroScape LED post top luminaire features flexible, robust energy- Location: saving solutions for heritage-styled urban architectural lighting. Crowned with an Cat.No: ornamental hood, the post top model comes with a flat lens to highlight the thinness Type: of the LEDs. The luminaire provides attractive lighting at night, adding appeal to the Qty: surroundings and promoting safe use of the environment. Includes Service Tag, Notes: innovative way to provide assistance throughout the life of the product. Ordering guide Example: MPIC-42W32LED4K-3-LE-20-COHOM25-PHB-BKIX LED Optical Optlons Poles/ Serles module CCT Gen. system Voltage Driver Receptical Control Luminalre Decorative Mounting Brackets Finlsh G3 MPTR' 35W32LED' 3K G3 LE2 UNV DMG RC HS SP2 FN2 Consult Consult BE2TX MPTRCR 56W32LED: 3000K Gen3 Typell 120-277V 0-10V Receptacle House 20KV/10KA Decorative thes Signlfy the Signify BE6TX MPTRRC 72W32LED 4K (ASYM) 347 SRD' for twist-lock Side Shleld Surge finlal web site web site BESTX MPTRCC 97W32LED: 4000K flatlens 347V Sensor ready photocellor PH8 protector FN3 for detalls for details LE3 480 driver, shortingo cap, Twist-Lock TN3 Decorative andt the andt the BG2TX MetroScape 65W48LED Typell 480V standard 3-pln PhotoslectricCell Fitter tof fit finial complete complete BKTX LEDpostt topl 80W4BLED (ASYM) configuration RCD77 PH9 overa3" FN4 linec of Finec of BRTX luminaire 108W48LED flatl lens SRD1' Receptacle Shortingc cap (76mm)0.D. Decorative Mountings Poles GN4TX 140W48LED LE3 Sensor ready fort twist-lock PHXL? by4 4" (102mm) finial GN6TX 70W64LED Typell driver, photocello or Twist-lockP Pho- longt tenon FN8 GN8TX (ASYM) alternate shortingcap, toelectricCell TN3.5 Decorative 110W64LED widef flat configuration 7-pins extended Ife,UNV Fitter tofit finial GNTX 90W80LED lens (120-277VAC) over a34" FN9 GR 135W80LED LE4 RCD* (89mm)0.D. Decorative GY3TX Typelv 5-Pinreceptacle by4 (102mm) finlal NP (ASYM) for dimming longt tenon FNIO RD2TX flatlens photoelectriccell BAC+ Decorative LES RCDM Meets the finlal RD4TX TypeV 7-Pin receptacle ofthe requirements FNII TG (SYMM) fory photoelectric Buy Decorative TS flatl lens cell AmericanAct finial WHTX of 1933 (BAA) TN3* (consult Fitter tof fito over pg4for a3"( (6mm)0.D. codes) by4 4" (102n mm) longt tenon TN3.55 Fittert tof fito over a31/2" (89mm) O.D.by4 4"(102 mm) longt tenon 1. DMGO-10V driver come standard. 2. Note avallabley with347V and4 480V. 3.1 Tho 347V and4 480V arer not available. 4. Useofp photoelectrice cello or shortingo caplsr required toe ensure properi illumination. 6. Falluret top properlyselect the' "BAC" suffix could result Inyour recelving product that Is notE BAAC compllant product with nor recoursef for anRMA or refund. This BAC deslgnation! hereunder does not address (1) the applicablity of, or avallabilityof av walver under, thel Trade Agreements Act, or () the" "Buy America" domestic content requirements! Imposed on states, localities, ando other non-federale entitles as a condition of recelving funds administeredbyt thel Department of Trensportation or other federale agencles. 1 DLC LISTED Metroseape-MPTR-spec 03/24 page1 1of 5 MPTR MetroScape LED Post Top Urban Luminaire Dimensions Motion Response* (must bec orderede lasas separateitem) Example: ACC-120-MRAPG-BKIX 20V" Serles Voltage Motion Response module Finish (Sllmm) ACC 1744" (45lmm) ACC Accessory 120 120V MR4PG1 Single grey Consult Lumec's Color 277 277V MR4PG2 Double grey Chart for complete MR4PW1 Single white specifications. MR4PW2 Double white 384" OVRoplonlaregutedtor. MotionF Response Accessory (978mm) 28%" (724mm) EPA: 1.97 sq ft Weight: 31.11 Ibs (14.1kg) Series code loglc: MPTR C R a at a L Retro fitter MPTR-C Contemporary cage Metroscape retro series MPTRCR-C MPTRRC-C MPTRCC-C LED Wattage and Lumen Values for 3000K & 4000K fixtures with No Shield Ave. LE2 LE3 LE3W LE4 LES System System Total current Watts Lumen Efficacy BUG Lumen Elficacy BUG Lumen Elficacy BUG Lumen Elficacy BUG Lumen Elficacy BUG Ordering Code: LEDs (mA) (W) Oulput (LPW) Rating Oulput (LPW) Rating Output (LPW) Rating Output (LPW) Rating Output (LPW) Rating NOSAAGMPTR3OOOK 35W32LED3K-G3-x 32 350 36 3920 109 BI-UO-GI 3948 110 BI-UO-GI 3982 111 BI-UO-GI 3963 110 BI-UO-GI 4038 112 B3-UO-GI 55W32LED3K-G3-x 32 530 54 5623 104 BI-UO-GI 5662 105 BI-VO-GI 5711 106 BI-UO-G2 5684 105 BI-UO-G2 5792 107 B3-UO-GI 72W32LED3K-G3- 32 700 68 7092 104 BI-UO- -GI 7142 105 BI-UO-G2 7203 106 BI- -U0-G2 7170 105 BI-UO-G2 7305 107 B3-UO-G2 97W32LED3K-G3-x 32 1050 101 9779 97 B2-UO-G2 9847 97 B2-UO-G2 9932 98 B2-U0-G2 9886 98 B2-UO-G2 10073 100 B4-UO-G2 55W48LED3K-G3- 48 350 53 5964 113 BI-UO- GI 6006 113 BI-UO-GI 6058 114 BI-UO-G2 6030 114 BI-UO-G2 6144 116 B3-UO-GI 80W4BLED3K-G3-x 48 530 79 8556 108 B2-U0-G2 8616 109 B2-UO-G2 8691 110 B2-U0-G2 8650 109 B2-U0-G2 8814 112 B3-UO-G2 108W4BLED3K-G3-4, 48 700 102 10789 106 B2-U0-G2 10865 107 B2-UO-62 10959 107 B2-UO-G2 10908 107 B2-UO-G2 11114 109 B4-U0-G2 140W4BLED3K-G3-* 48 1050 152 14879 98 B2-UO-G2 14983 99 B2-UO-G2 15113 99 B2-UO-G3 15042 99 B2-UO-G2 15326 101 B4-U0-62 70W64LED3K-G3-x 64 350 71 7972 112 B2-UO-GI 8028 113 BI- -UO-G2 8097 114 B2-U0-G2 8060 114 BI-UO-G2 8212 116 B3-UO-G2 110W64LED3K-G3-x 64 530 102 11435 112 B2-UO-G2 11515 113 B2-U0-G2 11615 114 B2-U0-G2 11560 113 B2-U0-G2 11779 115 B4-U0-G2 90WBOLED3K-G3-x 80 350 88 9842 112 B2-UO-G2 9911 113 B2-U0-G2 9997 114 B2-UO-G2 9950 113 B2-UO-G2 10138 115 B4-U0-G2 135W80LED3K-G3-x 80 530 132 14118 107 B2-UO-G2 14217 108 B2-U0- G2 14340 109 B2-U0-G2 14273 108 B2-UO-G2 14543 110 B4-UO-G2 NOSHACIMPTR4OOK 35W32LED4K-G3-x 32 350 36 4116 114 BI-UO-GI 4145 115 BI-UO-GI 4181 116 BI-UO-GI 4161 116 BI-UO-GI 4240 118 B3-U0-GI 55W32LED4K-G3-x 32 530 54 5904 109 BI-UO-GI 5945 110 BI-UO- GI 5997 11I BI-UO-G2 5968 111 BI-UO-G2 6082 113 B3-U0-GI 72W32LED4K-G3-x 32 700 68 7447 110 BI-UO-GI 7499 110 BI-UO-G2 7563 1lI BI-U0-G2 7529 IlI BI-UO-62 7670 113 B3-U0-62 97W32LED4K-G3-x 32 1050 101 10268 102 B2-UO-G2 10339 102 B2-UO-G2 10429 103 B2-UO-G2 10380 103 B2-UO-G2 10577 105 B4-UO-G2 55W48LED4K-G3-x 48 350 53 6262 118 BI-UO-GI 6306 119 BI-U0-GI 6361 120 BI-UO-G2 6332 119 BI-UO-G2 6451 122 B3-VO-GI 80WABLED4K-G3-x 48 530 79 8984 114 B2-UO-G2 9047 115 B2-U0-G2 9126 116 B2-UO-G2 9083 115 B2-UO-G2 9255 117 B3-U0-G2 108W4BLED4K-G3-* 48 700 102 11328 111 B2-U0-G2 11408 112 B2-UO-G2 11507 113 B2-UO-G2 11453 112 B2-UO-G2 11670 114 B4-UO-G2 140W4BLED4K-G3-4, 48 1050 152 15623 103 B2-UO-G2 15732 104 B2-UO-G2 15869 104 B2-UO-G3 15794 104 B2-UO-G3 16092 106 B4-U0-G2 70W64LED4K-G3-x 64 350 71 8371 118 B2-UO-G2 8429 119 BI-UO-G2 8502 120 B2-UO-G2 8463 119 BI-UO-G2 8623 121 B3-U0-G2 110W64LED4K-G3-x 64 530 102 12007 118 B2-U0-G2 12091 119 B2-UO-G2 12196 120 B2-UO-G2 12138 119 B2-U0-G2 12368 121 B4-UO-G2 90WBOLED4K-G3-x 80 350 88 10334 117 B2-UO-G2 10407 118 B2-UO-G2 10497 119 B2-UO-G2 10448 119 B2-UO-G2 10645 121 B4-U0-G2 135WBOLED4K-G3-4 80 530 132 14824 112 B2-UO-G2 14928 113 B2-UO-G2 15057 114 B2-UO-G3 14987 114 B2-UO-G2 15270 116 B4-U0-G2 Actualp performance mayy varyo due toinstallation variablesi including optics, mounting/celling! helght, dite depreclation,' lightloss factor, etc:; highlyr recommended toc confirmp performance withal layout contactApplications: ats serlyanypudoalwminaies, Note: Some data mayl bes scaledt basedo on tests ofs similar. Butr not identicall luminalres. Metroseape-MPTR-pec 03/24 page: 2of 5 MPTR MetroScape LED Post Top Urban Luminaire Specifications Cage Heat Sink Luminaire options Inarounds shape with 4 arms and a built-in Made of cast aluminum optimizing thel LEDs mechanlcalring. this cagel Is a one plece efficlency and life. Product does not use any FN2 Decorative finial die cast. A360 Aluminum alloy0.100 (2.5mm) cooling device with moving parts (only passive minimum thickness, mechanicallye assembled cooling device). FN3 Decorative finial tot thet fitter. Choice of Contemporary! (C) and Retro (R)style cages. See Series code logio. Driver FN4 Decorative finial High power factor of 95%. Electronic driver, FN8 Fitter operating range 50/60 Hz. Auto adjusting A Decorative finial Made of die castA360.1Aluminum: alloy 0.100 universal voltage input from 120t to 2778 and FN9 Decorative finial (2.5mm) minimum thickness, the fitter is 3471 to 480VACratedf for both application! line complete with a watertight access doors giving to line or line to neutral, Class I, THD of 20% FN10 Decorative finial access to the driver rated IP66, anda terminal max. Maximum ambient operating temperature block that accepts (#2 max.) wires from from 40°F (40°C) to 130°F (55°C). Certifiedin FN11 Decorative finial thep primaryo circuit. Comes with an easys self compliance tol UL1310 CULUS requirement. Dry adjusting system with two (2) set screws 3/8 16 and damp! location. Assembled one a unitized UNCI fore ease ofr maintenance andi installation. removablet traywith Tycoc qulck disconnect plug Fits on a 4"( (102mm) outside diameterb by4 4" resisting to 221°F (105°C). Dimmable driver HS (102mm) long tenon. Cholce of Contemporary 0-10V. The current supplying thel LEDs willl be House side shleld (C) and Retro (R) style fitters. See Serles reduced! by the driveri ift the drivere experiences codel logic. internal overheating as a protectiont to the LEDs andt the electricald components. Outputls PH8 (allows a 90°rotation) Finial protected from short circuits, voltage overload Photoelectric cell, twist-lock Decorative cast 356 aluminum, and current overload.. Automaticrecovery type complete with receptacle mechanically: assembled. after correction.: Standardbullt In drivers surge and decorative polycarbonate protection of2.5KV(min). (grey) capy with anlastiglens Hood Surge Protector Made of die cast. A360.1Aluminum: alloy PH9 0.1(2.5mm) minimum thickness, mechanically Surgep protector testedina accordance with Shorting cap, twist pe assembled tot the cast aluminum! heat sink. ANSI/IEEE C62.45p per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2 complete with receptacle. Scenariol ICategory C High Exposure 10KV/10KA Access-Mechanlsm waveforms forl Line Ground, Line Neutrale and Neutral Ground, andina accordance withU.S. PHXL (allows a 90° rotation) Adie castA A360.1Aluminum: alloy 0.1(2.5mm) DOE (Department of Energy) MSSLC( (Municipal ExtendedI life Photoelectric minimum thickness technical ring with latch Solid State Streetl Lighting Consortium) model cell, twist-lock type complete andhinge. specification forLEDr roadwayl luminaires withr receptacle and decorative electricall immunityr requirements for High Test polycarbonate (grey) cap witha Light Engine Level 10KV/1 10KA. Optional SP2: 20KV/1 10kA plasticl lens. LEDginei is composed of4 4r main components: surge protection devicet that provides extra LEDI lamp / Optical System /Heat Sink. / Driver protection beyond the SP11 10KV/IOKAlevel. RCD Electrical components are RoHS compllant. Receptacle 5-pins allowing Driver options dimming, can be used witha LEx Lens DMG: Dimmable driver 0-10V. twist-lock: Starsense, short ting Flat Lens: Made ofs sodal lime clear tempered OTL: Pre-set driver tos signal end ofli life oft the cap or a photoelectric cell. glass, mechanically: assembled ands sealedo onto LEDI module(s) for better fixture management. the ring of the access mechanism. SRD: Sensor Ready Driveri including! SR RCD7 communication (used for dimming and other Receptacle LED Module functionalities),. 24V auxillarys supplya anda a 7-pins. Composed ofh high-performancer whitel LEDs. loglcals signal input (LSI) connectedt tot the Color temperaturet as per ANSI/NEMA! bin top NEMA twist lockr receptacle. TN3. NeutralWhite, 40001 Kelvinr nominal (3985K SRD1: Sensor Ready Driveri including SR Fitter to fit over a +/-.275K or 3710Kt to 4260K) or Warmy white, communication (used for dimminga and other mm) O.D. 30001 3"(76n Kelvin nominal (3045K +/-1 175K or 2870K functionalities)! but with 24V auxllarysupply (102 mm) tenon. CRI 701 Min. by4" to 3220K), 75 Typical. andal logical signal input (LSI) not connected tot thet top NEMA twist lock. TN3.5 Optical System Fitter tot fit over a Composed of highp performance optical polymer 3-1/2" (89 mm) O.D. refractor lenses tos achieve desired distribution by4 4" (102r mm) tenon. optimized to get maximum spacing, target lumens and as superior lighting uniformity. System is ratedI IP66. Performance: shallbe testedp per LM 63,LM 79 and" TM1 15 (IESNA) certifyingi its photometric performance." Street sidel Indicated. Darks Sky compliant with 0% uplight and UO, per IESNA TM1 15. MetroScape-MPTR-spec 03/24 page 3of 5 MPTR MetroScape LED Post Top Urban Luminaire Specifications (continued) Finish LEDI manufacturing standard Vibration Resistance The Thermosettingl powder coating provided The electronic components sensitive to Meets the ANSI C136.31,A American National meetst the color requirements oft theA AAMA2604 electrostatic discharge (ESD) such as light Standard for Roadway Luminalre Vibration speclfication: as measuredp per ASTMD2244. The emitting diodes (LEDs) are assembledin specifications for Bridge/overpass, Thermosettingi product is applied at a dryf film compliance withl IEC61340 51 landA ANSI/ applications. (Testedf for 3G over 100000 of 2.5 to 4.0r mils (64-102 microns) on textured ESDS $20.20 standards so as toe eliminate ESD cycles! bye anl independent lab). finishes, resultingi inac durable long lasting finish. events that could decreaset thet usefulli life of Textured Finishes: Other Finlshes: the product. Service Tag BE2TX: Midnight Blue GR:Gray Sandtex Each individual luminaire is uniquely Vibration Resistance Identifiable, thanks to the Service tag BE6TX: Ocean! Blue NP:NaturalAlum. Meets the ANSI 018631-2018,Amarioan application. Witha a simples scan of a QR code, BE8TX: Royal Blue TG: Hammer-tone National Standard for Roadway! Luminaire placedi inside the luminaire, you gaini instant BG2TX: Sandstone Gold Vibrations specifications for Bridge/overpass access to the luminaire configuration, making BKTX: Black TS: Hammer-tone applications. (Testedf for 3G over 100,000 Installation and maintenance operations BRTX: Bronze Silver cycles bylndependent lab) faster and easier, nor matter what stage of the luminaire's! lifetime. Just download the APP GN4TX: Blue Green Quality Control andr register your product right away. GN6TX: Forest Green Manufacturedi tol ISO 9001 2015 and For more details visit: ignlfy.com/servicotag GN8TX: Dark Forest Green ISO1 14001 2015 International Quality GNTX: Green Standards Certification. Certifications and Compliance GY3TX: Medium Grey CULus Listedf for Canada andUSA. RD2TX: Burgundy MetroScape Is on the! Designlights. RD4TX: Scarlet WHTX: White LED Performance Predicted lumen depreciation data' Amblent Calculated Lumen Maintenance % Ordering Code Temperature (oC) Driver mA Lzohours'? L70 per TM-2123 @ 60,000! hours MPTR-135WBOLEDAK 25°C 530 mA >100,000 >60,000 94.01% MPTR-140WABLEDAK 25°C 1050 mA >100,000 >60,000 96.78% 1.Predicted; performance derived froml LEDmanufacturers dataa andengineeringe designe estimates, based on IESNALM-80 methodology. Actuale experience mayv vary duet tot fielda application conditions. 2.Lzoist the prediotedt timey whanlEDparformance: depreciates to7 70%0 ofi initiallumenc output. 3.Calculated; perl IESNAT TM21-11.F PublishedLzphoursl limitedt to 6t times actualLED test! hours. Motroseapo-MPTR-pec 03/24 page 4 of 5 MPTR MetroScape LED Post Top Urban Luminaire Specifications (continued) Poles 20 6.10 18 5.49 16 4.88 14 4.27 12 3.66 10 3.05 & 2.44 6 1.83 4 1.22 Z 0.61 ft m MPTR-FN10 MPTR MPTR-PHB-FNI Pole: RTA800-PS Pole: RA61 Pole: RTA906-BA Mounting: CRF-2 Consult galy.ompudonumhare: for details andt the complete line of Signify poles and brackets. Gignify 02024 Signify! Holding. Allr rights reserved. elwewutmrahadlaren SignifyNort 100Crossing! thA America Blvd, Suite Corporation 600 SignifyCanadalid 281Hillmount Road, issubjectt tochange. without notice. Signify MOAAIRwCNN Markham,ON. CanadaL6C or warr rantya as tol the accuracyor completeness of Mhelwtomatomlcdlwled Bridgewater. 800 NJ0B807 555 0050 668- 9008 253 herein and shallr not bel liable for anya actioninreliance thereon. Their information Telephone: Telephone: 800- presentedint this documenti is noti intondeda asa anycommercialotter anddoes their not formpart of any quotation or contract, unlesse allwriayeadlwyuix, Ms-wwESw respective owners. MetroScape MPIR-spec 03/24 page5of 5 www. lumec. .com #3 - $2,700.00 a - - PR8475/PR8275 Silver 2022 GRANDS PRIX COSMO DUI DESIGN FAMILY COSMO FAMILY - [533 21" mm) 40.75" [1035 mm) PR8475 PR8275 Distributions PR8475( (3Gcertified) PR8275 Typel Type II Type III Up to 190W Up to1 190W L1 L2 L3 Upt to 20000 lumens Up to 20 000 lumens Weight:4 40lb 18.1kg Weight:37lb- 16.8kg EPA:1.45f EPA:1.13R Description Typel III Typel IV Type V Asleek new line of LED lights that blend harmoniously ina anyo contemporary urban design. A touch of L3FL L4 L5S muted luxuryt that goes al long way. Construction Aluminum. A380 (Injection molding) Minimum wall thickness of 0.125" [3mm) Stainless steel hardware To: slip fit over a 4"(102mm) outside diameter pole or tenon CCT CRI 3000K 4000K C70 Opticals system C80 Tempered glass lens 0.1875" [5mm), clear or optional frosted lense (ITC) Aluminum heat sink dissipator Characteristics Highi intensityv white lighte emitting diodes (LED) IP66 66 LED 3G Driver Constant current, -40*C/-40*F) à 80'C(176*F), PF 0,99, 0-10V, 120 to 277V/347- -480V. Option PRG: Programmable Driver (Consult factory for scenario options) Sources Typel I-II-III-V Voltage 530mA 700mA 18LED0S 30W 18LED07 40W 120 208- 240- 277- 347 480 36LED05 60W 36LED07 80W 54LED05 90W 54LED07: 120W Finish 72LED051 120W 72LED07: 160W 90LED051 150W 90LED07 190W Plaforization (Alir metalic partsa arep pretreated using ane ervironmentallyf friendlyorganic phosphatingt technology) Polyester powder coating Minimum thickness of 100 microns Type IV Meet ASTMI B117: standardp practicef for salt spraytest Meet ASTM D2247 testingy waler resistance of coatingsin 100%relativel humidity 530mA 700mA 12LED05 20W 12LED0727W 24LED05 40W 24LED0754W Available options 36LED0S 60W 36LED07 80W 48LEDOS 80W 48LED07: 107W RCD-DOF Internal DimOnoifighte control systemC CW BTPE Buttont type photocell antenna (softwarer not Included) twist lock photocellre 60LED0S: 100W 60LED07: 134W HSSI House sides shield (Internal) TRP77pinst C136.41)CAWS shortinge cap receptacle(ANSI 72LED05 120W 72LED07 160W SGP Surges protector 10kVor2 20KV TRP7pinstwist) lock photocellr receplade/ASICI36A1) MS-24X Motion: sensor (PR8276only) CWWp photocell PRGP Programmable driver PERT Twisti lockp photocellr receptacle (ANSIC136.41) Lumca TECHNICAL DATA SHEET 2 COSMO FAMILY TECHNICAL INFORMATIONS ACCENT RING FOR AP54P POLESONLY Black Silver Red Orange (RA-B) (RA-S) (RA-R) (RA-0) BASE COVER Available for £4" (AP04) and gs" (AP54)p poles g4" ds" H m m Base cover Base cover Productcode: Producte code: WB24-4 WB24-54 (avalabley withAPS4only) Lumca TECHNICAL DATA SHEET 3 COSMO FAMILY Date Color chart City IES files Project name Photometric chart Type Options datasheet Qty. COSMO Product code Source Voltage Distribution CCT Options Lens option Color : PR8475 TypelHII-V 120 L1 30K "Seec options below* ITC "see color chart* PR8275 18LEDOS 30W 208 L2B 30KC80 AcidEtchGlass 36LED0S 60W 240 L3 40K 54LEDOS 90W 277 L3FL 40KC80 72LED051 120W 347 L4 90LED05150W 480 L5 18LED0740W 36LED07 80W 54LED07: 120W 72LED071 160W 90LED071 190W Typelv 12LED0S: 20W 24LEDOS 40W 36LED0S 60W 48LED0S 80W 60LED05 100W 72LEDO5 120W 12LED07 27W 24LED07! 54W 36LED07 80W 48LED07: 107W 60LED07134W 72LED071 160W Codee erample: PR8475 36LED07 80W 12013 40KC80SG Communication node House side shield Surge protector Motion: sensor Programmable driver Photocell RCD-DOF HSS S6P-10(120-277V) MS-24L PRG TRP7 DIMONOFF ANTENNA SGP-20(120-277V) MS-24M TRP SGP-10HV (347-480V) MS-24H PER SGP-20HV (347-480V) BTP RCD-DOF InternalDimOnoif htcontreisptemcwa antenna (softwarer not Included) BTP Button typey photocell HSSI House sides shleld(internal, fieldinstallable) TRP7 7pinst twist lock photocell MaCINAIAae SGP Surgep protector 10KVor2 20KV TRP7 7pinst wisti lock photocellr PAACIANcwae MS-24X1 Motions sensor (PR8276onl)witht Lovy Medium and! Highr rangel lens PER Twist lock photocellr receptacle! (ANSIC136.41) PRGP Programmable driver (consult factoryk fors scenariooptions) Lumca TECHNICAL DATASHEET 4 COSMO FAMILY TECHNICAL INFORMATIONS AP04 Overview Base cover splity view POLE INFORMATION A. g4" [102mm) OD extruded aluminium tube welded inside and outside the perimeter of the tube on: an extruded: aluminlum anchor plate. B. Recommended anchor bolts projection: 3" [76mm] maximum C. Tol be installed with 4: anchor bolts 81 nuts ands 8 washers. D D. Sealed aluminum: access door mechanically fixed to E the pole. - eup Auna E. Two-plece decorative cast aluminlum base cover mechanically secured with stainless steel: screws c/w retaining lip sliding underneath the anchor plate. C Base cover Installation details F. Bolt circle 08" [203mm) to 10" [254mm] G. Anchor plate overall dimension:: 11.75" [298mm) Anchor plate Pole options datasheet ORDERING INFORMATIONS Pole Nominal Height Options Base cover Color Anchor Bolts AP04 AP04 10' to 18' GFR4-ICR WB24-4 *See color chart* Supplied! byl LUMCA GFR4-ICP Supplied by others GFR4-ICA Existing "Seec on websitef forr mored options* POLE EPA CatalogNumber) NominalHelght Walll Thikness Welght MAXE EPA(2)* asp per CSA-S6-14 BoltCirce () (m) (In) (mm) (Ibs) (Kg) 70MPH 80MPH 90MPH 100MPH 110MPH 120MPH 130MPH 140MPH 150MPH (in) (mm) AP04-10 10 3.1 .188 4.8 30 13.5 13.3 9.6 8.2 6.0 6.0 - - - 9 229 AP04-11 11 3.3 188 4.8 32 14.5 11.7 8.4 7.1 5.1 5.1 - - - 9 229 AP04-12 12 3.7 .188 4.8 35 15.8 10.2 7.1 6.0 4.1 4.1 - - - - 9 229 AP04-13 13 4.0 .188 4.8 37 16.9 9.1 6.2 5.2 3.4 3.4 - - - - 9 229 AP04-14 14 4.3 .188 4.8 40 18.0 7.9 5.2 4.3 2.7 2.7 - - 9 229 AP04-15 15 4.6 .188 4.8 42 19.2 7.0 4.5 3.6 2.1 2.1 - - - - 9 229 AP04-16 16 4.9 .188 4.8 45 20.4 6.0 3.7 2.8 1.4 1.4 - - - 9 229 AP04-17 17 5.2 .188 4.8 47 21.5 5.2 3.0 2.2 0.9 0.9 - - 9 229 AP04-18 18 5.5 .188 4.8 50 22.6 4.4 2.4 1.6 0.4 0.4 - - 9 229 AP04-10HD 10 3.1 .23 5.8 56 25 22.1 18.5 18.5 16.0 13.0 10.8 9.1 7.8 6.8 9 229 AP04-11HD 11 3.3 .23 5.8 62 28 17.8 14.9 14.9 13.9 11.2 9.3 7.8 6.7 5.8 9 229 AP04-12HD 12 3.7 .23 5.8 67 30 14.6 12.1 12.1 12.1 9.8 8.0 6.7 5.7 5.0 9 229 AP04-13HD 13 4.0 .23 5.8 73 33 12.0 9.9 9.9 9.9 8.5 6.9 5.8 4.9 4.2 9 229 AP04-14HD 14 4.3 .23 5.8 78 36 9.9 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.4 5.9 5.0 4.2 3.6 9 229 AP04-15HD 15 4.6 .23 5.8 84 38 8.2 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.4 5.1 4.2 3.5 3.0 9 229 AP04-16HD 16 4.9 .23 5.8 90 41 6.8 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 4.3 3.5 2.9 2.5 9 229 AP04-17HD 17 5.2 .23 5.8 95 43 5.6 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 3.5 2.9 2.4 2.0 9 229 AP04-18HD 18 5.5 23 5.8 101 46 4.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.5 9 229 AP04-19HD 19 5.8 .23 5.8 106 48 3.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.1 9 229 AP04-20HD 20 6.1 .23 5.8 112 51 2.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 9 229 Lumca TECHNICAL DATA SHEET 5 COSMO FAMILY TECHNICAL INFORMATIONS AP54 Overview Base cover: split view POLEI INFORMATION A. gs" (127mm) extruded aluminum tube, mounted on an 3.5"S SCH40 extruded aluminum tube welded on thel inside and outside of the tube on an aluminum anchor plate. B. Recommended anchor bolts projection: 3" (76mm] maximum C. Tob bei installed with 4 anchor bolts 81 nuts and 8 washers. & D. Sealed aluminum: access door mechanically fixed to E thel base, oM I, E. Two-piece decorative cast aluminium base cover euna mechanically secured with stainless steel screws c/w retaining lip: sliding underneath the anchor plate. C Base cover installation details F. Bolt circle 8" (203mm) to 10" [254mm) Anchor plate G. Anchor plate overall dimension: 11.75" (298mm) 3 2 V Pole options datasheet ORDERING INFORMATIONS Pole Nominal Helght Options Accent ring Base cover Color Anchor Bolts AP54 AP54 10' to 20' GFR5-ICR RA-B WB24-54 *See color chart* Supplied by! LUMCA GFR5-ICP RA-S Supplied byc others GFR5-ICA RA-R Existing RA-O POLE EPA Catalog! Number NominalHeight Walll Thickness Welght MAX EPA(A2)* asper CSA-S6-14 Bolte circle (N) (m) (In) (mm) (bs) (Kg) 70MPH 80MPH 90MPH 100MPH) 110N MPH) 120N MPH 130N MPH 140M MPH 150MPH/160A MPH 170MPH (in) (mm) AP54-10 io 3.1 .23 5.8 56 25 22.1 18.5 18.5 16.3 13.3 11.0 9.4 8.0 7.0 6.1 5.3 9 229 AP54-11 11 3.3 .23 5.8 62 28 17.8 14.8 14.9 14.2 11.5 9.5 8.0 6.9 5.9 5.2 4.5 9 229 APS4-12 12 3.7 .23 5.8 67 30 14.6 12.1 12.1 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.9 5.9 5.1 4.4 3.8 9 229 APS4-13 13 4 .23 5.8 73 33 12.0 9.9 9.9 9.9 8.6 7.0 5.9 5.0 4.3 3.7 3.2 9 229 AP54-14 14 4.3 .23 5.8 78 36 9.9 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.5 6.0 5.1 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.7 9 229 APS4-16 16 4.9 .23 5.8 90 41 6.8 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 4.4 3.6 3.0 2.5 2.2 18 9 229 AP54-18 18 5.5 .23 5.8 101 46 4.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.0 2.4 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.1 9 229 AP54-20 20 6.1 .23 5.8 112 51 2.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 14 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 9 229 Lumca TECHNICAL DATA SHEET 6 COSMO FAMILY 18 16 A B 14 12 - B 10 0 n 1 F luninsire:PA827S luminaire:FA8475 luminsire:FR347S Pole:APO-10 Pole:APSL-10 MOEgam:MIACISI4 Bsecoer:W8244 BseceverwB245 Pole: APO1-14 B:secor:wa244 18776 650-1693 Lumca reservest ther rightt tor modifyt the Lumca 2645-A, Avenue Watt elements on this technical data sheet Québec (Québec) without prior notice LIGHTING LIFE G1P 3T2 Canada 4 - $3,799.55 555 Lawrence Avenue Roselle, ILE IAIpH/sB30.wmwatemhaylsllngcon CONCEPTUAL: ASSEMBLY DRAWING, SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING VERIFICATIONE BY THEF FACTORY POST TOP FIXTURE: E350LED This medium scale contemporary! fixture includes a permanent mold cast aluminum roof, fitter and (4) sweeping support! legs. The unit is provided with a flat acrylic! lens allowing for an open body. The top mounted driver mounting plate shall be cast aluminum and provide tool-less removal from the housing. The luminaire shall be UL listed in US and Canada. Model: E350LED, Standard Fitler (-SF) POST TOP LIGHT SOURCE: 6130T3-MDL01B-FL Array: 16L (16 LEDS, 42W for MD_010, 59W for MD_014, 77W forl MD_018) Color Temp: (16L) Distribution: 3000K (30) Driver: Type 3( (T3) Lens: Multi-Volt Dimmable Low-Range Driver,120-277V, 180mA (MDLO18) Flat Acrylic Lens (FL) POLE: 3816T54-.188 0 The 15" diameter cast 356 aluminum alloy base and aluminum shaft shall be a one-piece construction. The pole shall be U.L. or E.T.L. listed in U.S. and Canada. All pole heights tol have a tolerance of: t: 2" Model: 3800 Leesburg (38) Helght: 16F FL(16) Shaft Type: Smooth Tapered 5-4 Inch, 6063-T6 Aluminum Alloy (T54) Gauge: 0.188" (.188) FINISH: BKT Assembly shall be powder coated to Black Textured finish. Prior to coating, the: assembly shall be chemically cleaned and etched in a 5-stage washing system which includes alkaline cleaning, rinsing, phosphoric etching, reverse osmosis water rinsing, and non- chrome sealing to ensure corrosion resistance. Wind Load Evaluation This assembly, as configured, MEETS AASHTO requirements for wind loading Wind Speed: 1401 mph Gust Faclor: 1.14 I E 180* 900- - -270-- (4)3 3/4"> X 18" Anchor Bolts, 7" Boll Circle, Diamond pattern Access Door Orientation: 0* Street Side Orientation: 180* Jobl Name: Apalachicola Hill Comm Sidewalk Customer Signalure: Drawing #56769 Job Location: Apalachicola, FL Date: 2025/04/10 1of2 5551 Lawrence Avenue] |Roselle, ILE 601721p s)wwiww CONCEPTUAL/ ASSEMBLYD DRAWING, SUBJECT TOE ENGINEERING VERIFICATION BY THE FACTORY - - 9 0 9 6 € ( 2 1-3" 1-3"1 Job! Name: Apalachicola Hill Comm Sidewalk Customer Signalure: Drawing #56769 Job Location: Apalachicola, FL Date: 2025/04/10 2of2 - $3 3,160.00 555 Lawrence Avenuel Roselle, IL 601721p sas.wwsww CONCEPTUAL ASSEMBLY Y DRAWING, SUBJECT TOE ENGINEERING VERIFICATIONE BY THE FACTORY PTI FIXTURE: PT The medium scale Milleniag ML660 post top! luminaire Is a breakthrough in modern area lighting technology. Its new' world urban design transcends traditional lighting convention bys seamlesslyi interweaving form and function toy yet another level. Our convective AAD "Advanced Air-flow Dynamics" maximizes heat sink expulsion to deliver unsurpassed thermal management for long-life LED performance ande energy efficiency. Avallable with a myriad ofc options, the Millenia is perfect for commercial, institutional, andi municipal markets." The cast aluminum slipfilter slips a 3" OD> x3" tall tenon. The luminaire shall be listed in US and Canada.. PTI FIXTURE OPTIONS: -SV1-- Lens: Diffuse Acrylic Lens (SV1) Control None () Receplacle: POLE: SL900T416-188 SL900 Base 4" Dia. Pole Model: SL900 Shaft" Type: Smooth Tapered 4-3 Inch, 6063-T6 Aluminum Alloy (T4) Height: 16FL( (16) Gauge: 0.188" (.188) FINISH: /BKT Assembly shall be powder coated to Black Textured finish. Prior to coating, the assembly shall be chemically cleaned and etched in a 5-stage washing system which includes alkaline cleaning, rinsing, phosphoric etching, reverse osmosis water rinsing, and non- chrome sealing to ensure corrosion resistance. (4) 1/2" x 18" Anchor Bolts, 7.5" Bolt Circle, Diamond pattern Access Door Orientation: 0* Street Side Orientation: 180° Jobl Name: Customer Signalure: Drawing #56771 Job Location: Date: 2025/04/10 1of2 555 Lawrence Avenuel Roselle, ILE 601721p8 asAmaswwiywe CONCEPTUAL ASSEMBLYDRAWANG, SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING VERIFICATION BYT THE FACTORY 7 1 d C 9 6 6o ip 9 y 1 + 1'-6 1/2" 1'-6 1/2" Job! Name: Customer Signalure: Drawing #56771 Job Location: Date: 2025/04/10 2of2 lo $2,989.85 5551 Lawrence Avenuel |Roselle, IL 601721p aswwseiyee CONCEPTUAL ASSEMBLY DRAWING, SUBJECT TOE ENGINEERING VERIFICATION BYT THE FACTORY PTI FIXTURE: PT The medium scale Solana SL660 post-lop Luminaire's modern geometric design complements a diverse assortment of contemporary architectural seltings. Its urbanesque yoke design offers not only aesthetic beauly, durability, and optical efficiency, but takes street, area, and medium mount lighting to another level. The Solana SL660 is well suitedf for allr roadway, site, and pedestrian environments. Our convective AAD' "Advanced Air-flow Dynamics" maximizes heat sink expulsion to deliver unsurpassed thermal management for long-lifel LED performance and energy efficiency. The cast aluminum slipfitter slips a 3" OD x: 3"t tall tenon. The luminaire shall be UL listed in US and Canada. PTI FIXTURE OPTIONS: -SV1 Lens: Flat Diffuse Acrylicl Lens (SV1) POLE: SL900T416-188 SL900 Base 4" Dia. Pole Model: SL900 Shaft Type: Smooth Tapered 4-3 Inch, 6063-T6 Aluminum. Alloy (T4) Height: 16FL(16) Gauge: 0.188"( (.188) FINISH: IBKT Assembly shall be powder coated to Black Textured finish. Prior to coating, the assembly shall be chemically cleaned and etchedi in a 5-stage washing system which includes alkaline cleaning, rinsing, phosphoric etching, reverse osmosis water rinsing, and non- chrome sealing to ensure corrosion resistance. (4)1 1/2" x 18" Anchor Bolts, 7.5" Boll Circle, Diamond pattern Access Door Orientation: 0° Street Side Orientation: 180° Jobl Name: Customer Signalure: Drawing #56772 Job Location: Date: 2025/04/10 1of2 555L Lawrence Avenue Roselle, IL 601721p8 Ms.w-wwwawww CONCEPTUAL ASSEMBLY Y DRAWING, SUBJECT TOENGINEERING VERIFICATIONE BY THE FACTORY * * C C 9 6 6 9 i9 y oy 1 $ 1'-6 1/2" 1'-6 1/2" Jobl Name: Customer Signature: Drawing #56772 Job Location: Dale: 2025/04/10 2of2 APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: May 6th, 2025 SUBJECT: Avenue B runs through homeowner's property at 25 17th Street, Apalachicola, FL 32320 AGENDA INFORMATION: Agenda Location: New Business Item Number: 8 Department: Planning & Zoning Presenter: Karen Cox Dennis BRIEF SUMMARY: My husband Carl and I have lived in Apalachicola for 30 years. For the last 20 years, we have been living at 25 17th Street, Apalachicola, 32320. When we purchased the property we were made aware that AVENUE B runs through the middle of our property, and that it was officially abandoned". Previous mayors, Howell, Johnson and Begos, deemed it "abandoned" and all three came on site. Rhonda Skipper and Terry Tipton are also well aware and we have had the square footage reduction in taxes for 20 years. We understand that this is the tax payers land. We have the paperwork and figures for maintenance of the property for 20 years. We have been generous stewards to this land and would and happy to pay the higher tax rate, which will give city more money and clear up this ancient conundrum. Please find below, the survey and site plan on our property, to be clear, where the road to "no where,' 3 goes through the middle of our yard. We would like to not have our land divided by city property. Thank you for your consideration. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Requestor is seeking official abandonment" of part of Ave B that runs through her property and to purchase said parcel for $1. FUNDING SOURCE: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1) Site plan ;and 2) Boundary Survey STAFF'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: JISNOYH - - - 6 6v Be - e 0 e 9 à * 8 8 A ( B 0 a - e 5 8 & 0 9 9 8 & & a 3 N e * 6 ( 8 5 $ *3 % 6 e - s / B 2 S K 5 a Ka e 4 B % Ke a a e a 4 G a 3 ee *s S 5 & ou € & 6 % A / & & - 3 *, V 9 8 6 : $ * à > & 58 4 A 3 5 & à 23 e % S E : 8 A 3 SE K, B - 69 * e P 8 & c 8 6 9 & > P a & - 5 8 6 P @ o, 5 € eBoak - 8 Nab R - 1 e 5 4 3 & % : OL= 131V0S NVId LIS 866E 008 EQNATVIOI S2: >030 aooH MEAN SE1 a0aYoA3N OEE HO8041 INOSH AEN ONIAIT 7V101 B ONIAIT AEN ONAT JOOHAEASN I 9NN7 0oH MPEN OHH 2NISDS MIOL ELE 03380S AIN HOX04 ONISX3 88E (ONAIT 01 Q318EANODIA HO3O4 ENIRNE OH8 (GELYAONSN) ONAT 9NIS3 '1 'oS VaNyV OI 101 # X AVDBARG 1BAV8D E HOaOd (N338DS ONUSIXE NENI (ONISIXEI ZTE (eV1S ONOD) 180d8v DEN PNIATT DEN 53 (PNIAI1 2950 804 G3SO1ONE HOROd ONISIXE SI AVABAING HOOd INOds DaN (ONILSIXE 1BAVa2 TOI DNILSIXE Zo-x - -6L .0-8 .0-L 8. 107 0I / 0I K OI oI OI 9NIO1nGINO ONLLSIXE 10 NOILV001 DIN (7 1IEHS B3S) 2NIO109 aovdois / EDYavo nEN APALACHICOLA CITY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 5/6/2025 SUBJECT: 2nd Reading and Adoption: Ordinance 2025-02 AGENDA INFORMATION: Agenda Location: Unfinished Business Item Number: 1 Department: Admin Presenter: Dan Hartman BRIEF SUMMARY: Tree Ordinance 2025-02 RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Motion to approve 2nd Reading and adopt Ordinance 2025-02. FUNDING SOURCE: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Tree Ordinance 2025-02 STAFF'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve. ORDINANCE NO: 2025-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APALACHICOLA, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF PART II, SUBPART B, CHAPTER 105, ARTICLE Il, TREE PROTECTION, SECTIONS 105-21THROUGH 105-30; CHAPTER 109, ARTICLE II, SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS SECTIONS 109-46 THROUGH 109-51 AND CREATING CHAPTER 111, ARTICLE I, SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS SECTION(S) 111-10 THROUGH 111-15; PROVIDING FOR PURPOSE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. FINDINGS: WHEREAS, the City of Apalachicola is a Florida Municipality dulyincorporated, with all the rights and powers as provided in S. 2(b), Art. VIII of the State Constitution. WHEREAS the City to provide clarification and additional guidance regarding the protection of trees located within the City. The amendments provide for additional definitions, permitting considerations and enforcement; WHEREAS, the City of Apalachicola has determined that it is in the public interest to adopt amendments to its Land Development Code pertaining to Tree Protection and Site Plan Review; WHEREAS, included in this Ordinance is the relocation of the general Site Plan Review Regulations being amended in order to remove them from Chapter 109 and move them to Chapter 111 as indicated for clarity; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF APALACHICOLA, FLORIDA, that: NOTE: Struck-through language is language proposed to be deleted, Underlined lanquage is amended language, and *** represents sections that have been skipped and that remain unchanged. Page 1 of 11 Chapter 105 ENVIRONMENT ARTICLE Il. TREE PROTECTION Sec. 105-21. Purpose and intent. (a) Trees are recognized to be a valued asset, providing a healthier and more beautiful environment in which to live. Tree preservation enhances the value and marketability of property and thereby promotes the: stability of residential neighborhoods, making them more livable and desirable. (b)- This article establishes protective regulations for tree preservation and a permitting process to ensure, good management practices on private and city-owned property, including utility easements for continued healthy and beautiful trees. Sec. 105-22. Definitions. Tree. A woody plant having one or more well-defined trunks capable of being maintained with a clear trunk and normally growing to an overall height at maturity of a minimum of 15 feet. Diameter at breast height. The diameter of a tree trunk as measured four and a half (4 %) feet above ground level. Dead. In a state ofi irrecoverable decline with more than 50 percent of leaves, branches, and limbs not alive. Drip line. The limiting line established by a series of perpendicular drop points marking the maximum radius of the crown of an existing tree, but not less than ten feet from the trunk, whichever is greater. PattiarehHeritage tree. A protected native tree (section 105-23) whose trunk is 35 or more inches in diameter at breast height. Relocate. As used in article II, tree protection regulations and elsewhere in this Code, the digging up of a protected tree by a property owner from a place on the owner's property and the planting of the same tree in another place on the same property ori in a public place. Substantial alteration. The heavy cutting of top branches (topping), cutting of major lower limbs (elevating), or: significant trimming of a tree that alters the natural symmetry of the tree. The term does not include customarily accepted practices used by certified arborists for pruning shade trees. Sec. 105-23. Protected native trees. The native trees predominately foresting the City of Apalachicola are: Bald and pond cypress (Taxodium distichum and Taxodium ascendens), Eastern and southern redcedar Juniperus virginiana and. Juniperus solieicolasllicicold), Live oak (Quercus virginiana), Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), PeranCaryaillngensien Sabal (cabbage) palm (Sabal palmetto), Page 2 of 12 Seashpime/Pnusello##, Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), and Sycamore (Platanus occidentalispand Wateroak@HerusmtgN. Individual trees of these species having diameters of foureight or more inches at breast height are protected (hereinafter referred to as "protected trees"). Other native trees and all nonnative trees are not protected. Sec. 105-24. Preservation of patParchheritage trees. No patriarehheritage tree on privately- or city-owned property shall be removed or substantially altered by a private landowner or a department of the city unless: (1) Under a declared emergency (section 105-25(1)(c) or in the case of an imminent hazard (section 105- 25(2)), the adsemlorememialiepdly manager, or adesignee-in theirthe manager's absence the manager's designee (e.g. code enforcement officer), finds for a specific tree that immediate action is required to eliminate a condition endangering public safety or property. (2) In a non-emergency or non-imminent hazard situation: a. On private property, heplammingandzeninebeardcoindldent with the planning and zoning board's approval of a proposed development plan that is conditional on a tree permit application being approved, the city manager approves thei issuance of a tree permit to a private landowner to remove or substantially alter a tree on a lot because not doing sO would make the lot undevelopable for any principal structure (section 105-26(1)(c)). b. On private property when no development is proposed oron city property, the city manager documents in writing his or her reasons for allowing removal or substantial alteration (sections 105-26(1)(c) and 105-26(2)(c). Sec. 105-25. Activities exempted from or requiring a tree permit. (1) At tree permit is not required for the following exempt activities: a. Unprotected trees-The removal, relocation, or substantial alteration of: Native trees not listed in section 105-23; Native trees listed in section 105-23 that are less than foureight inches in diameter at breast height; Cultivated varieties of once native trees developed by selective breeding and sold by plant nurseries; and Nonnative trees, including invasive species. bDead trees when the code enforcement officer inspects the trees and agrees they are dead. b. As provided by State law (F.S. 5 163.045), the pruning, trimming, or removal of a tree on a residential property ift the property owner possesses documentation from an arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture or a Florida licensed landscape architect that the tree poses an unacceptable riskt to persons or property. A tree poses an unacceptable riski ifr removal is the only means of practically mitigating its risk below moderate, as determined by the tree risk assessment procedures outlinedi in Best Management Practices Tree Risk Assessment, Second Edition (2017). C. Pruning- - Pruning of unprotected trees, and light pruning of protected trees that does not substantially alter the protected trees. ed. Emergency-The removal or substantial alteration of any significantly-damaged, protected, non- patriarchheritage tree during or following a natural or man-made disaster (e.g., hurricane, tornado, high wind, flood, or forest fire) when the city commission or manager declares a state of emergency and determines that permitting requirements willl hamper private or public work to restore safety and order to the city. PermissionCity permission is required to remove or substantially alter a patriarchheritage tree (section 105-24(1))., In the interest of expeditiously addressing damaged heritage trees, the city's oral permission is sufficient, and written permission is notr required. de. Highway and electric utility rights-of-way- The removal or trimming of protected trees by: The Florida Department of Transportation along roads under its jurisdiction to maintain safe lines of sight at road intersections and alleys and horizontal clearance areas along roadways where errant vehicles leaving the roadway might travel. The electric utility along power lines necessary for the maintenance of accepted public safety standards and system reliability. (2) A1 tree permit is required for the following activities. Any removal or substantial alteration of a protected tree not exempted in section 105-25(1). Some specific situations requiring a permit include: Imminent hazard-The removal or substantial alteration of a protected tree when an applicant proposes that immediate action is required due to a condition endangering public safety or property. Diseased or pest-infested tree-The removal or substantial alteration of a diseased or pest-infested, protected tree when an applicant proposes that doing SO will prevent the spread of the disease or pests to healthy trees. Storm-damaged tree-The removal or substantial alteration of a protected tree damaged by a storm for which the city commission or manager did not declare a state of emergency. Tree in decline- --The removal or substantial alteration of a protected tree that has lost vigor and displays pale green or yellow leaf color, small leaves, poor growth, leaf drop, or dieback of twigs and branches. At tree in decline is not a dead tree. Sec. 105-26. Permits for removal, relocation, or substantial alteration of protected trees. Any person wishing to remove or substantially alter a protected tree shall makesubmit an application to the code enforcement oficerenatreeappliatonomprowdedbytheofleer: At tree permit shall be issued to remove or substantially alter a protected tree only ifs such action is in compliance with these article II requirements and thes section 109-5051 site plan requirements. Substantial alteration of a protected tree shall be allowed only under a declared emergency (sections 105- 24(1) and 105-25(1)(c)), when a permit is obtained in the case of an imminent hazard (sections 105-24(1) and 105- 25(2)), or when a permit is obtained in a non-emergency or non-imminent hazard situation to eliminate limbs that encroach on an adjacent structure. (1) Private property. a. Ifthe proposed tree removal or substantial alteration is in conjunction with proposed development the planning and zoning board reviews (e.g., a newly-proposed structure, the expansion of an existing structure where the footprint increases in size, the construction of a driveway or walkway, or other such development that disturbs the land surface), the beardcode enforcement officer shall implement these tree protection requirements at the time itthe planning and zoning board reviews and decides to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the site plan. b. Ifthe proposed tree removal or substantial alteration is not in conjunction with proposed development that the planning and zoning board reviews (e.g., tree removal due to tree roots affecting the structural integrity of a building foundation), the code enforcement officer, city manager, or a designee shall implement these tree protection requirements at the time he or she reviews and EtesteaPpovgcenaNemienalyapovemakes a decision on the tree removal or disapprovetheproposaksubstantial alteration application. Only the city manager shall make decisions on patriarchheritage trees (subsection c). C. Ifthe proposal is the removal or substantial alteration of a patriarchheritage tree, the code enforcement officer shall provide a copy of the tree application to the tree committee appointed byt the city commission. The committee shall review the tree permit application and make a recommendation to the decisien-maker!heplammingand.eningbearefsubseteetona)orthediy managerfsubsection.)civymanager. When eboirdistedetsommalerappoalpopied removal or maemsPpeaeremwe atsintalyalersbtanal alteration of a patriarehheritage tree enis in conjunction witha development plan for a a privately-owned lot that is reviewed by the planning and zoning board, the city manager shall allowremoval or substantial alteration of the heritage tree only-be-made when no principal structure could be legally built on the lot taking into consideration the location of the tree and such requirements as setbacks and minimum required size for single-family dwellings. Through the variance process thel board of adjustment may consider reducing setbacks or minimum dwelling sizei if doing so would spare the tree. When-theThe city manageristhederisiesonmaker,lnemanger'smanager's reasons for allowing removal or substantial alteration of a patriarchheritage tree shall be documented in writing. (2) City property. a. Ap person wanting to remove or substantially alter a protected tree on city property adjacent to private property owned by the person (e.g., to create an entryway to a proposed driveway on private property) shall apply for a tree permit. Cost of the permit and tree removal or substantial alteration shall be borne by the applicant. b. Ad city department wanting to remove or substantially alter a protected tree on city property shall make a request to the code enforcement officer. To document the request, the code enforcement officer shall prepare a tree application for the proposed action. Removal or substantial alteration of the tree shall not occur unless the code enforcement officer, city manager, or one of their designees approves the removal or substantial alteration. C. Ifthe proposal is the removal or substantial alteration of a patriarehheritage tree, the code enforcement officer shall provide a copy of the tree application to the city manager and tree committee appointed by the city commission. The committee shall review the tree permit application and make a recommendation. The city manager shall make a decision on the proposal and document in writing the reasons for allowing any removal or substantial alteration. As a condition of approval, decision makers may require that certain protected trees or native trees listed in section 105-23 that are less than foureight inches in diameter at breast height be relocated from the area of proposed development to an undeveloped location. Under a tree permit, thinning of healthy protected trees may be) justified if selective removal of trees improves the development of remaining trees and allows them to grow faster and in a fuller, characteristic form. To ensure that a tree permit is not prematurely issued for a proposed development that is never approved, the tree permit and building permit will be issued simultaneously. Sec. 105-27. Protection of trees during building operations. Within the drip line radius of a protected tree, the following activities shall not occur during development, redevelopment, or improvement: deposition of debris and fill; storage of gasoline, oil, paint, chemicals, and other toxic materials harmful to trees; and attachment of wire to trees. Driveways and sidewalks of impervious concrete and asphalt may not be constructed within the drip line of protected trees. Sec. 105-28. Utility easement trimming. Electric utility companies and their contractors that perform vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming within electric utility right-of-way corridors shall do sO in accordance with thet following requirements. As defined in State law (F.S. S 163.3209), vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming" means the mowing of vegetation within the right-of-way, removal of trees or brush within the right-of-way, and selective removal of tree branches that extend within the right-of-way." (1) All tree management will be limited to what is necessary for the proper maintenance of existing and new utility facilities in order to provide safe and reliable utility service. (2) Prior to vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming, the utility: shall provide the city manager with a minimum of five business days' advance notice. Such advance notice is not required for vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming required to restore electric service or to avoid an imminent vegetation-caused outage. (3) The electric utility shall meet with the city manager, or the manager's designee (e.g., code enforcement officer), to discuss and submit the utility's vegetation maintenance plan, including the utility's trimming specifications and maintenance practices. The plan shall identify any patriarchheritage trees that are proposed for trimming and the amount of trimming proposed. (4) Vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming conducted by utilities shall conform to American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 (Part 1)--2008 (R2014) pruning standards and ANSI Z133.1- 2000 Pruning, Repairing, Maintaining, and Removing Trees, and Cutting Brush-Safety Requirements. (5) Vegetation maintenance and tree pruning or trimming conducted by utilities must be supervised by qualified electric utility personnel or contractors licensed to do business in the City of Apalachicola and trained to conduct vegetation maintenance and tree trimming or pruning consistent with these requirements or by certified arborists certified byt the certification program of the International Society of Arboriculture. Trimming of patriarch trees may only be performed by certified arborists. Sec. 105-29. Reforestation fund. Fees collected for the lawful removal of protected trees shall be placed in a reforestation fund maintained by the City of Apalachicola. (Fees for the administrative processing of tree permit plationee-sso0pet application) and fines for the unlawful removal or substantial alteration of protected trees (section 105-30) shall not be placed in the reforestation fund.) Reforestation fund fees shall be spent to establish,acquire, install, and maintain, and promote a reforestation program on city property, primarily in parks, squares, and along highway and street corridors. Follewingare-The city, by resolution, is authorized to set and change the referestation-fundfes:haEshalbe coletedferremovalefprotectedres. Diameteratbreastheltofpolsetemevedinche) Fee-foreachtree(s) 4t0-16 25 GPsrnifietanss 35 Samdagetfpatiehtre, 1,000 Foratree-permit: appleantmotpropesigioremoveapatfarchireplhemswimumielalrelorestation-fund fee-cellected-foreaehleteoveredby-ttheapplication: shalmoteseed525090. Foratreepermitappleatpepeiacieremewemveepatiaéhieee,hemasimumtelale and any corresponding reforestation fund fee cellected-ereaeh-eaeh-ot-eeveredfor. permits applied for in this article, which resolutions are incorporated byt theapplcatienshalnshalnotewseeds250.00horlmemom-patiaarehtrees-plusan adeliional$1,990,0000foreachpataréhtree-reference herein. Sec. 105-30. Penalties for violations. Any person that removes or substantially alters a protected tree before a tree permit is obtained shall be charged a doubled permit application processing fee (e8$100.00for an after-the-fact permit. Ifan after-the-fact tree permit is not issued because the tree removal or substantial alteration is not in accordance with these tree protection regulations, a fine in the amount specified in section AD.ikofthis-Cedel0l- 143 shall be imposed. Each tree that is illegally removed or substantially altered is a separate offense. Any person that illegally removes or substantially alters a patriarch tree shall be fined up to $25,000.00. Commercial tree care contractors or general contractors are required to be licensed by the city in order for them to conduct business within the city. Commercial tree care contractors or general contractors hired by the City of Apalachicola to complete tree removals or substantial alterations must show proof of commercial general liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodilyi injury and property damage with a provision that does not allow cancellation without 30 days written notice to the city. Two or more violations of any provision of these tree protection requirements by any commercial tree care contractor or general contractor may result in revocation of such person's license to do business within the city. Chapter 109 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ARTICLE Il. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION REGULATIONS Sec. 111-10109-46. Purpose and intent. The public health, safety and welfare require thel harmonious, orderly and progressive development of land within the City of Apalachicola. The development of the land is a vital step in the process of community development. Once land has been developed, the correction of defects is costly and difficult. Substantial public responsibility is created by each new development, involving the maintenance of streets and storm water management systems and the provision of additional public services. As the general health, safety and welfare of the community are thereby affected by the development of land, it is in the direct interest of the public that site development be conveyed, designed and carried out in accordance with sound land and water management principles. The purpose and intent oft this chapter is to assure that new development within Apalachicola will not adversely affect the public's natural or financial resources, especially Apalachicola Bay or its tributaries. Sec. 111-11109-47. Applicability. This chapter establishes procedures and standards for the preparation, review and approval of plans to carry out development. Sec. 111-12109-48. Procedures for site plan application, review and decision. (1) Pre-application conference. a. It is recommended that the applicant meet with the city planner, building department and building official to discuss the proposed development prior to submitting a formal application. The purpose of this conference is to familiarize the applicant with minimum design guidelines and to minimize any potential adverse impacts of the proposed development on the city's natural or financial resources. (2) Application. a. An approved site plan is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. It shall be considered unlawful for any person to construct, erect or alter a building or structure or to develop, change or improve land for which a site plan is required except in accordance with an approved site plan. Enforcement shall occur pursuant to Chapter III of this Code for failure to obtain a permit or for failure to follow a permit. b. The site plan shall be prepared in accordance with requirements contained in this section. For a plan to be placed on the agenda of the next planning and zoning board meeting, the plan must be received by thel building department and considered complete no less than 30 days prior to the planning and zoning board meeting. C. The applicant shall submit four copies of all parts of the site plan. Electronic copies of site plans and building plans may also be submitted if available. (3) Review. a. The city planner and building department shall review the site plan to determine whether all required information is included in the application. If any required information is missing, the building department shall inform the applicant of any information require to complete the application. b. All site plans for architectural compatibility shall be reviewed by the planning and zoning board sitting as the architectural review board. (4) Decision. a. Based upon the information contained in the site plan application, the planning and zoning board shall approve, approve subject to stated conditions, or deny the site plan. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the planning and zoning commission may, in accordance with Chapter III, file a written appeal within the city commission. (5) Construction. a. Upon site plan approval and issuance of a building permit, the development shall be built in accordance with the approved site plan and site regulations. Deviation from the approved site plan shall require the submission of an application for a revised site plan. Sec. 111-13 109-49. Fees. Application fees for site plan review, as adopted from time to time by the city commission, must be paid by the applicant at the time of application. Sec. 111-14109-50. Time limit on approval. Following approval of the site plan, the applicant shall have one year, unless to commence construction on the: site. Notwithstanding the above time frame, site plans for multifamily development and new non-residential development shall be effective for two years. Any site where development has not commenced shall cause the site Page 8 of 12 plan to be re-evaluated by the appropriate bodies and any newly adopted regulations shall be imposed at the discretion of the city. Sec. 111-15 109-51. Site plan requirements. (1) Site plans or any portion thereof involving engineering shall be certified, sealed, and prepared by and/or under the direct supervision of a professional éngineer, qualified by training and experience into the specific technical field involved and registered or licensed to practice that profession. (2) Site plans shall contain documents and maps indicating: a. General information: i. Name of project. ii. Intended use of site. lii. Legal description of the property, size of parcel in acres or square feet and the linear dimensions oft the property. iv. Name, address and telephone number of the owner or owners of record. V. Name, address and telephone number of the owner's designated agent or attorney. vi. Names, addresses, signatures and registrations of the professionals preparing the plan. b. Maps: i. Vicinity map, showing relationship of proposed development to the surrounding streets, wetlands and surface water bodies at a scale of not less than one inch equals 2,000 feet. ii. Site plan map with date and north arrow at a scale not smaller than one inch equals 50 feet. iii. Elevation survey and topography at one foot contour intervals, existing and proposed. iv. Building restriction lines (i.e., highway setback lines, easements, covenants, rights-of-way, and building setback lines, existing and proposed). V. Location of existing and proposed building and structure footprints. vi. Location, elevation, and dimensions and materials of existing and proposed drive areas, or other paving. vii. Location of existing and proposed fences by type of material (e.g., wood or metal), type of design (open or closed) and height. vii. Location of existing and proposed walls by type of material (e.g., brick or masonry). ix. Location of each proposed, off-street parking space (regular and handicapped) and how they will be identified on site with paint or curb stops, including a diagram showing traffic circulation on site and access and egress to adjacent street. X. Location of proposed, designated loading and unloading zones. xi. Location of temporary and permanent structures and features proposed in the stormwater management plan. xii. Species and size (inches diameter breast height) of existing protected trees and which of these trees are proposed to be removed, relocated, or substantially: altered. C. Proposed buildings and structures: Page 9 of 12 . Number of stories. ii. Square footage grosses each floor. iii. Building height. iv. Multi-family dwellings. () Number and square footage of dwelling units and density (dwelling units per acre). () Calculation of off-street parking spaces required by supplementary parking section showing the number of dwelling units and spaces. V. Commercial. Calculation of off-street parking spaces required by Chapter IVZ Zoning District supplementary parking section showing: () Projected number of employees on peak shift. (li) Ifan eating and/or drinking establishment, seats and occupancy load and number of tables for service and number of stools at service counter. (li) Ifa an office, studio or financial institution, floor space (iv) Ifa retail establishment, floor space devoted to merchandising. (v) Ifa child care center, floor space. d. Lot coverage allowed by thez zone and calculations showing proposed lot coverage. Materials used to cover surface drive areas, walkways, patios and other areas counting as lot coverage. e. New multi-parcel (e.g., subdivision), commercial, and multi-family developments: i. Existing infrastructure (on-site, adjacent to site, and across or opposite any public right-of-way.) Surface drive areas and median/curb cuts to access driveways. Sidewalks, streets, alleys, and easements (note widths and type). Size and location of nearest water mains, valves, and fire hydrants. Sanitary sewer systems (size and invert elevations). Power, telephone and cable lines. ii. Proposed streets, sidewalks, and surface drive areas: Ifr required, engineering plans and specifications including elevation and dimensions for streets, sidewalks, and surface drive areas (driveways, parking areas and storage areas). Cross section of proposed street improvements Firel lanes. Locations of proposed surface drive areas, curb or median cut(s) to access driveways. Internal traffic circulation plan, including directional arrows and signs to direct traffic flow. Location of traffic-control signs and signalization devices. Locations of sidewalks. Coordination of walkways and driveway and their elevations with facilities in adjacent developments, including the elevation of the crown of the most adjacent road to ensure that lot filling andl hardened surfaces are not elevated higher than local streets. Proposed streets and alleys. Page 10 of 12 When applicable, the location of service roads and access roads extended onto the site. iii. Proposed water and sewer facilities: Water. Size, material, and location of water mains, valves and fire hydrants. Engineering plans and: specifications are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Sanitary sewer systems. Size, material, and location of lines. Engineering plans and specifications, with submittal of a profile where required, are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any commitments, such as contributions to offset public facilities impacts. Projected water usage in gallons per day, projected solid waste, projected number of school age children. f. Solid waste handling facilities. The location of the dumpster and access for refuse service collection, including dumpster pad screening, fencing and landscaping shall be identified. g. Dredge and fill. If any dredging or filling is intended in the development, a copy of the complete environmental resource permit application proposed for the Northwest Florida Water Management District shall be provided. h. Stormwater management plan requirements general: i. Sufficient information for the city to evaluate the environmental characteristics of the affected areas, the potential and predicted impacts of the proposed activity on wetlands and surface water, and the effectiveness and acceptability of those measures proposed for reducing adverse impacts. li. Ifa State: stormwater permit is required, the following shall be a part of the stormwater plan submitted to the city. ii. The design contained in any ten-two (10/2) self-certified general permit). Iv. A design that treats run off from the 25 year-24-hour duration storm event and ensures that post development runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads do not exceed pre- development conditions: The design contained in a complete application proposed to a State agency for: A general permit or; An environmental resource permits. For proposed development not requiring a State stormwater permit, a plan to control surface water runoff including: Temporary sediment control barriers and vegetative cover; Permanent best management practices. Sec. 109-24 109-52. [Historic Apalachicola Design Guidelines.) The historic design guidelines of the city, adopted by Ordinance No. 2013-03 on Aug. 6, 2013, are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set out at length, and a copy is on file and available for inspection in the offices of the city and a copy is on file and available for inspection in the offices of the city and may be accessed at the city's website, htips/www.iyfapalachicola.com), Page 11 of 12 Subpart B LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Chapter 109 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ARTICLE II. SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS ARTICLE 1H. A-GEAERAL SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS Sec. 111-1 through 111-9 * Insert new. Sec. 111-10 through 111-15 from Chapter 109 as amended above. Page 12 of 12 CITY OF APALACHICOLA 1831 City Manager Report 5/6/25 New: CDBG - Small Cities Application Public Hearing The city held a public hearing on a CDBG Small Cities Program application specific to the rehabilitation ofthree drinking water wells. The hearing was held on April 22nd at 1 p.m. The grant application funding request is in the amount of $344,250 ($114,750 per well) and would include the installation of Aqua Freed carbon dioxide and water treatment technology to remove mineral deposits and biological buildup at each water-bearing zone. The city is still waiting for an eligibility determination from the Department of Commerce. Splash Pad - Temporary Closure The Splash Pad at the City Hall Complex will remain closed until further notice due to excessive water consumption. The Water Crew is actively flushing hydrants to mitigate the sulfur odor caused by the absence of an odor scrubber, further increasing water demand. The splash pad requires 30,0001 to 40,000 gallons ofwater per day, which ifopenedwould place a significant strainon the City's water supply. Until the odor scrubber is installed and fully operational, reopening the splash pad is not feasible. The City is actively working to resolve this issue as quickly as possible. U.S. Coast Guard Property U.S. Coast Guard property on Water Street was supposed to have been placed under the ownership of the City of Apalachicola sincet the M0034 Riverfront Project was awarded in 2022. This was not completed - U.S. Coast Guard: stated thatt this process could take up to 2 years from the starting point. Ownership of the parcel is causing issues with DEP Permits for this project staff filed a 'real property outgrant request form' with the U.S. Coast Guardi in hopes ofapproval forj permitting and construction for thei needed repairs during the life of the CDBG-DR program. Waiting for response from the Coast Guard Office in Miami. Florida DEP 7001 - Apalachicola Bay Feasibility Study A request has been issued by Mr. Dusty May for the Apalachicola City Commission to submit a letter of support encouraging the Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection to facilitate the 7001 - feasibility study to investigate the restoration of the ecosystem health of Apalachicola Bay, St. Joe Bay, St. Andrews Bay, and Lake Wimico. Ongoing: Odor Scrubber The odor scrubber equipment was ordered for $221,000, with a separate order for the mixer that came in at $40,363 - installation is still estimated at $198,000 pending a site visit to confirm. Out ofthe$500,000 approved as an emergency expenditure - the incurredanticipated spending on this issue is $459,363. The scrubber is expected to be manufactured by the end of July and installation should begin shortly thereafter. Reserve Fund - SBA Attl the March 2025 meeting the City Commission approved up to $500,000 froma reservefund. in order to place the order fort the odor scrubberto be fabricated. The Cityi is exploring funding options to replenish this spending from the reserve account through FEMA, grants, or a FL Rural Water USDA loan. The money in this fund is primarily funding paid out from FEMA for small category projects after Hurricane Michael as well as Hurricane Michael insurance money. All Hurricane Michael projects have not been closed out yet - FEMA could request partial payments back on some of this Incorporated 1831 2 One ofFlorida's oldest Historic Seaports funding during the closeout process. City should be cautious allocating any more funding from this account until funding has been secured to replenish it. Building Official Vacancy The Building Official position is still vacant - City Manager needs direction on a dollar amount to advertise for this position. Last budgeted amount for this position was $60,000 - does City need a budget amendment to advertise at $80,000? Does the City want to advertise an RFQ for building official services? Splash Pad - Temporary Closure The Splash Pad at the City Hall Complex will remain closed until further notice duet to excessive water consumption. The Water Crew is actively flushing hydrants to mitigate the: sulfur odor caused by the absence of an odor scrubber, further increasing water demand. The splashj pad: requires 30,000 to 40,000 gallons of water per day, which ifopened would place a significant strain on the City's water supply. Until the odor scrubber is installed and fully operational, reopening the splash pad is not feasible. The City is actively working to resolve this issue as quickly as possible. 1 Bay Avenue - City Hall Relocation Staff has met with a representative ofthe USDA - Rural Development Office in Marianna to discuss a loan application process for required renovations to the Community Center building. Resolved: Tree Trimming Tree Trimming issues in the Historic District - Public Works must cut up to 13' for clearance of emergency service vehicles and school buses. Public Work was instructed to takea measured 14' pieceofPVC with them as theytrim and to not surpass this height. They have been instructed to take extra caution on patriarch trees with minimal trimming or to ask for direction if needed. Construction Projects - Timelines: African American Museum - Out for Bid Award at May CC meeting Contract in June 2025 Construction Begins August 2025 Construction Complete August 2026 Lafayette Park Tree Planting Project - Under Contract Contract signed March 2025 Planting to begin ASAP. But has not happened Completion by end of April 2025 Supplemental Watering 60-Day Grow-In Period Staff to resume Watering after 60-Day Period CDBG-DR Riverfront Project Waiting to Bid [Andiers Pier, U.S. Coast Guard Property, VFD Building Demolition and Reno into Parking Area, Popham Building Demolition, and Sidewalks and Lighting] Pending Permitting Approval (SHPO, DEP, USACE) - Bidding to commence 60-days from approval Contingent Start Date: August 2025 Contingent Completion: February 2026 CDBG-DR Hill Project - Waiting to Bid [Sidewalks & Lighting] TBD Contingent upon 3/26 Workshop Bidding April/May 2025 Contingent Start Date: July 2025 Contingent Completion Date: October 2025 2 Incorporated 1831 2 One ofFlorida's oldest Historic Seaports CDBG-DR Stormwater Avenues = Waiting to Bid [Repairs and upgrades for the avenues stormwater drainage system] Bidding - May 2025 Construction Begins September 2025 Construction Complete March 2026 TBD Projects: See grant report for more information on these projects: Avenue H Parking Lot Fire Hydrant Installation HCA (Harrison-Raney Building) Phase II Stormwater Repairs - Resilient Florida 24SRP65 Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 1 - Pending DEP Approval to Bid Old City Hall Phase III Bodiford Park Dock Repair Scipio Creek Marina Finger Docks Repairs VI Pier Dock Repair - City received bids for April 24th bid opening date. Dewberry Engineering is reviewing the submittals for compliance with bid specs and will subsequently make a recommendation to city. 3 Incorporated 1831 n One ofFlorida's Oldest Historic Seaports CITY OF APALACHICOLA CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT REPORT April 2025 Training New-Hire, Alayna Smith as the new front office Receptionist/Desk Clerk Training former receptionist for Utility Billing position Processed and mailed out utility bills before the end of the month Applied late payment penalties Conducted interviews for Receptionist/ Desk Clerk Completed Billing Clerk's monthly tasks and conducted account audits Compiled agenda packets and emailed to Commission and City Attorney. Notified 2K Web Group to upload meeting agenda packets to website and post meeting dates and times to website. Assisted customers with cemetery items, utility bill questions and payments, garbage/yard trash complaints, public records request, golf cart decals, Battery Park ramp stickers, business licenses, and other miscellaneous duties. Processed ACH billing Processed adjustment requests and refund requests Completed tasks as assigned by the City Manager and Mayor. Fulfilled 3 Public Records Request; 6 open requests Completed and mailed general monthly billing. Assisted Staff with various issues and project reporting. Assisted employees with HR related issues Responded to emails and fulfilling requests that requires research Additional tasks related to maintaining the Clerk's Office and overseeing Utility Billing City of Apalachicola Public Works Monthly Report April 2025 The public works department, services all city vehicles and replaces all the tires on city vehicles, services all the mowers and weed eaters, cut all city parks, cut all city properties, empty all garbage cans downtown and city parks, clean city right of ways, cut city right of ways, and patch holes on city roads as needed. Completed Few work orders. Collected trash from downtown and public parks. Cut our routine main roads parks and cemeteries. FoBj Picked up trash on the south side of town, mayor requested Cut grass at water plant Cut grass at 5th street water tower Doing maintenance on equipment Building a Maintenace Replaced flush valve and seals in women's bathroom public restroom . Replaced toilet seat at community center women oathroom . Put 2 shelves together at Holy family . Replaced air filters in all city buildings Clean out downtown water fountain at river front park Getting price for scipio creek restrooms Completed by Greg Harris ELOBIDE CITY OF APALACHICOLA CODE ENFORCEMENT 192 Coach Wagoner Blvd * Apalachicola, Florida 32320 * 850-653-8222 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE April 2025 6(City) Tree Permits 5' Tree Permits 137 Short term Rentals at 46 different locations Daily Phone Inquiries & Emails. Answered Daily inspections Code Violation Issues: Short-term Rentals &) = residential ( ongoing) Nuisance (Trash, waste, burning, etc.)2 in progress Encroachment issues (1) on-going Multiple complaints and questions about various code enforcement Apalachicola Margaret Key Public Library April 2025 Library hours are 10am to 6pm Monday = Friday, and Sundays from 12pm to 4pm. We are YOUR City of Apalachicola Library. Come sign up for your FREE Apalachicola library card. Any library offering is FREE to the public. Our Friends of the Library group' is the Patrons of the Apalachicola Library Society (PALS). They are a 501c3 nonprofit and membership forms to join are in the library. Follow us on Facebook or Instagram QApalachespupielbvarx for the latest! April 2025 Statistics: - 2,877 patrons visited our library - 26 new accounts opened - 294 patrons used our computers - 614 books/movles/tems circulated - 446 items donated to the library - $827.40 collected as library revenue 82 hours donated by our wonderful volunteers = 19,950 people reached on social media We THANK YOU for your patronage! We continue to send Library Director Lucy our love and best wishes for her complete recovery. The lovely, springtime weather on the Forgotten Coast didn't stop patrons from visiting the library. We continue to have something for everyone. A STEAM event organized by PALS volunteer Rich Lenhart, made for an exciting afternoon, with kids learning about physics and vacuum chambers; many kids participated. Richard also hosted our monthly Chess Club; he's difficult to beat. PALS offered an entertaining Classic Movie Night, showing the classic African Queen' with Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn. The library hosted another fly-fishing round table this month, tying flies with Shan Raetzloff. After school kids enjoyed building and painting bird houses at our monthly craft time. The Memoir Writing Group continues every second and fourth Tuesday. United WayMITA (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance) volunteers continued preparing free tax returns for anyone making under 64k per year. They prepared 101 tax returns!! The library is grateful for all our wonderful volunteers! Remember, this is YOUR library. We also welcome out-of-town visitors! We invite you to come in, grab a calendar, a free cup of coffee or tea, a few books, and enjoy fellowship with other library visitors. Your City of Apalachicola Library helps with reading, writing, and learning, and offers a suite of printlcopy/scanfaxland notary services. We loan FREE books, movies, puzzles, board games, and items from our Library of Things, and offer FREE audio books, e- books, and digital magazines through the Libby app. We also have a Book sale space on-site with FREE magazines. All donations go to our Friends of the Library group, PALS. Free Legal Help through volunteers from Legal Services of Northwest Florida is available the first Thursday of each month; appointments are required. We also offer Yoga weekly (in a by-donation class) on Mondays @ 6:15pm, Bring Me A Book Forgotten Coast hosts 'Books for Babies' weekly on Tuesday mornings @ 10:30am, and Mahjong meets on Wednesday and Fridays mornings @ 10. Our once-a-month Book Club meets each 3rd Wednesday @ 6pm; and Homework Help (FREE tutoring!) is by appointment. Let us know how we can serve you! Call: 850-653-8436 or email: acisciaibaxBsmalicon Isel Sanchez-Whiteley & Barbara 'Nissie' McNair, Library Assistants Lucy Carter, Library Director CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 10th, 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes Attendance: Jim Bachrach, Elizabeth Milliken, Myrtis Wynn, Greg Golgowski Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM 1. Approval of February 10th, 2025 meeting minutes. a. Motion to approve by Elizabeth Milliken; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn. All in favor - motion carried. 2. Review, Discussion and Decision for Accessory Structure. (R-1)(Historic District) @ 121 Coach Wagoner Blvd., Block 89 Lot 9-10. For Jeff Stephens - Owner; Contractor: TBD a. Motion to approve by Elizabeth Milliken; 2nd by Greg Golgowski. All in favor = motion carried. 3. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & New Construction (R- 1)(Historic District) @ 114 8th Street, Block 69 Lot 3. For Brandon Bogle - Owner; Contractor: Tyler Poloronis a. Dennis Winterringer gave public comment = requested special attention for tree permits and a stormwater management plan. Staff noted that a stormwater management plan would be required during permitting by the building permit clerk/building official. b. Motion to approve contingent upon parking in the rear of the property through the alley but allowing for a parallel parking pad in the front as well, as determined in the architectural review as to be more visually appealing than fully parking in the front by Greg Golgowski; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn. All in favor - motion carried. 4. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Construction (R-2) @ 197 22nd Avenue, Block 236 Lot 16-19. For Ron R. - Owner; Contractor: Tyler Poloronis a. Motion to approve by Greg Golgowski; 2nd by Elizabeth Milliken. All in favor - motion carried. 1 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 10th, 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes 5. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Construction (R-2) @ 191 14th Street, Block 140 Lot 10. For RG Building & Framing Inc. - Owner; Contractor: Ronnie Gooch a. Motion to approve by Greg Golgowski; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn. All in favor - - motion carried. 6. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Construction (R-2) @ 190 13th Street, Block 140 Lot 1. For RG Building & Framing Inc. - Owner; Contractor: Ronnie Gooch a. Motion to approve by Elizabeth Milliken; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn. All in favor - motion carried. 7. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Construction (R-2) @ 193 14th Street, Block 140 Lot 9. For RG Building & Framing Inc. - Owner; Contractor: Ronnie Gooch a. Motion to approve by Greg Golgowski; 2nd by Elizabeth Milliken. All in favor = motion carried. 8. Review, Discussion and Decision for Pavers (R-2) @ 108 22nd Avenue, Block 262 Lot 12-15. For James Grater & Kathleen Binder Owner; Contractor: Self a. Motion to approve by Greg Golgowski; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn. All in favor = motion carried. 9. Review, Discussion and Decision for Accessory Structure (R-1) @ 54 17th Street, Block 113 Lot 3. For Barbara Matheny. - Owner; Contractor: TBD a. Motion to approve by Elizabeth Milliken; 2nd by Greg Golgowski. All in favor = motion carried. 10. Review, Discussion and Decision for Parking Plan (C-1)(Historic District) @ 51 Avenue C, Block 1. For Gibson Inn LLC - Owner; Contractor: N/A a. City Attorney gave an overview on the process that the Gibson owners have went through to get to this point. He clarified that they are not seeking mitigation or waivers, but are requesting to formally tie in 45 Avenue D to the Gibson property in order to meet their parking requirements set by the LDC. 2 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 10th, 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes b. Cutler Edwards presented on behalf of the Gibson Inn. C. Public CommentDiscussion: i. Bonnie Davis gave public comment = questioned the use of 45 Avenue D and wanted to confirm that if the use of 45 Avenue D changes that it would be subject to P&Z review in the future. Cutler Edwards responded and confirmed that the point oft the binding legal agreement is for this purpose as the use of 45 Avenue D would be limited to event space. ii. Board members discussed event space as it pertains to the City LDC = City Planner stated that the LDC does state that the P&Z Board has the ability to assign parking spaces as needed, but historically the P&Z Board has consistently not assigned parking spaces to event spaces. She referenced the most recent application for a wedding pavilion space and the board's determination that parking was not required for it. iii. Bonnie Davis gave public comment and asked it to be made clear what the intent of the structure on 45 Avenue D is and if the intent is to rent it on a regular basis as a venue. She stated that the pavilion mentioned by staff is owned by the state and not subject to the City review sO it is not applicable to this situation. She asked that the board assign parking spots to the event space use as applicable. iv. Board member Jim Bachrach asked the City Planner if other spaces in town rent out as venues and if the City requires parking = City Planner responded that almost every bar in the downtown area rents out for weddings and they are not held to a higher standard for the increased density on event days. She also stated that all City parks rent out for weddings and that the pavilion mentioned previously is a similar situation as it was treated the same as any other application and faced P&Z and City Commission review before approval. V. Bonnie Davis gave public comment and stated that everything mentioned was built prior to 1991 so the ability to require parking is somewhat tied to 3 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 10th, 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes when the structure was put to use. Bonnie Davis stated that if the board does not require parking for the event space then the board needs to define what an event space is and it needs to be made clear that increased density in the future or changing the use of the structure will have to be addressed through a new parking plan. vi. Board member Jim Bachrach asked the City Attorney if this is the intent of the legal document provided to tie in 45 Avenue D? City Attorney confirmed that yes this is the intent of the legal document. If they change the use of the building then they have to come back for a new parking review. vii. Board member Jim Bachrach asked if the event space is removed from the conversation, otherwise does this plan contain all the parking they need to meet the LDC? City Attorney responded yes and that the City has historically not assigned parking for events. He noted that even though the Gibson itself was built prior to 1991 that due to increased density it had to come up to current parking standards. vili. Bonnie Davis asked that the agreement have a default condition specifically laid out in the document. She suggested that these kinds of approvals be recorded as a deed would be sO they run with the property. ix. Board member Jim Bachrach asked if the Gibson sold, would the documents we're discussing and requirements also pass along to the new owner? City attorney stated yes, and that the first document that tied in the Taranto lot' was already filed in this manner and any future documents would also follow this method. He agreed that a provision could be added to the document that if the owner wants to repurpose that parking they must seek approval from the City or risk default. X. Cutler Edwards stated that was fine with him as that has been the intent and the goal has been to be transparent all through this process. 4 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 10t, 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes xi. Board member Jim Bachrach asked staff if the current parking plan meets the LDC? City Attorney stated yes and the structure on 45 Avenue D is listed as an event space and storage on the site plan. xii. Bonnie Davis gave public comment and pointed out that this was an opportunity to reformat and tie in the Taranto lot parking lot as well as 45 Avenue D and keep everything tidy. xiii. City Attorney stated that the first parking lot is already tied in legally, but clarifying and including it in the new documents is not an issue if the board would like to see this. xiv. Citizen asked a question = what happens to the parking plan if the City Commission decides to remove parking spaces on Avenue D after a safety study? City attorney replied and confirmed that any changes to the current streetscape will not affect the parking plan. Citizen also asked if there is a definition of event space currently in the LDC = there is not at this time. d. Board Discussion: i. Jim Bachrach asked ift the attorney could incorporate the changes discussed to the legal document (default provision and tying in of both parking lots) after a contingent approval = City Attorney said yes. ii. Elizabeth Milliken spoke on the safety concerns at the corner of Avenue D and questioned the priorities of the parking plan drafted by the applicant's project engineer. She referenced the City Commission's recent decision to hire an engineer to look at the corner of Avenue D in lieu of safety concerns. She stated that before this parking plan is approved, she would like to see the parking and safety review on Avenue D and Market Street prioritized. iii. City Planner responsed that the parking plan is being reviewed based on current conditions and while she agreed that there is a safety concern on this corner, the parking plan review cannot be held up based on the decision to have a parking study completed. 5 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 10th, 2025 City Meeting Room = 74 6th Street Minutes iv. The City Attorney stated that the current public parking on Avenue D is the City's design and responsibility as it is existing parking. He explained that in the event that the City chooses to remove parking from Avenue D, this action does not affect or remove spots from the Gibson's parking plan submission as this is an existing project and application. V. Jim Bachrach agreed that there may need to be some spots eliminated form the Avenue D ROW, but that it doesn't affect their application as that's 'changing the rules after the game has been played. vi. Greg Golgowski asked if it is the City's responsibility to maintain passable walkways in the City downtown area = City Attorney responded that the current sidewalk in question does meet compliant width. vii. Myrtis Wynn voiced concern on there being too much wiggle room in terms of changing the legal document = she would like for him to make the changes and then bring them back to them for approval. viii. City Attorney stated that any potential changes/provisions could be voiced in the motion and would then be added to the legal document = default provisions and Taranto Lot tie in. ix. Greg Golgowski asked if a definition of event space would be included in the legal document - City Attorney stated that while the City should define this in our LDC, since there is not one at this time it will not be included in the legal document. X. Pete Whitesell spoke as a citizen and noted the importance of the public seeing the legal document before it is finalized. xi. Cutler Edwards addressed Elizabeth Milliken's comments on the parking plan = he clarified that it is based on survey measurements and takes FDOT parking spot dimensions into account. e. Greg Golgowski made a motion to approve, but including the addition of a default provision and declaration that the additional parking lots will all be combined into one document. 6 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 10th, 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes f. Elizabeth Milliken made a motion to table item 10 including review, discussion, and decision for a parking plan until we have in writing all the details for the event space and parking, sO we can read them and understand them, and until the City has a traffic engineer evaluation completed with the emphasis of public safety for pedestrians crossing Market Street from Avenue D. i. Point of order - Greg Golgowski withdrew first motion. ii. City Attorney responded to the motion and stated he is against requiring the applicant to do any of the city's job and the City has already voted to order a safety study on Avenue D, but we have to treat this application like every other application. Run the numbers and be careful about adding anything in that seems to treat this applicant differently than others. iii. Jim Bachrach noted that something that happens 2-3 weeks from now can't affect an application that has been made months ago. City Attorney agreed that we cannot take on-street parking away from an applicant during an open application process. City Attorney stated that changing the parking during the application process is a big red flag, legally speaking. iv. Elizabeth Milliken restated the motion as-is = City Planner stated that including the study as part of the consideration in this project is unnecessary, not applicable and against staff and legal advice. V. Elizabth Milliken stated that her motion remains as-is. vi. Motion died due to lack of second. g. Greg Golgowski made a motion to approve the parking plan with the understanding that the contingency of incorporating the changes to the legal document has to happen before the decision is finalized. i. City Attorney restated the motion = Motion to approve subject to the added declaration and adding the specific provision that if the parking and structure on 45 Avenue D is to be repurposed that they must seek the approval of the City and the Taranto lot is added to this declaration. 7 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 10", 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes ii. Jim Bachrach seconded the motion. He stated that in the event that the City were to remove all parking on Avenue D tomorrow, it would not affect this application or approval in any way - City Attorney agreed. iii. Call for vote = Greg Golgowski and Jim Bachrach in favor, Elizabth Milliken and Myrtis Wynn opposed. Motion died. h. Applicant representative, Cutler Edwards, asked for the reasoning for opposition and direction on how to move forward. i. Greg Golgowski made a motion to table this issue until next month's meeting with the understanding that the modified agreement can be brought back before the board at that meeting and distributed and made available to the public. i. Myrtis Wynn seconded the motion. All in favor = motion caried. j. Greg Golgowski made a motion to request that the City Commission direct the P&Z Board to workshop the definition of event space. 2nd by Myrtis Wynn. All in favor = motion carried. *5 Minute Recess* 11.Review, Discussion and Decision for Sketch Plat (R-2) @ Block 262 Lots 1-7 & 20-30. For It's a Cluster LLC - Owner; Contractor: Poloronis a. Chuck Leonard presented the project. b. City Planner references report and clarifies that while the applicant supplied more documentation than necessary for sketch plat approval, tonight the board is just reviewing the sketch plat documentation. She walked through the plat process as listed in the planner report. C. Applicant presented more details regarding the lot coverage as shown in application materials. d. Kathleen Binder & Jim Grater gave public comment = they mentioned that public notice should be routine for a development of this nature as it does impact the neighborhood. She mentioned a fence dispute with another neighbor and the applicant offered to remedy the fence issue at their own expense. Questions were 8 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 10", 2025 City Meeting Room - 74 6th Street Minutes asked in relation to the stormwater best management property = City Planner and P&Z Board confirmed that this will be covered in the Final Plat presentation. e. Greg Golgowski asked if the parking could be moved to the rear of the homes instead of the front yard, just sO 22nd doesn't look like a line of cars at first glance. f. Greg Golgowski made a motion to approve; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn. All in favor - sketch plat approved. Other/New Business: OutstandingUnresolved Issues: City Planner to request permission to workshop stormwater best management practices and incentives from the City Commission at April meeting. P&Z Board requested that City Planner also request to workshop the definition of "event space". Motion to adjourn the meeting by Greg Golgowski; 2nd by Elizabeth Milliken. Meeting adjourned. 9