PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 26, 2025 FXBG 6:30 PM City of Fredericksburg Joint Meeting with City Council & Planning Commission Community Planning & Building You may view and listen to the meeting in its entirety by going to the Planning Commission page on the City's website: htps/lwww.regilonalwebty.com/tredps The agenda, staff report and associated documents are also available on the Planning Commission page: htpsllwww.federicisurasev2a/Pinning-Commision MEMBERS CITY STAFF David Durham, Chairman Mike Craig, Director Carey Whitehead, Vice-Chairman (remote) Kate Schwartz, Principal Planner - Historic Dugan Caswell, Secretary (absent) Resources and Urban Design Mary-Margaret Marshall Josh Crump, Principal Planner Jane McDonald Caroline Hieber, Administrative Support Joseph Winterer Specialist IV CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Jason Graham, Ward 1 Jonathan Gerlach, Ward 2 Susanna Finn, Ward 3 Jannan Holmes, At-Large Will Mackintosh, At-Large 1. CALL TO ORDER [00:13:46] Chairman Durham called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in Council Chambers and explained meeting procedures for the public. Members of the public were invited to attend or access this meeting by public access television Cox Channel 84, Verizon Channel 42, or online at htps/www.resionalwebtv.om/redpe 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mr. Durham led the Commission and citizens in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. DETERMINATION OF A QUORUM [00:16:26] There were four members and one remote member in attendance of the meeting at the call to order. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA [00:16:46] There were no changes to the agenda. Ms. McDonald moved to approve the agenda. Ms. Marshall seconded. Motion passed 5-0. 5. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL POLICIES, ORDINANCES, OR APPLICATIONS [00:17:06] A. Joint Work Session with Planning Commission and City Council on the Comprehensive Plan (Attachment) Mike Craig presented an overview of the Comprehensive Plan, emphasizing its role as a 20-year guiding document for land use and capital improvements. He highlighted the city's unique position, having completed numerous Small Area Plans that allows for a system-wide approach to this update. The presentation detailed the extensive community engagement process, including public meetings, focus groups, and online surveys, which informed the plan's development. Mr. Craig gave a detailed overview of each chapter of the comprehensive plan, including the vision, goals, and key topics addressed in the plan including urban design, mobility, public open space, housing, historic preservation, public facilities, economic development, and environment, illustrating how the plan's policies and strategies will guide future city development. He emphasized the importance of walkable centers, infill development, and sustainable design practices, referencing a case study from Columbus, Ohio, to illustrate the benefits encouraging more intensive development along key corridors and how it could benefit Fredericksburg. Mr. Craig concluded by outlining the next steps in the plan's adoption process and thanked Commissioners and Council members for their participation. At the conclusion of the presentation, Mr. Durham opened discussion amongst Commissioners and Councilors. Councilor Jason Graham expressed appreciation to the Planning Commission for the invitation to the meeting and acknowledged the importance of collaborative efforts between the city council and the commission. He brought attention to the subject ofthe industrial park within the city. Councilor Graham appreciated the existing businesses in the industrial park but raised a forward-looking question about its future. He inquired whether maintaining an industrial park is the best use for that land in Fredericksburg over the coming decades. He mentioned that while there are valuable businesses currently operating within the park, it is crucial to consider ifthis area might be better suited for redevelopment in the future as part oft the city's long- range planning. He suggested that this would be an area worth examining as Fredericksburg grows and evolves over time, ensuring that the land use remains optimal and aligned with the city's development goals. Mr. Craig responded to Councilor Graham's observations, noting that traditionally discussions around such potential changes have taken place during the area planning process. He mentioned that the Industrial Park and the hospital area are among the final Small Area Plans to be completed. Mr. Craig implied that as part of future area planning, there could be an opportunity to evaluate the role and potential redevelopment of the industrial park. This planning process is opportune for having in-depth discussions about the future of industrial land use in the city. Councilor Jonathan Gerlach questioned if there will be any provisions for curbside electric vehicle (EV) charging in single-family residential zones. Mr. Craig referred to a strategy in the draft plan, addressing the integration of electric vehicle infrastructure. Mr. Craig stated that future development codes and standards will include minimum specifications for EV chargers in new parking facilities. Additionally, the City will also look into zoning ordinance revision where EV charging can integrate into new developments and retrofit into existing historic areas, covering both private properties and public rights-of-way. Councilor Susanna Finn raised a question about the housing section of the comprehensive plan, particularly focusing on the role of neighborhood conservation districts that have previously been identified in the Small Area Plans. She was curious about how the language within the comprehensive plan aims to integrate these specific recommendations from Small Area Plans into a unified policy framework. Susanna Finn highlighted the historical context of identifying neighborhood conservation districts and expressed interest in understanding the intended cohesive policy direction. Kate Schwartz responded by explaining that the comprehensive plan emphasizes robust policy dialogues, especially referencing the discussions held in the context of the Area 5 Plan. These discussions have been instrumental in developing strategies that focus on protecting neighborhoods from inappropriate demolitions. Furthermore, the plan delineates guidelines that are designed to facilitate infill development within neighborhoods, contributing to the evolution of a residential form-based code. This code encourages gentle infill and supports gradual increases in density, harnessing insights from effective policy discussions that took place during the development of the Area 5 Plan. Ms. Schwartz elaborated that the expanded policies within the comprehensive plan are intended to be adaptable and applicable to different neighborhoods throughout the city. This means that the framework respects and builds upon the unique characteristics of each neighborhood, allowing these specific traits to guide the implementation of such policies. The overarching goal is to ensure that these policies are not rigid but flexible enough to be tailored to the individual needs and contexts of various neighborhoods, ultimately leading to a cohesive policy framework that integrates neighborhood conservation efforts in a holistic and considerate manner. Commissioner Mary-Margaret Marshall addressed the issue of housing diversity as outlined in the comprehensive plan. She expressed her ongoing concern that, although the plan aims for diversified housing across all levels, current efforts predominantly emphasize high-end developments. She inquired about measures being implemented to incentivize diverse and affordable housing options. Mr. Craig acknowledged Commissioner Marshall's concerns, stating that while luxury housing developments are prevalent in the area due to its desirability, such developments can increase the availability of housing across other economic strata. However, he emphasized the ongoing need to focus on affordable housing initiatives. Mr. Craig referenced Policy 3 on page 33 of the plan, which supports the development and retention of affordable and workforce housing, including an incentive zoning program. This initiative would potentially offer density bonuses to encourage the development of affordable housing. Furthermore, Mr. Craig highlighted the importance of monitoring current affordable housing units and ensuring their continued participation in relevant programs, particularly as they approach the expiration of programs like the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. The Community Planning and Billing Office is tasked with tracking these properties and coordinating renewal efforts to maintain their affordable status. Commissioner Marshall expressed appreciation for the initiatives outlined but stressed a cautious approach to ensure these plans translate into tangible results. She highlighted concerns related to fulfilling housing demands without diminishing the diversity that is vital to the community's needs. Councilor Will Mackintosh inquired about the origins of the goals articulated in Chapter 3 of the comprehensive plan, questioning whether these were developed by the consultant team. He noted the uniqueness of the goal formulation compared to previous iterations. Mr. Craig responded, explaining the goals were formulated through an extensive community development process. He outlined that a variety of inputs were considered, including community feedback and reference documents such as council priorities. Mr. Craig emphasized the significance of aligning the goals with the community's vision, insights from previous comprehensive plans, the Planning Commission, and focus groups. These efforts collectively informed the development of the plan's goals. Councilor Mackintosh also sought clarification regarding the concept of "inherited character, I which was highlighted as a late addition to the draft comprehensive plan. He voiced concern that the term appeared to be somewhat vague and potentially inconsistent with specific recommendations within the plan, which seemed to focus on updating and improving past development designs, particularly in areas transitioning from 20th-century car-dependent structures to more mixed-use, walkable communities. Mr. Craig responded, highlighting that the term was deliberately chosen to enhance the community design chapter and its focus on urban design and community fabric. He explained that the term acknowledges the city's existing development, including both its successful historic urban design and less desirable mid-20th-century developments like sprawling shopping centers. He argued that understanding this 'inherited character" allows for tailored redevelopment strategies, leveraging the city's positive urban DNA while addressing past shortcomings. Ms. Schwartz added that "inherited character" serves as a functional synonym for existing context, but it additionally recognizes developmental patterns, not just structures. Ms. Schwartz used Route 1 as an example to illustrate how the conçept acknowledges existing networks and character structures while integrating both favorable and challenging elements of the landscape to guide thoughtful development without discarding the area's historical context. Councilor Jannan Holmes expressed interest in the planning strategies for walkable hubs within the city, emphasizing the importance of incorporating essential services, such as social services, throughout these areas. She highlighted the importance of ensuring that such services are accessible across the city, not confined to a single district. Specific examples mentioned included optometric services and expanded recreational activities, supported by recent collaborations, such as the recently discussed memorandum of understanding with Parks and Rec and local schools. Chairman Durham elaborated on these concerns by referencing similar discussions held earlier, such as the imperative of retaining a grocery store in the Eagle Village vicinity. Durham stressed the significance of creating a regulatory environment aimed at attracting diverse business services to meet the varied needs of Fredericksburg residents. In response, Mr. Craig commended the insightful discussion and referred to the strategies outlined within the comprehensive plan that emphasize maintaining current public services downtown while planning for population growth. He underscored the importance of development styles that enhance walkability and the potential for housing dedicated to public employees. Councilor Holmes proceeded to emphasize that redevelopment is a prime opportunity for meaningful mixed-use integration, advocating for thoughtfully interspersed residential and commercial spaces beyond the typical restaurants below, apartments above' paradigm. Commissioner Winterer raised a question regarding transportation planning, specifically focusing on walkability and transit within key corridors. He expressed concern over the limited budget allocated for infrastructure improvements. Highlighting Fredericksburg's status as a small city with significant competition for grant funding, Winterer inquired whether the comprehensive plan addresses strategies to expedite these improvements. He suggested linking them to land use scenarios to enhance walkability, particularly using Area 5 as an example, which aims to increase mixed-use and residential density. Winterer questioned the necessary enhancements on major thoroughfares to accommodate such development styles effectively. Mr. Craig provided a detailed overview of the transportation strategy and funding framework. He emphasized that the planning efforts for Area 5 are focused on improving connectivity and reducing congestion along Route 1. This would involve the integration of developments into the public transportation database and require any significant development to undertake a transportation improvement analysis. On a regional level, the city has been effective in securing funding for transportation enhancements, including expansions to the shared path network, the creation of the Dixon Park connector, and other local initiatives. Discussions are underway regarding potential revisions to interstate access, which might include the addition of a river crossing and a secondary access point to re-route traffic into Central Park, ultimately enhancing the capacity of Route 3. Locally, the strategy aims to address capacity issues by enhancing the existing street grid. The city has secured regional funds for active transport projects, focusing on connectivity and growth. Notable efforts include expanding the shared use path network for better pedestrian and bike access, and the Dixon Park connector to link downtown with the city's edges. Acknowledging budget constraints, Mr. Craig highlighted successful grant competitions and collaboration with regional bodies like FAMPO and VDOT for major infrastructure talks. Commissioner McDonald commented on the importance of maintaining accessibility and ADA- compliant pathways in walkable centers, ensuring inclusivity. She also appreciated the focus on creating adult and child daycare centers, noting this aligns with previous discussions about losing a local daycare center. Additionally, she had a question regarding public health services, specifically about the RACSB locations. She noted familiarity with RACSB and questioned the mentioned locations, as she believed not all RACSB locations were included. In response, Mr. Craig noted her concern and suggested an offline discussion to ensure all locations are thoroughly documented and included. Chairman Durham sought confirmation on whether the current draft plan effectively outlines a pathway for the city's future developments, emphasizing its role in increasing the housing availability in Fredericksburg. Mr. Craig responded affirmatively, indicating that the plan provides the foundational framework necessary to enhance the housing supply across Fredericksburg. He highlighted that it includes workflow steps outlining the ordinance work required to quantify development across various areas and define on-the-ground outcomes. Mr. Craig cited the next immediate implementation step as completing the shopping center redevelopment strategies currently underway. Moving the discussion to walkable centers, Chairman Durham expressed concern about the subsequent implications of lines and notations within the comprehensive plan, referencing the representation of walkability in certain districts such as Celebrated Virginia South. Mr. Craig acknowledged the necessity for updates to the representation of major walkability areas, notably required for the downtown sector. The diagrammatic nature of the current representations was clarified, and it was noted both the transect map and Small Area Plans form integral elements of the overarching plan. Chairman Durham suggested adding more city and community walkable centers due to their prevalence across the city, advocating for goals focused on connectivity among these centers, with Mr. Craig confirming that establishing such connectivity remains a goal. Aligning on future improvements, Chairman Durham requested a change in terminology from "sidewalk improvements" to 'pedestrian infrastructure improvements, a asserting that widespread development of these should be reflected as a priority. Mr. Craig acknowledged that clarity on the map would scrutinize pedestrian improvements. Switching the focus to housing, Chairman Durham emphasized the crucial need to align current zoning codes with historic housing types actively displayed throughout Fredericksburg. He pointed out that existing residential zones showcase diverse architecture not recognized formally by zoning regulations, rendering some historical buildings non-conforming. Mr. Craig aligned with this insight, confirming that an integral review of historic development patterns is embedded within the plan, aiming to re-permit and legitimize them through updated codes. Moreover, he acknowledged challenges presented by current lot standards, emphasizing forthcoming work on the general development code to better accommodate diverse housing formats like cottage courts. These converging discussions underpin a broad strategic movement toward more representative, cohesive, and functional planning documentation and policy-setting within the City's comprehensive plan, aiding in setting the city's trajectory towards reflective growth. Commissioner Marshall highlighted the prevalence of parking lots in the city and advocated for incentivizing diverse, affordable housing development. She expressed concern about developers focusing solely on high-priced projects. Mr. Craig responded, acknowledging the need for affordable housing and suggesting a pre-approved building type program"to streamline construction and reduce costs for smaller homes. Chairman Durham then raised concerns about a map in the economic development section, noting discrepancies with the Area 1 plan. He stressed the importance of aligning the maps in the Comprehensive Plan with the city's vision and area plans, advocating for a focus on neignborhod-serving businesses and redevelopment, rather than existing conditions. Mr. Craig agreed to review and revise any maps in the Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Durham brought up a topic from Mr. Craig's presentation ofthe "Corridor Concept" study from Columbus, Ohio how it encourages more intensive development along key corridors in Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area. Durham questioned if the "Corridor Concepts" was intended for city-wide implementation or regional cooperation. Mr. Craig clarified it was illustrative of the City's existing planning, showcasing the benefits of walkable centers, and demonstrating the city's unique position in the region regarding walkability. Chairman Durham opened the floor for additional commentary, welcoming any lingering questions or remarks from Commissioners and Council members. Councilor Gerlach proposed an exploration of Henrico County's approach to utilizing data center revenue for housing initiatives. He noted that Henrico County established a housing trust fund with a commitment of $60 million, facilitating the construction of 100 to 150 middle- income homes annually. He suggested considering a review of how other jurisdictions are allocating their data center revenues. He anticipated a forthcoming shift in discussions upon the commencement of similar revenue inflow, emphasizing the need to strategize its effective allocation. Councilor Graham revisited the topic of the industrial park and its relevance in long-term city planning, building on previous housing discussions. He proposed a review of its future viability as the value of city land continues to increase compared to surrounding regions. Councilor Graham projected that current businesses might opt to relocate to more cost-effective areas outside the city, driven by market incentives, particularly as land and lease values rise in urban Fredericksburg. He noted a comparable scenario had nearly occurred with a business previously. In preparing for a potential transition, he recommended initiating discussions on possible redevelopment plans for the industrial park, suggesting that it may not remain a suitable use of land within Fredericksburg's urban core in future decades. Mr. Craig acknowledged Councilor Graham's comment and noted that the final two area plans to be completed will cover the hospital and the industrial park. Historically, discussions about the relevance in long-term planning and similar topics have occurred within the framework for those area plans and will continue as those move forward. Councilor Finn sought clarity regarding the representation of walkable urban centers on the comprehensive plan map, questioning whether the depiction reflects current conditions or serves as an aspirational goal. She highlighted Route 3 as a particular point of interest, noting its vision contrasted with present realities. Mr. Craig clarified that the map serves an aspirational purpose but incorporates current community center areas from existing plans, which may evolve over time. He emphasized that, although there is an aspirational element, there may be certain features in those area that aren't likely to change easily. Councilor Finn came back to the topic of the industrial park and recollected that an Economic Development and Tourism report from two years ago showed nearly zero percent vacancy in the industrial park, highlighting its effectiveness and importance. Councilor Finn emphasized the need to balance redevelopment with maintaining business diversity and essential services unique to industrial zones, ensuring they're accessible without requiring long travel distances. She urged incorporating these considerations into any evaluation of the industrial park. Councilor Graham reiterated his openness to maintaining the current use of the industrial park, clarifying that his intention is to prepare for future scenarios where market conditions might lead businesses to consider relocation. He emphasized his appreciation of the current status, noting the zero percent vacancy rates as a positive indicator. Commissioner Marshall raised a concern regarding the integration of the area plans with the overall comprehensive plan, emphasizing the importance of cohesive alignment. She inquired whether each area plan had been thoroughly applied to ensure they work seamlessly together. Mr. Craig affirmed her concern and mentioned that forthcoming plan initiation would feature changes to three or four elements to ensure better cohesion between the area plans and the comprehensive plan. Councilor Gerlach highlighted that Central Park's vacancy rate is notably higher compared to the Industrial Park. He expressed a fondness for the Small Area 1 plan, which envisions an urban core development for southern Central Park. However, he expressed concerns about the lack of a clear path or actionable steps to achieve this vision, indicating a need to revisit the approved smaller plans to evaluate progress and formulate ideas for advancing redevelopment. He suggested a specific strategy for addressing Central Park's redevelopment, advocating for the creation of a second economic development authority exclusively focused on Central Park. He emphasized the considerable scope of this task, underscoring the necessity for dedicated resources in order to actively pursue and facilitate the area's future transformation. Councilor Holmes noted, in response to Councilor Finn's earlier comment, that Central Park currently maintains a 96 percent occupancy rate. She remarked that this level of occupancy indicates Central Park's performance may be more robust than previously perceived. Chairman Durham revisited a point raised by Councilor Finn in previous meeting where she had proposed that the transportation chapter of the comprehensive plan should incorporate lessons learned from previous VDOT projects in order to help ensure that the comprehensive plan's language is robust enough to guide VDOT's implementation of transportation projects effectively and align with Fredericksburgs strategic objectives to ensure that the city's development goals are met effectively. Mr. Craig affirmed that the comprehensive plan already incorporates measures addressing this issue. He emphasized the ongoing need for collaboration and integration among VDOT and all City departments to help with those efforts. This is particularly pertinent as the focus intensifies on pedestrian elements and traffic calming. Councilor Mackintosh followed up on the transportation discussion, emphasizing the importance of the "Complete Streets" initiative. He expressed a desire for stronger language regarding complete streets, with a focus on pedestrian element and traffic calming, to be applied more firmly across the comprehensive plan. This would serve as a clear message to both regional and state partners, indicating the city's priorities. Mr. Craig referenced plan language that stated "balance the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, and motor vehicle operators.. " however, Councilor Mackintosh pushed for prioritizes" over 'balances"to better reflect the city's desired emphasis. Mr. Craig agreed to revise the language. Chairman Durham requested a timeline for the submission of written input regarding the Comprehensive Plan draft from both the Commissioners and Council members to ensure timely provision to the consultants for the April 23rd work session. Mr. Craig outlined the process starting with City Council's initiation oft the public review on April 8th, followed by a Planning Commission work session on April 9th to discuss initial comments. Chairman Durham proposed that Planning staff review the meeting transcript, extract relevant suggestions, and compile them into a matrix. He then requested all Commissioners and Council members to submit their written comments by April 7th, for review before the April 9th work session. Mr. Craig concluded the joint work session by showing the consultants' online interactive tool for the Comprehensive Plan, featuring interactive maps and accessible information. He emphasized its potential for updates and collaboration with the GIS department and briefly displayed the formatted draft, praising the consultants' work. Chairman Durham thanked the City Council members for their attendance and participation, expressing appreciation for their insights and affirming ongoing collaboration on the Comprehensive Plan Update. 6. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR DISCLOSURES OF CONTACT None 7. OLD BUSINESS None 8. PUBLIC HEARING - New None 9. OTHER BUSINESS None 10. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT Mr. Durham opened the floor for Public Comment. No one in chambers and no letters received. 11. ADOPTION OF MINUTES [02:05:42] The meeting adopted the minutes from December 11, 2024, without modifications. 12. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS [02:06:07] A. Chairman Comments Chairman Durham formally acknowledged and extended his appreciation to Vice Chair Whitehead for her exemplary service and exceptional leadership during her tenure as acting chair. He furthermore officially acknowledged the appointment of the seventh commissioner, Thomas Johnson, and looks forward to welcoming him to the Planning Commission. B. Commissioner Comments There were no additional comments from the other commissioners. 13. PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMENTS [02:07:22] Mr. Craig reported that several items previously recommended by the Planning Commission were scheduled for City Council consideration on April gth, including the Area 5 Small Area Plan adoption and associated rezoning application, and the Special Use Permit for 400 Princess Anne Street. Josh Crump provided an update regarding the Fiscal Year 2026 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) process. He stated that once the finalized CIP document is received from the Finance Department following City Council's budget discussions, it will be distributed to the Planning Commission. A meeting of the Commission's CIP review committee (Vice Chair Whitehead, Commissioner Marshall) will then be scheduled, likely the following week. The full Planning Commission will subsequently discuss the CIP, with Finance staff present, during the April 9th meeting. Responding to an inquiry from Chairman Durham regarding the status of the commercial corridor revitalization study and related to the Commercial Highway (CH) zoning district discussed during Area 5 deliberations, Mr. Crump reported that the consulting firm for the study is actively working on the analysis, including market research. A draft report is anticipated by early April, with potential presentation to the Economic Development Authority (EDA) and Planning Commission targeted for mid-to-late April, pending coordination around budget and Comprehensive Plan schedules. 14. ADJOURNMENT [02:11:53 The next Planning Commission Meeting is scheduled for April 9, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. Chairman Durham adjourned the meeting at 8:28 p.m. - L. David B. Durham, Chairman FXBG City of Fredericksburg FXBG FORWARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE - 4 JOINT CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 2025 XXXXX2 - - FXBG City of Fredericksburg What is a Comprehensive Plan? Long-term policy guiding document Guides funding, project prioritization, grant eligibility Enabled and required by Code of Virginia - - FXBG City of Fredericksburg CITYOF FREDERICKSBURG VIRGINIA How is FXBG's Comp Plan Mapof Small Area Plan Boundaries unique? all Hill C approach, Calebrete Va. Park & Bottom-up building on local planning efforts already compléted Small Area Plans Cele ate Va. /CentralPark pute Macro-level focus on D 2 Fallil Braehead - Route 3 8 city- a Dixon 4 Hospital Cowan Univen ty Central Route 6 wide that connect Princess Anne N. Routel systems Downb South Dixon and enhance local areas Brache ad 10 Lafayette (S. Route Railroads Road Centerlines City Boundary - MAP PSLETE FXBG City of Fredericksburg Comprehensive Planning Process Joint Work Session Public Hearing w/ Project w/ City Council Planning Commission Kick-Off June 11 May 14 April 10th Present Final Draft Integrate Recent February 26, 2025 Planning Input October 2024 May/June July/Aug/Sept Oct/Nov Dec/Jan/Feb Mar/Apr 2025 Prepare& Refine StoryMap - Ongoing Open Survey, 20+ public engagement sessions Tour, Updated Public Database Report to Hearing w/ Planning City Council Draft & Refine the Commission Prepare Final Draft Joint Work w/ PC & June/July May 8th Vision Statement December-rebruary CC Joint Work Session Septèmber March 26 w/ Planning Prepare Draft Comp Commission Plan Chapters June 12 November Plan Timeline Planning Joint City Council Joint Planning Community Fourth in Project Kickoff Commission Work Session Commission Conversation #1 Fredericksburg April 10, 2024 Discussion June 11, 2024 Work Session Arts & Craft Show May 8, 2024 June 12, 2024 June 26, 2024 July 4, 2024 Mayfield Fall Hill Real Estate Focus Business Focus First Friday Farmer's Market Community Community Group Group July 5, 2024 July 13, 2024 Meeting Meeting September 11, September 13, July 17,2024 August 22, 2024 2024 2024 Economic Sports Saturday Community Human Services ARB Discussion ARB Discussion Development September 28, Conversation #2 Focus Group November 18, Breakfast Meeting 2024 October 5, 2024 October9, 2024 October 28, 2024 2024 November 21, 2024 ARB Comp Plan Committee ARB Comp Plan Pathways Clean & Green ARB Comp Plan Housing Advisory Committee Committee > Committee Committee Committee December 12, January 9, 2025 January 27, 2025 February 3, 2025 February 6, 2025 February 6, 2025 2024 Economic Community Pathways Recreation Housing Advisory Rotary Club Development Conversation #3 Committee Commission Committee Meeting Authority February 26, February 24, February 10, 2025 2024 2025 March 20, 2025 March 25, 2025 March 26, 2025 Public Engagement Methods City-Wide Community Meetings: 06/26/2024, 10/05/2024, and 2/26/2025 Neignbornood Meetings: Mayfield and Fall Hill Neighborhoods Focus Groups / Boards and Commissions: Wha. o you want MGRE of in 3G? 19 meetings (Oct 2024 = March 2025) Pop-Up Events: Fourth in Fredericksburg Show, 07/04/2024 First Friday, 07/05/2024 EKI Farmers' Market, 07/13/2024 Sports Saturday, 09/28/2024 Online: Survey - 588 respondents over the period 06/14/24 through 10/16/2024 Comprehensive Plan Ambassador e-mail list Fredericksburg Forward Story Map project website with comment map Takeaways from Community Conversations Community Meetings: Residents appreciate Fredericksburg's history, culture, and sense of community. They want to preserve and enhance these aspects. Improve transit, bike, and pedestrian infrastructure; address traffic congestion and safety. Focus Groups: Appreciation for how downtown has come to life. Participants see many development opportunities but feel the community is often resistant to any change. It's challenging to find or build space for new businesses. Community Conversations (cont'd) Pop-Up Events: People expressed concern with affordable housing, historic preservation, and traffic congestion. People want to preserve the character of the area. Neighborhood Meetings: Need to provide more grocery stores across the city. Develop vacant and underutilized properties, Survey: Respondents want Fredericksburg to be a safe, walkable place. Future Plan Timeline Planning Commission / City Council Initiation Planning Commission City Council Discussion Work Session March 26, 2025 April 8, 2025 April 9, 2025 Planning Commission Planning Commission City Council Public Work Session Public Hearing Hearing April 23, 2025 May 14, 2025 June/July FXBG City of Fredericksburg Comp Plan Chapters Introduction Vision Goals Community Design Urban Design and community Fabric Mobility Public Open Space Socioeconomic and Demographic Profile Housing Historic Preservation Public Facilities Economic Development Environmental Small Area Plans FXBG City of Fredericksburg Vision Fredericksburg is the cultural and economic hub of a fast-growing east coast metropolitan region. The city is a model of urban life that nourishes and enriches its residents while promoting economic vitality, historic integrity, environmental sustainability, and cultural vibrancy. Our diverse community enjoys a high quality of life enhanced by neighborhoods that are safe, accessible, and interconnected: Itis a place that works foreveryone; a place where people want to be! FXBG City of Fredericksburg Goals Community Historic Preservation Equity V Resiliency Sustainability FXBG City of Fredericksburg Systems Approach Urban Design & Community Fabric Environment Public Open Space - Economic Housing Development Public Historic Facilities & Preservation Services FXBG City of Fredericksburg Community Design Fredericksburg's traditional walkable urban form is a E 95 E defining feature, this plan calls ALAITDAVO - - 3 for replicating this form through o y of elvo 1 a 6 / S 6 Ca 51 a system of walkable centers. Cowan Blvd à V - S 5 à S - WALKABLE CENTERS 5 IN a % REGIONAL Blue GrayPkwy 3 Context Snapshot: cy e - Examples COMMUNITY 5 & yo € Blvd s Inherited Character CORRIDORS TYPES MalewIa S GATEWAY /ENTRYWAY e Mobility ane WALKABLEURBAN Open Space WALKABLEE BOULEVARD Housing URBANT MAINS STREET 1 FXBG City of Fredericksburg Community Design Fredericksburg's traditional walkable urban form is a E 95 E defining feature, this plan calls ALAITDAVO - - 3 for replicating this form through o y of elvo 1 a 6 / S 6 Ca 51 a system of walkable centers. Cowan Blvd à V - S 5 à S - WALKABLE CENTERS 5 IN a % Policy Snapshot: REGIONAL Blue GrayPkwy 3 cy - 1 Establish a vision for walkable centers COMMUNITY e then permit it to be built through 5 Blvd & yo € s CORRIDORS TYPES MalewIa S development codes.1 GATEWAY /ENTRYWAY ane e WALKABLEURBAN (1) FXBG Forward pg.15 WALKABLEE BOULEVARD URBANT MAINS STREET 1 FXBG City of Fredericksburg Community Design Fredericksburg's traditional walkable urban form is a E 95 E defining feature, this plan calls ALAITDAVO - - 3 for replicating this form through o y of elvo 1 a 6 / S 6 Ca 51 a system of walkable centers. Cowan Blvd à V - S 5 à S - WALKABLE CENTERS 5 IN a % Strategy Snapshot: REGIONAL Blue GrayPkwy 3 cy - 4.a Use and regularly update the COMMUNITY e 5 & yo € Capital Impact study to inçorporate Blvd s CORRIDORS TYPES MalewIa S school board and public safety capital GATEWAY /ENTRYWAY ane e planning into land use decisions on WALKABLEURBAN WALKABLEE BOULEVARD major projects.1 URBANT MAINS STREET 1 (1) FXBG Forward pg.15 FXBG City of Fredericksburg Community Design Policy Snapshot: 1. Establish a vision for walkable 95 centers then permit it to be built ( through development codes. ALAITDAVO - - 3 o y of elvo 1 a 6 Conclusion and implementation of / S 6 Ca 51 % Cowan Blvd à Shopping Center Redevelopment V - S 5 à S - Study WALKABLE CENTERS IN a % REGIONAL Blue GrayPkwy 3 cy e - Strategy Snapshot: COMMUNITY yo € 5.C Ensure that new development and 5 Blvd & s CORRIDORS TYPES MalewIa S redevelopment projects reinforce and GATEWAY /ENTRYWAY ane e connect to the Uplands and Riverfront WALKABLEURBAN WALKABLEE BOULEVARD Open Space Networks. URBANT MAINS STREET 1 Reviéw framework for future development as it relates to City- wide systems FXBG City of Fredericksburg Mobility Rivery Transportation systems provide 95 fall Ave 2 - A sustainable and accessible 5 6 ely walking, biking, and transit. / & cn R 4 2 a pl Blv % e Ro K es 5 a % A Objectives: Local Connectivity ae Regional Connectivity € Street Grid Improvement Future Intersection or & a 3 Analysis 1 Electrification ree Future Bridges S Equity Propcsed Interstate Changes Up to Date Parking Future Nature Trails Future Streat Advanced Technology.2 Connections Future On Street Bicycle Future Shared Use (2) FXBG Forward pg.24 Paths Future Sidewalk Improvements Improvements Future Street 25 0.5 Miles Map 6: Future Mobility Improvements FXBG City of Fredericksburg Mobility Rivery Transportation systems provide 95 fall Ave 4 a sustainable and accessible 3 € € & elva $ ? walking, biking, and transit. 6 , - * / 4 a - pit ca3 Blv 5 & Rowe K es 5 - % A Policy Snapshot: 1. Create complete streets in new and existing 31 2 communities that work for all transportation ae modes.2 Future Intersection 3 or A Improvement a 1 Analysis ai Future Bridges de S Strategy Snapshot: Propcsed Interstate Changes 1.b Execute the pavement condition study and Future Nature Trails develop a right-of-way Asset Management Strategy Future Connections Streat to add complete street elements or traffic calming Future On Street Bicycle during the repaving process. 2 Future Shared Use Paths Future Sidewalk Improvements (2) FXBG Forward pg. 24 Future Street 25 0.5 Miles Improvements Map 6: Future Mobility Improvements FXBG City of Fredericksburg Public Open Space Fredericksburg's open space network is woven throughout the city with a series of parks, trails, and natural areas. These areas contribute on many levels. Objectives Snapshot: Site Specific Master Planning Partnerships Next Generation Open Spaces Sports Tourism Legend Safe Access Future Nature Trails Future Sidewalk Existing Trails Green Streets Future On Street Bicycle * Improvements Existing Parks Major Streams and Future Shared Use Waterways Green Design3 Paths E Spaces Future Accessible Open a (3) FXBG Forwardpg.28 Uplands Open Space / Riverfront Open Space Map FXBG E Hanson Ave FaIFHII-AVe BSA à ont 91 % a Slva Cana St a PV - Cowan-Blvd. gerny - BIvs A a $ V * - a ROV NN - a ver S - oue Pkwy Charles St 13 Gray glue Sye 0 Legend BlVd Future Nature Trails dlewila.e Future On Street Bicycle e Shared Use sose Future Paths Future Sidewalk Improvements A Existing Parks Future Accessible Open Spaces Existing Trails : 4 Major Streams and / Waterways FXBG City of Fredericksburg Housing Fredericksburg residents appreciate their high quality of life and the character of the existing neighborhoods that provide it. HOUSING Objectives Snapshot: Preservation Revitalization Variety of Housing Homeownership Housing Supply Affordable Housing Community 4 (4) FXBG Forward pg.32-33 FXBG City of Fredericksburg Housing The key to housing affordability is - increasing housing supply. Given land constraints, the main option is redevelopment of existing assets in a way that enhances existing neighborhoods. - - E Strategy Snapshot: 1(a) Update the City's form-baséd and traditional development regulations to explicitly permit and encourage the replication of downtown's built form in walkable urban centers. Key features to replicate include block sizés and layouts, alleys, lot sizes and shapes, public frontages, Buldingonentultion,and building types. 4 dobe (4) FXBG Forward pg.33 FXBG Household projections by locality Estimated culumative growth in 2030, 2040, and 2050 Caroline Fredericksburg King George Orange Spotsylvania Stafford 35k 30k 25k 20k 15k 10k 5k Ok Source: HDAdvisors çalculations of Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service at UVa projections. FXBG Surplus or deficit of rental units by AMI Rental gap for Fredericksburgregion Above 120% AMI -4070 100-120% AMI -1334 80-100% AMI -1146 50-80% AMI 7864 30-50% AMI 2568 Below 30% AMI -3882 -4000 4000 8000 Source: HDAdvisors calculations of2018-2022 ACS5-year data. FXBG Minimum income needed to purchase median home by bedroom Based on all sales in 2024 through November Median renter income: 5+ bedrooms $139,432 $55,500 41 bedrooms $116,304 3bedrooms $88,526 Sources: Fredericksburg Area Association of REALTORSB; Bright MLS. FXBG Median Household Median Gross Rent Median Home Value Income (Rank) (Rank) (Rank) % Rental Units % Owner Units Alexandria - City 113,179 (4) 1,983 (3) 655,700 (2) 57% 43% Arlington - County 137,387 (1) 2,227 (1) 833,300 (1) 58% 42% Charlottesville - City 67,177 (9) 1,357 (7) 398,400 (6) 58% 42% Christiansburg - Town 71,468 (7) 1,125 (11) 231,200 (13) 38% 62% Fairfax - City 128,708 (3) 1,972 (4) 649,600 (3) 32% 68% Fredericksburg - City 83,445 (6)! 1,462 (6) - 438,400 (5) 62% 38% Harrisonburg - City 56,050 (14)] 1,060 (13) 263,700 (10) 62% 38% Herndon - Town 133,403 (2) 2,029 (2) 524,400 (4) 35% 65% Manassas - City 110,559 (5) 1,784 (5) 393,900 (7) 26% 74% Norfolk - City 60,998 (11) 1,188 (10) 254,200 (11) 55% 45% Petersburg - City 46,930 (17) 1,082 (12) 147,200 (17) 63% 37% Richmond - City 59,606 (13) 1,227 (9) 308,300 (8) 57% 43% Roanoke - City 51,523 (16) 917 (16) 162,000 (16) 48% 52% Salem - City 68,402 (8) 1,053 (14) 231,900 (12) 36% 64% Staunton - Çity 59,731 (12) 984 (15) 219,500 (15) 41% 59% Waynesboro - City 52,519 (15) 909 (17) 226,700 (14) 43% 57% Winchester - City 62,495 (10) 1,230 (8) 299,900 (9) 56% 44% FXBG Publicly Supported Affordable Housing 2% No. of Locality Affordable Units Caroline 95 Fredericksburg 2,518 Caroliné King George 389 Fredericksburg Spotsylvania 696 42% Stafford 2276 King George Total 5,974 L- Spotsylvania 1,400 Housing Choice Vouchers Stafford 7,374 total designated affordable units. 12% 0 38,588 low-income households across / region. The publicly supported housing can meet the need of 19% of the region's low-income households. FXBG City of Fredericksburg Historic Preservation 95 8 Preservation is no mere homage - to the past, it is integral to the future - as a dynamic philosophy of change, preservation is a critical factor in Character Structures planning urban National Register Buildings 6 Sites growth. National Register Historic District Bottiefield Sites FXBG Historic Overloy Districts 88 Sensitive Cultural Areas Eligible National Registert District National Register Historic District 025 05 Miles Map 1: Historic Preservation Assets Historic Preservation FXBG City of Fredericksburg Fredericksburg Forward Snapshot: Community Design and Land Use Policy 6. Meld preservation and land use to emulate successful 88 & & % & 88 % historic urban fabric. - 29 Housing Policy 5. Encourage neighborhood preservation, rehabilitation, and revitalization, while 8 discouraging displacement. Public Facilities and Services Policy 7. Strengthen preservation and maintenance of public facilities. Economic Development Policy 10. Implement a Character Structures National Register comprehensive economic development strategy Buildingsa Sites - National Register focused on investment in historic preservation. Historic District Battiefield Sites FXBG Historic Overioy Districts Environment Objective 7. The Greenest Buildings: 888 Sensitive Cultural Areas sensitively retrofit existing historic buildings and E Eligible Register Notional District identify sustainable historical design practices that can National Historic District Register be applied to new development to ensure long-term 0.25 05 Miles stewardship of the built environment Mop 1: Historic Preservation Assets FXBG City of Fredericksburg Historic Preservation Preservation is no mere homage to the past, it is integral to the future - as a dynamic philosophy of change, preservation is a critical factor in planning urban growth. Policy Snapshot: 3. Emphasize diverse stories and the recognition of underrepresented resources to work toward telling the full story of Fredericksburgs past and building an equitable future.5 (5) FXBG Forward pg.38 FXBG Planning Life Cyclé City of Fredericksburg 2021 Update incorporating Small Area Plans the 2010 Preservation Plan FXBG Forward into the comprenensive Plan Preservation Comprenensive Plan update Policy Plan 2021 Archaeology Ordinance Capital Regulations / e 2021 updated Historic District Idlewild Rehabilitation Improvements Design Guidelines Renwick Adaptive Reuse Code Character tructures/Form-Based Auction Block Memorial Codes Cutting-Edge Neighborhood Conservation Districts FXBG City of Fredericksburg Public Facilities & Services The efficient and effective provision of public facilities and services to all Fredericksburg residents is a key organizing principle for the City. Objectives Snapshot: Education Green Design Connectivity Capital Impacts - Preservation Efficiency Riverfront.6 (6) FXBG Forward pg.47 FXBG City of Fredericksburg Economic Development 5 The City's downtown is a unique economic asset, representing 76 the past, present, and future of the city as a walkable center where residents can live, work, play, and shop. Objectives Snapshot: Revitalization - a Enhance Economic Competitiveness Ii Cultivate a Skilled Workforce Expand Tourism / - Diversification/ (7) FXBG Forward pg.52 Legend Creative Maker Riverfront Walkable Urban Places Downtown Shopping Center Industrial Park Green Field Transmission/Sub Hospital University FXBG City of Fredericksburg Economic Development 5 The City's downtown is a unique economic asset, representing 76 the past, present, and future of the city as a walkable center where residents can live, work, play, and shop. Policy Snapshot: 1. Enable the development of an - a Ii environmentally sensitive Technology Campus including data center development in the North End of / - Area 1.7 (7) FXBG Forward pg.53 Legend Creative Maker Riverfront Walkable Urban Places Downtown Shopping Center Industrial Park Green Field Transmission/Sub Hospital University FXBG City of Fredericksburg Environment Diverse auto-oriented e / development patterns present % & HIL 1 & & € challenges and opportunities - 'o, do CA % - 1 & & Snal S1 S a * a S o a PIt 1 adapting and fostering % cowan Blv N ele * environmenta! resilience is s owe 5 19e * - 5 V & - % o paramount. 2" 4 Blue Gray Pkwy - € ae a Objectives Snapshot: 7 Resiliency 0.2% Annual Chance * * / ofF Flood s Climate Change Mitigation 1%Annual Chance of V f - Flood Environmental Justice Wetlands The River - 1 TI-F Preserved Open Y Space Open Spacé Networks Sustainable Urban Fabric The Greenest Buildings.8 0.25 0.5 Miles (8) FXBG Forward pg.64-65 Map 14: Wetlands and Flooding FXBG City of Fredericksburg Environment e / Diverse auto-oriented % & HIL 1 & & € development patterns present - 'o, do CA % - 1 & & Snal S1 S a * a S e a PIt 1 challenges and % opportunities cowan Blv N ele * adapting and fostering s owe 5 19e * - - 5 V & environmenta! resilienceis A % o 2" 4 Blue Gray Pkwy - paramount. ae a € 7 Policy Snapshot: 0.2% Annual Chance / * * ofF Flood s 1. Manage and protect key natural and 1%A Annual Chance of V f - Flood riparian landscapes and wildlife corridors.8 Wetlands TI-F Preserved Open Y (8) FXBG Forward pg.65 Space 0.25 0.5 Miles Map 14: Wetlands and Flooding FXBG City of Fredericksburg Environment Strategy Snapshot: 6.a Continue the implementation of sustainable e such as: / design practices % & HIL 1 Maximize the number of people who can adopt a & - & 'o, € do CA - walkable lifestyle. % 1 & & Snal S1 S a * a S Promote e a PIt 1 the development of smaller dwelling % cowan Blv N ele * units in compact, walkable centers. s owe 5 19e * - 5 V & Promote the use of complete streets to enable - 4 % 2" o 4 non-car transportation modes (transit, bicycles, Blue Gray Pkwy - walking). € ae a 7 Support infill, adaptive reuse, and redevelopment 0.2% Annual Chance * * / within key corridors and wâlkable centers. ofF Flood s 1%Annual Chance of V f - Sensitively retrofit existing historic buildings. Flood Identify sustainable historical design practices Wetlands - 1 TI-F Preserved Open Space Y that can be applied to new developmentto ensure long-term stewardship of the built environments 0.25 0.5 Miles (8) FXBG Forward pg.67 Map 14: Wetlands and Flooding FXBG Environment - Columbus, OH City of Fredericksburg Woodstock Milford Center hawneeHils Powell Harlem Johnstown nionvil A Visionary Framework Westerville for Growth blin Worthington Alexandria Colum bu art New Albany What if we focus growth around these corridors? ill Gahanna pper 3or CMH Pataskala What will it be like in Central East Columbus Ohio if we do? Colunbus Bexley Whitehall Etna Kirkersville Reynoldsburg South Viet What if we don't? London Grove City That's what Corridor Concepts Groveport Sait mo is about. arlesto outh Orient Lockboume CoaaN Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG Environment - Columbus, OH City of Fredericksburg CENTE Current Trajectory Regional Scenario Corridor Growth: 88,000 homes 245,000 jobs 40% ofnew regional 18% growth Homes Jobs CORRIDOR GROWTH SHARE (within 4 mile walking distance) 52 Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG Environment - Columbus, OH City of Fredericksburg Focused Corridor Concept Regional Scenario Corridor Growth: 260,000 homes 370,000 jobs 55% 60% ofnew regional growth Homes Jobs CORRIDOR GROWTH SHARE (within hr mile walking distance) 53 Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG Environment - Columbus, OH City of Fredericksburg Transit and Walk Current Access to Jobs Trajectory 74,000 Average number of jobs within 45 minutes Focused Corridor 125,000 Concept Focused Corridor Concept 262,000 (in corridors) COMPARED TO CURRENT TRAJECTORY In the Focused Corridor Concept, 1.7 times as many jobs are readily accessible by transit and walking. Insight CORRIDOR CONCEPTS URBAN 2050 p MC FOOTPRINT 54 Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG Environment - Columbus, OH City of Fredericksburg Greenhouse Gas Current 17.1MT Emissions Trajectory per Household Annual CO2 emissions from Focused Corridor auto transportation and Concept 15.8 MT residential building energy Focused Corridor Concept 11.9 MT (in corridors) COMPARED TO CURRENT TRAJECTORY The Focused Corridor Concept leads to 30% lower emissions MRAKANPESSNN per household within the corridors. Results are for residential energy use and passenger vehicle travel, and assume performance and emissions insight CORRIDOR CONCEPTS URBAN at existing rates. 2050 Opt FOOTPRINT 58 Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG Environment - Columbus, OH City of Fredericksburg $0 bil $5 bil $10 bil $15 bil $20pil $25 bil Network Infrastructure Current $19.3 bil $23.0 bil Cumulative Capital and Trajectory 0&M Costs (2018 $) Focused Corridor Concept $10.7 bil $12.7 bil ROADS SIDEWALKS WATER SEWER STORM COMPARED TO CURRENT TRAJECTORY The Focused Corridor Concept saves $10 billion in cumulative costs to 2050. insight CORRIDOR CONCEPTS URBAN 2050 p FOOTPRINT 59 Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG Environment - Columbus, OH City of Fredericksburg Land Consumption Current 135 sq mi Trajectory The Focused Corridor Concept consumes 112 square miles less greenfield land to 2050... including nearly 100 square miles of agricultural land. Focused Corridor Concept 23 sq mi COMPARED TO CURRENT TRAJECTORY The Focused Corridor Concept saves an area equivalent to half the City of Columbus from development. insight CORRIDOR CONCEPTS URBAN 2050 op FOOTPRINT 60 Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG Environment - Columbus, OH City of Fredericksburg Revenues per Current Acre Trajectory $14,000 Annual in 2050 (2018 $) Focused Corridor $40,000 Concept Focused Corridor Concept $134,000 (in corridors) COMPARED TO CURRENT TRAJECTORY The Focused Corridor Concept generates nearly 3 times the revenues peracre of new development. Insight CORRIDOR CONCEPTS URBAN 2050 p FOOTPRINT 61 Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG Environment - Bay Area City of Fredericksburg Environmental Impact Water Use -62% 7 Average HH VS Grand Boulevards Energy Use -39% Driving -55% GHG -50% HH Costs -53% Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG Environment - Cincinnati, OH City of Fredericksburg $ Innnl Innl 6 o Land Local Local Tax Transportation: Transportation: Transportation: Greenhouse Household Auto Consumption Infrastructure Revenues Accessibility Mode Share VMT Gas Emissions and Utility Costs & Services Capital O&M Residential Commercial 196 10.6 7.3 14.0 Current 135 sq mi $30.1 BIL $21.3 BIL 4% 1.5% 16% 489 BIL 29.4 MMT" $20.3 BIL umulative tetal, cumuiative total, Share omes with access transit total multive miles annual annual Trajectory 2018- 2050 2018 2050 to25% of repional jobs with- Transitand total nonaute in 45 min by walk/ transit (transit/ wally are of $941 MIL $14,000 74,000 totaltrips 16,800 17.1 MT $18,600 average annual costs annual per acre Average au of annual miles per annual perk household annual per household acces ssible bywalk/trans si household Capital OGM Residential Commercial 102 91 65 15.8 Focused 23 sq mi $19.3 BIL $22.3 BIL 11% 3.2% 20% 441 BIL 27.41 MMT $17.4 BIL Corridor cumulative tetal, cumulative total, Share ofhomes with access transit total non auto mulathe miles annual annual 2018-2050 2018-2050 to25% af regional)pbs with- Transit and total on auto 45 min bywalk transit (transit/ walky bike)s share o Concept $6031 MIL $40,000 125,000 total trips 14,200 15.8 MT $15,900 average annual costs annual peracre Averagenumber of jobs annual miles per annual per household annual per household accessible by walk/ transit household (A corridor area $134,000 29% 8.0% 29% 8,500 11.9 MT $10,100 average metric IS annual per Share ofhomes with access transit total 1on anual les per ual et hd annual per 0 us se nota applicable) to. 25% of regional jobs with- Transit and total 70 auto househo in 45 min by walk/ transit (transit/walk/ bike) share 262,000 total trips Average number jobs Coridor accessible by wally transit area Insight CORRIDOR CONCEPTS URBAN 2050 Mobill FOOTPRINT 65 Peter Calthorpe, Presentation, CNU 32 FXBG City of Fredericksburg Fredericksburg Forward - 2025 95 Falll HILAVO 5 0 ( - * veo of ENG 1 2 - - / 55r a canas PA Cowan n Blvd - % Roe $ B WALKABLE CENTERS 5 - % MANean REGIONAL Blue Graypky 3 cmy ye - COMMUNITY 3 Dve Blvd = a CORRIDORS TYPES Kaleila GATEWAY /ENTRYWAY & WALKABLE URBAN WALKABLE BOULEVARD URBAN MAIN STREET 1 FXBG FXBG https://storymapsargis.com/collections/27e6c 197983a4c9388-9ab9d2e900c41