FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 Council Members Mason Carter, Jerry Donald, Kavonte Duckett, M.C. Keegan-Ayer, Renee Knapp, Steve McKay, and Brad Young were present for the meeting. Also present were Catherine Keller, Assistant County Attorney; Ragen Cherney, Chief of Staff, County Council; Nancy Luna, Executive Assistant, County Council; and Abby Boroughs, Administrative Assistant, County Council. Council President Brad Young called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Opening Statement from Council President Brad Young Council President Brad Young provided an opening statement at the start of the meeting. Included in that statement was a welcome to the Legislative Day for Tuesday, January 21, 2025, and information on how to watch and participate in the meeting. The meeting began with a moment of silence followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. Council President Brad Young asked staff to call roll and a quorum was established. Action on the Agenda Council Member. M.C. Keegan-Ayer moved to approve the agenda for 01/21/2025 as presented. Council Member Steve McKay seconded the motion that passed 7-0. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1- Donald District 2- McKay District 3- -H Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5- Carter At Large - Knapp Presiding Officer-y Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay Public Comment Public Comment was heard from: None. With no further comments, Council President Brad Young closed Public Comment. Approval of Minutes Council Member M.C. Keegan-Ayer moved to approve the minutes from 01/07 & 01/14, 2025 as presented. Council Vice President Kavonté Dukett seconded the motion that 1 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 passed 7-0. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1-D Donald District 2- McKay District 3 - Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5- Carter AtL Large - Knapp Presiding Officer -Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay Budget Adjustments - Kelly Weaver, Director, Budget Office Council Member. Jerry Donald moved to approve the following budget adjustments: J-25-202 - Housing 125-205-Acounting: - Board of Education Budget Amendment #: 25-02 25-206-Acounting: - Board of Education Budget Amendment #: 25-03 J-25-207-A Accounting - Board of Education Budget Amendment #: 25-05 25-208-Accounting - Board of Education Budget Amendment #: 25-06 BOE Construction Amendment #25-04 Council Member Renee Knapp seconded the motion that passed 7-0. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1-D Donald District 2- McKay District 3 - Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5- Carter AtL Large - Knapp Presiding Officer-) Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay Carrollton Manor Rural Legacy Area to the Department of Natural Resources Resolution Kim Gaines, Livable Frederick Director, Planning & Permitting Division, and Shannon O'Neil, Land Preservation Program Administrator, Office of Agriculture Kim Gaines and Shannon O'Neil briefed the Council on the Carrollton Manor Rural Proposed Resolution - Revise the Soil Conservation District Fee Schedule- Legacy Area to the Department of Natural Resources Resolution. 2 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 Council President Brad Young Council President M.C. Keegan-Ayer moved to approve Proposed Resolution Revise the Soil Conservation District Fee Schedule. Council Member Renee Knapp seconded the motion that passed 6-1, with Council Member Mason Carter opposed. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1- Donald District 2- McKay District 3- - Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5- Carter AtLarge - Knapp Presiding Officer -Young Aye X X X X X X Nay X Third Reading Calendar: Council President Brad Young passed the gavel to Council Vice President Kavonté a) Bill 24-20 - Amendment to Frederick County Uniformed Employees Retirement Plan - Deferred Retirement Option Program - Council President Brad Young Council President Brad Young moved to approve Bill 24-20 - Amendment to Frederick County Uniformed Employees Retirement Plan = Deferred Retirement Option Program. Council Member Renee Knapp seconded the motion that passed 7-0. Duckett in order to make a motion. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1-D Donald District. 2- - McKay District 3. - Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5- Carter At! Large - Knapp Presiding Officer- -Y Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay Council President Brad Young regained the gavel in order to preside over the remainder b) Action on the 2024 Middletown Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation - Kim of the meeting. Gaines, Division of Planning and Permitting 3 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 Council Member Jerry Donald moved to approve the Action on the 2024 Middletown Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation. Council Member Steve McKay seconded the motion. Amendment 1- Council Member Steve McKay Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation. Council Member Steve McKay moved to approve amendment 1 to the 2024 Middletown AMENDMENT11 to The Middletown Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation Introduced By: Introduction Date: Council Member Steve McKay January 21, 2025 Adopted/Rejected/Withdrawn: Adopted An Amendment tot the Livable Frederick Comprehensive Plan. On Page 11, Table 3, the Recommendation for parcel 48 -1 lot 1, parcel 94, and parcel 103 -1 lots land 2 will be "No Change" and thel last sentence of Paragraph 2, Page 9 will be deleted. The Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map on Page 10 will be revised to reflect this amendment. Council Member Mason Carter seconded the motion that passed 7-0. Absent Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1- Donald District 2-N McKay District 3-H Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5- Carter Atl Large - Knapp Presiding Officer - Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay The Council returned to the original motion as amended which passed 7-0. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1- Donald District 2-N McKay District 3- - Keegan-Ayer District 4-1 Duckett District 5- Carter AtL Large - Knapp Presiding Officer - Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay 4 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 c) Action on the 2024 Myersville Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation - Kim Gaines, Council Member Jerry Donald moved to approve the Action on the 2024 Myersville Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation. Council Member Mason Carter seconded the Division of Planning and Permitting motion. Amendment 1- Council Member Steve McKay Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation. Council Member Steve McKay moved to approve amendment 1 to the 2024 Myersville AMENDMENT 1 to The Myersville Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation Introduced By: Introduction Date: Council Member Steve McKay January 21, 2025 Adopted/Rejected/Withdrawn: Adopted An Amendment to the Livable Frederick Comprehensive Plan. On Page 9, Table 2, the Recommendation for parcels 52 and 20 will be "No Change" and the last sentence of Paragraph 1, Page 9 will be deleted. Thel Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map on Page 12 will bei revised to reflect this amendment. On Page 11, Table 3, the Recommendation for parcels 135, 123, and 69 will be "No Change" and the last sentence ofParagraph 3, Page 9 will be deleted. The Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map on page 12 will bei revised to reflect this amendment. Council Member Mason Carter seconded the motion that passed 7-0. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1-D Donald District 2- McKay District 3- Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5- Carter AtL Large - Knapp Presiding Officer - Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay 5 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 Amendment 2 Council Member Steve McKay Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation. Council Member Steve McKay moved to approve amendment 2 to the 2024 Myersville AMENDMENT 2 to The Myersville Comprehensive Plan Reconciliation Introduced By: Introduction Date: Council Member Steve McKay January 21, 2025 Adopted/Rejected/Withdrawn: Adopted An Amendment to the Livable Frederick Comprehensive Plan. Onl Page 11, Table 3, the Recommendation for parcel 375 will be "Add to County GA, Change land use of1.901-acre NR area to LI" (as shown below). The Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map on page 12 will be revised to reflect this amendment. Council Member Mason Carter seconded the motion that passed 7-0. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1- Donald District 2- McKay District 3- - Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5 - Carter Atl Large - Knapp Presiding Officer- Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay The Council returned to the original motion as amended which passed 7-0. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1- Donald District 2- McKay District 3- - Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5- Carter At Large - Knapp Presiding Officer - Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay 6 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21,2025 d) Action on the 2024 Water Resources Element - Kim Gaines, Division of Planning Council Member Jerry Donald moved to approve the Action on the 2024 Water Resources Element. Council Vice President Kavonté Duckett seconded the motion. and Permitting Amendment 1 - Council Member Steve McKay Council Member Steve McKay moved to approve amendment 1 to the 2024 Water Resources Element. AMENDMENTI 1 to The Water Resources Element Plan Introduced By: Introduction Date: Council Member Steve McKay January 21, 2025 Adopted/Rejected/Withdrawn: Adopted An Amendment to the Livable Frederick Comprehensive Plan. The proposed language below will be added to the Water Resource Element Plan in the Drinking Water Assessment Section (beginning at page 2-1). The proposed language will bei inserted after the Major Water Issues, Water Conservation Section (page 2-17), prior to the Drinking Water Monitoring and Testing (page 2-20). The pages in the Water Resource Element Plan will be renumbered accordingly. Water Resource-Intensive Industries While the discussion of Commercial, Industrial, and Agricultural Withdrawal of water earlier in this assessment indicates that roughly 32% of permits issued by MDE for water withdrawals in Frederick County (since 1901) have been for commercial and industrial uses, new industries are seeking to establish themselves in the County with water needs that greatly exceed those typically associated with individual ground or surface water permits. As a result, these industries tend to rely on the capacity of public systems to meet water demands for activities like data hosting and data processing (data centers), for product washing or bottling, or for manufacturing processes and testing. These industries may bring economic benefits to Frederick County, but they can also exert significant influence on drinking water supplies and water resources if not prudently addressed through the planning.process. 7 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 As of the development of this Water Resources Element, data centers are at the forefront of the water resource-intensive industry discussion in Frederick County. This is due to a potentially significant water demand associated with evaporative cooling of the equipment used within them. While Frederick County has been home to several individual data hosting and processing facilities for the last decade, including the National Support Center for the Social Security Administration in Urbana that was opened in 2014, it was the commencement of development of the 2,100-acre data center campus on the former Alcoa Eastalco campus near Adamstown Data center water demand has also become a central topic in neighboring states like Virginia, which currently leads the nation in the concentration of data center facilities. A 2024 report by the State of Virginia's non-partisan Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) regarding the implications of data center development for the state indicated that approximately 54% of the data centers analyzed used between 0.5 and 3.99 million gallons of water in calendar year 2023 (enough to supply between 5 and 43 homes annually per data center fadilitv.Appro.imately 23% of the data centers used between 4.0 and 9.99 million gallons of water in calendar year 2023 (enough to supply between 43 and 110 homes annually per facility). Lastly, approximately 16% of the data centers used between 10.0 and 99.99 million gallons of water in calendar year 2023 (enough to supply between 110 and 1,095 homes annually per data center facility). 12 Only 1% of all the facilities surveyed by JLARC exceeded 100 million gallons in annual water use.3 This wide distribution in water utilization is the result of many factors, including the size of the data center, the type of computer equipment used within it, the associated electrical demand, and the type of cooling system(s) employed. Not all data centers utilize water for evaporative cooling, and those that employ alternative systems (also known as "dry cooling") tend to have higher electricity demands than water-cooled data that elevated concerns about data center water demand. centers.4 1Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission. (2024). Data centers in Virginia. Inl Report to the Governor and the General Assembly of Virginia (JLARC Report 598). Commonwealth of Virginia. The report analyzed data center water usage provided to, JLARC by utility operators in Fairfax, Henrico, Loudoun, Mecklenburg, and Prince William counties and the Town of Wise (Figure 5-3, page 62). ts/ler.vianasodlaiparsRase2nd F Facilities refers toi individual buildings andr not data center sites or campuses withr more than one building. Residential equivalents are not part of the, JLARC report but have beeni included for comparison purposes. Estimates are based on 250 alons-perdey-pec-nome or one "Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU)." 3The. JLARC report also notes that, statewide, data centers are estimated to use 2.1 billion gallons of water annually 4A discussion of electricity use by data centers is beyond the scope oft this Water Resources Element. (equivalent to around 23,013 homes). 8 FINAL WATER UTILIZATION. AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE: TOTALI NUMBER OF DATA CENTER FACILITIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR: 2023 (JLARC, 2024) 100+ Million Gallons 1% 0.0-0.49 Million Gallons 6% 10.0-99.99 Million Gallons 16% 4.0-9.99 Million Gallons 23% 0.5-3.99 Million Gallons 54% Image Source: Adapted from Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission. (2024). Data centers in Virginia. As noted in Table 2.01 of this Assessment the current allocation for potable water to Quantum Frederick was included in projections of future drinking water utilization from the New Design Water Treatment Plants Under the Amended and Restated Adequate Public Facilities Letter of Understanding (APF LOU) for Quantum Frederick, dated August 14, 2024, 0.2 mgd of potable water (maximum day) have been allocated to the data center campus for domestic use (such as bathrooms or drinking fountains) by the Division of Water and Sewer Utilities (DWSU).An additional 1.1 mgd of potable water (maximum day) have been allocated for use in cooling processes. Comparing this information with the data from the Virginia data centers cited earlier isd challenging because the Virginia data represents total annualized water usage by individual data center facilities, while the Quantum Frederick data is a "maximum day" limit for the entire 5Quantum Frederick is also identified in Table 3.01 in the Wastewater Assessment within the Ballenger McKinney In Report to the Governor and the General Assembly of Virginia (JLARC Report 598). WWTP service area. 9 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 campus of data centers. "Maximum day" is the highest demand that is permitted on a given day throughout the year. It is not intended as a cumulative measure to estimate the total annual water demand of a customer. For data centers, evaporative cooling water demands are generally highest during four or five months of the year peaking in July withr remaining months having much less demand. So, a data center, as an example, could use 33 million gallons a year but their max day or max month in that year can be much greater than their yearly average of Any increase to the potable water allocation to the data center campus would require a data center developer to work with Frederick County to either permit additional withdrawal capacity or create additional treatment capacity at the New Design Water Treatment Plant (or both). Per the APF LOU, design, permitting, and construction of any necessary infrastructure to provide that capacity would be the responsibility of the developer. An amended APF LOU that outlines the scope of work, and the responsibilities assigned to the developer, to create additional capacity would also need to be presented to, and approved by, the Frederick County Planning Commission prior to any such expansion. Permits associated with water withdrawal and/or potable water treatment capacity are administered and issued by the Maryland Department of the Environment and any increase in the County's withdrawal permit for the Potomac River The current APF LOU for the campus also indicates that a data center developer may opt to undertake the design, permitting, and construction of a wastewater effluent supply system that utilizes treated effluent from the Ballenger McKinney WWTP for cooling operations rather than potable water from the New Design WTP. As part of the design and construction of the wastewater effluent system, the developer would also be responsible for ensuring that the leftover treated effluent (wastewater) from cooling operations is safely and securely conveyed back to the Ballenger McKinney WWTP via a sewer system for retreatment prior to release to waterways or for future reuse in cooling operations. It should be noted that evaporative cooling (including cooling utilizing potable water sources) can produce wastewater with elevated levels of salts and minerals, as these elements are not typically released during the cooling process and can become concentrated with repeated circulation. 6 Measures to address this conditiona are already in place in Frederick County, as all wastewater discharges from data centers (potable or treated effluent sources, regardless of specific use) are subject to Frederick County's Industrial Wastewater Pretreatment Ordinance. . The Pretreatment Ordinance requires all commercial and GAcooling efficiency parameter often referred to as "cycles of concentration" or COC. 7Frederick County Ordinance 12-33-628, with an effective date of January 15,2013. The Industrial Wastewater Pretreatment Ordinance allows Frederick County to establish more stringent standards for non-residential wastewater discharges to the County's Publicly Owned Wastewaterl Treatment Works (POTW). A copy of the Pretreatment Ordinance can be viewed online here: htps/www.frederickcounlymdaov/DocumeniCenter/lew/1094lndustria-Waste-Ordinance7bidld-, 90,411 gpd. would need to be approved by the Maryland Department of the Environment 10 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 industrial wastewater contributors in the County to complete a survey prior to issuance of a building permit and, if conditions are met, secure coverage under a County-issued wastewater discharge permit. Permits are renewable on a 5-year basis, and permittees are subject to monitoring and reporting of wastewater discharges to ensure compliance. The requirements of permits can vary based on the type of commercial ori industrial use, but commercial ori industrial users discharging an average of 25,000 GPD or more of process water may qualify as a Significant Industrial User (SIU). SIUS are also subject to yearly inspection, wastewater sampling, and analysis of wastewater discharge characteristics including strength, volume, and content to ensure compliance. Permittees who exceed any required local, state, or federal parameters for wastewater are required to provide their own pretreatment to àpplicable standards before Additionally, in either future development scenario (potable water expansion or wastewater effluent utilization), the developer would also be responsible for addressing the implications of the Low Flow Allocation Agreement (LFAA) for the Potomac River if a significant expansion of evaporative cooling capacity is proposed that will utilize water from the New Design Water Treatment Plant and the Potomac River. The LFAA, and an associated, enforceable threshold for consumptive use of Potomac River water in Maryland, is discussed in more detail later in this Drinking Water Assessment (see Low-Flow Augmentation). In order to monitor consumptive use, the total amount of water entering and wastewater leaving each data center lot will be metered by the Division of Water and Sewer Utilities. It is anticipated that water consumption associated with evaporative cooling operations will be highest during the summer months. Beyond those data center facilities currently in operation, such as the National Support Center for the Social Security Administration, the former Eastalco site represents the only site in Frederick County with entitlements for data center uses. No data centers have been constructed on the campus as of the development of this WRE, but multiple parcels are currently proceeding through the entitlement and permitting processes. The Frederick County Council is currently considering the legislation that would address both siting and performance standards for data center facilities in all unincorporated areas of the County, and this legislation could determine where (and how many) data centers could be permitted in Frederick County in the future. Atthis time, County zoning regulations permit data centers in only the General Industrial (GI) and Additionally, the creation of any new data center site would require a developer to work with Frederick County Government to determine if adequate water capacity exists in the vicinity ofa 8Violations of the conditions associated with discharge permits can result in citations, fines, and imprisonment if parties are found to have willfully or negligenty/ntroduced substances into a County releasing wastewater to the County'ssystem. Limited Industrial (LI) zoning districts. POTW by a court of competent jurisdiction. 11 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 site and if capacity would be available to serve the project. If adequate capacity does not exist for a particular project site, then the developer could explore entering into an APF LOU to design, permit, and potentially construct additional capacity at their expense. It should be noted that there are locations in Frederick County where data centers may not be appropriate for any number of reasons (water availability, zoning, neighborhood compatibility, environmental As noted earlier, data centers are not the only industry with the potential to consume significant amounts of water. Other industries withdrawing water from the Potomac River or any waterway inF Frederick County that flows to the Potomac River, or any public system that eventually returns water to the Potomac River, should also be evaluated under the same standards established for data centers. Drinking water capacity is a valuable resource for Frederick County, and the allocation of it along with the implications of the Low Flow Allocation Agreement should be considered in each instance where the consumptive use of water might occur. Frederick County Government actively cooperates with the Water and Science Administration at the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) to ensure that established public water system capacities impact, etc.), and permitting and construction of them are not guaranteed. and Maryland's obligations under the LFAA are observed and respected. Council Member Mason Carter seconded the motion that passed 7-0. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1-D Donald District 2- McKay District 3-1 Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5- Carter AtL Large - Knapp Presiding Officer - Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay The Council returned to the original motion as amended which passed 7-0. Absent/ Abstain/ Present Council Members District 1- Donald District 2- McKay District 3- - Keegan-Ayer District 4- Duckett District 5 - Carter AtL Large - Knapp Presiding Officer - Young Aye X X X X X X X Nay Council Rules Update - Council President Brad Young 12 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 Council Member Mason Carter introduced two amendments to the Council Rules for discussion. Amendment 1 - Council Member Mason Carter AMENDMENT: 11 to Frederick County Council Rules of Procedure Introduced By: Introduction Date: Adopted/Reyected/Withdrawn: Council Member Carter Rules of] Procedure - Chapter 5 - Executive Appointments 5-2 Confirmation a) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR BELOW, the Council may proceed in considering an appointment by the County Executive in any manner it deems prudent, which may include aj public hearing on the appointment. INACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 412(A) OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY CHARTER, PERSONS APPOINTED BY THE EXECUTIVETO HEAD A PRINCIPAL OPERATING DEPARTMENT, AGENCY OR OFFICE UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE EXECUTIVE SHALL BE INTERVIEWED BY THE COUNCIL IN AN OPEN SESSION. THE COUNCIL MAY, BY A MAJORITY VOTE, HOLD THE INTERVIEWI IN CLOSED SESSION. ii. INDIVIDUALS DESIGNATED BY' THE. EXECUTIVE, AND SUBJECTTO COUNCIL CONFIRMATION TO SERVE ON THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, SHALL BE INTERVIEWED BY THE COUNCIL IN AN OPEN SESSION. THE COUNCIL MAY, BY A MAJORITY VOTE, HOLD THE INTERVIEW IN CLOSED SESSION. iii. INDIVIDUALS WHO APPLY TO SERVE ONT THE FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF APPEALS SHALL BEI INTERVIEWED BY' THE 13 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 COUNCIL IN AN OPEN SESSION. THE COUNCIL MAY, BYA MAJORITY VOTE, HOLD THE INTERVIEW IN CLOSED SESSION. b) When the Council is ready to consider the appointment, the President is to put the question to the Council as to whether the Council should confirm or reject the appointment. c) An affirmative vote of at least four Council Members is required to confirm an appointment. d) Pursuant to the Charter, ift the Council fails to act on an appointment within 30 days after the question of appointment has been submitted toi it, the appointment stands confirmed. Amendment 2 - Council Member Mason Carter AMENDMENT 2 to Frederick County Council Rules of Procedure Introduced By: Introduction Date: Adopted/Reyected/Withdrawn: Rules of] Procedure - Chapter 4 - Workshops Council Member Mason Carter Council Member Steve McKay Council Vice President Kavonté Duckett 4-3 Workshops d) Public comment will be reeledatesehyerkshePeRaeediethelepieseftae workshep] ALLOWED FOR FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES ATTHE BEGINNINGOF EACH WORKSHOP MEETING AND ATTHE END OF EACH WORKSHOP MEETING ASI LONG AS IS NECESSARY. Public Comment Public Comment was heard from: 14 FINAL COUNTY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 21, 2025 Nick Carrera With no further comments, Council President Brad Young closed Public Comment. Council Member Comments Council Member comments were provided. Upcoming Meetings Tuesday, January 28, 2025-1 Workshop Tuesday, February 4, 2025 - Legislative Day Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 6:49 p.m. Brad County/Council Aug2 15