CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, February 10th, 2025 City Meeting Room- - 746th Street Agenda Regular Meeting: 6:00PM 1. Approval of January 13th, 2025 meeting minutes. 2. Review, Discussion and Decision for Addition = - Covered Porch. (R-2)@1 17622nd Avenue, Block 237 Lot7. For Opha Kennedy - Owner; Contractor: Self 3. Review, Discussion and Decision for Fence (R-2) @ 278 Prado E4, Palmer Pointe Townhomes E4. For Terri &. Jason Piles - Owner; Contractor: All Pro Fence & Feck LLC 4. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & New Construction (R- 1) (Historic District) @ 205 gth Street, Block 166 Lot 7. For Damir & Leslie Drinkovic- Owner; Contractor: Bryce Ward 5. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness. Accessory Structure (R- 1)(Historic District) @ 101 6th Street, Block 18 Lot 10. For David & Lisa Albright - Owner; Contractor: GeoFlora Group, LLC Other/New Business: ustandingunresoved Issues: Motion to adjourn the meeting. 1 PAL A 1831 FLORIDE Minutes January 13th, 2025 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, January 13th, 2025 City Meeting Room-746"S Street Minutes Attendance: Joe Taylor, Jim Bachrach, Elizabeth Milliken, Myrtis Wynn Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM 1. Approval of December gth, 2024 meeting minutes. a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn - all in favor; motion carried. 2. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & Fence. (R-1) (Historic District) @ 226 Center Street, Block 8 Lot 5. For Emily Spear - Owner; Contractor: TBD a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Elizabeth Milliken - all in favor; motion carried. 3. Review, Discussion and Decision for Fence (R-1) @ 99 Butler Street, Block 1 Lots 158 & East 10' of Lot 14. For Andrew & Dawn Schriever- Owner; Contractor: GeoFlora Group, LLC a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn - all in favor; motion carried. 4. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Construction (R-2) @ 21 24th Street, Block 271 Lot 28&29. For Neil & Sharon Parker Owner; Contractor: Self a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Elizabeth Milliken - all in favor; motion carried. 5. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness. Addition, and Accessory Structure (R-1)@ 207 Avenue D, Block 107 Lot 9 & 10. For Tom Bradberry - Owner; Contractor: GeoFlora Group, LLC a. Motion to approve contingent upon the 'bonus room' not being rented out in any capacity by Elizabeth Milliken; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn = all in favor; motion carried. 1 CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, January 13th, 2025 City Meeting Room- - 746th Street Minutes Other/New Business: OutstandingUnresolwed Issues: Motion to adjourn the meeting by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Myrtis Wynn. Meeting adjourned. 2 APALACH 1831 ELORIDE Addition 176 22nd Avenue Official Use Only Date Received: 1/9/25 Meeting Date: 2/0/25 Fees Due: $so Date Fees Paid: 1/9/25 ClipyofApalachicola Planning & Zoning Applicationfor. DevelopmentSite Plan Approval OWNER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner opha KEBENY Address 176 22MVE CiyApAlackicala Phone 330-312-387/ Contractor Name TBD/See State License # Phone PROJECTTYPE City Liçense # State f1 Zip32320 Email New Construction Addition Alteration/Renovation Relocation Demolition Fence Repair CatifiemeofApopiatemes: Other CvEReL_pokch PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address (911Address): 176 22 ADE City & State: Ap hel.ccla Parcel ID: #: Zoning District: R-2 FEMAI Flood Zone: Zip: 32320 Block: 237 Lot: 17 Historic District Non-Historic District OFFICIAL USE ONLY Certificate of Appropriateness Required? YIN Setback Requirements of Property: Front: 15 Rear: 25 Side: SPwrar16' Corner Lot? YN) Street Sides: Lot Coverage: 40% STAFF NOTES/RECOMMENDATIONS: : applcowt adjustad to 10',20 d MAcet COVaAS OK This development request has been approvedj fora Certificate ofAppropriateness (fapplicable), zoning, land use, and development review by the Cityof Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Board and a building permit is authorized to be issued. Sctlaces * fot City Staff Date Approved NOTE: This is a conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC.) Please be aware that other documentation may be required by the Building Official. Initial & Describe the proposed project and materials. Describe the proposed project in terms of size, affected architectural elements, materials, and relationship to the existing structure(s). 0:20' Addihon PROJECT SCOPE MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FLPRODUCT APPROVAL# Siding Doors Windows Roofing Trim Foundation Shutters Porch/Deck Fencing Driveways/Sidewalks Other NOTE: Please have a site plan prepared to turn ini with your application. At minimum, the site plan needs to contain: a North arrow, surrounding streets, lot lines, lot dimensions, setbacks, current structure dimensions, proposed. structure dimensions, fence locations, and fence heights. Applications requiring a Certificate Appropriateness will also need to submit renderings/elevations ofany proposeds structures and note the materials proposed. More information may be requested by City Staff CERTIFICATION By signing below, Ic certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best ofr my knowledge at the time of application. I acknowledge that I understand and have complied with all ofthe submittal requirements and procedures and have read and understand the following: 1. I/We hereby attest to the fact that the above supplied property address(es), parcel numbers(s), and legal description(s) is(are) the true and proper identification of the area oft this petition. 2. I/We authorize staff from the City ofApalachicola to enter onto the property in question during regular business hours in order to take photos which will be placed in the permanent file. 3. I/We understand that the COAreview time period will not commence until the application is deemed complete by staff and may take up to 10 business days toj process. I further understand that an incomplete application submittal may cause my appliçation to be deferred to the next 4. I/We understand that, for Board review cases, an agenda and staff report (if applicable) will be available on the City's website approximately one week before thel Planning & Zoning Board 5. I/We understand that the approval oft this application by the Planning & Zoning Board or staffi in NO way constitutes approval ofal Building Permit for Construction from the City of 6. I/We understand that all changes to the approved scope of work stated in a Certificate of Appropriateness or Development Order application have to be approved by the P&ZI Board before work commences on those changes. There will be no charge for revisions. Making changes that have not been approved can result in a Stop Work Order being placed on the entire 7. I/We understand that any decision ofthe P&Z Board may be appealed to the City Commission within 30 days after the decision by the P&Z Board; otherwise, the decision will be final. 8. I/We understand that a Certificate of Appropriateness is only valid for one year after issuance. They are renewable for six months without cause ifr requested, and for an additional six months upon showing of good cause by the applicant. The applicant must submit all requests for extensions in writing and provide appropriate support documents to City Staff, ifneeded. 9. I/We understand that P&Z Board approval is] permission to obtain aj permit for work and installation as indicated. Ic certify that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws 10. I/We understand that there will be no issuance ofa Certificate ofA Appropriateness without the property owner obtaining Homeowner's Association approval (ifrequired) prior to the P&Z Board Meeting and/or before the beginning of an work and in no way authorizes work that is in posted deadline date. Meeting. Apalachicola Community and Economic Development Office. project and additional fees/penalties. regulating construction ini thisj jurisdiction. violation ofa any association rules or regulations. DATE Auk 0.4 20'au nu - 320sF 4' CHAIN LINK FENCE X GATE uwvent : 825 2 274 A 110 320 1,30 /W ALLEY ONSTRUCTED) R/W S01'05'01"w 60.02'(M) CONS 000 R/W 0001 R/W chogto NO1'00'12"E 85 59.73'(M) a B : wowd ht 2 AIN LINK X FENCE 0.3 wo m Lass 0,70SF 13.5' 9 & 274 6.85 12' 21.5' 87.5 0 - e 33' DK 1255 8.00' 3 23955 LONA 30.00'(RP) RP) 30.00/(RP) S00'45:39"w 59.94'(M) R/W - - x 22ND AVENUE: (60' R/W: - DIRT) PALA 4( CH, 1831 FLORIDE Fence 278 Prado E4 Official Use Only Datel Received: u/25 Meeting Date: 2/0/25 Fees Due: Date Fees Paid: ClyofApalachicola. Planning & Zoning Application for Development/Site Plan Approval OWNER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Name GifEences sbckus Owner lerri + Jasen Piles Address 278 The Prado, Ey City Apalachicola State License # Cityl License # State FL Zip. 32320 Email jacyolan@aol.con Phone 479 2074744 or 479459 1125 Phone 850 408 7769 PROJECTTYPE Sunbi2DocH L90000195104 New Construction Addition Alteration/Renovation Relocation Demolition Fence Accessory Structure Certificate of Appropriateness: Other PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address (911Address): 278 The Prado E4 City & State: Apalachi cola EL Parcel ID #: 01-045-03W-XLar-OOE-0090 Zip: 32320 Block: 64 District: Zoning FEMA Flood. Zone: PapTa R-2 Historic District XJNon-Historic District OFFICIAL USE ONLY Certificate ofA Appropriateness: Required? Y/N) Setback Requirements of Property: Corner Lot?Y/N Street Sides: STAFF NOTES/RECOMMENDATIONS: This development request has been approved fora Certificate afAppropriateness (ifapplicable), zoning, land use, and development review by the City of Apalachicola Planning & Zoning. Board and a building permit is authorized. to be issued. Front: Lot Coverage: Mets Rear: Side: LDC City Staff Date Approved NOTE: This is a conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC.) Please be aware that other documentation may be required by thel Building Official. Applicant Initial Describe the proposed project and materials. Describe the proposed project in terms ofs size, affected Add (l' Vinyl fcocing to enclosc hacy yard area Exlend out om exishing wohik Vinyl fcnce alradyin architectymatelements, materials, and relationship to the existing structure(s). plact PROJECT SCOPE MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FLPRODUCT APPROVAL# Siding Doors Windows Roofing Trim Foundation Shutters Porch/Deck Fencing lof foot wshitc Vinyl Driveways/Sidewalks Other NOTE: Please have a site plan prepared to turn in with your application. At minimum, the site plan needs to contain: a North arvow, surrounding streets, lot lines, lot dimensions, setbacks, current structure dimensions, proposed. structure dimensions, fence locations, and fence heights.. Applications requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness will also need to submit enderings/elevations ofany proposed structures and note the materials proposed. More information may be requested by City Staff CERTIICATION By signing below, I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge at the time of application. Iacknowledge that] I understand and have complied with all oft the submittal requirements and procedures and have read and understand the following: 1. I/We hereby attest to the fact that the above supplied property address(es), parcel numbers(s), and legal description(s) is(are) the true and proper identification oft the area ofthis petition. 2. I/We authorize staff from the City of Apalachicola to enter onto the property in question during regular business hours in order to take photos which will be placed int the permanent file. 3. I/We understand that the COA review time period will not commence until the application is deemed complete by staff and may take up to 10 business days toj process. Ifurther understand that an incomplete application submittal may cause my application to be deferred to the next 4. I/We understand that, for Board review cases, an agenda and staffi report (if applicable) will be available on the City's website approximately one week before the Planning & Zoning Board 5. I/We understand that the approval oft this application by thel Planning & Zoning Board or staffin NO way constitutes approval ofal Building Permit for Construction from the City of 6. I/We understand that all changes to the approved scope of work stated in a Certificate of Appropriateness: or Development Order application have to be approved by thel P&Z Board before work commences on those changes. Making changes that have not been approved can result in a Stop Work Order being placed on the entire project and additional fees/penalties. 7. I/We understand that any decision oft thel P&Z Board may be appealed to the City Commission within 30 days after the decision by the P&ZI Board; otherwise, the decision will be final. 8. I/We understand that a Certificate ofAppropriateness. is only valid for one year after issuance. They are: renewable for six months without cause if requested, and for an additional six months upon showing of good cause by the applicant. The applicant must submit all requests for extensions in writing and provide appropriate support documents to City Staff, ifneeded. 9. I/We understand that P&Z Board approval is permission to obtain aj permit for work and installation as indicated.. Icertify that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws 10.1 I/We understand that there will be no issuance ofa Certificate of Appropriateness without the property owner obtaining Homeowner's. Association approval (if required). prior to the P&Z Board Meeting and/or before the beginning of an work and inj no way authorizes work that isi in posted deadline date. Meeting. Apalachicola Building Department. regulating construction in this jurisdiction. violation ofany association rules or regulations. lgla0as Juni hls DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT BOUNDARY SURVEY - 278 E4 PRADO PRADO STREET STATE ROADI No. 384 4th STREET 50 ASPHALT PAVED ROADNAY Fnd. 2'PPEO NORTH BULDING OF PROPERTY CORNER 01 UNE- COMMON AREA 45.3 BUILOING "E" UNIT 1 BUILDING "E" UNIT2 BUILDING "E" UNIT3 S 89:36'31" E 108.81'(P) BUILDING "E" UNIT 4 Two STORY wo00 FRAME TOMHOUSE S893635E 109.03'(S) BEARING_BASE $893635"E 109.02'(P) BUILDING "E" UNIT 5 BUILDING "E" UNIT 6 45.3 BULDNG CORNER SOUTH OF PROPERTY PLNE COMMON AREA wwnt 20' WOE ELECTRICAL FENCE EASEMENT -SANTARY SEWER UFTSTATION 21.06 EASEVENT 21.01" CONCRÈTE" CONCRÉTE" DRIVEWAY 'CONCRETE DRIVEWAY HATER GeNTER OF 04SOFPAS DRIVEWA ETER BULONG OF 0.2 UNE COMMON AREA 12.92' S CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CRIVEWAY LB 17834 $00'22'22". wy 19.99'(S). S 00'23'25" w 20.0p'(P) 1BP834 FNAD CONCKÉTE. 3'x3 FENCE FENCE BUILDING "A" UNIT1 BUILDING UNIT2 "A" BUILDING "A" UNIT 3 BUILDING "A" UNIT 4 ARC5/8 #7i60 6'VM FENCEIA/CL S 89'36'17" E 108.76'(s) N0108'31" E 20.00'(s) N 00'59'37" E 20.00'(P) upiso FIRC 5/a"1 9.7 6WILF FENCE- 'Ms FENCE 33 COMMON AREA BUILDING "B" UNIT1 DRIVEWAY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LEGEND (O.R. BOOK 1353, 182, FRANKUN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS) BUILDING E, UNIT P PALMER POINTE TOWNHOMES, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF REÇORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 23, OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF FRANKUN COUNTY, FLORIDA. inch 20 ft. TANCDCE CERTIRED TO: TERRI MONTEZ PILES & JASON LEE PILES DHI MORTGAGE COMPANY, LTD DHI TTLE OF FLORIDA, INC. DHI TTLE INSURANCE COMPANY BASED DN Rc CCECRA AEC PALMER POINTE TONOESR RECORICD INPLATE 11. COCOENING TES MD DOTCRS BEN NOTA PART B RAISED SEAL DRARNE E. WLLS CHECKED BY: K. O'NEAL SCALE "=2 20 RAD BOOK 23-08 PAGE: 67-69 ar TION NOTES TE VAS FURNISEDA AT TET TIE a THIS SURVEY. TP CASDE SHEET_NO. 1 OF1 JOBNO. ereby the certify Boord that of T meets end the dministrgtive Code, pursuant to o OnOnale MNC. PROFESSIONAL ONEAL SURVEYOR MAPPER No. 6413 DATE ORDA UCENSEDE BUSNESS No. 7834 forth Meridion DATE: MAY1 14, 2024 UAVETHOPSAYTIHOTIC REMISED: 11/20/24 RECERTFY (849) PA L, 1831 ELORIDE Certificate of Appropriateness - New Construction 205 9th Street Official Use Only, Date Received: 124/25 Meeting Date: 2/10/25 Fees Due: $275.00 Date Fees Paid: 1/27/25 Cityo ofApalachicola Planning & Zoning Application for Development/Site Plan Approval OWNER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner Damil tisle Dfnkovil Address 227 25* SRt Phone 561-451-8727 Contractor Name Bie hhd Statel License # RB00925C CityLicense # Phone 850-853-772Z City. WERt lalh Btuch State ELZip33407 Email AylHZaclene PROJECTTYPE New Construction Addition Alteration/Renovyation Relocation Demolition Fence Accessory Structure Certificate ofAppropriateness: Other PROPERTYI INFORMATION Street Address (911 Address): 205 9t5 et City & State: Apalachiiple EL Parcel ID#: 025/ME3AIMA-O 911 Zip: 323D0 Needed Block: 1Q Non-Historic District Lot: 7 Zoning District: FEMA Flood Zone: [Historic District OFFICIALUSE ONLY Certificate of Appropriateness: Required? Y/N Setback Requirements of Property: Front: I5 Rear: 26 Side: 1Scp" Corner Lot? Y, Street Sides: Lot Coverage: 40/ STAFF NOTES/RECOMMENDATIONS: Neads meets SeMoAcs This development. request has been approved fora Certificate ofAppropriateness (ifapplicable), zoning, land use, and development review by the Cityof Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Board and a building permit is authorized. to be issued. C.OA. VINEw lot cowt City Staff Date Approved NOTE: This isac conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC.) Please be aware that other documentation: may be required by thel Building Official. Applicant Initial Describe the proposed project and materials. Describe thej proposed project in terms of size, affected architectural elements, materials, and relationship to the existing 109 SF CORT E7 bonk 1445E SERPAPd EA 645F PROJECTSCOPE MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FLPRODUCT APPROVAL# Siding Doors Windows Roofing Trim Foundation Shutters Porch/Deck Fencing Hardier Hardie Flerghss Viny! ning Hidie Abaghss YKK Meral Hodie Lonapter Bloch fil5 X Mbod X Raks Sem X hbot K Racls Driveways/Sidewalks Other NOTE: Please have a site plan prepared to turn in with) your application. At minimum, the. site plan needs to contain: a North arrow, surrounding streets, lot lines, lot dimensions, setbacks, current structure dimensions, proposed. structure dimensions,fence. locations, andj fence heights. Applications requiring a Certificate afAppropriateness will also need to. submit renderings/elevations ofany proposed. structures and note the materials proposed. More information may be requested by City Staff CERTIFICATION By signing below, Id certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best ofmy knowledge at the time ofapplication. I acknowledge that I understand and have complied with all of the submittal requirements andj procedures and have read and understand the following: 1. I/We hereby attest toi the fact that the above supplied property address(es), parcel numbers(s), and legal description(s) is(are) the true and proper identification of the area of this petition. 2. I/We authorize staffi from the City ofA Apalachicola to enter onto the property in question during regular business hours in order to take photos which will be placed ini the permanent file. 3. I/We understand that the COA1 review time period will not commence until the application is deemed complete by staff and may take up to 101 business days toj process. Ifurther understand that an incomplete application submittal may cause my application tol be deferred to the next 4. I/We understand that, for Board review cases, an agenda and staff report (ifa applicable) will be available on the City's website approximately one week before the Planning & Zoning Board 5. I/We understand that the approval of this application by the Planning & Zoning Board or staffin NO way constitutes approval ofal Building Permit for Construction from the City of 6. I/We understand that all changes to the approved scope of work stated in a Certificate of Appropriateness or Development Order application have to be approved by the P&Z Board before work commences on those changes. Making changes that have not been approved can result in a Stop Work Order being placed on the entire project and additional fees/penalties. 7. I/We understand that any decision ofthe P&ZI Board may be appealed to the City Commission within 30 days after the decision by the P&Z Board; otherwise, the decision will be final. 8. I/We understand that a Certificate of Appropriateness: is only valid for one year after issuance. They are renewable for six months without cause ifrequested, and for an additional six months upon showing of good cause by the applicant. The applicant must submit all requests for extensions in writing and provide appropriate support documents to City Staff, ifneeded. 9. I/We understand that P&Z Board approval is permission to obtain aj permit for work and installation as indicated.Icertify that all work will be performed to meet standards ofall laws 10. I/We understand that there will be no issuance ofa Certificate of Appropriateness without the property owner obtaining Homeowner's. Association approval (if required) prior to the P&Z Board Meeting and/or before the beginning ofa an work and in no way authorizes work that is in posted deadline date. Meeting. Apalachicola Building Department. regulating construction ini thisj jurisdiction. violation of any association rules or regulations. 12425 DATE beie SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT V 3222122 16L-2 38AAN 8or SAB 03X03HD MV EXBOM G3u *z/e1/z ISV0 31VO DMO6L42 3u NIXNYES INDOS IVId 83deN) atueE IONANKYI MEUPAVOVMNINON PSELE vanoz! 1440H3405 * 13PMISAOGTHESA . aIxO804 Su3ddy GNYS SHOASAHAS: 7YNOISS34084 ONI SAIYIDOSSV: PAWEENIQ4ON NVWHAHI opuoy "Kjunos uiyuoJy "10Z 'g Kioniqay :ajop xapu! J9250 6800Z1 :ON jovod Aljunwwos doy ajoy aouounsul pool Jad so X. auoz uI pajoool SI Ajadod joafgns NOLLVRHO.NI 3NOZ a00Td JAILO3d3 igzi pvo LY 1S3nVr ayepenes, Pp adad Eehwis s fauns ves : PvP iev Avins Aganui 88 e NMYAO 42/61/z1 3LYa posjge aan (isoi sjuawodag Kjunos ajopdoiddo ay Kq payueA aq Pinoys SYOVBL3S puo addow puo Jofonns posuasi oppoy D S3NOZ 0001 IMV "sasodind bunnuped uononsuos Joj pasn eq 01 jou 0Jo uoajay pappidap SXOV813S puo S3NOZ G0015 "L jo joas pasios joubyo ay puo aunjou6js ayi nou PIDA I0N '9 NOVIN3HINON ONUSIX3 uodn quapuadap S! Konns SI4L 'S "u02134 UMOYs asoy uow Jayo SIN3MHDVOHON3 318ISW ON aJo aJayL " "uoaJay UMOYS voy Jayo Kowns S141 uI pajpool uaaq DADY SIN3YGAO8dHI ON E "wnop YJON PM9 oppou Kq paysugoysa sbupoaq IIV 30N383938 ONISV38 Z ONNOS Jo 13S. 10N. INIOd V 37VOS 0L I0N -Wr AVM--0-1H9I8 M/B GOB NOBI GNAOS JU dyo ONV 0O8 NOBI GNNOS D8H IN3NANON. 3138ONO3 GNNOS wos IVId 080338 de G38ASV3W N CN3937 091LF 0O8-38. -8/s135 JBIS JoKoAns paubjsiapun ay Kq pawojad Konins Piay o puo ojd piooay 308nOS A3A8AS "I SEION 0914 (.8/9) 0813 Bs D8L - "oppoyy "Kjunos upyuosy u aoyyo unoo ay jo xalo ayi 10 aly uo asn uowwos uI joauay 1ojd JO dow Jad SD VIOOIHOVTVdV Jo ALIO ay1 jo .99L. x0018 'L107 NOIIdIOSIG 7V937 D8L .991. X0078 8107 0019ZSHLI8L 0811'94ES9Z R 0914 (.8/9) D8L % 0914 (.9/9) D8B (IN38) (.8/s) dL Las FS38OV 4lO "99I.M0078 LI0T .991, X0078 9107 09144 (.9/9) D8U 11 02 qouy I (1331 NI) ITVOS OIHdVID XNVdNO3 SONVEASNI 3TLIL 7VNOLLVN DI78Ada8 aTO OTAOXNII-MIACTVE 3I7S37 puD DIAOMNIHG AIRVG 0L aaId1.a33 AIAANS AUVGNAOE do VId "Vd 'SHNVE HONVEE AJSINN 1 (d8),00'001 (w),12001 MEEL.LS xoVaIsS 654 3 -3HC bsz XOVA13S 30S SL 3.94,60.LYN (w),60'00L (d8),00'001 M/8 (03AVd N M/8. .06) ul IANEAY 0906 I 1n 0J9 UOOOW PP 1831 ELORIDE Certificate of Appropriateness & Accessory Structure 101 6th Street Official Use Only Date Received: /s/25 Meeting Date: 2/16/25 Fees Due: $90 Date Fees Paid: 1025 CivyofApalachicola Planning & Zoning Application for Development/Site Plan. Approval OWNERINFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Name Dzew Resasrsa,Pé,C6c State License # CGC, 1534033 City License # 34-176 GEo FIORA Owner David & Lisa Albright Address 101 6th Street City Apalachiçola State FL Zip. 32320 Email DAwa) gesleagreupicom OFFIE 050:745 4226 is SMBS 278334 Phone. 301539 7a1/I-21-7PZ Phone MOBLG 850-7-10. 9257 PROJECTTYPE New Construction Addition Alteration/Renovation Relocation Demolition Fençe Accessory Structure CatifiameotApopiatems Other Storm Water Management AESSARA4 0sRathe PROPERTY INFORMATION 10 61H STREET [x Historic District Street. Address (911-Address): City & State: Apalachicola, FL Parcel ID#:. 01985.06W-8001B0100 Zoning District: R-1 FEMA. Flood Zone: Zip: 32320 Block: 18 Non-Historic District Lot: 10 X OFFICIAL USE ONLY Certificate of Appropriateness Required? Y/N Setback Requirements ofI Property: ComerLot?Y/N Street Sides: STAFF NOTES/RECOMMENDATIONS: This development request has been approved) fora Certificate of Appropriateness: (fapplicable),: zoning, landuse, and development review by the Cityof Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Board and a building. permit is authorized to be issued. Front: Lot Coverage: Ser Rear: Side: aktackre at end of paccr City Staff Date Approved NOTE: This is a conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC.) Please be aware that other documentation may. bei required by the Building Official. 58 9Ex/RMC Applic,ntInitial Describe the proposed) project and materials. Describe the proposed project in terms ofs size, affected architectural. elements, materials, and relationship to the existing structure(s). demolition ofe existing shed and! hardscaping areas, renovationa andi replacement decking, new gravel pathways. stormwater Thep proposeds site work fort they projecti includes thef following: çapture andi infiltration system, as small covered structure, and! landscaping PROJECT SCOPE MANUFACTURER PRODUCTDESCRIPTION FLPRODUCT APPROVAL#: Siding Doors Windows Roofing Trim Foundation Shutters Porch/Deck Fencing sirt A metal roof tor match existing see plans new fencing to match existing, see plans removal of impervious walkways; replace with gravel walkways see plans Driveways/Sidewalks: Other NOTE: Please have a site plan prepared to turn in with your application. At minimum, the: site plan needs to contain: a North. arrow, surrounding streets, lot lines, lot dimensions, setbacks, current structure dimensions, proposed structure dimensions, fence locations, and fence heights. Applications requiring a Certificate of4 Appropridteness will also need to: submit enderings/levations ofany proposedstnictures. and note the materials proposed. More information may be requested by City Staff CERTIFICATION By signing below, Icertify that thei information contained in this appliçation is true and correct. to the best of myl knowledge at the time ofa application. Ia acknowledge that I understand and have complied with all of the submittal requirements andj procedures and1 have read and understand the following: 1. I/We hereby attest to the fact that the above supplied property address(es), parçel numbers(s), and legal description(s) is(are) the true andj proper identification oft the area ofthis petition. 2. I/We authorize staff from the City of Apalachicola to enter onto the property in question during regular businéss hours in order to take photos which willl be placed in the permanent file. 3. I/We understand that the COA review time period will not commence until the application is deemed complete by staff and may take up to 101 businéss days toj process, Ifurther understand that an incomplete appliçation submittal may cause, my application to1 be deferred to the next 4. I/We understand that, for) Board review cases, an agenda staffreport (if applicable) available on the City's website approximately one wéek before thePlanning & Zoning Board 5. I/We understand that the approval of this application by the Planning & Zoning Board or staffin NO way constitutes approval ofal Building Permit for Construction from the City of I/We understand that all changes to the approved scope. of work stated in a Certificate of Appropriateness or Development Order application have to be approved by the P&ZI Board béfore work commences on those changes. Making changes that have not been approved. can result in a Stop Work Order being placed on the entire project and additional fees/penalties. 7. I/We understand that any decision ofthel P&Z Board may be appealed to the City Commission within 30 days after the decision by the P&ZI Board; otherwise, the decision will be final. 8. I/We understand that a Certificate ofAppropriateness: is only valid for one year after issuançe. They are renewable for six months without cause ifrequested, and for an additional six months upon showing of good çause by the applicant. The applicant must submit all requests for extensions in writing and provide appropriate support documents to City Staff, ifneeded. 9. I/We understand that P&Z Board approval is permission to obtain aj permit for work and installation as indicated. Icertify that all work will be performed. to meet standards ofall laws 10. I/We understand that there will be noi issuance ofa Certificate ofAppropriateness without the property owner obtaining Homeowner's. Association approval (ifrequired) prior to the P&Z Board Meeting and/or before the beginning of an work and in no way, authorizes work that is in posted. deadline date. Meeting: and willl be Apalachicola Building Department. regulating construction in this jurisdiction. violation of any association rules or regulations. ES R* honen Qubrught SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT TANVA 132025 DATE % 16, SA BEyA 637 PAMSRN Segcaape 8430 FRL BUILDING PERMIT: APPLICATION CHECKLIST (ALLSTEPS) MAYNOT APPLYTO SMALLER PROJECTS). 1.Approval from City Planning & Zoning Board 2. Complete Building Permit Application 3,TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS INCLUDING: Site] Plan Elevations Floor Plan Fire Protection Drawn to Scale Final Site Plan (New Construction): Stormwater Management Plan Signed/Scaled Structural Drawings 4. Contractor Information License I3 Photo ID ofLicense Holder COI: Workers Comp/General. Liability Letter of Authorization 5, Contract Scope ofWork 6. Energy Forms 7.1 Notice of Commencement (AIl permits valued at $2,500 or more) 8.) Flood Elevation Certificate 9. Fill Permit Application 10.1 Floodplain Management, Application (NOT ifFlood Zone X) 11. Water/Sewer Impact Fees Receipt (ifappliçable) Davio R, ALBRIb ga / Lisq Karen Albrich/ Rin Koun Cubnygil TArvy 13,2025 Applicant Name/Signature Date City of Apalachicola Building Department 192 Coach Wagoner) Blvd. Apalachicola, FL32320 (850)653-9319 E LOVE LAND STUDIO, INC. JANUARY 1, 2025 PROJECT INTRODUCTION: Albright Residence I 101 6th Street Apalachicola, FL: 32320 Lisa Albright (formerly Lisa Pruett, a long-time family of Apalach) and her husband, David. Albright purchased their home at 101 6th Street 9: years ago, and are becoming permanent: residents of the City. The current site is plagued by water drainage issues which render the back yard unliveable and unuseable. The lot has a nonconforming lot coverage due to the house being built in the 1890', and the previous owner's construction of structures and use of materials thatincreased impermeable space even further. The Albrights are seeking to address the existing stormwateri issues while creating an outdoor living space in theirb backyard in an ecologically responsible way, and in accordance with City regulations. This proposal will enable them to: safely use their property while environmentally benefitting their neighbors and the City as a whole. Along with the Albrights, we. kindly ask for your consideration and approval of this proposal. PROPOSAL OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this proposal are: Achieve municipal requirements for impermeable lot coverage: to remove impermeable surfaces and improve the impermeable lot coverage ratio to (less than) 40% from the current 50.5%, and Address current drainage issues through improved landscaping and water treatment Improve storm water quality and overall site runoff: this will be done by collecting rainwater from the roof of the main house structure and treating it using a comprehensive, ecologically Erecting a living area on top of the water treatment system which will be only partially covered -add native and naturalized planting to reduce site runoff, beautify the site, and block the view/ Standard Apalachicola best management practices as outlined in the 'City of Apalachicola Guide to Specific Storm water Best Management Practices' highlight the use of detention ponds and vegetated swales. These traditional methods are not always applicable on a small residential scale- historic 55.05%. responsible water treatment system mute the appearance of the proposed structure and are not applicable to this current site. P.O. Box 25 Apalachicola, FL 32329 (850)370-0215 I www.welovelandstudio.com PROPOSAL: Introduction to the sites specific storm waterinfiltration system included inj plans: We are proposing a storm water: infiltration system that will capture the storm water from the proposed backyard living area, cleani it, store it, and allow it to filter back into the soil on site to recharge the groundwater aquifer. The current site has a slight slope, and the concrete alley flume is elevated, which creates a bowl effect. As a result, surrounding runoff accumulates in the backyard area. This system will improve water quality and reduce/process: thel historically accumulated runoff. We can capture and treat more water with the structure: in place than without. It will also take pressure off of the city's current storm water system and reduce the outflow of water volume, and pollutants, to the surrounding waterways. This system benefits everyone; the homeowner, the city, *A note to the board: The proposed system is considered a storm water management "best practice" throughout the country and in environmentaly delicate areas adjacent to waterways in Florida. We believe the city can benefit tremendously through the responsible use oft this practice. Whether implemented to retrofit existing sites, or utilized with new construction, it has the ability to retain, "Of primary importance to minimizing the effects ofs stormwater on water quality is the 'first flush'. This term describes the washing action that stormwater. has on accumulated pollutants ina watershed. In the early stages of runoff the land surfaces, especially the impervious surfaces like streets and parking areas, are flushed clean by the stormwater. This creates a shock load of Studies in Florida have determined that the first one inch of runoff generally carries 90% of the pollution from a storm. Treatment of the first flush is the key to propers stormwater management."- City of Apalachicola 'Guide to Site Specific Stormwater Best Management Practices' - Page 4 Not only does this system most effectively treatt the first flush', it gives residents more flexibility within their property while simultaneously reducing the strain on the current city storm water drainage system and will reduce the contaminants entering the bay. Our goal is toi illustratea and explain the feasibility and benefits of thej proposed system sO the city can effectively evaluate the Thank you very much for your time and we appreciate your consideration of this proposal. and the bay. treat, and infiltrate the storm water produced on most sites. pollutants thatare flushed into the nearby coastal waters. Albright's proposed plan and approve it. Sincerely, Sam + Liz Berkheiser We Love Land Studio, Inc. Drew Robertson GeoFlora Group, LLC David +1 Lisa Albright - 101 6th Street Apalachicola, FL32320 P.O. Box 25 Apalachicola, FL 32329 - (850).370- -0215 - www.welovelandstudio.com 2 SYSTEMS COMPARISON: Grassy Swale tol Bay Gutter to Infiltration System B E 0 Outflow Infiltration Chamber Bay Aquifer Current stormwater trajectory flows mostly above ground, ori in pipes throughout the city, before being expelled into the waterways." This process puts a majority of the' 'first flush' directlyi into the bay. A: small portion oft this water recharges the aquifer Underground infiltration chamber storm water system captures the water and treats the' 'first flush'naturally before recharging the aquifer localized and on-site. through infiltration. P.O. Box 25 Apalachicola, FL 32329 (850)370-0215 www.welovelandstudio.com 3 B LOVE LAND STUDIO, INC. January 11,2025 ProjectLocation- - 101 6th Street Apalachicola, FL3 32320 To Whom Itl May Concern, Thej proposed storm waterinfiltration system has been designed to treat and store rainwaterproduced by the existing house and addition of the secondary shade structure. The system has been designed to ensure that storm water best management practices arei implemented responsibly toj protect the environment and Thel layout of the system has been designed utilizing current landscape architectural standards; and the overall flow rates have been verified usings site-specific geotechnical data collected and produced by Magnum Engineering Inc.' The associated geotechnical engineering report, site plans and details, calculations, and manufacturer documents prepared for this project arel located: in the following pages. Please allow this letter to serve: as verification that this proposed storm water best management practice has been designed to meet and exceed the design standard requirements (water quality treatment and storage) set by the State of Florida or City of Apalachicola for the 1in 25 year/24h hour storm event. While the system exceeds the necessary water quality treatment and storage capacity required for the lin 25) year/24hour storm event, please note that iti is not required to and may not treat larger storm events (such asl hurricanes) that exceed the current State of Florida design standards for the 1in 25 year/ /241 hour storm event. Please contact me with any additional questions or concerns at 850-370-0215 (office). surrounding areas. Regards, Samuel W. BerkheiserlII bnehiha Registered Landscape Architect LA6667589 State of Florida P.O. Box 25 Apalachicola, FL 32329 (850)370-0215 www.velovelandstudio.com 4 MEI MAGNUM ENGINEERING - INC GBOTBCHNICAL ENGINEBRING CONSULTANTS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT 101 6"HSTREET APALACHICOLA, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: MR. DREW ROBERTSON, PG GEOFLORA GROUP P.O. BOX 55 APALACHICOLA, FL 32323 429 FLORIDA AVENUE LYNN HAVEN, FLORIDA 32444 TELEPHONE (850) 258.0994 MEI MAGNUM, ENGINBERING INC GBOTECHNICAL ENGINBERINGS CONSULTANTS October 30, 2024 Mr. Drew Robertson, P.G. GeoFlora Group P.O. Box 55 Apalachicola, Florida 32323 SUBJECT: 1016 6th Street Geotechnical Services for Stormwater Apalachicola, Florida MEI Project No. M124-120-909 Dear Mr. Robertson: This letter forwards the results of our Geotechnical services for the subject site in Apalachicola, Florida. The purpose of this exploration was to evaluate the subsurface conditions present in the proposed stormwater management area. Project Description and Scope of Services The subject site is located at 101 6th Street in Apalachicola, Florida. At the time of our investigation, the site was developed with an existing single-family residence with associated parking, flowers beds, and surficial grasses. Note that an existing concrete swale was present in the drainage easement on the east side of the site. The area oft the proposed stormwater management area was easily accessible. Our exploration consisted of One (1) 4-feet deep hand auger boring and one (1) Double Ring infiltrometer Test (DRI). Upon completion of our field testing, the samples werel brought back to the office for lab testing, Ifany of the above information is incorrect, please inform Magnum Engineering, Inc. sO that we can review The scope of services did not include an environmental assessment for determining the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous materials in the air, surface water(s), soil, or groundwater on or in the visual inspection, classification and analysis by our engineering staff. and update our recommendations, as needed. vicinity of the subject site. Subsurface Conditions Figure #1 shows the Boring Location Plan and Figure #2 shows thel Log of Boring for HA-1. The test location was identified in the field using the provided site plan, a measuring wheel, and estimating right angles with reference to existing landmarks. Therefore, the test location should be considered approximate. The auger boring generally encountered clean light gray fine sands (fill) from the existing ground surface tor roughly 1f foot below existing grade underlain by dark gray silty fine sand to the boring termination depth of4.01 feet below existing grade. 101 6th Street Geotechnical Services for Stormwater Apalachicola, Florida Page 2of4 The above subsurface descriptions are of a generalized nature, provided to highlight the major soil strata encountered. The Logs of Borings should be reviewed for specific subsurface conditions at each boring location. The stratifications shown on the Logs of Boring represent the subsurface conditions at the actual boring locations only, and variations in the subsurface conditions can and may occur between boring locations and should therefore be expected. The stratifications represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials, and the transitions between strata may be gradual. Please refer to the attached logs of borings presented as Figure #2 for a more detailed description oft the soils encountered. At the time of our exploration (October 29, 2024), groundwater was encountered at 0.91 feet below existing grade, which was during a period of normal seasonal rainfall. By definition, the normal seasonal high groundwater table elevation is the highest level of the saturated zone in the soil during a year with normal rainfall. The procedure used in estimating the seasonal high groundwater table is based on adjusting the existing groundwater table encountered upward or downward, taking into consideration factors such as antecedent rainfall, redoximorphic features (identifying soil mottling) and vegetative indicators. We have estimated the seasonal high groundwater table the boring location. Please refer to Table #1 below Groundwater Conditions for groundwater data. Location HA-1 TABLE: #1 Groundwater Depth Below Existing Grade 0.91 feet Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater Depth Below Existing Grade 0.5 feet Large fluctuations are possible under severe weather conditions. We recommend that the Contractor verify the actual groundwater levels at the time of construction to determine potential impacts groundwater will have on construction procedures. Double Ring infiltrometer Test One (1) Double Ring Infiltrometer test was performed in thet field in general accordance with the procedures outlined in ASTM D-3385, "Infiltration Rate of Soils in Field using Double Ring Infiltrometers". Testing consisted ofi initially clearing all surface vegetation and topsoil fromy within the test area. The Infiltration test was performed just beneath the existing ground surface at location DRI-1. The outer ring, which is approximately 24 inches in diameter, was then driven to a depth of 6 inches below the exposed ground surface. The inner ring, approximately 12 inches in diameter, was then centrally located within the outer ring and driven to a depth of 2 inches. The two rings were then simultaneously filled with water to al height of 4 inches above the exposed ground surface test soils. The water level was maintained at this height throughout the test period, with the required amount of water added to maintain this level in both rings Thei infiltration rate for the inner ring and the annular space between the rings is determined by dividing (a) the water volume used (within each specific area) during the stabilized flow period of the test, by (b) the specific area and (c) the time interval. Infiltration rates are generally converted to units ofi inches per hour. The infiltration rate for the inner ring, if different than the infiltration rate of the annular area between the recorded at time intervals of 5 minutes. rings, according to ASTM, should be used as the infiltration rate for the soils. INFILTRATION DATA LOCATION DRI-1 ORIENTATION TEST DEPTH (feet) SUSTAINED INFILTRATION RATE (in/hr) Kv(unsaturated) Surface 0.5* 101 6th Street - Geotechnical Services for Stormwater Apalachicola, Florida Page 3of4 *Note: The above infiltration rate has not been factored and is up to the designer to apply an Wer recommend using at transformation ratio of1 horizontal to 1 vertical (i.e. the estimated ratio of horizontal appropriate factor of safety. tov vertical permeability). ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMITTING (ERP) DESIGN PARAMETERS DESCRIPTION SUSTAINED INFILTRATION RATE (Kvu) TEST DEPTH FILLABLE POROSITY DEPTH TO EXISTING GROUNDWATER TABLE DEPTH TO ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER TABLE LOCATION DRI-1 DRI-1 DRI-1 DRI-1 DRI-1 DESIGN PARAMTER 0.51 IN/HR* Surface 25% 0.9 FTI BELOWEXISTING GRADE O5FTBELOWEXISTING GRADE The above infiltration rate has not been factored and iti is up to the designer to apply an appropriate factor of safety. Stormwater Pond Filter Material Itis our understanding that the proposed stormwater ponds may be constructed using a sand filter. We recommend over-excavating the existingi in-situ soils in thet top: 2-feet andi replace them using a clean coarse sand (containing less than 5% fines and having a minimum permeability of 1x10-2 cm/sec). Warranty and Limitations of Study Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations prepared ina accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either expressed or implied. Magnum Engineering, Inc. is not responsible for thei independent conclusions, opinions or recommendations made by others based on the field exploration We wish toy point out that a geotechnical studyi is inherently limited in that the engineering recommendations: are developed from information obtained from test borings that only depict subsurface conditions at the specific locations, times and depth shown on the logs. Soil conditions at other locations may differ from those encountered in the test borings, and the passage of time may cause the soils conditions to change This report is intended for use by the designers of this project. While we have no objections to it being provided for review by parties to this project, it is not a specification document and is not to be used as a part of thes specifications. Ifdesired, we can assist in the development ofs specifications for this project based The nature and extent of variation and change in the subsurface conditions at the site may not become evident until the course of construction. Construction monitoring by the geotechnical engineer or his representative is therefore considered necessary to verify the subsurface conditions. Ifs significant variations or changes are in evidence, it may be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations. in this report. and laboratory test data presented in this report. from those described in this report. upon our exploration. 101 6th Street. Geotechnical Services for Stormwater Apalachicola, Florida Page 4of4 Furthermore, ift the project characteristics are altered significantly from those discussed in this report, ift the project information contained in this report is incorrect or if additional information becomes available, a review must be made by this office to determine if any modifications in the recommendations will be We hope this letter provides sufficient information fort the present. Ifyou have any questions or necessary. comments, please feel free to call. MAGNUM ENGINEERING. INC JAMES VICKERS, P.E. Sr. Geotéchnical Engineer F Florida Registration # 56813 11 - AES T. Sincerely, ENSE No. 56813 * STATEOF ID! MSSIONAL EN This item has been digitally signed and sealed by James T. Vickers, P.E. on 10/30/2024 Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies James Digitally signed Attachments: Figure #1 - Boring LocationPp Figure #2 -Log of Boring by JamesT. Vickers Date: 2024.10.30 Appendix (A)- Double Ring Infiltrometer Test Results T. Vickers 12:50:29-05/00 MEI MAGNUM ENGINEERING - INC GBOTBCHNICAL ENGINBERING CONSULTANTS BORING. LOCATION PLAN FIGURE # 1 h 11.76' a HA-1/DRI-1 2.85 9.45' 323 STEPS 5' 20' ( 0 ( 00 TSIDE YARD SETBACK5 1.0 7.5 1.341 5.66 Se 7.49' 37.15' FRONTYARD PORCH SETBACK15 MAS 56,03 5.67 BONCRETE SIDEWALK $0.00' co.00' (RA) 6th MEI MAGNUM ENGINEERING INC GBOTECENICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANIS LOGO OF BORING FIGURE# #2 Magnum Engineering, Inc. JLynn! Haven, Florida 32444 Telephone: 8502658332 BORING NUMBER HA-1 MEI 429 Florida Avenue CLIENT GeoFlora Group PROJECT NUMBER M124-120-909 DATE STARTED 10/29/24 DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLING METHOD Hand Auger Boring LOGGEDI BY J. Vickers NOTES PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME 101 6th Street PROJECT LOCATION Apalachicola, Florida GROUNDI ELEVATION GROUND' WATERI LEVELS: ZDEPTHT TO GROUNDWATER. AT TIME OF DRILLING 0.9ft ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH GWT AFTER DRILLING COMPLETED 10/29/24 CHECKED BY J.Vickers HOLES SIZE ATTERBERG LIMITS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 Light Gray Fine SAND (SP) Dark Gray Silty Fine SAND (SM) AU Boring Termination Depth at 4.0f feet. MEI MAGNUM ENGINEERING INC GBOTBCHNICAL ENGINEBRING CONSULTANTS Double Ring Infiltrometer Test Results Appendix (A) MEI MAGNUM ENGINEERINGINC GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSUITANIS Double-Ring! Field Infiltration Test Test Location: Project! Name: Project Location: Apalachicola, Florida Test Depth: Deptht to GWT: Inner Ring Diameter: Outer Ring! Diameter: Pre-Saturation Area Outer Ring: Areal Inner Ring: Net Outer Ring/ Area: Cycle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Results DRI-1 101 6th Street Surface ft 0.9feet ft 12in 24in 30r min 3.1416f2 0.7854 f2 2.3562 f2 ElapTime (sec) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Sustained Rate 0.3048m 0.6096m 0.00202683 m*2 0.00050671 m*2 0.00152013 m*2 Inner Ring Vol Used (in*3) 5 5 5 5 5 Infiltration Rate (fV/sec) 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 1.23E-05 Infiltration! Rate vs Time 1.40E-05 1.20E-05 1.00E-05 8.00E-06 6.00E-06 4.00E-06 2.00E-06 0.00E+00 123 4 8 9 1011 2131151671819 Cycle (300s sec) 3.74E-04 cm/sec 0.5 in/hr APPENDIXA Infiltration Rate: Eaaa 49 PNS 30'ALLEY BAB F3 ACKS e 6THSTREET EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS: TOTALI IMPERVIOUS AREA WIHINPROPERIYINE: LOT 10BLOCK"18 A. ISIORYIRAMEDWELNG, PORCHES &STAIRS- 2,459.42SF! 40.99% WITHINPL 276.585FIRO.W. 2,736.44SF COMBINED METALS SHED- 211.58SFI 3.53%V WITHINPL 70.03SF R.O.W. 281.61 SFI COMBINED CONCRETED DRIVEWAY- 26.72SF 10.4% WITHINPL 90.12SF R.O.W. 116.84SF COMBINED D. CONCRETE: SIDEWALK- 489.635F/R.O.W. E. BRICKPATHWAY- 605.43SF I 10.09% EXISTING DECKAREA: Fl. 53.11SF 0.89% F2. 81.09SF 1.35% F3. 75.32SF 11.26% F4. 50.12SF 0.83% F3. 365.91SF 6.10% 3,303.15SF 55.05% TOTALE DECKING AREA WITHIN PROPERIYLINE: 625.55SF11 10.43% 3,928.70SF 65.47% *TOTALI IMPERVIOUS AREA WITHIN CITYR.O.W.: 926.36SF 'TOTAL COMBINED AREAI IMPERVIOUS + DECKING WITHIN PROPERTY LINE: ELOVE LAND S0'ALLEY K SOEYARD SETBACKS - GTHSTREET 3,030.51 SFI 50.5% 926.36SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS. AREA CALCULATIONS: TOTALI EXISTING IMPERVIOUS. AREA WITHIN PROPERTY LINE: LOT TOBLOCK"18" A. ISTORY FRAME DWELLING, PORCHES &STAIRS- 2,459.42SF! 40.99%WIHINPL 276.585F/R.O.W. 2,736.44SF I COMBINED B. METAL SHED- 211.58SF! 3.53%v WITHINPL 70.03SF R.O.W. 281.61 SFI COMBINED CONCRETED DRIVEWAY- 26.72SF 10.4%V WITHINF PL 90.12SF R.O.W. 116.84SF IC COMBINED D. CONCRETES SIDEWALK- 489.635FIR.O.W. E. BRICKPATHWAY- 332.79SF15.6% EXISTING DECK AREA: FI. 53.11SFI 10.89% F2. 81.09SFI 11.35% F3. 75.32SFI 1.26% *ALLE EXISTINGI DECKI TOF REMAINV WILLBE NSPECTED/ ANDA ADJUSTED (IF NECESSARY) TO HAVEAI 1/8" GAPB BETWEENE BOARDS TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA WITHIN CITY R.O.W.: EXISTING IMPERVIOUS. AREA1 TOE BER REMOVED: 571.09 SFI 9523(AREASB,CLD TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREAT TO REMAIN: 2,A59.425F141% 649.78SF APPROXIMATELY 276.58SF) DECKING AREAI TOF REMAIN: 53.11/0.899(F1) DECKING ARET TOE BEF REMOVED: F2+F3= 156.41 SF 12.6% TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREAI INR.O.W.1 TOB BER REMOVED: (B,C,D) "REMAINING. AREAI INR.O.W.ISPART OFT THEN MAINHISTORIC: STRUCTURE ELOVE LAND EXISTING COVED. 30 ALLEY PROPOSED GRAVEL SOCIAL CIRCLE BACKYARD PERMEABLE) 1 PROPOSEDPERGOLA PROPOSEDF FENCING (APPX. 64LF) & GATE, TOMATCHEXISING PROPOSEDDECK COVERING GARDENPLOIS PROPOSEDI DECKING PROPOSED GRAVEL: PATHWAY (PERMEABLE) WITHE BRICKBORDER SIDEYARD SETBACK5' SETBACK5 RESIDENCE FRONTYARD SETBACK15 E LOVE LAND 30ALLEY PROPOSED COVEREDI PATIOAREA PROPOSED: STORMWATERI INFILTRATIONS SYSTEM, TOBEL LOCATEDE BELOW PROPOSEDI DECKING PROPOSEDDECKNG SETEACKS STHSTREET EXISTING DECKAREA: Fl. 54.00SF 0.9% PROPOSEDDECKING, AREA: G. 530.12SF 18.84% TOTALO DECKING AREA: 584.12SF 19.7% (<10%) *ALL PROPOSEDI DECKING TOH HAVEAT 1/8"GAP BETWEENE BOARDS. ALLE EXISTING DECKT TOR REMAIN WILL BEINSPECTED ANDA ADJUSTED (IF NECESSARY) TOHAVEAI 1/8" GAPE BETWEENE BOARDS ase impervivs *D EXISTINGI IMPERVIOUS. AREA CALCULATIONS: LOTI T0BLOCK"18" 1STORYFRAME! DWELLING, PORCHES.STAIRS- A. 2,459.42SF 40.99% WITHINPL 276.58SF IR.O.W. 2,736.44SF COMBINED *REMAINING, AREAII INR.O.W.I ISPARTOF THEN MAINHISTORIC: STRUCTURE APPROXIMATELY: 276.58SF) TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA] TOF REMAIN: 2,736.44SF 4.56% 45V PROPOSEDI IMPERVIOUS. AREA!+ (COVERED DECKA AREA) H. 181.25SF I(3.02% TOTALI IMPERVIOUS. AREA: 2917.96SF I 48.63% AREA OVER 40% (2,400SF) TOB BET TREATED UTILIZING STORM WATERE BEST MANAGEMENT! PRACTICES VIAT THE ORPABCPNPAIPMSBDA 517.96SF 8.63% # definahon on how 1070 ailocahon calwvlot 4 ba nonconfoyowies City cod does not aAlows bauis DF SIDrMvaeY watwwt. on 4 ELOVE LAND 30'ALLEY BACKYARD SETBACK5 PROPOSED: SECONDARY STRUÇTURE, SEE COVERED STRUCTURE DESIGN ANDI DETAILS PROPOSEDI INFILTRATION STORMWATER CHAMBER SYSTEMLOCATION = ANDSCAPED DESIGN- DESIGNO CONCEPTES STORMWATER CALCUIATIONS: DESIGNO CONCEPT- unctionol space. heg gooloft thep proposeds stormwoterr monogement plonf fort thisp projectist tolessen! thes stormwoteri issues cousedbyt thec currenti ont noins structuree exceedst the4 40%loto coveroge Imit. Wec aimtonoto onlye ensuret thotl ther new patio cover doesn'ty worsens stormwoter impermeobles surfaces thes site. porticulorlys sincet theh historic hep romb proposeds botht thee existingo structurev ondnewmelolroos: wilhoved ametalroofwitht Thiss twoo opens sidesc ondN fwos screeneds sides. Thes stormwoter monogements systemy wilincludec anir Infitrations system deignedlocopiver roinwoter tormwatery will theni infitrotei intot thes surroundings systemv sol. Additionolly, wile enhancev thss waterc systemis quolityb iscopoble byt treatingt ofmonogingt thef frstinchofs the totolst stormwoterr stormwoter runoff, volumef effectivelyf fiteringo outs sedimento ondp pollutonts. Allcollected problems buto olsot toimprovet thec currents situationv whle creofing froms storms thotc occuro once every 25years. TORMV WATER CALCUIATIONS- WATER WAITQUMACAGHATON: 517.96SF Droinoge Area (Squore! Feet/ /SF)- TotolA Areac ofMetolR Roofw w/ 4:12roofp pitch 42.99CF Requiredv RoinfoiDepth Volume (Inches/in)- (Cubic Feet/ /CF)- Generotedf Typicold omounto from1 ofRoinfolltr l"ofroinfollo treated ont Drainoge to ensurev Areo woter quolty inal lin25y years Storme event GEOTECHNICAL DATA UTLZEDFORS STORMWATER CALCULATIONS: 42.99CF So'Group 00.25 perHr N25 YEAR/24HOURS STORMDATA: 11.00" 0.458" FLOODA AIBMAIOHCAICUAIONS RequredFlood 474.45CF Attenuotion) Volume SUMMARY OFF REQUIREDS STORMWATER VOLUMES TOBET TREATED: 42.99CF Woter QuolityT Treatment 474.45CF Flood/ Attenuotion Volume STORMWATER: ITPAMFTPATONCAPACINS SUMMARY: 509.43CF InstolledStorm Woter Systems Storoge Copocily RECOVERYTME CALCULATIONS: 56HRS Requiredv Woter Quolty Ksot- Inchesp perk Hour! (ord designir infitrationrate) MognumE Engineering Consultonts. Roinfol deptho occuringin ino2 24hourp period Rainfolld depth occuringg perk houro durings storme event Totoloreoo avoloblei ininfitrationf forv woter quoiy-8245CF Thek Ksato designroted aboveh hoso as sofety foctor of2(x5)0 ogpiedondiboiedoid!; sites specific dotof fromt the Cokctdipwtponas, "Dataf fromi thes SoiConservotions Services Hstoricn roinfall doto, alin25 yeor2 24hours storme eventist thec designs standordfor Stormwoterl Infitrotions Systems 458ir RoinfolV Volumex xTimeD Durationx Cubic Foot Conversionx) TotolProposeds Stormwater Dronoge Areo! (MetolRoofA Areas) inchesp perh hourx 24hoursx x517.965 Square Feet TotalR Recoveryl Time (Hours) Instoleds system Depth (Inches) Iinfitrafionrate (Inchesp perk Hour) 14 /0.25' perH Hour (asp peri infitrotionrote dotop providedby! USDA WebsolSurvey) EL LOVE LAND 8 1 - BACKYARD SETBACK5' NOTE:S STORMW COLLECTONA AREASTOBE DVERTEDTO STORMWATERE ROOF "ISTSTORMWATER TONALS METALR ROOFY WITHNEWG GUTERS "2NDSIORMWATER STORM WATERI INFILIRATIONPLAN 3 0-6TJ 1-2 045 GABIONWALL WATERLEVEL LOCATONSF AREAS EVEL AFFROX6 EISTNGS UB-GR ADE SIDEVIEW GEOTE ALLS SDESOF TORMWATERT ROK GPADE SIDE VIEW ENLARGEMENT TOAMWAIRCAFVEAEA COABEDPAHACESMIOMA FRONTY VIEW SCALE: 1/8=1 TOTAL 507.43CF-(TOTALF TVP. COMPECIONMEETMEDN AND mP. GABIONWALL- FLLEDWTHCIEAN AASHTO43STONE CAPPED nP. STABLZATION FABRIC. EROW TREATMENTS) SYSTEM RAOMPACONMECIOMON VATERCAFTUREAFEA LOWHEVEL PLANVIEW SCALE1/8-1 E LOVE LAND STORMV WATERI MPURAIONSIEMDEAIS 10-6 12-5 PROPOSEDI DECKING PROPOSEDRALING COVERED STRUCTURE- -PLAN METALF ROOF- TOMATCHEXISING OPENF ROOFF PERGOLA- PROPOSED! RAILING 10-1 OPEN SOUTH ELEVATION 12 METALE ROOF- TON MATCHEXISTING OPENROOFPERGOLA PRIVACYPANELING PROPOSED! RAILING NORTHE ELEVATION 12 OPENROOFPERGOLA PROPOSEDRALING PRIVACYF PANELING PROPOSEDI RAILING OPEN WESTE ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION PRVACYPANEING. DECKING ANDF RAILING TOBEA A MIX OFT TIMBER AND COMPOSITE MATERIALS THATA ARE/ ACHIECIUALYCOMERENT TOT THE MAINE EXISTING STRUCTURE ELOVE LAND ALBRIGHT RESIDENCE = SECTION 01/24/2025 2 8 AVENUEF A ALBRIGHT RESIDENCE - PLAN 01/24/2025 30' ALLEY BACKYARD SETBACK5' SIDEYARD SETBACK5 LL RESIDENCE FRONTY YARD SETBACK15 Wel Lovel Lond Studio, Inc. (850)3 370-0215 wwwwelovelondsludo Om GABION WALL EXAMPLES ALBRIGHT RESIDENCE PHOTOS LEGEND 30' ALLEY Wo00 FENCE S48°15/32"E R/W 11.76' 20" 11.34 5.66 84 5.66' 96 7.49 20.93 37.15' COVERED PORCH 67 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK': N48'1532"W 60.00"(M) 100.00 (RP) ALBRIGHT RESIDENCE HISTORIC PHOTOS (SEE LEGEND) ALBRIGHT RESIDENCE HISTORIC PHOTOS (SEE LEGEND) 5 ALBRIGHT RESIDENCE RECENT PHOTOS (SEE LEGEND) ALBRIGHT RESIDENCE RECENT PHOTOS (SEE LEGEND) 10 ALBRIGHT RESIDENCE RECENT PHOTOS (SEE LEGEND) 12 A 13 14 City Planner Report Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness, Accessory Structure (R-1)(Historic District) @ 101 6th Street, Block 181 Lot' 10. For David & Lisa Albright-C Owner; Contractor: GeoFlora Group, LLC StaffNotes: Pervious decks and items identified on a site plan as a stormwater best management practice are listed as exceptions toi the impervious surface coverage definition. There is a 10% lot coverage allocation and spacing requirement for the pervious decking exception. There is no elaboration on stormwater best management practices ini the impervious definition, but the definition of stormwater best management practices read as "those practices and principles designed to manage water from rainfall events, reduce nonpoint sources of pollution and in some cases, protect wildlife and habitat. Methods mayi include structural devices or nonstructural practices, such as, but not limited to compensatory The Planning and Zoning Board needs to make a determination on if the shown stormwater best management practice falls under this definition. Staff opinion is that the system itself does fall under the exception, but the added roof does not. Staff suggest that the P&Z Board members discuss this in depth in the meeting and ask questions in order1 to understand Q: Is the roof necessary to the design? Would the design function the exact same without it being added? Would the design function better without it? Would the design function the same whether the roof is added or not?' Would the applicant still construct the stormwater best management practice design as shown without the If the design functions the same, treats the same amount of stormwater, with or without the roof, then the argument can be made as to why not allow the extra roof coverage? By City LDC, the roof itself is considered impervious. Staff's interpretation is that the onlyv way the roof could fall under the exception is ift the applicant can prove that the roofis necessary to the stormwater best management practice functionality, and that the design Iti is worth noting that this property isi in Flood Zone X, which requires a stormwater plan, but does not require the 24-hour 25-year rain event: standard requirement. The parcel is currently over the allocated standard lot coverage. The applicant documents show that the storage, swales, gutters, rain barrels and rain gardens." howi the design works. Ex: added roof, in order to receive the benefit of having it? would not function withouti it. 1 total impervious area within the property lines is at 3,303 SF, 55%, but there is an additional 926SF, 15% of lot coverage int the ROW-276SF 4.6%, of this comes from the home and porches encroaching into the ROW. Without including the accessories and pavement int the ROW, this would mean that the current true lot coverage is around 55% + 4.6%, with the full Q: Does the P&Z Board view the encroaching portion of the home in the ROWas part of The applicant is removing a great deal of accessory: structures, concrete, decking and bricks in order to lower their lot coverage. While this is encouraged and needed, this brings the remaining impervious to remain to 2,459.42SF 41%, with the encroaching home int the extent of the home included, prior to removals. the parcel's lotcoverage? ROWS still occupying 276SF, 4.6%. Ifthe encroaching portion of the home is considered in the current lot coverage allocation, which staff typically includes in reviewing historic nonconforming homes, then the total lot coverage after the removals would be around 45.6%, or 2,735SF. This places the home at 5.6% over their standard lot coverage. Ifthe board does not view the encroaching portion of the home as part oft the lot coverage allocation, then the total lot coverage after the removals would be 41%, or 2,459SF. This places the home at 1% over their standard lot coverage. Q:Ifal home is over their 40% lot coverage, does the overage cut into the 10% allocation for pervious decking? Ifyes, then this leaves an allocation of 4.4%,265SE for pervious decking, The lot has 53SF of decking to remain after the removals, which leaves 212SF leftover from their Ifno, then the lot coverage would be 41% after the suggested removals and their 'budget' for pervious decking would be 9%, with 1% already being used on existing 10% allocation for pervious decking. deck area. Staff's interpretation is yes, but ifthe board agrees that the two categories do not relate to one another, then the allowable 10% for pervious deckingwould equal to 600SF, which Applicant is requesting 530SF of new: structure, 181.25SF is roof covered and 348.75SF is Staff's interpretation is that the covered roof is not fully necessary to the functionality of the design and should be viewed as lot coverage, which the parcel is already over capacity on theirs structures (without the roof) doi fall under. pervious decking.* 2 whethery you count the encroaching portion of the home in the ROWI in the lot coverage or Staff's interpretation is that without ther roof, the 530SF of requested pervious decking is allowable if the board agrees that the overages on the standard lot coverage do not cut into *All numbers are approximate - will double check numbers with applicant during the not, soi iti is not allowable. the additional pervious lot coverage. meeting based on P&Z Board's direction and discussion. Recommended Action: Approve the stormwater system ndependentywinour the additional roof as an allowed and encouraged stormwater best management practice. Deny the covered awning extending over the pervious decking as an accessory structure, as this is a roof cover which isi impervious, by definition, and the parcel is over theirs standard 40% even after removals. Applicant has option to remove the roof cover from the design. Applicant has option to make the roof cover pervious by constructing is a raised pervious deck with 1/8" spacing. Any covering of a pervious decking Approve at to-be-determined amount of pervious deckingindependenty, as it falls would remove the designation as pervious. within their 10% allocation as allowed by the LDC. Need direction on if home encroachment in the ROWisi included in the lot Need direction on if the lot coverage overage, including the ROW encroachment or not, cuts into the 10% allocation for pervious decking. coverage. 3 Applicable Land Development Code: Accessorybuilding and uses means a structure or a use customarily incidental and subordinate tot the principal structure or use and located on the same lot. Accessory structures shall not be used for habitable purposes. Accessory buildings shall not be constructed until a principal structure is inj place. (LDC, Ch. 101, Art. 1,Sec. 101-8 Delintions)Accessony structures shall include, but not be limited to: patios, decks (pervious and impervious), gazebos, sheds, pools, spas, and mechanical swimming pool or Impervious surface coverage: Those hard surface man-made areas that do not allow, or minimally allow, the penetration of water, that reduce the natural rate or percolation of water or result in an increase int the natural quantity and rate of storm water runoff. Examples include but are not limited toj roof tops, parking, clay, asphalt, concrete, brick, compacted gravel, paved recreational areas such as pools, tennis courts, and landscape pavers. Exceptions: Pervious decks as described herein and items identified on a site plan as al best management practice to treat stormwater shall be allowed within opens space and not considered impervious. Pervious decks are defined as decks with a minimum spacing of Vi inch between decking boards. Pervious decks shall be limited to an additional ten percent additional total lot coverage (i.e. ten percent additional total lot coverage above the code maximum fori impervious coverage applicable to each zoning category; e.g. if maxi impervious coverage ist forty percent then a deck may be added which covers additional lot area upi to ai total of fifty percent lot coverage when adding the total impervious lot coverage and the pervious deck coverage). (LDC, Ch. 101, Art. 1,S Sec. Pervious: A surface that presents an opportunity for precipitation to infiltrate into the ground. Area maintained in its natural condition or covered by ar material that permits Storm water: The flow of water that results from, and that occurs immediately following, a Storm water management system: A: surface water: system that is designed and constructed ori implemented to control discharges which are necessitated by rainfall events, incorporating methods to collect, convey, store, absorb, inhibit, treat, use, or reuse water to prevent or reduce flooding, over drainage, environmental degradation, and water pollution or otherwise affect the quantity and quality of discharges from the system. spa equipment. 101-8 Definitions.) infiltration or percolation of wateri into the ground. rainfall event. 4 Stormwater best management, practice (BMP): The term "best management practices (BMP)" means those practices and principles designed to manage watert from rainfall events, reduce nonpoint sources of pollution and in some cases, protect wildlife and habitat. Methods mayi include structural devices or nonstructural practices, such as, but not limited to compensatonystorage, swales, gutters, rain barrels and rain gardens. ACity of Apalachicola Guide to Site-Specific Stormwater Best Management Practices is available Lot coverage means the area of the lot covered by the ground floor of all principal and accessory uses and structures, including all areas covered by the roof of such uses and structures, measured along the exterior faces of the walls, along the foundation wall line, between the exterior faces of supporting columns, from the centerline of walls separating two buildings or as a combination of the foregoing, whichever produçes the greatest total ground coverage for such uses and structures. Lot coverage shall also include all impervious surfaces such as drives, parking areas, walkways, swimming pools, patios, Nonconforming building means any building or structure which existed lawfully at the time itwas permitted, but that does not complywith the current regulations of the zoning district or the adopted comprehensive plan land use designation in which it is located. Sec. 111-322.- - Historic and monnistonenonconfoming structures. (c)Expansion of historic and nonhistoric, oncontbomingstnuctures. The intent of this section is not to permit either historic or nonhistoric nonconforming structures to be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended, except as allowed through the variance process at section 101-61(2). EXistingnonconiomites of a structure shall not be used as grounds for adding other structures prohibited elsewhere ini the same district.(1)An expansion in square footage for either historic or nonhistoric structures shall be permitted where such expansion meets all requirements of this code, including those of section 101-61(3)b when avariance is needed.(2)An expansion of either an historic or nonhistoric, nonconforming structure is permissible when iti is required by law or ordered by the building inspectort to to download from the city's website. terraces and the like. secure the safety of the building. 5