Meeting Minutes 9/05/2024  THE FAYETTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION met on September 5th, 2024, at 7:00 P.M. in the Fayette County Administrative Complex, 140 Stonewall Avenue West, Fayetteville,  Georgia.  MEMBERS PRESENT: John H. Culbreth Sr., Chairman  John Kruzan, Vice-Chairman [absent)  Danny England Jim Oliver Boris Thomas  STAFF PRESENT:  Debbie Bell, Planning and Zoning Director [absent] Deborah Sims, Zoning Administrator Maria Binns, Zoning Secretary E.A Allison Ivey Cox, County Attorney  NEW BUSINESS 1. Call to Order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance.  3. Approval of Agenda. Ms. Deborah Sims requested the board to amend the agenda to add item (d) Minor Final. Plat for Liberty. North. Danny England made a motion to approve the agenda with the addition of item (d) Minor Final Plat for Liberty North on the September 5th Agenda. Jim Oliver seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0 John Kruzan was 4. Consideration of the Minutes of the meeting held on August 1, 2024. Jim Oliver made a motion to approve the minutes of the meeting held on August 1, 2024. Boris Thomas  absent.  seconded: the motion. The motion carried 4-0.  5. Plats  a. Final Plat for Wright Chancey McBride LLC. Approval of the Final Plat for Wright Chancey McBride LLC. Ms. Sims explained the first final plat is McBride Estates, Mr. Rod Wright is subdividing these lots on McBridge Road. It has been reviewed and approved by staff, she showed the plat and explained he is making 5 lots and I think the board approved the rezoning sO he could do the neighborhood in that area. Mr. John Culbreth asked the board if they had any questions.? Jim Oliver asked if staffhad approved it.?1 Ms. Sims replied staffhad reviewed and approved it. The plat shown on display was not the correct one, she apologized to the board, and they showed the plat before. Mr. Thomas asked if there. were any conditions.? Ms. Sims responded no, there were no conditions on the final plat. Jim Oliver made a motion tOAPPROVE the Final Plat for Wright Chancey McBride LLC. Boris Thomas  Draft    seconded: the motion. The motion carried 4-0.  b. Minor Final Plat for 385 Snead Road. Approval ofthel Minor Final Plat for 385 Snead Road. Ms. Sims states the board also reviewed when we had the rezoning and these were discussed before, they had subdivided it into three lots, SO you don't have the strangely configured lot, each loti is still the 5-acre. Mr. Culbreth asked what changes were made.?Ms. Sims responded this was one lot and subdivided into three, they just rezoned it, SO they have weird lots sO the line lots were way back. Mr. Culbreth asked thel board for ai motion. Danny England made a motion to APPROVE the Final Plat for. 385, Snead. Road. Jim Oliver: seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0. Minor Final Plat for Riverbend Overlook Phase III. Ms. Sims commented to the board they already approved Phase I & Phase II; this is Phase II, and it has been reviewed and approved by staff. Mr. Culbreth asked the board ift they had any questions.? No one responded. Jim Oliver made a motion to APPROVE the Minor Final Plat for Riverbend Overlook Phase II. Danny England. seconded the motion. The motion d. Final Plat for Liberty North. Ms. Sims explained to the board they had seen this plat several times since 2006 with preliminary plats and staff had approved it. Mr. Culbreth asked the board if they had any questions.? No one responded. Then he asked for a motion. Danny England made a motion to APPROVE the Final Plat for Liberty North. Jim Oliver. seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0.  carried 4-0.  PUBLIC HEARING  6. Consideration of Petition No. 1353-24, The Estate of Richard N. Cates/Carol Denise Cates Mercer, Executrix; request to rezone 4.86 acres from A-R Agriculuma-Residemtial, to C-C (Community Commercial) for the purposes of constructing a convenience store with fuel pumps. Property is located in Land Lot 151 of the 5th District and fronts on Banks Road and Highway 54. Ms. Sims asked the petitioner would like to proceed without ai full board present, Ms. Sims stated that the property is located at the corner of] Banks Road and Highway 54 staff is recommended denial. However, should the planning commission decide they would like to 1.The applicant provides ai minimum of 401 feet ofROW as measured from the existing road centerline or at least 10 feet beyond payment for aceleraton/deceleration lanes 2. Submit all Warranty deeds and Legal descriptions for ROW dedications shall be provided to the county within 90 days of the approval of the rezoning request or prior to the 3. Entrance location on Banks Road shall be limited to a right in right out and as recommended by GDOT the driveway shall be a minimum of 200ft from the return radius of Banks Road and SR 54. 4. Applicant shall extend the existing sidewalk along Banks Road for  the petitioner said yes.  approve that, staffrecommends the following CONDITIONS:  whichever is greater.  final plat approval whichever comes first.  2    the length of the property.  This is surrounded by residentially zoned properties there is not any floodplain or that concerned, they are asking to go to C-C (Community Commercial) SO they can have a convenience store, the lot is located in the eastern part of the county. This is an A-R Agriculural-Residemtial, is a legal lot of record, there are no rezonings that have been Mr. Culbreth asked the petitioner to proceed with his presentation. Mr. Newton Galloway- Attorney, stated he was representing The Estate of Richard N Cates/Denise Mercer's daughter, Owner; Mr. Sudesh Dhingra is the applicant who desires to do the convenience store, and Mr. Jim Kelly, whoisareal estate professional. They providedaprinted PowerPoint presentation that staff distributed to the board, he: said he worked with Ms. Bell in Spalding County with her before she came to work for Fayette County, but Ms. Bell was not He explained int the presentation that the first page shows where the proposed store will be; the next page is a picture shown on gpublic.net lot diagram this is a request to go to Community Commercial from A-R on 4.6 acres and at its corner on Highway 54 and Banks Rd., which is a key element in this zoning. He explained how and where the building would be located, this is a triangular piece of property. Mr. Galloway said it is surrounded by residential zonings and it's been: sitting there ever since Fayette County had az zoning ordinance. You condemn property, and the state condemns property, for the expansion of Highway 54 and also improvements on Banks Rd., sO what started asa 5 acres tract it's nowa4 4.8 acre tract, He stated a real problem with this property is the traffic, it is at the corner of a thoroughfare. Traffic is aj problem for a piece of property that has a funny shape and is sitting undeveloped in the middle ofai residential developments around it. He stated another problem is the A-R zoning; everything else around changed except for that lot. He doesn't think you will be allowed to build since the lot doesn't have the A-R zoning acreage. You might be able to rezone to R-20 or R-40 one-acre lots, but people will not buy houses on a busy intersection. He states that the property in 2003 requesting a change in zoning to an R-20 or R-40; it went up tot thel BOC and they said no, they keep it as A-R. How long itl has been zoned undeveloped? 21 years. Ms. Bell has covered some conditions ifa approved but there are other things youcan do such as lighting, and the rear buffer and we will be open to discussion with staffi in orderto Mr. Jim Kelly has been with TrueMark Realty, the listing broker for the property since 2023 spoke. He stated when they listed the property over 300 prospects contacted them for commercial and were able to narrow it down to two offers. Both were convenience store operators and chose the lower offer amount. They chose someone local, Sam, owner of BP station west oft town on Veterans Highway and Highway 54. We want to present this to the community and the neighbors to make the best attempt and best effort. He explained how they contracted toj present the plans for this meeting and went to the neighbors ont that street offering acopy of the plans and letting them know if they had any questions regarding the plans to Ms. Denise Mercer states shei is the oldest daughter ofl Richard Cates, and she was born and raised in this county. She spoke about the property expansions, and they are left with a littlel bit over 4 acres, she said they will secure a 60-foot natural wooded buffer for the adjacent  approved for this property.  present at tonight's meeting.  as significant reduction.  get this property functional and useful.  contact him or the owners, they were very approachable.  3    homeowners, a buffer that will be lost ift they do not develop this property and will be forced  tos sell off the timber in order to sO, that will eliminate that natural buffer. Mr. Culbreth asked ifa anyone was in opposition.?  Arnold Martin has lived in the Deer Glen subdivision for over 20 years. He states he sent opposition letters, and that this convenience store will be very disruptive, this proposed zoning is not in the comprehensive plan, and the future land use plan and it's surrounded by residential zones. He spoke about traffic ini the area and it's very dangerous for the community Mr. Darryl Hicks lives at Oak Manor and he represents The Oaks HOA. Hes spoke about the environmental harm through soil, groundwater contamination, and air pollution given the proximity oft the site to residential homes. He stated they are deeply concerned about the long- Mr. Griffin Root he is the secretary and treasurer for Wellington Place HOA. He has resided here for about 13 years, and he states they have 45 families in the subdivision. Hel has two concerns about this rezoning request. The first is the noise and light pollution we. know if we put a gas station in that corner will be a lot more traffic, making it a lot noisier and al lot of light pollution in the evenings, especially for the neighbors across the street from where this property supposed to be built. Mr. Root added that if you look around there are already gas stations near our residential neighborhoods. It doesn'tmake any sense to add another one. Ms. Sandra Lee Quiry lives 500 or 600: feet from the subject property. She talked about health concerns about living near a gas station. Ethanol is a compound in petroleum which is as solvent used to turn petroleum into something to use in your car to use gasoline and another associated with it and is carcinogenic. She explained different types of substances that will harm your health and the air. She asked the board to deny the petition to the danger to the Mr. Leroy Brown lives in Deer Glen Forrest subdivision, they own two oft the 7 lots in the neighborhood, he states the value ofthe properties will devalue and thej pace they have now will not be there anymore, and there will be a lot more foot traffic and crime concerns the Mr. Culbreth asked Mr. Galloway if he wanted to say anything in rebuttal. He said the owner has to be able to have that opportunity to use the property and have the use and have a reasonable economic return and there are: no uses on that property that has developed as zoned in21 years, which sends the signal that the zoning isn'tappropriate. Thisi is a difficult piece of Anonymous opposition speaker stated that he has livedi in Deer Forest Road since 2011 and explained if this petition is granted it will destroy this person's driveway. There is water Mr. Culbreth stated to the public present that the planning commission's vote is a recommendation to the Board of Commissioners for final adoption, and they will need to follow up with the next meeting. Mr. Culbreth asked the board for any questions. Mr. Jim Oliver asked Mr. Galloway how he would address the fact that the property presently doesn'tcomply with the comprehensive land use plan? Mr. Galloway responded that the comp plan is used as a guide and that there are sometimes oversights between what the comp plan should provide for a piece of property and what it does provide. The comp plan is not subject to constitutional standards; they apply to zoning because isi it an action oft the local  ifthey allow this convenience store.  term impact on our community.  people to reside in these homes.  neighbors.  property because ofi its size and location..  that flows down the area where this will be located.  government to affect land uses.  4    Mr. Oliver responded he did think no one is denying the use oft the property and Ihave been on both sides, of the commissioners and attorneys. The comprehensive plan many times has been used as a sword both ways, "don't come here and ask us to rezone this because it doesn't apply" or "it's only a guide." There are, perhaps, other reasonable uses for the property, not necessarily C-C; 0-I it comes to mind, some other less invasive less disrupted use. Mr. Galloway I will go back to what Mr. Kelley said the people who called all wanted a commercial property, that tells you what the market is. Since COVID, the Office uses have Mr. Boris Thomas added, referring to Mr. Galloway's comments that the property wasn't necessarily functional on certain returns but just depended upon the profit the owners wanted to make, it has over 47 uses other than a gas station and that can be quite commercial. We are not obstructing the ownership of the property from making a profit by selling the Mr. Galloway responded he acknowledged there are 47 listed permitted uses and 20 Mr. Thomas responded that is not our responsibility to make the property okay, but the Mr. Galloway explained that each one ofthose uses would require rezoning. Mr. Danny England commented that they had more convenience store/gas station rezoning in the past 18 months, we approved all of them except for one, which was located at GA 85 S and al lot of the discussion was the same as this one. We voted to reject that proposal because it was surrounded by residential uses. We looked at the character of the area and the surrounding uses. The fact that this is located at a signalized intersection does not mean that a Mr. Culbreth asked for a motion after no further comments. Boris Thomas made the motion to deny Petition 1353-24.. Danny. Englandseconded. the motion. The motion to. DENY carried 4-0. Mr. England asked Ms. Sims for the BOC date meeting. for follow-up on this petition, Ms. Sims responded on. September 26"h at. 50'clock in this room. 7. Consideration of Petition No. 1354-24, Marion L. Holt, owner; requests to rezone from A-R to R-45 for the purposes of creating additional lots without any new infrastructure. Property is located in Land Lot 148 of the 7th District and fronts on Palmetto Road. Ms. Sims explained the petition is located at 285 Palmetto Road, staff found a problem with this, and staff is recommending being withdrawn, we need the planning commission approval to withdraw SO we can refund the applicant's money, it wasn't going to meet all the requirements needed. Mr. Boris asked staffift the petitioner was aware of the withdrawal? Ms. Sims responded yes; we told them we were going to request withdrawal. WITHDRAWN. BY PETITIONER, Danny England made a motion to allow the WITHDRAWAL of Petition 1354-24, Jim Oliver  about died.  property, that will not stop them from selling the property.  conditional uses that are allowed but to get to those what do we have to do?  owner's responsibility to get the property set up.  gas station is automatically the best use.  seconded: the motion. The motion carried 4-0.  8. Consideration of Petition No. 1355-24, Andrea Pope Camp & Jordan Camp, owners; request tor rezone 41.78 acres from A-R to R-75 for the purposes of creating additional lots without any new infrastructure. Property is located in Land Lot 28 of the 7th District and fronts on Ms. Sims explained the petition and said staff recommends conditional approval ofthis  Davis Road and Huiet Drive.  5    request that does fit with the future land use plan. The recommended conditions are: 1.7 The owner/developer shall dedicate land to Fayette County as needed to provide a minimum 401 ft of right ofway as measured from the existing centerline of Davis Road. 2. The owner/developer shall dedicate land to Fayette County as needed to provide ai minimum 40-ft of right of way as measured from the existing centerline of Huiet Drive. 3. Submittal of all warranty deed(s) and legal descriptions for right-of-way dedications shall be provided to the County within 90 days of the approval of the rezoning request, or prior to the final plat 4. The owner/developer shall improve the gravel road segments fronting the parcel and extend the improvement north on Huiet Drive to meet existing pavement. The improvement shall meet County Standards for Collector Roads and be designed and constructed in accordance with Fayette County's Development Regulations. Alternatively, the owner/developer may pay Fayette County $1,105,000 SO that Fayette County can make the improvements ini the future. The work shall be completed, or thej payment made, prior to Final 5. The existing house and barn on the property shall be demolished, with the appropriate demolition permits, within 6 months of the approval of the rezoning; or prior to the submittal ofa a subdivision plat; or prior to the submittal of any permits, whichever comes 6.1 Prior to submission of any final plat(s) or amendments or revisions thereto, and irrespective of the number ofl lots in any final plat(s) or revision thereto, the developer shall be required to extend the public water line from adjacent subdivision to provide water service for each lot in the subdivision. The water line extension shall be constructed to the standards outlined in, "Sec. 12-90. - Mandatory connection to public water system, including the 7. The availability ofwater is conditioned upon, among other things, Fayette County, Georgia, receiving a recorded permanent easement prior to final plat approval if the Construction Plan review process determines a recorded easement is required. Alternatively, any future water infrastructure the County maintains shall be located within an accessible Ms. Sims explained on the map this is located by one: side Canoe Club and on the other side they are constructing the new development Hunt Cliff Manor, Davis Road is a gravel, Mr. Randy Boyd, he represented Andrea Pope Camp that is the owner oft this property, and her son Jordan Camp ist the attorney in fact, Ms. Pope inherited this property back in 2011 her dad originally purchased 40 years ago and my request tonight to have rezoned to R-75 which consist in 2 acre lot with a minimum house size of2,500 sq ft. To the north and east is a borderline subdivision of an R-40 zoning minimum house size of 1,500 sq ft. To the west and south is A-R and to the southeast is aj piece of property that was zoned PUD back in 2016 ite ended up going to litigation, there are 212 acres and 91 lots, andIre request tonight's for R-75, Iread over the recommended conditions, and I have been doing this for 41 years and I was shocked when I saw condition number"4", we agree with condition number 1,2 and 3, we will dedicate the appropriate ROW's for both of those streets, I don't even know where to start with that deal about donating $1,105,0001 million dollars to do what the county should be doing and also punishing this land owner by saying you going to go north 300 feet tying into a subdivision they should it brought down to that point back into 2007 that would it adequate  approval, whichever comes first.  Plat approval.  first.  installation of fire hydrants."  public right-of-way.  Road. Mr. Culbreth asked ift the petitioner was present.    $1,105,000 million dollars to it cost addition in our property $69,000 dollars per lot if this zoning goes through we will put the water line in, I got different prices $300,000 divided by 16 lots is another $18,750 dollars ifyou add it the cost oft the land in what their asking for the property it will be about $10,000 dollars more than you can possible get for, under a current market analysis, it'sj just surrender that property absolutely where you can't do anything about He explained another case from last month from Davis Road it should have been at right at 69-70K,Idon't! believe is legal, we'll consult it with an attorney on that, but I think is very improper to ask us one week later to donate over a million dollars for what the county should be doing, staff didn'teven suggest that a month ago, they suggested donate ROW on We will agree with every bit of that in our street also, SO will accept condition 1,2,3 and absolutely ask you to not impose number 4 and number 6 on the extension of the water line I be happy to do that, and we will dedicate ROW or easement whatever is the case but in the second sentence "Prior to submission of any final plat(s) or amendments or revisions thereto, and irrespective ofthe number ofl lots in any final plat(s) or revision thereto"Iwill ask that you eliminate that with the number of] lots. Hei requested that on section 12-90 mandatory connection to the public water system, "is you have 5 lots you don't have to tie to the county water system" Iwill ask that be taken out to the number oflots and put ini ifthey are "6 ori more lots"and be more: in compliance ofs section 12-90 oft the existing ordinance. He asked the board  it.  Lester Road and Davis and will have 90 days to turn the deeds in.  to grant the petition without condition 4 and as per his request. No one else spoke in support or opposition. Mr. Culbreth brought the petition to the Board.  Mr. Boris Thomas made a comment saying I was going to say in addition to the million dollars there needs to be an extra 10% contingency because all oil prices and vendors changes. The impact in the county tol have aj paved road there is strong and wide enough for emergency vehicles, that location is going to cost even more at that intersection area and probably will Mr. Boyd responded that the staffis asking to go there 300: feet about our site and bring it down to the intersection and go over to the east about 1,500 feet sO we wouldn't be paving the entire road we just are paving that section in front of this property, which to me is very Mr. Culbreth asked staffifwe have a president where we ask foramillion dollars.? Ms. Sims responded this was the first time I am aware that we have requested such funding toj pave a road, is it an issue because Davis Road is a gravel road, and I don't believe the county owns enough ROW and this was the recommendation from the public works director to facilitate having this many homes, even though this goes along with the future land Mr. Culbreth asked Ms. Sims, is the county asking the developer toj pave its road.? Ms. Sims responded, I am not sure the county owns all of the ROW, SO part ofis going to be to acquire all oft that ROW soi it could bej paved and that's why they gave the alternative that they could pay the county and the county would do that they wouldn'thave all their responsibility Mr. Culbreth added he opposed to that, and Mr. Oliver asked why are youp paying taxes Ms. Allison Cox responded currently the county is not require paving or upgrade this  need a traffic light.  demanding.  use plan it will put a lot more on Davis Road.  were they were offering those options. for.?This is the responsibility ofthe county.  7    road at all and it's been asked in other to go through requires an upgrade and we just don't have in the county's budget. Mr. Oliver asked Ms. Cox why wasn't asked to Canoe Club.?I Mr. Boyd responded the Canoe Club is on the north side but even closer than that why wasn't even asked to the PUD that was taken to court, last month the same road at another intersection they didn'task aj penny for that, their assessment based on these values should be $69,000 dollars for that one lot exactly what our is, sO there is consistency here. Ms. Cox responded that single lot doesn'tcost the same impact than 16. Mr. Boyd responded but ifyou take one. lot at the timei it does cost the same impact that Mr. Oliver said I was just trying to figure it out about the consistency. Ms. Cox replied that with a single lot we have a house full of people who came in to tell you about the problems when they disrupt, that gravel road barely supports what's there SO the single lot that was being to be put in is not going to add but one more car, 16 lots significantly increases the traffic and the area in front oft the subdivision to be paved to support that sort ofroad where the county is not currently planning to invest in that infrastructure, sO ift this is the plan and the county is not planning to invest can't be developed until there is an Mr. Danny England state it that the rest of us has seen where that development has occurred without that infrastructure or investment, SO is this going to be the policy coming forward? Every time someone develops something on a dirt road will have to pull out the Ms. Cox responded she thinks that is probably where you are as far as supporting Mr. England responded you can incrementally develop more than 16 lots on this road and be on the same boat that we: ran last month where we didn'trequire funds, sO 16 lots isn't Mr. Thomas added that his neighborhood is considered private and got to pay $3,000,000 dollars to get the road pave and wej paid the millage rate as the sounding areas, but we are told that we use the main road sO that why your millage will stay the same. We can't get any help from the county in repaving the roads or doing any ofthei infrastructure underneath Mr. Oliver asked Mr. Boyd about the other conditions, you said number 1,2,3...weare good, what about number 5.? Mr. Boyd responded that 5 is good, the only thing I would like to be more in line with the ordinance that exists and change it to prior to submission of any final plat(s) the developer shall be required to extend the public water line from adjacent subdivision to provide water service for each lot in exits in six lots in the subdivision. Jim Oliver made the motion to recommend CONDITIONALA APPROVAL of Petition 1355-  don't think I was here for the Canoe Club.  ari ridiculous argument.  infrastructure to support it.  checkbook? something oft this size.  al lot wel have seen way more than that.  sewage or anything like that.  24 subject to amended conditions. The conditions are as follows: Recommended. thef following AMENDED CONDITIONS:  1. The owner/developer shall dedicate land to Fayette County as needed to provide a minimum 40ofrightofway as measured from the existing centerline of Davis Road.  8    2. The owner/developer shall dedicate land to Fayette County as needed to provide a minimum 40-ftc ofrightofm way as measuredfrom the existing centerline of Huiet Drive. 3. Submittal of all warranty deed(s) and legal descriptions) for right-of-way dedications shall be provided to the County within 90 days of the approval ofthe rezoning request, or prior to 4. OMIT NUMBER 4-#4-Pheomerewelepershal-imprerehegrerevel-roasegmelns femting-he-persehamkasemA-mpeone-Dahee-metashling Paveme-Th-impreremshwECmmp-semm-erCaleter-Remh-mlle esigred-amd-eensfrele--aecordanee-w#-Fayete-Com"s-DevelepmenS. Aerativeby-"e-owerewdeper-meyele-Cmmd-SH85-se-that-Fayele Comdr-er-mae-heimpeN-ae-mrhatalkhe-empiteerte 5. The existing house and barn on the property shall be demolished, with the appropriate demolition, permits, within 61 months oftheapproval ofthe rezoning; or prior to the submittal ofasubdivision, plat; or prior to the submittal of any permits, whichever comes. first. 6. [Amended Condition #61 Prior to submission of any. final plat(s) the developer shall be required to extend the public water line from adjacent subdivision to provide water service for each lot in excess of six lots in the subdivision. The water line extension shall be constructed to the standards outlined in, "Sec. 12-90. - Mandatory connection to public 7. The availability of water is conditioned upon, among other things, Fayette County, Georgia, receiving a recorded permanent easement prior to final plat approval if the Construction Plan review, process determines a recorded easement is reguirel.Alematheb, anyfuture water infrastructure the County maintains shall be located within an accessible Danny England seconded the motion for conditional approval, subject to amended conditions. The motion for CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, subject to amended conditions, 9. Consideration of Amendments to Chapter 110. Zoning Ordinance, regarding Article V.- Conditional uses, noncontormances, and transportation corridor overlay zone. Sec.110-175.- Ms. Cox explained that the next item three items kind of go together but we need three separate votes, did you remember Detox facility, not long ago in the last legislative session there was a new law passed it removed detox facilities from those items that require special use permit, we just need to amend our code to follow state law. And what we are doing here in number one, is removing it from the special use section entirely and replacing it with a small section that says reserved because we might have special uses in the future, that's number 9. Danny England made the motion to recommend approval of Consideration ofAmendments  thej final plat approval, whichever comes first.  PAY-EHEMHE,Prorl0-FAPlatapprovak  watersystem, including the installation offire hydrants. "  public right-of-way.  carried. 3-1. Boris Thomas abstained.  Special Use of] Property.  9    to Chapter 110. Zoning Ordinance, regarding Article V.- Conditional uses, monconformances, and transportation corridor overlay zone. Sec.110-175.-, Special Use of Property. Jim Oliverseconded the motion. The motion to. APPROVE carried 4-0.  10. Consideration of Amendments to Chapter 110. Zoning Ordinance, regarding Article V.- Conditional uses, nonconformances, and transportation corridor overlay zone. Sec.110-169.- Conditional use approval. Number 10 - is to be as going taking those detox facilities and Danny. England made the motion to recommend approval of Consideration ofAmendments to Chapter 110. Zoning Ordinance, regarding Article V.- Conditional uses, nonconformances, and transportation corridor overlay zone. Sec.110-169.- Conditional use approval. Jim Oliver seconded the motion. The motion to. APPROVE carried 4-0.  making them conditional uses in the O-I section on our zoning ordinance.  11. Consideration of Amendments to Chapter 110. Zoning Ordinance, regarding Article IV.- District use requirements. - Sec.110-142.- Office institutional district. Number 11- We will Danny England made the motion toi recommend approval of Consideration ofAmendments to Chapter 110. Zoning Ordinance, regarding Article IV.- District use requirements. - Sec.110-142.- Office institutional district. Boris Thomas seconded the motion. The motion  remove them from our special use section and our O-Iz zoning ordinance.  tOAPPROVE carried 4-0.  ADJOURNMENTE  Danny England moved to adjourn the meeting. Boris Thomas seconded. The motion passed 4-0.  The meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m.  PLANNING COMMISSION FAYETTE COUNTY  OF  ATTEST:  CHAIRMAN  AhloekkK. DIRECTOR, PLANNING & ZONING  DEBORAH  PA  BELL  10