Centreville Planning Commission Work Session October 2, 2024 7:00 p.m. MINUTES  The October 2, 2024 Centreville Planning Commission work session was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Kara Willis, Chair; in the Liberty Building, second floor meeting room. The following members and staff were present: Kara Willis, Chair; Nancy Emerick, Secretary; Pat Fox, Mitchell Delaney and Kyle Farabaugh, Members; Daniel B. Worth, Town Council Member; Stacey) Dahlstrom, Town Planner and Betty. Jean Hall, Administrative Assistant.  Discussion  a. Residential in Central Business District Code changes  Ms. Dahlstrom sought direction from the Planning Commission on providing residential uses in the Ms. Dahlstrom used a 30x40 lot on Lawyers Row as an example ofal building that when changing it into The commission members did not see any issue with that amount of allowance and confirmed the intent oft the statements in the Comprehensive Plan were in relation to calculations for density and streetscape.  Central Business District as stated int the Comprehensive Plan: 2040. entirely residential the calculation would only allow one unit per floor.  b. TND/CN/PUD Traditional Neighborhood District - Complete Neighborhood - Planned Unit Development  Ms. Dahlstrom presented an overview ofzoning updates inj power point form.  TND Updates and Complete Neighbornood PUD Create the following two new zoning districts with purposes and standards in accord with this Plan: Resource Conservation / Open Space District, and Institutional District, and update the Traditional Neighborhood Development Modify the current zoning and subdivision regulations standards and procedures to establish master planned complete neighborhoods as the preferred and required approach to development within residential zoning districts, the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process and standards: should focus on the complete neighborhood: approach for Annexations."  (TND) District.  Centreville TND Zoning-2015 based on 2009  Comprenensive Plan  The TNDI Districti isi intended to allow development consistent with design principles ofat traditional neighborhood. Al traditional neighborhood is compact; is designed fort thel human and pedestrian: scale; provides a mix of residential uses including civic, small scale retail and opens spaceu uses inc close proximity toc one anotheri int ther neighborhood;is architecturally integrated; provides ai mix ofl housings styles, types and sizes to accommodate a variety ofh households; is integratedi into the surrounding communities; incorporates interconnected: streets with sidewalks and bikeways and transit that offer multipler routes fori motorists, pedestrians and! bicyclists and provide for the connections oft thoses streets to existing and future developments andi incorporates significant environmental featuresi into the design.  Pagelof2    2021-TND - PUD updates limited to) TND standards: Mixo of Dwelling Types Deviations from Parking Standards distributed throughout the community Private Streets and/ Alternative ROWa and; pavement widths  Currently the PUDI Floating Zone process provides opportunity for consideration ofr modification oft thesei important example (not  Computation ofF Res Units: totalarrangement: averaged or clustered  Open Space: Thosel lands designated as ani integral parto of the PUDI in anu underlying TND District, eveni if usedf for agriculture and not available for use byt the public, shall be considered" "common open space" provided other opens space areas are reasonably  Additionally, the current land coverage ratio of 35% in PUD, provisions may need to ber reconsidered:  Land coverage. The maximum amount ofl land that may! be built over (covered) by parking! lots, roads, sidewalks, plazas, buildings or other structures shall be 35% oft the gross! land oft the PUD.  Important Considerations thats should be findings:  Whether the proposed PUD development conforms tot the Town's of Comprehensive Plan;  Whether the proposed PUD development conforms with all provisions of the Town Zoning Code which are notp proposed Whether the proposed PUD development complies with all Towne engineering and design regulations and standards; Whether the proposed PUD development complies with any other applicable Town, County, State, or Federal regulations, policies or plans, except those standards proposed for modification. Whether the proposed PUDY will be superior to or morei innovative than conventional development and howi itv willp provide greater public benefit withouta additional probable signifiçant adversei impacts top public health, safety or the environment, than would be available through the use of conventional zoning and/or development standards.  for modification subject to the request;  Important to Consider:  Does the current process provide clarity for the applicant and community about what thel Town wants?  Doest the current process incentivize orr makei it easyf fora applicants top provide growth and development consistent with the Town's Does the currentp process provide fora ane equitable demonstration that considerations ofc deviation from the zonings standards thatl demonstrate for all that the granting oft the variations requesteda and! how they ares superior toc or morei innovative than conventional development: and! howi itwill provide greater publicb benefity withouta additional probable significant adverse impacts top public! health, safety or the environment, thany would be available throught the use of conventional: zoning and/or development standards? Ms. Dahlstrom emailed a link to a video and a case study, The Katrina Cottage Movement, on tiny Community Commercial Mixed Use is the zoning district that was used for the Katrina Cottages. Ms. Dahlstrom pointed out that the Captain's Houses would not conform to the current R-2 zoning but  desired vision as expressed throught the Comprehensivel Plan?  Tiny House/sketch concept discussion  house/cottages that are in Mississippi for viewing prior to the work session.  would fit within the TND: zone.  Adjournment  There being no further business, the work session adjourned at 9:18 p.m.  Respectfully: submitted, bith SawHall Betty. Jean Hall Administrative Assistant  Page 2of2