249  MINUTES BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF YORK Regular Meeting August 20, 2024 6:00 p.m.  Meeting Convened. A Regular Meeting of the York County Board of Supervisors was called to order at 6:01 p.m., Tuesday, August 20, 2024, in the Board Room, York Hall, by Chairman G. Attendance. The following members of the Board of Supervisors were present: Douglas R. Holroyd, Sheila S. Noll, M. Wayne Drewry, G. Stephen Roane, Jr., and Thomas G. Shepperd, Also in attendance were Mark L. Bellamy, Jr., County Administrator; Brian Fuller, Deputy County Administrator; Richard Hill, County Attorney; Heather Schott, Deputy Clerk/Assistant to the County Administrator; and Michelle Wright, Administrative Coordinator. Invocation. Reverend Megan Collins of St. Luke's United Methodist Church, gave the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. Mrs. Noll led the Pledge of  Stephen Roane, Jr.  Jr.  invocation. Allegiance. PRESENTATIONS Volunteer Service Recognition  Chairman Roane recognized those volunteers who had served on Boards or Commissions for twenty or more years. He explained that the nine volunteers being honored this evening have provided over 4,200 hours of volunteer service, which in monetary terms would equate to over $135,000. He then asked the volunteers to come forward, noting on which board/commission they have served, and presented each one with a York County challenge coin. Chairman Roane shared his gratitude for their dedicated stewardship to York County on behalf of the Board of  Supervisors. The volunteers recognized at the meeting were as follows: H.J. Coxton - Economic Development Authority Vernard Lockwood, III - Economic Development Authority  Mary Clark - Historical Committee Carol Ferro - Beautification Committee Bonnie Karwac - Historical Committee Jerry Karwac - Historical Committee Thomas McNamara - Senior Center Board Lois Winter - Historical Committee Timothy Smith - Historical Committee  CITIZENS' COMMENT PERIOD  Pam Pouchout, 103 Kimberly Court addressed the following items during her remarks:    250 August 20, 2024  Elevator Request: She requested the Board to consider installing an elevator in the waterfront parking garage for accessibility reasons. She noted that disabled individuals could not access the second floor parking lot and to park at a more distant location poses greater difficulties for individuals with mobility issues, particularly in adverse Residential versus Commercial Zoning: She expressed concern about the Board's tendency to convert residential homes into temporary rentals or businesses, which she believes undermines community cohesion and reduces property values. She stressed that this shift away from stable, neighborly communities to transient commercial uses Cooling Center Proposal: She proposed establishing a 24-hour cooling center, such as a school cafeteria, to help. those without air conditioning during extreme heat events. She emphasized the increasing severity of climate change and the need to address related James Roberts, Jr., 7628 George Washington Memorial Highway, stated that he is the owner of Roberts Furniture and Mattress in York County. He expressed a desire to erect a stand-alone ice machine to serve the community and increase the availability of ice. He also pointed out that in the case of an emergency, a stand-alone ice machine would be an excellent resource for Diane Davis, 30 Elm Drive, Newport News, explained that she and her husband had introduced the first stand-alone ice vending machines to the area 16 years ago, making her an expert in the field. She explained that she works for Ice House America, now the second largest retailer of bagged ice in the U.S. She noted that the growth of ice vending is attributed to three main factors: affordability, convenience, and quality, as the ice is made fresh daily, never handled by humans, and is filtered and de-chlorinated. Lastly, Ms. Davis agreed that these machines can Erin Snyder Dixon, 25 White Oak Drive, Newport News stated that she has had a landscaping company based in York County for over a decade. She explained that she uses ice extensively in her business and noted that heat related ilnesses are a major concern for OSHA and that ice plays a crucial role in keeping her workers safe and productive, especially during hot weather. In addition, she pointed out that as a CERT volunteer and professional rescuer, the benefits of  weather.  diminishes the quality of life for residents.  health and quality of life issues.  the community.  be quite valuable to municipalities in times of emergencies and disasters.  ice units far outweigh any potential challenges they may pose. Chairman Roane closed the Citizens' Comment Period. COUNTY ATTORNEY REPORTS AND REQUESTS  Mr. Richard Hill had no report.  COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS AND REQUESTS  Mr. Bellamy expressed his gratitude to Public Works and Planning and Development Services for their hard work and dedication towards preparing schools for the upcoming first day of the  school year.  MATTERS PRESENTED BY THE BOARD Mr. Shepperd made no comment.  Mr. Drewry mentioned a recent email and newspaper article about Beales, noting that there seems to be significant developments regarding this matter. He acknowledged the progress made and the long journey to reach this point, expressing interest in understanding the details from the Economic Development Authority (EDA) and how the process will conclude. Mr. Drewry shared his concerns about Q Daddy's, noting that Mr. Whitten had experienced significant delays due to misinformation regarding building permits and asbestos abatement,    251  August 20, 2024  which cost him additional time and money. He noted that Mr. Whitten has expressed frustration over the conflicting guidance and pointed out that miscommunication has been a recurring issue and highlights broader frustrations with the County's business processes. To address these problems, he proposed hiring a business advocate to streamline procedures and reduce misinformation. He requested that this proposal be added to the agenda for the next work session to discuss hiring options, qualifications, and implementation, aiming to simplify Mrs. Noll expressed her appreciation for the recently released 2025 Adopted Budget in Brief, which she stated is well done and citizen-friendly, helping the public understand the budget process and the effort involved. She also discussed her involvement with the Local Government Advisory Board of the Chesapeake Bay Council and highlighted a recent round table discussion on a new Chesapeake Bay agreement. The meeting, which included various stakeholders such as government officials and community members, she stated emphasized that funding grants are preferable to loans, and allocations are even better. Key issues discussed at the meeting, she noted, included the need for funding to accompany mandates and the importance of highlighting successful local environmental efforts, such as sewer projects and recycling initiatives. Mrs. Noll stressed the significance of preserving the Chesapeake Bay for future generations and urged everyone to be mindful of their environmental impact, as today's actions Mr. Holroyd raised two key issues. First, he expressed concern about a daycare located at 263 Kings Court in the Queens Lake District, which has been operating as a preschool for about a year. Despite receiving a license from Commissioner of the Revenue, he stated the daycare, which accommodates nine children daily, including eight non-residents, and has not been registered with the state as required by Virginia statutes. Additionally, he pointed out there have been 32 complaints from neighbors regarding disturbances such as a petting ZOO and noise issues. Mr. Holroyd stated he would like to request a review of the daycare's compliance with state statutes and local regulations. The second issue, he noted involves a massage therapist who has been issued two licenses: one for a massage parlor on Denbigh Boulevard and another for operating out of a home on Weaver Street, which appears. to violate zoning ordinances. Mr. Holroyd questioned the legitimacy of the home-based business license and requested that the County review this matter to ensure compliance with zoning, laws and proper auditing of such licenses. In conclusion, he sought the County's assistance in Chairman Roane began by recognizing, Chief Kopczynski and his department for their exceptional service, noting that they had recently received three thank-you notes for their efforts on behalf of our citizenry. He then shared that he, along with Darren Williams and Brian Fuller, had recently met with local National Park Service leaders to discuss upcoming significant events, including the 250th anniversary of the Nation's Independence in 2026 and the 2031 independence-related discussions. He also reminded everyone that with the new school year starting soon, particularly with back-to-school nights this Thursday and classes resuming Tuesday, drivers should be cautious around schools and neighborhoods. He highlighted the new technology to enforce school zone speed limits and mentioned the installation of safety cameras on the buses to prevent illegal passing. Lastly, he voiced concerns about Springfield Road, a VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation) road facing heavy traffic issues and encouraged everyone involved to seek creative solutions to alleviate the congestion and improve conditions for residents. He also suggested a brainstorming session In response to the Chairman's comments, Mr. Holroyd provided an update on a recent issue with a malfunctioning gate timer causing delays for trucks on Springfield Road. Due to this issue, he stated trucks have been lining up ten minutes before the hour and were delayed for an additional 25 to 30 minutes. He explained that he had spoken with Pete Henderson, who corrected the problem the following day. Mr. Holroyd stressed that this issue should be resolved and expressed full support for continued efforts to improve the neighborhood and the road in question, encouraging ongoing actions to address and enhance the situation. Chairman Roane noted as there was sufficient time, the Consent Calendar would be considered  the process and improve the business climate in York County.  will affect tomorrow's world.  addressing both concerns.  with the developer to address the problem.  prior to the Public Hearings. CONSENT CALENDAR    252 August 20, 2024 taken is below.  The Consent Calendar was considered and approved on a vote of 5:0. A summary of actions Chairman Roane highlighted the items on the consent calendar and asked the Board if there Since no further discussion was requested, Chairman Roane asked for a motion.  were any items they wished to discuss separately.  Mrs.Noll moved that the Consent Calendar be approved as submitted, Item Nos. 5, 6,7, and 8,  respectively. On roll call, the vote was: Nay: (0)  Yea: (5)Holroyd, Noll, Drewry, Shepperd, Roane  Item No. 5. REPLACEMENT OF FIRE PUMPERS: Resolution R24-103.  A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO MAKE PURCHASE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF TWO FIRE Item No.6. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR POST 65 RETIREE MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PLAN: A - RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH RETIREE FIRST FOR A POST-65 RETIREE MEDICARE Item No.7 REQUEST FOR REFUND OF PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES - E.F.M.T.:  PUMPERS FROM ATLANTIC EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS  Resolution R24-138.  ADVANTAGE PLAN Resolution R24-137.  A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO AUTHORIZE A TAX REFUND A TAX REFUND TO E.M.F.T. FOR AN OVERPAYMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR TAX YEAR2024 Item No. 8. REQUEST OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FROM DISABLED VETERANS:  Resolution R24-136.  RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A TAX REFUND TO INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR REAL PROPERTY TAX RELIEF PURSUANT TO CODE OF VIRGINIA SECTION 58.1-3219.5, TAX RELIEF FOR DISABLED VETERANS FOR TAX YEARS 2021-  2024 RECESS  Chairman Roane called a brief recess at 6:47 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 7:02 p.m.  PUBLIC HEARINGS  APPLICATION NO. UP-1032-24 WESLEY TOBIN JOHNSON AND ERIN L. CASEY  The matter was considered and approved on a vote of 5:0. A summary of the proceeding is Ms. Caitlin Aubut, Planner II, explained that this application is a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP) pursuant to Section 24.1-306 of the York County Zoning Ordinance, to authorize the establishment of a tourist home on a 2.3-acre parcel located at 103B Deer Path Road. She noted that the property is zoned RR (Rural Residential) and is designated Low-Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. She pointed out that since 103B uses a shared driveway with the property owners of 103 Deer Path, a condition, if approved, is required and has already been executed by both homeowners confirming they are in agreement with  below.    253  August 20, 2024  potential, short-term rentals utilizing this driveway. She also pointed out that the proposed short-term rental is over a half-mile away from other approved short-term rentals. She noted that since the application meets all of the Board policy guidelines, staff recommends approval as did the Planning Commission. Lastly, she stated that the applicant and staff are present  and will be pleased to answer any questions the Board might pose. Chairman Roane opened the floor for Board comments and/ /or questions. neighbors in opposition to the application which concerned him.  Mr. Drewry noted that in the agenda material provided, there appeared to be numerous Mr. Shepperd noted that the number expressing support and opposition appeared to be same and the proposed location he pointed out is quite some distance from neighbors. Chairman Roane stated that he did not see a condition in the resolution that would prohibit the applicant from erecting a sign in the yard advertising the Short Term Rental (STR). He then Mr. Wesley Tobin Johnson, one of the applicants, came forward and stated that they would not erect a sign if that is the Board's desire. He stated that it is his and his wife's full-time home and they will not rent out space when they are not at home. He also pointed out that the  invited the applicant to come forward in support of his request.  driveway is shared with his wife's sister and her family. Chairman Roane opened the floor for questions for the applicant.  Mr. Drewry asked about the approximate location of the homes of those neighbors who In response, Mr. Johnson stated that they are 300 to 400 yards away from their property. Following a brief discussion only the nearby residents at 107 Deer Path Road were in Mr. Holroyd stated that he knew the applicants well and is fully supportive of their request as it Chairman Roane then called to order a public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 24-142 that A RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION TO AUTHORIZE A TOURIST HOME IN AN EXISTING DWELLING AT 103B DEER  expressed opposition to the application.  opposition to the application.  meets all of the Board's criteria for STRs.  was duly advertised as required by law and is entitled:  PATH ROAD  As there were no speakers, Chairman Roane closed the public hearing. Mr. Shepperd made a motion to approve Resolution R24-142.  On a roll call the vote was:  Yea (5) Noll, Drewry, Shepperd, Holroyd, Roane  Nay: (0)  PROPOSED PARKING RESTRICTIONS - HUBBARD LANE (Route 716)  The matter was considered and approved on a vote of 5:0. A summary of the proceeding is Ms. Aubut stated that Section 46.2-1220 of the Code of Virginia provides authority for any county to regulate the parking, standing or stopping of vehicles within its limits. In addition, she noted that the State Code provides the Board with specific authority to regulate parking on any part of a state secondary highway located within the County. As such, several adjacent residents within the Nelson Park Subdivision have requested that the Board adopt an ordinance to prohibit parking on the western side of Hubbard Lane for 750 feet in a northerly  below.    254 August 20, 2024  direction beginning at its intersection with Penniman Road, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. She explained that this agenda item originated from a resident contacting the Planning Division about traffic issues on Hubbard Lane as it relates to drop-off and pick-up of school children. Upon speaking with the School Division about this issue, it was determined that a timed restriction only on the western side of Hubbard Lane, from the Penniman intersection to just past the fire station, during school drop- off and pick-up, hours was needed. In conclusion, she stated that the proposed ordinance the Board is considering will restrict parking in the previously specified portion of Hubbard Lane  and only during drop-off and pick-up of school children. Chairman Roane opened the floor for Board questions and comments.  Mr. Holroyd noted that with the approval of the proposed amendment, the County is opening up an extra lane sO there will be more cars moving with no crosswalk. He asked if there has been any discussion regarding adding a crosswalk sO that the kids can safely cross the street In response, Ms. Aubut stated that staff could discuss this matter with VDOT and the Williamsburg Residency. However, she pointed. out that should a crosswalk be approved and constructed, a reception point at the opposite side of the crosswalk will be mandated. Mr. Drewry asked if the cars parked on the west side of Hubbard were occupied by parents letting off or picking up kids, or were people parking there for convenience, that is those who volunteer or work at the school. In addition, he questioned if the school's current parking area was sufficient for staff and visitors alike, and if parking on the west side of the road during the Ms. Aubut stated that she was uncertain as to who is parking on the west side of the road and, regarding the adequacy of the school's parking lot, this information could only be provided by the School Division. She explained that if parking on the west side of the street during intake and release of school children is eliminated, staff believes the additional space will make for a Mr. Shepperd stated that this issue is very similar to another school that experienced at one time until they created a longer stacking lane on school property. He then asked if staff had  from where the parents will be forced to park in this scenario.  busiest hours is eliminated will that completely alleviate the traffic issue.  safer situation.  looked at possibly using this solution for this situation as well. Ms. Aubut stated that trying to do sO in this case would be very challenging.  Chairman Roane stated that the issue of congestion around the County's schools is pretty prevalent. He asked, in this particular situation, if the drop-off or pick-up lane steadily moved Ms. Aubut stated that it appeared to be a slow but continuous movement of cars through the Chairman Roane asked, if the western side of Hubbard is opened up for driving how does staff Ms. Aubut responded that if adopted she will have a discussion with Mr. Gregory Dolak, School Maintenance and Facilities Support Director, and Dr. Jim Carroll, Chief Operations Officer, Mr. Drewry suggested using signage also to explain how the newly opened western lane can be Chairman Roane then called to order a public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 24-18 that AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 15-48 OF THE YORK COUNTY CODE, PARKING PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED IN SPECIFIC PLACES, TO ADD 750 FEET OF THE WESTERN SIDE OF HUBBARD LANE (ROUTE 716), BEGINNING AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH PENNIMAN ROAD (ROUTE 641) AND ENDING AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH EDALE AVENUE (ROUTE 731), TO THE LIST OF  or did it stop momentarily.  que.  plan to train the parents to use this newly opened lane. about getting this message out to parents and teachers.  appropriately used.  was duly advertised as required by law and is entitled:    255 August 20, 2024  PLACES WITHIN THE STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS IN YORK  COUNTY WHERE PARKING IS PROHIBITED  As there were no speakers, Chairman Roane closed the public hearing. Mrs. Noll made a motion to approve Resolution R24-18. Chairman Roane again opened the floor for Board comments.  Mr. Holroyd stated that since we clearly have a traffic congestion problem in the specified area and both the school and the parents across the road support it, he too offered his support. Chairman Roane asked staff if there had been any traffic incidents on this specific roadway due Mr. Drewry noted that a similar situation at Seaford Elementary School had only been resolved due to the adjacent Baptist Church allowing the que to be extended on their property. Ms. Aubut stated that there had been some traffic incidents on this specific portion of the  to traffic congestion.  street; however, she did not currently possess the statistical data.  On a roll call the vote was: Nay: (0)  Yea (5) Drewry, Shepperd, Holroyd, Noll, Roane  APPLICATION NOS. SI0224AND/DI9224 YORK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The matter was considered and continued until the September 3, 2024 work session by a Mrs. Noll momentarily left the meeting before the aforementioned motion was taken at 8:18 Chairman Roane explained that amending the County's Zoning Ordinance is a tremendous task which cannot be fully addressed in one Board session. Since the Board does not have deadlines to do so, he stated that a discussion on the matter will commence this evening, Ms. Elgui Roman, Planner I, explained that a series of Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance amendments are being presented for the Board's consideration. She noted that the amendments seek to address several areas where changes have been recommended for consideration in response to citizen requests, questions and/or concerns. In addition, the proposed amendments would codify administrative zoning interpretations. that have been made over the years, make changes to update and clarify the Code, and revise the regulations of During the presentation, the Board asked the following questions or made the following Mrs. Noll stated that the proposal includes a change to the nominal fee of $130 for submitting Ms. Roman stated that the fee charge is not changing, staff is simply charging $130 for site Ms. Aubut stated that the development was $115, but was increased to $130 a couple of years Mr. Earl Anderson, Chief of Development Services, explained that in the past the County has not charged for reviewing preliminary and development plans; however, the amendment proposes that $130 be charged for these two specific reviews as that is the same fee that is charged for other plan reviews. He added that the fee is to reimburse staff for the time it takes  vote of 4:0. A summary of the proceeding is below.  p.m.  accomplish what is reasonable, and then continue at the next work session.  Chapters 20.5 and 24.1. comments:  these plans and she asked how staff arrived at the new fee figure. plans, the same fee that is charged for development plans. ago which aligned our fees with those of our neighboring localities.    256 August 20, 2024 which ones will not. paid to perform these reviews.  to review these plans for compliance with the County Code. However, he added that this is what staff is proposing, but the Board will determine which amendments are adopted and Mr. Shepperd stated that he has a problem with the proposed fee, as staff is already getting Mr. Mark Bellamy, County Administrator, asked Mr. Anderson if it is fair to say that we have not been charging these two fees which our neighbors have, and staff is recommending, it in an effort to recover our costs specifically associated to a particular project. He also noted that this  is basically the cost of doing business for the bullder/developer. Mr. Anderson concurred with Mr. Bellamy's remarks. these plans do not require a public advertisement. reviewing and processes the various plans.  Mr. Shepperd than questioned what the $130 fee is used for since staff is already salaried and Chairman Roane asked if there is material and/or other expenses that the County incurs in Mr. Anderson explained that the County has been charging for review of site plans and subdivision plans for some time and the proposed review fees are quite similar to those that are Mr. Drewry stated that should the Board decide not to charge the proposed new fees then the equitable thing to do is to eliminate the current $130 for site and subdivision plan reviews. Chairman Roane stated that the Board should focus on the proposed new fees before them this evening and then perhaps at a future date consider amending all of the similar fees to make Ms. Roman, noted during her presentation, that a definition for grocery store was added to the list of definitions in the Code for clarity. She also mentioned that due to public opinion comments, the current definition for Self-Service Ice Vending Unit includes changing the Ms. Aubut further explained that this definition was added to distinguish between a grocery Ms. Roman pointed out that there was no definition included in this section of the Code for wetland which staff is proposing, specifying coastal or tidal wetlands and inland or non-tidal Mrs. Noll stated that she could not support the addition of the wetland definition as the County In response, Ms. Roman stated that the definition proposed is from the Environmental Mr. Holroyd interjected that the EPA's definition of wetland is weak and needs some work. Ms. Aubut stated that the wetland definition in this section of the Code was suggested by the County's Environmental Specialist; however, she noted that the Planning Commission recommended removing it and did not support its inclusion in this section of the Code. Following a brief discussion, the Board's consensus was to remove the suggested wetland definition and simply make a reference to its definition in Chapter 18 of the Code. Mr. Richard Hill, County Attorney, suggested that it might be helpful to have. Mr. Kenton Henkel, Engineering Specialist III, attend an upcoming meeting to explain and simplify this Chairman Roane agreed that this was a good suggestion and noted that the Board wants to ensure that the County is doing this correctly for future development. As such, he stated that Mr. Henkel should provide clarification on this issue at a future Board meeting.  already being charged.  them more equitable.  maximum height of these units to 18 feet. store and smaller specialty food stores.  wetlands.  must adhere to the Army Corps of Engineers' definition of this item.  Protection Agency.  matter.    257  August 20, 2024  Ms. Roman noted that one of the suggested amendments is that Special Use Permits shall run Due to remarks made by the Board on this amendment, Mr. Anderson explained that this has always been the Board's policy; however, it was not in the Code. In addition, he noted that the Board always has the ability to change this stipulation with each and every SUP application During Ms. Roman's comments on the recommended clarification language on buildable or developable area measurements, Mr. Holroyd asked for assistance in understanding the table of Mr. Anderson explained that this portion of the Code is very technical, and he provided a brief overview of the table. Regarding Section 24.1-251, after the Board asked for clarification, he stated that developers cannot be forced to make offsite improvements; however, when a developer is seeking a rezoning for the development, the Board cannot support it as it will create a traffic jam or some other off-site problem which can be validated. Specifically, he noted that with any commercial structure measuring 80,000 square feet of gross floor space, the traffic analysis must be taken out a mile to determine ifit will have a detrimental impact on Mr. Holroyd pointed out that the proposed amendment does not specify that the 80,000 gross  with the land unless otherwise required by the Board.  brought forward. measurements.  traffic.  floor is commercial and should it not say this. Chairman Roane asked ifit should also say contiguous.  In response, Mr. Anderson stated that it would not be problematic to add word commercial to Chairman Roane stated it should say commercial contiguous. He added that it does not define anything, but rather provides another data point to help the Board to make a wise decision in the matter. He then stated that the Board would now end its discussion on this matter and sought Mr. Hill's recommendation as to how to properly move forward on this application. Mr. Hill stated that the Board can choose to readvertise the public hearing to another future date or a public hearing on this application can be held this evening and the Board can Chairman Roane stated that he wants to hold the public hearing this evening, continue the application review and discussion at the next work session and then continue the public  this amendment.  continue the public hearing and its action (vote) at future meeting.  hearing and vote on it at the next regular meeting.  Mr. Hill concurred that this is indeed appropriate action for the Board.  Chairman Roane then called to order a public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 24-17 that AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 20.5,  was duly advertised as required by law and is entitled:  SUBDIVISIONS CODE AND CHAPTER 24.1, ZONING As there were no speakers, Chairman Roane closed the public hearing.  Ms. Heather Schott, Deputy County. Clerk, reiterated the aforementioned motion made by Chairman Roane was to hold the public hearing on this item tonight, discuss it further at the next work session, and continue the public hearing and consideration at the next regular  meeting.  On a roll call the vote was: Nay: (0)  Yea (4) Shepperd, Holroyd, Drewry, Roane    258 August 20, 2024 NEW BUSINESS None. CLOSED MEETING. None.  Meeting Adjourned. At 8:36 p.m. Chairman Roane declared the meeting adjourned sine die.  MABlle MarkL. Bellamy, Jr. County Administrato  Ligks 020 G. Stephen Roane, Jr., Chairman York County Board of Supervisors