MEXICOBEACH CITY OFI MEXICO BEACH PLANNING AND: ZONING MEETING PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING MONDAY,AUGUST: 5, 2024A AT6:001 P.M.  Julie Gardner Post1 Lee] Ellzey - Post 2 Jack Kerigan - Chair- Post3 3 Tim Sloan, City. Attorney  Rock Kries- - Post 4 Steve Cox - Post 5 Larry Henderson - Alt1 Erik Fossage- Alt2 Tammy Brunson, City Clerk  Mell Smigielski, Interim City Administrator  This meeting will be live streamed on the City of Mexico Beach Government Facebook Page. If you have any questions/comments on the agenda, please email them up to 21 hours prior to the meeting to yemextopachigoy  I. II.  CALL TOORDER ROLLCALL III. CONSENT AGENDA  1. Minutes July 8, 2024  IV. SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING. LOTI DEVELPOPMENTORDER- 4 Allara Mills Gutcher  a. Open Public Discussion b. Close Public Discussion Discussion d. Recommendations  V.  DUKE ENERGY EASEMENT-Mesico Beach Welcome Center - Allara Mills Gutcher, tpc  VI. ADJOURNMENT  Emailed toi interested parties and posted on the website on: DATE: 08/01/2024  Note: Copies oft the Agenda items are posted on the City's Website mexicobeachf.gov This meeting willl be recorded *You arel hereby notified thati in accordance with Florida Statutes, you! have a right to appeal any decision made by the Council with respect to any matter considered. You may need to ensure that a verbatim record of thej proceedings is made which may need to include evidence and testimony upon which the appeal is based. Any person requiring a special accommodation at this meeting because ofa disability or physical impairment should contact Tammy Brunson, City Clerk, at 201 Paradise Path, Mexico Beach, Florida 32456; or by phone (850) 648-5700 at least five calendar days prior to the meeting. Ify you are hearing or speech impaired, andy you) possess TDD equipment, your may contact the City Clerk using thel Florida Dual Party Relay System, which can be reached  and on the website.  at 1-800-955-8770(IDD)    City of Mexico Beach  Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes  MONDAY,JULY8,2024-6:00PM  The City of Mexico Beach Planning & Zoning Board met in a regular meeting on Monday May 6, 2024, at 6:00 pm in the Public Works Building in Mexico Beach. Board members present were Lee Ellzey, Julie Gardner, Steve Cox, Jack Kerigan, Erik Fossage and Larry Henderson. Rock Kries was not present. Also present were City Administrator, Chris Hubbard, City Clerk, Tammy Brunson  and Interim City Attorney, Tim Sloan  Call to order: Mr. Kerigan called the meeting to order at 6: 00 pm.  II. Swearing in of New Members: City Clerk swore in new members: Larryh Henderson- Alternate 1 and Erik Fossage -A Alternate 2. Mr. Sloan reviewed the duties of the Alternates and when they were required to vote. Alternate 1 will III. Consent Agenda: Mrs. Gardner motioned, and Mr. Ellzey seconded to approve the meeting minutes from May 6,  vote whenl Imember is absent and Alternate 2 will vote when 2 members are absent.  2024. Motion passed unanimously.  IV. Regular Agenda:  Quasi-Judicial Hearing of Variance Request - 3114 Hwy 98 = Lance Watson with SCE, presented variance and stated that a portion of the city roadway is on this this property which reduces the availability for impervious area. The reason for the variance request is to be able to use some space of the setbacks to offset some of this property that is taken by the city roadway. The intent of this property is for a grocery store. The variance request is for 9.7ft on the south side, 3.2 on the northwest side, 4.51 feet on the southwest side, and 1.31 feet on the north: side. The intent of the applicant being granted this variance is to deed the city a portion of this area so the city will own the right of way to this section. He also stated thati int the variance request application that they are requesting impervious area percentage and that he wanted to go on record stating that they are not asking for this request. With the permeable pavers that they will be at 85.75% and will be under the LDCr requirements and to please include in the motion. Allara Mills Gutcher with tpc working on behalf of the City. Stated that there was an analysis ini the packet that they were given and went over the variance that was requested. Special conditions or physical circumstance requirement are met. Special conditions and circumstances that exist do not result from actions of the property owner requirements met. Relief granted is the minimum degree of relief necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land in compliance with all other applicable regulations - due to the hardship placed on the site as a result of City action, this requirement is met." The existing character of this site is a centralized location within Mexico Beach ofn non-residential uses requirement is met. Recommendation with removal oft the impervious surface is approval of this variance. Lance added that before a motion was made that the front setback is 9.71 feet but he did want to make sure mentioned in the motion that once this property is deeded to the Cityt that the 9.7 foot setback will be close to zero. Mr. Kerigan asked that once property is deeded would there not need to be a request for variance, Allara stated thati it would still need variance. Mr. Sloan asked specifically how this was advertised. Mr. Cox asked Zach Childs ifit was typical to have a city right of way through a parking lot. Mr. Kerigan opened to the public. Resident on 31st Street - just wanted understanding of the variance. He wanted top know ift this was a variance or zoning issue and parking. Mr. Ellzey questioned since this was on the agenda as a Quasi-Judicial Hearing, he was concerned with making sure process was carried out properly. Allara stated that usually anyone commenting need to be sworn in.  City Clerk: swore in public and that previous comments complete and correct    City of Mexico Beach  Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes  MONDAY,JULY8,? 2024-6:00PM  Mr. Fossage asked about delivery trucks entering and exiting the property and the power pole and guide wire being in the way of any parking. Asking about the property line ont the other side of the alley behind the property with trees and ifr maybe these trees could be taken down for parking. Allara stated we have to wait for the actual survey to be done. Mr. Sloan will review advertisement. Mr. Kerigan very muchi ini favor of a grocery store on this property and very thankful that someone is willing to pursue this. Ms. Gardner also in favor and feels that Mr. Duren cares about the community. Mr. Ellzey stated he was ready to make ar motion and asked Mr. Sloan how specific he needs to be. Mr. Ellzey motioned to grant the variance as requested with the exception of requesting the impervious area ORDINANCE 838 - PROPOSED AMENDMENT FOR SIGN SECTION (POLITICAL SIGNS) - Chris Hubbard presented this Ordinance due to the confusion of the last election with the political signs and try to make it easier on the staff to regulate these signs. Mr. Kerigan opened to the public. Lisa Logan, MB - stated this proposal was a waste oft time to discuss. Closed public comments. Mr. Fossage did not think this would be worth the effort. Mr. Cox stated he was a big believer in the 1st and 2nd Amendment Right and to leave it alone. Ms. Gardner did agree that too many signs on residents' property was tacky. Mr. Henderson stated that it seemed to him that there were several misconceptions of where residents thought where the ROW was, and he gets where the confusion is. Mr. Hubbard stated that there were al lot of property owners that don't know exactly where the ROW starts. Mr. Kerigan asked for a motion to recommend or deny. Mr. Henderson motioned to deny this proposal. Mr. Cox seconded the motion. Motion passes  percentage. Mr. Cox seconded the motion. Motion passes unanimously.  unanimously to deny.  ADJOURMMENT = Mr. Kerigan made a motion to adjourn. Mr. Ellzey seconded. Adjourned at 6:58pm  Attest:  Jack Kerigan, Chairperson  Tammy Brunson, City Clerk    MEXICOBEACH  PLANNING AND ZONING Agenda Abstract Form Meeting Date: August 5,2024 Department: Planning Public Hearing: R Yes D No Date of Public Hearing: August 5,2024  For Clerk's Use Only AGENDAI ITEM#  Agenda Consent Regular Agenda Closed Session  PRESENTER/NFORMATION CONTACT: Allara Mills-Gutcher, AICP  ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED quasi-judicial process. Attachment(s): Brief Summary:  Subject:  This is a request for the development of a temporary gravel parking lot and pedestrian path. This decision is a  Staff report; application package and all submitted documents by the applicant.  The project is the development of at temporary gravel parking lot located to the south of U.S. 98. Access tot the lot will be via Canal Parkway and HWY 98. In addition, a pedestrian pathway willl be constructed to connect the existing sidewalk  from the Mexico Beach Crossings Apartments to a path under the US HWY 98 bridge.  Action Requested:  Approval of the temporary gravel parking lot and pedestrian pathway.  ISSUE OVERVIEW Background Information & Issue Summary: Please see the staff report. Financial Impacts: None. Approval.  Staff RecommenditiosCommens    RE: Parcels 04101-075-000, 04101-030-000 and 04101-040-000  Tony. Johnson <TJohnson@centralfire.net>  Thu 8/1/2024 1:33PM  To:Mell Smigielski mel@mexcobeachtlgve,information Inquiries ciyemencobeachigow, CcJjuli Danaher <.Danaher@mexicobeachtlgovovP;RichardWolf <rwolf@mexicobeacobeachfigove,Chris Hubbard Adams jadams@mexicobeachiigova,Tim Linderman <Llinderman@mencoencobeachilgov>ule Gardner  chubard@mexcobeeachilgov2jery Smith smitn@mexobeachi.govejlinda Hamilton <LHamiton@mecopewirobeachtigow>jason Gardher@mexicobeachilgovilee. Ellzey <lelzey@mexicobeachflgovppack Kerigan kergan@mexicobeachigov>RockKies: MwcmaccNgnSee Cox scoemeolaahgonin Fosshage eloshageemencobeachigovP,lany Henderson CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open Iwould greatly appreciate you entering them into the record. The meeting is short notice and Ihave ai trip scheduled to Our main objection is the entrance to the parking lot being on Canal Parkway, it should be on Hwy 98. Allowing the  henderson@mexicobextcobeachgoweElen Johnson ohnsonerentafiene  attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.  Mell, Montana.  entrance on Canal Parkway will ruin the area.  Thank you, Tony Johnson President of CFP  CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION, INC. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Contractor Since 1968 Please visit our website at www.centralire.net  Licensedin Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Florida, Alabama, Virginia, Mississippi andN Missouri  Main: (770)922-4250 Cell: (678)480-4641  CENTRAL CFP FIRE PROTECTION From: Mell Smigielski melemeacobechngon Sent: Thursday, August 1, 20249:28AM  Since 1968  To: Tony. Johnson <TJohnson@centralfire.net>; Information Inquiries dlyemeacopeacmigop Cc: Juli Danaher .Danaher@mexicobeacht.govP; Richard Wolff olemeacoteehgp, Chris Hubbard chebdemcioadngpo, Jerry Smith smith@mexicobeachfl.gov>; Linda Hamilton LHamiton@mexicobeachl.govo, Jason Adams adimsemeiceadnjpe, Tim Linderman Llingerman@mexicobeachti.gov. Julie Gardner .Gardner@mexicobeachfl.gov>; Lee Ellzey <elzey@mexicobeachfl.gov>; Jack Kerigan kerigan@mexicobeachr.gov2; Rock Kries Hesemeatoleaigoo, Steve Cox ScoxemeatbeAc.go, Erik Fosshage celosshage@mexcobeachlgovp,lary Henderson .nenderson@mexicobeachfl.gov; Ellen. Johnson ohnsonecentalrenet Subject: RE: Parcels 04101-075-000,0 04101-030-000 and 04101-040-000  Hey Mr. Johnson,    We appreciate your comments. Ifyouv wish, we can have your concerns entered into the record at the  meeting if you can'tattend. Mell Smigielski Interim City Administrator City of Mexico Beach 201 Paradise Path Mexico Beach, FL: 32456 Office: (850)648-5700 melemextopeachi.gow  MEXICOBEACH  PLEASENOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. As ai result, any written communication created or received by the City ofl Mexico Beach will be made available to the public and media, upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. Ifyou do not want your e-mail address released in response toa aj public records request, do not send  electronic mail to this office. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing.  From: Tony. Johnson <Dlohnson@centralfire.net> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 20247:59AM To: Information Inquiries lvyemescobeacnlgoe  Cc: Juli Danaher <Danaheremexicobeachtl.govP; Richard Wolff otemecacNlga Chris Hubbard <c.hubbardemexicobeachtl.govP: Jerry Smith smith@mexicobeacht.gov>; Linda Hamilton hmtemtsato, Jason Adams <adams@mexicobeachl.gov>; Tim Linderman ntmuenaidsatise Julie Gardner Gardner@mexicobeacht.gov>; Lee Ellzey elvemeiohsadlpe Jack Kerigan kergan@mexicobeachtl.govP; Rock Kries tsemeacteaclgpes Steve Cox scosemeatobsacgos Erik Fosshage elosshage@mexicobeachl.go; Larry Henderson .hendersonemexirobeachtgo; Ellen. Johnson omonecentahrener Subject: Parcels 04101-075-000, 04101-030-000 and 04101-040-000  CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open  attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My wife and lare the owners of 114 Canal Parkway where we: are ini the process of build our house.  We received the notice regarding the proposed parking lot on the parcels mentioned above. We strongly.object to the  proposal for several reasons.  1. Ift the parking. lot is allowed the entrance should come from Hwy 98. It appears they plan to use Canal parkway for the entrance to the parking lot. The entrance to Canal Parkway off of hwy 98 is already a challenge during busy traffic times with al bad line of sight at the bridge. There is already a fair amount of foot traffici from the parking for the fishing boats and this proposal will add more foot traffic and roughly 801 to 100 cars to compete with each 2.1 There is no plan for how the foot traffic from the parking lot will get to the beach. For this reason alone the 3. It will have a negative affect on the small quiet street and the parking for the fishing boats.  other.  application should be denied.    4. Thel beach parking will end up over flowing and using the existing parking that isi intended for loading and This proposal is a terrible idea that will ruin this quiet street (Canal Parkway). The proposed parking lot does nothing to benefit the property owners on Canal parkway but willl have negative consequences. It's obvious the owner of the proposed parking loti is trying toi improve the selling point oft the apartments across hwy 98 and looking fori the cheapest  offloading of fishing boats.  route (parking lot entrance location) to do that.  Thank you, Tony Johnson President of CFP  CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION, INC. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Contractor. Since 1968 Please visit our website at www.centralire.net  LicensedinG Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Florida, Alabama, Virginia, Mississippi and! Missouri  Main: (770)922-4250 Cell: (678)480-4641  CENTRAL CFP FIRE PROTECTION  Since 1968  PLEASE NOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. As a result, any written communication created or received by the City of Mexico Beach willl be made available to the public and media, upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this office. Instead, contact our office by phone or in writing.    TPc thep planning collaborative Memorandum for Record  July23,2024  To: From: Through: Subject:  Chris Hubbard, City Administrator Cody Tillman Allara Mills-Gutcher, AICP  Salt Creek Temporary Parking and Pedestrian Path  Project Address: U.S. Highway 98/Canal Parkway  Parcel IDs: 04101-030-000 (north of HWY 98, pedestrian path),0 04101-040-000 (south of HWY 98, parking  lot)  Future Land Use Mapl Designation: Tourist Mixed Use Zoning District: Tourist Mixed Use Project Description  A commercial development order application was submitted by the applicant for approval of a 44,365 square foot (1.02 acre) temporary gravel parking lot with an associated dry retention stormwater management facility. The application also includes the construction of a pedestrian pathway connecting The parcels are located within al FEMA Flood Zones X and A. The proposed parking area is located within  Mexico Beach Crossings tot the temporary parking lot. Flood Zone X, outside of the! 500-year floodplain. There are no wetland impacts proposed on these sites.  From a planning perspective, the only review required impervious surface ratios and setbacks since no  buildings are proposed on the sites.  Analysis  1. Impervious Surface  The City of Mexico Beach's Land Development Code (LDC) Article II 2.02.02 J requires a maximum 70% impervious surface ratio for the Tourist Mixed Use zoning district. In addition, the Mexico Beach Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use (FLU) Policy 1.1.4E Estates that thei impervious surface of the Tourist Mixed Use FLU designation is "not to cumulatively exceed 70% lot coverage based on the total land area  oft the project."  Pagelof2    Int the development order application submitted by the applicant, the project areai is 81,021 square feet and the impervious surface is 44,365 square feet. This is an impervious surface ratio of approximately 54.8%. However, please note that impervious surface calculations are typically taken at the parcel level, so the impervious surface measured at that boundary is much less of an overall percentage since the  parking lot parcel is 17.94 acres. This requirement is met. 2. Lots Setbacks pedestrian/bicycle uses.  No vertical development is proposed. This request is for horizontal work, which includes vehicular and  3. Stormwater Management  Article IV 4.06.02 B of the Mexico Beach LDC requires the installation of a stormwater facility for development activities that exceed4 4,000squarei feet of parking areas. The development order application includes an associated: stormwater facility with the proposed temporary gravel parking lot. Al licensed engineer should review the stormwater management facility plans and make comment.  4. - Wetland Impacts/Sebacks  Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.2.10 requires development to "maintain a minimum thirty (30) foot vegetative buffer from any wetland jurisdictional line with exception to a maximum ten (10) foot wide Sheet 1 of the applicant's submittal includes the proximity of wetlands to the gravel parking lot and associated stormwater management facility. The provided setbacks in the applicant's submittal include a 30' setback on the southeast, a 595.08' setback from the east, and a 216.05' setback on the northeast  access way for the purpose of access to the water.  corner of the proposed development. This requirement is met.  5. Other considerations  Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.2.1 states that sand dunes are designated as environmentally sensitive "and  shall be afforded maximum protection with applicable planning controls."  Recommendation: Path.  Arecommendation: of approval for the development of the Salt Creek Temporary Parking and Pedestrian  Page e2of2    Dewberry Engineers Inc. 850.522.0644 203 Aberdeen Parkway 850.522.10111 fax Panama City, FL32405 www.dewberry.com:  Dewberry  June 27,2024 VIA Email Mr. Chris Hubbard City Administrator City of Mexico Beach 201 Paradise Path Mexico Beach, FL, 32456  RE: Salt Creek Temporary Parking and Pedestrian Path Development Order Submittal Dewberry Project No. 50169273  Dear! Mr. Hubbard:  On behalf of The St. Joe Company, Dewberry is pleased to submit this Development Order submittal package to The City of Thep project ist the development: a temporary gravel parking lot and a pedestrian pathi inl Mexico Beach, FL. The proposed gravel parking loti is located tot the south ofU.S. Highway 98. Access tot the site is vial U.S. Highway 98 and Canal Pkwy. The proposed pedestrian path willo connect with the existing sidewalk from the Mexico Beach Crossings Apartments and will cross the existing Town Village Blvd and City Docks Road where it will then connect with the existing path undert the US Hwy 98 bridge. There will be one (1)stormwater management: facility thaty will serve the temporary gravel parking lot. The proposed stormwater management facility has been designed tot treat and attenuate onsite stormwater runofft to ERP and The City of Mexico Beach  Mexico Beach for the Salt Creek Temporary Parking and Pedestrian Path development.  requirements where applicable.  Please find attached the following documents for your review:  Development Order Application S/S Engineering Plans S/S Stormwater Management Report S/S Survey Legal Deed GIS Exhibits  Pleaser review the enclosed materials. Ify youl have any questions or need additional information, please contact us at (850)571-  1199 ory you may e-mail me at shonti@dewpery.com.  Sincerely, DEWBERRY Project Manager d  P.E.  Page Lofl    MENIY BEACH  CITY OF MEXICO BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT  Development Order Application  Commercial  Residential  INCOMPLETE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE REVIEWED (Separate forms and fees required for Building Permits) NOTE: PROPERTY ADDRESS MUST BE POSTED PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL All new construction must meet City of Mexico Beach Land Development Regulations and 1. Site Plan with square feet of living space, total square feet, impervious surface, trees to  FEMA's flood elevation requirements  be removed from property, and setbacks 2. New address application if needed Project Address: HWY 98/Canal St  Construction ofat temporary gravel parking lotv with associated! SWMF. Construction ofap pedestrian path  Project Description: connecting! Mexico Beach Crossings tot the temporary parking! lot. Project Square Footage: 81,021 sq ft./1.86 acres  Setbacks: Front: N/A Lot Square Footage: N/A Driveway Square Footage: N/A Pool Square Footage: N/A Floor Area Ratio: N/A  Left Side: N/A Right Side: NIA Dwelling Square Footage: N/A Accessory Building Square Footage: N/A Patio/Deck Square Footage: N/A  Rear: N/A  Lot Coverage:  Gravel or pervious pavers  Current Impervious Surface: Osq.ft Building Height in Feet: N/A Flood Zone: X,AE(EL8 8)  Impervious Surface Including Project: 44,365sq. ft./1.02 ac  Landscape Buffers: (height X width). N/A Finished Floor Elevation: NIA  1    Setbacks in feet for accessory uses (including pools and sheds):  From Rear Property Line: N/A Are trees to be removed from the property? (If yes, attach a tree location map) Isa Conservation Easement required? Are there any yard encroachments? Are there any of the following on the property?  From Primary Structure: N/A  Y N) Y Y NN Y N Y N Y N) Y Y Y N  Protected habitat Archaeological site Historical site Wetlands Protected species Conservation site  Flood zone classification if other than X (Other will require elevation certificate)  Will any of the following be placed, conducted or located on this property?  Waterwell Antenna Home business Swimming Pool  Y (W) Y N Y (N Y N)  Ihave answered the above questions truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.  Ac Applicants  102/24 Date  Clby  Signature  130 Richard Jackson Blvd., Suite 200  Applicants Address anemencoyece.com e-mail address  850-231-6400 Telephone Number  2    -  E T  2  I  99882889 5    SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING THE ST. JOE COMPANY CITY OF MEXICOE BEACH BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA    P2  MM  SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING THE ST. JOE COMPANY CITY OFN MEXICOE BEACH BAY COUNTY,FLORIDA    SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING THE ST. JOE COMPANY CITY OFI MEXICOB BEACH BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA    SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING THESTJ JOE COMPANY CITYOF MEXICOE BEACH BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA    SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING THEST. JOE COMPANY CITY OF MEXICO BEACH BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA    WETATSN    CPATA-TNN FEFR-  -  BASIFA  SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING THE STJ JOE COMPANY CITY OFN MEXICOBEACH BAY COUNTY,FLORIDA    SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING THE ST. JOE COMPANY CITY OFN MEXICOBEACH BAY COUNTY,FLORIDA    BA  SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING THE ST. JOE COMPANY CITY OFN MEXICOBEACH BAY COUNTY,FLORIDA  C    ELEVATION  SECTION  SALTO CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING THE ST. JOE COMPANY CITY OFI MEXICOBEACH BAY COUNTY,FLORIDA    PROJECT LIMITS   1  BayCounty, FL_State ofF Floriday Maxar, Microsoft  Dewberry Dewberry Engineers, Incl 203 Aberdeen Parkway Panama City, FL32405 Ph: 850-571.1182  AERIAL PHOTO MAP SALT CREEKTEMP PARKING AND: PED: PATH THE ST. JOEC COMPANY MEXICO1 BEACH, FL  Scale: 1":4 4,000' Jobl No.:50169273 2024.06.17 Exhibit: 1  w >E Date:    PARCEL:04101-060-000  Greci  PARCEL: 04101-030-000  PARCEL: 04101-075-000  30)  PARCEL: 04101-040-000  PARCEL: 04101-030-000  SAit  Camat Pkwy  D  -  Miramar Dr  sal Fark  County ofE Bay, ESriHERE, GaTMiR-INCREMENT,  SG:  Dewberry 2034 Aberdeen Parkway Panama City, FL3 32405 Ph: 850.571.1182  PARCELSID MAP ANDPEDPATH THE: ST.JOE COMPANY MEXICO BEACH, FLORIDA  Scale: 1":4,000 Job No.: 50169273 Date: 2024.06.17 2 Exhibit:  Dewberry Engineers, Incl SALT CREEK TEMP PARKING      AREKEE  0 Dewberry'  TOPOGRA SURVEY    7/30/2019  Landmark' Web Official Records Search  File # 2006087760, OR BK 2869 Page 2066, Recorded 12/29/2006 at 01:58 PM, Harold Bazzel, Clerk Bay County, Florida Deputy Clerk GC Trans # 790770  ORDINANCE NO. 510  AN ORDINANCE VOLUNTARILY ANNEXING INTO THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MEXICO BEACH, FLORIDA, TRACTS OF UNINCORPORATED LAND LOCATED AT THE WESTERN PORTIONS OFTHE PRESENT CITY LIMITS; CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 462 ACRES AND AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" AND GENERALLY SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP; THE LANDIS CONTIGUOUS TO THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MEXICO BEACH, FLORIDA, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BELOW AND BY REFERENCE; AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE THE LAND; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND RECITING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the owner of the land described in Exhibit "A", attached and incorporated herein (the Property"), pursuant to $171.044, Florida Statutes, has filed a voluntarily petition to the WHEREAS, a copy of the Public Notice to consider this Ordinance for final adoption was WHEREAS, the City of Mexico Beach has caused to be published a notice, together with a legal WHEREAS, the City Commissioners ofthe City of Mexico Beach, Florida have ascertained that iti isi in the best interests oft the City of Mexico Beach, Florida to annex the Property; NOW THEREFORE, BE ITI ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF MEXICO SECTIONI. The City of Mexico Beach, Florida does hereby voluntarily annex into the municipal limits of the City of! Mexico Beach, Florida, at the request of the owner oft the Property and pursuant tol Florida Statute $171.044, the Property legally. described in Exhibit "A". and made aj part hereof as if fully set forth. The Property consists of unincorporated and continuous parcels of property located in Bay County, Florida. The Property contains approximately 462 acres and is generally located on the map attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit' "B". SECTION2. The boundaries of the City of Mexico Beach, Florida are hereby amended and SECTION3. The owner of the Property shall be responsible for any and all recording fees or taxes which may become due and payable in the future. SECTION4. Should any part of this Ordinance be deemed invalid by a Court of competent  City of Mexico Beach, Florida to annex the Property; and provided to the City ofMexico Beach, Florida; and description and map showing the area sought to be annexed, and  BEACH, FLORIDA:  redefined so as toi include the Property.  ecords2.baycocierk.com/Recordingsearch/index7tneme-.blueasection-searchCmtenaBookPageaquicksearchSelection-#  1/11    7/30/2019  Landmark Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2067  jurisdiction, the invalid parts shall be severed from the Ordinance and the remaining parts shall SECTIONS. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the SECTION6. This Ordinance shall become effective upon passage.the approval of Ordinance #'s 511, 512, 513 with respect to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Property and the expiration of all appeal periods for this Ordinance and Ordinance #'s511,512, 513 or the finality ofa any actions broughi under this Ordinance and Ordinance #'$511,512,512. INTRODUCED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council on,February 14, 2006, and ADOPTED by the City Council at a Regular Meeting on September 12, 2006.  not be affected thereby. extent of such conflict.  CITY OF MEXICO BEACH, FLORIDA  R Mayor, William A.    Attest  AIRE Clerk, Deborah McLeod  Approved as to form e City Attorney, Paull Komarek  records2. bhayecerkcomRececdingpsachmoememema-buassdomaacCheaBoNPapeusucASearehSelecion-  2/11    7/30/2019  Landmark' Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2068  Exhibit"A" (Property Description)  records2. baycodter.comRecardnnoafreme"iiscon-taraoPpaiguosqueaSearselection-:  3/11    7/30/2019  Landmark Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2069  FOR: ST. JOE TOWNS & RESORTS, L.P.  DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL ONE: LOT NINE (9), BLOCK FIFTEEN (15), MEXICO BEACH, UNIT 7, ACCORDING TO PLAT ON FILE IN PLAT BOOK8, PAGE 80 IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OF BAY DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL TWO: BEGIN. AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 15, MEXICO BEACH UNIT7, ACCORDING TO PLAT ON FILE IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 80 IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OF BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE RUN SOUTHWEST ALONG AN EXTENSION OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 12TH AVENUE. A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET: THENCE AT AN ANGLE OF 90°7 TO THE RIGHT. A DISTANCE OF 90 FEET; THENCE AT AN ANGLE OF 90° TO THE RIGHT A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE. AT AN ANGLE OF 90° TO THE RIGHT AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF THE SAID LOT 9, BLOCK 15, A DISTANCE OF 90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.  COUNTY, FLORIDA.  e 16  gmabradleyloca  records2baycodlerk.coRecadngsearchinoe.7heme-bueiecionsearehcmeriaBonPageaqucasearehSelecion-*  4/11    7/30/2019  Landmark' Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2070  JULY: 29, 2005  JOB NO. 5888.20 ANNEXATION) FOR: ST. JOE TOWNS & RESORTS, L.P.  DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 4: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 12 WEST, BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 15 FOR 1718.40 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 98 (100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR 4256.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR 944.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE NORTH 22 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST FOR 533.32 FEET TO Al NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TOTHE NORTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 7406. .99 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1856.35 FEET, THE CHORD OF SAID ARC BEARING SOUTH 82 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST FOR 1851.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST FOR 3804.81 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST FOR 2321.07 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1, ACCORDING TO CITY OF MEXICO BEACH ORDINANCE 470, DESCRIBED IN BAY COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2443, PAGE 1505; THENCE SOUTH89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE FOR 1688.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 53 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE FOR 539 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTER OF SALT CREEK AND THE WESTERLYLINE OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER OF SALT CREEK AND SAID WESTERLY LINE FOR 772 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 98; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAYI LINE FOR 3040 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 25 SECONDS WEST. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR 944.86 FEET TO THE POINT  OF BEGINNING.  labr  Intarnet  ecords2.baycoclerk.com/Recordinglsearch/index7lhneme-.bluessection-searchCrteraBookPageaquicksearchSelection-#  5/11    7/30/2019  Landmark' Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2071  DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 5: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 12 WEST, BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST ALONG1 THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 15 FOR 1897.66 FEETT TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 98 (100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST. ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR 4107. 54 FEET: THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR 325.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 22 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST FOR 2987 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EDGE OF THE GULF OF MEXICO; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID EDGE OF THE GULF OF MEXICO FOR 4039 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3, ACCORDING TO CITY OF MEXICO BEACH ORDINANCE 470, DESCRIBED IN BAY COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2443, PAGE 1505; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST. ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE FOR 1220 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2, SAID ORDINANCE 470. AND THE CENTER OF SALT CREEK; THENCE WESTERLY, NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER OF SALT CREEK AND EDGE OF SAID PARCEL: 2 FOR 2116 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 98; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 02 MINUTES! 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR: 3042 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR  925.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.  ands  records2baycocierik.com-Recocingsearchince.Aheme-bueasecion-seanehomeraBooPagesquaskSearchSelecion-*  6/11    7/30/2019  Landmark Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2072  FOR: ST. JOE TOWNS & RESORTS, L.P.  DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 6: AI PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN FRACTIONAL SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 12 WEST, BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA, BOUND ON THE NORTH BY THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SECTION 22, ON THE SOUTH BY THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF A TIDAL CANAL, AND ON THE EAST BY THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF MEXICO BEACH UNIT NO. 8, AS PER MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 15 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ON THE WEST BY PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1628, PAGE 1438, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 22, AND RUN THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 22 AND THE NORIHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF MEXICO BEACH UNIT NO. 8 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 15 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA, Al DISTANCE OF 995.19 FEETT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST FOR: 23.05 FEETT TO A POINT ON THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF A TIDAL CANAL LOCATED AT ELEVATION 1.32 NGVD 29; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE AS FOLLOWS: NORTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST FOR 18.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 12 SECONDS WEST FOR 14.19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST FOR 35.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 56 SECONDS WEST FOR 61.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST FOR 37.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 56 SECONDS WEST FOR 39.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST FOR 18.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST FOR 42.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST FOR 31.95 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST FOR 84.24 FEET: THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 37. MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST FOR 64.55 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST FOR 81.16 FEET TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1628, PAGE 1438 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST FOR 2.43 FEET TO THE SAID NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 22; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY FOR 525.42  FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.  PaDosumentse of6 ands  inemet  records2.b baycoclerk.com/Recordingsearch/noex7ineme-.be-.bluessecton-searchCntenaBookPageaquicksearchSelection-#  7/11    7/30/2019  Landmark' Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2073  FOR: ST. JOE TOWNS & RESORTS, L.P.  DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 7: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 22; TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 12 WEST, BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN WEST FOR 1520.61 FEET. ALONG THE SECTION LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE TO RUN WEST FOR 195. 00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 56° 03' EAST FOR 100.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEAST RIGHT OF WAYLINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 98; THENCE RUN NORIHEASTERLY FOR 128.00 FEET ALONG A CURVE BEARING TO THE "NORTHEAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE" OF A CANAL TO THE  POINT OF BEGINNING.  records2bayoderk.coRecerdinyseac.hince.lheme-bluaisecion-seachomeriaboPagesqucsSearchselecion-:  8/11    7/30/2019  Landmark' Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2074  AUGUST 12, 2005 JOB NO. 5888.20  FOR: ST. JOE TOWNS & RESORTS, L.P.  DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 8: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 15, MEXICO BEACH UNIT 7, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 7C, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROJECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 FOR 150.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 73 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST FOR 90.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST FOR 337 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EDGE OF THE GULF OF MEXICO; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EDGE FOR 90 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON A LINE BEARING SOUTH 16 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST FOR 337 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.  CADocum  gmTemporer ary  records2baycocleik.coRecardingsearchince,Aheme-buesecionsearchcmelaBonPagesquasSearehSelecion-:  9/11    7/30/2019  Landmark' Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2075  Exhibit' *B" (Map)  records2baycocierik.comRecodnyseachinceiheme-bueisecion-seanchomeraBowPageaqucisearchSelection-:  10/11    7/30/2019  Landmark Web Official Records Search  OR BK 2869 PG 2076  3  recordis2baycodeik.comRecordingsearchince,Aheme-bueisecion-searchonterlaBookPageiquessearehSelecion-:  11/11    July22. 2024(14:5722ESD K150169273 SJC SALT CREEKI TEMPF ANDI  REFERENCEVFLOOD: ZONE CUT  PROXIMITY MAP. DWG 10X BY: EEVANS    July2 22,  <150169273 SJC SALTO CREEK TEMP PARKING ANDF PEDESTRIAN FACILITY  ZONE CUTF FILLIFLOODZ ZONE COMPARISON.DWG 10X BY:EEVANS    MEI  MAGAUMINGINEFAINGING GBOTBCHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANIS  GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT  SALT CREEK CONTECH BRIDGE MEXICO BEACH, FLORIDA  PREPARED FOR: MRS. DINA BAUTISTA, P.E. 324 MARINA DRIVE PORT ST. JOE, FLORIDA 32456  1026 PIERSON DRIVE LYNN HAVEN, FLORIDA: 32444 TELEPHONE (850) 258.0994    MEI  MAGNUM ENGINEERING INC GBOTBCHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS  February 19, 2019 Mr. Dina Bautista, P.E. 324 Marina Drive Port St.. Joe, Florida 32456  SUBJECT: Salt Creek Contech Bridge Geotechnical Services  Mexico Beach, Florida Project Number: M119-106-089  Dear Mrs. Bautista:  This letter forwards the results of our Geotechnical exploration for the proposed Contech bridge across Salt Creek in Mexico Beach, FI. The subsurface exploration was conducted to provide information needed in the design of an effective foundation system. The following report presents the results of our study as well as our evaluation and recommendations pertaining to the geotechnical aspects of the project.  Project Information  The subject site is located south of US highway 98 on Canal Parkway where the Salt Creek meets Mexico Beach Canal in Mexico Beach, Florida. At the time of our exploration, the existing culvert had been completely blown out by Hurricane Michael, preventing vehicular traffic to the west side of Canal Parkway. Based on visual observations, the invert elevation of the creek is roughly 10 feet below existing street Itis our understanding that there will be a connecting conspan bridge on either timber or concrete piling to replace the destroyed bridge on. At the writing of this report no structural information had been provided. Our exploration consisted of One (1) 40-feet deep Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings on the east side of the proposed abutment. Due to inaccessibility to the west side, only one boring was performed. Upon completion of our field testing, the samples were brought back to the office for visual inspection, If any of the above information is incorrect, please inform Magnum Engineering, Inc. (MEI) so that we can  grade.  classification, and analysis by our engineering staff. review and update our recommendations, as needed.  Subsurface Conditions  Figure #1 show the Boring Location Plan and Figure #2 shows the Log of Boring for Standard Penetration Test boring B-1. The test location was established in the field using a 100 foot tape and estimating right angles with reference to existing landmarks, thus, the test location should be considered approximate. Boring B-1 generally encountered medium dense to dense silty fine sands and clean fine sands from the ground surface to roughly 33 feet below existing grade underlain by very loose to loose silty fines sands to  Soil Conditions  the boring termination depth of 40 feet below existing grade.    Salt Creem Contech Bridge - Geotechnical Services  Mexico Beach, Florida Page 2of4  The above subsurface descriptions are of a generalized nature, provided to highlight the major soil strata encountered. The Logs of Boring should be reviewed for specific subsurface conditions at each boring location. The stratifications shown on the Logs of Boring represent the subsurface conditions at the actual boring locations only, and variations in the subsurface conditions can and may occur between boring locations and should therefore be expected. The stratifications represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials, and the transitions between strata may be gradual. Please refer to the attached Logs of Borings presented as Figure #2 for a detailed description of the subsurface conditions  encountered. Groundwater Conditions  Groundwater was encountered roughly 8.0 feet below existing grade at the time of drilling (February 4, 2019), which was during a period of slightly above normal seasonal rainfall. Groundwater levels will fluctuate with rainfall and tidal influences, and could vary several feet during typical seasonal fluctuations. Larger fluctuations are possible under severe weather conditions. We recommend that the Contractor verify the actual groundwater levels at the time of construction to determine potential impacts groundwater  will have on construction procedures.  CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS  General  The following geotechnical related design recommendations have been developed on the basis of the previously described project characteristics and subsurface conditions encountered. Ift there are any changes int these project criteria, including project location on the site, a review should be made by! MEI to determine if Once final design plans and specifications are available, a general review by MEI is required as a means to confirm the evaluations and recommendations made in preparation of this report are correct and that the earthwork, stormwater and foundation recommendations are properly interpreted andi implemented.  modifications to the recommendations are warranted.  Site Preparation  The site should be cleared and grubbed of surface vegetation/organics. As a minimum, iti is recommended The subgrade soils should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557)  the clearing operations extend at least five feet beyond the development perimeters. maximum dry density to a depth of 12 inches below thei floor slab bottom.  Engineered Fill  Allf fill used to raise the foundation area to final grades should consist of sandys soils with less than 15 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. These soils should be free of rubble, organics, clay, debris and other unsuitable material. Fills should be placed in lifts on the order of 12i inches or less (inl loose thickness) and compacted to  95 percent of the soil's Modifies Proctor maximum dry density, per ASTMI D-1557.    Salt Creek Contech Bridge Geotechnical Services  Mexico Beach, Florida Page 3of4 Pile Foundations  The test borings encountered suitable subsurface conditions fort founding the proposed structure on 8-inch tip timber piling. We have also included both 10-inch square and 12-inch square pre-stressed concrete pile capacities. Table #1 below shows allowable pile capacities for an 8-inch tip timber pile, 10-inch square concrete pile, and 12-inch square concrete piles jetted to 51 feet below existing grade, then driven to bearing approximately 15 feet below existing grade with an approved pile driving hammer. Note that the allowable pile capacities assume flooded conditions, a pile butt elevation of roughly 81 feet below existing  grade, no scour, and include al Factor of Safety of 2i in compression and tension.  TABLE #1  Pile Size/Description 8" tip timber pile 10" square pre-stressed Pile 12" square pre-stressed Pile (*)E Below existing grade. tol be used on the site.  Embedment (") Tension Capacity  Compression Capacity 5.31 tons 9.61 tons 12.8 tons  15' 15' 15'  2.5 tons 4.01 tons 4.8 tons  Field determination of the actual pile capacities developed should be analyzed using a dynamic pile driving formula (i.e. Hiley, WAVE, etc.). This analysis requires knowledge of the piles and pile driving equipment  Embedment depth based on a pile butt elevation of 81 feet below existing grade parameters provided in Table 1 be used for the LPILE Model.:  Based upon the soil conditions encountered ini test boring B-1, we recommend the following on-site soil  TABLE1 FRICTION ANGLE (degrees) 32 28  RETAINING WALL SOIL DESIGNPARAMETERS: - BORING B-1 and B-2  LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS AT REST ACTIVE PASSIVE (Ka) 0.31 0.36  TYPICAL () 0 33 33 40  DEPTH SUBMERGED UNIT  COHESION (psf). 0 0  WEIGHT (pcf) 50 50  (Ko) 0.47 0.53  (Kp) 3.25 2.77    Salt Creek Contech Bridge - Geotechnical Services  Mexico Beach, Florida Page 4of4  Warranty and Limitations of Study  Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either expressed or implied. MEI is not responsible for the independent conclusions, opinions or recommendations made by others based on the field exploration Soil conditions at other locations may differ from those encountered in the test borings, and the passage This report is intended for use by the designers of this project. While we have no objections to it being provided for review by parties to this project, it is not a specification document and is not to be used as a part of the spec(fications. If desired, we can assist in the development of specifications for this project The nature and extent of variation and change in the subsurface conditions at the site may not become evident until the course of construction. Construction monitoring by the geotechnical engineer or his representative is therefore considered necessary to verify the subsurface conditions at the time of construction and to verify the recommendations made in the preparation of this report are properly carried out. If significant variations or changes are in evidence, it may be necessary to reevaluate the Furthermore, if the project characteristics are altered significantly from those discussed in this report, ifthe project information contained in this report is incorrect or if additional information becomes available, a review must be made by this office to determine if any modifications in the recommendations will be We hope this letter provides sufficient informationf nforithepjesent. If you have any questions or comments,  and laboratory test data presented in this report.  of time may cause the soils conditions to change from those described in this report.  based upon our exploration.  recommendations ini this report.  necessary.  please feel free to call. Sincerely,  T. AES ENTS No. 56813 * STATEOF   P.E.  Senior Geotechnical Engineer Floridal Registration: # 56813 Attachments: Figure #1 - Boring Location  H  Figure #2 - Logs of Borings    MEI  MAGNUM ENGINEERINGINC GBOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANIS  BORING LOCATION PLAN  FIGURE #1        MEI  MAGNUM. ENGINEERING INC GBOTBCHNICAL ENGINEERING: CONSULTANIS  LOG OF BORING  FIGURE #2    Magnum Engineering, Inc. Lynn Haven, Florida 32444 Telephone: 850-265-8332  BORING NUMBER B-1  MEI 1026 Pierson Drive CLIENT. Dewbery Inc. PROJECT NUMBER DATE STARTED 2/4/19 DRILLING CONTRACTOR, GeoDrill Tech, LLC DRILLING METHOD Standard Penetration Test (SPT) LOGGEDBY. J. Governale NOTES  PAGE 1 OF 1  PROJECT NAME. Canal Street Contech Bridge PROJECT LOCATION Mexico Beach, FI GROUND ELEVATION GROUNDI WATERI LEVELS: ZDE-TMTOGROUMDMATER. AT TIME OF DRILLING 8.0ft ESTIMATED: SEASONAL HIGH GWT. 8.0ft AFTER DRILLING  COMPLETED 2/4/19 CHECKED BY. J.Vickers  HOLE SIZE 3  ATTERBERG IMITS  MATERIAL DESCRIPTION  Light Gray Silty Fine SAND (SM) Light Gray Fine SAND (SP)  12-18-17- 13 (35) 8-11-10-9 (21) 5-7-10-10 (17) 6-8-12-15 (20) 8-10-12-13 (22)  SS SS SS SS SS  SS  12-17-21 (38) 12-19-25 (44)  SS  20  12-15-17 (32) 10-8-5 (13) 1-1-1 (2) 3-3-3 (6)  25  SS  SS  30  Dark Gray/Green Silty Fine SAND (SM)  SS  35  0  SS  Boring Termination! Depth at4 40.01 feet.    9N 00h  July 26, 2024 Ms. Julie Danaher Deputy City Clerk/Executive Assistant City of Mexico Beach 201 Paradise Path Mexico Beach, Florida 32456  Sent via email to:j dananer@mexicobeacngov.com  RE: MEXICO BEACH SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN TRAIL  DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW ANCHOR PROJECT NO. 2024.03  Dear Ms. Danaher:  As requested, Anchor Consulting Engineering and Inspection, Inc. (Anchor) has reviewed the proposed Mexico Beach Salt Creek Temporary Parking and Pedestrian Trail Development located along Highway 98 and Canal Street in Mexico Beach, FL. Below is a summary of our  review and comments. UTILITY SYSTEM IMPACTS Water System Impacts Wastewater System Impacts STORMWATER REVIEW  There are no water system impacts as water is not proposed in this development. There are no wastewater impacts as wastewater is not proposed in this development.  1. Applicant to provide reasonable assurance that the post-discharge runoff will not create 4. Note: the system does not attenuate the 100-yr, 24-hr event but the Mexico Beach LDRS 5. Note: the geotechnical data is from 2019, Anchor is not aware of any cut-off timeframes for geotechnical data and it likely has not changed much if the existing topography is  a "ponding" situation.  2. Applicant to provide rip-rap dimensions. only requires attenuation oft the 25-yr storm.  3. Applicant to provide runoff curve number calculations for ICPR input.  similar. PLAN REVIEW 1. Parcel ID:  ID #'s: 04101-040-000, 04101-030-000, 04101-075-000 Note: Project is performing construction in US HWY 98 Easement. Please provide documentation from FDOT showing  approvalpermiting for construction.  2. Section/Township' 15-6S-12W  Range    3. Purpose of Application 4. Area 5. Current Use 6. Proposed Use 7. FLU  Construction of a temporary gravel parking lot with associated SWMF and construction of a pedestrian path connecting Mexico Beach Crossings to the temporary parking lot. Tourist Mixed Use per Bay County GIS mapping  1.86 acres Tourist Mixed Use  FLUMap MVAEN inh MNAROR WMAAW" PA  Mavreisosvae  78R0M  Note: Plans indicate a Future Land Use of"AC NON AG", however Bay County GIS indicated a Future Land Use of Tourist Mixed Use. Applicant to confirm FLUV with County.  8. Building Height ($48 feet) 9. Setback- - Front 10. Setback- - Rear 11. Setback- - Side  N/A: No vertical building is proposed N/A: No Vertical Building is proposed N/A: No Vertical Building is proposed N/A: No Vertical Building is proposed  12. Setback- Corner N/A: No Vertical Building is proposed    13. Impervious Surface Requirement Met.  Ration (ISR) (0.70) The Impervious Surface Ratio is the ratio between the parcel  area and impervious surfaces, excluding the stormwater pond. The Parcels are located within Flood Zone X, Flood Zone A, and Flood Zone AE in FIRM Panel No. 12005C0508H. The Note: According to Bay County GIS there are wetlands located within the parcels (Freshwater Emergent Wetlands and Freshwater Forested Shrub Wetlands). If Wetlands are indeed present, this needs to be indicated on DO application. Applicant There is a coastal high hazard area located along Salt Creek, however the portion of this parcel proposed for development is The parcel has existing contours ranging from 1 foot (along Salt Creek) to 14 feet (near Hwy 98). The proposed temporary parking area has existing contours ranging from approximately The parcel contains Centenary Sand, Osier Fine Sand, Rutledge Sand, Arents Sand, Leon Sand, and Hurricane Sand. Proposed project area is composed of Centenary Sand and Note: As referenced in Article 3.02.01 oft the Land Development Regulations - Sidewalk: Sidewalks are to be a minimum width "C.D Design and Construction Standards: Design and construction of sidewalks, bikeways, or other footpaths shall be designed and constructed with pavers or commercial-grade, reinforced concrete with a minimum width of six (6). feet anda a minimum thickness of four (4) inches. In all other regards, the construction shall be in compliance with the standards in the Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways, published by the Note: Article 4.01.06 of the Land Development Regulations - Section A. Required Landscaping & B. Vehicle Use Areas have vehicle use areas. Applicant to provide a landscape plan or justification if this requirement is not met. Note: Article 4.01.06 oft the Land Development Regulations - Section C. Buffer Zones sets standards for buffers between parcels. The neighboring parcel is PI Public/nstitution), which is shown as "compatible" with this zoning oft this parcel in table 4.01.06 of the LDR, therefore no buffer is required. Note: Applicant to confirm no trees are in the project area (reference Article 4.02.07 Section A- Review Procedures For  14. FIRM Panel No, Flood Zone and 15. Wetlands  BFE (ifapplicable) temporary parking area is in Flood Zone X, while portions of the  sidewalk is in Flood Zone AE.  to confirm presence of wetlands. not within the hazard area.  16. Storm Surge Risk The parcels located within storm surge risk areas 1,2,3,4,85.  17. Coastal High Hazard Area 18. Soils/ Contours  21 feet to 11 feet.  Arents Sand, per Bay County GIS.  19. Sidewalks  of6 feet.  Florida Department of Transportation.  20. Required Landscaping & 21. Buffer Zones  Vehicle Use Area standard landscaping requirements and requirements for  22. Tree Protection    Site Development of the Land Development Regulations). Ifany existing trees are in the project area, notate on plans per "As referenced in Article 4.02.07.A - Review Procedures - For The Planning and Zoning Board shall review all site plans for compliance with the preceding Tree Protection Regulations. 1. For submission to the Planning and Zoning Board, the  4.02.07.  Site Development -  developer will denote on site plans:  a. The Primary Tree Protection Area. b. The Secondary Tree Protection Area. The Structure Footprint Area. Mexico Beach Land Development Code May 2019 Page 4-13 d. The location of tree protection zones, as  indicated by barriers.  2. The developer will provide an estimate of total inches of protected trees removed from each Protection Area. From this estimate, the number of replacement trees will be determined." Regulations - Off-Street Parking Standards, D. Spaces for Handicapped Persons: "Any parking area to be used by the general public shall provide suitable, marked spaces for handicapped persons as required by the American National Standards Institute, (ANSI), A117.1, and by Chapter 553, Part V Florida Statutes.' Applicant to confirm this requirement is met or  23. Off-Street Parking Note: As referenced in Article 6.03.00. of the Land Development  Standards  provide justification.  ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS  If the sidewalk being proposed is located within the Highway 98 right-of-way, ensure proper coordination and permitting (if any) is completed with FDOT, Bay County, or any other regulatory  agency.  Please review and respond to comments above in red. Anchor Consulting Engineering and Inspection, Inc.  Pylpe  Emily Thomasee Project Manager 850-215-1285 omassanStAIsIcen  cc: Ms. Elizabeth Moore, President, Anchor emcore@archorelcom,    MKXICOBEACH  FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIV/APPLICATION  Tol be Completed for development (see note) within Mexico Beach Special Flood Hazard Area (est. Ordinance 757) Note: City ofl Mexico Beach Development Code, Amended through. January 11, 2022, Article VI, Section 7.00.02 Definitions, page 7-1:  including: Zones A, AE, AO, AH, VE, or Shaded X flood zones.  Development: is defined as: any oft the following activities:  Any building activity involving any material change in appearance to any structure orl land, a changei int thei intensity ofl land use exclusive ofr normal lot cleaning where no trees or vegetation protected byt the Land Development Codes are removed, or clearing ofland for development purposes and 1. Construction, clearing, filling, excavating, grading, paving, dredging, drilling, or otherwise significantly disturbing the soil ofas site. (Examples: Any parcel ofl land which contains a structure buta also vacant lots such ast those ina a subdivision- such as Casuna or Ocean Plantation- or vacant lots whichl have met the definition of development and have been maintained over time, such ast those along Hwy 2. Building, installing, enlarging, replacing, or substantially: restoring as structure, impervious surface, or water management: system, and  98.)  including thel long-t term storage of materials. 3. Division ofl landi into two or more parcels. Street Address: Canal Parkway/ Hwy 98 Owner Name: The St. Joe Company LLC: Applicant/Contractor: Dewberry Parcel ID: 04101-040-000 Building Permit Application #: n/a Reviewer: K. Simpson  SITE DATA  Date:7/09/2024,7/7A7/2024,7723/2024 Flood Zone/ Base Flood Elevation: AE & ShadedX Owner Phone Number: 850-571-1199 Applicant/Contractor Phone Number:  Description: Temporary Parking Lot and Walking Path  Type of Review Requested: Property Description:  CLOMR/LOMR Preliminary Plat OPUD Development Order OFinal Plat OPlacement of Fill  Vacant Lot Existing Structure Existing Drainage Features Seaward of the CCCL  DEVELOPMENT DATA Type of Development (Description):  Vacant Lot: (Check all that apply)  Filling  Grading  Excavation  ONew Construction  Fill Type and Source Proposed: Silty fine sand  Fill Volume Proposed: 1,9390 CY of fill for entire work area, Cut 595 CY for stormwater pond= 1,3440 CY of total fill  Fill Depth Proposed: "1-"2' Compaction Specs provided? Yes    MIXJCOBEACH  FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/APPLICATION  Vallowable =1ft depth over constructionarea: = 1.15 acres of construction area =50,094: sq.ft./ /27=1,855 CY allowable  fill  Sq.FtofCnstruction. Area or Parcel *1'/27CY= allowable CY  10-14 CYA per truckload  595 CY of stormwater storage provided. Highest Adjacent Grade Current:"5'-6 Lowest Adjacent Grade Current: "3'  Proposed Finished Grade: "7' Proposed Finished Grade: "4'  New Construction: No vertical construction at this time.  Commercial  Residential OMain Structure DAccessory Structure  Elevation of Top of the Bottom Floor: Elevation of Top of the Next Higher Floor:  Elevation of Mechanical, Electrical Equipment servicing the building: Elevation of highest point along roadway adjacent to property (shaded X only):  Enclosure. Area Below BFE (Sq. Ft.):  Ground Floor Enclosure breakaway walls? (v zone and seaward of CCCL) OYes ONo Ifyes are they free of electrical,  mechanical, and plumbing equipment? DYes ONo Flood Proofing (JWet/0 Dry) Flood Opening Net Area (Sq. In.): FDEP approved plans provided (Seaward of CCCL only)? Elevation of Lowest Horizontal Member (Seaward of CCCLO only): Has V-zone certification been provided? (V-zone only)  Does structure comply with Scour-resistant construction methods for foundation? (V zone only) DYes ONo  Breakaway walls & Slab:  Existing Structure: DRepairs/ Remodel Total Cost of Improvement repair/remodel): Present Market Value of Structure Only: Determination of Percent of Improvement:  Addition  Enclosure within Existing  Attach Contract of Proposed Improvements (scope of work with corresponding cost):  2    MEXICOBEACH Structure Data: BFE:  FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMITV/APUICATION  First Floor Elevation:  Highest Adjacent Grade (finished):  Permit Approval/ Denial: Determination: ONo Floodplain Permit Required Or  Approved. As Is  DApproved with Comments DDenied  OMore Information Required (check all that apply):  DArchitectural Plans OStructural Plans OSite Plan OGrading Plan DElevation Certificate Reviewer Comments/Notes:  Requested type and amount of fill and compaction specs. - Provided 7/22/2024  Approved 7/23/2024.  (Permit Reviewer Signature)  KI82  (Floodplain Administrator Signature)  THIS PERMIT IS USED WITHTHE CONDITION THAT THE DEVELOPER/OWNER WILL PROVIDE CERTIFICATION BYA REGISTERED ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR OF THE "AS-BUILT" LOWEST FLOOR (INCLUDING BASEMENT) ELEVATION OF ANYI NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVED BUILDING COVERED BY1 THIS PERMI  3    SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING  STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT  Prepared for:  THE ST.JOE COMPANY 130 RICHARD JACKSON BLVD PANAMA CITY BEACH, FL 32407  Prepared By: Dewberry  JUNE 2024  PROJECT NO. 50169273 DEWBERRY 203 ABERDEEN PARKWAY PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA 32405 PHONE: 850.522.0644/FAX: 850.522.1011    Professional Engineer's Certification  Ihereby certify that I am a Licensed Professional Engineer ini the State of Florida practicing with Dewberry and that Ihave supervised the preparation of and approve the evaluations, findings,  opinions, conclusions, and technical advicel hereby reported for:  Project:  Salt Creek' Temporary Parking and Pedestrian Facility  Stormwater Management Report Dewberry Project No. 50169273 Mexico Beach, FL32410 Digitally signed by Date: 2024.06.27 10:36:11 -05'00'  Location:  Christoph Christopher Shortt  TATE LORID!  er Shortt  Christopher Shortt, P.E. Project Manager Licensel No. 78424  Date  Dewberry    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Stormwater Management Report Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  TABLE OF CONTENTS  Report  1. Introduction 2. Stormwater Management Overview. 3. Stormwater Modeling Techniques.. 4. Design Criteria. 5. Geotechnical Information. 6. Post Development Treatment Analysis 7. Treatment Volume Criteria.. 8. Attenuation/Staging Criteria. 9. Erosion Control 10. Conclusions Supporting Documentation EXHIBITI 1- GIS EXHIBITS EXHIBIT2 - NRCS SOILS MAP EXHIBIT: 3 - SWMF CALCS EXHIBIT 4 - ICPR INPUT DATA AND RESULTS EXHIBIT5- - DRAINAGE BASIN MAPS  2-3 4-5 5-6  EXHIBIT 6- GEOTECHNICAL REPORT/HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ANALYSIS EXHIBIT7- STORMWATER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN  Dewberry    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Stormwater Management Report Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  ENGINEER'S NARRATIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING MEXICO BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NO. 50169273  INTRODUCTION  The proposed Salt Creek Temporary Parking project involves the addition of a temporary gravel parking lot which will include one (1)dry retention stormwater management facility (SWMF). This project is located in Mexico Beach/Bay County on Canal Parkway, south of US Hwy 98. Please see Exhibit 1 for the project location map and other GIS exhibits.  Parcels: 04101-040-000  The total contributing area of the SWMF #1 drainage basin is 1.60-ac, which includes 1.15-ac of disturbed limits on the referenced parcel. There are no wetland impacts  proposed in this project.  STORMWATER MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW  Pre-Developed Conditions  The existing conditions of the project site includes partially developed land with impervious areas and undeveloped land with sandy soils. The project area is comprised of soils from Hydrologic Soil Group A, which correlates to low runoff potential. Based on the existing topography of the site, in the pre-development conditions, all 1.60 acres oft the stormwater runoff discharges via sheet flow to the west of the project site. Please see Exhibit 5 for the Pre-Development Basin Map and Exhibit 2 for the NRCS Web Soil Survey data.  Post-Development Conditions  Stormwater runoff from the proposed site will overland sheet flow from the proposed gravel parking lot to the proposed dry retention stormwater management facility (SWMF #1). SWMF #1 will discharge via a 3.5-ft broad crested rectangular weir to the pre- development flow location west of the site. The runoff from the contributing basin (1.60- ac) will be treated and attenuated per City of Mexico Beach and NWFWMD standards before iti is discharged. SWMF #1 will also be designed to percolate the required treatment volume as defined in the ERP Applicant Handbook Volume II, Section 5.2 Please see The developments owner will be responsible for the maintenance of the proposed dry retention stormwater management facility. A copy of the stormwater operation and  Exhibit 5 for the Post-Development Basin Map.  maintenance plan is included in Exhibit 7 of this report.    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Stormwater Management Report Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  STORMWATER MODELING TECHNIQUES  Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing (ICPR version 4.05.02) was used as the stormwater management facility (SWMF) modeling software. This program has been accepted by numerous regulatory agencies across Florida and is accepted by FEMA for Flood Insurance projects. ICPR uses a link-node concept in conjunction with the basin data to idealize real-world systems. A node is a discrete location in the drainage system where conservation of mass or continuity is maintained. Links are the connections between nodes and are used to transfer or convey water through the drainage conveyance system. The input data, network diagram, and node maximum conditions  (maximum stage elevation) are included with this report.  DESIGN CRITERIA Water Quality:  The proposed dry retention stormwater management facility has been designed toj provide treatment for the first half inch (1/2") of rainfall over the basin or the runoff caused by one inch (1") of rainfall over the basin whichever was determined to be greater.  Flood Attenuation:  The proposed site will capture the stormwater in a dry retention facility and will discharge at a controlled rate once water quality criteria is met. ERP flood attenuation criteria will be required since the site is being developed to greater than 50% impervious surface. The proposed site will meet the Bay County flood attenuation criteria by attenuating the required 2-year/24-hour SCS III and the 25-year and 100-year critical duration storm events. The SWMF was also designed to attenuate the 25-year/24-hour storm event per  The City of Mexico Beach requirements. GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION Seasonal High Groundwater Determination  Geotechnical information was provided by Magnum Engineering, Inc. on February 19, 2019, to determine the seasonal high water table elevations and subsurface conditions for the subject project area. A copy oft the Geotechnical Report is included in Exhibit 6 oft this report. This geotechnical report contains information needed in the design of the stormwater management facilities. As part of the geotechnical services, one 40-foot deep Standard Penetration Test (SPT) was performed. This boring is located on the southeast comer of the project area. The location of this boring is marked on the boring location map Based on the enclosed geotechnical information, the groundwater table was encountered at roughly 8.00-ft below existing grade on the project site during a period of normal seasonal rainfall. The seasonal high groundwater table (SHGWT) was estimated to be at 8.00-ft below grade at boring B-1, which is southeast of the location of the location of the dry retention pond. The basin bottom elevation of the dry retention pond is approximately  included in the attached geotechnical report.    Salt Creek" Temporary Parking Stormwater Management Report Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  6.00-ft lower than thel location of the boring, so it is reasonably inferred the SHWT for the location of the pond is 2.00-ft. The existing elevation of B-1 is 9.90'. Based onthese findings and the existing grades at the boring locations, the SHGWT elevation fort the pond  is2 2.00-ft, which will be used in the SWMF design and calculations.  Hydraulic Conductivity Analysis  Hydraulic conductivity rates for this project were determined using the USGS Web Soil Survey. The Web Soil Survey measures Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (KSAT), which is how water will be transmitted in saturated soils (i.e. pond bottom). These rates are based on the soils structure, porosity, and texture. For this project's area of interest, the KSAT values were measured at 91.74 micrometers/secon, which converts to 26.54 feet/day. Given that this measurement comes from Web Soil Survey, we will be using a factor of safety of 4 for the SWMF's percolation, which results in 6.641 feet/day of hydraulic  conductivity.  POST DEVELOPMENT TREATMENT ANALYSIS  As previously stated, the stormwater runoff from the site will be treated and attenuated by one (1)dryretention: stormwater management facility. A portion of the site will be collected and conveyed to the SWMF by overland flow. The site will be appropriately graded to allow for overland sheet flow of stormwater runoff to the proposed stormwater  management facility. Treatment Volume Criteria  Based on dry retention requirements the runoff from one inch (1") of rainfall was determined to be the higher retainment volume. The required treatment volume  calculation is shown below:  1ft 12in  TVreqd = 1.60 ac x 43560/E x1.0in x  x 0.73 =4 4,238ft3  ac  The designed pond is modeled to percolate and fully recover more than the required treatment volume within 72 hours per the ERP Applicant Handbook, Volume II, Section 5.3 requirement. By setting the treatment volume elevation to 4.9166-ft, this allows for a provided treatment volume of 8,447 ft3. The bottom of the designed SWMF is set at elevation/stage 4.00-ft, providing 2 feet of separation between the bottom of the pond and the SHGWT. A condensed recovery timetable is provided below (see ICPR report for full  time-series table): Time Stage Total Vol (ft3)  (hrs) 0.00 1.00 1.75 (ft) 4.92 4.64 4.43  2.00 4.36  3.00 24.00 72.00 4.18 4.00 4.00  0  2,667 4,580 5,209 6,803 8,357 8,357    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Stormwater Management Report Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  Based on the results provided by the ICPR analysis, the required treatment volume will be recovered in 1.75 hours. Please see Exhibit 3 for our dry retention pond calculations and  Exhibit 4 for the full ICPRresults. Attenuation/staging Criteria  The designed dry detention facility will discharge at a controlled rate once treatment volume criteria is met via a 3.5-ft broad crested rectangular weir. Shown below is a pre-  development VS. post-development runoff rates table.  Storm Event 002 YR - 024 HR 2.79 (SCSIII) 025 YR- 001 HR 2.41 025 YR- 002 HR 025 YR- 004 HR 2.07 025 YR - 008 HR 2.70 025 YR - 024 HR 100 YR - 001 HR 100 YR - 002 HR 100 YR- 004 HR 100 YR - 008 HR 100 YR- 024 HR  Pre-Development Post-Development Maximum Staging  Runoff Rates (cfs) Runoff Rates (cfs)  (ft)  0.60 1.49 1.58 1.67 2.12 1.05 3.27 3.32 2.99 3.74 1.61  5.07 5.20 5.21 5.22 5.27 5.14 5.39 5.39 5.36 5.43 5.21  2.50 1.07 3.85 3.95 3.02 3.83 1.50  Dry Stormwater Management Facility Data Table  Top of Bank Elevation: 5.501 ft NAVD88 Pond Bottom Elevation: 4.001 ft NAVD88 Req'd Treatment Volume: 4,238f3 Provided Treatment Volume: 8,447ft ft3  Dry Retention Pond  Weir Invert Elev.: 4.9167 ft NAVD88 Recovery Time: 1.75 hours  Max Pond Stage Elevation: 5.43 T ft NAVD88 (100yr-8hr)  Please reference Exhibit 4 for all modeling inputs and results.  EROSION CONTROL  Best Management Practices for erosion control measures will be utilized throughout the construction phase of this project to protect the existing conditions and to restrict any turbid runoff from entering or leaving the construction site. Temporary stabilization may be utilized as determined necessary. All drainage inlets shall be protected utilizing inlet sediment barriers. Installation details for silt fences, tree barriers and hay bales, where    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Stormwater Management Report Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  applicable, are included within this permit application. Please see the Erosion Control  Plans in the plan set for specific detail.  CONCLUSIONS following requirements: FDEP NPDES  The design of the stormwater management system for this project complies with the  BMP erosion control measures will be utilized throughout the construction phase of this project to restrict any turbid runoff from entering or leaving the construction site. It is the Contractor's responsibility to obtain the NPDES permit and provide appropriate permit administration. Installation details for silt fences and inlet sediment barriers, where applicable, are included within this permit application.  NWFWMD  The development exceeds the ERP requirement for treatment of the runoff from The proposed design meets the ERP recovery requirement of a 72-hour volume The proposed design meets the ERP attenuation requirements of the 2-year/24- hour SCS III, and the 25- and 100-year critical storm duration events.  one inch (1")ofr rainfall over the basin.  retainment recovery.  City of Mexico Beach  The development meets The City of Mexico Beach treatment volume requirement for treatment of the first one inch (1") of runoff from the contributing drainage The proposed design meets The City of Mexico Beach attenuation requirement of  basin.  the 25-year/24-hour storm event.  Ins summary, the design of the proposed stormwater management facility for this project exceeds ERP, and city of Mexico Beach requirements for stormwater pollution  abatement and attenuation.    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  June 2024  EXHIBIT 1 GIS EXHIBITS    98  PROJECT SITE  CANAL PKWY  Bay County, FL, State.f Florida, Maxar, Microsoft  AERIAL PHOTO MAP SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITY MEXICO BEACH, FLORIDA  N W  Scale: NTS Job No.: 50169273 Date: 2024.02.05 Exhibit:  Dewberry Dewberry Engineers Inc. 203 Aberdeen Parkway Panama City, FL 32405 850.571.1182 Ph:  1    PARCEL# 07674-030-000  PROJECT SITE  PARCEL# 04101-040-000  an L  PARCEL# 04101-010-000  JI PARCEL# 04752-000-000  EEILA PARCEL# 04751-000-000  PARCEL# 04101-050-000  County of Bay. Esri, HERE, Garmin.-INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS  Dewberry Dewberry Engineers Inc. 203 Aberdeen Parkway Panama City, FL 32405 Ph: 850.571.1182  PARCEL MAP SALT CREEK TEMPORARY PARKING AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITY MEXICO BEACH, FLORIDA  N W  S  Scale: NTS Job No.; 50169273 Date: 2024.02.05 Exhibit:  2    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  June 2024  EXHIBIT 2 NRCS SOILS MAP    OPLMIEE OELHIEE OLMEE OLZMEE OOZMEE OBPMEE  C9PIEE  OB9MIEE 019MIEE  M.SPSZ.S8  M.TSSLaSB  OVLIEE OELMEE  OQMEE  OBOVIEE  0I9MEE    df  N de 080  <8.808. NN  -    Hydrologic Soil Group--Bay County, Florida  bndy  Hydrologic Soil Group  Map unit symbol 26 29 31 40  Map unit name Centenary sand, Oto5 A percent slopes Rutlege sand, Oto2 A/D percent slopes Osier fine sand Arents, Oto 5 percent A slopes  Rating  Acresi in AOI  Percent of AOI  1.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.6  68.4% 1.6% 0.3% 29.7% 100.0%  A/D  Totals for Area ofl Interest  Description  Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to ther rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having al high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having al layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have al high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate ofv water transmission. Ifa soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), thet first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.  precipitation from long-duration storms.  transmission.  water transmission.  USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service  Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey  2/6/2024 Page 3of4    Hydrologic Soil Group--Bay County, Florida  bndy  Rating Options  Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher  USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service  Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey  2/6/2024 Page 4of4    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  June 2024  EXHIBIT 3  SWMF CALCULATIONS    2ee    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  June 2024  EXHIBIT 4  ICPR INPUT DATA AND RESULTS    Salt Creek Temp. Parking  ICPRI INPUT DATA8 & RESULTS Dewberry Project Number: 50169273  (June 2024) Node Diagram  Raster Legend OFFSITE SWMF  UNCAPTURED    ConductMtys  20242:231P 407.05  AunDa/Tme W10m422 OM407aS  bas  60.0000  Energy    0000  OOR  RunDab  OSOR n2 hergy  CondudMiyset  Program  OSOR  Energy  5.0000  OR 7.08    13A2 Braryy  me 24.00  OCOSOR 1R2 Eneryy  DOPR3  RunDa    Canducvtyset Laslages  DOSOR  Hour  PR3  00000  0000  JOR3    nergy Bnergy  Commet  Con  QOOR DOOR    vids) 079 aa 00000 B 00 07 000 072 050 aa1 as on 000 07  Cam  DeE Sage nfowlds) Gvfonida 41 400 00000 as 00 14 410 400 00000 158 0.00 410 400 00000 410 400 410 400 40  025-002 025-004  Ij 27 00000 241 000 00 0000 250 000 00000 207 0.00 270 000 107 C0 355 GDO 00000 195 aoo 302 000 000  000  000 000 000  agea 100-024  00000    1DI Nodes- Volume NodeName  Relative Time [hrs  Stagefy  jotalOutiow Volume ft3)  SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF  0.0000 0.2511 0.5016 0.7517 1.0025 1.2501 1.5000 1.7517 2.0034 2.2520 2.5049 2.7507 3.0053 3.2551 3.5033 3.7519 4.0033 4.2587 4.5060 4.7566 5.0011 5.2548 5.5164 5.7664 6.0164 6.2664 6.5164 6.7664 7.0164 7.2664 7.5164 7.7664 8.0164 8.2664 8.5164 8.7664 9.0164 9.2664 9.5164 9.7664 10.0164 10.2664  4.92 4.85 4.78 4.71 4.64 4.57 4.50 4.43 4.36 4.30 4.26 4.22 4.18 4.15 4.12 4.10 4.07 4.05 4.03 4.01 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00  0 680 1350 2011 2666 3306 3945 4580 5209 5720 6135 6485 6803 7078 7322 7543 7744 7932 8098 8255 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 6/10/202415:20  CMMOaw.samcaa Recovery- DrawdowniSalt Creek Recoveryl ICPRI    1DI Nodes Volume NodeName  2  RelativeT imeIhrs)  Stageft  Total Outfiow VolumeTits)  SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF  10.5164 10.7664 11.0164 11.2664 11.5164 11.7664 12.0164 12.2664 12.5164 12.7664 13.0164 13.2664 13.5164 13.7664 14.0164 14.2664 14.5164 14.7664 15.0164 15.2664 15.5164 15.7664 16.0164 16.2664 16.5164 16.7664 17.0164 17.2664 17.5164 17.7664 18.0164 18.2664 18.5164 18.7664 19.0164 19.2664 19.5164 19.7664 20.0164 20.2664 20.5164 20.7664  4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00  8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 6/10/20241 15:20  CMAemaOAySHCe Recovery DrawdownSait Creek Recovery! ICPRI    1DI Nodes- Volume Nodel Name  3  Relativel Tmefhs!  Stagelf  IoaOutfowVolumel [3)  SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF  21.0164 21.2664 21.5164 21.7664 22.0164 22.2664 22.5164 22.7664 23.0164 23.2664 23.5164 23.7664 24.0164 24.2664 24.5164 24.7664 25.0164 25.2664 25.5164 25.7664 26.0164 26.2664 26.5164 26.7664 27.0164 27.2664 27.5164 27.7664 28.0164 28.2664 28.5164 28.7664 29.0164 29.2664 29.5164 29.7664 30.0164 30.2664 30.5164 30.7664 31.0164 31.2664  4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00  8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357] 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357] 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 6/10/20241 15:20  Caemsaisswoal Recovery- DrawdowniSalt Creek Recovery! ICPRI    1DI Nodes Volume Node Name  RelativeT Fmehrsl  Stagef  Taaomowyaumeltg  SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF  31.5164 31.7664 32.0164 32.2664 32.5164 32.7664 33.0164 33.2664 33.5164 33.7664 34.0164 34.2664 34.5164 34.7664 35.0164 35.2664 35.5164 35.7664 36.0164 36.2664 36.5164 36.7664 37.0164 37.2664 37.5164 37.7664 38.0164 38.2664 38.5164 38.7664 39.0164 39.2664 39.5164 39.7664 40.0164 40.2664 40.5164 40.7664 41.0164 41.2664 41.5164 41.7664  4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00  8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 6/10/20241 15:20  CUermCaNsySaCw Recovery- DrawdownSalt CreekF Recoveryl ICPRI    1DI Nodes- Volume NodeName  5  Relative Timel Ihrsl  Stage   IQa0atlowyolumeit  SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF  42.0164 42.2664 42.5164 42.7664 43.0164 43.2664 43.5164 43.7664 44.0164 44.2664 44.5164 44.7664 45.0164 45.2664 45.5164 45.7664 46.0164 46.2664 46.5164 46.7664 47.0164 47.2664 47.5164 47.7664 48.0164 48.2664 48.5164 48.7664 49.0164 49.2664 49.5164 49.7664 50.0164 50.2664 50.5164 50.7664 51.0164 51.2664 51.5164 51.7664 52.0164 52.2664  4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00  8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 6/10/20241 15:20  CUerCMNySaCn Recovery- DrawdowniSalt Creek Recovery ICPRI    1DI Nodes- Volume NodeName  6  Relativel Tme[hrs  Stagef  TotalOutlow Volume [ft3]  SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF  52.5164 52.7664 53.0164 53.2664 53.5164 53.7664 54.0164 54.2664 54.5164 54.7664 55.0164 55.2664 55.5164 55.7664 56.0164 56.2664 56.5164 56.7664 57.0164 57.2664 57.5164 57.7664 58.0164 58.2664 58.5164 58.7664 59.0164 59.2664 59.5164 59.7664 60.0164 60.2664 60.5164 60.7664 61.0164 61.2664 61.5164 61.7664 62.0164 62.2664 62.5164 62.7664  4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00! 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00  8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357] 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357] 8357] 6/10/202415:20  CAlemewenDaks,5an Creek Recovery DrawdowniSalt Creek Recoveryl ICPRI    1DI Nodes- Volume NodeName  Relativel Fime Ihrsl  Stage  lomOuow.ydumel [sj  SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF SWMF  63.0164 63.2664 63.5164 63.7664 64.0164 64.2664 64.5164 64.7664 65.0164 65.2664 65.5164 65.7664 66.0164 66.2664 66.5164 66.7664 67.0164 67.2664 67.5164 67.7664 68.0164 68.2664 68.5164 68.7664 69.0164 69.2664 69.5164 69.7664 70.0164 70.2664 70.5164 70.7664 71.0164 71.2664 71.5164 71.7664 72.0164  4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00  8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357 8357] 8357 8357  CNm-mmOaNysaGaN Recovery- DrawdowniSalt Creek Recovery! ICPRI  6/10/202415:20    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  June 2024  EXHIBIT 5  DRAINAGE BASIN MAPS    SNVA33 AB NISVE/ A3038d OMONISVES  ONV dWEI  ors    SNVA33: AB NISVBA  ONIMHVdE dW31X M338D1 ITVS ors ELZ69LOSL3 (s3    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  June 2024  EXHIBIT 6  GEOTECHNICAL REPORT/HYDRAULIC  CONDUCTMVITY ANALYSIS    MEI  MAGAUMENGINEKNGING GBOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS  GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT  SALT CREEK CONTECH BRIDGE MEXICO BEACH, FLORIDA  PREPARED FOR: MRS. DINA BAUTISTA, P.E. 324 MARINA DRIVE PORT ST. JOE, FLORIDA 32456  1026 PIERSON DRIVE LYNN HAVEN, FLORIDA32444 TELEPHONE (850) 258.0994    MEI  MAGNUM. ENGINEERINGINC GBOTBCHNICAL ENGINEERING: CONSULTANTS  February 19, 2019 Mr. Dinal Bautista, P.E. 324 Marinal Drive Port St. Joe, Florida 32456  SUBJECT: Salt Creek Contech Bridge Geotechnical Services  Mexico Beach, Florida Project Number: M119-106-089  Dear Mrs. Bautista:  This letter forwards the results of our Geotechnical exploration for the proposed Contech bridge across Salt Creek in Mexico Beach, FI. The subsurface exploration was conducted to provide information needed in the design of an effective foundation system. The following report presents the results of our study as well as our evaluation and recommendations pertaining to the geotechnical aspects of the project.  Project Information  The subject site is located south of US highway 98 on Canal Parkway where the Salt Creek meets Mexico Beach Canal in Mexico Beach, Florida. At the time of our exploration, the existing culvert had been completely blown out by! Hurricane Michael, preventing vehicular traffic to the west side of Canal Parkway. Based on visual observations, the invert elevation of the creek is roughly 10 feet below existing street Itis our understanding that there will be a connecting conspan bridge on either timber or concrete piling to replace the destroyed bridge on. At the writing of this report no structural information had been provided. Our exploration consisted of One (1) 40-feet deep Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings on the east side of the proposed abutment. Due to inaccessibility to the west side, only one boring was performed. Upon completion of our field testing, the samples were brought back to the office for visual inspection, If any of the above information is incorrect, please inform Magnum Engineering, Inc. (MEI) so that we can  grade.  classification, and analysis by our engineering staff. review and update our recommendations, as needed.  Subsurface Conditions  Figure #1 show the Boring Location Plan and Figure #2 shows the Log of Boring for Standard Penetration Test boring B-1. The test location was established in the field using a 100 foot tape and estimating right angles with reference to existing landmarks, thus, the test location should be considered approximate. Boring B-1 generally encountered medium dense to dense silty fine sands and clean fine sands from the ground surface to roughly 33 feet below existing grade underlain by very loose to loose silty fines sands to  Soil Conditions  the boring termination depth of 40f feet below existing grade.    Salt Creem Contech Bridge - Geotechnical Services  Mexico Beach, Florida Page 2 of4  The above subsurface descriptions are of a generalized nature, provided to highlight the major soil strata encountered. The Logs of Boring should be reviewed for specific subsurface conditions at each boring location. The stratfications shown on the Logs of Boring represent the subsurface conditions at the actual boring locations only, and variations in the subsurface conditions can and may occur between boring locations and should therefore be expected. The stratifications represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials, and the transitions between strata may be gradual. Please refer to the attached Logs of Borings presented as Figure #2 for a detailed description of the subsurface conditions  encountered. Groundwater Conditions  Groundwater was encountered roughly 8.0 feet below existing grade at the time of drilling (February 4, 2019), which was during a period of slightly above normal seasonal rainfall. Groundwater levels will fluctuate with rainfall and tidal influences, and could vary several feet during typical seasonal fluctuations. Larger fluctuations are possible under severe weather conditions. We recommend that the Contractor verify the actual groundwater levels at the time of construction to determine potential impacts groundwater  will have on construction procedures.  CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS  General  The following geotechnical related design recommendations have been developed on the basis of the previously described project characteristics and subsurface conditions encountered. Ift there are any changes int these project criteria, including project location on the site, a review should be made by! MEI to determine if Once final design plans and specifications are available, a general review by MEI is required as a means to confirm the evaluations and recommendations made in preparation of this report are correct and that the earthwork, stormwater and foundation recommendations are properly interpreted and implemented.  modifications to the recommendations are warranted.  Site Preparation  The site should be cleared and grubbed of surface vegetationorganics. As a minimum, it is recommended The subgrade soils should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557)  the clearing operations extend at least fivet feet beyond the development perimeters. maximum dry density to a depth of 12 inches below thei floor slab bottom.  Engineered Fill  All fill used to raise thet foundation area toi final grades should consist of sandy soils with less than 15 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. These soils should be free of rubble, organics, clay, debris and other unsuitable material. Fill should be placed in lifts on the order of 12i inches or less (in loose thickness) and compacted to  95 percent of the soil's Modifies Proctor maximum dry density, per ASTM D-1557.    Salt Creek Contech Bridge Geotechnical Services  Mexico Beach, Florida Page 3of4 Pile Foundations  The test borings encountered suitable subsurface conditions for founding the proposed structure on 8-inch tip timber piling. We have also included both 10-inch square and 12-inch square pre-stressed concrete pile capacities. Table #1 below shows allowable pile capacities for an 8-inch tip timber pile, 10-inch square concrete pile, and 12-inch square concrete piles jetted to 51 feet below existing grade, then driven tob bearing approximately 15 feet below existing grade with an approved pile driving hammer. Note that the allowable pile capacities assume flooded conditions, a pile butt elevation of roughly 81 feet below existing  grade, no scour, and include al Factor of Safety of 2 in compression and tension.  TABLE# #1  Pile Size/Description 8" tip timber pile 10" square pre-stressed Pile 12" square pre-stressed Pile () Below existing grade. to be used on the site.  Embedment) Tension Capacity  Compression Capacity 5.31 tons 9.61 tons 12.81 tons  15' 15' 15'  2.5 tons 4.01 tons 4.8 tons  Field determination of the actual pile capacities developed should be analyzed using a dynamic pile driving formula (i.e. Hiley, WAVE, etc.). This analysis requires knowledge of the piles and pile driving equipment  Embedment depth based on a pile butt elevation of 81 feet below existing grade parameters provided in Table 1 be used for the LPILE Model.:  Based upon the soil conditions encountered in test boring B-1, we recommend the following on-site soil  TABLE1 FRICTION ANGLE (degrees) 32 28  RETAINING WALL SOIL DESIGN PARAMETERS- - BORING B-1 and B-2  TYPICAL (ft) 0 33 33 40  LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS AT REST ACTIVE PASSIVE (Ka) 0.31 0.36  DEPTH SUBMERGED UNIT  COHESION (psf) 0 0  WEIGHT (pcf) 50 50  (Ko) 0.47 0.53  (Kp) 3.25 2.77    Salt Creek Contech Bridge Geotechnical Services  Mexico Beach, Florida Page 4of4  Warranty and Limitations of Study  Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations. prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either expressed or implied. MEI is not responsible for the independent conclusions, opinions or recommendations made by others based on the field exploration Soil conditions at other locations may differ from those encountered in the test borings, and the passage This report is intended for use by the designers of this project. While we have no objections to it being provided for review by parties to this project, it is not a specification document and is not to be used as a part of the specifications. If desired, we can assist in the development of specifications for this project The nature and extent of variation and change in the subsurface conditions at the site may not become evident until the course of construction. Construction monitoring by the geotechnical engineer or his representative is therefore considered necessary to verify the subsurface conditions at the time of construction and to verify the recommendations. made in the preparation oft this report are properly carried out. If significant variations or changes are in evidence, it may be necessary to reevaluate the Furthermore, if the project characteristics are altered significantly from those discussed in this report, if the project information contained in this report is incorrect or if additional information becomes available, a review must be made by this office to determine if any modifications in the recommendations will be We hope this letter provides sufficient mbomatgntamtappsent If you have any questions or comments,  and laboratory test data presented in this report.  of time may cause the soils conditions to change from those described in this report.  based upon our exploration.  recommendations in this report.  necessary.  please feel free to call. Sincerely, MAGNUM  AES SN No. 56813 STATEOF & FLORIDE MINSIONAL ENGI  ENGINEERING_INC.  Senior Geotechnical Engineer Registration  Florida  # 56813  H  Attachments: Figure #1 - Boring Location Platum  Figure #2 -L Logs of Borings    MEI  MAGNUM ENGINEERINGINC GBOTECHNICAL ENGINBERING: CONSULTANTS  BORING LOCATION PLAN  FIGURE #1        MEI  MAGNUMENGINERANG INC GBOTBCHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS  LOG OF BORING  FIGURE #2    Engineering, Inc. 1026 Pierson Drive Lynn! Haven, Florida: 32444 Telephone: 850-265-8332  BORING NUMBER B-1  PAGE 1 OF 1  MEIE CLIENT Dewbery Inc. PROJECT NUMBER. DATE STARTED 2/4/19 DRILLING CONTRACTOR, GeoDrill Tech, LLC DRILLING METHOD. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) LOGGED BY. J. Governale NOTES  PROJECT NAME Canal Street Contech Bridge PROJECTI LOCATION Mexico Beach, FI GROUNDI ELEVATION, GROUND WATER LEVELS: DEPTH1 TO GROUNDWATER. AT1 TIME OF DRILUING 8.0ft ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH GWT. 8.0ft AFTER DRILLING  COMPLETED 2/4/19 CHECKED BY. J.Vickers  HOLE SIZE 3  ATTERBERG LIMITS  MATERIAL DESCRIPTION  Light Gray Silty Fine SAND (SM) Light Gray Fine SAND (SP)  12-18-17- 13 (35) 8-11-10-9 (21) 5-7-10-10 (17) 6-8-12-15 (20) 8-10-12-13 (22)  SS SS SS SS SS  SS  12-17-21 (38) 12-19-25 (44) 12-15-17 (32) 10-8-5 (13) 1-1-1 (2) 3-3-3 (6)  - SS  20  SS  25  SS  30  Dark Gray/Green Silty Fine SAND (SM)  35  X SS  ss X  40  Boring Termination Depth at4 40.0feet.    Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat)-E Bay County, Florida  (SWMF Area) 651445 -  51418  651427  651436  651454 -  651463  295714'N  26  -  SofMapmayt motbe Validatt fhisiscalen  295 5712'N  29°5712'N 651472  651418  651427  661436  651445  651454 Meters 30 Feet 90  651463  MapScale: 355fprtdonAporas: (85'x11)sheet  60 Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey  Mapprojection: WebN Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edgetis: UTMZ Zonei 16NWGS84  JSDA Natural Resources Conservation Service  2/28/2024 Page 1of3        Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat)-Bay County, Florida  SWMF Area  Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat)  Map unit symbol 26 29 40  Map unit name Rating micrometers Centenary sand, Oto5 86.1086 percent slopes Rutlege sand, Oto2 91.7400 percent slopes Arents, Oto 5 percent 247.0000 slopes  Acres in AOI  Percent of AOI  per second)  0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2  92.7% 2.7% 4.6% 100.0%  Totals for Area ofl Interest  Description  Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) refers to the ease with which pores in a saturated soil transmit water. The estimates are expressed in terms of micrometers per second. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is considered in the design of soil drainage systems and septic tank absorption Fore each soil layer, this attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. Al low value and al high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A "representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component. For this soil property, only the representative valuei is The numeric Ksat values have been grouped according to standard Ksat class  fields.  used. limits.  Rating Options  Units of Measure: micrometers per second Aggregation Method: Dominant Component Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Fastest Interpret Nulls as Zero: No  Layer Options (Horizon Aggregation Method): AII Layers (Weighted Average)  SDA Natural Resources Conservation Service  Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey  2/28/2024 Page3of3    Salt Creek Temporary Parking Dewberry Project No.: 50169273  June 2024  EXHIBIT 7  SWMF OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN    STORMWATER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCEP PLAN  The entity responsible for the contained Operation and Maintenance Plan is TheSt.J Joe  Company  AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT  1. 2. 3.  Pavement Areas - Clean/sweep debris and dirt from pavement areas. Sediments in retention/ detention areas Removed immediately Debris ini retention detention areas All debris and foreign material shall be 4. Yard Inlets, Catch Basins, etc. All debris and foreign materials shall be removed  removed immediately immediately  PERIODIC PONDISYSTEMI MAINTENANCE  1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.  Cleaning/ Sweeping of pavement areas shall be accomplished weekly or as Inspect pond periodically for accumulation of trash and debris and remove it upon Mowing and landscaping maintenance should be done on a monthly basis during the active growing season for this area. Inspect and maintain as required during Weeds or undesirable growth shall be removed upon discovery. Catch basins shall be flushed as necessary (ifany). The Owner shall re-grade and re-stabilize swale/ retention detention areas as required to maintain the approved design, cross-section. liner and grade. Remove sediment from pond when accumulation reaches four (4) inches.  required. discovery.  the growing season.  Measure accumulation once a year.  INSPECTIONS  1. A mamtenance inspection must be performed at minimum every fifth year by a 2. The maintenance inspection must be documented on the FDEP and or NWFWMD The inspection must be signed, sealed and dated by the registered protessional and submitted to either the FDEP or NWFWMD within 30 days of the inspection. 4. The inspection must be conducted using the plans. calculations and specifications There must be an inspection completed by a registered professional one year after  registered professional.  standard inspection form 62-330.311(1).  3.  approved by the FDEP and/ or NWFWMD. the conversion into operation.  5.    MEXICOBEACH  PLANNING AND ZONING Agenda Abstract Form Meeting Date: August 5, 2024 Department: Planning Public Hearing: Date of Public Hearing: August 5, 2024  For Clerk's Use Only AGENDA ITEM#  Consent Regular Closed Agenda Agenda Session  Yes N No  RESENIERINPORMAION CONTACT: Allara Mills-Gutcher, AICP  ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED Subject:  The applicant has requested an easement from the City for the location of two of electronic vehicle charging  stations at the Mexico Beach Welcome Center. This agenda item is for information only.  Attachment(s): Brief Summary:  Staff report; application package and all submitted documents by the applicant.  Duke Energy has requested ane easement from the City of Mexico Beach for the installation oft two EV charging stations located in the parking lot oft the Mexico Beach Welcome Center. The City Council must grant the easement.  Action Requested:  None. This item is fori information purposes only.  ISSUE OVERVIEW Background Information & Issue Summary: Please see the staff report. Financial Impacts: None.  Staff ecommendtonsCommens    TPC the planning collaborative Memorandum for Record  August 1, 2024  To: From: Through: Subject:  Mell Smigielski, Interim City Administrator Cody Tillman Allara Mills-Gutcher, AICP  Duke Energy Easement EV Charging Infrastructure  Project Address: 102 Canal Parkway  Parcel IDs: 04756-000-000 and 04755-010-000 (U.S. Highway 98 and Canal Parkway)  Future Land Use Map Designation: Publiç/Institutional Zoning District: Public/Institutional  Project Description  The City of Mexico Beach owns two parcels at the intersection of HWY 98 and Canal Parkway, the location of the Mexico Beach Welcome Center. Two (2) Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations, owned by Duke Energy, are proposed to be located within the parking lot located on the eastern parcel (04755-010-000) that is primarily greenspace and parking lot. The adjacent parcel to the west 04756-000-000), where the officer centeri is actually located, is also owned byt the City. Int the photograph below, the parcel highlighted  ist the subject parcel for the development.  Page 1 of2    Because the location is not on Duke owned property, the utility is requesting an easement from the City From a planning perspective, the only review required is impervious surface ratios and parking  for continued access and maintenance of the stations.  requirements. Analysis  1. Impervious Surface  The city of Mexico Beach's Land Development Code (LDC) Article 1I2.02.02 G requires a maximum 90% impervious surface ratio for the Public/Institutional zoning district. In addition, the Mexico Beach Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use (FLU) Policy 1.1.4 G states that the impervious surface of the Public/Institutional FLU designation is "not to exceed ninety (90) percent lot coverage as determined by  dividing total impervious areas by the gross area of the site."  This requirement is met. 2. Off-site Parking  According to Section 6.03.000 of the LDC, Parking space requirements fora a use not specifically listed int the matrix shall be derived from a use that most closely approximates the unlisted use." The Mexico Beach Welcome Center most closely approximates to the land use Commercial Offices (Excluding medical, Dental, and Health Clinics) listed in section 6.03.00(A).This land use requires sa minimum of one (1)parking The total area of the Mexico Beach Welcome Center is 1,596 square feet, according to the Bay County  space per 300: square feet of gross floor area.  Property Appraiser's Website. A minimum of 5.32 parking spaces are. required.  This requirement is met. Recommendation:  This item is for information only. Since the electric equipment will be installed on property not owned by Duke Energy, the request is for the City Council to grant an easement to Duke Energy for the access and  maintenance of these two charging stations and related equipment.  Page 2 of2    Prepared by: Duke Energy Florida, LLC Return To: Duke Energy Florida, LLC  Parcel # 04756-000-000 102 Canal Parkway Mexico Beach, FL  Attn: Land Services 2166 Palmetto St Mail Code: CW Eng Clearwater, Florida 33765  EASEMENT  State ofl Florida County ofBay  THIS EASEMENT ("Easement"): is made this day of  20  from CITY  OF MEXICO BEACH, a Florida municipality ("Grantor", whether one or more), to DUKE: ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Post Office Box 14042, St. Petersburg, FL33733 Grantor, for and in consideration oft the sum of One and 00/100 Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto Grantee a perpetual easement, to construct, reconstruct, operate, patrol, maintain, repair, replace, relocate, add to, modify, and remove electric and communication lines including, but not limited to, all necessary supporting structures, and all other appurtenant apparatus and equipment for the transmission and distribution ofe electrical energy, and for technological purposes related to the operation oft the electric facilities and for the communication purposes of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers  ("Grantee").  (collectively, "Facilities").  Grantor is the owner of that certain property described in "Exhibit A" attached hereto and The Facilities may be both overhead and underground and located in, upon, over, along, under, through, and across aj portion oft the Property within an easement area described as follows: A strip ofland ten feet (10) in uniform width, lying equidistant on both sides ofa centerline, which centerline shall be established by the center oft the Facilities as installed, (hereinafter referred to as  incorporated herein by reference ("Property").  the' 'Easement Area"). For Grantee's Internal Use: Work Order: #: EVI Infrastructure 53561690-20 52908594 D  Page 1 of4    The rights granted herein include, but are not limited to, the following:  1. Grantee shall have the right ofingress and egress over the Easement Area, Property, and any adjoining lands now owned or hereinafter acquired by Grantor (using lanes, driveways, and 2. Grantee shall have the right to trim, cut down, and remove from the Easement Area, at any time or times and using safe and generally accepted arboricultural practices, trees, limbs, 3. Grantee shall have the right to trim, cut down, and remove from the Property, at any time or times and using safe and generally accepted arboricultural practices, dead, diseased, weak, dying, or leaning trees or limbs, which, in the opinion of Grantee, might fall upon the Easement Area or interfere with the safe and reliable operation oft the Facilities. 4. Grantee shall have the right to relocate the Facilities and Easement Area on the Property to conform to any future highway or street relocation, widening, or alterations. 5. Grantor shall not place, or permit the placement of, any structures, improvements, facilities, or obstructions, within or adjacent to thel Easement Area, which may interfere with the exercise of the rights granted herein to Grantee. Grantee shall have the right to remove any such structure, 6. Excluding the removal of vegetation, structures, improvements, facilities, and obstructions as provided herein, Grantee shall promptly repair or cause tol be: repaired any physical damage to the surface area oft the Easement Area and Property resulting from the exercise ofthe rights granted herein to Grantee. Such repair shall be to a condition which is reasonably close to the condition prior to the damage, and shall only be to the extent such damage was caused by 7. Grantee may increase or decrease the voltage and change the quantity and types ofl Facilities. 8. Ifin the future, Grantee, in Grantee's sole opinion, determines that it no longer needs some or all ofthe Easement Area or easement rights granted herein then Grantee shall, to the extent not needed, release the unneeded Easement Area or easement rights, as the case may be, following a 9. All other rights and privileges reasonably necessary, in Grantee's sole discretion, for the safe, reliable, and efficient installation, operation, and maintenance oft the Facilities. The terms Grantor and Grantee shall include the respective heirs, successors, and assigns of Grantor and Grantee. The failure of Grantee to exercise or continue to exercise or enforce any oft the rights herein granted shall not be construed as a waiver or abandonment oft the right thereafter at any TOHAVE. ANDTOHOLD: said rights, privilege, and easement unto Grantee, its successors, licensees, and assigns, forever. The rights and easement herein granted are exclusive as to entities engaged in the provision of electric energy service. Grantor warrants and covenants that Grantor has the full right and authority to convey to Grantee this perpetual Easement, and that Grantee shall have quiet  adjoining public roads where practical as determined by Grantee).  undergrowth, other vegetation, and obstructions.  improvement, facility, or obstruction at the expense ofGrantor.  Grantee or its contractors or employees.  written request from Grantor.  time, or from time to time, to exercise any and all such rights.  and peaceful possession, use and enjoyment of thes same.  For Grantee's Internal Use: Work Order #: EVI Infrastructure 53561690-20 52908594D  Page 2 of4    IN_WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has signed this Easement under seal effective this  day  of Witnesses:  20_  CITY OF MEXICO BEACH al Florida municipality  (Witness #I) Printed Name: Address:  Richard Wolff, Mayor Grantor(s) Mailing Address: 201 Paradise Path Mexico Beach, Florida 32456  (Witness #2) Printed Name: Address: STATE OF COUNTY OF  The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of D physical presence or MEXICO BEACH, a Florida municipality, on behalfofti the municipality who is personally known to me  online notarization, this or has produced  day of  20 by Richard Wolff, Mayor of CITY OF  as identification.  Notary Public: Printed/ Typed Name: Commission Expires:  This instrument prepared by Manny R. Vilaret, Esquire, 10901 Danka Circle Suite C, St. Petersburg, FL33716.  For Grantee's Internal Use: Work Order #: EVInfrastructure 53561690-20 529085941 D  Page 3 of4    EXHIBIT, A  Lot 10, Block 14, Unit 7, MEXICO! BEACH SUBDIVISION, and also:  Commence at the Northeast comer of fractional Section 22, Township 6 South, Range 12 West, and extend al line Westerly along the North line of said Section 22, for 1894.67 feett to the POINT OF BEGINNING on the Southern Right Of Way line of State Road 30- -U.S. 98.1 From this POINT OFI BEGINNING continue the line last described above for 22.42 feet; thence turn 90°00' left for 90.00 feet; thence turn 90°00' left for 156. 10 feet to the point ont the Southern Right Of Way line of State Road: 30 - U.S. 98; thence turn 146°03' left along said Right Of Way line for This parcel of land lies immediately East ofLot 10, Block 14, MEXICO BEACH UNIT NO.7, Bay County, Florida.  161.13 feet to thel POINT OF BEGINNING.  Also know as unnumbered Lot in Block 14, MEXICO BEACH, UNITI NO.7.  A/K/A:  MEXICO BEACHI UNIT! #7LOT 10 & THE UNNUMBEREDI LOT ONI PLAT OF UNIT#7LYINGI ELYOF LOT I0BLK 14TOHWY 981 BLK 14(-10.1-)213DG ORB 1948 P 108 LESS HWY R/W DOTI PRCL# 100  For Grantee's Internal Use: Work Order #: EVI Infrastructure 53561690-20 52908594 D  Page 4 of4    Juli Danaher From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:  Kimberly Shoaf imbeyomeooescon Monday, July 29, 2024 10:08AM MEXICO BEACH BAY County  Juli Danaher  FW: Duke Energy Easement- EV Charging Infrastructure 52908594 102 CANAL PKWY  Duke Energy -City of Mexico Beach Easement- Ev.pdf  CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open Here is the easement letter sent to Chris from Duke Energy. I'm fairly certain that Chris signed it, so just  attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.  wanted a completed copy for my files.  Thanks, Kimberly Shoaf President 102 Canal Parkway Mexico Beach, FL 32456 Office (850)648-8196 www.MexcoBeachcom  Mexico Beach Community Development Council  Please Note: Under Floridal law, e-mail addresses are public records. Ify you do not want your e-mail address released inr response to ap public records  request, do not send electronici mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone ori inv writing.  From: Chris Hubbard <c.hubbard@mexicobeacht.gov, Sent: Tuesday, July 2,20248:36AM To: Kimberly Shoaf amberyemeatok.atcom  Subject: Fw: Duke Energy Easement- EV Charging Infrastructure 52908594 102 CANAL PKWY MEXICO BEACH BAY County You weren't copied on this SO Ithought/would share since it's your project. Idon'thave any problem with giving Duke Energy an easement to complete this for as long as you're also okay withi it. Ihave a workshop at 9am so it you want to reach back outto Jonathan, feel free to dos so-if not, I'lL  contact him later, if you're good with the easement.  -C  From: Kasper, Jonathan onathan.aspereduke-enetsv.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2024 8:10AM To: Chris Hubbard chubbard@mexicobeachtgov>  Subject: Duke Energy Easement- EV Charging Infrastructure 52908594 102 CANAL PKWY MEXICO BEACH BAY County Duke Energy Engineering has completed the design for the electric infrastructure for the proposed EV charging stations. This willi include a padmount transformer installed along the North of the above referenced address.  Good morning,    Being that electric equipment will bei installed on private property, Duke Energy will need to seek an easement allowing  this install. Thank you  Please feel free to review and let me know if there are any questions. gPublic.net- Bay County, FL-F Report: 04756-000-000 schneidercorp.com)  75  22.42  04756-000-000 04755-000-00C CITYVACANT CIYOFMEXICOBEACH 102CANALE PKWY 050Acres Ju:Vave:204120 5Daa3472035APa: $100 MLS View: Bsalantfauras! Pictans:nsarK GFEMaRt  75  156.1  C3IKOBEAEUNTEOY      - COASTAL CONS1 SÇOPE OFV WORK Primay Polehreug Vdlege 500KVA Riser. 277/4801 Fuse, TX POLB-6842552-3046  a  P1  P4  S1 $3 P2 S2 P3  -ABC 102 ABC.  PARKING LOT  DANALFKN  Unscaled- Jonathan Kasper Real Estate Representative South Coastal Region Portion of North Coastal Region- (7Springs) 2166 Palmetto Street Clearwater, FL: 33765 Mail Code: CWBAYG Ofice-727-893-9262  Email: Jonathan. Kasper@Duke Energy.com  DUKE ENERGY. FLORIDA  PLEASE NOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. As ar result, any written communication created or received by the City of Mexico Beach will be made available to the public and media, upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. Ify you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail  toi this office. Instead, contact our office by phone ori in writing.  3    Prepared by: Duke Energy Florida, LLC Return' To: Duke Energy Florida, LLC  Parcel # 04756-000-000 102 Canal Parkway Mexico Beach, FL  Attn: Land Services 2166 Palmetto St Mail Code: CWI Eng Clearwater, Florida 33765  EASEMENT  State ofFlorida County of Bay  THIS EASEMENT ("Easement") is made this  day of  20 from CITY  OF MEXICO BEACH, al Florida municipality ("Grantor", whether one or more), tol DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC, al Florida limited liability company, Post Office Box 14042, St. Petersburg, FL: 33733 Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of One and 00/1001 Dollar (S1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are. hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto Grantee aj perpetual easement, to construct, reconstruct, operate, patrol, maintain, repair, replace, relocate, add to, modify, and remove electric and communication lines including, but not limited to, all necessary supporting structures, and all other appurtenant apparatus and equipment for the transmission and distribution of electrical energy, and for technological purposes related to the operation oft the electric facilities and for the communication purposes of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers Grantor is the owner of that certain property described in' "Exhibit A" attached hereto and The Facilities may be both overhead and underground and located in, upon, over, along, under, through, and across a portion of thel Property within an easement area described as follows: A strip ofl land ten feet (10) in uniform width, lying equidistant on both sides ofa centerline, which centerline shall be established by the center of the Facilities as installed, (hereinafter referred to as  ("Grantee").  (collectively, "Facilities").  incorporated herein by reference ("Property").  the' "Easement. Area"). For Grantee's Internal Use: Work Order #: EVI nfrastructure 53561690-20 529085941 D  Page 1 of4    The rights granted herein include, but are not limited to, the following:  1. Grantee shall have the right of ingress and egress overt the Easement Area, Property, and any adjoining lands now owned or hereinafter acquired by Grantor (using lanes, driveways, and 2. Grantee shall have the right to trim, cut down, and remove from the Easement Area, at any time ort times and using safe and generally accepted arboricultural practices, trees, limbs, 3. Grantee shall have the right to trim, cut down, and remove from thel Property, at any time or times and using safe and generally accepted arboricultural practices, dead, diseased, weak, dying, or leaning trees or limbs, which, int the opinion of Grantee, might fall upon the Easement Area or interfere with the safe and reliable operation of the Facilities. 4. Grantee shall have the right to relocate the Facilities and Easement Area on the Property to conform to any future highway or street relocation, widening, or alterations. 5. Grantor shall: not place, or permit the placement of, any structures, improvements, facilities, or obstructions, within or adjacent to the Easement Area, which may interfere with the exercise of the rights granted herein to Grantee. Grantee shall have the right to remove any such structure, 6. Excluding the removal of vegetation, structures, improvements, facilities, and obstructions as provided herein, Grantee shall promptly repair or cause tol be repaired any physiçal damage to the surface area of the Easement Area and Property resulting from the exercise of the rights granted herein to Grantee. Such repair shall be to a condition which is reasonably close to the condition prior to the damage, and shall only be tot the extent such damage was caused by 7. Grantee may increase or decrease the voltage and change the quantity and types ofl Facilities. 8. Ifin the future, Grantee, in Grantee's sole opinion, determines that it no longer needs some or all ofthe Easement Area or easement rights granted herein then Grantee shall, to the extent not needed, release the unneeded Easement Area or easement rights, as the case may be, followinga 9. All other rights and privileges reasonably necessary, in Grantee's sole discretion, for the safe, reliable, and efficient installation, operation, andi maintenance of thel Facilities. The terms Grantor and Grantee shall include the respective heirs, successors, and assigns of Grantor and Grantee. The failure of Grantee to exercise or continue to exercise or enforce any oft the rights herein granted shall not be construed as a waiver or abandonment oft the right thereafter at any TOHAVE. ANDT TOI HOLD: said rights, privilege, and easement unto Grantee, its successors, licensees, and assigns, forever. The rights and easement herein granted are exclusive as to entities engaged in the provision of electric energy service. Grantor warrants and covenants that Grantor has the full right and authority to convey to Grantee this perpetual Easement, and that Grantee shall have quiet  adjoining public roads where practical as determined by Grantee). undergrowth, other vegetation, and obstructions.  improvement, facility, or obstruction at the expense ofGrantor.  Grantee or its contractors or employees.  written request from Grantor.  time, or from time to time, to exercise any and all such rights.  and peaceful possession, use and enjoyment oft the same.  For Grantee's Internal Use: Work Order #: EV Infrastructure 53561690.0/5290854D  Page 2 of4    INWITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has signedt this Easement under seal effective this day  of Witnesses:  20  CITY OF MEXICO BEACH aP Florida municipality  (Witness #1) Printed Name: Address:  Richard Wolff, Mayor Grantor(s) Mailing Address: 201 Paradise Path Mexico Beach, Florida 32456  (Witness #2) Printed Name: Address: STATEOF COUNTY OF  The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of D physical presence or L MEXICO BEACH, a Florida municipality, on behalf of the municipality whoi is personally known to me  online notarization, this day of  20 by Richard Wolff, Mayor ofCITY OF  or has produced  as identification.  Notary Public: Printed/ Typed Name:, Commission Expires:  Thisi instrument prepared by Manny R. Vilaret, Esquire, 10901 Danka Circle Suite C, St. Petersburg, FL: 33716.  For Grantee's Internal Use: Work Order #: EVI Infrastructure 53561690-201 52908594D  Page 3 of4    EXHIBITA  Lot 10, Block 14, Unit 7, MEXICOBEACH SUBDIVISION, and also:  Commence att the Northeast corner of fractional Section 22, Township 6 South, Range 12 West, and extend al line Westerly along thel North line ofs said Section 22, for 1894.67 feet tot thel POINT OF BEGINNING on the Southern Right Of Way line of State Road 30 U.S. 98. From this POINT OF BEGINNING continue the line last described above for 22.42 feet; thence turn! 90000 left for 90.001 feet; thence turn! 90°00' left for 156.1 101 feet tot thej point on the Southern Right Of Way line of State Road 30 - U.S. 98; thence turn 146°03'1 left along said Right Of Way line for This parcel ofl land lies immediately East ofI Lot 10, Block 14, MEXICOBEACH UNIT NO.7, Bay County, Florida.  161.13 feet tot the POINT OF BEGINNING.  Also know as unnumbered Loti in Block 14, MEXICOBEACH, UNIT NO.7.  A/K/A:  MEXICO BEACH UNIT #7LOT 10 &1 THE UNNUMBEREDI LOT ON PLAT OF UNIT #7LYING ELY OF LOT 10BLK 14TOHWY! 98 BLK 14( (10.1-)213D ORB 1948 P 1081 LESSI HWY R/WI DOT PRCL# 100  For Grantee's Internal Use: Work Order# #: EVI Infrastructure 53561690-201 529085941 D  Page 4 of4