CITY OF WILDOMAR CITY COUNCIL  AGENDA 6:00 P.M.  May 27, 2009 Council Chambers 23873 Clinton Keith Road  Scott Farnam, Mayor Bridgette Moore, Mayor Pro Tem Sheryl Ade, Council Member Bob Cashman, Council Member Marsha Swanson, Council Member  City Manager John Danielson  City Attorney Julie Hayward Biggs    City of Wildomar 2 Council Agenda May 27,2009  WILDOMAR CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA  MAY 27, 2009  ORDER OF BUSINESS: Public sessions of all regular meetings of the City Council begin at 7:00 P.M. Closed Sessions begin at 6:00 P.M. or such other time as noted. REPORTS: All agenda items and reports are available for review at Wildomar City Hall, 23873 Clinton Keith Road and at the Mission Trail Library, 34303 Mission Trail Blvd., Wildomar, CA. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection at City Hall during regular business hours. If you wish to be added to the regular mail list to receive a copy of the agenda, a request must be made through the City Clerk's office in writing PUBLIC COMMENTS: Prior to the business portion of the agenda, the City Council will receive public comments regarding any agenda items or matters within the jurisdiction of the governing body. This is the only opportunity for public input except for scheduled public hearing items. The Mayor or chairperson will separately call for testimony at the time of each public hearing. Ifyou wish to speak, please complete a "Public peaker/Comment Card" available at the door. The completed form is to be submitted to the Mayor prior to an individual being heard. Lengthy testimony should be presented to the Council in writing (8 copies) and only pertinent points presented orally. The time limit established for public ADDITUNS/DELEIONS Items of business may be added to the agenda upon a motion adopted by a minimum 2/3 vote finding that there is a need to take immediate action and that the need for action came to the attention of the City subsequent to the agenda being posted. Items may be deleted from the agenda CONSENT CALENDAR: Consent Calendar items will be acted on by one roll call vote unless members, staff or the public request the item be discussed and/or  or by e-mail.  comments is three minutes per speaker.  upon request of staff or upon action ofthe Council.  removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.    City of Wildomar 3 Council Agenda May 27,2009  6:00 P.M. program. 7:00P.M.  Call to Order for presentation by Buxton regarding retail economic development  Reconvene the regular meeting of May 27, 2009  Roll Call: Flag Salute: Presentations:  Code Enforcement Monthly Update Charlie Pate from Wishes for Children  Oral Communications: This is the time for any citizen to comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. Comments relative to noticed public hearing items will be heard at that time the public hearing is conducted. Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the legislative body is prohibited from discussing or taking action on items not listed on the agenda. The City Council encourages members of the public to address them at this time SO that your questions and/or  concerns can be heard. PUBLIC COMMENTS:  1. CONSENT CALENDAR:  All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Council, the public or staff request specific items be removed  from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1A. Approve the reading by title only of all ordinances. 1B. Approve regular meeting minutes dated May 13, 2009.    City ofWildomar 4 Council. Agenda May 27,2009  1C. Approve Warrant Register dated May 13, 2009 ini the amount of $246,189.30 and Warrant Register dated May 27,2009 in the amount of $19,241.40.  1D. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for April 2009.  1E. ORDINANCE NO. 30 (2nd reading and adoption) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 1.03.080 TO THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING AN ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION PROCEDURE. (Introduction and first reading  held May 13, 2009, Item 3B)  1F. Approve the Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads (also known as Expenditure Plans) and authorize thel Public Works Director to submit the plans to Riverside County Transportation Commission. Authorize the Public Works Directors to make adjustments to the Measure A Expenditure Plans, ifr needed, to reflect more current Measure Ap projections when the torecasted figures become available by RCTC. RESOLUTION NO. 09-26 A RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR APPROVING THE. MEASURE A EXPENDITURE PLANS 1G. Authorize execution of a professional services agreement with MuniServices LLC: for sales tax audit and information services and adopt Resolution No. 09- RESOLUTION NO. 09-27 Al RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXAMINATION OF SALES, USE. AND' TRANSACTION TAX RECORDS, PURSUANT TO: SECTION 7056 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA REVENUE. AND' TAXATION CODE, BY MUNISERVICES LLC AND DESIGNATED BY CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES 1H. Adopt Resolution No. 09-28, proposed by the League of California Cities, regarding borrowing" of property tax by the State of California in order to RESOLUTION NO. 09-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, FINDING A SEVERE FISCAL HARDSHIP WILL EXIST IF ADDITIONAL LOCAL PROPERTY TAXI FUNDS ARE SEIZED AND ADDITIONAL UNFUNDED MANDATES ARE. ADOPTED BY THE STATE  27.  help balance the State's budget.  OF CALIFORNIA    City of Wildomar 5 Council Agenda May 27,2009  2. PUBLICHEARINGS: None  3.  GENERAL BUSINESS ITEMS:  3A. Council consider and discuss the establishment ofa a Higher Education  Subcommittee.  3B. Council consider: and discuss the proposed Capital Improvement Program for  Fiscal Years 2009/10 through 2013/14.  3C. Review: and consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Temeka, incorporated, for the directional sign program for the City of  Wildomar.  3D. Review: a and consider: a Resolution establishing a fee for the registration of  abandoned or distressed properties.  RESOLUTION NO. 09-29 Al RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING Al FEE FOR' THE REGISTRATION OF ABANDONED OR DISTRESSED PROPERTIES  CITY MANAGER REPORT,John Danielson  CITY ATTORNEY REPORT, Julie Hayward Biggs:  COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS: FUTURE. AGENDA ITEMS: ADJOURNMENT:    City ofWildomar 6 Council Agenda May 27,2009  The next regular meeting is scheduled for) June 10, 2009.  Ifrequested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the City Clerk either in person or by telephone at (951) 677-7751, no later than 10:00 A.M.  and regulations adopted in implementation thereof.  on the day preceding the schedule meeting.  POSTING STATEMENT: On May 22, 2009, a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at the three designated posting places: Wildomar City Hall, 23873 Clinton Keith Road; U.S. Post Office, 21392 Palomar Street; and Mission Trail Library, 34303  Mission Trail Blvd.    Jtim 1B,  CITY OF WILDOMAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY13,2009  The regular meeting of May 13, 2009 of the Wildomar City Council was called to order by  Mayor Scott Farnam at 6:00 P.M. for the purpose of Closed Session.  Roll Call showed the following Council Members in attendance: Mayor Scott Farnam, Mayor Pro Tem Bridgette Moore, Council Members Bob Cashman and Marsha Swanson. Council Staffi in attendance: City Manger Danielson, City Attorney Biggs and City Clerk Schroeder. Mayor Farnam recessed the Council meeting to Closed Session for the following purpose:  Member Sheryl Ade arrived shortly after 6:00 P.M.  1.  CONFERENCE WITH REAL: PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Section 54956.8 oft the Government Code) Property: Negotiators: Julie Cline Negotiating Parties: A&SI Property at Clinton Keith, LLC Under Negotiation: Terms and conditions oft the potential sale ofa a remnant parcel ofreal property located at immediately adjacent to APN 380-130-015  At 7:00 P.M., Mayor Farnam reconvened the City Council meeting.  Roll Call showed the following Council Members in attendance: Mayor Scott Farnam, Mayor Pro Tem Bridgette Moore, Council Members Sheryl Ade, Bob Cashman and Marsha Swanson. Staffi in attendance: City Manager John Danielson, Assistant City Manager Terry Fitzwater, City Attorney Julie Hayward Biggs, Supervising Engineer Jon Crawford, Assistant Planning Director Dave Hogan, Finance Director Gary Nordquist, Fire Chief Steve Beach, Police Chief  Joe Cleary and City Clerk Sheryll Schroeder.  FLAGSALUTE:  was led by Mayor Pro Tem Moore.  City Attorney Biggs reported that the Council met in Closed Session for real property negotiations listed above and there was no reportable action taken.  PRESENTATIONS:  Police Chief] Joe Cleary provided at third quarter report.  Fire Chief Steve Beach provided a monthly update report.    City of Wildomar Council Minutes May 13, 2009 Page 2  Code Enforcement displayed recent photographs oft the debris on Lost Road. Mayor Farnam presented a proclamation supporting the U. S. Census 2010. Layla Arcelus explained her program "Savvy Silver Surfers Group".  Finance Director, Gary Nordquist, provided a power point presentation which responded to  recent budget questions.  COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC:  Thomas Cameron of Boy Scout' Troop 332 presented Mayor Farnam with a plaque representing his volunteering to take a pie in the face, raising funds for the troop. Vicki Long asked ifl her property owners association could use the Council Chambers as a meeting room and the City Manager responded that the room was not leased by the City, it Gina Castanon said she was a resident who had met with the Finance Director regarding the budget and presented a spread sheet and when compared with the Finance Director's spread sheet, the numbers were less than two percent off oft their figures. She said she predicted that the City would still be short of funds and recommended immediate steps be taken to reduce the salary schedule oft the new City Manager. She recommended the Council agendize the salary reduction within thirty days of the current contract services. She added that the Council should reconsider the pay scales of new: staff when drafting the 2009/10 budget. She added that she did not want to meet monthly with staff regarding the budget. She finalized by saying the behavior of staff was not professional, citing an incident aftera George Cambero asked Council to reconsider the pay for the new City Manager, citing  was provided by thej property owner.  speaker at the last Council meeting.  current budget situations at the state level.  Kathe Sabetzadeh said she wished to see regular dialog between the Council, staff and public  as to how the taxpayer dollars were being spent.    City of Wildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page 3  Edy Rodarme said she agreed with the previous speakers, adding that the City needed to make serious cuts; she added that she did not think public speakers were treated  respectfully.  1. CONSENT CALENDAR:  City Clerk Schroder announced a change to item 10 C.; on the warrant register, check 1653 Mayor Pro' Tem Moore moved to approve the Consent Calendar,seconded by Council  and 1654, the payee: names were tol be reversed.  Member Swanson.  Council Member Cashman requested Item 1D. be removed for discussion. He asked how Finance Director Nordquist responded that contracts providing services in excess of $50,000 would go to Council. Under that dollar amount, the City Manager would have the City Manager Danielson said all expenditures would be shown in the budget. He added that  contracts would be awarded under the new policy.  authority to execute the contract or purchase orders, he noted.  controversial items would also come to Council. Rull Call vote: - Ayes: 5. Nays: 0. Motion carried. 1A. Approved the reading by title only of all ordinances. 1B. Approved regularmeeting minutes dated April 22, 2009.  1C. Approved Warrant Registers dated April 24, 2009 in the amount of $2,149.28, Warrant Register dated April 28, 2009 in the amount of $996.00, Warrant Register dated May 1, 2009 in the amount of $22,429.33, Warrant Register dated May 13, 2009 in the amount of $31,979.51 and Payroll Warrant Register dated May 13, 2009  in the amount of $1,280.28.    City of Wildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page 4  1D. ORDINANCE NO. 25 (2nd reading and adoption) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTERS 3.06, 3.07 AND 3.081 TO THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BIDS, PURCHASES AND CONTRACTS. (Introduction and first reading held April 22, 2009, Item 3B.) 1E. ORDINANCE NO. 27(2nd reading and adoption) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR ADOPTING WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS REGARDING CABLE FRANCHISE AND VIDEO SERVICE. AND CONTINUING FRANCHISE FEES. (Introduction and first reading held April 22, 2009, Item 3D.) 1F. ORDINANCE NO. 28 (2nd reading and adoption) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ANDI RESTATING WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.100 PROVIDING FOR' THE. ADMINISTRATION OF DISASTER OPERATION AND RELIEF IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR. (Introduction and firsti reading held April 22,  2009, Item 3E.)  1G. ORDINANCE NO. 29 (2nd reading and adoption) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 11.04.040 OF THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS. (Introduction and first reading held April 22,2009,  Item 3F.)  PUBLICHEARINGS: None,  3.  GENERAL BUSINESS ITEMS:  3A. Council consider discussion oft the establishment of an ad hoc subcommittee to review, investigate and report to the Council with regard to the current status and options regarding the Lakeland Village Redevelopment Project Area.  City Attorney Biggs presented the staffreport, which included a' "white paper" on the RDA. Gary Andre presented photographs of Marin O'Brian Park, looking for a staging area. The photographs showed fences and sidewalks installed at incorrect elevations. George Cambero said he was a director of the RDA, and reminded everyone that the RDA represented both Wildomar and Lakeland Village and he offered to meet with the City.    City of Wildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page 5  Council Member Swanson clarified that the Cityl had no concerns with the advisory board; the concern was with the County not listening to what the City and Lakeland Village wanted. Mayor Farnam expressed his frustration that no one could provide the dollar amount oft the Kami Sabetzadeh said the City had the right to an itemized breakdown oft the original funds. He: said the County has indicated that no: funds have been expended from the City's/Lakeland Village RDA funds. He stated funds had been expended on the Marin Council Member: Swanson moved to form an ad hoc committee. Sheand Council Member Ade volunteered to serve on the ad hoc committee. Mayor Pro Tem Moore seconded the  RDA funds that went to the County and should return to the City.  O'Brian Park.  motion.  Council Member Ade said she was concerned with legal issues and felt that the jurisdiction Mayor Pro Tem Moore nominated Council Members Swanson and Ade to serve on the ad hoc committee, seconded by Mayor Farnam. Council Member Cashman volunteered also.  belonged in the City.  Roll Call vote: -. Ayes: 5. Nays: 0. Motion carried.  3B. Considerintroduction and first reading of an ordinance establishing an  administrative citation procedure for the City.  ORDINANCE NO. 30 (Introduction and 1st reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 1.03.080 TO THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING AN ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION  PROCEDURE.  City Attorney Biggs presented the staff report. There were no publics speakers.  Mayor Pro Tem Moore moved toi introduce and hold first reading on Ordinance No. 30, Council Member Cashman stated that he felt a 20 day response time was tool limited. He also asked if this was a general type ordinance and the rules were not yet established. City  seconded by Council Member Swanson.    City of Wildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page 6  Attorney Biggs responded that the law was set forth in the ordinance and set: a procedure Council Member Ade added that the 20 day was not aj remedy but a response time. City Attorney Biggs said the intention was to lessen what the City currently had, which was only a criminal procedure. She explained that currently ifthere was a violation, the person was charged with a misdemeanor. She said the ordinance was a different approach; it was intended to give notice ofv violation to give thei individual time to talk to staff and work outa  for citation, which was very standard.  method of correction.  Roll Call vote: Ayes: 5. Nays: 0. Motion carried. The Clerk read the title of Ordinance No. 30.  3C. Consider approval and authorize the City Manger to execute the Memorandum of Understanding with the Riverside County Emergency Management Agency forj joint  monitoring of emergency ambulance services.  City Manger Danielson gave the staff report, noting a correction in the staff report, replacing  the word Menifee" to Wildomar. No one wished to speak on this topic.  Council Member Swanson moved to authorize the City Manger to execute the Memorandum prunderstanding, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Moore. Roll Call vote: Ayes: 5. Nays: 0.  Motion carried.  3D. Consider and discuss appointing two Council Members to an ad hoc Finance Committee that would work with the Finance Director to help develop administrative policies and review monthly financial reports.  There were no public speakers for this item. Committee, seconded by Mayor Farnam.  Mayor Pro Tem Moore moved to appoint two Council Members to an ad hoc Finance  Council Member Ade mentioned that she was uncomfortable setting administrative policies  as sited in the staff report.    City of Wildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page7  Finance Director Nordquist clarified that the ad hoc committee would recommend different City Manger Danielson recommended that the ad hoc committee review monthly financial reports and have some oversight responsibility as a treasurer might do. City Attorney Biggs noted that this was a standing committee, rather than an ad hoc committee ift they were meeting monthly, which would require an agenda and minutes. She Mayor Pro Tem Moore moved to amend the motion with wording provided by the City Attorney "consider and discuss appointing two Council Members to an ad hocadvisory committee that would work with the Finance Director to help develop administrative policies for submission to the City Council and review monthly financial reports." Seconded by Council Member Swanson. Roll Call vote: Ayes: 4. Nays: 1, Council Member Cashman, Mayor Farnam nominated Mayor Pro Tem Moore and Council Member. Ade to serve on the ad hoc advisory committee, seconded by Council Member Swanson. Roll Call vote: - Ayes: 5. 3E. Presentation by Douglas Johnson, National Demographics, regarding timeline, procedures and analytical basis for establishment of electoral districts.  policies to the Council fora a vote, they would not set policy.  suggested a sunset date of six months for an ad hoc committee.  Motion carried.  Nays: 0. Motion carried.  Consideration and discussion by City Council. Doug Johnson presented a power point presentation.  Council Member Cashman asked ifit was by population not registered voters and Mr. Council Member Ade asked Mr. Johnson to explain the legislative intent at the state level Julie Biggs explained that the statute. said there were various ways a city could organize; by district representation, from districts or at large. She gave the history oft the by district representation. She explained that the City, when incorporated, had a question regarding districts which was approved and there may or may not be ini interest in changing that. She said when the City discussed the election system, that discussion would be appropriate at Doug Johnson proposed the first workshop for Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 10:30 AM in the Council Chambers and the criteria would be used as proposed in his presentation.  Johnson answered yes, population.  regarding districting.  that time. She said the City would always have a choice.    City of Wildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page 8  A resident asked if the Council had a choice of going to districts or at] large and how it would City Attorney Biggs answered that the first municipal election would be November of 2010, that was why the City was working to have the districts in place before that election and depending on what the City decided to do, it may be possible to submit the districts to the electorate in thel November 2009 frame sO that the community can eitheraffirm or reject the districts. She added that the staffwould be showing Council and citizens the effects of districts on the City sometime in June. That was when the election system discussion would 3F. Consider approval ofa Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute an agreement for professional consultant services for Western Riverside Council of RESOLUTION NO. 09-25_AI RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF WILDOMAR, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER' TO: SIGN AND EXECUTE. AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCILOF  affect the current Council and their terms.  take place.  Governments Clean Cities Program  GOVERNMENTS CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM.  Staff report was presented by) Jon Crawford, Supervising Engineer.  There were: no public speakers on this item.  Council Member Swanson moved to approve Resolution No. 09-25, seconded by Mayor Pro  Tem Moore.  Council Member Ade noted that the population figure was incorrect.  Allison Ellison with WRCOG said for the first year oft the contract they would use that figure Council Member. Ade said she was uncomfortable spending the $3,000, she felt the City could get most oft the proposed items done without spending the fee. Regarding a natural gas fueling station in the City, she asked where the lines would hook up. Allison explained that the natural gas fueling station was already in existence at. Lake Elsinore High School, which was in the City of Wildomar. She explained that they were looking to expand it and make it public accessible. The expansion, she explained, would cost about $500,000 and she felt that spending $3,000 to get a $500,000 project was well worth  for a smaller fee base.  it.    City ofWildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page9  Council Member. Ade asked ift the City wasn'talready a member ofWRCOG and Allison said that WRCOG had ai number of programs. Council Member Ade asked if there were separate costs for the various programs and Allison responded yes, they usually paid for the grant Council Member. Ade asked if staffhad investigated doing this project without going through WRCOG. City Manager Danielson responded not for this specific project, but there would be Council Member Ade said that she represented the City on SCAG and she sawal lotof  application and subsequenti implementation.  some costs. duplicate efforts.  Allison explained that the school district really wanted to pursue this project and the grant application was due on May 29, 2009 and itl had tol be partnered with the Clean Cities Council Member Ade noted that there was no guarantee that they would get the grant and Mayor Farnam added that one benefit would bet that it would put people back to work. Allison answered that yes, there was no guarantee that they would get the grant but explained that WRCOG was among the top five agencies that were eligible and fit the Roll Call vote: - Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Abstention: 1, Council MemberAde. Motion carried.  Coalition and that was something SCAG could not do for the City. she asked if the benefit to the City would bei in tax dollars.  criteria.  3G. Discuss and provide direction to staff regarding grant writing and grant writing Cynthia Miller encouraged the City to invest: in a team of people who would seek out not only grant funds but public funds as well to help the City grow. She explained that she had worked at a model where 100 plus people were. supported by grant funding for over ten Mayor Farnam noted that: a grant team could put a lot of people to work, as there were al lot of grant funds available. He explained that the administrative fee from the grant could compensate the team. He suggested a sunset. ad hoc committee to look at the pros and cons, howi it could be funded, etc. Headded that he understood that there was a long term cost  services.  years. She explained her history in this field.  after receiving the grants.    City of Wildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page 10  Council Member Cashman suggested that they look to neighboring cities to see how they Council Member Ade said she was not opposed to creating an ad hoc committee, but she had many questions. Also, she noted that Interwest and PMC may have grant writing personnel Mayor Farnam moved to establish an ad hoc committee to return to Council in two weeks, which could be extended, with pros and cons, benefits, costs, strings, disadvantages of establishing a grant team. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Moore. Roll Call vote: Ayes: 5.  were. handling the issue.  on staff.  Nays: 0. Motion carried.  Council Member Swanson nominated Mayor Farnam, Mayor Farnam nominated Mayor Pro Tem Moore. Council Member. Ade seconded the nominations. Roll Call vote: - Ayes 5. Nays:  0. Motion Carried. CITYMANAGER REPORT: City Manager Danielson had no report. CITYATTORNEY REPORT:  Julie Hayward Biggs, City Attorney, reported that there would be ruling coming out tomorrow from the California Supreme Court on the St. Marie VS. Riverside County Regional  Parks case.  COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:  Mayor Pro Tem Moore announced she had attended the Wildomar Community Fair at which the City had a booth, attended a Victim's Right event in' Temecula, Student oft the Month awards, the City had al booth at the Economic Summit, attended an animal shelter: meeting, California League of Cities dinner, attended a SCAG event. She invited everyone to the Council Member Cashman said he attended an RCA meeting this week. He asked about a Mayor Farnam explained that Fire Chief Beach had presented that report and it needed to be Council Member. Ade reported that she attended the yearly general assembly meeting of SCAG. She noted they discussed SB 375, which was regarding regional green house gas reduction target methodologies. She added that discussion also took place on the State  Memorial Day ceremony at the cemetery.  report presented to staff on weed abatement, asking fora copy.  brought to a future agenda.    City of Wildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page 11  attempting to take funds from cities tol balance the State's budget.  Regarding the trails and bike lane item presented by Gary Andre at the lastmeeting, she noted he wanted everyone tol look: ati it and give input. She asked staff to place the maps in the Council's room SO input could be given sO it could be put on the next agenda. She noted the trail issues were minor and the information needed to return to the County for adoption. Mayor Farnam explained that the Council felt fiscal responsibility was their first priority. Regarding the pay scale for the City Manager position, he said it was just an average, it did not mean the City had to pay that amount; the Council would negotiate the best contract Mayor Farnam announced June 4th Temecula Chamber of Commerce would host the 2009 Economic Forecast, each city speaking on how it effects cities locally. Hei informed he attended an RCTC meeting where discussion took place on state and federal legislation, citing ACA1 15, changing the tax increase approval process from a 2/3 vote to a 55 percent.  She wanted it on the next agenda.  they could.  FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:  Council Member Swanson requested an update on the progress of the selection ofa City logo/seal, not necessarily at the next meeting. She wished to see the police cars carry the Council Member Cashman asked tol have the issue of weed abatement discussion on the Mayor Farnam expressed a desire tol have discussion on the creation of a Wildomar Mayor Farnam also asked to have placed on the next agenda the reduction of development fees by 15 to 20 percent for two years with an option to extend it a year to stimulate the  logo. agenda.  Beautification Committee, tol be made up ofl local citizens.  development community.    City ofWildomar Council Minutes May 13,2009 Page 12  ADIOURNMENT:  With no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Farnam adjourned the May 13,  2009 Council meeting at 10:00 P.M.  Respectfully submitted:  Sheryll Schroeder, MMC City Clerk    CITY OF WILDOMAR - CITY COUNCIL  Agenda Item 1C.  CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  TO: FROM:  Mayor and Members of the City Council Gary Nordquist, Director of Finance  SUBJECT: Warrant Registers dated May 13 and 27 2009.  STAFF REPORT  RECOMMENDATION:  1. Approve Warrant Register dated May 13, 2009 in the amount of Approve Warrant Register dated May 27, 2009 in the amount of  $246,189.30. $19,241.40.  2.  BACKGROUND:  The City of Wildomar City requires that the City Council audit payments of demands and direct the City Manager to issue checks. The Warrant and Payroll  Registers are submitted for approval.  DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACTS:  These Warrant and Payroll Registers will have a budgetary impact in the amount noted in the recommendation section of this report. These costs are included in the  FY08-09 Budget. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Take no action  2. Provide staff with further direction.  1    Submitted by:  Approved. Ea  Gary Nordquist Director of Finance  Jonn City Manager  2    Cityof Wildomar Warrant Register May 13, 2009 Name  Date 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 5/13/2009  Type Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check  Num 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691  Memo/Description  Amount $ 15.23 $ 441.41 $ 4,116.00 $ 324.13 $ 155.00 $ 104.15 $ 75.00 $ 813.66 $ 75.00 $ 73.95  Artisan Goldsmiths &A Awards AFLAC Aetna AT&T Exec- U- Care Gary Andre Guardian Harv Dykstra Image Printing System Interwest Consulting Group Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP Miguel Casillas Office Depot Robert Devine Scott Nowak The Press- Enterprise Danielson Associates, Inc. WRCOG Wells Fargo Business Card  Name Badges Mayi Insurance payment May Medical Prem Council Mobile Phones Marchl Ins payment Planning! Meeting 4/15/2009 May Dental Prem Planning Meeting 4/15/2009 Fliers Municipal Services March: 2009, Planning, andF PublicWorks Finance Services March 2009 Planning Meeting4 4/15/2009 Supplies Planning! Meeting4 4/15/2009 Planning Meeting4 4/15/2009 Neg Dec publication meeting reimbursement Gen. Assembly Meeting- City Manager Misc city operatinge expenses and materials $  Ca. Municipal Treasurers Assoc. Annuall Membership Fin Director  Engineering, Building, Clerk,IT, GIS, Accounting $ 205,947.40  $ 6,480.00 $ 75.00 $ 1,121.95 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 160.00 $ 67.75 $ 75.00 8,003.08 $ 35,165.10  Burke, Williams &5 Sorensen, LLP CityLegal Services April2 2009  Californial Public Employee Retireme  Employee and Employer Payment May 2009 $ Cityl Telephone -April 2009  305.41 445.08 264,189.30  ntSys Verizon  $  3    Warrant Register May27,2009 Gary Nordquist Marathon! Reprographics MuniServices, LLC North Countyl Times OnTrac Timeless Portraits Photography by Rh onda Naples Plazal Ltd.- Oak Creekl II League of CA Cities DirecTV Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP CBC Technical  5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009 5/27/2009  Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check Check  1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707  Meeting Reimbursement Maps Financial Services Dec-March Administrative. Ad Delivery Services City Pictures Rent June: 2009 Western City, City Manager Ad May-09 Financial Services April 2009 VGACable  $ 20.66 $ 190.09 $ 163.45 $ 5,615.58 $ 519.95 $ 47.87 $ 153.99 $ 10,136.33 $ 223.50 $ 43.00 $ 202.50 $ 35.07 $ 5.49 $ 100.00 $ 1,311.00 $ 472.92 $ 19,241.40 Total $ 283,430.70  Innovativel Document: Solutions Service contracti for Officer machines  Cityo of Riverside, Purchasing Supply Rubber Bands Riverside County! Division, LLC League of Ca Cities Annual Dues  GMI Building Services, Inc. ScottF Farnam  Janitorial Services Feb-Apr. Travel andI Meeting Reimbursement ICSC  4    CITY OF WILDOMAR - CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 1D. Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  Agenda Item  TO: FROM:  Mayor and Members of the City Council Gary Nordquist, Director of Finance  SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report, April 2009  STAFF REPORT  RECOMMENDATION:  Staff recommends City Council to approve the Treasurer's Report.  BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION:  Attached is the Treasurer's Report for Cash and Investments for the month of April  2009.  FISCAL IMPACTS:  None at this time, however due to the State of California withholding monthly Gas Tax revenue allocations to all cities until June 2009, a decrease in interest income as  compared to budget is anticipated.  ALTERNATIVES: 1. Take no action Submitted by:  2. Provide staff with further direction.  Approved by: &  Gary Nordquist Finance Director  Cily Reviewed by: Julie Hayward Biggs City Attorney  Attachments: Treasurer's Report  1    CITY OF WILDOMAR TREASURER'S! REPORT FOR CASH AND INVESTME ENT PORTFOLIO April 2009 CITYCASH BALANCE 644,285.77 BEGINNING BALANCE  FUND GENERAL GENERAL  ACCOUNT  INSTITUTION TOTAL INSTITUTION TOTAL  RATE  WELLSFARGO $ 644,285.77 0.00%  (-)  ENDING  FUND GENERAL GENERAL  ACCOUNT  DEPOSITS WITHDRAWALS BALANCE RATE  WELLSFARGO $ 571,857.57 $ 442,974.94 $ (370,546.74) $ 644,285.77 0.000%  571,857.57 442,974.94. $ (370,546.74) 644,285.77  CITYINVESTMENT  PERCENT OF  DAYS STATED 0 1.607%  FUND  ISSUER  BOOKV VALUE FACEVALUE MARKETVALUE PORTFOLIO TOMAT, RATE 1,508,731.11 $_ 1,508,731.11 1,508,731.11 100.00% 1,508,731.11 $. 1,508,731.11 1,508,731.11 100.00%  GENERAL LOCALAGENCYINVESTWENTFUND  TOTAL  CITY -TOTAL CASH ANDI INVESTMENT  2,153,016.88 CITYINVESTMENT BEGINNING DEPOSITSI 1,501,667.75 $ 7,063.36 $ 1,501,667.75 $ 7,063.36 $.  () WITHDRAWALSI SALESI  ENDING STATED 0.00 $_ 1,508,731.11 1.607% 0.00 $ 1,508,731.11  FUND  ISSUER  BALANCE PURCHASES MATURITIES BALANCE RATE  GENERAL LOCAL ACENCYAVESTHENTUNOS  TOTAL  Inc compliance witht the California Code: Section! 53646, as the Director of Financel City Treasurer ofthe City of Wildomar,1 Ihereby certify thats sufficienti investment! liquidity and anticipated revenues area available to meett the City's expenditure requirements fort ther nexts sixr months andt thata alli investments arei in compliance to the City's Statement ofinvestment Policy. lalso certifyt thatt this reportr reflects all Government, Agency pooled investments and all City's! bank balances. Gary Nordquist Director ofF Finance/City' Treasurer  Date  2    April 2009 Daily Cash Balance All Funds Checking Only Pool Report Balance  1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0  55555599S885955EEEEESEE8888585  April 2009 Ending Balanceln Wholes 585,216 585,096 636,086 636,086 636,086 636,080 634,107 655,696 645,597 680,357 680,357 680,357 451,718 433,754 634,496 569,232 571,431 571,431 571,431 562,430 636,031 635,332 635,377 646,663 646,663 646,663 646,529 617,669 645,126 644,285  Net Change from Prior Day (120) 50,990 (6) (1,973) 21,589 (10,099) 34,760 (228,639) (17,964) 200,742 (65,264) 2,199 (9,001) 73,601 (699) 45 11,286 (134) (28,860) 27,457 (841)  Ending Monthly Net Balance 20,855 $ 2,297,920  Actvity 20,855 2,277,065 104,163 (61,647) (137,267) (1,455,505) 78,838 (93,251) (161,394) 72,428  Date 4/1 4/2 4/3 4/4 4/5 4/6 4/7 4/8 4/9 4/10 4/11 4/12 4/13 4/14 4/15 4/16 4/17 4/18 4/19 4/20 4/21 4/22 4/23 4/24 4/25 4/26 4/27 4/28 4/29 4/30  July August September 2,402,083 October 2,340,436 November 2,203,169 December 747,664 January February March Apri) May June  826,502 733,251 571,857 644,285  3    CITY OF WILDOMAR - COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM Meeting Date: MAY 27, 2009  Agenda Item 1E E.  TO: FROM:  Honorable Mayor Farnam, Members of the City Council  Julie Hayward Biggs, City Attorney  SUBJECT: Administrative Citation Ordinance  STAFF REPORT  RECOMMENDATION:  Introduce for first reading the attached ordinance establishing an  administrative citation procedure for the City.  BACKGROUND:  The City has a complete ordinance establishing its authority to enforce provision of the City Municipal Code through the criminal process. Violations may be processed as misdemeanors and penalties may be imposed. In order to give the City more flexibility to work with residents and business owners in the City, however, it is advisable for the City to implement an administrative process that will permit it to enforce code provisions without taking the matter to criminal  prosecution.  The attached ordinance will establish an administrative process for code enforcement that will result in a hearing before a member of the City's staff or a hearing officer retained to conduct the hearing. Civil penalties are set forth that may be imposed. The decision of the hearing officer will be final unless appealed  judicially.  The City is going to be taking over all code enforcement responsibility as of. July 1, 2009. Adopting this ordinance at the present time will make it effective  prior to that date.  RIV# #A820-0218-8803V1  1    ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance  AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 1.03.080 TO THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE  PROVIDING PROCEDURE  AN  ADMINISTRATIVE  CITATION  Submitted by:  Approved by:   Auue aow Debbie A. Lee, CMC City Clerk  John City Manager  Approved as to form: T City Attorney  Julie-Hayward Biggs Thons DI  RIV# #A820-0218-8803V1  2    ORDINANCE NO. 30  AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 1.03.080 TO THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE  PROVIDING PROCEDURE.  AN  ADMINISTRATIVE  CITATION  THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR DOES ORDAIN AS SECTION 1. Addition of Section 1.03.080 to the Wildomar Municipal Code. A new section 1.03.080 is hereby added to the Wildomar Municipal Code, and shall read  FOLLOWS:  as follows:  "1.03.080. Administrative citations and penalties.  In addition to the remedies and penalties contained in this chapter, and in accordance with Government Code Section 53069.4, an administrative citation may be issued for any violation of this Code. The following procedures shall govern the imposition, enforcement, collection and administrative review of administrative citations  and penalties.  A. Notice of Violation. If the violation is not corrected within the period stated in the notice of violation, or if the violation creates an immediate danger to health or safety, an administrative citation may be issued by the enforcement officer. The notice shall specify the manner in which the Code has been violated and the actions required to correct the violation. The notice shall also state that failure to correct the violation could subject the recipient of the citation to civil, administrative and criminal penalties and could result in the imposition of a lien on the property for costs related to the enforcement of the Code and correction of the conditions. The failure of the notice to set  forth all required contents shall not affect the validity of the proceedings. approved by the City Attorney and shall contain the following information:  B. Content of Citation. The administrative citation shall be issued on a form  1. Date, location and approximate time the violation was observed; 2. Thec ordinance violated and a brief description of.the violation; 3. The amount of the administrative penalty imposed for the violation; 4. Instructions for the payment of the penalty, and the time period by which it shall be paid and the consequences of failure to pay the penalty  within this time period;  5. Instructions on how to appeal the citation;  RIV #4840-9914-4195v1 5/7/09    6. The signature of the enforcement officer.  The failure of the citation to set forth all required contents shall not affect the  validity of the proceedings.  C. Service of Citation.  1. Ifthe owner, occupant or other person who has violated the ordinance is present at the scene of the violation, the enforcement officer shall attempt to obtain his or her signature on the administrative citation and shall deliver a copy of the administrative citation to the violator. 2. Ifthe owner, occupant or other person who has violated the ordinance is ab business, and the business owner is on the premises, the enforcement officer shall attempt to deliver the administrative citation to him or her. If the enforcement officer is unable to serve the business owner on the premises, the administrative citation may be left with the manager or employee of the business. If left with the manager or employee of the business, a copy of the administrative citation shall also be mailed to the business owner by certified mail, return receipt 3. Ifr no one can be located at the property, then the administrative citation shall be posted in a conspicuous place on or near the property and a copy mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested to the owner, occupant or other person who has violated the ordinance. The citation shall be mailed to the property address and/or the address listed for the 4. The failure of any interested person to receive the citation shall not  requested.  owner on the last county equalized assessment roll.  affect the validity of the proceedings.  D. Administrative Penalties.  1. The penalties assessed for each violation shall not exceed the  following amounts:  a. One hundred dollars ($100.00) for a first violation;  b. Two hundred dollars ($200.00) for a second violation of the C. Five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each additional violation of  same ordinance within one year; and the same ordinance within one year.  2. Ifthe violation is not corrected, additional administrative citations may be issued for the same violation. The amount of the penalty shall increase  at the rate specified above.  RIV# 4840-9914-4195v1 5/7/09    3. Payment of the penalty shall not excuse the failure to correct the  violation nor shall it bar further enforcement action. 4. The penalties assessed shall be payable to the City.  E. Administrative Appeal.  1. Time for Appeal. The recipient of administrative citation may appeal the citation by filing a written notice of appeal with the department that issued the administrative citation. The written notice of appeal must be filed within twenty (20) days of the service of the administrative citation as set forth in subsection C of this section. Failure to file a written notice of appeal within this time period shall constitute a waiver of the right to appeal the administrative citation. The notice of appeal shall be submitted  on City forms and shall contain the following information:  a. A brief statement setting forth the appellant's interest in the b. A brief statement of the material facts which the appellant claims supports his or her contention that no administrative penalty should be imposed or that an administrative penalty of a different C. An address at which the appellant agrees notice of any additional proceeding or an order relating to the imposition of the administrative penalty may be received by mail; d. The notice of appeal must be signed by the appellant.  proceedings;  amount is warranted;  2. Appeal Hearing. Upon a timely written request by the recipient of the administrative citation, an administrative hearing shall be held as follows: a. Notice of Hearing. Notice of the administrative hearing shall be given at least ten (10) days before the hearing to the person requesting the hearing. The notice may be delivered to the person or may be mailed to the address listed in the notice of appeal. b. Hearing Officer. The administrative hearing shall be held before the director of the issuing agency or his or her designee. The hearing officer shall not be the enforcement officer who issued the administrative citation or his or her immediate supervisor. The director may contract with a qualified provider to conduct administrative hearings or to process administrative citations. C. Conduct of the Hearing. The enforcement officer who issued the administrative citation shall not be required to participate in the administrative hearing. The contents of the enforcement officer's file  RIV #4840-9914-4195v1 5/7/09    in the case shall be admitted as prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. The hearing officer shall not be limited by the technical rules of evidence. If the person requesting the appeal fails to appear at the administrative hearing, the hearing officer shall make their determination based on the information contained in the  notice of appeal.  d. Hearing Officer's Decision. The hearing officer's decision following the administrative hearing may be personally delivered to the person requesting the hearing or sent by mail. The hearing officer may allow payment of the administrative penalty in installments, if the person provides evidence satisfactory to the hearing officer of an inability to pay the penalty in full. The hearing officer's decision shall contain instructions  for obtaining review of the decision by the superior court.  F. Review of Administrative Hearing Officer's Decision.  1. Notice of Appeal. Within twenty (20) days of the date of the delivery or mailing of the hearing officer's decision, a person may contest that decision by filing an appeal to be heard by the superior court. The filing fee for the appeal shall be in the amount provided for in Government Code section 70615. The failure to file the written appeal and to pay the filing fee within this period shall constitute a waiver of the right to an appeal and the decision shall be deemed confirmed. A copy of the notice of appeal shall be served in person or by first class mail upon the issuing agency by the 2. Conduct of Hearing. The conduct of the appeal is a subordinate judicial duty and may be performed by traffic trial commissioners and other subordinate judicial officials at the direction of the presiding judge of the court. The appeal shall be heard de novo, except that the contents of the issuing agency's file in the case shall be received in evidence. A copy of the document or instrument of the issuing agency providing notice of the violation and imposition of the administrative penalty shall be admitted into evidence as prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. The court shall request that the issuing agency's file on the case be forwarded to the court, to be received within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3. Judgment. The court shall retain the filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. If the court finds in favor of the contestant, the amount of the fee shall be reimbursed to the contestant by the local agency. Any deposit of the fine or penalty shall be refunded by the issuing agency in accordance with the judgment of the court. If the fine or penalty has not been deposited and the decision of the court is against the contestant, the issuing agency may proceed to collect the penalty pursuant to the procedures set forth in this chapter, or in any other manner  contestant.  provided by law."  RIV #4840-9914-4195V1 5/7/09    SECTION 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional. by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional, without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconsttutional.  SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days SECTION 4. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be  after its passage by the City Council.  published or posted in accordance with California law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this  day of  2009.  Scott Farnam, Mayor  ATTEST:  Sheryll Schroeder, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:  Julie Hayward Biggs, City Attorney  RIV: #4840-9914-4195v1 5/7/09    STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF WILDOMAR  ) )  1,S Sheryll Schroeder, City Clerk of the City of Wildomar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 09- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of  Wildomar at a regular meeting, held on the  day of  2009, by the  following vote of the Council:  AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:  Sheryl! Schroeder, City Clerk  RIV 4840-9914-4195v1 5/7/09    CITY OF WILDOMAR - CITY COUNCIL  Agenda Item 1 F. CONSENT ITEM  Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  TO: FROM:  Council Members  Michael Kashiwagi, Development Services  SUBJECT: Measure A Five-Year Expenditure Plans  STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATION:  City staff recommends approval of the attached Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads (also known as Expenditure Plans) and authorize the Public Works Director to submit the plans to Riverside County Transportation Commission. The Public Works Director is also authorized to make adjustments to the Measure A Expenditure Plans, if needed, to reflect more current Measure A projections  when the forecasted figures are become available by RCTC.  BACKGROUND:  In 1988, Riverside County voters approved Measure A, a half cent sales tax increase to pay for transportation related infrastructure improvements. Measure A spelled out a twenty year plan for transportation improvements that would help ensure mobility in The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is the agency charged with making sure the projects and programs voters wanted became a reality. In 2002, voters Both the 1988 and 2002 Measure A Ordinances require each recipient of local streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Riverside County Transportation Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive its Measure A disbursements. The City of Wildomar has received an allocation in the last year of the Measure A Ordinance for FY 2008/09 in the amount of $516,000. The City has also received an allocation for the first year of the "new" Measure A Ordinance, FY 2009/10 in the amount of $413,000. The Expenditure Plan is attached, to satisfy the The five-year expenditure plan for FY 08-09 allocation covers FY 2008/09 through FY 2012/13. The five-year expenditure plan for the new Measure A allocation in FY  Riverside County.  approved an extension of Measure A until 2039.  requirements of both old and new Measure A.  2009/10 covers FY 2009/10 through FY: 2013/14.  1    Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  Due to programming scenario regarding federal economic stimulus funding, RCTC has allocated an additional $210,000 in Measure A dollars for programming. This programming scenario placed economic stimulus funds on a select list of Measure A projects, allowing a portion of the measure A allocations to be distributed to local agencies in Riverside County. Those expenditures are included in the Expenditure plans. All Measure A allocations (approved by RCTC) which are programmed to the  City of Wildomar are summarized in Table 1.  Table 1. Measure A allocations approved by RCTC for the City of Wildomar  Measure A Allocation Fiscal Year 2008/09 (1988 Measure A Ordinance) Fiscal Year 2009/10 (2002 Measure A Ordinance) One-time Economic Stimulus  Amount  $516,000 $413,000 $210,000 TOTAL $1,139,000  A certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) is required to be submitted with the 5- year Expenditure Plan but this will not apply for the City of Wildomar until 3 years of transportation operations have surpassed to provide the MOE data. Therefore, City of Wildomar is relieved of the MOE requirement for the two attached Expenditure Plans.  FISCAL IMPACTS:  The Measure A Expenditure Plans enable the City of Wildomar to utilize Measure A allocations to Wildomar in FY 2008/09 and FY 2009/10 which is $516,000 and $413,000, respectively. This program also includes an additional $210,000 from a one- time infusion of Measure A due to economic stimulus. The program will not utilize  General fund revenue. ATTACHMENTS:  1. Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of  Wildomar, Fiscal Years 2008/09 through Fiscal Year 2013/14  2. Resolution No. 09-26  Submitted by:  Approved by: / N  Michael Kashiwagi Development Services  Manager  2    RESOLUTION NO. 09- 26 MEASURE A EXPENDITURE PLANS  AI RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR APPROVING THE  WHEREAS, Both the 1988 and 2002 Measure A Ordinances require each recipient of local streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Riverside County Transportation Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive its  Measure A disbursements; and  WHEREAS, The City of Wildomar has received an allocation in the last year of the WHEREAS, The City of Wildomar has also received an allocation for the first year of the WHEREAS, the City of Wildomar has received $210,000 in Measure A funding related to WHEREAS, City of Wildomar has prepared a five-year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for each of the previously mentioned allocations in FY WHEREAS, there is some overlapping years in the Measure A Capital Improvement Plan (also known as Expenditure Plans). The five-year expenditure plan for FY 08-09 allocation covers FY 2008/09 through FY 2012/13. The five-year expenditure plan for the new Measure A  Measure A Ordinance for FY 2008/09 in the amount of $516,000; and "new" Measure A Ordinance for FY 2009/10 in the amount of $413,000; and  economic stimulus; and  2008/09 and FY 2009/10;  allocation in FY 2009/10 covers FY 2009/10 through FY 2013/14; and  WHEREAS, the Measure A Ordinance also has a Maintenance of Effort requirement that does not apply to these expenditure plans, or the City's Measure A allocations until three years  oft transportation operations have elapsed; and  WHEREAS, the Measure A revenue projections may change and minor cost changes may be needed in the Expenditure Plan as this works through the RCTC process for Board approval and the Public Works Director will need to make any edits to ensure compliance with  Measure A program.  NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Wildomar does resolve as follows: 1. The City Council approves the Five-year Measure A Expenditure Plans for Measure A allocations in FY 2008/09 and FY 209/10 for submittal to Riverside County 2. The City Council authorizes the Public Works Director to make adjustments to the Measure A Expenditure Plan, as needed, to reflect any changes in project costs or  Transportation Commission.  Measure A revenues and submit the Expenditure Plans to RCTC.  PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27"h day of May 2009.    Scott Farnam Mayor  ATTEST:  Debbie Lee City Clerk  APPROVED ASTO FORM:  Julie Biggs City Attorney    RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM  FY: 2008 - 2009  Agency: City of Wildomar Page 10 of6 Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 19, 2009 Item No.  Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public' Works Director  Total Cost  Measure A Funds  Project Name /Limits No Measure A projects proposed inFY 2008-09; funds proposed to carryover for FY 2009-10 projects.  Project Type    RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM  FY2009 - 2010  Agency: City of Wildomar Page 2of6 Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 19, 2009 Item No. 1  Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director  Total Cost Measure A  Project Name /Limits Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide)  Project Type  Funds $45,000  Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs,  $45,000  pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements  2  $50,000  $50,000  3  Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide)  Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, $80,000 Slurry Seal as needed  $40,000  4 5  Traffic Signal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Reconstruction, or Widening Projects  Install new signals/traffic signal modifications Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways  $550,000  $550,000  $50,000  $50,000  6 7  Unspecified Rehabilitation, Rehab/Reconstruct/Widening $194,000  $194,000  TOTAL Measure A Funds:  $929,000  Note: FY 08-09 Measure A carryover is $516,000 and FY 09-10 Measure A allocation is $413,000  which total $929,000.    RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM  FY2010 - 2011  Agency: City of Wildomar Page 3 of6 Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 19, 2009 Item No. 1  Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director  Total Cost Measure. A  Project Name /Limits Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program citywide)  Project Type  Funds $20,000  Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs,  $20,000  pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, improvements  2  $50,000  $50,000  (various project locations related roadway safety  3  Slurry Seal Program citywide)  Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, $80,000  $58,000  (various project locations Slurry Seal as needed  4  Traffic Signal Program citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Reconstruction, or Widening Projects  Install new signals/traffic  $50,000  $50,000  (various project locations signal modifications  5  Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways  $50,000  $50,000  6  Unspecified Rehabilitation, Rehab/Reconstruct/Widening $395,000  $395,000  TOTAL Measure A Funds:  $623,000  Note: Assumes economic stimulus Measure A funding in the amount of $210,000 and projected  FY 2010/11 Measure A revenue of $413,000. Grand total is $623,000.    RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM  FY2011 - 2012  Agency: City of Wildomar Page 4 of6 Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 19, 2009 Item No. 1  Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public' Works Director  Total Cost Measure A  Project Name/Limits Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program citywide)  ProjectType  Funds $20,000  Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs,  $20,000  pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, improvements  2  $50,000  $50,000  (various project locations related roadway safety  3  Slurry Seal Program citywide)  Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, $80,000  $58,000  (various project locations Slurry Seal as needed  4 5  Traffic Signal Program citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Reconstruction, or Widening Projects  Install new signals/traffic  $50,000  $50,000  (various project locations signal modifications  Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways  $50,000  $50,000  6 7  Unspecified Rehabilitation, Rehab/Reconstruct/Widening $185,000  $185,000  TOTAL Measure A Funds:  $413,000  Note: Assumes projected Measure A revenue is $413,000.    RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM  FY2012 - 2013  Agency: City of Wildomar Page 5 of6 Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 19, 2009 Item No. 1  Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public works Director  Total Cost Measure A  Project Name /Limits Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program citywide)  Project Type  Funds $20,000  Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs,  $20,000  pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, improvements  2  $50,000  $50,000  (various project locations related roadway safety  3  Slurry Seal Program citywide)  Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, $80,000  $58,000  (various project locations Slurry Seal as needed  4 5  Traffic Signal Program citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Reconstruction, or Widening Projects  Install new signals/traffic  $50,000  $50,000  (various project locations signal modifications  Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways  $50,000  $50,000  6 7  Unspecified Rehabilitation, Rehab/Reconstruct/Widening $185,000  $185,000  TOTAL Measure A Funds:  $413,000  Note: Assumes projected Measure A revenue is $413,000.    RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM  FY2013 - 2014  Agency: City of Wildomar Page 6 of6 Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 19, 2009 Item No. 1  Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public works Director  Total Cost Measure A  Project Name /Limits Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program citywide)  Project Type  Funds $20,000  Accessibility Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs,  $20,000  pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, improvements  2  $50,000  $50,000  (various project locations related roadway safety  3  Slurry Seal Program citywide)  Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, $80,000  $58,000  (various project locations Slurry Seal as needed  4 5  Traffic Signal Program citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Reconstruction, or Widening Projects  Install new signals/traffic  $50,000  $50,000  (various project locations signal modifications  Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways  $50,000  $50,000  6 7  Unspecified Rehabilitation, Rehab/Reconstruct/Widening $185,000  $185,000  TOTAL Measure A Funds:  $413,000  Note: Assumes projected Measure A revenue is $413,000.    CITY OF WILDOMAR - CITY COUNCIL  Agenda Item 1G.  CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  TO: FROM:  Mayor and Members of the City Council Gary Nordquist, Director of Finance  SUBJECT: Sales and Use Tax Auditing  STAFF REPORT  RECOMENDATION:  1. Authorize execution of a professional services agreement with MuniServices LLC for 2. Adopt Resolution No. 09-27 authorizing the examination of sales, use and transaction tax records, pursuant to Section 7056 of the State of California Revenue and Taxation Code, by MuniServices LLC and designated City officers and  sales tax audit and information services.  employees.  BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION:  The City desires a comprenensive Sales and Use Tax Audit program that will ensure the City is receiving all the Sales and Use Tax revenue to which it is entitled. MuniServices approach is both innovative and flexible, offering a full spectrum of state-of-the-art revenue enhancement services. In conjunction with MuniServices' comprehensive Sales and Use Tax Audit Service, MuniServices will also provide Sales Tax Analysis Reporting Service (STARS) digest and information services. MuniServices' STARS service provides a digest summary that features a general analysis regarding statewide trends that may affect sales tax plus a specific analysis of the City's sales tax composition, changes and performance. The quarterly specialized reports will provide comprehensive analysis of the City's sales tax economic base and performance. Staff reviewed other firms providing similar services and recommends the selection of MuniServices based on the quality of  products unique to the City of Wildomar's needs.    FISCAL IMPACTS:  MuniServices' compensation for the Sales and Use Tax Audit Service is a 25% contingency fee. This fee applies to recovered revenue received for six quarters. The STARS' proposed fee is an annual fixed fee of $1,500.00 per year, paid $375  quarterly. The City has budget for both services.  ALTERNATIVES: 1. Take no action Submitted by:  2. Provide staff with further direction.  Approved by: A  Gary Nordquist Finance Director  CityN Manager  Attachments: Resolution 09-27  2    RESOLUTION NO. 09-27  RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR  AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX RECORDS WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7270 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the City of Wildomar (City) entered into a contract with the State Board of Equalization (Board) to perform all functions incident to the administration and operation of the WHEREAS, the City deems it desirable and necessary for authorized representatives of the City to examine confidential transactions and use tax records of the State Board of Equalization pertaining to transactions and use taxes collected by the  Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance; and  Board for the Commission pursuant to that contract; and  WHEREAS, Section 7056' of the Revenue and Taxation Code sets forth Certain requirements and conditions for the disclosure of Board records and Establishes criminal penalties for the unlawful disclosure of information contained in Or derived from, the transactions and use tax records of the Board; NOW, THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Manager or Chief Financial Officer of the City designated in writing by the Board of Commissioners to the State Board of Equalization is hereby appointed to represent the City with Authority to examine transactions and use tax records of the Board pertaining to Transactions and use taxes collected for the City by the Board pursuant to The contract between the City and the Board. The information obtained by Examination of Board records shall be used only for purposes related to the Collection of the City's transactions and use taxes by the Board pursuant to  The contract.  Section 2. That the City Manager or Chief Financial Officer of the  City designated in writing by the City to the State Board of Equalization is hereby appointed to represent the City with authority to examine those transactions and use tax records of the Board for purposes related to the following governmental functions of the a) Review of sales tax records to ensure proper allocation and remittance  City: To the City;  b) Economic development; and  c) Other governmental functions as required by the City.  3    The information obtained by examination of Board records shall be used only for Section 3. That MuniServices, LLC is hereby designated to examine the Transactions and use tax records of the Board pertaining to transactions and use Taxes collected for the City by the Board. The person or entity designated  Those governmental functions of the City listed above.  By this section meets all of the following conditions: a) Has an existing contract with the City to examine those  Transactions and use tax records;  b) Is required by that contract to disclose information contained in, or Derived from those transactions and use tax records only to the officer Ore employee authorized under Section 1 and Section 2 of this c) Is prohibited by that contract from performing consulting services fora d) Is prohibited by that contract from retaining the information contained In, or derived from those transactions and use tax records after that BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the information obtained by examination of Board records shall be used only for purposes related to the collection of City's transactions and use taxes by the Board pursuant to the contracts  Resolution to examine the information; Retailer during the term of that contract;  Contract has expired.  Between the City and Board.  ADOPTED this 27th day of May, 2009.  Scott Farnam, Mayor City of Wildomar ATTEST: Debbie Lee, Clerk of the Board City of Wildomar  4    tem IH H,  1400 K Street, Suite 400 . Sacramento, California 95814  LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES City Officials Chris McKenzie, Executive Director Sample Resolution Declaring Severe Fiscal Hardship Friday, May 08, 2009  Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240  www.cacities.org  TO: FROM: RE: DATE:  Background. On May 5 the Department of Finance announced it had proposed to the Governor that the state "borrow" over $2 billion in local property taxes from cities, counties and special districts to balance the state budget, causing deeper cuts in local public safety and other vital service. In order to start that process, the Governor would have to issue a proclamation declaring the existence of a "severe fiscal hardship.' . The legislature would then have to implement the "borrowing" program by passing urgency legislation (2/3 vote) which identifies how the "loan"will be repaid with interest. Resolution. The League has developed the attached Resolution Finding A Severe Fiscal Hardship Will Exist if this proposed state property tax raid is added to the pressures of the ongoing property tax losses and the serious revenue losses due to the economic reçession. The resolution in effect states that the idea of the state taking property tax funds from already stressed city budgets is ludicrous and irresponsible. It helps demonstrate that part ofthe reason cities are cutting there budgets today, in fact, is because of past and continuing property tax raids. If possible, we urge that a staff report be prepared with information on property tax losses (see below) and budget cuts the city Cumulative Property Tax Losses. The attached resolution cites the cumulative property tax losses ofcities statewide since the state began taking these funds in the early 1990s which is $8.6 billion statewide even after deducting payments cities receive from the Prop. 172 public safety sales tax the state COPS grant program. If you want to see your individual city total, see: itp/www.calfomiacyImanecVEkAFbyCIVOS.pd: Please use the figure in the last column on the right ify you want to insert the amount your Where to Send Copies. The draft resolution directs the city clerk to send copies to your legislators, the Governor, and the League. We would appreciate you faxing copies to both your League Regional Public Affairs Manager and the League's Sacramento Office (Fax Note, The last WHEREAS clause was included on the advice of bond counsel to avoid any implication that the city would not honor any of its bond or other contractual Questions. If you have any questions or need any information pleasc contact your  has made and is facing.  city has lost to these state raids.  916-658-8240).  obligations.  League Regional Public Affairs Manager.    RESOLUTION NO. 09-28  A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, FINDING A SEVERE FISCAL HARDSHIP WILL EXIST IF ADDITIONAL LOCAL PROPERTY TAX FUNDS ARE SEIZED AND ADDITIONL UNFUNDED MANDATES ARE ADOPTED BY THE  STATE OF CALIFORNIA  WHEREAS, the current economic crisis has placed cities under incredible financial pressure and caused city officials to reopen already adopted budgets to make painful cuts, including layoffs and furloughs of city workers, decreasing maintenance and operations of public facilities, and reduction in direct services to keep spending in  line with declining revenues; and  WHEREAS, since the early 1990s the state government of California has seized over $8.6 billion of city property tax revenues statewide to fund the state budget even after deducting public safety program payments to cities by the state; and  WHEREAS, in FY 2007-08 alone the state seized $895 million in city property taxes statewide to fund the state budget after deducting public safety program payments and an additional $350 million in local redevelopment funds were seized in  FY2 2008-09; and  WHEREAS, the most significant impact of taking local property taxes has been to reduce the quality of public safety services cities can provide since public safety  comprises the largest part of any city's general fund budget; and  WHEREAS, in 2004 the voters, by an 84% vote margin, adopted substantial constitutional protections for local revenues, but the legislature can still "borrow" local  property taxes to fund the state budget; and  WHEREAS, on May 5 the Department of Finance announced it had proposed to the Governor that the state "borrow" over $2 billion in local property taxes from cities, counties and special districts to balance the state budget, causing deeper cuts in local  public safety and other vital services; and  WHEREAS, in the past the Governor has called such "borrowing" proposals fiscally irresponsible because the state will find it virtually impossible to repay and it  -1-    would only deepen the state's structural deficit, preventing the state from balancing its  budget; and  WHEREAS, the Legislature is currently considering hundreds of bills, many of which would impose new costs on local governments that can neither be afforded nor  sustained in this economic climate; and  WHEREAS, state agencies are imposing, or considering, many regulations imposing unfunded mandates on local governments without regard to how local agencies will be able to comply with these mandates while meeting their other  responsibilities; and  WHEREAS, the combined effects of the seizure of the City's property taxes, increasing unfunded state mandates, and the revenue losses due to the economic downturn, have placed the city's budget under serious fiscal pressure; and  WHEREAS, our city simply cannot sustain the loss of any more property tax funds or to be saddled with any more state mandates as they will only deepen the  financial challenge facing our city; and  WHEREAS, a number of the City's financial commitments arise from contracts, including long term capital leases and debt obligations which support securities in the public capital markets, that the City must honor in full unless modified by mutual  agreement of the parties.  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, has determined that the City will experience a severe fiscal hardship if the recommendation of the Department of Finance to "borrow" $2 billion of local property taxes is supported by the Governor and the Legislature.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council strongly and unconditionally opposes the May 5 proposal of the Department of Finance and any other state government proposals to borrow or seize any additional local funds, including the property tax, redevelopment tax increment, and the city's share of the Prop 42  transportation sales tax.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council strongly urges the state legislature and Governor to suspend the enactment of any new mandates on local  -2-    governments until such time as the economy has recovered and urges the state to  provide complete funding for all existing and any new mandates.  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall send copies of this Resolution to the Governor, our state senators, our state assembly members and the  League of California Cities.  PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of May, 2009.  Scott Farnam Mayor  ATTEST:  Debbie A. Lee, CMC City Clerk  3-    CITY OF WILDOMAR - COUNCIL GENERAL BUSINESS ITEM Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  Agenda Item 3A.  TO: FROM:  Honorable Mayor Farnam, Members of the City Council  SUBJECT: Higher Education Subcommittee  NO STAFF REPORT  1    CITY OF WILDOMAR - CITY COUNCIL  Agenda Item 3B.  GENERAL BUSINESS ITEM Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  TO: FROM:  Council Members  Michael Kashiwagi, Development Services  SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program (Fiscal Years 2009/10- 2013/14)  STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATION:  The City of Wildomar's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a planning tool that identifies anticipated capital improvements for fiscal years 2009/2010 through 2013/2014. It also identifies the funding sources to finance the capital improvements. This is a discussion item for Council and no action is being asked at this meeting. Following Council direction, the CIP will be brought back in June to be considered along  with the operating budget. BACKGROUND:  The City staff has prepared a Capital Improvement Program covering a five-year planning horizon (starting in Fiscal Year 2009/10 through Fiscal Year 2013/14). The CIP does not appropriate funds, but functions as a budgeting and planning tool, supporting actual appropriations that are made through adoption of the budget. The 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) describes transportation capital improvements planned by the City for the next five years and sets forth a funding As a multi-year program which includes forecasts of anticipated capital improvement expenditures, the CIP links the project development process with the fiscal planning process of the City. The expenditures shown for the first year of the CIP comprise the Capital Budget starting in fiscal year 2009/10. Subsequent years are also included in the CIP, although these "future years" are subject to change due to more detailed engineering analysis becoming available, possible changes in project priorities, updates or revisions to anticipated revenues, and/or changes in cost and funding projections. The CIP includes all active transportation projects and programs and those expected to be undertaken during the coming five fiscal years. Specific projects and their scheduled  strategy for their implementation.  completions are selected based upon:  1    Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  Implementation of the City's General Plan; location of expected development; that distribute traffic flows efficiently; Availability of funding; and City Council direction.  Existing traffic patterns and associated improvement needs;  Projected traffic patterns, based on assumptions regarding the quantity and The need to establish a coherent roadway network, with strategic connections  Minimizing disruptions associated with construction activity;  CIP programs are dedicated to enhancing accessibility and safety throughout the City by targeting various improvements. Five distinct programs have been incorporated in  this five-year CIP and costs are summarized in Table 1 below.  Table 1. FY  City of Wildomar Capital Improvement Programs FY 2009/10- FY 2013/14  FY  FY  FY  FY  Program/Project 1.Accessibility mprovements Program 2. Roadway Safety improvement Program 3. Slurry Seal Program 4.1 Traffic Signal Program TOTAL Notes:  2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 5-Year Total $45,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $125,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $400,000 $550,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $750,000 $825,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,825,000  5. Unpaved Roadway Enhancement Program $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000  1. Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming totais for Accessibility Improvements Program includes funding for an 2. Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming totals for Traffic Signal Program assumes construction on new traffic Totaling $1,825,000 in project costs over the 5-year period, Table 2 shows the anticipated Measure A and Air Quality revenues to cover those costs. It is assumed that the city's other funding sources for transportation- gas tax, Proposition 42, and some Measure A funds--will be budgeted toward transportation maintenance, operating costs, and staff labor. Therefore expenditures and costs for those activities are not  American Disabilities Act Transition Plan.  signals.  reflected in the CIP.  Table 2. FY  Capital Improvement Program Revenue Sources  *** 5-Year Capital Improvement Program  FY  FY  FY  FY  FY 2012/13 2013/14 Total  Revenue Source Measure A Air Quality (AB: 2766) TOTAL  2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 $19,000 $22,000 $22.000 $390,000 $435.000 $250,000  $371.000 $413,000 $228,000 $228,000 $228,000 $228,000 $1,696,000  $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $129,000 $250.000 $250,000 $250.000 $1,825,000  2    Meeting Date: May 27,2009  1. FY 2008/09 unexpended revenue will carryover and along with FY 2009/10 revenue; the total revenue of $825,000 will finance the first year oft the CIP Program of projects which also total $825,000 in cost. 2. FY 2008/09 revenue from Air Quality funding is only $19,000 as $3,000 was approved by Council for 3. Alli funds in the CIP are assumed tol be funded through Measure A and AB: 2766 Air Quality funding. There are also capital transportation projects (with Riverside County as the lead agency) which directly benefit the City of Wildomar. Twelve county projects are  expenditure towards membership in the WRCOG Clean Cities Coalition.  identified for informational purposes in the' Wildomar CIP.  FISCAL IMPACTS:  The City of Wildomar's Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2009-14 consists of five programs costing a total of approximately $1,825,000. Of this amount, approximately $825,000 is assumed for expenditure in the upcoming Fiscal Year 2009/10. Approximately $700,000 of projected Measure A revenues remain unprogrammed in the 5-year CIP, to serve as a contingency, on Measure A projects to be later identified by Council. A separate Council item approves a 5-year Expenditure Plan for Measure A which does program the entire contingency toward an illustrative list of expenditures, because this is a requirement for planning purposes in order for City to access a current year's Measure A allocations. The Measure A expenditure plan will be  modified as Council makes decisions on the contingency programming.  ATTACHMENTS:  1. Capital Improvement Program (FY 2009/10- FY 2013/14)  Submitted by:  Approved by: A  Michael Kashiwagi Development Services  Intérim City Manager  3    Ey dfOMllomar  Capital Improvement Program  2009/10 - 2018/2014 WORKING DRAFT ONLY  FOR DISCUSSION    NTRODUCTION    Introduction  The 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) describes transportation capital improvements planned by the City for the five-year period from Fiscal Year 2009-10 through Fiscal Year 2013-14 and sets forth a funding strategy for their implementation. The CIP will be updated each year and presented to the City Council for consideration. The capital improvements listed in the CIP necessitate the expenditure of public funds over and As a multi-year program which includes forecasts of anticipated capital improvement expenditures, the CIP links the project development process with the fiscal planning process of the City. The expenditures shown for the first year of the CIP comprise the Capital Budget for the current fiscal year (FY 09-10), which is adopted annually by the City Council. Subsequent years are also included in the CIP, although these "future years" are subject to change due to more detailed engineering analysis becoming available, possible changes in priorities, updates or revisions to anticipated revenues, and/or changes in cost The information included in the CIP is based on the best information available at the time the program was developed. A new five-year CIP will be submitted for consideration to the City Council each year with recommended adjustments to project budgets, funding sources, descriptions, and/or schedules. Financial information included in the CIP is shown The CIP includes all active transportation projects and programs and those expected to be undertaken during the coming five fiscal years. Specific projects and their scheduled  above the City's annual operating expenditures.  and funding projections.  in2 2009 dollars.  completions are selected based upon:  implementation of the City's General Plan;  Existing traffic patterns and associated improvement needs;  Projected traffic patterns, based on assumptions regarding the quantity and location The need to establish a coherent roadway network, with strategic connections that  ofe expected development; distribute traffic flows efficiently; Availability of funding; and City Council direction.  Minimizing disruptions associated with construction activity;    Projected Revenue for Maintenance/oPeratons and Capital Improvement Projects by Fiscal Year  5-Year CIP  Funding Source FY08/09 FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 2009-14 2009- Gas Tax (Prop.111) 617,200 617,200 617,200 635,700 654,800 674,400 3,816,500 46.0%  Total 14%  Traffic Congestion Relief (Prop.42) Measure A Air Quality (AB 2766) 22,000  232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 1,392,000 16.8% 516,000 623,000 421,000 438,000 465,000 501,000 2,964,000 35.7%  22,000 22,000  22,000  22,000 22,000  132,000  1.6%  Totals: 1,387,200 1,494,200 1,292,200 1,327,700 1,373,800 1,429,400 8,304,500 100.0%  Of the $8.3 million in revenue identified above, approximately $1.8 million is planned to be invested on CIP programs and projects over the five-year planning horizon. A summary of the programmed funding for the CIP, by funding source and fiscal year, is shown in the table below. Refer to the Funding Source Summaries section of the CIP for more detailed Note: In Fiscal Year 2009/10, Measure A revenue includes a one-time infusion of economic  information regarding the specific funding sources. stimulus funding in the amount of $210,000.  2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program Programmed Funding by Fiscal Year  5-Year CIP  2009-14 2009-  Funding Source FY08/09 FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 Total 14% Air Quality (AB2 2766) 19,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 129,000  Measure A  371,000 413,000 228,000 228,000 228,000 228,000 1,696,000 92.9%  7.1%  Totals: 390,000 435,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,825,000 100.0%  CIP programs are dedicated to enhancing accessibility and safety throughout the City by targeting various improvements relating to pedestrian accessibility, roadway safety, and traffic  signs, markings, and signals.    The CIP contains three sections:  Funding Source Summaries - Information regarding key transportation funding sources utilized in the program, including how funds are generated, restrictions on use, and Ongoing Transportation Program Summaries - A description, funding plan, and County Lead Agency CIP Project Summaries - A description, funding plan, and schedule information for County-led CIP projects that directly benefit the City. Projects are funded by the County and are included for information purposes only.  appropriations by fiscal year, historical use, and legislative references. schedule information for each annual transportation program in the CIP.  Each section above includes a separate table of contents.    FUNDING SOURCES    CIP Funding Sources  Air Quality Fund (AB 2766). Measure A Fund.  F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4  Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (Proposition 42). Gas Tax Fund (Proposition 111).    City of Wildomar Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014 Funding Sources  Air Quality Fund (AB 2766)  Air Quality (AB 2766) fees are collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles and are subvened to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for the purpose of funding three programs:. The Local Government Subvention Fund Program, The AQMD Program Fund, and  The Discretionary Fund Program.  How are these funds used?  Air Quality funds may be utilized to fund expenditures relating to promoting alternative. fueled vehicles, vehicle emissions abatement, land use strategies that reduce automobile trips and emissions, reducing single occupancy vehicle trips, traffic management and signal coordination, developing and/or installing bikeways, bike 30 lockers/racks and other bicycle-related improvements, paving roads and shoulders, purchasing AQMD Rule 1186.1 compliant street sweepers, public education on options that reduce single occupancy vehicle trips, and other miscellaneous projects that. reduce emissions.  Air Quality (AB 2766) Fund Annual CIP Appropriation  50 40 20 19 10  22 22 22 22 22  FY08/09 FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14  DollarsinThousands  What are the restrictions on the use of these funds?  Air Quality funds must be used for expenditures that meet the criteria and guidelines established  by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).  What legislation governs the use of these funds? Section 44223 to the California Health and Safety Code.  To protect public health, Assembly Bill 2766 was signed into law in September 1990 and added.  F-1    City of Wildomar Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014 Funding Sources  Measure Al Fund  Measure A Fund revenues are generated from a 20-year countywide one-half percent sales tax for transportation improvements approved by voters in 1988 and 2002. The program is administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), who distributes the proceeds to jurisdictions within Riverside County via a population-Dased formula, with a specific amount to be spent on maintenance and a specific amount to be spent on capital improvements: The Measure A Ordinance requires recipients of Measure A funding to provide a five-year  expenditure plan to the Commission on an annual basis.  How are these funds used?  Measure A funds are used to fund the City's maintenanceloperatons programs and ongoing Improvements, Roadway Safety Improvements, Slurry. Seal, Traffic Signal, and Unpaved 500  Measure AFund Annual CIP Appropriation  transportation  programs  (Accessibility  600 400 371 300 200 100  413  Roadway Enhancement).  228 228 228 228  FY08/09 FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14  Dollars in Thousands  What are the restrictions on the use of these funds?  Measure A funds must be spent on specific projects and programs as approved by voters in the original ballot measure. Modifications to the list can be made but such amendments must be  approved by the RCTC.  What legislation governs the use of these funds? 180000 et seq. added by Statutes of 1987, Chapter 786).  Local Transportation Authority and improvement Act. (Public Utilities Code Division 19, Section  F-2    City of Wildomar Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014 Funding Sources  Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (Proposition 42)  Traffic Congestion Relief fund revenues are allocated to the City from the State's Traffic Congestion Relief Fund, which is funded through sales and use taxes on gasoline sales in California pursuant to Assembly Bill 2928, for purposes of road maintenance or reconstruction.  How are these funds used?  Revenues may be used for public transit and mass transportation, street and road repairs and improvements, and state highway Traffic Congestion Relief funds will primarily be used for maintenance and are not proposed to be utilized within the current CIP.  Traffic Congestion Relief Fund 500 Capital Expenditures Not Planned  improvements.  400 300 200 100  0 0 Dollars InThousands  0  FY08/09 FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14  What are the restrictions on the use of these funds?  There are Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirements to receive Prop. 42 funds. However, cities incorporated after Prop. 42 passage have an MOE requirement of "zero" since incorporation occurred after Prop. 42 passage and such cities are not subject to MOE which is calculated in the  three years prior to 1999.  What legislation governs the use of these funds?  State of California Assembly Bill 2928 - Maintenance of Effort Program, State of California  Proposition 42.  F-3    City of Wildomar Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014 Funding Sources  Gas Tax Fund (Proposition 111)  Gas Tax Fund revenues are generated from the $0.18 per gallon State excise tax on motor vehicle fuel sold in California. The State Board of Equalization administers the tax and the State controller distributes the proceeds to cities and counties using formulas based on population and  lane-miles of maintained roadways.  How are these funds used?  Revenue from Gas Tax may be used for the research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways (including the mitigation of 2,500 environmental affects, payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and Gas Tax funds will primarily be used for maintenance and are not proposed to be  Proposition 111 Fund Capital Expenditures Not Planned  3,000 2,000 1,500 1,000 500  administrative costs).  0  0 0  utilized within the current CIP.  FY08/09 FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14  Dollars in Thousands  What are the restrictions on the use of these funds?  Use of Gas Tax funds is limited to research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and public transit guide ways. Gas Tax funds may not be used for the maintenance or operating costs for mass transit power systems and mass transit passenger,  facilities, vehicles, equipment, and services.  What legislation governs the use of these funds?  State of California Streets and Highways Code Sections 2105, 2106, 2107, and 2107.5.  F-4    CAPITAL MPROVEMENT  PROJECTS    Program Summaries (Alphabetical)  Accessibility Improvements Program.. Roadway Safety Improvements Program..  Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6  Slurry Seal Program Traffic Signal Program  Unpaved Roadway Enhancement Program..    Accessibility Improvements Program Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Program Description:  This program is dedicated to improving ADA accessibility through various types of repairs too curbs, gutters, and sidewalks throughout the City. Priority is given to safety-related issues and those which have been requested by citizens. This first year includes costs  to prepare egaly-mandated ADA Transition Plan.  5-Year CIP  Funding Source Measure A  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals $ 25 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 125  Totals  $ 25 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 125  Expenditures  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  PE, ROW, Construction $ 25 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 125  Totals  $ 25 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 125  Schedule  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14  PE, ROW, Construction  Notes:  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page 2    Roadway Safety mprovements Program Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Program Description:  This program is dedicated to improving roadway safety through upgrading existing and/or adding new high-visibility traffic signs, pavement markings, and other  geometric improvements (i.e. site distance).  5-Year CIP  Funding Source Measure A  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 250  Totals  $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 250  Expenditures PE, ROW, Construction  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 250 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 250  Totals  Schedule  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14  PE, ROW, Construction  Notes:  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page 3    Slurry Seal Program  Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Program Description:  This program is dedicated to resurlacing pavement with slurry seal on various city  streets to improve ride-ability and maintain pavement integrity.  5-Year CIP  Funding Source Measure A AB 2766 Air Quality  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals 3 $ 36 $ 58 $ 58 $ 58 $ 58 $ 271 $ 19 $ 22 $ 22 $ 22 $ 22 $ 22 $ 129  $  Totals  $ 22 $ 58 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 400  Expenditures  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  PE, ROW, Construction $ 22 $ 58 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 400  Totals  $ 22 $ 58 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 400  Schedule  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14  PE, ROW, Construction  Notes:  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page4    Traffic Signal Program Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Program Description:  This program is dedicated to making improvements to existing signalized intersections and/or installing new traffic signals. Improvements to existing intersections may include adding turn lanes, modifying signal timing, signal interconnections, and  pedestrian safety.  5-Year CIP  Funding Source Measure A/Western  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals $ 293 $ 257 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 750  Totals  $ 293 $ 257 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 750  Expenditures  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  PE, ROW, Construction $ 293 $ 257 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 750  Totals  $ 293 $ 257 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 750  Schedule  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14  PE, ROW, Construction  Notes:  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page 5    Unpaved Roadway Enhancement Program Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Program Description:  This program is dedicated to maintaining and improving unpaved public roadways throughout the City. Eligible roadways are those which the City can accept through  dedication.  5-Year CIP  Funding Source Measure A  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 300  Totals  $ 50 $ 50 S $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 300  Expenditures  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  PE, ROW, Construction $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 300  Totals  $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50_$ 50 $ 50 $ 300  Schedule  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14  PE, ROW, Construction  Notes:  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page 6    COUNTY (LEAD AGENCY)  PROJECTS    County Lead Agency CIP Project Summaries  (Alphabetical)  Baxter Road/I-5 Traffic Signals  Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14  Bundy Canyon Road' Widening (Mission Trail to I-15). Bundy Canyon Road/Scott Road' Widening (I-15t to I-215) Clinton Keith Road Widening (I-15 to Copper Craft). Grand Avenue Widening (Ortega Hwy to Central). Palomar Street' Widening (Mission Trail to' Washington)  Clinton Keith Road Widening (I-15).  Note: The projects included in this section were approved as part of the County-adopted Transportation Improvement Program 2008. Funding for these projects is provided by regional development impact fees, local development impact fees, benefit districts, and other funding sources. The County is the lead agency to deliver these projects. These transportation projects directly benefit the City of Wildomar and are therefore included in this section solely for  informational purposes.    Baxter Road/I-5 Traffic Signals Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Project Description:  Traffic signals will be installed at I-5 ramps and right-turn lanes added on Baxter Road.  Funding Source Unfunded  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  West County DIF Signal Mit Fund $ 7 $ 212  $ 219 5 1 1,768  $1,768  Totals  $ 7$1,980  $ 1,987  Expenditures Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Totals Schedule Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Notes:  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 7  $ 7  1,980 $ 1,987  $1 1,980  $ 7$1 1,980  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page 8    Bundy Canyon Road Widening (Mission Trail to 1-15)  Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Project Description: be constructed. Funding Source  Bundy Canyon Road will be reconstructed, widened, and an interim four-lane section will  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  Southwest Area R&B Benefit Dist  $ 2 208 $ 2,029 $ 2,237  Totals  $_208 $ 2,029 $2,237  Expenditures Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Totals Schedule Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Notes:  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 30 $170  $ 30 $ 170  $ 8_$2,029 $2 2,037 $_208 $2,029 $2,237  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page 9    Bundy Canyon Road/Scott Road Widening (I-15t to I-215)  Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Project Description:  An interim four-lane section of road will be constructed.  Funding Source TUMP-ldentifea-miunoed Southwest. Area R&B Benefit Dist Scott Road and Benefit District Unfunded R&B Benefit Dist- Unidentfiedumfunded Totals  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 2,714 $ 3,385  $ 2,714 18,259 $ 3,385 $ 1,449 $11,757 $ 6,421 $43,985  Southwest: Zone (WRCOG) $ 601 $4,000 $2,674 $ 10,753 $ 231  $ 39  $ 20 $ 1,211 $ 179 $1,351 $ 8,416 $1,990  $ 6,421  $ 640 $ 4,000 $ 4,045 $ 32,900 $ 2,400  Expenditures Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Totals Schedule Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Notes:  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 60 $ 580  $ 60 $ 580 $ 8,000 $ 35,345 $4 43,985]  $4,000 $ 4,000  $ 45 $3 32,900 $ 2,400  $ 640 $ 4,000 $ 4,045 $ 32,900 $ 2,400  08/09 09/10 10/11  11/12 12/13 13/14  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page 10    Clinton Keith Road Widening (I-15) Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Project Description: constructed. Funding Source  Clinton Keith Road will be widened and an interim four-lane section of road will be  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  Southwest Area R&B Benefit Dist  $ 364 $ 364  Totals  $364 $ 364  Expenditures Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Totals Schedule Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Notes:  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 71 $ 71 $293 $ 293  $364 $ 364  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14  1. All dollar figures in thousands  2. SouthwestArea R&B funding for $1,536,000 is planned for construction in 14/15.  Page 11    Clinton Keith Road Widening (I-15 to Copper Craft)  Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Project Description:  Clinton Keith Road will be reconstructed and widened to four lanes.  Funding Source TuMPicentifiealmiunded Developer In-Lieu Funds Unfunded  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $284  $5,219 $ 279  $ 5,503 $ 5,108 $ 279 $11,510  Southwest Zone (WRCOG) $116 $1 1,990 $2,227 $ 775  $32 $ 980 $ 923 $ 9,575  Totals  $_432 $ 2,970 $ 8,648 $ 10,350 08/09 09/10 10/11  $ 22,400  Expenditures Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Totals Schedule Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Notes:  11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 432  $ 432 $ 2,970 $ 1 18,998 $22,400  $ 2,970  $8,648 $ 10,350  $ 432 $ 2,970 $ 8,648 $ 10,350 08/09 09/10 10/11  11/12 12/13 13/14  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page 12    Grand Avenue Widening (Ortega Hwy to Central) Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Project Description:  Grand Avenue will be widened from two to four thru lanes.  Funding Source Measure AWWestern TuMFldentufeaumtunded  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 41  $ 41 20,860 2,869 $ 1,629  $ 468 $11,438 $8,954  Southwest Zone (WRCOG) $1,088 $1,781  Unfunded  $ 1,038 $ 591  Totals  $1 1,129 $ 2,249 $ 12,476 $ 9,545  $ 25,399  Expenditures Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Totals Schedule Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Notes:  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 100 $ 150 $1 1,020 $ 1,628 $ 1,000  $ 250 $ 3,648 11,938 9,563 $25,399  $ 462 $ 11,476 9  $  9 $  $9,545  $1 1,129 $ 2,249 $ 12,476 $ 9,545  08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14  1. All dollar figures in thousands  Page 13    Palomar Street' Widening (Mission Trail to Washington)  Funding Plan and Tentative Schedule  Project Description:  Palomar Street will be widened to four lanes and realigned to connect to Jefferson Avenue.  Funding Source Measure A/Western TuMFidentifiedumtumded Developer In-Lieu Funds Unfunded  08/09 09/10 10/11 $ 20 $ 253 $ 966  11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 58  $ 58 $ 1,239 $ 8,833 $ 233 $ 44,870  Southwest Zone (WRCOG) $ 805 $3,334 $ 2,455 $ 2,239  $ 233 $ 813 $16,396 $27,661  Totals  $ 883 $ 4,400 $ 20,050 $ 29,900 08/09 09/10 10/11  $55,233  Expenditures Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Totals Schedule Environmental Design Right-of-Way Construction Notes:  11/12 12/13 13/14 Totals  $ 883  $ 883 $ 6,600 47,750 $ 55,233  $4,400 $ 2,200  $ 17,850 $ 29,900  $ 883 $ 4,400 $ 20,050 $ 29,900  08/09 09/10 10/11  11/12 12/13 13/14  1. All dollari figures in thousands  Page 14    CITY OF WILDOMAR - COUNCIL  Agenda Item 3C.  GENERAL BUSINESS ITEM Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  TO: FROM:  Mayor and Members of the City Council Paula Willette, Special Events & Projects  SUBJECT: Kiosk Program  STAFF REPORT  RECOMMENDATION:  Approve a contract with Temeka, Incorporated for the directional sign program for the City of Wildomar and authorize the City Manager to execute the  agreement. BACKGROUND:  Before Incorporation the County of Riverside contracted with Business Industry Association (BIA) to implement a kiosk program in the Wildomar community. These directional signs kiosks have been in the community for at least three (3) years and are in multiple locations within the city boundaries. Temeka, Incorporated has proposed to provide a similar program offering a 50% return on Temeka is the forerunner in this industry and is currently managing similar programs in three (3) other local cities. They have a business relationship with most developers working in our area, therefore an easy transition to those Temeka uses quality materials in the construction of their signs and has an ongoing maintenance program. Locations of all signs are approved by City staff before site construction. The City of Wildomar and logo will be identified on every kiosk header. They will also provide up to two (2) public service institutional directional panels. These panels can be used for directing the public tos such services as libraries, parks, City Hall and emergency services at no cost to the City. Additional public service panels may be allowed, if space is available, at no cost to the City. On every kiosk, where available, the bottom  fees charged to developers for advertising.  developers that are currently using the BIA program.  panel will display the City's website.  1    FISCAL IMPACT:  Projected increase to general fund revenues of approximately $32,000 the first  year.  ATTACHMENTS: Temeka proposal Submitted by:  ballek Paula Willette Special Events & Projects  Approved By: R  GityManager  2    CITY OF WILDOMAR KIOSK PROGRAM  TEMEKA ADVER SING    COMPANY PROFILE  Temeka Advertising Inc. is a full service "State of the. Art" facility specializing in the production and maintenance ofCity Kiosk Programs. A IO0% commitment to quality and: service to our valued customers has enabled us to: see thes accelerated growth ofthe company overt the past decade. We envision a continued. strategy, which has made Temeka Advertising Inc. what iti is today.a first class City Kiosk manufacturing facility with the highest quality products and services in the industry. Mike Wilson, President, sights years ofindustry experience among its management staff. He began this company in 1991 providing clients with al level of professionalism unmatched in the marketplace. The result.Temeka's; growth and increasing client list ofr nationally recognized Temeka is very proud to have four of the finest and largest City Kiosk programs.  companies.  Literally the first toi introduce metal construction, breakaway footings, arrow consistency and bootleg enforcement. The price-point of Kiosk directions to the client through Temeka is typically 75% of marker. This, with extremely competitive. licensing agreements, has driven the: success of this program to the point of negotiations with: a number ofcities and municipalities to better improve their In order to perform in such a competitive. market, Temeka has always considered an important key element. We plan, strategize, and execute our customer's needs in: a manner which includes communication every step of the way. Initial meetings, design and construction, location planning, regulatory demand meetings and announcements to: applicable media and newspapers, are: all examples of the network we operate in order to assure: aj positive end result. Which, in turn, creates a favorable and profitable outcome for our clients. Temeka Advertising Inc. looks forward to helping you, our valued customer, achieve your goals..  City Kiosk Programs.  Fullyl licensed and insured.  CREATING A SYSTEM OF DIRECTION    COMPANYINFORMATION  COMPANY NAME: SCOPE OF WORK:  TEMEKA ADVERTISING INCORPORATED ADVERTISING & DIRECTIONAL MEDIAS  LOCATION:  150 W. WALNUT PERRIS, CA 92571  YEAR INCORPORATED: STATE OF INCORPORATION:  1991 CALIFORNIA MIKE WILSON  PRESIDENT:  WORK PERFORMED:  COMPLETE DESIGN & FABRICATION OF SIGNS & DIRECTIONAL MEDIA CURRENT AUDITED STATEMENT PROVIDED UPON REQUEST VINEYARD BUSINESS BANK ATTN: GAYLE CORRIDAN 200 S. MAIN STREET CORONA, CA 92882  FINANCIAL:  BANK REFERENCES:  CREATING A SYSTEM OF DIRECTION  2    PROJECT SUMMARY  MANAGEMENT APPROACH  Methods of maintaining communications with the city, community groups, builders, and the public. The Manager of Temeka Advertising, Incorporated isi in constant communication on, an' "as needed" basis with the city and the builders who advertise via the Kiosk Program. Most kiosk related communications relative to the city are conducted through the Public Works Department: and with the designated employee of cach building company. Temeka'sg goal is to make the Kiosk Program as user-friendly as possible. We manage the program with a minimum effort on the part of the cityand Whether we use our office phone and message system, cell phones, faxes or" "one on one" meetings, we are extremely "hands on" in the field and in the office maintaining communication at whatever level is needed to operate the program as effectively as possible. Temeka Advertising Incorporatedis backed by an entire. staffo ofdesigners, sales associates, administrators, accountants, Installersand We may be reached at any time for all concerns related to the City Kiosk Program. Means for documenting installations,; removals. maintenance, graffiti control, bootleg sign removal, and reporting of unauthorized advertising media within the Public Right of Way.- I.I Documenting Installations: Determine location ofi installation. Prepareas site plan for submission to the Public Works Department. Upon approval, we call "Underground Service Alert"..wait for their approval within 48 hours. Then schedule installation per customer's request. 2. Removals: Upon termination ofs signage or completion of project by the builder, we schedule the removal oft the signs and/orlocation: according to the contract terms. 3.N Maintenance: Maintenance is performed on a continuous basis. Temeka has a fleet of service trucks, which are used to perform all maintenance-relted items as soon as they are needed. Since Temeka is the manufacturer of the signs, we stock everything related to the signs so that we can 4. Graffiti control: This is a part oft the maintenance" program. We "police" all signs in order to 5. Bootleg sign removal: According to the contract, the City! has been handling the misuse oft bootlegs and offsite signage. But please note, we are working every weekend pulling illegal bootlegs (sec photographs). 6.F Reporting ofunauthorized advertising: This also falls in line with the general package ofservices Temeka provides, if the city would choose tol have themn enforced. Each contract is handled independently and according to the Cities needs. We would report all unauthorized advertising media  it's"all important" building clients.  fabricators  immediately correct: any problems. quickly find any problems and resolve them.  and removal as necessary. Any proposed use ofsub-consultants. forall products and services.  Temeka is a complete sign manufacturing and installation facility. We do ALL: aspects oft the Kiosk Program "IN HOUSE". There are no: sub-consultants. The city is able to deal directly with our company  CREATING A SYSTEM OF DIRECTION  3    PROJECT SUMMARY  MANAGEMENT APPROACH CONT.  Systems to assure responsiveness to: request for sign installations, repairs and removals, Temeka manufactures all signs needed for Kiosk Programs. We are a complete "ONE STOP SHOP". Our systems include procedures for signing up clients, design and implementation of complete Kiosk Programs, supportstaff for administration, bookkeeping, fabrication, sign up sheets, mapping for site analysis and extensive experience in permitting andj proper authorizations, as needed. We are very "safety conscious" and work closely with the City to safely operate and conduct a successful Kiosk  Program.  Accounting, payment and billing methods:  Accounting procedures have been designed and improved over the course ofr many years of operating Kiosk Programs. We use state oft the art accounting programs, Excell. spreadsheets and computer mapping programs for: accurate portrayal of all pertinent information. These records are maintained and may be viewed at any time by City officials. We handle collections in line with standardized. practices of maintaining: accurate, up to date receiveables. This information is forwarded tot the City upon request. AlI licensing fees are: forwarded to the City on the first of every month with  as supporting list ofl builders, panel quantities, etc.  PROJECT APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK  Who will manufacture the subdivision directional signs and how will quality be controlled? We manufacture the signs at our facilityin] Perris, CA. We have quality control staff who inspect all of our products before they leave the plant. Then, once. installed..wel have secondary inspections by the instalation crew. The third inspection is by, our kiosk manager. And ofcourse, we welcome any comments by, the city's employces. The quality is also controlled by way ofo our experience in the business. Wel have developed close business relationships with our material suppliers to insure the highest quality of inspected products. Whetherit's vinyl,p paint, wood, metal or whatever is used, we are continually in the marketplace purchasing thel best products available to maximize overall quality. How much time will be required to handle requests for thei installation, removal, repairand  maintenance of the signs? I. Installation of new panels - I-2 daysi 2. Produce new structures - 3-4 weeks 4. Graffiti removal - same day 5. Panel removal - 1-2 days 6. Structure removal - I-2 days  3.Installation of new structures - I-2 weeks (includes cityapproval)  Time frames are recommended guidelines for standard turnaround times. Temeka can perform  installations faster ifr needed on an emergency basis.  SIGN ENFORCEMENT  ITemeka will drive the City's limits on Saturday and Sunday between 9am and 12pm. 3. Temeka will supply the city with a report by Tuesday on any illegal signs placed. This report would  2. Temeka will remove any bootlegs placed. within the city! limits, include builder name, project name and quantity ofs signs placed.  CREATING A SYSTEM OF DIRECTION  4    PROJECT SUMMARY  PROPOSALS  How do you propose to work within the streets, medians and parkways oft Public Rights of Way Our kiosk managerand: his crews use a variety oftools to assist in this important area ofc concern. Our crews wear orange vest while working. We place orange "cones" around the work area to indicatea "safe" zone to the public. We follow closely to all rules and suggestions by city staffi in regard tol how they would like us to" section off" as specific area. Especially in an area located medians. We also plan our work so that we are on site during hours conductive to thel least amount of traffic when possible. This reduces the chances ofany traffic-related problems occurring. We presently operate 41 very large and: successful Kiosk Programs throughout Southern California and our system of approach to onsite work has been quite successful. Again, working closely with the city staffi is the How do you propose to control/mitigate sign vandalism (cg. Graffiti,flyers,etc.)  when Installing or removing the signs?  key to: safety for all concerned.  Over the years, we have learned a great deal. One of the best ideas we've: adopted is using powder- coated aluminum on all our kiosk signs. Thistreatment ofthe metal allows us to remove various forms of vandalism fairly easily. Paints, chalk, ink and other chemicals are much more readily removed. Other kiosk companies use woods of various types which soak up the chemicals and make it much more difficult to remove., Also, our constant monitoring of the signs in the field allow us to find vandalized signs and make the required repairs and/ or replacement of panels and: signs. Again, since we build the signs, we carry all thes materials on site so those quick repairs are no problem for -How do you propose to accomplish the removal of weekend directional signs? How do you propose to handle illegal advertising signs within the right ofv way?  our installation crew.  We remove them with the authority given to us by the city.  We will remove them with the authority given to us by the city. We will also report to the city who is  violating the sign ordinance so they can take further action.  -How do) you propose to insure that the sign program isi implemented fairly?  As we have done for years with our other programs..we don'tdiscriminate in: any" way with regard to any, company qualified to be apart oft the cities Kiosk Program according, to the predetermined qualification requirements: as set by the municipality. We also work closely with the builders to make sure they understand the program and we gladly answer their concerns on an on-going basis. Also, we work with many of the builders in more than one Kiosk Program. This helps us enteri intoa a new  working relationship, which has a positive history from prior programs.  PREVIOUS SIGN PROGRAM EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE  Temeka Advertising Incorporated has extensive experience in sign and kiosk programs. At this time, we operate kiosk programs fort the City of Corona, City ofTemecula, City of Colton and City ofl Murrieta. In: addition to city programs, we: also manage over 20 master planned community kiosk programs throughout Southern California. Our manufacturing facility located inl Perris, CA. We Proudly boasta 50,000 s.f. plant, an advanced design center, spray booth, administrative offices, fleet of work trucks, installation crews, sales staff, accounting department and more.. Along with the fabrication of products and installation, we also maintain our work out in the field. It's very important to builders that our signs represent them in a clean and professional manner. We strive to accomplish this with every aspect oft the sign program.  CREATING A SYSTEM OF DIRECTION  5 -    PROJECT SUMMARY  EXPERTISE CONT  We uise simple and user-friendly contract/lease forms for the builder.  We assist them in determining the best possible sign/panel locations to maximize their  advertising dollar.  We police our programs continuously for vandalism, bootlegs. illegal signage, damage and any other  problem relative to thel kiosk signs.  We work closely with the city and the builders to insure communication.  We strategize with the designated city employees to create the highest possible effect for the program  We use breakaway footings (A Temeka Invention!). Your city could earn up to 50% percent oft the Kiosk Revenue.  Simply stated..Temeka Advertising Incorporated does whatever it takes to make our clients goal..a reality. As one can assess by way of our increasing client list and devoted customer base, we: area company who believes in controlled growth while maintaining ingenuity in design, excellence in  manufacturing. communication and positive relations on all fronts.  1998 Temeka took over the City Kiosk Program. In one week we removed eighty (80) wood dilapidated kiosk structures and installed: ninety (90) new powder coated aluminum signs witha consistent identity thru out the City of Corona. In the first thirty (30) days we removed overa a thousand (1,000) illegal boot- 2000 - Temeka designed, manufactured, and installed three (3) "North Main" kiosk structures to identify City locations which included: Corona Corporate Center, Fender Muscum, and Villa Amalfi at no cost. 2001 to. 2003 - Temeka designed, manufactured, and installed twelve (12) 8'xi2' Redevelopment: signs. Projects including: North Main, Low Income multi-housing projects, Corona Corporate Center, etc. Coor-  legs a weekend and resolved that issue.  dinated these projects with Darla Charbonnet at n0 cost.  CREATING A SYSTEM OF DIRECTION  6    YEARLY RETURNS  CORONA 1999 $106,230 2000 $135,720 2001 $82,260 2002 $42,180 2003 $42,180 2004 $26.010 2005 $36,910 2006 $79,100 2007 $96,300 2008 $60,295 $707,185  MURRIETA 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008  $24,782 $70.571 $88,135 $98,972 $93,575 $97,376 $222.640 $147,700 $111,660 $94,980 $1,050,391  TEMECULA 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008  COLTON 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008  $2,305 $3,273 $4.840 $5,609 $4,345 $109,200 $71,700 $84.810 $94.770 $48,780 $429,632  $1,920 $6,000 $6,200 $6,760 $7,370 $7,080 $35,330  171    PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS  MICHAEL WILSON/PRESIDENT  As owner and Chief Operating Officer, Mike sights a combined 30 years of industry experience among his management staff. Commitment to his clients as well as his employees since 1991, Temeka remains unmatched in the marketplace with first class manufacturing providing the highest quality of products and services in the industry. His loyalty to his clients is first and foremost. He will be your point of contact for all negotiations for the TRINA KICHARDS/SENIOR ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE  City of Corona.  As Senior Account Executive, she will work closely with production to keep time commitments on track and ensure a quality product. She brings over 13  years of sign experience to Temeka. JIM WILSON/KIOSK MANAGER  As point ofcontact once contract has commenced, Jim will be the lead on all coordination and scheduling of all signs including notification with Dig Alert and Utility companies. With overI3 years of service here at Temeka, he will  always ensure time commitments and client satisfaction. HARMONIE UFEMA/GRAPHIC DESIGN DIRECTOR  With over IO years of experience, Harmonie prides herselfin the management ofthe Art Department. Planning, strategizing, and execution ofher designs include team meetings, budgeto evaluation, targetmarkets, and design forums to achieve positive results. She provides a hands-oninolvement to ensure the  continuity oft the kiosk program and its design. NATE KRAFT/PRODUCTION MANAGER  As Production Manager, Nate will act as funnel between design and production to guarantee construction specifications as well as maintaining quality control. His commitment to quality and deadlines are unsurpassed. Luis brings over 6 years experience to your account. He will be responsible for allinstallation scheduling and management in the field. He will keep constant communication with Jim Wilson for time commitments and schedule  ALFREDO ARGUELLO/INSTALL COORDINATOR  coordination.  CREATING A SYSTEM OF DIRECTION  8    KEFERENCES  CITY OF TEMECULA MARK HAROLD (951)694-6439  CITY OF CORONA CHUCK CONRAD 951)739-4973  CITY OF COLTON DAVID ZAMURA (909)370-5079  CITY OF MURRIETA TERI CARDOZA (951)304-2489  CREATING A SYSTEM OF DIRECTION  9    ACTIVE PROGRAMS  CITYWIDE KIOSK PROGRAMS:  CITY OF CORONA CITY OF MURRIETA CITY OF TEMECULA CITY OF COLTON  MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY KIOSK PROGRAMS  REDHAWK EAGLE GLEN TEMEKU HILLS CROWNE HILL HARVESTON  PROVIDENCE RANCH THREE RINGS RANCH MORGAN HILL STONEBRIDGE  110H    CITY OF TEMECULA  MUARIETA HOT SPRINGS RESERVE E AUSTC GLEN o  NICOLAS  LAS SERENA TEMEN HONORS  O8  RANCHO CALIF  AMPIOMEAIN RD.  NCHO VISTA RD-  PIOPICO HWY79  @ HWY79 Bo  o LOMAL UNDA Le WOUF  STRUCTURES: 70 PANELS: 185 CONTACT: MARK HAROLD CITY OF TEMECULA CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL 951.694.6439  Rates Rental  S/F $92.66  D/F $116.53 $185.00 11H  Production $145.00    CITY OF CORONA  CORONA SEERAESTTSST  KB HOMEA IE 69E4 An03 0034  SONZ  ISNODD FOMONA STHST  10'STRUCTURE  HASNEONS ST  0 CLg  HODEI  8 CITRON  CORONA EDIS MBAECCIOE SUMMT VIEW CRESTVIEW 1 HARVEST X5 Rone  ONTAGAR    FDOTHE 0  12' STRUCTURE STRUCTURES: 68 PANELS: 135 CONTACT: CHUCK CONRAD CITY OF CORONA 951.739.4973  Rates Rental  S/F  D/F  $110.00 $170.00  12H    CITY OF MURRIETA  VIA MADRID 00  CLNTON KETH NUTMEG  49   TARAGONA  d  LOS ALAMOS  a  ALTA MURRIETA B SPRINGS a  @  MURPIETA HOT  STRUCTURES: 70 PANELS: 250  Rates Rental  S/F $75.00  D/F $125.00 $185.00 13H  CONTACT: CITY OF MURRIETA TERI CARDOZA 951.304.2489  Production $145.00    BEFORE & AFTER  CAL. OAKS BEFORE  THE COLONY ATHENA LAFAYETTE MONTECITO MALAGUENA  CAL. OAKS AFTER  MARRTETA GREER RANCH AASTEEGECOONIA PACIFIC OAKS SERENADAA OSATHEIISHTA  114H    BEFORE & AFTER  FRENCH VALLEY BIA  ArborGlen 3to 11 Bedrooms From the Low $190.000 V116SR 4CrCangn Righto on Winchester)  HOTSPRINGSANDWINGHESTER  FRENCH VALLEY TEMEKA  115H    BOOTLEG REMOVALS  MAY 10TH, 2008  MAY17TH, 2008  MAY 17TH, 2008  CREATING A SYSTEM OF DIRECTION  16H    SAMPLE PERMIT  PERMIT FOR KIOSK SIGN PLACEMENT  JIM WILSON Perris,CA91575 951-196-39/0  DG-19-07  Applicant: I5AWY WEluist.  TE. WEKA  C.9515382495. "ACAXSACSAEEXX 951-296-3576 ieemekalne.cam  Atlachs site! plan(s) showing exacti iccation ofp proposed anda any existing signs within3 30Dfeet. Kiosk  sign(s) are requested for the following locations:  42 WIL SHERMAN OST  (Attach overflow sheeti ifr neededj  CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Compliance With applicaht's site plan.  2. Complience with all appliçable codes, ordinances, and contract provisionis. 3. The material, color and! height of the! kiosks: shall 5A consistent City approved design. 4. The sign(s) shall! be maintainedi in a noat and orderly condibon. 5, Diractional panels shall nof contain directions or messages advertising developments outside 6, The applicant shall submit detailed plans for an encroachment permit showing the exact location of the proposed kiosk signs ins relationi to existing righl-of-way andi improvements to 7. Priort to digging and as parto of the encroachment permit process, applicant shall contact Tim Brown int the Parks Departmsnt at (909) 736-2492, for the location of possible underground B. The applicant shall notify thet tratfic engineerwithin: 241 hours or byt thet next City business day to request: a site inspection for location. approval, 9. lsigylocalpns: shall be approved byt the Director of Public Works. AEE  the Cily of Corane, or any businesses. lie Public-Works Director for review and: approval.  utilities at the proposed site.  Date  Code Enforcement! Supervisor  6/20/07  lagree to comply with abave referenced conditions ofa approval. 91  6-19-07 MMOAROPARACSSHTERE  Date  117H    POSSIBLE KIOSKS  CITY OF Maldomar NAME COPY NAME COPY NAME COPY NAME COPY NAME COPY NAME COPY  NAME COPY $ NAME COPY * NAME COPY 1 NAME COPY 1 NAME COPY 1 NAME COPY 1  W  CITY OF OMhldomar NAME COPY € NAME COPY * NAME COPY 1 NAME COPY 1 NAME COPY 1 NAME COPY 1  Malomar NAME COPY NAME COPY NAME COPY NAME COPY NAME COPY NAME COPY  118H    CITY IDENTIFICATION  SAmp Cp The Promenade Shops at Dosl Lages MIGUEL'S RESTAURANT TAPS FISH HOUSE &B BREWERY a TRADER JOES  0 CITY CORONA ay  CORONA Welcumeo, Ahsss Gircio CNy Corohachamisots  119H    CITY IDENTIFICATION  KON  20H    CITY OF WILDOMAR - CITY COUNCIL  Agenda Item 3D.  GENERAL BUSINESS ITEM Meeting Date = May 27, 2009  TO: FROM:  Honorable Mayor and City Council Members John Danielson, City Manager  SUBJECT: Registration fee for abandoned and distressed properties  STAFF REPORT  RECOMMENDATION:  That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 09 - 29, adopting Riverside County's fee required for the registration of abandoned and distressed residential properties.  BACKGROUND:  The City has adopted County Ordinances No. 880 and 881, codified in Chapter 15.88 of the County Code. This chapter regulates abandoned and distressed residential properties, and establishes a registration requirement. Section 15.88.040 provides that a registration fee shall be established by minute order of the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors set the registration fee at $70, after performing the necessary analysis and determining that a $70 fee reflects the actual cost of providing the services. Though the City has formally adopted Chapter 15.88, it has not  formally adopted the minute order setting the required registration fee.  This resolution will adopt Riverside County's fee required for the registration of abandoned and distressed residential properties at $70. City Staff recommends that the City formally adopt Riverside County's fee to ensure that the City can properly enforce Chapter 15.88. However, the City may re-evaluate the fee amount in the future to ensure that it accurately reflects the costs borne by the CityofWidomar.  FISCAL IMPACTS: None. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Take no action meeting.  2. Provide staff with further direction and take action at a subsequent Council  RIV; #4820-5101-6963v1  1    Meeting Date:  Submitted & Approved by: John Danielson 25 City Manager  2  RIV/820.5101-6983V1    RESOLUTION NO.C 09-29  ARESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING RIVERSIDE COUNTY'S FEE FOR THE REGISTRATION  OF ABANDONED OR DISTRESSED PROPERTIES.  THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR DOES RESOLVE AS  FOLLOWS:  SECTIONI. Recitals.  (a) The City of Wildomar has adopted portions of the Riverside County Code as the Wildomar Municipal Code, including Chapter 15.88 of  the County Code.  (b) Chapter 15.88 of the Riverside County Code regulates abandoned and distressed residential properties, and requires such properties to be registered and for a registration fee to be paid by the  registrant.  (c) By minute order, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors has (d) The City of Wildomar has not previously adopted the minute orders of the County Board of Supervisors as having effect within the City. (e) The City Council desires to adopt Riverside County's registration fee that will be required by the City for the registration of an abandoned or distressed residential building.  set the required fee at $70.00.  SECTION II. The required fee for the registration of abandoned and distressed buildings, as required by Chapter 15.88 of the County Code, shall be $70.00. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27th day of May, 2009.  Scott Farnam, Mayor  ATTEST:  Debbie A. Lee, CMC, City Clerk  RIV #4842-7843-5842vi RIV #4833-5852-56991 vi  1-    APPROVED AS TO FORM:  Julie Hayward Biggs, City Attorney  RIV #4842-7843-5842vl RIV#83-5852-5699V1  2-    STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF WILDOMAR  ) ) )  1,Sheryll Schroeder, City Clerk of the City of Wildomar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 09- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of  Wildomar at a regular meeting thereof, held on the  day of  2009, by the  following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:  Sheryl! Schroeder, City Clerk  RIV 4842-7843-5842: v! RIV #4833-5852-5699v1  -3-    CITY OF WILDOMAR - COUNCIL Agenda Item To Be Added Meeting Date: May 27, 2009  BUSINESS ITEM 3.E  TO: FROM: SUBJECT:  Honorable Mayor Farnam, Members of the City Council David Hogan, Assistant Planning Director Modification to Trail Designations  STAFF REPORT  RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled:  "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR REDESIGNATING THE TRAIL ALONG THE RANCHO MIRLO ROAD ALIGNMENT  FROM AC COMMUNITY TRAIL TO AR REGIONAL TRAIL"  BACKGROUND:  Because of potential conflicts between public trail usage and habitat preservation along the southern segment of Murrieta Creek, the City of Wildomar has been requested to redesignate a segment another trail in the area from Community to Regional to ensure future connectivity. (The potentially conflicted trail segment is marked as "1"in Attachment A.) The trail segment to be redesignated begins at the intersection of Clinton Keith Road and Grand Avenue, runs south along Rancho Mirlo Road, and connects with other trails in the City of Murrieta. The trail segments to be redesignate are marked as "2"/"3" and "4" on Attachment A. The precise location of the trail near the intersection of Clinton Keith Road and Grand Avenue, in either  location "2" or" "3", will be determined at a future time.  FISCAL IMPACT: None. ALTERNATIVES: 1. 2.  Deny the project. Provide direction to staff.  ATTACHMENTS: A. B.  Location Exhibit for Effected Trails  Resolution  Submitted byA David Assistant  Diredtor  1  BH    ATTACHMENT NO.A Location Exhibit for Effected Trails  2    WILDOMAR CHANNEL  GRAND AVE  CLINION KEITHRD  NE  PAEOMARRD!  GN AASALG  3    ATTACHMENT NO. B Resolution  4    RESOLUTION 09-XX  A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR REDESIGNATING THE TRAIL ALONG THE RANCHO MIRLO ROAD ALIGNMENT FROM A COMMUNITY  TRAIL TO A REGIONAL TRAIL  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors for Riverside County approved the designations as well as the approximate location for trails in the Wildomar area on January 29, 2008. WHEREAS, the City of Wildomar incorporated on July 1, 2008; and  WHEREAS, the City of Wildomar has received a request from the County of Riverside to consider the redesignation of the Rancho Mirlo Road trail segment from a Community Trail to a WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Wildomar, the City Council considered the appropriate designation for the Rancho Mirlo Road trail  Regional Trail; and segment; and  NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Wildomar does Resolve, Determine, Find and Order the designation of the multi-use trail along the Rancho Mirlo Road alignment as PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City of Wildomar City Council this 27th day of  a Regional Trail:  May, 2009 by the following roll call vote:  AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN:  ATTEST:  Debbie Lee, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:  Scott Farnam, Mayor  Julie Hayward Biggs, City Attorney  5