Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 1  September 10, 2024 County of Greene, Virginia  THE GREENE COUNTY BOARDOFSUPERVISORS, METONTUESDAY,SEPTEMBERI 10, 2024, BEGINNING AT 5:30 P.M. IN PERSON IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION  BUILDING MEETING ROOM  Present were:  Marie Durrer, Chair Davis Lamb, Vice Chair Steve Catalano, Member Tim Goolsby, Member Francis McGuigan, Member Cathy Schafrik, County Administrator Kim Morris, Deputy Clerk Kelley Kemp, County Attorney Terry Beigie, Grant Writer  Staff present:  Stephanie Golon, Deputy Director of Planning & Zoning  RE: CLOSED MEETING  Ms. Kemp read the proposed resolution for Closed Meeting.  WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greene County desires to discuss in Closed Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body Consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation, where such consultation or briefings in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the public body regarding litigation over zoning matters. WHEREAS, pursuant to: $2.2-3711(A)0) and (A)(7) of the Code of Virginia, such NOW,THEREFORE, BEI ITI RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County Upon motion by Davis Lamb, second by Steve Catalano and unanimous roll call vote, the  Meeting the following matter(s):  concerning the planning department and the Board of Supervisors.  discussions may occur in Closed Meeting;  does hereby authorize discussion of the aforestated matters in Closed Meeting.    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 2  Board entered into Closed Meeting. Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried. RE: OPENN MEETING Board returned to open meeting. Recorded vote:  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  By unanimous roll call vote, members certified that only public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirement and only such matters as identified by the motion to  enter into closed meeting were discussed.  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE  The Chair opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of  silence.  RE: ADOPTION OF AGENDA agenda was adopted as presented.  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 3  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: MATTERSFROMTHE PUBLIC  Mr. Paul Risk expressed excitement about the Blue Ridge Meadows and Sheets developments but raised concerns about water sustainability and the significant increase in his water bill, from $70 to $300 in just a few months. He called for more information from the county about a concrete plan to address the water issues and ensure sustainable growth in the county. Ms. Sarah Morton was present representing Greene Commons and the Farmers Market. She discussed the need to look at the municipal codes around agricultural exemptions for vendors at the farmer's market. She is concerned that some of the new business license requirements being imposed on vendors could run them away from the farmer's market. She urged the board to work with Cooperative Extension, the Virginia Association for Farmers Markets, and other organizations to establish proper codes that will help protect and support the local farming and  agricultural sector.  Ms. Jennifer Lewis-Fowler, Director of Elections, said that early voting starts on Mr. Scott McGehee commended the board for considering revisions to the ordinances related to agritourism and subdivisions. He stated that the proposed changes seem to be moving in the right direction by keeping the importance of community, the integrity of the community, and the protection of the conditions and waysofli life that have attracted people to live in Greene County. McGehee acknowledged that the proposed changes likely present a great deal of work for the supervisors, but he expressed his support for the initiative on behalf ofl himself and many others in  September 20th and that sample ballots are now available on her webpage.  the community.  Ms. Lisa Smith expressed frustration with the lack of enforcement of the noise ordinance by the sheriff's office. She stated that she and others have called about noise ordinance violations, but the sheriff's office either says there is nothing they can do or that they have to witness the violation themselves. Smith urged the board to ensure that if they update the noise ordinance, the sheriff's office actually enforces it, as otherwise it would be a waste oft time. She emphasized that the Ruckersville area inj particular has been al hot spot for noise issues that are not being addressed. Ms. Joanne Burkholder thanked the board for making the county website more accessible, allowing her to see the faces of the board members. She requested that the shmubberylandscaping at the library be trimmed, as it currently looks like a weed patch in her opinion. She mentioned an    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 4  issue with the property belonging to the park that needs maintenance, as it has not been taken care of since 2005. She expressed support for the proposed tax relief for the elderly and disabled, as  well as the proposed revisions to the zoning ordinances.  Mr. Ken Copeland applauded the board for the items they were taking up regarding providing greater transparency and giving a voice to citizens on county matters. He stated that he was glad to see the board taking ownership of these issues and writing revisions, rather than just passing them along. Copeland expressed support for the board taking these first steps to address  these concerns.  Mr. Bill Zutt complimented the board for considering the revisions to the agritourism laws and subdivision/site plan laws. Zutt said these contemplated revisions will bring greater transparency to major projects and put decision-making power back where it belongs - with the  Board of Supervisors. He thanked the board fori initiating these efforts.  Ms. Andrea Leffew was present via Zoom. She also commended the board for addressing the lack of citizen voice in zoning and planning committee decisions. She stated that these committees are unelected, SO citizens have not had a chance to voice their opinions. Leffew expressed concern about the county's dire situation with water issues and all the new development happening, noting that the senior apartments and other projects will likely have no water pressure. She urged the board to stand up for common sense in the community and appreciated them  addressing this issue.  Ms. Jean Sims expressed frustration and concerns regarding Supervisor Mcguigan. She stated that when Mcguigan was running for the Board of Supervisors, he made untrue statements about what she and her husband could do with their property. Sims said she tried to correct him at adebate but was booed by the audience. Sims explained that the county had taken their property through eminent domain without notifying them, and they were not allowed to use the dirt from their own property. She also said that at board meetings, people were allowed to make negative comments about her and her husband, and the board members did not stop them. Sims accused Mcguigan of trying to illegally buy their property, which she said was already under contract. She felt Mcguigan was trying to change things that were put in place years ago and warned that there RE: Public Hearing to consider revisions to the Greene County Code, Chapter 14 - Animals, Subdivision II- Animal Noise and to Greene County Code, Chapter 38, Environment, Article II Sheriff Smith expressed concerns about the enforcement of the proposed noise ordinance revisions. He stated that he would feel more comfortable involving the Commonwealth's Attorney to get input from aj judge on how to properly handle noise complaints, as the sheriff's office views this more as a civil matter. The Sheriff indicated that the Sheriff's Office does not have the manpower to go out and monitor noise levels or record barking dogs for 20 minutes, as would be required. He suggested taking the Sheriffs Office out of the enforcement process and leaving the  would be lawsuits if the board continued tol let him act like a one man show.  -Noise    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 5  decibel level requirements in place, but acknowledged the county would need to purchase noise  monitoring equipment if that approach were taken.  The Board discussed deferring the public hearing but chose to hold the hearing and defer Ms. Kemp provided some background and explanation on the proposed revisions to the noise ordinance. The revisions were aimed at aligning the barking dog ordinance with the general noise ordinance, SO the decibel levels and punishments would be the same regardless oft the source of the noise. Kemp explained that the 20-minute requirement for barking dogs was to differentiate between sporadic barking versus more sustained noise disturbances. She noted that the proposed revisions increased the punishments from a Class 3 to a Class 2 misdemeanor for repeat offenses within 12 months. Kemp indicated they could also look at implementing civil penalties as an alternative to criminal misdemeanors as a deterrent. Ms. Kemp said that she was open to different  the decision to a later date.  approaches based on the board's feedback. The public hearing was opened. There were seven speakers.  Some of the concerns that were. raised include:  1. The reduction in the time limit for dogs barking from 20 minutes to 10 minutes 2. Dogs bark as a natural response to potential threats 3. Ordinance should exempt agricultural properties and working dogs 4. Property size should be dropped lower than 5 acres 5. The removal of the words psychological and physiological from the code  The public hearing was closed.  Itv was the consensus of the Board to ask the County Attorney to rewrite the ordinance to include an escalation clause in reference to the penalties for multiple recurring offenses and to reduce the acreage requirements. Another public hearing will be held on November 12th after the  details have been worked out.  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the Board deferred decision on amendments to the code regarding noise until an additional public  hearing is held on November 12th.    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 6  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM UPDATE  Mr. David Blount, Deputy Director and Legislative Director with the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission was present to provide a legislative update. He noted that the state budget was finally approved in May, later than usual, and that state revenues came in higher than expected for fiscal year 2024. Blount mentioned several ongoing studies and commissions at the state level that may drive legislative discussions in the 2025 session, including a review of K-12 education funding, an analysis of data centers, and a look at energy generation facility siting. Regarding the regional legislative program, Blount indicated that priorities like public education funding and local land use authority were likely to remain consistent from previous years. Blount welcomed input from the board on any new priorities they would like to see included in the  regional legislative program for the upcoming session.  Supervisor Lamb expressed interest in exploring childcare assistance as a potential legislative priority tol helpl boost workforce participation. Supervisor Catalano reiterated the board's desire to maintain local control over land use decisions, especially regarding commercial power  generation facilities, rather than having the state override local authority.  The Board thanked Mr. Blount for his presentation.  RE: OPERATIONS PLAN FORT THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Ms. Schafrik spoke with the Board regarding the current process at the County Administration building for dealing with citizens/customers when they come into the building. She also shared what all of the other county offices currently have and explained that the approach has been inconsistent, with some buildings having staffed plexiglass barriers and others relying on phone systems for entry. Schafrik noted that the cost of implementing plexiglass vestibules at the county administration building would be around $50,000. The board discussed the pros and cons ofmaintaining the current phone-based entry system versus opening up the main doors and relying more on individual office security. Supervisor McGuigan pointed out that some of the plexiglass barriers were initially installed due to COVID-19 concerns, rather than for security reasons. The board agreed that the main door should be unlocked, and individual office doors should be locked and the costs of putting up the plexiglass vestibules would be budgeted in the next budget cycle.    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 7  RE: CONSENT AGENDA  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Tim Goolsby, and unanimous roll call vote,  the Board approved the consent agenda as presented.  a. b. C.  Minutes of previous meetings Attachment "A")  Resolution to accept and appropriate $750,000.00 in Community Project Grant Funding for capital improvements to the Greene County Community Park (See Resolution to accept and appropriate $43,363.00 for the DMV Selective Enforcement Grants for the Sheriff's Office (See Attachment "B")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE FALL Ms. Beigie was present to present information about a grant application for the Rescue Squad Assistance Fund. Beigie explained that the grant is a 50/50 match, and the maximum amount the county could be required toj provide as a match is $196,612. The grant funds would be used to purchase critical equipment for the EMS department, including infusion pumps, Lucas chest compression devices, ventilators, and cardiac monitoryderbillator, Beigie noted that these equipment items have a lifespan of 7-8 years, and the total cost per county resident would be around $10 over that time period. Beigie recommended using the county's opioid abatement settlement funds to cover the required match, as EMS regularly responds to drug overdose calls. Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb, and unanimous roll call vote, the Board adopted the resolution to authorize the County Administrator to execute the grant  2024 RESCUE SQUAD ASSISTANCE FUND GRANT APPLICATION  application as presented. (See Attachment "C")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 8  RE: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO GREENE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 66 - TAXATION Kim Tate, the Commissioner of Revenue, presented information to the board regarding proposed revisions to the tax relief program for the elderly and disabled in Greene County. Tate explained that the current program has an income limit of $27,000 and a net worth limit of $100,000. Based on research, Tate proposed increasing the maximum income limit to $35,000, with different income brackets and corresponding relief percentages. Tate noted that the last time the income limits were revised was in 2012 and recommended reviewing the program every two years to keep up with inflation and cost-of-living changes. The board members expressed support for the proposed revisions, agreeing that the increased income limits were necessary to provide relief to more elderly and disabled residents facing the impacts of inflation. The board directed staff to advertise the proposed ordinance changes for a public hearing, SO the revisions could be  REGARDINGTAX RELIEFFOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED  formally adopted and implemented effective January 1,2025.  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb, and unanimous roll call vote, the Board directed staff to advertise the proposed revisions to the Greene County Code, Chapter 66  fora a public hearing (See Attachment "D")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: BOARD DISCUSSION OF INTENT TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE Mr. McGuigan provided an overview of the proposed revisions to the countysagnitourism ordinances, including the farm winery, farm brewery, and agricultural events ordinances. McGuigan explained that the current ordinances have a problematic middle ground category between by-right and special use permit (SUP) approvals, which he referred to as zoning certification or zoning clearance -a designation that does not actually convey any additional rights. The proposal is to eliminate this middle category and require either by-right or SUP approval for these agritourism uses, giving the Board of Supervisors more direct input and control. McGuigan noted that the current ordinances also have broad discretionary language around customary uses that allow for subjective interpretations, which the revisions aim to clarify. Additionally, the proposed changes would put key aspects like amplified music, vehicle trips, event frequency, and visitor limits under the purview of the Board of Supervisors through the SUP process, rather than leaving them to staff discretion. McGuigan emphasized that the goal is to ensure the ordinances align with the board's vision for how agritourism should be regulated and integrated into the  REGARDING AGRITOUTISM  agricultural landscape of Greene County.    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 9  Mr. Catalano echoed the concerns that the current agritourism uses have grown beyond their original intent to be a supplement to working farms and have become more commercial in nature. He agreed that the special use permit (SUP) process would be a good way to: maintain local control and ensure the scale and scope of agritourism activities align with the board's vision for the county. Catalano suggested that even with an SUP requirement, the board could consider using as size or acreage trigger to determine which agritourism operations would require the SUP versus being permitted by-right. Catalano was supportive of the proposed revisions, as he felt they would help the board reassert its authority over how agritourism is developed and integrated into the  county'sa agricultural areas.  Ms. Kemp asked if the board would like to include farm stands, farm sales and farm Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb, and unanimous roll call vote, the Board approved the resolution of intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance as amended to include  markets. The board agreed that those should also be reviewed.  farm stands, farm sales and farm markets. (See Attachment "E")  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  RE: BOARD DISCUSSION OF THE INTENT TO DIRECT STAFF TO REVIEW AND RECOMMEND CHANGES TO THE ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES TO REQUIRE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISION SITE PLANS FOR GREATER THAN 20 DIVISIONS AND SITE PLANS FROM APPROVED SUPS Mr. McGuigan proposed revisions to the county's zoning and subdivision ordinances to require Board of Supervisors approval for certain site plans. McGuigan explained that currently, there is no input or approval from the elected Board of Supervisors on site plans, which are solely reviewed and approved by the appointed Planning Commission. He argued that this lack of elected oversight is problematic, especially for major developments where the county is facing issues like water supply constraints, but the Planning Commission is not required to consider those broader community impacts. McGuigan proposed requiring public hearings and Board of Supervisors approval for site plans involving more than 20 housing units, as well as any site plans resulting from special use permits in the agricultural and conservation districts. He contended that the public should have a voice in how their community develops, even if the technical aspects of site plans are regulated by state law. McGuigan acknowledged there could be legal concerns with this proposal, but felt the benefits of increased transparency and elected oversight outweighed the potential risks. However, the majority of the board expressed hesitation about taking on this additional responsibility, citing concerns about their own expertise and the potential for politicizing an otherwise technical review process. Ms. Golon provided some clarification and context around the site plan review process. Golon explained that for both subdivision site plans    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 10  and commercial site plans, the county does provide public notice, allow for public comment, and post the plans online for citizens to review. She noted that the review process is largely ministerial, meaning the staff and Planning Commission have to evaluate the plans based on the county's adopted ordinances and regulations, rather than subjective criteria. Golon acknowledged that while citizens may have opinions about the outcomes of development, the staff and Planning Commission are bound to apply the existing laws and ordinances, which the Board of Supervisors has previously approved. She suggested that if the board is concerned about the results of the site plan review process, the better approach would be to revise the underlying ordinances, rather than inserting the board into the technical review. Golon recommended a work session with the Planning Commission as a first step to better align the goals and priorities around growth  management and development review.  Mr. McGuigan made a motion that the Board of Supervisors of Greene County directs the Planning Department and Planning Commission to revise all county ordinances by November 19, 2024 to require public hearings on all preliminary and final site plan review for developments of greater than 201 housing units and all site plans resulting from special use permit approvals in the agricultural and conservation districts and to require board of supervisor approval of these site  plans after planning commission review. Motion failed with no second.  The Board agreed to have a workshop with the Planning Commission regarding these  topics.  RE: BOARDLIAISON REPORTS are dealing with similar growth issues.  Mr. Goolsby said that he met with the TJPDC and that most of the surrounding localities  RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS UPDATE  Ms. Schafrik noted the successful ribbon cutting for the renovated courthouse, which the judges and staff are very pleased with. She mentioned an upcoming fun fair event this Sunday at Greene Commons, with a wellness focus and activities for children. She reported that the DMV mobile unit had a very successful visit the previous day, with over 60 people taking advantage of the convenient service. Schafrik stated that the new generator for the county administration building is being installed this Saturday, with some potential disruptions to access. She informed thel board that the scales at the transfer station will be replaced, requiring a temporary closure from September 14-21 to complete the necessary work. Schafrik did not have an update on the status of  the Solid Waste Manager, who has been out on extended medical leave.  RE: ADJOURN Board meeting was adjourned.  Upon motion by Steve Catalano, second by Davis Lamb and unanimous roll call vote, the    Board of Supervisors September 10, 2024 Sheet 11  Recorded vote:  Marie Durrer Davis Lamb Tim Goolsby Francis McGuigan Steve Catalano  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  Motion carried.  cbsw MarieDurrer, Chair  Cathy Schafrik,  Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors  GLEGR    September 10, 2024 Attachment A  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE SEVEN HUNDRED THOUSAND FIFTY DOLLARS FOR THE HUD COMMUNITY PROJECT GRANTS PROGRAM  WHEREAS, the County of Greene has been awarded a grant from the U.S. Department ofHousing and Urban Development Community Project Funding; and WHEREAS, the funds are to be used by the Greene County Parks and Recreation Department for capital improvements to Greene County Community Park, including paving the parking lot, adding lighting to the parking lot, bringing the water line to the park, creating an overflow lot, winterizing the concession stand,  and putting in an electronic entrance gate; and  WHEREAS, the funds in the amount of seven hundred thousand fifty dollars ($750,000.00) need to be accepted and appropriated to the correct line item in the  2024-2025 budget ofthe County of Greene, Virginia.  NOW,THEREFORE, BEI IT ANDITISI HEREBY RESOLVED by thel Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that seven hundred thousand fifty dollars ($750,000.00) be appropriated to the 2024-2025 County of Greene budget. BE ITI FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County ofGreene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in  the budget to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 10th day of September, 2024.  Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Tim Goolsby Recorded Vote: Steve Catalano Marie C. Durrer Tim Goolsby Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Ves Yes  Francis McGuigan Yes VhccRe - Marie C.Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST  Greene County Board of Supervisors  SAS    September 10, 2024 Attachment B  RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE TWENTY-THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND TWENTY DOLLARS FOR THE DMV SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT ALCOHOL AND NINETEEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-THREE DOLLARS FOR THE DMV SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT POLICE TRAFFIC SERVICES GRANTS. WHEREAS, the Greene County Sheriff's Office has been awarded grants from the Division ofMotor WHEREAS, the funds are Lo be used by the Greene County Sheriffs Office lo perform selective NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that forty-three thousand three hundred sixty-three be appropriated to the FY25 Sheriff's Office budget of the County of Greene. This grant has a cash match that will be met with BEIT: FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of the County of Greene, Virginia is authorized to make the appropriate accounting adjustments in the budget to do all things necessary  Vehicles Selective Enforcement grant program; and patrols as defined in the grant agreement; and  the cost of fuel and maintenance on the Sheriff's vehicles.  to give this resolution effect.  Adopted this 10th day of September, 2024. Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Tim Goolsby Recorded Vote: Marie C. Durrer Steve Catalano Francis McGuigan Yes Tim Goolsby Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Yes Yes  ucSu Marie Durrer, Chair  ATTEST!  u  Eathy Schafrik,  ddu  Greene County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Board of Supervisors    September 10, Z0Z4 Attachment C  RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE COUNTY ADMINISTISTRATOR TO EXECUTE FALL 2024 RESCUE SQUAD ASSISTANCE  FUND GRANT APPLICATION  WHEREAS, the Virginia Department ofHealth (VDH) Office of] Emergency Medical Services (OEMS) is accepting applications for the Fall 2024 cycle of the Rescue Squad Assistance Fund (RSAF) competitive matching program; and  WHEREAS, OEMS will accept applications from nonprofit licensed EMS agencies and other Virginia EMS organizations pursuant to $ 32.1-111.12 until  September 16, 2024; and  WHEREAS, the Greene County Emergency Medical Services has identified the need to replace six (6)Lifepak monitor defibrillators and the purchase oftwo (2) new infusion pumps, three (3) LUCAS chest compression devices, and three (3)  ventilators; and  WHEREAS, the RSAF awards grants per the Code of Virginia for the WHEREAS, the Greene County EMS proposes to request the full slate of WHEREAS.,fawarded the Fall 2024 RSAF grant, it will require a 50% match in funding of up to one hundred ninety-six thousand six hundred twelve dollars  replacement of equipment or procurement ofr new equipment; and  needed lifesaving equipment on this grant round; and  ($196,612.00), in Fiscal Year 2025.  NOW,THEREFORE, BEI - IT ANDI ITI ISI HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene, Virginia that the County Administrator is  authorized to execute the grant application for this equipment.  Adopted this 10th day of September, 2024.  Motion: Steve Catalano Second: Davis Lamb    Recorded Vote: Steve Catalano Marie C. Durrer Tim Goolsby Davis Lamb  Yes_ Yes Yes Yes_  Francis McGuigan Yes Ymau CSe Marie C. Durrer, Chair Greene County Board of Supervisors  ATTEST.  Greene County Board of Supervisors   4    September 10, 2024 Attachment D  Greene County Commissioner's Office  P.O. Box 438  Stanardsville, VA 22973-0438  Phone 434-985-5211 Fax 434-985-5283  MEMORANDUM  TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE:  Board of Supervisors  Kimberly Tate, Commissioner of Revenue Tax Relief for the Elderly and Disabled Program  September 10, 2024  Recommended Action:  Authorize staff to advertise for a public hearing to update the Greene County Code of Ordinances  with the proposed real estate tax reliefincome limits.  Background:  This Office has reviewed the current tax relief for the Elderly and Disabled Program. The  current program has the following provisions:  "Total combined. income means gross income from all sources of the owners of the dwelling residing therein and of the owner' 's relatives living in the dwelling during the preceding calendar. year, except that the first $6,500 of income from each relative, other than the owner' 's spouse, residing in the dwelling, and who does not qualify for the exemption provided by the Code of Virginia, Section 5; 3211 (1)(B), is excludedj from the calculation of 1. The head of the household occupying and dwelling and owning title or partial title thereto. shall have reached the age of 65) years prior to the taxable yearj for which the exemption is claimed, unless the head of household is also joint owner and less than 65 years of age, eligibility shall be determined as if the head of the household was the sole  gross income.  owner.    2. The head of the household occupying the dwelling and owning title or partial title thereto determined. to be permanently and totally disabled. Such determination must be certified as required by Section 66-83 (A). Further, the Commissioner of Revenue must 3. Title or Partial Title to the real estate, for which the exemption. is claimed. shall be owned on January 1 of the taxable year by the person claiming such exemption. 4. The total combined. income shall not exceed. $27,000fort the calendar year immediately  find that such person is permanently and totally disabled.  preceding the taxable year.  Current Real Estate Tax Relieffor the Elderly and Disabled  Gross Combined Income  Exemption 100% 75% 55%  S0 $10,001 $18,001  $10,000 $18,000 $27,000  5. The net combined financial worth shall not exceed $100,000 as of December 31 of the calendar year immediately preceding the taxable year. 6. The person claiming the exemption shallj file the affidavit required by this division no earlier than. January 2, nor later than April 1 ofeach taxable year." Given the uncertainty oft the financial impact of changing the income requirements, we. are proposing the following chart that aligns with other localities and takes into consideration current  federal poverty rates.  Proposed Real Estate Tax Relief for the Elderly and Disabled  Gross Combined Income  Exemption 100% 75% 55%  $0 $15,001 $25,001  $15,000 $25,000 $35,000  Iwould be happy to answer any questions.    September 10, 2024 Attachment E  RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO AMEND THE GREENE COUNTY ZONING  ORDINANCE  WHEREAS, the Greene County Zoning Ordinance may from time to time be amended, supplemented, changed, modified or repealed by the governing body pursuant to WHEREAS, this resolution is to amend various sections of the text of the Zoning Ordinance, which are listed below, for purposes of correction, modification, and elaboration of general regulations. Amendments are proposed for clarification of intent,  Section 15.2-2285 of the Code of Virginia.  the addition of definitions, and correction of inconsistencies.  Farm Wineries (Article 16-21) Farm Breweries (Article 16-23)  Events and Activities at Agricultural Operations (Article 16-24) Farm stands, farm sales, and farmers' markets (Article 16-22)  WHEREAS, in an effort to promote opportunities for property owners in the rural area, the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS added the uses listed above into the A-1 (Agriculture) WHEREAS, the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS has determined that a review of these Articles to ensure compliance with the Code of Virginia and to develop additional conditions that promote harmony with the surrounding properties is beneficial to the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT for purposes of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good Zoning practices, the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS hereby adopts a resolution of intent to amend the appropriate section of the Greene County Zoning Ordinance to achieve the purposes described herein; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the zoning text amendment proposed by this resolution of intent, and make its recommendation to the Board of Supervisors, at the earliest possible date. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Board of Supervisors (1) finds that these amendments are in furtherance of the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, (2) directs staff to prepare draft amendments for consideration, and (3) directs that the proposed amendments on these matters be brought forward for notice, hearing, Planning Commission recommendation, and Board  and C-1 (Conservation) zoning districts on June 23, 2015; and  health, safety and welfare of county residents; and  of Supervisors' action.    ADOPTED BY THE GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON SEPTEMBER  10, 2024. Motion: Second: Votes: Durrer: Lamb: Goolsby: McGuigan: Yes Catalano:  Steve Catalano Davis Lamb  Yes Yes Ves Yes  yie COu - Marie Durrer, Chair Greene_County Board of Supervisors  Greene County Boafd of Supervisors  -BSA