STANLY COUNTY Water. Ain Lard. Saccess. Stanly County Board of Adjustment June 13,2023 - Meeting Minutes  Call to Order Chair Cindy Fish called the meeting to order on. June 13, 2023 at 6:30j p.m. int the Gene McIntyre Meeting Room at 10001 N. First Street, Albemarle, North Carolina. Bobl Remsburg served as Clerk oft ther meeting.  Stanly County Board of Adjustment Members attending Absent: Billy Franklin Lee, Judy Nelms &1 Brenda Farmer  Richard Cosgrove, Michael Fleming, Cindy Fish, Rick. Johnson, Devron Furr & Michael Efird  Stanly County Planning Staff Attending Bobl Remsburg, Planning Director & Bailey Emrich, Planner 2 Others Present: refer to signi ins sheet (Board of Adjustment meeting minutes binder) Chair Fish asked for ai motion to adopt the minutes from April 11, 2023.  Motion: Richard Cosgrove Second: Brenda Farmer Passed: 7-0  Chair Fish announced there would be three cases.  Chair Fish introduced the cases which consist of one Special Use Permit for ai recreational facility on Saint Martin Road and two variance cases both of which are on Woodland Drive, Norwood. The evidentiary hearing on these matters are quasi-judicial in nature and willl be conducted in accordance with special due process safeguards. Those who signed in on thes sign up sheet to speak came forward to recite thes swearing in ceremony. Chair Fish "The Stanly County Board of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial board. Therefore, thel North Carolina State Statute, requires that thel board base its decisions only on testimony given under oath. Any person who, while under oath during this proceeding, willfully swears falsely, is guilty ofa class 1 misdemeanor. Ifanyone refuses tol be sworn, your statement will not not be treated as evidence on which tol base a decision but merely as arguments". Chair Fish "Before opening the evidentiary hearing, Iwould like to give Board members a chance toi reveal any  possible conflicts that you may have and withdraw from these proceedings ifnecessary".  There were no conflicts.  Chair Fish "Any Board members whol have any information or special knowledge about the case that may come out att thel hearing tonight, please describe that information for the record so thati interested persons willl know and can  respond".  No board member had knowledge. Chair Fish explained the proceedings.  1    Chair Fish "Parties may cross examine each witness aftert the witness testifies when questions are called for. Ifyou want the Board to see written evidence such as reports and maps or exhibits, the witness who is familiar with the evidence should ask thati it be introduced during or at the end ofhis /hert testimony. Thel Board cannot accept reports from persons who are notl heret to testify. Attorneys who speak should not give factual testimony but mays summarize their client's case. Before you begin your testimony, please clearly identify yourself for ther record." Chair Fish asked Planning Staff to share the details ofthe first case, SUP 23-03.  Bailey] Emrich shared thei following:  Tony Ledbetter with TRLI Family Properties, LLCI requests approval for a Special Use Permit fora a33.04 acre parcel located at 24076 Saint Martin Road, Albemarle, NC: 28001. This would allow up to 20 park model homes and other recreational spaces such as a splash pad, pickleball courts, gaga ball court, volleyball court, commercial playground andi indoor and outdoor stages tol be constructed in relation to an event center (Tax Record #3102). Tony Ledbetter has requested a Special Usel Permit for a 33.04 acre parcel that is owned by' TRL Family Properties, LLC in order to operate an event space withj park models andi recreational activities. The request indicates that there will be up to 20 park model homes which will allow at two week maximum stay. There is an existing mobilel home, pavilion area and bath house on the property. The owner has indicated that the home may be replaced, the existing pavilion will be enclosed for indoor recreational activities and the bathhouse willl be torn down or renovated for future use. This property had served as a campground many years ago (prior to zoning beingi implemented in Stanly Thej property is zoned County, RA (Residential Agricultural) which requires a Special Use Permit per section 601.2 for recreational and entertainment activities. The space that TRL: Family Properties plans to construct will hold events such as weddings, receptions, meetings, retreats, reunions, etc. Per states statute 160D-903 "Al building or structure used for agritourism includes any building or structure used for public or private events, including, but not limited to, weddings, receptions, meetings, demonstrations of farm activities, meals and other events that are taking place on the farm because ifit's farm or1 rural setting". Since this property is designated as al bona fide farm, the event space is exempt from the Special Usel Permit request and allowed by right pers state statute. The recreational uses and proposed on-site housing to be usedi in conjunction with the events space require the Special Use Permit. There is an area offlood: zone on thej property which is not allowed tol be built upon but can be utilized for driveway access. Due tot the environmental health assessment not being fully completed, iti is unsure of where all ofthe recreational activities and parking willl be located. The application indicated that the recreational activities willt take place either tot thel left or right of the events space area. In your packets you have al list ofp proposed conditions as well  County).  asa as site plan whichi includes thel location of! park models andi new event space area. There are four findings of fact that have tol be met for a Special Use Permit request: 1. That thej project will not materially endanger public health and safety. 2. That thej project will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property. 4. That the project will meet all required conditions and specifications.  3. That the project willl bei inl harmony with or compatible withi its neighbors and generally consistent with the The Board of Adjustment has the authority to amend, add or remove: any oft the proposed conditions. Thej property owners willl have to obtain all necessary permits in order to construct or renovate all new: structures on the property. Ms. Emrich displayed images of the property which displayed thej proposed areas for amenities.  comprehensive plan.  2    Chair Fish askedi ifthere were any questions regarding the staffr report.  There were none. evidence.  Chair Fish stated since there were no objections that the staffi report and related documents would be submitted into Chair Fish invited the applicant to speak ori ifthere was an attorney present for them to speak first.  Tony Ledbetter shared the following:  We are applying fort the Special Usel Permit primarily because we have already collected funds in memory ofmy deceased wife who the property is named after to do a commercial type playground for kids. That was the primary reason but as Imet with Planning and Zoning they said toi include anythingwe amy de in the future with the property. Ourf first objective is playground equipment. The second project will probablyi involve just the venue structure whichi is about 6000s square feet and seat about 200. When you do the venue structure, after talking to the soil and forestry services who did all oft the suitability test for the soil, we would probably go ahead and make the septic large enough to support thej park model homes. Chances are the park model homes will notl happen at the same time as the venue. When they do happen itj probably willl be five atat time, not all at once. The other thingI wanted to mention was that our real purpose in applying was that we wanted to return thej property to its former use when my deceased wife's grandparents operated a campground: facility there. The main thing is being ablet tos see individuals go enjoy aj play they can stay andi involve themselves ini recreational practices. Our heart is to see this property throughout the years maintain that form that it once had. Rather thans see thel land sold off to another A question we have received is how we will make sure that the guests dont go overi into other people's property because there are ponds around. The answer: is that we willj probably fence ini the entire property as well as having an automated gate at Saint Martin Road soO we will give people access whenever they have rented it out. Rick. Johnson "Bailey mentioned that you owned some oft the adjoining property, can you point it out?" Mr. Ledbetter showed the other properties that he owns. Hei indicated that the current plans arej just for one  investor. Thati is where our heart is and wei really don't plan on doingi it all overi night.  Chair Fish askedi ifthe board had any questions.  parcel.  Michael Efird' "Does this go all the way to Long Creek?"  Mr. Ledbetter "Yes, it does."  Chair Fish asked if there were any present to speak in opposition to the request.  Bernita Efird shared thei following:  Iam one oft the owners of] Efird Farm and rifle range. Ihave property adjoining this property. Thei rifle range was established in 1970. Wes serve not only Stanly butt the surrounding counties as well. We alsol have members from the law enforcement agencies that use the range for practicing their firearms before they do their qualifications. Ialso have a contract with security forces to do their qualifying as well. The day that they are qualifying therei is constant firing. When the people leave thei range al lot of them visit thel local restaurants before they head home. Ithink we provide a very important servicel because the safer they are int their gun handling the safer wea are. My main concern ist thej people coming into thep property we are talking about. Thej people that willl be coming in fori recreational events and staying in the onsitel housing because I am afraid some of them may complain about thei firing and the gun use and Ithink thatt they just need tol be made aware ahead oft time ands some agreement is in place. So the county is not getting complaints abouti it. Wel have always been good neighbors and IJ just wanti itt to continue.  Michael Fleming "Does your property touch this one?"  Ms. Efird' "Yes, it does."  3    Devron Furr shared that he had been tot thei range andi it was a very good place and extremely safe. Mr. Remsburg "Mr. Ledbetter could add tot the conditions that all visitors mustl be made aware oft the guni range. Mr. Ledbetter "Wel have never had aj problem, is there any way that we could work together where ifIhavea potential wedding or event going on, couldIc contact yout to sayi ifthe datei is goingt tol be a good date?" Ms. Efird "Thej problem is our members know the hours are 8:30 to sunset except for Sundays. Sot there would be Mr. Ledbetter "We willj justi make sure thatj people know that and understand that could be going on. Iami not planning on this anytime soon but ifIl had some sort of christian music concert andi it goes until 9 or 10atr night, Ms.] Efird' "It would not! bother me, I would sit and enjoyi it. But I am concerned about thej people whol hear gunfire Mr. Ledbetter "Ia am totally fine with you all putting something in the conditions that wei notify the guests and also  The board could recommendi that addition tot thel list."  no way for me tol know ift they are coming because they. just know we are open."  would that bother you?" ofany kind."  post signs that say they mayl hear firearms." Michelle Baucom shared the following:  Iam noti necessarilyi in opposition but do want to speak. Iown the property adjacent to ther right. My mother and her husband own the parcel next tot this. Allofthis property is part ofal larger parcel that was owned by my great grandparents who did operate ita as ac campground. Our concerns would bei mainly the boundary lines tol be clearly marked for those visiting. When the property was subdivided the boundary was not clearly established. We are worried about our liability for injury or death. We can certainly put up signs but wondered what would need tol be done to clearly establish those property lines. For example, there have been trespassers that have climbedi in our deer stands on our property and posted photos ofit on social media. Therel have also been children under 18 taking our boat out without permission. We want tol know how this could bej prevented and also the location oft thej park models tot thej property lines. The conditions state they will be atl least 501 feet from the property line and that is not much space ata all. Wel havel had an: accidental drowningi in our family when I was at teenager andl I was the responsible supervisor SO wel know things can happen with very little warning. The second concern is that while studies have been done on thes septic systems, has it been done for the whole property. Thej property that I am on is spring feds sO we have concerns about whether this was considered and what the dangers could be to impact our pond. The areas that are marked in blue andi redi in the soil evaluation are quite elevated: ini relation to the remainder of thej property. I wanted to address the infrastructure requirements such as setbacks for access roads and the water source ifthat will be well or county watera and ther required septic systems. Much of what is there now isi in a designated floodplain. Mr. Cosgrove "Mr. Remsburg, perhaps you can tell how far back the park models willl be? Is there ai required Mr. Remsburg "There is but in that zoning district iti is actually only 151 feet. So, whati is proposed is 50 feet. Itis considerably more but of course thel board could come together with) Mr. Ledbetter to make it more." Richard Cosgrove "Asi it stands, those park model homes willl be 50 feet from thej property line?"  Those would bei the scope ofour concerns related to the development.  setback?"  Mr. Remsburg "Yes, ata minimum."  Richard Cosgrove "Mr. Ledbetter, yous said that you arej proposing tol build a fence around thej property. Would that Mr. Ledbetter "Thei intention therei is that we willj probably fence in the entire campground property on both sides, the back and across Saint Martin with an automated gate. There should not! be an opportunity to cross aj property line or climba a 6f foot metal fence. Itwilll bea ai fencet that will take quite a bit ofwork. We willj probably dot that ass soonas  be: aj priority on either side of the park model homes?"  we start thej playground. It will be donel before the park model homes."  4    Michael Efird' "Whati is going tol bey your water source?"  Mr. Ledbetter' "There used tol be al bridge at the entrance but the state came in and put al big culvert in and when they did that as part oft the agreement withl Myra's family, the county allowed us tol be al large tapi in with the intentions of doing something like we are now. There is a well there now but before anything thei intention is to go to county water because the welll has al lot ofiron ini it anyways. What I have conveyed carefully to SFS in Concord doing the survey work ist that we want to lay thes septic in a way thati it will support everything even ifthe onlyt thing we ever did was the venue. Iam certain they will ensure that ity will not affect local groundwater or anything. Michael Fleming "II know thes studies that willl be done on the property willl become immensely intimate with what isr required. Thel lady that just spoke brought up a good point that thes surroundingi properties may not be kept up with or not given information. They may not evenl know the procedure. Isi it possible fort the Planning Department to meet Mr. Remsburg 'All thes structurlwor.yill need to get building permits which generally include zoning permits. Dol keep in mind as Bailey said earlier that the event venue space is not part oft the Special Use Permit because iti is int thel bonafide farmj program. For the general issuance fort the: zoning compliance permit we dor not really havea a mechanism in place to notify neighbors. Ia am not sure how that would even happen. Ift there was an amendment that was ever done tot this permit thati it would come back to you. We did tell Mr. Ledbetter to think about the future and ask for those things. We can always stepl back and ask for something later. Thej proposal is al little choppy but there are steps to what hel has envisioned. Wei really don't have ai mechanism inj place for that. We are open for anyone to call us and want tol know whati is happening because ifj permits have been pulled we willl be ablet to tell them. Richard Cosgrove "I would like tol know what direction the bullets are: flying from the gun range." Mr. Remsburg showed her thej parcel. Michael Efird expressed he had been there and explained the way the  with them to at least explain thej procedure that the applicant willl have to go through?  bullets are shot.  Chair Fish asked ift there were: any further questions. residence, dot they have to get any kind of zoning change fort that?" Mr. Remsburg "Just building permits are needed." Chair Fish asked if there were: any further questions. Devron Furr "Could we add a condition pertaining to the fence?"  Mr. Ledbetter "Ifsomeone in my family decides to replace the mobile home on thej property with aj permanent  There were none.  Mr. Remsburg "Thel board could certainly suggest that added condition with the agreement of thej property owner." Ms. Baucom "We are not asking for a fence all the way around butj just something toj protect them from! liability and Michael Efird "I think there should be ai fence around the whole thing because ift they get in the creek they end up  where therei is al body of water." right behind the rifle range."  Mr. Ledbetter explained where he was proposing toj put up the fence.  Mr. Remsburg "This either needs tol be a condition or ifthere iss some sort of understanding and trust on the families part. The only way to put iti in binding is toj put it intot the conditions. You can word that any way: you want as far as what property lines thati it should go on ori ifit should go around the whole thing." Rick. Johnson "Iti makes good common sense to do it along the right hand side and use the existing vegetation as a Mr. Ledbetter Perhaps we also need toj put signage on that fence every sO often so they know thati ift they cross the Chair Fish "Ify you are going to do signage on the fence then you could also do it along the creek." Mr. Ledbetter "We are thinking of four feet buti it can always be taller ifneeded."  natural boundary."  fence then they are on private property."  Chair Fish "How tall are you thinking for the fence?"  5    Ms. Baucom "I would say six feet would be good, something that ist not easy tos scale."  Mr. Remsburg "In thei idea ofkeeping this simple, I would suggest you include language that fencing and signage shall be added that discourage access toj private property to the satisfaction of the adjoining property owners. We could add that as a condition becausel Idon'ts see an easy solution since iti is 33 acres with creeks," Chair Fish stated the hearing was closed and that the additional condition would be added.  Rick. Johnson "With that language, Ithink that they could agree."  Standard #1 - That the project will not materially endanger public health or safety; ifl located where proposed, andi if  developed and operated according to the plan submitted. Motion to find this true: Richard Cosgrove  Second: Devron Furr Approved: 6-0  Standard #2 -7 That thej project will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property.  Motion to find this true: Richard Cosgrove Second: Rick. Johnson Approved: 6-0  Standard #3 - That the project willl bei in harmony with or compatible with its neighbors andi is generally consistent  with thel latest Stanly County Land-Use Plan. Motion to find this true: Michael Efird Second: Michael Fleming Approved: 6-0  Standard #4 - That thej project meets all other required conditions and specifications for the operation ofr recreational  and entertainment activities in thel RA Zoning District. Motion to find this true: Devron. Furr Second: Rick. Johnson Approved: 6-0 Motion: Richard Cosgrove Second: Michael Efird Approved: 6-0  Chair Fish asked for a motion to approve this request.  Chair Fish "The motion to approve has been approved".  Chair. Fish "Those affected by this decision willl have 30 days to appeal this ruling to the Stanly County Superior  Court."  Chair Fishi introduced thes second item, ZV23-01. Bailey Emrich shared thei following:  Chris Lambert requests a variance for a single family home to bel built within 51 feet of the side yard property line on ap parcel located at Woodland Drive, Norwood, NC: 28182 (Tax Record #36526). Chris Lambert owns aj parcel of land containing 0.53 acres and is 22,634 square feet on Woodland Drive. Mr. Lambert is requesting a7 foot variance in order tol build as single family dwelling within 51 feet of the east side property line. Thej property is zoned County, R20 (Residential) andi is al lake front lot. Mr. Lambert has indicated the reasoning for this request is therei is a 25: foot  utility easement that runs through the center ofhis property.  6    Hel has tol build outside oft that easement pert the utility company. Therefore, iti reduces the area on his property that hei is able to utilize. The home will have tol bej placed to the right or left of the easement. The R20: zoning district requires a 12 foot sidej property line setback. Thej property has not received as site evaluation from Environmental  Health.  Thei four standards that must be met for approval are:  Standard #1 -1 the unnecessary hardship results from thes strict application oft the ordinance; Standard #2 - the unnecessary hardship results from conditions that are peculiar tot the applicant's property; Standard #3 -1 the unnecessary hardship is not: a self-created hardship; Standard #4 - the requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the ordinance such that public safety is secured and substantial justice is achieved. Ifthese standards are: found to be true, then it would be appropriate to approve the request. All neighbors within 100  feet of the property were: notified by mail and a sign was posted on thej property.  Chair Fish askedi ift there were any questions.  Michael Fleming "When I looked up the definition ofs setback, iti included anything that was. 30i inches above ground. Whichi includes a gutter. Nothing attached to thel building can penetrate thes setback, have the applicants Ms. Emrich "With zoning, we tell them thati iti is the closest point oft thel home to thej property line." Chair Fish invited the applicant to speak ori ift there was an attorney present for them to speak first.  been made aware?  Michael Sandy shared the following:  Iami representing Mr. Lambert andl Mr. Long tonight. Mr. Lambert would like to ask for a 5 foot variance. This property was subdivided in 2004 and progress energy created the properties and thel homes were already on thel lots. The easement supplies water tot thel lake from the Piney Point water system. Mr. Lambert is goingt tol have to ask one way or the other for a variance because no matter how he would place the home he has to be so far away from that utility easement. He is looking toj place a 2500-2800 square footl house on thel lake. He would like tol be as close as he can to thel left side property line. Wei feltl likei it would benefit thej public in order toj place thel home there because ifhel built on ther right side ofthe lott then] he would be backi ini the cove which is more ofas sensitive area for the environment. Duke energy has already given preliminary approval for this. Hel has spoken to all the neighbors and no one had a concern. Mr. Lambert currently lives across thes street sol his own home would be the only one with an  obstructed view.  Chair Fish asked ift there were any questions. both fine with the reduced setback."  Richard Cosgrove "I could assume that you) have talked to the Longs about all of this?"  Mr. Lambert' "Thel Longs andl Iare friends. His house is on as small lot and he is going to add onto my side. We are Michael Fleming "5: foot, ist this a 2 story home?. Are you going tol be able to maintain thes side of thel home with a Mr. Lambert "It won't be ai real 2 story home, it willj just have a roofa area on the lefts side. But, yesl Iwill be able to Michael Fleming "One of the things the: zoning code does is separate homes sO we do not have aj jumping fire. 10 feeti is all there would be between the two ofy you. Building code requires fire resistant construction ifyou are closer Mr. Lambert "I am a contractor and I am aware soI do not have aj problem at all and neither does Mr. Long."  ladder?" maintain it."  than 10: feet. Are you okay with that?"  Chair Fish asked ift there was anyone present to speak in opposition.  There were none.  7    Standard #1 -The unnecessary hardship results from the strict application oft the ordinance; Dolb have a1 motion to find this standard true based on the evidence submitted?  Thel Board finds this standard True Motion to find this true: Rick. Johnson Second: Richard Cosgrove Vote:6-0  Standard #2 - The unnecessary hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the applicant's! property.  DoIh have a motion to find this standard true based on the evidence presented?  The Board finds this standard true. Motion to find true:Michael Fleming Second:Michael Efird Vote:6-0  Standard #3 - The unnecessary hardship isi not as self-created hardship;.  DoIh have ai motion to find this standard true based on the evidence presented? Make a ruling on Finding #3 - The] Board finds this standard true.  Motion to find true: Rick. Johnson Second: Michael Efird Vote:6-0  Standard #4 - The requested variance is consistent with thes spirit, purpose, andi intent of the ordinance sucht that  public safety is secured and substantial justice is achieved. Make ai ruling on Finding #4 - The Board finds this standard true. Motion to find true: Michael Fleming Second: Devron Furr Vote: 6-0  Chair) Fish asked for a motion to approve the variance.  Motion: Devron Furr Second: Richard Cosgrove Vote: 6-0  Chair Fish "The motion to approve has been approved".  Chair Fish "Those affected by this decision will have 30 days to appeal this ruling to the Stanly County Superior  Court."  Chair Fish introduced the second item, ZV23-02. Bailey Emrich shared the following:  Michael and Vicky) Long request a variance for an addition to their single family home to be built within 51 feet of thes side yard property line on aj parcel located at 49190 Woodland Drive, Norwood, NC28182(1 Tax Record Mr. & Mrs. Long own aj parcel of] land containing 0.35 acres on' Woodland Drive. Thel Longs are requesting a 7 foot variance in order toj put an addition onto the side oft thel home and be within 51 feet of the southwest side property  #36525).  8    line. The property is zoned County, R20 (Residential): andi is al lake front lot. Thel Longs have indicated the reasoning The septic system is] placed next to thel home on the east side oft the property and thes septic lines run behind the home (lakeside). Environmental. Health does require a 101 foot minimum setback between a septic system and a dwelling. There is also an existing treel line that is approximately 35 feet wide. Therefore, there is little area left tol be built upon on the east side and rear of the property. The R20: zoning district requires a 12 foot side property line  for this request is the location of thes septic system and existing tree line vegetation.  setback.  The four standards that must be met for approval are:  Standard #1 -1 the unnecessary hardship results from the strict application oft the ordinance; Standard #2 - the unnecessary hardship results from conditions that arej peculiar to the applicant's property; Standard #3 -1 the unnecessary hardship is not a self-created hardship; Standard #4 -1 thei requested variance is consistent with thes spirit, purpose andi intent oft the ordinance such that public safety is secured and substantial justice is achieved. Ift these standards are found to be true, then it would be appropriate to approve the request.. All neighbors within 100  feet oft the property were notified by mail and as sign was posted on the property.  Chair Fish asked ift there were any questions.  There were none.  Chair Fish asked those in favor of the request to come up. Michael Sandy shared thei following:  There was al lot line adjustment done in 2002 and Mr. Lambert gave thel Longs some land to fix the property line. The Longs would like to add on to the home but as stated, the septici is the main issue. Thel home has been there for many years and ther new: addition will not be large. The current tax value of thej property is 300,0001 but with the addition hopefully willi increase the property value and bea able to update the home. Therei is public water outi in the  area. They are not blocking anyone's view. Chair Fish asked ift there were any questions.  There were none. There were none.  Chair Fish asked ift there was anyone present to speak in opposition.  Chair Fish "Ifthere are no objections or discussions Id declare the evidentiary hearing closed." Standard #1 - The unnecessary hardship results from the strict application oft the ordinance; Dolk have ai motion toi find this standard true based on the evidence submitted?  Thel Board finds this standard true Motion toi find true: Michael Fleming Second: Richard Cosgrove Vote:6-0  Standard #2 - The unnecessary hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the applicant's property.  DoIhave ar motion to find this standard true based on the evidence presented?  The] Board finds this standard true Motion toi find true: Michael Efird Second: Rick. Johnson  9    Vote: 6-0  Standard #3 -The unnecessary hardship isi nota a self-created hardship;.  DoIhave ar motion toi findt this standard true based on the evidence presented?  The] Board finds this standard true Motion to find true: Devron! Furr Second: Michael Efird Vote: 6-0  Standard #4 - The requested variance is consistent with thes spirit, purpose, andi intent oft the ordinance such that  public safety is secured and substantial justice is achieved. Thel Board finds this standard true Motion to find true:Michael Fleming Second:Richard Cosgrove Vote:6-0  Chair Fish asked for ai motion to approve the variance. Motion to approve: Rick. Johnson Second: Michael Efird Vote: 6-0  Chair Fish' "The motion to approve has been approved".  Chair Fish "Those affected by this decision will have 30 days to appeal this rulingt to the Stanly County Superior  Court."  Chairl Fish "If there is no other business I will entertain ai motion to adjourn."  Motion: Richard Cosgrove Second: Michael Efird Vote: 6-0 Time adjourned: 8:08 lyuh ChairindyFish  Ppu  BEhy  10