WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting Agenda Tuesday November 5, 2013  7:00 PM  I. I. Invocation Il. Roll call IV. Old Business  Opening oft the meeting  312 Water Street Demolition Request V. Major Works, Certificate of Appropriateness  A.  Major Works  1. AI request has been made byl Mr. William Kenneri to install a 3.51 foot high fence at the rear of his property, install safety rails on the wrap around porch at the rear oft the property and install operable shutters on the front façade of his property, located at 720 East Main Street. 2. A request has been made by Sloan Family Ventures, LLC to remove the roofand support columns from the porch ati the rear oft the building located at 245 West Main Street and install 3. Arequest has been made by Ms. Rachel Mills to expand the rear porch on her property by 8 feet so that iti matches the rear façade of the house in width. The property is located at 409 East 4. Arequest has been made by Mr. Mark Kucas to replace the existing windows with vinyl replacement windows at 406 E Main Street. Windows willl bei identical in appearance (grids,  an awning in its place. Main Street.  screens, etc..)t to the existing windows.  Minor Works the HVAC: system.  1. A request has been made by the property owner at 7201 East Main Street to change out 2. A request has been made by the property owner at 114 East Main Street to replace the 3. An request has been made by the property owneri at 117 North Market Street to replace 4. Arequest has been made by the property ownera at 210 East Main Street to replace 5. Ar request has been made by the property owner at 102 Stewart Parkway to change out 6. Arequest has been made by the owner of 406 East Main Street to change out the HVAC 7. Arequest has been made by the owner at 322 East Main Street to change out the gas  heating system with a new HVAC: system. the roof with a new" TPO membrane system.  rotten railings and balusters with new, matching historic exactly. the old HVAC: system and replace with a new system. system in six units with new systems.  pack system.  VII. Other Business  1. Election of New Officers 2. Design Guidelines Sub-Committee  VII. Approval of Minutes - October 1, 2013  VIII. Adjourn    OLD BUSINESS    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black ink  Street Address of Property: 317 Waler Shect  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Willian Honry   feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Demol ltion of-Hu hose 02 31Z WJo-ler Shreel  olue 4o neglec?  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  denai-y annan (Name of Applicant type or print) (Mailing Address) ashington  (Initials)  ACTION  C4y Gf 7131l3 (Date) Bun (Signature of Applicant)  (Zip Code)  (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded any  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is reguired at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    city of Washington  Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Notice of Intent to Demolish  The undersigned do petition the Historic Preservation Commission for a Certificate of Historic District Appropriateness for the demolition of the structure (s) at 31Z Noker - stroet Type of structure- Singla fomily Cesicence  The notice of intent to demolish will be received and reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission at their next regular meeting.  113113  Date  40R0  signed  Historic Preservation Action taken:  Date taken  Authorizing Official  61    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From:. Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development  Re: The City ofWashington has submitted al Notice ofi Intent to Demolish the property located at3 312  Water Street.  A request has been made by the Cityo ofWashington, fora Certificate of Appropriateness Tog grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  demolish the property located at 312 WaterStreet.  to  may be attached to the motion.  appropriate  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission granta a Certificate of Appropriateness to the City of Washington to allow for the demolition of the property located at 312 WaterS Street. motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic This Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 6.0 Demolition and Relocation.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness tot the CityofWashington: to allow for the demolition of the property located at 312 Water Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the applicationi is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically! Section 6.01 Demolition and Relocation. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness: to the Cityof Washington to allow the demolition of the property located at. 312 Water: Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 4.0 Streetscape and Site  Design.    OH  CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVBLOPMENT 01 HISTORIC: PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of APpropriateness-312 Water Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According toi the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propetyi is located within 100 feet oft the above referenced  property.  Arequest has been made by the City of Washington for a Notice of Intent To  Demolish for the property located at 312 Water Street.  You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting oft the Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Washington  Date: Tuesday November 5, 2013  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enterf from the Market  Street side oft the building and go tot the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should youl have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan Community Development Planner 252-946-0897 Preman@washingtomegow    Adjoining Property Owners: 312 Water Street  Charlotte Mason 1195. Harvey Street Washington, NC: 27889 Maurice Bridgeman 204 Yukon Street Hampton, VA23663 Dorothy Wheeler 512 Hickory' Woods Way Antioch, TN37013 Margaret Howdy 326 Water Street Washington, NC 27889 Aulander Crisp 1225. Academy Street Washington, NC 27889 Litchfield Holdings 135 Harbor Rd. Washington, NC27889 Mary Elizabeth Haubenreiser 118S. Academy Street Washington, NC: 27889 Crystal Phillips 331 E. Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Henry Carter 325 E. Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Annette Jefferson 323 E. Main Street Washington, NC 27889    Rachel Cahoon 1149A Nicklous Dr. Greenville, NC27834 Laura Darre 316 Riverside Dr. Washington, NC: 27889 Joseph Wooten 221 Lake Rd. Greenville, NC 27834 Betty. Jane Green 307 E. Main Street Washington, NC 27889 RobertMudd PO Box 26 Pomfret, MD 20675 Steven Rader 113S. Harvey Street Washington, NC 27889 Dianna Aideuis 1225. Harvey Street Washington, NC: 27889 Arthur Tyndall 1105. Harvey Street Washington, NC27889 Helen Myers 243 E. Main Street Washington, NC: 27889 Richard Hodges 1537 Craig Street Greenville, NC27834    Anna Maria Investments 122S. Academy Street Washington, NC: 27889 William Toler 224 E. Water Street Washington, NC27889    ADDRESS:  312 Water St 5675-97-5062 Yes  TAXPARCEL NUMBER: CONTRIBUTING: CONTRIBUTING NUMBER: CURRENT OWNER: FLOODZONE:  458 NON-CONTRIBUTING NUMBER:  William R. Henry Jr.  No  SQUARE FOOTAGE OF STRUCTURE:  1836 downstairs:  WINDOW STYLE: DOOR STYLE: ROOF MATERIAL:  upstairs:  Asphalt Shingle  DESCRIPTION: John Mayo House. 2 Story symmetrical late 19th Turned porch posts, diagonal sheathing under porch, simple molded century trim. OTHER FEATURES: (i.e. fences, accessory building, etc.): Shed- 41 X  frame house. 10, Shelter- 8x  20    MAJOR WORKS  Mr. William Kenner 720 East Main Street  Fence in Rear of Property Safety Railings for Deck Shutters on Front Facade    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 720 Egst mg  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Kenner Kenner  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  hlliAm  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  inStal fene 35 hish  4.5  stau Spfty Ra!S Bucofhavse  pot shuthir Bach 0M  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that  Preservation Commission must be submitted 5:00  require review by the Historic  Iwish to attend; otherwise Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  by  p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the Willgm pKehner (Name of Applicant-type or print) 743 West (Mailing Address) (Date)  consideration will be delayed until the following HPC  meeting  application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one meeting. An incomplete  year.  (Initials)  ACTION  351  (Zip Code)  0923-20/3 99-345876/  (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized  huloke (Signature of Applicant)  Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next  application becomes a Issuance of a Minor  other permit required by City code or any law. Minorwork projects not or property owner from obtaining any  approved by staff will be fowarded  meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that ofy your authorized representative is required at written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing  Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. the meeting of the  You must give on your behalf.    CRMT  AN            REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development  Re: William Kenner has submitted a request to install shutters on the front façade, install a 3.5f foot high fence at the rear of the property and is submitting final plans fori the safety railing onl his wrap around  porch at the rear of his property located at 720 E. Main Street.  A request has been made by William Kenner for a Certificate of Appropriateness to return shutters on the front façade, installa 3.5 high fence ini the back of the property andi install safety rails on his wrap around porch on the property located at 720E. Main Street. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission musti makei findings ofi fact, which arei included in. the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to William Kenner to allow) fort the return of shutters to the front façade, install a 3.5 high wooden fence andi install proposed safety rails on the wrap around porch on the property located at located at 720E. Main. Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buldingand40smesape and Site Design.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriatenessto William Kenner to allow) for the return ofs shutters to thej frontf façade, install a 3.5 high wooden fence and install proposed safety rails on the wrap around porch on the property located at located at 720 E. Main: Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings and 4.0 Streetscape and Site Design. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the  approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to William Kenner to allow for the return of shutters toi thej front façade, install a 3.51 high wooden fence and install proposed safety rails on the wrap around porch on the property located at located at 720 E. Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the    applicationi is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically! Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings and 4.0Streetscape and Design.    G) A  CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 01 HISTORICP PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate ofA APproprateness-720 East Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City ofWashington. According tot the application submitted by Mr. Kenner, your propety is located within 1001 feet of the above referenced property.  Mr. Kenner requests toi install a 3.5 foot tall fence at the rear of his property located at 720 East Main Street. Additionally, he has submitted final plans for his wrap around porch on the rear façade of his property and to reinstall shutters on the front façade of You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting ofthe Washington Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  the house.  Date: Tuesday November 5, 2013  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side ofthe building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan Community Development Planner 252-946-0897 Premanewashngomegow    Adjoining Property Owners: 720 East Main Street  John and Sandra Harvey 8714 Cypress Club Dr. Raleigh, NC 27615 Douglas and Diane Wright 728 East Main! Street Washington, NC 27889 Hugh and! Sylvia Sterling 718 East Main Street Washington, NC: 27889 Lisa Clark 102. James Court Chocowinity, NC: 27817 Eugene Fellenger and Laura Frye 712 East Main Street Washington, NC: 27889 Kenneth and Paula Tisdale 704 East Main Street Washington, NC: 27889 James and Cheryl Peavyhouse 517 Boulevard SE Atlanta, GA 30312 Don Crawford 236 Huntington. Ave., Suite 318 Boston, MA 02115 Moira and Stephen Laughlin 1227 Surf Ave Pacific Grove, CA 93950 Stephen and Rachel Smith 1313 College Place Raleigh, NC27605    Sam Carty c/o Peggy Farrell 150Lowtide Lane Bath, NC27808 Constance Howard 137 East Main Street Washington, NC27889    ADDRESS: 720 E. Main, Street TAXPARCEL NUMBER: 5685-16-4223  CONTRIBUTING: Yes CONTRIBUTING NUMBER: 100 CURRENT OWNER: William Keller FLOOD ZONE: Yes  NON-CONTRIBUTINGNUMBER:  SQUARE FOOTAGE OF STRUCTURE: 1935 WINDOW STYLE: upstairs: 4/1 downstairs: same  DOOR STYLE: 4 lite/3 panel ROOF MATERIAL: Asphalt Shingle  DESCRIPTION: 2 story early 20th century frame house with 1920s type porch. OTHER FEATURES: (ie. fences, accessory building, etc.): Storage-1S10x12    MAJOR WORKS  Sloan Family Ventures, LLC  245 West Main Street  Remove Rear Porch and Replace with a  New Awning    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  245 Wsr MAIN STREEF WASHINGTON NCZ7E  Owner's Name: SLon Fmiy VENTLES LLC  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  PEmOrAL OF ROOEÉ Couuma SUPPORT OE REAR PORCH THs PRcH WAS AODED TO THE BULDING IN THE LATL 1970's SD WE DON'T BKLIEVK IT TO bE SKNIFICANE OUR INTENTION 1STU REPLALE MIITH A SQVARR /SLPED ANNING AS SIMICAR 73 TAE EYISTING REAN AWNING WHCH 15 IN THE PIMCHED AHoTa Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the require month by the Historic wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC prior to the meeting application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one meeting. year. An incomplete  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropnateness that  review  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  SLOPN FAMILY Po. Bor (Mailing Address) lo/2/2013 (Date) Tieme (Signature of7 Applicant)  (Name of Applicant -type orp print) VENTRES,LC  (Initials)  ACTION  1847  (Zipc 2788 252.9457704  (Daytime Phone Number) Mh. doe  (Date)  (Authorized  Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  application becomesa Issuance of a Minor will be fowarded  other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not property approved owner staff from obtaining any  by  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. meeting of the written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your Youmustgive behalf.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development  Re: Sloan Family' Ventures LLC has submitted a request to remove the roof and columns on the porch at the rear of the building andi install an awning to match remainder on building located at 245 W. Main  Street.  A request has been made by Sloan Family Ventures for a Certificate ofAppropriateness: to remove the roof and columns on the porch at the rear oft the building and install an awning to match remainder on building located at 245 W. Main: Street. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which arei included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate may be attached to the  motion. Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission, grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Sloan Family Ventures, LLCto remove the roof and columns andi install an awning on the rear of the property located at 245 W. Main. Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings and Section 4.0 Streetscape and Site  Design.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Sloan Family Ventures, LLCto remove the roof and columns and install an awning on the rear of the property located at 245 W. Main, Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings and Section 4.0 Streetscape and Site Design. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions ont the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness' to Sloan Family Ventures, LLCto remove the roof and columns and install an awning on the rear of the property located at. 245 W. Main. Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings and Section 4.0 Streetscape and Site  Design.        StZ                    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 01 FISTORIC PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate ofA Appropriateness-245 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovatiop work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propety is located within 100 feet oft the above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by Thomas Sloan to remove the roofand columns on the rear stoop oft the property and install an awning over the entry on the building  located at 245 W. Main Street.  You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting oft the Washington  Historic Commission. Please note: the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday November 5, 2013  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side oft the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan Community Development Planner 252-946-0897 Premanewashngtomcsow    Adjoining Property Owners: 245 W. Main Street  Fortescue Investment Group 444 Stewart Parkway Washington, NC 27889 Strong Shields Properties 444 Stewart Parkway Washington, NC 27889 PGML LLC 107 Island Lane Washington, NC 27889 Randall Walker PO Box 2632 Washington, NC 27889 David' Williams PO Box 2165 Washington, NC 27889 Randy Cantrell 258 W. Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Gary Wilson POBox'1865 Washington, NC 27889 Norman Manning PO Box 2611 Washington, NC 27889 Wallace Smith 2283 Old New Bern Rd. Chocowinity, NC 27817 MBA Holdings 234 W. Main Street Washington, NC 27889    Murray Lynch PO Box 1887 Washington, NC27889 Williamr Oden. Jr. Trust Executor PO Box 190 Washington, NC 27889 Marie Tomasolo 107 Island Lane Washington, NC: 27889 Wolf Enterprises 19245 Fishburne Dr. Spring Hill, FL. 34610 Melton Everett 231E. Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Rodney Schmitt 202 W. Main Street Washington, NC 27889    MAJOR WORKS  Ms. Rachel Mills  409 East Main Street  Expand Rear Porch 8 Feet to Match Width  of House    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 409 EMAIN STA WASHINGION  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  BACHFL Verkia Mus  50 (width)  feet by  /00  feet. pkae  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done: &' Bybusfs  hrek Porck  # #  AA  apaeNE SPuretane  hose + falnt  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid, for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  RACBEL Viam RIA MILLs (Name OfApplicant,type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  Po. By 1325 WACHINGTEN OrAs Ro13/ 252-414-94PL ab! Meels  7B  (Mailing Address) (Date)  (Zip Code)  (9aytime/Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature ofApplicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of al Minor  other  any  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required ati the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    To: Washington Planning Department; Washington Historic Commission  October 25, 2013  The enclosed rendering describes the planned extension of my back porch at 409 East  Main Street, Washington.  Shown on sketch 1i is the exterior planned view.  Shown on sketch 2i is the footprint with current porch shaded and the planned  extension 8 feet to the west unshaded.  Photograph shows the current view of] porch. Allarchitectural details oft the porch will remain the same except for ai new gabled porch roof, which will connect to thel back oft the  currently gabled roof over the kitchen portion of the house.  Background: the porch was added by one oft thej previous owners, either Lonnie Squires  orl before. him Max Chestnutt. Its sits simply on a concrete base with wooden studs and screening oni its three sides. Ith has ai metal roof (as does thel house) in a shed style.  Problems to be addressed by the extension: 1) The current porch is too small for practical use.  2) Itisa also too small for the proper architectural balance of the back of thel house. 3) There: is occasional leakage between the porch shed roof and the upper frame oft the Procedure: The current wood supports and screen, as well as the shed-style: roof, will ber removed. The concrete pad will remain. Ar new pad will be constructed to attach to the current pad, going (see sketch) eight feet out tot the west to: meet the southwest corner oft the house and coming forward (south) to meet the width of the current pad. Ar new gabled roof willl be attached to the current gabling on the back of thel house (see sketch), so that it appears almost a seamless metal roof line. Wooden supports and screening (see sketch) willl be replaced in the same pattern as current porch. Porch supports will bej painted white, the current color of  kitchen back door.  the trim on the wholel house. Porch trim will match house trim.  PLEASE NOTE: Unfortunately, Iwill not bei ini town at thel November Commission meeting to answer questions myself; instead, Mr. William Cochran, the builder, will address planning questions for you. Ican, however, be reached A+252414-9684, ifnecessary.  Thank you for your assistance with this plan.  RachèVietoria Mills, owner Tix    J 7  -  2 de 2    Ai  3  h 8 5 2. 1 <  a            REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development  Re: Ms. Rachel Mills has requested to extend the back porch on her property by 8f feet to fit the width of  the house at 409 East Main Street.  AI request has been made by Ms. Mills fora Certificate ofA Appropriateness to extend the rear porch on the back of the house located at 409 East Main Street. The extension will go 8feet To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which arei included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  beyond the current porch and fit the entire rear of the house.  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Mills to extend the back porch of the property at 409 East Main! Street by 81 feet in order to match the façade of the house. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission, grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Mills to extend the back porch of the property at 409 East Main Street by 81 feeti in order to match the façade of thehouse. This motion is based ont the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Mills to extend the back porch of the property at 409 East Main Street by 81 feet in order to match the façade of the house. This motion is based on thei following findings off fact: the application is congruous withi the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings.    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 01 HSTORICPRESERVATON  Subject: Certificate of APpropriateness-409 East Main STreet  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 1001 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required tol be notified by the City of Washington. According tot the application submitted by Ms. Rachel Mills, your propetyi is located within 100 feet oft the above referenced property.  Ms. Mills has submitted a request to exend the back porch ont the property at 409 East Main Street. The extension will cover the width oft the rear façade oft the house. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting oft the Washington Historic Commission. Please note: the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday November 5, 2013  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00F PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan Community Development Planner 252-946-0897 Premanewashngtomegow    Adjoining Property Owners: 409 East Main Street  Virginia Finnerty 400 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Vergil. Jenkins, Jr. 412 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 John O'Neil 420 East Main Street Washington, NC 277889 Kirk Stamant 427 E. Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Litchfield Holding 135 Harbor Rd Washington, NC 27889 Ana Maria Investments 122S. Academy Street Washington, NC: 27889 Leslie Moore 31 Evanshire Dr. Fredericksburg, VA 22406 Crystal Phillips 331 East Main Street Washington, NC: 27889 David Clark 401 E. Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Geraldine Bennett 405 East Main Street Washington, NC: 27889    Charles Davis 413 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Walter Hannan 1721 Anderson Street Wilson, NC 27893    ADDRESS: 409 E. Main St  TAX: PARCEL NUMBER: 5685-06-0966  CONTRIBUTING: Yes CONTRIBUTINGNUMBER: 130  NON-CONTRIBUTING NUMBER:  CURRENT OWNER: Jerry Leath and Rachel Mills  FLOOD ZONE: No  SQUARE FOOTAGE OF STRUCTURE: 2010 WINDOW STYLE: 6/1 Downstairs: same  DOOR STYLE: ROOF MATERIAL: Tin diagonal treatment under porch.  DESCRIPTION: 2 story late 19th century gable end frame house with bracketed detail, OTHER FEATURES: (i.e. fences, accessory buildings, etc.): Garage-ISFR29x21    Major Works  Mr. Mark Kucas  406 E Main Street  Replace existing windows with  vinyl replacement windows    A.4.2  CITY OF WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Date_ 10/28/13  Fee  A: Information on Structure Under Consideration  Address: 406 E MAIN ST. WASHINGTDN,NA 227889  Current Owner: MARK KUCAS  Tax Parcel Number:.  This document does not constitute the issuance of a Building Permit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections  at Dept.  975-9383. Has al Building Permit been obtained? YES_ B: Information on Person Making Application Name: MARK KUCAS Address: 107 BENEDUM PLACE  NO_  NIAX  City: CARY  State: NC Zip:275/8 Phone:9 919-4/2-1556  C: Proposed Changes to Structure  (We) respectfully request a Certificate of Appropriateness be issued in accordance with the City of Washington Zoning Ordinance for the following reason: (details of the proposed project) TO REPLPCE THE EKISTING WINDOWS WITH VINYL REPLACEMENT W/NDOWS. WINDOWS wILL BE TDETICAL 7N APPEARANCE (6R:05,5CREENSCa ETC.., - To THE EXISTING WINDOWS. SIMLAR TD WHAT WAS APPROVED ON MY OTHEE  WASHINGTDN PROPERTY LOCATED a717 w  PROPERTY IS A MDNI-CONTIEOTIG BOLBIWG. D: (We) understand approved requests are valid for one year.  MAN/SE  Note: Applicants, and/or their agents or parties of interest are prohibited from any contact in relation to this matter with Historic Preservation Commission members prior to the public hearing.  FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: ACTION Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Respectfully Submitted, MaliKueso  DATE  Signature A4-3    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jennifer Brennan, Planning & Development windows on the property located at 406 East Main Street.  Re: Mr. Mark Kucas has requested permission to replace the existing windows with vinyl replacement  A request has been made by Mr. Kuckas for a Certificate ofAppropriateness: to replace the existing windows with vinyl replacement windows on the property located at 406 East Main To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  Street. Windows will bei identical in appearance to the existing windows.  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission, grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Kucas to replace existing windows with vinyl replacement windows for the property located at 406 East Main Street. Windows will bei identical in appearance to the existing windows. This motion is based ont thet following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing  Buildings.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission, grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Kucas to replace existing windows with vinyl replacement windows fort the property located at 406 East Main! Street. Windows will bei identical in appearance to the existing windows. This motion is based on1 thet following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Mr. Kucas to replace existing windows with vinyl replacement windows for the property located at 406 East Main Street. Windows will bei identical in appearance to the existing windows. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing  Buildings.    CITY OF WASHINGTON DOWNTOWNI DEVELOPMENTOHISTORICPRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate ofA APpropriateness-406 East Main STreet  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted int the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required tol be notified by the CityofWashington. According to the application submitted by Mr. Mark Kucas, your propety is located within 100 feet oft the above referenced property.  Mr. Kucas has submitted a request to replace existing windows with vinyl replacement windows at 406 El Main Street. Windows will be indentical in appearance to the existing You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  windows.  Date: Tuesday October 1, 2013  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Jennifer Brennan Community Development Planner 252-946-0897 jprennan@washingtonnc.gov    Adjoining Property Owners: 406 East Main Street  Virginia Finnerty 400 East Main Street Washington, NC27889 Vergil Jenkins, Jr. 412 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 John O'Neil 420 East Main Street Washington, NC 277889 Keith Hardt 424 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Michael Messner 428 East Main Street Washington, NC: 27889 Leslie Moore 31 Evanshire Dr. Fredericksburg, VA 22406 Henry Carter 325 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Crystal Phillips 331 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 David Clark 401 E. Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Geraldine Bennett 405 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889    ADDRESS: 406. EI Main St  TAXI PARCEL NUMBER: 5685-07-1213  CONTRIBUTING: No CONTRIBUTING: NUMBER:  NON-CONTRIBUTINGNUMBER:  CURRENT OWNER: IBX Development, LLC  FLOOD ZONE: No  SQUARE FOOTAGE OF STRUCTURE: 5958  WINDOW STYLE: DOORSTYLE:  Downstairs: same  ROOF MATERIAL: Asphalt Shingle wide porch, diagonal treatment under porch.  DESCRIPTION: 2 story late 19th, early 20th century frame house with bay windows, OTHER FEATURES: (i.e. fences, accessory buildings, etc.): Tax Card addressed as 1  Lot N/S EI Main St, Apts. 1-6            MINOR WORKS    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 220E3  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Ma rennel  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  ChAns8 o HVAC Snstem  2701 24tged sp) HP zoned  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  R L1 7Nameof) Applicant -type or priht)  (Initials)  ACTION  6452 (Mailing Address) 1006-13 (Date) % (Signature of Applicant)  NeckR 2576 252 212-0036 (Daytime Phone Number)  -  Pines  (Zip Code)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the_ Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black ink  Street Address of Property: 114 E Maiw Sr. Owner's Name: KmDonsras MERCER  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Lot Size:  feet by  (width)  feet.  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Replacs  hehayryah 1 y e HVAc sysle  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness Preservation Commission must be submitted 5:00 Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will by  that require review by the Historic  p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the  application will not be Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  be delayed until the following HPC  meeting  accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one meeting. An incomplete  year.  Doussas mercer 7Name of Applicant- - typeo or print)  (Initials) 3  ACTION  Kson Rued WEBETAZN Mc 2)89  Address) 24 Zos  dairg  (Zip Code)  (Daytime 946- Phone 8538 Number)  (Date) Upon  (Authorized Signature)  yescs  F  being signed and dated below by the Planning Department Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati  or designee, this application becomes a  Issuance of a Minor  other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work tenant, or property owner from obtaining  to  any  projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  its,nextr (Mipor  A12leli3 (Date)  Auth. Sig.)  a  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative Historic Preservation Commission at which the written permission to your authorized  is required at the meeting of the  application is to be considered. You must give  representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 117A.Ackets  Historic Property/Name (ifa applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  WAylan Serrons  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work tol be Done:  Teplate Zfsglew wifk CSA 7P6 Membrane  spteu  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior toi the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Bu Beok (Name of7 Applicant-type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  SBANHIck 2.WhNET  (Maling Address) Wk4ls  (Zip Code)  943-7457 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded any  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  210 K WAihunyriv M-Qih  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Kevm Connors  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work tol be Done:  Rephars Bahaye Rud Bailulen w/  Mcw 1 Spinll 01,  7eaTed KumBEK  Be TuxNre 70 Mepaximal  E  understand that all applications for a Certificate, of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  MIChREL FCONNeS  (Name of Applicant-type or print)  (Initials)]  ACTION  13847om Charhrd 2914p  (Mailing Address) 9-08-13 (Date)   (ZipCode)  803-225-2ES8 (Daytime Phone Number) Lmmrs  (Date)  (Authorized Signature))  Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the_ Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: la Stewrt Kw Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Chanber  2281 - Awil  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  EA  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Cha gt dsyte * fepleve WR New)  Dame Joalion  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that  review year. Swi  Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the require month by the Historic lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC prior to the meeting application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one meeting. An incomplete  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  AleSA 1809 (Mailing Address) Idrls (Date)  7Name of Applicant-type or print) Sapiens  (Initials)  ACTION  Crsrk. 22889  (ZipCode)  152-94-674 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date) Upon  (Authorized Signature)  apiep  being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next  application becomes a Issuance of a Minor  other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects tenant, not or property owner from obtaining any  approved by staff will be fowarded  meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the  Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. meeting You of the written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf. must give    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street. Address of Property: 406 Cman Sf.  Historic Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Whignone  Property/Name (if applicable):  Mark-kucas  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done: (spl)  Cher Qut Guits Ac unib  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that  Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 wish to attend; otherwise consideration will  require review by the Historic  p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting approved requests are valid for one year. Adua.Q 2Ar Sefie 7Name of Applicant-type or (Mailing Address) 10hlo (Date)  application will not be accepted. understand be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Spfens  (Initials)!  print)  ACTION  1809 Crsice Lo0 2789  (Zip Code)  251-946- 6F78 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized  o (Signature oApplicant)  Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next  designee, this application becomes a approved by staff will be fowarded  Issuance of a Minor  other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not or property owner from obtaining any  meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing  Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. meeting oft the_  You must give on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 32 EMah Sfreef  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  GHenn Simpson  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Changeout Of gaspack Spstem  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month by to the Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. prior An incomplete meeting application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Aire Serv (Name of7 Applicant -type or print) 4Efst (Mailing Address) 1053/13 (Date) - (Signature  (Initials))  ACTION  07889 (Zip Code)  252-746-7356 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  - OfApplicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining of a Minor other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded any  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance  a  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behaif.    MINUTES    Washington HISTORICI PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting- Agenda Tuesday October 1, 2013 7:00PM Members Present Picott Harrington Geraldine McKinley EdH Hodges Jerry Creech Victoria Rader Members Absent Seth Shoneman Judi Hickson Others Present John Rodman, Director Jennifer Brennan, Community Development Planner Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. H.  Opening of the meeting The Chairman called the meeting to order. Amoment ofs silent meditation was taken. III. Roll Call A silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old Business  Invocation  V.  Major Works, Certificate of Appropriateness:  A. Major Works  1. Arequest has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Richard Mechling to construct ai addition ont to the rear of their property, located at 603 West Main Street. two: story Mr. Mechling came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Mechling presented the the addition and explained the plans in detail. Mr. Mechling explained that all plans for construction would be wood, no vinyl. Mr. Hodges asked if the; patio doors the new  were siding  1    doors. Mr. Mechling stated that they would be swinging. Mr. Mechling stated are going to have the new banisters cut to match the existing.  that they  The Chairman opened thei floor. Steve Rader came forward. He: spoke ini favor ofthe addition. There being no others coming forward the floor was closed. Victoria Rader made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. and Mrs. construct a two story addition on the rear ofthe property located at Mechling 603 West to Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes tol Existing Buildings. Her motion was seconded by Ed  voted in favora and the motion carried.  Hodges. All  2. Arequest has been made by Mr. John and Deborah Logelfo to replace the windows  on the second floora and add a fire escape to the side alley for their  located at is off that they use. Toc do  126 W. Main Street.  property,  Mr.. John Logelfo came forward and was sworn in. He explained that this Labella's pizzeria downtown. He stated that they would really like to get the property boards the ofthe windows. Mr. Logelfo spoke about his love oft the downtown and stated wanted tol beautify their building and make it more functional. He would like to utilize the almost 3,000sqft oni the second floor for residential explained that they that Mr. Logelfo stated that a fire escape will have tol be installed. He they would be installing a fire escape similar to the one currently located explained that Street side oft the Washington Daily News building. He stated that there on the 3rd nothing coming down into the alley, it would be at second floor height. would be Mr. Creech stated that he felt windows and doors are right at the heart ofthe historical architecture representation oft the town. He stated that the windows in this have the fittings where the shutters use to be, which is very unique. He stated building still those windows come down would make his heart bleed and would whole building. Mr. Creech stated that the sashes, muttons, and compromise the can be repaired. He explained that he would like that windows on the front of the building are removed and replaced with Rodman stated that the only windows open in this  to see the  moldings look like they new windows. Mr.  option looked into before building are the three on1 the front,  all the others are boarded  up. Mr. Creech spoke further about the uniqueness  front windows. He stated this ist the only building with 2 over 4 windows, which ofthe installing new windows in the alley way. Ms. Rader agreed that opening the front windows and Logelfo spoke more about the current bad condition ofthe front windows and his to make the building more energy efficient. Ms. Rader asked ifthe new windows desire  veryl historically significant. Mr. Creech did speak in favor of very unique. A representative from the window the new windows would have the  the  makes if windows are  company came forward and stated that  same grind pattern as the existing windows. Mr.  2    would be wood and ift they would look identical to the existing windows. Mr. stated that the new windows can be manufactured tol look identical to the Logelfo windows with the modern day efficiency ratings. Mr. Logelfo stated that the existing would: stay the same but the material would not be wood. Mr. Creech then design the factt that the mutton on the proposed window was not ont the outside. He pointed out that one of the Commission's requirements is that the mutton is affixed toi the stated outside oft the window. Mr. Hodges asked where that requirement was located in the guidelines. Mr. Rodman stated that it was not located in the Commercial  design section, but it  isl listed in the residential section ofthe guidelines.  Mr. Hodges stated that since he has been on the Commission they have allowed seconded story window replacement. Mr. Rodman stated that he believed the was at Mr. Sermon's building on Market Street and before that the Commission last one approved window replacement oft the Wash and Wag building on Main Street. Ms. McKinley asked ift the outside frame would be removed. The representative Carolina Windows and Doors showed the Commission want would be existing windows and what would stay. He stated that the replaced would be the glass and the sash around the  from removed from the  only thing that would be glass on the top and bottom ofthe  window. Mr.  Hodges asked about the number of windows that would be replaced.  Logelfo stated that he believed they counted 15. Mr. Hodges stated that he felt Mr. replacing 15 windows; all but three being boarded up, with workable windows  second floori is a good thing. The Chairman opened the floor.  on the  Mr. Rader came forward. He: stated that windows are very critical in historic architecture. He agreed that the front windows are much more significant for the appearance ofa building then the side and the rear. He stated that he felt the proposed window ont the side and rear would not be as big ofa a deal as going on He explained that even though the windows are ont the second can still look up and see the difference, sO he felt the fact that story people walking by floor should not be a significant factor in the decision. like to see someone compile a list of contractors that can repair historic stated that the wood in the historic windows is usually far superior tot the windows. window He materials that you get today. Mr. Rader explained his own experience with the windows in his own house. He stated that they should encourage replacement not justi in the residential area, but ini the commercial. repair and not Rader asked the Commission to look at the rear and side windows in section also. Mr. than the front. He: stated that he felt there is a significant difference a different way William Kenner came forward. He stated that he came before the Commission month about windows on the second floor of his home. He explained that the last on his windows are on the exterior oft the windows and they are real wood installed muttons glass. Mr. Kenner stated that he found them locally at a local supplier in Washington.  with the front. he would repairing  they are on the second Mr. Rader stated that  there.  3    He stated that he wasi in support of preserving the historical integrity of the front windows. He stated that he would prefer the Commission to require wood replacement Mr. Doug Mercer came forward to address the Commission. He stated that he does have a specifici interest in window replacement now because he is working on a historic building in the downtown area. He stated that his building has four downstairs windows that need to be worked on and 7 upstairs windows. He stated that ift the Commission is going to allow vinyl windows on the upstairs, then he is going to come and tell the Commission that he would liket the 4 downstairs windows to match the upstairs windows. He: stated that he felti the Commission would be setting a precedent ift allow vinyl and they shouldn't doit. He stated that the Commission differentiate between thet first floor and second floor or the area ofthe shouldn'ttryto building. He  windows with the muttons on the exterior.  they  urged the Commission to stick tot their guidelines.  Mr. Rodman stated that staff would prefer the Commission to address thei items ini the request separately. Ms. Rader asked ift the Commission could ask Mr. Logelfo to consider repairing the front three windows to keep the historical elements and replace the ones on the side and rear. Mr. Logelfotalked about the condition ofi just the front windows and the possible safety hazard. He stated that he would  do tryand  whatever the Commission requested.  Picott Harrington made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. and Mrs. Logelfo to add a fire escape ati the side alley oft their property at 126 West Main! Street. This motion is based ont thei following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.00 Changes to Existing Buildings. His motion was seconded by Victoria Rader. All voted in favor and the The Commission discussed the window issue further. The Commission asked Mr. Logelfo if he would consider having someone look at the front windows and the repair and other options, and then bring back thet findings to the Commission. investigate Mr. Victoria Rader made the following motion: Imovei that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. and Mrs. Logelfo to replace the windows on the east side, west side and rear windows on the second floor oft the property located at 126 West main Street. This motion is based ont the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings. Ed seconded the motion. All voted ini favor and the motion carried.  motion carried.  Logelfo stated that he could do that.  Hodges  4    3. Arequest has been made by. James and Sarah Withersi to construct a wooden fence in the rear yard, expand bathroom at rear of property ont the second floor, alter the pitch ofthe garage roof, modify roofat rear oft the house for better drainage, remove tree in the rear oft the yard. All work is located at 622 West Second Street. Mr. and Mrs. Withers came forward and were. sworn in. Mr. Withers stated that are currently under contract to purchase the Rumley House located at 622 West Second they Street. He stated that all the work they plan to do is on the exterior ofthe home. He explained that they are going tol have an engineering analysis oft the foundation. He stated that they believe thel house is stable but they would liket to confirm that. He explained that they plan on re-erecting a wooden fence in the rear yard which tol have been there in the past. He stated that the entire exterior oft the home and appears the detached garage are going to be completely stripped, sanded and repaired as needed and repainted. Mr. Withers stated that they would also like to put a new metal roof on the entire structure, both the garage andi the main house. He then explained the bathroom renovation to the Commission. He stated that they plan on modifying the rooft toi fix some drainage issues. Mr. Withers stated that none oft the proposed improvements are visible from Second Street. He explained that they do not plan on altering the front façade or character ofthel house. Mr. Withers explained the renovations in detail. He stated that thel last request is to remove a Bradford garage He explained that they wish to landscape the back yard in a way that is the pearl tree is currently encroaching on the back porch. He stated that appropriate, they would but The Chairman opened the floor. Mr. Kenner stated that he isi in favor oftaking down Ed Hodges made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. and Mrs. Withers to their fence, expand the second floor bathroom, install a metal roof on the main replace house and garage as well as change the pitch oft the garage rooft to improve drainage, and finally, to remove a Bradford Pear tree from their rear yard, at the property located 622 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the at application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings and Section 4.0Streetscape Site Design. Victoria Rader: seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion and 4. Arequest has been submitted by Thomas and Gail Colley to replace the door with a new fiberglass door on their property located at 523 East Second existing Street. This item was removed due to the fact that the Colleys decided to keep the door.  pearl tree.  like to replace it with a more appropriate tree.  the pearltree. The Commission discussed the request further.  carried.  front  5    5. Arequest has been submitted by William Kenner toi install lights on the front porch, add a wraparound balcony to the rear porch and stair, use architectural wire on the balcony, and add operable wooden shutters on his property located at 720 East Main Mr. Kenner stated that he would like to install recessed lighting all the way across the front and down the side of the front porch. He stated that they would be 4i inch diameter halogen lights. Mr. Kenner then explained the design oft the wraparound balcony and its function. Mr. Kenner then moved onto the architectural wiring. He explained that it has been around for the last 10 or 15 years. He explained how the wiring works and presented the Commission with a picture. He stated that he does not like the 2x2 wooden rails and wanted to use the wiring instead. He stated that this is the rear oft the property and cannot be seen from the road. Mr. Kennerand the Commission discussed his request further. Mr. Creech asked ift the house currently shutters. Mr. Kenner stated that it does not and never has had shutters. He explained has that the shutters are: something his wife wanted to add. Ms. Rader stated that she would bei in favor of the shutters if they added to the beauty ofthe house. Mr. Kenner explained that thei top three windows on the front would have shutters and the two going down on the west side. The Commission discussed the shutters and how the The Chairman opened the floor. There being none coming forward thet floor was closed. Ed Hodges made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to' William Kenner to allow for the construction ofa wraparound balcony off the rear deck and install stair at the located at 720E EN Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings offact: property the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0Changes to Existing Buildings. Geraldine McKinley seconded the Mr. Kenner stated that he would like to come back before the Commission about the Ed Hodges made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to William Kenneri to allow for the ofa architectural wiring in place of wooden rails at 720 E Main Street. This motion is use based on the following findings of fact: the application isi incongruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0 Changes tol Existing Buildings. Geraldine McKinley seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion  Street.  guidelines address them.  motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried.  shutters at their next meeting.  carried.  6    6. Arequest has been made by Mark Kucas to replace the Existing Masonite siding with fiber cement siding, replace any rotten exterior wood with new wood trim, and wrap Mr. Kucas was not present at the meeting. Mr. Rodman stated that they do allow the replace ofthe Masonite siding with thel hardi- plank as an administrative approval item. He explained that they feel Masonite is a lesser material then hardi-plank. He explained that replacing the rotten wood with new wood trim would be allowed also, but they need tor make sure the soffit and facia is not replaced with vinyl siding until before the Commission. Ms. Brennan stated that Mr. Kucas stated that ifthe they Commission would not allow vinyl then he would be willing to replace with wood. Geraldine McKinley made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Kucas to replace existing Masonite siding with newi fiber cement siding, replace any rotten wood with new wood trim and all wood trim for the soffit and fascia, no vinyl, for the property located at 406 East Main Street. The motion is based on1 the following findings oft fact: the application iso congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Section 3.0Changed to Existing Buildings. Ed Hodges seconded the motion. All voted in  the existing soffit and facia with vinyl siding.  come  favor and the motion carried. B. Minor Works  1. Arequest has been made by the property owner at 149 North Market Street to 2. AI request has been made by the property owner at 228 Stewart Parkway to change 3. Arequest has been made by the property owner at 4091 N. Bonner Street to repair the floor ofthe front porch. The owner plans to maintain the original dimensions oft the Ed Hodges made a motion to approve all the minor works. His motion was seconded  replace air conditioning unit and replace with a new unit.  the wording on sign on the building.  porch.  Picott Harrington. All voted in favor.  by  VI. Other Business  1. Election of New Officers This item was continued. 2. Design Guidelines Sub-Committee  Ms. Brenan stated that she has contacted everyone who was on the sub-committee and everyone but one person was interested in returning. She stated that she has  7    sent out the guidelines for review and they are almost complete. She stated that the Committee would be meeting lateri in the month to discuss any changes or updates that need to be made and she will have another report for the Commission Ms. Brennan also reminded the Commission about the upcoming tax credit She then updated the Commission on the house on East 2nd Street that they approved for demolition. She explained that the house is due tol be demolition on  inN November.  workshop on October 15"at5 5:30pm.  November 4th.  3. Preservation North Carolina Conference, October 2-4, Edenton  Ms. Brennan stated that the Conference started tomorrow and the City has a very  good representation going toi the Conference. The staff also gave an update on the Water Street house.  VII. Approval of Minutes- - September 3, 2013  Ed Hodges made a motion to approve the minutes. Geraldine McKinley seconded the motion.  All voted in favor. VIlI. Adjourn  There being no further business the meeting was adjourned.  8