WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Tuesday, November 6, 20187:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. Ar request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new single family, one and a half-story 2. A request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new single family, two-story dwelling 3. Ar request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, fora Certificate of Appropriateness that states once a Moss Landing plan has been approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, it can be processed as a Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness should the plan be presented again. This would apply for previous and future Major Work plans that fall outside the 2016 4. An request has been made by Mr. Sed Naziri for a Certificate of Appropriateness to recreate and paint the brick of the primary facade of the property located at 157 5. Ar request has been made by Ms. Patty Franz for a Certificate of Appropnateness to elevate the structure and remove the chimney on the property located at 613 Old 6. Ar request has been made by Mr. Fred Read for a Certificate of Appropriateness to elevate the structure on the property located at 516 East Second Street.  dwelling on Lot: #10 within Moss Landing.  on Lot #31 within Moss Landing.  Moss Landing blanket approval.  West Main Street.  Second Street.  1    7. A request has been made by the City of Washington for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 8. A request has been made by the Washington Harbor District Alliance for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install string lighting throughout four alleyways  108 Gladden Street.  within the Downtown Harbor District.  B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of 405 East Second Street to replace the existing retaining wall along the driveway using like materials on the property. 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 216 Stewart Parkway to replace the existing 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 524 West Main Street to maintenance the existing  ductwork in the same location on the property.  items on the property: a. Trimming existing trees b. Re-installing the wooden shutters d. Repair existing sills using like materials  . Reinstall wood siding where cement board siding was inappropriately placed e. Replace existing siding, fascia, soffit boards, and eaves using like materials 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 117 South Harvey Street to replace the existing 5.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 507 East Main Street to replace the existing A/C 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 617 East Main Street to maintenance the existing  A/C unit in the same location on the property.  unit in the same location on the property.  items on the property: a. Roofing materials  b. Repair porch using like materials :. Reconstruct previously removed columns  d. Replace the front that is an interior door with the original, exterior door.  2    7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 405 North Market street to install a mini split 8. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 118 Charlotte Street to replace the existing porch 9. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 102 Stewart Parkway to replace the existing 10. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 184 West Main Street to replace the existing sign 11.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 216 Stewart Parkway to replace the existing 12.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 405 North Market Street to install a mini split 13.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 748 West Second Street to install a gas pack and 14.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 748 West Second Street to install a gas pack and 15.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 225 West Main Street to replace the split system in 16.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 219 East Third Street (Pamlico Rose Institute) to  system in the back yard of the property.  floor boards using like materials on the property.  ductwork in the same location on the property.  using like materials in the same location on the property.  ductwork in the same location on the property.  system in the rear elevation of the property.  mini split system in the rear elevation of the property.  mini split system in the rear elevation of the property.  the rear elevation of the property.  install three (3) arbors in the Healing Garden of the property.  VI. Other Business 1. Tree Policy  2. 411 and 415 West Second Street Update  3    VII. Approval of Minutes = October 2, 2018  VIII. Adjourn  4    OLD  BUSINESS  None    MAJOR  WORKS    Moss Landing  Lot #10  New Construction    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use BlackInk  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 too cashiers in thet front lobby ofCity Hall under-Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  200 Acadeny Shrut  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  BEACOS Shruck Mas, LL  46 (width)  feet by  joo (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  NEW Censhuchon "Azalea PLAN to br built pur pla od LoTID  Mass LANDING  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  BERLCJ Shyrel MosLLC (Name of Applicant -ty type or priht) (Mailing Address) lohghg (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  Po Bu 6474 Rakish,L 2762R  (Zip Code)  914-785-1445 (Daytime Phone Number)  Sutd  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve thé applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will bei fowârded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    N)  ns    13'-0"  "'-10"  71-6"  C  II'-I0" 12'-10"  5-6 3  js E E  S. ACADEMY STREET  AZALEA - LOT IO Moss LANDING WASHINGTON, N.C.  33E9-0447    Adjacent Property Owners - Moss Landing IBX DEVELOPMENTI L.L.C. 1589' W: 5TH STREET WASHINGTON, NC27889 RAINESTROY M 305 MOSS WAY WASHINGTON, NC27889 MOSS LANDING ONEI LLC 41401 MENDENHALL OAKS PARKWAY HIGH: POINTNC27265 LITCHFIBLD, HOLDINGS LLC 1351 HARBOR DRIVE WASHINGTON/NC278) MASON CHARLOTTE NICHOLLS 119 SOUTHHARVEY STREET WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 BEACON STREET MOSS LLC POI BOX 6474 RALEIGH) NC27628 HAYES MARKT 301 MOSS WAY WASHINGTON: NC27889 HOWDY DAVIDA 251 MOSS WAY WASHINGTON: NC27889 MITCHBLLPAULR 3091 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 JOHNI EI MOOREI MARITIAL TRUST 307 WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 RICHARDSONI DANIELD 305 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONA NC27889 WAECHTER: HOLLY CLEXTON 303) EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 MEISELLJAYNEA 301 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC2788 COLLINS PAUL: RICHARD  239. EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONNC2728) FARRAR ROBERTG 7357 GORDA PEAK CT MELBORNE FL32940 SMITHWICK: TERRYLD 212TEACHSCOVEF RD BATHI NC27889 ANNA MARIA IS INVESTMENTS, LLCI 416 WATERI EAST STREET WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 HAZARD-DANIEL SLAYTON PO: BOX 166 FALKLAND: NC27827 GRAY ALLEN: BAHNSON POBOX422 WASHINGTON! NC27889 MOORE WILLIAM W. JR 2517CROWNI COURT PANAMA CITY FL3 32405 REAMES MARK K SR 12048 ROYALPORTRUSH DRIVE CHARLOTTE NC28277 HOUGH CHARLES 412 WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 JOHNSON FRANKLIN DUVALJR POBOX445 WASHINGTON: NC27889 WAYT SANDRA 404 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 OAKLEY SUSAN 122 SOUTH. ACADEMY STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 HOWDY MARGARET 326 WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC 27889 BIENES JERRY  7541 MCCOTTERS MARINE ROAD WASHINGTON: NC27889 BRIDGMAN MAURICE. M 204 YUKONST HAMPTON VA23663 ROLINSKY-RADER VICTORIA 1131 HARVEY STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 HODGES RICHARD ANDREW 101 GUINEVERE, LN GREENVILLEN NC 27889 TOLER WILLIAM 224 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 DOTSON VICKIE 6201 DUCK CREEK ROAD WASHINGTONNCZAS GASKINS HERMAN POBOX933 WASHINGTONI NC27889 CONGLETON: ADELIA SMITH 210 WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 NC ESTUARIUM 223 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONNC278)    orntoion Deoelopmenb efhtoric Presevoation  Citys  Washington  NORTH CAR'OLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - Moss Landing- Lots #10  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by Moss Landing and Beacon Street Develop-  ment, your property is located adjacent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, for a Cer- tificate of Appropriateness to construct a new single family, one and a half-story dwell-  ing on Lot; #10 within Moss Landing.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Thursday November 6, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 94 Mal Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  200 Academy Street- Moss Landing Lot #10  The application for the property located at 200 Academy Street, Moss Landing Lot #10 is requesting Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 5.2 Residential  approval to construct ar new one. and al half story dwelling.  Construction:  Massing, Scale, and Orientation  As with commercial construction, size and scale of a residential structure as well as its orientation is of primary importance. Residential buildings within the historic district display a variety of heights and scale with most buildings being two stories. Examples of one andi three story buildings are also seen. Homes ini the district are also typically built close to the street. but the set backs vary from block to block. Some blocks with architecture more significant in scale have the buildings being set back further from the street than others. Finally, the majority of residential buildings ini the district are oriented facing the: street with at front porch, portico, or  stoop.  Residential: Massing. Scale. And Orientation Guidelines  5.2.1 The height of new construction shall be compatible with other residential buildings in the 5.2.2 Oversized or monumental residential construction is not prevalent in the district and should be avoided. Only in special cases and in strategic locations should this type of 5.2.3 In order to retain a continuous block face, new homes should not be built farther back than an average of its neighbors along the same side oft the: street within the same block face, 5.2.4 Main entrances should be clearly evident and should be oriented toward the sidewalk and 5.2.5 New construction projects should follow the site features and district setting guidelines  district when measured from the current Base Flood Elevation (BFE).  architecture be permitted. even ifp permitted by zoning code.  street. If possible, new buildings should include at front porch or portico.  found in Chapter 4 of this document.  Residential: Design. Proportion, and Architectural Features Guidelines  5.2.6 The design of a new building should not attempt to create at false historic appearance, but rather complement the existing district. New construction should have its own character: and 5.2.7The fenestration of a new building should reflect that of existing historicstructures within adistrict and be compatible in proportion, shape, location, pattern and size. 5.2.8 Architectural details such as cornices, trim, windows and doors should reflect the scale of 5.2.9 New homes within the district should be built with approved materials. Modern materials, 5.2.101 Ifv vinyl-clad windows are used, they must have permanent exterior muntins to match the  style.  buildings in the existing historic district.  ifused, should be similar in appearance and texture traditional materials.  existing windows.    5.2.11 Aluminum and vinyl siding are prohibited on new construction.  5.2.12 There are a variety ofr roof forms in the district including gable, hip, and gambrel. The roof forms used on new construction should relate to neighboring buildings int form and material. 5.2.13 The historic landscape oft the district including green. space and mature trees is one oft the character-defining elements oft the district. When undertaking new construction, significant  trees or vegetation shall be preserved.  The request displays the front door facing Water Street, but the entryway to the porch faces Academy Street. The front walk does not directly lead to the front door. Chapter 5.2.5 states "New construction projects should follow the site features and district setting guidelines found in Chapter 4 of this document". Chapter 4.3.19 states "Front walks in residential areas shall lead directly from the public sidewalk to the front door of the structure". Based on finding of fact, the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Chapter 4.3 Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks therefor Note: This plan was previously approved for Lot #16 at the May 2017 Historic  not congruous with Chapter 5.2 Residential Construction.  Preservation Commission Meeting.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: From: Re:  Historic Preservation Commission Emily Rebert, Planning and Development  Lot #101 Moss Landing - Construction of as single-family dwelling  Ar request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new one and al half story dwelling on the property located at Lot #10 Moss Landing. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.0 New Construction To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate may be  Section 5.2 Residential Construction.  attached to the motion. Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr.. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #10 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the appliçation is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically  Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section 5.2 Residential Construction.  or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #10 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section 5.2 Residential Construction. Ifurther move that the Historic  Preservation Commission place thei following conditions on the approval:  or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot: #10 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 5.01 New Construction: Section 5.2 Residential Construction.    Moss Landing  Lot #31  New Construction    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Blackl Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 tocashiersi in thef frontl lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NG 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  247 Mo_Way  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  BEACAN Shoch Mess, LLL  50 (width)  feet by ID  feet.  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  MEW CoNshnehw. "WArEAsEle' plJ to be bwilt per plaso ON  LeT 31 Moss LANDING  understand that all applications fora Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preseryation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th ofi the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Anir incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  BERLEN Shut Maci, LLL (Name of Applicant -type or print) PaBey 6474 Ralask, NC 27628 (Mailing Address) (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  (Zip Code)  loliglig lr  919785144C (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of/ Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff willl bei fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor. Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    ns    Adjacent Property Owners - Moss Landing IBXI DEVELOPMENTILC. 1589 W: STH STREET WASHINGTON, NC27889 RAINES TROYI M 305 MOSS WAY WASHINGTON/NC278) MOSS LANDING ONEI LLC 41401 MENDENHALL OAKS PARKWAY HIGH POINT NC27265 LITCHFIELD HOLDINGS LLC 135HARBOR DRIVE WASHINGTON, NC27889 MASON CHARLOTTE NICHOLLS 119 SOUTHHARVEY STREET WASHINGTON, NC27889 BEACON STREET MOSS LLC POJ BOX 6474 RALEIGH: NC27628 HAYES MARKT 301 MOSS WAY WASHINGTONI NC2 27889 HOWDY DAVID. A 251 MOSS WAY WASHINGTONNC278) MITCHBLLPAULR 309 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 JOHNI EI MOORE MARITIAL TRUST 307 WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 RICHARDSONJ DANIEL. D 3051 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 WAECHTER HOLLY CLEXTON 303 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONNC2738> MEISELLJAYNEA 301 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC2788 COLLINS PAULI RICHARD  2391 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONNC2738) FARRAR ROBERTG 7357 GORDA PEAK CT MELBORNE FL: 32940 SMITHWICK TERRYLD 212 TEACH'S COVEF RD BATHI NC27889 ANNA MARIA IS INVESTMENTSLLC 416 WATER EAST STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 HAZARD-DANIEL: SLAYTON POI BOX166 FALKLANDNC27827 GRAY ALLEN: BAHNSON POBOX422 WASHINGTONI NC27889 MOORE WILLIAM W. JR 2517 CROWN COURT PANAMA CITY FL: 32405 REAMES MARK: K: SR 12048 ROYALPORTRUSH DRIVE CHARLOTTE NC28277 HOUGH CHARLES 412 WATER STREET WASHINGTON! NC27889 JOHNSON FRANKLIN DUVALJR POBOX445 WASHINGTON: NC27889 WAYT SANDRA 404 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 OAKLEY SUSAN 122 SOUTHACADEMY STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 HOWDY MARGARET 326 WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 BIENES JERRY  754 MCCOTTERS: MARINE WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 BRIDGMAN MAURICEI M 204 YUKON ST HAMPTON VA 23663 ROLINSKY-RADER VICTORIA 113 HARVEY STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 HODGES RICHARD ANDREW 101 GUINEVEREI LN GREENVILENC2788) TOLER WILLIAM 2241 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONNCZIS DOTSON VICKIE 6201 DUCK CREEK ROAD WASHINGTONNC2738) GASKINS HERMAN PO. BOX933 WASHINGTONI NC27889 CONGLETON: ADELIA SMITH 210 WATER STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 NCI ESTUARIUM 223 EAST WATER: STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889  ROAD    Dorontoion eoelopmenb > Citoric Presewation  City.  Washington  NORTH CAROLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - Moss Landing- Lots #31  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are, required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by Moss Landing and Beacon Street Develop-  ment, your property is located adjacent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, for a Cer- tificate of Appropriateness to construct a new single family, two-story dwelling on Lot  #31 within Moss Landing.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Thursday November 6, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  247 Moss Way- Moss Landing Lot #31 too construct a newt two: story dwelling.  The application for the property located at 247 Moss Way, Moss Landing Lot #31 is requesting approval Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 5.2 Residential  Construction:  Massing, Scale, and Orientation  As with commercial construction, size and scale of a residential: structure as well as its orientation is of primary importance. Residential buildings within the historic district displaya variety of heights and: scale with most buildings being two stories. Examples of one and three story buildings are also seen. Homes ini the district are also typically built close to the street. but the set backs vary from block to block. Some blocks with architecture more significant in scale have the buildings being set back further from the: street than others. Finally, the majority of residential buildings in the district are oriented facing the street with at front porch, portico, or  stoop.  Residential: Massing. Scale. And Orientation Guidelines  5.2.1 The height of new construction shall be compatible with other residential buildings in the 5.2.2 Oversized or monumental residential construction is not prevalent in the district and should be avoided. Only in special cases and in strategic locations should this type of 5.2.3 In order to retain a continuous block face, new homes should not be built farther back than an average ofi its neighbors along the same side of the street within the same block face, 5.2.4 Main entrances should be clearly evident and should be oriented toward the sidewalk and 5.2.5 New construction projects should follow the site features and district setting guidelines  district when measured from the current Base Flood Elevation (BFE).  architecture be permitted. even if permitted. by zoning code.  street. If possible, new buildings should include ai front porch or portico.  found in Chapter 4 oft this document.  Residential: Design. Proportion, and Architectural Features Guidelines  5.2.6 The design of a new building should not attempt to create ai false historic appearance, but rather complement the existing district. New construction should have its own character and 5.2.7Thei fenestration of a new building should reflect that ofe existing historic structures within adistrict and be compatible in proportion, shape, location, pattern and size. 5.2.8 Architectural details such as cornices, trim, windows and doors should reflect the scale of 5.2.9 New homes within the district should be built with approved materials. Modern materials, 5.2.10lfvinyl-clad windows are used, they must have permanent exterior muntins to match the  style.  buildings in the existing historic district.  ifused, should be similar in appearance and texture traditional materials.  existing windows.    5.2.11 Aluminum and vinyl siding are prohibited on new construction.  5.2.12 There are a variety of roof forms in the district including gable, hip, and gambrel. The roof forms used on new construction should relate to neighboring buildings int form and material. 5.2.13 The historic landscape of the district including green space and mature trees is one of the character-defining elements of the district. When undertaking new construction, significant  trees or vegetation shall be preserved.  The request follows all new residential guidelines. Based on finding of fact, the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Chapter 5.2 Note: This plan was previously approved for Lot #36 at the April 2018 Historic  Residential Construction.  Preservation Commission Meeting.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: From: Re:  Historic Preservation Commission Emily Rebert, Planning and Development  Lot #31 Moss Landing-C Construction ofas single-family dwelling  Ar request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new two story dwelling on the property located at Lot #31 Moss Landing. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate may be  5.2 Residential Construction.  attached to the motion. Possible. Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #31 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically  Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section 5.2 Residential Construction.  or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #31 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section 5.2 Residential Construction. Ifurther move that the Historic  Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #31 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 5.0 New Construction Section 5.2 Residential Construction.    Moss Landing  Blanket Approval    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIAIENESS  Please Use Blackl Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in thet frontl lobby ofCity! Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Moss LANDING  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  BEALaS Slyect Must, LLC  N/A (width)  feet by  NIA (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Bcacen Siach Moss LLC Regut that ifa Mas LAMDING plaw hasbu pridewly appaud by Hu Huhurical Comnicien, thwif i+ is built asaid (N Mesladigg t Will be proceised a a  Mino worls  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  BEN Shret Morc LLC (Name of Applicant - type or print) (Mailling Address) 10/ighg (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  PO Box 6474 RaleihNL Z7628  (Zip Code)  719-783-1-45 (Daytime Phone Number)  f  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by thé Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will bei fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Adjacent] Property Owners - Moss Landing IBXI DEVELOPMENTILC. 1589 W STHS STREET WASHINGTON,NCZ73) RAINES TROYI M 305 MOSS WAY WASHINGTON/NC278) MOSS LANDING ONEL LLC 41401 MENDENHALL OAKS PARKWAY HIGH POINTNC27265 LITCHFIELD HOLDINGS LLC 135HARBOR DRIVE WASHINGTON.NC278) MASON CHARLOTTE NICHOLLS 119 SOUTH HARVEY STREET WASHINGTON, NC27889 BACONSTRUETMOSIIC POI BOX6474 RALEIGH. NC27628 HAYES MARKT 301 MOSS WAY WASHINGTONI NC 27889 HOWDY DAVID. A 251 MOSS WAY WASHINGTON! NC27889 MITCHBLLPAULR 3091 EAST WATER: STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 JOHNI El MOORE MARITIAL TRUST 307 WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 RICHARDSON: DANIEL! D 305 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 WAECHTER HOLLY CLEXTON 303 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 MEISELLIAYNEA 301 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC2788 COLLINS PAUL RICHARD  2391 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 FARRAR ROBERTG 7357 GORDA PEAK CT MELBORNE FL32940 SMITHWICK TERRYLD 212 TEACH'S COVERD BATHI NC27889 ANNA MARIA IS INVESTMENTS, LLC 416 WATER EAST STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 HAZARD-DANIEL SLAYTON POBOXI 166 FALKLAND: NC27827 GRAY ALLEN: BAHNSON POBOX422 WASHINGTONNC278) MOORE WILLIAM W. JR 2517 CROWN COURT PANAMA CITY FL 32405 REAMES MARK K SR 12048 ROYALI PORTRUSH DRIVE CHARLOTTE NC:28277 HOUGH CHARLES 412 WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 JOHNSON FRANKLIN DUVALJR POBOX445 WASHINGTONI NC27889 WAYT SANDRA 404) EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 OAKLEY SUSAN 122 SOUTH ACADEMY STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 HOWDY MARGARET 326 WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 BIENES. JERRY  754 MCCOTTERS MARINE WASHINGTON: NC27889 BRIDGMAN: MAURICEI M 204 YUKON ST HAMPTON VA: 23663 ROLINSKI-RADER VICTORIA 113HARVEY STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 HODGES, RICHARD ANDREW 101 GUINEVEREI LN GREENVILENC27889 TOLER WILLIAM 2241 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 DOTSON VICKIE 6201 DUCK CREEK ROAD WASHINGTON NC27889 GASKINS HERMAN PO: BOX933 WASHINGTONI NC27889 CONGLETON: ADELIA SMITH 210 WATER STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 NC ESTUARIUM 223 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889  ROAD    orntoion Decelopmenb ftorie resewation  Citys  Washindton  NORTH CAR'OLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate ofAppropriateness: - Moss Landing- Blanket Approval  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by Moss Landing and Beacon Street Develop-  ment, your property is located adjacent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley, acting as agent for Beacon Street, for a Cer- tificate of Appropriateness that states once a Moss Landing plan has been approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, it can be processed as a Minor Works Cer- tificate of Appropriateness should the plan be presented again. This would apply for previous and future Major Work plans that fall outside the 2016 Moss Landing blanket  approval.  Ifyous would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Thursday November 6, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincereky,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: From: Re:  Historic Preservation Commission Emily Rebert, Planning and Development They Were Approved Once Before.  Moss Landing - Blanket Approval to Allow Major Works Plans be Processed as Minor Works After  Ar request has been made by Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development for a Certificate of Appropriateness that states once a Moss Landing plan has been approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, it can be processed as a Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness should the plan be presented again. This would apply for previous and future Major Work plans To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate may be  that fall outside the 2016 Moss Landing blanket approval.  attached to the motion. Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #31 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines.  or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #31 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate. of Appropriateness to Mr. Jim Wiley of Beacon Street Development to construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at Lot #31 Moss Landing. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines.    157 West Main  Street  Façade Recreation  Painting Brick    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in thei front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if appliçable):  157w, MAIN SIAERNNGNyEN  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  INA,LLC 50 (width)  feet by  2395 (depth).  feet.  Brief Description oft the Work to be Done Belk Panel and Sign structures  Aswe alll know this Building Front has been subject to sever physical damage by previous owners to! hold the Our intentioni is to restore the visual and physical integrity of the masonry building front with a careful rehabilitation. In our Restoration process, we will do our best to imitate the original brick and mortar designs, e.g. band Allr missing and fractured bricks, Keystones,and concrete structures willl be reconstructed by casting in place Upon Completion of the masonry repairs and restoration, coating the entire building with colored Sealer will provide uniform appearance and prevent the existing weathered and vulnerable bricks and Lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  rollouts, soldier courses, arches, and dentils or comparable matching designs. method, usingproper mortar mix of Portland cement and sand. mortars from spallation and further damages.  0  Office Use Only (Date Received) 0 Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Sed Nazire (Name of Applicant-type or pnnt) (Malling Address) 10/22-/2018 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  5161 Six Ferk,Ralih, NC 27609  (Zip Code)  719-274-4400 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature) TSCIBEROPRSTS  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or anyl law. Minorwork projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written. permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing ony your behalf.        Beaufort Printed October 29, 2018 SeeE Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNECIGIS  WEBI HOSTING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Linès Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:39Feet    OBJECTID 6607 OWNER NAME INALLC MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27609 TOTVAL 420337 PREV ASSESS 422572 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK: and PAGE 1949/00542 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YRI BUILT 1920 SUB DESC COMMERCIAL EFF YR 1980  GPIN 5675-87-0984 OWNER NAME2 CITY RALEIGH PROP DESC 1LOT COR UNION ANDI MAIN STRIVERTOWNI MALL DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.26 MBL 567508284 STAMPS 700.00 NBHDCDE AC1 EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBRBED PIN 01013463  GPIN Long 5675-87-0984 MAILING. ADDRESS 5161 SIX FORKS ROAD STATE NC LAND VAL 229320 BLDG VAL 191017 TAXABLE VA 420337 PROPERTY, ADDRESS 157WN MAINST DATE 1/8/2018 SALE PRICE 350000.00 NBHD DESC ZONE1 1 AVERAGE COMMERCIAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC10 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 43634  Beaufort County onliner mapa accessi is provided asap public service, asis, asa availablea andv withoutv warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont thisy websitei is fori informational purposes only andi isr noti intendedt to constitute al legal record nors shouldi itbes substituted fort the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel ounty ofE Beaufort andt the Website Providerd disclaim alln responsibilitya andl legall liabilityf fort thec content published ont thisw website. Theu user agreest thatB Beaufort Countyl  andits Assigns shall be! heldh harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arisingo out ofthe used ofCounty data.    Emily Rebert From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:  Ina.Harbor18 maharbonsegmal.om Wednesday, October 31, 20183:58PM Emily Rebert 'Base Construction, Inc' FW: Belk Building Roof  Dear Miss Emily Robert, Appropriateness.  Ijust wanted to thank you for your efforts and cooperation in processing my application for The Certificate of As per our conversation on the related subject this morning, like to express thatl lunderstand that painting of the And, fori that, Ifeel obligated to provide youy with more details oft the work that we willl be performing on the building façade to bring it alive, and as close to as it used to historically look like prior to the damages done by previous owners. As youa all know well, this building front has gone through major distractions to hold heavy panels and sign stretchers by Most every: section of the wall, corners, bottom, and the top needs to be repaired and the all missing elements re- Our plans are to re-create the original look as much as possible. We will try to re-create the dentils, the setbacks, Material used willl be Portland cement and Sand mix, similar to the material used in existing bricks.  building façade maybe against your design guidelines.  workers whom never thought of easy reveres restoration.  created.  keystones, and most possible elements.  All the walls would be power washed, all loose material removed, and all decades and voids will be chiseled clean. Then Inap proper way the mentioned motor mix would be applied in forms, and carved to recreate brick and other element Due toj the nature of the work thet final painting would be a compromise to bring the uniform and presentable historic My hope is that, this explanation would help to clarify our Intention and Recreation techniques for the involved work  Look-alikes. look back.  ahead of us to re-create our building façade as close to the historic shape.  Thanks again for all your help and efforts. Please call ify you have any questions. Thank You, Sed Naziri, CE BASE CONSTRUCTION, INC Quality Building By Design 5161 Six Forks Road Raleigh, NC 27609 919-274-4900 Base@nc.rr.com            Adjoining Property Owners: 157 West Main Street  INAI LLC 5161 SIX FORKS ROAD RALEIGH. NC: 27609 BLACKSTONE. JWHIT 222 W STEWARTPKY STE204 WASHINGTONNCZIS LITCHFIELD WILLIAMF 2007 NJ MARKET ST WASHINGTONNC2789 GRAY MARK VL 1081 NI ELM STREET GREENSBORONC27401 WALLJAYNED 111 SREED DR WASHINGTONNC27889 163 WESTMAIN STRBETLLC 45 MILLERS LN NEW: HYDEJ PARKI NY 11040 WOOLARD BENJAMIN. FRANKLIN POBOX36 WASHINGTONNC2789 LTHOMAS PROPERTIES LLC 201 WESLEY. ROAD GREENVILLENC27858 EVANSJERRYO 162 W MAIN STREET WASHINGTONNC2788) MOORE PROPERTY GROUP LLC 2305 W. ALABAMA ST HOUSTON TX 77098 ALM: INVESTMENT COMPANYI LLC 610 COURTLAND ST GREENSBORONCZ7ADN  BEAUFORT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL 108 GLADDEN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 GOLDEN ROCK INVESTMENTS LLC 45 MILLER LANE NEW HYDE PARKNY11040    Docntoron Decelopmenb 6 Blftoric Preseroation  C  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness = 157 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Sed Naziri for a Certificate of Appropriateness to rec- reate and paint the brick of the primary facade of the property located at 157 West Main  Street.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday Novermber 6, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  157 West Main Street  The application fori the property located at 157 West Main Street is requesting approval to closely approximate the appearance oft the original brick details and paint the masonry on the front Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.1 Walls:  façade of property.  3.1.1 Historic character-defining wall features should be retained and protected including clapboards, corner boards, cornices, quoins, corbelling and other architectural detailing. 3.1.2 Original walls should be properly maintained and repaired when necessary. Ifan original wall feature must be replaced due to excessive deterioration or damage, the newi feature should 3.1.5 Iti is prohibited to cover or replace original wall: surfaces with vinyl, aluminum, veneer or other synthetic siding, including chemical applications that may change the texture oft the  match the original in size, profile, material, and texture. 3.1.4 Paint should not be applied to original unpainted wall surfaces.  original siding.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.2 Materials:  Masonry  Various types ofr masonry construction are found in the district including brick, stone, stucco, and concrete. Buildings in the downtown commercial area are primarily of brick construction while there are also several examples of brick residential structures.. Just like with wood, masonry construction contributes to a building's historic character in its texture, color, size and scale, and detailing. This architectural detailing includes subtle elements like variations in bond patterns to more prominent detailing like corbelling, brick cornices, quoins, etc. 3.2.6 Preserve and protect character-defining masonry architectural features including 3.2.7 Routinely inspect masonry features for cracks, loose bricks, and signs of. weather damage 3.2.8 Apply caulk to the joints between bricks and window frames in order to prevent water 3.2.9 Deteriorated masonry units should be repaired rather than replaced using materials that match: the original in size, texture, color, and overall appearance. Synthetic materials are prohibited on historic structures for the wholesale covering ofas structure. 3.2.10 Do not apply paint to masonry: surfaces that were historically not painted. 3.2.13 When repair to mortar joints is needed due to cracks, missing and crumbling mortar, and o Remove deteriorated mortar by hand raking rather than using electric saws and hammers than o Match the original texture, color, width, and profile of the historic mortar joints  corbelling, cornices, sills, quoins, foundations and walls. paying particular attention to mortar joints.  penetration.  loose bricks, use proper techniques for repainting.  can damage the brick    OF Repointing with mortar that is stronger than the original, such as Portland cement, can cause brick to crack, break or spall. In repainting mortar joints, mortarofappropriate PSI should be  used.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.7 Storefronts:  3.7.1 Retain and preserve commercial storefronts and: storefront details that contribute to the historic character oft the building including display windows, recessed entryways, doors, 3.7.2 Retain and preserve historic materials including wood, stone, architectural metal, and cast 3.7.3 Follow the guidelines outlined in the materials section in order to protect and maintain historic: storefront materials such as wood, masonry, and architectural metals. 3.7.4 If replacement of a deteriorated storefront or storefront feature is necessary, replace only the deteriorated element to match the original in size, scale, proportion, material, texture and 3.7.5 Ifr reconstructing al historic storefront, base the design on historic research, physical evidence, and photographic documentation, ifa available. Recreate the original architectural elements including overall proportions, fenestration, dimensions, and orientation. 3.7.6 Altering the entrance, including its location, through a significant storefront is not permitted. Changing as storefront so that it appears as an office or residential use other than 3.7.7 Using materials which detract from the historic or architectural character of the building,  transoms, corner posts, columns, and other decorative features.  iron.  detail.  commercial shall not be allowed. such as mirrored glass, shall not be allowed.  Upper Facade Guidelines  3.8.1 Retain and preserve historic facades and their architectural features such as brick corbelling, brick and stone string courses, quoins, stone and tile coping, cornices, and other 3.8.2 Retain and preserve historic materials whenever possible including wood, stone, 3.8.3 Iti is prohibited to cover architectural details or entire facades with non-historic materials ort treatments. Whenever possible, remove metal cladding or other non-historic coverings from 3.8.4 If replacement of an upper facade feature is necessary, replace the deteriorated element with a new element and design that matches the original in size, scale, design, proportion,  façade elements.  architectural metal, and cast iron.  historic facades.  detail, and material, if possible.  The property owner is trying to closely approximate the appearance of the original brick details on the primary façade of the building. They will be creating lost dentures but filling in and smoothing out the space where corbeling once ran up the pilasters. The property owner would like to paint the façade upon completion. Based on findings of  fact, the request is not congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 157 West Main Street- Recreate the Original Façade and Paint the Brick  A request has been made by Mr. Sed Naziri for a Certificate of Appropriateness to closely approximate the appearance of the original brick details and paint the masonry on the front façade of property located at 157 West Main Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, Tog grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the: sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls, 3.2 Materials, and 3.7 Storefronts.  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible. Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Sed Naziri to approximate the appearance oft the original brick details and paint the masonry on the front façade of property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls, 3.2 Materials, and 3.7  Storefronts.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Sed Naziri to approximate the appearance of the original brick details and paint the masonry on the front façade of property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.1 Walls, 3.2 Materials, and 3.7 Storefronts. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place thei following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Sed Naziri to approximate the appearance oft the original brick details and paint the masonry on the front façade of property located at 157) West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls, 3.2 Materials, and 3.7  Storefronts.    613 Old Second  Street  Home Elevation Chimney Removal    Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Hisioric Preservation Commission  Please submit thei Applicatian Feeof $50 tos cashiersi in thet front! lobby ofCity! Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washingten, NC 27889  Sireel Address of Property: h13 OLD OAD  ST  Historic Property/Name (f applicable):  Owners Name: Lot Size:  PATRIIA FERAN/Z  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Raist haie A EEmaapuaas  Rimai/o  Chimmuy K Ap-ide  uklo (t bckpasA wK Latten innb  lunderstand that all applicalions for a Certnçale of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic, Préservation Commission must be submilled by 6:00 p-m. on the 15th oft the month priort to the meeting Lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepled. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one yéar.  Office Use Only (Date Received) o Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  PATRICIA FEAMZ 7Name OT Applicant -t type ar pant) HRCMELATE S7  (Initials)  ACTION  Mailing Address) (Date)  (ZipCode)  10-05-18 $432457037  (Dayume Phone Number)  (Authonzed Signature)  Rang  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Depariment or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any ather permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff wwill be fowarded  Minor Woiks Certificate of Appropnateness. lis valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for réview at ils next meeling.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's. presence or that of your authorized representative is required àt the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You mustgive written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    ConnectGIS Feature Report  10/28/18, 9:18 AM Beaufort  Printed October 28, 2018 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  WEBI HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  Qlo  1:29 Feet  PIReMeIcNMsOAcRPNASACNNNAEYANA  Page 1of2    ConnectGIS Feature Report OBJECTID 10820 OWNER NAME FRANZI PATRICIAI ROSE MAILING ADDRESS2  10/28/18, 9:18AM  GPIN 5685-16-1804 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP_ DESC 1LOT 613 EAST2 2ND STREET TOT VAL 76145 PREV ASSESS 85316 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1908/00257 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1930 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1980  GPIN Long 5685-16-1804 MAILINGADDRESS 118 CHARLOTTESTREET STATE NC LAND VAL 27470 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.23 MBL 56850951 STAMPS 166.00 NBHD CDE H. EXEMPT AMT SQ_FT 1210 NBR_BED 2 PIN 01027268  ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 48675 TAXABLE VA 76145 PROPERTY ADDRESS 613 OLD 2ND ST DATE 8/19/2016 SALE PRICE 83000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE GRAVEL SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 42054  Beaufort County online mapa accessi is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed or implied. Content published ont this website is for informational purposes only andi is not intended to constitute al legal record nor should it be substituted1 for the advice or services of industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andI legall liabilityf fort the content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort Countyl  and its Assigns shall be! held harmless from all actions, claims, damages or judgments arisingo out oft the use of County data.  vetatLemmscicOwwwnaNaNaNNSNRNaNtPNA  Page 2 of2    OMBI No. 1660-0008 Expiration Date: November 30, 2018 FORI INSURANCE COMPANYUSE  ELEVATION CERTIFICATE 613 Old 2nd Street City Washington  IMPORTANT: In these spaces, copyt the corresponding information from Section A.  Building Street Address (including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg. No.)orP.O.F Route: and Box No. Policy Number:  NAIC Number  State North Carolina  ZIP Code 27889  Company  SECTION C-E BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY REQUIRED)  C1. Building elevations are based on:  Construction Drawings* Building Under Construction* X Finished Construction  *Ar new Elevation Certificate will bei required whend construction oft the building is complete. C2. Elevations - Zones A1-A30, AE, AH, A (with BFE), VE, V1-V30, V(with BFE), AR, AR/A, ARIAE, Rico AR/A1-A30, enter AR/AH, meters. ARIAO. Complete Items C2.a-h! below according tot the! building diagram specified in Item A7. In Puerto only, Indicate elevation datum used for the elevations ini itéms a)t through h) below. NGVD1 1929 R NAVD1 1988 Other/Source: Datum used for building elevations must bet the same ast that used for the BFE. Top ofl bottom floor (including basèment, crawlspace, or enclosure floor). c) Bottom oft the lowest! horizontal structural member (VZ Zones only) e) Lowest elevation ofr machinery ore equipment servicing thel building (Describe type ofe equipment andl location in Comments) Lowest adjacent (finishéd) grade next to! building (LAG) g) Highest adjacent (finished) grader next tol building (HAG) h) Lowest adjacent grade atl lowest elevation of deck or stairs, including  Benchmark Utilized: NCGS Station ARMORY  Vertical Datum: 9.57  Check the measurement used. X feet meters x feet meters x feet meters feet meters X feet meters X feet meters feet meters X feet meters  4.43 6.98 N/A. N/A, 6.20 3,99 5,14 5,14  gerh  b) Top oft the next higher floor d) Attached garage (top ofs slab).  structural support  SECTION D- SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR/ ARCHITEÇT CERTIFICATION  This certification ist to! bes signed ands sealed! bya al land surveyor, engineer, or architect the authorized available. by law lunderstand to certify elevation thata anyf information. false  Icertify that the information on this Certificate represents my best efforts foi interpret Section 1001. data statement. mayk be punishable by fine ori imprisonment under 18 U.S. Code, Were latitude: and longitude in Section A provided by al  licensed land surveyor? Yes ONo Check herei ifattachments.  Certifier's Name Hugh A. Sorrell Title Professional Land Surveyor Company Name Sorrell Land Surveying! Inc. Address 107 Union Drive, Suite 101 City Washington Signature Hugh Sorrell Copy all pages oft thjs Elevation C2e. Lowest machinery isaa air condition unit.  License Number L-2849  State North Carolina Date 08/15/2016 (1) community  ZIP Code 27889 Telephone (252) 948-2464  T  Certificate all attachments for A and  official, (2) insurance agenticompany, and (3) building owner.  Comments (includingtypé ofe equipment andl location, per C2(e), ifapplicable)  Replaces all previous editions.  Form Page 2of6  FEMA Form 086-0-33 (7/15)    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management. Agency National Flood Insurance Program  OMB No. 1660-0008 Expiration! Date: November 30, 2018  ELEVATION CERTIFICATE Important: Followt the instructions onp pages 1-9.  Copy all pages oft this Elevation Certificate and all attachments for (1) community official, (2)i insurance agent/company,: and (3) building owner.  SECTION, A-PROPERTY INFORMATION  FORI INSURANCE COMPANYUSE Policy Number: Company NAIC Number: ZIP Code 27889  A1. Building Owner's Name Edward Irvine Box No. 613 Old: 2nd Street City Washington NC Pin Number 5685-16-1804 A5. Latitude/Longitude: Lat. 35.53912 A7. Building Diagram Number 8 A8. Fora al building with a crawispace ore enclosure(s):  A2. Building Street/ Address (including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg. No.) orP.O. Route and  State North Carolina  A3. Property Description (Lota and Block Numbers, Tax Parcel Number, Legal Description, etc.) A4. Building Use (e.g., Residential, Non-Residential, Addition, Accessory, etc.) Residential A6. Attach atl least 2p photographs oft the building ift the Certificate! is being used to obtain flood insurance.  Long.7 77.04564  Horizontal Datum: NAD 1927 X NAD1 1983  a) Square footage of crawispace ore enclosure(s) 1,261.44 sqft c) Total net area off flood openings in A8.b 0 sqi in d) Engineered flood openings? OYes No A9. Fora al building with an attached garage: a) Square footage ofa attached garage c) Totalr net area off flood openings inA A9.b d) Engineered flood openings? Yes No B1. NFIP Community Name & Community Number City of Washington 370017 B4. Map/Panel Number 3720568500J  b) Number of permanent flood openings int the crawispace ore enclosure(s) within 1.0 foot above adjacent grade  0  0 sqf ft 0 sqi in  b) Number ofp permanent flood openings int the attached garage within 1.01 foot above adjacent grade  0  SECTION B- - FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION  B2. County Name Beaufort Effectivel Revised Date 07/07/2014  B3. State North Carolina (Zone AO, use Base Flood Depth) 10.00'  B5. Suffix B6. FIRMI Index: B7.FIRME Panel  B8. Flood Zone(s) B9. Base Flood Elevation(s)  Date 05/15/2003  J  AE  B10. Indicate the source ofthe Base Flood Elevation (BFE) data or base flood depth entered inl Item B9: X FISF Profile. OFIRM Community Determined JOther/Source: B11. Indicate elevation datum used for BFE in Item B9:  NGVD1 1929  NAVD 1988  Other/Source:  B12. Ist the building locatedi ina Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) area or Otherwise Protected. Area (OPA)? D Yes  No  Designation Date: FEMAI Form 086-0-33 (7/15)  CBRS J OPA Replaces allp previous editions.  Form Page 1of6    -  Camemg        COpuig 513 Cast Brondghut    ta, 80  -  - o  a -    Adjoining Property Owners: 613 Old Second Street  BANKS BRANT SHAWN 6021 E] MAIN ST WASHINGTON: NC27889 FORTESQUE. INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 444 STEWART PARKWAY WASHINGTON NC27889 GREEN ERICY 6101 EASTMAIN STREET WASHINGTONI NC 27889 HARSTAD. JAMES ALAN TRUSTEE 332TALONI DRIVE PITTSBORONC27312 NEWBOLD GINGER W 6121 EASTI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON) NC27889 THOMPSON PEGGY HARRISON 115) BROWN STREET WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 FRANZI PATRICIA ROSE 118 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 MACEWAN: ROBERT A 1171 BROWN STREET WASHINGTON: NC 27889 OWENS SHARON BARRETT 6221 EMAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 FRANZI PATRICIA ROSE 118 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 BEAUFORT COUNTY OF 121 W: 3RD STREET WASHINGTON: NC 27889 CAMPBELL CECIL SII 5064 SLATESTONE ROAD WASHINGTONNC278)  DARREI LAURA 316 RIVERSIDE DRIVE WASHINGTON NC2 27889 BURLESON DEBANNALOU 116 CHARLOTTE ST WASHINGTON: NC27889 FRANZI PATRICIA ROSE 118 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 STALLINGS JOHN WJR 120 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 YOUNG-MARTIN EMMA 617E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 CASEY JAMES E 124 CHARLOTTE STREET WASHINGTONNCZ78) ELKS BARBARA W 601 E2ND STREET WASHINGTONNC2738)    Docntoion Deoelopmenb ffstoric Preseroation  City  Washincton NORTH CAR'OLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness-613 Old Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Patty Franz for a Certificate of Appropriateness to ele-  vate the structure on the property located at 613 Old Second Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday Novermber 6, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  613 Old Second Street  The application for the property located at 613 Old Second Street is requesting approval to elevate Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.2 Materials:  the structure and remove the east side chimney.  3.2.6 Preserve and protect character-defining masonrya architectural features including 3.2.9 Deteriorated masonry units should be repaired rather than replaced using materials that match the original in size, texture, color, and overall appearance. Synthetic materials are prohibited on historic structures for the wholesale covering ofas structure. Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.3 Foundations: 3.3.1 Retain and preserve historic foundations including their design, texture, color, and materials. Character-defining features of historic foundations should be retained and preserved including vents, grills, panels, piers, lattice, porch steps, basement windows and door openings. 3.3.2 Ifal historic foundation must be repaired or replaced, match the original in size, shape, 3.3.5 New foundation openings including vents or mechanical installations should be installed only in noncharacter defining elevations. New openings should not bei installed if they will 3.3.6 Underpinning shall consist of bricks and joint tooling that match the piers as closely as possible. Nonstructural underpinning may consist of a single course of bricks, lattice brick walls, or even treated wooden lattice. Ifopenings between brick piers are to bet filled in, they should be done with similar materials or lattice. The infill area should be recessed and clearly 3.3.7 Structural underpinning may be a veneer wall of brick covering a concrete block wall. This thickness may meet the minimum requirements fora at foundation wall. Brick lattice may also be  corbelling, cornices, sills, quoins, foundations and walls.  texture, color, and material. damage the historic structure.  differentiated from the original piers used as a veneer to cover the concrete block.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.5 Roofs:  3.5.2 Character defining elements of historic roofs should be retained and preserved including dormer windows, chimneys, turrets, cupolas, and parapet walls. Eave overhangs, moldings and  trim, and: soffit boards should also be retained and preserved.  Based on findings ofi fact, the request is not congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 613 Old Second Street- Elevating the Dwelling and removing the chimney  Ar request has been made by Ms. Patty Franz for a Certificate of Appropriateness to elevate the dwelling and remove its east side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations and To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  3.5 Roofs.  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Patty Franz to elevate the dwelling and remove the east side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2  Materials, 3.3 Foundations and 3.5 Roofs.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Patty Franz to elevate the dwelling and remove the east side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations and. 3.5 Roofs. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Patty Franz to elevate the dwelling and remove the east side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations and 3.5 Roofs    516 East Second  Street  Home Elevation    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIAIENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in the front lobby of CityHall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  516 East Second Street  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Fred Read (width)  feet by  feet.  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Property owner would like to elevate the house located at 516 East Second Street.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Fred Read  (Name OfA Applicant - type or print) 516 East Second Street (Mailing Address) October 9,2018 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  27889 (Zip Code)  916-865-7080 (Daytime PhoneANumber)  (Authorized Signature)  SgnaturegtADplcany)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Google    ConnectGIS Feature Report  10/28/18, 9:17 AM Beaufort  Printed October 28, 2018 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  SP  1:35Feet  MPReMaMteeAsamPeSMNNNMtyaNA  Page1of2    ConnectGIS Feature Report OBJECTID 10730 OWNER NAME READ FRED MAILING ADDRESS2 411 WALNUT STREET #7595 ZIP 32043 BLDG VAL 59849 TAXABLE VA 113409 PROPERTY ADDRESS 516 E: 2ND ST DATE 1/4/2012 SALE PRICE 85000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR_ BATHS REID 41464  10/28/18, 9:17 AM  GPIN 5685-07-8342 OWNER NAME2 READ. JANE CITY GREEN COVE: SPRINGS PROP DESC 1LOT 516 EAST2NDSTREET TOT VAL 113409 PREV ASSESS 124172 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1771/00187 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1976 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1990  GPIN Long 5685-07-8342 MAILING ADDRESS 411 WALNUT STREET #7595 STATE FL LAND VAL 53560 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.25 MBL 56850979 STAMPS 170.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQ_FT 1396 NBR_BED 2 PIN 01033020  Beaufort County online mapa access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website isf fori informational purposes only and is noti intended too constitute a legal record nor shouldi itl be substituted for the advice ors services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaima allr responsibility: andI legall liabilityf fort thec content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort County  landi its Assigns shall be held harmless from alle actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.  htps/Desufor.comectgisascopoamladia.aNdlusump2epa255060abstbasacahmat-pinle  Page 2 of2                Tn TET    Ckauuple: 4 513 &ast Bgaud &    3 p  o  V3    Adjoining Property Owners: 516: East Second Street  HAWKINS! FREDERICK: F 507 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 REAPP BRIAN 509 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 STONE: EDDIE EARL 513 E2ND: STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 TUBAUGH, HARRY S 2964 CORSICA ROAD WASHINGTON: NC27889 O'ROURKEI DORCAS 510E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 TAU TRIBE: NO 181 REDMENS LODGE 304 BEECH STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 HARSTAD JAMES ALAN TRUSTEE 332 TALON DRIVE PITTSBORO: NC27312 O'ROURKE. DORCAS 5101 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 READ FRED 516E2NDS ST WASHINGTON: NC27889 KBUSENKOTHEN MARK 524 EAST SECOND STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 DINTINO ALFRED! M 518E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 ALLAM SULAIMAN HISHAM 107 RHEM ST NEW: BERN NC28562  MOOREI LEASING CO: INC POI BOX 1567 WASHINGTON NC27889    Dotntoion ecelopmenb éfitoric Preseroation  0  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness = 516 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within. 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Fred Read for a Certificate of Appropriateness to ele-  vate the structure on the property located at 516 East Second Street.  Ifyoux would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday Novermber 6, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  516 East Second Street the structure.  The applicationi for the property located at 516 East Second Street is requesting approval to elevate Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.2 Materials:  3.2.6 Preserve and protect character-defining masontyarchitectural features including 3.2.9 Deteriorated masonry units should be repaired rather than replaced using materials that match the original in size, texture, color, and overall appearance. Synthetic materials are prohibited on historic structures fort the wholesale covering of a structure. Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.3 Foundations: 3.3.1 Retain and preserve historic foundations including their design, texture, color, and materials. Character-defining features of historic foundations should be retained and preserved including vents, grills, panels, piers, lattice, porch steps, basement windows and door openings. 3.3.2 Ifal historic foundation must be repaired or replaced, match the original in size, shape, 3.3.5 New foundation openings including vents or mechanical installations should be installed only in noncharacter defining elevations. New openings should not be installed ift they will 3.3.6 Underpinning shall consist of bricks and joint tooling that match the piers as closely as possible. Nonstructural underpinning may consist ofa single course of bricks, lattice brick walls, or even treated wooden lattice. If openings between brick piers are to be filled in, they should be done with similar materials or lattice. The infill area should be recessed and clearly 3.3.7 Structural underpinning may be a veneer wall of brick covering a concrete block wall. This thickness may meet the minimum requirements fora af foundation wall. Brick lattice may also be  corbelling, cornices, sills, quoins, foundations and walls.  texture, color, and material. damage the historic: structure.  differentiated from the original piers used as ay veneer to cover the concrete block.  Based on findings of fact, the request is not congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 516 East Second Street- Elevating the Dwelling  A request has been made by Mr. Fred Read for a Certificate of Appropriateness to elevate the dwelling on the property located at! 5161 East Second Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.2 Materials and 3.3 Foundations. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. John Read to elevate the dwelling on the property located at 516 East Second Street. This motion is based on thei following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3 3.2 Materials and 3.3  Foundations.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. John Read to elevate the dwelling on the property located at 516 East Second Street. This motion is based ont the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter: 3.2 Materials and. 3.3 Foundations. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. John Read to elevate the dwelling on the property located at 516 East Second: Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2 Materials and 3.3  Foundations.    108 Gladden  Street  Replacing Clerestory Windows    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application! Fee of $50 toc cashiers in thei front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Filing! Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Property/Name (if  Street Address of Property: 108 Gladder 8twect Owner's Name: Dty of Washington  Historic Lot Size:  Centrr  applicable): Civic  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work tol be Done: The Citiy  Washinptm wonud duik ta  8  cplacu Ch hupp cleeatny wolidins  v  Civo Cmtn with vingi  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) 0 Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn - Staff Approval (Date)  CHy of kshivotm (Name of7 Applicant - type orp priy) Po Bx 1988 Malling Address) 1022/18 (Dae)  (Initials)  ACTION  27889 (Zip Code)  252-9757656 (Daytime Phone Number)  Aloal dp  (Authorized Signature) (Sighature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or anyl law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its. next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    ConnectGIS Feature Report  10/28/18, 9:25 AM Beaufort Printed October 28, 2018 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNECIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:72Feet  Mewhawwtamskcampw.wNNNapsasmdastpaw  Page1 1of2    ConnectGIS Feature Report OBJECTID 6488 OWNER NAME CITY OF WASHINGTON MAILING ADDRESS; 2  10/28/18, 9:25 AM  GPIN 5675-78-6742 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC ST DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 1.24 MBL 567508452 STAMPS NBHD CDE AC1 EXEMPT AMT 2120887.00 SQ_FT NBR BED PIN 15000439  GPIN Long 5675-78-6742 MAILINGADDRESS POBOX1988 STATE NC LAND VAL BLDG VAL 1687207 TAXABLE VA 0 PROPERTY ADDRESS 108 GLADDEN ST DATE 1/1/1900 SALE PRICE 0.00 NBHD DESC ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC89 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 20458  ZIP 27889 TOT VAL 2120887 PREV ASSESS 2244304 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 0746/00701 NBR BLDG LAND USE YR BUILT 1906 SUB DESC OTHER MUNICIPAL EFF_ YR 1975  2LOTS 34 AND: 35 W/S GLADDEN 433680  ZONE 1 AVERAGE COMMERCIAL  Beaufort County online map: access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published on this website isf fori informational purposes only andi is not intended to constitute al legal record nors should itl be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. The County of Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility and legall liabilityf fort the content published ont this website. The user agreest that Beaufort Countyl  and its Assigns shall bel held! harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.  MwawatcuMAcaNeo--AwwudNatyNe  Page 2of2    MGPINGTON CVICCENTER PARKING  a 1S                CAROLINA WINDOWS & DOORS, INC. Providing Qualily Servioe andProducts Sinoe 1984 303SMemorialD, Greenville, NC27834 (252) 756-2585 -(800)545-7172 Fax-( (252)756-1761  The Caribbean Window  PolyPour Aluminum Thermal Break' Windows Not all' "aluminum windows" are the same! Our commercial-grade aluminum windows featurea thermal break that separates the inside metal from the outside metal with very high-density catalyzed polyurethane. Generically, this engineered design is called "pour and de-bridge" inre reference tot the extrusion process. Wej just call it PolyPour. These windows set our aluminum lines apart from conventional, old- fashioned typical aluminum windows that have no thermal breaks. Among those that do, be careful to make sure you noticet the differences. For example, ours feature wide thermal breaks int the jambs, heads, sills, and all sashes of our windows; and thel breaks align for maximum thermal performance and design pressure rating of 50. Lesser windows have thinner breaks, may not align, and may even have no thermal break int their sashes or sills. PolyPour windows fight condensation and have significantly better insulating values than any cheap" "builder grade" MATERIALS: Frame and sash main members are made of T6063-16 anodized aluminum alloy extrusions with ap poured in channel urethane thermal barrier, debridged to prevent temperature transfer through the extrusion. Typical extrusion wall thickness is 062 inches.  aluminum window.  ENERGY STAR  vwy.ewdne.com    CONSTRUCTION: Frame corner seams are sealed with al low modulus, non acetic silicone. sealant. Frame depth is 31 1/4" with sill sloped to the outside for positive water drainage. Frames are available in new construction as) well as replacement configurations. Sash components are joined at the corner using double screw coped corner construction and arei fastened with 410 GLAZING: Sashes are channel glazed using a flexible vinyl glazing gasket along the perimeter of as sealed insulating glass unit. Standard INSULATING GLASS UNITS have an overall thickness of 7/8" and consist of twol lites of double strength glass and one air space. The air space is created by al Mylar Composit (Edge Tech Super Spacer).The edge seal consists of a uniform layer of hot melt butyl sealant. Insulating glass meets ASTM E773, ASTMI E774, & ASTM E546. Insulated Glass Units consist argon filled in combinations with High Performance soft coat low-e. FINISHES: All aluminum extrusions in master frame, sash, and screen are finish painted with an electrostatically applied enamel in a choice of three colors: White, Bronze, and Tan.  hardness stainless steel screws seti in extruded screw bosses.  "The dryi ice experiment above demonstrates the effectiveness ofthet thermal break in preventing  cold from transferring to the inside ofthei window. "  w.ewdme.com    CAROLINA WINDOWS & DOORS, INC. Providing Qually Servioe andProducts Sinoe 1984  3203SMemorial Dr, Greenyillg,NC2734 405.718285-09.986712  Fax- (252)756-1761  PROPOSAL For  Washington Civic Center 110 Gladden St, Washington, NC27889  Carolina Windows and Doors would like to thank you for your time and the opportunity to help preserve one ofyour historical building. On Monday July 30 we discussed with Mr Daniels the possibility ofreplacing approximately 165 windows at the top or the Civic Center. Att this time we discussed replacing all units with new picture  windows.  This project in its entirety should require approximately (5-7) working days on the property. IfCarolina Windows and Doors was chosen to complete this project we would have a projected start date approximately 6-8 weeks from date oft the signed property improvement contract. Not sub contracting and having our own trained installers we have them consistently booked for this length oft time. We would try to schedule an installation start date on any Monday hoping to be completed by Saturday "weather permitting". We leave Fridays and Saturdays open for any fall back days caused by rain or unforeseen incidents during the week. Ifr rain ofunforeseen incidents occur we could possibly return that following Friday and or Saturday to finish the job. Accesses to the property would be needed throughout the project however no one is required from your party tol be  present during the installation.  Below you will see the description and break down oft the project at] hand. We can mix and match any units to be fixed or operate and price reflected will not change. Color options will not change the price. Available colors for windows are white, almond, and  bronze. Exterior trim color can be done in almost any color.  Ifeither of you have any questions about this proposal feel free to: reach out to  JeffBailey or Blake Bailey.  Thank you again for the opportunity!  www.ewdne.com    CAROLINA WINDOWS & DOORS, INC. Providing Qually Servioe andProducte Sinoe 1984  3203SMemorial. Dr, Greenville,NC27834 03.78.55-9045712 -  Fax-(252)756-1761 Washington Civic Center 110 Gladden St, Washington, NC27889  Description  1. Manufacture and install 165 Caribbean replacement windows fitted to the existing  openings.  2. Replace any needed deteriorated wood 3. Trim exterior with PVC trim coil 4. Color ofa all materials tol be white 5. Clean up and haul off all job debris  Carolina Windows and Doors to furnish all materials, labor, and insurance needed  in order to complete. job  Windows Trim Labor Tax Total  $ 47,685.00 9,075.00 14,025.00 4,954.00 - 75,739.00  Vww.ewdne.com    Washington Civic Center Glass 1/2" Low EI.G. Remove & Dispose Existing Glass Install New Glass Install New Flashing Repairs to Frame &I New Stop Prime and finish painting Misc. Materials  Unit  Qty U/M Rate 1Ea. 1.5Hr. $ 55.00 1.5_Hr. $ 55.00 1Hr. $ 55.00 1Hr. $ 55.00 1Hr. $ 55.00 1Ea.  Cost MarkUp Tax Totals $84.63 $ 42.32 $8.57 $ 135.52  $ 82.50 $ 82.50 $ 55.00 $ 55.00 $ 55.00 25.00 465.52 170 25 6.8 $ 4,420.00 9,424.80 92,983.20 98,559.80 $ 1,136.60 1,800.00 2,640.00 5,576.60  Total Per Unit  Totall Units Subtotal- Repairs $ 79,138.40 Units per wk- -crew of 2 Weeks to Complete Travel/Equip Rental $ 13,844.80 Measuringl Trip_ $ 5,576.60  170 $79,138.40 4 50 3.4 $ 4,420.00 9,424.80 13,844.80 $92,983.20 5,576.60 98,559.80  Crew Units per Wk Crew of Units per Wk  Estimated Lift cost Estimated1 travel crew of2( (per week)  1Wk $ 650.00 1Wk $ 1,386.00  Measuring Trip (All units)  Travel Costs Lift 1Ea.  Sitel labor (Crew of2,3days) 48 Hr. $ 55.00 Total Cost to tor measure glass    DOUBLE  DOUBLE HUNG, LLC  HISTORIC WINDOW RESTORATION  Hiorick HindowR Restorallon  2801 Patterson Street Greensboro, NC 27407 Phone: 888.235.8956  Fax: 866.681.1080  06/28/18 To: City ofWashington Attn: Mac Daniels  Re: Civic Center Clerestory) Window Replacement.  What follows is the communication of our proposal for the Civic Center window replacement project as sent tol Mac Daniels in and email dated 5/1/18. Alsoi included is our worksheet that accompanied that email. We are initially proposing the measuring/evaluation trip: as outlined below. Completion  oft the project willl be contingent upon the City's budget.  Mac, again my apologies for taking our time on getting this toy you on a more timely basis. This one is al head scratcher. Iti is difficult, more like impossible, to arrive at a per unit price not knowing how manyv windows can be completed per budget phase nor do we know the actual conditions oft the There are: some unknowns, SO we: assumed certain things... mainly regarding thet flashing. We are not able to completely understand howi thet flashing integrates with the window system until we get "up close and personal" with a window or two. We are assuming a simple aluminum: flashing that extends under each pane. We would get the profile fort this defined during the below measuring trip: andt then get it precisely shaped by a company who does such things. I'm sure we could order all of it for much less money than ordering just enough for ai few windows at at time. We also have no idea of any wood Because youi indicated that the sizes vary, andi the questions regarding the flashing, we have included the costs of coming and measuring every window. This includes lift rental, travel and labor for a crew of two. This really ought tol be done as a "one time"... we estimate that trip @ $5,576.60. Al break out of those items is ini the attached. Obviously we have to have ordered the correct sized glass several weeks before they are to bei installed. We would create a document indicating each glass size for use on all You did not specify the type ofi insulating glass to be utilized - wei included 1", low E. Our pricingi is based on buying this in: small quantities at at time because we don't know how many to undertake for  existing openings. But we' ve done the best as we could... couple of things....  deterioration ati the sills, so have assumed none.  future phases.  "DON'T REPLACE... REPAIR" MFOBDOUBLEUNG.CON    each phase. Should you find a way to contract for the entire project, your per unit glass costs could decrease significantly. Also... ifyoud don'trequire the "LowE" energy savings glass, the price would also We can only send a crew oft two due to the limitations of who we can get on as single boom lift. Itwill only hold two people and the materials. Iwe rent two lifts, we could move faster with two crews, but thel lift costs would rise precipitously. We believe we can complete between 10: and 15 windows within Short of it... Everyt time we come down - to do 1 window or 20- - certain costs are fixed: measuring trip, lift costs, travel to/from Washington. So obviously it would be! best to award a week's worth of windows atat time. Also... ift the award could include ALL of the windows, but undertaken during, say, 6 mobilizations, Ihave no doubt that some pricing would drop due to "economies ofs scale".  drop.  av week's mobilization.  Our Scope includes:  Removing and disposing oft the old glass and exterior stop (including the bottom piece of interior  stop to run flashing under it) Installation of aluminum flashing. Installation of new LowE 1" IG panes- Finish coating of replaced. stop molding. One year warranty on materials and workmanship Hope this isn't too confusing.. call with questions.  Installation of new exterior stop- - back primed. (And the new lower interior stop on to of the  flashing)  David Hoggard Double Hung, LLC    Washington Civic Center Glass 1/2"Low EI.G. Remove & Dispose Existing Glass Install New Glass Install New Flashing Repairs to Frame & New Stop Prime and finish painting Misc. Materials  Unit  Qty U/M Rate Cost Mark Up Tax Totals  1Ea. 1.5'Hr. $55.00 1.5Hr. $55.00 1Hr. $55.00 1Hr. $55.00 1Hr. $55.00 1Ea.  $84.63 $ 42.32 $8.57 $ 135.52  $ 82.50 $ 82.50 $ 55.00 55.00 55.00 25.00 465.52 $1,800.00 $1,386.60  Total Per Unit  Estimated Lift cost perweek Estimated travel crew of2( per week) We estimate 10to 15units per week Measuring Trip (All units)  1Ea.  Travel Costs  $1,136.60 $1,800.00 $2,640.00 $5,576.60  Lift 1Ea.  Site labor (Crew of2,3 3days) 48 Hr. $55.00 Total Cost tot to measure, glass    CITY OF WASHINGTON INVITATIONTOBID FOR WASHINGTON: NC  Civic Center Clerestory Window Replacement  1.  INTRODUCTION  The City Of Washington is requesting quotes from qualified firms for clerestory window replacement located at (Civic Center) 110 Gladden Street Washington NC27889. The project scope is as enclosed. If awarded this project the vendor must abidel by all oft the City OfWashingtons safety regulations. The vendor is responsible for all oft the equipment + labor to complete this project. The windows that will be replaced is about 50 feet: from the ground. The awarded vendor will need to start work on thel East Side oft the Civic Center. The awarded vendor will also need to block off Gladden Street while any work is being performed. This is an informal bid and you do not have to bej present att the time oft thel bid opening. The vendor must be able to complete this) project by May 31 2018. Ifvendor does not complete this proiect) by M32018 theré will be a $100.00 penalty  per day. No yuidadbopiya S  Questions should be addressed to: Mac Daniels (252)402-5226  2.  GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS  2.1 Submit the bids marked (Civic Center Clerestory Window Replacement). Bids should be submitted to the City Of Washington, Attention: Jennifer Nelson, 203 Grimes Road Washington NC 27889 no later than 10:00AM on Wednesday March 28 2018 at which time they will be opened and made aj part oft the public record. The bid opening will be conducted in the Purchasing Agents Office located at 203 Grimes Road Washington NÇ 27889. Bidders are not required to be present at the time of the bid opening. Bids can be mailed, dropped by the office or emailed to nelon@masnngomcgor Bids must be submitted by the date and time stated or they will remain unopened. Iti is the responsibility of the bidder to ensure timely and correct delivery of the quote. A BID BOND is not 2.2 Its shall be the bidder's responsibility to read this entire document, review all enclosures and attachments, and comply with all requirements specified  required. herein.    2.3 All quotes are subject to the provisions oft terms and conditions specific to  this invitation to bid, and the specifications. 2.4 Failure to sign will render bid invalid.  2.5 Unless otherwise indicated, the offer shall be valid for 45 days from the 2.6 The City Of Washington reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids in whole or inj part and to waive any informality in thel bid. Informality shall be defined as a deviation from a non-statutory requirement or a specification, neither of which affect the amount oft the bid. Any deviation from specifications indicated herein must be clearly pointed out; otherwise, it will be considered that items are in strict compliance with these specifications, and bidder will be held responsible therefore. Deviations shall be explained in detail. The specification herein isi intended to indicate the character, quality and/or performance of the goods or services desired. Reference to brand names is not intended to restrict the bidding, but to inform the bidder more 2.7 The City Of Washington will assume no responsibility for oral instruction, suggestion, ori interpretation. Any question regarding thel bid documents, and/or specifications shall be directed to. Jennifer Nelson or Mac Daniels and any material change will be submitted to all bidders in a written addendum. Bidders must acknowledge: receipt of addendum(s) by signing the appropriate form that will bei included ini thel bid. 2.8 Modification ofc or corrections to quotes are not acceptable after bids have been closed. Erroneous bids may be reclaimed or superseded any time prior to bid opening time. Any new bid must be marked on the outside of the sealed envelope with the notation "Supersedes all previous submissions" or an email that references this. 2.9 Tabulations of quotes and award information are a matter of public record and are available upon request when accompanied by a stamped self-addressed envelope or can be emailed. responsible bidder meeting specifications provided. Isy your organization registered with HUB office?  date of quote opening.  clearly what is required for this project.  2.10 Awards shall be based on determination of the lowest responsive  2.11 Historically Underutilized Business:  Yes  No_  Is your organization ai minority Contractor, small Contractor, physically  2    handicapped Contractor, a woman Contractor, a disabled business enterprise, orar non-profit work center for thel blind and severely  disabled? Yes  No  MBE requirements and 5% goal also apply on informal contracts EXCEPT the Owner, not the bidder, has the responsibility to make agood faith effort to solicit minority bids to attain the goal. (GS 143-131(b)). Documentation and data on MBE participation isr required for informal projects and must be reported upon project completion to the Department of Administration- - HUB Office. 2.12 Permit Fees: The Contractor shall pay for all permits and fees.  The Contractor shall give all notices and comply with all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders ofany public authority bearing on the  performance of this work.  2.13 Performance and Payment Bonds are not required.  2.14 Insurance Provisions:  a.  Worker's Compensation Insurance: Insurance covering all employees meeting statutory limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. Thej policy must include the employers' liability with al limit $100,000 each accident, $100,000 bodily injury by disease, $500,0001 bodily injury by disease policy Comprehensive General Liability: Shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury liability and property damage liability. This shall include premises and/or operations, independent contractors, products and/or operations, independent contractors, products and/or completed operation, broad form property damage and SCU coverage, and a Business Auto Policy: Shall have minimum limits of $300,000 per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury liability and property damage liability. This shall include owned vehicles, hired and non-owned vehicles, and employee non-ownership. Builder's Risk: Contractor shall have all risk coverage with limits ofinsurance equal to 100% oft the completed value of the materials  limit. b.  contractual liability endorsement.  C.  d.  beingi installed for the City ofWashington.  2.15 Termination of Contract: The contract may bet terminated by the City if(a) the Contractor fails to prosecute the work as directed within the time specified, (b) fails toj perform the work in ai manner satisfactory to the  3    City, or (c)ifthe Contractor shall become insolvent or be declare  bankrupt.  The City Of Washington shall give notice in writing to the Contractor and his surety ofs such delay, neglect or default, specifying thes same and ift the Contractor within ten (10) days after such notice has not complied, the City Of Washington has full power and authority, without violating the contract to: remove the work out oft thel hands oft the Contractor and to appropriate or use any or all materials and equipment on the ground that may be suitable and acceptable. All costs and charges incurred by the City, together with the completion oft thej project shall be deducted from any monies due or which may become due to the Contractor. Ifthe expenses incurred are greater than the amount which would be payable to the Contractor, then the Contractor and the Surety shall be liable and shall pay  the City the amount of said excess. SUPPLEMENTARY GENERAL CONDITIONS:  3.  3.1 Cleaning of Area: The Contractor at all times shall keep the premises free from an accumulation of waste materials or rubbish caused by his operations. At the completion oft the work, the Contractor: shall remove all waste materials and rubbish from and about the project as well as his tools, construction equipment, machinery and surplus materials and shalll leave 3.2 Contractor shall provide any and all equipment deemed necessary to  all surfaces' "broom clean" or its equivalent.  complete work intended.  4.  CONTRACTOR SAFETY REQUIREMENIS:  4.1 Contractor is required to comply with all current NCOSHA Safety and Health Standards that are applicable to the work being performed by the  Contractor form the City OfWashington.  4.2 The City shalll have the right but not the obligation to stop work ifa condition is observed that is considered immediately dangerous to the life or health ofa Contractor's employee. The job: shall be closed until the situation is corrected. The City's representative shall attempt to first contact the person designated by the Contactor tol handle questions or situations concerning safety. However, the City does not have to allow this situation toj persist to satisfy any requirement to contact this] person. The City shall not be liable for any expense or damages incurred by the  4    Contractor due to job closure that is the result ofa condition that is  immediately dangerous to life andi health.  5. SITE SAFETY AUDIT:  5.1 The City's Risk Manager or his/her designee shall have the right, but not the obligation, toj periodically audit the Contractor's job site to ensure  compliance with the provisions ofthis contract.  6. ACCIDENT REPORTING REQUIREMENT:  6.1 Accidents that occur on thej job site ofa Contractor working for the City  shall be reported to the City's Risk Manager.  5    Civic Center Clerestory Window Replacement  SCOPE OF WORK:  Se AANaD  PLYGEMABUILDER SERIES WOOD FIXED WINOW- -S SASH SETDIMENSIONS CUSTOM-1 FRAME SIZE 37875X38.375 SASH SIZE35.65,35.965 PRIMED + ATPCI-GAPeNT U-FACTOR = 0,33, SHGC0.3 LOW-EGLA8S, INSULATEDAAPAEALED WARMI EDGE GLASS AND ALL FLASHING' TOI PROPERLY'SEAL WINDOWS OPENING.  THESE ARE SASHES -THERE. MAY BES SMIGTVARIATIONS INE EACH  DELIVERY, STORAGE. AND HANDLING:  1. Products shall be delivered in manufacturer's original packaging or containers, undamaged and dry, with seals and labels intact and legible. Materials shall be stored for the project with weather protective covering Combustible materials shall be stored away from any ignition sources.  2. 3.  and off the ground.  WARRANTY  1. Contractor shall stipulate his warranty for the work performed in this bid.  6    City OfWashington  Civic Center Clerestory Window Replacement  EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATION  Please provide detailed information for all exceptions and any substitutions.  S&R  afde  7    COST EXECUTION OF CONTRACT  By submitting this RFQ, the potential contractor certifies the following:  RFQ, Hold Harmless Statement for the City and is signed by an authorized representative oft the Can obtain insurance certificated as required in the specified length oft time following the notice ofa award Cost and availability ofa all equipment, materials and supplies associated with performing the services described here in have been determined and included in the proposed All labor cost, direct and indirect, havel been determined Contractor. has inspected the sight andi is familiar with all aspects oft the project and the specifications required. If exceptions to the specifications exist, they must be clearly listed onj page 7- "Exceptions of Specifications."  firm  cost.  and included int the proposed cost  Therefore, in compliance with the Request for Quote, and subject to all conditions herein, the undersigned offers and agrees, ifthis RFQi is accepted  within specified date from the date of opening.  Bidder: Address: City, State, Zip:  Le 4 21401 wC Cell:  2801 GREBNSBORO  s  Telephone Number88 335-895Wax The following if applicable: Federal Employee NC Contractor'sI  Identification'  Number: D-3840960  na  malnoaulay  Typed'orp printed mame Daid Agard  Ecke  Date:  8    City OfWashington Request For Quote For  Civic Center Clerestory Window Replacement  The undersigned bidder hereby declares that he has carefully examined the requirements and specifications herein, has visited the: site and examined all conditions affecting this project and will provide all materials, equipment and  appurtenances required for the following sum:  5: ASD  Price Per Window IfAwarded  This Project A Tentative Start Date:  ASAP  Number Of Calendar Days To Complete Project: depudonhdet  9    Emily Rebert From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:  Wood, John johnpwoodencdegoue Friday, August 10, 20186:16PM Kristi Roberson Emily Rebert Window Clerestory Washington, Beaufort Co. Things.pdf  Atlantic Coast Line Freight Depot (Washington Civic Center)  Project:  4.Secretary of thel Interior's Standards for Rehabilitationdoc; Windows APT2005.pdf; Windows APT 2010.pdf; Windows Energy Payback OHJ 2007. pdf; Windows 137  Good Afternoon Kristi,  a  ofour discussion  the  Per our August 8, 2018 telephone conversation, this e-mail provides summary  regarding  clerestory windows in the Atlantic Coast Line Freight Depot (Washington Civic Center). In the past, Ihave had several discussions with Ms. Lynn Davis regarding the: repair oft the windows and understand that you are now acting in her capacity for this project. Imet with Lynn on site, but given the location oft the windows, Iv was not As we discussed, thel building is a contributing property in the National Register-listed Washington Historic District. When we: review work being proposed on historic buildings our office uses the Secretary oft the  able to closely inspect their condition.  Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Ihave attached a copy for your information.  Thei replacement of] historic wooden windows in not in keeping with Standard Nos. 2, 5, and 6. Windows are an important character defining feature ofal building and should be repaired rather than replaced. In past conversations with Lynn, Irecommended that she obtain estimates for the repair oft the existing wood sash windows from a contractor with experience in the repair/restoration ofhistoric wood sash windows. Double Hung Historic Window Restoration (David Hoggard) based in Greensboro was one contractor that I had  recommended tol her.  Idiscussed with Lynn that ifi money was an issue several options were possible viz:  1. Repair/restore the existing windows (reglazing, repainting, and wood repair where needed). 2. Repair/restore the existing windows, per Option 1 and add low-profile exterior storm windows, a reversible means toj protect the wood sash windows and provide additional energy efficiency. 3. Ifbudget did: not allow for the repair/restoration of the windows at the present time, leave the existing windows intact with no work to them and add low-profile exterior storm windows to prevent water infiltration and stop the deterioration of the windows. The existing windows would then be preserved 4. Repair/restore the worst oft the existing windows and then periodically repair/restore the remaining You indicated that Double Hung has provided an estimate ofaround $100,000 to repair the existing windows. You also indicated that the city has an estimate from Carolina Windows to replace all clerestory As we discussed, while the loss ofhistoric building fabric (such as windows) adversely impacts the historic character ofal building, the cost difference between repair and replacement windows does not reflect the true  and could be repaired in the future when the budget allows. windows till all have been repaired/restored.  windows with the Caribbean model replacement window at a cost of$75,000.    cost of replacement windows. When you look at the long-term life-cycle cost of replacement window, it Analysis of replacement windows show that the average life-span ofai replacement window is 15-20 years before the components and materials start to: fail (this includes the plastic/vinyl frames and jamb liners, as well as the seals between double panes). As the failing replacement window units cannot be repaired, they will need tol be replaced again. This being the case, should the city decide to replace the existing wood sash windows, they would spend $75,000 to replace windows today and would have to spend another $75,000+ inflation to replace the replacement windows in 15-20 years. Should a window unit get damaged, the entire unit would Inl looking at historic wood sash windows, they are constructed of quality materials that can easily be repaired. As the building was constructed in 1903, the historic windows would be 115 years old. With: repair, reglazing, and wood repair (where necessary), the historic windows could provide another 115 years of service at a cost of$100,000. They of course would require routine maintenance. Given the design and material oft the historic windows, ift the glazing or paint begins to fail or the glass gets broken, the sash can bei repaired without having to replace the entire window unit. The long-term cost comparison shows that rehabilitating the historic windows is ai more cost-effective alternative that also retains the historic character and integrity of the building. Ifenergy efficiency is a consideration, the energy efficiency ofi restored windows incorporating retrofit components, such as weather stripping and storm windows, can: meet and even exceed the efficiency of replacement units.. Typical window-replacement systems offer payback periods that are often nowhere near manufacturer's claims. The payback of a typical unit can be over 100 years and can exceed 200 years. Remember that most thermal replacement windows will have a life span of1 15t to 20 years, therefore they In comparing the heat lost through an un-insulated window and al high-efficiency window, it would take more than 10 years of energy savings to: recover the cost ofinstalling the replacement window; that payback period increases to 50 years ift the historic windows have simple storm windows added to them. Looking at the various options, all the options involving repair of existing windows (including major repairs and installation of storm In considering replacement windows consideration should be given to manufacturer's warranties. While many replacement windows offer a "lifetime warranty, " this warranty is typically does not cover typical aging (such. as. loss oft the inert gas in the glass unit, color variations, or the deterioration of plastic/vinyl components). Even ifcovered by a warranty, the labor to execute the replacement is typically not included, what is covered may be Lastly, we discussed the possibility of using replacement windows on upper floors or higher parts of buildings (such as clerestories) as them being noticed as replacements would be less. While this has been done on other projects, Iwould not advise against doing sO: for thei reasons cited above. In addition, for the 150- windows in the clerestory, I would assume that only a very small percentage have deteriorated to the point ofi requiring total replacement. It would not bel logical to replace all 150+ windows when only a few may require total replacement. Even ifa small number of windows warrant replacement due to deterioration, replication ofthose few windows to match the existing windows coupled with the repair/restoration of the remaining intact existing Ihave attached some information on the cost benefits of retaining and repairing historic windows for your  becomes clear that the repair and retention of] historic windows is more cost effective.  require replacement.  will not last long enough to pay for themselves.  windows) end up being cheaper at the end of 50 years than any form of replacement.  pro-rated, and there is no calculation for the mess and inconvenience created by the work.  windows would still be more cost effective than total replacement in the long run.  information.  2    One additional item that we did not discuss is that the building lies within the locally-designated Washington Historic. As such thej proposed work will require a Certificate of Appropriateness and therefore must be reviewed by the local historic preservation commission. Ihave copied Emily Rebert in the Planning Please do not hesitate to contact me if youl have any questions or require additional information.  Department on this e-mail message sO that she has the benefit ofmy comments.  Sincerely,  John P. Wood  Pleservalton/Resboraton Specialist NC State Historic Preservation Office NC Dept. of Natural and Cultural Resources Phone: (252) 830-6580, extension 225 ohnpwood@nccrgow  117 West Fifth Street I Greenville, North Carolina 27858  **This message does not necessarily represent the policy of the N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources ** E-mail messages to and from me, in connection with the transaction of public business, are subject to the North  Carolina Public Records Law and may be monitored. and/or disclosed to third parties.  3    Adjoining Property Owners: 108 Gladden Street H-DHOLDINGS OF WASHINGTONLLC 4181 E WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 JENNINGS NEILLARCHIBALDII 328 W: MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 CITY OF WASHINGTON 102E2NDST WASHINGTONI NC27889 HESTER. JOSEPH M 316 W MAIN STREET WASHINGTON! NC:27889 RIVERTOWNE PROPERTIES LLC 328 W MAIN STREET WASHINGTONNC2788) BAGWELL REALTY BEAUFORTLLC POBOX 1901 GREENVILLENC27835 CANTRELL RODNEYL 258 W. MAIN STREET WASHINGTON! NC2 27889 WILSON GARYD 481 ERIVER. ACRES RD WASHINGTON: NC 27889 MANNINGN NORMANI A POBOX2611 WASHINGTON: NC27889 BOYD. JOHN TRUSTEE PO: BOX 691 WASHINGTON: NC27889 FIRST PRESB CHURCH OF WASH 211 WEST 2ND STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 304 WEST: 2ND STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 UNITED STATES POSTAL: SERVICE  222 WEST 2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 PROPERTIES DOWN EAST: INC 414LODGE ROAD WASHINGTON NC: 27889 SAUNDERS ROBERT 296TEACHES COVE BATHNC27808    orontoin ecelopmenb ftoric Presevoation  1  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAROLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness--108: Gladden Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner, Whenever exterior renovation work is being cent to the above subject property.  conducted in the Washington Historic District all property construction activities are required to notified by the City  be  of adja-  100  of feet the proposed  owners within  is located  Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property  A request has been made by the City of Washington for a Certificate of Appropriate- ness to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden  Street.  lfyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday Novermber 6, 2018 Place: City Hall- Municipal building,  102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  108 Gladden Street  The application for the property located at 108 Gladden Street is requesting approval to replace the  original wooden clerestory windows with aluminum windows.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows and  Doors:  3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. All elements and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware. 3.4.2 Windows and doors should be repaired when necessary by splicing or patching only the 3.4.3 Ifr replacement of a window or door unit is necessary, the new unit should be replaced to match the original in size, scale, material, detail, pane and/or panel configurations. 3.4.4 Replacement of a multi-light window with a single-pane sash or replacing multi-sash 3.4.12 Sash, window panes, muntins, and rails shall not be replaced with those that are incompatible in size, configuration, and reflective qualities or alter the relationship between 3.4.16 Retain and preserve energy efficient features such as transom windows, awnings,  deteriorated section to match the original.  windows with only one sashi is prohibited.  window and wall.  shutters, skylights, and porches.  Please review the Historic Preservation: Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.5 Roofs:  3.5.2 Character defining elements of historic roofs should be retained and preserved including dormer windows, chimneys, turrets, cupolas, and parapet walls. Eave overhangs, moldings and  trim, and soffit boards should also be retained and preserved.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.8 Upper Facades: 3.8.7 Original windows on upper floors that are located on rear or moncharacterdenining elevations may be repaired, or replaced with vinyl-clad windows that match the originals in  design, size, proportions and detail.  elements of the Civic Center, and are on  The clerestory windows are character defining  character defining elevations. Based on findings of fact, the. request is not congruous  with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 108 Gladden Street- Replace the Clerestory Windows  AI request has been made by the City of Washington for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and 3.8 To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings ofi fact, which are included in the: sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  Upper Facades.  appropriate may be attached toi the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the City ofWashington to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at: 108 Gladden! Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3.4  Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and 3.8 Upper Facades.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the City ofWashington to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street. This motion is based on thei following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and 3.8 Upper Facades. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on1 the approval:  Or  Imove thati the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness toi the City ofWashingtont to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden: Street. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is not  with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.4  congruous  Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and 3.8 Upper. Facades.    Downtown Alleyways  Installing String Lighting    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Blackl Ink:  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in thet front lobby of City! Hall underDevelopmenta. Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Four Alleyways in the Harbor District  Various (width)  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (depth)  Brief Description of Work tol be Done:  TheV Washington Harbor District Alliance and the City ofWashington would like to collaborate with downtown property owners to install string lighting down four (4) alleyways within the Harbor District.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. I understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) 0 Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Washington Harbor District Alliance andi the City ofWashington  (Name of Applicant -t type or print) 102 East Second: Street (Mailing Address) October 18, 2018 (Date)  (Initials)  27889 (Zip Code) 252-946-0897 - (Daytime Phone Number)  ACTION  8  (Authorized Signature)  (Signaturé 6f Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    3  -  - Da  -    00D  /  -  HLT.        m  Susten Nat In Service  Alley 1.    Alley 2.    - - -  Alley 3.    Sprinklet Noti Service  Alley 4.    Staff Report  Alleyway Lighting in the Alleyways of the Harbor District  The applicant is seeking approval to install string lighting downt four (4) alleyways in the downtown's  Harbor District.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, 4.2 Lighting:  Lighting in the historic district should be planned in such a way that provides adequate safety but does not overly illuminate the district. Fixture design, in particular, should be appropriate to the building and  district.. Lighting Guidelines  4.2.1 The design of lighting fixtures and poles shall be compatible in size, scale, material and 4.2.2 Lighting fixtures and pole design used in conjunction" with commercial property located in the B1-H Historic District shall use the North Yorkshire, 4" diameter, 12-1 foot pole with Utility 4.2.3 Use understated techniques and light sources tol highlight al building's architecture. 4.2.4 Existing or newl lighting shall not adversely affect or spill overi into neighboring properties. 4.2.6 Utility lines, including electricity to lighting fixtures, should be buried whenever possible. 4.2.7 Low height, low brightness landscape lights are allowed as long as they don't detract from 4.2.8 Standard utility company security lights on utility poles are prohibited for area lighting in the historic districts. Use fixture designs that are appropriate to the structure and district. 4.2.9 In commercial areas or in public rights-ofway, use appropriate style and intensity of lighting that provides as safe environment for pedestrians while not adversely affecting the 4.2.10 Lighting in parking lots should be directional and not spill over into adjacent properties. 4.2.11Ifal lighting fixture must be attached to an historic: structure, it should be done ina a manneri that does not damage the structure or any architectural feature and can be removed if  brightness with the structure, landscape, and neighborhood setting.  Granville Luminare.  4.2.5 Al low height is recommended for light poles in most locations.  the structure or historic landscape.  district.  necessary.  The clerestory windows are character defining elements of the Civic Center, and are on character defining elevations. Based on findings of fact, the request is congruous with  the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: Downtown Alleyways- String Lighting  A request has been made by the Washington Harbor District Alliance and the City of Washington fora a Certificate of Appropriateness toi install string lighting throughout four alleyways within the Downtown Harbor District. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.2 To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must makei findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  Lighting.  appropriate may be: attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to the Washington Harbor District Alliarice and the City of Washington to install string lighting throughout four alleyways within the Downtown Harbor District. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.2 Lighting.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Washington Harbor District Alliance and the City of Washington to install string lighting throughout four alleyways within the Downtown Harbor District. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.2 Lighting. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Washington Harbor District Alliance and the City of Washington to install string lighting throughout four alleyways within the Downtown Harbor District. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation  Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.2 Lighting.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 405 East Second Street to replace the existing retaining wall along the driveway 2. AI request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 216 Stewart Parkway to replace the existing ductwork in the same location on the 3. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 524 West Main Street to maintenance the existing items on the property:  using like materials on the property.  property.  a. Trimming existing trees b. Re-installing the wooden shutters d. Repair existing sills using like materials  Reinstall wood siding where cement board siding was inappropriately placed e. Replace existing siding, fascia, soffit boards, and eaves using like materials 4. AI request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 117 South Harvey Street to replace the existing A/C unit in the same location on 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 507 East Main Street to replace the existing A/C unit in the same location on the 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 617 East Main Street to maintenance the existing items on the property:  the property.  property.  a. Roofing materials  b. Repair porch using like materials - Reconstruct previously removed columns  d. Replace the front that is an interior door with the original, exterior door.  7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 405 North Market street toi install a mini split system int thel back yard oft the property. 8. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 118 Charlotte Street to replace the existing porch floor boards using like materials 9. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 102 Stewart Parkway to replace the existing ductwork in the same location on the 10. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 184 West Main Street to replace the existing sign using like materials in the same  on the property.  property.  location on the property.    11. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of216 Stewart Parkway to replace the existing ductwork in the same location on the 12. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness fort the owner of 405 North Market Street to install a mini split system in the rear elevation of the 13.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 748 West Second Street to install a gas pack and mini split system in the rear 14.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 748 West Second Street to install a gas pack and mini split system in the rear 15.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of2 225V West Main Street to replace the split system int the rear elevation oft the property. 16.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 219 East Third Street (Pamlico Rose Institute) to install three (3) arbors in the  property.  property.  elevation of the property.  elevation of the property.  Healing Garden of the property.    OTHER  BUSINESS  Tree Policy Update  Update- 411 & 415 W 2nd Street    MINUTES    WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATON COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting - minutes Tuesday, October 2, 2018 7:00 pm Members Present Cheri Vaughn Colleen Knight Kathleen Couch Mark Everett William Kenner Rebecca Clark Karen Mann Members Absent All members were present Others Present Emily Rebert, Historic Planner John Rodman, Planning Director Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the meeting The Chairman called the meeting to order. Invocation Ar moment of silence was taken. III. Roll Call As silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old Business  1. Arequest has been made by Ms. Charlotte Cutler fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to place two sets of bistro tables in the primary elevation of the property located at 225 Harold Cutler came forward and was sworn in. He stated that Charlotte Cutler is his wife and hei is there representing her. He explained that they have two sets of tables on both sides oft the main entrance at The Meeting Place. He stated that he would very much like permission to keep the sets there. He stated that in total iti includes 21 tables and four chairs. William Kenner stated thati the furniture is wooden and asked Mr. Cutler if they considered using a different type off furniture, material wise. Mr. Kenner asked ift they considered using rod iron, metal, or aluminum. Kathleen Couch asked if there was a reason why the adirondack: style chairs were chosen. Mr. Cutler: stated that they purchased all the outside chairs and tables at the same time. He explained that the other sets were put ont the deck at the rear of the restaurant. He stated thay chose this  West Main Street..  1    style because it sat high enough sot that people could see the water over the deck railing/ledge. He stated that they had two tables and four chairs more than they could accommodate ont the rear deck, so they would like to put them out front. Mr. Cutler The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the Cheri Vaughn stated that she didn'ti feel the style of the proposed furniture matched the streetscape downtown very well. Mark Everett stated that he thought rod iron or aluminum would ber more in keeping with the: streetscape. Ms. Vaughn stated that most, if not all, the furniture down there nowi is rod iron or a combination. She stated that the proposed furniture stands out and does not match that style. Karen Mann pointed out that thei furniture in front ofl La Bella's Pizza and Rachel K's were more ofa bistro style. She stated that she felt the proposed furniture should be smaller in scale as well. Kathleen Couch: stated thati the furniture. does look like it belongs on a deck as opposed to a sidewalk. Rebecca Clark stated that the style did not bother her and iti is prevalent in al lot of coastal towns. She stated that they are large but they do not impede the sidewalk. William Kenner stated that the proposed furniture does not blend well with the streetscape. He stated that the park benches are cased aluminum. Rebecca Clark reminded the Commission that the City will be going through a streetscape change in the near future, the City may be changing a lot of what is there now may be different. William Kenner stated that if the City does plan to change the streetscape certain aspects of that will have to be approved by the board. Kathleen Couch stated that they must make their decision tonight based upon the current streetscape and their current guidelines. Cheri Vaughn mentioned painting the furniture. Emily Rebert reminded the Commission that they do not regulate paint colors. Karen Mann: stated that she would rather see furniture in the rod iron family that matches others int the district. Ms. Mann stated that they are only using this furniture because if was extra and they didn't! have room fori it on the back deck. William Kenner: stated that he does appreciate what the owners: are doing and these table and chairs add seating to the restaurant and business to the City, but the material William Kenner made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Charlotte Cutler to place two sets of bistro tables int the primary elevation of the property located at 225 West Main Street: This motion is based on thet following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.8 Sidewalks. His motion was seconded by Cheri Vaugh. The motion carried with a majority vote with Rebecca Clark voting in opposition. Kathleen Couch noted that it is not the tables and chairs that the Commission is against per say, iti is the style of the proposed furniture that is not congruous. Mark Everett agreed and stated that no one was against having the tables and chairs but were not in favor of the: style.  stated that they weather pretty well.  request.  and style are noti in keeping with the streetscape.  2    2. Ar request has been made by Ms. Caroline Collie for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the structure and construct a new one and al half story dwelling on the Tony Edwards came: forward and stated that the Commission asked for al licensed. surveyor to look at the house and submit a report. Mr. Edwards asked ift the Commission would be satisfied with al licensed general contractor report. William Kenner: stated that a general contractor does have to know the codes and regulations of the building that they are working on. Mr. Kenner stated that het felt that Mr. Edwards, asa general contractor, knows what hei is doing and is qualified enough to present a report ont this project. Mr. Edwards gave al brief description of his back ground and his qualifications. Mr. Edwards stated that hel knows the work and the money it will take to restore this property. He stated that he has remodeled four or five houses nowi in the downtown area and potentially a store front. He explained that hei is noti in the business oft taring down historic homes but with this property it may be the best option. He stated that if something is not done with the property, the City wille eventually teari it down, al lean willl be placed on the property, and an empty lot will sit there. He: stated. that he does not want to take possession of the property, unless hel knows that the house can be torn down as a last resort. He stated that restoring the property would be the main goal. He explained that he would also like to make a profit on the property. Rebecca Clark stated that she is concerned that the person who is giving the report is also the person who wants to buy the property. She stated that anything the Commission does will be setting a precedent. Mr. Edwards stated that the house can be repaired, but it being economically: feasible is the question. Mr. Edwards stated that Preservation NC didn't want to take the property because it would cost too much to fix. Mr. Edwards stated that it is no fault of his that the property fell into disrepair and the owners actually approached him about the property. Mr. Edwards stated that he does have an agreement with the current property owner about what can be done on the property ifi it is turned over to him. He explained that the family can not afford the liability of the property. Mr. Edwards stated that the only way he will be able to restore the house is if he cani find another invester willing to help with the cost. Cheri Vaughn asked for al ball parke estimate of the cost to restore the house. Mr. Edwards stated that this house would take at least $150,0001 to $175,0001 to restore. Mr. Edwards stated that the entire floor system, footers, and foundation has to be replaced. He explained thati if the repairs are more that 50% of the house value than the entire houses have to be brought up to 100% code. Cheri Vaughn then asked what the house would sell fori if it was repaired. Mr. Edwards stated that he got his realtor to look at the compsand with thel location someone would not get more than $150,000, ift that. Kathleen Couch stated that the staff report states that the owner has been working with staff for the last 2 years. She then asked Emily Rebert what that entailed. Ms. Rebert stated that this property is a Demolish by Neglect property, so that hasi involved reaching out to Preservation NC and looking into other ways to repair the house. Ms. Rebert stated that  property located at 325 Harvey Street.  3    the owner only recently found out that they owned the house and the owner was looking into all of her options fori the house. Kathleen Couch asked if Preservation NC had given an estimate when they determined that it would not bet financially feasible to restore the house. Ms. Rebert stated that they did not, theyj just said the project would not bet financially feasible for them to take on. Mr. Edwards then explained how the owner contacted him and how they got to where they are now. Mr. Edwards stated that if he is able to tear this house down he would like to build something in the same footprint, but with the area and the lot size he would not be able to sell a new house for more than $150,000. He explained that they could build a one-story! house with a different type ofr roof, but stay in the same footprint and keep some of the same attributes of the original home. Mr. Edwards stated that the house to the right of this property is a one-story home that he did not believe was a historic property. He stated that there is also a newer duplex across the street. Mr. Edwards stated that theyl have not put al lot of thought into the new structure, they are just focusing on the current  structure and what can be done to it. The Chairman opened the floor..  Steven Fuchs came forward and was sworn in. He stated that he was there representing three pieces of property on North Harvey Street. He explained that his sister Nancy Phelps owns 320 NI Harvey which is directly across the street.. Mr. Fuchs stated that he owns the duplex apartments at 324 and 326 N Harvey Street. Mr. Fuchs stated that over the last 15 years that neighborhood has been in ai transition. He stated at 320N N Harvey Street is a new house built in early 2000 and his duplexes are new built in 2007. He stated that the house on the corner of Harvey and 4th Street is also newi in the early 2000. Mr. Fuchs stated that along that street there are only 2 or 3 houses left that would be considered historicstructures. Mr. Fuchs stated that the property in question has been neglected for many years. He explained that things could have been done 5or 6 years ago but were not. He: stated that he has been int the house because he was looking at purchasing the house as well. He explained that hei is al licensed plumbing contractor: and has remodeled a number of houses in town. Mr. Fuchs stated that the Harvey Street house is full of bats and explained that you will never get the bat smell out oft that house unless you replace every piece of wood. Mr. Fuchs stated that he didn't think the house could be restored at the cost of $150,000, the cost would be much more. He stated that SO much would have to be replace, the original character of the house would be gone. Mr. Fuchs spoke more about the bad condition of the house and stated that if you open a wall the bat guano would probably be half way upt the wall. He stated that hei is all for saving historic structures, but he does not see any way it could be cost feasible to save this house. Mr. Fuchs stated that when Mr. Edwards stated that ity would take $150,000 to restore this house he is dead on the money. Mr. Fuchs stated thati it would probably cost more, whichi is not cost feasible for anyone. He stated that he and his sister are in favor of the old structure being torn down and a  new structure, that means the guidelines, being built there.  4    Betsy Cane, owner of 302 E2 2nd Street, came forward and was sworn in. She stated that she lives about al block away from the property in question. Ms. Cane spoke about the precedent that will bes seti if the house ist torn down and the severity of taring downa contributing structure ini the historic district. Ms. Cane spoke about the Commission's responsibility when looking at demolition request. Ms. Cane then spoke about the credibility when the applanfsrepresentative is a person who has ani interest in the property. Ms. Cane: suggested that the Commission make some findings of fact when they make the motion that can be used to distinguish this particular case from future Doris Moate came forward and was sworn in. She stated that she is very supportive of the historic district and maintaining/preservings the structures. Ms. Moate stated that she does not have anything to gain one way or the other in this case. She explained that she has gone by the property many times and thought something needed to be done to this house. She stated that it willl be SO beneficial to the neighborhood if something is done to the property. She: stated that she agreed that it was not financially feasible to save this house. She stated that this is one case where the Commission needs to seriously consider allowing the structure to be torn down and something new be put in its place. She stated that she does support the demolition oft the old structure. There being no others coming forward the Chairman closed the floor.  cases.  Mark Everett asked staff what they felt would happen if the Commission approved the request with a 365-day delay. Emily Rebert stated that once the delay was overa demolition permit would be issued. William Kenner spoke about his personal experience and the cost of restoring his own home. He explained that the difference is that hel bought the house for the location and to live in. He stated that there would be no way he would ever sell because oft the amount ofwork and money puti into it. He explained that the property in question would also take al lot of blood and sweat but unlike his own home iti is not in a desired location. Mr. Kenner: stated that he was shocked when he heard the resell figure of $150,00, he was thinking closer to $89,000 in that area. He stated that this house has been on the market and no one has wanted to put the money into fixing it and live there. Rebecca Clark stated that one of the disturbing things is the number of new houses on that street. She stated that all of those properties started out as one oft these historic homes and this is how historic neighborhoods are destroyed. She stated that this neighborhood has probably already gone through that metamorphous, but taking down another historic home will not help. Ms. Clark: spoke about the affect this willl have on the historic district as a whole. She stated that shel hates knowing that structurally this house can be saved, but allowing it to be torn down because of the cost to restore it. Cheri Vaughn stated that she got were Ms. Clark was coming from, but in this instance ift they do not do anything nowt the house is going to sit there and get worse and worse because no one is going to buy the house to restore it. Mark Everett stated that int this case iti is pretty telling that Preservation NC, who isi int the business of saving historic: structures, could not take on  5    this project. He stated that he certainly doesn't want to advocate for historicstructures being torn down, but eveni if they puta a 365 delay on the demolition the house will decay further and ultimately have tol bet torn down. William Kenner stated that int the meani time the structure is a safety hazard for the City and a destination for squatters during the winter months. Markl Everett: stated that the Demolition by Neglect tooli is something that they have and are using tol be more proactive with. He stated that hopefully this will prevent these situations from arising. Emily Rebert then explained the responsibility oft the Commission ifa delay is put on1 the demolition. Kathleen Couch pointed out the fact that the owner has been working with: staff fort two years to find a solution. Cheri Vaughn stated that if they have been working oni iti for two years, how is ayear delay going to make a difference. She stated that the house willl be in even worse shape by then. William Kenner: stated that properties that the Commission have delayed demolition on and were ultimately torn down, the property owners did not replace those homes on those lots. In this case there is a gentleman who is willing to put al home backi int the neighborhood which will add to more sustainable housing int the Kathleen Couch made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Caroline Collie to allow for the demolition of the property located at 325 North Harvey Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically: Section 6.0 Demolitiona and Relocation. Note that the COA is based on the fact that the owner has been working with the Planning staff for two years, Preservation NC has deemed the property financially unfeasible to store, and the fact that the house has been empty for 25 plus years. Her motion was seconded by Cheri Vaughn and passed with a majority vote. 3. Arequest has been made by Mr. George Finn fora a Certificate of Appropriateness' to make thei following alterations to the property located at 748 West Second Street:a) Tony Edwards stated that last month he did not have all the information needed for this request. He presented pictures and the additional information. He stated that due to the floor system they went with the 6by 6 post coming down to the ground to support the balcony. He explained thati it would be majori inside construction to try and candelabra it out. He stated to his knowledge the request meets the requirements of the Commission. Mr. Edwards stated that they decided to go with wood railing instead ofr rod iron. William Kenner asked about the depth of the balcony. Mr. Edwards stated The Chairman opened the floora and no one came forward to speak for or against the  City.  Rebecca Clark voted in opposition.  Construct a second story balcony on the rear elevation.  that it would be 4ft out and 8ft wide.  request.  6    William Kenner: stated that the balcony can be removed andi iti is at the rear of the Rebecca Clark made the following the motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. George Finn to constructa balcony on the rear, second story elevation of the property located at748 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.6 Porches and Entryways and 5.3 Additions. Her motion was seconded by  house.  Kathleen Couch and all voted in favor. Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  V.  1. Ar request has been made by Mr.. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriateness: to convert the existing gravel driveway to concrete runners at the property located at 720 Mr.. John Carbone came forward and was sworn in. He stated they purchased the property in. July of 2017. He stated that the application is actually to reconvert the gravel driveway back to concrete runners. He explained that if you dig under the gravel there is already two concrete runners that run from the sidewalk to under the overhang. He stated that overt time the driveway was neglected and weeds and gravel encroached over the runners. Mr. Carbone presented a photo of his neighbors drive way with concrete runners and stated that he would like to do the exact same on his property.  West Main Street.  The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward.  Cheri Vaughn made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission. grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr.. John Carbone to convert the current gravel driveway to concrete at the property located at 720 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.3, Driveways and Sidewalks. Rebecca Clark seconded the motion and all voted ini favor. 2. Arequest has been made by Mr.. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriatenessto construct a 4' wooden picket fence in the back yard of the property located at 527 West Mr. Carbone came forward and explained that his 89-year-old mother purchased the house at! 527 West Second Street. He stated that the problem arises when grandchildren and pets visit grandma. He explained that there is noi fenced area ini the back. He stated that his mother can not chase pets or grandchildren, hence the need  Second Street.  7    for the fenced in area. He stated that it would not extend to the property line and would not be very big. He estimated that it would be 800 sqft., but would probably not bet that large. He presented photos ofai fence int the area and one on the neighbor's that mirrored what they wanted. Mr. Carbone stated that the fence would be  property  3%to4fti in height and would be wooden.  The Chairman opened thei floor and no one came forward.  Karen! Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. John Carbone for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct: a 4-foot wooden picket fence in the back yard oft the property located at! 527 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. Her motion was seconded 3. Arequest has been made by Ms. Susan Strickland for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make thet following alterations to the property located at 705 East Main Street:a) Replace the existing windows b) Convert a front door to a window. Susan Strickland came forward and was sworn in. Ms. Strickland presented allt the information she complied about the windows she would like to replace. She: stated that they purchased the house in. June and plan on moving into the home next year. She explained that this willl be their forever home. She presented photos of the current windows showing rotted wood and broken windows. She explained that they were not interested in installing storm windows, it is not a look that they love. She stated that they would like to go back with something that they feel is the more original look to the home and make allt the windows look the same as well as something that is al little more efficient. She then presented the door request. She stated that the house isi in the energy of being converted back to a single-family residence on the inside so they would process like to mirror that on the outside by removing the second door and replacing it with a window. William Kenner asked what style window they wanted to use since there were a number of different ones on the house now. Ms. Strickland stated that she would prefer going with a window with no grids at all. Cheri Vaughn asked what the original windows were and it was determined that they were two over two. Ms. Strickland stated that there is a combination of both ini the house now and most are wooden, but some have been replaced already. She stated that the ones that have been replaced are in the back and have been replaced with vinyl windows. Kathleen Couch asked if the replacement windows would be wood. Ms. Strickland presented the windows that she would like to use and stated that they are vinyl windows. William Kennera asked if they had considered using a composite window. Ms. Strickland stated that they would be delighted to look into that option. William then asked ift they are allowed to replace the door with the window, what they would do about the siding. Ms. Strickland stated that there is some existing siding that they could use and keep it as is.  by William Kenner and all voted in favor.    The Commission spoke about the home historically being a single-family home ora duplex. William Kenner: stated that many of those homes were converted into duplexes and have been converted back to single-family homes. Rebecca Clark asked for thet total number of windows they want to replace. Ms. Strickland stated that they wished to replace 20 windows throughout the house and spoke more about he bad condition the current windows are in. Kathleen Couch: stated that many oft the components oft the windows that are broken many be repairable. Ms. Couch explained that when you put storm windows overa a wooden window youl have an energy efficient window.  The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward.  William Kenner asked ift the siding was original to the house. Emily Rebert: stated thati it was not. William Kenner stated that this house has undone many changes through the years. The Commission discussed the difference between composite and vinyl windows. Rebecca Clark stated that vinyl windows are against the guidelines. Mark Everett stated that in the past they have allowed vinyl windows on the back. He stated that the applicant did say that they were open to exploring other options like the composite material. Kathleen Couch stated that when they bought their home the windows needed some attention and they had someone come in and repair the windows and it was a lot less expensive than replacing the windows and has preserved the historic character of the house. She stated that once the wooden windows are removed and the window configuration is change it takes away from the historic integrity oft the home. William Kenneralso pointed. out that replacement windows would not have true divided light. Kathleen Couch stated that ift they get the true divided light windows they will pay even more. Kathleen Couch: stated that perhaps the home owners can explore more in-depth having the windows repaired and the storm windows fixed. Staff stated that they could give them names of contractors that repair wooden windows. Kathleen Couch made thet following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Susan Strickland to replace the windows and convert the east front doori into ay window at the property located at 705 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application isn not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors and 3.6 Porches and Entryways. We would request that the homeowner pursue evaluating restoration of the original historic wooden windows and return to the Commission with that information. Her motion was  seconded by Rebecca Clark and all voted in favor.  B. Minor Works  1. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 243 East Main Street to replace the existing window on the front façade on  the property.  9    2. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness' for the owner of134 South Market Street to replace the broken window glass of the door in the front façade and to replace the existing awning in the same location on the 3. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 803 West Second Street to replaced the existing HVAC unit in the same 4. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 509 West Second: Street to repair and replace the existing wooden picket Rebecca Clark made a motion to approve all the minor works. Karen Mann seconded  property.  location on the property.  fencè using like materials on the house oft the property.  the motion and ally voted ini favor.  VI. Other Business 1. Tree Policy  Emily Rebert gave the Commission an over view of what the Tree Committee discussed at their meeting. She stated that they are working on an informational brochure and newsletter. Emily Rebert stated that they are also revisiting the time given to replace a Mark Everett asked if there were any updates on the Carter house. Mayor Hodges stated that the appraisal had been done and they are waiting on the results. And once they receive Emily Rebert also stated that the house and the gas station on the Haven Property have  three that is removed.  the report it will be presented to the City Council.  been purchased.  VII. Approval of Minutes- September 4, 2018  William Kenner made a motion to approve the September minutes. Rebecca Clarkseconded  the motion and all voted in favor and the motion carried.  VIII. Adjourn  There being no other business Cheri Vaughn made a motion to adjourn and Kathleen Couch  seconded the motion.  10