WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting Agenda Tuesday, October 1, 20197:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Mr. Stephen Barnes for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations in the back yard of the property a. Remove the existing pergola on the rear of the house and add a screened b. Convert double windows facing Harvey Street into French doors leading to C. Remove front walkway from Main Street and add a new walkway leading d. Grade the existing driveway to add brick edging and gravel or crushed  located at 303 East Main Street:  porch. screened porch. from Harvey Street. oyster shells.  2. A request has been made by Beaufort County for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace two windows on the second floor of the front facade on the property 3. A request has been made by INA Ilc. for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations south façade on the property located at 157 West Main  located at 111 West Second Street.  Street:  a. Introduce 3 arched openings on second floor b. Construction of a deck C. Installation of a rollup door d. Introduce 1 door with a sidelight on first floor e. Replace the two existing windows  f. Introduce 3 or 4 arched windows on the west façade of the newer addition  1    4. A request has been made by the City of Washington for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the clerestory windows on the property located at 108  Gladden Street. B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #24 to construct a 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #13 to construct a 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #9 to construct a 4.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 502 East Main Street to install gutters, a storm door, repair the sidewalk using like materials, and elevate the existing HVAC units in 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 110 North Academy Street to replace rotten siding 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 245 East Second Street to replace eroded gravel in  new: single-family dwelling on the property.  new: single-family dwelling on the property.  new single-family dwelling on the property.  the same location on the property.  using like materials on the property.  the driveway on the property.  VI. Other Business  1. Update Rules and Procedure to comply with General Statutes 2. Discussion: Subcommittee for New Construction and Additions  VII. Approval of Minutes - September 3, 2019  VIII. Adjourn  2    OLD  BUSINESS    None    MAJOR  WORKS    303 East Main  Street  Add a Screened Porch  Convert Double Windows into  French Doors  Remove Front Walkway and Add  a New Walkway  Alteration ofDriveway    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Use Black! Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of$50 toc cashiers int thet front lobby of City Hall under' Developmental Finding Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street. Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  303 E.Manst.  Owner's Name: Gteph-en D. Bames Sarah J. Bemart  Lot Size:  67 (width)  feet by  128 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to! be Done:  A Remove estgpergela onreay of louse Salda Scheenporch 2.K Remove dowole windows facing Harvey St. aud add hke siyle 3, Rewmove front walkucy due toroot upheavel Fadd one-to Hanveuy 4. Grude cwent dnye avca, re Iine eyishy bickjada grve) oV cnushed Gyster shells fy dréway lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Fench doors t2 Screen Porch  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Cavpl Nash (Name of Applicant - type or print) (Mailing Address) 9/2/9 (bate)  (Initials)  ACTION  (Zip Code)  252)944-3756 (Daytime Phone Number)  Caiplep - B. hwn  (Authorized Signature) (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until,  Issuance of al Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. Your must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort Printed September 25, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  CADS  1:27 Feet    OBJECTID 6954 OWNER NAME BARNES: STEPHEND D MAILING, ADDRESS2 303 EMAIN: STREET ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 119129 TAXABLE VA 170049 PROPERTY. ADDRESS 303 El MAIN ST DATE 4/5/2019 SALE PRICE 220000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 43533  GPIN 5675-97-5274 OWNER NAME2 BERNART SARAHJ CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT 303 EAST MAINS STREET TOT VAL 170049 PREV ASSESS 184795 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1986/00170 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1850 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1975  GPINLong 5675-97-5274 MAILING ADDRESS 303 EN MAIN: STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 50920 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.19 MBL 56751215 STAMPS 440.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2336 NBR BED 3 PIN 01014272  Beaufort County onliner map access is provided asa ap publics service, asi is, asa available and without warranties, expressed or implied. Content published ont this website is fori informational purposes only and is noti intended to constitute a legalr record nor should it bes substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. The County ofE Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legall liabilityf fort the content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort Countyl  andits Assigns shall be held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft they use of County data.    113 SI Harvey St- Google Maps  htps/wwwgoglecom'mepie7l#EiMains-Washingon.  Google Maps 113 S Harvey St    Google  Image capture: Apr2 2019 02019 Google  Washington, North Carolina Google Street View- Apr 2019  1of1  8/9/2019, 1:33PM    Poo PITErt S MATERIALS T MATEI EXISTING- usE  h  NEw KRILK. FOWNDTP To WATGAL EXISTNE  HousE  SBMcAED WTIITY, WETER  STLET VEW 303 E MANST:  HARVEN    6    303 E. MAINS ST BARNES  TTTTEL  REMOVE FLONT WSALK  EETIEENGEESE  NEw CONRETE WIRLK  5T SIDEWALK  EXKTING FneVFy                Adjoining Property Owners 303 East Main Street  OWNER NAME AIDEUIS, DIANNAL TYNDALL, ARTHURT  MAILING ADDRESS  CITY  STATE ZIP  122 SOUTHI HARVEY STREET WASHINGTON NC 110 SOUTH HARVEY STREET WASHINGTON NC  27889 27889 27889 28513 27889 27889 27889 27889 27834 27889 27889  MASON, CHARLOTTE NICHOLL:119: SI HARVEY STREET MOSELEY, JOHN ELMURE JR 348 THIRD STREET ROLINSKY-RADER, VICTORIA 1131 HARVEY STREET  WASHINGTON NC AYDEN WASHINGTON NC WASHINGTON NC WASHINGTON NC WASHINGTON NC GREENVILLE NC WASHINGTON NC WASHINGTON NC  NC  RADER, STEVENP BARNES, STEPHEND FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH WOOTEN.JOSEPHA GREEN, BETTY. JANE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH  113S HARVEY STREET 303 E MAIN STREET 113 NHARVEY STREET 221 LAKE ROAD 307 EASTI MAIN: STREET 113 NI HARVEY STREET    Docntoion Decelopmenb Gistoric Presevation  C  6  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  September 20, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 303 East Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  Ar request has been made by Mr. Stephen Barnes for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations in the back yard of the property located at 303 East Main a. Remove the existing pergola on the rear of the house and add a screened porch. b. Convert double windows facing Harvey Street into French doors leading to screened porch. C. Remove front walkway from Main Street and add a new walkway leading from Harvey Street. d. Grade the existing driveway to add brick edging and gravel or crushed oyster shells. Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Street:  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2019  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  a Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  303 East Main Street  The application for the property located at 303 East Main Street is requesting approval to make the  following alterations to the property:  a. Remove the existing pergola on the rear oft the house and add a screened porch. b. Convert double windows facing Harvey: Street into French doors leading to screened porch. Remove front walkway from Main Street and add a new walkway leading from Harvey: Street. d. Grade the existing driveway to add brick edging and gravel or crushed oyster shells. (A) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.6 Porches and  Entryways and! 5.3 Additions:  3.6.1 Entryways and porches are important character-defining elements ofal historic: structure and should be retained and preserved. Important elements include steps, columns, balustrades. 3.6.5 Iti isp prohibited to enclose porches on primary elevations. Porches on rear elevations not seen from the public right-of-way may be: screened or enclosed only if the work is designed sO that it can be installed or removed without damage to the historic structure. 5.3.1 Additions should be located to the rear or non-character defining elevation. With historic residential structures, additions should be placed ina a manner that they are not clearly seen from the public right-of-way. Landscaping can often be used to minimize the visual impact that 5.3.2 New additions: should not remove, damage, or obscure character-defining architectural 5.3.3 Additions should be compatible in materials, design, roof form, and proportion toi the main structure. However, new additions should be constructed at a scale smaller than the historic 5.3.4 Additions, like new construction, are representative of the time in which they are built. Therefore, contemporary designs are permitted, but should always be compatible with the 5.3.5 An addition should never mimic or recreate the architecture oft the primary historic 5.3.6 Additions to historic structures should be clearly identifiable as such. Additions should be set back and constructed at a smaller scale than the original building. Architectural details should complement the main structure but should be clearly differentiated. 5.3.9 Significant trees or other landscape should not be removed or damaged when constructing  doors, railings, brackets, roofs, cornices and entablatures.  additions may have to the historic structure.  feature.  structure sO as not to overpower the existing historic building.  existing historic: structure. structure.  ana addition.  (B) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows and  Doors:    3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. All elements associated with historic windows and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, 3.4.2 Windows and doors should be repaired when necessary by splicing or patching only the 3.4.3 If replacement ofa a window or door unit is necessary, the new unit should be replaced to match the original ins size, scale, material, detail, pane and/or panel configurations. 3.4.11 Introduction of new window and door openings into the principal elevations ofa structure is not recommended. If permitted, new openings should be proportionally the same as existing openings and should have matching sash, glass, sills, frames, casings, and muntin  glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware. deteriorated section to match the original.  patterns.  (C&D) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.3 Parking,  Driveways, and Sidewalks: Parking Guidelines  4.3.1 Parking lots, driveways and sidewalks shall comply with City Code requirements for size and landscaping elements as well as: site grading. Refer to Miele XVI/Parking of the Zoning 4.3.3 Parking in residential: areas should be to the rear of the structure whenever possible. 4.3.5 Parking shall be screened from the ight-oFwaywnenever possible. Vegetative buffer strips, fencing, low-masonry walls, etc., shall be utilized to minimize the visual impact of parking 4.3.7 Residential parking areas shall be surfaced with appropriate materials such as brick, concrete, asphalt crushed. stone, crushed and compacted oyster shells, or gravel (with edging  Ordinance  Parking in front yards is not permitted.  and vehicles. materials). Driveway Guidelines  4.3.10 Driveways on residential properties within the Historic District shall be composed of either concrete, brick, asphalt, crushed stone, or compacted and crushed oyster shells. Loose 4.3.11 When loose material is used for driveways or parking, the perimeter of such shall be 4.3.13 Double width drives that are visible from the public right-of-way are not permitted. 4.3.14 Curb-cuts must be located in accordance with City Code and shall be kept to the smallest 4.3.15 New driveways should be designed to minimize any impact to the landscape, building,  material is prohibited in commercial areas. clearly defined by an edging material. openings that are functional. and historiccurbing. Walkway Guidelines  4.3.16 Historic walkways and sidewalk materials shall be retained and preserved whenever possible. New: sidewalks ini the historic district shall be composed ofe either concrete, brick, stone 4.3.18 Walkways and steps shall be compatible to the architectural style and character oft the  oro other masonry material such as pavers or scored concrete.  structure located on the property.    4.3.19 Front walks in residential areas shall lead directly from the public sidewalk to the front 4.3.20 Walks shall be flush with the grade of thei front yard and with the public sidewalk. (a) The proposed screened in porch is using appropriate materials and is one the back of the house. Though the elevation faces Harvey Street and is considered a primary elevation, iti is on the back of the house and screened. Based on finding ofi fact request "A" is congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. (b) The proposed doorway conversions are on a back of the house. It is clearly identifiable as a later addition to the house. Based on finding of fact, the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. (c) and (d) Request C and D is partially congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. While the request for installing a sidewalk on the West elevation is congruous, removing the existing is not. The driveway is of appropriate materials and edging. Based on finding of fact, this request is congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines with the exception of  door of the structure.  the removal of the front walkway.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 303 East Main Street- screened porch construction, window configuration, walkway alteration, A request has been made by Mr. Stephen Barnes for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the  driveway restructuring.  following changes to the property located at 303 East Main Street:  a. Remove the existing pergola on the rear of the house and add a screened porch. b. Convert double windows facing Harvey Street into French doors leading to screened porch. C. Remove front walkway from Main Street and add a new walkwayl leading from Harvey! Street. d. Grade the existing driveway to add brick edging and gravel or crushed oyster shells. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings oft fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Stephen Barnes to make the above changes on the property located at 303 East Main Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, 4.3 Parking, Driveways, and! Sidewalks, and 5.3 Additions. Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Stephen Barnes to make the above changes on the property located at 303 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, 4.3 Parking, Driveways, and Sidewalks, and! 5.3 Additions. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the  Or  approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Stephen Barnes to make the above changes on the property located at 303 East Main Street. This motion is based on thet following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the    Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.41 Windows and Doors, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, 4.3 Parking, Driveways, and Sidewalks, and! 5.3 Additions.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9ld); which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    111 West Second  Street  Window Replacement    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission Street Address of Property: IW.2nd S+ Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Courthouse Anney  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers int thet front lobby of City! Hall underDevelopmenta. Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Beaufort County  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Replace & windows on upper floor of  front facade, Windows were previously rephced in 1980's. wih snap-in Muntins. Pposed replcemant Windouss will be Vinyl-clad wi#pemanert eikrior myrtlns.same style as  previously approved for West elevation.  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed untili the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Christina Smith (Name of Applicant - type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  LW.znd S+.-Washrglm.NC 27889  (Mailing Address) 0a/15/3014 (Daté)  (Zip Code)  353-337-962/ (Daytime Phone Number)  Claimich (Signature of Applicant)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of al Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort Printed September 18, 2019 See Below for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  Cpon  1:26 Feet    OBJECTID 6689 OWNER NAME BEAUFORT COUNTY MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 675003 TAXABLE VA 0 PROPERTY ADDRESS 111 W: 2NDST DATE 12/1/2015 SALE PRICE 0.00 NBHD DESC ZONE1A AVERAGE COMMERCIAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC86 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 03261  GPIN 5675-88-5268 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC PTLT15 BONNERS OLD PART TOT VAL 729461 PREV ASSESS 710128 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 0208/00275 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YRBUILT 1936 SUB DESC OTHER COUNTY EFF YR 1970  GPINLong 5675-88-5268 MAILING ADDRESS 112 WEST SECOND: STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 54458 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.17 MBL 567508327 STAMPS NBHD CDE AC1 EXEMPT AMT 729461.00 SQFT NBR BED PIN 15025456  Beaufort County online map: access is provided as a public service, asi is, asa available andy without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website is fori informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute al legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County of Beauforta andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility: andl legall liabilityf for the content published ont this website. The user agreest thatE Beaufort County  andi its Assigns shali be! held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use ofCounty data.    FM  v ua/s        W-2500 WOOD CLAD-WOOD WINDOW DOUBLE-HUNG  JELDWEN VIRDOWSEDOOKS  JW  LITE CUT INFORMATION  Lite Cut Options  W-2500 Clad-Wood Double-Hung windows araavallabla.wih ramovable Grilles, Grilles Between Glasc-(GBe or Simulated Divided Lites (SDL) in various widths and styles. The standard grid patterns are shown below. Special lite cut patterns can include a wide variety ofs straight line and radius patterns. Non-standard patterns are  subject to factory approval. Proposed  V*hsil be 8over 81 pane  Colonial Bar Alignment  Colonial from Top Down  Uneven  Prairie  Alignment of divided lite muntin bars from one window to the nexti is often required by fine architectural design.  Wood grilles, GBG, and SDL's may be specified with muntin bars aligned.  Architectural Design Manual September 2018  Product specifications may change without notice. Questions? Consult JELD-WEN customer service.  Scale: NTS 4    W-2500 WOOD CLAD-WOOD WINDOW DOUBLE-HUNG  VINDOWSEDOORS  JW JELDWEN  GRID OPTIONS  Exterior  Interior  SDL Option 3/16"  3/8" np 7/8"   7/8" Bead GBG Options 3/16" 5/8" 5/8" Flat  Proposed  7/32" 23/32" 23/32" Contoured  Grille Options  18" 7/8" 7/8" Wood Grille  7/8" 7/8" Full Surround  Architectural Design Manual September 2018  Product specifications may change without notice.. Questions? Consult. JELD-WEN customer: service.  Scale: 3"=1-0"  5    Adjoining Property Owners 111 W: Second Street MAILINGADDRESS 102 E2ND: STREET 126 WEST MAIN STREET PO BOX 901 POBOX1 1988 3MARY'S WAY 322 POST ROAD  OWNER NAME WATERFRONT LOGELFO JOHN JEFFERSON WILLIAME WASHINGTON CITY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY TBC WASHINGTON PROPERTIES LLC MIDGETTE RACHELJ BEAUFORT COUNTY BEAUFORT COUNTY BEAUFORT COUNTY BEAUFORT COUNTY MAYO WILLIAMP RICHARDSON HOODL  CITY  STATE ZIP  DOWNTOWN WASHINGTON ON THE  WASHINGTON NC 27889 WASHINGTON WA 27889 WASHINGTON WASHINGTON JACKSON BATH  NC 27889 NC 27889 NC 27889 NJ 08527 NC 27808 NC 27889 NC 27889  112 WEST SECOND STREET WASHINGTON  112 WEST SECOND STREET WASHINGTON 112 WEST: SECOND STREET WASHINGTON  112 WEST 2ND: STREET PO BOX6 635 208 NI MARKET STREET  WASHINGTON NC 27889  112 WEST: SECOND STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889  WASHINGTON WASHINGTON  NC 27889 NC 27889    Dorontoion Decelopmenb Bistoric Presevoation  C  Citys  Washincton NORTH CAR'OLINA  September 20, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 111 West Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent toi the above subject property.  A request has been made by Beaufort County for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace two windows on the second floor of the front facade on the property located at  111 West Second Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2019  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 24  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  111 West Second Street  The application for the property located at 111 West Second Street is requesting approval to replace Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows and  two windows on the second floor on the front facade of the property.  Doors:  3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. All elements associated with historic windows and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, 3.4.2 Windows and doors should be repaired when necessary by splicing or patching only the 3.4.3 If replacement ofa a window or door unit is necessary, the new unit should be replaced to match the original ins size, scale, material, detail, pane and/or panelconfigurations. 3.4.4 Replacement ofa a multi-light window with a single-pane sash or replacing multi-sash 3.4.7 Historic windows and doors should be properly maintained and protected by: ON Maintaining caulking and weather stripping to ensure the unit is weather tight and to o Properly cleaning wood windows and doors and maintaining a sound paint film 3.4.8 Metal storm windows with painted or baked enamel finishes are acceptable. They should bei installed properly and should not allow moisture to accumulate. They should not bei installed inar manner which would obscure or damage the existing window and frame. 3.4.9 Storm doors shall bei full view glass doors and constructed of wood. Ifi metal doors must be used, they should be full view and have al baked enamel finish to match the structure's trim 3.4.12 Sash, window panes, muntins, and rails shall not be replaced with those that are incompatible in size, configuration, and reflective qualities or alter the relationship between  glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware. deteriorated. section to match the original.  windows with only one: sashi is prohibited. improve thermal efficiency  color.  window and wall.  3.4.17 Prefabricated snap-in muntins are prohibited.  The request to replace the two windows match the originals in size, scale, detail, pane and/or panel configurations, but does not match material. The material for the window should be wood. Based on finding of fact the request is not congruous with the Historic  Preservation Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 111 West Second Street- Window replacement  A request has been made by the Beaufort County for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace two windows on the second floor on thet front facade of the property located at 111 Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors. Tog grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  West Second Street.  appropriate may be attached toi the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Beaufort County to replace two windows on the second floor on1 the front facade of the property located at 111 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Beaufort County to replace two windows on the second floor on thet front facade of the property located at 111 West Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.41 Windows and Doors. I further move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Beaufort County to replace two windows on the second floor on the front facade of the property located at 111 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design  Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors.  Or    Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    157 West Main  Street  Change/Add Window and Door  Configurations Construct a Deck    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Blackl Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 tocashiers in thet front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmenta. Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: J57W. MAIN TEENNaNyE.N  Historic Properly/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  INA,LLC  50 (width)  feet by  239.5 (depth)  feet.  Brief Descrintion of Work to! be Done: The alteration would include:  We hereby_propose to remodel/alter the side and back facade ofthe building facing thel Pamlico River. Installation ofap proper deck Structure. Architectural and engineering design will bes sent for approval/permit Installation of single door with side light to provide ingress and aggress through the back ofthe building. -Int the meantime. all the window openings willl be covered by painted plywood waiting proper windows. Thej provided picture shows the roof top back parapet lowered to the side parapet elevations. (Please note that this is what we like the final look to bei in future. In the meantime, thel back parapet is untouched.) Our hopei is to present our plans to the committee inj near future for changing the back buildingroofing from the Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Anincomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  -Construction oft three arched openings (approx. 8'Wx1 11'H). Installation ofar rollup door with the proper access to the lower level. Replacing the existing lower level windows with the proper ones.  Installing 3to 4 windows at the side oft the building per attached picture,  metal A-frame to the original flat roofing structure.  0  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Sed Naziri (Name OfA Applicant-type or print) (Malling Address) 8/15./2019 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  5161 Siy Forks,Ralid, NC 27609  (ZipCode)  79-274-4400 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)) Tsgnaypippitant  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff willl be fowarded  Minor' Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid untit,  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission. at which the appliçation is to be considered. Your mustg give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing onyour behalf.    Beaufort Printed September 25, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNECTGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels  PORDAT  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  W  1:39Feet    OBJECTID 6580 OWNER NAME INA LLC MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27609 TOT VAL 420337 PREV ASSESS 422572 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1949/00542 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1920 SUB DESC COMMERCIAL EFF YR 1980  GPIN 5675-87-0984 OWNER NAME2 CITY RALEIGH PROP DESC 1LOT COR UNION ANDI MAIN ST(RIVERTOWN MALL DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.26 MBL 567508284 STAMPS 700.00 NBHD CDE AC1 EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBR BED PIN 01013463  GPIN Long 5675-87-0984 MAILING ADDRESS 5161 SIX FORKS ROAD STATE NC LAND VAL 229320 BLDG VAL 191017 TAXABLE VA 420337 PROPERTY ADDRESS 157' W MAIN ST DATE 1/8/2018 SALE PRICE 350000.00 NBHD DESC ZONE: 1A AVERAGE COMMERCIAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC10 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 43634  Beaufort County online map: access is provided as ap publics service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed or implied. Content published on this website is fori informational; purposes onlya andi is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility: andl legall liabilityf fort thec content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort Countyl  and its Assigns shall be! heldh harmlessf from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    Beuple Pollyp DoGr  Sauple d Wiudorus    Adjoining Property Owners: 157 West Main Street  INALLC 5161 SIX FORKS ROAD RALEIGH NC 27609 BLACKSTONE. J WHIT 222 W STEWART: PKY STE204 WASHINGTON NC: 27889 LITCHFIELD WILLIAMF 2007. NI MARKET ST WASHINGTON NC 27889 GRAY MARK VL 108 N ELM STREET GREENSBORONC27401 WALL. JAYNE D 111 SREED DR WASHINGTON NC 27889 163 WEST MAIN STREET: LLC 45 MILLERSLN NEW: HYDE PARK NY 11040 WOOLARD BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PO: BOX36 WASHINGTON NC27889 LTHOMAS! PROPERTIESLLC 201 WESLEY ROAD GREENVILLE NC 27858 EVANS. JERRYO 162 W: MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 MOORE PROPERTY GROUP LLC 2305 W. ALABAMA ST HOUSTON TX 77098 ALM INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC 610 COURTLAND ST GREENSBORO NC27401  BEAUFORT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL 108 GLADDEN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 GOLDEN ROCK INVESTMENTS LLC 45 MILLER LANE NEW HYDE PARK NY 11040    Dotontoion Decelopmenb Glistoric Preseroation  C  6  Cityy  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  September 20, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness = 157 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by INA Ilc. for a Certificate ofA Appropriateness to make the following alterations south façade on the property located at 157 West Main Street:  a. b. C. d. e. f.  Introduce 3 arched openings on second floor Construction of a deck Installation of a rollup door Introduce 1 door with a sidelight on first floor Replace the two existing windows  Introduce 3 or 4 arched windows on the west façade of the newer addition  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2019  Place: City Hall- - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 98  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 reber@wasnngomego"    Staff Report  157 West Main Street  The application for the property located at 157 West Main Street is requesting approval to make the  following alterations on the property:  a. Introduce 3 arched openings on second floor on the south elevation  0. Construction ofa a deck on the south elevation Installation ofar rollup door d. introduce 1 door with a sidelight on first floor e. Replace the two existing windows  f. Introduce 30 or4 arched windows on the westi façade of the newer addition  (A,C,D,E, and F) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4  Windows and Doors, 3.9 Rear Elevations, and 3.10 Architectural Details:  3.4.11 Introduction of new window and door openings into the principal elevations ofa structure is not recommended. If permitted, new openings should be proportionally the same as existing openings and: should have matching sash, glass, sills, frames, casings, and muntin 3.9.1 Retain and preserve historic: side and rear elevations and their architectural features. 3.9.2 Historic structures which are adjacent to rear parking areas or public rights-of-way are encouraged to utilize rear entrances allowing public and private access. Ift the rear entrance is public, awnings and other exterior features should be more subdued than those of the primary 3.9.3 Whenever a rear elevation faces a public right of way or parking facilities, particularly on the waterfront, unnecessary utility lines and equipment shall be removed, whenever possible. 3.9.4 New utility and mechanical equipment shall be placed in inconspicuous locations such as 3.10.1 Original architectural components and details shall be retained whenever possible. 3.10.2 When architectural components and details must be replaced, the new components or details shall match the historic elements as closely as possible in style, proportion, and material. 3.10.3 Architectural components and details that are not appropriate to the historic character of the structure shall not be added. Newi features should not be added unless there is physical or 3.10.4 Historic architectural components shall not be replaced with materials, such as plywood, vinyl, and aluminum that would not have been used in the original construction. B) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 5.4 Decks:  patterns.  elevation.  the roof or screened from public view.  other evidence that they historically existed.  5.4.1 A deck shall be designed and constructed sO that the historic structure and its character- defining features and details are not damaged or obscured. Install decks so they can be removed  int the future without damage to the structure.    5.4.2 Decks shall not, when feasible, be visible from the public right-of-way. New decks should be constructed in inconspicuous locations, usually on the building's rear elevation. 5.4.3 Design and detail decks and associated railings and steps to reflect materials, scale, and 5.4.4 New decks should be painted or stained in a colort that is compatible with the historic  proportions oft the building. structure and district.  Based on finding of fact the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation  Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 157 West Main Street- introducing fenestrations, deck construction, window replacement. Ar request has been made by INAI Ilc. for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following changes  tot the property located at 157 West Main Street:  a. Introduce 3 arched openings on second floor on the south elevation b. Construction of a deck on the south elevation G. Installation of a rollup door on the south elevation d. Introduce 1 door with a sidelight on first floor Replace the two existing windows  f. Introduce 3 or 4 arched windows on the west façade of the newer addition To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions:  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA lic. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application' is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.9  Rear Elevations, 3.10 Architectural Details, and! 5.4 Decks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA lic. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motioni is based on thei following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.9 Rear Elevations, 3.10 Architectural Details, and! 5.4 Decks. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to INA lic. to make the above changes on the property located at 157 West Main Street. This motioni is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.9  Rear Elevations, 3.10 Architectural Details, and 5.4 Decks.    Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso movei the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    69 96 69  *Alteration oF tlparappt mot included w thisiequest  nenchDoocb  EE  EEEE  Ek  AA    ZEAARAAAA  INA, LLC  3 120 RollupDoor or SugPorGatp)  108    108 Gladden  Street  Clerestory Window Replacement    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  HistoricF Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission Street Address of Property: 108 Gladden Street Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Civic Center  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Ownér's Name: Lot Size:  CityofWashington  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work tol be Done:  The GivyofWashinytonvoall like to replace the top clerestory windows oft the Civic Center with aluminum  sash windows.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must bé submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  City of Washington (Name of Applicant - type or print) POI Box 1988 (Malling Address) 09/15/19 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  27889 (Zip Code).  252-975-9636 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will bei fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of al Minor  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort Printed September 25, 2019 See Below for Disclaimer  WEB HOSTING  CONNEÇIGIS  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:72Feet    OBJECTID 6468 OWNER NAME CITY OF WASHINGTON MAILING ADDRESS2  GPIN 5675-78-6742 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC TOT VAL 2120887 PREV ASSESS 2244304 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 0746/00701 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1906 SUB DESC OTHER MUNICIPAL EFF YR 1975  GPIN Long 5675-78-6742 MAILING ADDRESS POE BOX1 1988 STATE NC LAND VAL DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 1.24 MBL 567508452 STAMPS NBHD CDE AC1 EXEMPTAMI 2120887.00 SQFT NBRBED PIN 15000439  ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 1687207 TAXABLE VA 0 PROPERTY ADDRESS 108 GLADDENST DATE 1/1/1900 SALE PRICE 0.00 NBHD DESC ZONE: 1 AVERAGE COMMERCIAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC89 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 20458  2LOTS 34. AND 35 W/S GLADDENST 433680  Beaufort County online map: access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website is fori informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County of Beaufort and the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legall liabilityf fort the contentp published ont this website. The user agreest thatE Beaufort County  andi its Assigns shall bel held! harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft thes use of County data.    ET  E4 LL        Double Hung, LLC  llisoricw Vindow Rsorton  Historic Window Restoration  2801 Patterson Ave Greensboro, NG 27407 Phone: 888.235.8956  Fax: 866.681.1080  07/01/2019 To: City of Washington  Re: Civic Center- Clerestory' Windows  We have disassembled andi inspected several oft the Clerestory opening ini the Washington Civic center top provide a detailed description of current conditions and to formulate our recommendations and a  plan of action. Our findings and recommendations follow.  Current Conditions:  Many oft the openings are experiencing water infiltration which is working to deteriorate the windows and leaki into the building'si interior. Additionally, the seals of Insulated Glass units are failing causing the void between the two glass panes to collect moisture. This condensation results in' "foggy" glass. Its should be noted here that the life-expectancy ofi insulated glass (IG) is between 12 and 20 years, sO this "foggy" condition is to be expected at the end of the service life of ALLI IG units. This life expectancy has noti improved since the Civic Center was fitted with these units - perhaps 15 years ago. Iti is just the nature of the 'beast'. While there can sometimes be some small amount of energy savings realized with utilizing insulating glass in older buildings, generally the cost of the continuous (every 15 years, ors so) replacement of these expensive glazing units will negate = or invert = any annual savings in! heating or cooling cost. For this reason. wei are no fans ofl IG units - especially in historic structures. We also noted that whoever installed the current "windows" did the City of Washington no favors. The  IG units are too small to fit the openings and they were placed at the wrong position on the aluminum flashing (theys should have been set in front of the flashing, not behind it). This was mitigated by the installation of wood "stop molding" at both the interior and exterior, but the gaps created by the glass being ill- fitting remained. This was 'corrected" with a whole lot of  "DON'T REPLACE... REPAIR" ESTIMATING@DOUBLEHUNG.COM    CAROLINA WINDOWS & DOORS, INC. Providing Quaily Servioe andProducts Sincel 1984  3203 SMemorial Dr, Greenville, NC27834 (252) 7562385-000,5457172  Fax- (252)756-1761  Washington Civic Center 110 Gladden St. Washington, NC27889  Description  1. Manufacture and install 165 Caribbean replacement windows fitted to the existing  openings  2. Replace any needed deteriorated wood 3. Trim exterior with PVC trim coil 4. Color of all materials to be white 5. Clean up and haul off all job debris  Carolina Windows and Doors to furnish all material, labor, and insurance needed in  order to complete job  Windows Trim Labor Tax Total  D 54,285.00 10,725.00 17,325.00 5763.00 88,098.00  ww.ewdme.com    CAROLINA WINDOWS & DOORS, INC. Providing Qualily Servioe and1 Products Since 1984 3203SMemorialDr, Greenville,! NC27834 (252)756-2585 -(800)545-7172 Fax-252,756-1761  The Caribbean Window  PolyPour Aluminum Thermal Break' Windows Not all' "aluminum windows" are the samel Our commercial-grade. aluminum windows feature a thermal break thats separates thei inside metal from the outside metal with very high-density catalyzed polyurethane. Generically, this engineered design is called' "pour and de-bridge" inr reference to the extrusion process. Wej just calli it PolyPour. These windows set our aluminum lines apart from conventional, old- fashioned typical aluminum windows that have no thermal breaks. Among those that do, be careful to make sure you notice the differences. For example, ours feature wide thermal breaks int thej jambs, heads, sills, and all sashes of our windows; and the breaks align for maximum thermal performance and design pressure rating of 50. Lesser windows have thinner breaks, may nota align, and may even have noi thermal break int their sashes or sills. PolyPour windows fight condensation andl have significantly better insulating values than any cheap' "builder grade" MATERIALS: Frame and sash main members are made of T6063-T6 anodized aluminum alloy extrusions with a poured in channel urethane thermal barrier, debridged to prevent temperature transfer through the extrusion. Typical extrusion wall thickness is. 062 inches.  aluminum window.  ENERGYSTAR  VY.ewdme.com    CONSTRUCTION: Frame comer seams are: sealed with al low modulus, non acetic silicone sealant. Frame depth is 3 1/4" with sill sloped to the outside for positive water drainage. Frames are available in new construction as well as replacement configurations. Sash components are joined at the corner using double screw coped corner construction and are fastened with 410 GLAZING: Sashes are channel glazed using at flexible vinyl glazing gasket along the perimeter of as sealed insulating glass unit. Standard INSULATING GLASS UNITS have an overall thickness of 7/8" and consist oft twol lites of double strength glass and one air space. The air space is created by a Mylar Composit (Edge Tech Super Spacer).The edge seal consists ofau uniform layer of hot melt butyl sealant. Insulating glass meets ASTMI E773, ASTM E774, & ASTM E546. Insulated Glass Units consist argon filled in combinations with High Performance soft coatl low-e. FINISHES: All aluminum extrusions in master frame, sash, and screen are finish painted with an electrostatically applied enamel in a choice of three colors: White, Bronze, and Tan.  hardness stainless steel screws seti in extruded screw bosses.  "The dry ice experiment above demonstrates the effectiveness oft the thermal break in preventing  cold from transferring to the inside oft the window."  YYY.EYdne.com    latex caulk- -V which has now deteriorated causing further water infiltration.  The combination of the glass being installed inside the line of the aluminum flashing, ill-fitting glass, and  deteriorated caulk is allowing the water infiltration. This condition Lastly, know that historicstructures, such as the Civic Center, did NOT originally have just a piece of glass ini those openings. From our experience and research, each of those clerestory windows was originally fitted with a proper wood: sash with 1/8" clear glass, and Another consequence oft the current glass installation is wood deterioration at the sills. Although not yet severe, this deterioration must be reversed before bigger problems arise. These will be repaired within our proposal. With the current installation, the IG units were installed directly to the rough openings, sometimes with "fill" lumber and then caulked in place. Exacerbating the problem is that a piece of stop molding was installed at the bottom exterior of  will only worsen with time.  putty glazed.  each opening. This caused water to be trapped behind the stop molding andi further infiltrating the  building.  Recommendations:  We have learned over our many years of restoring historic windows it that it always best to put things back the way they were... ifata all possible. That is what are proposing for the Civic Center.  Wood Sash/Jamb and Frame Repairs  With the current installation, the IG units were installed directly to the rough openings, sometimes with "fill" lumber and then caulked in place. Exacerbating the problem is that a piece of stop molding was installed at thel bottom exterior ofe each opening. This caused water to bet trapped behind the stop We propose to custom build new, wood sash for each oft the 155 openings and install them in new, reconstructed: K" jambs as they originally appeared. (See Proposed Drawings, attached, for how they will appear in the openings). The sash willl be secured with new interior and exterior wood stop moldings - each 'back primed" and custom fit tot their respective openings to eliminate water infiltration. With this installation, the current aluminum flashing will sit under the sash so that the system will shed water as originally designed. Additionally, whent the sash are replicated and installed, the Civic Center  molding and further infiltrating the building.  will recover its original, historic appearance.  Additional items included in the proposal -( (155 total units) Allworko completed in a single mobilization. Remove and dispose of all demolished materials. Repair all deteriorated sills with epoxy consolidation techniques.    Repair or replace all deteriorated exterior mullion covers. Stain/finish all interior surfaces to match existing. Prime coating of alle exterior surfaces Five year limited warranty Travel costs for crew of 41 from Greensboro  AlII lifts and other equipment/materlalis to complete Scope of Work  Items excluded from the proposal  Finish coating of exteriors surfaces (shop sash finish coating - add $50 per sash)  Nor retainage willl be withheld. Duration of project and payment terms  Traffic control, permits and other associated costs Completion: Six weeks from notice to proceed. 50% upon contract sign, 50% upon completion  Contract Sum:  Total of Proposal: $105,259.00 (One Hundred Five Thousand, Five Hundred Fifty Nine Dollars and  00/00). Broken down as follows. Sash and Installations: Boom lifts: Travel (crew/4):  $89.226.00 (incl sales tax) $7,440.00 $8,593.00    in    in    9 S a  6  -    Adjoining Property Owners: 108 Gladden Street H-D HOLDINGS OF WASHINGTON LLC 4181 E WATER STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 JENNINGS NEILL. ARCHIBALD II 328 Wi MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 CITY OF WASHINGTON 102E2NDST WASHINGTON NC27889 HESTER JOSEPH M 316 W. MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 RIVERTOWNE PROPERTIES LLC 328 W MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 BAGWELL REALTY BEAUFORTLLC POBOX 1901 GREENVILLE NC27835 CANTRELL RODNEYL 258 W MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 WILSON GARYI D 48) EI RIVER. ACRES RD WASHINGTON NC27889 MANNING NORMAN A POI BOX2611 WASHINGTON NC27889 BOYDJOHN' TRUSTEE POI BOX 691 WASHINGTON NC27889 FIRST PRESB CHURCH OF WASH 211 WEST: 2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 304 WEST2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 UNITED STATES POSTALSERVICE  222 WEST 2ND: STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889 PROPERTIES DOWN EAST INC 414. LODGE ROAD WASHINGTON NC27889 SAUNDERS ROBERT 296 TEACHES COVE BATH NC27808    Docntoin Decelopmenb Glistoric Preseroation  C  6  Cityy  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  September 20, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness = 108 Gladden Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by the City of Washington for a Certificate of Appropriate- ness to replace the clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2019  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 94  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  108 Gladden Street  The application for the property located at 108 Gladden Street is requesting approval to replace the  original wooden clerestory windows with aluminum windows.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.4 Windows and  Doors:  3.4.1 Retain and preserve historic windows and doors. All elements associated with historic windows and doors shall be retained and preserved including frames, trim, sashes, muntins, 3.4.2 Windows and doors should be repaired when necessary bys splicing or patching only the 3.4.3 If replacement ofav window or door unit is necessary, the new unit should be replaced to matchi the original ins size, scale, material, detail, pane and/or panel configurations. 3.4.4 Replacement ofa a multi-light window with a single-pane sash or replacing multi-sash 3.4.12 Sash, window panes, muntins, and rails shall not be replaced with those that are incompatible in size, configuration, and reflective qualities or alter the relationship between 3.4.16 Retain and preserve energy efficient features such as transom windows, awnings,  glass, lintels, shutters, and hardware. deteriorated section to match the original.  windows with only one sash is prohibited.  window and wall.  shutters, skylights, and porches.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.5 Roofs:  3.5.2 Character defining elements of historic roofs should be retained and preserved including dormer windows, chimneys, turrets, cupolas, and parapet walls. Eave overhangs, moldings and  trim, and soffit boards should also be retained and preserved.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.8 Upper Facades: 3.8.7 Original windows on upper floors that are located on rear or moncharacter.denining elevations may be repaired, or replaced with vinyl-clad windows that match the originals in  design, size, proportions and detail.  The clerestory windows are character defining elements of the Civic Center, and are on character defining elevations. Though the new information that the windows are not original, the replacements should be wood. Based on findings oft fact, the request is not  congruous with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 108 Gladden Street- Replace the Clerestory Windows  AI request has been made by the City of Washington for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and 3.8 To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included ini the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  Upper Facades.  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the City of Washington to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3 3.4  Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and 3.8 Upper Facades.  Or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to the City ofWashington to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3.4 Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and 3.8 Upper Facades. Ifurther move that the! Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to the CityofWashington to replace the top clerestory windows on the property located at 108 Gladden Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3.4  Windows and Doors, 3.5 Roofs, and. 3.8 Upper Facades.  Or    Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #24 to construct a new single-family 2. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #13 to construct a new single-family 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development- Lot #9 to construct a new single-family 4. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 502 East Main Street to install gutters, a storm door, repair the sidewalk using like materials, and elevate the existing HVAC units in the same location on the 5. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 110 North Academy Street to replace rotten siding using like materials on 6. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 245 East Second Street to replace eroded gravel in the driveway on the  dwelling on the property.  dwelling on the property.  dwelling on the property.  property.  the property.  property.    OTHER  BUSINESS    Update Rules and Procedures  to Comply with General  Statutes    Agenda Date: October 1,2019  o  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAROLINA Memorandum  To: From: Date: Subject:  Historic Preservation Commission Emily Rebert, Historic Preservation Planner Amending the Rules and Procedures  September 10, 2019  The Planning office has been comparing the Historic Preservation Commission's Rules and Procedures to the North Carolina State Statutes and has found a discrepancy. The current Rules of Procedures state 4 ...mail adjoining property owners within 100 feet and a sign on the property not less than one week prior to the meeting." State statutes require 10 days prior to the date of the The Planning office also recommends removing, "Using stamped, self-addressed envelopes supplied by the applicant,' because staff has been generating, processing and mailing the adjoining property  hearing.  owners through the office.  Excerpt from North Carolina General Statutes  General Statutes 160A-388, a2: Notice of Hearing. - Notice of hearings conducted pursuant to this section shall be mailed to the person or entity whose appeal, application, or request is the subject of the hearing; to the owner oft the property that is the subject oft thel hearing ifthe owner did not initiate the hearing; to the owners of all parcels of land abutting the parcel of land that is the subject of the hearing; and to any other persons entitled to receive notice as provided by the zoning or unified development ordinance. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the city may rely on the county tax listing to determine owners of property entitled to mailed notice. The notice must be deposited in the mail at least 10 days, but not more than 25 days, prior to the date of the hearing. Within that same time period, the city shall also prominently post a notice of the hearing on the site that is the subject of the hearing or on an adjacent street or highway right-of-way.    Agenda Date: October 1,2019  RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE  HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  WHEREAS, the state authorizes cities to safeguard the heritage of the city by preserving any historic site therein that embodies important elements of its cultural, social, economic, political, archaeological or architectural history and to promote the use and conservation of such site for the education, pleasure and enrichment oft the residents oft the city, county, and state as a whole; and WHEREAS, pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes, chapter 160A, article 19, part 3C, the City Council designates a commission to be known as the Washington Historic Preservation WHEREAS, except as otherwise provided in the City Code, all boards and commissions of the city shall adopt Rules of Procedure for Small Local Government Boards that includes in the document WHEREAS, the city planning staff needs to update the Rules of Procedure to comply with North Carolina General Statute 160A-388, a2: Notice of Hearing that would require notices to be mailed not less than 10 days and not longer than 25 days prior to a meeting. Within that same time period, the city shall also prominently post a notice of the hearing on the site that is the subject of the THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington Historic Preservation Commission oft the  Commission (HPC); and  the commission's parliamentary procedural rules governing its meetings; and  hearing or on an adjacent street or highway right-of-way.  City of Washington wishes to amend the current Rules of Procedure as follows:  Section 1. That Rule 20. Application Procedures, part b be amended by removing "Using stamped, self-addressed envelopes supplied by the applicant, * and "not less than one week" and add that "at least 10 days, but not more than 25 days," and "Within that same time period, the city shall also prominently post a notice oft the hearing on the site that is the subject of the hearing or on  an adjacent street or highway right-of-way".  Rule 20. Application Procedures  The staff person shall notify by mail, at least 10 days, but not more than 25 days, prior to the meeting at which the matter is to be heard, the affected property owners within 100 feet on all sides oft the subject property. Within that same time period, the city shall also prominently post ai notice of the hearing on the site that is the subject of the hearing or on an adjacent street or highway right-of-  way.  Section 2. This Amendment shall become effective upon its adoption. Section 3. All Rules of Procedure or parts in conflict herein are repealed.    Agenda Date: October 1,2019  Adopted this day of  2019  Cheri Vaughn, Chairman Approved  Commission Members: Cheri Vaughn, Chairman Karen Mann, Vice Chairman Kathleen Couch Colleen Knight Rebecca Clark Scarlett Boutchyard Scott Craigie    Discussion: Subcommittee for New Construction/Additions    Property owner submits application for COA to Planning Office  Deadline 15th oft the month  Planning Staff determines if project is Major or Minor work  Major Work Project  Minor Work Project  Adjoining Property owners notified 10 days before meeting  Signs placed 10 days before meeting  Advertisement placed inj paper before 10am, thel Friday before the meeting soito can be advertised in the weekend paper before the meeting Deliver agenda to commission members one week prior tot the meeting  New Construction Sub-Committee  HPC reviews project at regular meeting  Planning Staff reviews project  First" Tuesday of the Month  Denied  Approved  Not approved  Approved  Mail denial letter  Option: Appeal to BOA  Applicant receives COA  Mail approval letter and COA  Within 30 days after ther minutes have been approved    MINUTES    Revised: September! 5, 2019  WASHINGTON HISTORICI PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting - Minutes Tuesday, September 3, 2019 7:00 pm Members Present Karen Mann - Vice-Chairman  Rebecca Clark Scarlett Boutchyard Cheri Vaughn-Chairman  Kathleen Couch Colleen Knight Scot Craigie  Members Not Present Others Present Emily Rebert, Historic Planner Dawn Maye, Administrative Support  Opening of the meeting Invocation  II.  1. Amoment of silence was taken.  IlI. Roll Call IV. Old Business V.  1. Asilent roll call was taken by staff. Cheri Vaughn and Scot Craigie not present.  Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  1. Arequest has beenmade by Ms. Emily Mayne fora Certificate ofA Appropriateness: tor make thei following alterationsi ini the backy yard of the property located at 735 West Main! Street: a. Demolish the garage in in the south west corner oft the back yard b. Construct a garden shed int the south east corner of the back yard Mr. Winfield Mayne came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Mayne requesting the  demolition of the existing garage.  Vice Chairman asked ift thel board had any questions.  Collen Knight, is the garage damaged beyond repair? Mr. Mayne, yes. Kathleen Couch asked, how long had the Mayne's owned the property? Mr. Mayne, they have owned the property: since 2005. Rebecca Clark, when was the garage built? Mr. Mayne, not sure when the home was built. Kathleen Couch, asked staffi if they knew when the garage was built. Staff responded, between 1920's to 1930's. Rebecca Clark, asked if the garage was original to the house? Staffresponded, not sure when the garage was  Page 1of6    Revised: September 5, 2019  built as an addition to the existing home. Kathleen Couch, when was the house built? Mr. Mayne, 1910. Rebecca Clark, will the garage be replaced or willi it be a complete tear down? Mr. Mayne, will tear down for now and see how the space will be incorporated with the rest of the backy yard. Scarlett Boutchyard, do you have any landscaping plans ora proposal showing what will replace the garage? Mr. Mayne, not at this time. Kathleen Couch, have you investigated rehabilitating the building? Mr. Mayne, Planket Hamilton has assessed the garage and his assessment was that the building has foundation damage and the building is not salvageable. Rebecca Clark, is there any materials that could be salvaged, for example any shiplap or any wood that could be repurposed? Mr. Mayne, the wood has termite damage andi is too far gone to be salvaged. Ms. Couch has one concern with the request, only one contract has Vice Chairman opened the floor for questions. No one came forward.  assessed the garage.  Vice Chairman asked the board for any discussion.  Kathleen Couch, from personal experience, when she started investigating her carriage house she had three contractors to come and assess the house. Some did say that it needed to be demolished. To rehab a structure takes al lot of time and is very expensive, even withi tax credits. She understands why Mr. Mayne is requesting the building to be demolished. The only problem that Ms. Couch has concerning the Rebecca Clark, since the garage is not original to the house she would agree to the Kathleen Couch, asked staff, if the board was to vote fort the demolition, how would the board need to proceed. Staff responded, in the state of North Carolina you cannot deny demolition unless the building is statewide significance historical and has a restrictive covenants from Preservation of North Carolina. The most the board can do is delay demolition for 365 days. During this time, it will give the home owner and commission time investigate on what to do with the building. Ms. Couch, if we vote to allow the demolition, the demolition can proceed immediately. Staff, yes. Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Emily Mayne to all for demolition of the carport located in the back yard of the property located at 735 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings and fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 6.0 - Demolition and Relocation. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all Vice Chairman asked discussion on item B- Construct a garden shed in the south east corner of the back yard. There was no discussion and Ms. Mann asked for a motion. Kathleen Couch made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Emily Mayne to all for  request, only one contract has assessed the garage.  request.  voted 4 in favor and 1 (Scarlett Boutchyard) opposed.  Page: 2of6    Revised: September 5, 2019  construct a garden shed in the south east corner of the back yard of the property located at 735 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings and fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.12- Outbuildings and Accessory Structures. Rebecca Clark seconded the motion and all voted 5 in favor ànd 0 opposed. 2. Arequest has been made by Ms. Terri Knight for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a deck in the back yard of the property located at117 Charlotte Street Mr.. John Stallings, representing Ms. Terri Knight, came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Stallings lives across the street from the Knight's. Mr.Stallings came to answer: any The Vice-Chairman opened the floort for questions. No one came forward  questions from the board.  Kathleen Couch made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Terri Knight for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a deck in the back yard of the property located at 117 Charlotte Street. This motion is based on the following findings and fact: the application isc congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.4 - Decks. Rebecca Clark seconded the motion and all voted 5 in favor and 0 3. Arequest has been made by New Vision Partners for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations on the property located at 189 West Main Street:  opposed.  a. Alter storefront entryways on the north: side. b. Change window configurations. C. Construct a covered deck on the: south side. d. Create a rooftop lounge/deck.  e. Construct two balconies on the second floor oft the south side.  Mr. Trent Tetterton, representing New' Vision Partners, came forward and was sworn in. 189 W Main Street commonly known as the Fowle Building has become known as the Castle Brewery. The intention of the New' Vision Partners is to open a micro-Brewery. The micro-brewery has been under a "Stop Work Order" from the Department of Commerce. During this period of time New Vision Partners has been pursuinga a $500,000 grant and was awarded the grant and working to have the funds released. Vice-Chairman commended Mr. Tetterton on their complete package.  The Vice Chairman opened the floor for questions.  Kathleen Couch, concerning the mural on the right side oft the building, will the owners going to try to keep the mural? Staff, the brick willl be repointed and will not be painting the building as per the National Park Services. The National Park: Services has not said anything about restoring the mural. Ms. Couch, requested if this was something that could be asked to have restored or preserved? Staff made note. Rebecca Clark, this was originally painted by Whiteing Toler. About 5to 6 years ago Ms. Clark had asked Mr.  Page 3of6    Revised: September 5, 2019  Toler about restoring the mural. Mr. Toler said that he was noti interested in restoring the mural but that he would paint over the mural. Due to his reaction the restoration was not pursued. Ms. Clark asked ifa request could be made to have something to Karen Mann, confirmed that there would be a roof top bar. Mr. Tetterton replied that the roof top bar could hold up to 250 people. Rebecca Clark asked about the time line. Mr. Tetterton, once work begins the project should be completed in one year. But, due to the demand on equipment for micro-brewers there will be a delay. Vice-Chairman asked if there were any questions from the public.  preserve the mural.  Mr.. Jeff Furst, came forward to speak for the construction and opening of the micro- brewery at 189 West Main Street. He believes the opening will be agreat for the Scarlett Boutchyard, the State Preservation has already approved the design plan, there really is not muchi that the board can say. Colleen Kinight and Kathleen Couch both agreed that the plans look great. Vice-Chairman asked fora ai motion. Rebecca Clark made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission granta a Certificate of Appropriateness to New Vision Partnersi fora Certificate ofAppropriateness: to make thet following alterations on the property located at: 189 West  Downtown.  Main Street:  a. Alter storefront entryways on the north side. b. Change window configurations. C. Construct a covered deck on the south side. d. Create a rooftop lounge/deck.  e. Construct two balconies on the second floor of the south side. This motion is based on thei following findings and fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4- Windows and Doors, 3.5-F Roofs, 3.7- Storefronts, 3.8- - Upper Facades, 3.9. - Rear Elevations, and 5.4- Decks. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all voted! 5i int favor  and Oopposed. B. Minor Works  1. Rebecca Clark made a motion to approve all minor works. Scarlett Boutchyard seconded the motion and all voted 5 in favor and 0 opposed.  VI. Other Business  1. Summary from Public Forum  a. Rebecca Clark, what willl be doing with the information that was obtained from the meeting? Staff, some of the goals that the City Council came up with was to revise the Design Guidelines. The state statue states that the Historic Commission should set goals and how to achieve those goals. Staff: stated that. Johnathon Russell, City Manager, commented that there will probably be another meeting. There will be a  Page 4of6    Revised: September 5, 2019  future meeting with Staff and the Historic Commission. (date and time has not been Rebecca Clark was encouraged by the number of people that attended and Scarlett Boutchyard, there was a reoccurring theme among the home owners, consistency or inconsistency is the perception of the Historic Preservation Commission. Ms. Boutchyard suggested this should be one of the goals. The public needs to understands the process of the Historic Commission and what is are the Karen Mann, some of the home owners believe that the Design Guidelines are not being enforced the same fore each home owner. One homeowner gave an example, the house across the street from her was infested batts, rats and cats. Scarlett Boutchyard, this type of violation would be under Code Enforcement. This was addressed int the meeting but, does not think that home owner understand that Code Enforcement is different from Historic Preservation Commission. Staff, in this Rebecca Clark, a lot has been done in the area in question. In the past four or five years Ms. Clark and Mr. Scott Campbell went around the historic district and took pictures of the homes that were not being neglected. Letters were sent out to those property owners. It did take time but, there were homes that were saved from being demolished. Ms. Clark would like to see ift this program could be implemented again. She does understand that staff probably does not have the time to but, thinks that this is good way for the Commission to get more involved. Staff stated that it is notj just writing letters and taking pictures. There are rules and procedures that have to bei followed. There were 19 houses that were approached 12 came out of Demolition by Neglect. The house in question, the property owner could declare economic hardship and this is the reason the home was not placed in Demolition by Neglect. This property has since been sold. Staff, there are approximately 6001 homes ini the Historic District and at one time 57-60 constituted some type of Demolition by Neglect. Staff tries to work with home owners due to some may have rotten fascia board but another may need to repair an entire foundation. Rebecca Clark, believes that this has been a goodi investment for the  set).  continued interest in the Historic District.  difference between Major Works and Minor Works.  case this would be considered Demolition by Neglect.  District.  Staff asked for other comments.  Rebecca Clark, new property owners are not getting information concerning the Design Guidelines from there Real Estate Agents. She continued stating that she was a real estate agent and the agents are required to give this information to new buyers. There are rules and regulations that pertain to this situation. Would like to see an education seminar to make sure that the agents understand the Design Guidelines and have them to make sure new buyers aware of the Guidelines. Scarlett Boutchyard, discussed with the Rich Company at their last staff meeting concerning the Design Guidelines and also sent al link from the City's Website.  Page 50f6    Revised: September 5, 2019  When speaking to some of the public Ms. Boutchyard learned that they did not work with a realtor. The property was either purchased through private sale or through foreclosure. Staffa asked if anyone has a name ofar real estate agent that has not disclosed the guidelines to al buyer? Scarlett Boutchyard, has not been told ofany agents. Scarlett Boutchyard continued, when she purchased her house she knew to go and look for some type ofr restrictive convent and the agent did not bring this to my attention. Karen Mann, owners are using builders that are not familiar with the guidelines. Could there be a list of approved builders? Scarlett Boutchyard, could the builders apply to be placed on al list of approved builders, for example an application for potential builders to complete. Staff states that the owners should ask their neighbors for recommendation or do research on the internet for builders. Kathleen Couch, how many homes have been sold (an average) int the Historic District and is there any way to. send new home ownersa letter welcoming them to the Historic District. Colleen Knight, ift the letter could contain al brief summary of items that can be performed under the Minor Worksof the Design Guidelines. Also, have the city website and phone numbers of whom they need to contact before starting any construction. Scarlett Boutchyard, even if this is a private sell, the deed transfers are public and are published on Monday. Karen Mann, remembers getting a pamphlet concerning the Historic District. Kathleen Couch, sated that she did not receive anything concerning the Design Guidelines. Scarlett Boutchyard, if there was a pamphlet available it could be distributed to closing attorneys and realtors. Rebecca Clark, the WHDA was working onay package for new business owners to help them get started. This contained a checklist and phone numbers. Ms. Clark asked staff about this package. Staff was not aware. Ms. Clark, this could possibly be pursued by the WHDA and the  Chamber. Discussion ended.  VII. Approval of Minutes - August 6, 2019  Rebecca Clark mad a motion to approve the August 6, 2019 minutes. Scarlett Boutchyard  seconded the motion all voted 5i ini favor and 0 opposed.  VIII. Adjourn.  There being no other business Kathleen Couch made a motion to adjourn. Rebecca Clark  second the motion all voted. 5 inf favor and 0 opposed.  Page 6of6    216.51  420  TATIZ  INA, LLC