WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting Agenda Wednesday, January 2, 20197:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  1. A request has been made by Mr. Sed Naziri for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter and paint the brick of the primary facade of the property located at 157 West  Main Street.  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Mr. John Logelfo for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter the primary facade of the property located at 126 West Main Street. 2. A request has been made by Mr. Richard Mechling for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the roof with a different material on the property located 3. A request has been made by Mr. Archie Jennings for a Certificate of Appropriateness to convert the primary entrance from two doors to one door on the 4. A request has been made by Mr. Stephen Furr for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a concrete patio in the back yard of the property located at 311 East 5. A request has been made by Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the roof with a different material on the property located  at 112 East Main Street.  property located at 134 South Market Street.  Water Street.  at 418 East Water Street. B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 140 West Main Street to replace the existing roof  using like materials on the property.  1    2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 409 West Main Street to install a decorative brick 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 124 Charlotte Street to replace the existing A/C 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 115 Respess Street to repoint masonry joints and 5.A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 743 East Main Street to replace rotten siding using  cap over the concrete bulkhead on the property.  unit in the same location on the property.  install flashing on the rear parapet wall on the property.  like materials on the property.  VI. Other Business  VII. Approval of Minutes - December 4, 2018  VIII. Adjourn  2    OLD  BUSINESS    157 West Main  Street  Façade Alteration Painting Brick    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers in thet front lobby of City Hall under-Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Owner's Name: Lot Size:  157W, MAIN TEANcyen  INA,LLC  50 (width)  feet by  239.5 (depth).  feet.  Brief Description oft the Work to be Done Belk Panel and Sign structures rehabilitation.  As we all know this Building Front has been subject to sever physical damage byprevious owners to holdt the Our intention is to restore the visual and physical integrity oft ther masonry building front with a careful Inour Restoration process, we will do our best to imitate the original brick and mortar designs, e.g. band  All missing and fractured bricks, Keystones, and concrete structures willl be reconstructed by casting in place Upon Completion of the masonry repairs and restoration, coating the entire building with colored Sealer will provide uniform appearance and prevent the existing weathered and vulnerable bricks and lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior tot the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. Iu understand approved requests are valid for one year,  rollouts, soldier courses, arches, and dentils or comparable matching designs. method, usingproper mortar mix of Portland cement and sand. mortars from spallation and further damages.  0  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Sed Nazire (Name of7 Applicant- type or prnt) (Malling Address) 10/22/2018 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  5161 Six Farks,Ralk,N 27609  (Zip Code)  74-274-4400 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signatuse aippticant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You mustglve written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    &Ns    Beaufort Printed October2 29, 2018 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNECTGIS  WEBH HOSTING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line D County Line (Solid)  1:39 Feet    OBJECTID 6607 OWNER NAME INA LLC MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27609 TOT VAL 420337 PREV ASSESS 422572 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOKand PAGE 1949/00542 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1920. SUB DESC COMMERCIAL EFFYR 1980  GPIN 5675-87-0984 OWNER NAME2 CITY RALEIGH PROP DESC 1LOT COR UNION ANDI MAIN ST(RIVERTOWN MALL DEFRVAL 0 ACRES 0.26 MBL 567508284 STAMPS 700.00 NBHD CDE AC1 EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBRBED PIN 01013463  GPIN Long 5675-87-0984 MAILING ADDRESS 5161 SIX FORKS ROAD STATE NC LAND VAL 229320 BLDG VAL 191017 TAXABLE VA 420337 PROPERIVADDRESS 157 WI MAINST DATE 1/8/2018 SALE PRICE 350000.00 NBHD DESC ZONEIAVERAGE COMMERCIAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC10 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 43634  Beaufort County onliner mapa accessi is provided asap publics service, asis, asa available andy without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websiteis is fori informational purposes onlya andi isnoti intendedt to constitutea ak legalr recordr nors shouldi itbes substitutedf for the advice ors services ofi industry professionals. Thel Countyo of Beauforta andthe Website Provider disclaima allresponsibility: andl legall liabilityf fort the contentp publishedo ont thisv website. The usera agreest thatE Beaufort Countyl  landitsA Assigns shallb beheldharmless! froma alla actions, claims, damageso orj judgments arising outo oftheu use ofc County data.    Emily Rebert From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:  Ina.Harbor18 naarponsegmatcom Wednesday, October 31, 20183:58PM Emily Rebert 'Base Construction, Inc' FW: Belk Building Roof  Dear Miss Emily Robert, Appropriateness.  Ijust wanted to thank you for your efforts and cooperation in processing my application for The Certificate of As per our conversation on the related subject this morning, I like to express thatlunderstand that painting oft the And, for that, I feel obligated to provide you with more details oft the work that we will be performing on the building façade to bring ita alive, and as close to as it used to historically look like prior to the damages done by previous owners. As you: alll know well, this building front has gone through major distractions to hold heavy panels and sign stretchers by Most every section oft the wall, corners, bottom, and the top needs to be repaired and the all missing elements re- Our plans are to re-create the original look as much as possible. We will try to re-create the dentils, the setbacks, Material used will be Portland cement and Sand mix, similar to the material used in existing bricks.  building façade maybe against your design guidelines.  workers whom never thought of easy reveres restoration.  created.  keystones, and most possible elements.  All the walls would be power washed, all loose material removed, and all decades and voids will be chiseled clean. Then Ina a proper way the mentioned motor mix would be applied in forms, and carved to recreate brick and other element Due to the nature of the work the final painting would be a compromise to bring the uniform and presentable historic My hope is that, this explanation would help to clarify our Intention and Recreation techniques for the involved work  Look-alikes. look back.  ahead of us to re-create our building façade as close to the historic shape.  Thanks again for all your help and efforts. Please call ify you have any questions. Thank You, Sed Naziri, CE. BASE CONSTRUCTION, INC Quality Building By Design 5161 Six Forks Road Raleigh, NC 27609 919-274-4900 Base@nc.rr.com  1            Emily Rebert From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:  nalatbon8@gmal.com Monday, December 17, 2018 11:48 AM Emily Rebert naharbori8@gmail.com FW: Update Application for HPC meeting  3rd delivery w/ out Pictures  From: na.Martor8@Gmal.com malto:ina.harbor18@gmail.com,  Sent: Monday, December 17, 20182:21AM To: 'Emily Rebert' Cc: na.natboris@gmal.com Subject: RE: Update Application for HPC meeting Good Morning Emily, Ihope all is going well.  Itried to draw what Ilike the front look like on paper and also on MS Paint. but they are not as presentable asl want them to be. So, instead, It thought, some of the attached photos may better serve to illustrate the Store  front and the temporary look oft the façade as intended.  a. The Store front Double door and sidelight shown on the picture would be the type ofl look and b. The "State Theater" Building, in Greenville, best illustrates the temporary look of the window For the large panel section above the awning; if we have to keep it, then it would bei in similar  material replacing the front, middle entry section. openings when Concrete blocks are removed. look as the one at: 158 W main Street Building.  The Material for the first floor store fronts are going to be Glass & Metal (aluminum) combination with some  wood trims if needed.  The existing structure in front will be dressed up with proper trims and lighting. Ihave attached few photos of our masonry work, all done by my same mason.  lalso have al historic photo attached. This one shows al business sign on the brick above the front door.  Please let me know where Ican pay the$50 fee.  fJust FYI, I discussed the façade brick work with my mason again last month. He told me that he would install as many bricks of the same size as required and possible. Andi for the rest he will repair with the same mix we talked about  before.)    Ina addition; lam not sure iflc can request to have some changes made to the back oft the building on this meeting or not. This is needed: For practical reasons and better access to the building for the renovation purposes, Llike to install 9' operational door in the 10' existing Structure. Apparently, at one time there was a larger access that later was closed  off with bricks and the existing back door. The type and design of the door can be discussed.  Like always, l'appreciate your help and your efforts, and Thank you.  Please call if you have any questions.  Thank You, Sed) Naziri 5161 Six Forks Road Raleigh, NC27609 919-274-4900 MAlarbonBesmal.con  From: Emily Rebert malto.erebert@washingtonnc.govy. Sent: Friday, November 09, 20188:45AM Subject: Update Application for HPC meeting  To: Sed Naziri Cc: Margaret Howdy HiSed, application:  Inp preparation for the next historic preservation commission meeting, can you submit the following items for your  Full Main Street Façade Drawings including-  What the first-floor façade will looks like and what type of materials will be used to make it?i i.e. metal,  wood?  An explanation for what you're doing with the windows till you replace them  Photos of past projects you have done  Photos of past projects from your mason has done. Has he done something like this before? showing what allt the Parks Service would want you to do to restore the front façade)  Write up evaluation from SHPO (Spoke to. John Wood yesterday, Thursday, morning and he is compiling ar report  Historic photo (already done!)  $50 Developmental Filing Fee- Ido not have a receipt for your application. Iti is $50 to go before the commission  Deadline Nov: 15 close of business day. can meet to go over everything before the meeting.  Of course. ify you have any questions, please call me. Ido have some ideas for your application. Perhaps you, Meg, andI  Emily Omily eberk Historic Preservation Planner Community Development  2            AAN    5        STATE THEATRE    ST  OW MAIN 00  Satfen acc Badk    3732    Adjoining Property Owners: 157 West Main Street  INAI LLC 5161 SIX FORKS ROAD RALEIGH NC27609 BLACKSTONE, J WHIT 222 W STEWART PKYSTE204 WASHINGTONNC2789 LITCHFIELD WILLIAMF 2007 NI MARKET ST WASHINGTONNC2788) GRAY MARK VL 108 N ELM STREET GREENSBORONC27401 WALLJAYNE D 111 SI REED DR WASHINGTON NC 27889 163 WEST MAIN STREET: LLC 45 MILLERS LN NEW: HYDE PARK NY 11040 WOOLARD BENJAMIN FRANKLIN POI BOX36 WASHINGTON: NC 27889 LTHOMAS PROPERTIES LLC 201 WESLEY ROAD GREENVILEENCZ7SS EVANS. JERRYO 162 WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 MOORE. PROPERTY GROUP LLC 2305 W. ALABAMA ST HOUSTONTX77098: ALM INVESTMENT COMPANYLLC 610 COURTLAND ST GREENSBORONC27401  BEAUFORT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL 108 GLADDEN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 GOLDEN ROCK INVESTMENTS LLC 45 MILLER LANE NEW HYDE PARK NY 11040    ontoion eoelopmenb flitoric Preseroation  0  Citys  Washincton NORTH CAR'OLINA  October 26, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 157 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Sed Naziri for a Certificate of Appropriateness to rec- reate and paint the brick of the primary facade of the property located at 157 West Main  Street.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday Novermber 6, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 ereber@washngomegow    Docntoion Decelopmenb fitoric Presewation  C  Cityy  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  December 19, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 157 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Sed Naziri for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter and paint the brick of the primary facade of the property located at 157 West Main  Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Wednesday January 2, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 3 AA Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 ereber@washngomego"        Staff Report  157 West Main Street  The application for the property located at 157 West Main Street is requesting approval to closely approximate the appearance oft the original brick details and paint the masonry on the front Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.1 Walls:  façade of property.  3.1.1 Historic character-defining wall features should be retained and protected including clapboards, corner boards, cornices, quoins, corbelling and other architectural detailing. 3.1.2 Original walls should be properly maintained and repaired when necessary. If an original wall feature must be replaced due to excessive deterioration or damage, the newi feature should 3.1.5 Iti is prohibited to cover or replace original wall surfaces with vinyl, aluminum, veneer or other synthetic siding, including chemical applications that may change the texture oft the  match the original in size, profile, material, and texture. 3.1.4 Paint should not be applied to original unpainted wall surfaces.  original siding.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.2 Materials:  Masonry  Various types ofr masonry construction are found in the district including brick, stone, stucco, and concrete. Buildings in the downtown commercial area are primarily of brick construction while there are also several examples of brick residential: structures. Just like with wood, masonry construction contributes to a building's historic character in its texture, color, size and scale, and detailing. This architectural detailing includes subtle elements like variations in bond patterns to more prominent detailing like corbelling, brick cornices, quoins, etc. 3.2.6 Preserve and protect character-detining masonry architectural features including 3.2.7 Routinely inspect masonry features for cracks, loose bricks, and signs of. weather damage 3.2.8 Apply caulk tot the joints between bricks and window frames in order to prevent water 3.2.9 Deteriorated masonry units should be repaired rather than replaced using materials that match the original in size, texture, color, and overall appearance. Synthetic materials are prohibited on historic structures for the wholesale covering ofa a structure. 3.2.10 Do not apply paint to masonry surfaces that were historically not painted. 3.2.13 When repair to mortar. joints is needed due to cracks, missing and crumbling mortar, and o Remove deteriorated mortar by hand raking rather than using electric: saws and hammers than of Match the original texture, color, width, and profile of the historic mortar joints  corbelling, cornices, sills, quoins, foundations and walls. paying particular attention to mortar joints.  penetration.  loose bricks, use proper techniques for repainting.  can damage the brick    o Repointing with mortar that is stronger than the original, such as Portland cement, can cause brick to crack, break or spall. In repainting mortar) joints, mortar ofa appropriate PSI should be  used.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.7 Storefronts:  3.7.1 Retain and preserve commercial storefronts and storefront details that contribute to the historic character of the building including display windows, recessed entryways, doors, 3.7.2 Retain and preserve historic materials including wood, stone, architectural metal, and cast 3.7.3 Follow the guidelines outlined in the materials section in order to protect and maintain historic storefront materials such as wood, masonry, and architectural metals. 3.7.4 If replacement ofa deteriorated storefront or storefront feature is necessary, replace only the deteriorated element to match the original in size, scale, proportion, material, texture and 3.7.5 Ifreconstructing al historicstorefront, base the design on historic research, physical evidence, and photographic documentation, ifa available. Recreate the original architectural elements including overall proportions, fenestration, dimensions, and orientation. 3.7.6 Altering the entrance, including its location, through a significant storefront is not permitted. Changing a storefront sO that it appears as an office or residential use other than 3.7.7 Using materials which detract from the historic or architectural character oft the building,  transoms, corner posts, columns, and other decorative features.  iron.  detail.  commercial shall not be allowed. such as mirrored glass, shall not be allowed.  Upper Facade Guidelines  3.8.1 Retain and preserve historic facades and their architectural features such as brick corbelling, brick and stone string courses, quoins, stone and tile coping, cornices, and other 3.8.2 Retain and preserve historic materials whenever possible including wood, stone, 3.8.3 Iti is prohibited to cover: architectural details or entire facades with non-historic materials ort treatments. Whenever possible, remove metal cladding or other non-historic coverings from 3.8.4 Ifr replacement of an upper facade feature is necessary, replace the deteriorated element with a newe element and design that matches the original in size, scale, design, proportion,  façade elements.  architectural metal, and cast iron.  historic facades.  detail, and material, if possible.  The property owner is trying to closely approximate the appearance of the original brick details on the primary façade of the building. They will be creating lost dentures but filling in and smoothing out the space where corbeling once ran up the pilasters. The property owner would like to paint the façade upon completion. The property owner is not reconstructing the historic storefront by recreating the original architectural elements including overall proportions, fenestration, dimensions, and orientation even though photographic documentation is available. Based on findings of fact, the request is not  congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 157 West Main Street- Altering the Primary Facade  A request has been made byl Mr. Sed Naziri for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter the front façade of property located at 157 West Main Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls, 3.2 Materials, and 3.7 Storefronts. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which arei included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible. Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Sed Naziri to approximate the appearance of the original brick details, paint the masonry, and alter the first-floor entryway on the front façade of property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on thet following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter: 3.1 Walls, 3.2  Materials, and 3.7 Storefronts.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Sed Naziri to approximate the appearance of the original brick details, paint the masonry, and alter the firs- floor entryway on the front façade of property located at 157) West Main Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls, 3.2 Materials, and. 3.7Storefronts. further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place  the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Sed Naziri to approximate the appearance of the original brick details, paint the masonry, and alter thet firs- floor entryway on the front façade of property located at:: 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous withi the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.1 Walls, 3.2  Materials, and 3.7 Storefronts.    MAJOR  WORKS    126 West Main  Street  Entryway Alteration    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers int the front lobby ofCity Hall under' "Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: hat Nest AGhS Shneey  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: So Aolerso  Dehhyt ARekBo  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Rckpcntc Lss8 Rhove &o Aos oNSL  Lochlion.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Sco Lole 1o (Name of Applicant type or print) AGTdp RasT AD  (Initials)  ACTION  (Maling Address) //8 (Date)  Sheix (Zip Code)  531K-296 (Daytime Phone Number)  GS50 (Signature of Applicant)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropniateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation: Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting oft the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort Printed December 18, 2018 SeeB Below fort Disclaimer  CONNEÇTGIS  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:31Feet    OBJECTID 6697 OWNER NAME LOGELFOJ JOHN MAILING, ADDRESS2 126WESTI MAIN: STREET ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 202554 TAXABLE VA 280554 PROPERTY. ADDRESS 128 WI MAINST DATE 1/22/2012 SALE PRICE 255000.00 NBHD DESC COMMERCIAL HISTORIC ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC21 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 44057  GPIN 5675-88-4008 OWNER NAME2 LOGELFO DEBORAHA CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOTEWAYERS! ESTATE TOT VAL 280554 PREVASSESS 255013 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1771/00670 NBR BLDG LAND USE YR BUILT 1920 SUBDESC RESTAURANTS EFFYR 1995  GPIN Long 5675-88-4008 MAILING ADDRESS 126 WEST MAINS STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 78000 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.12 MBL 567508317 STAMPS 510.00 NBHD CDE CH EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBR_BED PIN 01010194  Beaufort County online mapa accessi is provided asa publics service, asis, as available and withouty warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont thisv websitei is fori informational purposes onlya andi is noti intended to constitute a legalr recordr nors shouldit itbes substituted fort the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beauforta andt the) WebsiteP Providero disclaim allresponsibility: andI legall liabilityf fort the content publishedo on thisw website. Theu usera agreest thatB Beaufort County  andits Assigns shallbeh heldharmlessf from alla actions, claims, damageso orj judgments arisingoutofthe useo ofCounty data.    948-0948 Parkingi in Rear,  HEEKIN LAW  BBella  ZatmRatmm,  W  UYS 7414333  Google    %  Zi W  Vi  Z  Wi  W %  W h %A W  Vi %  %  %  V  Aluairuw  FRONT ELEVATION    B  AVIdSIO VZZId,  - L    Adjoining Property Owners: 126 West Main Street  WALLJAYNEI D 111: SREEDI DR WASHINGTON NC 27889 MORGAN: ELLENLEWIS HRS 1161 RIVER ROAD WASHINGTON NC 27889 L WRIGHT PROPERTIES LLC 407 QUEEN ANN ROAD GREENVILLE NC27858  BEAUFORT COUNTY 112 WEST SECOND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 WOOLARD JEFFREY THOMAS POJ BOX5 WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 WARD. MICHAEL GREGORY 503 BAY LAKES STREET CHOCOWINITY NC27817 MIDGETTE RACHELJ 322 POST ROAD BATHI NC27808  S& M ENTERPRISES OF WASHINGTON 102 SIMMONS STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 NOBLES JOSEPHINE! D 600 WINGED FOOT CT NEW: BERNI NC2 28562 BUCKMAN ETTA C 1361 N WASHINGTON STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 BEAUFORT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL 108 GLADDEN STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 SMITHWICK PLAN BI LLC 2681 NANCE LANE WASHINGTON: NC 27889 DOWNTOWN WASHINGTON ON THE WATERFRONT 102 E: 2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 LOGELFOJOHN 126 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 JEFFERSON: WILLIAMI E POBOX901 WASHINGTON NC 27889 SMITH RUSSELLA 118 WI MAIN ST WASHINGTON NC2 27889  LLC    Dotntoion eoelopmenb éffstoric Preseroation  0  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  December 19, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 126 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. John Logelfo for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter the primary facade of the property located at 126 West Main Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Wednesday January 2, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  126 West Main Street  The application fort the property located at 126 West Main Street is requesting approval alter the east Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.7 Storefronts:  side entryway on the front façade of property.  3.7.1 Retain and preserve commercial storefronts and storefront details that contribute to the historic character oft the building including display windows, recessed entryways, doors, 3.7.2 Retain and preserve historic materials including wood, stone, architectural metal, and cast 3.7.3 Follow the guidelines outlined in the materials section in order to protect and maintain historic storefront materials such as wood, masonry, and architectural metals. 3.7.4 If replacement ofa deteriorated storefront or storefront feature is necessary, replace only the deteriorated element to match the original in size, scale, proportion, material, texture and 3.7.5 If reconstructing a historic: storefront, base the design on historic research, physical evidence, and photographic documentation, ifa available. Recreate the original architectural elements including overall proportions, fenestration, dimensions, and orientation. 3.7.6 Altering the entrance, including its location, through a significant storefront is not permitted. Changing a storefront: sO that it appears as an office or residential use other than 3.7.7 Using materials which detract from the historic or architectural character of the building,  transoms, corner posts, columns, and other decorative features.  iron.  detail.  commercial shall not be allowed. such as mirrored glass, shall not be allowed.  The property owner would like to reverse an alteration that was done to the east storefront from in the early 2000's on the primary façade of the building. The property owner is not reconstructing the historic storefront by recreating the original architectural elements including overall proportions, fenestration, dimensions, and orientation. Based on findings of fact, the request is not congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 126) West Main Street- Move the storefront on the east side oft the front façade  Arequest has been made by Mr.. John Logelfo for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter the primary facade of the property located at 126 West Main Street. Please review the Design To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.7 Storefronts.  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. John Logelfo to alter the east side entryway on the front façade of property located at 126 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3.7  Storefronts.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. John Logelfo to alter the east side entryway on the front façade of property located at 126 West Main Street. This motion is based ont the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3.7 Storefronts. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. John. Logelfo to alter the east side entryway on the front façade of property located at 126 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3 3.7  Storefronts.    112 East Main  Street  Roof Replacement    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Blackl Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers int thei front lobby of City! Hall under' Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 11A Eosk nai Owner's Name: Richasc Meckling  Historic Properly/Name (if applicable): Fw Socd Hatchusavs Company  Lot Size:  5o (width)  feet by  103 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work tol be Done:  Seeakhak - Soof reploremr  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Rchand Wechlins (Name of Applicant - type or print) 2M4N.6ST. (Mailing Address) 12/a/aog E  38401 (Zpo Code)  (Initials)  ACTION  MMnSe A10515-1440 (Daytime/Phone Number)   (Authorized Signature)  Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning. Department or designee, this application. becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply):  This document does not constitute the issuance of a Building Permit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  ) Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2" x 11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. NCOMPLETEAPRLCATONS WILLI NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank ift the item Property Owners & Address. Provide a list of property owners & addresses of all properties located within a 100' of the above subject property. Ey Rziorst wb Rie Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when youl bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to: show existing conditions and your proposed work. Evs Rzloest aadcaga,  is not applicable).  vichE.  . Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate). & Photographs of existing conditions. ohoskch.  See pgsas:  & Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings. aacwzd Elevation drawings showing the newi façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12"x1 11" reductions of full-size drawings. If reduced size is sO small as to bei illegible, make 8-1/2" x 11" snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. Ifyou are applying for. any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2"x11" sheets sO that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  a S M IVRG Svo TN sohnbose  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State. ouc  S    poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work    Beaufort Printed! December 19, 2018 SeeB Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNECTGIS  WEB HOSIING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:18Feet    OBJECTID 6645 OWNER NAME MECHLING LINDA CARPENTER MAILING, ADDRESS2 214 NORTH 6THSTREET ZIP 28401 BLDG VAL 38837 TAXABLE VA 70037 PROPERIVADDRESS 112EMAINST DATE 12/20/2017 SALE PRICE 65000.00 NBHD DESC ZONE 1A AVERAGE COMMERCIAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC10 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 45127  GPIN 5675-87-6960 OWNER NAME2 MECHLING RICHARDWILLIS CITY WILMINGTON PROP DESC 1L112EMAIN: STREET TOT VAL 70037 PREVA ASSESS 97582 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1948/00455 NBR BLDG 1 LANDUSE YRE BUILT 1880 SUB DESC COMMERCIAL EFFYR 1960  GPINLong 5675-87-6960 MAILING ADDRESS 2141 NORTHE 6TH STREET STATE NC LANDVAL 31200 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.06 MBL 567508220 STAMPS 130.00 NBHD CDE AC1 EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBRBED PIN 01000017  Beaufort County online mapa accessi is provided asa publics service, asis,a as available andw withouty warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont thisv websitei IS fori informational purposes only andis is noti intended to constitute legal record nors shouldi itbes substitutedf fort the advice ors services ofi industry professionals. The Countyo of Beauforta andt theV Website Provider disclaima allr responsibility: andk legall liabilityf fort thec contentp publishedo ont thisw website. Theu usera agreest thatB Beaufort County  andits Assigns shallbeh held! harmless froma alla actions. claims, damagesorj judgments arising outo ofthe usec ofCountyd data.    112 East Main Street Fulford Hardware Company  Request for Grant under the Downtown Washington  Façade Improvement Program Owners Linda and Richard Mechling    Page 2  Description of the Exterior Improvements Narrative Description of Roof Replacement  We are in the process of an extensive restoration of the exterior and interior oft the old Fulford Hardware building at 112 East Main Street. The project includes application for federal and state tax credits.  The current roof on the building is made of standing seam overlapping metal panels. The roof is rusting, has deteriorated, and is leaking (see photos). The proposal is to replace the roof with a new membrane roof made of EPDM Membrane Mule-Hide 60 mil. (see attached Product Data Sheet) Insulation underlayment will be installed under the membrane roofing in order to provide insulation, a vapor barrier, and avoid disturbance of  trusses and ceiling of the second floor. Rationale for Change in Roofing Material  Our justification for the proposed replacement material is based on (see attached letter from Mr. John Wood, reseration/Restoration 1) The shallow slope of the current standing seem roof makes the  Specialist, NC State Historic Preservation Office):  overlapping panels leak;  2) The roof can not be seen from street level; current standing seam metal roofing.  3) The current roof is not original and has been replaced with the    Page 3  View of Existing Roof Looking South    Page 4  Separating Seams Allowing Water Penetration into the Building    Page 5  Cracked Sealer at Base of Parapet Allowing Water  Penetration into Building Walls    Page 6  wJ ORTK  ISfeéT  SCALES    STreeT  115 E. malw  Plan Drawing of the Existing Scale of the Roof    Product Data Sheet  MULE-HIDE PRODUCTS  MULE-HIDE WHITE-ON-BLACK 45-MIL EPDM MEMBRANE  PRODUCT DESCRIPTION  Mule-Hide 45-mil White-on-Black EPDM is a high performance non-reinforced membrane that stands up to tearing, impacts, punctures and normal roof traffic. The elastomeric properties of the EPDM membrane compensate for thermal shock and building movement. EPDMI membranes provide excellent resistance to ozone and aging. The membrane is manufactured in accordance with the guidelines established by the RMA (Rubber Manufacturers Association) and meets ore exceeds the ASTM Standard Specification D 4637, Typel. The White-on-Black 45-mil EPDMI membrane is used in fully adhered roofing systems for Modular Building Construction only. Thes system must bei installed  BASIC USES  over an acceptable roof insulation or other suitable substrate. See the Mule-Hide Specifications Manual for complete  specifications and details. SPECIFICATIONS  Available roll sizes for Mule-Hide 45-milV White-on-Black EPDM membrane are;  Widths: 11,1 13'15' and 17' Lengths: 305' Physical Properties Tolerance on Nominal Thickness, % Weight, Ibm/ft (kg/m) Tensile Strength, min, psi (Mpa) Elongation, Ultimate, min, % Tear Strength, min, Ibflin (KN/m) Factory Seam Strength, min. Resistance tol Heat Aging* Properties after 1 weeks @ 240°F (116°C) Tensile Strength, min, psi(MPa) Elongation, Ultimate, min, % Tear Resistance, min,lbflin (KN/m) Linear Dimensional Change, max, % Ozone Resistance* Conditions after exposure 100 pphm Ozone in air for 168 hrs @ 104°F(40°C) Specimen is at 50% strain Brittleness Temp., max, deg. F (deg. C) Resistance to Water Absorption* After 7 days immersion @ 158°F (70°C), Change in mass, max, % Water Vapor Permeability* max, perm-mils Resistance to Outdoor (Ultraviolet) Weathering Xenon-Arc, 4000 hrs. exposure, 176°F (80°C) black panel temperature Fungi Resistance  Test Method ASTM D412 ASTM D412 ASTM D412 ASTM D 624 (Die C) ASTMD8 Modified 816 ASTMD573 ASTMI D412 ASTMD D412 ASTMI D624 ASTM D 1204 ASTM D1 1149 ASTM D746 ASTMD471 ASTME96 (Proc. B or BW) ASTM D 4637 Conditions ASTM G21  SPEC (Pass) +1 10 1305 (9) 300 150(26.3)  TypicalValues +10 0.29 (1.43) 1685 (11.6) 420 200 (35.0)  Membrane Rupture Membrane Rupture  1205 (8.3) 200 125(21.9) +1.0 No Cracks -49(-45) +8,-2 0.10 NoC Cracks No Crazing N/A  1550 (10.7) 250 185 (32.4) -0.5 No Cracks -67(-55) +3.6 0.05 No Cracks No Crazing O(nog growth)  *Nota a Quality Control Test due tot the time required for thet test ort the complexity of the test. However, all tests run Typical properties and characteristics are based ons samples tested and are not guaranteed for all samples oft this product. This data and information isi intended as a guide and does not reflect the specification or specification  on as statistical basis to ensure overalll long-term performance of the sheeting.  range for any particular property oft this product  Revised Sept 2016  PDS09-1335  Page 1of4    Product Data Sheet  MULE-HIDE PRODUCTS  MULE-HIDE WHITE-ON-BLACK 45-MIL EPDM MEMBRANE  BENEFITS & SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENTS  Quality System Ease of Installation Energy efficiency: - white color reflects sunlight Lowt temperature flexibility Fully adhered system is lightweight CODE APPROVALSCOMPLANCE  A variety of Factory Mutual Ratings and Underwriters Laboratories Classifications are available. Contact Mule-Hide Technical Department for additional information. Meets or exceeds ASTM D4637 for Type I non-reinforced EPDM single-ply roofing 1) Approved insulation shall be attached to the roof deck with an approved insulation adhesive or approved fasteners and plates. Install insulation with its largest dimension perpendicular tot the direction oft the membrane seams where possible. a) The membrane is required tol be mechanically attached at thel base of all vertical surfaces, roof edges, b) The field oft the roof is fully adhered to the substrate with Mule-Hide membrane adhesive.  membrane.  INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS 2) Fully Adhered Roofing System and angle changes.  4) Fields seams are made with seam tape and tape primer. 5) All details will be done in accordance with Mule-Hide details. project. Contact Mule-Hide Products for: additional information.  6) On projects where al Mule-Hide Standard or Premium Warranty is requested, an authorized Mule-Hide representative shall inspect all completed work. This is only a briefs summary and not the complete specification. The Mule-Hide Specifications, Details, Technical Bulletins, and associated documents should be thoroughly reviewed prior to starting any  PRECAUTIONS  Surfaces may be slippery when wet, or due tof frost and ice build-up. Exercise caution to prevent falls. Mule-Hide White-on-Blacki EPDMr membranes are highly reflective to sunlight. Workers should dress appropriately, Exercise care when working near roofe edge. Roofe edges may not be visible when surrounding area is covered with Store Mule-Hide membrane in original wrappings in a cool, shaded area. Cover with light-colored, breathable,  wear sunscreen, and wear sunglasses that filter out UVI light.  snow. waterproof tarpaulins. PROTECTION & SAFETY  Mule-Hide maintains Safety Data Sheets on all ofi its non-exempt products. Safety Data Sheets contain health and safety information for your development of appropriate product handling procedures to protect your employees and customers. Mule- Hide's Safety Data Sheets should be read and understood by all of yours supervisory personnel and employees before using  Mule-Hide products iny your facilities.  Revised Sept 2016  PDS09-1335  Page 2of4    Product Data Sheet  MULE-HIDE PRODUCTS  MULE-HIDE WHITE-ON-BLACK 45-MIL EPDM MEMBRANE  SUPPLEMENTAL APPROVALS, STATEMENTS AND CHARACTERISTICS 1) Mule-Hide White-on-Black EPDM meets and exceeds the requirements of ASTM D4637' Type 1, Standard Specification for non-reinforced EPDM Sheet Usedi in Single-Ply Roofing 2) Radiative Properties for ENERGY STARB, Cool Roof Rating Council (CRRC) and LEEDTM  WHITE on BLACK EPDM 0.76 0.64 0.90 0.76 0.64. 0.90 0.87 94 77 0670-0007 0.91  DESCRIPTION  TEST METHOD Solar Spectrum Reflectometer Solar Spectrum Reflectometer (uncleaned) ASTM E408 ASTM C1549 ASTM C1549 (uncleaned) ASTM C1371 ASTM C1371 (uncleaned) ASTME E1980 ASTME1980 NIA ASTME E408  ENERGY: STAR initial solar reflectance ENERGY: STARS solar reflectance after 3 years ENERGY STARI initiale emissivity CRRC initial solar reflectance CRRC solar reflectance after 3y years CRRCI initialt thermal emittance CRRC thermal emittance after 3y years CRRC: SRI (Solar Reflectance Index) CRRC SRI (Solar Reflectance Indexa after 3y yrs) CRRC Product ID LEED thermal emittance rated roof products.  3) Mule-Hide White-on-Black EPDM membranes are LEED compliant and are ENERGY STAR and California Title 24 An ENERGY STAR qualified low slope roof product must have ani initial solar reflectance of at least 0.65 and a 3-year aged solar reflectance of at least 0.50. Cleaning the aged roofs surface is not permitted! by the ENERGY STAR test The Cooll Roof Rating Council (CRRC) does not specify minimums for reflectance ore emittance but they do require specific protocols for testing andr reporting. Cleaning of the aged roof surface is not permitted for determination of AL LEED' "point" may be earnedi ifar roofr material is ENERGY STAR qualified and has a thermal emittance of at least Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) is calculated per ASTMI E 1980. The SRI is ar measure of the roofs ability tor reject solar heat, as shown by a small temperature rise. Itis defined sot that a: standard black (reflectance 0.05, emittance 0.90) is 0a and as standard white (reflectance 0.80, emittance 0.90) is 100. Materials with the highest SRI values are the coolest choices for roofing. Due to the way SRIi is defined, particularly hot materials can even take slightly California Title 241 requires ani initial minimum reflectance of 0.70 and emittance of0.75 as determined by CRRC. 'Copyright O ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA  protocol. Energy Star is only valid in the United States for Roofing Products.  radiative properties after 3y years. 0.90 as determined by ASTM E408.  negative values, and particularly cool materials can even exceed 100.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION  The information given on this PDSi is subject to change without notice. Always check the Mule-Hide website at www.mulehide.com for the latesti information, changes and updates or contact Mule-Hide Products Company at 800-786-1492.  Revised Sept 2016  PDS09-1335  Page 3 of4    Product Data Sheet  MULE-HIDE PRODUCTS  MULE-HIDE WHITE-ON-BLACK 45-MIL EPDM MEMBRANE  DISCLAIMER  Thes statements provided concerning the material shown are intended as a guide for material usage and are believed tol bet true and accurate att the time ofp printing. Nos statement made! by anyoner may supersede thisi information, except when done in writing by! Mule-Hide Products Co., Inc. Since the manner of use is beyond our control, Mule-Hide does not authorize anyone tor make any warranty ofr merchantabiity: or fitness for any particular purpose or any other warranty, guarantee orr representation, expressed ori implied, concerning this material. This product may! be eligible for al Mule-Hider warranty, please check the! Mule-Hide website aty www.mulehide.com or contact Mule-Hide directly at 800-786-1492 for details. Buyer and user accept the product undert these conditions and assume the risk of anyf failure, any injury person or property (including that oft the user), loss orl liability resulting from the! handling, storage or use oft the product whether or noti itish handled, stored or used in accordance with the directions ors specifications. Mule-Hide must ber notified in writing of any claims and be given the  opportunity toi inspect the alleged failure beforer repairs arer made.  Revised Sept 2016  PDS 09-1335  Page 4 of4.    Emily Rebert From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:  Wood, John omnpwoodenccrgo Thursday, December13, 20185:53PM  rmechling Emily Rebert  RE: [External] letter of support needed for roof COA  Good Evening Linda & Richard,  Ispoke with Emily about your roof by telephone yesterday.  While standing-seam metal roofs can bei important historic features, in evaluating its replacement on your building as part ofy your tax credit application, we find that the replacement of the roofi is acceptable for the following reasons: 1. The roof is hidden behind parapet walls andi is not visible from the ground, therefore it is not a character-defining  feature. oft thel building.  2. As the roofi is leaking iti is resulting in damage to the building. 3. The proposed membrane roof covering will not be seen from the ground.  Please feel free to include this e-mail int the application packet fort the COA for the property.  Sincerely, John P. Wood  reseration/Restoration Specialist NC State Historic Preservation Office NC Dept. of Natural and Cultural Resources Phone: (252) 830-6580, extension 225 john.pwood@ncdergoy  117 West Fifth Street I Greenville, North Carolina 27858  **This message does not necessarily represent the policy oft the N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources ** E-mail messages to and from me, in connection with the transaction of public business, are subject to the North  Carolina Public Records Law and may be monitored and/or disclosed to third parties.  Original Message--  From: rmechling rmechlingeplmal.com> Sent: Wednesday, Derember12,201840AM Subject: [External] letter of support needed for roof COA attachment to Report pam.maito-reportspamencgov  To: rmechling mecningepmal.com, Wood, John omnpwoodencergoe  CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an  Hi John,  1    We have finished cleaning out the building 112 East Main in Washington and love the way the open space. looks. Although we haven't heard back from our application, we have located someone to put a roof on the building and we We met with Emily Rebert yesterday and she suggested that we get an email or more formal letter attachment addressed to her regarding your opinion. (support) to remove the existing,rooft that is standing seam overlapping metal panels and replace it with new membrane roofing. Since we will be changing materials we need to go before the historic She recommended that you mention the need for the change and that it was included in our tax credit application and will not hinder our receipt oft tax credits. She also recommended mentioning the following: shallow slope ofthe current standing seam roof makes the current overlapping panels leak; the roof can not be seen from street level; and that it I'm afraid the deadline for our application and this letter of support is this Friday the 14th. We don't like having to work with such short notice, but did not realize a COA was needed fort the roof until yesterday. We will try to be more diligent  are anxious to move ahead and get it dry.  commission in January.  was previously replaced with the current  in our future efforts! Linda and Richard Mechling  2    Adjoining Property Owners: 112) East Main Street WELLS FARGO BANK 142856 POI BOX2609 CARLSBAD CA 92018 BUTTERSMITH HOLDINGS. LLC 78I5THOROUGHFARE RD WILLIAMSTON: NC27892 FAMILY AFFAIR LLC 5541 EMAIN STREET WASHINGTONNC2789 MERCER DOUGLASG 105LAWSON! ROAD WASHINGTON NC 27889 THE CORNER. AT MAIN & MKTLLC PO: BOX69 WASHINGTON: NC27889 SERMONS WAYLANDJJR POBOX69 WASHINGTONT NC27889 MECHLING RICHARD WILLIS 214 NORTH 6TH STREET WILMINGTON NC2 28401 STEWART BETTY 121 NJ MARKET ST WASHINGTON: NC 27889 RAWLSJESSETJR 1271 NI MARKET: ST WASHINGTON NC: 27889 PAGEI FAMILYLLC PO: BOX 1828 WASHINGTON NC27889    Dotontoion Decelopmenb épfstoric Presewation  C  City  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  December 19, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 112 East Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Richard Mechling for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the roof with a different material on the property located at 112 East Main  Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Wednesday January 2, 2018  Place: City Hall Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 94  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  112 East Main Street  The application for the property located at 112 East Main Street is requesting approval use a Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.5 Roofs:  different material for roofing on property.  3.5.1 Retain and preserve historic roofs and roofing materials including Its overall design, shape, 3.5.2 Character-defining elements of historic roofs should be retained and preserved including dormer windows, chimneys, turrets, cupolas, and parapet walls. Eave overhangs, moldings and 3.5.5 Changing the historic character of the building by adding roof elements that are not historically accurate such as donner windows, vents, or skylights is prohibited. Note: This is a Historic Tax Credit project that is being reviewed by the State Historic Preservation office and the National Parks Service. The property owner would like to replace the existing metal roof with a rubber roof on the property. The property owners have included a letter from Restoration Specialist John Wood from the State Historic Preservation office stating the alteration is permissible under the Secretary of Interior Standards. Based on findings of fact, the request is congruous with the Design  pitch, and line.  trim, and: soffit boards should also be retained and preserved.  Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 112 East Main Street- Roof Replacement  A request has been made by Mr. Richard Mechling fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the existing metal roof with a rubber roof on the property located at 112 East Main  Street.  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.5 Roofs.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the: sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission: feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Richard Mechling to replace the existing metal roof with a rubber roof ont the property located at 112 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  3.5 Roofs.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Richard Mechling to replace the existing metal roof with a rubber roof ont the property located at 112 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.5 Roofs. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate ofA Appropriateness: to Mr. Richard Mechling to replace the existing metal roof with a rubber roof on the property located at 112 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous witht the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically  Chapter 3.5 Roofs.    134S South Market  Street  Front Door Configuration  Alteration    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIAIENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 toc cashiers in thef front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street. Address of Property: 134 S.MARKET ST.  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: RELOINES PPopEETIES ARCAIESLE JENAw  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work tol be Done:  REPACE fULRICADE AMACED MAkLE EERIOR D686 1Y4 SIGLE onf BBTAIED_Fen AdOTHER BAEbb DN MAKET.ST OF THESARE  ERA. PAT DbR  fJonD FROME.  Lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior toi the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approvedrequests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  JEPNwLS - type or print)  (Name bf ARCNK  (Initials)  ACTION  ST 27585 (ZipCode)  MAunl 12168 (Date)  250-645.4584 (Daytime Phohe Number)  A15 (Signature of Applicant)  (Authorized Signature)    Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designeéthis application becomesa Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply):  This document does not constitute the issuance of a Building Permit. Iti is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2"x11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item Property Owners & Address. Provide a list of property owners & addresses of all properties Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  is not applicable).  located within a 100' of the above subject property.  conditions and your proposed work. 3 Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12" x 11" reductions of full-size drawings. Ifreduced size is SO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2"x11" snapshots ofi individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. If you are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2" X 11" sheets sO that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work    Down On Mainstreed  C  BoHas Studio  Washington Visitor Center  WSlewanPkwy  Washington: Misitor Center            RE  Sda yte-bic    Adjoining Property Owners: 134 South Market Street SOUTH MARKET PROPERTIES LLC POJ BOX 668 WASHINGTON NC:27889 LI WRIGHT PROPERTIES LLC 407 QUEEN ANN ROAD GREENVILLE NC27858  S&I M: ENTERPRISES OF WASHINGTON LLC 102 SIMMONS ST WASHINGTON NC27889 SMITH WARREN FRANCIS 601 SHOREWOOD DR WASHINGTON NC: 27889 WELLS FARGO BANK 142856 PO BOX2609 CARLSBAD CA 92018 SUNNYSIDE PORT FOLIOLLC 120 SOUTH MARKET ST WASHINGTON NC2 27889 NOBLES JOSEPHINE. D 600 WINGED FOOTC CT NEW BERN NC27889 RODMAN PROPERTIES LLC 222 W STEWARIPARKWAY WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 JENNINGS! NEILL. ARCHIBALD, II 328 Wi MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889    Dontoun SDecelopmenb 6 ffstoric Preseroation  C  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  December 19, 2018  Subject: Certificate ofAppropriateness - 134 South Market Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Archie Jennings for a Certificate of Appropriateness to convert the primary entrance from two doors to one door on the property located at  134 South Market Street.  If you would like to see plans fori this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Wednesday January 2, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 9  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  134 South Market Street  The application for the property located at 134 South Market Street is requesting approval to convert Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.7 Storefronts:  the primary entrance from two doors to one door in the primary facade.  3.7.1 Retain and preserve commercial storefronts and: storefront details that contribute to the historic character of the building including display windows, recessed entryways, doors, 3.7.2 Retain and preserve historic materials including wood, stone, architectural metal, and cast 3.7.3 Follow the guidelines outlined in the materials section in order to protect and maintain historic storefront materials such as wood, masonry, and architectural metals. 3.7.4 Ifr replacement ofa deteriorated storefront or storefront feature is necessary, replace only the deteriorated element to match the original in size, scale, proportion, material, texture and 3.7.5 If reconstructing al historic storefront, base the design on historic research, physical evidence, and photographic documentation, if available. Recreate the original architectural elements including overall proportions, fenestration, dimensions; and orientation. 3.7.6 Altering the entrance, including itsl location, through a significant storefront is not permitted. Changing a storefront sO that it appears as an office or residential use otherthan 3.7.7 Using materials which detract from the historic or architectural character of the building, Note: The work has already been performed on the property. The property owner would like to convert the early, two doors to one door in the primary façade of the building. The property owner said they had evidence to prove the building originally had one door, but was not able to produce the evidence. Based on findings of fact, the request is not  transoms, corner posts, columns, and other decorative features.  iron.  detail.  commercial shall not be allowed. such as mirrored glass, shall not be allowed.  congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 134 South Market Street- Converting two doors to one door on primary facade  Ar request has been made by Mr. Archie Jennings fora Certificate of Appropriateness: to convert the primary entrance from two doors to one door on the property located at: 134  South Market Street.  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.7Storefronts.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Archie Jennings to convert the primary entrance from two doors to one door on the property located at 134 South Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 3.7 Storefronts.  Or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness tol Mr. Archie. Jennings to convert the primary entrance from two doors to one door on the property located at 134 South Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.7 Storefronts. If further move that the Historic Preservation Commission  place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Archie. Jennings to convert the primary entrance from two doors to one door on the property located at 134 South Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 3.7 Storefronts.    311 East Water  Street  Construction of a Concrete Patio    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 tocashiers int thei front lobby of City Hall under Developmental. Filing Fee" Moss Landling  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street. Address  of Property: 311 Wokr Snech hbshnylon NC 27889  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  (LotIs)  Owner's Name: J.Sephen anol Rebeca. Sears furr  Lot Size:  feet by  feet. 078 OCres *See allabhed plot  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Approvimale. 8'x7' Corcrele. paho wihh z 45'nalls Anishedl whh Sane maknal and color as He shucco Colums ard  Buncbhon dhehowst,  phohos anddesia shelch aHacheel  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  3.Slephen furr Sere) (Name of'Applicant -1 type or print) 311 MkrShel (Mailing Address) 12/15/18 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  27889 (ZipCode)  704-5D2-8421 (Daytime Phone Number)  Shle (Signature of Applicant)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law, Minorv work projects not approved by staff willl be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropniateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  toi the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort Printed December 19,2 2018 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇTGIS  WEBHOSIING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:19Feet    OBJECTID 44494 OWNER NAME FURR. JOHN STEPHEN MAILING ADDRESS2 311EWATERS STREET ZIP 27889 TOTVAL 70000 PREV ASSESS 52500 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1972/00717 NBR BLDG 0 LAND USE YR BUILT SUB DESC EFF YR  GPIN 5675-96-5867 OWNERI NAME2 FURR REBECCA: SEARS CITY WASHINGTON PROPDESC HOMES! DEFRVAL 0 ACRES 0.08 MBL 56751250 STAMPS 881.00 NBHD CDE MOSS EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBRBED PIN 15028971  GPIN Long 5675-96-5867 MAILING ADDRESS 311 EWATERSTREET STATE NC LAND VAL BLDGVAL 0 TAXABLE VA 70000 PROPERTY, ADDRESS 311 WATERST DATE 10/4/2018 SALE PRICE 440500.00 NBHD DESC MOSS LANDING' VILLAS ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE NBR BATHS REID 00320  LT15PH-1 MOSS LANDING HARBOR 70000  Beaufort County online mapa access is provided asa publics service, asis, asa available andv without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont thisy websitei ori informational; purposes only andi is notir intendedt to constitute al legalr record nors shouldi itb bes substituted for thea advice ors services ofi industry professionals. The County ofE Beaufort andt the Website Providero disclaima allre responsibility: andl legall liabilityf fort thec contentp published on thisv website. Theu usera agreest that Beaufort Countyl  andits Assigns shallb bel heldh harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orjy judgments arisingo outo oftheu useo ofCounty data.    DocuSign Envelope ID: 72F1F721-D054-4FC5-8D59-6048B025C2E8  5/25/2018  OB O Of4 O4 O8 03l Oil OB O4  ZZSFN O o opl O oBd ol    MOSS LANDING HARBOR HOMES  MODIFICATIONS TOI EXTERIOR OFI ESDAG-ARCITICTNA REVIEW: REQUEST  REQUEST BY: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE #:  STEVE FURR. 311 WATERS STREET 704-502-8421  DATE OF REQUEST: 12/6/18  Please complete the following by answering all oft the questions and statements.  1. Please give a written description ofyour requested modifications including purpose and use. Approximate 8' x7' concrete patio.with (2) two 4.5' walls finished with the same materiai and color as the stucco columns and foundation oft the house. Outdoor grill, as shown in photo,will be located in the additional space. ROQ Concrete provided us a quote for labor; we estimate the cost of the project tol be $1400.  2. Please render a sketch/design of requested modifications, as they will appear upon completion. Please locate exactly where modifications will bei ins relation to your residence. Indicate all dimensions of modifications (height from ground, length, deptih, etc.). Include type of materials, maintenance requirements, and colors (ifapplicable). Use separate sheet if necessary.  Please see attached photos.  3. Approximate Date work to commence:  Tol be completed:  Work will commence when the contractor is available and completion should not be more thans a week.  1Page    Requesting Homeowner Signature: 5  Date: Approved: Inspections: Comments:  1zL7 12/6118 Rejected:  Date received by Board of Directors:  12.j13/8  PArewsr rcaanin 3tof properhy liv fvon WASHINeTIN torikal Commitci Musk bu  prhab Cons)weh,  Arp  Date copy returned to homeowner:  12/13118  ANY BOARD APPROVALISSUMIKCTTO, ANYI REQUIRED APPROVAL OF ORI PERMIT, FROM THE CITY OF WASHINGTON AND/OR THE HISTORIC COMMISSION. THE APPLICATION IS NOT DEEMED FILED" UNTIL REVIEWED BY THE BOARD ATA REGULAR MEETING: AND NO APPROVAL ISI IMPLIED UNTIL: SPECIFIC WRITTEN  APPROVAL IS ISSUED BY THE BOARD.  Upon approval of preceding request, the undersigned hereby agrees to:  1. Maintain and keep in good repair the addition, improvement, or alteration as described on) Page 1 and 2. Replace and/or repair, at owner's expense, any damages to common areas, personal residence areas, including grass, walk stones, trees, building, roads, etc. as aj result ofi making the approved modifications. Upon completion ofconstruction or modifications, thel Board will inspect the work for damage to the common area. Ifdamage exists, the. Association will repair the damages and the 3. Upon transfer of ownership of subject property, the responsibility of maintenance shall pass to the next owner and the undersigned hereby agrees toi inform the new owner oft the Maintenance  shall bear the cost of such maintenance and repair.  undersigned will be billed for same.  Agreement prior to the transfer of property.  Jndh Homeowner's signature  128 Acknowledgment date  ldn Homeowner's signature  12/1318 Acknowledgment date  2/Page    >  4  o  8'-10" 15'-103/4"  CO  a    FRONT  Aa BEUIEE  BACK    ISIDE  STREET SIDE    EXAMPLE proposed wall willl be 4.5"a and along the back.    Adjoining Property Owners: 311 East Water Street  BIENES JERRYF 754 MCCOTTERS MARINE RD WASHINGTON NC: 27889 MASON CHARLOTTE NICHOLLS 119SHARVEY STREET WASHINGTON NC27889 ROLINSKY-RADER VICTORIA 113 HARVEY STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 BRIDGMAN MAURICE. M 204 YUKON ST HAMPTON VA 23663 BEACON STREET MOSS LLC PO BOX 6474 RALEIGH. NC27628 HAYES MARKT 301 MOSS WAY WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 FURR. JOHN STEPHEN 3111 E WATER STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 MITCHELLPAUL R 3091 E WATER STREET WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 JOHN EI MOORE MARITIALTRUST 307 WATER STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 RICHARDSON DANIELI D 305 EAST WATER STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889    Dountoton Decelopmenb fistoric Preseroation  0  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  December 19, 2018  Subject: Certificate ofAppropriateness -311 East Water Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  Ar request has been made by Mr. Stephen Furr for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a concrete patio in the back yard of the property located at 311 East Water  Street.  If you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are. welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Wednesday January 2, 2018  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  311 East Water Street  The application for the property located at 311 East Water Street is requesting approval to construct Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls: 4.6.2 Wood, brick, stone, decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of authentic design are appropriate fencing materials int the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link 4.6.6 New fences and walls should be ofa design that is appropriate to the architectural style 4.6.11lti is inappropriate to construct walls and fences on the waterfront that obstruct views and vistas from the historic district or from the water. No privacy fence that exceeds four (4) feeti in height shall be allowed int the side or rear yards of property located south of Main Street.  ac concrete patio in the back yard oft the property.  fences are not allowed. and period oft the historic structure.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 5.4 Decks:  5.4.1 A deck shall be designed and constructed so that the historic structure and its character- defining features and details are not damaged or obscured. Install decks sO they can be removed 5.4.2 Decks shall not, when feasible, be visible from the public right-of-way. New decks should be constructed ini inconspicuous locations, usually on the building's rear elevation. 5.4.3 Design and detail decks and associated railings and steps to reflect materials, scale, and 5.4.4 New decks should be painted or stained in a color that is compatible with the historic  in the future without damage to the structure.  proportions of the building. structure and district.  The property owner would like construct a patio in the side, rear yard of the property. The walls are of a design that is appropriate to the architectural style and period of the structure. The request is for the wall to be four (4) feet, six (6) inches, but the Design Guidelines state for it to not exceed four (4) feet. Based on findings of fact, the request  is not congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 311 East Water Street- construct a concrete patio ini the back yard  A request has been made by Stephen Furr fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to constructa concrete patio in the back yard of the property located at 311 East Water Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls, and! 5.41 Decks. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Stephen Furr to construct: a concrete patio in the back yard of the property located at 311 East Water Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences  and Walls, and 5.4 Decks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Stephen Furr to construct a concrete patio in the back yard of the property located at 311 East Water Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls, and! 5.41 Decks. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the  following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Stephen Furr to construct a concrete patio in the back yard of the property located at 311 East Water Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter4.6  Fences and' Walls, and 5.4 Decks.    418 East Water  Street  Roof Replacement    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Blackl Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers int thet frontl lobby of CityHall under" "Developmental Filing! Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 419E wiater Streut Owner's Name: Sinyton Hizard- Danici  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Lot Size:  54 (width)  feet by  75 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  replace Shingle roof with white metal fix damadis Caused by Hurhicane Elcrence  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  siaytn H4z4r4-Daicl 418 E Water Strelt 27881  (Name of Applicant -type or print) (Mailing Address) 12/8/18 (Date) Suybe W  (Initials)  ACTION  (ZipCode)  252-910- 4561 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature) (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of al Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply):  This document does not constitute the issuance ofa Building Permit. Itis the responsibility of the applicant too obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2" x11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETEA APPLICATIONS WILL NOTI BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item Property Owners & Address. Provide al list of property owners & addresses of all properties Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  isnot applicable).  located within a 100' of the above subject property.  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12"x11" reductions of full-size drawings. Ifreduced size is sO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2"x11"; snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. If you are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2" x1 11" sheets so that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work    Beaufort) Printedt December 19, 2018 SeeB Belowf forD Disclaimer  CONNECTGIS  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line D County Line (Solid)  CICA  1:26 Feet    OBJECTID 10635 OWNER NAME HAZARD-DANIEL: SLAYTON MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27827 BLDG VAL 31073 TAXABLE VA 86073 PROPERTY, ADDRESS 418WATERST DATE 5/25/2017 SALE PRICE 85000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 41988  GPIN 5685-06-1709 OWNER NAME2 CITY FALKLAND PROP DESC TOT VAL 86073 PREV ASSESS 91829 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1930/00285 NBRB BLDG 1 LAND USE YRBUILT 1956 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFFYR 1966  GPINLong 5685-06-1709 MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX1 166 STATE NC LANDVAL DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.18 MBL 568509115 STAMPS 170.00 NBHDCDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 840 NBRBED 2 PIN 01027867  (.18 AC) SLAYTON HAZARD-DANIEL 55000  Beaufort County onliner mapa accessis is provideda asay publics service, asis,a asa available andv withouty warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont thisy websitei is for informational purposes only andi is noti intendedt to constitute legal record nors shouldi itbes substituted fort thea advice ors services ofi industry professionals. The CountyofB Beauforta andt theV Website Providero disclaim allr responsibility: andl legall liabilityf fort thec content publishedo on thisv website. The usera agreest thatB Beaufort County  andits Assigns shallbeheldharmlesst from allactions, claims, damages orjudgments arising outoftheu usec ofCountyd data.        Adjacent Property Owners: Al and Angela Crisp 416 E Water Street Bahnson Gray 420 E Water Street Will and Michele Mayo 409 E Water Street Rodney and Vicki Pfahler 419 E Main Street  Description of Materials:  29 gauge metal roofing "AG" panel in white from Lyon Metal Roofing    Adjoining Property Owners: 4181 East Water Street HOUGH CHARLES. AJR 201 SOUTH ACADEMY STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 BEACON STREET MOSS LLC PO BOX 6474 RALEIGH. NC27628 ANNA MARIA ISJ INVESTMENTS LLC 416 WATER EAST STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 HEEKIN SARAHLLEWELLYN 409 E MAIN ST WASHINGTONNC278) HAZARD-DANIEL SLAYTON POJ BOX 166 FALKLAND: NC27827 GRAY ALLEN BAHNSON POBOX422 WASHINGTONNC278) JOYNER DONALDC 413 EMAIN: ST WASHINGTONI NC27889 PFAHLER RODNEY PAULSR 4191 EMAIN ST WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 MOORE WILLIAM W. JR 2517 CROWN COURT PANAMA CITY FL32405 REYNOLDS DAVID 4271 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 MOOREI LESLIE. A 31 EVANSHIRE DR FREDERICKSBURG VA 22406    Docntoin SDecelopmenb Gffistoric Presewation  C  City  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  December 19, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness -418 East Water Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  Ar request has been made by Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel for a Certificate of Appropri- ateness to replace the roof with a different material on the property located at 418 East  Water Street.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Wednesday January 2, 2018  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of thel building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  418 East Water Street  The application for the property located at 418 East Water Street is requesting approval use a Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.5 Roofs:  different material for roofing on property.  3.5.1 Retain and preserve historic roofs and roofing materials including its overall design, shape, 3.5.2 Character-defining elements of historic roofs should be retained and preserved including dormer windows, chimneys, turrets, cupolas, and parapet walls. Eave overhangs, moldings and  pitch, and line.  trim, and soffit boards should also be retained and preserved.  Note: The work has already been done to the building. The property is requesting to change the materials of the roof from asphalt to metal. The proposed metal roof alters the overall design of the structure. Based on findings of fact, the request is not  congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 418 East Water Street- Roof Replacement  A request has been made by Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the roof with a different material on the property located at 418 East Water Street.  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.5 Roofs.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included ini the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel to replace the existing asphalt shingle roof with a metal roof on the property located at 418 East Water Street." This motion is based on thei following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 3.5 Roofs.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel to replace the existing asphalt shingle roof with a metal roof on the property located at 418 East Water Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.5 Roofs. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place  the following conditions on1 the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel to replace the existing asphalt shingle roof with a metal roof on the property located at 418 East Water Street. This motion is based on thet following findings oft fact: the application is not congruous withi the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 3.5 Roofs.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor' Works  1. AI request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 140 West Main Street to replace the existing roof using like materials on the 2. AI request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 409 West Main Street to install a decorative brick cap over the concrete bulkhead 3. AI request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 124 Charlotte Street to replace the existing A/C unit in the same location on the 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 115 Respess Street to repoint masonry joints and install flashing on the rear parapet 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 743 East Main Street to replace rotten siding using like materials on the property.  property.  on the property.  property.  wall on the property.    MINUTES    WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting - Minutes Tuesday, December 4, 2018 Members Present Cheri Vaughn Kathleen Couch Mark Everett (Chairman) William Kenner Rebecca Clark. Karen Mann Members Absent Colleen Knight Others Present Emily Rebert, Historic Planner John Rodman, Director Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the meeting The Chairman called the meeting to order. Invocation Ar moment of silence was taken. III. Roll Call A silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old Business  1. Ar request has been made by Ms. Patty Franz for a Certificate of Appropriateness to elevate the structure and remove the chimney on the property located at 613 Old Ms. Patty Franz came forward and was sworn in. Ms. Franz: stated that the question from last month was should she bring in fill orj just go with the 4ft piers. Ms. Franz explained that bringing in dirt will cost her $4,000 and willl be al burden on her. She stated that it is even more of a burden since her business is not up and running and this decision is being pushed back. She stated that she is afraid that ifs she doesn't get approval and a building permit, things could get bad for her. She stated that she would like to get the request approved whether she has to spend the extra money or not. Mark Everett asked if Ms. Franz had any additional discussions with. John' Wood from the State Historic Office. Ms. Franz stated that she has not. She did email him a number of  Second Street.  times, but has not received additional information.  1    A member of the audience came forward. She asked about the stability of bringing in dirt first and then constructing the piers. She asked ifini the event ofa a large amount of water like they had during the hurricane would the dirt then) just become mud. She asked how stable that option is fora al house int the event ofa another flood. Mark Everett stated that he couldn'ta answer that question from a geo-tect stand point, but generally when you provide filli it has to be suitable material and compaction has tol be achieved  so that it is stable. The Chairman closed the floor.  Rebecca Clark: stated that again she didn't have a problem with Ms. Franz using the 4ft pylons. She stated that she felt they would have the same issues if they brought in fill dirt. Ms. Clark stated that they would still have 4-foot pylons and just be covering them with dirt. Kathleen Couch stated that she believed the benefit of using the dirt ist to cover the pylons sO that it does not appear to be on piers. Ms. Couch stated that the whole reason why the State Office recommended 21 ftoff filli is so that the house is consistent. Ms. Couch asked if. John Wood from the State Office recommended: 2ft of fill and asked ifs staff had gotten confirmation on that. Emily Rebert stated that she did not have any recommendation from that Office in writing. Ms. Clark stated that someone will not know if there is dirt or pylons under the house due to the screening. William Kenner stated that once Ms. Franz puts up the lattice you will notl be able to see anything. William Kenner then spoke about the elevations oft the surrounding houses. He stated that the house across from this one has 5foot of brick and every house in that area is raised up 4 or 5ft. Rebecca Clark:s statèd that the flood in this area is not going to stop: and this is an issue that isn't going away. She stated that they needed to do what they can to keep the house standing when the next flood comes through and she didn't feel dirt would matter. William Kenner stated that with the way the water goes out there will be al lot of erosion oft that dirt. Kathleen Couch stated that she thought those would. be questions for an engineer. Kathleen Couch stated that the Commission must look at following the guidelines. She stated that the Commission would be amending a guideline for one homeowner. She stated that the purpose oft the dirt is to hide the piers sO that the house doesn'ta appear tol be raised. Ms. Couch stated that ify you look at the house that she wants to copy at 513 E2nd Street, you can see that the house is on piers and it has lattice underneath. She stated that she felt the question oft the fill dirt was to mediate that appearance. Rebecca Clark asked what it would look like if dirt was brought in. Kathleen Couch stated that she believed the dirti is landscaped up/graded out sO there is not an appearance of the big elevation of piers and lattice. William Kenner asked if the dirt would protrude out from under the house sO there is a gradual slope or will itj just be sitting under the house. Emily Rebert explained that the dirt would be graded out from the house. Mark Everett clarified that the Commission is discussing the option of2fto of dirt/filland then 21 ft of piers. Karen Mann: stated that with this option the house would only have to be elevated 21 ft piers from the new lot. Cheri Vaughn asked if the piers would remain 41 ft. Ms. Franz stated that the piers will remain 41 ft no matter what, the house has to be raised 4ft. She explained that FEMAis  2    requiring her to go 4 ft which is above the BFE. She stated that basically she is being asked to: spend al large amount of money to cover the 4 ft piers with 21 ftof graded fill. She stated that there will be 4 ft piers, but 21 ft will be covered by dirt. The Commission questioned whether it would. be 41 ft piers or 21 fto of fill and then 2 ft piers. Karen Mann stated that it seemed like another question for an engineer. Rebecca Clark stated that you can'tj just put a house on new ground, every house has to have support. Ms. Franz stated that the dirt is only for esthetics. Karen Mann asked if Ms. Franz had spoken to John Wood again. Ms. Franz stated that she has contacted him a number of times and as of November 29th he stated that they still do not have any guidance. Ms. Franz stated that she did ask where in the bylaws that it states that 2ft of visible piers are okay but 4 ft of piers are not. She stated that iti is her understanding thati it is really. just a matter of opinion from the preservation society on whether that is acceptable or not. William Kenner pointed out that the house across the street is already elevated 4 or51 ft., SO if the house in question is elevated 41 fti it would: still blend into the neighborhood. Mr. Franz stated that the house inf front of her has piers on the deck that are almost 5ft tall. Ms. Franz asked the Commission to keep in mind that she is the only house on Old 2nd Street, the houses across from her are the backs of the houses that face 2nd Street. Ms. Franz stated that she really needed to gett the request approved because the house is falling apart. The Commission discussed the chimney. Mark Everett said that it was his recollection that they didn't have a problem with the chimney request at the previous meeting. He stated that the issue wasi ift the raising oft the house would deem it a non- contributing structure. Karen Mann stated that it was her recollection that Mr. Wood recommended. grading the lot 2 fta and raising the house up on 21 ft piers fora a total of4 ft. Ms. Mann stated that if the house is raised without the lot being graded it will lose Emily Rebert came forward. She stated that Ms. Franz's request is to elevate the house with 4ft piers. She stated that the design guidelines call for, sO that the house doesn't look like iti is on stilts, is tol bring in 2fto of fill and then have 21 ft of piers. Kathleen Couch asked if there were tax credits available for Mr. Franz to use. Emily Rebert stated that there are tax credits available for this type of project, but she wasn'ts sure how it would Mark Everett reminded the Commission of their options, to approve, deny, or continue Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Patty Franz to elevate the dwelling and remove the east side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations; 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation. Her motion was seconded by William Kenner. The motion failed witha2 2-3 vote with Karen Mann,  it's contributing status.  work with any type of insurance money.  the request.  Kathleen Couch, and Cheri Vaughn voting in opposition.  3    Cheri Vaughn made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Patty Franz to elevate the dwelling and remove the east side chimney on the property located at 613 Old Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations, 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval: that Ms. Franz bringi in 2ft of fill sO that there will only be 2ft of piers. John Rodman explained that the Commission should be careful when granting a motion for something that the applicant didn't request. He stated that Ms. Franz is requesting the use of41 ft piers and the Commission can either grant or deny that request. He stated that with that motion they are approving something completely different from the request and what was advertised. The Commission discussed a similar case they had on Short Drive and: stated that conditions were placed on that request to elevate. Emily Rebert explained that the Storks request was approved with the condition that they work with the State Historic Preservation Office to keep it contributing. Cheri Vaughn amended her previous motion and changed the conditions to the following: that the application work with the State Historic Preservation Office on the elevation to keep the house a contributing structure. William Kenner seconded the motion. The motion carried with a majority 4-1 vote. Rebecca Clark voted in  opposition.  2. Arequest has been made by Mr. Fred Read fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to elevate the structure on the property located at 516 East Second Street.  Mr. Fred. Read came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Read stated that one oft the issues with his request was also the fill dirt. Mark Everett explained that the Commission received Mr. Read's elevation certificate last minutes at the previous meeting and there were some questions as to how high the house needed to be raised. Mr. Read explained that per the Cityl Inspector, Allen Pittman, the house only needs to be raised 3 feet and his previous drawing was for 4%ft. Mr. Read agreed that fill dirt would be an engineer question. Mr. Read then showed his neighbor's home along with others that are elevated in the area. He stated that he didn't feel the elevation detracts from those homes. Mr. Read then spoke about how close his house is to the neighboring home. He stated that he couldn'ti imagine bringing in fill dirt on the property. He stated that he is William Kenner also spoke about the house's close proximity to the neighbor's! house and the issues bringing in fill dirt would cause. Mark Everett asked about the estimate that Mr. Read: submitted. He asked if the estimate was just to elevate the house or ifit  flexible and will gladly work with the Commission.  4    included bringing in dirt. Mr. Read stated that the estimate was only for thei internal piers, it did not include the façade or any service hook ups. The estimate is only for the elevation and didn'tinclude fill dirt. Emily Rebert confirmed that this house is a non- Alfred Dintino, 518 E2nd Street, came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Dintino stated that he is Mr. Read's direct neighbor and he was concerned about how bringing in fill dirt would affect his property along with others surrounding the property in question. Mr. Dintino stated that if2ft of fill dirti is brought in, he will have issues on his property during heavy rains. Mr. Dintino stated that he already has issues with flooding and he too will be requesting to elevate his house in the near future. He stated that he hoped the Commission would grant the request to elevate the house without the fill dirt option. Mr. Dintino then asked about the purpose or reason of the fill dirt. Mark Everett stated that it was his understanding that it was consistent with the guidelines that fall under The Department ofl Interior Standards. Ms. Rebert stated that Mr. Everett was correct. She stated that the issue is addressed in the Commission's Guideline Chapter 6.2.5: A relocated building must be compatible with the surrounding structures ini its architectural style, height, scale, size and orientation. She explained that when looking down the streetscape you: shouldn't see a wave of different house heights. Mr. Dintino stated that the City already has that to a certain degree down 2nd Street and the different elevations do not detract from the appearance of the districti in his opinion. He again talked about the added drainage and flooding issues he willl have if fill dirt is brought on top of the issues he already has with water on his property. Mr. Dintino stated that since this house is a non-contributing structure it may not even be  contributing structure.  an issue.  The Chairman closed the floor.  Rebecca Clark stated that the Commission needs to hold this structure to a different standard since it isal non-contributing structure. Rebecca Clark: stated that she didn't think fill dirt would work on this property. She stated that she didn't have a problem with him raising the house and not using fill dirt. Kathleen Couch stated that shei felt that the: standards that the Commission applies to the Historic District is uniform, whether iti is a contributing or non-contributing structure, unless there are extenuating circumstances for one verse the other. Kathleen Couch: stated that the structure being non-contributing is really not the issue, iti is whether iti is adhering to the standards because in time any structure can become contributing. She stated that if the Commission is going to divert from the standards, they need to specify the reason for diverting from the standards. Karen Clark asked whyi in their guidelines would it clearly differentiate between contributing and non-contrbuting ift the Commission was not supposed to look at them differently and look at a non-contributing structure with more leniency. Ms. Clark stated that the fact is that this house is a non-contributing structure today and she felt it should be looked at differently. Ms. Clark then stated that just because al house is old doesn't mean it has historical value. Kathleen Couch stated that  5    even new homes have to be held to a standard and be approved byt the Commission because they are in the historic district and has the potential of be a contributing structure. Kathleen Couch stated that was the reason why the guidelines are for the entire historic district not guidelines for contributing structures. Rebecca Clark stated that she disagreed with that opinion and stated that she felt they should look at them different. Cheri Vaughn stated that she agreed that there can be a little more leniency with non-contributing structures, but the guidelines also need to be followed. Ms. Vaughn stated that ini this case if fill dirti is brought in the water is just going to run into the very close neighbor's yard. She stated that she felt this would be the extenuating circumstance to allow him to elevate withj justt the piers and not fill dirt, along with the fact that this house is extremely close to the neighboring property. Karen Mann stated that she is concerned about this because like Mr. Dintino stated there will be more people coming before the Commission with this type of request. She stated that the Commission needs to have a good reason as to why they are averting from the guidelines. Ms. Mann stated that to bel honest even if the house was raised sixf feet all the houses would have still flooded because the River flooded. She stated that one house being elevated al little higher that the other will not necessarily make someone else's house flood. William Kenner stated that the houses in the that area are already elevated especially the new construction. He stated that this willl be an issue that will Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Fred Read to elevation the dwelling on the property located at 516 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2 Materials, 3.3 Foundations, 3.5 Roofs, and 6.2 Relocation. Ms. Clark stated that she would like it noted that this house isai non-contributing structure. William Kenner seconded the motion and the motion carried with a majority vote. Kathleen Couch and Karen Mann voted in opposition. Mark Everett stated that it would be great if they could get. John Wood from the State Historic Preservation Office to come and give them feed back about this type of situation. He stated that in at flood prone town like Washington thei issue is not going to go away, it is going to continue to be an issue. Mr. Everett stated that just int the time he has been in Washington the severity and frequency oft these storms seem to be getting greater over time. Mr. Everett stated that he would love for them to look at this issue and find al better way to deal with it as they move forward. He stated that they will continue to receive these types of applications especially after a storm event. Mr. Everett stated that it would be helpful to have some clarification from John Wood as to what the decision oft the Department of Interior Standards is when looking at this type ofr request and how should a Community look at this issue when the floodingi is not going to go away. He stated that it can become an equity issue when looking at lot lengths and sizes. He: stated that al larger lot has plenty of room to bring inf fill and grade it out but smaller lots have al lotl less ability to allow freeboard for adjacent properties.  come before the Commission until all those homes are raised.  6    He stated that it would be helpful to the Commission to have that information from the State Office and have their design guidelines allow them to expeditiously consider these  requests.  V.  Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  1. An request has been made by Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 12'x16' storage shed in the  back yard of the property located at: 221 East Second Street.  Mr. Mooring came forward and was sworn in. He explained that they are looking to get some extra storage in their reary yard. He stated that they currently do not have much storage space. Mr. Mooring explained that the proposed shed comes as a kit that he will have to assemble. The Commission discussed the appearance and the direction of the lap boards. Kathleen Couch: stated that she didn't think that the lap board had to run in the same direction as the house becausei it isa a new building. She stated that she didn't think is was: supposed to mimic the house. Emily Rebert stated that the design of the lap board was upi to the pleasure of the Commission. Karen Mann asked if the shed would be visible from the road. Mr. Mooring stated thati ift that was an issue, they could The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the William Kenner made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Betty Mooring to install a 12'x15' storage shed in the back yard of the property located at 221 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.12 Outbuildings. Cheri Vaughn seconded the motion and all voted in favor.  put it in a spot where it would not be visible.  request.  B. Minor' Works  1. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of Moss Landing Development - Lot? #22 to construct a new single-family 2. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of 311 East Main Street to replace the existing A/C unit in the same location 3. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of2 217 and 213 North Market Street to repair the existing materials in kind on  dwelling on the property. of the property.  the front façade on the property.  7    4. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 211 South Academy Street to replace the existing split heat pump: system 5. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 217 and 213 North Market Street to repair the existing materials in kind on Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 518 East Second Street to replace the existing standing seam roof using 7. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the owner of 315 West Main Street to replace the existing roof using like materials on 8. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 112 South Respess Street to replace the existing door using like materials. 9. Arequest has been made and approved. by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 118 North Bonner Street to repair the existing staircase using like materials Rebecca Clark made a motion to approve all the minor works. Her motion was  int the: same location on the property. thet front façade on the property. like materials on the property.  the property.  The doors are covered with: shutters.  on the property.  seconded by Kathleen Couch and all voted in favor.  VI. Other Business  1. Resolution to Amend Historic Preservation Commission Rules and Regulations John Rodman came forward and presented the Resolution to the Commission. He explained that each Board has rules and regulations that they must follow. He stated that when the rules for the HPC were written it only allows the Chairman to vote int the event of a tie. Mr. Rodman stated that they do not want to get in a situation where only four members oft the Commission are present, including the Chairman, andi they do not have a voting quorum. He stated that they would like to amend the rules and regulations to allow the Chairman to vote on all matters that come before the Commission. Rebecca Clark asked how the other board and committees operate. Mr. Rodman stated that all the other board allow the Chairman to vote and this amendment would be consistent with the other boards. Kathleen Couch made a motion to accept the Resolution to Amend the Rules of Procedure for the Historic Preservation Commission to allow the Chairman to vote on all matters that come before the Commission. Cheri Vaughn seconded the motion. The motion carried with  an majority vote with Rebecca Clark voting in opposition.  VII. Approval of Minutes- November 6, 2018  Karen Mann made a motion to approve the November minutes. Cheri Vaughn seconded the motion  and all voted ini favor.  8    The Commission discussed the issue ofe elevation further. Rebecca Clark stated that she would like to pursue thei issue further and look into amending the guidelines ift they need to. She stated that they need more information on the issue. Mark Everett agreed and stated that they do need: some guidance as to how to handle the cases moving forward. They discuss the option ofas sub-  committee to look at thei issue. VIII. Adjourn the motion.  There being no other business Rebecca Clark made a motion to adjourn. Cheri Vaughn seconded  9