WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:00 PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Ms. Judy Van Dorp for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace an existing wooden fence with a 4-foot stone and wrought iron picket fence in the back yard of the property located at 709 West Main 2.A A request has been made by Mr. Jonathan Russell for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in the back yard of the 3. A request has been made by Mr. J.B. Bland for a Certificate of Appropriateness to convert an existing gravel driveway to concrete on the east side of the property 4. Ar request has been made by Mary Chandler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the siding on the eaves of the front porch using cement board on the  Street.  property located at 746 West Main Street.  located at 242 East Second Street.  property located at 524 West Second Street.  B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 111 West Second Street to replace the existing door on the second floor in the same style and using like materials. They will also be 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 302 East Second Street to replace rotten siding and a rear shed roof using like materials on the property. The property owner will  installing a small awning over the back that door.  also be installing gutters.  1    3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 307 West Main Street to repair the roof using like 4. A  request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness: for the City of Washington to remove the trees along the old 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 109 Brown Street to repair the roof using like 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 524 West Second Street to repair the siding and  materials on the property.  Rowing Club.  materials on the property.  HVAC stand using like materials on the property.  VI. Other Business  1. Tree Policy, Request for Commission Action  2. Terrell Award Nominations VII. Approval of Minutes = March 5, 2019  VIII. Adjourn  2    OLD  BUSINESS  None    MAJOR  WORKS    709 West Main  Street  Fence Construction    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 too cashiersi in thei front lobby of Cityl Hall underDevelopmental Finding Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 709 West Main st.  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  HAnk and Judy Manborp  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work tobe Done:  Replace wooden fa fence and falrond tie barrier w:T Wrousht o piclat FEnE a a stov base. 667  Stveth on Short Orive (BAK yarl). Iron fence shopr fall Welded Solid iron.  fencing poodued by fence heigkt =4A  Posts arc 3"x3" 4 capped with bAI ornamenfathon.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Judy VenDarp (Name of/Applicant -type or print) 709 W, Main St. (Mailing Address) Z-15-19 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  (Zip Code)  252-367-5419 (Daytime Phone Number)  Vaw Borp  (Date)  (Authorized Signature) ahs Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort County Property Photos  PIN: 01004772  Photo: 01004772.jpg  Copyright 2019 by Dude Solutions. All Rights Reserved    Beaufort Printed March1 11, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  GEBRTOR  1:30 Feet    OBJECTID 6257 OWNER NAME VAN DORP ABRAHAM HJR MAILING ADDRESS2 709 WEST MAIN ST ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 154957 TAXABLE VA 214207 PROPERTY ADDRESS 709 W MAIN ST DATE 5/2/2016 SALE PRICE 250000.00 NBHD DESC WEST SIDE HISTORIC ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 44610  GPIN 5675-59-8281 OWNER NAME2 VAN DORP JULIA B CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC TOT VAL 214207 PREV ASSESS 230472 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1899/00466 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1924 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFFYR 1975  GPIN Long 5675-59-8281 MAILING ADDRESS 709 WEST MAIN: ST STATE NC LAND VAL 59250 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.24 MBL 567500209 STAMPS 500.00 NBHD CDE WSH EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2864. NBR BED 3 PIN 01004772  LOT "B" WHITLEY WI MAIN ST  Beaufort County online map access is provided as a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website is for informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute al legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services of industry professionals. The County of Beaufort and the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legal liability fort the content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort Countyl  andi its Assigns shall be! held! harmless from all actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out of the use of County data.        Short  Drive  51 ft.  8R  "76'  Ggeagk (SK2.0  bO In  DO  D D  0go0  109  West MMain Sh  Beplace existing wood fence (yellov) wrh wroght Iron    About Iron Fence Shope  Iron Fence Shope is a company that takes pride in our work and it shows in everything we do. Itstarts with having quality products that wel believe in. Our superior craftsmanship extends beyond expectations toi include exclusive, authentic detailing such as cast iron or aluminum finials welded on each picket. Wealso go above-and-beyond to galvanize our iron materials for superior rust-inhibition and all ofour products geta quality' TGIC powder coat with UV fade inhibitors to ensure decades of enduring beauty. Lastly, all of our fence, postand gate products are) produced within our own manufacturing facility We are also a company that prides itself on knowledgeable customer service. With over 60 years of combined: fence experience, wel know our products inside and out. No hourly employees reading out ofa catalog here. Ourl knowledgeable sales staff can help with suggesting products, comparing us to competitors, answering questions of all kinds and even giving guidance on installation. One oft the biggest reasons our customers recommend us to others is our one-on-one approach to service. We want you to understand exactly  where quality can be controlled: from start to finish.  what you are buying and how tol best install it.  Classic Style Sigasfure 4'f. huigkt 3K3 posts  Grade    Fence Panel Styles  Stronghold Iron Fence and Gates  Classic Style  Pool Style  -  Available in 3ft, 4ft, 5ft and 6ftTall * 6ft tall pieces have two upperrails. * Available in Traditional and'Signature Grade * All fence panels are 8ft (96in) wide *N Matching gates in 4ft, 5ft,6ft, 8ft, 10ft and 12ft wide  Available only in 4ft 2in (50in) tall height Available in' Traditional andSignature Grade * All fence panels are 8ft (96in) wide *I Matching gates in 4ft and 8ft wide  Puppy Picket Style  * Available in 4ft and 5ft'Tall * Available in' Traditional GradeOnly * All fence panels are 8ft (96in) wide *] Matching gates in 4ft, 5ft, 8ft and 10ft wide  Page 6    IRON - FENCE  G    A   ENG 5 DR    IRON SFENCE    Adjoining Property Owners: 709 West Main Street  SLOAN BLIZABETHP 701 SHORT DRIVE WASHINGTONI NC27889 PECK R BRANTLEY JR 715 SHORT DRIVE WASHINGTONI NC27889 MANN CRAWFORD ALEXANDERJR 711 SHORT DRIVE WASHINGTONNC2789 KUCASI MARK A 1071 BENEDUM PLACE CARY NC27518 BRADBURY JANETT 715 W MAIN STREET WASHINGTONNC278) MCLENDON CHRISTOPHER B 705 SHORT DRIVE WASHINGTON: NC27889 SCALES G FREDERICK 713 WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTONNC278) VAN DORP. ABRAHAM HJR 709 WEST MAIN ST WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 SILVERMAN ROD: SPENCER 710 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 POSTON: MAGGIE 705 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 BERTING. JOSHUA MICHAEL 701 WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 COLLIER CHRISTOPHER. H 124 WASHINGTON ST WASHINGTON NC 27889    Colonial  Oxford  Plantation Previous            WESTON STONETM RETAINING WALL  CLASSIC  The flexibility of Weston Stone is unmatched. Its natural stone appearance allows for a wide range of applications and design options. This double-sided wall is the ideal choice for garden walls, pillars, outdoor kitchens and planters.    orontoin Decelopmenb ftoric Presevoation  -  Citys  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  March 19, 2019  Subject: Certificate ofAppropriateness- -709 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Ms. Judy Van Dorp for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace an existing wooden fence with a 4-foot brick and wrought iron picket fence in  the back yard of the property located at 709 West Main Street.  Ifyour would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are. welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side oft the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 3 Ml Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 reber@washngomegow    Staff Report  709 West Main  The application for the property located at 709) West Main Street is requesting approval to replace an existing wooden fence with a 4-foot stone and wrought iron picket fence in the back yard oft the  property.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls: 4.6.2 Wood, brick, stone, decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of authentic design are appropriate fencing materials in the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link 4.6.6 New fencesa and walls should be of a design that is appropriate to the architectural style 4.6.7 Front yard fences, fences erected adjacent to a main: street or a side street should be ofan open design, sucha as picket and no greater than four (4) feet in height. Iti is prohibited to use solid privacy fences ini front yards. Split rail, basket weave, lattice and shadowbox are also 4.6.8 Privacy fencing shall only be allowed in the reary yard. Ifai majority ofal privacy fence is visible from the publicrightof-way,: al landscape buffer shall bei included. No fence, includinga 4.6.9 Arear yard privacy fence shall place the framing for the fence to the inside facing the owner's property. The outside ofa all wooden rear yard privacy fences shall bei finished using an opaque stain or paint. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure. The fence is within the height requirements and is of an appropriate design. Based on finding of fact, this request is congruous with the historic preservation design guidelines.  fences are not allowed. and period of the historic structure.  prohibited.  privacy fence, shall exceed six (6) feet in height.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 709 West Main Street- Fence Construction  Arequest has been made by Ms.. Judy Van Dorpi fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace an existing wooden fence with a 4-foot stone and wrought iron picket fence in the back yard  oft the property located at 709 West Main Street.  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached toi the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Judy Van Dorp fora Certificate of Appropriateness to replace an existing wooden fence with a 4- foot stone and wrought iron picket fence in the back yard of the property located at 709 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences  and Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Judy Van Dorp for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace an existing wooden fence witha 4- foot stone and wrought iron picket fence in the back yard oft the property located at 709 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Judy Van Dorp for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace an existing wooden fence witha 4- foot stone and wrought iron picket fence in the back yard of the property located at 709 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is not    congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  4.6 Fences and Walls.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking from HPO that will aid them ini making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    746 West Main  Street  Fence Construction    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use BlackInk  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 toc cashiers ini the front lobby of City Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  746 West Main Street  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Paul Spruill 48' (width)  feet by  226' (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Construct: a 6-foot wood privacy fence ini the back yard of the property.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Jonathan Russell (Name of Applicant -t type or print) 746 West Main Street (Mailing Address) March, 5, 2019 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  27889 (Zip Code)  252-975-9319 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized  AA (Signature of Applicant)  Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work, Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Beaufort County Property Photos  PIN: 01006260  Photo: 01006260.jpg  -  Copyright 2019 by Dude Solutions. All Rights Reserved    Beaufort Printed March 05, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇIGIS HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Linés Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:38 Feet    OBJECTID 6210 OWNER NAME SPRUILL PAUL G MAILING ADDRESS2 746 WEST MAIN ST ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 185560 TAXABLE VA 239060 PROPERTY ADDRESS 746 W MAIN ST DATE 9/29/2003 SALE PRICE 156000.00 NBHD DESC WEST SIDE HISTORIC ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 44454  GPIN 5675-59-3736 OWNER NAME2 SPRUILL KEELYL CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC TOT VAL 239060 PREV ASSESS 244951 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1356/00509 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1900 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFFYR 1999  GPIN Long 5675-59-3736 MAILING ADDRESS 746 WEST MAIN ST STATE NC LAND VAL 53500 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.28 MBL 567500113 STAMPS 312.00 NBHD CDE WSH EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2500 NBR BED 4 PIN 01006260  LOT11 BLK B GRIST PROPERTY  Beaufort County online map access is provided asa a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this website is fori informational purposes only and is noti intended to constitute: al legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals." The County ofE Beaufort and the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legall liability for the content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort Countyl  andi its Assigns shall be held harmless from all actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.            tePlar  Gate   Shed  ate  House  Gsbe  Lot  Fence Location  West Main Street    Adjoining Property Owners: 746 West Main Street  WHITE-WAGONER. JOAN 111 WMAIN STREET WASHINGTONNCZIBS RIVER CHASEHOMEOWNERS ASSC POI BOX 82 WASHINGTONNC278) GRIFFIN MARCIA S 134 WASHINGTON ST WASHINGTON NC 27889 BROWN CHARLES Q 86 CYPRESS SHORES DRIVE WASHINGTONI NC27889 GRAVES CSWANSON 705 SHORT DRIVE WASHINGTON: NC27889 WICKHAM CHARLENE W 739 WI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON! NC27889 SPRUILL: PAUL G 746 WESTMAIN! ST WASHINGTON! NC2 27889: MCLEAN CATHY B 742 WESTMAIN STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 COLLIER CHRISTOPHER H 124 WASHINGTON STREET WASHINGTONNC278) RATCLIFF. ZENOII 1564' TERRA CEIA ROAD PANTEGONC27860 BRAZIER BETTY JO 140 WASHINGTON HARBOUR WASHINGTONI NC27889 MUSSELMAN SCOTT 755 W2ND STREET WASHINGTON NC2 27889    otntoin eoelopmenb eBfstoric Presevoation  Citys  Washington NORTH CAR'OLINA  March 19, 2019  Subject: Certificate ofA Appropriateness-746 West Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Jonathan Russell for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 6'v wood privacy fence in the back yard of the property located at 746  West Main Street.  Ifyouw would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  As Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  746 West Main  The application for the property located at 746 West Main Street is requesting approval to construct a 6-  foot wood privacy fence around the perimeter oft the back yard oft the property.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls: 4.6.2 Wood, brick, stone, decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of authentic design are appropriate fencing materials in the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link 4.6.6 New fences and walls should be ofa a design thati is appropriate to the architectural style 4.6.8 Privacy fencing shall only be allowed int the rear yard. Ifar majority of a privacy fence is visible from the public right-of-way, al landscape buffer shall be included. No fence, includinga 4.6.9 Ar rear yard privacy fence shall place the framing for the fence to the inside facing the owner's property. The outside of all wooden rear yard privacy fences shall be finished using an opaque stain or paint. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure. 4.6.12 The use of plant screenings, in the form of hedgerows and landscaping, is encouraged as an alternative to fences and walls. Any such plantings shall comply withi the height and location  fences are not allowed. and period of the historic structure.  privacyf fence, shall exceed six (6) feet in height.  standards oft these guidelines.  The fence is within the height requirements and is of an appropriate design. Based on finding of fact, this request is congruous with the historic preservation design guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 746 West Main Street- Fence Construction  Ar request has been made by Mr.. Jonathan Russell for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in the back yard of the property located at 746 West  Main Street.  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.61 Fences and Walls.  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Jonathan Russell to construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in the back yard oft the property located at746 West Main Street. This motion is based on thet following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and' Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jonathan Russell to construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence in the back yard of the property located at 746 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. If further move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Jonathan Russell to construct a 6-foot wooden privacy fence int the back yard of the property located at7 746 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls.  Or    Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission. seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NCGS160A-400.9ld), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    242 East Second  Street  Driveway Installation    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers int the front lobby ofCityh Hall under' Developmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 242 E. Sacond S1. Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Capt show House Owner's Name: Down Fask Trust NG. 242  Lot Size:  feet. by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  replace ekishirg Concveke in drivewey. exkend cvivtwcy to fence.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior toi the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  J.B. Bland  (Name of Applicant-type or print) wash. NC. 610 w. 157h - st. Sui10 (Mailing Address) 3u19 (Date  (Initials)  ACTION  27339 (ZipCode)  252-412-7600 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  A1  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply):  This document does not constitute the issuance ofa Building Permit. Itis the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  D Exterior Alteration New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  Addition Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2"x11"; sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item  isn not applicable).  Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12" x 11" reductions of full-size drawings. Ifreduced size is sO small as to be illegible, make 8-1/2"x11"s snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. Ify you are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2"x11" sheets sO that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work        Beaufort Printed March: 11, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇTGIS  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:25E Feet    OBJECTID 6989 OWNER NAME DOWN EAST NO242 MAILING ADDRESS2  GPIN 5675-97-7930 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT2 242 EAST: 2ND: STREET TOT VAL 79639 PREV ASSESS 73235 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1795/00063 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1840 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1960  GPIN Long 5675-97-7930 MAILING ADDRESS 610W1 15TH ST STATE NC LAND VAL 39270 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.16 MBL 567508136 STAMPS NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 1020 NBR BED 2 PIN 01005171  ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 40369 TAXABLE VA 79639 PROPERTY ADDRESS 242 E2NDST DATE 9/27/2012 SALE PRICE 0.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUS01 NBR BATHS REID 44553  Beaufort County online map: access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available andy without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published on this websitei is for informational purposes only and is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor should it bes substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County of Beaufort and the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility: and legall liabilityf for the content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort Countyl  andi its Assigns shall bel held! harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    e    Google            Adjoining Property Owners: 242 East Second Street CROWLEY KENNETH MICHAEL 605 DELUTH STREET DURHAM NC27705 NEVILLLLC 3008 BUCKINGHAM WAY APEXNC27502 BURDI ANTHONY 239 EAST SECOND STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 OLSEN ANDREAS. A HELMERS 2451 E2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 FREEMAN FORD WORTHY 1001 RIVERSIDE: DRIVE. APT2 WASHINGTON: NC27889 WILBERSCHBID JOSEPHJ 424 EAST SECOND STREET WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 MITCHELL ROBERT: EUGENE 11705 5th AVE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10029 TOLER WHITING M 238E2ND: ST WASHINGTONNC2789 DOWN EASTNO242 610 W 15TH ST WASHINGTON NC27889 MCDOWELL GEOFFREY 210HARVEY ST WASHINGTONNC2789 PARKERJEREMIAE ALLEN 239) EAST 3RD: STREET WASHINGTONI NC27889 NORMAN DIANNA 2141 N. HARVEY STREET WASHINGTONNC278)  NIELSENTHERESA GILROY 5834 BOUNDARYI PL LONGMONT CO 80503    Dountoun eoelopmenb 6 Glistoric Presevoation  C  Citys  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  March 19, 2019  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 242 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. J.B. Bland for a Certificate of Appropriateness to con- vert an existing gravel driveway to concrete on the east side of the property located at  242 East Second Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 25  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  242 East Second Street  The application for the property located at 242 East Second Street is requesting approval to convert an  existing gravel driveway to concrete on the east side oft the property.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.3 Driveways and  Sidewalks:  4.3.10 Driveways on residential properties within the Historic District shall be composed of either concrete, brick, asphalt, crushed stone, or compacted and crushed oyster shells. Loose 4.3.11 When loose material is used for driveways or parking, the perimeter of such shall be 4.3.13 Double width drives that are visible from the public right-of-way: are not permitted. 4.3.14 Curb-cuts must be located in accordance with City Code and shall be kept to the smallest 4.3.15 New driveways should be designed to minimize any impact to the landscape, building, The proposed driveway is of appropriate material and size. Based on finding of fact, this  material is prohibited in commercialareas. clearly defined by an edging material. 4.3.12 Circular drives in front yards are not permitted.  openings that are functional. and historic curbing.  request is congruous with the historic preservation design guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 242 East Second Street- Driveway installation  Ar request has been made by Mr.. J.B. Bland for a Certificate of Appropriateness to convert an existing gravel driveway to concrete on the east side of the property located at 242 East Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.3 Driveways and Sidewalks. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  Second Street.  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission granta a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. J.B. Bland to convert an existing gravel driveway to concrete on the east side of the property located at: 242 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 4.3 Driveways and Sidewalks.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. J.B. Bland to convert an existing gravel driveway to concrete on the east side of the property located at 242 East Second: Street. This motion is based on thet following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.31 Driveways and Sidewalks. It further move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place thei following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. J.B. Bland to convert an existing gravel driveway to concrete on the east side of the property located at 242 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter 4.3 Driveways and Sidewalks.  Or    Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9(d); which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. Jalso move the commission seek guidànce from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS160A-400.9ld), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    524 West Second  Street  Substitution of Materials on Front Porch    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Blackl Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submitt theApplication Fee of $50 tocashiersi in the front lobby ofCity! Hall underDevelopmenta. Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 524 W. 2nd St.  Historic Property/Name Owner's Name: Lot Size:  NIA  (if applicable): 95 (width)  Nary lohgpod Chandler  feet. by  2/0 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done: Replace roted e  boards on house in preparation  for Corners  replace dilapidated interior plymandat porch roof,raplace looden structure.  under hesthnglair conditipner  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior toi the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Hobaobd Chandler  (Name Hary-labye  type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  524 W. Znd St. (Mailing Address) MWashingon, (Date) 7 Clendk Signature of Applicant)  (Zip Code) Number) 678)427-0587  Nc 27889 (Daytime Phone  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply): Exterior Alteration O Addition New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  This document does not constitute the issuance of a Building Permit. It is the responsibility oft the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2" x11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank if the item  isn not applicable).  Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one: set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the new façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12" X 11" reductions of full-size drawings. Ifreduced size is sO small as to bei illegible, make 8-1/2"> X 11" snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. Ifyou are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2"x11"; sheets SO that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy of your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work    Google    Beaufort Printed March 25, 2019 See Belowf for Disclaimer  CONNEÇTGIS HOSTING  Parcels  Property Land Owners Interior Tract Linés Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1.:42 Feet:    OBJECTID 6408 OWNER NAME CHANDLER MARY HOBGOOD MAILING ADDRESS2  GPIN 5675-69-8503 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROPDESC 2LOTS ROBERT O'CONNOR TOT VAL 187526 PREV ASSESS 194512 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1908/00942 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YR BUILT 1915 SUB DESC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE EFF YR 1985  GPIN Long 5675-69-8503 MAILING ADDRESS 524 WEST: 2ND STREET STATE NC LAND VAL 78850 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.47 MBL 567500122 STAMPS 348.00 NBHD CDE H EXEMPT AMT SQFT 2270 NBR BED 3 PIN 15020069  ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 108676 TAXABLE VA 187526 PROPERTY. ADDRESS 524 W2NDS ST DATE 8/26/2016 SALE PRICE 174000.00 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUSO1 NBR BATHS REID 07496  Beaufort County onliner mapa access is provided as a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websitei is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute al legal record nor should it bes substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals." The County of Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility: and legall liabilityf for the content published ont this website. The user agreest that Beaufort County  and its Assigns shall be held harmless from all actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    H. Chandler  Mary  524 W. 2nd Sk.  Description of malerials  Replacement  of  porch  P(por boards:  un-freated lumber  Replacement  of wood on  house:  Wntreated lumber (lap Siding)  Replace of end coverins on porch:  hardy plank  Cused because  matches original boards On +the exterior of the house, and ;t  will  Withstqnd weather conditions better  than -the interior Plywood hat had been  used)            Adjoining Property Owners: 524 West Second Street  LEGGETT. DANNY HINES 601 W: 2ND STREET WASHINGTON! NC27889 CARBONE. JEAN GOVE 527 W SECOND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 WILLIAMS GARYD 600 W SECOND ST WASHINGTON NC27889 BLACK DEASVETOE 222 N PIERCE STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 SAWYER GROVERHJR 904 W3RDSTREET WASHINGTON NC27889 COCHRANRAMONA DAVIS 511 W2 2NDSTREET WASHINGTON! NC27889 MILLARD ANITAI F 509 WEST SECOND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 WINFIELD. BARBARAA 201 ISABELLA. AVE WASHINGTON: NC27889 BANKS ROBINT 5501 EJ MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 CHANDLER MARYI HOBGOOD 524 WEST 2ND STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 JENKINSJOHN CURTIS POBOX333 CHOCOWNITYNC27817 TURNER PRESTONI K POBOX1196 WASHINGTONI NC27889  LITCHFIELD WILLIAM FJ JR 20071 NORTH MARKET STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889    Docntoin Decelopmenb 80 Gitoric CPresevoation    Citys  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  March 19, 2019  Subject: Certificate ofA Appropriateness - 524 West Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  AI request has been made by Mary Chandler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the siding on the eaves of the front porch using cement board on the property  located at 524 West Second Street.  Ifyouy would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 94  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  524 West Main Street  The application for the property located at 524) West Second Street is requesting approval to replace the  siding on the eaves oft the front porch using cement board on the house. *** Note: The property owner has already replaced the siding without permission. *** Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.1 Walls:  3.1.1 Historic character-defining wall features should be retained and protected including clapboards, corner boards, cornices, quoins, corbelling and other architectural detailing. 3.1.2 Original walls should. be properly maintained and repaired when necessary. If an original wall feature must be replaced due to excessive deterioration or damage, the new feature should 3.1.5 It is prohibited to cover or replace original wall surfaces with vinyl, aluminum, veneer or other synthetic siding, including chemical applications that may change thei texture oft the  match the original in size, profile, material, and texture.  3.1.3 Wooden wall materials should be properly painted and maintained.  original siding.  The proposed siding is going on a primary elevation that can clearly be seen from the public right-of-way. The proposed material is a modern material that is does not match the original feature (wood siding). Based on findings of fact, the request is not  congruous with the Design Guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 524 West Second: Street- siding replacement  A request has been made by Mary Chandler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the siding ont the eaves of the front porch using cement board on the property located at! 524 West Second Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls. To grant sucha a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings ofi fact, which are included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached tot the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mary Chandler fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the siding on the eaves of the front porch using cement board on the property located at! 524) West Second Street. This motion is based on thei following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mary Chandler for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the siding on the eaves oft the front porch using cement board on the property located at 524 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls. further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions ont the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mary Chandler fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the siding on the eaves oft thet front porch using cement board on the property located at 524 West Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls.  Or    Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking from HPO that will aid them ini making a defensible decision regarding the case]. We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS: 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor' Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 111 West Second Street to replace the existing door on the second floor in the same style and using like materials. They will also be installing a small awning over the back 2. AI request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 302 East Second Street to replace rotten siding and a rear shed roof using like materials on the property. The property owner will also be installing gutters. 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 307 West Main Street to repair the roof using like materials on the property. 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 109 Brown Street to repair the roof using like materials on the property. 6. AI request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 524 West Second Street to repair the siding and HVAC stand using like materials  that door.  City of Washington to remove the trees along the old Rowing Club.  on the property.    OTHER  BUSINESS    Updating Design  Guideline 4.1.9    Citys  owntoin Deoelopmenb 6 Gitoric Presevoation  Washington NORTH CAROLINA  April 2; 2019  RE: Updating Historic Preservation Commission Design Guideline Chapter 4.1.9  Existing:  Previously Proposed: 4.1.9 Ifa diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, it should be replaced by a suitable in an approved sikty-ge/deys-fom within one (1) year of removal, between the months of September 1st and March 1st of the following year.  Proposed:  4.1.9 Ifa diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, it should be replaced by a suitable ina an approved landscaping plan, within sixty (60) days from time of removal.  4.1.9 Ifa diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, itshould be replaced by a suitable species, as designated ina an approved landscaping 9days-romrtime- within one (1) year of removal, preferably between the dates of September 1st and March 1st to encourage survival. Should the replacement tree die, the tree shall be continuously replaced until it survives.  species, as designated species, as designated  landscaping plan, within plan. within-sixty time-ofremoyat-The tree of-remeval.The tree replacement must occur replacement must occur  Tree Committee Members: William Kenner Cheri Vaughn Monica Ferrari Will Aley  Sincerely,  Emily Rebert Historic Preservation Planner Community Development ereber@washngomegor 252.946.0897    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: Landscape Design Guidelines  A request has been made by the HPCTree Committee to review and update Chapter4  Streetscape and. Site Design Section 4.1 Landscaping.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant approval oft the revision of the Landscaping Design Guidelines and recommend that the updated guidelines be sent toi the City  Council fori final approval.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission not grant approval oft the revision of the Landscaping Design Guidelines and recommend that the updated guidelines not be sent to the  City Council for final approval.    Terrell Award  Nominations    MINUTES    WASHINGTON HISTORICI PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting- - Minutes Tuesday, March! 5, 2019: 7:00 pm Members Present Colleen Knight Mark Everett William Kenner Karen Mann Members Absent Cheri Vaughn Kathleen Couch Rebecca Clark Others Present Emily Rebert, Historic Planner Jessica Green, Administrative Support Specialist  I. II.  Opening of the meeting The Chairman called the meeting to order. Invocation Amoment of silence was taken. III. Roll Call As silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old Business  V.  Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  1. Arequest has been made by Ms. Doris Schneider for a Certificate of Appropriateness to extend the existing bump-out addition on the west side oft the property located at 323 Ms. Doris Schneider, 323 ES Second Street, came forward and was sworn in. She stated in 2012 they were given permission to do the bump out on1 the side of the house facing the overflow parking lot fori the First Baptist Church. She explained that she is requesting permission to add on toi that bump out. She. stated that the addition will add appropriately 6ft and they plan to use the same materials, same roofing, and one wood frame window to match the house. She explained that the purpose of the addition is to enlarge the kitchen. William Kenner asked about the siding. He asked ift they planned to  East Second Street.  1    run all new boards along the side or ift they planned to: stagger. Ms. Schneider: stated The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the Karen Mann made thet following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission a Certificate of appropriateness to Ms. Doris Schneider to extend the existing bump-out addition on the west side of the property located at 323 East Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.3 Additions. Her motion was seconded by William Kenner and all voted in 2. AI request has been made by Mr. Will Mayo fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove two holly trees in the south side of the property located at 102 West Second Mr. Will Mayo came forward and was: sworn in. He stated that there are two holly trees int the planters in thet front of his office. He explained that he and his father planted those trees roughly 30 years ago. He stated that the tree located on 2nd street has a root system that is starting to compromise the planter and the sidewalk. He explained that he would like to remove the trees clean out the planters and plant new trees that are similar to those in the area. William Kenner stated thati this is an old structure int the district and the trees are causing damage. The other Commission members agreed. The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the Colleen Knight made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission, grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. William Mayo to remove two holly trees and replace them with two smaller holly trees in the primary elevations of the property located at 102 West 2nd Street. This motion is based on the following finding off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.1 Landscaping. Her motion was seconded by 3. Ar request has been made by Mr. AII Dintino fora a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at! 518 East Second Street: a) Elevate the structure b) Detach the existing rear addition and move it to the northeast corner of the property c) Construct a new, 1-story addition in the footprint oft the old addition in the backyard d) Deconstruct the existing deck in the backyard and reconstruct it o wrap around the west side ift the new addition e) Install shutters on the house f) Install a  that they did plan to stagger the board siding.  request.  favor.  Street.  request.  Karen Mann. The motion carried with all voting inf favor.  2    10'x12' shed int the back yard of the property g) Construct a run of 6' privacy fencing in William Kenner suggested that the Commission consider each request individually. Mr. Al Dintino came forward and was sworn in. He stated that he and his wife moved to the area about 61 months ago and they currently reside at 518 E2nd Street. He stated that he did submit documents showing why they would like to do the items listed in the COA application. Starting with itema, that they would like to elevate the structure due tot the flooding that they incurred with Hurricane Florence and try to mitigate that from happening again. He stated that theyl have taken the time to consult with the State Historic Office andi the office stated that the plan Mr. Dintino has was in line withi the historic guidelines and they felt it would be acceptable. Karen Mann asked ift the level that the house will be raised would be similar to the height of the house across the street. Mr. Dintino stated that the height would be similar to Mr. Stone's house across the way and probably just a little lower than Ms. Schneider's house at 323 E2nd Street. Karen Mann asked if he planned to do any grading. Mr. Dintino stated that the west side oft the property does have some erosion and he plans tol build that back up to make sure thei foundation is not comprised and equal out the grade so that it would not The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward. Mark Everett stated that he appreciated the fact that Mr. Dintino contacted the State Historic Office andi the fact that he is trying to use multiple ways to mitigate the height. Mr. Dintino stated that he also submitted al landscape plan to help screen and soften the elevation appearance. William Kennera asked how Mr. Dintino planned to accommodate the extra height of the stairway. Mr. Dintino stated that he will: still be able to do stairs without encroaching on the sidewalk. He stated that there is currently a pad on the stairway and he willl have to end up using half oft that pad, but he will still have a 2ft clearance between the sidewalk and the steps. William Kenner stated that this willl be an issue the Commission will come across in thet further with elevation requests. The Commission discussed the issue. Emily Rebert explained that in this case Mr. Dintino is congruous and it is nota problem. She stated that the problem comes when you have stairs down to al landing and then disburse out on the: sides. She stated that they willl have to address this when ap property comes before them, but that is not the situation in this case. William Kenner stated that East 2nd Street houses are really close to the road. Karen Mann stated that she is very comfortable with the request being that they are working with the State Colleen Knight made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. AID Dintino to elevate the structure located at 518 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following finding of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission  the backy yard.  negatively impact his neighbor.  office.  3    Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.2 Materials and 3.3 Foundations. Her motion Mr. Dintino explained that they would have tol build a garage laterand! because the addition structure was: still intact, they decided to move the addition. He explained that the addition was an: add on, not part of the original structure. So, all they are proposing to do is remove it and rebuild a newl I-story addition in the same footprint. In stead of demoing the old addition they would like to move it and repurpose it as a workshop. William Kenner: asked about the direction of the roofline. Mr. Dintino explained that they would turni it and the roof line would run parallel with the short line of the property. He stated that youy would not be able to see it very well from the street dot to  was seconded by) William Kenner: and all voted in favor.  trees.  The Chairman opened thei floorand no one came forward.  Karen Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Al Dintino to detach the existing rear addition and move it toi the northeast corner of the property at 518 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the applicationi is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically 3.12 Outbuildings and Accessory Structures. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all With the construction of the new addition Mr. Dintino stated that he would keep the new construction int the same footprint as the removed addition. Mr. Dintino stated that this section of the house is not really visible. He stated that the only thing they are really changing is removing the deck and building a wrap around so that there is an exit off of the back. He stated that they would use approved matching materials for the construction as well as the roof. He stated that they would like to use the hardi-plank siding. William Kenner asked about the windows. Mr. Dintino stated that the windows int the house now are wood cased double paned windows with grids imbedded in the glass and since this is al back section, he is open to matching the rest oft thel house or any guidance from the Commission. William Kenner stated that they allow wood or composite windows with external muttons visible from both sides. Mr. Kenner stated that the windows would need to match the other windows with the six over six configurations. Mr. Dintino stated that wouldn't be a problem. The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the William Kenner made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. AlI Dintino to construct a new, 1-sttory addition in thei footprint oft the old addition in the backyard at! 518 East Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is  voted in favor.  request.  4    congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.3 Additions. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval: that the applicant use wood or composite windows with muttons. His motion was seconded by Karen Mann and all votedi ini favor. Mr. Dintino moved on to the deck request. He explained that the current deck does partially wrap around the west side of the house. He: stated that they arej just planning to extend that warp around another 10ft. He stated that materials and the pickets  would match the original.  The Chairman opened, the floorand no one came forward.  Karen Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Al Dintino to deconstruct the existing deck int the backyard and reconstructit to wrap around the west: side oft the new addition. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the applicationi is congruous' with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.4 Decks. Colleen Knight seconded the motion and all voted ini favor. Mr. Dintino explained that they would like toi install shutters. He stated that Emily Rebert informed them that the shutters they were looking at may not be appropriate for the time period of the house, sO they are willing to work on that. He stated that with the style of the house they may not put shutters on the house, but they would like to have the option. Colleen Knight stated that there wasn't ani issue with putting shutters on the house, but the style is not appropriate for the house. Mark Everett stated that in his research he found that louvered shutters were: appropriate fori that time period. William Kenner asked about the materials and Mr. Dintino stated that he would use wood shutters. Mr. Kenner then asked if whiling working ont the house if he had seen anyi indication that shutters were ont the house in the past ori if he had any photographs showing shutters on the house. Mr. Dintino stated that he has not seen any evidence of shutters on the house. Karen Mann stated that as long as they went with as shutter appropriate for the time period, like al louvered shutter, she didn't have a problem with it. William Kenner asked if they would be working shutters. Mr. Dintino stated that The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward. William Kenner and Mr. Dintino discussed working shutters. Karen Mann stated that shutters shouldn't! be put on thel house ift they were not there before, but evidence of shutters could have been removed if the siding had been replaced. Mark Everett stated that as long as he was willing to go with a style that is suitable to the architecture of the house, he didn't Karen Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Al Dintino to install shutters  they probably wouldn't be operable, just decorative.  necessarily have a problem with the request.  5    on the house located at 518 East Second Street that are appropriate with the Historic Preservation Guidelines, specifically louvered shutters. This motion) is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors and 3.10 Architectural Details. Her motion was seconded by Colleen Knight and all voted int favor. Mr. Dintino stated that the house does not have much storage, sO he would liket to utilize a 10'x12' shed to: store mostly garden tools. He showed the Commission where the shed would be located. William Kenner: asked ift the shed would be elevated. Mr. Dintino stated thati it would, but the reary yard does go up: sO he didn'tt think it would need to be elevated as much as the house. He stated that he would elevate itj just to The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward tos step for or against the Colleen Knight made the following motion: I move that the Historic Preservation Commission, grant a Certificate of Appropriates to Mr. AII Dintino to installa a 10'x12' shed in the back yard oft the property located at 518 East 2nd Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.12 Outbuildings and Accessory Structures. Her motion was seconded by William Kenner and all voted in Mr. Dintino stated that his final request is to construct: a 6' fence int the back yard. He stated that he was hoping that he would not have to, but there is a business behind them who chose to remove the natural barrier. He stated that since that natural screening was removed, he has a great view ofa a commercial property with a dumpster and everything that comes with that. So, for privacy and esthetics they would like to have the option to construct a fence, but they may decide to go with a tree screen.  base flood elevation and then build a set ofs steps ora a ramp.  request.  favor.  The Chairman opened thet floor and no one came forward.  Karen Mann made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Al Dintino to construct a run of6' privacy fencing in the back yard oft the property located at 518 East Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.61 Fences and' Walls. Her motion was seconded by Colleen Knight and all voted in favor.  6    B. Minor Works  1. An request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 524) West Second Street to replace rotten siding using like materials on the 2. Arequest has been made and approved by staff fora a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 127 West Street to install ai fire escape 0 the west elevation of the 3. Arequest has been made and approved by staff fora a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 202 West Main Street to replace the existing windows on the second floor 4. Arequest has been made and approved by staff fora a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 106 West Main Street to replace the roof and elevator shaft siding using Colleen Knight made a motion to approve all the minor works. Her motion was  property. property.  using like materials on the property. like materials on the property.  seconded by Karen Mann and all voted ini favor.  VI. Other Business  Emily Rebert stated that back in November of 2018 the City of Washington came before the Commission to discuss replacing the clear clerestory windows at the Civic Center. She explained that as of right nowi they pulled the application because they are leaning towards using a wooden replacement window. She stated that replacing with a wooden window would be a minor works, but the City would still like to have input from the Commission. The City would like to know if the Commission supports the wooden replacement windows or would they like the application to come before them with the alternative option which was aluminum. Mark Everett stated that his recollection of the discussion was thati the Commission would generally prefer like materials, which would mean wooden windows, but given the height and the difficulty maintaining those windows the question was did it make more: sense, particularly when using tax payer's money, to allow the City to use an alternative material that would enhance the longevity and reduce maintenance. He stated that he can only speak as one member of the Commission, but while the preference would probably be wood, he personally is willing to show some flexibility on that. Mr. Everett stated that the windows are noty visible from the ground and it will be an ongoing maintenance issue. The Commission discussed the initial request of the aluminum frame window and some oft the issues that came up with that request. Emily Rebert stated that the aluminum replacement windows were not congruous with the Historic Preservation Guidelines. Colleen Knight stated that the windows are pretty significant toi the overall architecture and the look of the building. Emily Rebert stated that both companies did offera 16-year warranty whether they went with the aluminum or the wooden window. Mark Everett explained that the City isj justl looking for some guidance or preference from the Commission to go on record. Hes stated that the Council is going to consider this item at their next meeting and asked the members for their guidance. Colleen Knight stated that it isn't fair for the Commission to hold the Cityt to a different standard than they doi individuals. William Kenner stated that the Commission is not suppose to consider the cost ofa a project when  7    making their decisions. He stated that they are only suppose to consider if the request is following the design guidelines. Colleen Knight stated that the Commission would not allow al home owner to replace their wooden windows with aluminum. Emily Rebert stated that currently the windows are just glass wedged between two pieces of wood. She explained that Double Hung would be constructing a wooden window with the double pane of glass. Karen Mann stated that her preference would bei for1 the City to back with a wooden window because she felt like you can always tell when a wooden window is replaced with an alternate material in al historic structure. Karen Mann stated that the City has bucket trucks that should be: able to access those windows better than a private resident could get to their own windows. Ms. Mann stated that the Civic Center is a very visible and: significant structure in the district. Mark Everett stated that its sounded like the Commission's preference would be supporting the wooden replacement windows. William Kenner stated that the Commission has to hold the Cityt to the same standard as the residents. Colleen Knight made a motion to approve. the February minutes. Her motion was seconded by  VII. Approval of Minutes - February 5, 2019 William Kennera and all voted ini favor.  VIII. Adjourn the motion  There being no other business Karen Mann made a motion to adjourn. William Kenner seconded  8