WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Tuesday, February 5, 20197:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call IV. Old Business  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Mr. Kirt Storch for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at 123 Short Drive:  a) Construct an 18" brick retaining wall with 4' fence on the west property line  b). Alter the north porch c) Alter the east porch d) Alter the south porch  2. A request has been made by Mr. James Hess for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a second story addition on the rear of the property located at 625 East 3. A request has been made by Mr. Seldon Taylor for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install 6-foot fencing in the rear of the property located at 130 East Second  Main Street.  Street. B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 532 East Second Street to replace one window on 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Moss Landing to convert the back porch to a sunroom on a new  first floor of west elevation using like materials on the property.  home currently under construction on the property.  1    3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 122 South Harvey Street to replace the existing 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 401 North Market Street to replace the roof and 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 106 West Main Street to make the following  gas pack in the same location on the property.  repair the porch details using like materials on the property.  changes to the property:  a) Remove awnings on front façade b) Repoint masonry using like materials c) Replace gutters on the rear of the building  VI. Other Business  1. Tree Policy, Request for Amendment of the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines  2. CLG Training, February 22, 2019 VII. Approval of Minutes - January 2, 2019  VIII. Adjourn  2    OLD  BUSINESS    None    MAJOR  WORKS    123 Short  Drive  Wall Construction Porch Alterations    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers int thet front lobby of City! Hall under-Developmental Filing Fee"  102, East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street Address of Property: 123 Shoft Drive Washinghon NL 27889  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  64+ (width)  feet by  182*/ (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done: Sce AHacheck  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be dèlayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved rèquests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  kiA d Sheri Stwchn (Name of7 Applicant-ty type or printy) (Maling Address) 149 D (Signature  (Initials)  ACTION  6loy oak Flrest Drive PaleinC274  (ZipCode)  7196095302 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  OfApplicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not reliève the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff willl be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until,  Issuance of al Minor.  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your àuthorized representative is required at the méeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    123 Short Drive Washington, NC  Proposed Design Changes: Model includes brick retaining wall at 18" height with fence at west property line. Shows newf foundation walls left unpainted with 18" of fill keeping the relationship of the house North Porch - Remove existing stair, and add new railing. The new railing will need tol be at 36" height (This is a code requirement not SHPO requirement) instead of the existing 2-3" original rail height. The historic railings on this porch willl be retained in place. Railing detail with include 2'-3" wood railing with additional cable rails upt to 36" per code. Lattice may be used to  elevation and grade remaining thes same.  filli int the space between the brick piers. West Porch- unaltered South Porch -The porch keeps the existing footprint.  Existing non-original: stair replaced with new, wider stair. Reorient stair to face the river, and  widen: stair a maximum of twoi feeti from with existing width. New carriage doors to match north side. Foundation openings on east and west remain. First floorwindows and door remain unaltered.  East Porch-N Matches the existing size, due to the "build to line" this porch can not be enlarged in Window configuration - double window (1/1) on south elevation with single windows on east elevation. Door and window on north elevation remain in similar configuration.  the East direction.  Relocate HVAC units to roof ofp porch  Add decorative railing per code providingscreening for HVACunit    Beaufort PrintedJ January: 28, 2019 SeeB Belowf forD Disclaimer  CONNECIGIS  WEB HOSTING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tractl Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:32 Feet.    OBJECTID 6196 OWNER NAME STORCHI KIRT D MAILING, ADDRESS2 123 SHORT DRIVE ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 219183 TAXABLE VA 466683 PROPERTY ADDRESS 123 N WASHINGTONST DATE 6/15/2018 SALE PRICE 385000.00 NBHD DESC WEST: SIDE MAIN WATERFRONT ROADTYPE PAVED SUB CDE BLUSO1 NBR BATHS REID 44385  GPIN 5675-58-9965 OWNER NAME2 STORCH SHERI LYN CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT1 123 SHORT DRIVE TOT VAL 466683 PREV ASSESS 427438 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1963/00098 NBR BLDG 1 LANDUSE YRBUILT 1926 SUB DESC SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCE EFFYR 1988  GPIN Long 5675-58-9965 MAILING ADDRESS 123: SHORT DRIVE STATE NC LAND VAL 247500 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.28 MBL 567500196 STAMPS 770.00 NBHD CDE WSMW EXEMPT AMT SQFT 3016 NBR_BED 4 PIN 01007001  Beaufort County onliner mapa accessis is provided asa publics service, asis, as available andv withouty warranties, expressed or implied. Content published ont thisv websiteis fori informational purposes only andis isn noti intendedt to constitute legalr record nors should itbes substituted fort the advice ors services ofi industry professionals. Thel Countyo of Beauforta andt thev Website Provider disclaima allresponsibility: andle legall liabilityf fort thec content published ont thisv website. Thel usera agreest that Beaufort Countyl  andits Assignss shallb beh held! harmlessf from alla actions, claims, damages orj judqmentsa arising outo oftheu usec ofCounty data.        2143    FA          HC Mb                Adjacent Property Owners - 123 Short Drive  SLOAN ELIZABETH 701 SHORT DRIVE WASHINGTON, NC 27889 JONES ALBERT MCCRAYII 123S SHORT DRIVE WASHINGTON, NC 27889 POSTON MAGGIE 705 WEST MAIN:: STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 BERTING. JOSHUA MICHAEL 701 WI MAIN: STREET WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 SANDERS NICHOLAS HUGH 627 WI MAIN: STREET WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 NINAN: SARAH G 621 WI MAIN: ST WASHINGTON, NC: 27889 MCLENDON CHRISTOPHERB 705 SHORT DRIVE WASHINGTON, NC27889 VAN DORP ABRAHAM HJR 918 MARKET STREET WASHINGTON, NC 27889 FUTRELL ASHLEYBJR PO BOX1788 WASHINGTON, NC 27889    Dorntoton @fstoric  (  eoelopmenb reseroation  Citys  Washington NORTH GAR'OLINA  January 28, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 123 Short Drive  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required tol be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Kirt Storch for a Certificate of Appropriateness to make the following alterations to the property located at 123 Short Drive:  a)  Construct an 18" brick retaining wall with fence on the west property line  b) Alter the north porch c) Alter the west porch d) Alter the east porch e) Alter the south porch  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday February 5, 2019  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side oft thel building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 25  Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  123 Short Drive  The application for the property located at 123 Short Drive is requesting approval to make the following  alterations on the property:  a) Construct an 18" brick retaining wall with 4' fence on. the west property line  b) Alter the north porch c) Alter the east porch d) Alter the south porch  (A) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6 Fences and  Walls:  4.6.2 Wood, brick, stone, decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of authentic design are appropriate fencing materials in the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link 4.6.6 Newi fences and walls should be ofa design that is appropriate to the architectural style 4.6.7 Front yard fences, fences erected adjacent to a main street or a side: street: should be of an open design, such as picket and no greater than four (4) feeti in height. Iti is prohibited to use solid privacy fences in front yards. Split rail, basket weave, lattice and shadowbox are also 4.6.8 Privacy fencing shall only be allowed in the rear yard. Ifa majority ofa privacy.fence is visible from the publici right-of-way, al landscape buffer shall bei included. No fence, includinga 4.6.9 A rear yard privacy fence shall place the framing for the fenice toi the inside facing the owner's property. The outside of all wooden rear yard privacy fences shall be finished using an opaque stain or paint. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure. 4.6.10 All newly constructed wooden fences which are parallel to a main street or side street shall bei finished using an opaque stain or painted. Ifp painted, the color shall be compatible with 4.6.1 1ltisi inappropriate to construct walls and fences on the) waterfront that obstruct views and vistas from the historic district ori from the water. No privacy fence that exceeds four (4) feet inl height shall be allowed int the side or rear yards of property located south of Main Street. 4.6.12 The use of plant screenings, int thet form of hedgerows and landscaping, is encouraged as an alternative to fences and walls. Any such plantings shall comply with the height and location 4.6.13 Fences and walls should be used to screen service areas, refuse receptacles, and parking 4.6.14 Masonry walls that were historically unpainted should not be painted. Repainting 4.6.15 Retaining walls, when visible from a public right-of-way, must be constructed of brick or stone. Landscape timbers and railroad ties may be used when they are noty visible from the  fences are not allowed. and period oft the historic structure.  prohibited.  privacy fence, shall exceed six (6) feet in height.  the structure.  standards of these guidelines. lots in the commercial areas.  previously painted masonry walls is permitted.  public right-of-way.    (B-D) Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 3.3 Foundations,  3.6 Porches and Entryways, and 3.14 Mechanical and Communication Systems:  3.3.1 Retain and preserve historic foundations including their design, texture, color, and materials. Character-defining features of historici foundations should be retained and preserved including vents, grills, panels, piers, lattice, porch steps, basement windows and door openings. 3.6.1 Entryways and porches are important character-defining elements ofa al historic structure and should be retained and preserved. Important elements include steps, columns, balustrades. 3.6.2 If replacement of a porch element is necessary, replace only the deteriorated or missing detail with new materials that match the design of the original as closely as possible. 3.6.4 Reconstruction: of missing or extensively deteriorated porches is encouraged. Reconstructed porches shall be based on documentary evidence. If adequate documentation is not available, a new design is appropriate ifiti is compatible with the style and period oft the 3.6.5 Iti is prohibited to enclose porches on primary elevations. Porches on rear elevations not seen from the public right-of-way may be screened or enclosed only if the work is designed sO that it can be installed or removed without damage to the historic: structure. 3.6.6 Repairs to porches using materials incompatible with the original materials are not allowed. For example, metal supports shall not be used as substitutes for wood columns, plywood shall not be substituted for beaded board ceilings, and concrete shall not be used as a 3.14.2 New mechanical systems shall be installed in areas and: spaces that will require the least 3.14.3 Mechanical systems including utility meters and heating and air conditioning equipment shall bel located att the rear ofa structure if feasible. Mechanical equipment which can be seen  doors, railings, brackets, roofs, cornices and entablatures.  building.  substitute for tongue-and-groove wood flooring.  possible alteration to the plan, materials, and appearance ofal building. from the street must be screened with shrubbery or appropriate fencing.  Request A- The fence is an open design that is appropriate to the structure and within the height requirements. Based on finding of fact, this request is congruous with the Request B- Removing the staircase on the north elevation would compromise the building's character. The staircase appears to be original to the building. Chapter 3.3.1 and 3.6.1 states the stairway should be preserved. Based on finding of fact, this request Request C- Moving the mechanical system to a location that is less visible is preferable. The balustrade will also aide in the screening of the units. Based on finding of fact, this Request D- The rear staircase appears to be a modern adaption. Based on finding of fact, this request is congruous with the historic preservation design guidelines.  historic preservation design guidelines.  is not congruous with the historic preservation design guidelines.  request is congruous with the historic preservation design guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 123 Short Drive Street- Fence Construction, Porch Alterations, Moving Mechanicals  A request has been made by Mr. Kirt Storch for a Certificate ofAppropriateness: to make the  following alterations to the property located at 123 Short Drive:  a) Construct an. 18" brick retaining wall with 4' fence on the west property line  b) Alter the north porch c) Alter the east porch d) Alter the south porch  Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter: 3.3 Foundations, 3.6 Porches and Entryways,  3.14 Mechanical and Communication Systems, and 4.6 Fences and Walls:  To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Kirt Storch to make the above changes to the property located at 123 Short Drive. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3.31 Foundations, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, 3.14 Mechanical and Communication. Systems, and 4.6 Fences and Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness tol Mr. Kirt Storch to make the above changes to the property located at 123 Short Drive. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3.3 Foundations, 3.6 Porches and Entryways, 3.14 Mechanical and Communication Systems, and 4.6 Fences and Walls. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the  approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Kirt Storch to make the above changes to the property located at: 123 Short Drive. This motion is based on the following findings oft fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic    Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter3.3 Foundations; 3.6 Porches and Entryways, 3.14 Mechanical and Communication Systems, and 4.6 Fences and Walls.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS1 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NCGS160A-400.94d, the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    625 East Main  Street  Rear Addition    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIAIENESS  Please Usel Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 tocashiers in thet front lobby of City! Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Street. Address of Property: 635 - E. Main st.  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Javesa-liade Hess  48 (width)  feet by  271 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  andstory addition on reacol Home oucexisting foot print- expaeding He mesler edcm- ad& a GK6 Akstcy deck ofE sear sf Additien  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC, meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Edudls  (Name epA Applicant - type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  POBDL 293 whig,AE.2789  Mailing Address) Hmla Ia (Signaturgof Applicant)  (kipo Code)  357-414-8606 paytime Phone Number)  S  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will bei fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of al Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. Your must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    PROJECT CATEGORIES (check all that apply): Exterior Alteration & Addition New Construction SUPPORTING INFORMATION:  This document does not constitute the issuance ofa Building Permit. Iti is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all necessary permits before commencing work. Contact the Inspections Department at  Demolition  252-975-9304.  Attach 8-1/2" X 11" sheets with written descriptions and drawings, photographs, and other graphic information necessary to completely describe the project. Use the checklist below to be sure that your application is complete. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (Leave the checkbox blank ift the item Property Owners & Address. Provide a list of property owners & addresses of all properties Plot Plan (if applicable). A plot plan showing the relationship of buildings, additions, sidewalks, drives, trees, property lines, etc., must be provided if your project includes any addition, demolition, fences, walls, or otherlandscape work. Show accurate measurements. You may also use a copy of the survey that you received when you bought your property. Revise the copy as needed to show existing  isnot applicable).  located within a 100' of the above subject property.  conditions and your proposed work. Photographs of existing conditions.  Description of Materials (provide samples if appropriate).  Drawings showing proposed work. Include one set of full size drawings when available.  Plan drawings.  Elevation drawings showing the newi façade(s). Dimensions shown on drawings.  8-12"x1 11" reductions of full-size drawings. If reduced size is sO small as to bei illegible, make 8-1/2" X 11" snapshots of individual drawings on the bigsheet. Photocopy reductions may be obtained from a number of blueprinting and photocopying businesses.  State or Federal Tax Credits/Funds or CAMA Permits. Ifyou are applying for any of these programs, Black Ink. Your application must be prepared in black ink on 8-1/2" x 11" sheets sO that it can be copied for commission members. Applications prepared in blue, red, or other colored inks and/or pencil copy  you must include a copy ofy your letter or permit from the State.  poorly and will not be accepted.  (Office Use Only) Section (page)Topic  Brief Description of Work            6 Main Sr-  G.  3  sidewalk %  3 3  Propoka Sdk deeke  '  p3l  1        qUUIPAPIES SHIP TO:  quore INOL ceruned  BILLTO:  PlyGem  QUOTE# 4379316 Lineltem # 1-1  QUOTE DATE 1/8/2019  LOAD DATE Load Date Not Set CUSTOMEER: PO#  SHIP DATE Quotel Not Ordered  QUOIED BY Keith' Travis  JOB NAME  Description  Net Price Extended $417.22  ***#*Sash Only#RR# Unit IPro Series 2001 Double Hung Dimemion-Calire2-034mmESursSipe Top: 32.625-X31) Bottom: 32.625 X32 Color Exterior-Primed, Interior- Natural Unit Type 200-SDL, Tit-Pins Unit Performance NoFhermal: Requirement, U-Factop-0.42, SHGC=0.3, VLT=0.52, CPD-PWG-ME6-01348-00805 Glass Unit lowDoabiclaa, WamEdge (WE)Metal UnitLower, 1 Upper-Annealed Grilles 7/8"8DL wioShadow Bar, Colonial, Exterior= White,Interior NaturalWood,3WzH Hardware White, 2) Locks ##*#*Balance Kit Only####* Unit 1:Pro Series 4001 Doublel Hung PWG-M-87-00079-0001  $41722  Qty: Room Locatian: NonfAssigned Note:  35p5  Lineltem# 2-1 Qty: 1 Room Location: None Assigned Note:  Description  Net] Price Extended $42.45  $42.45  Dimensions Call Size 2-105-2,1 Frame Size 35.375X65 Unit Performance U-Factor = 0.43, SHGC=0.56, VLT=0.58,CPD-  B5p5  Total Unit Quantity:2  $40  Quote; #: 4379316  Page 1of2 Printed: 1/8/2019 8:38:05 AM  PlyGem WINDOWS JAMAAAI nlunemwindnwe rom    e  93  336    IE7  K    M &  Q  .9.8  3    e - ro yA  Ix6pine woadsicing ha metdn tis  o5LI AUTSIVVZAAATIN  sH, Astfloor Reae Flevatin  Woed Deck        aje+527  1    S 28  )  33 300    UOest    Ces    Webt.    M $  e    Adjoining Property Owners LITCHFIELD HOLDINGS LLC 135 HARBOR RD WASHINGTON: NC 27889 FLANNERY PATRICK. A 55421 NSTH DRIVE PHOENIX AZ 85013 CHRISTNER DEBORAH JOANNA 613 EASTI MAIN STREET WASHINGTONNC: 27889 MCCAFFREY TIMOTHY: M 6191 EAST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 HORNEI LANNY CHRIS II 623 WEST MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 HESSJAMES! E 625 EASTI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC2 27889 NEWBOLD GINGER W 6121 EASTN MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 SMITH STEPHENJOSEPH 6291 E: MAIN STREET WASHINGTON: NC27889 OWENS SHARON: BARRETT 6221 E: MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 SAIRANEN KAREN. A 6281 EI MAIN ST WASHINGTON: NC 27889 MATTHEWS LINDA GIBSON 1344 BOLLING. AVE NORFOLK VA 23508    Dountoion Deoelopmenb ftoric Presewation  0  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAR'OLINA  January 28, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness -6 625 East Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  Ar request has been made by Mr. James Hess for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a second story addition on the rear of the property located at 625 East Main  Street.  Ify you would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2019  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, a sgl Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    Staff Report  625 East Main Street  The application1 for the property located at 625 East Main Street is requesting approval to constructa second story addition overt the existing one-story: addition ont the back of the house. From the Secretary of Interior's Standards of Rehabilitation (page 3 ofWashington's Design Guidelines): New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new one: shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed int thet future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its  historic integrity oft the property and its environment.  environment would be unimpaired.  Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 5.3 Additions:  S.3.1 should be located to the rear or non-character defining elevation. With historic residential structures, additions should be placed in a manner that they are not dearly seen from the public right-of-way. landscaping can often be used to minimize the visual impact that additions may S.3.2 New additions should not remove, damage, or obscure character-defining architectural S.3.3 Additions should be compatible in materials, design, roof form, and proportion to the main structure. However, new additions should be constructed at: a scale smaller than the historic S.3.4 Additions, like new construction, are representative oi the time in which they are built. Therefore, contemporary designs are permitted, but should always be compatible with the 5.3.6 Additions tol historic structures should be clearly identifiable as such. Additions should be set back and constructed at a smaller scale than the original building. Architectural details should complement the main structure but should be clearly differentiated.  have to the historic: structure.  features.  structure sO as not to overpower the existing historicb building.  existing historic: structure.  Based on findings of fact, the request is congruous with the Design Guidelines Chapter  5.3 Additions.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 625 East Main Street- New Addition on the back ofal house  A request has been made by Mr.. James Hess for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a second storyaddition over the existing one-story addition on the property located at 625 East Main Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.3 Additions. To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included int the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. James Hess to construct a second story addition over the existing one-story addition on the back oft the property located at 625 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design  Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.3 Additions.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. James Hess to construct a second story addition over the existing one-story addition on the back oft the property located at 625 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.3 Additions. further move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate ofA Appropriateness to Mr. James Hess to construct a second story addition over the existing one-story: addition on the back oft the property located at 625 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design  Guidelines, specifically Chapter 5.3 Additions.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS160A-400.9ld), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic    Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of whati information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC6S160A-400.91d, the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    130 East Second  Street  Installation ofFencing    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Please Use Black Ink  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  Please submit the Application Fee of $50 to cashiers int thei front lobby ofCity! Hall underDevelopmental Filing Fee"  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  130 EM4T ZMP SITZEET  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  STC HarpINy  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description ofWork to be Done:  hsoor FEMLE To EE BuIT  StE DZ4MNT4  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m, on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Anincomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  HeLpINtS  Min Applicant-type or print) To Eek 7147 (Maillng Address) Wug  (Initials)  ACTION  27589 (Zip Code)  L51416-684 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  LT  Upon being signed and dated below by. the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor.  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.        Beaufort Printed) January2 28, 2019 See Below forD Disclaimer  CONNECTGIS  HOSIING  Parcels Property Land Owners Interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid)  1:31Feet    OBJECTID 7027 OWNER NAME STCH HOLDINGS LLC MAILING ADDRESS2 ZIP 27889 BLDG VAL 241641 TAXABLE VA 267660 PROPERTY, ADDRESS 130E2NDST DATE 4/16/2015 SALE PRICE 79500.00 NBHD DESC COMMERCIAL HISTORIC ROAD TYPE PAVED SUB CDE SOCC17 NBR BATHS 0.0000 REID 44898  GPIN 5675-98-1291 OWNER NAME2 CITY WASHINGTON PROP DESC 1LOT: 130EAST2NDSTRET TOT VAL 267660 PREV ASSESS 158331 TOWNSHIP 01 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1869/00758 NBR BLDG 1 LAND USE YRBUILT 1974 SUB DESC OFFICE EFFYR 2000  GPIN Long 5675-98-1291 MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX2147 STATE NC LAND VAL 26019 DEFR VAL 0 ACRES 0.20 MBL 567508201 STAMPS 159.00 NBHD CDE CH EXEMPT AMT SQFT NBRBED PIN 01002246  Beaufort County online mapa accessis isp provided asa publics service, asis, as available andw without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont thisv websiteis fori informational purposes onlya andi isr noti intended to constitute legal record nors shouldi itbes substituted fort thea advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel Countyo ofB Beauforta andt theV Website Provider disclaim allresponsibility: andle legalli liabilityf for thec content published on thisv website. Theu usera agreest thatB Beaufort County!  landits Assignss shallbeh held! harmlessf from allactions, claims, damagesc orj judgmentsa arisings outoft the usec ofCounty data.    DN  2        Adjoining Property Owners 130 East Second Street IPLAN GROUP AGENTI FOR CUSTODIAN FBO WILLIAM POULIN IRA 28011 CLEMENS ROAD WESTLAKE OH44145 POI BOX 1336 KINSTONNC 28503 STROUD DONALD. RJR 127 E: SECOND ST WASHINGTON: NC: 27889 CHERRY THOMAS KEVIN 607 SMEDES PL RALEIGH NC27605 NICKEL & DIME: PROPERTIES LLC 202 CAMILLA! RD WASHINGTONI NC27889 STCI HOLDINGS! LLC POJ BOX2147 WASHINGTONNC278) JONES VANCE HARPER POE BOX237 NEW: BERN: NC: 28563 HONEY BEELLC 11101 NORTH RESPESS STREET WASHINGTON NC: 27889 BANKS ROBINT 550 EI MAIN STREET WASHINGTON NC 27889 BRAMMALL: KAYLIE M 3437 GALLBERRY ROAD WASHINGTON NC: 27889 THEI KEVIN SCOTTLONG REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 1640 RELYEA AVENUE CHARLESTON SC 29412 SCHERER CAROL: S 215 NORTH BONNER STREET WASHINGTONNC278)  RANDOLPH, BETTY B 127 WELLINGTONI DR WASHINGTONNCZAS)  DANIEL CLIFTON! RIGHT REVEREND    otntoion eoelopmenb 8 Gitoric Presevoation  Citys  Washington NORTH GAROLINA  January 28, 2018  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness - 130 East Second Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the applicant, your property is located adja-  cent to the above subject property.  A request has been made by Mr. Seldon Taylor for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install 6-foot fencing in the rear of the property located at 130 East Second Street.  Ifyou would like to see plans for this work, please visit the City Planning Office prior to the meeting. You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the regularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Additionally, the full application is available on the city website. Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday February 5, 2019  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market Street  side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  In the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely, 9 Aas Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation 252-946-0897 erebert@washingtonnc.gov    130 East Second Street  The application for the property located at 130 East Second Street is requesting approval to install a 6- Please review the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls: 4.6.2 Wood, brick, stone, decorative block, iron, and equivalent materials of authentic design are appropriate fencing materials int the Historic District. Welded Wire, vinyl, and chain link 4.6.6 New fences and walls should be ofa design that is appropriate to the architectural style 4.6.7 Front yard fences, fences erected adjacent to a main street or a side street should be ofa an open design, such as picket and no greater than four (4) feet in height. Iti is prohibited to use solid privacy fences in front yards. Split rail, basket weave, lattice and shadowbox: are also 4.6.8 Privacy fencing shall only be allowed in the reary yard. Ifar majority ofay privacy fence is visible from the public right-of-way, a landscape buffer shall be included. No fence, includinga 4.6.9 A rear yard privacy fence shall place the framing for the fence to the inside facing the owner's property. The outside of all wooden reary yard privacy fences shall bet finished using an opaque stain or paint. If painted, the color shall be compatible with the structure.  foot wooden fence int the back yard oft the property:  fences are not allowed. and period oft the historic structure.  prohibited.  privacy fence, shall exceed six (6) feet in height.  The request is using appropriate materials and height in the back yard. Based on finding  of fact, the application is congruous with the design guidelines.    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 130 East Second Street- Construction ofa 6-foot wooden privacy fence int the backy yard  A request has been made by Mr.. Seldon Taylor for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install 6- foot fencing in the rear of the property located at 130 East Second. Street. Please review the To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings ofi fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.61 Fences and Walls.  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Seldon Taylor to install 6-foot fencing in the rear of the property located at 130 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines; specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and  Walls.  Or  move that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Seldon Taylor to install 6-foot fencing in the rear oft the property located at: 130 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions  on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Seldon Taylor to install 6-foot fencing in the rear of the property located at 130 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences  and Walls.  Or  Imove the commission continue this Certificate of Appropriateness application and invoke NC GS 160A-400.9(d), which allows the commission to request technical advice from the Historic    Preservation Office (HPO) staff. lalso move the commission seek guidance from the HPO regarding [detailed description of what information the commission is seeking. from HPO that will aid them in making a defensible decision regarding the case). We would like to remind the applicant pursuant to NC GS: 160A-400.9(d), the HPO has 30 days from the date an official request is received from the commission to review and comment on the request.    MINOR  WORKS    Minor Works  1. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 532 East Second Street to replace one window on first floor of west elevation using 2. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Moss Landing to convert the back porch to a sunroom on a new home currently under construction 3. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 122 South Harvey Street to replace the existing gas pack in the same location on 4. Are request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 401 North Market Street to replace the roof and repair the porch details using like 5. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 106 West Main Street to make the following changes to the property:  like materials on the property.  on the property.  the property.  materials on the property.  a) Remove awnings on front façade b) Repoint masonry using like materials c) Replace gutters on the rear oft the building    OTHER  BUSINESS    Tree Policy    Supplemental Material  to Support the  Importance of'Trees  in the Historic District    orontoion Depelopmenb 6 Bitoric Preseroation  Citys  Washindton NORTH CAR'OLINA  TREE REMOVAL REQUEST FORM FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIAIENESS  PROPERTY Property Owner: Property Address: City:  Date of HPC Meeting:  Phone: Suite #: Zip: yes  State:  Property Owner/Agent has given permission to remove tree(s):  no  APPLICANT Applicant's name: Company name: Address: City:  Applicant is: Property Owner Tree Contractor (complete this section) Arborists can! be found at treesaregood.org  Arborist Certificationi #: Phone: Email: Zip:  State:  TREE INFORMATION Tree: Species: 1 2 3 4  Measure the diameter oft trees at 4.51 feet above the ground. Show measurement in inches.  Diameter  Reason for Tree Removal:  Estimated number of trees to remain on the property: PROPOSED TREE REPLACEMENT  Tree: Species: 1 2 3  REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS  Sketch of the property, showing location of building(s), tree(s) to be removed, and location for new tree(s) Photographs showing the property, trees in question, and any other evidence to support your claim. Letter from an arborist or other credentialed plant specialist verifying the tree's condition *Including a verification letter can strengthen a case and save time. lunderstand that Iwill replace the removed tree(s) within one(1) year of receiving a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove the proposed tree(s). Iwill also contact the City Planning Department to inform  RECOMMENDED ATTACHMENTS  them of said replacement upon completion.  Application Signature:  Date:  P.O. Box 1988 Washington, NC27889  Phone: 252-946-9393 Fax: 252-946-1965 Last Updated: November 21, 2018    City of WashingtonlHistoric District Ohee CPaly  Co  Otyg  Washfindton MOLOHICADOLINA  Published by the  Planning and Development Department  The goal of the newsletter is to keep property owners who live and work in the Washington Historic District up to date with maintaining their trees in the Historic District. If you have any questions, please  contact Emily Rebert at creber@.ashnglommegpov0r252.946.0897  Common Errors When Caring for Trees  1.Always dig a hole twice as large as the root ball of a tree to help roots expand outward. 2. Never use BLACK or RED mulch around tree, as the dyes will seep into the ground and into the root system which can be toxic for the tree. Use natural undyed mulches around your tree. 3. Mulch should not touch the tree trunk as this invites dampness and disease to the tree trunk. In- stead, mulch around the tree and leave 2-3 inches of space between the mulch and tree trunk in a  "volcano" shape.  4. When planting, the bud union should be above the soil. Fruit trees are an 5. Never use landscape fabric over the root system, as light rainwater will not get to roots. Ifyou wish to reduce weeds, spread a layer of mulch around using 6. Do not plant too close to buildings or near plumbing lines. Plan for the future to ensure yourtree is placed in a location where roots will not become an issue for foundations or underground lines. Remember to call 811 before you dig.  exception as they vary from species to species.  BUD UNION GROUND LEVEL  the 'volcano" method (described in number 3).  7. Do not stake the tree unless absolutely needed. If staking is required, check often thattree  trunk is not growing into the ties. Remove the ties/ staking as soon as tree is established. 9. Donotp prune up conifers, as theywill nevers grow back and it makes them too top heavy in storms. Instead, prune sparingly (described in number 9). 9. Do not prune the top of a tree aka top off' (as seen in the picture to the right). This is not the way a tree is meant to grow. Iti invites disease and decay and can lead  to the tree dying. Pruning should only be done to remove dead or dying limbs and limbs hanging close to buildings or powerlines at risk of falling in a storm. When in  doubt, contact an arborist about pruning.    IMPACTSOFTREES  SETTINGS  Trees can be ani important part ofa any downtown setting. They enhance the area's! beauty and offeray practical bufferf from streettraffic. Wheread downtown with! historic buildings is concerned, trees often addt the' "final  touch" tot thel historics streetscape and create ai full sense of the history of thea area.  Many historic downtowns once had trees. Adding or replacing trees can return an important part ofl history to thearea.  -  Inac downtown setting, trees offerat touch of nature ina an environment fullof concrete and asphalt.  The cover of trees provides shade for cooler sidewalks, pavement, and even buildings as well as protection from weather.  Studies show that trees reducestress, depression, and strengthent the immune: system.  The roots of trees can filter toxins from water and their leavesf filter toxinsfrom the air. This means cleaner streets and cleaner air.  The increased positive mood of visitors duet to trees in a downtown can lead to better sales.  Pollinators are drawn toflowering trees for foodand shelter.  Trees in Historic Downtowns lfyou'rep plamingtoatdoreplare treesiny your historic downtown, historicphotos may reveal thet trees thatwere oncet there. Ifnot,research appropriate treesa and planting times fory your  Planting and Caring for Trees When planting trees, plan fort the future. Makesure thetrees won'tgrowt too lageforthespare.thar theyhave enoughs spacef fortheirroots togrow,and thatthey are properlymaintained. Well cared for  area.  createdbyA Amber Peny trees can lasth hundredsofyears    Samplesite Plail  When making a request to the Historic Preservation Commission to remove and replace a tree, the following is an example of what should be included in the drawing:  Street  Fountain  Replacement Tree  Fountain  House  Garage  Driveway  TreeTo Be Removed  I  WhatDo the Design Guidelines Say About landscaping, 4.1.1 Retain and preserve significant and character-defining vegetation including mature trees, hedges, 11.2 Historic site features, such as walkways, walls, formal and informal gardens, fountains, and trellises 1.1.3 Trees and other vegetation shall not block views of historic structures and should be well maintained 11.4 In adding new landscaping, native and commonly occurring vegetation is recommended. New plant materials shall be appropriate in species and scale to existing plant materials in the immediate vicinity. 1.1.5 Shrubbery planted along building edges and property lines shall have amature height of less than six 1.1.6 Trees, shrubs and fencing shall be used to screen service areas, garbage enclosures and, whenever 1.1.7 When undertaking new construction, significant trees or vegetation shall be preserved. 1.1.8 A Certificate of Appropriateness is required forthe removal of! live trees with a diameter ofis six (G)inches or greater. Removal of significant trees should only be done if it has disease or storm damage, orisa 1.1.9 Ifa diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, it should be replaced by a suitable species, as designated in an approved landscaping plan. The tree replacement must occur within one  shrubs, and ground cover whenever possible.  - should be retained. and pruned regularly.  (6) feet.  possible, parking areas.  safety hazard to historic structures.  (1)year of removal, between the months of September 1stand March 1st.    I @ i5 9  C K I  -    - a  - S  A  /    -  Citys  Downtoin Developmenb @htoric Preeroation  Washincton NORTH CAROLINA  January 15, 2019  RE: Updating Historic Preservation Commission Desigh Guideline Chapter 4.1.9  Existing:  Proposed:  4.1.9 Ifa diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, its should be replaced by a suitable species, as designated in an approved landscaping plan, within sixty (60) days from time of removal.  4.1.9 Ifa diseased, storm damaged or safety hazard tree is removed, its should be replaced by a suitable species, as designated in an approved landscaping plan,withip-sikty f80)days-fom-time ofremovat-The tree replacement must occur within one (1) year of removal, between the months of September 1st and March 1st of the following year.  Tree Committee Members: William Kenner Cheri Vaughn Monica Ferrari Will Aley  Sincerely,  Emy Repert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation erebert@washingtonnc.gov 252.946.0897    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: Landscape Design Guidelines  A request has been made by the HPC Tree Committee to review and update Chapter4  Streetscape and Site Design Section 4.1 Landscaping.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant approval of the revision oft the Landscaping Design Guidelines and recommend that the updated guidelines be sent to the City  Council for final approval.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission not grant approval of the revision oft the Landscaping Design Guidelines and recommend that the updated guidelines not be sent to the  City Council for final approval.    Certified Local Government  Training    0 a 8 de 8 @ I  3 a  II  35 5 3  e 3  )  : 3  @ - 3  1  € e I f - -  e 3  o    MINUTES    WASHINGTON HISTORICI PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Wednesday, January 2, 2019 7:00 pm Members Present Cheri Vaughn Colleen Knight Kathleen Couch Mark Everett William Kenner Rebecca Clark Karen Mann Members Absent Alli in attendance Others Present  Emily Rebert, Historic Preservation Planner Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the meeting The Chairman called the meeting to order. Invocation An moment ofs silent prayer was taken. III. Roll Call A silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old Business  1. Arequest has been made by Mr. Sed Naziri for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter and paint thel brick of the primary façade of the property located at 157 West Main Mr. Sed Naziri came forward and was sworn in. He explained that they are back requesting to recreate the façade oft the Belk building. Mr. Naziri stated that he spoke tol his brick mason and they have decided to replace the broken bricks with brick as much as they can and rebuild the façade oft the building with brick. He stated that they will be using the mortar mix for some of the: smaller areas and dents where brick could not be used. Mark Everett asked about an elevation drawing oft the building. Mr. Naziri stated that he didn't feel an elevation drawing would show the quality of his mason's work, so he included actual photos of his previous projects. Mr. Naziri explained the project in more detail. William Kenner stated that if Mr. Naziri is repairing the brick with brick then the request would basically be al Minor' Work/Repair. Kathleen Couch asked if he was going to try and match the brick. Mr. Naziri stated that they have found  Street.  1    the correct size brick, so it would match in size. He explained that it willl be very difficult to match the color because the façade is sO old and the mortar mix would be a different color as well. He stated that was the reason why after doing thel brick repair they wished to paint the façade and have a uniform look. Mr. Naziri stated that the other sides oft the building have already been painted, the front façade is the only side that has not been painted. He explained that he would like to paint the entire building sO that it will have a uniform look. William Kenner spoke about the type of paint that should. be used. Emily Rebert stated that the Guidelines do not regulate paint color or types. Mr. Naziri explained in more detail what they will be removing and fixing on that front façade. He stated that he was not sure ift they could bring it back to the original façade from 200 years ago. He showed pictures of what he envisioned for the storefronts. Kathleen Couch asked what color Mr. Naziri planned to paint the building. Mr. Naziri stated that he was open for suggestions on paint color ori the type of paint from the City. Mr. Naziri stated that he believed the stucco color) would look best. Karen Mann: stated that she had: some concerns about them power washing the building. Emily Rebert stated that the Secretary of Interior Standards recommends using the gentlest means possible when power washing al building, especially with masonry. She explained that since this is portolan based it is not as detrimental as it would be ifit was al lime-based mortar. Mr. Naziri stated that they plan on power The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the Rebecca Clark made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Sed Naziri to approximate the appearance of the original details, paint the masonry, and alter the first-floor entryway on thei front façade of property located at 157 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.1 Walls, 3.2 Materials, and 3.7 Storefronts. She noted that the building is a non-contributing structure. Her motion was seconded by Colleen Knight. All voted in favor and the  washing the building because there isal lot of mold. request. The Commission discussed the request further.  motion carried. Certificate of Appropriateness A. Major Works  V.  1. Arequest has been made by Mr.. John Logelfo for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter the primary façade of the property located at 126 West Main Street.  John Logelfo came forward and was sworn in. Mr. Logelfo stated that they would like to return the front façade back to its original storefront. He stated that currently the storefront sits back and over the years it has become some what of a hindrance. He  2    stated that they have had al loitering problem and otheri issues that go along with thati in that covered area. He stated that hel believed that the change to the storefront was done within the last 10 years. He stated that they recessed back the storefront to create that area and they would just! like to return it back to its original location. Rebecca Clark asked if Mr. Logelfo knew when they did the construction on the storefront to make it look like what it does now. Mr. Logelfo stated that he would say that it was done within the last 10 years. He explained that Mr. Tomisulo did that when he renovated the building. Mr. Logelfo stated that they have had multiple people dine out in that area and walk away from their bill. He stated that they would like to take that space back as part oft thei interior of the building. He explained that from what he had measured with the modifications done on the building already the actual store frontage would be 5ft ofactual glass that willl be put back in there to allow for the doorway and proper egress. He stated that there will still be a little vestibule to protect people from the rain, but you will not even be visible. Mr. Logelfo stated that this storefront would match the storefront next door and just basically relocating the glass and the aluminum. He also presented more details and measurements. He stated that The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the request. Rebecca Clark: stated that the store front had already been altered once before and this isj justt trying to make the space more useful and more appropriate. Cheri' Vaugh made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr.. John Logelfo to alter the east side entryway on the front façade of the property located 126 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.7 Storefronts. Her motion was seconded by Kathleen Couch. The motion carried with a 2. Ar request has been made by Mr. Richard Mechling fora Certificate of Appropriateness tor replace the roof with a different material on the property located at 112 East Main Mr. Richard Mechling came forward and was sworn in. He explained that they would like to replace the roof at: 112 East Main Street with a rubber roof. Hes stated that with the certain roof water is getting into the building and it is penetrating the base oft the parapet wall. He explained that they would like to use a rubber membrane roof and that would take care of the issue they are having with the roof and the leaking. He explained that they have been working with the State Historic Preservation Office on  itwilll be handicap accessible.  majority vote with William Kenner voting in opposition.  Street.  this project.  3    The Chairman opened the floora and no one came forward to speak for or against the request. William Kenner stated that it seemed Mr. Mechling had done his due diligence with consulting with the State Historic Office and getting their recommendation. Rebecca Clark made thei following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Richard Mechling to replace the existing metal roof with a rubber roof on the property located at 112 East Main Street. This motion is based on thei following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.5 Roofs. Cheri Vaughn seconded the motion and all voted ini favor. 3. Arequest has been made by Mr. Archie. Jennings for a Certificate of Appropriateness to convert the primary entrance from two doors to one door on the property located at Mr. Archie. Jennings came forward and was sworn in. He stated that hei is asking fora post review ofs some work that he had recently done at 134 South Market Street. He stated that in the final phase of the remodel at that building they changed the store front from at two-door store front to a single door. He presented pictures oft the new door. He explained that the building was significantly damaged in the previous storm. He: stated that they have owned the building for 20 years and they have been able to keep water from going into the building during storms with sandbags. He explained that they have determined that the water actually broke through the old door at this storefront. He stated that the old doors hadi falling into significant disrepair and went into more detail about the condition of the old doors. He stated that they sustained additional damage during the storm when they broke open. He explained that their primary goal was to repair the building as quickly as they could because they had three businesses ini that building before the storm and those businesses had to relocate. He stated that their primary goal was to get them back into business and back into the building as quickly as they could and the last step was to: secure thet front door of that store front. He explained that they did have a double door from another building in the historic district, buti it wouldn't fit, so they reconfigured the doorway and used just one of the doors from the other building and that is what they have now. Mr. Jennings stated that if you survey that block the new door looks very similar to doors int those store fronts and he personally feelingi it is one oft the better-looking doorways. He stated that they tried to: stayi in keeping with the style and time oft the building but they did switch the door from two to one. Karen Mann stated that she rode by the building today and the door looks nice and looks like an actual retail door. She stated that she noticed that a number of the double doors still there have been sealed off and are not usable. She: stated that for anyone with al handicap trying to open the two doors would be very difficult. She stated that they did do a goodj job at replacing the door. Rebecca Clark asked ift they altered any of the actual doorway to puti in the single door. Mr. Jennings explained that they did have to frame some, but they did not deconstruct any  134 South Market Street.  4    oft the actual façade. He explained that someone could remove the framing and put ina a The Chairman opened the floor and no one came forward to speaki for or against the request. The Commission discussed the request further. Kathleen Couch stated that she felt it was very logical for someone with a handicap or someone in a wheelchair to have just the one door, nott thet two. She stated that there are many other businesses Colleen Knight made thei following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Archie. Jennings to convert the primary entrance from two doors to one door on the property located at 134 South Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.7 Storefronts. Her motion was seconded by Rebecca Clark. All voted in favor 4. Arequest has been made by Mr. Stephen Furr for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a concrete patio in the back yard of the property located at 311 East Water Mr. and Mrs. Furr came forward and were sworn in. Mrs. Furr stated that they would like permission to construct a small 8x7 concrete patio to house their grill. She stated that they would also like to put upa a stone wall around the area. She explained that the purpose of the wall is not really for privacy, iti is more ofa andscape/screening feature. Mrs. Furr stated that they would like the wall to go around the patio sO that their neighbors do not have to see the grill. Karen Mann stated that a 4ft wall would be allowed and asked why they were requesting 4 %ft. Mrs. Furr: stated that 4ft would be fine fort them. Kathleen Couch asked about the materials they planned to use. Mrs. The Chairman opened thei floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the request. Rebecca Clark stated that they do not have anything in the guidelines that directly address patios and maybe that is something they should look at ini the future. Kathleen Couch made thei following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Stephen Furr to constructa concrete patio in the back yard of the property located 311 East Water Street. This motion is based ont the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.6 Fences and Walls, and! 5.41 Decks. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval: that the requested wall does not exceed 4ft in height. Her motion was seconded by Colleen Knight. All voted in favor and the motion  double doori in the future if they wanted.  with single doors so it doesn't stand out and iti is reversable.  and the motion carried.  Street.  Furr stated that all the materials would match the house.  carried.  5    5. Arequest has been made by Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel for a Certificate of  Appropriateness: to replace the roof with a different material on the property located at Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel came forward and was sworn in. He stated that he is asking for permission to replace his roof with a different material. He explained that he didn't know the he needed to do this, so the roof! has already been done. He explained that aftert the hurricane they had: some shingles lift up and hei felt that a metal roof was more appropriate fori the house. Karen Mann asked ift the house was a contributing structure. Mr. Hazard-Daniel stated that it was not a contributing structure. He stated that the house was built in: 1956. Emily Rebert stated that it could potential bei in the next The Chairman opening thet floor and no one came forward to speak for or against the request. Rebecca Clark stated that the roof is in line with the otherarchitecture in that area. She stated that there are two other cottages in that area that have metal roofs as well as new construction in Moss Landing with metal roofs. Mark Everett stated there were many houses along that street that were eye sores but are now very pretty homes. Karen Mann stated that this home owner was just trying to salvage his house after the storm, not realizing that he needed to ask the Commission for permission. She stated that it should be noted that it was extenuating circumstances. Rebecca Clark: stated that she also appreciated that they have four river houses which are traditional one-story level cottages on that whole street, which is kind ofr rare. Ms. Clark stated that two houses were taken down and two-story homes were built on those lots. She stated that it was nice that they are able to sustain the original river homes along that street. Cheri Vaughn made thei following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel to replace the existing asphalt shingle roof with a metal roof on the property located at 418 East Water Street. This motion is based ont thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.5 Roofs. Herr motion was: seconded by Colleen Knight. Ally voted in  418 East' Water Street.  update, but it is not currently contributing.  favor and the motion carried.  B. Minor Works  1. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of1 140 West Main Street to replace the existing roof using like materials on 2. Ar request has been made and approved by staff fora a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 409 West Main Street to install a decorative brick cap over the concrete  the property.  bulkhead on the property.  6    3. Arequest has been made and approved by staff fora a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of 124 Charlotte Street to replace the existing A/C unit in the same location 4. Arequest has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of115 Respess Street to repoint masonry joints and install flashing on the 5. An request has been made and approved by staff fora a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner of743 East Main Street to replace rotten siding using like materials on the Kathleen Couch made a motion to approve the minor works. Karen Mann seconded the  on thej property.  rear parapet wall on the property.  property.  motion: and all voted in favor.  VI. Other Business  Emily Rebert explained that Washington will be hosting the next CLG training on February 22nd and Emily Rebert introduced Mr. Slayton Hazard-Daniel and explained that he purchased Haven Mill.  explained ini more detail what that entailed.  Slaton Hazard-Daniel talked about what his plans were fori the property.  VII. Approval of Minutes - December 4, 2018 seconded by William Kennera and all voted in favor.  Rebecca Clark made a motion to approve the corrected December minutes. Her motion was  VIII. Adjourn  There being no other business Cheri Vaughn made a motion to adjourn. Rebecca Clark seconded  the motion and all voted ini favor.  7