WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  Regular Scheduled Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2015  GW  Agenda  7:00PM  I. II.  Opening of the meeting Invocation III. Roll call  IV. Old Business = Major Works  1. Reconsideration of applications which have been denied. Pat Griffin has asked that the Historic Preservation Commission reconsider his applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for vinyl windows on the front façade of the  structures located at 315 & 319 West 2nd Street.  V. Certificate of Appropriateness  A. Major Works  1. A request has been made by Mr. Richard Dwayne Godley for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a porch roof over the approved front porch on the front façade of the structure located at 323 North Bonner Street. 2. A request has been made by Mr. Chris McLendon for a Certificate of Appropriateness to renovate the damage to the front office façade using 3' X 6'white fiberglass and a 6', X 6' picture window with simulated grilles glass on the structure located at 131 North Market Street. The renovation will match 3. A request has been made by Mr. Glenn Williams for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the existing transom and awning with copper material on the front façade of the structure located at 201 West Main Street. 4. Ar request has been made by Patricia Lewis and Lori Hardee for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install 278' of privacy fence in a majority of the rear yard of the structure located at 409 East 2nd Street. The fence will stepped in 5. A request has been made by Mr. Calvin McLean for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install wood railings and spindles to the wheel chair ramp  the building at 248 West Main Street.  as to not be seen from the front of the house.  and landing on the structure located at 121 East 2nd Street.  1    B. Minor Works  1. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Teriann Scarantino to remove a dead and decaying 2. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Mr. Leland Hill representing the First Christian Church to add small landscaping and repair the front porch railing with like material on 3. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Mr. William Cochran to repair and replace windows with like materials and replace siding with same material on the structure located 4. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Metropolitan AME Zion Church to remove and replace the existing sign located at the front of the church at 102 West Martin Luther 5. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Mr. Don Perkins to add new gutters to the front porch on 6. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Beaufort County to: (1) wash and clean the exterior brick (2) repoint damaged brick and replace mortar and (3) use waterproof sealer on the building located at 210 North Market Street (Sheriffs Dept.). 7. A request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Mr. Calvin McLean to add 2 condensing units on the east side of the house located at 121 East 2nd Street. The units are not visible from  Pecan tree located in the rear yard of 216 Fleming Street.  the structure located at 120 North Academy Street.  at 218 North Bonner Street.  King Jr. Drive.  the house located at 402 East 2nd Street.  the street.  VI. Other Business  1. Design Guidelines - Masonry Products. VII. Approval of Minutes - October 6, 2015  Vill. Adjourn  2    Old Business  Major Works  Reconsideration of Applications  315&319 West 2nd Street    WASHINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION  RULES OF PROCEDURE  Rule 20. Application Procedures  Reconsideration of Applications Which Have Been Denied. The order of business for reconsideration of applications for Certificates of Appropriateness which have been  previously denied shall be as follows:  (1) The Chairperson shall entertain a motion from a member of the Commission that the applicant be allowed to present evidence in support of the request for reconsideration. Such evidence shall be limited to that which is necessary to enable the Commission to determine whether or not there has been a substantial change in the facts, evidence or conditions relating to the application, provided, however that the applicant shall be given the opportunity to present any other additional supporting evidence, if the (2) After receiving the evidence, the Commission shall proceed to deliberate whether or not there has been a substantial change in the facts, evidence or conditions relating to the application which would warrant reconsideration. If the Commission finds that there has been such a change, it shall thereupon  Commission decides to reconsider the application.  treat the request as a new application received at that time.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  317 a 319 West 2ndStreet  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  James FBAgwel)  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Replace windows wit islwinda.e.  Dastll Sls Hadie Plawk oth stalalstas  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior by to the Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An meeting application will not be accepted. L understand approved requests are valid for one year.  incomplete  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  RIG GrfEN 7Name of Applicant-type or print) 414 (Mailing balse 8/18/2015 (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  RWasliagtn 8h27567 253-946-7700  (Zip'Code) Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  A  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will obtaining be fowarded any  becomes a of al Minor  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  application Issuance  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    New Business  Major Works  Richard Dwayne Godley 323 North Bonner Street    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street. Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  323 NBonner  Owner's Name: Ruardusyu. Godley  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Iwould liko. to congtruct aporch roof Over top oFtuo Clly, approued porch dock, Dn tuo. Pronkfntedo. oftD hous.. TA. Bhyle wsill wakch lus. existluce 8tosp Bud I Lill ba, Utuc lnericalpscpropise Waeris6.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Ani incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Behsrsyu Goteu (Name of Applicant -type or print) 883 N.unigt. (Mailing Address) abOctaGis (Date)  (Initials)  ACTION  ai889 (Zip Code) Number)  bas-2784 (Daytime Phone  (Authorized Signature)  Rdln p Adleg  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the_ Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.        3  A  7 Round' ARCH TOMATH  (ucod S  2X6 del-  6  sessoma CuRa  STRET  STREET  STREET  Aukel    Staff Report  323 North Bonner Street  The application for the property located at 323 North Bonner Street isi requesting approval constructa porch roof over top oft the recently approved porch deck on the front façade of the property. The applicant would like to install metal porch roof consisting of metal and wood material. The style  would match the existing stoop, and all materials are historically appropriate. The Design Guidelines states in Chapter 3.6 Porches and Entryways:  Chapter 3.6.4 "Reconstruction of missing or extensively deteriorated porches is encouraged. Reconstructed porches shall be based on documentary evidence. Ifadequate documentation is not available, a new design is appropriate ifiti is compatible with the style and period of the  building."    Adjacent Property Owners - 323 North Bonner Street  Gene F. Godley 210 Jackie Lane Washington, NC 27889 Clinton E. Tetterton 315 North Bonner Street Washington, NC 27889 William M. Dotson 2334 Tar Landing Road Williamston, NC 17892 Wilhemina Cooper 209 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Washington, NC 27889 Ford Freeman 208 Edgewater Drive Washington, NC 27889 Thairbie Gibbs 327 North Bonner Street Washington, NC 27889 Rev. David L. Moore 406 East 5th Street Washington, NC 27889 Orr Lodge #104 316 North Bonner Street Washington, NC 27889    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development  Re: 323 North Bonner Street- The addition ofa a porch roof ont front façade  A request has been made by Mr. Richard Godley for a Certificate of Appropriatenessi to construct porch roof over the recently approved porch deck on the front façade oft the house. The style will match the existing stoop and historically appropriate materials will be used, located at 323 North Bonner Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter To grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are includedi in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  3.6 Porches and Entryways.  may be attached toi the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Richard Godley to construct a porch roof on the front façade, located 323 North Bonner Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.6 Porches and  Entryways.  Or  imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Richard Godley to construct a porch roof on the front façade, located 323 North Bonner Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter. 3.6 Porches and Entryways. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following  conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Richard Godley to construct a porch roof on thei front façade, located 323 North Bonner Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is not congruous withi the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.6 Porches and  Entryways.    Beaufort County Property Photos  PIN: 01005954  Photo: 01005954.jpg  Copyright 2015 by Mobile311,LLC    CONNEÇIGIS  fien'asi Bmentestesstsi 122935 5etwoasise  wi OSAN3 6790D5 759383 6727  Parcels Prepertyland Owners D GPIN interior Tract Lines Centerlines County Line County Line (Solid) State  SeCAA  90793 47503 7 657  0675:98-6727  962319-6704  5675:07715  3679:98-5604  72009560  3675.945575 125Fset    PSERTIR 7223 SRINLONG 5675-98-5704 MNRARPRISS 25A1ATHAMDRME STATI N ACRES a NERBLDG LANDVA 30400 TOTVAL 54111 SUBCPE SALEPRICE RISTRICT EXEMPTAMI SQ.FI 1592 EFFYR 1965 FLOOPPLAIN  ZN 0105454 OWNERNAME GODLEV RECHARD DMAYNE MAILING ARRRESSZ ZR 27889 ACSTLNES 654505 DATE 06/14/2015 BLPGYAL 43711 NAHP.CDE # SUBRESC ZONE RHD PROPRESC 1LOT 323 BONNERST BOARTMEE a NERBED 2 EXEMPTPROP NERSTORES 3.  GPN 5675-98-675M OMINER NAMEZ SIIY WASHINGION PROPIRTKAPPRESS 323 BONNERST MAP SHEET 567508 PEEPEOOK sm PASE 1979/0795 PEFRVAL 0 NEMP.DISG HSTORICAL STAMES LANDUSE MBL 557508113 YRBVILT 1915 NBRBATHS 1 CENSUS BLOCK NER HALF BATHS 1  Befoitt Gounty onlng mapa asoss ap procided asapaes srvize #4 $ svalable ands shoutv VATOERS. eaprssed eri  er inforatisnal purposes only and a note manded toc cite alegai recoidt no shoul ibes sertited fart the acigs imgies. Br SoMent efi pibishes OR1 day ubised oantys oiBesvlens endthey Wbane: Prersers dsclam *lis apsmpbiry and legat Sstagy fer the somers published on tas senices industry profassipnsls Tad andihsl Astigns shalls beh heshemess fes AEa3s. se damsger ai Mdamestss Bivas SAC siths sses ofCe dsso. vevrn Thes ose s shant SessfssCau    C  City  CITY OF WASHINGTON  Washington  NORTH CAPOLIN, DOWNIOWNDBVELOMENT 01 HISTORIC PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Appropratenes-323 N Bonner Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted ini the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required tol be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propety is located within 1001 feet oft the above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the owner to construct a porch roof on the front  façade.  You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date:T Tuesday November 3, 2015  Place: City! Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side oft the building and go tot the second floor.  Time: 7:00P PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Omily ORebert Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation reber@washingtonnegow 252.946.0897    New Business  Major Works  Chris McLendon  131 North Market Street    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  13LNMarket  Owner's Name: Cris Melendan  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Renovate office Front Facade dsing 3X6white fiberglass Sldoor with simalateds-illes between slass and 6XG Ricture window with simalte_grille,  between slass  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  HalWoolard 7Name of7 Applicant-type or print)  (Initials)  ACTION  1213 (MVailing Address) 10-6-15 (Date)  Schocl  Magnolia  Rd  wash M.c. 27FP4P Code)  252- 945-5665 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Applicant)  MAeLe  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of al Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    0 DA o    :  Z € -  a  - -  =    131 North Market ST    FOR SALE  248 West Main ST    248 West Main ST    Staff Report  131 North Market Street front facade of the property.  The application for the property located at 131 N Market Streeti is requesting approval to renovate the The applicant would like to install a 3x6 foot fiberglass door with 15 lights that has simulated muntins between the glass. They would also like toi install a 6x61 foot picture window that also has simulated muntins between the glass. The applicant would like to mimic what was done on the front façade at 248 The Design Guidelines state to retain and preserve historic windows and doors. However, the original Chapter 3.4.11: "The introduction ofr new window and door openings into the principal elevations of a structure is not recommended. If permitted, new openings should be proportionally the same as existing openings and should have matching sash, glass, sills, frames, casings, and muntin patterns." ." The Design Guidelines also state in Chapter3.7.5:"fr reconstructing al historicstorefront, base the design on historic research, physical evidence, and photographic documentation, ifavailable. Recreate the original architectural elements including overall proportions, fenestration, dimensions, and orientation." Chapter! 5.2.10: "lfv vinyl-clad windows are used, they must have permanent exterior muntins to  Main Street.  windows and doors oft this structure have already been replaced in the past.  match the existing windows."    Adjacent Property Owners - 131 North Market Street  Rachel Midgette 322 Post Road Bath, NC 27808 Jesse T. Rawls 127 North Market Street Washington, NC 27889 Edna R. Woolard 207 West 12th Street Washington, NC 27889 Michael Gregory Ward 503 Bay Lake Street Chocowinity, NC 27817 Clarence Tetterton PO Box 324 Washington, NC 27889 Wayland Sermons Jr PO Box 69 Washington, NC 27889 Betty Stewart 121 North Market Street Washington, NC 27889 Beaufort County 112 West 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Page Family LLC PO Box 1828 Washington, NC 27889    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 131 North Market Street- Front Façade Renovations  A request has been made by Mr. Chris Mclendon, fora Certificate of Appropriateness to renovate the front office façade. This will include installing a. 3x6j foot fiberglass door with. 15 lights that has simulated muntins between the glass. He would also like to installa 6x6 foot picture window that also has simulated. muntins between the glass, located at 131 North Market Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.41 Windows and Tog grant such ar request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  Doors, Chapter3.7Storefonts, and 5.2 Residential Construction.  may be attached to the motion.  Possible. Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Chris Mclendon to renovate the fronti façade of the structure located at 131 North Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4Windows and  Doors, Chapter 3.7Storefronts, and 5.2 Residential Construction.  Or  imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate ofA Appropriateness to Mr. Chris Mclendon to renovate the front façade of the structure located at 131 North Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows and Doors, Chapter. 3.7 Storefronts, and 5.2 Residential Construction. Ifurther move that the Historic  Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Chris Mclendon to renovate the front façade of the structure located at 131 North Market Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.4 Windows  and Doors, Chapter 3.7Storefronts, and 5.2 Residential Construction.    10/28/2015  BeaufortPropertyl Photos  Beaufort County Property Photos  PIN: 01005097  Photo: 01005097.jpg   I  Copyright 2015 by Mobile311,LLC  g.wesamolieilcombeakrPabsimagas-aspdpin-oiopss,  1/1    10/28/2015  ConnectGISF FeatureReport  CONNEGIGIS  Beaufort  GSNE  Printed October 28, 2015 See Below for Disclaimer  Parcels  Property Land Gwners terier Tracti Laes Centerines Souiny Lne DJ Ceunty Line (Selies State  126 Feet  Mp.hassrtomaesamoomsfaswNunwRAPARMRSTBCRSNBicacas.emnae-gpiad  1/2    10/28/2015 OBJECTID 6884 GPIN LONG 5675-88-7027 MAILING ADDRESS POBOX1362 STATE NC ACRES o NBR BLDG BLDG VAL 201978 NBHD CDE CH SUB DESC LAND USE MBL 567508214 YR BUILT 1900 NBR BATHS CENSUS BLOCK NBR HALF BATHS 1  ConnectGis Feature Report  PIN 01005097 OWNER NAME MCLENDON NANCYW MAILING ADDRESS2  GPIN 5675-88-7027 OWNER NAME2 MCLENDON CHRISTOPHERB CITY WASHINGTON PROPERTY. ADDRESS MARKET ST MAP SHEET 567508 LAND VAL 60480 TOTVAL 262458 SUB CDE SALE PRICE 320000 PROP DESC 1L0T1331358137 MARKET STREET ROADTYPE P NBR BED 0 EXEMPT PROP NBR STORIES 3 ZONE B1H  ZIP 27889 ACCTNBR 881015 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1544/0071 DEFR VAL 0 NBHDDESC COMMERCIAL HISTORIC STAMPS 640 DISTRICT 1 EXEMPT AMT SQFT 9036 EFFYR 1970 FLOOD PLAIN DATE 09/07/2006  Beaufort County online mapi access is provided asa a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published on this website is for informational purposes only andi is not intended to constitute al legal record nor should it be substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. Thel County ofE Beaufort and the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility andl legall liability fort the content published on this website. The user agreest that Beaufort Countyl  andi its Assians shall be held harmless from alla actions. claims. damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.  eplDeautortcmectyscmDomoafleain,BkA-AmgAEPePLa2AtidRis.Mmérgrinid  2/2    0o  City  CITY OF WASHINGTON  Washington  NORTH CAPITNA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OHISTORIC PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness-131 N Market Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required tol be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propety isl located within 100 feet of the above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the owner to renovate the front façade oft the  structure.  You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday November 3, 2015  Place: City! Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Omily gRebert Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation rehenpwahntemmesw 252.946.0897    New Business  Major Works  Glenn Williams  201 West Main Street    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property:  Please use Black Ink  201 W.Mms Streef  Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Gew  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Gleww Wilinns  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Replese ficAsow # Awmag w' doppec mitexial  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. Anincomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  G(eww W:llims (Name of Applicant - type or print) PoBok 2165 (Mailing Address) 1o/s/s  (Initials)  ACTION  27889 (Zip Codey  252-945-1848 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized  S (Signature of Applicant)  Signature)]  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. It is valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    20( West Miio Shreet  1o  36" decp 36" keiglt        201 West Main ST  emonade ARTINFY    Staff Report  201 West Main Street front facade oft the property.  The application for the propertyl located at 201 West Main Street is requesting approval to renovate the The applicant would like to replace the vinyl on the transom and the awning with copper material. Copperi is al historicmaterial that has been used for centuries and: served many purposes, including  roofing.  The Design Guidelines states in Chapter 3.7 Storefronts:  Chapter 3.7.5' "freconstructing a historic storefront, bases the design on historic research, physical evidence, and photographic documentation, ifavailable. Recreate the original architectural elementsi including overall proportions, fenestration, dimensions,  and orientation."    Adjoining Property Owners - 201 West Main Street  Randy' Walker PO Box 2632 Washington, N.C. 27889 Charles Rodney Schmitt 202 West Main Street Washington, N.C. 27889 Melton Everett 213 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 PGML LLC 107 Island Lane Washington, NC 27889 nedman-Ravenwood LLC 401 Moss Landing Ste 301 Washington, NC 27889 Sid Hassell PO Box 2187 Washington, NC 27889 New' Vision Partners 1205 Kinsdale Drive Raleigh, NC 27615    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 201 West Main Street- Front Façade Renovations  A request has been made by Mr. Glenn Williams forc a Certificate ofA Appropriateness to renovate the front office façade. This willi include replacing the wood over the transom and awning with copper material located at. 201 West Main Street. Currently wood covers the transom and the awning is aj fabric material. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically To grant such ar request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings oft fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  Chapter3.7Storefronts:  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Glenn Williams to renovate thei front façade oft the structure located at 201 West Main! Street. This motion is based on thet following findings oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.7 Storefronts.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Glenn Williams to renovate the front façade of the structure located at 201 West Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.7 Storefronts. I further move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the  approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Glenn' Williams to renovate thet front façade of the structure located at 201 West Main! Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chopter37Storefronts:    10/28/2015  BeaufortProperty Photos  Beaufort County Property Photos  PIN: 01019513  Photo: 01019513.jpg  Copyright 2015 by Mobile311,LLC  mp.wesamolieilcombeakPalsimagssasppin-oroisi3  1/1    PCONNECIOIS wE HOSNG  Printed October 28, 2015 See Below for Disclaimer  Parcels  Propery Land Owners Ierier Treet Lines Centerlines County Line D County Une (Selles State  121Fee!    MIM 558 PIN LONG 575-78-8173 IAILING ADDRESS )1 W MAIN ST TATE C CRES BR BLDG LDG VAL 36706 BHD CDE + JBDESC AND USE IBL 57508467 RBUILT 380 BR BATHS ENSUS BLOCK BR HALF BATHS  : 01019513 OWNER NAME WILLIAMS DAVID GLENN MAILING ADDRESS2 POBOX2165 ZIP 27889 ACCT NBR 57294 DEED BOOK and PAGE 957/948 DEFR VAL 0 NBHD DESC COMMERCIAL HISTORIC STAMPS DISTRICT 1 EXEMPT AMT SQFT 9128 EFFYR 1980 FLOOD PLAIN DATE 04/29/1992  :as 5675-78-8173 OWNER NAME2 WILLIAMS SHARONL CITY WASHINGTON PROPERTY ADDRESS 201W MAIN ST MAP SHEET 567508 LAND VAL 75168 TOT VAL 461874 SUB CDE SALE PRICE PROP DESC (TRACT#1) ROAD TYPE P NBR BED 0 EXEMPT PROP NBR STORIES 5 ZONE B1H  1LOT201 WEST MAINS STREET  ufort County online map accessi is provided as a public service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websitei is informational purposes only andi is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor shouldi it bes substituted for the advice or services ofi industry professionals. The unty of Beaufort andt the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility: andl legall liabilityf for the content published ont this website. The user agrees that Beaufort Countyl  iits Assigns shall be held harmless from all actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    0o  City  CITY OF WASHINGTON  Washington  NORTH CAPOLENA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 01 HISTORIC PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Aproprateness-201 WI Main Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted ini the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted byt the City of Washington, your propetyi is located within 100 feet of the above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the owner to replace transom and awning with copper  material.  You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday November 3, 2015  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second! Street. Enterfrom the Market  Street side oft the building and goi tot the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Ini the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Omiy gRebert Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation engwahntanes 252.946.0897    New Business  Major Works  Patricia Lewis and Lori Hardee  409 East 2nd Street    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  H09E, and Street  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Tatricia Lewis /lori taree  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Have barn origural to, house at KES uasaik  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Install 218 lianfu privuy frelr photo atachoh, We would Vike Sopy W ol bck yard- Steppel li 50 notpen ADM el hbus -  Seunky and    Rud  privaey  t hake Spang for MA angts be outeire wiHhaat  DDomyjgy about him a Ho dout waict fo lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  in SR 24 meetingmidd ut 70 NC27849 Zipo Code)  prior tot the  lwish to attend; otherwise consideration  will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incompleteot  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Patlewis (Name of Applicant type or print) 4D4E.ns (Mailing Address) (Date), Pat (Signature of Applicant)  Lor Hardee Ke'nees  (Initials)  6  ACTION Conditions with  Washingbny  252-917-4534 bwis  (Daytime Phone Number) Bmbnpoo  (Date)  (Authorized  Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor' Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Proposal WHITEHURST and SON'S FENCE CO, INC. P.O. BOX6083 GREENVILLE, NORTHCAROLINA 27835 PHONE (252) 752-2736 NÇ 1-800-682-6555 FAX (252)7 752-7894 ATTN:  PROPOSAL SUBMITTEDTO Pat Lewis 409 E. 2nd. St. cIY, STATE & ZIP CODE Washington, NC 27889 Estimator Bob Kennedy Weh hereby submits spedlications ande estimatesf for: 2)2x4 4 Back Rails 3)1x6D Dog Eared Pickets  DATE 8/26/2015  JOBI NAME &. JOBI LOCATION PHONE 917-4534 FAX  paMwcwisepomalcon  Install 2781 L.F. of Pressure Treated Pine Privacy Fence  1)6x61 Double Gate Posts/4 x4 Single Gate-Fence Posts-French Gothic Top  4) One(1) 10' Wide Double Gate On Aluminum Frame 5) Two(2) 4' Wide Single Gates On Aluminum Frames TERMS: 50% Deposit/Balance On Completion  Total Labor and Materials!  WEI PROPOSE hereby toi fumish material and labor- to complete ina accordancer witha above specifications, for the sum of.  As Above Payment tob ber madea asf follows: As Above Authorized Signature_  NOTE: This proposal mayb bey withdrawn byusi Ifnota accepted within 15 days. Acceptance of Proposal The above prices specifications and conditions are satisfactory: anda are hereby accepted. Youare authorized to dot the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Should payment not be paid as agreed, any cost of collection including interest and attorney's fees, etc. shall  Signature, Signature_  be paid byt the customer. Date ofA Acceptance:        e -    Staff Report  409 East Second Street  The application for the property located at 409 East Second Street is requesting approval toi installa 6 The applicant would like toi install a 278 linear foot privacy fence. The fence will enclose the majority of the backyard, including the original barn. The perimeter will be stepped in ai fewi feet from the outer  foot privacy fence on the tertiary elevation of the property.  edge oft the house so not be as noticeable from the streetscape. The Design Guidelines states in Chapter 4.6 Fences and' Walls:  Chapter 4.6.6 "Newi fences and walls should be of a design that is appropriate to the Chapter 4.6.8 "Privacy fencing shall only be allowed in the reary yard. Ifai majority ofa a privacy fence is visible from the publici right-of-way, al landscape buffer shall be included. No fence,  architectural style and period of the historic structure." including aj privacy fence, shall exceed six (6) feeti inl height."    Adjacent Property Owners - 409 East 2nd Street  Donald Perkins 605 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 George Nemecz 2225 Dungiven Ct. Garner, NC 27592 Tim Crompton 421 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Virgil Carroll Jenkins Jr 412 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Attila Nemecz 415 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 John Baugher 414 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Daniel Mallison PO Box 2005 Washington, NC 27889 Rita Buck PO Box 808 Chocowinity, NC 27817 First Christian Church 401 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 409 East Second Street- Construction of ai fence  A request. has been made by Ms. Pat Lewis fora Certificate of Appropriateness to add a six foot high wooden fence to enclose the rear property yard located at 409 East Second Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter4 4.0Streetscape and Site Design Tog grant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings off fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Anyconditions the Commission feels  Section 4.6 Fences and Walls.  appropriate may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Pat Lewis to add a six foot high wooden privacy fence to ençlose the rear property yard located at 409 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application iso congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter  4.0Streetscape and Site Design Section 4.6 Fences and Walls.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Pat Lewis to add a six foot high wooden privacy fence to enclose the rear property yard located at 409 East Second Street. This motion is based on the following findings ofi fact: the application isc congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.0Streetscape and Site Design Section 4.6 Fences and' Walls. further move that the Historic  Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission denya Certificate of Appropriateness to Ms. Pat Lewis to add a six foot high wooden privacy fence to enclose the rear property yard located at 409 East Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically  Chapter 4.0 Streetscape and! Site Design Section 4.6 Fences and Walls.    10/28/2015  BeaufortPrpertyPhois  Beaufort County Property Photos  PIN: 01017628  Photo: 01017628.jpg  Copyright 2015 by Mobile311,LLC  iplwersmoaltaficombatyPhabsimags-aspahn-0n0r7a8  1/1    CONNEGIGIS WEB ROSTING  Printed October 28, 2015 See Belowf for Disclaimer  Pareals  Prgpery Land Owners interier Tractl Line: Centedines Couny LiRe County Line (Selidh State  1BFeel    MIM 1999 PINLONG 585-07-2387 AILINGADDRESS 19 EAST 2ND STREET TATE C CRES BRBLDG LDG VAL 78631 BHD CDE JBDESC AND USE IBL 5850992 RBUILT 371 BR BATHS ENSUS BLOCK BR HALF BATHS  Las 01017628 OWNERNAME HARDEE LORI CLARECE MAILING ADDRESS2  Mas 5685-07-2387 OWNER NAME2 LEWIS PATRICIA WILLIAMS CITY WASHINGTON PROPERTY ADDRESS 2ND: STREET MAPSHEET 568509 LAND VAL 50000 TOTVAL 228631 SUB CDE SALE PRICE 111000 PROP DESC 1LOT4 409 E2 2ND STREET ROAD TYPE P NBR BED 4 EXEMPT PROP NBR STORIES 3 ZONE RHD  ZIP 27889 ACCT_NBR 921915 DEED BOOK and PAGE 1876/0028 DEFR VAL 0 NBHD DESC HISTORICAL STAMPS 222 DISTRICT 1 EXEMPT AMT SOFT 3016 EFFYR 1991 FLOOD PLAIN DATE 06/29/2015  lufort County online map access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available and without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content published ont this websitei is informational purposes only and is noti intended to constitute a legal record nor should it bes substituted for the advice ors services ofi industry professionals. Thel unty ofB Beaufort andi the Website Provider disclaim allr responsibility: andl legall liability for the content published ont this website. The user agreest that Beaufort Countyl  fits Assigns shall be held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.    Co  Citys  CITY OF WASHINGTON  Washington  NORTH CAROEINA DOWNTOWN. DEVELOPMENT 01 HISTORIC PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Approprateness-4OEZ"4 Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 1001 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required to be notified by the City of Washington. According tot the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propety is located within 100 feet of the above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the ownerto install a 6foot high wooden privacy fence  to enclose the rear property yard.  You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday November 3, 2015  Place: City Hall- Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Omilgy gRebert Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation rhengwashngtomnesew 252.946.0897    121E Second ST.  Installation of 1 wooden  railing on wheelchair  ramp    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 12/S2w0 57 Owner's Name: CALAN_MELEAN  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  INSTAZL lwaco RAILMIG SPMLESTO  WWHEEL CHALR - RAME  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting lwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year,  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  MEAN -type or print)  AMRA  (Initials)  ACTION  121Bimp 57 (Mailing Address) E  (Zip Code)  995628617 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  chosr  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature of Applicant)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor  tot the Historic Preservation Commission for review ati its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. Your must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    121 East Second ST    121 East  Seçond ST    Staff Report  121 East Second Street  The application for the property located at 121 East Second Street is requesting approval toi install a The applicant would like toi install a wooden railing on the wheelchair ramp located on the western side of the property. The railing will look like the bannister on the porch, but have larger gaps between the  railing on the wheelchair. access ramp of the property.  spindles to differentiate between the new and old construction. The Design Guidelines states in Chapter 5.3 Additions:  Chapter 5.3.3 "Additions should be compatible in materials, design... to the main structure.. - Chapter! 5.3.4"Additions. : should always be compatible with the existing historic structure." Chapter! 5.3.5"Additions should never mimic or recreate the architecture of the primary historic  structure."    Adjacent Property Owners -1 121 East 2nd Street  Don Stroud 127 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Thomas Kevin Cherry 3232 7th Ave NE Washington, DC 20017 Jayne D. Wall 111 S. Reed Drive Washington, NC 27889 Ford Freeman 100 Riverside Drive Apt. 2 Washington, NC 27889 Benjamin Clark 116 N. Bonner Street Washington, NC 27889 Richard M. Young 142 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 Nickel & Dime Properties 128 Abbey Lane Washington, NC 27889 Sherri E. Dean 122 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Elmo T. Carawan 114 North Bonner Street Washington, NC 27889 City ofWashington PO Box 1988 Washington, NC 27889 Martha Matthews 140 East Main Street Washington, NC 27889 STC Holdings, LLC 102 E. Victoria CT Ste A Greenville, NC 27858    REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION  To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Emily Rebert, Planning & Development Re: 121 East Second Street- Installation of Wood Railings  A request has been made by Mr. Calvin McLean, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to installa wood railing and spindles to the wheel chairn ramp on the western. side of the structure located at 121 East. Second. Street. Please review the Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter5.3 Togrant such a request, the Historic Preservation Commission must make findings of fact, which are included in the sample motions below. Any conditions the Commission feels appropriate  Additions.  may be attached to the motion.  Possible Actions  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Calvin McLean toi install a wood railing and spindles to the wheel chair ramp on the western side oft the structure located 121 East Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines,  specifically Chapter. 3.5 Additions.  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: to Mr. Calvin McLean to install a wood railing and spindles to the wheel chair ramp on the western side of the structure located at 121 East Second Street. This motion is based on thet following findings. oft fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.5 Additions. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation  Commission place the following conditions on the approval:  Or  Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission deny a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Calvin McLean toi install a wood railing and spindles to the wheel chair ramp on the western side of the structure located at 121 East Second Street. This motion is based on the followingi findings of fact: the application is not congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design  Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.5 Additions.    10/28/2015  BeaufortPropertyl Photos  Beaufort County Property Photos  PIN: 01011003  Photo: 01011003.jpg  Copyright 2015 by Mobie311,LLC  p.MatsmoliteilcombakrPatsimsgssasp.ph:piorog  1/1    CONNES WEE GIS SSRG  Printed October 28, 2015 See Belowf for Disclaimer  Partels  Preperty Land Gwaers Interier Tractlinas Centerlines Eounty Line D Eounty LRE (Seliel State  145Feet    w 303 PINLONG 575-88-9077 IAILING ADDRESS 5780' W EARLL DRIVE TATE Z CRES BRBLDG LDGVAL 9040 BHD CDE LHR JBDESC AND USE IBL 57508232 RBUILT 900 BRBATHS ENSUS BLOCK BR HALF BATHS  :ay 01011003 OWNER NAME MCLEAN INVESTMENT CO.LLC MAILING ADDRESS2  : 5675-88-9077 OWNER NAME2 CITY GOODYEAR PROPERTY, ADDRESS 121E2ND: ST MAP SHEET 567508 LAND VAL 44520 TOT VAL 133560 SUBCDE SALE PRICE 171000 PROP DESC ROAD TYPE P NBRBED 5 EXEMPT PROP NBR STORIES 3 ZONE B1H  ZIP 85395 ACCT NBR 922181 DEED BOOKand PAGE 1880/0711 DEFR VAL 0 NBHD DESC B1 HISTORICAL RESIDENTIAL STAMPS 342 DISTRICT 1 EXEMPT AMT SOFT 9658 EFFYR 1950 FLOOD PLAIN DATE 08/28/2015  1LOT121 EAST 2ND: ST (LOT #39)  ufort County online map access is provided as a publics service, asi is, as available andy without warranties, expressed ori implied. Content iits Assigns shall be held harmless from alla actions, claims, damages orj judgments arising out oft the use of County data.  this Countyl  informational purposes only and is noti intended to constitute a legalr record nor shouldi it bes substituted for the advice ors services of published professionals. ont websitei is unty of Beaufort and thel Website Provider disclaim all responsibility andl legall liability for the content published on this website. The user agreest industry that Beaufort Thel    co  City  CITY OF WASHINGTON  NORTR Washington  CAPORANA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 01 HISTORIC PRESERVATION  Subject: Certificate of Appropratenes-1ZIEZ Street  Dear Adjoining Property Owner,  Whenever exterior renovation work is being conducted in the Washington Historic District all property owners within 100 feet oft the proposed construction activities are required tol be notified by the City of Washington. According to the application submitted by the City of Washington, your propety is located within 1001 feet of the above referenced property.  Arequest has been made by the owner to install a wood railing and spindles to the  wheel chair ramp on the western side of the structure.  You are welcomed and encouraged to attend the reularly scheduled meeting of the Washington  Historic Commission. Please note the following date, time, and place:  Date: Tuesday November 3, 2015  Place: City Hall - Municipal building, 102 East Second Street. Enter from the Market  Street side of the building and go to the second floor.  Time: 7:00 PM  Int the meantime, should you have any questions please feel free to contact me.  Sincerely,  Omly gRebert Emily Rebert Community Development Planner Historic Preservation ereber@wahnstonegow 252.946.0897    New Business  Minor Works    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  216 FLEMIS ST.  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  TEVIANA  SCARANT7NO  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  REMOVAL OP DECAY/NG PECAAS TRée IA BACKHARD  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior by to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  SIMON K. SRou (Name of Applicant - type or print)  (Initials) &z,  ACTION  216 ELEMISS ST. 278837  (Mailing Address) 1o/o5/2015 (Date)'  (Zip Code) -  252-947- 2075 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  (Signature 5 - of7  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes Works Certificate shall not relieve the appigatsaptractor, tenant, or property owner from other permit required by City code or any law. Minorwork projects not approved by staff will obtaining be fowarded any  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until to the Historic Preservation CommissigorTevens at  Issuance of al Minor a   MinorNorkwth. Sig.)  15c+2015 (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Please use Black Ink  Iao N. cademy street  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Firot Chriotian Church  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Repair front Porch railiag with  S0me aterial.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. understand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) f Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Lelont Hill (Name of Applicant t-type or print) l09 Falrwoy or. (Mailing Address) D/6/15 (Date) en Hil (Signature of Applicant)  (Initials)  ACTION  27889 (Zip Code)  252-943-7076 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomesa Works Certificate shall not relieve the plcap-citacto.enan. or property owner from obtaining permit required by City code or any law. Minor work propcts not approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropniateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of a Minor  other  any  to the Historic Preservation  1sDet2ois (Date)  -  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 218 North Bonner St.  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  willam Cochron  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  Repaic : Teplaced windows 05 before.  Reploce Siding with like Materic)  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th oft the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Wlan Cooiran 7Name of Applicant-typeor; print)  (Initials) R  ACTION  1(o (Mailing Address) (Date)  SE 27889 (Zipo Code)  NRespess 10-13-45  (Daytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Depatment or designee, this  47  application becomes a Issuance of a Minor  Minor Works Certificate of Appropnateness. Itis valid until  Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work projects not approved by staff will be fowarded  to the Historic Preservation Commission for review at its next meeting.  (Minor Work. Auth. Sig.)  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: IDMLK  Please use Black Ink  Historic Property/Name (if applicable): KéiplhaeZia.thh  Owner's Name: Mehpalilaa_AME ZigChureb  Lot Size:  a0 (width)  feet by  12 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done: Lonhaotoy will remale ekithag oaphns). Tastalppe  Dig boahngs frnes Signlpr.spacs. komhdkasg  323  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th ofi the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete appliçation will not be accepted. Tunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  Senn AFaner (Name of Applicant - type or print) (Maling Plls  (Initiais) 322  ACTION Conditions  NC 27B89 (Zip Code)  Mahgha  32-496-3868 (gaytime Phone Number)  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designée, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor.tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minopwork projects not approyed-bystaa be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate  Bez  of Appropriateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of a Minor  to the Historic Preservation Gommission for reviéwat its pextipeetings  -  Cas (Date)  (MinorWork AuSig)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889 Street Address of Property: 465 Historic Property/Name (if applicable): Owner's Name: DJon Perkins  Please use Black Ink  E MNain  Lot Size:  56 (width)  feet by  200 (depth)  feet.  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  NW sies etal  an frontt parch Bau Celor Bs fascie.  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval (Date)  Don Terks (Name of Applicant -type or print)  (Initials) a1  ACTION  603 Kupol .Crealle 27858  (Mailing Addrèss) /s MRk (Signature of Applicant)  (Zip Code)  263893.0690 (Daytime Phone Number)  (Authorized Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minor work preiectsnot approved by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropnateness. Iti is valid until  Issuance of al Minor  toi the Historic Preservation Commission for s@aengfmg  -  (Minor Work  40-2015  E  (Date)  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the_ Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: 2BAKRKArRe Historic Property/Name (if applicable): herlider  Owner's Name: Lot Size:  Bebercy  121 wist 37  80' (width)  feet by  103 (depth)  feet.  Brief Descriptign of Work to be Done:  HE  Bhala uas  Shhihen Becchae. asLeis Aent Apw rwshg SDyerr dhsaka Se/Bk usiNs Michek  and hsesry Abhpohg Seakc.  understand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting Iwish to attend; otherwise consideration will be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  GL (Name of Applicant - type or print)  (Initials) aB  ACTION  123 AFrAbgAS 27535  (Mailing Address) sobuhE (Date)  (ZipCode) Number)  252-940-85Y6  (Date)  (Authorized Signature)  and  EZC  Upon being signed dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this application becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant-contractor, tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or anylawMinorv work proicts not approved.by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropnateness. Itis valid-until to the Historic Preservation Commission forr review  Issuance of a Minor 246)4205  -  Sig.)  (Date)    Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS  Historic Preservation Commission Washington, NC  To: Washington Historic Preservation Commission  102 East 2nd Street Washington, NC 27889  Please use Black Ink  Street Address of Property: IALEAST  Historic Property/Name (if applicable):  Owner's Name: CALVIN! MEAN  Lot Size:  feet by  feet.  (width)  (depth)  Brief Description of Work to be Done:  ENSTALL 2CANDINSING CNITS ON/TAE SASTSIDE OF TRE BULAING NOT MSIBLE  FRm THESTREET  lunderstand that all applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that require review by the Historic Preservation Commission must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th of the month prior to the meeting wish to attend; otherwise consideration willl be delayed until the following HPC meeting. An incomplete application will not be accepted. lunderstand approved requests are valid for one year.  Office Use Only (Date Received) & Approved Approved with Conditions- Denied Withdrawn Staff Approval  MCLEAN  Applicant-type or print) BAELA MLAwOST (Mailing Address) (Dater BEHE A (Signature of Applicant)  (Initials)  ACTION  (ZipCode)  SPL  2095538617 (Daytime Phone Number)  Kean  (Date)  (Authorized  Signature)  Upon being signed and dated below by the Planning Department or designee, this appliçation becomes a Works Certificate shall not relieve the applicant, contraotor,tenant, or property owner from obtaining any other permit required by City code or any law. Minpfwork praiècts not approvad by staff will be fowarded  Minor Works Certificate of Appropriateness. Itis valid until  Issuance of al Minor  to the Historic Preservation Commission forreview aP *he atipa   2005 (Date'  Mingr Merk Auth.  5  Applicant's presence or that of your authorized representative is required at the meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission at which the application is to be considered. You must give written permission to your authorized representative to attend the hearing on your behalf.    Other Business  Design Guidelines -  Masonry Products    Washington, NG Historic District Design Guidelines  Masonry  Masonry Guidelines  Various types of masonry construction are stucco, and concrete. Buildings in the downtown commercial area are primarily of brick construction while there are also several examples of brick residential structures. Just like with wood, masonry historic character in its texture, color, size and scale, and detailing. architectural detailing includes subtle elements like variations in bond patterns brick cornices, quoins, etc.  found in the district including brick, stone, 3.2.6 Preserve and protect character-  defining masonry architectural features including corbelling, cornices, sills, quoins, foundations  and walls.  construction contributes to a building's 3.2.7 Routinely inspect masonry  features for cracks, loose bricks, and signs of weather damage paying particular attention to and windows to prevent water penetration. Caulk is not an appropriate material for repointing 3.2.9 Deteriorated masonry units should be repaired rather than replaced using materials that match the original in size, texture, color, and overall appearance. Synthetic materials are prohibited on historic structures for the wholesale covering of a structure.  This  mortar. joints.  to more prominent detailing like corbelling, 3.2.8 Caulk may be used around doors  joints.  Masonry must be property maintained in 3.2.10 Do not apply paint to masonry  order to prevent deterioration. Typical masonry maintenance issues include deteriorated mortar joints, broken or this deterioration is due to the effects of weather as well as improper maintenance  surfaces that were historically not  painted.  chipped bricks, and loose bricks. Much of 3.2.11 Removal of paint from a masonry  structure is encouraged when the underlying masonry units are character defining and are in good condition, and only if safe and proper paint removal procedures are used resulting in no damage  and cleaning.  to the masonry.  3.2.12 When cleaning is necessary,  proper techniques should be used. Use the gentlest means possible including low-pressure washing with detergent and natural soft bristle brushes.  20    Washington, NC Historc District Design Guidelines  Test the cleaning method on a to waterproof masonry as a substitute for small area first because older repointing or repair, water  repellent  brick can be damaged by even coatings low-pressure washing Use caution when utilizing prohibited. chemical cleaners. Test a small area first to determine that no  are permitted as they  do not trap moisture. Sealants are  Metal  damaging effects will occur. Architectural metals are frequently found Run-off from chemical cleaning int the historic district on both residential must be controlled and and non-residential construction. Cast authorized by the City of iron columns, metal roofs, and wrought Washington prior to the iron details are typical metal treatments in Do not use sandblasting or Common maintenance and deterioration high-pressure water blasting to issues include corrosion, rust, and peeling 3.2.13 When repair to mortar joints is problematic as they will continue to cause needed due to cracks, missing deterioration of metal as long as it is  cleaning process.  Washington and are important character- defining elements of historic architecture. paint. Corrosion and rust are particularly  clean historic masonry.  and crumbling mortar, and loose exposed. bricks, use proper techniques for Remove deteriorated mortar by hand raking rather than using electric saws and hammers than can damage the brick Match the original texture, strength, composition, color, width, and profile of the historic mortar joints. Repointing with mortar that is as Portland cement, can cause brick to, crack, break or spall. AIl lime based" mortar is recommended for historic brick. In repointing mortar PSI should be used.  repointing.  Metal Guidelines  stronger than the original, such 3.2.14 Preserve and protect character-  defining metal features including cast iron columns, metal roofs, gutters, architectural details, fences, gates, and hardware. for peeling paint, corrosion, and 3.2.16 Deteriorated metal should be repaired rather than replaced. Should the level of deterioration warrant replacement, the element shall match the original in design, color, detail, and material.  joints, mortar ofappropriate 3.2.15 Routinely inspect metal features  rust.  o  3.2.14 A stone strengthener, water repellent or a combination or both may sometimes be used to preserve soft brick, sandstone and porous masonry. It is not recommended,  21    10/22/2015  Preservation! Brief1 1:Assessing Cleaninga andWater-Repalent Treatments for Historicl Masonry Buildings  be consulted prior to beginning a cleaning project, especially ifi it involves anything more than plain water washing. This advance planning will ensure that the cleaning effluent or run-off, which ist the combination of the cleaning agent and the substance removed from the masonry, is handled and disposed ofi in an environmentally sound and legal manner. Some alkaline and acidic cleaners can be neutralized so that they can be safely discharged into storm sewers. However, most solvent-based cleaners cannot be neutralized and are categorized as pollutants, and must be disposed of by a licensed transport, storage and disposal facility. Thus, itis always advisable to consult with the appropriate agencies before starting to clean to ensure that the project progresses smoothly and is not interrupted bya a stop-work order because a required Vinyl guttering or polyethylene-lined troughs placed around the perimeter oft the base of the building can serve to catch chemical cleaning waste as iti is rinsed off the building. This will reduce the amount of chemicals entering and polluting the soil, and also will keep the cleaning waste contained until it can be removed safely. Some patented cleaning systems have Concern over the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the air has resuited in the manufacture ofr new, more environmentally responsible cleaners and paint removers, while some materials traditionally used in cleaning may no longer be available for these same reasons, Other health and safety concerns have created additional cleaning challenges, such as  permit was not obtained in advance.  developed special equipment to facilitate the containment and later disposal of cleaning waste.  lead paint removal, which is likely to require special removal and disposal techniques. Cleaning can also cause damage to non-masonry materials on a building, including glass, metal and wood. Thus, it is usually necessary to cover windows and doors, and other features that may be vulnerable to chemical cleaners. They should be covered with plastic or polyethylene, ora masking agent that is applied as a liquid which dries to form a thin protective film on glass, and is easily peeled off after the cleaning is finished. Wind drift, for example, can also damage other property by carrying cleaning chemicals onto nearby automobiles, resulting in etching of the glass or spotting of the paint finish. Similarly, airborne dust can enter surrounding buildings, Possible health dangers of each method selected for the cleaning project must be considered precautions must bet taken. The precautions listed in Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) that and alkaline chemical cleaners in both liquid and vapor forms can also cause serious injury to passers-by. Itr may be necessary to schedule deaning at night or weekends if the building is  and excess water can collect in nearby yards and basements.  Safety Considerations  before selecting a cleaning method to avoid harm to the cleaning applicators, and the necessary Thel lower floors oft this historic are provided with chemical products should always be followed. Protective clothing, respirators, covered during chamical hearing and face shields, and gloves must be provided to workers to be worn at all times. Acidic and deaning vehicular to probect traffict pedstrians from located in a busy urban area to reduce the potential danger of chemical overspray to pedestrians, Cleaning during non- business hours will allow HVAC systems to be turned off and vents to be covered top prevent dangerous chemical fumes from entering the building which will also ensure the safety of the buildingis occupants. Abrasive and mechanical methods produce dust which can pose a serious health hazard, particularly ift the abrasive or the masonry contains silica. Water-Repellent Coatings and Waterproof Coatings To begin with, iti is important to understand that waterproof coatings and water-repellent coatings are not the same. Although these terms are frequently interchanged and commonly confused with one another, they are completely different materials. Water-repellent coatings-often referred toi incorrectly as' "sealers", but which do not or should not' "seal"-are intended to keep liquid water from penetrating the surface but to allow water vapor to enter and leave, or pass through, the surface oft the masonry. Water-repellent coatings are generally transparent, or clear, although once applied some may darken or discolor certain types of masonry while others may give ita glossy or shiny appearance. Waterproof coatings seal the surface from liquid water and from water vapor. They are usually opaque, or pigmented, and include bituminous Water-repellent coatings are formulated to be vapor permeable, or' breathable". They do not seal the surface completely to water vapor so it can enter the masonry wall as well as leave the wall. While the first water-repellent coatings to be developed were primarily acrylic or silicone resins in organic solvents, now most water-repellent coatings are water-based and formulated from modified siloxanes, silanes and other alkoxysilanes, or metallic stearates. While some of these products are shipped from the factory ready to use, other water-borne water repellents must be diluted at the job site. Unlike earlier water-repellent coatings which tended to form a "film" on the masonry surface, modern water-repellent coatings actually penetrate into the masonry substrate slightly and, generally, are almost invisible if properly applied tot the masonry. They are also more vapor permeable than the old coatings, yett they still reduce the vapor permeability of the masonry. Once inside the wall, water vapor can condense. at cold spots producing liquid water which, unlike water vapor, cannot escape  cotta brick and building architectural have been terra- potentially harmfut overspray, Photo: NPS files.  coatings and some elastomeric paints and coatings. Water-Repellent Coatings  ntp.www.nps.gowrpwtyahow-Dpreservetrieslideaningwatter-repalenthtm  8/11    :.: 10/22/2015  Preservation! BMTAMMVCArIgm.wtTisnes for Historic Masonry Buildings  through a water-repellent coating. The liquid water within the wall, whether from condensation, leaking gutters, or other  sources, can cause considerable damage.  Water-repellent coatings are not consolidants. Although modern water-repellents may penetrate slightly beneath the masonry surface, instead of just' "sitting" on top of it, they do not perform thes same function as a consolidant which is to' "consolidate" and replace lost binder tos strengthen deterlorating masonry. Even after many years of laboratory study and testing, few consolidants have proven very effective. The composition off fired products such as brick and architectural terra cotta, as well as many types of bullding stone, does not lend itself to consolldation. Some modern water-repellent coatings which contain ab binder intended to replace the natural binders in stone that have been lost through weathering and natural erosion are described in product literature as both a water repellent and a consolidant The fact that the newer water- repellent coatings penetrate beneath the masonry surface instead of just forming a layer on top oft the surface may indeed convey atl least some consolidating properties to certain stones. However, a water-repellent coating cannot be considered a consolidant. In some Instances, a water-repellent or' preservative" coating, if applied to already damaged or spalling stone, may form a surface crust which, ifitf fails, may exacerbate the deterioration by pulling off even more  This clear coating has failed andi is pulling offp pieces oft the stone asitp peels. Photo: NPS files  of the stone.  Is a Water-Repellent Treatment Necessary?  Water-repellent coatings are frequently applied to historic masonry buildings for the wrong reason, They also are often applied without an understanding of what they are and what they are Intended to do. And these coatings can be very difficuit, if not impossible, to remove from the masonry ift they fail or become discolored. Mosti importantly, the application of Most! historic masonry buildings, unless they are painted, have survived for decades without a water-repellent coating and, thus, probably do not need one now, Water penetration to the interior of a masonry building iss seldom due to porous masonry, but results from poor or deferred maintenance. Leaking roofs, clogged or deteriorated gutters and downspouts, missing mortar, or cracks and open joints around door and window openings are almost always the cause of moisture- related problems in a historic masonry building! If historic masony buildings are képt watertight and, in good! Rising damp (capillary moisture pulled up fromt the ground), or condensation can also be a source of excess moisture in masonry buildings. A water-repellent coating will not solve this problem either and, int fact, may be likely to exacerbate it. Furthermore, a water-repellent coating should never be applied to a damp wall. Moisture in the wall would reduce the ability ofa coating to adhere tot the masonry and top penetrate below the surface. But, ifit did adhere, it would hold the moisture inside the masonry because, although a water-repellent coating. is permeable to water vapor, liquid water cannot pass through it. In the case of rising damp, a coating may force the moisture to go even higher ini the wall because it can slow Excessive moisture in masonry walls may carry waterborne soluble salts from the masonry units themselves or from the mortar through the walls, Ift the water Is permitted to come to the surface, the salts may appear on the masonry: surface: as efflorescence (a whitish powder) upon evaporation. However, the salts can be potentially dangerous If they remain in the masonry and crystallize beneath the: surface as subfiorescence. Subflorescence eventually may cause the surface of the masonry to spall, particularly if a water-repellent coating has been applied which tends to reduce the flow of moisture out from the subsurface of the masonry. Although many of the newer water-repellent products are more breathable than their predecessors, they can be especially damaging if applied to masonry that contains salts, because they limit the flow of There. are some instances when av water-repellent coating may be considered appropriate to use on al historic masonry neglected fora a long period oft time, necessary repairs may be required in order to make it watertight. If, following a reasonable period oft time after the building has been made watertight and has dried out completely, moisture. appears actually to be penetrating through the repointed and repaired masonry walls, then the application of a water-repellent coating may be considered in selected areas only. This decision should be made in consultation with an architectural conservator. And, if such a treatment is undertaken, its should not be applied to the entire exterior of the building. Anti-graffiti or barrier coatings are another type of dlear coating--although barrier coatings can also be pigmented-that may be applied to exterior masonry, but they are not formulated primarily as water repellents. The, purpose of these coatings is tor make it harder for graffiti to stick to a masonry surface and, thus, easier to clean. But, like water-repellent coatings, in  water-repellent coatings to historic masonry is usually unnecessary.  repair, water-repellent coatings shouid not be necessary.  down evaporation, and thereby rétain the moisture in the wall.  moisture through masonry. building. Soit, Ancomptetciy omatn  When a Water-Repellent Coating May be Appropriate  When a masonry building has been  rtp.www.mpa.gowtpahow-Dpreservervetriesidearingwaater-repelenthm  9/11    10/22/2015  Preservation Brief 1:Assessing Charingamswaar-Repaliert Treatments for Historic Masonry Buildings  most cases the application of anti-graffiti coatings is generally not recommended for historic masonry buildings. These coatings are often quite shiny which can greatly alter the appearance of a historic masonry surface, and they are not always effective. Generally, other ways of discouraging graffiti, such as improved lighting, can be more effective than a coating. However, the appliçation of anti-graffiti coatings may be appropriate in some instances on vulnerable areas of historic masonry buildings which are frequent targets of graffiti that are located in out-of-the-way places where constant surveillance is not  possible.  Improper cleaning methods may have  been responsible for thef formation of Some water-repellent coatings are recommended by product manufacturers as a means of efflorescence on this brick. Phobo: NPS keeping dirt and pollutants or biological growth from collecting on the surface of Generally, the application of a water-repellent coating is not recommended on al historic masonry building as a means of preventing biological growth. Some water-repellent coatings may actually encourage biological growth on a masonry wall. Biological growth on masonry buildings has traditionally been kept at bay through regularly-scheduled cleaning as part ofa maintenance plan. Simple cleaning oft the masonry with low-pressure water using ar natural- or synthetic-bristied scrub brush can be very effective if done on a regular basis. Commercial products are also available which can be sprayed on In most instances, a water-repellent coating is not necessary if a building is watertight. Tho wétirrepalentoaino: isyotat mpommentashrsment REPAUTeMPN  files,  masonry  buildings and, thus, reducing the need for frequent cleaning. While this att times may be true, in some cases a coating may actually retain dirt more than uncoated masonry.  masonry to remove biological growth.  as asnecific Drohlon  HEEN  epssaies Meprobler: vaunstirmrpmtafthePMIge routiontynthac an woa Extreme exposures such as parapets, for example, or portions of the building subject to driving rain can be treated more effectively and less expensively than the entire building. Water-repellent coatings are not permanent and must ber reapplied periodically although, ift they are truly invisible, it can be difficult to know when they are no longer providing Testing a water-repellent coating by applying iti in one small area may not be helpful in determining Its suitability for the building because a limited test area does not allow an adequate evaluation of at treatment. Since water may enter and leave through the surrounding untreated areas, there is no way tot tell ift the coated test area is' breathable," But trying a coating ina as small area may! help to determine whether the coating is visible on the surface or ifity will otherwise change the Int theory, waterproof coatings usually do not cause probiems as long as they exclude all water from the masonry. - Ea not be abie toescape During cold weather this wateri in the wall can freeze causing serious mechanical disruption, Ina addition, the water eventually will get out by the path of least resistance, If this path ist toward the interior, damage to interior finishes can result; ifiti ist toward the exterior, it can lead to damage to the masonry caused by built-up water inmost.instances,watesproof. coatingsshouid: tha mpplied is NitoricmasontyaThe possible exception tot this might bet the application of a waterproof coating to! below- grade exterior foundation walls as al last resort to stop water    the intended protection.  appearance of the masonry. Waterproof Coatings dase enter thes wdPirgmathegpoundont such as spalling. pressure.  of a bullaing, the poating cant intensily the darrage becauset the,  infiltration oni interior basement walls. Gencallyp oweveywaterpra  yyw mer ndudereraswmes imts,  shouldaimast, neverw be applied Summary and References  to "Emaayhatinye  Awell-planned cleaning project is an essential step in preserving, rehabilitating or restoring a historic masonry building. Proper cleaning methods and coating treatments, when determined necessary for the preservation of the masonry, can enhance the aesthetic character as well as the structural stability of al historic building. Removing years of accumulated dirt, pollutant crusts, stains, graffiti or paint, If done with appropriate caution, can extend the life and longevity oft the historic resource, Cleaning thati is carelessly or insensitively prescribed or carried out by inexperienced workers can have the opposite oft the intended effect, Iti may scar the masonry permanently, and may actually result in hastening deterioration by introducing harmful residual chemicals and salts into the masonry or causing surface loss. Using the wrong cleaning method or using the right method incorrectly, applying the wrong kind of coating or applying a coating that is not needed can result in serious damage, both physically and aesthetically, to al historic masonry building. Cleaning a historic masonry building should always be done using the gentlest means possible that will clean, but not damage the building. It should always be taken into consideration before applying. a water-repellent coating or a waterproof coating to a historic masonry building  whether iti is really necessary and whether iti isi in the best interest of preserving the building.  p.hwmapagpngarow-peenanidennngwaar-regalertrmm  10/11    10/22/2015  The Secretary ofthel Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation & lllustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buldings-Masonry,  Using methods of removing paint which are destructive to masonry, such as sandblasting, application of caustic solutions, or high pressure waterblasting. Failing tot follow manufacturers' product and application instructions when Using new paint colors that are inappropriate to the historic building and district. Failing to undertake adequate measures to assure the protection of masonry  repainting masonry.  features. .Repair  Masonry recommended.  Repairing masonry walls and other masonry features by repointing the mortar joints where there is evidence of deterioration such as disintegrating mortar, cracks in mortar joints, loose bricks, damp walls, or damaged  plasterwork.  Removing deteriorated mortar by carefully hand-raking the joints to avoid damaging the masonry. puplicating old miortar In strength, çomposition. çolor, and textured Duplicating old mortar jointo in width and inj joint profile. Repairing stucco by removing the damaged material and patching with new stucco that duplicates the old in strength, composition, color, and Using mud plaster as a surface coating over unfired, unstabilized adobe because the mud plaster will bond to Cutting damaged concrete back to remove the source of deterioration  texture,  the adobe.  Preparation for stuccoi repair.  (often corrosion on metal reinforcement bars). The new patch must be applied carefully so itwill bond satisfactorily with, and matoh, the historle  concrete.  Repairing masonry features by patehing, plecing- in, or consolidating the masonry using recognized preservation methode. Repair may also include the limited replacement In kind-or with compatible substitute material-of those extensively deteriorated or missing paris of masonry features when there are surviving prototypes such as terra-cotta brackets or stone  balusters.  Repiacement: siones iooiedto  y/MwwAPagowtyasesinrcrenbiseniehabmagonyvi.nm  4/6    10/22/2015  The Secretaryo ofthe! Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation & Illustrated Guidelines for RehabilntstirgHistaricBuldinge-Masony  match original. penetration problems.  Applying nowornon-istoncauntcsurfacatratments: such as water-repellent coatings to masonry, only  after repointing and only ifmasonry repairs have. fallod to arrest water  not recommended.  Removing nondeteriorated mortar from sound joints, then repointing the entire  building to achieve a uniform appearance,  Using electric saws and hammers rather than hand toois to remove deterlorated mortar from joints prior to repointing. Repointing with mortar of high portiand cement content (unless it is the content of the historic mortar). This oan often create a bond that is stronger than the historic material and can cause damage as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and the differing porosity of the material and the mortar. Repointing withae aynthetic caulking Using a "sorub" coating technique to repoint instead of traditional repointing Changing the width or joint profile when  compound, methods. repointing.  Loss oft the historic character due to insensitive repointing.  Removing sound stucco; or with new stucco that is stronger than the  repairing  historic materal or does not convey the same visual appearance. Applying cement stucco to unfired, unstabilized adobe. Because the cement stucco will not bond properly, moisture can become entrapped between materlals, resulting In accelerated deterioration of the adobe. Patching concrête without removing the source of deterloration.  Replacing an entire masonry feature such as a comice er balustrade when repair of the masonry and limited replacement of deteriorated of missing parts are Using a substitute material for the replacement part that does not convey the visual appearance of the surviving parts of the masonry feature or that is Applying waterproof, water repellent, or non-historic coatings such as stucco to masonry as a substitute for repointing and masonry repairs. Coatings are frequently unnecessary, expensive, and may change the appearance of historio  appropriate.  physically or chemically incompatible.  masonry as well as accelerate its deterioration.  ep.Mpwarpagowipaisinardresisaonehabmasonypirm  5/6    10/21/2015  file  EXTERIOR CHANGES TO. HISTORICI BUILDINGS   NewBen  to remove more stubbom surface stains. Such chemical applications, however, should never be undertaken until tested in an inconspicuous location on the building in order to determine if any masonry discoloration or damage occurs. More abrasive cleaning techniques such as sandblasting or high pressure water blasting are prohibited due to their tendency to damage the protective sur- face of1 historic masonry and accelerate its deterioration. lkisywattmpelents and seaters OF Bricka are prohibited Suchpxoductsoften: trap moistueinthehickmd icauseis spallinge Failure of masonry mortar is perhaps the most common problem associated with brick and other masonry construction. Mortar joints siowl deteriorate over time due to exposure to veath- er. This deterioration resuits in moisture penetration in brick walls and foundations. To correct the problem, repointing is necessary. Alll loose and deteriorated mortar must be raked out of the joint by hand and new mortar inserted. Old moitar should generally be remored to 2 minimum depth of 1" to ensure: an adequate bond. Cafemust be takentos chogsea mostarmistuse that matches the original in tems of compositioaycoloty,temureystengeh, and appearunce. Care must also. be taken to match the joint width and profile of the finished joint. Ferolderysofe brick,saortar misturemust! be made consistentwitht the historici mortar. Please contact the Res- toration Specialist in the Eastern Office of Archives and History for additional information and Painting brick and other masonry features of historic buildings that historically were not coated is prohibited. Excepticns may be made based on the condition of thel brick and the aesthet- ici impact of the paint application on the character oft the building and district as a whole, Ifbrickis tol bej painted, lates paint is recommended. It allows thel brick tol breathe and will not peel as qick- lya as oil paints, provided the surface is properl prépared prior to painting. Removai of paint from  guidance.  masonry surfaces is not recommended unless the brickis of high quality and was onginally intended not to be painted. When paint iemoval is undertaken, use only chemical stzippers that are specifically recommended fcr masonry. Always test the product in an inconspicuous location to determine if damage or discoloration occurs. Brick & Other Masonry Materials  Guidelines  1. Retain andj preseive originai masonry walls, founda- 2. Preserve masonry construction features that help to define the character of histonc buildings such as chimneys, decorative corbeliing, corices, arches, belt courses, foundations, window sills andl hoods, 3. Monitor brick and other masonry materiais regularly for signs of vegetation growth, dirt build up, mois- +. Eliminate. lichen, ivy, and other forms of vegetation  tions, andi roofs.  and cormices. ture damage, or cracking.  : vnel gfmaregy baillg maferial and details an eridarfint thel Doastonn! Historic distic.  N Ben Hisent Dimat Deifge Ginh  38  ntps.www.drgboxsiatostasicconsiatclpasarseriplexemapds07AcheMewer-IKOK0sS.ntm!  43/157    fdertor  Exterior Changes  Design Guidelines for Building Materials and Details  1) Maintain and preservel historic building materials and details that contribute to the character oft the 2) Repair historic building materials and details in-kind matching the original in regard to size, shape, design, scale, color, texture, and material. Cracked or missing masonry mortar joints should be care- fully repginted using materials, methods, and finishing methods that match the original as closely as possible in regard to color, texture, and finish. Itisi important to use the same strength mortar as the original or softer. Using mortar or brick that is stronger than the original can result in serious and more: rapid deterioration. Contact the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for additional in- 3) Ifhistoric bullding materials and details must be replaced due to deterioration, replace only the detail or element with materials similar to the original material in size, shape, design, scale, color, and mate- 4) Ifa detail is missing, replace it based on existing details or documentary evidence such as photo- graphs. Replace with materials similar in size, shape, design, scale, color, and material as the original. 5) Itis not appropriate to clean historic building materials using damaging methods such as sandblast- ing, power washing, or propane or butane torches. The gentlest means possible for cleaning should be used. Contact thel Planning Office or SHPO for approved methods of cleaning. Consult the. Ap- 6) Paint wooden andi metal architectural elements. Itisi nappropriate to remove paint to replace with 7) Itisi inappropriate to paint unpainted masonry elements. Repaint previously painted masonry ele- 8) Itisi inappropriate to paint or coat historic terra cotta. Clean and repair using accepted preservation techniques. Consult the Appendices for the Preservation Brief website address. 9) Itisi inappropriate to: replace sound historic building materials with new: materials to create a "new or 10) Itisi inappropriate to use contemporary substitute materials such as vinyl, aluminum, masonite, or cementitious board to cover or replace historic building materials. 11) Itisi inappropriate to: repair or patch metal roofing and flashing with tar or asphalt.  building and the significance oft the district as a whole.  formation.  rial. Contt the SHPO for additional information. Contact the SHPO for additional information.  pendices for the Preservation Brief website address.  stain.  ments in colors compatible with the historic district.  smooth appearance."  12) Itisi inappropriate to apply omamental architectural details and features that replicate a historic detail toal historic building without documentary evidence. Itis alsoi inappropriate to use details to create a  false sense of history (Ex. Dentil moldings to a mill village house)  Edenton Historic District Design Gmidelines  44    Building Changes  Masonry/Stone  WbMngkoy  Ine early Wilmington, where: fire was a constant threat, brick Was used for warehouses and commercial buildings beginning in the late eighteenth century. Brick was also used for street paving, for building structural and decorative walls, and for underpinnings, pathways and driveways within the historic districts. Stone ballast from overseas supplied the foundations for early houses. Beginning in the Iate nineteenth century, many ofthe commer- cial buildings had a stucco finish often with terra cotta details. Sandstone appears as trim and as applied ornament. Granite curbing is common  throughout all thei historic districts. Suggested Repair and Maintenance Ensure that water does not collect at the base  A steep retaining wall on Orange Street, near Chandler's Wharfi in the Residential Historic District (HD-R).  ofar masonry foundation or  chimney. Surfaces should bei inspected regularly for dirt build-up, moisture damage, deteriorated mortar joints and cracking. Cleaning is not recom- mended to reduce the effects ofv weathering but is acceptable to reduce accumulative deposits of"dirt." Heavily soiled masonry should be cleaned with low pressure water washing (500 pounds per sq. inch) and soft natural brushes. Care should be taken when cleaning sandstone or soft brick. If detergent is necessary check composition before use. Chemical cleaners are acceptable provided a spot test demonstrates the masonry material will not be adversely affected. Sandblasting should not be employed to clean masonry. Itcan heavily damage the hard fired exterior surface of bricks and the Mortar joints that deteriorate over time can allow thej penetration ofi moisture to the interior ofthe structure. Repointing is necessary to correct the prob- lem. All loose and deteriorated mortar needs to be raked out ofthe joint by hand and newi mortar inserted. Old: mortar should generally be removed to a minimum depth of one and one halft times the width oft thej joint to ensure an adequate bond. Care must be taken to choosc a mortar mix that matchesthe original in terms of composition, color, texture. strength, tooling width and pparaneRepointing with ai mortar composed of a high Portland Cement mix is not recommended as this will often create a mortar that is stronger than the existing mortar and may cause the brick to spall. Repointolder brickswith: a mortar 110 harder or softerthan the original. Color match should be achieved with proper selection ofs sand, not color additives. The new mortar joint should match the original in appearance and profile. As stone strengthener, water repellant or a combination of both may some- times be used to prescrve soft brick, sandstone: and porous masonry.  calcified mortar joints.  Early brickwork in the Downtown Commercial Historic District (HDO).  46    sonry and Stone  Masonry/Stone: Guidelines 1 Retain and and pediments.  Wlsitost  preserve original and or historic masonry walls, foundations,  and construction features including chimneys, arches, quoins, cornices, Ifreplacement of deteriorated material is necessary, match the new materials to the original materials in composition, size, shape, color, pattern, and texture. Iti is not appropriate to use: new masonry materials which were unavailable when the building was constructed. 3 Eliminate any forms of vegetation that may cause structural damage or 4 Itis not appropriate to apply paint or other coatings to unpainted masonry elements that are. inferior quality and were never painted. Itisr not recommended to waterprool masonry as a substitute for repointing or repair. Water repellent coatings are permitted as they do Removal of paint from masonry surfaces is only recommended if the surface was not historically: painted. Undertake removal only with a chemical paint remover specifically formulated for masonry.. Always test the remover on an inconspicuous area or at test panel first. 7 Itisn not appropriate to use high-pressure cleaning methods such as sandblasting and waterblasting on historic masonry surfaces. Such cleaning techniques permanently damage the masonry surface and  prevent surface drainage.  Painted brick deteriorates rapidly.  not trapi moisture.Sealants. are prohibited.  Sandstone Masonic Building 17-21 North Front Street.  facing,  accelerate deterioration.  47    Minutes  October 6, 2015    HSTORICPRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Regularly Scheduled Meeting - Agenda Tuesday, October6",2015 7:00PM Members Present Mary Pat Musselman Judi Hickson Seth Shoneman Monica Ferrari Members Absent Geraldine McKinley Edl Hodges Others present John Rodman, Director Emily Rebert, Community Development Planner Jessica Green, Administrative Support  I. II.  Opening of the Meeting  Judi Hickson ad acting Chair called the meeting to order.  Invocation Amoment of silence was taken. III. Roll Call As silent roll call was taken by staff. IV. Old Business- Major Works  1. Arequest has been made by Ms. Sarah Heekin for a Certificate of Appropriateness to add a four foot high aluminum ornamental fence to enclose the rear propertyyard located at 144 East Mr. Rodman came forward and explained that Ms. Heekin had submitted her application three months ago and this was one of the fences the Commission put on hold until the fence guidelines were finalized. He explained that the Commission needs to act on the request because according to their rules of procedure the request will automatically be approved by  Main Street.  codei if they do not make an action oni it.  1    Sarah Heekin came forward and explained her request. She explained that int thei front of her house there isa a small low white fence. She stated that she would like to construct: at fencei in the rear yard and have a gate. She explained that the purpose of the fence is for her dog. She stated that her neighbors didn't seem to have any objection to the fence. Ms. Heekin stated that she discussed the placement of the fence with her neighbor and theyl have come to an agreement. Seth Shoneman asked if thei fence would match thet front fence. Ms. Heekin explained that it would be a white ornamental fence that would match the one in the front yard. Ms. Heekin stated that thet fence would juste enclose the rear yard and would: start off the rear of Dee Congleton came forward and was sworn in. She stated that she was concerned first of all because she thought that there was a hold on all approval of fences until the fence guidelines were finalized. Ms. Congleton stated that what Ms. Heekin has out front is not reallya a fence, it isj just a section. She explained that the new guidelines, ift they are approved, state that the fence should bel black and not white. Ms. Congleton then discussed the matter in which the fence at the front of Ms. Heekin'shouse was approved. Again Ms. Congleton stated that Ms. Heekin does not have ai fence in the front, iti is only as section and should be replaced. She asked the Commission to consider her comments. She stated that the fence should be black and not what andi in actually the request should bei tabled until the new guidelines are finalized. Richard Young came forward and was sworn in. He explained that he lives next door to Ms. Heekin. He stated that she has discussed the fence issue with him and the actual location oft the fence between their two properties. He stated that Ms. Heekin has agreed to put the fence ina location that hei is satisfied with. He stated that he doesn'thave any problem with anything that Monica Ferrari made thei following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriatenessi to Ms. Sarah Heekin to add at four foot high aluminum ornamental fence to enclose the rear property yard located at 144 East Main Street. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: the application is congruous with the. Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.05 Streetscape and Site Design Section 4.6 Fences and Walls. Ifurther move that the Historic Preservation Commission place the following conditions on the approval: that the fence running along the driveway side adjacent to Dr. Youngi is 18inches off oft the property line. Her motion was seconded by Seth Judi Hickson asked Mr. Rodman to address Ms. Congleton's concerns. Mr. Rodman stated that the Commission must place an action on the request. He explained that this means a couple different things. They can continue the request ift the Commission is concerned about the color. He stated that thei fence meets the guidelines with the height. He stated that when he said the  the house.  Ms. Heekini is requesting.  Shoneman. All voted inf favor andi the motion carried.  2    Commission had to act oni it, he did noti mean thati they had to approve the request; theyj just  have to make an action on the request. Certificate of Appropriateness A. MajorWorks  V.  1. AI request has been made by Mr. Tim Evans for a Certificate of Appropriateness to do the a. Add sixi feet ofs six feet high wooden picket fence between bathroom and storage building. b. Addi fourteen feet of six feet high wooden picket fence between storage building and Rich Mr. Tim Evans came forward and was sworn in. He stated that he owns the Dairy Palace andi the Rich Tattoo building. He explained that there is an open areal between the Rich Tattoo building and the storage building that is approximately 14ft. He stated that unfortunately! he has customers that walk back in that area. Mr. Evans stated that he also replaced a cooler and would like to put up a fence along that area also that would be approximately 6ft. He explained that hei is putting up the fence at the request of his neighbors. Mr. Evans stated that he is game for anything and will put up any type ofi fence the Commission would allow. He explained that his neighbors would like to see al PVC or metal fence, but he would use wood if he needed too. Mr. Evans stated that he would like al high enough fence that someone wouid not be able go over. Ms. Musselman and Mr. Evans discussed the actual location oft the fence. Ms. Ferrari stated that he fence would bei in two sections, not one long fence. Mr. Evans stated that she was correct; the fence would start and end at each corner of the buildings. Ms. Ferrari askedi if Mr. Evans would be open to a metal fence that would look like black rod iron. Mr. Evans stated that he would be up for anything the Commission would want as long as iti is high enough that  following at 120 Bridge Street:  Tattoo Building.  someone could not step over.  The Commission discussed the metal fence option and the height.  The Chairman opened the floor.  Don Stroud came forward and stood ins support ofa! 5ft black ornamental fence. He stated that black ornamental fences arel less likely to damage and he will save money in thel long run. He explained that the Historic Foundation would be much more satisfied with the metal fence. Dee Congleton came forward and stated that the fence committee supports the! 5ft black  ornamental fence.  3    Monica Ferrari made thei following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Tim Evans to 1) add ai five foot high aluminum ornamental stylel black fence 6 feet in one section and 141 feet in another section along the rear property linel located at 120 North Bridge Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 4.0Streetscape and Site Design Section 4.6 Fences & Walls. Her motion was seconded by Mary Pat Musselman. All voted in favor and the motion carried. 2. Arequest has been made Mr. Richard Godley for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new porch and railings tot the front of the house to match other houses in the district Mr. Godley came forward and was sworn in. He explained that he would like to construct a small 6x11 porch on the front of his home. He explained that the porch would be 20inches from the ground and willl have as safety railing. Monica Ferrari asked about the height oft the railing. Mr. Godley stated that it would be 3t to 4ft. Mr. Rodman stated that building code requires it to be at least 3ft. Mr. Godley explained that the pickets would bel historically accurate and would match the pickets on the porches in the: surrounding area. Seth Shoneman asked if the railings would be painted. Mr. Godley stated that he does plan to paint the railings and the actual porch  located at 323 North Bonner Street.  would be constructed of salt treated wood. The Chairman opened the floor. No one came forward.  Mary Pat Musselman made the following motion: Imove that the Historic Preservation Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to Mr. Richard Dewayne Godley to adda6 6'x 11' front porch & railings to thet front of the house to match other houses in the district. The structure isl located at 323 North Bonner Street. This motion is based on the following findings off fact: the application is congruous with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines, specifically Chapter 3.0 Changes to Existing Buildings Section 3.6 Porches and Entryways. Her motion was seconded by Seth Shoneman. All voted in favor and the motion  carried. B. Minor Works  1. Arequest has been made and approved by staffi for a Certificate of Appropriateness to remove at tree in Bughouse Park, located on Charlotte Street. The tree was struck by lightning 2. Ar request has been made and approved by staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the owner at 731 West Main Street (Mr. Richard Smoot) to replace the HVAC unit. No duct work  and was at risk of damaging historic homes adjacent to it on the street.  will be altered.  4    Monica Ferrari made a motion to approval alli the minor works. Seth Shoneman seconded the  motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried.  VI. Other Business  1. Design Guidelines-Fences  John Rodman came forward and presented all the changes and updates to the fence guidelines. He explained that the Commission can make a recommendation that these be forwarded to the City Council for their review, they can decide that they are not satisfied with the changes and not recommend that they go to City Council, or they can continue working on the guidelines.  The Chairman opened thet floor for comments.  Don Stroud came forward and asked the Commission to adopt thel last working draft. He stated that the Historic Foundation however supportsi it being amended back to lowering the height of the fences to! 5ft instead of 6ft and go back to requiring at least lin space between any privacy fences. Judi Hickson explained to Mr. Stroud that the new guidelines stated that any new fence should not exceed! 5fti in height. Mr. Stroud stated that the Foundation still objects tol have the boards on any privacy fence back to back for many reasons and they are asked that the 1in requirement be put back into the new draft. Don Stroud and the Commission discussed Dee Congleton came forward. She stated that the fence committee goes along with all the amended changes to the guidelines except for the 1 inch requirement being taken out. She stated that thet fence committee feels that they should still pursue the: 1 inch requirement Joanna Hubert came forward and stated that she is in favor of the 5ft highrequirement. Tamika Blount came forward and spoke in favor of the 5ft hih requirement and also the 1i inch Pat Griffin came forward. He explained that his neighbors have stockade fences and they have them for goodr reason. He stated that there may be times when a stockade fence is needed. Judi Hickson explained that when the guidelines go to the City Council a publicl hearing will take Keith Hardt came forward and asked the Commission to recommend that the guidelines  barricade fences furthera and the 1 inch gap.  between boards.  requirement between boards.  place and residents will have a chance to voice their opinions or concerns.  presented to them bet forward to City Council for their review.  5    Monica Ferrarin made a motion that the Historic Commission not grant approval of thet final revision of thet fence design guidelines and recommend that the updated guidelines not be sent toi the City Council fori final approval that this time. Seth Shoneman seconded the motion. All Mr. Rodman stated that now that the new guidelines have not been approved the Commission reverts back to the current guidelines, sO any fence request will be acted on according to the current guidelines. Mr. Rodman stated that since the new guidelines were rejected the Commission will revert back to the existing. Mr. Rodman stated that ift they want to make more changes then they will have to go through the process of advertising and holding a workshop all over again. The Commission and Mr. Rodman discussed at timeline. Mr. Rodman: stated that he has to discuss any type of workshop or special meeting with the Chairman being that he ist the  voted in favor and the motion carried.  only one who can call a special meeting of the Commission.  2. Recipients of the Terrell Award  Emily Rebert came forward gave the Commission al brief on the Terrell Award and explained that  the winners would be contacted and pressreleases will bei in the paper.  3. Notice of Decision 315 West 2"d Street  Seth Shoneman made a motion to approve the Notice of Decision at 315 West 2nd Street. His  motion was seconded by Mary Pat Musselman. All voted ini favor.  4. Notice of Decision 319 West 2"d Street  Seth Shoneman made a motion to approve the Notice of Decision at 319 West 2"d Street. His  motion was seconded by Monica Ferrari and all voted in favor.  VII. Approval of Minutes - September 1,2015 Musselman and all voted in favor VIII. Adjourn favor,  Monica Ferrari made a motion to approve the minutes. Her motion was seconded by Mary Pat  Seth Shoneman made ar motion to adjourn. His motion was seconded by Monica Ferrari. All voted in  6